184
ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR PROPOSED EXPANSION OF RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT PROJECT “GREEN FIELDS” At Survey No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) & 81, Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore. Submitted By M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., No. 40/43, 4th Cross Road, 8th Main Road, RMV Extension, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore – 560 080. Submitted to State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Karnataka. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS M/s. AQUA TECH ENVIRO ENGINEERS, # 3391, 6 th Main, 3 rd Cross, RPC Layout, Vijayanagara II Stage, Bangalore – 560 040. Tele Phone: 080 - 23141679 Fax: 080 – 23148166

ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR ...environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/FormB/EC/EIA...4.2 Measures For Minimizing and/ or Offsetting Adverse Impacts Identified 122 4.3

  • Upload
    lethien

  • View
    222

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) FOR PROPOSED EXPANSION OF

RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT PROJECT “GREEN FIELDS”

At

Survey No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) & 81, Bommenahalli Village,

Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk,

Bangalore.

Submitted By

M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., No. 40/43, 4th Cross Road,

8th Main Road, RMV Extension, Sadashivanagar,

Bangalore – 560 080.

Submitted to

State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Karnataka.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

M/s. AQUA TECH ENVIRO ENGINEERS, # 3391, 6th Main, 3rd Cross, RPC Layout,

Vijayanagara II Stage, Bangalore – 560 040. Tele Phone: 080 - 23141679

Fax: 080 – 23148166

CONTENTS

Sl. No. Components Page No.

CHAPTER: 1

INTRODUCTION 1-26

1.1 Purpose of the report 1

1.2 Scope of EIA 2

1.3 Methodology of EIA 3

1.4 Environmental Regulatory Context 4

1.5 Indian Environmental Legislations 4

1.6 Major Provisions In Indian Environmental Legislations 5

1.7 Applicable Environmental Standards 8

1.8 Environmental Clearance requirements 14

1.9 Identification of the project & project proponent 15

1.10 Brief description of nature, size, location of the project

and its importance to the country, region

18

1.10.1 Nature of the Project 18

1.10.2 Location of the project 19

1.10.3 Importance of the project around the region 20

1.11 Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping

carried out (as per Terms Of Reference)

20

CHAPTER: 2

PROJECT DESCRIPTION 27-77

2.1 Type of Project 27

2.2 Need for the Project 27

2.2.1 Location (maps showing general location, specific

location, project boundary & project site layout)

27

2.3 Site Selection 27

2.4 Size or magnitude of operation 33

2.5 Proposed Schedule for Approval and Implementation 33

2.5.1 Statutory Licenses / Approvals 34

2.6 Project Description 34

2.6.1 Project Location 34

2.6.2 Project Profile 34

2.6.3 Land Use Pattern 36

2.7 Details of Water Consumption 37

2.7.1 Water Distribution System 39

2.7.2 Sewage Generation & Disposal System 39

2.7.3 Treatment Methodology & Design Details of proposed

STP

41 – 52

2.8 Site Clearance and Proposed Landscaping 53

2.8.1 Description of mitigation measures incorporated into

the project to meet environmental standards,

environmental operating conditions, or other EIA

requirements

54

2.8.2 Construction phase 54

2.8.2.1 Water Demand & Wastewater Discharge from labor

Camps

54

2.8.2.2 Man power requirement 54

2.8.2.3 Compliance of acts related to employees services 55

2.8.2.4 Solid Waste Generation & Management 57

2.8.2.5 Power Requirement 57

2.9 Occupancy Phase 58

2.9.1 Water Supply, Discharge, Treatment & Disposal Details 58

2.9.2 Source of water Supply 58

2.9.3 Storm water management system 58

2.10 Rain water harvesting and groundwater recharging 59

2.10.1 Volume of Rain Water Harvested 59

2.11 Solid waste generation & its management 61

2.11.1 Domestic solid waste management 61

2.11.2 Secondary sludge from STPs 64

2.11.3 Hazardous waste 64

2.11.4 Bio-medical waste 64

2.11.5 E – waste 64

2.12 Air Pollution Sources & its management 64

2.13 Noise Generation Sources 65

2.14 Type of Building material to be used 65

2.14.1 Approximate quantities of construction materials used 65

2.14.2 Structural Aspects 66

2.15 Fire Fighting System 76

2.16 Assessment of New & untested technology for the risk

of technological failure

76

CHAPTER: 3

DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 77-120

3.1 Study area, Period, Components & Methodology 77

3.1.1 Study Area 77

3.1.2 Period 77

3.1.3 Components 77

3.1.4 Methodology 77

3.2 Establishment of baseline 80

3.2.1 Meteorological Environment 80

3.2.2 Baseline Monitoring 88

3.2.2.1 Baseline Studies 88

3.2.2.2 Air Environment 92

3.2.2.2

(a)

Reconnaissance Survey 92

3.2.2.2

(b)

Air Quality 93

3.2.3 Noise Environment 97

3.2.4 Hydrology and Hydrogeology 99

3.2.5 Water Environment 99

3.2.5.1 Reconnaissance Survey 99

3.2.5.2 Surface Water 101

3.2.5.3 Ground water 103

3.2.6 Soil and Geology 103

3.3 Ecology 109

3.3.1 Terrestrial flora 109

3.3.2 Fauna 110

3.4 Socio-Economic Environment 111

3.4.1 Demographic Structure 111

3.4.2 Literacy Levels 112

3.4.3 Infrastructure Facilities 112

3.5 Base Maps of all Environmental components 113

3.5.1 Project Location 113

3.5.2 Environmental Features 116

3.5.2.1 Project Location and its Environs 116

3.5.3 Significant Environmental Attributes 120

CHAPTER: 4

ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION

MEASURES

121-130

4.1 Details of Investigated Environmental Impacts due to

Project Location, Possible Accidents, Project Design,

Project Construction, Regular Operations, Final

Decommissioning or Rehabilitation of Completed

Project

121

4.1.1 Environmental impacts due to project location, possible

accidents, project design

121

4.2 Measures For Minimizing and/ or Offsetting Adverse

Impacts Identified

122

4.3 Irreversible & irretrievable commitments of

environmental components

122

4.4 Assessment of significance of impacts & mitigation 123

4.5 Impact Matrix 123

4.6 Impacts due to the Project Setting/Location 124

4.6.1 Displacement Of People 124

4.6.2 Change of Land Use 124

4.6.3 Loss of Trees 124

4.6.4 Shifting Of Utilities 124

4.6.5 Impact On Archaeological Property 124

4.6.6 Impacts During Construction Phase 125

4.6.7 Pressure on Local Infrastructure 125

4.6.8 Air Environment 125

4.6.9 Noise Pollution 125

4.6.10 Traffic Congestion 126

4.6.11 Soil / Land Environment 126

4.6.12 Stacking and disposal of construction material 127

4.6.13 Water Environment 127

4.6.14 Public health and safety 128

4.6.15 Socio-Economic Environment 1128

4.7 Impacts During Occupancy Phase 128

4.7.1 Air Environment 128

4.7.2 Noise Environment 128

4.7.3 Water Consumption and Wastewater Treatment and

Disposal Details, Water Harvesting and Recharge

129

4.7.4 Solid Waste 129

4.7.5 Induced development 129

4.7.6 Flora and Fauna 129

4.7.7 Traffic Impact 130

4.8 Positive Impacts 130

4.8.1 Physical Infrastructure & Financial Support to Local

Administration

130

4.8.2 Employment 130

4.8.3 Environment 130

CHAPTER: 5

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY AND SITE) 131-134

5.1 Alternative / Eco Friendly Technologies (Construction) 131

5.2 Building Orientation to take advantage of soar access, 132

shading and natural lighting

5.3 Plastic Free Zone area 133

5.4 Electrical savings and consumption 133

CHAPTER: 6

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME 135-136

6.1 Measurement Methodology 135

6.2 Frequency, Location, Data Analysis, Reporting

Schedules, Emergency Procedures

135

6.3 Detailed Budget and Procurement Schedules 136

6.4 EMP Implementation Schedule 136

CHAPTER: 7

ADDITIONAL STUDIES 137-140

7.1 Public Consultation 137

7.2 Risk Assessment 137

7.2.1 Introduction 137

7.2.2 Objective and Scope 137

7.3 Risk Assessment and Management Plan 138

7.4 Disaster Management 138

7.4.1 Preventive Action 139

7.4.2 Reporting Procedures 139

7.4.3 Emergency measures 139

7.4.4 Emergency lighting 139

7.4.5 Fire Protection 139

7.5 Social Impact Assessment R & R Action Plans 140

CHAPTER: 8

PROJECT BENEFITS 141-142

8.1 Improvements in Physical Infrastructure 141

8.1.1 Employment 141

8.1.2 Environment 141

8.2 Improvements in Social Infrastructure 142

8.3 Other Tangential Benefits 142

CHAPTER: 9

ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS 143-144

9.1 Introduction 143

9.2 Cost Benefit Analysis for the proposed apartment

project

143

CHAPTER: 10

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) 145-166

10.1 Introduction 145

10.2 EMP During Construction Phase 146

10.2.1 Leveling and Site Clearance 146

10.2.2 Transportation Of Construction Materials 147

10.2.3 Construction Activities 147

10.2.4 Wastewater Discharge 148

10.2.5 Labor Camps 148

10.2.6 Disposal Of Excavated Earth 149

10.2.7 Personnel Safety system 149

10.3 EMP During Occupancy Phase 150

10.3.1 Air Quality Management 150

10.3.2 Water Quality Management 150

10.3.3 Noise Management 151

10.3.4 Solid Waste Management 151

10.3.5 Storm Water Management 152

10.3.6 Land scape Development 153

10.3.7 Management Of Socio-Economic Issues 153

10.4 EMP Implementation Schedule 155

10.5 Financial allocation/budgetary provisions for

environmental management aspects

155

10.6 Environmental Monitoring Routines 158

10.7 Environment, Health & Safety Policy 164

10.8 Administrative Chart for Environmental Issues 165

10.9 Deploying EHS Process 166

CHAPTER: 11

SUMMARY & CONCLUSION 167-168

11.1 Overall Justification For Implementation of the Project 167

11.2 Explanation of how adverse effects have been mitigated 168

CHAPTER: 12

DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED 169-172

12.1 The Names of the Consultants Engaged with their Brief

Resume & Nature Of Consultancy Rendered

169

12.2 Architects engaged for the project 172

12.3 Laboratory studies for monitoring 172

TABLES & FIGURES

TABLES

1.0 Land use pattern for the proposed project 18

1.1 Area Statement for the Project 19

1.2 Car Parking Statement 19

1.3 ToRs as per the Letter From State Level Expert Appraisal Committee, Karnataka. No. SEIAA 09 CON 2016 Dated 22nd March 2016

20

1.4 Generic Structure of EIA Document 25

2.1 Land use pattern for the project 35

2.2 Water consumption and Wastewater discharge details 38

2.3 Air pollution sources during construction phase 58

2.4 Quantity of solid waste generated from project 61

2.5 Air Pollution Sources for the Proposed Project 65

2.6 Approximate quantities of construction materials

required

66

2.7 IS Standards – material 70

3.1 Meteorological data of Bangalore for the year 2015 81

3.2A Techniques adopted/protocols for ambient air quality

monitoring

89

3.2 B Protocol for surface water quality monitoring 81

3.2 C Protocol for ground water quality monitoring 90

3.3 Ambient air Sampling stations 93

3.4A Air Quality Data Analysis during March 2016 94

3.4B Air quality data analysis during April 2016 95

3.4C Air quality data analysis during May 2016 96

3.5 Revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards 97

3.6 Noise level monitoring stations 98

3.7 Summary of noise level 98

3.8 Limits as per Environmental Protection Rules, 1986 98

3.9 Water sampling stations 99

3.10 Surface water quality 101

3.11 Ground water quality at all locations in the month of March

103

3.12 Soil sampling stations 106

3.13 Physico-chemical characteristics of soil at all locations in the month of March

107

3.14 Location of sampling stations 107

3.15 Distribution of population 111

3.16 Distribution of literates and literacy levels in the study

area

112

3.17 Significant environmental attributes 120

4.1 Impact Matrix 123

6.1 Monitoring schedule for environmental parameters

(Construction & occupancy phase)

135

6.2 Financial allocation/budgetary provisions for

monitoring program

136

9.1 Cost Benefit Analysis 143

10.1 Environmental management during leveling and site

clearance

146

10.2 Environmental management during transportation 147

10.3 Environmental management during construction 147

10.4 Environmental management for labor camp 148

10.5 Air quality management during occupancy phase 150

10.6 Water quality management during occupancy phase 151

10.7 Noise management during occupancy phase 151

10.8 Financial Allocation And Budgetary Provision For EMP

Aspects (Construction Aspects)

156

10.9 Financial Allocation And Budgetary Provision For EMP

Aspects (Occupancy Phase)

157

10.10 Monitoring schedule for environmental parameters

(Construction & Occupancy phase)

158

10.11 Summary of the potential impacts and mitigation

measures during construction and occupancy phases

159

11.1 Possible effects and its mitigative measures during the

operation phase

168

FIGURES

2.1 Location map showing the project location 28

2.2 Google Map showing project boundary 29

2.3 Topo map of the Project area 30

2.3 B CDP image with project site location 31

2.4 Site photographs 32

2.5 Master Plan of the project site 37

2.6 Water Balance Chart 41

2.7 Typical flow chart of proposed STP 52

2.8 Project Implementation Team 56

2.9 Organic waste converter 62

2.10 Operational procedure of Organic Converter 63

2.11 Wind zoning map 68

2.12 Seismic zoning map 68

3.1 Topo map of the project area 79

3.2 Wind rose diagram 84 - 87

3.3 Top map showing sampling stations 108

3.4 Google Map Showing Surrounding Lakes 114

3.5 Google Map Showing Connectivity 115

3.6 Topo Map Covering 2 Km Distance from Project Site 116

3.7 Google map covering 1 km aerial distance 117

3.8 Google map covering 5 km aerial distance 118

3.9 Google map covering 10 km aerial distance 119

10.1 Environmental Chart for Environmental Issues 165

10.2 Deploying EHS Process 166

12.1 Organizational chart 171

ANNEXURE

1 Geo Technical Investigation Report.

2 Traffic impact and management study and ambient air quality modelling

studies for the vehicular traffic.

3 Drawings

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 1

CHAPTER: 1

INTRODUCTION

Preamble:

Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF), Government of India, in 1994 made

preparation of REIA/EIA & Environmental Management Plan (EMP) mandatory for 30

different activities for categories under Schedule - I of EIA Notification. Further on

7.7.2004, EIA notification was amended to include Construction Projects in the ambit

of Environmental Clearance process this notification was based on the criteria of the

total contributing population, Investment made and wastewater discharge from

projects seeking Environmental Clearance. Further, on 14th September 2006 the

Ministry of Environment and Forests amended the existing Notification & Rules making

built up area as the criteria for Environmental Clearance thus any building and

construction projects with a built-up area >20,000 sq m and <1,50,000 sq m comes

under Schedule 8 (a) of the notification necessitating Environmental Clearance from

the regulatory authority. Preparation of Impact Assessment Report is necessary for

Township and Area Development Project (Schedule 8 (b)) covering an area >50 ha and

or built up area >1,50,000 sq m.

1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT:

The purpose of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is to assist in the decision

making process and to ensure that the project under consideration are environmentally

sound and sustainable. EIA identifies the ways of improving project environmentally by

preventing, minimizing, mitigating or compensating the adverse impacts. Urban

development projects including housing and office complexes do have the potential in

altering environmental resources of any urban area. They cause stress on local

environmental assets of the urban area and could become the potential source for

limiting the growth of the city. Unplanned construction and occupancy of such projects

usually result in impacts on various facets of environment.

Keeping above issues under consideration, an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

study is conducted which incorporates into development and planning process, a plan

for environmental protection and conservation. The procedure identifies the possible

positive and negative impacts on the environment likely to emanate as a result of

construction and occupancy of a project. The EIA thus, provides for a plan which, upon

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 2

implementation, will reduce or offset the negative impacts of a project resulting in a

minimum level of environmental degradation. This minimization may be the result of

implementation of project modifications or environmental protection measures which

simply reduces the severity or number or magnitude of negative impacts. The plan may

also result in utilization of positive impacts for enhancement measures which offset

negative impacts. To measure the level of plan implementation and the degree of

effectiveness of the above environmental protection provisions, the EIA provides a

monitoring program. This program is so designed that it identifies the parameters of

uncertainty and measures the related impacts. It is necessary that there is close

integration of EIA with various aspects of a project including financial and engineering

aspects which ensures environmental consideration are given due weight in project

selection, siting, design and operation. Analysis of past experiences indicates that it is

necessary to examine a number of problem areas in-order to ensure that environmental

concerns can be effectively integrated in the development process. Similar approach

has been adopted while conducting the EIA study for the proposed project.

1.2 SCOPE OF EIA:

The scope of Environmental Impact Assessment study includes a detailed study of the

existing environmental status within the study area of 5 km radius from the proposed

site for significant environmental components/parameters viz. air, water, land,

biological, socio-economic and cultural environment. This serves as a prevalent

environmental component of the area around the project site depicting the baseline

characteristics of the environment before the actual establishment of the project. This

broadly covers.

Assessment of environmental features of the project.

Establishment of present status of air, noise, water, terrestrial, biological &

socio-economic components of the environment.

Identification and quantification of probable or likely impacts due to the

implementation of the project on the prevailing environmental settings during

the Occupancy phase.

Evaluation of proposed pollution control programs adopted by the project to

combat the possible pollution of air, water, noise, terrestrial environment etc.,

Compilation & assimilation of collected, generated data during the course of EIA

studies.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 3

Delineation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) outlining measures to be

adopted for mitigation of adverse impacts, enumerating post project

environmental quality monitoring to be followed by the project proponent.

1.3 METHODOLOGY OF EIA:

Any human establishment invariably has certain impacts on the surrounding

environment, which may be either beneficial or adverse. The nature and the magnitude

of the impact is a relative concept based on the nature & magnitude of the activity that

is intended to be carried out and also depends on the prevalent environmental setting

of the proposed area and its sensitivity to the changes that are likely to be brought

about due to the proposed activity.

Therefore, the net impact of any proposed activity could be accessed through a

exhaustive study of the environmental parameters within the study zone prior to the

implementation of any proposed project and presented in the form of ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) report which serves as a basis for the establishment to

develop strategies to combat the pollution either at its source of generation or at the

end of the pipe and also to implement measures to reduce the pollution either

quantitatively or qualitatively by resorting to suitable technological up-gradations from

time to time.

The EIA studies can be broadly divided into three phases.

The first phase involves field studies to assess or identify the significant

environmental components, which serves as a baseline status within the study

zone.

The second phase involves the prediction of all the impacts comprehensively on

the existing baseline status of various environmental components due to the

proposed activity. The process evaluation is also carried out to assess the

consumption of liquid & solid fuel, quantification & characterization of effluents,

solid and hazardous wastes, as applicable.

The third phase includes evaluation of impacts on the environmental setting and

assessment of its effects and delineation of an Environmental Management Plan

to mitigate adverse impacts on the quality of surrounding environment.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 4

1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY CONTEXT:

This section reviews the policies and the Environment legislations at the National and

State level to understand the legal requirements and implications on the proposed

project. All activities under the proposed project must be consistent with all applicable

laws, regulations, notifications, and standards. It is the responsibility of the project

Implementing Agency to ensure that project activities are consistent with the

regulatory/legal framework, whether National, State or Municipal/Local.

1.5 INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATIONS:

The Constitution of India directs the State to endeavor to protect and improve the

environment and to safeguard the forest and wildlife of the country. Article 51(g) of

the constitution states that it shall be the duty of every citizen of India to protect and

improve the national environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to

have compassion for living creatures. The language of the Directive principles of the

State Policy (Article 47) also contains a specific provision, which commits the state to

protect the environment. In addition to Constitutional provisions, India has established

a comprehensive set of laws for the management and protection of the environment.

The Acts, Notifications, Rules and Amendments applicable to any type of development

projects include the following:

The Environment (Protection) Act and Rules, 1986.

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 1994 and amendments

for Environmental Clearance.

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, Rules and Amendment, 1981,

1982, 1983, 1987.

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act and Rules, 1974, 1975.

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act and Rules, 1977, 1978,

1991.

The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991.

The Environmental Standards Notification, 1993, 1996.

The Hazardous Waste Management and Handling Rules, 1989 and Amendment

Rules 2000.

The Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules 2000, 2002.

The National Environment Tribunal Act, 1995.

The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 5

Note: The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has stipulated general discharge

standards for water effluents and general emission standards for air and noise

emissions. These standards limit the concentration and volumes of the effluents and

emissions released to the atmosphere. The respective State Pollution Control Boards

(SPCBs) could make these standards more stringent based on the environmental

sensitivity of a specific location.

The project proponents are required to take Consents (for both air and water) and No

Objection Certificates (NOCs) from the relevant SPCBs before initiating any activity.

In addition to the above, the Central Pollution Control board (CPCB) has also specified

National Ambient Air Quality and Noise Standards for residential, commercial, industrial

and sensitive zones for the country as a whole.

1.6 MAJOR PROVISIONS IN INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATIONS:

The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 including Rules, 1986:

This Act is an umbrella legislation that provides a single focus for the protection of the

environment. The potential scope of the Act is broad, with “environment” defined to

include water, air and land and the inter-relationships which exist among water, air,

land and human beings and other living creatures, plants, micro-organisms and

property. The Act has been enacted to provide for the protection and improvement of

environment by preparation of manuals, codes or guides relating to prevention, control

and abatement of environment pollution.

The Act provides powers to the Central Government to take necessary measures for the

purpose of protecting and improving the quality of the environment and prevention,

control and abatement of environmental pollution. It lays down standards for the

quality of the environment, emissions or discharges of environmental pollutants from

various sources. It provides restriction on discharge or emission of pollutants in excess

of the prescribed standards. Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 1994 and

the various amendments pertaining to this notification form a part of the regulations

under this legislation.

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 1994 and Amendments:

As per the EIA notification, 1994 and subsequent amendments, new or expansion or

modernization of any activity falling in the 32 categories of activities shall not be

undertaken in any part of India unless it has been accorded environmental clearance by

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 6

the Central Government in accordance with the procedures specified in the

notification.

Until January 1994, obtaining environmental clearance from the MoEF was only an

administrative requirement intended for mega projects undertaken by the government

or public sector undertakings.

Relevance to the construction projects:

Certain type of urban housing projects needs Environmental Clearance from the MoEF.

These include (Obtaining Clearance by Preparation of EIA Report) Township and Area

Development Project (Schedule 8 (b)) covering an area >50 ha and or built up area

>1,50,000 sq m. Project proponents should adhere to the conditions prescribed in the

clearance. In all their plant operations, the proponents need to meet the requirements

/ standards prescribed in the various Environmental Protection Rules and other

environmental regulations. Whenever a project is given environmental clearance, a set

of recommendations and conditions are stipulated by the Appraisal Committee that has

to be complied with by the proponent once the project is commissioned. Project

authorities are required to submit periodical compliance reports to the MoEF to enable

the Ministry to monitor the implementation of the recommendations and conditions of

environmental clearance. Cases of non-compliance of recommendations and conditions

of environmental clearance are brought to the notice of the concerned SPCB for action.

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981:

This Act was enacted to implement measures devised for the effective prevention,

control or abatement of air pollution. The Act prohibits the construction and occupancy

of any specified activity without the consent of SPCBs. For the prevention and control

of air pollution, the State Government, in consultation with the SPCB has the powers

to set standards for emissions from automobiles, impose restrictions on use of certain

activities and prohibit emissions of air pollutants in excess of the standards laid down

by the SPCB. It can also make an application to the court for restraining persons from

causing air pollution. In addition, it also has the power of entry and inspection, power

to obtain information and power to take samples of air emissions and conduct the

appropriate follow up. The CPCB, as well as the SPCBs are eligible for contributions

from the Central as well as the State Government, respectively, to perform their

functions appropriately. The Act also allows for appropriate penalties and procedures

for non-compliance.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 7

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, amended in 1988:

This Act has been enacted to implement measures devised for effective prevention and

control of water pollution. It empowers the State Pollution Control Board to prepare

manuals, codes or guides relating to treatment and disposal of sewage and trade

effluents and information dissemination for maintaining or restoring wholesomeness of

water.

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977:

This Act provides for levy and collection of Cess on water consumed by persons carrying

on certain activities and by the local authorities with a view to augment the resources

of CPCB and SPCBs for the prevention and control of water pollution, constituted under

the Water Act, 1974. It also covers specifications on affixing of meters, furnishing of

returns, assessment of Cess, interest payable for delay in payment of Cess and penalties

for non-payment of Cess within the specified time.

The Hazardous Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989 (as amended, May

2003):

The Act requires owners to identify their wastes for applicability under the hazardous

wastes amendment rules 2003 and manage them as per the prescribed guidelines. The

assessment criteria under the amended rules are based on process and concentration.

The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991:

The Public Liability Insurance Act (PLI), 1991, imposes on the owner the liability to

provide immediate relief in respect of death or injury to any person or damage to any

property resulting from an accident while handling any of the notified hazardous

chemicals. This relief has to be provided on "no fault" basis. Owner handling hazardous

chemicals has to take an insurance policy of an amount equal to its "paid up capital" or

upto Rs 500 millions, whichever is less. The policy has to be renewed every year. New

undertakings have to take this policy before the commencement of the activity. The

owner also has to pay an amount equal to its annual premium to the Central

Government's Environment Relief Fund (ERF). The payment under the Act is only for

the immediate relief; owners shall have to provide the final compensation, if any,

arising out of the legal proceedings.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 8

Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000:

The Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 provides for

procedures for collection, segregation, storage, transportation, processing and disposal

of municipal solid waste.

Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958:

According to this Act, area within radii of 100m and 300m from the “protected

property” are designated as “protected area” and “controlled area” respectively. No

development activity (including building, mining, excavating, blasting) is permitted in

the “protected area” and development activities likely to damage the protected

property are not permitted in the “controlled area” without prior permission of the

Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) if the site/remains/monuments are protected by

ASI or the State Department of Archaeology if these are protected by the State.

Relevance to the Construction Projects:

Activities in protected areas should not be undertaken.

If activities are to be done in the controlled area of protected properties, then

the necessary permissions should be taken from ASI.

1.7 APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS:

The MoEF has the overall responsibility to set policies and standards for the protection

of environment along with Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). This includes air,

noise, water, and hazardous waste standards. The relevant standards, which may be of

significance to the proposed project, are as follows:

Ambient Air Quality Standards:

National Ambient Air Quality (NAAQS) has been prescribed by CPCB vide Gazette

Notification dated 11th April 1994. The prescribed Indian standards are given in the

table below.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 9

Sl

No

Pollutant Time

Weighted

Average

Concentration in Ambient Air

Industrial,

Residential,

Rural and

Other Area

Ecologically

Sensitive Area

(notified by Central

Government)

Methods of Measurement

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

1 Sulphur dioxide (SO2)

µg/m3

Annual*

24 hours**

50

80

20

80

-Improved West and Gaeke

-Ultraviolet fluorescence

2 Nitrogen dioxide (NO2)

µg/m3

Annual*

24 hours**

40

80

30

80

-Modified Jacob & Hochheiser (Na-Arsenite)

-Chemiluminescence

3 Particular Matter (size

less than 10 µm) or

PM10 µg/m3

Annual*

24 hours**

60

100

60

100

-Gravimetric, TOEM,

-Beta attenuation

4 Particulate Matter (size

less than 2.5 µm) or

PM2.5 µg/m3

Annual*

24 hours**

40

60

40

60

-Gravimetric, TOEM,

-Beta attenuation

5 Ozone (O3) µg/m3 8 hours**

1 hour**

100

180

100

180

-UV photometric

-Chemiluminescence -Chemical Method

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 10

6 Lead (Pb) µg/m3 Annul*

1 hour**

0.50

1.0

0.50

1.0

-AAS /ICP method after sampling on EPM

2000 or equivalent filter paper

-ED-XRF using Teflon

7 Carbon Monoxide (CO)

mg/m3

8 hours**

1 hour**

02

04

02

04

-Non Dispersive Infra Red (NDIR)

spectroscopy

8 Ammonia (NH3) µg/m3 Annual*

24 hour**

100

400

100

400

-Chemiluminescence -Indophenol blue

method

9 Benzene (C5H5) µg/m3 Annual* 05 05 -Gas chromatography based continuous

analyzer

-Adsorption and desorption followed by GC

analysis.

10 Benzo(α) Pyrene(BaP) –

particulate phase,

ng/m3

Annual* 01 01 -Solvent extraction followed by HPLC/GC

analysis

11 Arsenic (As), ng/m3 Annual* 06 06 -AAS ICP method after sampling on EPM

2000 or equivalent filter paper

12 Nickel (Ni), ng/m3 Annual* 20 20 -AAS /ICP method after sampling on EPM

2000 or equivalent filter paper

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 11

Ambient Noise Standards:

Ambient standards with respect to noise have been notified by the MoEF vide gazette

notification dated 26th December 1989. It is based on the weighted equivalent noise

level (Leq). The standards are given in the following table.

Ambient noise standards

Area code Category of area Limits in dB(A) Leq.

Day time Night time

(A) Industrial areas 75 70

(B) Commercial areas 65 55

(C) Residential areas 55 45

(D) Silence zone 50 40

Note:

1. Day time is reckoned in between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.

2. Night time is reckoned in between 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.

3. Silence zone is defined as areas upto 100 m around such premises as hospitals,

educational institutions and courts. The silence zones are to be declared by

Competent Authority. Use of horns, loudspeakers and bursting of crackers shall be

banned in these zones.

4. Mixed categories of areas should be declared as one of the four above mentioned

categories by the Competent Authority and the corresponding standards shall apply.

Noise Standards for Occupational Exposure:

Noise standards in the work environment are specified by Occupational Safety and

Health Administration (OSHA-USA) which in turn are being enforced by the Government

of India through model rules framed under the Factories Act. These are appended

subsequently.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 12

Standards for occupational noise exposure

Total time of exposure per day in hours Sound pressure level in dB(A)

8 90

6 92

4 95

3 97

2 100

3/2 102

1 105

¾ 107

½ 110

¼ 115

Never >115

Note:

1. No exposure in excess of 115 dB (A) is to be permitted.

2. For any period of exposure falling in between any figure and the next higher or

lower figure as indicated in column (1), the permissible level is to be determined

by extrapolation on a proportionate scale.

Wastewater Discharge Standards

The discharge of treated wastewater from the sewage treatment plant (STP) should

comply with the norms prescribed by the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board

appended subsequently.

Sewage discharge standards

Sl.

No

Parameter Quality of

raw sewage

Quality of treated sewage as

per Urban Reuse Standards

1 pH 6 – 8 6 - 9

2 BOD5, mg/L 250 ≤10

3 Turbidity, NTU 100 ≤ 2

4 E coli --- Nil

5 Residual Cl2, mg/l --- 1 - 1.5

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 13

Noise Standards for Stationary DG sets

The prescribed noise standards for control of noise pollution from stationary Diesel

Generator (DG) sets are given subsequently.

(A) Noise standards for DG sets (15-500 kVA)

The total sound power level, LW, of a DG set should be less than, 94+10 log10 (KVA), dB

(A), at the manufacturing stage, where, KVA is the nominal power rating of a DG set.

This level should fall by 5 dB (A) every five years.

(B) Mandatory acoustic enclosure/acoustic treatment of room for stationary DG sets

(5 KVA and above)

Noise from the DG set should be controlled by providing an acoustic enclosure or by

treating the room acoustically.

The acoustic enclosure/acoustic treatment of the room should be designed for minimum

25 dB(A) insertion loss or for meeting the ambient noise standards, whichever is on the

higher side (if the actual ambient noise is on the higher side, it may not be possible to

check the performance of the acoustic enclosure/acoustic treatment. Under such

circumstances the performance may be checked for noise reduction up to actual

ambient noise level, preferably, in the night time). The measurement for Insertion Loss

may be done at different points at 0.5 m from the acoustic enclosure/room, and then

averaged.

The DG set should also be provided with proper exhaust muffler with Insertion Loss of

minimum 25 dB (A).

(C) Guidelines for the manufacturers/users of DG sets (5 KVA and above)

The manufacturer should offer to the user a standard acoustic enclosure of 25

dB(A) Insertion Loss and also a suitable exhaust muffler with Insertion Loss of 25

dB(A).

The user should make efforts to bring down the noise levels due to the DG set,

outside his premises, within the ambient noise requirements by proper siting and

control measures.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 14

The manufacturer should furnish noise power levels of the un-licensed DG sets

as per standards prescribed.

The total sound power level of a DG set, at the user's end, shall be within 2 dB(A)

of the total sound power level of the DG set, at the manufacturing stage, as

prescribed.

Installation of a DG set must be strictly in compliance with the recommendation

of the DG set manufacturer.

A proper routine and preventive maintenance procedure for the DG set should

be set and followed in consultation with the DG set manufacturer which would

help prevent noise levels of the DG set from deteriorating with use.

1.8 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS:

As per the policies and legal framework, for any new activity the following set of

Environmental Approvals are necessary from the State Pollution Control Board (SPCB):

Consent to Establish

Consent to Operate

Consent To Establish:

The provision of “Consent to Establish” under the Water and Air Acts have been made

obligatory after amendments to the Acts made in 1988 and 1987 respectively. Earlier,

SPCBs were issuing separate NOCs for only siting of an industry and for adequacy and

appropriateness of pollution control equipment and related measures. This requirement

has now been replaced by the “Consent to Establish” and even extended to projects on

housing and office complex. However, some SPCBs have not yet notified the amended

rules. In such cases, the proponent is still required to obtain a NOC from the SPCB and

not the “Consent to Establish”.

Consent to establish for discharge of effluents under the Water Act, 1974

All projects (operation, process or any treatment and disposal system) which are likely

to discharge sewage or trade effluents into a stream, sewer or on land, are required to

obtain ‘Consent to Establish for Discharge of Effluents’ under the Water Act, 1974

(amended in 1988). For obtaining this consent, an application is to be submitted to the

concerned SPCB in the prescribed form along with the prescribed application fee.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 15

Consent to establish for emission under the Air Act, 1981:

All projects (operation or process) located in an Air Pollution Control Area (APCA)

declared so by the concerned SPCB, and likely to emit air pollutants in the atmosphere,

are required to obtain ‘Consent to Establish for Emissions’ under the Air Act, 1981

(amended in 1987). For obtaining this consent, an application is to be submitted to the

concerned SPCB, in the prescribed form and along with the prescribed application fee.

After obtaining the ‘Consent to Establish’ and ‘Environmental Clearance’, the project

proponents can begin work related to the setting up of the project. After this, a periodic

compliance report is to be submitted indicating effective implementation of the

recommendations and connotations.

Consent to Operate:

It is obligatory to obtain ‘Consent to Operate’ from the SPCB under the provisions of

Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Air (Prevention and Control

of Pollution) Act, 1981 prior to the operation (occupancy in case of residential

apartment) of particular projects. While issuing these consents, conditions relating to

emission and discharge limits as well as other conditions are stipulated.

Implementation of these conditions may also be monitored for their effective

implementation.

1.9 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT & PROJECT PROPONENT:

PROJECT AND PROPONENT:

M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., is a subsidiary of M/s. Shriram Properties.

Shriram Properties is a part of the INR 90,000 crore Financial Giant - Shriram Group and

was established with a mission of creating splendid homes and luxurious living spaces.

Launched in 1995, the company has operations throughout the country with extensive

presence across South India. Company has delivered over 20 million sq. ft. of built-up

space, with 12.61 million sq. ft. to be delivered in the next two years and 45.85 million

sq. ft. under development.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 16

PROPOSED PROJECT Expansion of Residential Apartment Project with

addition of flats (710 flats), built up area 88,458.25

sq m

EC Reference: Environmental Clearance obtained

from SEIAA vide letter No. SEIAA 123 CON 2014

dated 18.10.2014 for apartment with 935 flats and

built up area 1,46,372 sq m.

LOCATION “Green Fields”,

Survey No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) & 81,

Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli,

Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore District.

TOTAL PLOT AREA EC obtained: 78,812 sq m (19.48 Acres)

TOTAL BUILT UP AREA EC obtained: 1,46,372.00 sq m

Proposed Addition: 88,458.25 sq m

After Expansion: 2,34,830.25 sq m

TOTAL COST OF PROJECT Expansion Cost: Rs. 167,00,00,000/-

(Rupees One Hundred and Sixty Seven Crores Only)

NO. OF FLOORS PROPOSED 1) EC Obtained:

a) Activity: Residential Apartment. b) Flats: 935 units. c) Built up area: 1,46,372 sq m. d) Plot area: 78,812 sq m. e) Number of buildings: 1 Building (6 Towers) f) Configuration: 6 Tower viz., A to F

comprising of 2 Basements, Ground and 19 Floors.

2) Proposed Addition:

a) Activity: Residential Apartment. b) Flats: Addition of 710 flats c) Built up area: Addition of 88,458.25 sq m

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 17

d) Number of buildings: Addition of 1 Building (3 Towers)

e) Configuration: Proposed Building 2 consisting of 3 towers namely G, H and J comprising of 2 Basements, Ground and 19 Floors.

3) Scenario after expansion:

a) Activity: Residential Apartment b) Flats: 1645 units c) Built up area: 2,34,830.25 sq m g) Plot area: 78,812 sq m. d) Number of Buildings: 2 Buildings (and 9

Blocks)

Configuration: Building 1 comprises of Towers viz., A to F consisting of 2 Basements, Ground and 19 Floors and Building 2 comprises of Towers viz., G, H and J consisting of 2 Basements, Ground and 19 Floors.

CAR PARKING DETAILS Existing building : 1001 cars Proposed building : 735 cars Total after expansion : 1736 cars

WATER SUPPLY The water supply is from Mandur Gram Panchayath

Sources

PROPOSED SANITATION EC is obtained for STP of 650 KLD capacity. Proposed Expansion: Additional STP of 500 KLD capacity will be established for proposed blocks. After Expansion: 1 X 650 KLD and 1 X 500 KLD.

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Collection and Segregation at source of generation

and the Organic waste will be treated in Organic

Converter and the Inorganic Waste will be sent for

recycling.

AIR POLLUTION/ NOISE

GENERATION SOURCE

i) EC obtained: 1 X 1250 kVA capacity DG set. ii) Proposed Expansion: Addition of 1 X 1250

kVA capacity DG Set. iii) After expansion: 2 X 1250 kVA capacity DG

sets.

DG sets will be provided with acoustics and adequate stack height.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 18

1.10 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, SIZE, LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND ITS

IMPORTANCE TO THE COUNTRY, REGION:

1.10.1 Nature Of The Project:

M/s Gardencity Realty Pvt. Ltd., # 845, 5th Cross, 10th Main, 2nd Stage, Indiranagar,

Bangalore – 560 038 had obtained Environmental Clearance (EC) for the Residential

Apartment Project “Green Fields” at Survey No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) & 81,

Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore.

Subsequently, M/s. Gardencity Realty Pvt. Ltd., have given General Power of Attorney

(GPA) and Development Agreement (DA) to M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., No. 40/43,

4th Cross Road, 8th Main Road, RMV Extension, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore – 560 080.

Presently, M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., intend to expand the Residential Apartment

with addition of flats (710 units) and built up area 88,458.25 sq m.

Environmental Clearance has been obtained for the project from State Level

Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka vide Letter No. SEIAA 123

CON 2014 dated 18.10.2014.

TABLE 1.0: LAND USE PATTERN FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:

Sl. No

Particulars EC Obtained After Expansion

Area Percentage

(%)

Area Percentage

(%) Sq m Acres Sq m Acres

1 Total Plot Area

78,812.00 19.48 - 78,812.00 19.48 -

2 Road Widening Area

7,095.00 1.75 - 5,748.14 1.42 -

3 Future Development Area

8,433.00 2.08 - Presently, buildings are added in this area with few changes in other areas also

4 Net Plot Area 63,284.00 15.64 100 73,063.86 18.05 100

5 Ground Coverage Area

9,035.00 2.23 14.28 18,813.94 4.64 25.74

6 Paved area 28,677.00 7.09 45.31 30,138.85 7.44 41.25

7 Landscape area

25,572.00 6.32 40.41 24,111.07 5.95 33.00

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 19

TABLE 1.1: AREA STATEMENT FOR THE PROJECT:

Sl. no Description Built up area in sq m

EC Obtaining (Building 1 –

Tower A to F)

Proposed Expansion (Building 2 – Tower namely G, H and J)

Total

1 Lower Basement Floor

12,067.45 8,250.41 20,317.86

2 Upper Basement floor

12,067.45 8,250.41 20,317.86

3 Ground floor 9,034.69 8,548.93 17,583.62

4 First floor 10,336.80 5,522.48 15,859.28

5 Typical floor (Second to Nineteenth floor)

1,02,420.00 3,202.47 X 18 = 57,644.46

1,60,064.46

6 Terrace floor 445.68 241.49 687.17

7 Total 1,46,372 (935 flats)

88,458.25 (710 flats)

2,34,830.25 (1645 flats)

TABLE 1.2: CAR PARKING STATEMENT:

Sl. No.

Description EC Obtained Proposed Addition After Expansion

1 Lower Basement 377 cars 267 644 cars

2 Upper Basement 383 cars 258 641 cars

3 Ground Floor 241 cars 210 451 cars

4 Total parking spaces 1,001 cars 735 1,736 cars

1.10.2 Location of the project:

Expansion of Residential Apartment Project with addition of flats (710 flats) at Survey

No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) & 81, Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East

Taluk, Bangalore.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 20

1.10.3 Importance of the project around the region:

1. The proposed project basically fulfills the need of housing in the region.

2. Further the Project provides short term and long term employment opportunity for

people residing in the surrounding of the project area.

3. The proposed project may result in creation of additional infrastructure, such as

improvement of existing roads, storm water drains etc.,

4. The proposed project will help in improving local economy generate revenue through

taxes, levies etc.,

1.11: SCOPE OF THE STUDY – DETAILS OF REGULATORY SCOPING CARRIEDOUT

(AS PER TERMS OF REFERENCE):

The proposed project is Expansion of Residential Apartment project. As per the

amended EIA notification dated 14th September, 2006 the projects with built-up area

≥150000 sq m falls under Category 8 (b) which necessitates preparation of EIA. The

project under consideration has built-up area of 2,34,830.25 sq m and Environmental

Impact Assessment (EIA) Report has been prepared based on the Terms Of References

(TORs) for the construction phase and occupancy phase of the proposed Project.

TABLE: - 1.3 TORS AS PER THE LETTER FROM STATE LEVEL EXPERT APPRAISAL

COMMITTEE, KARNATAKA. No. SEIAA 09 CON 2016 DATED 22nd MARCH 2016

Sl.

No. Description Details provided in Chapter / Section

1 Examine details of land use as per

Master Plan of the project site. Analysis

should be made based on latest satellite

imaginary for land use with raw images.

Check on flood plain of any river.

CDP image of the project site is

appended as Figure – 2.3B. The project

is constructed as per the bylaws of the

planning authority.

2 Submit details of environmentally

sensitive places, land acquisition

status, rehabilitation of communities/

villages and present status of such

activities.

No environmentally sensitive places are

located in the surroundings.

The project site is converted for

Residential use & therefore no

rehabilitation activities are proposed.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 21

Land description - plot and survey no.s,

village, tehsil, district, state: Section

2.6.1, Chapter 2

Area of the land: Table 2.1, Chapter 2.

3 Examine baseline environmental quality

along with projected incremental load

due to the project.

Baseline environmental quality data is

appended in in Chapter – 3.

4 Environmental data to be considered in

relation to the project development

would be (a) land (b) ground water (c)

surface water (d) air (e) bio-diversity (f)

noise and vibrations (g) socio economic

and health.

Baseline environmental quality data is

appended in in Chapter – 3.

5 Submit a copy of contour plan with

slopes, drainage pattern of the site and

surrounding area. Any obstructions of

the same by the project.

Details appended in Section – 2.2,

Chapter – 2. Contour plan is appended as

Annexure – 3.

6 Submit the details of the trees to be

felled for the project.

Details appended in Section 2.8, Chapter

– 2.

7 Submit the present land use and

permission required for any conversion

such as forest, agriculture etc.

Section 2.3, Chapter - 2;

8 Submit Roles and responsibilities of the

developer etc., for compliance of

environmental regulations under the

provisions of EP Act.

Chapter - 6.

9 Ground water classification as per the

Central Ground Water Authority.

Section 3.2.4, Chapter 3

10 Examine the details of Source of water,

water requirement, use of treated

waste water and prepare a water

balance chart.

Section - 2.7, Chapter – 2.

11 Rain water harvesting proposals should

be made with due safeguards for ground

water quality. Maximize recycling of

water and utilization of rain water.

Examine details.

Section - 2.10, Chapter – 2.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 22

12 Examine soil characteristics and depth

of ground water table for rainwater

harvesting.

Section - 3.2.6, Chapter – 3.

13 Examine details of solid waste

generation treatment and its disposal.

Section - 2.11, Chapter – 2.

14 Examine and submit details of use of

solar energy and alternative source of

energy to reduce the fossil energy

consumption. Energy conservation and

energy efficiency.

Chapter – 5.

15 DG sets are likely to be used during

construction and operational phase of

the project. Emissions from DG sets

must be taken into consideration while

estimating the impacts on air

environment. Examine and submit

details.

Section – 2.12 of Chapter – 2, Section –

11.2 of Chapter – 11.

16 Examine road/ rail connectivity to the

project site and impact on the traffic

due to the proposed project. Present

and future traffic and transport

facilities for the region should be

analysed with measures for preventing

traffic congestion and providing faster

trouble free system to reach different

destinations in the city.

Figure 3.5, Chapter – 3

Traffic survey and management report is

appended as Annexure – 2.

17 A detailed traffic and transportation

study should be made for existing and

projected passenger and cargo traffic.

Traffic survey and management report is

appended as Annexure – 2.

18 Examine the details of transport of

materials for construction which should

include source and availability.

Chapter – 4 and Section 10.2.2 of

Chapter – 10

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 23

19 Examine separately the details for

construction and operation phases both

for Environmental Management Plan

and Environmental Monitoring Plan with

cost and parameters.

Environmental Management Plan is

appended as Chapter – 10.

Environmental Monitoring Plan with cost

and parameters is appended as Chapter

– 6.

20 Submit details of a comprehensive

Disaster Management Plan including

emergency evacuation during natural

and man-made disaster.

Section 7.2, Chapter 7

21 Details of litigation pending against the

project, if any, with direct/ order

passed by any Court of Law against the

Project should be given.

None

22 The cost of the Project (capital cost and

recurring cost) as well as the cost

towards implementation of EMP should

be clearly spelt out.

EMP cost allocation is detailed in Table

10.8 and Table 10.9, Chapter – 10.

23 Any future clarifications on carrying out

the above studies including anticipated

impacts due to the project and

mitigative measures, project proponent

can refer to the model ToR available on

Ministry website

“http://moef.nic.in/Manual/Township

s”.

--

Additional TOR:

1 Revised Water Balance Chart

considering

Revised water balance charter

considering fresh water requirement at

55 LPCD is appended as Figure 2.6,

Chapter 2

2 Scientific assessment of sustainable

availability of water for quantity &

quality along with scheme of treatment

for reuse of treated water.

Water quality analysis details is

appended in Section 3.2.5.3, Chapter 3.

Scheme for reuse of treated sewage in

the project is proposed. Water balance

chart is appended as Figure 2.6, Chapter

2.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 24

3 RTC copy indicating details of kharab

land and other details if any

Copy of RTC document is appended as

Annexure.

4 Compliance to earlier issued EC Compliance to earlier issued EC is

appended as Annexure.

5 Approved drawings (Sanctioned) of

earlier phase to be submitted

Approved drawing is is appended as

Annexure.

6 Details of the nearby lake from LDA and

clarifications from the BDA for the

project site is not falling in the sensitive

zone.

Map with location of maps in the vicinity

of the project is appended as Figure 3.4,

Chapter 3.

7 Fool proof treatment for using recycled

water for potable use to be given.

Scheme for reuse of treated sewage in

the project is proposed. Water balance

chart is appended as Figure 2.6, Chapter

2.

8 Scheme & design details of treated

sewage for domestic use.

400 KLD of treated sewage in the project

will be provided with treatment

comprising of softener, ultrafiltration,

UV treatment and will be reused in the

project. Scheme is appended as Figire

2.5, Chapter 2.

GENERIC STRUCTURE OF EIA DOCUMENT:

This EIA report presents the existing baseline scenario and the assessment and

evaluation of the environmental impacts that may rise during the construction and

operational phases of the project. This report also highlights the Environmental

Monitoring Program during the construction and operation phases of the project and

the post project monitoring program. In terms of the EIA Notification of the MoEF dated

14th September 2006 as amended Dec. 2009, the generic structure of the EIA document

will be as under:

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 25

TABLE: 1.4 GENERIC STRUCTURE OF EIA DOCUMENT

Sl.No. Chapters name Description

Chapter 1: Introduction

Introductory information is presented in this

Chapter. The introduction provides a

background to the project and describes the

objective of this document. This Chapter also

includes the outline of the project and its

proponent. The purpose and organization of the

report is also presented in this chapter.

Chapter 2:

Project

Description

This Chapter includes Project Description and

Infrastructure Facilities delineating all industrial

and environmental aspect of expansion of

Residential Apartment Project of M/s Gardencity

Realty Pvt. Ltd., Construction and operation

phase activities as well as process details of

proposed scenario. This Chapter gives

information about storage and handling, water

and wastewater quantitative details, air

pollution and control system, sludge storage

facility, utilities, greenbelt and safety measures

for proposed plant.

Chapter 3:

Description of the

Environment

This Chapter provides Baseline Environmental

Status of Environmental components (Primary

data) delineating meteorological details of the

project site and surrounding area.

Chapter 4:

Anticipated

Environmental

Impacts &

Mitigation

Measures

This Chapter presents the analysis of impacts on

the environmental and social aspects of the

project as a result of establishment of plan and

thereby suggesting the mitigation measures.

Chapter 5:

Analysis of

Alternatives

This chapter includes the justification for the

selection of the project site from Environmental

point of view as well as from economic point of

view so that the technology will be affordable to

the member units of the industrial area.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 26

Chapter 6:

Environmental

Monitoring Plan

This chapter will include the technical aspects

of monitoring, the effectiveness of mitigation

measures which will include the measurement

methodologies, frequency, location, data

analysis, reporting schedules etc.,

Chapter 7: Additional Studies

This chapter will detail about the Public

Consultation sought regarding the project. It will

also identify the risks of the Project in relation

to the general public and the surrounding

environment during construction and operation

of the project and thereby presents Disaster

Management Plan.

Chapter 8

& 9:

Project Benefits &

Environmental

Cost Benefit

Analysis

The realization of the project activity is

envisaged to impart benefits to the areas in

concern. This Chapter will identify the benefits

from the project and summarize them.

Chapter 10: Environmental

Management Plan

It is the key Chapter of the report and presents

the mitigation plan, covers the institutional and

monitoring requirements to implement

environmental mitigation measures and to

assess their adequacy during project

implementation.

Chapter 11: Summary and

Conclusion

This chapter summarizes the information given

in Chapters in this EIA/EMP report and the

conclusion based on the environmental study,

impact identification, mitigation measures and

the environmental management plan.

Chapter 12: Disclosure of the

Consultant

Names of consultants engaged in the preparation

of the EIA/EMP report along with their brief

resume and nature of Consultancy rendered are

included in this chapter

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 27

CHAPTER 2

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT:

Proposed construction is an Expansion of Residential Apartment Project with addition

of flats (710 flats), built up area 88,458.25 sq m at Survey No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) &

81, Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore District.

Environmental Clearance for the project was obtained from SEIAA vide letter No. SEIAA

123 CON 2014 dated 18.10.2014 for apartment with 935 flats and built up area 1,46,372

sq m.

2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT:

As discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.10.4

2.2.1 LOCATION (MAPS SHOWING GENERAL LOCATION, SPECIFIC LOCATION,

PROJECT BOUNDARY & PROJECT SITE LAYOUT):

Proposed project will be constructed at Survey No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) & 81,

Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore District.

Location map, photographs showing site views, Google image is appended is the

subsequent sections.

2.3 SITE SELECTION:

The site is selected based on the holistic perspective of land use, development intensity,

social well-being and preservation of the environment. And also, the infrastructure and

utilities available, expected water and power requirement for the proposed buildings.

The proposed project is at a distance of about 25 km from Bangalore City Railway

Station, 12 Kms from Krishnarajapuram Railway Station and 25 Kms from Kempegowda

International Airport at Latitude: 13°4.288' N and Longitude- 77°45.138' E with 898 m

above MSL. The project site is plain land sloping towards east direction. The project

site is converted for residential usage. The project site is surrounded by few Residential

areas, layouts and areas with rural settings. Expected water, power requirement &

other utilities are available around the site for the proposed buildings.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 28

Figure 2.1: Location map showing the project location:

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 29

Figure 2.2: Google Map showing project boundary:

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 30

Fig. 2.3 TOPO MAP OF THE PROJECT AREA

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 31

Fig. 2.3 B CDP MAP OF THE PROJECT AREA

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 32

Fig. 2.4 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 33

2.4 SIZE OR MAGNITITUDE OF OPERATION:

The proposed Project is an Expansion of Residential Apartment Project with addition of

flats (710 flats), built up area 88,458.25 sq m comprising of 2 buildings (9 blocks).

Building 1 consists of 6 Towers viz., A to F consisting of 2 Basements, Ground and 19

Floors and Building 2 consists of 3 Towers viz., G, H and J consisting of 2 Basements,

Ground and 19 Floors.

Total built up area: 2,34,830.25 sq m

The total projected cost of the proposed expansion proposal:

Sl. No.

Particulars Cost in Rupees

1. Construction Cost @ rate of 1750/Sft of built up area (Additional built up area 88,458.25 sq m)

Rs. 166,56,68,847/-

TOTAL Rs. 166,56,68,847/- Or say Rs. 167,00,00,000/-

Rupees One Hundred and Sixty Seven Crores Only

2.5 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION:

The time schedule for starting and completion of all project works at site including

tender event, civil and structure works with date and time frame is appended as

Annexure.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 34

2.5.1 STATUTORY LICENSES / APPROVALS:

Sl.

No.

Statutory licenses /approvals Status

1 Airport Authority of India NoC obtained

2 Karnataka State Pollution Control

Board

Application preparation under progress

3 State Environment Impact

Assessment Authority

EC obtained and construction is in progress. ToR presented for proposed modification

4 BESCOM Application submitted and is in progress

5 BSNL NoC obtained

6 Bangalore Metropolitan Region

Development Authority (BMRDA)

Preliminary drawing submitted and

approval under progress

7 Karnataka Ground Water Authority

(KGWA)

NoC obtained

2.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

2.6.1 Project Location:

M/s Gardencity Realty Pvt. Ltd., # 845, 5th Cross, 10th Main, 2nd Stage, Indiranagar,

Bangalore – 560 038 had obtained Environmental Clearance (EC) for the Residential

Apartment Project “Green Fields” at Survey No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) & 81,

Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore.

Subsequently, M/s. Gardencity Realty Pvt. Ltd., have given General Power of Attorney

(GPA) and Development Agreement (DA) to M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., No. 40/43,

4th Cross Road, 8th Main Road, RMV Extension, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore – 560 080.

Presently, M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., intend to expand the Residential Apartment

with addition of flats (710 units) and built up area 88,458.25 sq m.

2.6.2 Project Profile:

Comparative Summary of the Proposed Expansion Project:

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 35

Sl. No

Description PROJECT DETAILS

EC Obtained Project After Expansion

Remarks

Project Proponents

M/s. Gardencity Realty Pvt. Ltd.,

M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd.,

GPA and DA given for

development

1 Project location

“Green Fields”, Survey No.s 73/1, 73/2A, 74 (P) & 81,

Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore.

No Change

2 Activity 935 Flats 1645 Flats + 710 Flats

3 Total Plot Area 78,812 sq m 78,812 sq m No change

4 Total Built up area

1,46,372 sq m 2,34,830.25 sq m +88,458.25 sqm

5 Total Number of blocks

1 Building (6 Towers viz., A to

F)

2 Buildings ( 9 Towers A to J)

Addition of 1 Building (3

Towers namely G, H and J)

6 Building Configuration

2 B + G + 19 Floors

Building 1: 2B + G + 19 Floors, Building 2:

2B + G + 19 Floors and

Addition of Building 2

7 Number of Occupants in the project

4,675 persons 8,225 persons +3,550 persons

8 Water consumption

696 KLD 1,224 KLD + 528 KLD

9 Wastewater discharge

627 KLD 1,103 KLD + 476 KLD

10 Sewage Treatment Plant

650 KLD 650 and 500 KLD + 500 KLD

11 Solid waste generated

1870 Kg/day 3290 Kg/day + 1420 Kg/day

12 DG capacity 1 X 1,250 kVA 2 X 1,250 kVA + 1 X 1,250 kVA

13 Total no. of Parking Proposed

1,001 cars 1,736 cars + 735 cars

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 36

2.6.3 Land Use Pattern: The project site is proposed to be developed by giving due

considerations to the amenities & services required by the occupants. The land-use

pattern of the project site is detailed in the following table.

Table 2.1 Land use pattern for the project

Sl. No.

Particulars EC Obtained After Expansion

Area Percentage (%)

Area Percentage (%) sq m Acres sq m Acres

1 Total Plot Area

78,812.00 19.48 - 78,812.00 19.48 -

2 Road Widening Area

7,095.00 1.75 - 5,748.14 1.42 -

3 Future Development Area

8,433.00 2.08 - Presently, buildings are added in this area with few changes

in other areas also

4 Net Plot Area 63,284.00 15.64 100 73,063.86 18.05 100

5 Ground Coverage Area

9,035.00 2.23 14.28 18,813.94 4.64 25.74

6 Paved area 28,677.00 7.09 45.31 30,138.85 7.44 41.25

7 Landscape area

25,572.00 6.32 40.41 24,111.07 5.95 33.00

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 37

FIGURE 2.5: MASTER PLAN OF THE PROJECT SITE:

2.7 DETAILS OF WATER CONSUMPTION:

The water requirement in the proposed project is for domestic purpose and firefighting

purposes. It includes the quantity of water required in the houses for drinking, bathing,

cooking, washing etc., The quantity of water required for domestic purposes depends

on the habits, social status, climatic conditions and customs of the people. In India on

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 38

an average the domestic water consumption under normal conditions is about 135

litres/capita/day as per NBC, the details of domestic consumption is as follows:

Sl. No.

Utility Consumption in Litres per capita per day

1 Drinking 5

2 Bathing 20

3 Cooking 5

4 Washing of clothes 40 5 Utensils washing

6 Washing of floor

7 Flushing of Toilets 45

8 Others 20

Total 135

The anticipated water demand is worked out by taking into consideration that the

project is fully developed and occupied. The total water demand of the proposed

project is worked based on 135 LPCD of domestic water requirement, the total water

requirement details are as under.

Table 2.2: WATER CONSUMPTION AND WASTEWATER DISCHARGE DETAILS:

Sl. No.

Description Number of Flats

(a)

Total number of occupants*

(a X 5 = b)

Water requirement**

(b X 135 = c)

10% extra for visitors

(10% of c = d)

Total water requirement

(c + d = e)

1 EC obtained

935 4,675 6,31,125 L/day or say 632 KLD

63,112.5 L/day or

say 64 KLD

696 KLD

2 Proposed Expansion

710 3,550 4,79,250 L/day or say 480 KLD

47,925 L/day or

say 48 KLD

528 KLD

3 Total 1645 8,225 1,112 KLD 112 KLD 1,224 KLD

*Considering population as 5 persons per flat.

**Considering water demand of 135 LPCD.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 39

2.7.1 Water Distribution System:

The proposed water supply scheme to cater to the public and domestic water

requirement of the proposed project consists of sourcing potable water to a common

collection facility known as the Raw Water Sump. The Raw Water Sump will be

constructed in RCC. The water from the UG sump will be pumped to overhead tank.

The OHTs will be staged on terrace depending on the contour of its distribution

network.

2.7.2 Sewage Generation & Disposal System:

Wastes of different type such as spent water from bath rooms, water closets/pans,

house and street washings, semi liquid waste of human excreta, refuse of house and

street sweepings, crockery etc., are produced daily. If proper arrangement for

collection treatment and disposal of all the wastes produced are not made, unsanitary

conditions will develop and it will become impossible for public to live. Therefore, it is

most essential to collect, treat and dispose all the sanitary wastes produced. Generally,

it has been observed that about 75 - 80 % of the water supplied comes out as sewage.

Therefore, total quantity of wastewater generated from the proposed project is worked

out as below:

Sl. No.

Description Water requirement

(a)

Wastewater generated*

(90% of a = b)

Capacity of STP

1 EC obtained 696 KLD 626.4 or say 627 KLD 650 KLD

2 Proposed Expansion

528 KLD 475.2 or say 476 KLD 500 KLD

3 Total 1,224 KLD 1,103 KLD 650 and 500 KLD

(*Assuming 90 % of the water supplied comes out as wastewater)

Domestic wastewater generated from the proposed project will be conveyed to

Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) of capacity 650 and 500 KLD for treatment and disposal.

EC has been obtained from SEIAA, Karnataka for STP of 650 KLD capacity. Further, in

the Expansion proposal Additional STP of 500 KLD capacity will be established for

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 40

proposed blocks. Further, after Expansion the project shall consist STPs of 1 X 650 KLD

and 1 X 500 KLD capacity.

TREATED SEWAGE DISPOSAL: The quantity of treated sewage generated from the project is 1,103 KLD. The treated

sewage will be disposed as under:

a. Toilet Flushing:

Total contribution population from the proposed project is 8225 Persons.

Toilet flushing water requirement at the rate of 45 LPCD

= 8,225 X 45 = 3,70,125 L/day or say 371 KLD

b. Gardening:

Treated water used for gardening @ rate of 7 L/ sq m /day

Area available for landscape development: 24,111 sq m

Total water used for landscape development is 24,111 x 7

= 1,68,777 L/day

Or say 169 KLD

c. Excess quantity of 563 KLD will be used for:

I. Car washing : 1736 X 35 = 60,760 L/day or say 61 KLD

II. Road washing : 30,139 X 1 litre/sq m/day = 30,139 L/day or say 31 KLD

III. Other construction projects/ watering avenue plantations = 471 KLD

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 41

Figure 2.6 WATER BALANCE CHART

Recycle for Toilet

Flushing Wastewater generated 1103 KLD

2.7.3 Treatment Methodology:

The Sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process is a sequential suspended growth (activated

sludge) process in which all major steps occur in the same tank in sequential order

(figure 1). There are two major classifications of SBRs: the intermittent flow (IF) or

“true batch reactor”, which employees all the steps in figure 1, and the continuous

flow (CF) system, which does not follow these steps.

Daily water Requirement

after recycling

1224 – 371 = 853 KLD

453 + 400 = 853 KLD

(Fresh & recycled water)

Total Raw Water

demand (Start Up)

1,224 KLD

Toilet Flushing

371 KLD

STP Designed for 1,150

KLD (650 & 500 KLD)

400 KLD to be recycled

Landscape

Development

169 KLD

Water Drawn from

bore wells @ 55 LPCD

= 1645X5X55= 453 KLD

Softener

Ultra-

Filtration

UV

Potable water

for judicial

mixing

163 KLD for other construction

projects and watering avenue

plantations / Car and Road Washing

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 42

Both have been used successfully worldwide installations. SBRs can be designed and

operated to enhance removal of nitrogen, phosphorus, and ammonia, in addition to

removing TSS and BOD. The intermittent flow SBR accepts influent only at specified

intervals and, in general, follows the five-step sequence. There are usually two IF units

in parallel. Because this system is closed to influent flow during the treatment cycle,

two units may be operated in parallel, with one unit open for intake while the other

runs through the remainder of the cycles. In the continuous inflow SBR, influent flows

continuously during all phases of the treatment cycle. To reduce short circuiting, a

partition is normally added to the tank to separate the turbulent aeration zone from

the quiescent area.

QUALITY OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE BEFORE & AFTER TREATMENT:

The quality Raw Domestic Sewage & treated sewage after the treatment as per the

Standards stipulated by KSPCB are as appended below:

Sl.

No.

Parameter Quality Of Raw

Sewage

Quality Of Treated

Sewage as per KSPCB

1 pH 6 – 8 6 – 9

2 BOD5, mg/L 250 ≤10

3 Turbidity, NTU 100 ≤ 2

4 E. coli --- Nil

5 Residual Cl2, mg/l --- 1 to 1.5

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 43

The outfall sewer main from the last manholes, will be let into a screening chamber by

gravity flow. Large solids particles shall be intercepted by a fine screen. The screen

shall be manually cleaned with suitable rake arrangement at periodic intervals.

The sewage after screening is collected in a equalization tank for smoothing out peak

flows. This sump is sized to accommodate peaks, as well as breakdown buffer. The

provision of air shall be kept in this tank to break the solids in suspension and

homogenize the sewage.

The homogenized effluent is then pumped into the SBR Reactor. The air shall be

provided through an air diffusion system to ensure equal distribution of air in the

reactor.

The overflow from the SBR reactor is passed through a settler, and collected in Clarified

Tank by gravity, from where it is pumped to a pressure sand filter, which is capable of

removing finely divided colloidal particles. An activated carbon filter will remove all

traces of color and odor, so that treated water shall be used for gardening.

Filter backwash and sludge filtrate, would be taken back into the collection sump.

Sludge generated in the settler will be de-watered in a sludge filter press and bagged

for removal. This sludge will be used as organic manure.

Treated water will be passed to softening system. After softening water will be used

for flushing, gardening and AC make up water requirement.

DESIGN DETAILS FOR 500 KLD CAPACITY STP:

1 BAR SCREEN:

* Size of the unit : 1.0 m x 1.5 m x 1.0 m

*Function : To separate coarse matter from the Raw Sewage

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 44

2. OIL AND GREASE SEPARATOR:

* Flow rate : 500 m3/day = 20.83 m3/hr

* Detention time provided : 30 minutes

* Volume of oil separation

tank required : 10.42 m3

* Let the depth of the unit be : 1.2 m

* Therefore area of oil

Separator required : 8.68 m2

* Let the width of the unit b : 1.0 m

* Size of unit proposed : 2.95 m x 1.0 m x 1.2 m SWD

* Function : To separate oil & grease from raw sewage

3. EQUALISATION TANK:

OBJECTIVE: To equalize the flow and pollutant concentration. Generally, 6 - 8 hrs Hydraulic

retention time is given for equalization tank.

Provide one no. Equalization tank of 8 hrs hydraulic retention.

Q max = 500 m3/day

Average flow rate = 20.83 m3/hr

Tank volume required = 20.83 x 8 = 166.64 m3

Size of the unit = 6.9 m x 6.9 m x 3.5 m SWD

Average BOD of sewage at the inlet of the Pre-aeration tank.

: 300 mg/lit.

Total organic load with 20 % BOD reduction considered : 60 mg/lit.

Quantity of BOD to be removed = ( 60 x 500 )/1000 = 30 kg/day

Total oxygen required assuming 2 Kg of O2/kg of BOD Removed

: 30 x 2 = 60 Kg/day.

Air required for pre aeration : 94.48 m3/hr.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 45

4. RAW SEWAGE PUMP:

Volume of sewage : 500 m3 / day ~ 62.5 m3/hr

5. SBR TANK:

OBJECTIVE: To oxidize the organic content in the influent and to avoid any

objectionable odor. As chemical not used in the process is biological in nature, the DO

levels need to be high for maintaining the oxygen demand in the system.

Flow (design) = 500 m3/day

BOD = 300 mg/l

SBR tank volume = Q x BOD

F/M x MLSS

= 500 x 300

0.1 x 4000

SBR tank volume = 375 m3

Provide 30% for sludge accumulation = 112.5 m3

Total SBR tank volume provided = 375+112.5 = 487.5 m3

Assume SWD to be 3.5 m

Therefore plan area required = 487.5/3.5 = 139.29 m2

Size of Aeration Tank Required: 11.8 m x 11.8 m x 3.5 m SWD with partition

DIFFUSED AERATION SYSTEM:

Flow = 500 cum/day

Inlet BOD = 300 mg/l

Organic load = BOD X Flow rate

1000

Total organic load in the system: (500 X 300)/ 1000 = 150 Kg/day

Total oxygen required assuming that 2 Kg of O2/kg of BOD Removed

= 2 X 150 = 300 Kg/day

Assume alpha =0.6 and β= 0.7

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 46

Consider oxygen transfer at 0.35 m depth = 25%

Density of Air = 1.2 Kg/m3

Percentage of Oxygen in Atmospheric air = 21%

Air required = 300

1.2 x 0.21 x 0.6 x 0.7 x 0.25

= 11337.87 m3/day

= 472.41 m3/hr.

Calculation of diffuser required:

Considering 12 m3/hour diffusion of air through the diffuser /m length

Number of diffusers required = 472.41/12

= 39.36 diffusers.

Number of diffusers provided = 39 No’s

* Type of aeration : Membrane Fine pore diffused aeration System

6. SLUDGE TRANSFER PUMP:

* Discharge rate : 2.0 m3/hr @ 15 m head.

* Type of pump : Horizontal centrifugal with CI open impeller self-priming type

Coupled to motor of required speed with B Class insulation and

IP 55 protection hood.

* Function : To transfer the sludge to Filter press

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 47

7. PLATE & FRAME FILTER PRESS:

* Assumed Type of Sludge : Secondary Biological

* Design Liquid Sludge Flow : 15,000 Lts/day

* Concentration of Solids : 1%

* Specific Gravity : 1.2

* Minimum Dry Solids allowable in the sludge solid cake: 25-30%

Sludge Cake Characteristics :

* Cake Thickness : 32 mm

* Wet Cake Density : 1280 Kg/m3

Operating Time

*10 Hrs/Day : 6 Days /week

Cycle Time

* Feed : 20 Minutes

* Compression : 15 Minutes

* Cake Discharge : 25 Minutes

* Total : 60 Minutes

Daily Sludge Solid Generation

* Rate : 15000 x 0.01 X 1.2 = 180 Kg/Day

* Quantity of sludge solids load

on filter press :180 x 7 (Seven days in a week operation)

:1260 Kg/week

* Assuming that the filter press is operated for 5 days/week.

* Therefore Solid Load/day =1260/5 = 252 Kg/day

* Assuming that sludge holding capacity as = 0.61 x 0.61 x 0.032 x 1280

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 48

= 15.24 Kg/m2

* The size of Filter press required = 252/15.24 = 16.54 m2

* Let the size of each Plate be (0.61x 0.61 m) = 0.37 m2

* Therefore the number of such chambers required will be

= 16.54/0.37 = 44.7 No.s

Note: However provide 45 chambered filter press of size 0.61 m x 0.61 m with Collection

tray, Filtrate line with Hydraulic/Power packed mechanism.

8. SCREW PUMP 2 No.s (1 W + 1 SB):

* Flow rate =2-2.5 m3/hr

* Type Single Screw Type with shaft mounted gear box

* Working Pressure 4 to 6 kg/cm2

9. SLUDGE HOLDING TANK:

* Anticipated quantity of secondary sludge from the STP

: 15000 liters per day

= 15 m3/day

* Capacity of aerobic digester required : 1000 liters

* Size of aerobic digester required : 3.2 x 3.2 x 1.5 m SWD

* Considering air required as 1.0 m3/hr per cum of volume

* Air required for aerobic : 1.0 X volume of the tank digestion

: 1 m3/Hr/cum volume x 15 m3/day

= 15 m3/hr

* Type of air diffusion : Membrane/HDPE air grid

* Function : To supplement oxygen for aerobic digestion of secondary sludge.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 49

10. PRE FILTRATION TANK /DECANT TANK:

Average flow = 20.83 m3/hr

Provide 8 hr holding capacity

Volume of the tank required= 166.64 m3

Providing SWD 3.0 m

Final collection tank size is 7.5 m x 7.5 m x 3.0 m SWD

11. FILTER FEED PUMP – 2 Nos. (1 W + 1 SB):

Pumping Rate : 62.5 m3/Hr

Type of pump : Horizontal centrifugal with CI open impeller self-priming

type coupled to motor of required speed with B Class

Insulation and IP 55 protection hood.

Function : To pump the clarified water through Pressure Sand and

Carbon Filters.

12. PRESSURE SAND FILTER:

OBJECTIVE: To filter the residual suspended solids from the clarified water.

* Total Flow : 500 m3/day

* Duration of Pumping considered : 8 Hr/day

* Pumping rate : 62.5 m3/hr

* Surface Loading considered : 12 m2/m3/hr

* Area of filter required : 5.21 m2

* Dia of the Filter : 2.28 m

* Number of Sand Filters : 1

* Number of Carbon Filters : 1

* Height of the Shell : 1.5 m

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 50

* Media for sand filter Pebbles, Grit, Stilt, Gravel Coarse & Fine sand

* Function of Sand Filter For removal of suspended impurities

13. ACTIVATED CARBON FILTER:

OBJECTIVE: To remove the odor and color from the clarified water.

* Total Flow : 500 m3/day

* Duration of Pumping considered : 8 Hr/day

* Pumping rate : 62.5 m3/hr

* Surface Loading considered : 12 m2/m3/hr

* Area of filter required : 5.21 m2

* Dia of the Filter : 2.28 m

* Number of Sand Filters : 1

* Number of Carbon Filters : 1

* Height of the Shell : 1.5 m

* Media for Carbon Filter Pebbles, Gravel and Activated Carbon

* Function of Carbon Filter For removal of color and Odor

14. CHLORINE DOSER:

Provide Milton Roy Asia LMI/ Prominent make metering pump of dosing capacity 4-6

LPH with 1000 Liters capacity dosing tank.

18. FINAL COLLECTION TANK:

Average flow = 20.83 m3/hr

Provide 8 hr holding capacity

Volume of the tank required= 166.64 m3

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 51

Providing SWD 3.0 m

Final collection tank size is 7.5 m x 7.5 m x 3.0 m SWD

19. BLOWER CAPACITY:

Blower capacity : Air for pre-aeration + SBR Tank + final Collection tank

= 94.48 + 472.41 + 166.64

= 733.5 m3/hr or say 734 m3/hr.

Note: The capacity of Common Twin Lobe Roots Air blower suitable to discharge about

740 m3/hr @ 0.45 KSC – 2 No.s (1 W + 1 SB). The common blower shall supply the air

required for the Aeration Tank & final storage tank.

Design details summary for 500 KLD STP

Sl. no. Particulars Size

1 Bar Screen 1.0 m x 1.5 m x 1.0 m

2 Equalization cum neutralization Tank 6.9 m x 6.9 mX 3.5 m

3 SBR 11.8m x 11.8 m x 3.5 m

5 Mechanical filter press 0.61 m x 0.61 m

6 Pressure Sand and Carbon Filter - 1

each

2.28 m

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 52

Fig 2.7: FLOW CHART FOR STP

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 53

2.8 SITE CLEARANCE AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPING:

The project site was barren land without any vegetation. In the project 700 new trees

are proposed to be planted in the site. The landscape of project site has been planned

to provide a clean, healthy and beautiful green environment for the people. Within the

proposed project site 74% is open space, and in this about 33% of the total space has

been designated for landscape development and has been designed to achieve a blend

between modern building and various species of plants, shrubs, to create a clean,

healthy and aesthetic environment that provides a visual retreat and relaxation to the

occupants of these buildings. Most of the plant species proposed to be planted in the

project will have better environmental value in terms of helping soil texture building,

less maintenance, help bio diversity by producing nectars, fruits etc., which attract

birds and insects. The proposed Landscape area in the project is proposed with

combination of evergreen trees and ornamental flowering trees and palms.

PROPOSED TREES

No. Botanical Name Common Name

1 Michelia champaca Champaca

2 Thespesia populnea Indian Tulip tree

3 Aegle marmelos Stone apple, Beli fruit, Wood apple

4 Azadirachta indica Margosa tree, Neem

5 Sapindus emarginatus Soapnut tree, Kookatakayi, Soapberry

6 Butea monosperma Parrot tree, Palash, Dhak, Tesu , Bastard Teak

7 Pongamia pinnata Honge, Indian Beech tree

8 Bauhinia purpurea Devakanchan, Purple Butterfly tree

9 Cassia fistula Golden shower tree, Indian Laburnum

10 Saraca asoca Ashoka tree

11 Ixora brachiata Gorbale, Torchwood Ixora, Gurani, Kurati

12 Holarrhena pubescens Indrajao, Bitter Oleander, Easter tree

13 Mangifera indica Mango

14 Phyllanthus emblica Amla, Indian Gooseberry

15 Psidium guajava Guava

15 Grevillea robusta Silver Oak

16 Tectona grandis Teak

17 Cynadon dactylon Bermuda grass

18 Zoysia teunifolia Mexican grass

19 Astytasia Gangetica Chinese violet

20 Dainthus alpinus Alpine pink

21 Dianthus Sunflower

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 54

2.8.1 DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT

TO MEET ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS, ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING CONDITIONS,

OR OTHER EIA REQUIREMENTS:

2.8.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

2.8.2.1 Water Demand & Wastewater Discharge from Labor Camps:

Domestic water requirements during construction phase.

Total number of manpower required : 700

Water requirements @ of 100 LPCD : 700 x 100 = 70,000 L/day

Total domestic water requirements : 70 KLD

Wastewater discharge (Considering 90% of water consumed comes out as wastewater)

= 70,000 X 0.90 = 63,000 L/day or say 63 KLD

The wastewater generated will be treated in Package Sewage Treatment Plant of

70 KLD Capacity, which will be designed based on Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR)

Technology, the treated sewage will be reused for flushing and dust suppression.

Design details summary for 100 KLD STP

Sl. no. Particulars Size

1 Bar Screen 1.0 m x 1.5 m x 1.0 m

2 Equalization cum Neutralization Tank 3.08 m x 3.08 m x 3.5 m

3 SBR tank 5.28 m x 5.28 m x 3.5 m

4 Mechanical Filter Press 0.47 m x 0.47 m

5 Pressure Sand and Carbon Filter - 1 each

1.02 m dia

2.8.2.2 Manpower Requirement:

i) No. of Skilled workers - 100 No.s

ii) No. of semi-skilled workers - 200 No.s

iii) No. of unskilled workers - 400No.s

Details of Project Implementation Team are appended as Figure 2.4.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 55

2.8.2.3 Compliance of acts related to employees services:

The project proponents intend to comply to the following acts regarding for the workers

working in the construction site.

a) Minimum Wages Act, 1948

b) Contractors All Risk Insurance Policy.

c) Workmen’s Compensation (General) Policy.

d) Employees Provident Fund Scheme.

e) Employee's State Insurance Corporation.

f) Register of Workmen, Muster Roll / Attendance Register, Wages / Salary

Register, Leave With wages Register, Overtime Register, Sample Wages Slip.

g) Contact labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970.

h) Inter-state migrant workmen (Regulation of Employment & Condition of Services)

Act 1979.

i) The Building and other construction workers (Regulation & Employment of

Service) Act, 1996.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 56

Figure2.8: Project Implementation Team

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 57

2.8.2.4 SOLID WASTE GENERATION & MANAGEMENT:

DOMESTIC GARBAGE:

The total manpower : 700

Considering solid waste generation @ 0.2 kg/capita/day

Total solid waste generation : 700 x 0.2 = 140 Kg/day

The domestic wastes will be composted and product will be used as manure.

EARTH EXCAVATION & CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS DISPOSAL:

The proposed project is having Basement floors and earth excavation is necessary. The

total quantity of excavated soil is about 90,000 cum. About 26,000 cum will be used for

landscape development, 35,000 cum will be used for backfilling and 29,000 cum will be

used for formation and hardscaping activities within the project site.

TEMPORARY STRUCTURES:

The construction workers are provided with 100 sheds and 70 toilets with bathrooms.

The temporary structures are made during the construction phase such as workers

sheds; storage yards for construction materials will be dismantled and re-used for

future developmental activities.

2.8.2.5 POWER REQUIREMENT:

Temporary power of 250 kVA will be obtained from BESCOM to operate construction

machinery and general lighting for workers shed.

DG set of 2 X 1250 kVA capacity DG sets are proposed to serve as backup power supply

during power failure.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 58

Table 2.3 Air pollution sources during construction phase

Sl. No

Stack Details Stack Attached to

Physical Details D.G Set

1 Capacity 2 X 1250 kVA capacity

2 Fuel quantity 250 L/hr

3 Fuel used Ultra-Pure Low Sulphur Content Diesel

4 Stack height Chimneys (Above roof level) of 8m for each DG set.

5 Stack diameter 80 mm

Emission Details

1 Sulphur dioxide 0.06835 g/s

2 Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM)

0.02794 g/s

3 Oxides of Nitrogen 0.18625 g/s

2.9 OCCUPANCY PHASE:

2.9.1 Water Supply, Discharge, Treatment & Disposal Details:

The main issues of concern from the environmental point of view are the proper

treatment & disposal of domestic sewage, management of domestic garbage and

adequate measures for controlling the noise pollution from generators. A description of

the above mentioned aspects is detailed in the following sections.

2.9.2 Source of water Supply:

The water supply is from Mandur Gram Panchayath Sources.

2.9.3 Storm water management system:

In general the rainwater from terraces and other elevated open areas is proposed to be

collected through rainwater down-take pipes connected to catch basins. The rain water

from hard courts and landscaped area shall be collected by catch basins through a RCC

pipe network/open drains with gratings and connected to the storm water

manholes/channels in the project. The collected water from the catch basins will be

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 59

diverted to rain water harvesting pits. Provision is to be made for rain water harvesting

as required by the Codes.

2.10 RAIN WATER HARVESTING AND GROUNDWATER RECHARGING:

Rain is the first form of water in the hydrological cycle and hence it is considered as a

primary source of fresh water to sustain life on earth. Rivers, lakes (surface water) and

groundwater are all secondary sources of water. At present we depend solely on these

secondary sources of water for all our fresh water needs and in the process the primary

source of water i.e., rainwater is totally neglected. Therefore, the concept of

harvesting rainwater to find its optimum use finds relevance in today’s scenario.

Of all the secondary sources of water i.e., surface and subsurface water sources, there

has been extensive tapping or abstraction of groundwater over the years to cater to all

the human needs. This has resulted in drastic depletion of groundwater. In addition to

this, due to rapid industrialization and urbanization, several impervious structures have

come up thereby reducing the unpaved areas, which hitherto were helping the natural

recharge of groundwater. Therefore, the concept of rain water harvesting along with

groundwater recharging is gaining importance in today’s world.

2.10.1 VOLUME OF RAIN WATER HARVESTED:

The total quantity of water i.e., received in the form of rainfall over an area is called

the rain water endowment of that area, out of which the amount of water that can be

effectively harvested is called the rain water harvesting potential.

Rain Water harvesting potential = Intensity of Rainfall (m) x Roof Area x Impermeability

Factor.

The collection efficiency accounts for the fact that all the rain water falling over an

area cannot be effectively harvested due to losses on account of evaporation, spillage

or run off etc.,

According to the data available from the Indian Meteorological Department, the

Average annual rainfall around month of September = 194.80 mm

Assuming that about 90 % Rainfall can be effectively harvested.

Number of Rainy Days = 9.3

Therefore the I.R = 194.80/9.3= 20.94 mm/day or 0.02094 m/day

or 0.021 m/day

The ground coverage area of the proposed project is about 18,814 sq m

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 60

For rain water harvesting consider 75 % of this total area is 14,111 sq m

Quantity of Rain Water that can be harvested from the building is as follows.

Rain water (Q) from Roof top = 0.021 x 14,111 x 0.9

= 266.7 cum/day or say 267 cum/day

Storm water disposal is divided into 2 Groups:

Terrace Storm water disposal: The entire rainwater from the terrace would be

disposed through suitable rain water pipes and collecting in the dedicated rain

water collection sump, which is proposed at site level. This water will be utilized

for domestic purpose (as detailed in VOLUME OF RAIN WATER HARVESTED).

Site (Paved and landscape area) Storm water disposal: The entire storm water

from the site would be disposed off through suitable RCC Box drainage system to

the rainwater recharge pits and the excess is diverted to external storm water

drainage.

The amount of storm water that the paved area will produce can be determined by

considering the impermeability factor to be 0.9.

Q = 0.021 x 30,138 sq m x 0.9

= 569.60 cum/day or say 570 cum/day

The amount of storm water that the landscaped area will produce can be determined

by considering the impermeability factor to be 0.3

Q = 0.021 x 24,111 sq m x 0.3

= 151.89 cum/day or say 152 cum/day

The Total amount of storm water = paved area + landscaped area

= 570 + 152 cum/day

= 722 cum/day

The Proponents shall also Provide Recharging Pits along the inner periphery of the

boundary wall with recharging pit of size 1.2 m dia x 2.5 m deep spaced at 20 m center

to center. These recharging pits are filled with graded media comprising of Boulder at

bottom and with coarse aggregates to facilitate percolation of harvested rain water to

Recharge Ground Water table. The Recharge Pits are interconnected in such a way that

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 61

the rain led to the first recharge pit is also led to the next pit. The excess rain water

shall be drained off to the storm water drain.

2.11 SOLID WASTE GENERATION & ITS MANAGEMENT:

2.11.1 Domestic solid waste management:

The wastes that are generated from the day to day activities which are in solid form

are categorized as solid wastes. Solid Wastes include dry refuse of house and street

sweepings, crockery, Kitchen Wastes, electronic wastes. Collection, disposal and

management of Solid Wastes are very important to avoid the nuisance and unhygienic

conditions. The quantity of solid waste generated from project is calculated as under

table 2.4.

Per capita generation of refuse from residential establishments: 0.3 to 0.6

kg/capita/day according to the Manual on Municipal Solid Waste Management (first

edition) – Pg. 48, 3.3.6.2.

The solid Wastes generated will be segregated at its point of generation and collected

separately in different color coded Synthetic Bins depending upon the basis of its Bio

Degradability at a common designated point. The collection and disposal of the solid

wastes from the Project is done in such a way that it is scientifically disposed without

causing eyesore or any adverse effects to the surrounding environment. Organic solid

waste from the project will be treated in an organic converter and is used as manure

for Landscape or used as fuel. The inorganic solid waste will be sent for recycling.

Description EC obtained After expansion

Total Contributing population from the Project 4675 persons 8225 Persons

Assuming solid waste generation rate as 0.6 kg/person/day for Residential Apartment

Quantity of solid waste generated from the project

1870 Kg/day 4935 Kg/day

Organic solid waste: 60 % of the total waste 1122 Kg/day 2961 kgs/day

Inorganic solid waste: 40 % of the total waste 748 Kg/day 1974 kgs/day

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 62

Figure 2.9: ORGANIC WASTE CONVERTER

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 63

Figure 2.10: Operational procedure of Organic Converter

Fuel pellets needs 2-3 days of sun drying and bio-manure needs 10-15 days of curing

time in open space. The compost formed by this method will have a pH value of 6.5 –

7.5 C: N ratio of 15:1 and organic matter of 40 – 50%. There will not be any pathogens

and the pellets manufactured will have a calorific value of 3500 to 4000 Kcal/kg.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 64

2.11.2 Secondary sludge from STP:

The solid waste generated from the STP’s of secondary settling is in the form of

stabilized secondary sludge. Then is passed through the Plate & Frame filter press, the

solids obtained as semi solid cakes are used as organic manure for the development of

plantations within the premises of the project. The quantity of secondary sludge from

the secondary settling units of the treatment

2.11.3 Hazardous waste:

The Hazardous waste generated from the project is waste oil of about 750 – 1000

Liters/annum which will be stored is oil sealed barrels and disposed to KSPCB approved

and CPCB register waste oil re-processors. Authorization will be obtained from KSPCB

as per Hazardous waste (Management & Handling) Amendment Rules, 2003.

2.11.4 Bio-medical waste:

The Bio Medical Waste generated from the project will be collected and segregated at

source based on their categorization as per the Biomedical Waste (Management and

Handling) Rules in Color coded bags and containers and will be disposed as per the

guidelines. Common designated place will be earmarked for the storage of bio medical

waste and will be disposed scientifically.

2.11.5 e – waste:

The electronic waste (e-waste) such as radios, televisions, computer and its

components, used batteries, etc. from the project will be segregated, collected and

stored at a designated place and will be handed over to authorized recyclers.

2.12 AIR POLLUTION SOURCES & ITS MANAGEMENT:

The anticipated power required for the project (about 5,000 kVA) will be augmented

from BESCOM. The primary sources of air pollution from the establishment are from the

operation of diesel generator sets, which are used as an alternative source of power

supply during the emergencies of power failure from KPTCL/BESCOM. The proposed

project will be provided with DG set of following capacity and is installed to serve as

an alternative back up source of power supply in the event of break down power supply

BESCOM. The details of capacities & fuel consumption for the DG sets are given below.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 65

Table 2.5: Air Pollution Sources for the Proposed Project:

Sl. No

Stack Details Stack Attached to

Physical Details D.G Set

1 Capacity EC obtained: 1 X 1,250 kVA Proposed addition: 1 X 1,250 kVA Total after expansion: 2 X 1,250 kVA

2 Fuel quantity 250 L/hr for each DG set

3 Fuel used Ultra-Pure Low Sulphur Content Diesel

4 Stack height Chimneys (Above roof level) of 8m for each DG set.

5 Stack diameter 80 mm

Emission Details

1 Sulphur dioxide 0.06835 g/s

2 Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM)

0.02794 g/s

3 Oxides of Nitrogen 0.18625 g/s

2.13 NOISE GENERATION SOURCES: Major noise producing sources are expected to be from operation of DG sets and by

vehicular movements from and to the proposed project site. The DG sets are provided

with acoustic enclosures to control the noise levels in such a way that they are within

the permissible limits (<55 dB) specified for ambient noise levels. Moreover the DG sets

are operated only during emergencies when there is power failure.

2.14 Type of building material to be used:

2.14.1 APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS USED

The following table lists the approximate quantities of construction materials

proposed to be used

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 66

Table2.6: Approximate quantities of construction materials required

Description Unit Quantity

Cement Bags 12,58,300

Sand MT 1,25,300

Aggregate MT 1,75,500

Reinforcement MT 15,800

Str. Steel MT 800

Vitrified Tiles sq m 1,35,000

Marble / Granite sq m 22,500

Kotah Stone sq m 21,800

Glass sq m 5,800

Aluminum MT 175

The construction materials are proposed to be obtained from the dealers in the surrounding areas. 2.14.2 STRUCTURAL ASPECTS:

The proposed project is aimed to provide a safe and stable structure. The following structural elements are considered while designing the building.

LOADS:

A. Dead loads:

Dead load shall include weight of all structural and architectural components. Self-

weight of the materials shall be calculated on the basis of unit weights given in IS: 875.

B. Live loads: Following live loads are considered while designing the structural

elements apart from the dead loads as per codes.

Sl.

No.

Particulars Loads considered

1 Lobby 400 kg/ sq m

2 Toilets 400 kg/ sq m

3 Lift machine rooms 1000 kg/ sq m or as per actuals

4 Electrical rooms 750 kg/ sq m or as per actuals

5 UPS rooms 1250 kg/ sq m or as per actuals

6 Server rooms 1200 kg/ sq m or as per actuals

7 Terraces 400 kg/sq m

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 67

C. Gardening/Landscape loads: As per actuals.

D. Equipment loads: Chillers, antenna towers as per actuals.

E. Wind load:

Wind loads for design of structures shall be based on the design wind speeds arrived

at based on IS: 875-1987.

The parameters for calculation of design wind speed as per IS:875-1987 is as follows

Basic wind speed, Vb 33 m/s

Risk coefficient, K1 1.0

Terrain, height, structure size

factor, K2

To suit the height of the structure for terrain

category - 1 and class A or appropriate.

Topography factor, K3 1.0

The external and internal pressure co-efficient shall be as per respective clauses of

IS: 875

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 68

Fig 2.11: Wind zoning map

Fig 2.12: Seismic zoning map

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 69

F. Seismic load:

Zone : II

Zone factor : 0.10

Importance factor : 1.00

Response reduction factor : 3.0

Average response acceleration coefficient (sa/g) : As per soil conditions

Infill panels : No infill panels

Detailing as per IS-13920-2002 : Ordinary moment

Resistant frame with wall:Torsional force due to mass and stiffness irregularities in

the building shall be accounted in the analysis & design appropriately.

G. Temperature and shrinkage effect:

Horizontal floor displacement due to differential temperatures and shrinkage is of

importance in long concrete buildings. It can be taken care of by either providing

expansion joints at an appropriate spacing or designing structural members for the

additional moments caused by the temperature and shrinkage effects. Pour strips at

suitable locations shall also be considered where required.

MATERIALS:

Materials specified will conform to the latest edition of the relevant Indian Standards

or other accepted standard. Specifications for materials will include for sampling and

testing as stipulated in the design standards.

A. Concrete:

A) All structural concrete shall have cube-crushing strength varying from M25 to M40 N/sq m at 28 days.

B) Plain cement concrete shall have cube crushing strength of 10 N/sq.mm (M10) at 28 days.

B. Reinforcement steel:

All reinforcement shall confirm to IS: 1786 – 1985 having minimum yield strength of 500

N/sq.mm.

C. Structural steel:

All structural steel shall confirm to IS: 2062 with minimum yield strength of 250

N/sq.mm

D. Expansion joint material

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 70

Elastomeric expansion material – React 1000, Sonalastic NP2.

E. Water proofing material

Physical membrane such as elastomeric modified oxidized bituminous membrane

(APP modified membrane / polyurethane spray applied membrane / SBS membranes).

F. Mechanical splicing material

Moment coupler – threaded type

Table 2.7: IS STANDARDS – MATERIAL

IS : 269–198 Specification for ordinary, rapid hardening and low heat

Portland cement.

IS : 455 – 1989 Specification for Portland blast furnace slag cement

IS : 1489 -1991 Specification for Portland pozzolana cement

IS : 4031 -1991 Method of physical tests for Portland cement

IS : 383 - 1970 Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural

sources for concrete

IS : 516 -1959 Method of test for strength of concrete

IS : 1199 -1959 Method of sampling and analysis of concrete

IS : 432-1982 Specification for mild steel and medium tensile steel bars and

hard drawn steel wire for concrete reinforcement

IS : 1139 Specification for hot rolled mild steel and medium tensile

steel deformed bars for concrete reinforcement

IS :1566-1982 Specification for plain hard drawn steel wire fabric for

concrete reinforcement.

IS : 1786-1985 Specification for high tensile bars for concrete reinforcement

IS : 4990 -1993 Specification for plywood for concrete shuttering works

IS : 2645 -1975 Specification for integral cement water proofing compounds

BS: 4449 :1997 Specification for carbon steel bars for the reinforcement of

concrete

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 71

A. Safe bearing capacity

Minimum depth

below lower

basement level

Founding level Allowable bearing

pressure (kg/cm2) for

width of foundation (cm)

2.00 m 4.0 m to 5.0 m below present

ground level

1.80 2.00

2.00 m 6.0 m to 8.0 m below present

ground level

2.00 2.00

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, CORROSION AND FIRE PROTECTION

For concrete and structural steel

Environment – mild

Exposure conditions – concrete surface protected against weather.

Fire protection – thickness of structural elements as per codes.

Nominal cover to reinforcement – mild - 20 mm.

Nominal covers for 2 hr fire resistance.

Type of structural element cover to

Reinforcement beams - 40 mm

Slabs - 35 mm

Ribs - 45 mm

Columns - 40 mm

Footings/Foundations - 50 mm

Minimum grade of concrete - mild – M 25

EXPANSION JOINTS:

Expansion gap between two structures shall be sufficient to accommodate temperature

and shrinkage effects, wind and earthquake loads. Expansion joints at suitable

locations shall be provided.

WATER PROOFING METHODS:

Water proofing for retaining walls shall be done by using physical membrane as

specified.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 72

A. Underground waterproofing

Underground waterproofing with APP modified membrane with polyester

reinforcement. The membrane is reinforced with a reinforcement layer of non-woven

polyester of minimum 180 g/m². The upper surface is finished with calibrated granules

of 1 to 2 mm if required, pressed mechanically into the bitumen. The under surface is

finished with a polyethylene foil of 12 micron thickness. The total membrane thickness

is 4 mm and 4.5 kg/sq m.

B. Roof waterproofing

A flexible waterproof membrane is proposed. The upper coating consists of a mixture

of penetration bitumen, improved with amorphous poly alpha olefins / APP. The under

coating consists of a mixture of penetration bitumen, improved with Styrene-

Butadiene-Styrene (SBS) / APP membrane. The membrane is reinforced with a layer of

non-woven polyester of minimum 180 g/sq m. The upper surface is finished with colored

slates, pressed mechanically into the bitumen if required. The under surface is finished

with a polyethylene foil. The membrane thickness is 4.00 mm and has a minimum weight

of 4.8 kg.

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN:

The structural analysis is carried out as three dimensional space frame with finite

elements using commercially available software STADPRO 2007 for the load

combinations as per IS standards. The designs of the RCC elements are made using the

limit state method with appropriate load factors as per IS: 456-2000.

Designs of structural steel members are made using elastic method as per IS: 800 - 1989

with relevant allowable stresses. Load combinations considered in the analysis of

framed structures for buildings are detailed as below:

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 73

A. Combination Load Factor

DL + LL 1.5

DL + WLX 1.5

DL + WLZ 1.5

DL - WLZ 1.5

DL + LL + WLX 1.2

DL + LL + WLZ 1.2

DL + LL - WLX 1.2

DL + LL - WLZ 1.2

DL + LL + ELX 1.2

DL + LL - ELX 1.2

DL + LL - ELZ 1.2 Limit state method

DL + ELX 1.5

DL - ELX 1.5

DL + ELZ 1.5

DL - ELZ 1.5

DL + WLX 0.9, 1.5

DL - WLX 0.9, 1.5

DL + WLZ 0.9, 1.5

DL - WLZ 0.9,1.5

DL + ELX 0.9, 1.5

DL + ELZ 0.9, 1.5

DL - ELX 0.9, 1.5

DL - ELZ0.9, 1.5

DL + LL + TL 1.0 Working stress method

DL - Dead Load

LL - Live Load

WLX - Wind load in X direction

WLZ - Wind load in Z direction

ELX - Earthquake load in X direction

ELZ - Earthquake load in Z direction

TL - Temperature load

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 74

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM:

General structural system for all floors is a combination of flat slab and waffle slab with

columns, core walls and shear walls.

A. Structural configuration

Flat slab system & waffle slab system:

a) Column grids 10 .5 m x 10.5 m

b) Structural system Waffle slab

c) Waffle 455 mm depth

d) Column drop 450mm depth

e) Peripheral beams 300 mm x 900 mm

f) Core walls 200 mm thick

g) Column size 900 x 900 mm for specified grid

B. Foundation

Foundations are designed based on geo technical investigation report and will dissipate

all the vertical and horizontal loads safely to the soil below. Isolated, combined footings

or raft is envisaged depending on the soil load bearing capacity. Keeping in view the

probable perched water table, waterproofing shall be done as recommended.

C. Design standards

Specific applicable codes and standards will be identified and adopted in the design

philosophies as appropriate to the structural elements. The latest editions of the Codes

and Standards will be used in designs. All design work shall be based on Indian Standards

and Codes with latest revision, with amendments if any, as on date.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 75

D. IS CODES – DESIGNS

IS : 875 Part 1 1987 Code of practice for unit weight of materials.

IS : 875 Part 2 1987 Code of practice for live loads.

IS : 875 Part 3 1987 Code of practice for wind loads.

IS : 1893 - 2002 Code of practice for seismic loads.

IS : 456 - 2000 Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete

IS : 800 - 1989 Code of practice for steel design

IS : 1080 Code of practice: design and construction of shallow foundations

IS : 1904 COP for structural safety of building foundations

IS : 3370 COP for concrete structures for storage of liquids

SP: 16 Design aid for reinforced concrete to IS: 456

SP: 34(S&T)-1987 Handbook on concrete reinforcement and detailing

IS : 13920-2002 COP for ductility detailing for seismic forces

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY:

A. CONCRETE STRUCTURES

The structure proposed is of cast in-situ concrete construction with columns suitably

placed. The core walls around lifts, stairs and shear walls are of cast in-situ concrete

to resist lateral forces.

The structural design of the project is based on Indian Standard Codes and is analyzed

for dead, live, wind and seismic load conditions taking into consideration relevant load

combinations recommended by the codes.

The vertical loads including the dead and superimposed loads and the lateral loads due

to wind and seismic forces are transferred to the soil through proposed reinforced

concrete core walls/shear walls, columns and footings. Footings are sized with

consideration to the safe bearing capacity of soil at the level of transfer of load

recommended by specialist soil investigation consultants. Geo technical Investigation

has been carried out to assess the soil stability and safe bearing capacity for designing

the proposed structure in the project.

The type of footings proposed is either individual, combined or raft depending on the

soil investigation report at specific locations as the soil strata varies considerably over

the extent of proposed plot.

Following are the design considerations for the liquid retaining structures.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 76

i. Crack width

ii. Strength

iii. Deflection

They are designed based on the above criteria by limit state method. The limiting crack

width shall be 0.2 mm for liquid retaining structure/underground structures and 0.3

mm for super structure.

2.15 FIREFIGHTING SYSTEM:

The basic system for firefighting shall be designed as per the provisions of the National

Building Code (NBC). Firefighting system in the apartment will consist of fire detection

system and firefighting system. Automatic fire detection system with different types of

heat and smoke detectors will be provided in different areas of the building. The system

shall be connected to the fire alarm system. In case of fire, water from the fire water

tanks will be drawn by electrically driven fire pump and supplied into hydrant ring main

and wet riser system. Minor line losses would be made up by an on-line jockey pump.

The sprinkler heads shall be distributed throughout the buildings as per the National

Building Code.

The proposed project will be provided with adequate fire protection arrangements such as Fire water tanks for residential development.

Fire pump, wet riser system, hose reel, hose box, fire alarm system, portable fire

extinguisher, fire pump, emergency light etc. are proposed.

Automatic sprinklers shall be installed in the entire building. The portable fire

extinguishers shall be provided at strategic locations.

2.16 Assessment of New & untested technology for the risk of technological failure:

Proposed project is Construction of mixed used development project and hence

assessment of new and untested technology for the risk of technological failure is not

envisaged.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 77

CHAPTER: 3

DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

The study of baseline environmental status helps in assessing the existing environmental

conditions of the project area and identifying the critical environmental attributes,

which would be monitored after implementation of the proposed project. This would

facilitate the comparison of the resultant environmental conditions in the post project

scenario with the present day conditions and would help in preserving the environment

without any deterioration and safeguarding the interest of the study area.

The study area covers 10 KM radius of the proposed project site. This chapter illustrates

the description of the present environmental status of the study area with reference to

the prominent environmental setting to adjust the baseline conditions which are

described with respect to climate, hydro-geological aspects, atmospheric conditions,

water quality, soil quality, ecology, socio-economic profile, land use etc. besides marine

environment. The present report incorporates the primary baseline environmental data

related to land, air, water, soil, noise, ecology and socio-economic status along with

secondary data collected from various Government, Semi-Government and Public Sector

organizations. Secondary data collected from various scientific studies conducted in the

study area by different organization are utilized in the report. The Salient feature of the

project is given in the table below.

3.1 STUDY AREA, PERIOD, COMPONENTS & METHODOLOGY:

3.1.1 Study Area: An area, covering 10 km radial distance around the project site is

considered as the study area for conducting baseline studies.

3.1.2 Period: Baseline study in this Environmental Impact Assessment report was

conducted for a period of three months during March to May 2016.

3.1.3 Components: Air, Noise, Water & Soil analysis studies were carried out. Survey of

the flora & fauna in the surroundings & demographic pattern of the survey area were also

studied.

3.1.4 Methodology: Baseline environmental studies were conducted to know the status

of various environmental attributes viz., climatic and atmospheric conditions, air, water,

noise, soil, land use pattern, ecological, socio-economic environment. The studies

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 78

involved conducting field studies and analyzing various parameters that might be

affected by the project and conducting socio-economic survey among the people.

Secondary data was collected from State/Central Government organizations,

Semi-Government and public sector organizations.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS AROUND THE PROJECT SITE

(WITHIN 10KMS RADIUS)

SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT:

State Karnataka

District Bangalore

Tehsil Bangalore East Taluk

Village Bommenahalli Village

Nature of the Land/Area Project site was barren / vacant land.

Presently construction work is in progress

Project Coordinates

Project Site Co-ordinates Latitude: 13°4.288' N

Longitude- 77°45.138' E

Geological & Meteorological Features

MSL 898 m

Nearby Locations

Nearest Railway Station Krishnarajapuram Railway Station at about 12

Kms

Nearest Air Port Kempegowda International Airport Limited at

about 25 Kms.

Nearest Water body Lagumenahalli lake (at about 70 m on North East

Direction), Hosakote lake (at about 1.3 Km on

East Direction) and Katamnallur lake (at about

1.75 Km on South Direction)

National Highway NH – 4 (Bangalore – Hosakote Road) at about 1.5 Kms on South direction.

Ecologically sensitive zones like

Wildlife Sanctuaries, National

Parks or biosphere

No Ecologically Sensitive Area is existing within

10 km radius.

Archeological Monuments No Archeological Monuments within 10 km radius

Socio-economic factors No homestead displacement is proposed at the

project site

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 79

Figure 3.1: TOPO MAP OF THE PROJECT AREA

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 80

1.2 ESTABLISHMENT OF BASELINE:

3.2.1 Meteorological Environment:

Assessment of the micro and macro meteorology is important from the standpoint of

understanding the nature and extent of air pollution in the study area. Climate has an

important role in the build-up of pollution levels. The climatic condition of the area may

be classified as moderately or seasonally dry, tropical or temperate savanna climate with

four seasons in a year. Winter is critical for air pollution build-up because of frequent

calm conditions with temperature inversions resulting in poor atmospheric mixing,

natural ventilation and high emission loads.

The classification of months according to the seasons is given in the following table

Season Period

Summer March to May

Monsoon June to September

Post monsoon October to November

Winter December to February

The meteorological data reflecting minimum, maximum temperature in 0C, relative

humidity in %, rainfall in mm/hr, wind speed in m/s, mixing height in m, cloud cover in

tenths and atmospheric pressure in mb for the year 2015 obtained from modeling

studies carried out using U.S. EPA AERMOD dispersion model, 1996 – 2015 Lakes

Environmental Software, Version 7.1.0 has been appended as table 3.1.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 81

TABLE 3.1: METEOROLOGICAL DATA OF BANGALORE FOR THE YEAR 2015

Month Temperature 0C

Relative humidity %

Precipitation rate

(mm/hr)

Atmospheric pressure

(mb)

Wind

speed

(m/s)

Wind direction

(from)

Inversion / mixing height

(m)

Cloud cover

(tenths)

Min Max Max Min Min Max Min Max Day Night Min Max

Jan 19 30 90 46 0 0 909 919 4.1 E 2305 2479 2 8

Feb 23 35 86 36 0 0 907 914 4.1 SE 2520 1788 2 6

Mar 24 35 82 32 0 0 906 918 4.1 SE 2799 2059 2 6

Apr 24 37 82 32 0 3.0 909 915 25.8 SE 2912 1799 2 5

May 24 35 88 49 0 37.0 904 912 4.1 W 3320 2320 2 5

June 22 34 87 44 0 0 903 912 7.7 W 2829 4001 2 6

July 22 32 93 52 0 1.0 903 913 6.1 W 2692 3640 2 6

Aug 21 32 93 53 0 0 903 913 5.0 NW 2679 2781 3 6

Sept 21 32 92 51 0 0 906 913 5.0 W 2805 2803 2 6

Oct 21 31 90 53 0 25.0 905 912 4.1 W 2576 2047 3 6

Nov 20 30 88 53 0 0.8 906 914 4.1 NE 2178 2246 2 6

Dec 21 30 88 52 0 0 907 913 4.1 NE 1758 2521 2 6

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 82

1. TEMPERATURE

The mean maximum temperature is observed at (37°C) in the month of April and the mean minimum temperature at (19°C) is observed in the month of January.

In the summer season the mean minimum temperature is observed during the month of March (24°C). During the monsoon the mean maximum temperature is observed to be 32°C in the month of July with the mean minimum temperature at 21°C during August. By the end of September with the onset of post monsoon season (October - November), day temperatures drop slightly with the mean maximum temperature at 31°C in October and mean minimum temperature is observed at 20°C during November. The values are presented in table 3.1.

2. RELATIVE HUMIDITY Minimum and maximum values of relative humidity have been recorded. The minimum humidity is observed to be at 32 % in the month of March and the maximum is 93 % in the month of July. The mean minimum values of humidity during summer, monsoon, post-monsoon and rainy seasons are 32%, 44%, 53% & 36% during the months of March, June, October and February respectively. Similarly the maximum values are 88%, 93%, 90%, 90% in the months of May, August, October & January during the summer, monsoon, post monsoon & winter seasons. The values are presented in table 3.2.

3. RAINFALL The monsoon in this region usually occurs twice in a year i.e. from June to September and from October to November. The maximum annual rate of precipitation over this region ranges between 0.8 to 37.0 mm/hr.

4. ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE

The maximum and the minimum atmospheric pressures are recorded during all seasons. In the summer season, the mean maximum and minimum pressure values are observed to be 904 mb in the month of May and 918 mb in the month of June respectively. During monsoon season, the maximum pressure is 913 mb (July) and minimum 903 (August) mb. The maximum pressure during the post-monsoon season is observed to be 914 mb in November and minimum pressure is 905 mb in the month of October. During the winter season the minimum atmospheric pressure is 907 mb in December and the maximum is 919 mb in the month of January. The values are presented in table 3.1. 5. INVERSION HEIGHT The maximum inversion heights at the project site during the day time & night time for

all the months of the year is as given in the table 3.1. The maximum mixing height of

4001 m is observed during the month of June during the night time and 3320 m during

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 83

the month of May during the day time. The minimum inversion heights are 1758 m in

the month of December during the day and 1788 m during the night in the month of

February.

6. CLOUD COVER

The minimum cover measured in the unit of tenths is 2 and the maximum observed

cloud cover is 6.

7. WIND The data on wind patterns are pictorially represented by means of wind rose diagrams

for the entire year as figure 3.1(1-4) (for different seasons). The wind rose diagram for

the study period is depicted in fig 3.2.

Predominant wind directions

Season Period Wind direction

Summer March to May South East

Monsoon June to September North East

Post monsoon October to November South West

Winter December to February South West

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 84

Fig 3.2: Wind rose diagrams

1) March to May (summer season)

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 85

2) June to September (monsoon season)

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 86

3) October to November (post monsoon season)

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 87

4) December to February (winter season)

Dec 01-Feb 28

00.00-23.00

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 88

3.2.2 BASELINE MONITORING

3.2.2.1 BASELINE STUDIES:

The baseline quality of the environment is determined by survey within the study area

of the proposed project site (covering a radial distance of 5 km) to establish the existing

quality and background levels of

1. Air environment 2. Noise environment 3. Water environment 4. Soil environment 5. Biological environment 6. Socio-economic environment

AIR QUALITY:

PM10 and PM2.5 have been estimated by gravimetric method. Modified West and Gaeke

Method (IS: 5182 Part – II, 1969) has been adopted for estimation of SO2. Jacobs –

Hochheiser Method (IS: 5182 Part-VI, 1975) has been adopted for the estimation of NOx.

N D I R S (Non-Dispersive Infra-Red Spectroscopic) Method (IS: 5182 Part-X, 1999) has

been adopted for the estimation of CO and Electro chem sensor method has been

adopted for the estimation of Ozone. Spectrophotometric method for ammonia, AAS

(Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry) method for lead. Summary of the analytical

techniques and their references are appended in table 3.2A

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 89

TABLE: 3.2A: TECHNIQUES ADOPTED/PROTOCOLS FOR AMBIENT AIR QUALITY

MONITORING

SL. No

Parameters Techniques Technical Protocol

Minimum detectable limits as provided by lab

1 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) West & Geake IS:5182 (P2) 4 mcg

2 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)

Jacob & Hochheiser IS:5182 (P6) 1 mcg

3 Particulate Matter PM10

Gravimetric IS:5182 (P15) 5 mcg

4 Particulate Matter PM2.5

Gravimetric - 5 mcg

5 Ozone (O3) Electrochem sensor -

NIL

6 Ammonia as NH3 Spectrophotometric Handbook of air pollution analysis

NIL

7 Carbon monoxide as CO

NDIR (Non Dispersive Infra Red)

IS: 5182 (P-10)

10 mcg

8 Lead as Pb AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectro photometry)

IS:5182 (P22) 0.01 mcg

*mcg: microgram

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 90

WATER QUALITY:

TABLE: 3.2 B: PROTOCOL FOR SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING

Sl.

No.

Parameter/Test Protocol

Physical parameters

1 pH IS: 3025 (P 11)

2 Suspended solids IS: 3025 (P 17)

3 Color & odor IS: 3025 (P 4&5)

4 Oil & grease IS: 3025 (P 39)

Chemicals parameters

5 Total dissolved solids IS: 3025 (P 16)

6 Ammoniacal nitrogen, as N IS: 3025 (P 34)

7 Total nitrogen, as N IS: 3025 (P 34)

8 Biochemical Oxygen Demand

at 270 C for 3 days (BOD3)

IS: 3025 (P 44)

9 Chemical Oxygen Demand

(COD)

APHA

10 Chlorides, as Cl IS: 3025 (P 32)

11 Sulfates, as SO4 IS: 3025 (P 24)

12 Nitrates, as NO3 IS: 3025 (P 34)

13 Phosphates, as PO4 IS: 3025 (P 31)

14 Phenolic compounds, as

C6H5OH

IS: 3025 (P 43)

15 Total hardness, as CaCO3 IS: 3025 (P 21)

16 Calcium, as Ca IS: 3025 (P 40)

17 Magnesium, as Mg IS: 3025 (P 46)

18 Nitrates, as NO2 IS: 3025 (P 34)

19 Alkalinity, as CaCO3 IS: 3025 (P 23)

20 Fluoride, as F IS: 3025 (P 60)

21 Electrical conductivity APHA

22 Dissolved oxygen, mg/L -

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 91

TABLE: 3.2 C: PROTOCOL FOR GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING

Sl.

No.

Parameter/Test Unit Protocol

1 Color True color units IS: 3025 (P 4)

2 Odor - IS: 3025 (P 5)

3 Taste - IS: 3025 (P 8)

4 Turbidity NTU IS: 3025 (P 10)

5 pH - IS: 3025 (P 11)

6 Chlorides as Cl mg/L AN-S-003

7 Total hardness as CaCO3 mg/L IS: 3025 (P 21)

8 Calcium as Ca mg/L IS: 3025 (P 40)

9 Magnesium as Mg mg/L IS: 3025 (P 46)

10 Total dissolved solids mg/L IS: 3025 (P 16)

11 Sulfates as SO4 mg/L AN-S-003

12 Copper as Cu mg/L IS: 3025 (P 42)

13 Iron as Fe mg/L IS: 3025 (P 53)

14 Manganese as Mn mg/L IS: 3025 (P 59)

15 Nitrate as NO3 mg/L AN-S-003

16 Fluoride as F mg/L AN-S-003

17 Phenolic compounds as

C6H5OH

mg/L IS: 3025 (P 43)

18 Mercury as Hg mg/L IS: 3025 (P 48)

19 Cadmium as Cd mg/L IS: 3025 (P 41)

20 Selenium as Se mg/L IS: 3025 (P 56)

21 Arsenic as As mg/L IS: 3025 (P 37)

22 Cyanide as CN mg/L APHA

23 Lead as Pb mg/L IS: 3025 (P 47)

24 Zinc as Zn mg/L IS: 3025 (P 49)

25 Anionic detergents as MBAS mg/L Annex K of IS:13428

26 Chromium as Cr+6 mg/L IS: 3025 (P 52)

27 Residual free chlorine mg/L IS: 3025 (P 26)

28 Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/L IS: 3025 (P 23)

29 Aluminum as Al mg/L IS: 3025 (P 55)

30 Boron as B mg/L APHA

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 92

NOISE & SOIL QUALITY:

EQUIPMENTS USED FOR NOISE & SOIL MONITORING:

Noise levels were measured using integrated sound level meter & soil quality using pH

meter, Conductivity meter, Turbidity Meter, Flame Photometer, Spectro photometer,

Mercury Analyzer, Oven, Electronic Balance.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES:

3.2.2.2 AIR ENVIRONMENT:

A methodologically designed Air Quality Surveillance Program (AQSP) should form the

basis for the impact assessment on air environment, which ultimately helps in

formulating a sound EMP. The basic consideration for designing such program includes.

1. Representative selection of sampling locations primarily guided by the

topography and micrometeorology of the region,

2. Adequate sampling frequency,

3. Inclusion of all the major pollution parameters.

All these aspects were given due consideration for devising an optimal scheme for “Air

Quality” surveillance program for Environmental Impact Assessment [EIA] around the

proposed project site.

3.2.2.2(a) RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY The prime objective of this ambient air quality survey within the study area for the

project was to establish the existing Ambient Air Quality levels. Major sources of air

pollution were identified as vehicular movement by the local populace and movement

of tucks, lorries and other vehicles. There are no other major air pollution sources

within the study area.

The fluctuations in ambient air quality within the study area of the proposed project

are expected to be governed by the overall regional emissions and micro-meteorology

of the study area.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 93

3.2.2.2(b) AIR QUALITY:

The baseline air quality was established by monitoring major air pollutants like

Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM), Oxides of Sulfur (SO2) & Nitrogen (NOx), Carbon-

Monoxide (CO) etc., at various locations near the project site. High volume samplers

were used for ambient air sampling. Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) i.e. PM2.5&

PM10, sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), NH3, Pb,O3 were determined.

Samples were collected continuously from all the stations for 24 hours. Samples thus

collected were analyzed for various pollutants as indicated in the section above.

Baseline data for ambient air quality was collected during the months of March to May

2016. The sampling stations along with their distance and direction from the project

site, ambient air quality monitoring stations, wind rose diagram showing the direction

of the blowing wind during the analysis period, ambient air quality analysis data &

National Ambient Air Quality Standards specified by MoEF are detailed subsequently.

To study the existing ambient air quality, monitoring was done by Bangalore Test House,

Bangalore, NABL Accredited lab for the project site & other locations.

The sampling stations along with their distance and direction from the project site is

detailed in Table 3.3, Ambient Air Quality monitoring stations are shown in Fig 3.3,

ambient air quality analysis data is shown in Table 3.4, National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NAAQS) adopted by CPCB is indicated in Table 3.5.

Table 3.3: Ambient air Sampling stations

Sl. No. Code

no.

Name of the station Direction

from the site

Distance from

site (km)

1 A 1 Project site - -

2 A 2 Katamnallur South 2.3

3 A 3 KHB Colony, Hosakote

East 3.1

4 A 4 Raghuvanahalli North 2.2

5 A 5 Bommenahalli West 0.95

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 94

Table 3.4 A: Air Quality Data Analysis during March 2016

Sl. No.

Parameter 24 Hrs concentration (µg/m3)

Monitoring station

A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5

1 Particulate Matter (PM10), µg/m3

132 92.8 153 92.3 96.6

2 Particulate Matter (PM2.5), µg/m3

73.5 52.6 83.3 57 55.6

3 Sulfur-dioxide (SO2), µg/m3

<4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0

4 Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), µg/m3

13.5 20.8 16.0 13.3 15.5

5 Carbon monoxide (CO), mg/m3

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

6 Ozone (O3), µg/m3

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

7 Ammonia, as NH3, µg/m3

<20 <20 <20 <20 <20

8 Benzene, µg/m3

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

9 Benzo (a) pyrene (BaP) – Particulate Phase only, ng/ m3

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

10 Arsenic (As), ng/ m3

<4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0

11 Nickel (Ni), ng/ m3

<4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0

12 Lead, as Pb, µg/m3

<0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 95

TABLE 3.4 B: AIR QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS DURING APRIL 2016

Sl. No.

Parameter 24 Hrs concentration (µg/m3)

Monitoring station

A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5

1 Particulate Matter (PM10), µg/m3

98.8 97.7 80.4 60.7 59

2 Particulate Matter (PM2.5), µg/m3

52.6 57 52 48.2 47.8

3 Sulfur-dioxide (SO2), µg/m3

<4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0

4 Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), µg/m3

8.9 13 11.3 9.6 8.3

5 Carbon monoxide (CO), mg/m3

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

6 Ozone (O3), µg/m3

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

7 Ammonia, as NH3, µg/m3

<20 <20 <20 <20 <20

8 Benzene, µg/m3

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

9 Benzo (a) pyrene (BaP) – Particulate Phase only, ng/ m3

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

10 Arsenic (As), ng/ m3

<4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0

11 Nickel (Ni), ng/ m3

<4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0

12 Lead, as Pb, µg/m3

<0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 96

TABLE 3.4 C: AIR QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS DURING MAY 2016

Sl. No.

Parameter 24 Hrs concentration (µg/m3)

Monitoring station

A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5

1 Particulate Matter (PM10), µg/m3

64.4 72.3 60 64.6 59

2 Particulate Matter (PM2.5), µg/m3

47.6 51 52.2 57 52

3 Sulfur-dioxide (SO2), µg/m3

<4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0

4 Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), µg/m3

6.9 7.3 8.2 8.7 7

5 Carbon monoxide (CO), mg/m3

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

6 Ozone (O3), µg/m3

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

7 Ammonia, as NH3, µg/m3

<20 <20 <20 <20 <20

8 Benzene, µg/m3

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

Not detected

9 Benzo (a) pyrene (BaP) – Particulate Phase only, ng/ m3

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

10 Arsenic (As), ng/ m3

<4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0 <4.0

11 Nickel (Ni), ng/ m3

- - - - -

12 Lead, as Pb, µg/m3

<0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004 <0.004

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 97

Table 3.5: Revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards – MoEF as per the notification dated 16th November 2009 for Industrial, Residential & Rural areas

Air quality parameter Concentration

24 hrs Annual

Particulate matter (size less than 10 µm), PM10, µg/m3

100 60

Particulate matter (size less than 2.5 µm), PM2.5,µg/m3

60 40

Sulfur-di-oxide, µg/m3 80 50

Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m3 80 40

Ammonia (NH3), µg/m3 400 100

Benzene (C6H6), µg/m3 - 5

Benzo(a) pyrene in particulate phase, ng/m3 - 1

Arsenic (As), ng/m3 - 6

Nickel (Ni), ng/m3 - 20

Lead (Pb), µg/m3 1 0.5

Ozone (O3), µg/m3 180 – 1 hr 100 – 8 hrs

Carbon monoxide, mg/m3 4 – 1 hr 2 – 8 hrs

Note:

24 hourly or 08 hourly or 01 hourly monitored values, as applicable, shall be complied with 98% of the time in a year. 2% of the time, they may exceed the limits but not on two consecutive days of monitoring.

Whenever and wherever monitoring results on two constitutive days of monitoring exceed the limits specified above for the respective category, it shall be considered adequate reason to institute regular or continuous monitoring and further investigation.

OBSERVATIONS:

It has been observed that the maximum concentration of SPM, SO2, NOx, Pb & O3 at all

the locations are within the limits specified by MoEF (as per the notification dated 16th

November 2009 for Industrial, Residential & Rural areas). Marginally high values at KHB

Colony, Hosakote are due to the frequent movement of vehicles on the main road close

to the sampling location.

3.2.3 NOISE ENVIRONMENT: Any construction project necessitates movement of construction materials during the

construction phase and movement of residents during the occupancy phase which will

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 98

result in a moderate increase in the traffic, which would not result in any drastic change

in either the existing traffic pattern or noise levels of the area.

Background noise levels were measured in 5 locations (Table 3.6), monitoring locations

depicted in map (Fig 3.3) in human settlements within the study area. A sound level

meter was used for measuring the noise level at one-hour interval continuously for 24

hrs at 1.5 m above ground level, about 3 m from walls, buildings or other sound

reflecting sources.

The measurements were carried out in such a way that the monitoring locations were

1 m away from the sources and 1 m away from the edge of the roads. The lowest and

the highest noise levels are presented in Table 3.7 and limits as per Environmental

Protection Rules, 1986 for the project are presented in Table 3.8as under.

Table 3.6: Noise level monitoring stations

Sl. No.

Code No.

Name of the Station Direction from site

Distance from site

(km)

1 N 1 Project site - -

2 N 2 Katamnallur South 2.3

3 N 3 KHB Colony, Hoskote East 3.1

4 N 4 Raghuvanahalli North 2.2

5 N 5 Bommenahalli West 0.95

Table 3.7: Summary of noise level during March 2016

Sl.

No.

Code

No.

Name of the Station Lowest

dB (A)

Highest

dB (A)

1 N1 Project site 55.6 66.7

2 N 2 Katamnallur 45.6 51.8

3 N 3 KHB Colony, Hoskote 44.7 50.1

4 N 4 Raghuvanahalli 44.7 49.8

5 N 5 Bommenahalli 45.8 50.1

Table 3.8: Limits as per Environmental Protection Rules, 1986

Limits as per Env. Protection Rules, 1986 in dB(A)Leq

Industrial area Commercial area Residential area Silent zone

Day Night Day Night Day Night Day Night

75 70 65 55 55 45 50 40

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 99

OBSERVATIONS: The baseline noise levels have been monitored at different locations as indicated in the table above. Marginally high noise levels at Project are due to the construction activities, movement of vehicles and operation of machineries.

3.2.4 HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY

Geographically the site is located at Latitude: 13°4.288' N and Longitude- 77°45.138' E with 898 m above MSL. Water bodies around the site are Lagumenahalli lake (at about 70 m on North East Direction), Hosakote lake (at about 1.3 Km on East Direction) and Katamnallur lake (at about 1.75 Km on South Direction)The ground water in the area occurs under water table conditions in the weathering mantle of the granite gneisses and in the joints, cracks and crevices of the basement rock. Ground water is derived mainly from precipitates. Smaller amounts are derived from infiltration of water from the tanks and the water used for irrigation. Most of the rainwater is lost through evaporation and run off, only a small percentage reaches the groundwater reservoir.

3.2.5 WATER ENVIRONMENT: 3.2.5.1 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY The impact has been assessed on randomly selected surface and ground water sources

falling within the impact zone.

In order to assess the existing water quality, the water samples were collected from

five different locations within the study area (Fig. 3.3) and analyzed as per the

procedure specified in standard methods for examination of water and wastewater

published by American Public Health Association and Bureau of Indian Standards

(APHA/BIS). Name of locations, orientation with respect to the project site are listed

in the Table 3.9. The analytical data for surface water quality has been tabulated in

Table 3.10 and ground water quality at all locations has been depicted in Table 3.11.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 100

Table 3.9: Water sampling stations

a) Ground Water:

Sl. No.

Code No.

Name of the Station Direction from site

Distance from

site (km)

1 GW 1 Project site - -

2 GW 2 Katamnallur South 2.3

3 GW 3 KHB Colony, Hoskote East 3.1

4 GW 4 Raghuvanahalli North 2.2

5 GW 5 Bommenahalli West 0.95

b) Surface Water:

Sl.

No.

Code

No.

Name of the Station Direction

from site

Distance

from

site (km)

1 SW 1 Hosakote lake 1.3 Km East

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 101

3.2.5.2 SURFACE WATER The results of the analysis of Hosakote Lake water sample is appended as Table 3.10.

Table 3.10: Surface water quality

Sl

No

Parameters Results Limits as per KSPCB Protocol

SW1

1 Color Almost colourless IS: 3025 (P4)

2 pH 7.99 @ 25⁰C 6.0 to 9.0 IS: 3025 (P 11)

3 Chlorides, as Cl, mg/L 563.4 Max. 1000 IS: 3025 (P 32)

4 Total dissolved solids, mg/L 1316 Max. 2100 IS: 3025 (P 16)

5 Biochemical Oxygen Demand,

mg/L (for 3 days at 27⁰C)

7.2 Max. 30 IS: 3025 (P 44)

6 Free Ammonia, as NH3, mg/L <0.05 Max. 5.0 IS: 3025 (P 34)

7 Total hardness as CaCO3, mg/L 378.0 -- IS: 3025 (P 21)

8 Magnesium, as Mg, mg/L 43.4 -- IS: 3025 (P 46)

9 Sulphates, as SO4, mg/L 211.5 Max. 1000 IS: 3025 (P 24)

10 Copper, as Cu, mg/L < 0.05 Max. 3.0 IS: 3025 (P 42)

11 Iron, as Fe, mg/L 0.1 -- IS: 3025 (P 53)

12 Conductivity in micromhos/cm

@ 25⁰C

2560.0 Max. 2250 APHA

13 Manganese, as Mn, mg/L <0.1 Max. 2.0 IS: 3025 (P 59)

14 Nitrates, as NO3, mg/L 1.1 -- IS: 3025 (P 34)

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 102

15 Fluorides, as F, mg/L 0.4 Max. 2.0 IS: 3025 (P 60)

16 Arsenic, as As, mg/L <0.01 Max. 0.2 IS: 3025 (P 37)

17 Cyanide, as CN, mg/L Absent Max. 0.2 APHA

18 Lead, as Pb, mg/L

<0.01

Max. 0.1 APHA

19 Zinc, as Zn, mg/L <0.01 Max. 5.0 IS: 3025 (P 49)

20 Boron, as B, mg/L <0.1 - APHA

21 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.3 -- IS: 3025 (P 38)

22 Sodium absorption ratio 1.6 Max. 18 IS: 11077

MICROBIOLOGICAL TESTS

23 Coliform organisms/100ml 920 -- IS: 1622 - 1981

CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSES OF LAKES

Class A Drinking water source without conventional treatment but after

disinfection

Class B Outdoor bathing (organized)

Class C Drinking water source with conventional treatment followed by

disinfection

Class D Propagation of wildlife, fisheries

Class E Irrigation, industrial cooling, controlled waste disposal

Class below E Not meeting A, B, C, D & E criteria

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 103

3.2.5.3 GROUND WATER Ground water occurs under water table conditions in the weathered mantle of granite gneisses and in the joints, cracks and crevices of the basement rock. The depth of water is also dependent on topography and varies depending on the depth of weathering.

Table 3.11: Ground water quality

GROUND WATER QUALITY AT ALL THE LOCATIONS IN THE MONTH OF MARCH

Sl.

No.

Tests

Results Acceptabl

e Limits

As per

IS:10500-

2012

Permissibl

e Limits as

Per

IS:10500-

2012

GW1

GW2

GW3

GW4

GW5

1 Color, true color units <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Max. 5 Max. 15

2 Odor Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable -

3 Taste Agreeable Not

Agreeable

Not

Agreeable

Not

Agreeable

Not

Agreeable

Agreeable -

4 Turbidity, NTU 0.1 8.5 0.2 1.8 0.1 Max. 1 Max. 5

5 pH 7.74 @

25⁰C

7.95 @

25⁰C

6.80 @

25⁰C

7.03 @

25⁰C

8.01 @

25⁰C

6.50-8.50 No

relaxation

6 Chlorides, as Cl, mg/L 66.8 111.4 213.6 55.7 61.3 Max. 250 Max. 1000

7 Total Hardness as CaCO3,

mg/L

147.0 117.6 504.0 90.3 54.6 Max. 200 Max. 600

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 104

8 Calcium, as Ca, mg/L 48.8 37.0 134.6 23.6 18.5 Max. 75 Max. 200

9 Magnesium, as Mg, mg/L 6.1 6.1 40.8 7.6 2.0 Max. 30 Max. 100

10 Total dissolved solids,

mg/L

384.0 400.0 894.0 282.0 284.0 Max. 500 Max. 2000

11 Sulphates, as SO4, mg/L 18 8.7 35.2 12.3 12.4 Max. 200 Max. 400

12 Copper, as Cu, mg/L <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Max. 0.05 Max. 1.5

13 Iron, as Fe, mg/L 0.09 0.5 0.13 0.1 0.09 Max. 0.30 No

relaxation

14 Manganese, Mn, mg/L <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Max. 0.1 Max. 0.3

15 Nitrates, as NO3, mg/L 11.8 4.2 58.6 0.6 0.4 Max. 45 No

relaxation

16 Fluorides, as F, mg/L 1.0 1.5 <0.02 2.5 3.5 Max. 1.0 Max. 1.5

17 Phenolic compounds, as

C6H5OH, mg/L

Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Max.

0.001

Max. 0.002

18 Mercury, as Hg, mg/L <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Max.

0.001

No

relaxation

19 Cadmium, as Cd, mg/L <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Max.

0.003

No

relaxation

20 Selenium, as Se, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Max. 0.01 No

relaxation

21 Arsenic, as As, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Max. 0.01 Max. 0.05

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 105

22 Cyanide, as CN, mg/L Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Max. 0.05 No

relaxation

23 Lead, as Pb, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Max. 0.01 No

relaxation

24 Zinc, as Zn, mg/L 0.17 0.04 0.02 0.03 <0.01 Max. 5 Max. 15

25 Anionic detergents, as

MBAS, mg/L

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Max. 0.20 Max. 1

26 Total Chromium, as

Cr,mg/L

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Max. 0.05 No

relaxation

27 Residual free chlorine,

mg/L

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Min. 0.20 Min. 1.0

28 Alkalinity, as CaCO3,

mg/L

197.4 130.2 325.5 127.4 115.5 Max. 200 Max. 600

29 Aluminum, as Al, mg/L <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Max. 0.03 Max. 0.2

30 Boron, as B, mg/L <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Max. 0.50 Max. 1.0

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 106

OBSERVATIONS:

The physicochemical quality of the ground water sources at and around the project site

has been analyzed, which indicates that few parameters like total hardness, alkalinity,

calcium, total dissolved solids are above the Acceptable Limits as per IS:10500-2012.

However are within Maximum Permissible Limits in the Absence of Alternate Source as

per IS: 10500-2012.

The source of water for the project is from Mandur Gram Panchayath Sources & water will

be extracted from bore wells located in the project site for which permission is obtained

from Karnataka Ground Water Authority (KGWA).

3.2.6 SOIL AND GEOLOGY:

Soil characteristics, erosion aspects, soil fertility etc., have direct bearing on the

environment. Knowledge of soil parameters is essential for the planning and

implementation of green-belt. Hence it becomes important to study the soil

characteristics. Baseline data for land environment was collected at five locations in

order to assess the soil quality of the study area. Soil samples at a depth of one and

half feet were collected using sampling augers, spades and field capacity apparatus.

The list of locations and the orientation with reference to the project site are listed in

Table 3.12. Soil sampling locations are shown in the map appended as Fig. 3.3. Soil

samples were analyzed for physical and chemical parameters the results of which are

given in Table 3.13.

Table 3.12: Soil sampling stations

Sl.

No.

Code

No.

Name of the Station Direction from

site

Distance from

site (km)

1 S 1 Project site - -

2 S 2 Katamnallur South 2.3

3 S 3 KHB Colony, Hoskote East 3.1

4 S 4 Raghuvanahalli North 2.2

5 S 5 Bommenahalli West 0.95

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 107

Table 3.13: Physico-chemical characteristics of soil

PHYSICO-CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL AT ALL THE LOCATIONS IN THE MONTH

OF MARCH

Sl.

No.

Parameter Sampling station

S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 S 5

1 Description Brown

colored

soil

Pale

Brown

colore

d soil

Brown

colored

soil

Brown

colored

moist

soil

Brown

colored

moist

soil

2 pH (20% suspension) @ 25⁰C 6.18 5.89 6.14 6.18 6.35

3 Organic solids, % 6.2 8.1 6.5 6.6 6.4

4 Inorganic solids, % 93.8 91.9 93.5 93.4 93.6

5 Chlorides, as Cl, % 0.01 0.0026 0.018 0.002 0.0016

6 Phosphorous, as P, % 0.02 0.01 0.015 0.018 0.017

7 Nitrogen, as N, % 0.057 0.027 0.12 0.038 0.04

8 Potassium, as K, % 0.18 0.14 0.11 0.16 0.11

9 Iron, as Fe, % 4.5 3.74 3.47 3.96 3.0

10 Sulfates, as SO4, % 0.001 0.0059 0.004 0.004 0.008

11 Calcium, as Ca, % 0.025 <0.01 0.079 0.025 <0.01

12 Magnesium, as Mg, % <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.03 0.03

13 Conductivity, micromhos/

cm (20% suspension) @ 25⁰C

65.0 196.0 76.0 27.3 56.0

14 Moisture, % 0.39 0.46 0.46 0.14 0.18

The results of the analysis show that the nature of the soil is neutral.

Table3.14: Location of sampling stations

Code no.

on topo

Sampling code

no.

Name of the Station Direction

from site

Distance from

site (km)

1 A1, N1, GW1, S1 Project site - -

2 A2, N2, GW2, S2 Katamnallur South 2.3

3 A3, N3, GW3, S3 KHB Colony, Hoskote East 3.1

4 A4, N4, GW4, S4 Raghuvanahalli North 2.2

5 A5, N5, GW5, S5 Bommenahalli West 0.95

6 SW1 Hosakote lake East 1.3

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 108

Figure 3.3 Top map showing sampling stations

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 109

3.3 ECOLOGY: Natural flora and fauna are important features of the environment. They are organized into natural communities with mutual dependencies among their members and show various responses and sensitivities to physical innocence. The integrated ecological thinking and planning process is an urgent need in the context of natural environment's deterioration which has a direct bearing on socio-economic development. Ecology of the study area includes the flora and fauna studies within the study zone. The investigation included field observations, discussions with local people, forest officials etc. 3.3.1 TERRESTRIAL FLORA The naturally growing plants, vegetation & grasses found in the study area are as appended below. Sl. No. Botanical name Local name Distribution

1 Bambusa bamboo Big-Bamboo Occasional

2 Azadirachta indicia Bevu Common

3 Acacia suma Bilijali Rare

4 Casuarinas equsetifolia Galimara Occasional

5 Alangum lamrkil Ankola Rare

6 Parthenium hystresporus Congress grass Common

7 Ficus religiosa Arali Predominant

8 Mangifera indica Mavu Predominant

9 Vitex negundo Lakki-gida Rare

10 Bauhinia variegate -- Common

11 Ficus mysotrensis Gonimara Common

12 Pongamia pinnata Honge Common

13 Cleredendron inerne -- Occasional

14 Artocarpus integrifolia Halasu Rare

15 Acacua Arabica Gobli Rare

16 Asparagus recemosa -- Rare

17 Terminalia catapa -- Common

18 Michaelia chamara Sampige Occasional

19 Barleria buxifloria -- Rare

20 Eucalyptus teretilmonis Neelagiri Common

21 Govofiar ottleformis Buthale Rare

22 Acacia ferruginea Kaggali Common

23 Bombax ceiba Burga Common

24 Tinospora cordifolia -- Occasional

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 110

25 Cymbopogon felxuosos Ginger grass Occasional

26 Dendrocalamus strictus Small bamboo Occasional

27 Crotalaria verrucosa -- Occasional

28 Emblica officinalis

(Phylanthusembilaca)

Amla, Nalli Occasional

29 Teprosia purpuria -- Common

30 Albizzia amara Chukkiau Common

31 Cymbopo nardus Citronella grass Common

32 Erythrine variegate (Erythrina

indica)

Hongarike Common

33 Delbergia latifolia Beete Occasional

3.3.2 FAUNA The fauna found in the region does not show much diversity, as there is no suitable habitat for the occurrence of ecologically important fauna. Fauna observed in the region include domestic animals, reptiles and birds. The composition of fauna in the study area is presented in the table below.

S No. Zoological Name Common Name

Mammals

1 Bos indicus Cow

2 Babulus indicus Buffalo

3 Lepus nigrocollis Indian Hare

4 Pteropus gigantus Bats

5 Equus cabulus Donkey

6 Funambulus ponnanti Squirrel

Avian

7 Pavo cristatus Pea fouls

8 Corvus splendens Common crow

9 Passer domesticus House sparrow

10 Psittacula cupatria Indian parakite

11 Acrodopthesus tristis Indian myna

12 Conturnix coturnix Common quails

Reptiles & Amphibians

13 Rana tigrina Frog

14 Bufo melanosticus Toad

15 Hemidoctylus brookie Common lizard

16 Ptyas mucosus Rat snake

17 Calotes versicolor Garden lizard

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 111

3.4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT The baseline data referring to the socio-economic environment is collected by way of

secondary sources such as census records, statistical hand book and relevant official

records with the government agencies and primary sources such as the socio-economic

surveys conducted by different Govt. & Non Govt. Agencies.

The growth of industrial sectors and infrastructure development in and around the

agricultural area i.e., villages and semi-urban settings and towns is bound to create

certain socio-economic impacts on the local populace. The impacts may be either

positive or negative depending on the nature of development. To assess such impact it

is necessary to know the existing socio-economic order of the study area, which will be

helpful in improving the overall quality of life.

3.4.1 DEMOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE The information collected from the Secondary sources are from the district census

statistical hand books and the records of the National Informatics Center, New Delhi in

respect of the population, infrastructure facilities available and the occupational

structures of the study area.

The data has been collected for Bommenahalli Village which is presented subsequently.

The distributions of population in the study area as per the census record of the 2001

and forecasted for 2011 (Considering Percentage decadal growth as 16.02 for 2001 –

2011) (Source: From http://censuskarnataka.gov.in/) are presented as Table 3.15

below

Table 3.15: Distribution of population

Particulars Bommenahalli Village

Particulars Bommenahalli Village

Total residential houses 270 Main workers Male 519

Total population 1280 Main workers female 394

Population male 631 Marginal workers male 5

Population female 648

Marginal workers female

8

Schedule caste male 358 Non workers male 237

Schedule caste female 378

Non workers female 523

Schedule tribe male 2

Schedule tribe female 0

Literates male 408

Literates female 300

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 112

Source: District Census Handbook

Male population – 49.29%

Female population – 50.70%

3.4.2 LITERACY LEVELS The literacy level in the study area is appended as Table 3.16 below

Table 3.16: Distribution of literates and literacy levels in the study area

Particulars Bommenahalli Village

Total population 1280

Total literate 708

Literate male 408

% of Male literate 57.76

Literate female 300

% of Female literate 42.24

Source: District census hand book 3.4.3 INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES: The infrastructure and amenities available in the area reflects the economic well-being

of the region

Educational facilities: The educational facilities available in and around the

study area include primary, middle, high school and colleges with good facilities.

Communication facilities: The study area and its surroundings have sufficient

post offices.

In addition to the above the study area and the surrounding areas have been

provided with good electrical power supply for domestic, industrial purposes.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 113

3.5 BASE MAPS OF ALL ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS:

3.5.1 PROJECT LOCATION:

The land around the project site indicates a mixed land use pattern with Residential

Apartments, Layouts and areas with rural settings. The project site is converted and

impact of conversion is not anticipated. The project site is located at a distance of

about 25 km from Bangalore City Railway Station in the north eastern direction.

Transportation: Project site is located at a distance of about 1.5 Kms from NH – 4

(Bangalore – Hosakote Road) on South direction.

Agricultural land: Areas around the project have few plantations, and agricultural

lands are seen / agricultural activity is carried out in the surrounding areas of the site. The site is surrounded by villages / areas like Bommenahalli, Bendiganahalli, Lagumenahalli, Huskur, Katamnallur, Kodigehalli Raghuvanahalli etc.,

Water bodies: Lagumenahalli lake (at about 70 m on North East Direction), Hosakote lake(at about 1.3 Km on East Direction) and Katamnallur lake (at about 1.75 Km on South Direction)

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 114

FIG 3.4: GOOGLE MAP SHOWING SURROUNDING LAKES

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 115

FIG: 3.5: MAP SHOWING CONNECTIVITY

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 116

3.5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES:

3.5.2.1 Project Location and Its Environs:

The proposed project site is in the North Eastern part of Bangalore. The site is located

at a Latitude: 13°4.288' N and Longitude- 77°45.138' E with 898 m above MSL. The total

plot area is 78,812.00 sq m (19.48 Acres) and is located at a distance of about 25 km

from Bangalore city railway station. The general topographical features of the area

reveal that the proposed project site and its surroundings is generally a plain land.

FIG 3.6: TOPO MAP COVERING 2 KM DISTANCE FROM THE PROJECT SITE

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 117

FIG 3.7: GOOGLE MAP COVERING 1 KM AERIAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROJECT SITE

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 118

FIG 3.8: GOOGLE MAP COVERING 5 KM AERIAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROJECT SITE

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 119

FIG 3.9: GOOGLE MAP COVERING 10 KM AERIAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROJECT SITE

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 120

3.5.3 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES:

Baseline environmental survey forms the basis for evaluation of the proposed

development on the existing conditions. This can be broadly grouped into physical,

social, aesthetic & economic environment. Physical environment includes air, water,

land, aquatic & terrestrial flora & fauna, civic infrastructure, public services, etc.,

social environment includes demography, community facilities & services, community

characteristics, employments, commercial facilities, serving the area, etc., and

aesthetic environment includes historical monuments, archaeological or architectural

sites at & in the vicinity of the proposed project activity. Economic environment covers

employment levels, sources & levels of income, economic base of the area, land values,

land ownership etc., table 3.17 gives various Environmental attributes considered for

formulating environmental baseline.

Table 3.17: Significant environmental attributes

Sl. No.

Environmental attribute

Parameter Source of data

1 Ambient air quality

PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO Ambient air quality monitoring at 5 locations.

2 Noise levels Noise levels in db(A) Noise level monitoring at 5 locations

3 Geology Geological history Secondary sources.

4 Water quality Physical, chemical and biological parameters

Grab samples are collected at 7 locations.

5 Soil Soil types and samples analyzed for physical and chemical parameters.

Data collected from secondary sources and soil sample analysis at 5 locations.

6 Ecology Existing terrestrial flora and fauna within 5 km radius of project influence area

Secondary sources.

7 Socio – economic aspects

Socio-economic characteristics of the affected area.

Based on field survey and data collected from secondary sources.

8 Land-use Trend of land use change for different categories

Master Plan 2015.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 121

CHAPTER 4

ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES

4.1 Details of Investigated Environmental Impacts due to Project Location, Possible

Accidents, Project Design, Project Construction, Regular Operations, Final

Decommissioning or Rehabilitation of Completed Project

4.1.1 Environmental impacts due to project location, possible accidents, project

design

PROJECT LOCATION:

Major environmental impacts due to project location is not anticipated because

• The proposed project is Expansion of Residential Apartment project. • No national park and environmentally sensitive areas area located around the

project site.

POSSIBLE ACCIDENTS:

The proposed project is Expansion of Residential Apartment project. All precautionary

measures are taken in construction activities of the project and optimum utilization of

the existing infrastructural facilities will be made. Therefore environmental impacts

due to possible accidents are not anticipated.

PROJECT DESIGN

The project is designed with utmost consideration to the environment. a) Green-belt/landscape development is earmarked in the project. b) Indigenous / native trees species of different species are proposed to be planted. c) Environmental Infrastructure facilities like Sewage Treatment Plant for treating

the wastewater from the project. Organic Waste Converter for treating the Organic Waste, the product will be used as manure.

d) Rain water harvesting and Ground water recharging is proposed in the project to enhance ground water potential in the area.

e) Use of alternative source of energy like solar lighting, solar hot water generation

will assist in reducing load on conventional energy sources.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 122

4.2 MEASURES FOR MINIMIZING AND / OR OFFSETTING ADVERSE IMPACTS

IDENTIFIED:

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is aimed at mitigating the possible adverse

impact of a project and ensuring the existing environmental quality. The EMP converse

all aspects of planning, construction and occupancy of the project relevant to

environment. It is essential to implement the EMP right from the planning stage

continuing throughout the construction and occupancy stage. Therefore the main

purpose of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to identify the project specific

activities that would have to be considered for the significant adverse impacts and the

mitigation measures required.

The construction phase impacts are mostly short term, restricted to the plot area and

not envisaged on the larger scale. In the occupancy phase the environmental impacts

are due to continuous operation of the project, hence, the emphasis in the Environment

Management Plan (EMP) is to minimize such impacts. The following mitigation measures

are recommended in order to synchronize the economic development of the project

area with the environmental protection of the region.

The emphasis on the EMP development is on the following;

Mitigation measures for each of the activities causing the environmental Impact.

Monitoring plans for checking activities and environmental parameters and

monitoring responsibilities.

Role responsibilities and resource allocation for monitoring; and

Implementation of the Scheduled plan.

Environmental management plan has been discussed in the later Chapters separately

for Construction phase and occupancy phase.

4.3 IRREVERSIBLE & IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL

COMPONENTS

There are no irreversible or irretrievable commitments of the environmental

components as adequate care will be taken to prevent any major impact on the

environmental parameters.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 123

4.4 ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES:

The Environmental Impact Statement enumerates the likely impacts due to the implementation of the proposed project on the six basic environmental parameters, which are listed below.

1. Air Environment

2. Water Environment

3. Land Environment

4. Noise Environment

5. Biological Environment

6. Socio-economic Environment

4.5 IMPACT MATRIX:

Table 4.1 gives the overview of the potential impacts due to project location, construction and occupancy of the proposed project.

Table 4.1: Impact matrix

Sl.

No.

Environmental parameter Positive impact

Negative impact

No impact

Short term

Long term

Short term

Long term

A Project setting

i Displacement of people

ii Change of land use

iii Loss of trees/vegetation

iv Shifting of utilities

v Impact on archaeological property

B Construction phase

I Pressure on local infrastructure

ii Impact on air quality including dust generation

iii Noise pollution

iv Traffic congestion loss of access

v Impact on the land/soil environment

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 124

vi Stacking and disposal of construction material

vii Impact on water quality

viii Public health and safety

ix Social impact

C Occupancy phase

I Increase in air and noise levels

ii Water harvesting and recharge

iii Disposal of solid waste

iv Induced infrastructure development

v Quality of life

vi Increment in the green cover

4.6 IMPACTS DUE TO THE PROJECT SETTING/LOCATION:

4.6.1 DISPLACEMENT OF PEOPLE:

The project and its associated activities are limited to the proposed site area of

78,812 sq m (19.69 Acres) which is free from encroachment; hence no displacement of

people is anticipated.

4.6.2 CHANGE OF LAND USE:

The site area in which the project is proposed to be developed comes under the

“Residential Zone” of the Conceptual Development Plan of BMRDA.

4.6.3 LOSS OF TREES:

The project site was barren land. 4.6.4 SHIFTING OF UTILITIES:

There is no shifting of any existing utilities such as water supply pipelines, sewers,

electrical lines etc., for the development of the project.

4.6.5 IMPACT ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROPERTY:

There are no sites/properties of archeological importance within the study area, around

the project site.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 125

4.6.6 IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

The activities which need to be monitored and managed from the point of view of

pollution during the construction phase are detailed in the subsequent sections.

4.6.7 PRESSURE ON LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE:

During the construction phase, demand of the basic amenities such as water,

power, etc., for the construction labors and construction activities, put pressure on the

existing infrastructure. These impacts are of short-term and of low magnitude limited

to construction phase only. Also excess treated water from the occupancy phase of the

project is utilized for construction activities, dust suppression and watering avenue

plantation etc.,

4.6.8 AIR ENVIRONMENT:

Potential impacts on the air quality during the construction stage will be due to the

fugitive dust and the exhaust gases generated in and around the construction site. Dust

is generated mainly from the following construction activities

Site clearance and use of heavy vehicles, machinery/equipment etc., at construction site;

Procurement and transport of construction materials such as sand, cement, etc., to the construction site;

Operation of construction vehicles and equipments.

The following mitigation measures are proposed to control dust

GI sheets are provided to a height of 5 m all around the project site to control dust;

Water is sprinkled at regular intervals;

SO2 emissions from diesel generators is expected to be low because of usage of low sulfur content diesel;

Use of efficient machinery and schedule maintenance of the construction vehicles and equipments.

4.6.9 NOISE POLLUTION:

Noise is perceived as one of the most undesirable consequences of construction activity.

Though the level of discomfort caused by noise is subjective, the most commonly

reported impacts of increased noise levels are interference in oral communication and

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 126

disturbance in sleep. Due to the various construction activities, there will be short-term

noise impacts in the immediate vicinity of the project corridor. The construction

activities include

Operation of DG sets;

Concreting and mixing;

Excavation for foundations;

Movement of vehicles carrying construction materials;

Operation of various construction equipments.

These activities are limited to construction period and are only temporary phenomena.

Also the project site is surrounded by open areas; hence no major adverse impacts are

anticipated. Nonetheless the following mitigation measures are proposed

It is proposed to carry out all the noise generating activities during day time;

Proper planning of the movement of vehicular traffic;

Proper and periodic upkeep of construction equipments;

Providing noise reduction gadgets, providing PPE to construction workers to prevent its effect on them.

4.6.10 TRAFFIC CONGESTION:

Suitable temporal segregation of traffic will be undertaken, in order to ease the load

of traffic in the region. Adequate parking facilities are proposed within the project.

4.6.11 SOIL/LAND ENVIRONMENT:

Soil erosion at the project site during the construction phase will be controlled by

adopting the following measures

1. Pitching and paving of slopes and kerbing is done as structural controls to divert and prevent storm water from entering exposed soils.

2. Grit and sediment removal facilities with sediment traps are provided in the storm water drains to prevent run-off contamination.

3. Top soil is stacked and will be reused for landscape development.

4. The spillage of oil from the machinery or cement residual from concrete mixer plants might contaminate the soil if not properly collected and disposed off. Collection trays are provided to collect oil dripping from construction machineries.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 127

4.6.12 STAKING AND DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL:

Staking of construction materials shall be confined to the project site only and also

suitable enclosures shall be provided, hence no impacts on surrounding land is

envisaged. About 500 cum of construction debris generated will be used as preparatory

for road formation within the project site. Disposal of construction waste is likely to

cause unaesthetic view, unhygienic conditions, choking of nearby drains etc., such

impacts are short term. The severity of such impact will depend upon the magnitude

and type of construction waste.

4.6.13 WATER ENVIRONMENT:

The most susceptible locations for contamination of water during construction are

Waterlogged areas;

Surface and ground water resources close to construction material storage yard, concrete mixer plants and maintenance sites of construction vehicles;

Surface water bodies close to labor camps.

All the construction activities are strictly confined to the project site. The following

measures are undertaken to prevent water quality degradation during construction

phase

Good construction practices is strictly implemented and care is taken to see that no water logging takes place at the project site;

Remedial measures is immediately undertaken to remediate any accidental spills or other unforeseen incidents if any;

The domestic sewage from the construction workers camp is treated in Package STP.

The impacts if any are short term and low in magnitude and confined to the construction site and to the construction period only.

Water requirement of laborers is met by bore well sources and also excess treated water from the occupancy phase of the project will be used for water avenue plantation / will be given for others construction project.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 128

4.6.14 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY:

The project is construction of mixed use development project and all the construction

related activity will be confined to project site area. Hence no health related impacts

are envisaged in the surroundings during the construction phase.

At the project site about 700 people are engaged in the construction activities. Direct

exposure of these people to dust is likely to cause health related impacts. This is

minimized by providing suitable respiratory Personal Protective Equipments (PPE) such

as nose mask with filters etc.,

4.6.15 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT:

The construction activities will benefit the local population as it creates

employment opportunities. The proponents have given preference to local

people with both direct and indirect employment.

The social impacts during the construction stage could result due to influx of migrant

workers and associated induced development. This will ensure a rise in the consumption

of consumer goods in the local area, which will tend to boost up the local economy. All

the activities related to construction work are confined to the project site only; hence

no adverse social impacts are envisaged in the surrounding areas due to the project.

4.7. IMPACTS DURING OCCUPANCY PHASE:

During the occupancy phase, there would be impacts on the air, water, land

environment and socio-economic aspects. The subsequent sections present the impacts

during the occupancy phase.

4.7.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT:

During occupancy phase the major air pollution sources are DG sets and vehicular

movement. The DGs are operated only during emergencies when there is failure of

power supply from BESCOM. Also the DGs are proposed to be provided with adequate

stack heights as per KSPCB norms to disperse the pollutants high into the atmosphere.

4.7.2 NOISE ENVIRONMENT:

The main sources of noise pollution from the project are DG sets, pumps and vehicles.

High noise generating DG sets will be provided with acoustic enclosures. The DG sets

will be distributed in the Basement floors in a separate acoustically treated room.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 129

Green-belt at the project boundary will further act as noise barrier and help in

attenuation of noise.

4.7.3 WATER CONSUMPTION AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL DETAILS,

WATER HARVESTING AND RECHARGE:

The water required for the project will be drawn from bore wells for which permission

is obtained from Karnataka Ground Water Authority (KGWA). The wastewater generated

from the project will be treated in Sewage Treatment plant and the treated sewage

will recycled for toilet flushing, reused for landscape development and for car washing

and road washing etc.,

It is proposed to provide shallow recharge pits along the inner periphery of the boundary

wall of size 5’ dia x 20’ depth. These recharging pits will be filled with graded media

comprising of boulder at bottom and with coarse aggregates to facilitate percolation of

harvested rain water to recharge groundwater table. The recharge pits are

interconnected in such a way that the rain from the first recharge pit is led to the next

pit and so on. The excess rainwater shall be drained off to the storm water drain.

4.7.4 SOLID WASTE:

The domestic solid waste generated from the project will be treated in an organic

converter and the inorganic solid waste will be sent for recycling.

4.7.5 INDUCED DEVELOPMENT:

Since the entire project influenced area will be developed as per the Zoning

regulations, to cater the demand of the living population hence no induced

development is foreseen due to the proposed project.

4.7.6 FLORA & FAUNA:

Project site is vacant land and no trees are proposed to be felled in the project and no

major threat to the flora & fauna is not envisaged as the project is developed in area

located in Commercial Zone of Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP).

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 130

4.7.7 TRAFFIC IMAPCT:

The project is located Bommenahalli Main Road. The traffic studies conducted on the

approach roads reveal that there will not be major impact by addition of traffic /

vehicle from the project on the existing traffic scenario.

4.8 POSITIVE IMPACTS:

4.8.1 PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE & FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO LOCAL ADMINISTRATION:

The occupancy of the project provides value addition to the existing infrastructure

facilities such as public transport, water supply, telecommunications etc.,

4.8.2 EMPLOYMENT:

The occupancy of project and other allied facilities, will improve the employment

opportunities. Both direct and indirect employment is envisaged. The employment will

have positive impact on the local economy thereby increasing the quality of life.

4.8.3 ENVIRONMENT:

An area of 24,111.07 sq m is left for landscape development.

Water conservation measures adopted in the project will reduce burden on water

resources.

Use of alternative source of energy like solar lighting, solar hot water generation

will assist in reducing load on conventional energy sources.

Indigenous / native trees of different species are proposed to be planted.

Environmental Infrastructure facilities like Sewage Treatment Plant for treating the

wastewater from the project. Organic Waste Converter for treating the Organic

Waste, the product will be used as manure.

Rain water harvesting and Ground water recharging is proposed in the project to

enhance ground water potential in the project.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 131

CHAPTER 5

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY AND SITE)

The proposed project is Expansion of Residential Apartment project. Project is

proposed to be developed in Residential Zone as per the Comprehensive Development

Plan (CDP) of Bangalore Metropolitan Region Development Authority (BMRDA). The

project is proposed to cater the needs of the surrounding areas and hence no alternate

site is examined.

5.1 Alternative / Eco Friendly Technologies (Construction):

Porotherm Hollow clay blocks for Superstructure for Heat insulation, thereby

reduction of Air Conditioning load. Use of precast thin lintels, use of

Ferrocement-sunshade cum lintel etc.,

Gypsum punning for internal plastering- reduction in conventional material

consumption.

Doubly glazed windows -UPVC/Plantation Wood- reduce heat gain & reduces AC

load.

Aluminum from verified recycled content.

PVC doors & windows, natural fiber-reinforced polymer composite door panels.

Locally available stone with least value additions replaces the conventional

jambs & sills.

Planting of trees in Southern & Western facades & greening all around reduces

heat gain of the building.

QED-(Quite Easily Done) wall panels containing 99.9% of waste from fertilizer

plant will be used for certain partitions.

Autoclaved Aerated Concrete containing minimum of 60% fly ash from thermal

power station will be incorporated.

Alternatives for finishes include fly ash, Ceramic tiles, Terrazzo floors.

Minimal disturbance to landscapes & site condition.

Use of recycled and Environmental Friendly Building Materials.

Use of Non-Toxic and recycled/recyclable Materials.

Efficient use of water & water recycling.

Use of Energy Efficient & Eco –Friendly Equipment.

Use of Renewable Energy.

Use of native plants for landscaping

Apartment building Common areas to be provided with energy efficient CFL & T5

fluorescent light fitting.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 132

All external lighting provided with automatic ON/OFF control by light sensitive

device to save power.

Air – conditioning in apartments by the tenants may propose with available

energy efficient split AC system.

CISTERNS & FLUSHES- CONCEALED CISTERN which consumes only 5-6 litres of

water compared to the conventional system that consumes 15-20 litres will be

used.

Transformer efficiency - 98.74% (Full load)

Light intensity

a) Car park – 5 lux

b) Corridors – 50 lux

c) Rooms – 200Lux

d) Elec. Room 200 Lux

In the project the construction involves use of

Low VOC emissions products e.g., cement paints.

Products that conserve energy – e.g., CFL lamps for domestic & common area lighting.

Solar lights for street lighting (as per norms) & solar heaters (For top 5 floors).

Un-plasticized PVC or HDPE products.

Use of water based paints, enamels, primers & polishes.

The construction debris of 750 cum are expected to be generated from the construction activities and will be used as preparatory for internal roads, fire drive way, pavements works etc., within the project site. Thermal insulation for wall with fenestration and roof pergolas are considered as passive architectural design building orienting with east to west to meet the ECBC guidelines. (Balconies, Projections, Recessed windows with orientations etc.)

5.2 Building Orientation to take advantage of solar access, shading & natural

lighting:

Passive solar architectural features are considered while designing the buildings in respect of orientation of building less exposed surface area to east to west directions.

The following eco-friendly materials/approaches will be carried out in the project.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 133

Utility of Solar Energy for heating/ Lighting

Energy Saving lamps , CFL (Compact Fluorescent Lamps) will be used in Common

Areas and energy Efficient Fluorescent Lamps with Electronic Ballast in Working

Areas to achieve Energy Savings

Water, polyurethane foam & acrylic based chemical admixtures for corrosion

removal, rust prevention & water proofing.

Epoxy resin system flooring, sealants, admixtures

Polymerized water proof compound

CPVC for drain pipes

All Drives will be high Efficiency Motors

Low VOC emissions products e.g. cement paints

Un plasticized PVC or HDPE products

R.C.C., PVC. pipes instead of lead, A.C Pipes

Windows are of Aluminum which is recyclable.

China tiles on Terrace to reflect the heat.

Use of Cement Hallow Blocks for better Thermal insulation.

PVC pipes for water supply and sewerage which are less intensive.

Materials that reuse waste that would otherwise have resulted in landfill.

E.g. fly ash masonry blocks & ready mix concrete

5.3 PLASTIC FREE ZONE AREA:

Following measures will be taken to make project site Plastic Free Zone area:

1. Sign boards will be placed about not using plastic in the campus.

2. Awareness campaigns for creating plastic free environment will be conducted.

3. Program will be arranged about use of eco-friendly, jute, paper bags etc.,

4. Recycling and reuse of plastic materials will be emphasized.

5.4 Electrical Savings & Consumptions:

The following energy efficient approaches will be adopted in the project to conserve

energy. Electrical savings brief is appended

a. Utility of solar energy for heating/ lighting in common areas. b. Energy saving lamps, CFL (Compact Fluorescent Lamps) and LEDs will be used in

common areas and energy efficient fluorescent lamps with electronic ballast in working areas to achieve energy savings.

c. All drives will be high efficiency motors.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 134

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 135

CHAPTER 6

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME

6.1 MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY:

Environmental Monitoring / sample analysis will be carried out by external agency

a) Ambient air monitoring: Bangalore Test House, Bangalore

b) Water quality: Bangalore Test House, Bangalore

c) Wastewater quality: Bangalore Test House, Bangalore

d) Soil quality: Bangalore Test House, Bangalore

e) Noise monitoring: Bangalore Test House, Bangalore

6.2 FREQUENCY, LOCATION, DATA ANALYSIS, REPORTING SCHEDULES, EMERGENCY

PROCEDURES:

The project is Expansion of Residential Apartment Project. A comprehensive monitoring

program is suggested below;

Table 6.1: Monitoring schedule for environmental parameters

(Construction & occupancy phase)

Sl. No

Particulars

Monitoring frequency

Duration of monitoring

Important parameters for monitoring

I Air quality

Ambient air monitoring

1. Project premises Once in a month 24 hourly sample

RSPM, SPM, SO2, NOx

2. Stack monitoring Once in 6 month Grab SPM, SO2, NOx, HC, CO

II Water and wastewater quality

1. Water quality

i. Groundwater at two locations (up-gradient and down-gradient)

Once in a month Grab As per KSPCB requirements

2. Wastewater quality

i. Domestic sewage at the outlet of the STP

Once in a month Grab As per KSPCB requirements

III Soil quality

1. Within project premises at 1 location

Once in six months

Composite samples

As per KSPCB requirements

2. Ecological preservation and up-gradation

Seasonal Visual observation

Survival rate

IV Noise monitoring

1. Project premises Once in six months

Day and night

As per KSPCB requirements

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 136

6.3 DETAILED BUDGET AND PROCUREMENT SCHEDULES:

Detailed budgetary provisions for monitoring program are detailed in the following

table.

Table 6.2: Financial allocation/budgetary provisions for monitoring program

Sl. No

Description Number of sampling/year

Cost per sampling

Monitoring cost

1)

Air monitoring 12

12,000

2,40,000 a) Ambient air

quality monitoring

b) Stack monitoring 2 2,000 4,000

2)

Water quality 2

1,500

3,000 a) Groundwater quality

3) Treated water from STP 12

2,000

24,000 a) Treated sewage

4) Soil quality 2 2,500 5,000

5) Noise monitoring 2 250 500

Total 2,76,500

6.4 EMP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:

Phased according to the priority, the implementation schedule is presented in the

following table.

Implementation Schedule for EMP

Sl.

No.

Recommendations Requirement

1 Air pollution control measures Before commissioning of respective units

2 Water pollution control measures Before commissioning of the project

3 Noise control measures Along with the commissioning of project

4 Solid waste management During commissioning of the project

5 Green belt development Stage-wise implementation

The responsibility of EMP implementation lies with the project promoter for a period

of 3 years. Once the residents' society is established, the EMP responsibility will be

properly handed over with clearly defined procedures and guidelines.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 137

CHAPTER 7

ADDITIONAL STUDIES

7.1 PUBLIC CONSULTATION:

As per the Amended EIA Notification dated 14th September 2006 “All Building /

Construction projects/Area Development projects and Townships (Item 8)” are

exempted from Public Consultation process.

7.2 RISK ASSESSMENT:

7.2.1 Introduction:

Environmental risk analysis deals with the identification and quantification of risks the

equipment and personnel are exposed to, from the hazards present in the area.

Risk analysis follows hazard analysis (Risk = Hazard x Probability of occurrence). It

involves identification and assessment of risks to the personnel and neighboring

populations. This requires a thorough knowledge of failure probability, credible

accident scenario, vulnerability of population etc., much of this information is difficult

to procure. Consequently, the risk analysis is confined to maximum credible accident

studies. The subsequent sections shall address the identification of various hazards and

risks in the operations, which will give a broad identification of risks involved.

7.2.2 Objective & scope

The objective of the study is to carry out risk analysis and prepare disaster management

plan/emergency preparedness plans

The risk analysis/assessment study covers the following:

(a) Identification of potential hazard due to fuel storage.

(b) Assess the overall damage potential of the identified hazardous events and

impact zones from the accident scenarios.

(c) Suggestions and recommendations on the minimization of the accident

possibilities.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 138

7.3 RISK ASSESSMENT & MANAGEMENT PLAN:

a. Construction phase

Sl.

No.

Potential Mitigation

1 Accidental fire Fire safety gadgets

2 Fall of objects Use of personal protection devices-helmets

3 Working at great heights Protection to prevent fall; with life safety belts

and nets.

4 Accidents from machinery Personal protection gadgets

5 Electrical mishap Adopting safety measures to prevent any act of

negligence and providing electrical safety

measures like fire extinguishers.

b. Occupancy phase:

Precautions for risk and disaster management plan:

Once the likelihood of the disaster is suspected, preventive actions should be undertaken by the project in-charge.

Conditional maintenance of equipments, materials and expertise for use during emergency.

The electrical systems should be provided with automatic circuit breakers activated by over-current.

Fire extinguishers will be provided at pre-notified locations inside the building.

Proper escape routes will be planned and displayed in the public domain.

Selected representatives will be given proper training to guide other inhabitants during fire accidents.

Periodic awareness program will be conducted for the occupants on their roles during emergency situations.

Important telephone numbers like police authorities, fire department and hospitals etc. of use during emergency situations should be made available. 7.4 DISASTER MANAGEMENT

Disaster is an unexpected event due to sudden failure of the system, external threats,

internal disturbances, earthquakes, fire and accidents. Following subsection describes

the measures to be undertaken by the project proponent to prevent / minimize risk of

unexpected event.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 139

7.4.1 Preventive action:

Once the likelihood of a disaster is suspected, action has to be initiated to prevent a

failure. Engineers responsible for preventive action should identify sources of repair

equipments, materials, labor and expertise for use during emergency.

7.4.2 Reporting procedures:

The level at which a situation will be termed a disaster shall be specified. This shall

include the stage at which the surveillance requirements should be increased both in

frequency and details. The project in-charge should notify the officer for the following

information

Exit points for the public,

Safety areas at the site,

Nearest medical facilities.

7.4.3 Emergency measures:

The proposed project is designed as per the NBC norms and occurrence of accidents is

not envisaged. The emergency measures are adopted to avoid any failure in the system

such as lights, fire, means of escape, ventilation shafts etc. The aim of Emergency

Action Plan is to identify areas, population and structures likely to be affected due to

a catastrophic event of accident. The action plan should also include preventive action,

notification, warning procedures and co-ordination among various relief authorities.

These are discussed in following sections.

7.4.4 Emergency lighting:

The emergency lights operated on battery power shall be provided at appropriate

locations. The system shall supply power to at least 25 % of the lights at those locations

for a period of 2 hours.

7.4.5 Fire protection:

Fire protection is one of the most essential services to be provided. In design component

of the project adequate measures have to be taken as per the provisions of the National

Building Code (SP 7: 1983 Part IV Amendment No. 3 of January 1997).

The building materials should be of appropriate fire resistance standard. Wood shall

not be used for any purpose, excluding artificial wood products, which are flame

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 140

resistant. The materials which have zero surface burning characteristics need to be

used. The electrical systems shall be provided with automatic circuit breakers activated

by the rise of current and by over-current. The design will include provision for the

following:

Fire prevention measures,

Fire control measures,

Fire detection systems,

Means of escape,

Access for fireman &

Means of firefighting.

Accumulation of refuse of any inflammable material like paper, plastic cartons

constitute a major fire hazard and should not be permitted. Smoking should be strictly

prohibited at all public locations.

All aspects of fire prevention and control will be dealt in close collaboration with the

city firefighting authority. Smoke control will be achieved by the following means

Down stand bulkheads of a minimum depth of 600 mm to provide smoke containment.

These will be provided around openings for escalators, lifts and stairs in underground

stations. Adequate firefighting requirement have been taken into account while

designing the distribution system for the area. The LPG supply to the apartment will be

individual and central LPG supply is not proposed.

7.5 Social Impact Assessment R & R Action Plans:

The proposed project is mixed use development project which does not have any

habitation and therefore no re-settlement & re-habilitation is envisaged.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 141

CHAPTER 8

PROJECT BENEFITS

8.1 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE:

The operation of the project provides value addition to the existing infrastructure

facilities such as public transport, water supply, telecommunications etc.,

8.1.1 Employment:

The operation of project and other allied facilities, will improve the employment

opportunities. Both direct and indirect employment is envisaged. The employment

will have positive impact on the local economy thereby increasing the quality of life.

The project activities are likely to generate employment opportunities both during

construction (About 700 workers) and the occupancy phase (About 250 workers). The

occupational profile of nearby settlements is such that the locals can be good source

of labour during both phases. During the construction phase, various manual-laboring

activities can engulf residents of nearby settlements, like the labour camp. People

from these areas, will also have opportunities during the occupancy of the project.

These include ancillary jobs like housekeeping, cleaners, gardeners, helpers, security

staff, etc., the project will increase the economic activities around the area, creating

avenues for direct/indirect employment in the post project period. There would be

a wider economic impact in terms of generating opportunities for secondary

occupation around the project.

Thus the impact on employment due to construction and occupancy of the project

can be considered as “significantly positive”.

8.1.2 Environment:

Total area of 24,111.07 sqm is reserved exclusively for green-belt/landscape

development.

Indigenous / native trees species of different species are proposed to be

planted.

Environmental Infrastructure facilities like Sewage Treatment Plant for treating the

wastewater from the project. Organic Waste Converter for treating the Organic Waste,

the product will be used as manure.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 142

Rain water harvesting and Ground water recharging is proposed in the project

to enhance ground water potential. Rain water harvesting, recharging

proposed will help in improving water table in the area.

Water conservation measures adopted in the project will reduce burden on

water resources.

Use of alternative source of energy like solar lighting, solar hot water

generation will assist in reducing load on conventional energy sources.

8.2 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE:

The construction activities will benefit the local population as it creates

employment opportunities. The proponents have given preference to local

people with both direct and indirect employment.

The social impacts during the construction stage could result due to influx of migrant

workers and associated induced development. This will ensure a rise in the

consumption of consumer goods in the local area, which will tend to boost up the

local economy. All the activities related to construction work shall be confined to the

project site only; hence no adverse social impacts are envisaged in the surrounding

area due to the proposed project.

8.3 OTHER TANGENTIAL BENEFITS:

1. The project basically fulfills the need of housing in the region.

2. Further the project provides short term and long term employment opportunity

for people residing in the surrounding of the project area.

3. The project may result in creation of additional infrastructure, such as

improvement of existing roads, storm water drains etc.,

4 The project will help in improving local economy generate revenue through taxes,

levies etc.,

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 143

CHAPTER 9

ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

9.1 INTRODUCTION:

Cost–benefit analysis (CBA), sometimes called Benefit–Cost Analysis (BCA), is a

systematic process for calculating and comparing benefits and costs of a project for

two purposes

to determine if it is a sound investment (justification/feasibility)

to see how it compares with alternate projects (ranking/priority assignment)

It involves comparing the total expected cost of each option against the total expected

benefits, to see whether the benefits outweigh the costs, and by how much.

In CBA, benefits and costs are expressed in money terms, and are adjusted for the time

value of money, so that all flows of benefits and flows of project costs over time (which

tend to occur at different points in time) are expressed on a common basis in terms of

their "present value."

ENVIRONMENTAL COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS, refers to the economic appraisal of policies

and projects that have the deliberate aim of improving the provision of environmental

services or actions that might affect (sometimes adversely) the environment as an

indirect consequence.

9.2 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:

CBA for M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., is tabulated below

Table: 9.1 Cost Benefit Analysis

Costs / Impact Benefits /Mitigation

Air Environment: Discharge of air emission

Discharge of air emission as per the stipulated norms

Noise Environment: Noise from DG set and Traffic

Acoustic enclosures will be provided for DG sets

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 144

Peripheral compound wall and noise buffer trees (3 rows in staggered manner) are proposed.

Land environment: Solid Waste Generation

Solid waste to be treated in organic converter and product will be used as manure.

Social/Economic Environment: Employment and income generation from apartments. Infrastructural development benefits due to proximity of apartments.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 145

CHAPTER 10

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)

10.1 INTRODUCTION

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is aimed at mitigating the possible adverse

impacts of a project and ensuring the existing environmental quality. The EMP

converses all aspects of planning, construction and occupancy of the project relevant

to environment. It is essential to implement the EMP right from the planning stage

continuing throughout the construction and occupancy stage. Therefore the main

purpose of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to identify the project specific

activities that would have to be considered for significant adverse impacts and the

mitigation measures required.

The construction phase impacts are mostly short term, restricted to the plot area and

not envisaged on a larger scale. In the occupancy phase the environmental impacts are

due to continuous operation of the project, hence, the emphasis in the Environment

Management Plan (EMP) is to minimize such impacts. The following mitigation measures

are recommended in order to synchronize the economic development of the project

area with the environmental protection of the region.

The emphasis on the EMP development is on the following

Mitigation measures for each of the activities causing environmental impact.

Monitoring plans for checking activities and environmental parameters and

monitoring responsibilities.

Role, responsibilities and resource allocation for monitoring, and

Implementation of the scheduled plan.

The scope of EMP is

Collection of data on the baseline environmental quality around the

proposed project site including air, water, noise and land environments.

Identification and assessment of potential adverse and beneficial

environmental impacts due to the proposed project.

Preparation of an EMP to minimize the adverse impacts.

Preparation of post-project monitoring plan to ensure that the EMP

achieves its desired objectives.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 146

10.2 EMP DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

During construction phase, the activities which need to be monitored and managed

from the point of pollution are detailed in the subsequent sections.

10.2.1 Leveling and Site Clearance:

The proposed project is having Basement floors and earth excavation is necessary. The

total quantity of excavated soil is about 90,000 cum. About 26,000 cum will be used for

landscape development, 35,000 cum will be used for backfilling and 29,000 cum will be

used for formation and hardscaping activities within the project site.

Table 10.1: Environmental management during leveling and site clearance

Environmental

impacts

Mitigation proposed Remarks

Noise

generation:

Caused due to

excavators

and

bulldozers.

Most optimum no. of operation.

Less noise generating equipments are used.

The earth moving equipment are periodically

checked and maintained for noise levels.

The workers are provided with adequate

Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) such as

ear plugs to reduce impact of high noise levels.

All construction activities are carried out during

the day time.

To reduce

noise levels,

only

equipments

provided with

noise control

devices will

be used.

Dust

generation:

Leveling

operations

results in the

emission of

dust.

The site cleared is periodically watered to

reduce emission of dust particles.

Barricades like metal sheets are provided all-

round the premises to avoid fugitive dust

emissions into the neighboring area apart from

water sprinkling.

The workers are provided with Personal

Protective Equipment (PPE) such as nose masks

and goggles to reduce impact on health.

Water supply

for labor

camps is

augmented

from bore

wells &

treated water

from STP

(Labour

colony) will

be used.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 147

10.2.2 TRANSPORTATION OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS:

During the transportation of construction materials, minimum number of vehicles will

are used. Most optimum route is planned to reduce the impact of transportation activity

on the environment.

Table 10.2: Environmental management during transportation

Environmental

impacts

Mitigation proposed

Noise

generation

Quality fuel is being used.

Periodic maintenance of vehicles is ensured.

Dust

generation

Quality packaging of the construction materials.

Construction materials are covered with tarpaulin sheet to

prevent them from being air borne.

The vehicle speed is regulated.

Workers transporting materials are provided with PPE such as nose

mask to reduce impact of air borne dust on their health

Vehicular

emissions

Periodic emission check for vehicles is ensured.

Clean fuel is being used for vehicles.

10.2.3 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES:

During the construction work, the following impacts are identified to monitor and

mitigate the level of impact.

Table 10.3: Environmental management plan during construction

Environmental

impacts

Mitigation proposed Remarks

Noise generation

Selection of less noise generating

equipments.

Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) such

as ear plugs and helmets is provided for

workers.

The working hours are imposed on the

construction workers.

Implementation

responsibility:

Contractor -

Civil Works

Dust generation All the loose material are either stacked or

transported is provide with suitable

covering such as tarpaulin etc.,

Implementation

responsibility:

Contractor

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 148

PPE in the form of nose masks is provided

for construction workers.

Use of water sprays to prevent dust from

being air borne.

Barricades like metal sheets (GI) is provided

all around the premises to avoid fugitive

dust emission into the neighboring area

apart from water sprinkling.

Water discharge

from construction

works

Runoff from the construction site will be

collected in sediment basin / retention pond

and the excess will be discharged to

external storm water drain.

Tertiary treated water is used for

construction purposes.

Implementation

responsibility:

Contractor

Air emissions

from

construction

machinery

Periodic check and regular maintenance of

construction machinery for emissions.

Clean fuel is used in equipments.

Implementation

responsibility:

Contractor

10.2.4 WASTEWATER DISCHARGE:

Sheds for the construction workers are provided within the project site. 100 sheds and

70 toilets with bathrooms are provided.

The sewage generated from the labor camp during construction phase is estimated to

be about 70 KLD. Presently, sewage generated from the construction site is treated in

package STP.

10.2.5 LABOR CAMPS:

Table 10.4: Environmental management for labor camp

Environmental

impacts

Mitigation proposed Remarks

Domestic

wastewater

generation

Provision of adequate sanitation

facilities.

Sewage from labor camps is

treated in Package STP

Implementation

responsibility:

Contractor - Civil Works

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 149

Usage of water Water required for the labor camps

is provided.

Implementation

responsibility:

Contractor - Civil

Solid waste

generation

Segregation of dry and wet waste.

Adequate facilities are provided

for handling solid wastes which will

be segregated at source,

collected, stored, composted and

product is used as manure.

Implementation

responsibility:

Contractor–

maintenance.

Protection to the

water courses

The construction workers camp is

located within the project site.

The sewage generated from the

construction workers camp is

treated in package STP.

Implementation

responsibility:

Contractor

10.2.6 DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED EARTH

The proposed project is having Basement floors and earth excavation is necessary. The

total quantity of excavated soil is about 90,000 cum. About 26,000 cum will be used for

landscape development, 35,000 cum will be used for backfilling and 29,000 cum will be

used for formation and hardscaping activities within the project site.

10.2.7 PERSONNEL SAFETY SYSTEM :

It is planned to adopt the safe working practices which shall govern all construction

works undertaken throughout the project. Following safety aids to all laborers will be

provided

Safety helmets, belts, shoes & hand gloves

Gumboots while concreting

Safety goggles while welding/ stone dressing etc.,

Facemasks and full body kit during pest control

Implementation of safety procedures such as:

• Using proper lifting techniques

• Using safe scaffolds

• Hot work permits for fabrication and welding.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 150

10.3 EMP DURING OCCUPANCY PHASE

10.3.1 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT

The pollutants envisaged from the proposed project are SPM, SO2, NOx and CO mainly

due to burning of liquid fuel (HSD) in DG.

Exhaust from DG sets will be emitted from stacks of adequate heights for dispersion of

gaseous pollutants. The following table presents the EMP for air quality management

during occupancy phase.

Table 10.5: Air quality management during occupancy phase

Environmental impacts Mitigation proposed

DG sets Equipment selected will ensure the exhaust emission

standards be as per the latest amendments from the

MoEF.

Adequate stack heights are provided as per KSPCB

standards.

DGs are used as stand-by units.

Periodic check and maintenance is ensured.

Vehicular movement Proper maintenance of the internal roads.

Adequate greenbelt is developed and maintained.

Informatory sign is provided to encourage vehicle

owners to maintain their vehicles and follow the

emission standards fixed by Government authorities.

Ambient air quality Ambient air quality monitoring as per the prescribed

norms at regular intervals.

10.3.2 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT

Water requirement of project will be augmented through Mandur Gram Panchayat

Sources. Details of water requirement and Water Balance Chart are presented in

Chapter 2.

The sewage generated from the proposed project will be treated in the STP. The

treatment scheme for domestic sewage generated from project is detailed in Chapter

2. Treated water will be reused for flushing, gardening etc., The following table

presents the EMP for water quality.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 151

Table 10.6: Water quality management during occupancy phase

Environmental

impacts

Mitigation proposed

Wastewater Treated in proposed sewage treatment plant.

STP to produce tertiary treated water which will be reused for

secondary purposes such as flushing, landscaping etc.,

Water conservation measures will be adopted.

10.3.3 NOISE MANAGEMENT :

High noise generating units such as DG sets s provided with acoustic enclosures. Green-

belt at the project boundary will further act as noise barrier and help in attenuation of

noise. The typical noise levels from these sources are listed in the following table:

Sl.

no.

Type of

equipment

Noise level

– dB (A)

1 DG sets 80-85

2 Pumps 70-75

The following table presents the EMP for noise level.

Table 10.7: Noise management during occupancy phase

Environmental impacts Mitigation proposed

Noise from DG set area Acoustic enclosures are proposed for DG sets.

DG sets will be installed in an area (utility section)

where the access will be restricted.

The use of PPE (ear plugs) will be mandatory in this

area.

Selection of equipment to ensure that the residual

noise level of < 55 dB (A).

Noise levels will be checked periodically using a

noise pressure level meter.

10.3.4 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

The solid wastes generated during occupancy phase can be categorized as under:

1. Domestic/Residential waste

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 152

Wet garbage: food waste, lawn mowing wastes etc.

Dry garbage: paper, plastic, bottles, etc.

2. Sludge from Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)

The solid waste generated from the project is estimated to be about 3,290 Kg/day out

of which 1,974 kgs/day (60%) is biodegradable 1,316 kgs/day (40%) is non-

biodegradable/recyclable wastes.

The sludge generated from the STP will be used as manure for landscape development

after taking it through the filter press.

The various mitigation measures to be adopted during collection and disposal of wastes

are as follows:

It is preferable that the container and bins used for collection of waste should

be of closed type so that the waste is not exposed and thus the possibility of

spreading of disease through flies and mosquitoes is minimized.

Adequate number of collection bins, separate for biodegradable and non-

biodegradable waste shall be provided as per The Municipal Solid Waste

(Management and Handling) Rules, 2000. Waste from the bins shall be collected

separately on daily basis.

Collection system should be properly supervised so that quick and regular

removal of waste from the dustbin is practiced.

Door to door collection of the solid wastes shall be done. The biodegradable

wastes will be treated in organic converter and the non-biodegradable wastes-

such as plastic materials, glass & metal wastes are handed over to the waste

recyclers.

Litter waste comprising of fallen leaves and other vegetative material will be

collected at the secured location such that it does not hinder the daily activity

schedule or be washed away by the surface runoff causing choking of drains,

etc., and such waste will be composted and used as organic manure.

10.3.5 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT:

In order to mitigate adverse impacts on water environment due to the surface runoff,

wastewater etc., provisions for adequate infrastructure facilities such as suitable

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 153

drainage system, wastewater collection and conveyance including treatment and reuse

has been proposed.

As the project location is blessed with fairly good rainfall, it is planned to collect the

storm water at different gradients of the location. There will be rainfall runoff from

building roof-tops, roads and pavements and greenbelt area. Necessary provision will

be made to collect rainfall runoff from the rooftop during rainy season. Rain harvesting

pits/recharge pits at every 30 m (centre to centre) have been envisaged.

10.3.6 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT:

The landscape of project site has been planned to provide a clean, healthy and beautiful

green environment for the people. Landscaping has been designed to achieve a blend

between modern building and various species of plants, shrubs, to create a clean,

healthy and aesthetic environment that provides a visual retreat and relaxation to the

occupants of these buildings. List of tree species proposed to be planted in the project

is detailed in Chapter 2.

Following approach will be adopted for vegetation and ground management.

It is planned to include an ecologically knowledgeable landscape architect as an

integral member of the design team.

Decrease paving and monoculture lawns.

Contain heavy equipment and stockpiling areas to predefined areas.

Design new plantings as diverse communities of species well adapted to the site.

Plant native species of varying ages.

Avoid invasive species and monocultures (same species, same age).

10.3.7 MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC ISSUES:

1) Schools for laborer’s children: Temporary education centers (crèche) is provided

for education of the children of the laborers.

2) Health camp for laborer’s family

Periodical health camps is organized to monitor and facilitate the occupants of the

labor camps.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 154

3) Public health and safety

Since all the construction related activities are confined to the project site, minimal

health related impacts are envisaged within the project influenced area during the

construction stage.

At the project site on an average of 700 people are engaged, who face direct exposure

to dust and noise generated from the construction activity. This is likely to cause health

related affects such as asthma, bronchitis etc., and hearing impairments respectively.

To minimize these anticipated impacts, suitable actions as listed below will be

undertaken

• Use of water sprinklers to prevent dust from being air borne.

• Providing suitable Personal Protective Equipments (PPE) like mouth mask with

filters, noise mask, helmets etc.,

• Periodic health check-up camp for the laborers is arranged.

• Provision of safety belts.

• In case of injury on-site medical treatment and transport will be organized.

Due to operation of the proposed project, there will be enhancement in public health

and safety.

Regular visit of resident medical officer to take care of the first-aid and primary

medication in case of emergency for occupants and laborers.

First-aid kit with primary medicines will always be available in the medical

centre.

Display of action plan and preparedness measures during emergency situations.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 155

10.4 EMP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:

Phased according to the priority, the implementation schedule is presented in the

following table.

Implementation schedule for EMP

Sl.

No.

Recommendations Requirement

1 Air pollution control

measures

Before commissioning of the project.

2 Water pollution control

measures

Before commissioning of the project.

3 Noise control measures Before commissioning of the project.

4 Solid waste management Before commissioning of the project.

5 Landscape Stage-wise implementation.

The responsibility of EMP implementation lies with the project promoter. The

responsibility of promoter during the construction phase of the project is for a period

of 3 years. Once the resident’s association / society is established, the EMP

responsibility will be properly handed over with clearly defined procedures and

guidelines.

10.5 FINANCIAL ALLOCATION/BUDGETARY PROVISIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT ASPECTS.

The financial allocation for EMP during construction phase and occupancy phase of the

project is detailed in Table 10.8 & 10.9 respectively.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 156

Table 10.8: FINANCIAL ALLOCATION AND BUDGETARY PROVISION FOR EMP ASPECTS

(CONSTRUCTION ASPECTS)

Sl. No.

Description Financial Provision in Lakhs

Capital Cost

Recurring Cost

1 Environmental Management Plan during construction phase: Using tertiary treated water for

Sprinkling to control fugitive dusts

Construction & curing purposes

Flushing and Package STP

2.0 2.0 10.0

1.0 1.0 1.0

2 Sewage Treatment Plants for Operation Phase 150.0 -

3 Potable water requirement for the construction workers 2.0 1.0

4 Maintenance of Vehicles and equipments - 1.0

5 Top Soil Conservation 2.0 -

6 Temporary Storm Water Drains 10.0 1.0

7 Personal protection safety gadgets and health care. 2.0 1.0

8 First aid facilities for workers 2.0 1.0

9 Plantation of Saplings 10.0 -

10 Environmental Monitoring Plan (Air, Noise, Water and Solid Waste).

- 10

11 TOTAL 192 9.0

Contingency at 10 % 19.2 0.9

TOTAL 211.2 9.9

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 157

Table 10.9: FINANCIAL ALLOCATION AND BUDGETARY PROVISION FOR EMP ASPECTS

(OCCUPANCY PHASE)

Sl.

No.

Description Financial Provision in

Lakh

Capital

Cost

Recurring

Cost

1 Operation of Sewage Treatment Plant - 6.0

2 Reclaimed Sewage Distribution Network 10.0 1.0

3 Rain water harvesting tanks and its facilities 10.0 1.0

4 Ground water recharging pits & its management 15.0 2.0

5 DG sets acoustic & Maintenance 10.0 1.0

6 Landscaping 20.0 2.0

7 Solid waste management per annum 10.0 1.0

8 Environmental Monitoring Plan per annum (Air, Noise,

Water and soil)

- 1.0

9 TOTAL 75.0 15.0

Contingency at 10 % 7.50 1.50

TOTAL 82.50 16.50

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 158

10.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ROUTINES

A comprehensive monitoring program is suggested below

Table 10.10: Monitoring schedule for environmental parameters

(Construction& occupancy phase)

Sl.

No

Particulars

Monitoring

frequency

Duration of

monitoring

Important

parameters for

monitoring

I Air quality

Ambient air monitoring

1. Project premises Once in a month 24 hourly sample As per Revised

NAAQS, 2009

2. Stack monitoring Once in 6 month Grab SPM, SO2, NOx,

HC, CO

II Water and wastewater quality

1. Water quality

i. Groundwater at two

locations (up-gradient and

down-gradient)

Once in a month Grab As per KSPCB

requirements

2. Wastewater quality

i. Domestic sewage at the

outlet of the Sewage

Treatment Plant

Once in a month Grab As per KSPCB

requirements

III Soil quality

1. Within project premises at

1 location

Once in six

months

Composite

sample

As per KSPCB

requirements

2. Ecological preservation and

up-gradation

Seasonal Visual

observations

Survival rate

IV Noise monitoring

1. Project premises Once in six

months

Day and night As per KSPCB

requirements

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 159

Apart from the mitigation measures described in above sections, table 10.11 describes the generic measures that need

to be undertaken during project construction and occupancy stage.

Table 10.11: Summary of the potential impacts and mitigation measures during construction and occupancy phases

Sl.

No.

Potential

impact

Action Parameters for monitoring Timing

I. CONSTRUCTION PHASE

1 Air emissions All equipments are operated within specified design

parameters.

Random checks of equipment logs

/ manuals

Construction

activities

Vehicle trips is minimized to the extent possible. Vehicle logs Site clearance

& construction

Any dry, dusty materials stored in sealed container

or prevented from blowing.

Absence of stockpiles or open

containers of dusty materials

Construction

activities

Compaction of soil during various construction

activities.

Construction logs As per PCC

(Project Civil

Contractor)

requirement.

Ambient air quality within the premises of the

project is monitored.

The ambient air quality will

conform to the standards for SPM,

SO2 and NOX.

-

2 Noise List of all noise generating machinery onsite is

prepared.

Equipments are maintained in good order.

Equipment logs, noise reading During

construction

phase

Night working is minimized. Working hour records Construction

activities

Generation of vehicular noise. Maintenance records of vehicles Construction

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 160

Good working practices is implement (equipment

selection and siting) to minimize noise and also

reduce its impacts on human health (ear muffs, safe

distances, enclosure).

Site working practices records,

noise reading

During

construction

phase

No machinery shall be running when not required.

Acoustic mufflers / enclosures are provided in large

engines.

Mufflers / enclosures in place Prior to use of

equipment

Noise is monitored in ambient air within the plant

premises.

Noise reading As per PCC

requirement or

quarterly

whichever is

lesser

The noise level do not exceed the permissible limit

both during day and night times.

All equipment are operated within specified design

parameters

Random checks of equipment logs

/manuals

Construction

phase

Vehicle trips is minimized to extent possible. Vehicle logs

3 Wastewater

discharge

No untreated wastewater discharge to be made to

surface water, groundwater or soil.

The wastewater from labor camps

is treated in package STP

Construction

phase

The discharge point is selected properly and

sampling and analysis is undertaken prior to

discharge.

Discharge norms for wastewater as

per standards is followed by

project proponent.

During

construction

phase

Wastewater generated is treated in package STP to

ensure that the soil and groundwater resources are

protected.

The wastewater generated is

treated in Package STP

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 161

4 Soil erosion Minimize area extent of site clearance, by staying

within the defined boundaries.

Site boundaries not extended /

breached as per plan document.

Construction

phase

Protect topsoil stockpile where possible at edge of

site.

Effective cover in place Construction

phase

5 Drainage and

effluent

management

Ensure drainage system and specific design

measures are working effectively.

The design to incorporate existing drainage pattern

and avoid disturbing the same.

Visual inspection of drainage and

records thereof.

During

construction

phase

6 Waste

management

Implement waste management plan that identifies

and characterizes every type of waste generated,

associated with construction activities and which

identifies the procedure for collection, handling &

disposal of each waste.

Comprehensive Waste

Management Plan in place and

available for inspection on-site.

Compliance with MSW Rules, 1998

Prior to site

clearance

7 Non-routine

events and

accidental

releases

Plan is drawn up, considering likely emergencies

and steps required to prevent / limit consequences.

Mock drills and records of the

same.

During

construction

phase

8 Environmenta

l Management

Plan

The Environmental Management Cell/Unit is set up

to ensure implementation and monitoring of

environmental safeguards.

A formal letter from the

management indicating formation

of Environment Management Cell.

During

construction

phase

II. OCCUPANCY PHASE

9 Air emissions Stack emissions from DG set to be optimized,

monitored.

The ambient air quality shall

conform to the standards of

Revised NAAQS, 2009.

During

occupancy

phase

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 162

Ambient air quality within the premises of the

proposed unit to be monitored.

Exhaust from vehicles to be minimized by use of fuel

efficient vehicles and well maintained vehicles

having PUC certificate.

The ambient air quality will

conform to the standards for SPM,

SO2 and NOx.

Vehicle logs to be maintained.

During

occupancy

phase

Vehicle trips to be minimized to the extent possible Vehicle logs During

occupancy

phase 10 Noise Noise generated from operation of DG sets to be

optimized and monitored.

DG sets to generate less than 75 dB (A) Leq at 1.0 m

from the source.

DG sets are to be provided at the Stilt floors with

acoustic enclosures with height of chimney as

specified by KSPCB.

Provide acoustic enclosures for DG

sets

Generation of vehicular noise Maintain records of vehicles

11 Wastewater

discharge

No untreated discharge to be made to surface

water, groundwater or soil.

The wastewater from the project

will be treated in a Sewage

Treatment Plant.

During

occupancy

phase

12 Drainage and

effluent

management

Ensure drainage system and specific design

measures are working effectively.

Design to incorporate existing drainage pattern and

avoid disturbing the same.

Wastewater to be treated in STP and the treated

sewage to be reused for flushing, landscaping etc.,

Visual inspection of drainage and

records thereof.

During

occupancy

phase

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 163

The project surrounding areas will be protected

and measures for protection to be undertaken.

The following measures are

undertaken

The storm water drains will be

provided with silt traps.

The wastewater generated

from the proposed

development will be

completely recycled/re-used

within the project premises.

The solid waste is proposed to

be treated in an organic

converter.

During

occupancy

phase

13 Energy usage Energy usage for AC & other activities to be

minimized. Conduct annual energy audit for the

buildings.

Findings of energy audit report During

occupancy

phase

14 Emergency

preparedness

(firefighting)

Fire protection and safety measures will be followed

to take care of fire and explosion hazards, to be

assessed and steps taken for their prevention.

Mock drill records, on site

emergency plan, evacuation plan.

During

occupancy

phase

15 Environment

Management

Cell / Unit

The Environment Management Cell / Unit to be set

up to ensure implementation and monitoring of

environmental safeguards

A formal letter from the

management indicating formation

of Environment Management Cell.

During

occupancy

phase

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 164

10.7 Environment, Health & Safety Policy:

This policy confirm the commitment of M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., to carry out its

health & safety responsibilities & duties in a manner designed to achieve & maintain a

high standard of protection for our employees, property, equipment and the public in

the conduct of our Business.

This policy will be applied continually to enhance these standards in all of our

operations from initial planning & design stage through construction, final turnover &

start-up & continuous operations.

All the management, supervisors & employees along with our direct contractors / sub-

contractors, consultants & their employees are charged with the responsibility of

providing & maintain the highest degree of health & safety performance & the

protection of our environment as well as the safety of others affected by our work.

It is the commitment to excellence that motivates M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., to

be diligent in the placement of supervisors & the selection of contractors & suppliers.

Through our established programmed, as well as relevant training & open

communication, we nurture the employees desire to excel in the areas of environment,

Health & Safety performance of the project work.

While complying with the Government Environmental Health & Safety regulatory

requirements we will also meet or exceed recognized standards as an integral part of

policy.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 165

10.8 Administrative Chart for Environmental Issues:

Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues is as under

Figure 10.1: Environmental Chart for Environmental Issues

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 166

10.9 Deploying EHS Process:

Figure 10.2: Deploying EHS Process

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 167

CHAPTER 11

SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

11.1 OVERALL JUSTIFICATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT

The Environmental Impact Assessment studies carried out for the Expansion of

Residential Apartment project is completed. The study conducted encompasses the

various areas of the proposed project starting from the location of the project, its

environmental setting and surrounding area details. This is followed by the detailed

description of the project covering details such as the land-use pattern, built-up area,

car parking facilities proposed and investment on the project. The sources of pollution

from the project viz., sewage generation from the occupants and emissions from the

generators are discussed in detail along with the measures proposed to prevent any

impact on the surrounding environment. Water requirement for the project and

rainwater harvesting and recharging measures proposed are discussed. In addition to

this landscape development options are considered.

The building structural aspects, eco-friendly features of the project, electrical

consumption and the savings achieved due to the usage of unconventional sources of

energy are detailed. The meteorological data and baseline environmental & ecological

features have been evaluated to understand the environmental setting of the project

site.

Traffic studies and its survey have been conducted to ascertain the pattern of traffic

along the approach roads to the project site. The percentage increase in the traffic due

to the proposed project reveals that the net increase in traffic is marginal when

compared with the overall traffic.

Based on the above studies an Environmental Impact and mitigation plan has been

prepared to ascertain the possible impacts of the project on the environmental

parameters like air, water, land, biological and socio-economic environment. An impact

matrix has also been prepared based on the observations of the impacts on the

environment.

An Environmental Management Plan has been prepared covering the environmental

aspect and the management plan required to be adopted by the management not only

during the course of setting up of the project but also during its occupancy phase.

The following conclusions can be drawn from the EIA studies

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 168

Development of the project will have certain level of marginal impacts on the local

environmental setting, which will not affect the natural environmental setting of

the study zone either drastically or otherwise.

The development of this project will create some direct & indirect employment

opportunities during & after the construction phase.

The development of the project will improve the infrastructure facilities around the

project site.

Mitigation measures are undertaken to prevent adverse impacts on the surrounding

environment like air, water, land and biological.

There shall be economic growth and development at the local and regional level.

To put it in a nut shell the management of M/s. Shrivision Towers Pvt. Ltd., strongly

believes in the concept of sustainable development and understands the impacts of the

project on the environment from the Environmental Impact Assessment studies

conducted. It is committed to construct and establish the project without giving room

for any adverse impacts on the environment and also lays emphasis on the

implementation of the recommendations of the Environmental Management Plan in true

spirits.

11.2 EXPLANATION OF HOW ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN MITIGATED:

The measures adopted to mitigate the impacts due to the project is tabulated below

Table 11.1 Possible effects and its mitigative measures during the Occupancy phase

No. Parameter Mitigation measures

1 Domestic sewage Treated in Sewage Treatment Plant and the treated sewage will be recycled and reused.

2 Air pollution sources

D.G. sets Stacks of adequate heights

3 Noise pollution

sources – DG sets

Acoustic enclosures

4 Domestic garbage Organic waste will be treated in Organic Converter and in-organic waste will be sent for recycling.

5 Hazardous solid

waste

DG Oil - Handed over to authorized recyclers

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 169

CHAPTER 12

DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED

12.1 THE NAMES OF THE CONSULTANTS ENGAGED WITH THEIR BRIEF RESUME &

NATURE OF CONSULTANCY RENDERED

Address: M/s. AQUA TECH ENVIRO ENGINEERS,

No. 3391, 6th Main, 3rd Cross, RPC Layout,

Vijayanagar 2nd Stage, Bangalore – 560 040.

Phone No. 080 23142697, Fax No. 080 23148166

E – mail id – [email protected]

The Consultants and experts engaged in Preparation of the EIA report for obtaining

Environmental Clearance for the proposed Expansion of Residential Apartment Project

with addition of flats (710 flats), built up area 88,458.25 sq m at Survey No.s 73/1,

73/2A, 74 (P) & 81, Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk,

Bangalore District.

M/s. AQUA TECH ENVIRO ENGINEERS is an Environmental Engineering Consultancy

established in the year 2000 with specialization in Water and Wastewater Management.

The Organization is having a team of specialized professionals, technically qualified and

competent graduates and post graduates in disciplines of Environmental, Chemical,

Civil, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, capable of achieving comprehensive

solutions for industrial pollution prevention control and abatement.

Our infrastructure includes modern office with office area of 1200 Sqft backed with

3000 Sqft of manufacturing facility to manufacture STP/ETP treatment plant

equipments and Air Pollution control systems.

We offer

1. Consultancy services for Water and Wastewater Treatment & its Management.

2. Turnkey Execution of Water and Sewage Treatment Plants (STP’s) and Industrial

3. Effluent Treatment Plants (ETP’s).

4. Annual Operation and Maintenance of Treatment Plants.

5. Conducting Environmental Audits and Preparation of Environmental Statements.

6. Preparation of Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment (REIA)/Environmental

7. Impact Assessment (EIA) for projects covered under EIA Notifications and

8. Environment Management Plan & Studies.

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 170

9. Solutions to any other related Environmental problems.

KEY PERSONNEL OF THE ORGANISATION:

Name Qualifications Designation Experience

Mr. K.R Sree Harsha B.E (Civil & Env. Engg)

M. Tech (Env Engg )

Chief Executive 18 Years.

Mr. C.T Puttaswamy B.E (Chem.),

M Tech (Env.)

Technical Advisor. 15 Years

Mr. Channakesava B.E (Env.)

Environmental

Engineer.

13 Years

Mr.Hanumantha Raj Urs M Sc (Envi Sc) Environmental

Analyst

9 Years

Mrs. Rohini. S B.E. (Env.) Environmental

Engineer.

8 Years

Ms. Jyothi B.E (Env.)

Environmental

Engineer

1 Year

Ms. Vidhya B.E (Env.)

Environmental

Engineer

1 Year

Mr. Vinay Kumar M Com., MBA Finance 9 Years

Mr. Jahirdhar DME Site Engineer 15 Years

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 171

Figure: - 12.1 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

“Green Fields”

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 172

12.2 ARCHITECTS ENGAGED FOR THE PROJECT:

Sl. No.

Description

1 Architects: M/s. A & A Architects and Planners Pvt. Ltd., 1150, 26th Main, 4th T Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore – 560 041

12.3 Laboratory studies for monitoring

M/s. Bangalore Test House is a NABL certified laboratory.

Address: M/s. Bangalore Test House

#65, 20th Main,, Marenahalli,

Vijaynagar, Bangalore – 560 040.

NAME OF LABORATORY SCOPE OF SERVICES ACCREDITATION

STATUS

M/s. Bangalore Test House

#65, 20th Main,, Marenahalli,

Vijaynagar, Bangalore – 560 040

Monitoring and Analysis of:

1. Ambient Air Quality

Monitoring

2. Ground and Surface Water

Quality Monitoring

3. Noise Level Monitoring and

4. Soil Quality Monitoring

5. Metrological data collection

M/s. Bangalore Test

House is a NABL

certified laboratory