21
ELSIN 2015 20 th International Conference on Learning, 1 st -3 rd July, University of Exeter The Importance of Effective Feedback to Future Learning and Achievement for All Practitioner’s View Dr Joanna Goodman 04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 1

Elsin 2015 Conference

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Elsin 2015 Conference

ELSIN 201520th International Conference on Learning, 1st-3rd July,

University of Exeter

The Importance of Effective Feedback to Future Learning and Achievement for All

Practitioner’s View

Dr Joanna Goodman

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 1

Page 2: Elsin 2015 Conference

Context and Focus

Main study conducted in an English independent school (3 to 13)

Study Focus:

Assessment practices and the impact of assessment/marking/ feedback on future learning

Subsequent studies conducted across a range of secondary schools

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 2

Page 3: Elsin 2015 Conference

Focus

The study is part of a larger practitioner’s research conducted to examine assessment practices in schools and their role in

improving learning through engaging pupils in their learning processes.

The study looked at how teacher assessment was used for formative purposes and how teachers and pupils understood

the role of assessment for learning in improving outcomes.

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 3

Page 4: Elsin 2015 Conference

Main Theoretical Framework

Paul Black

Dylan Wiliam

John Hattie

The main study draws on Paul Black and Dylan Wiliam findings into the effectiveness of assessment for learning strategies in the classroom for improved achievement and attainment.

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 4

Page 5: Elsin 2015 Conference

Focus on effective feedback as one of the most influential strategies to future learning

“The quality of interactive feedback is a critical feature of learning activity”

Black and Wiliam (2009)

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 5

Page 6: Elsin 2015 Conference

Effect Size: the ratio between the average improvement in pupils’ scores and the range of scores for typical groups of pupils on the same tests.

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 6

Page 7: Elsin 2015 Conference

AfL: Learning Gains

AfL understa-

nding

AfL strategies

Gain of 1 – 2

grades

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 7

Improvement in pupils’ learning = 0.4 – 0.7 effect size

“Effect size” is the ratio between the average improvement in

pupils’ scores and the range of scores for typical groups of pupils

on the same tests.

Effect size of 0.4 = improvement of 1 – 2 grades in

public examinations (GCSEs)

Page 8: Elsin 2015 Conference

Factors Influencing ProgressFeedback Effect Size

Feedback 1.13

Students’ prior cognitive ability 1.04

Teaching quality 1.00

Providing formative evaluation 0.90

Teaching quantity 0.84

Acceleration 0.72

Home factors 0.67

Student disposition to learn 0.61

Class environment 0.56

Challenging goals 0.52

Bilingual programmes 0.51

Peer-tutoring 0.50

Teacher insets 0.4904/07/2015 Dr J Goodman

8

Page 9: Elsin 2015 Conference

Research Tools and Population

Research Tools Numbers

Teacher questionnaire 45

Lesson observation 20

Pupil interviews (aged 9 – 13) 35

Teacher interviews 28

Work scrutiny (across curriculum and

ability range)

54

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 9

Page 10: Elsin 2015 Conference

Forms of Feedback

Grades

Marks

Grades and/or marks

Ticks

Ticks + another form

Formative comments

Formative comments and grades or marks

National Curriculum levels

Formative verbal feedback

Verbal feedback of summative nature

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 10

Page 11: Elsin 2015 Conference

Summary of Analysed Feedback Strategies Feedback mainly summative in nature (grades/marks/levels) 17%

Formative comments 4%

Formative comments + grades/marks/levels 25%

Praising/encouraging comments + grades/marks/levels 54%

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 11

Feedback Strategies

Summative Formative Form +Sum Praise

Page 12: Elsin 2015 Conference

View on Practice in Place

All pupils stated that they received summative-type feedback on their work

Pupil data mirror teacher data with respect to the feedback given

But …

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 12

Page 13: Elsin 2015 Conference

Pupils’ Views on Most Useful Feedback to Future Learning

Guidance on how to improve 100%

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 13

Useful Feedback

Formative

Page 14: Elsin 2015 Conference

Characteristics with Impact on Learning Styles

Limited evidence of pupils’ independent work

Reliance on commercial worksheets

Reliance on teachers (spoon-feeding/learnt helplessness)

Focus on activities rather than outcomes

Pupils’ compliance with little evidence of challenge or interrogation

Teaching-to-the-test

Learning for exams

Limited evidence of independent research or investigations

Fixed mindsets and reluctance to have a go for fear of getting anything wrong

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 14

Page 15: Elsin 2015 Conference

Tensions

Teachers’ views regarding useful feedback to future

learning

Pupils’ views on the most helpful feedback for

improvement

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 15

Page 16: Elsin 2015 Conference

Learning Dialogues

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 16

The teachers stated that they

assessed progress in a similar

way through tests and class

discussions and that their forms

of feedback were summative in

nature with focus on

marks/grades, listing other forms

of feedback as reward and verbal

feedback.

Page 17: Elsin 2015 Conference

Impact of Feedback on Learning Styles or Attitudes to Learning

Quality feedback for improvement

Active learning leading to learning

independence

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 17

Page 18: Elsin 2015 Conference

Impact of Feedback on Learning Styles or Attitudes to Learning

Feedback lacking in advice on improvement (summative)

Passive attitudes to learning, reliance on teachers, little evidence of independent

learning

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 18

Page 19: Elsin 2015 Conference

Impact of Teaching Strategies on Learning Styles: the importance of feedback to shaping future

learning

Learning sustainability

Quality dialogic interactions,

including metacognition

Quality feedback

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 19

Page 20: Elsin 2015 Conference

ReferencesBlack, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. London: GL Assessment.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2002). Research Methods in Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Goodman, J. (2011). Assessment Practices in an Independent School: The Spirit versus the Letter. London: King’s College London. Available online: http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Assessment_Practices_in_an_Independent_S.html?id=uWtzMwEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage

Patton, M.Q.(2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Publications.

Mann, C. (2003). Analysis or anecdote? Defending qualitative data before a sceptical audience. In C. Hughes. (Ed.). Disseminating Qualitative Research in Educational Settings. A Critical Introduction. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Woods, P. (2006). Successful Writing for Qualitative Researchers. London: Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2009) Visible Learning. Oxon: Routledge.

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 20

Page 21: Elsin 2015 Conference

Dr Joanna Goodman

Cromwell Consulting Ltd

www.cromwell-consulting.com

[email protected]

04/07/2015 Dr J Goodman 21