esemenku

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    1/17

    1

    INTRODUCTION

    One of the most important types of subsystem in any organization is the work group. Any

    huge task cannot be done alone except for the person who could do it alone is a

    superhuman which had all the abilities of all humans. One may think that he could do his

    work alone but without realizing it is because of participants from his group mate.

    If we look apart from our work life, could someone stand alone by himself in this huge

    world? The answer is affirmatively no. One needs family, friends and others, or otherwise

    his life would become so bored and totally wrecked. Imagine if we are getting sick, the

    first we need is for someone to take care of us. Thus, it shows that in every little thing in

    we do in this world we need someones help in getting the work done. That is why we have

    to work in group. Even one group can give benefits to other group in achieving the

    organization goals.

    What exactly is a group? There is no actual definition of group. A popular definition

    defines the group term as any number of people who:

    1) Interact with one another2) Are psychologically aware of one another3) Perceive themselves to be a group

    A group usually consists of large size of members in it. Since it consist large amount of

    people in a group, thus it will face a large number of behaviour. It is a natural human being

    to have a different behaviour between each other. If humans are made with the same

    behaviour or intelligence, there will be no various type of work can be done. For example

    if all humans are born to be a doctor who have all the abilities to becomes one, there will

    no leaders who could lead his country and all his followers towards a better world.

    Mc Gregor (1960) developed a theory of humans behaviour. He distinguished between

    two world-views managerial styles that is Theory X and Theory Y. People in theory X are

    the one that is dislike work, trying to avoid it as much as possible and needs to be

    controlled and motivated by others. Apart from that is a person in theory Y who likes work

    and can control and motivate himself.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    2/17

    2

    Since there is two totally different people introduced by McGregor, would there any

    cooperation exist if those two types of people were gathered in a group? If we think it

    generally, both of these people cannot fit into a group. There wouldnt be any chances for

    east to meets west. Yet it takes all sorts to makes a world. These differences complete each

    other.

    Generally, behaviour can be expected if we know how is someone perception on one thing

    and what is important for him. Even though we find someones behaviour is not rational, it

    is believed that his behaviour is actually to become rational and totally rational. One will

    see it as irrational because of they dont get the information as the same way or they look it

    from a different view. Affirmatively there exists diversity between these people.

    Various type of work talent had an important implication in management. All of those

    manager should change their thought that all people are the same to agree on the diversity

    and give reaction to the diversity by indiscriminate the workers.

    The relationship between behaviour and personality is perhaps one of the most complex

    matters that managers have to understand. When we speak about an individuals

    personality we are referring to a relatively stable set of feelings and behaviours that have

    been significantly formed by genetic and environmental factors. Thus this individuals

    personality also contributes to the behaviour of a person in a group. And this will make the

    diversity getting bigger.

    Group members are brought together in order to collaborate or contribute towards a

    common goal, most commonly in the workplace or school projects. This does not

    necessarily mean that the group acts like individuals. A group needs to have a mix of

    different roles in order for the group to accomplish the task at hand.

    Members of a group always fall into specific roles; defining and understanding these roles

    greatly influence groups as a whole and their level of performance. Who leads and who

    follows? To simplify the roles of individuals have to look back on its overall cause and the

    realization of an objective. Roles are expected behaviour for a given position (Kreitner &

    Kinicki, 2003). Roles become evident at critical points in group development, normally at

    its formation, and throughout each stage of the group's evolution.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    3/17

    3

    Kenneth Benne and Paul Sheats the two influential theorists on group behaviour, who

    wrote a respected article titled "Functional Roles of Group Members" back in the 1940s. In

    it, they defined 26 different group roles that can be played by one or more people within a

    group. Their work influenced other early research and thinking on group functions. And

    while more recent research has refined many of these ideas, Benne and Sheats Group

    Roles remains a useful and interesting way of looking at group.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    4/17

    4

    BENNE AND SHEATS GROUP ROLES

    Benne and Sheats defined three categories of group roles:

    1) Task roles2) Personal and social roles / maintenance roles3) Dysfunctional or individualistic roles

    Task roles

    The task roles were identified by behaviours such as facilitating and co-ordinating group

    activities and suggesting new ideas and ways of solving problems. These are the roles that

    relate to getting the work done. Group task roles focus on the task at hand and include.

    Beneath task roles, there are 12 types of roles that are:

    i) Initiator/contributor

    People who plays role the initiator/contributor are whom who suggests new

    ways of perceiving or approaching the problems or goals of the group. This

    may entail new solutions, procedures or ways of organizing the group. They

    always move groups into new areas of exploration.

    ii) Information seeker

    These are the people who ask for clarification of new ideas in terms of their

    factual adequacy and expertness/authoritativeness. He always seeks for expert

    information or facts relevant to the problem by determining what information is

    missing and needs to be found before moving step ahead.

    iii) Information giverThese are the people who offers facts or generalizations which are expert or

    authoritative. They provide factual information for the group. Sometimes

    they used their own experience when relevant.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    5/17

    5

    iv) Opinion seeker

    These are the people who ask for clarification of the values, attitudes and

    opinions of group members. They concentrate on the group discussions to make

    sure different perspectives are given. They did not tend trying to find the

    relevant facts.

    v) Opinion giver

    These people supplies values and beliefs to the problem in hand rather than

    facts. They express their own opinions about the subject being discussed. They

    often states in terms of what the group should do.

    vi) Elaborator

    People in this role take other peoples initial ideas and builds on them with

    examples, relevant facts and data. They also look at the consequences of

    proposed ideas and actions.

    vii) Co-ordinator

    They identify and explain the relationship between ideas. They pull together all

    the ideas and make them cohesive.

    viii) Orienter

    This role is the people who reviews and clarifies group position. They provide a

    summary of what has been accomplished, how far has the group veered and

    suggest on how to get back on target

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    6/17

    6

    ix) Evaluator/critic

    They evaluate proposals against the objective standard. They asses the

    proposals and look for the unreasonable objectives and whether it was heading

    to a solution.

    x) Energizer

    These people stimulate and challenge the group to take further action and

    always make the group move forward.

    xi) Procedural technician

    They are suppose to take care about logistical concerns for the group such as

    preparing the needs for meeting and place where the meeting wild held.

    xii) Recorder

    They acts as the secretary or minute keeper which record all the ideas and keep

    track on everything that were discussed in a meeting.

    Personal and social roles / maintenance roles

    The maintenance roles are to ensure that human relationship and communication within

    group are strengthened while tasks are being performed. These roles are focusing on

    keeping the group together to achieve the groups goal. Maintenance roles contribute

    positive functioning of the group. Both task and maintenance roles help the group pursue

    its goals. There are 6 types of roles identified by Benne and Sheats under maintenance

    roles. These are:

    i) EncouragerThese are the people who praise, reward and support others in the group

    especially on the efforts that they had shown. They demonstrate warmth and

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    7/17

    7

    provide a positive attitude during meetings. They always defend the shy

    members by encouraging them to be confident during presenting their ideas.

    ii) Harmonizer

    Harmonizer or sometimes known as a peacemaker are the people who always

    soothing the mood in a group. They seek to find the way to reduce the tension

    between the members and diffuse the situation by providing further

    explanations and sometimes by using humour. They play the diplomat and try

    to build a consensus. They are trying to keep the group in a harmony and

    peaceful situation.

    iii) CompromiserThese are the people who are willing to reduce conflict by compromising with

    the oppositions by yielding status or admitting error. Sometimes they offer to

    change their position for the good of the group.

    iv) Gatekeeper/Expediter

    They ensure that everybody have chances to speak up their own ideas. These

    are done by limiting the members who dominate the conversation and

    encourage the shy and quiet members to express their ideas. Sometimes they

    suggest a groups rules to make sure everybody had their chances.

    v) Observer/Commentator

    They provide feedback on how the group is functioning and often seen when a

    group wants to set, evaluate or change its standards and processes.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    8/17

    8

    vi) Follower

    The followers are always seen as the listener not the contributor. They accept

    what others say and involve in decision making even though they was not

    contributing any idea.

    Individual roles

    Individual roles are negative functional roles and do not help the group to move towards

    its goals. People playing this roles attempt to satisfy their own needs and desires and work

    against the group as it tries to achieve its goals. These roles disrupt the group progress and

    weaken its cohesion. There are 8 types of negative roles which are:

    i) Aggressor

    These people always make personal attacks by using insulting comment.

    Attacking people is their main role. They tend to critics and give negative

    comments to all the ideas given by other group members without giving a

    solution to it.

    ii) Blocker

    They oppose ideas or opinion given yet refuse to give even a single suggestion

    for all the ideas that they opposed. That is why they are named as the blocker.

    They block all the ideas or opinions given by others.

    iii) Recognition seeker

    This person attracts everybodys attention to focus on him especially during

    meeting. They always talks about something good or best that he they had done

    in the past so that people will recognize them as one of the excellent member.

    And sometimes they draw peoples attention by making something stupid such

    as making excess noise.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    9/17

    9

    iv) Self-confessor

    This type of role used meetings as a place which they can confess or appoint

    their personal feelings and issues. They always relate topics discussed in the

    meetings with their personal experience which almost of the time did not have

    any relation of the topics discussed by the group.

    v) Disrupter/playboy or playgirl

    They used meetings as a place which they can have fun time and avoid from

    real work. They distract the meetings by playing pranks, telling jokes or even

    reading unrelated material.

    vi) Dominator

    This person dominates everything in the group. This can be easily seen during

    meetings. This type of people loves to control the conversation and did not

    giving any chance for the other group members to give their own opinions or

    ideas. They manipulate the conversation by exaggerating their knowledge and

    giving solutions which they think is the best while others disagree with his

    ideas.

    vii) Help seeker

    They actively look out for sympathy by expressing feelings, acts like they are

    so helpless, vulnerable and unable to contribute. If people starts to give

    sympathy to this kind of person, than all the attentions to group work will

    disrupted.

    viii) Special interest pleader

    They tend to use sceptical and stereotypical responses such as they wont do

    that or they wont like that. They make lame suggestions responding on

    others think or feel.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    10/17

    10

    USING BENNE AND SHEATS THEORY

    Benne and Sheats point out that those group members should not limit the range of roles

    they can play. In a rigid role structure of group, each member only plays one or two roles

    during discussion. Usually, such a group cannot become successful group compare to the

    group with more flexible structures. Group with flexible structures would allow everyone

    to play as many as roles they can play. This kind of system will help the group to utilize

    the talent of its members.

    Benne and Sheats did not actually prescribe any application of their theory but they simply

    identify and brought out the roles. However, their group roles theory could be used in

    management of a group to improve group effectiveness and harmony. This is done by

    determining and placing each roles in the suppose situation or stage, which roles are

    required and which are suppose to be eliminated noting that the roles required in a group

    can vary depending on the stage of the group development and the task in hand.

    These are the steps suggested on using Benne and Sheats theory:

    Step 1 : determining which stage are the group at

    Tuckman (1965) concluded that group pass through four phases that are:

    i) Phase One : Forming

    During this ice breaking phase, group members tend to be uncertain and

    anxious about such things as their roles, who is in charge and the group goals.

    At this phase, there are few stages which are forming a group, discussing tasks

    and roles, setting out expectations and goal setting. An emergent leader is

    needed to fulfil the groups need for leadership and direction.

    ii) Phase Two : Storming

    This is a time of testing. Individual is challenging their leaders by performing

    numerous types of behaviour. Some are the good and useful behaviours and

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    11/17

    11

    some are not. The stages of a group included during this phase are

    brainstorming ideas and discussing alternatives.

    iii) Phase Three : Norming

    A feeling of group spirit is experienced because members believe they have

    found their proper roles. Group cohesiveness is also increased gradually with

    the group performance. At this moment, the group should completing the tasks

    and duties and making the decision.

    iv) Phase Four : Performing

    Activity during this phase is they are solving task problems. Cohesiveness and

    personal commitment to group goals help the group achieve more than could

    any one acting alone. The stages included in performing phase are

    implementing the solution and evaluating the performance of a group.

    Step 2 : determine which roles are most suitable and helpful for the current

    stage/function

    By using Tuckman theory of group phases, both maintenance and task roles can run

    roughly concurrently. The suitable roles for each phase could be placed such as these:

    i) Phase One : Forming

    For the maintenance role it needs to discover the limits of acceptable

    behaviours during interaction. Thus the maintenance roles which we can use in

    this phase are encourager and follower as for encourager to supports the entire

    group member to form a group, while the follower is to follow on what has

    been set by the group. There will be no leader if there has no follower.

    As for the task role, we can include the initiator, orienter and recorder. During

    this phase, the group attempts to define the task and the manner in which the

    group will accomplish it. Initiator will suggest new goals and ideas for the

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    12/17

    12

    group, the orienter keeps the group towards and focuses to its goals by

    discussing about tasks and roles that should have the group provides. And as for

    the recorder, he will record the entire ideas and keeps track on the groups

    development.

    As for example is the group of the teachers society in a school. During

    forming, they need one teacher to initiate what are the groups goals and the

    purpose of forming that group. After that they had to appoint someone to act as

    a secretary who will marks down all the group development process. They also

    need an orienter which could suggest task and roles needed for the group to

    provide by focusing on the group goals.

    ii) Phase Two : Storming

    This is one of the critical phases of a group. In this phase, group members tend

    to argue with each others. All the maintenance and task roles are needed during

    this phase. Maintenance roles are used in development of intragroup conflicts.

    They polarize around interpersonal issues and resistance to emerging structure

    of interpersonal relationships.

    For example, when discussing one of the group problems sometimes there

    exists dissension of ideas by the group members. This is the time for the

    harmonizer and evaluator could play their part. As for recorder, he is needed

    along the storming process so that he could record and track down the group

    development. Yet, no individual roles are needed in this phase but usually they

    exist in any group formed. The existence of any of these individual roles will

    make the relationship between group members disrupted.

    Storming is the most crucial part. Usually it is been held in a meeting. As for

    the example earlier, the teachers society held meeting by meeting to discuss

    and brainstorming on the activities of the group or discussing on the problems

    which the group members faced in achieving the groups goals.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    13/17

    13

    During storming phase, the group tends to create misinterpretation among

    members and cause a quarrel. Thus, the harmonizer needed who will always

    played by the happy go lucky person to handle the situation by making jokes

    or calming the hot and crammed situation. To find out whether the group

    process is well developed, roles such as information giver/seeker and opinion

    giver/seeker are also important in order to gain people opinion or information.

    Same goes to the evaluator, their roles are to keep group in line with goals and

    provides sense of progress. They always measure accomplishments against

    goals, noting progress and blocks. As a conclusion, all the maintenance and task

    roles are needed during storming phase.

    iii) Phase Three : NormingDuring this phase, maintenance roles are focusing on developing the group

    cohesion. They try to accept the structure of interpersonal relationships. The

    maintenance roles that are needed here is the encourager and commentator. This

    is considered to affirms, supports and praises all the efforts given by the group

    members so that the relationship between group members could be tighten.

    While the commentator will observe the group development and sees either the

    group needs any changes or they could stay in the existed position.

    Roles of the energizer and orienter are needed for the task roles. This is due to

    the development of the group. The energizer will gives energy to the group

    movement. They challenge and stimulate the group to take further action. As

    for the orienter, they provide a summary of what had been accomplished by the

    group and also they make sure that the group has not veered from their earlier

    goals.

    iv) Phase Four : Performing

    This is the phase that we can see either the group can success or fail. During

    this phase, a group needs people who could encourage and monitor the group to

    move forward. That is why a group needs the encourager, commentator and of

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    14/17

    14

    course a follower to follow the groups ideas in performing. Commentator is

    there so that he could comments on a group processes/dynamics.

    As for the task roles, the emergence of solutions needed and someone who

    could construct attempts to complete the task. Thus the coordinator, orienter,

    evaluator and energizer play their role during this phase. One of the important

    roles is the coordinator where they could pull together the entire ideas and

    suggestion and comes out with a new solution. The orienter keeps the group on

    track which was set earlier by the group. Another role is the energizer who

    keeps the group working out on the problems.

    Step 3 : recruit and develop the missing roles within your group

    Benne and Sheats had stated in his writing that the more flexible the group members are

    the better. This means that the group members should be able to adapt their roles

    depending on the groups need. A manager could help the group understand there are gaps

    in the functions being represented or discussed and how filling these gaps could bring the

    harmony to the group. With a flexible group structure like this, members could use wide

    range of talents and provide maximum contribution to the team.

    Step 4 : identify any dysfunctional roles being played within the group

    Since these dysfunctional roles are negative roles played by the members, it should be

    eliminated from the group roles. The existence of these kinds of roles will bring the group

    to become ineffective group. More miscommunication will happens and leads the group to

    destruct the relationship between the group members. Thus the manager have to make a

    plan on how to eliminates these negative roles either through increasing awareness,

    coaching or giving feedback.

    This plan is between the manager and the person who brings this type of behaviour into the

    group. Consultation is one of the ways to coach group members from doing the wrong

    things that are not supposed to be done in a group in order to reducing prejudices,

    minimizing miscommunication and building relationship with diverse others. After

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    15/17

    15

    eliminating the disruptive and damaging behaviours, a group process will automatically

    improved.

    In education group, there exist many of these dysfunctional roles played by the teachers if

    we are talking on the school community. As we could see generally, these roles can be

    seen on some senior teachers who had been teaching in many years. They feel hard to

    except any new ideas which are suggested by the others. They tend to play the recognition

    seeker role who always trying to brag all about past achievement made by them during few

    years back. Sometimes they become the dominator who dominates the entire conversation

    and not giving any chance for other member to speak out their own ideas or opinions.

    As for the novice teachers, some role can be seen in few of them are the aggressor and

    disrupter. Since they are younger compare to others, thus they have this hot-blooded gene

    in themselves. They are easily to getting mad on some topics or irrelevant issues and tend

    to makes personal attacks. For the disrupter roles always can be seen during meetings.

    They just talks between them which are far from the related topics discussed in the

    meeting. This is one of the ways for them to get out from the real work. The disrupter role

    exists due to the member did not have the belonging feelings in the group. They think that

    their opinions are not needed in the group.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    16/17

    16

    CONCLUSION

    A group consists of people with different types of behaviours. To build and manage a

    group, one has to determined roles that should exist in a group. These roles are the

    behaviour of the group members played in a group. According to benne and Sheats there

    are three types of roles that are being played by the group members. The roles are task

    roles, maintenance and individual roles.

    Behaviours had influenced the group development process. There are two types of

    behaviour which Benne and Sheats described it as group roles that are positive functional

    roles (task roles and maintenance roles) and negative functional roles (individual roles).

    The positive functional roles leads the group move forward and achieve victory while

    negative functional roles could disrupt the group process and lead the group doomed area.

    As a manager, one has to include these positive functional roles suggested by Benne and

    Sheats into their group management so that the group will becomes more effective. At the

    same time, they had to avoid as much as they could for the negative functional roles as

    those roles can distract the group developments process and creates tension situation

    within the group. This will weaken the group cohesiveness. The more interactions, the

    more positive feelings exist and the more cohesive a group is.

    Building successful group is one of the important things to be discussed in the modern

    organization era. It is necessary to take account a variety of interrelated factors, including

    the characteristics and behaviour of the members and relationship among the members.

    The task of management is to view the development of group and provides necessary

    support and training. The requirement for continual development and improvement is a

    necessary part of effective teamwork.

  • 8/3/2019 esemenku

    17/17

    17

    REFERENCES

    1) Angelo Kinicki, Robert Kreitner, Organizational Behavior : key concepts, skills &best practices, Mc Graw-Hill/Irwin (2008).

    2) Suzanne C. De Janasz, Karen O. Dowd, Beth Z. Schneider, Interpersonal Skills inOrganizations, 3

    rdedition, Mc Graw-Hill/Irwin (2009).

    3) Laurie J. Mullins, Management and Organisational Behaviour, 8th edition,Pearson Education Limited (2007).

    4) Allan R. Cohen, Stephen L. Fink, Herman Gadon, Robin D. Willits, EffectiveBehaviour in Organizations : learning from the interplay of cases, concepts and

    student experiences, Richard D. Irwin, Inc. (1980).

    5) Baden Eunson, Behaving ; Managing yourself and others, Mc-Graw Hill BookCompany (1988)

    6) http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_85.htm7) http://books.google.com.my/books?id=Y-uB1-

    IUjo8C&pg=PA321&dq=using+benne+and+sheats+theory&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vI7y

    TvHoFoXtrAet6pXKDw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=using%20benne

    %20and%20sheats%20theory&f=false