View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
especially concerning optimization of
identification power, energy resolution, efficiency, optimal readout device for
the barrel part of CALIFA,
a calorimeter to be used by
i.e. in an energy interval between the Deep Inelastic/Incomplete Fusion region
where EMRIC (CsI) operated and the Quark-gluon plasma region where ALICE/PHOS (PWO) will operate
(particle physics CsI calorimeters – BaBar and BELLE (30.3 tons of CsI)).
for Reactions with Relativistic Radioactive Beams
Bo Jakobsson , LU: R3B Collaboration meeting, GSI, April 2009
--What we learnt about CsI(Tl) as calorimeter detectors--
EXL
*) The producer should deliver polished crystals with monotonously decreasing LO. The proposal by CMS (PWO det.) to paint some parts of side areas black is not possible with CsI. It can be replaced by black scotch but even better is to lap the side areas up to the ”inflection point” This is done in 20 – 30 min / detector by the users
no loss i LO
Energy resolution (large scale production)*
- The light output (LO) non-uniformity (doping concentration) must be corrected in any finger-type CsI(Tl) detector!
10x30x100/130 mm3 two-truncated pyramide (USC) type
20x20x110 mm3
δE/E, 0.5 – 0.9%δE/E, 0.4 – 0.7 %
LO (a.u.)
TSL test with 179 MeV protons show small differences in the energy resolution between,
2 ( , )1( , , ) ( , ) a Z AL Z A E c a Z A E
The error in the determination of a2 gives some finite contribution to the resolution
TSL test with 179 MeV protons shows that response function must be controlled
Gamma source data + GEANT4 simulated response in USC type detectors
APDs are superior. PD and PMT readout is acceptable for ideal one-detector exposure but much worse when signal addition is needed?
What we learnt about gamma resolution is up to now based on ....
GEANT4 simulations of detector response [D. Di Julio, J. Cederkäll]
2. TSL proton data is now compared to simulations. First observation -When adding signals the resolution is destroyed and even new peaks appear in the spectra. This is interpreted as a result of using one unique response function.
Individual response functions are needed. Tuning of GEANT4?
• Even more important – simulation of gamma response.
500 keV gammas hitting the central detector of the 3x5 CALIFA array
What we learnt and what is still missing – readout
PDs are excellent for proton and light charged fragments but not (yet) acceptable for gammas because of too high threshold and noise level which makes signal adding particularly bad.
Some new results for the PANDA APD S8664-1010 on CALIFA detectorand ALICE/PHOS PA are
Temperature (°C)
We propose for the TUD gamma test:
- to operate at a temperature close to 0 ºC (~ +2 ºC)
-to use extra stable power supply e.g. from [email protected] providing ΔV= 0.1 V for ΔT = ±5 ºC
-to consider having extra thermal isolation between detector boxes (aerogel?)
Can the large dynamic range be handled with two readout channels – APD + PD ??
M2J MATA CO32 CAEN Vl729 for temp. and HV control
CAEN V1724 Flash ADCs
focal plane
radiator
magnet
coincidence
experiment
1 m
electronsphotons
focal plane
radiator
magnet
coincidence
experiment 64 ch MesytecCSPA
What we need now is the – gamma test at NEPTUN hopefully in September!
What is still missing – forward cap decision
LU optional forward detectorsGamma source measurements with tentative? CALIFA forward cap CsIgeometry,PANDA APD readout ALICEpreamplifiers and T +V stabilization
Compare to barrel detector performance!
The test run at The Svedberg Lab. was really successful thanks to ,
Vladimir Avdeichikov, Pavel Golubev, Douglas di Julio, Joakim Cederkäll et al., LU
Håkan Johansson, Thomas Nilsson et al. Chalmers
Martin Gascon et al,, USC
Olof Tengblad et al.,CSIC
And thank you Uppsala University for providing free beamtime!