Upload
xena-lancaster
View
22
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
C&D DERIVED BIOMASS ENERGY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT & OPERATIONAL ISSUES PRESENTED BY: Dammon M. Frecker Vice President, Energy & Industrial Services ESS Group, Inc. Wellesley, MA 781.489.1146 [email protected]. www.essgroup.com. October 28, 2008. OVERVIEW. Project Concepts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
www.essgroup.comOctober 28, 2008
C&D DERIVED BIOMASS ENERGY FACILITIES
DEVELOPMENT & OPERATIONAL ISSUES
PRESENTED BY:Dammon M. Frecker
Vice President, Energy & Industrial ServicesESS Group, Inc.Wellesley, MA781.489.1146
OVERVIEW
●Project Concepts
●Motivators & Incentives
●Licensing Requirements
●Project Developments & Operating Concerns
●Existing & Proposed Projects
PROJECT CONCEPTS
●PROJECT SIZE: Typically 15 – 40 MW
• Balance revenue, fuel “risk”, technology and impact considerations.
15 – 30 acres• Power island, fuel receiving and storage, water
treatment, ash handling, administration
●FUEL REQUIREMENTS 20 MW Plant => ~600 TPD (~200,000 TPY) “Clean”/”unadulterated” wood? Limits on C&D Wood fraction?
PROJECT CPROJECT PPPROJECT CONCEPTS
http://www.energyproducts.com/fluidized_bed_boilers.htm
FLUIDIZED BED
COMBUSTOR
PROJECT CONCEPTS
• IMPACT MITIGATION Enclosed wood storage and conveyors Pollution Control Train
• SNCR (SCR?) for NOx Control• ESP, Fabric Filter (Baghouse) for PM Control• Scrubbers (?) for acid gas control• Carbon Injection (?) for metals control
Enclosed ash handling Enclosed wood grinding Dry Cooling? Zero Liquid Discharge? Rail Access? LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION
MOTIVATORS & INCENTIVES
●MassDEP Waste Ban Increased wood supply?
●Renewable Energy Requirements Programs in place in MA, CT and NY Provide added revenue stream
●Lower Cost Fuel Supply Increasing costs of oil and gas Opportunity for C&D wood tipping fee?
MOTIVATORS & INCENTIVES
●Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas Initiatives Biomass combustion considered “carbon
neutral” Opportunity for offsets?
●Production Tax Credits Open-Loop Biomass approved ($0.015/kW-hr)
MOTIVATORS & INCENTIVES
●Fuel Diversity Increased reliance on natural gas Concerns with gas supply and oil costs
●Energy Demand ISO-NE forecasted potential shortfalls in ’07
and beyond Motivate financial markets Ability to feed load pockets?
LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
●Environmental Impact Assessment (e.g. MEPA) Potential triggers:
• Energy facility > 25 MW (ENF, EIR if required by Secretary)• Major Source of Air Emissions (ENF, EIR if required by Secretary)• Solid waste processing, combustion, etc. > 150 TPD (ENF & EIR)• Land Alteration> 25 acres• Rare species, hist/arch, ACEC – things to watch out for
Other agencies cannot issue permits until MEPA is complete May take 6-12 months depending on Sectary’s requirements
and availability of information.
●Solid Waste Site Assignment/Permitting Not required if:
• No processing• Valid air permit• BUD
LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
●Air Permitting Major CPA & Nonattainment Review (MassDEP) PSD Review (EPA in MA and NY) BACT, LAER, Emissions Offsets Up to 190 day application review period Air Toxics Impacts Boiler MACT
●Local Land Use & Zoning Stacks (height, visual impacts, visible plumes) Odors? Traffic (30-40 trucks per day @ 20 MW + employees,
other)
●Water Supply & Discharge 500-800K GPD Consumption (wet cooling)
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
●Is it “Incineration”? Moratorium New Source Performance Standards (Sub CCCC - CISWI)
●Is it Solid Waste? Mass – probably no, other states – probably yes
●Is it Hazardous Waste?
●Qualified Renewable or Legislated Illegal?
●Is the wood “clean” (enough)?
DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS
●Securing Land
●Time for Permitting
●Purchase Power Agreements
●Long Term REC Agreements Supply and price uncertainty Regulatory uncertainty
●Securing the fuel supply
●Financing! ($40-80 MM)
OPERATIONAL CONCERNS
●Maintaining Fuel Quality Boiler fouling Emissions Ash Quality
●Dispatch Order Frequency of startup and shutdown
●Wood pile management
EXISTING FACILITIES
●BioEnergy, Hopkinton, NH 12.5 MW plant Granted permit for C&D in 1984 Significant local opposition, but demonstrated compliance No Advisory Ruling or SOQ
●Boralex, Stratton Energy Energy, ME 45 MW plant Re-tooling Advisory Ruling June, 2004 25% C&D
●Greenville Steam Company, ME Re-tooling (BFB) with Advisory Ruling & SOQ
PROPOSED FACILITIES
●GenPower – Hinsdale, NH & Uxbridge, MA Two different Advisory Rulings Emissions not specified Projects announced with some opposition
●Russel Biomass, Massachusetts 50 MW BFB “Clean wood waste e.g. construction & demolition wood
waste” Emissions not specified
●EcoPower, Massachusetts 20 MW plant Advisory Ruling including emissions