Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
APPENDIX A
Environmental Services Environmental Health
SERVICE PLAN 2010-12
Head of Service: Keith Marley
Director: Nigel McCurdy
Member Champion(s): Cllr Rona Burt – Regulatory Services; Cllr Marion Fairman-Smith – Health & Older Communities; Cllr Tony Simmons – Environment
Date:
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
1. What will the overall service look like in 2012?
Our vision is to protect, sustain and improve the quality of the environment and the health of the community. Through:
x better working together x providing value for money x highly efficient, responsive & accessible services x quality, innovation, enthusiasm & inclusion
This will support the Corporate Priorities:
1) Affordable & accessible housing 2) Community engagement and communication 3) Community safety 4) Economic regeneration 5) Outreach projects for young people 6) Street scene and environment 7) Transport issues 8) Corporate excellence
We will seek to be even more flexible and targeted in our approach to enable the service to adequately respond and adapt to the future economic climate, and continue to tackle the serious environmental health issues. The structure of our service has been changed to accommodate a larger team to support and regulate the business community, and consideration will now be given to how best to align the remaining services. We will also regularly review our policies, systems, capacity and opportunities for partnerships to ensure that we achieve our priorities and vision.
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
2. Resource Statement
A. Future strategy / direction (Key issues & challenges)
B. Resources – HR (FTEs)
80. Impact on resources HR / IT / Property & Accommodation
09/10 10/11 11/12 Food, Licensing and Safety • Food Hygiene Interventions, and • Health and Safety Interventions • Licensing Interventions & Administration
4.5
2.2
3.5
2.2
3.5
2.2
Subject to VfM review and budget considerations
Private Sector Housing • Housing Regulatory Interventions • Housing Assistance Interventions • HMO Interventions • Public Health Interventions
4.0 3.0 30 Subject to VfM review and budget considerations
Environmental Protection • Pollution Control Interventions • Nuisance & Public Health Interventions • Dog & Pest Control Interventions • Sustainability including Climate Change • Flooding & Drinking Water Interventions
5.0 5.0 5.0 Subject to VfM review and budget considerations
Support function 3.5 3.5 3.5 Resources – HR
(FTEs) Resources – Base Budget
(£s) 09/10 10/11 11/12 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12
Total for the Service 15.7 13.7 13.7 £1,196,085 £1,308,188 £1,314,910
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
3. Service Standards (not the Council’s Corporate Service Standards)
How measured Ref Standard PI Other method /comment
Last reviewed
Animal Welfare
SS3 Inspect all animal establishments at least once a year. N/A Monitored via a year end M3 Report, based on programmed work schedule.
April 2009
SS4 Respond to enquiries and complaints regarding animal establishments within three working days. N/A Monitored via an M3 Report run quarterly. April 2009
Dog Control Services
SS30 Respond to all enquiries about dangerous dogs within one working day. ENP101 Monitored via M3
20 Oct 2009
SS31 Respond to reports about stray dogs within one working day. ENP101 Monitored via M3 20 Oct 2009
SS32 Respond to enquiries about barking dogs and dog fouling within three working days. ENP101 Monitored via M3 Report run quarterly
20 Oct 2009
SS33 Collect stray dogs within one working day and keep them for seven days (if the owner does not claim the dog within that time we will try to find the dog a new home).
ENP101 Monitored via contractor Reports 20 Oct 2009
Enforcement (Environmental Services) SS34 Respond to all service requests within three working days. ENV101 Monitored via M3 Report run quarterly 20 Oct 2009
SS35 Ensure consistency and equality in advice provided in response to all service requests and other incidents. NI 182 Relates to business contacts Ongoing
SS36 Ensure that all enforcement action taken by the Council is proportionate to the risks posed and the seriousness of any breach of the law.
NI 182 As above Ongoing
SS37 Confirm in writing any actions that are required, clearly stating what law has been contravened and identifying what must be done to meet the law.
N/A Ongoing
SS38 Confirm in writing any right of appeal against any action that we take. N/A
Principles of our enforcement policy Ongoing
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
How measured Ref Standard PI Other method /comment
Last reviewed
Food Safety
New Issue Scores on the doors certificate following inspections of risk category A to D food premises Monitored via audits of food hygiene inspections
(as per team work procedure) 20 Oct 2009
SS40 Respond to complaints of poor hygiene and unsatisfactory food within three working days. FWS101 Monitored via M3 on a monthly basis 20 Oct 2009
SS41 When dealing with food complaints, update the complainant every 20 working days. N/A Monitored via M3. 20 Oct 2009
SS42 Respond to requests for advice and information about food safety within three working days. FWS101 Monitored via M3 on a monthly basis 20 Oct 2009
SS43 Post food safety letters and notices following an inspection within 10 working days.
N/A
Officer recommendation, removal from list. Monitoring would be too onerous. Std is monitored via team monitoring work procedure (audit)
20 Oct 2009
SS44 Offer a food safety training course at least every quarter. N/A Administered by Support Team: approx. 5 run per year. 20 Oct 2009
SS45 Publish food safety newsletters each year. N/A Officer recommendation, removal from list. 20 Oct 2009
SS46 Differentiate between legal requirements and recommendations in reports and letters. N/A As with ss37 and 38, this service standard is
required to be done by law. 20 Oct 2009
SS47 Inspect businesses within a month of the due inspection date. N/A Monitoring is done by checking programmed visits versus actual visits. 20 Oct 2009
Health and Safety New Complete health and safety interventions (inspections) N/A Monitored via M3. 20 Oct 2009
SS48 Respond to complaints of poor health and safety within three working days. FWS101 Monitored via M3 on a monthly basis 20 Oct 2009
SS49 Respond to accidents that are notified within three working days. N/A
Not all accidents investigated. Accidents selected based upon risk and accident selection criteria. FWS101 does not monitor this standard.
20 Oct 2009
SS50 Respond to requests for advice and information about health and safety within three working days. FWS101 Monitored via M3 on Monthly basis 20 Oct 2009
SS51 Post letters and notices following an inspection within ten working days. N/A This Service Standard is a duplicate of ss44 and
therefore should be removed from the list. 20 Oct 2009
SS52 Publish health and safety newsletters each year. N/A Officer recommendation, removal from list. 20 Oct 2009 Infectious Diseases
SS55 Respond to reports of food borne and infectious diseases within one working day. N/A Monitored via M3 Report run quarterly. 20 Oct 2009
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
How measured Ref Standard PI Other method /comment
Last reviewed
Housing (Private Sector Housing)
SS56 Respond to enquiries about housing conditions within three working days. PSH103 Monitored via M3 Report run quarterly 24 Oct 2009
SS57 Carry out enforcement action in accordance with the Council’s Corporate Enforcement Policy and the Regulation of Housing Standards Policy.
N/A This service standard is a legal requirement. Ongoing
Licensing New Respond to service requests within three working days. TBC Monitored via M3 on Monthly basis Nov 2009
SS63 Issue licences under the Licensing Act (2003) and Gambling Act (2005) within three working days of receiving all the necessary approvals, including Hearing decisions.
LIC102a; LIC102b;
To be removed as a covalent PI, still monitored locally
SS64 Issue Private Hire/Hackney Carriage/Operator’s Licences within three working days of receiving all the necessary approvals. LIC101;
As above
SS65 Issue and dispatch all other licences, permits and consents within three working days of receipt of completed application forms.
LIC102a; LIC102b;
As above
Pest Control
SS66 Respond to requests for pest investigations and advice about pest issues within three working days. ENP101 Monitored via M3 Report run quarterly 20 Oct 2009
Pollution (Contaminated Land)
SS80 Respond to enquiries about contaminated land within three working days. ENP101 Monitored via M3 Report run quarterly 20 Oct 2009
SS81 Assess reports of investigations into any soil contamination within 10 working days. ENP101 Monitored via M3 20 Oct 2009
SS82 Respond to requests for environmental searches within 10 working days. ENP101 Monitored via M3 20 Oct 2009
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
How measured Ref Standard PI Other method /comment
Last reviewed
Pollution (Pollution Control)
SS83 Meet our responsibility to review air quality and meet government deadlines and produce reports on our assessments.
N/A Statutory Responsibility under Environment Act 1995. Monitored through returns to DEFRA.
20 Oct 2009
SS84 Respond to reports of environmental crime and nuisance, including noise and odour, within three working days. ENP101 Monitored via M3 Report run quarterly 20 Oct 2009
SS85 Respond to planning applications within 21 days. ENP101 Monitored via M3 24 Oct 2009
SS86 Inspect potentially polluting processes for which we have responsibility at least once every year. N/A Statutory Responsibility, monitored through
returns to DEFRA. 24 Oct 2009
4. Service Actions
1: AFFORDABLE AND ACCESSIBLE HOUSING 5: OUTREACH PROJECTS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE 2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION 6: STREET SCENE AND ENVIRONMENT 3: COMMUNITY SAFETY 7: TRANSPORT ISSUES
Cor
pora
te
Pri
ority
K
ey
4: ECONOMIC REGENERATION 8: SUPPORTING CORPORATE EXCELLENCE
WHAT IS THE SERVICE DOING TO SUPPORT THESE PRIORITIES?
FOOD, LICENSING AND SAFETY
KEY CURRENT BUSINESS
ACTIVITY LINKED PI? (see sect. 5)
2010-2012
• Complete planned food hygiene inspections • Complete planned health and safety inspections • Complete planned licensing inspections • Carry out at least one campaign each for food; licensing and safety functions • Implement new Skin Piercing Bye-laws
NI 182/NI 184/FWS01 NI 182/FWS02
NI 182/LIC04/LIC05 NI 182 NI 182 NI 184
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
• Review and update HACCP interventions strategy • Review Team response procedure to infectious diseases • Ensure full compliance with revised Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 Section 18 Standard. • Partnership (continue HSE & Suffolk LA’s Joint Health and Safety Warranting) • Implement improvements to licensing service • Implement outcomes from Equality Impact Assessments
FWS02
FWS02 LIC01
NEW BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT / TRANSFORMATION
Priority (Enter Y) LINKED PI? ACTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Est. start (mn/yr) (see sect. 5)
• Ensure full compliance with revised Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 Section 18 Standard.
Y Y Y
April 2010 NI 182
• LPG – Interventions at all establishments with buried LPG supply pipes (ICL Enquiry)
Y Y
April 2010
FWS02
• Implement revised animal welfare licensing regime (when secondary legislation introduced)
Y Y Subject to legislation
• Revision of work procedures and approaches following Pennington E. coli inquiry
Y Y
April 2010 NI 184
• Identification of joint/partnership enforcement initiatives for all team functions Y Y April 2010 PRIVATE SECTOR HOUSING
KEY CURRENT BUSINESS
ACTIVITY LINKED PI? (see sect. 5)
2010-2012
� Regulation of housing standards & public health � Improved accommodation for residents of houses in multiple occupation through a risk based (worst first)
inspection programme � Housing assistance: adaptations & improvement of non decent homes � Regulation of mobile home sites � Provision of a Landlords Accreditation Scheme to improve standards in the private rented sector and
PSH103/N1 182 PSH103/ENV101 PSH103 PSH103 PSH103/ENV101 PSH103
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
reduce the need for enforcement interventions � Planning consultations on housing developments � Provision of housing related advice to the general public � Support the new Home Improvement Agency (HIA) Service � Implement outcomes from Equality Impact Assessments
ENV101 PSH103/N1 182 PSH103
NEW BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT / TRANSFORMATION
Priority (Enter Y) LINKED PI? ACTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Est. start (mn/yr) (see sect. 5)
2010-2012
• Launch & implementation of the Landlord Accreditation Scheme (if viable)
Y
08/2010 N21/PSH03/PSHO4 • Implementation of the revised Housing Assistance Policy 04/2010 N21/PSH01/PSH04 • Input into the Council’s new Housing Strategy Y 04/2010
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
KEY CURRENT BUSINESS
ACTIVITY LINKED PI? (see sect. 5)
2010-2012
• Regulation & improvement of the environment & public health: • Control of nuisance, pests & ensuring responsible dog ownership • Contaminated land: identification & remediation • Assessment & regulation of air quality • Regulation of industrial installations • Regulation of private water supplies • Licensing Act consultation and interventions • Implementation of the sustainable development strategy • Implementation of the Home Energy Conservation Act (HECA) • Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change • Project Lead in respect to the Carbon Management Programme • Planning consultation lead
NI 194/182/ENV101 NI 182/ENP101 NI 182/188 NI 194/188/186 NI 194/188/N1 182 NI 188/ENP101 NI 182 NI 188/187/186 NI 188/187/186 NI 188 NI 188/186/185 NI 194/188 NI 188/182
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
• Prevention of Flooding • Local land search consultation • Implement outcomes from Equality Impact Assessments
NI 188/182
NEW BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT / TRANSFORMATION
Priority (Enter Y) LINKED PI? ACTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Est. start (mn/yr) (see sect. 5)
Review Sustainable Development Strategy y 08/2010 NI188/187/186 Review the Contaminated Land Strategy y 01/2011 NI188/185 Contribute to the Flooding Action Plan when agreed
y
04/2011 NI 188
Implement the Private Water Regulations
y 04/2011 N1 188
5. Performance Measurement
5(a). National Indicators (NIs)
Target NI No. NI
All DCs Median
All DCs Top quartile
2008/2009 Actual
2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
NI 182 Satisfaction of business with local authority regulation services
Data not yet
available
Data not yet
available 67% 65% 65% 65%
NI 184 Food establishments in the area which are broadly compliant with food hygiene law
Data not yet
available
Data not yet
available 80.00% 79% 81% 83%
NI 185 * CO2 reduction from local authority operations
Data not yet
available
Data not yet
available NA 7% 6% 6%
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
NI 186 Per capita reduction in CO2 emissions in the LA area
Data not yet
available
Data not yet
available NA -8.0% -12% NA
NI 187(i)
Tackling fuel poverty – % of people receiving income based benefits living in homes with a low energy efficiency rating: (i) Low energy efficiency
Data not yet
available
Data not yet
available 13.00% 11.00% 11.00% 11.00%
NI 187(ii)
Tackling fuel poverty – % of people receiving income based benefits living in homes with a high energy efficiency rating: (ii) High energy efficiency
Data not yet
available
Data not yet
available 24.25% 23.00% 23.00% 23.00%
NI 188 Planning to Adapt to Climate Change
Data not yet
available
Data not yet
available 1 2 3 4
NI 194 Air quality – % reduction in NOx and primary PM10 emissions through local authority’s estate and operations
No data available for this range
5(b). Local Performance Indicators (LPIs)
Target NI No. NI
All DCs Median
All DCs Top quartile
2008/2009 Actual
2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
ENP01 Information on contaminated land (was BV216b) 4% 11% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5%
FWS01 % of food premises inspections that should have been carried out that were carried out (was EH01)
n/a n/a 97.00% 90.00% 90.00% 90.00% 90.00%
FWS02 % of H&S premises inspections that should have been carried out that were carried out
n/a n/a 82% 90.00% 90.00% 90.00% 90.00%
LIC04 % of premises inspections carried out n/a n/a 39% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0%
LIC05 % of premises that are compliant n/a n/a No data for
this range 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0
PSH01 Number of non decent homes made decent n/a n/a 27 24 24 24 24
PSH02 HMO’s made broadly compliant n/a n/a n/a (new PI) 8 8 8 8
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
5(c). Service Performance Measures (SPMs)
SPM No. SPM 2008/09 Actual
Baseline 09/10
ENV101 Average time from service request to completion (days) - Env Health 25.0 23.0
There are no improvement targets for SPMs (e.g. End to End times)
Performance improvement is considered against previous performance (moving baseline)
ENP101 Average time from service request to completion (days) - Env Protection 28.6 22.6
FWS101 Average time from service request to completion (days) - Food/Workplace Safety 8.9 8.8
LIC102a Average time for variation application - Premises (days) 33 29 Remove as SPM, and report locally as part of quarterly
grants report LIC102b Average time for new application -
Premises (days) 30 29 As above
LIC103 Average time from service request to completion (days) - Licensing No data 2
PSH101 End to end completion time (days) for disabled facilities grants (from OT referral requesting grant to works completed)
197 221 Remove as SPM, and report locally as part of quarterly grants report
PSH103 Average time from service request to completion (days) - Private Sector Housing 39.4 39.4
PSH104 Average time (days) from receipt of Decent Home Application to completion of works - Private Sector Housing
124.7 105 Remove as SPM, and report locally as part of quarterly grants report
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
6. Risk
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.02 Failure to Provide Food Safety Enforcement Function Keith Marley Tom Wright 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Food Standards Agency take over function as a Food Authority at cost to the Authority. LA is also vulnerable to negative publicity and increased risk to consumers by consumption of food (outbreaks/death)
Risk Category Details
Political, Social, Legislative, Customer. Professional, Legal, Information & reputational
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 3 Possible 4 Significant 2 Unlikely 4 Significant
Risk Rating as at:
20 October 2009
Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
X
L
I
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
31 October 2010
Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
X
L
I
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Treat
Linked Actions Details • Database maintained on a daily basis to ensure accurate information • Use of competent and qualified staff to carry out inspections • Provision for use of qualified and quality contractors to assist in inspections • All premises properly risk rated following an inspection/intervention • Ensure the interventions are carried out in accordance with the Food Safety
• Ensure capacity is maintained • Undertake review of existing work procedures • Implement new work procedures • Review current position against
By date
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Act Codes of Practice • Food Sampling carried out – assists in targeting resources on non compliant
premises
recommendation from Prof. Pennington E. coli enquiry
• Implement identified improvements
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.03 Scores on the doors Keith Marley Tom Wright 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Inconsistency with national scheme, causing increased criticism from food businesses and consumers
Risk Category Details
Political, Social, Customer and Information
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 2 Unlikely 2 Minor 2 Unlikely 2 Minor
Risk Rating as at: 24 Jul 2009
Low (4) Minor-Unlikely
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
31 Mar 2010 Low (4) Minor-Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Tolerate
Linked Actions Details • Maintenance of current system • Reports in place • Webpage produced & updated • Standard correspondence in place
• Management Team report to seek approval for change to current scheme
• Produce work procedure • Provided information to food businesses • Implement revised scheme
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.04 Failure to provide health and Safety Enforcement Function Keith Marley Tom Wright 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Local inquiry may result in the issue of a ‘fault order’ against the LA. Failure to comply with this may result in transfers of function to HSE at cost to the LA.
Risk Category Details
Political, Social, Legislative, Customer. Professional, Legal and Information
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 3 Possible 4 Significant 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate
Risk Rating as at: 24 Jul 2009
Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
X
L
I
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
31 October 2010
Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Treat
Linked Actions Details • Database maintained on a daily basis to ensure accurate information • Use of competent and qualified staff to carry out inspections • All premises properly risk rated following an inspection/intervention • Ensure that interventions are carried out in accordance with National HSE
Guidance and LAC’s • Ensuring compliance with S.18 standards of Enforcement in accordance with
the timescale prescribed within the document
• Ensure capacity is maintained • Undertake review of existing work procedures • Implement new work procedures • Review current position against HASAW S.18
Self Assessment Audit • Implement identified improvements
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.05 (EP) Public health & nuisance complaint investigations (including out of hours) Keith Marley Keith Mumford 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Failure to carryout the Council’s statutory duties and corporate priorities
Risk Category Details
The risk categories that are relevant and have been assessed are legislative, customer, environmental, social and legal
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate
Risk Rating as at: 20 Oct 2009
Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
20 Oct 2010 Low Minor Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Tolerate
Linked Actions Details Current: * Monthly progress checks * Provide training for other team members to assist when needed * Weekly checks carried out if need be to assess & maintain capacity within the team * Appropriate & timely use of enforcement powers to ensure swift resolution of problems
• Work flexibly within the team to deal with out of hours
• Undertake review of procedures
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.06 Air Quality Improvements Keith Marley Keith Mumford 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Failure to carryout the Council’s statutory duties and corporate priorities
Risk Category Details
The risk categories that are relevant and have been assessed are legislative, customer, environmental, social and legal
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate
Risk Rating as at: 20 Oct 2009
Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
20 Oct 2010 Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Tolerate
Linked Actions Details Current: * Monthly progress checks in respect to action plan * Provide training for other team members to assist when needed * Weekly checks
• Work flexibly within the team • Ensure capacity is maintained
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.07 Sustainability improvements Keith Marley Keith Mumford 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Failure to carryout the Council’s statutory duties and corporate priorities
Risk Category Details
The risk categories that are relevant and have been assessed are legislative, customer, environmental, social and legal
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate 2 Unlikely 3
Risk Rating as at: 20 Oct 2009
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
20 Oct 2010 Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Approach Tolerate
Linked Actions Details *Monthly progress checks Provide training for other team members to assist when needed be * To put forward a growth bid for additional capacity if need be
• Work flexibly within the team • Ensure capacity is maintained
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.08 Private Water supplies inspections Keith Marley Keith Mumford 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Failure to carryout the Council’s statutory duties and corporate priorities
Risk Category Details
The risk categories that are relevant and have been assessed are legislative, customer, environmental, social and legal
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate
Risk Rating as at: 20 Oct 2009
Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
20 Oct 2010 Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Tolerate
Linked Actions Details Current: * Monthly progress checks * Provide training for other team members to assist when needed * To put forward a growth bid for additional capacity if need be
• Work flexibly within the team • Ensure capacity is maintained
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.09 Flooding Improvements Keith Marley Keith Mumford 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Failure to carryout the Council’s statutory duties and corporate priorities
Risk Category Details
The risk categories that are relevant and have been assessed are legislative, customer, environmental, social and legal
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 2 Unlikely
3 Moderate 2 Unlikely 3 Moderate
Risk Rating as at: 20 Oct 2009
Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
20 Oct 2010 Medium (6) Moderate-Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Tolerate
Linked Actions Details Current: * Monthly progress checks * Provide training for other team members to assist if needed * To put forward a growth bid for additional capacity if need be
• Work flexibly within the team • Ensure capacity is maintained
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.13 Private sector housing; regulatory and assistance functions Keith Marley Andrew Newman; Keith Mumford 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Failure to carryout the Council’s statutory duties and to fulfil corporate priorities
Risk Category Details
The risk categories that are relevant and have been assessed are legislative & legal, customer, professional, social, reputational & financial
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 3 Possible 4 Significant 2 Unlikely 4 Significant
Risk Rating as at: 20 Oct 2009
Medium (12) Significant - Possible
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
20 Oct 2010 Medium (8) Significant - Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Treat
Linked Actions Details Current: * Sufficient and effective database, reporting and management interventions * Risk based inspection regime * Enforcement good practice in line with policy and associated guidance * Required capacity supplemental via external consultants
* Implement data quality improvements * Monthly monitoring checks and management interventions * Maintain permanent capacity * Use of revised enforcement Policy & associated procedural manual
'UDIW�6HUYLFH�3ODQ���������(QYLURQPHQWDO�6HUYLFHV�
Risk Code & Title Risk Owner Assigned To Year Identified
RSK SRV ENV 9.14 Licensing statutory functions Keith Marley Tom Wright 2008
Description (Threat / vulnerability)
Legal action from applicants and other responsible authorities
Risk Category Details
Political, Social, Legislative, Customer. Professional, Legal and Information
Current Risk Assessment Target Risk Assessment Likelihood Impact Likelihood Impact 2 Unlikely 4 Significant 2 Unlikely 4 Significant
Risk Rating as at:
20 October 2009
Medium (8) Significant - Unlikely
Target Date and Target Risk Rating
31 October 2010
Medium (8) Significant - Unlikely
Existing Controls Effectiveness Not Assessed Approach Tolerate
Linked Actions Details • Reports are available every quarter and managed on Lalpac IT system • Improved application and issue processes • Implementing Licensing review recommendations • Risk based inspection of licensed premises being undertaken
• Implement standard procedures for licensing inspections
• Identify joint enforcement initiatives to coincide with ‘due’ inspections
• Host licensing update training for all officers