EthxWeb Search Results Document 1 Document 2 › wordpress › wp-content › ... · 2017-03-06 · EthxWeb Search Results Search Detail: Result=("21.3".PC.) AND (@YD >= "20000000")

EthxWeb Search Results

Search Detail: Result=("21.3".PC.) AND (@YD >= "20000000") 2=1 : " Documents: 1 325 of 647

Document 1 Nightingale, Stuart L Scientific publication and global security. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2011 Aug 3; 306(5): 5456

Georgetown users check Georgetown Journal Finder for access to full text

Document 2 Sheehan, Helen E. The Bhopal gas disaster: focus on community health and environmental effects Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2011 AprilJune; 8(2): 9596


Document 3 Kuhlau, Frida; Höglund, Anna T; Evers, Kathinka; Eriksson, Stefan A precautionary principle for dual use research in the life sciences. Bioethics 2011 Jan; 25(1): 18 Abstract: Most life science research entails dualuse complexity and may be misused for harmful purposes, e.g. biological weapons. ThePrecautionary Principle applies to special problems characterized by complexity in the relationship between human activities and theirconsequences. This article examines whether the principle, so far mainly used in environmental and public health issues, is applicable andsuitable to the field of dualuse life science research. Four central elements of the principle are examined: threat, uncertainty, prescriptionand action. Although charges against the principle exist for example that it stifles scientific development, lacks practical applicability and ispoorly defined and vague the analysis concludes that a Precautionary Principle is applicable to the field. Certain factors such as credibilityof the threat, availability of information, clear prescriptive demands on responsibility and directives on how to act, determine the suitabilityand success of a Precautionary Principle. Moreover, policymakers and researchers share a responsibility for providing and seekinginformation about potential sources of harm. A central conclusion is that the principle is meaningful and useful if applied as a contextdependent moral principle and allowed flexibility in its practical use. The principle may then inspire awarenessraising and the establishmentof practical routines which appropriately reflect the fact that life science research may be misused for harmful purposes.


Document 4 Schouten, Ronald Terrorism and the behavioral sciences. Harvard review of psychiatry 2010 NovDec; 18(6): 36978 Abstract: Terrorism has existed for millennia and is a phenomenon wellknown to many parts of the world. Americans were forced torecognize this phenomenon, and our vulnerability to it, by two sets of events in 2001: the attacks on New York City and Washington, DC, andthe anthrax mailings that followed shortly thereafter. Psychiatry, psychology, and other behavioral and social sciences have been looked tofor assistance in collecting and analyzing intelligence data, understanding terrorism, and developing strategies to combat terrorism. Inaddition to reviewing areas in which the behavioral sciences have made contributions in addressing this problem, this article discusses thedeveloping roles for behavioral scientists in this field.


Document 5 Miles, Steven H. Commentary on psychiatry in a battle zone Bioethics 2010 July; 24(6): 307308

http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/databases/

http://www11.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/databases/EthxWeb/ethxbool.htm

http://kie.georgetown.edu/netacgi/nph-brs?co1=AND&co2=AND&co3=AND&co4=AND&d=EWEB&Sect2=THESON&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww11.georgetown.edu%2Fresearch%2Fnrcbl%2Fdatabases%2FEthxWeb%2Fethxbool.htm&r=0&p=2&f=S&l=50&s4=21.3.pc.+and+%40yd+%3E%3D20000000&s2=&co5=AND&pg1=SUBJ&op1=AND&s1=&co6=AND&op6=AND&s6=&Sect3=PLURON&Sect5=HITOFF&l=0

http://kie.georgetown.edu/netacgi/nph-brs?co1=AND&co2=AND&co3=AND&co4=AND&d=EWEB&Sect2=THESON&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww11.georgetown.edu%2Fresearch%2Fnrcbl%2Fdatabases%2FEthxWeb%2Fethxbool.htm&r=0&p=1&f=1&l=50&s4=21.3.pc.+and+%40yd+%3E%3D20000000&s2=&co5=AND&pg1=SUBJ&op1=AND&s1=&co6=AND&op6=AND&s6=&Sect3=PLURON&Sect5=HITOFF&l=0

http://ethicslab.org/openurl/wc/0000340291/

http://ethicslab.org/openurl/gt/0000340291/








Document 6 Pajević, Izet; Hasanović, Mevludin; Koprić, Alina Psychiatry in a battle zone Bioethics 2010 July; 24(6): 304306


Document 7 Geissler, Erhard; Guillemin, Jeanne German flooding of the Pontine Marshes in World War II. Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2010 Mar; 29(1): 223 Abstract: The German army's 1943 flooding of the Pontine Marshes south of Rome, which later caused a sharp rise in malaria cases amongItalian civilians, has recently been described by historian Frank Snowden as a unique instance of biological warfare and bioterrorism in theEuropean theater of war and, consequently, as a violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibiting chemical and biological warfare. We arguethat archival documents fail to support this allegation, on several counts. As a matter of historical record, Hitler prohibited German biologicalweapons (BW) development and consistently adhered to the Geneva Protocol. Rather than biological warfare against civilians, theWehrmacht used flooding, land mines, and the destruction of vital infrastructure to obstruct the Allied advance. To protect its own troops inthe area, the German army sought to contain the increased mosquito breeding likely to be caused by the flooding. Italians returning to thePontine Marshes after the German retreat in 1944 suffered malaria as a result of environmental destruction, which was banned by the 1899and 1907 Hague Conventions and by subsequent treaties. In contrast, a state's violation of the Geneva Protocol, whether past or present,involves the use of germ weapons and, by inference, a statelevel capability. Any allegation of such a serious violation demands credibleevidence that meets high scientific and legal standards of proof.


Document 8 Friedman, David; RagerZisman, Bracha; Bibi, Eitan; Keynan, Alex The bioterrorism threat and dualuse biotechnological research: an Israeli perspective. Science and engineering ethics 2010 Mar ; 16(1): 8597 Abstract: Israel has a long history of concern with chemical and biological threats, since several hostile states in the Middle East are likelyto possess such weapons. The TwinTower terrorist attacks and Anthrax envelope scares of 2001 were a watershed for public perceptions ofthe threat of unconventional terror in general and of biological terror in particular. New advances in biotechnology will only increase the abilityof terrorists to exploit the burgeoning availability of related information to develop evermore destructive bioweapons. Many areas of modernbiological research are unavoidably dualuse by nature. They thus have a great potential for both help and harm; and facilitating the formerwhile preventing the latter remains a serious challenge to researchers and governments alike. This article addresses how Israel might best(1) prevent hostile elements from obtaining, from Israel's biological research system, materials, information and technologies that mightfacilitate their carrying out a biological attack, while (2) continuing to promote academic openness, excellence and other hallmarks of thatsystem. This important and sensitive issue was assessed by a special national committee, and their recommendations are presented anddiscussed. One particularly innovative element is the restructuring and use of Israel's extensive biosafety system to also address biosecuritygoals, with minimal disruption or delay.


* Document 9 Gross, Michael L. Medicalized weapons and modern war Hastings Center Report 2010 JanuaryFebruary; 40(1): 3443 Abstract: "Medicalized" weapons those that rely on advances in neuroscience, physiology, and pharmacology offer the prospect ofreducing casualties and protecting civilians. They could be especially useful in modern asymmetric wars in which conventional states arepitted against guerrilla or insurgent forces. But may physicians and other medical workers participate in their development?


http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/hastings_center_report/toc/hcr.40.1.html (link may be outdated)

Document 10 Deal, Jeffery L Torture by Cieng: ethical theory meets social practice among the Dinka Agaar of south Sudan.











http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/hastings_center_report/toc/hcr.40.1.html

American anthropologist 2010; 112(4): 56375 Abstract: Here I detail violence in South Sudan by first discussing a specific Dinka Agaar practice alongside existing discourses on thesocial aspects of violence and universal human rights, then I show how these acts had meaning and purpose using data from personalaccounts of violence. I posit that the violence described was consistent with Dinka Agaar concepts of justice and basic human rights andthat it cannot be judged against any universal human rights standard, devoid of local context or of an overarching metanarrative. Theseevents highlight conflicting subjectivities, ethical norms, and the painful difficulties inherent to advocacy in areas of conflict. Viewed from theperspective of the larger social unit, it is easy to see how violence was required to end violence. However, witnessing punitive violencepurposefully enacted on innocent individuals to achieve peace has the potential to create conflicting positions that modern anthropologicaldiscourse cannot reconcile.


Document 11 United States. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary. Screening framework guidance for synthetic doublestranded DNA providers Federal Register 2009 November 27; 74(227): 6231962327 [Online]. Accessed: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR20091127/pdf/E928328.pdf [2009 December 22]

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR20091127/pdf/E928328.pdf (link may be outdated)

Document 12 International Gene Synthesis Consortium [IGSC] Harmonized screening protocol; gene sequence and customer screening to promote biosecurity International Gene Synthesis Consortium, 2009 November: 5 p. [Online]. Accessed:http://www.genesynthesisconsortium.org/Harmonized_Screening_Protocol_files/IGSC%20Harmonized%20Screening%20Protocol.pdf [2009December 22]

http://www.genesynthesisconsortium.org/Harmonized_Screening_Protocol_files/IGSC%20Harmonized%20Screening%20Protocol.pdf(link may be outdated)

* Document 13 Schumm, W.R.; Nazarinia, R.R.; Bosch, K.R. Unanswered questions and ethical issues concerning US biodefence research. Journal of Medical Ethics 2009 October; 35(10): 594598 Abstract: Unanswered questions and ethical issues associated with US biodefence medical research over the past five decades arediscussed. Objective scientific standards are essential for making policy decisions that can stand the test of time. For decades, scholarshave reported that the human anthrax vaccine field trials conducted in the 1950s by Brachman and his colleagues were singleblind ratherthan doubleblind. Nevertheless, in March 2005, Dr Philip S Brachman reported in a letter to the US Food and Drug Administration that hisstudy had been doubleblind. It is here argued that, rather, the field trial of a human anthrax vaccine should continue to be deemed as singleblind unless more detailed information is provided to explain exactly how the investigators were kept unaware of which subjects were in thetreatment and control groups. Moreover, a number of other questions about the details of this critically important study have remainedunanswered and are discussed. More recently, similar concerns have arisen with respect to more contemporary biodefence research,especially with reference to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's allegations that Dr Bruce Ivins, a US government biodefence researcher,was responsible for the anthrax letter attacks of fall 2001. The medical ethics and related issues involved with continuing to base nationalbiodefence and public health policy on unclear, if not contradictory, research are discussed.


http://jme.bmj.com/content/35/10.toc (link may be outdated)

* Document 14 Atlas, Ronald M. Responsible conduct by life scientists in an age of terrorism. Science and Engineering Ethics 2009 September; 15(3): 293301


http://www.springerlink.com/content/120482/ (link may be outdated)




http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-11-27/pdf/E9-28328.pdf


http://www.genesynthesisconsortium.org/Harmonized_Screening_Protocol_files/IGSC%20Harmonized%20Screening%20Protocol.pdf



http://jme.bmj.com/content/35/10.toc



http://www.springerlink.com/content/120482/

* Document 15 Sutton, Victoria Smarter regulations: commentary on "Responsible conduct by life scientists in an age of terrorism". Science and Engineering Ethics 2009 September; 15(3): 303309


http://www.springerlink.com/content/120482/ (link may be outdated)

* Document 16 A question of control [editorial] Nature 2009 August 20; 460(7258): 933 Abstract: Scientists must address the ethics of using neuroactive compounds to quash domestic crises.


http://www.nature.com/nature/ (link may be outdated)

* Document 17 Dando, Malcolm Biologists napping while work militarized Nature 2009 August 20; 460(7258): 950951 Abstract: As researchers discover more agents that alter mental states, the Chemical Weapons Convention needs modification to helpensure that the life sciences are not used for hostile purposes, says Malcolm Dando.


http://www.nature.com/nature/ (link may be outdated)

Document 18 Appel, Jacob M. Is all fair in biological warfare? The controversy over genetically engineered biological weapons Journal of Medical Ethics 2009 July; 35(7): 429432 Abstract: Advances in genetics may soon make possible the development of ethnic bioweapons that target specific ethnic or racial groupsbased upon genetic markers. While occasional published reports of such research generate public outrage, little has been written about theethical distinction (if any) between the development of such weapons and ethnically neutral bioweapons. The purpose of this paper is tolaunch a debate on the subject of ethnic bioweapons before they become a scientific reality.


http://jme.bmj.com (link may be outdated)

* Document 19 Berger, Kavita M.; Leshner, Alan I. New rules for biosecurity [editorial] Science 2009 May 29; 324(5931): 1117


http://www.sciencemag.org/archive/ (link may be outdated)

Document 20 Crock, Ronald D. Bioterror and Biowarfare, by Malcolm Dando [book review] Ethics and Medicine 2009 Spring; 25(1): 60




http://www.springerlink.com/content/120482/



http://www.nature.com/nature/



http://www.nature.com/nature/



http://jme.bmj.com/



http://www.sciencemag.org/archive/



* Document 21 Resnik, David B. What is "dual use" research? A response to Miller and Selgelid [letter] Science and Engineering Ethics 2009 March; 15(1): 35


http://www.springerlink.com/content/120482 (link may be outdated)

Document 22 Shane, Scott Army slows bioresearch at Maryland laboratory New York Times 2009 February 10; p. A16

http://www.nytimes.com (link may be outdated)

Document 23 Hayden, Erika Check 'Experiments of concern' to be vetted online: expert panel to offer advice on science with bioterror applications [news] Nature 2009 February 5; 457(7230): 643


http://www.nature.com/nature/archive/ (link may be outdated)

Document 24 Lutwick, Larry I. and Lutwick, Suzanne M., eds. BEYOND ANTHRAX: THE WEAPONIZATION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES New York: Springer, 2009. 374 p. Call number: RC88.9 .T47 B49 2009

* Document 25 Nightingale, Paul; McLeish, Caitriona Governments and the governance of bioscience as a 'new security challenge' In: Lyall, Catherine; Papaioannou, Theo; Smith, James, eds. The Limits to Governance: the Challenge of PolicyMaking for the New LifeSciences. Farnham,; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009: 133152 Call number: Q125 .L52 2009

* Document 26 Orr, Wendy Medical ethics and the military in South Africa during apartheid: judging history In: Baker, Robert B.; McCullough, Laurence B., eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. Cambridge; New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2009: 633639 Call number: R724 .C3279 2009

Document 27 Warrick, Joby Report sounds alarm over bioterror; bipartisan study finds insufficient laboratory safeguards, loose regulation Washington Post 2008 November 30; p. A3

http://www.washingtonpost.com (link may be outdated)

Document 28



http://www.springerlink.com/content/120482


http://www.nytimes.com/



http://www.nature.com/nature/archive/

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RC88.9%20.T47%20B49%202009&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=Q125%20.L52%202009&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=R724%20.C3279%202009&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Wein, Lawrence M. Neither snow, nor rain, nor anthrax ... [oped] New York Times 2008 October 13; p. A29


Document 29 Loretz, John Abolition, small arms action plans emerge from Delhi Congress Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2008 JulySeptember; 24(3): 228235


Document 30 van Bergen, Leo The poison gas debate in the interwar years Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2008 JulySeptember; 24(3): 174187


Document 31 Kaiser, Jocelyn Senate bill would alter biosafety, select agent rules [news] Science 2008 June 20; 320(5883): 1573


http://www.sciencemag.org (link may be outdated)

* Document 32 Nordin, James D.; Kasimow, Sophie; Levitt, Mary Jeanne; Goodman, Michael J. Bioterrorism surveillance and privacy: intersection of HIPAA, the Common Rule, and public health law American Journal of Public Health 2008 May; 98(5): 802807 Abstract: The threat of bioterrorism in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks cannot be ignored. Syndromic surveillance, thepractice of electronically monitoring and reporting realtime medical data to proactively identify unusual disease patterns, highlights theconflict between safeguarding public health while protecting individual privacy. Both the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Actand the Common Rule (which promulgates protections for individuals in federally sponsored medical research programs) safeguardindividuals. Public health law protects the entire populace; uneven statelevel implementation lacks adequate privacy protections. Wepropose 3 models for a nationwide bioterrorism surveillance review process: a nationally coordinated systems approach to using protectedhealth information, creating public health information privacy boards, expanding institutional review boards, or some combination of these.


http://www.ajph.org (link may be outdated)

Document 33 Fitzgerald, Gerard J. Chemical warfare and medical response during World War I American Journal of Public Health 2008 April; 98(4): 611625



Document 34 King, Nicholas B. Review of Barry Kellman, Bioviolence: Preventing Biological Terror and Crime [book review]









http://www.sciencemag.org/



http://www.ajph.org/




American Journal of Bioethics 2008 February; 8(2): 5355


http://bioethics.net (link may be outdated)

Document 35 Wing, Kenneth R. The fed's role in public health emergencies Medical Ethics Newsletter [Lahey Clinic] 2008 Winter; 15(1): 45, 78


http://www.lahey.org/Ethics/ (link may be outdated)

Document 36 Johnstone, R. William BIOTERROR: ANTHRAX, INFLUENZA, AND THE FUTURE OF PUBLIC HEALTH SECURITY Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2008. 219 p. Call number: HV6433.35 .J64 2008

Document 37 Fidler, David P. and Gostin, Lawrence O. BIOSECURITY IN THE GLOBAL AGE: BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND THE RULE OF LAW Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics, 2008. 306 p. Call number: UG447.8 .F54 2008

Document 38 Miller, Seumas; Selgelid, Michael J. Ethics and the dualuse dilemma in the life sciences In: Allhoff, Fritz, ed. Physicians at War: The DualLoyalties Challenge. New York: Springer, 2008: 195211 Call number: RC971 .P456 2008

Document 39 Selgelid, Michael J. Armed conflict and value conflict: case studies in biological weapons In: Allhoff, Fritz, ed. Physicians at War: The DualLoyalties Challenge. New York: Springer, 2008: 179193 Call number: RC971 .P456 2008

Document 40 Miller, Seumas; Selgelid, Michael Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dualuse dilemma in the biological sciences Science and Engineering Ethics 2007 December; 13(4): 523580


Document 41 Vanderwagen, W. Craig A shocking biodefense editorial Nature Biotechnology 2007 October; 25(10): 10831084


Document 42



http://bioethics.net/



http://www.lahey.org/Ethics/

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=HV6433.35%20.J64%202008&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.F54%202008&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RC971%20.P456%202008&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RC971%20.P456%202008&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4





Gronvall, Gigi Kwik; Trent, Dennis; Borio, Luciana; Brey, Robert; Nagao, Lee The FDA animal efficacy rule and biodefense Nature Biotechnology 2007 October; 25(10): 10841087


Document 43 Tyshenko, Michael G. Management of natural and bioterrorism induced pandemics Bioethics 2007 September; 21(7): 364369 Abstract: A recent approach for bioterrorism risk management calls for stricter regulations over biotechnology as a way to control subversionof technology that may be used to create a manmade pandemic. This approach is largely unworkable given the increasing pervasiveness ofmolecular techniques and tools throughout society. Emerging technology has provided the tools to design much deadlier pathogens butconcomitantly the ability to respond to emerging pandemics to reduce mortality has also improved significantly in recent decades. In itshistorical context determining just how 'risky' biological weapons is an important consideration for decision making and resource allocation.Management should attempt to increase capacity, share resources, provide accurate infectious disease reporting, deliver informationtransparency and improve communications to help mitigate the magnitude of future pandemics.


* Document 44 Moreno, Jonathan D.; Selgelid, Michael J. The dualuse dilemma [letter and reply] Hastings Center Report 2007 SeptemberOctober; 37(5): 67


Document 45 Chess, Caron; Clarke, Lee Facilitation of risk communication during the anthrax attacks of 2001: the organizational backstory American Journal of Public Health 2007 September; 97(9): 15781583



Document 46 Safety clause: US research on bioweapons has expanded rapidly, without sufficiently transparent regulation [editorial] Nature 2007 July 12; 448(7150): 105106


http://www.nature.com (link may be outdated)

Document 47 Willis, Liz Marching Plague: Germ Warfare and Global Public Health, by Critical Art Ensemble [book review] Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2007 JulySeptember; 23(3): 236237


Document 48 US biodefense shocking and awful [editorial] Nature Biotechnology 2007 June; 25(6): 603













http://www.nature.com/





* Document 49 Kmietowicz, Zosia Doctors condemn use of drugs as weapon [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2007 May 26; 334(7603): 1073


http://www.bmj.com (link may be outdated)

* Document 50 Selgelid, Michael J. A tale of two studies: ethics, bioterrorism, and the censorship of science Hastings Center Report 2007 MayJune; 37(3): 3543


* Document 51 Kaebnick, Gregory E. Secrets and open societies [editorial] Hastings Center Report 2007 MayJune; 37(3): 2


Document 52 Kelle, Alexander Securitization of international public health: implications for global health governance and the biological Global Governance 2007 AprilJune; 13(2): 217235


Document 53 Stone, Richard Agent Orange's bitter harvest [news] Science 2007 January 12; 315(5809): 176179



Document 54 Capitol Hill anthrax attack 'hit wide area' [news brief] Nature 2007 January 11; 445(7124): 137



Document 55 Dando, Malcolm R. Biowarfare and terrorism, by Francis A. Boyle [book review] Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2007 JanuaryMarch; 23(1): 7981




http://www.bmj.com/















Document 56 Lee, Bruce Y. The role of internists during epidemics, outbreaks, and bioterrorist attacks Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007 January; 22(1): 131136


http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov (link may be outdated)

Document 57 Kellman, Barry BIOVIOLENCE: PREVENTING BIOLOGICAL TERROR AND CRIME Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 362 p. Call number: HV6433.3 .K45 2007

Document 58 Vierucci, Luisa Offensive military applications of biotechnologies: loopholes in the law? In: Francioni, Francesco, ed. Biotechnologies and International Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007: 363389 Call number: K3925 .B56 B558 2007

* Document 59 Selgelid, Michael J. Bioterrorism, society and health care ethics In: Ashcroft, Richard E.; Dawson, Angus; Draper, Heather; McMillan, John R., eds. Principles of Health Care Ethics. 2nd edition. Chichester,West Sussex, UK; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2007: 631637 Call number: R724 .P69 2007

* Document 60 Greif, Karen F.; Merz, Jon F. Science in the national interest: bioterrorism and civil liberties In their: Current Controversies in the Biological Sciences: Case Studies of Policy Challenges from New Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT,2007: 235254 Call number: R850 .G74 2007

* Document 61 Hurst, G. Cameron Biological weapons: the United States and the Korean War In: LaFleur, William R.; Böhme, Gernot; Shimazono, Susumu, eds. Dark Medicine: Rationalizing Medical Research. Bloomington: IndianaUniversity Press, 2007: 105120 Call number: R853 .H8 D37 2007

* Document 62 Moreno, Jonathan D. Bioethics and bioterrorism In: Steinbock, Bonnie, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007: 721733 Call number: QH332 .O94 2007

Document 63 Enserink, Martin Little progress at bioweapons talk [news] Science 2006 December 15; 314(5806): 1673




http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=HV6433.3%20.K45%202007&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=K3925%20.B56%20B558%202007&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=R724%20.P69%202007&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=R850%20.G74%202007&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=R853%20.H8%20D37%202007&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=QH332%20.O94%202007&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4




Document 64 Wadman, Meredith Agency set up to tackle bioterror [news] Nature 2006 December 14; 442(7121): 796797



Document 65 Hocking, Barbara Ann; McCallum, Hamish An Australian case study on biosecurity: some legal, constitutional, ethical and policy reflections. Journal International de Bioéthique = International Journal of Bioethics 2006 December; 17(4): 115130


* Document 66 Steinbruner, John In the name of defence: bioweapons research in the U.S. could trigger just the sort of arms race it is meant to forestall. But that'snot the worst of it. New Scientist 2006 November 25December 1; 192(2579): 20


Document 67 Martens, Debra Fight to free the world of WMD heats up [news] CMAJ/JAMC Canadian Medical Association Journal 2006 November 21; 175(11): 13601361


http://www.cmaj.ca (link may be outdated)

Document 68 Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit U.S. panel wants security rules applied to genomes, not pathogens [news] Science 2006 November 3; 314(5800): 743



* Document 69 Aldhous, Peter Bioterror: friend or foe? New Scientist 2006 October 1420; 192(2573): 2023


* Document 70 Proceed with caution [editorial] New Scientist 2006 October 1420; 192(2573): 5












http://www.cmaj.ca/








Document 71 Boulton, Frank Deadly Cultures: Biological Weapons Since 1945, edited by Mark Wheelis, Lajos Rózsa, and Malcolm Dando [book review] Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2006 OctoberDecember; 22(4): 314316


* Document 72 Hirsch, Jules An anniversary for cancer chemotherapy JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2006 September 27; 296(12): 15181520


http://jama.amaassn.org (link may be outdated)

Document 73 Plans for new federal biolab advance GeneWatch 2006 SeptemberOctober; 19(5): 18


Document 74 Court rules against BU Biolab GeneWatch 2006 SeptemberOctober; 19(5): 17


Document 75 Byravan, Sujatha Editorial GeneWatch 2006 SeptemberOctober; 19(5): 2


* Document 76 Schmidt, Ulf Cold War at Porton Down: informed consent in Britain's biological and chemical warfare experiments CQ: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2006 Fall; 15(4): 366380


* Document 77 Holdstock, Douglas Chemical and biological warfare: some ethical dilemmas CQ: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2006 Fall; 15(4): 356365


Document 78 Atlas, Ronald M. Securing life sciences research in an age of terrorism Issues in Science and Technology 2006 Fall; 23(1): 4149





http://jama.ama-assn.org/












http:///www.nap.edu/issues (link may be outdated)

* Document 79 Guillemin, Jeanne Scientists and the history of biological weapons. A brief historical overview of the development of biological weapons in thetwentieth century EMBO Reports 2006 July; 7 Special No: S45S49


Document 80 Rosenthal, Elisabeth Trial for 80's chemical attacks on Kurds test scientists New York Times 2006 June 25; 25: 4


* Document 81 Annas, George J. Bioterror and "bioart" a plague o' both your houses New England Journal of Medicine 2006 June 22; 354(25): 27152720


http://content.nejm.org (link may be outdated)

* Document 82 Aldhous, Peter The accidental terrorists New Scientist 2006 June 1016; 190(2555): 24


Document 83 Dunn, M.J. Research in defense of terrorism will benefit medicine as a whole WMJ: Official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin 2006 May; 105(3): 6768


* Document 84 Towards better biosecurity [editorial] Nature 2006 April 6; 440(7085): 715



* Document 85 United States supports work on scientists' codes of conduct to combat proliferation of biological weapons. American Journal of International Law 2006 April; 100(2): 464466



http://www.nap.edu/issues







http://content.nejm.org/










Document 86 Wright, Susan Terrorists and biological weapons: forging the linkage in the Clinton administration Politics and the Life Sciences 2006 MarchSeptember; 25(12): 57115


http://www.politicsandthelifesciences.org/ (link may be outdated)

Document 87 Frischknecht, Freddy Meeting report: Public health in reverse? Biotechnology Journal 2006 February; 1(2): 133134


Document 88 Relman, David A. Bioterrorism preparing to fight the next war New England Journal of Medicine 2006 January 12; 354(2): 113115



* Document 89 Declaration of Gijón: against the use of biological weapons Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 2006 January; 16(1): 23


http://www.unescobkk.org/index.php?id=2434 (link may be outdated)

Document 90 Critical Art Ensemble MARCHING PLAGUE: GERM WARFARE AND GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH New York: Autonomedia, 2006. 148 p. Call number: HV6433.3 .M37 2006

Document 91 National Research Council (United States). Committee on Advances in Technology and the Prevention of Their Application to NextGeneration Biowarfare Threats [and] Institute of Medicine (United States). Board on Global Health GLOBALIZATION, BIOSECURITY, AND THE FUTURE OF THE LIFE SCIENCES Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006. 299 p. Call number: HV6433.3 .G56 2006

http://www.nap.edu (link may be outdated)

Document 92 Tucker, Jonathan B. WAR OF NERVES: CHEMICAL WARFARE FROM WORLD WAR I TO ALQAEDA New York: Pantheon, 2006. 479 p. Call number: UG447 .T83 2006




http://www.politicsandthelifesciences.org/








http://www.unescobkk.org/index.php?id=2434

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=HV6433.3%20.M37%202006&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=HV6433.3%20.G56%202006&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://www.nap.edu/

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447%20.T83%202006&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


Document 93 Vilensky, Joel A. DEW OF DEATH: THE STORY OF LEWISITE, AMERICA'S WORLD WAR I WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005. 213 p. Call number: UG447.5 .L48 V35 2005

Document 94 Khardori, Nancy, ed. BIOTERRORISM PREPAREDNESS: MEDICINE, PUBLIC HEALTH, POLICY Weinheim: WileyVCH, 2006. 261 p. Call number: RA647 .B57 2006

Document 95 Wheelis, Mark; Rózsa, Lajos; and Dando, Malcolm, eds. DEADLY CULTURES: BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS SINCE 1945 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006. 479 p. Call number: UG447.8 .D43 2006

Document 96 Naff, Clay Farris, ed. BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS Detroit, MI: Greenhaven Press/Thomas Gale, 2006. 191 p. Call number: UG447.8 .B573 2006

Document 97 Bunn, Matthew Preventing a nuclear 9/11 Issues in Science and Technology 2005 Winter; 21(2): 5562


http://www.nap.edu/issues/ (link may be outdated)

Document 98 Watts, Geoff Harnessing Mother Nature against your fellow humans [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2005 November 26; 331(7527): 1228



* Document 99 Lim, MengKin Hostile use of the life sciences [opinion] New England Journal of Medicine 2005 November 24; 353(21): 22142215



* Document 100 Steinbrook, Robert Biomedical research and biosecurity [opinion]

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.5%20.L48%20V35%202005&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RA647%20.B57%202006&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.D43%202006&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.B573%202006&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4




http://www.nap.edu/issues/



http://www.bmj.com/




New England Journal of Medicine 2005 November 24; 353(21): 22122214



Document 101 Aldhous, Peter The bioweapon is in the post [news] New Scientist 2005 November 1218; 188(2525): 89


Document 102 Genes for sale: we must act now to stop terrorists getting their hands on deadly DNA [editorial] New Scientist 2005 November 1218; 188(2525): 5


Document 103 Kaiser, Jocelyn Critics question proposed countermeasures agency [news] Science 2005 November 4; 310(5749): 755



* Document 104 Kennedy, Donald Better never than late [editorial] Science 2005 October 14; 310(5746): 195



* Document 105 Grönvall, Gigi Kwik A new role for scientists in the Biological Weapons Convention Nature Biotechnology 2005 October; 23(10): 12131216


Document 106 White, Caroline UK research funding bodies unite against bioterrorism threat [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2005 September 10; 331(7516): 535



Document 107 Frank, Erica Funding the public health response to terrorism: has cut funds for common chronic diseases and for disaster relief in New


















http://www.bmj.com/

Orleans [editorial] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2005 September 10; 331(7516): 526527



Document 108 Aginam, Obijiofor Bioterrorism, human security and public health: can international law bring them together in an age of globalization? Medicine and Law: World Association for Medical Law 2005 September; 24(3): 455462


Document 109 Falkenheimer, Sharon A. In the Wake of Terror: Medicine and Morality in a Time of Crisis, edited by Jonathan D. Moreno [book review] Ethics and Medicine 2005 Fall; 21(3): 179180


* Document 110 Agre, Peter C.; Altman, Sidney; Curl, Robert F.; Wiesel, Torsten N.; WestEberhard, Mary Jane; Somerville, Margaret A.; Atlas, Ronald M. Using ethics to fight bioterrorism [letter and reply] Science 2005 August 12; 309(5737): 10131015, 1017



* Document 111 Perman, Ben; Somerville, Margaret A.; Atlas, Ronald M. Using ethics to fight bioterrorism [letter and reply] Science 2005 August 12; 309(5737): 1013, 10141015, 1017



* Document 112 Rath, Johannes; Jank, Bernhard; Somerville, Margaret A.; Atlas, Ronald M. Using ethics to fight bioterrorism [letter and reply] Science 2005 August 12; 309(5737): 10121013, 10141015, 1017



* Document 113 Green, Shane K.; Somerville, Margaret A.; Atlas, Ronald M. Using ethics to fight bioterrorism [letter and reply] Science 2005 August 12; 309(5737): 1012, 10141015, 1017





http://www.bmj.com/

















* Document 114 Li, Lewyn; Somerville, Margaret A.; Atlas, Ronald M. Using ethics to fight bioterrorism [letter and reply] Science 2005 August 12; 309(5737): 1012, 10141015, 1017



* Document 115 Frankel, Mark S.; Somerville, Margaret A.; Atlas, Ronald M. Using ethics to fight bioterrorism [letter and reply] Science 2005 August 12; 309(5737): 1012, 10141015, 1017



* Document 116 King, Nicholas B. The ethics of biodefense Bioethics 2005 August; 19(4): 432446 Abstract: This essay reviews major areas of ethical debate with regard to biodefense, focusing on cases in which biodefense presentsethical problems that diverge from those presented by naturallyoccurring outbreaks of infectious disease. It concludes with a call forethicists to study not only the ethical issues raised in biodefense programs, but also the ethics of biodefense more generally.


Document 117 Kaiser, Jocelyn New panel to offer guidance on dualuse science [news] Science 2005 July 8; 309(5732): 230



Document 118 Enserink, Martin Researchers consider codes of conduct [news] Science 2005 July 1; 309(5731): 33



Document 119 Kaiser, Jocelyn PNAS publishes botulinum paper [news] Science 2005 July 1; 309(5731): 31



* Document 120


















A gift to pharma? [editorial] Nature Medicine 2005 July; 11(7): 693


* Document 121 Schwab, Abe The biases of bioterror funding American Journal of Bioethics 2005 JulyAugust; 5(4): 5456



* Document 122 Allhoff, Fritz On economic justifications of bioterrorism defense spending American Journal of Bioethics 2005 JulyAugust; 5(4): 5254



* Document 123 Green, Shane K.; Morin, Karine Biodefense: spend, but spend wisely American Journal of Bioethics 2005 JulyAugust; 5(4): 5052



* Document 124 Selgelid, Michael J. Democratic defense spending in an age of bioterrorism American Journal of Bioethics 2005 JulyAugust; 5(4): 4950



* Document 125 Egan, Erin A. Bioterrorism defense education: prioritizing public health education American Journal of Bioethics 2005 JulyAugust; 5(4): 4748



* Document 126 Gostin, Lawrence O. Finding a space for the public's health in bioterrorism funding: a commentary American Journal of Bioethics 2005 JulyAugust; 5(4): 4546























* Document 127 May, Thomas Funding agendas: has bioterror defense been overprioritized? American Journal of Bioethics 2005 JulyAugust; 5(4): 3444 Abstract: Post9/11, concern about bioterrorism has transformed public health from unappreciated to a central component of nationalsecurity. Within the War on Terror, bioterrorism preparedness has taken a back seat only to direct military action in terms of funding.Domestically, homelessness, joblessness, crime, education, and race relations are just a few of a litany of pressing issues requiringgovernment attention. Even within the biomedical sciences and healthcare, issues surrounding the fact that more than 40 million Americanslack health insurance, the rising cost of prescription medications, and the use of government funds for research using embryonic stem cellsremain unresolved. Should we prioritize a hypothetical threat (bioterrorism), or existing conditions that have implications for identifiableindividuals? Even more fundamentally, should we prioritize research aimed at defense from bioterrorism (or even terrorism in general) whenthere are so many pressing social problems that affect the U.S. population?



Document 128 Coupland, Robin; Leins, KobiRenee Science and prohibited weapons [editorial] Science 2005 June 24; 308(5730): 1841



Document 129 Check, Erika Biologists asked to breed a culture of responsibility in face of terrorism [news] Nature 2005 June 16; 435(7044): 860



Document 130 Risks and benefits of dualuse research [editorial] Nature 2005 June 16; 435(7044): 855



Document 131 Cohen, Jon HHS asks PNAS to pull bioterrorism paper [news] Science 2005 June 3; 308(5727): 1395



* Document 132 Atlas, Ronald M. Biodefense research: an emerging conundrum Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2005 June; 16(3): 239242



















* Document 133 Trotter, Griffin What jurisdiction? Whose justice? A response to Eckenwiler CQ: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2005 Summer; 14(3): 316321


* Document 134 Eckenwiler, Lisa Ethics and the underpinnings of policy in biodefense and emergency preparedness CQ: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2005 Summer; 14(3): 306315


Document 135 Sparacio, D. Catrina Winged migration: international nurse recruitment friend or foe to the nursing crisis? Journal of Nursing Law 2005 Summer; 10(2): 97114


Document 136 Fauci, Anthony S.; Zerhouni, Elias A. NIH response to open letter [letter] Science 2005 April 1; 308(5718): 49



* Document 137 Somerville, Margaret A.; Atlas, Ronald M. Ethics: a weapon to counter bioterrorism Science 2005 March 25; 307(5717): 18811882



Document 138 Rosenwald, Michael S. Just in case: hospitals, businesses ponder value of biohazard detectors Washington Post 2005 March 7; p. E1, E10


Document 139 Enserink, Martin; Kaiser, Jocelyn Has biodefense gone overboard? Science 2005 March 4; 307(5714): 13961398




















* Document 140 Enemark, Christian United States biodefense, international law, and the problem of intent Politics and the Life Sciences 2005 MarchSeptember; 24(12): 3242



Document 141 Bioethical implications of globalisation processes [news] Bulletin of Medical Ethics 2005 March; (206): 4


http://www.bullmedeth.info/ (link may be outdated)

Document 142 Safety Net Residents sue over BU's proposed bioterrorism lab [press release] GeneWatch 2005 MarchApril; 18(2): 14


Document 143 Woodall, John P. WHO and biological weapons investigations [letter] Lancet 2005 February 1925; 365(9460): 651


http://www.thelancet.com/journal (link may be outdated)

Document 144 Schecter, William P.; Fry, Donald E. The surgeon and acts of civilian terrorism: chemical agents Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2005 January; 200(1): 128135


Document 145 Trossman, Susan Germ warfare: the ANA and nurses work to prevent the misuse of antimicrobials in agriculture AJN: American Journal of Nursing 2005 January; 105(1): 7374


* Document 146 National Research Council (United States). Committee on Advances in Technology and the Prevention of Their Application to NextGeneration Biowarfare Threats AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON ADVANCING TECHNOLOGIES AND STRATEGIES FOR MANAGING DUALUSE RISKS:REPROT OF A WORKSHOP Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005. 141 p.







http://www.bullmedeth.info/





http://www.thelancet.com/journal






http://www.nap.edu/

* Document 147 Boyle, Francis A. BIOWARFARE AND TERRORISM Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press, 2005. 58 p. Call number: UG447.8 .B75 2005

Document 148 Cordesman, Anthony H. THE CHALLENGE OF BIOLOGICAL TERRORISM Washington, DC: CSIS Press, 2005. 208 p. Call number: HV6433.35 .C67 2005

Document 149 Charles, Daniel MASTER MIND: THE RISE AND FALL OF FRITZ HABER, THE NOBEL LAUREATE WHO LAUNCHED THE AGE OF CHEMICALWARFARE New York: Ecco/HarperCollins, 2005. 313 p. Call number: QD22 .H15 C48 2005

Document 150 Coleman, Kim A HISTORY OF CHEMICAL WARFARE New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 198 p. Call number: UG447 .C637 2005

Document 151 Guillemin, Jeanne BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS: FROM THE INVENTION OF STATESPONSORED PROGRAMS TO CONTEMPORARY BIOTERRORISM New York: Columbia University Press, 2005. 258 p. Call number: UG447.8 .G85 2005

* Document 152 Rosner, David; Markowitz, Gerald The states and the war against bioterrorism: reactions to the federal smallpox campaign and the Model State Emergency HealthPowers Act. In: Kleinman, Daniel Lee; Kinchy, Abby J.; Handelsman, eds. Controversies in Science and Technology: From Maize to Menopause.Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press; 2005: 297310. Call number: QH442 .K57 2005

* Document 153 Stone, Lesley; Gostin, Lawrence O.; Hodge, James G. The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: a tool for public health preparedness. In: Kleinman, Daniel Lee; Kinchy, Abby J.; Handelsman, eds. Controversies in Science and Technology: From Maize to Menopause.Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press; 2005: 283296. Call number: QH442 .K57 2005

* Document 154 Green, Shane K. E3LSI research: an essential element of biodefense Biosecurity and Bioterrorism 2005; 3(2): 128137




http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=HV6433.35%20.C67%202005&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=QD22%20.H15%20C48%202005&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447%20.C637%202005&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.G85%202005&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=QH442%20.K57%202005&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=QH442%20.K57%202005&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4



* Document 155 Rath, Johannes; Jank, Bernhard; DoblhoffDier, Otto Journals must cooperate to defend biosecurity [letter] Nature 2004 December 2; 432(7017): 549



Document 156 Biosecurity with 'biosense' [editorial] Nature Immunology 2004 December; 5(12): 1191


* Document 157 Clements, Bruce; Evans, R. Gregory The doctor's role in bioterrorism Lancet 2004 December; 364(Special Issue): 2627



* Document 158 Selgelid, M.J Bioterrorism and smallpox planning: information and voluntary vaccination Journal of Medical Ethics 2004 December; 30(6): 558560 Abstract: Although smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980, there are fears that stocks of the virus manufactured for military purposes bythe Soviet Union may have fallen into the hands of "rogue nations" or terrorists. Worries about bioterrorism have thus sparked debate aboutwhether or not the smallpox vaccine, which can be dangerous, should be offered to the general public. Meaningful public debate on this issuerequires expert information about the likelihood that the virus will in fact be used as a weapon. Informed voluntary individual decision making,about whether to get vaccinated if vaccine is made available to the public, would similarly require appreciation of the likelihood of attack.Public deliberation and private deliberation thus both require briefing by the intelligence community.


http://www.jmedethics.com (link may be outdated)

Document 159 Oren, Meir Quarantine after an international biological weapons attack: medical and public health requirements for containment Israel Medical Association Journal 2004 November; 6(11): 658660


Document 160 Eaton, Lynn BMA says scientists should take part in bioterrorism debate [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2004 October 30; 329(7473): 993



Document 161











http://www.jmedethics.com/





http://www.bmj.com/

Willis, Elizabeth A. Contamination and compensation: Gruinard as a "menace to the mainland" Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2004 OctoberDecember; 20(4): 334343


* Document 162 Cohen, Hillel W.; Gould, Robert M.; Sidel, Victor W. The pitfalls of bioterrorism preparedness: the anthrax and smallpox experiences American Journal of Public Health 2004 October; 94(10): 1667 1671



Document 163 Council for Responsible Genetics [CRG] Open letter from the campaign for the peaceful development of the biological sciences GeneWatch 2004 SeptemberDecember; 17(56): 21


Document 164 Wulff, Mary Rocky Mountain fever: Montana's struggle against a BSL4 lab GeneWatch 2004 SeptemberDecember; 17(56): 14, 19


Document 165 Ozonoff, David 10 reasons to oppose the Boston University biolab GeneWatch 2004 SeptemberDecember; 17(56): 1213


Document 166 Byravan, Sujatha; Turner, Chuck A biolab on Boston? Boston City Council member Chuck Turner talks about biodefense research expansion [interview] GeneWatch 2004 SeptemberDecember; 17(56): 811, 19


Document 167 Sidel, Victor Bioshield, biosword GeneWatch 2004 SeptemberDecember; 17(56): 37, 20


* Document 168 Moreno, Jonathan D. Medical ethics and nonlethal weapons American Journal of Bioethics [Online]. 2004 Fall; 4(4): W1W2




















* Document 169 Trotter, Griffin Loyalty in the trenches: practical teleology for office clinicians responding to terrorism Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2004 August; 29(4): 389416 Abstract: Were terrorists ever to effectively deploy weapons of mass destruction, medical practice would be quickly transformed. Manyordinary clinicians would be asked or required to treat unfamiliar yet serious medical conditions in a setting of overwhelming urgency andimpossible odds. Clinical focus would shift from doing good things for a succession of individual patients to considering many patients atonce, a change that could beget loss of trust and rapport with patients. Clinicians might also experience restrictions in personal liberties andappropriation of their property. The purpose of this essay is to develop a teleological framework for undertaking this transformation. Inordinary clinical medicine, the elusiveness of the individual telos (i.e.,the good for the individual) is acknowledged in procedures (such associal history taking,informed consent and outpatient scheduling) designed to protect patients' (and clinicians')prerogatives to interpret thetelos for themselves. In mass casualty scenarios, on the other hand, the telos is standardized and regarded as an Immediate Object (usuallyas a state of affairs in which survival is maximized and permanent disability is minimized). Clinicians who provide mass casualty care willface a number of ethical challenges that can be negotiated by appealing to the political and ethical rationale, and limits, pertaining to thepursuit of aggregate survival as an Immediate Object.


Document 170 Brown, Hannah From the Bible to bioterrorism: anthrax through the ages [review of Spores, Plagues and History: The Story of Anthrax, by ChrisHolmes] Lancet 2004 July 1723; 364(9430): 239140



Document 171 Forge, John The morality of weapons research Science and Engineering Ethics 2004 July; 10(3): 531542


* Document 172 Goodman, Laurie Biodefense cost and consequence Journal of Clinical Investigation 2004 July; 114(1): 23


* Document 173 Wynia, Matthew K.; Gostin, Lawrence O. Ethical challenges in preparing for bioterrorism: barriers within the health care system American Journal of Public Health 2004 July; 94(7): 10961102



Document 174 Martin, William Legal and public policy responses of states to bioterrorism American Journal of Public Health 2004 July; 94(7): 10931096
















Document 175 Enserink, Martin; Kaiser, Jocelyn Accidental anthrax shipment spurs debate over safety [news] Science 2004 June 18; 304(5678): 17261727



* Document 176 May, Thomas Isolation is not the answer. International scientific collaboration is the best defence against bioterror Nature 2004 June 10; 429(6992): 603



* Document 177 Balmer, Brian How does an accident become an experiment? Secret science and the exposure of the public to biological warfare agents Science as Culture 2004 June; 13(2): 197228


* Document 178 Trotter, Griffin Chemical terrorism and the ethics of decontamination Journal of Clinical Ethics 2004 Summer; 15(2): 149160


Document 179 Green, Shane K. ELSI and bioterrorism countermeasures? [letter] Nature Biotechnology 2004 June; 22(6): 656


* Document 180 Richardson, Louise Buying biosafety is the price right? New England Journal of Medicine 2004 May 20; 350(21): 2121 2123



* Document 181 Hirschberg, Rona; La Montagne, John; Fauci, Anthony S. Biomedical research an integral component of national security



















New England Journal of Medicine 2004 May 20; 350(21): 2119 2121



Document 182 Avery, George Bioterrorism, fear, and public health reform: matching a policy solution to the wrong window Public Administration Review 2004 MayJune; 64(3): 275288


* Document 183 Ethics and bioterrorism research Bulletin of Medical Ethics 2004 May; (198): 1320


http://www.bullmedeth.info/ (link may be outdated)

Document 184 Ozonoff, David Public health deception testimony to the Boston City Council in Boston University's proposed biodefense lab GeneWatch 2004 MayJune; 17(3): 1213


Document 185 Gaudioso, Jennifer; Salerno, Reynolds M. Biosecurity and research: minimizing adverse impacts Science 2004 April 30; 304(5671): 687



Document 186 Lawler, Andrew Boston weighs a ban on biodefense studies [news] Science 2004 April 30; 304(5671): 665



Document 187 Fraser, Claire M. An uncertain call to arms [editorial] Science 2004 April 16; 304(5669): 359



Document 188








http://www.bullmedeth.info/












Couzin, Jennifer U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review [news] Science 2004 March 12; 303(5664): 1595



Document 189 O'Riordan, T.G.; Smaldone, G.C. Respiratory medical societies and the threat of bioterrorism. Respiratory medical societies throughout the world have an importantrole in helping governments to develop public policy to counter the threat of bioterrorism. Thorax 2004 March 1; 59(3): 265267


Document 190 Malakoff, David Pentagon biodefense program critiqued [news] Science 2004 January 30; 303(5658): 607



Document 191 McFarlane, A.C. Terrorism and disaster in the 21st century [review of Terrorism and Disaster: Individual and Community Mental HealthInterventions, edited by R.F. Ursano, C.S. Fullerton and A.E. Norwood] Lancet 2004 January 24; 363(9405): 336



Document 192 Boyce, Nell Smallpox mixes make a stir U.S. News and World Report 2004 January 19; 136(2): 64

http://www.usnews.com (link may be outdated)

Document 193 Saha, Subrata; Saha, Pamela Conflicts of values and biodefense measures IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 2004 JanuaryFebruary; 23(1): 171174


* Document 194 Terrorism the scientific response. BMA Memorandum of evidence to the Science and Technology Committee (HC): inquiry intothe scientific response to terrorism Nursing Ethics 2004 January; 11(1): 8487














http://www.usnews.com/





Document 195 Millett, Piers D. Proliferation of biological weapons: challenges and responses Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2004 JanuaryMarch; 20(1): 4 18


Document 196 World Health Organization PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE TO BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS: WHO GUIDANCE Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. 340 p. Call number: UG447 .W66 2004

Document 197 Davis, Jim A. and Schneider, Barry R., eds. THE GATHERING BIOLOGICAL WARFARE STORM Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004. 263 p. Call number: UG447.8 .G38 2004

* Document 198 Barenblatt, Daniel A PLAGUE UPON HUMANITY: THE SECRET GENOCIDE OF AXIS JAPAN'S GERM WARFARE OPERATION New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2004. 260 p. Call number: D810 .B3 B37 2004

Document 199 National Research Council [NRC] (United States). Committee on Research Standards and Practices to Prevent the Destructive Application ofBiotechnology BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH IN AN AGE OF TERRORISM Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004. 147 p. Call number: HV6432 .N387 2004


Document 200 Dudley, William, ed. BIOLOGICAL WARFARE: OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, 2004. 218 p. Call number: UG447.8 .B5653 2004

* Document 201 Sanders, Cheryl J. Religion and ethical decision making in the African American community: bioterrorism and the black postal workers In: Prograis, Lawrence J.; Pellegrino, Edmund D., eds. African American Bioethics: Culture, Race, and Identity. Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press, 2004: 93104 Call number: R724 .S937 2004

* Document 202 Meacham, Katharine R.; Croom, Jo Ann T. Tricksters, The Plague, and mirrors: biotechnology, bioterrorism, and justice. In: Brannigan, Michael C., ed. CrossCultural Biotechnology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004: 177191. Call number: TP248.23 .C76 2004



http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447%20.W66%202004&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.G38%202004&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=D810%20.B3%20B37%202004&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=HV6432%20.N387%202004&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://www.nap.edu/



http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=R724%20.S937%202004&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=TP248.23%20.C76%202004&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

Document 203 Sidel, Victor W. Warfare: IV. Chemical and biological weapons. In: Post, Stephen G., ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Reference USA: Thomson/Gale; 2004: 25692575. Call number: QH332. .E52 2004 v.5

Document 204 Moreno, Jonathan D. Bioterrorism. In: Post, Stephen G., ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Reference USA: Thomson/Gale; 2004: 317320. Call number: QH332 .E52 2004 v.1

Document 205 Stein, Bradley D.; Tanielian, Terri L.; Eisenman, David P.; Keyser, Donna J.; Burnam, M. Audrey; Pincus, Harold A. Emotional and behavioral consequences of bioterrorism: planning a public health response Milbank Quarterly 2004; 82(3): 413455


* Document 206 Hodge, James G., Jr.; Brown, Erin Fuse; O'Connell, Jessica P. The HIPAA Privacy Rule and bioterrorism planning, prevention, and response Biosecurity and Bioterrorism 2004; 2(2): 7380


* Document 207 Kahn, Laura H. Biodefense research: can secrecy and safety coexist? Biosecurity and Bioterrorism 2004; 2(2): 8185


Document 208 ScottClark, Cathy; Levy, Adrian Specter orange International Journal of Health Services 2004; 34(3): 557566


* Document 209 Beane, Jennifer A look behind the scenes: bioterrorism, smallpox, and public health policy Journal of Biolaw and Business 2004; 7(2): 4053


Document 210 Petro, James B.; Relman, David A. Understanding threats to scientific openness Science 2003 December 12; 302(5652): 1898


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=QH332.%20.E52%202004%20v.5&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=QH332%20.E52%202004%20v.1&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4














Document 211 Cooper, H.H.A. Biohazard, by Ken Alibek with Stephen Handelman [book review] Journal of Psychiatry and Law 2003 Winter; 31(4): 493499


Document 212 Matsumoto, Gary Anthrax powder: state of the art? [news] Science 2003 November 28; 302(5650): 14921496



Document 213 Fitch, J. Patrick; Raber, Ellen; Imbro, Dennis R. Technology challenges in responding to biological or chemical attacks in the civilian sector Science 2003 November 21; 302(5649): 13501354



* Document 214 Pincock, Stephen UK plans ethical code to stop misuse of bioresearch [news] Lancet 2003 November 15; 362(9396): 1634



Document 215 Mulcahy, R. Timothy An uncertain partnership [editorial] Science 2003 November 7; 302(5647): 949



Document 216 Black, John Logan III Genome projects and gene therapy: gateways to next generation biological weapons Military Medicine 2003 November; 168(11): 864871


Document 217 Coupland, Robin M. Incapacitating chemical weapons: a year after the Moscow theatre siege [opinion] Lancet 2003 October 25; 362(9393): 1346




















* Document 218 Malakoff, David; Enserink, Martin Researchers await government response to selfregulation plea [news] Science 2003 October 17; 302(5644): 368369



* Document 219 Wade, Nicholas Panel of scientists supports review of biomedical research that terrorists could use New York Times 2003 October 9; p. A20


Document 220 Teramo Declaration Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2003 OctoberDecember; 19(4): 337339


* Document 221 Nathanson, Vivienne Bioterrorism: how should doctors respond to the threat of biological weapons? Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2003 OctoberDecember; 19(4): 331334


Document 222 Boulton, Frank Which bioweapons might be used by terrorists against the United Kingdom Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2003 OctoberDecember; 19(4): 326330


Document 223 Sidel, Victor W. Bioterrorism in the United States: a balanced assessment of risk and response Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2003 OctoberDecember; 19(4): 318325


Document 224 Millet, Piers D. The Biological Weapons Convention after November 2002 Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2003 OctoberDecember; 19(4): 303317




















* Document 225 Willis, Elizabeth A. Seascape with monkeys and guineapigs: Britain's biological weapons research programme, 194854 Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2003 OctoberDecember; 19(4): 285302


Document 226 Enserink, Martin Johns Hopkins biodefense pioneers depart en masse [news] Science 2003 September 26; 301(5641): 1824



Document 227 Casagrande, Rocco Biological Warfare and Disarmament: New Problems/New Perspectives, edited by Susan Wright [book review] Politics and the Life Sciences 2003 September; 22(2): 5860



Document 228 Leitenberg, Milton; Leonard, James; Spertzel, Richard Biodefense crossing the line Politics and the Life Sciences 2003 September; 22(2): 23



* Document 229 May, Thomas; Aulisio, Mark P.; Silverman, Ross D. The smallpox vaccination of health care workers: professional obligations and defense against bioterrorism Hastings Center Report 2003 SeptemberOctober; 33(5): 2633


* Document 230 London, Alex John Threats to the common good: biochemical weapons and human subjects research Hastings Center Report 2003 SeptemberOctober; 33(5): 1725


* Document 231 Alexander, G. Caleb; Wynia, Matthew K. Ready and willing? Physicians' sense of preparedness for bioterrorism Health Affairs 2003 SeptemberOctober; 22(5): 189197



















* Document 232 Iserson, Kenneth V.; Pesik, Nicki Ethical resource distribution after biological, chemical, or radiological terrorism CQ: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2003 Fall; 12(4): 455465


Document 233 Army burns sarin from rockets; mass amount of deadly agent destroyed at Ala. incinerator Washington Post 2003 September 1; p. A17

http://www.washintonpost.com (link may be outdated)

* Document 234 Rappert, Brian Biological weapons, genetics and social analysis: emerging responses, emerging issues I New Genetics and Society 2003 August; 22(2): 169181


Document 235 Pavlin, Julie A.; Mostashari, Farzad; Kortepeter, Mark G.; Hynes, Noreen A.; Chotani, Rashid A.; Mikol, Yves B.; Ryan, Margaret A.K.;Neville, James S.; Gantz, Donald T.; Writer, James V.; Florance, Jared E.; Culpepper, Randall C.; Henretig, Fred M.; Kelley, Patrick W. Innovative surveillance methods for rapid detection of disease outbreaks and bioterrorism: results of an interagency workshop onhealth indicator surveillance American Journal of Public Health 2003 August; 93(8): 1230 1235



Document 236 Marmagas, Susan West; King, Laura Rasar; Chuk, Michelle G. Public health's response to a changed world: September 11, biological terrorism, and the development of an environmental healthtracking network American Journal of Public Health 2003 August; 93(8): 1226 1230



Document 237 Greenberg, Michael R. Public health, law, and local control: destruction of the US chemical weapons stockpile American Journal of Public Health 2003 August; 93(8): 1222 1226



Document 238 Stone, Richard British expert leaves impressive arms control legacy: bioweapons [news] Science 2003 July 25; 301(5632): 445, 447




http://www.washintonpost.com/















Document 239 May, Thomas; Silverman, Ross Bioterrorism defense priorities [editorial] Science 2003 July 4; 301(5629): 17



Document 240 Diamond, Bruce Backyard biodefense rouses extreme reactions [news] Nature Medicine 2003 July; 9(7): 805


Document 241 Dyer, Clare Court stands by decision on Gulf war syndrome [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2003 June 21; 326(7403): 1350



Document 242 From red peril to red tape [editorial] Nature 2003 June 12; 423(6941): 669



* Document 243 Censoring science CMAJ/JAMC: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2003 June 10; 168(12): 1517



Document 244 Frischknecht, Friedrich The history of biological warfare: human experimentation, modern nightmares and lone madmen in the twentieth century EMBO Reports 2003 June; 4(Special Issue): S47S52


* Document 245 Beck, Volker Advances in life sciences and bioterrorism. Risks, perspectives and responsibilities EMBO Reports 2003 June; 4(Special Issue): S53S56










http://www.bmj.com/






http://www.cmaj.ca/




* Document 246 May, Thomas; Silverman, Ross D. Should smallpox vaccine be made available to the general public? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2003 June; 13(2): 6782 Abstract: In June 2002, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approved draft recommendations concerning preparationfor potential biological terror attacks that utilize the smallpox virus. ACIP recommends against both mandatory and voluntary vaccination ofthe general public. The present paper examines the moral and political considerations both for and against each of the general publicvaccination options considered by the ACIP in the context of the state's authority over vaccination for the purposes of protecting publichealth. Although it is clear that compulsory mass vaccination is not justified at this time, the issues surrounding voluntary vaccination aremore complex. Should smallpox vaccination prior to an outbreak be made available to the general public? The paper concludes that thevaccine should not be made available at this time. This conclusion, however, is based upon contingent features of current circumstances,which would change once an outbreak occurred. In the even of a terrorrelated outbreak of smallpox, the general public's access to voluntaryvaccination would become justified, even in areas beyond where the outbreak has occurred.


Document 247 British soldier wins claim that Gulf war drugs caused illness [news brief] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2003 May 10; 326(7397): 1000



Document 248 Cherry, Catherine L.; Kainer, M.A.; Ruff, T.A. Biological weapons preparedness: the role of physicians Internal Medicine Journal 2003 MayJune; 33(56): 242253


Document 249 Grayson, M.L. The difference between biological warfare and bioterrorism: Australia finally makes a start towards real preparedness forbioterrorism [editorial] Internal Medicine Journal 2003 MayJune; 33(56): 213214


* Document 250 Haas, John M. Addressing bioterrorism. What ethical issues and questions surround potential responses to bioterrorist attacks? Healthcare Executive 2003 MayJune; 18(3): 7677


Document 251 Shorett, Peter The $1.6 billion secret: investigating Boston University's proposed biodefense laboratory GeneWatch 2003 MayJune; 16(3): 910








http://www.bmj.com/









Document 252 Healy, Bernadine Time for a pause [smallpox vaccination program] U.S. News & World Report 2003 April 21; 134(13): 54


Document 253 United States. Government Accounting Office [GAO] Bioterrorism: Preparedness Varied across State and Local Jurisdictions Washington, DC: Government Accounting Office, 2003 April. 48 p. [Online]. Available: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03373.pdf [2005 July5]

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03373.pdf (link may be outdated)

* Document 254 Robertson, John A. Bioterrorism and the right to research Nature Reviews. Genetics 2003 April; 4(4): 248



* Document 255 Trotter, Griffin Balancing pluralism and the common good: a look at openair experiments of biowarfare agents Accountability in Research 2003 AprilJune; 10(2): 109121


* Document 256 Hodge, James G., Jr. Protecting the public's health in an era of bioterrorism: the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act Accountability in Research 2003 AprilJune; 10(2): 91107 Abstract: During the fall of 2001, public health law scholars at the Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns HopkinsUniversities were asked by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and a series of national partners to develop the ModelState Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA). The MSEHPA provides a series of modern powers for states to consider in responding tocatastrophic public health emergencies, including bioterrorism events. Since December 2001, provisions based on the MSEHPA have beenintroduced in nearly 40 states and passed in 20. Underlying the development of the act is a longstanding debate between legal and ethicalscholars and law and policymakers as to the appropriate ways to balance individual and communal rights. The drafting challenge was tocreate a comprehensive model law that provides adequate powers to protect the public's health while also respecting individual and grouprights. The MSEHPA empowers public health agents with broad authority and simultaneously limits the exercise of power in time, duration,and scope to accomplish communal goals of abating serious public health threats. Coercive public health powers, particularly isolation andquarantine, are exercised on a temporary basis, only so long as are reasonably necessary and only among persons who justifiably may posea risk to others because of their contagious conditions. Individual rights to contest the coercive use of public health powers, even during anemergency, are secured.


Document 257 Knight, Jonathan Critics slam US [United States] over plans to use riotcontrol chemicals in the Gulf [news] Nature 2003 March 27; 422(6930): 363





http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03373.pdf











Document 258 Dalyell, Tam Westminster diary: Tam Dalyell on why bioresearch should always be published, and how to detect illegal fur imports New Scientist 2003 March 22; 177(2387):57


* Document 259 Couzin, Jennifer New rule triggers debate over best way to test drugs [news] Science 2003 March 14; 299(5613): 1651, 1653



Document 260 Singh, Jerome Amir Work on 'nonlethal' weapons should be limited too [letter] Nature 2003 March 13; 422(6928): 113



Document 261 Boyce, Nell Keeping details from the devil: scientists who study dangerous germs and toxins try not to tell all U.S. News & World Report 2003 March 10; 134(7): 62


Document 262 Dalyell, Tam Westminster diary: keeping research into biological agents secure New Scientist 2003 March 1; 177(2384): 51


Document 263 Connor, Daniel J.; White, Stuart M. Preparedness of London hospitals for a chemical weapons attack [letter] Lancet 2003 March 1; 361(9359): 786787



Document 264 Fasano, Alessio Bioterrorism and biological warfare: not only a respiratory affair Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2003 March; 36(3): 305306



















* Document 265 Editors' statement on considerations of biodefence and biosecurity [editorial] Nature Medicine 2003 March; 9(3): 240


Document 266 Wheelis, Mark "Nonlethal" chemical weapons: a Faustian bargain Issues in Science and Technology 2003 Spring; 19(3): 7478



Document 267 Steinbruner, John D.; Harris, Elisa D. Controlling dangerous pathogens Issues in Science and Technology 2003 Spring; 19(3): 4754



Document 268 FitzPatrick, William J.; Zwanziger, Lee L. Defending against biochemical warfare: ethical issues involving the coercive use of investigational drugs and biologics in themilitary Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law [electronic] 2003 March; 3: 16 p. Available: http://www.psljournal.com/ [2 October 2003]


http://www.psljournal.com (link may be outdated)

Document 269 Vollen, Laurie Fools rush in: the United States in spending money on biodefense but is it spending wisely? GeneWatch 2003 MarchApril; 16(2): 913


Document 270 Wright, Susan Rethinking the biological warfare problem: historical and contemporary attitudes towards the `poor man's nukes' GeneWatch 2003 MarchApril; 16(2): 37


* Document 271 Moreno, Jonathan D. Human experiments and national security: the need to clarify policy CQ: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2003 Spring; 12(2): 192195













http://www.psljournal.com/







Document 272 Colton, Richard J.; Russell, John N., Jr. Making the world a safer place [opinion] Science 2003 February 28; 299(5611): 13241325



* Document 273 Malakoff, David Security rules leave labs wanting more guidance Science 2003 February 21; 299(5610): 1175



* Document 274 Fauci, Anthony S. Biodefence on the research agenda [commentary] Nature 2003 February 20; 421(6925): 787



Document 275 Enserink, Martin Trust us, we're experts [news] Science 2003 February 14; 299(5609): 993



Document 276 Fitzpatrick, Mike Bioterrorism alert Lancet 2003 February 1; 361(9355): 442



Document 277 Fox, Jeffrey L. US policy on data disclosure debated [news] Nature Biotechnology 2003 February; 21(2): 116117


* Document 278 Spier, R.E. Bioterrorism and the biotechnologist [editorial] Vaccine 2003 January 30; 21(78): 582585



















Document 279 Malakoff, David Bioweapons: plague of lies lands Texas scientist in jail [news] Science 2003 January 24; 299(5606): 489490



Document 280 Kerr, Cathel; Sibbald, Barbara US, UK and Canada begin preparations for possible smallpox bioterror attacks [news] CMAJ/JAMC: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2003 January 21; 168(2): 210



* Document 281 Cohen, Philip Recipes for bioterror: can we stop potentially deadly biotech research getting into the wrong hands? New Scientist 2003 January 18; 177(2378): 1011


* Document 282 For whose eyes only: how do you preserve scientific freedom and combat terrorism? [editorial] New Scientist 2003 January 18; 177(2378): 3


Document 283 Malakoff, David Researchers urged to selfcensor sensitive data [news] Science 2003 January 17; 299(5605): 321



Document 284 Check, Erika US [United States] officials urge biologists to vet publications for bioterror risk [news] Nature 2003 January 16; 421(6920): 197



Document 285 Pala, Christopher Anthrax island: in the middle of the Aral Sea, the ruins of an earlier bioweapons threat New York Times Magazine 2003 January 12; p. 3639








http://www.cmaj.ca/












Document 286 von Hippel, Frank N.; Brenner, David J.; Lyman, Edwin S.; Chapin, Douglas M.; Cohen, Karl P.; Davis, W. Kenneth; Kintner, Edwin E.; Koch,Leonard J.; Landis, John W.; Levenson, Milton; Mandil, I. Harry; Pate, Zack T.; Rockwell, Theodore; Schriesheim, Alan; Simpson, John W.;Squire, Alexander; Starr, Chauncey; Stone, Henry E.; Taylor, John J.; Todreas, Neil E.; Wolfe, Bertram; Zebroski, Edwin L. Revisiting nuclear power plant safety [letters and reply] Science 2003 January 10; 299(5604): 201203



Document 287 Gewin, Virginia Agriculture shock [news] Nature 2003 January 9; 421(6919): 106108



Document 288 Meslin, Eric M. Bioterrorism and bioethics: challenges for industry, government and society Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 2003 January; 9(2): 101109


Document 289 Crupi, Robert S.; Asnis, Deborah S.; Lee, Christopher C.; Santucci, Thomas; Marino, Mark J.; Flanz, Bruce J. Meeting the challenge of bioterrorism: lessons learned from West Nile virus and anthrax American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2003 January; 21(1): 7779


* Document 290 Bruce, Julie Bioterrorism meets privacy: an analysis of the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act and the HIPAA privacy rule Annals of Health Law 2003 Winter; 12(1): 75120


Document 291 Appeal of the International Committee of the Red Cross on biotechnology, weapons and humanity Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2003 JanuaryMarch; 19(1): 64 67


* Document 292 Selgelid, Michael J. Smallpox revisited American Journal of Bioethics [Online]. 2003 Winter; 3(1): W3 [WIF1]. 9 p. Abstract: This article reviews the history of smallpox and ethical issues that arise with its threat as a biological weapon. Smallpox killed

















more people than any infectious disease in historyand perhaps three times more people in the 20th Century than were killed by all the warsof that period. Following a WHOsponsored global vaccination campaign, smallpox was officially declared eradicated in 1980. It has sincebeen revealed that the Soviet Union, until its fall in the early 1990s, manufactured tens of tons of smallpox for military purposes. A worry isthat some of this may have fallen into the hands of "rogue" nations or terrorists. Current U.S. debate questions whether smallpox vaccineshould therefore be made available to the American public, whichlike the rest of the worldnow lacks immunity. Because the vaccine isconsiderably dangerous, public dialogue cannot resolve this matter if evidence material to the likelihood of attack is classified (i.e. secret). Iconclude by recommending numerous future areas for ethics research related to the weaponization of smallpox.



* Document 293 Shamoo, Adil E.; Campbell, James D. The use of experimental drugs during national crisis Accountability in Research 2003 JanuaryMarch; 10(1): 6984


Document 294 National Research Council (United States). Committee on Biological Threats to Agricultural Plants and Animals COUNTERING AGRICULTURAL BIOTERRORISM Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003. 169 p. Call number: UG447.8 .N37 2003


Document 295 Institute of Medicine (United States). Committee to Review the Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides VETERANS AND AGENT ORANGE: UPDATE 2002 Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003. 619 p. Call number: RA1242 .T44 I57 2003


Document 296 Holmes, Chris SPORES, PLAGUES AND HISTORY: THE STORY OF ANTHRAX Dallas: Durban House Publishing, 2003. 227 p. Call number: RA644 .A6 H65 2003

Document 297 Mauroni, Al CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE: A REFERENCE HANDBOOK Santa Barbara, CA: ABCCLIO, 2003. 243 p. Call number: UG447.8 .M33 2003

Document 298 Domaradskij, Igor V. and Orent, Wendy BIOWARRIOR: INSIDE THE SOVIET/RUSSIAN BIOLOGICAL WAR MACHINE Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2003. 341 p. Call number: UG447.8 .D65 2003

Document 299 Brower, Jennifer and Chalk, Peter THE GLOBAL THREAT OF NEW AND REEMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES: RECONCILING U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AND






http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.N37%202003&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://www.nap.edu/

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RA1242%20.T44%20I57%202003&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://www.nap.edu/

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RA644%20.A6%20H65%202003&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.M33%202003&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.D65%202003&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2003. 146 p. Call number: RA643.5 .G564 2003

Document 300 Koplow, David SMALLPOX: THE FIGHT TO ERADICATE A GLOBAL SCOURGE Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. 265 p. Call number: RA644 .S6 K675 2003

Document 301 Koplow, David A. That wonderful year: smallpox, genetic engineering, and bio terrorism Maryland Law Review 2003; 62(3): 417514


Document 302 Terrorism preparedness in State Health Departments United States, 20012003 MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2003; 52(43): 1051 1053


* Document 303 Fidler, David P. Public health and national security in the global age: infectious diseases, bioterrorism, and realpolitik George Washington International Law Review 2003; 35: 787856


* Document 304 Meslin, Eric M. Genetics and bioterrorism: challenges for science, society, and bioethics. In: Moreno, Jonathan D., ed. In the Wake of Terror: Medicine and Morality in a Time of Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 2003: 199218.Call number: R725.5 .I5 2003

* Document 305 Childress, James F. Triage in response to a bioterrorist attack. In: Moreno, Jonathan D., ed. In the Wake of Terror: Medicine and Morality in a Time of Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 2003: 7793. Call number: R725.5 .I5 2003

* Document 306 Bayer, Ronald; Colgrove, James Rights and dangers: bioterrorism and the ideologies of public health. In: Moreno, Jonathan D., ed. In the Wake of Terror: Medicine and Morality in a Time of Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 2003: 5174. Call number: R725.5 .I5 2003

Document 307 Marchant, Joanna Bioterror takes centre stage New Scientist 2002 December 2128; 176(23742375): 22


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RA643.5%20.G564%202003&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RA644%20.S6%20K675%202003&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4








http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=R725.5%20.I5%202003&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4





Document 308 Greenberg, Daniel S. Homeland security is good and bad news for US [United States] science [news] Lancet 2002 December 2128; 360(9350): 2056



* Document 309 Cohen, Jon; Enserink, Martin Roughandtumble behind Bush's smallpox policy Science 2002 December 20; 298(5602): 23122316



Document 310 Malakoff, David New U.S. [United States] rules set the stage for tighter security, oversight [biological agents] [bioterror research regulations] [news] Science 2002 December 20; 298(5602): 2304



Document 311 Durodie, Bill; Wessely, Simon Resilience or panic? The public and terrorist attack [commentary] Lancet 2002 December 14; 360(9349): 19011902



Document 312 Kennedy, Donald Balancing terror and freedom [editorial] Science 2002 December 13; 298(5601): 2091



* Document 313 Orient, Jane M.; Gostin, Lawrence O.; Sapsin, Jason W.; Teret, Stephen P.; Burris, Scott; Mair, Julie Samia; Hodge, James G., Jr.; Vernick,Jon S. Bioterrorism and public health law [letter and reply] JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002 December 4; 288(21): 26862687



* Document 314



















Annas, George J.; Gostin, Lawrence O.; Sapsin, Jason W.; Teret, Stephen P.; Burris, Scott; Mair, Julie Samia; Hodge, James G., Jr.;Vernick, Jon S. Bioterrorism and public health law [letter and reply] JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002 December 4; 288(21): 26852687



Document 315 Leary, Warren E. Scientific panel urges incinerating obsolete chemical arms New York Times 2002 December 4; p. A20


Document 316 Rehnquist, Janet United States. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General. State and Local Bioterrorism Preparedness Washington, DC: Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services; 2002 December: 24 p. [Online]. Available:http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei020100550.pdf [2005 July 5]

http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei020100550.pdf (link may be outdated)

Document 317 Meslin, Eric M. Bioterrorism and bioethics: challenges for society Lab Report (Law and Bioethics Report) 2002 December; 2(2): 8 10


http://www.louisville.edu/medschool/ibhpl/Lab_report/ (link may be outdated)

Document 318 MacLeod, Roy Britain and Biological Warfare: Expert Advice and Science Policy, 193065, by Brian Balmer [book review] Science, Technology and Human Values 2002 Winter; 28(1): 171 175


Document 319 Volans, Glyn N.; Karalliedde, Lakshman Longterm effects of chemical weapons Lancet 2002 December; 360(Supplement): s35s36



Document 320 Barbera, Joseph A.; Macintyre, Anthony G. The reality of the modern bioterrorism response Lancet 2002 December; 360(Supplement): s33s34








http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-01-00550.pdf



http://www.louisville.edu/medschool/ibhpl/Lab_report/









Document 321 Cassels, Alan Bioterrorism becoming too dominant on public health agenda? [news] CMAJ/JAMC: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2002 November 26; 167(11): 1281



Document 322 Kahn, Joseph Shouting the pain from Japan's germ attacks New York Times 2002 November 23; p. A4


Document 323 Gettleman, Jeffrey Suit seeks to block burning of chemical arms New York Times 2002 November 20; p. A16


Document 324 Alberts, Bruce; May, Robert M. Scientist support for biological weapons controls [editorial] Science 2002 November 8; 298(5596): 1135



Document 325 MacKenzie, Debora Secret gas changes face of urban war [news] New Scientist 2002 November 2; 176(2367): 67


Save All Print All




http://www.cmaj.ca/













EthxWeb Search Results

Search Detail: Result=("21.3".PC.) AND (@YD >= "20000000") 2=1 : " Documents: 326 647 of 647

Document 326 A Russian tragedy: is a perfect knockout gas achievable, or even desirable? [editorial] New Scientist 2002 November 2; 176(2367): 5


* Document 327 Shanker, Thom U.S. tested a nerve gas in Hawaii New York Times 2002 November 1; p. A24


* Document 328 Federation of American Scientists [FAS]. Working Group on BW [Biological Warfare] Stockholm International PeaceResearch Institute [SIPRI] Verification Research, Training and Information Centre [VERTIC] International Network ofEngineers and Scientists for Global Responsibility[INES] Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy; SunshineProject; Pax Christi International; Physicians for Social Responsibility; 20/20 Vision Draft recommendations for a code of conduct for biodefense programs Federation of American Scientist 2002 November; 2 p. [Online] Accessed: http://www.fas.org/bwc/papers/code.pdf[2007 May 11]

http://www.fas.org./bwc/papers/code.pdf (link may be outdated)

* Document 329 Etzioni, Amitai Public health law: a communitarian perspective [opinion] Health Affairs 2002 NovemberDecember; 21(6): 102104


* Document 330 Bayer, Ronald; Colgrove, James Bioterrorism, public health, and the law [opinion] Health Affairs 2002 NovemberDecember; 21(6): 98101




http://kie.georgetown.edu/netacgi/nph-brs?co1=AND&co2=AND&co3=AND&co4=AND&d=EWEB&Sect2=THESON&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww11.georgetown.edu%2Fresearch%2Fnrcbl%2Fdatabases%2FEthxWeb%2Fethxbool.htm&r=0&p=2&f=1&l=50&s4=21.3.pc.+and+%40yd+%3E%3D20000000&s2=&co5=AND&pg1=SUBJ&op1=AND&s1=&co6=AND&op6=AND&s6=&Sect3=PLURON&Sect5=HITOFF&l=0






http://www.fas.org./bwc/papers/code.pdf




* Document 331 Annas, George J. Bioterrorism, public health, and human rights [opinion] Health Affairs 2002 NovemberDecember; 21(6): 9497


* Document 332 Powell, Kendall; Jayaraman, K.S. Mosquito researchers deny plotting secret biowarfare test [news] Nature 2002 October 31; 419(6910): 867



Document 333 Faden, Ruth Staying ahead of a scourge [opinion] Washington Post 2002 October 29; p. A21


Document 334 York, Anna Civilian health: the new target of conflict Lancet 2002 October 19; 360(9341): 1228



* Document 335 Enserink, Martin Secret weapons tests' details revealed [Department of Defense] [biological and chemical warfare] [news] Science 2002 October 18; 298(5593): 513514



Document 336
















Preston, Richard The specter of a new and deadlier smallpox [editorial] New York Times 2002 October 14; p. A19


Document 337 Underwood, Anne; Rosenberg, Debra; Lipper, Tamara; Carmichael, Mary; Noonan, David; Springen, Karen; Breslau,Karen; Murr, Andrew; Gesalman, Anne Belli The plan to fight smallpox Newsweek 2002 October 14; 140(16): 4452

* Document 338 Shanker, Thom U.S. troops were subjected to a wider toxic testing New York Times 2002 October 9; p. A18


Document 339 Nathanson, Vivienne Bioweapons: usable weapons are technically easier to produce now, but we lack legal protection againstthem [editorial] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2002 October 5; 325(7367): 727 728



Document 340 Ashraf, Haroon Bioterror and HIV dominate infectious disease meeting [Anthony Fauci] [news] Lancet 2002 October 5; 360(9339): 1076



Document 341 Artenstein, Andrew W.; Neill, Marguerite A.; Opal, Steven M. Bioterrorism and physicians [letter] Annals of Internal Medicine 2002 October 1; 137(7): 626









http://www.bmj.com/






http://www.annals.org (link may be outdated)

Document 342 Japan admits it waged germ warfare [news brief] Monash Bioethics Review 2002 October; 21(4): 4


Document 343 Greenhouse, Linda The day anthrax came to the Supreme Court New York University Law Review 2002 October; 77(4): 867873


Document 344 Davis, Lauren Biowar and peace: understanding the threat of biological weapons development GeneWatch 2002 October; 15(5): 1315


* Document 345 MacKenzie, Debora; Le Page, Michael `Act now' plea on bioterror threat: the Red Cross is calling for curbs on sensitive research before lethalgerms fall into the wrong hands New Scientist 2002 September 28; 175(2362): 45


Document 346 Wallerstein, Mitchel B. Science in an age of terrorism [editorial] Science 2002 September 27; 297(5590): 2169



Document 347 Mervis, Jeffrey; Stokstad, Erik NAS [National Academy of Sciences] censors report on agriculture threats [news] Science 2002 September 20; 297(5589): 1973, 1975


http://www.annals.org/















Document 348 Bragg, Rick; Wilson, Glynn Burning of chemical arms puts fear in wind New York Times 2002 September 15; p. A1, A24


Document 349 Moser, Michael; Robbins, Anthony; Stone, Sergio C.; Annas, George J. Bioterrorism and civil liberties [letters and reply] New England Journal of Medicine 2002 September 12; 347(11): 856857



Document 350 Stolberg, Sheryl Gay; Miller, Judith Many worry that nation is still highly vulnerable to germ attack New York Times 2002 September 9; p. A16


Document 351 Malakoff, David; Enserink, Martin One year after [news] Science 2002 September 6; 297(5587): 16301633



Document 352 Japan admits to use of biological weapons in Second World War [Unit 731] [news brief] Nature 2002 September 5; 419(6902): 8



Document 353 Leitenburg, Milton















Biological weapons and bioterrorism in the first years of the twentyfirst century Politics and the Life Sciences 2002 September; 21(2): 327


* Document 354 Berry, Roberta; Eisen, Arri Addressing key aspects of the peer commentaries [commentary] American Journal of Bioethics [Online]. 2002 Fall; 2(4): W1. 2 p.



Document 355 Coleman, Elizabeth Ann Smallpox in the ED: how prepared are we? [opinion] AJN: American Journal of Nursing 2002 September; 102(9): 11


Document 356 Nunn, Sam The future of public health preparedness Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002 Fall; 30(3 Supplement): 202209


Document 357 Lichtveld, Maureen; Hodge, James G., Jr.; Gebbie, Kristine; Thompson, F.E. "Ed", Jr.; Loos, Diane I. Preparedness on the frontline: what's law got to do with it? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002 Fall; 30(3 Supplement): 184188


Document 358 Matthews, Gene W.; Benjamin, Georges; Mills, S. Peter; Parmet, Wendy; Misrahi, James J. Legal preparedness for bioterrorism Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002 Fall; 30(3 Supplement): 5256


Document 359 Freedom of information [editorial] Nature Medicine 2002 September; 8(9): 899
















Document 360 Couzin, Jennifer Unconventional detective bears down on a killer [Barbara Hatch Rosenberg] [news] Science 2002 August 23; 297(5585): 12641265



Document 361 Stone, Richard Peering into the shadows: Iraq's bioweapons program [news] Science 2002 August 16; 297(5584): 11101112



Document 362 Lindqvist, Martti; Halila, Ritva Finland. National Advisory Board on Health Care Ethics [ETENE] / Valtakunnallinen terveydenhuollon eettinenneuvottelukunta Proposal for a Government Bill on Incorporating Provisions Concerning Terrorism into the Penal Code andthe Coercive Measures Act: Views on the Bill from the Point of View of the National Advisory Board on HealthCare Ethics Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 2002 August 8; 2 p.

http://www.etene.org/dokumentit/Terrorismien.pdf (link may be outdated)

* Document 363 Gostin, Lawrence O.; Sapsin, Jason W.; Teret, Stephen P. Burris, Scott; Mair, Julie Samia; Hodge, James G., Jr.;Vernick, Jon S. The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturallyoccurring infectious diseases JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002 August 7; 288(5): 622628 Abstract: The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities drafted theModel State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA or Model Act) at the request of the Centers for DiseaseControl and Prevention. The Model Act provides state actors with the powers they need to detect and containbioterrorism or a naturally occurring disease outbreak. Legislative bills based on the MSEHPA have been introducedin 34 states. Problems of obsolescence, inconsistency, and inadequacy may render current state laws ineffective oreven counterproductive. State laws often date back to the early 20th century and have been built up in layers overthe years. They frequently predate the vast changes in the public health sciences and constitutional law. The ModelAct is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensiveplanning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3)management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well asproviding power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination,testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear andauthoritative information to the public. The Model Act also contains a modernized, extensive set of principles and









http://www.etene.org/dokumentit/Terrorismien.pdf

requirements to safeguard personal rights. Law can be a tool to improve public health preparedness. A constitutionaldemocracy must balance the common good with respect for personal dignity, toleration of groups, and adherence toprinciples of justice.


http://www.jama.com (link may be outdated)

* Document 364 Stone, Alexander U.S. research on sedatives in combat set off alarms [chemical weapons] Science 2002 August 2; 297(5582): 764


* Document 365 Couzin, Jennifer A call for restraint on biological data [bioterrorism] [news] Science 2002 August 2; 297(5582): 749, 751


Document 366 Miller, Judith Argentine to head group seeking to ban chemical weapons New York Times 2002 July 26; p. A4


* Document 367 MacKenzie, Debora; Westphal, Sylvia Pagan Should the genetic sequences of deadly diseases be kept secret? [news] New Scientist 2002 July 20; 175(2352): 7


Document 368 Westphal, Sylvia Pagan How to make a killer virus [news] New Scientist 2002 July 20; 175(2352): 67


* Document 369 Surfing for a satan bug [editorial]



http://www.jama.com/











New Scientist 2002 July 20; 175(2352): 5


* Document 370 Check, Erika Poliovirus advance sparks fears of data curbs [news] Nature 2002 July 18; 418(6895): 265


Document 371 Synthetic bioterror [editorial] New York Times 2002 July 18; p. A22


Document 372 Defending against smallpox [editorial] Washington Post 2002 July 15; p. A16


Document 373 Seppa, N. Vaccine for all? Science News 2002 July 13; 162(2): 2122


http://www.sciencenews.org (link may be outdated)

Document 374 Weiss, Rick Poliocausing virus created in N.Y. [New York] lab: madefrom scratch pathogen prompts concerns aboutbioethics, terrorism Washington Post 2002 July 12; p. A1, A12


Document 375 Connolly, Ceci Smallpox vaccine program readied: inoculations may surpass 500,000 under U.S. [United States] plan











http://www.sciencenews.org/



Washington Post 2002 July 8; p. A1, A11


Document 376 Varkey, Prathibha; Poland, Gregory A.; Cockerill, Franklin R., III; Smith, Thomas F.; Hagen, Philip T. Confronting bioterrorism: physicians on the front line Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2002 July; 77(7): 661672


Document 377 Meyer, Richard F.; Morse, Stephen A. Bioterrorism preparedness for the public health and medical communities [editorial] Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2002 July; 77(7): 619621


Document 378 Idemyor, Vincent; Smith, Stephanie W. Biological warfare a growing healthcare concern Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2002 JulyAugust; 36(78): 1282 1286


Document 379 Kron, Shmuel; Mendlovic, Shlomo Mental health consequences of bioterrorism IMAJ: The Israel Medical Association Journal 2002 July; 4(7): 524527


Document 380 Berger, Stephen A.; Shapira, Itzhak Hemorrhagic fevers and bioterror IMAJ: The Israel Medical Association Journal 2002 July; 4(7): 513519


Document 381 Slater, Paul E.; Anis, Emilia; Leventhal, Alex Preparation for an outbreak of smallpox in Israel IMAJ: The Israel Medical Association Journal 2002 July; 4(7): 507512
















Document 382 Green, Manfred S.; Kaufman, Zalman Surveillance for early detection and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks associated with bioterrorism IMAJ: The Israel Medical Association Journal 2002 July; 4(7): 503506


Document 383 Sagi, Rami; Robenshtok, Eyal; Katz, Lior H.; Reznikovich, Shmuel; Hendler, Israel; Poles, Lion; Hourvitz, Ariel;Tadmor, Boaz; Oren, Meir; Martonovich, Giora; Lev, Boaz Preparedness of the Israeli Health System for a biologic warfare event IMAJ: The Israel Medical Association Journal 2002 July; 4(7): 495497


Document 384 Shapira, Shmuel C.; Shemer, Joshua; Oren, Meir Hospital management of a bioterror event IMAJ: The Israel Medical Association Journal 2002 July; 4(7): 493494


Document 385 Shapira, Shmuel C.; Shemer, Joshua Medical management of terrorist attacks IMAJ: The Israel Medical Association Journal 2002 July; 4(7): 489492


Document 386 Metcalfe, Neil A short history of biological warfare Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2002 JulySeptember; 18(3): 271282


Document 387 Yergler, Marilyn Emergency: mass casualty: nerve gas attack: the effects of chemical warfare are not universally fatal AJN: American Journal of Nursing 2002 July; 102(7): 5760














Document 388 Dove, Alan FDA [Food and Drug Administration] lowers the bar for biodefense drugs [news] Nature Medicine 2002 July; 8(7): 646


Document 389 Dove, Alan Ebola vaccine gets corporate backer [news] Nature Medicine 2002 July; 8(7): 645646


Document 390 Bouchie, Aaron Harvester of sorrow [review of Biological Warfare Against Crops, by Simon M. Whitby] Nature Biotechnology 2002 July; 20(7): 656


* Document 391 Hanna, Kathi E. Extraordinary measures for countermeasures to terrorism: FDA's [Food and Drug Administration] "animalrule" Hastings Center Report 2002 JulyAugust; 32(4): 9


* Document 392 Boyce, Nell Speak no evil: should biologists publish work that could be misused? U.S. News & World Report 2002 June 24; 132(22): 6062

Document 393 Enserink, Martin Did bioweapons test cause a deadly smallpox outbreak? [biowarfare] [news] Science 2002 June 21; 296(5576): 21162117















Document 394 Spake, Amanda How small a pox? U.S. News & World Report 2002 June 17; 132(21): 56

Document 395 ShamimurRahman; Mudur, Ganapati Doctors in India and Pakistan campaign against nuclear war [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2002 June 15; 324(7351): 1412



Document 396 Enserink, Martin On biowarfare's frontline [news] Science 2002 June 14; 296(5575): 19541956



Document 397 United States. Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] HHS [Department of Health and Human Services] approves state bioterriorism plans so building can begin.States, cities to receive additional funds for strengthening public health systems [press release] HHS News 2002 June 6; 2 p. [Online]. Available: http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2002pres/20020606c.html [11 June2002]

http://www.hhs.gov/ (link may be outdated)

Document 398 Purkitt, Helen E.; Burgess, Stephen South Africa's chemical and biological warfare programme: a historical and international perspective Journal of Southern African Studies 2002 June; 28(2): 229 253


* Document 399 Richards, Edward P.; O'Brien, Terry; Rathbun, Katharine C. Bioterrorism and the use of fear in public health Urban Lawyer 2002 Summer; 34(3): 685726




http://www.bmj.com/





http://www.hhs.gov/





Document 400 Kaufman, Marc FDA [Food and Drug Administration] acts to speed bioterror medicines Washington Post 2002 May 31; A1, A11


* Document 401 Wynia, Matthew K.; Gostin, Lawrence The bioterrorist threat and access to health care Science 2002 May 31; 296(5573): 1613



Document 402 Enserink, Martin How devastating would a smallpox attack really be? [news] Science 2002 May 31; 296(5573): 15921593, 1595



Document 403 Malakoff, David Congress adopts tough rules for labs [bioterrorism] [news] Science 2002 May 31; 296(5573): 1585, 1587



Document 404 O'Reilly, Michael Preparing for bioterrorism [news] CMAJ/JAMC: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2002 May 28; 166(11): 1455


Document 405 Read, Timothy D.; Parkhill, Julian















Restricting genome data won't stop bioterrorism [letter] Nature 2002 May 23; 417(6887): 379


* Document 406 Vastag, Brian Bioterrorism threat calls for revisiting research protections JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002 May 2229; 287(20): 2639


Document 407 Rath, Johannes; Kasten, Frederick H.; Graham, Thomas Jr. Biological weapons, war crimes, and WWI [letters and reply] Science 2002 May 17; 296(5571): 12351237


Document 408 MacKenzie, Debora Behind the smokescreen: why is the US [United States] trying to keep reports into nonlethal weaponssecret? [news] New Scientist 2002 May 11; 174(2342): 45


Document 409 The deadly effect of nonlethal weapons [editorial] New Scientist 2002 May 11; 174(2342): 3


Document 410 Inglesby, Thomas V.; O'Toole, Tara; Henderson, Donald A.; Bartlett, John G.; Ascher, Michael S.; Eitzen, Edward;Friedlander, Arthur M.; Gerberding, Julie; Hauer, Jerome; Hughes, James; McDade, Joseph; Osterholm, Michael T.;Parker, Gerald; Perl, Trish M.; Russell, Philip K.; Tonat, Kevin Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management [consensus statement] JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002 May 1; 287(17): 22362252


http://jama.amaassn.org/ (link may be outdated)

Document 411














Burkle, Frederick M. Jr. Mass casualty management of a largescale bioterrorist event: an epidemiological approach that shapestriage decisions Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 2002 May; 20(2): 409436


* Document 412 Nass, Meryl The anthrax vaccine program: an analysis of the CDC's [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]recommendations for vaccine use [commentary] American Journal of Public Health 2002 May; 92(5): 715721 Abstract: The anthrax vaccine was never proved to be safe and effective. It is one cause of Gulf War illnesses, andrecent vaccinees report symptoms resembling Gulf War illnesses. The vaccine's production has been substandard.Without adequate evaluation, the Food and Drug Administration recently approved (retrospectively) significantchanges made to the vaccine's composition since 1990. The vaccine's mandatory use for inhalation anthrax is "offlabel." A skewed review of the vaccine literature by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) led toremunerative collaborative research with the army, involving civilian volunteers. Despite acknowledging possible fetalharm, the CDC offered the vaccine to children and pregnant women. New trends could weaken prelicensure efficacyand safety review of medical products intended for biodefense and avoid manufacturer liability for their use.


* Document 413 Annas, George J. Bioterrorism, public health, and civil liberties [Model State Emergency Health Powers Act] New England Journal of Medicine 2002 April 25; 346(17): 1337 1342


http://www.nejm.org (link may be outdated)

* Document 414 Bicknell, William J. The case for voluntary smallpox vaccination [sounding board] New England Journal of Medicine 2002 April 25; 346(17): 1323 1325



* Document 415 Fauci, Anthony S. Smallpox vaccination policy the need for dialogue [editorial] New England Journal of Medicine 2002 April 25; 346(17): 1319 1320









http://www.nejm.org/







Document 416 Spake, Amanda Smallpox redux [news] U. S. News & World Report 2002 April 8; 132(11): 46

Document 417 Gostin, Lawrence O. Legal powers to combat bioterrorism Health Law News 2002 April; 15(3): 4, 1415


Document 418 Bard, Jennifer S. How can we learn from our mistakes: the legacy of the anthrax vaccine Health Law News 2002 April; 15(3): 8


Document 419 Willis, Elizabeth A. Landscape with dead sheep: what they did to Gruinard Island [United Kingdom] Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2002 AprilJune; 18(2): 199 211


Document 420 van Aken, Jan; Hammond, Edward Closing loopholes in the Biological Weapons Convention Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2002 AprilJune; 18(2): 194 198


Document 421 Meier, Oliver Verification of the Biological Weapons Convention: what is needed? Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2002 AprilJune; 18(2): 175 193


Document 422 Feakes, Daniel; Littlewood, Jez Hope and ambition turn to dismay and neglect: the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention in 2001












Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2002 AprilJune; 18(2): 161 174


Document 423 Biggs, Peter M. Response to Whitby, Millett and Dando [The potential for abuse of genetics in military significant biologicalweapons] Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2002 AprilJune; 18(2): 157 160


* Document 424 Whitby, Simon; Millett, Piers; Dando, Malcolm The potential for abuse of genetics in militarily significant biological weapons Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2002 AprilJune; 18(2): 138 156


Document 425 Balmer, Brian Biological warfare: the threat in historical perspective Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2002 AprilJune; 18(2): 120 137


Document 426 Hyams, Kenneth C.; Murphy, Frances M.; Wessely, Simon Responding to chemical, biological, or nuclear terrorism: the indirect and longterm health effects maypresent the greatest challenge Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2002 April; 27(2): 273291


Document 427 Graham, Thomas, Jr. Biological weapons and international law [editorial] Science 2002 March 29; 295(5564): 2325


Document 428 Vastag, Brian Despite finding anthrax vaccine useful, IOM recommends seeking a better one [news] JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002 March 27; 287(12): 15161517















Document 429 Larkin, Marilynn Anthrax vaccine is safe and effective but needs improvement, says IOM [Institute of Medicine] Lancet 2002 March 16; 359(9310): 951


http://www.thelancet.com (link may be outdated)

Document 430 Sobel, Jeremy; Khan, Ali S.; Swerdlow, David L. Threat of a biological terrorist attack on the US food supply: the CDC [Centers for Disease Control andPrevention] perspective Lancet 2002 March 9; 359(9309): 874880



Document 431 Charatan, Fred Bush moves to tighten security around scientific research [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2002 March 2; 324(7336): 505



Document 432 Schecter, Arnold; Pavuk, Marian; Constable, John D.; Dai, Le Cao; Papke, Olaf A followup: high level of dioxin contamination in Vietnamese from Agent Orange, three decades after theend of spraying [letter] Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2002 March; 44(3): 218220


Document 433 Garland, Brent Bioethics and bioterrorism Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law [electronic] 2002 March; 2: 14 p. Available: http://www.psljournal.com/ [2October 2003]


http://www.psljournal.com (link may be outdated)




http://www.thelancet.com/






http://www.bmj.com/





http://www.psljournal.com/

Document 434 King, Jonathan Biological defense is just another name for offensive weapons GeneWatch 2002 March; 15(2): 68


Document 435 Wright, Susan Double language and biological warfare GeneWatch 2002 March; 15(2): 35


Document 436 Birmingham, Karen Hopkins dean criticizes smallpox research [news] Nature Medicine 2002 March; 8(3): 197198


* Document 437 Fidler, David P. Bioterrorism, public health, and international law Chicago Journal of International Law 2002 Spring; 3(1): 726


Document 438 Place, Michael D. The threat of bioterrorism Health Progress 2002 MarchApril; 83(2): 67, 52


Document 439 American Public Health Association Call for United States to support a strengthened biological weapons convention [policy statement] American Journal of Public Health 2002 March; 92(3): 483


Document 440 Tucker, Jonathan B.













Putting teeth in the biological weapons convention Issues in Science and Technology 2002 Spring; 18(3): 7177


Document 441 Taylor, Eric R. Bioterrorism Issues in Science and Technology 2002 Spring; 18(3): 1011


Document 442 Guyer, Ruth Levy; Moreno, Jonathan D. Bioterror Social Education 2002 March; 66(2): 8089


Document 443 Crane, Conrad C. "No practical capabilities": American biological and chemical warfare programs during the Korean War Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2002 Spring; 45(2): 241249


Document 444 McCarthy, Michael; Ramsay, Sarah Fears that security rules will impede US and UK [United Kingdom] science [news] Lancet 2002 February 23; 359(9307): 679


Document 445 Nichols, Rodney W. Allaying the threat of biological weapons [letter] Science 2002 February 22; 295(5559): 1464


Document 446 Gerberding, Julie Louise; Hughes, James M.; Koplan, Jeffrey P. Bioterrorism preparedness and response: Clinicians and public health agencies as essential partners JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002 February 20; 287(7): 898900
















Document 447 Beeching, Nicholas J.; Dance, David A. B.; Miller, Alastair R. O.; Spencer, Robert C. Biological warfare and bioterrorism BMJ: British Medical Journal 2002 February 9; 324(7333): 336339



Document 448 Evison, Demetrius; Hinsley, David; Rice, Paul Chemical weapons BMJ: British Medical Journal 2002 February 9; 324(7333): 332335



Document 449 Stone, Richard DNA mutations linked to Soviet bomb tests [news] Science 2002 February 8; 295(5557): 946


Document 450 Vatican ratifies U. N. convention blocking biological weapons [news] America 2002 February 4; 186(3): 4


http://www.americamagazine.org/archives.cfm (link may be outdated)

Document 451 Shute, Nancy America's doctor [Anthony Fauci] U.S. News & World Report 2002 January 28February 4; 132(3): 32 34

Document 452 Stone, Richard WHO puts off destruction of U.S., Russian caches [smallpox] [news] Science 2002 January 25; 295(5555): 598599




http://www.bmj.com/



http://www.bmj.com/





http://www.americamagazine.org/archives.cfm




Document 453 Greenberg, Daniel S. USA expands homeland health security [news] Lancet 2002 January 19; 359(9302): 237



Document 454 Sharma, Rohit WHO dissenter warns against plans to retain smallpox virus [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2002 January 12; 324(7329): 69



Document 455 Altman, Lawrence K.; Kolata, Gina Anthrax missteps offer guide to fight next bioterror battle New York Times 2002 January 6; p. A1, A16


Document 456 Meyerson, Laura A.; Reaser, Jamie K.; Chyba, Christopher F. A unified definition of biosecurity [letter and reply] Science 2002 January 4; 295(5552): 44


* Document 457 AnayaVelázquez, Fernando Bioethics, bioweapons and the microbiologist. Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiología 2002 JanuaryMarch; 44(1): 3845


Document 458 Javitt, Gail H. Drugs and vaccines for the common defense: refining FDA regulation to promote the availability of productsto counter biological attacks Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 2002 Winter; 19(1): 37116






http://www.bmj.com/








Document 459 Cimons, Marlene Plans to step up bioterrorism research via the NIH... [news] Nature Medicine 2002 January; 8(1): 6


Document 460 Eachempati, Soumitra R.; Flomenbaum, Neal; Barie, Philip S. Biological warfare: current concerns for the health care provider Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care 2002 January; 52(1): 179186


Document 461 Niiler, Eric Bioterrorism biotechnology to the rescue? Nature Biotechnology 2002 January; 20(1): 2125


Document 462 Harris, Edward D., Jr. Perpetrators: bunnies, evildoers, and miasma [editorial] Pharos 2002 Winter; 65(1): 1


Document 463 Haas, John M. Ethical challenges of bioterrorism Ethics and Medics 2002 January; 27(1): 12


Document 464 Special Issue: Ethics and Reason in Chemical and Biological Weapons Research MINERVA: A REVIEW OF SCIENCE, LEARNING AND POLICY 2002; 40(1): 3113 Call number: Special Issue shelf













http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=Special%20Issue%20shelf&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


Document 465 Wright, Susan, ed. BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AND DISARMAMENT: NEW PROBLEMS/NEW PERSPECTIVES Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002. 458 p. Call number: UG447.8 .B5645 2002

Document 466 Bartlett, John G.; O'Toole, Tara; Inglesby, Thomas V.; and Mair, Michael, eds. BIOTERRORISM AND PUBLIC HEALTH: AN INTERNET RESOURCE GUIDE Montvale, NJ: Thomson PDR, 2002. 305 p. Call number: RC88.9 .T47 B566 2002

http://www.eMedguides.com/bioterrorism (link may be outdated)

Document 467 Preston, Richard THE DEMON IN THE FREEZER: A TRUE STORY New York: Random House, 2002. 240 p. Call number: RA644 .S6 P74 2002

Document 468 Henderson, Donald A.; Inglesby, Thomas V. and O'Toole, Tara, eds. BIOTERRORISM: GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT Chicago: AMA [American Medical Association] Press, 2002. 244 p. Call number: RC88.9 .T47 B56 2002

Document 469 Harris, Sheldon H. FACTORIES OF DEATH: JAPANESE BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, 19321945, AND THE AMERICAN COVERUP New York: Routledge, 2002. 385 p. Call number: DS777.533 .B55 H37 2002

Document 470 Hammond, Peter and Carter, Gradon FROM BIOLOGICAL WARFARE TO HEALTHCARE: PORTON DOWN 19402000 Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire/New York: Palgrave, 2002. 280 p. Call number: UG447.8 .H357 2002

Document 471 Croddy, Eric; PerezArmendariz, Clarisa; and Hart, John CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE: A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY FOR THE CONCERNED CITIZEN New York: Copernicus Books/SpringerVerlag, 2002. 306 p. Call number: UG447 .C755 2002





http://www.emedguides.com/bioterrorism

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RA644%20.S6%20P74%202002&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4




http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=DS777.533%20.B55%20H37%202002&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.H357%202002&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447%20.C755%202002&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

Document 472 Huxtable, Ryan J. Reflections: Fritz Haber and the ambiguity of ethics [editorial] Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society 2002; 45: 13


* Document 473 Barbera, Joseph; Macintyre, Anthony; Gostin, Larry; Inglesby, Thomas V.; O'Toole, Tara; DeAtley, Craig; Tonat,Kevin; Layton, Marcelle Largescale quarantine following biological terrorism in the United States: scientific examination, logisticand legal limits, and possible consequences. In: Henderson, Donald A., ed. Bioterrorism: Guidelines for Medical and Public Health Management. Chicago:American Medical Association; 2002: 221230. Call number: RC88.9 .T47 B56 2002

Document 474 Goldsmith, Jeff Facing reality in preparing for biological warfare: a conversation with George Poste Health Affairs 2002; Web Exclusives: W219W228


Document 475 Johnson, Jeffrey Allan Chemical warfare in the great war [review of Seeking Victory on the Western Front: the British Army andChemical Warfare in World War I, by Albert Palazzo Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 2002; 40(1): 93106


* Document 476 Gould, Chandre; Folb, Peter The role of professionals in the South African chemical and biological warfare programme Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 2002; 40(1): 7791


* Document 477 Balmer, Brian Killing 'without the distressing preliminaries': scientists' defence of the British biological warfare programmeMinerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 2002; 40(1): 5775













* Document 478 Simon, Jacqueline; Hersh, Melissa An educational imperative: the role of ethical codes and normative prohibitions in CBWapplicable research Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 2002; 40(1): 3755


Document 479 Zanders, Jean Paul Introduction [Special issue: ethics and reason in chemical and biological weapons research] Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 2002; 40(1): 313


Document 480 MacLeod, Roy Preface [Special issue: ethics and reason in chemical and biological weapons research] Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 2002; 40(1): 12


* Document 481 Gibson, T.M. Duty of care in immunisation against biological warfare agents Medical Law International 2002; 5(3): 181197


* Document 482 Gibson, T.M. A shot in the arm for the military: consent to immunisation against biological warfare agents Medical Law International 2002; 5(3): 161179


Document 483 Feldbaum, Carl B. Bioterrorism: a challenge we cannot decline to meet [editorial] Journal of Biolaw and Business 2002; 5(3): 34


Document 484 Nowak, Rachel













Open to attack: natural or manmade, infectious diseases showed they still have us at their mercy [news] New Scientist 2001 December 2229; 172(23222323): 2223


Document 485 Kapp, Clare USA [United States of America] goes it alone on bioweapons convention [news] Lancet 2001 December 15; 358(9298): 2058



Document 486 Fialka, John; Fields, Gary Army confirms experiments with anthrax Wall Street Journal 2001 December 14; p. A4

Document 487 Pear, Robert Lobbyists seek special spin on federal bioterrorism bill New York Times 2001 December 11; p. A1, A24


Document 488 Allen, Mike; Mufson, Steven U.S. scuttles germ war conference Washington Post 2001 December 8; p. A1, A5


Document 489 Laws for an epidemic [editorial] Washington Post 2001 December 3; p. A20


Document 490 Noeller, Thomas P. Biological and chemical terrorism: recognition and management













Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2001 December; 68(12): 10011002, 10041005, 10071009, 10131016


Document 491 Pile, James C.; Longworth, David L. Bioterrorism: what participating physicians can do [editorial] Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2001 December; 68(12): 998999


Document 492 Zilinskas, Raymond A. Rethinking bioterrorism Current History 2001 December; 100(650): 438442


Document 493 Polgreen, Philip M.; Helms, Charles Vaccines, biological warfare, and bioterrorism Primary Care 2001 December; 28(4): 807821


Document 494 Henderson, D. A. Biopreparedness and public health [letter] American Journal of Public Health 2001 December; 91(12): 1917 1918


Document 495 Hamburg, Margaret A. Preparing for and preventing bioterrorism Issues in Science and Technology 20012002 Winter; 18(2): 2730


Document 496 Coleman, Elizabeth Ann Emergency: Anthrax. Know the guidelines for management AJN: American Journal of Nursing 2001 December; 101(12): 4852
















Document 497 Mason, Diana J. Anthrax and the voice of reason: Education can serve as an antidote to panic over bioterrorism [editorial] AJN: American Journal of Nursing 2001 December; 101(12): 7


Document 498 Lane, H. Clifford; La Montagne, John; Fauci, Anthony S. Bioterrorism: A clear and present danger [commentary] Nature Medicine 2001 December; 7(12): 12711273


Document 499 Broad, William J. Genome offers 'fingerprint' for anthrax: analysis of bacterium could help investigators New York Times 2001 November 28; p. B1, B8


Document 500 Stevens, Lise Anthrax JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2001 November 28; 286(20): 2626


Document 501 Lane, H. Clifford; Fauci, Anthony S. Bioterrorism on the home front: a new challenge for American medicine [editorial] JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2001 November 28; 286(20): 25952597


Document 502 Borio, Luciana; Frank, Dennis; Mani, Venkat; Chiriboga, Carlos; Pollanen, Michael; Ripple, Mary; Ali, Syed;DiAngelo, Constance; Lee, Jacqueline; Arden, Jonathan; Titus, Jack; Fowler, David; O'Toole, Tara; Masur, Henry;Bartlett, John; Inglesby, Thomas Death due to bioterrorismrelated inhalational anthrax: report of 2 patients JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2001 November 28; 286(20): 25542559














Document 503 Mayer, Thom A.; BersoffMatcha, Susan; Murphy, Cecele; Earls, James; Harper, Scott; Pauze, Denis; Nguyen,Michael; Rosenthal, Jonathan; Cerva, Donald, Jr.; Druckenbrod, Glenn; Hanfling, Dan; Fatteh, Naaz; Napoli,Anthony; Nayyar, Ashna; Berman, Elise L. Clinical presentation of inhalational anthrax following bioterrorism exposure: report of 2 surviving patients JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2001 November 28; 286(20): 25492553


Document 504 Sweet, Mark Policing online pharmacies: bioterrorism meets the war on drugs Duke Law and Technology Review [electronic] 2001 November 26: article no. 41. Available:http://jacob.nlc.gwu.edu/search/+Duke+Law+and+Technology [13 June 2003]


http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/ (link may be outdated)

Document 505 Brown, David U.S. Wants the Smallpox Virus Preserved for Further Research Washington Post 2001 November 17; p. A9


Document 506 Heap, Brian Scientists against biological weapons [editorial] Science 2001 November 16; 294(5546): 1417


* Document 507 Aldhous, Peter Biologists urged to address risk of data aiding bioweapon design [news] Nature 2001 November 15; 414(6861): 237238


* Document 508 The end of innocence? Nature 2001 November 15; 414(6861): 235






http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/









Document 509 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Update: investigation of bioterrorismrelated anthrax and interim guidelines for exposure management andantimicrobial therapy, October 2001 JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2001 November 14; 286(18): 22262232


Document 510 Watson, Rory Europe needs "urgent focus" on bioterrorism [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2001 November 10; 323(7321): 1086



Document 511 Modlin, Robert L.; Bloom, Barry R. Chips, infections, and national security [letter] Science 2001 November 9; 294(5545): 1279


Document 512 Connolly, Ceci U.S. officials reorganize strategy on bioterrorism Washington Post 2001 November 8; p. A1, A9


Document 513 Connolly, Ceci HHS set to order smallpox vaccine for all Americans Washington Post 2001 November 7; p. A9


Document 514 Cohen, Jon Smallpox vaccinations: How much protection remains? [news] Science 2001 November 2; 294(5444): 985





http://www.bmj.com/









Document 515 del Río Chiriboga, Carlos; FrancoParedes, Carlos Bioterrorismo: un nuevo problema de salud pública [Bioterrorism: a new public health problem] Salud Pública de México 2001 NovemberDecember; 43(6): 585588


http://bvs.insp.mx/rsp/anteriores/ (link may be outdated)

Document 516 Maddox, P.J. Bioterrorism: a renewed public health threat Nursing Economics 2001 NovemberDecember; 19(6): 286290


Document 517 King, Tim Biowarfare and the Department of Energy GeneWatch 2001 November; 14(6): 35


Document 518 Lamb, Andrew Biological weapons: the facts not the fiction Clinical Medicine 2001 NovemberDecember; 1(6): 502504


Document 519 Shemer, Joshua; Shapira, Samuel C. Terror and medicine the challenge IMAJ: The Israel Medical Association Journal 2001 November; 3(11): 799802


* Document 520 Fraser, Claire M.; Dando, Malcolm R. Genomics and future biological weapons: the need for preventive action by the biomedical community[commentary] Nature Genetics 2001 November; 29(3): 253256





http://bvs.insp.mx/rsp/anteriores/











http://genetics.nature.com (link may be outdated)

Document 521 Schmitt, Brian P.; Bhattacharya, Mondira; Gerding, Dale N. Recognizing and responding to an attack with a biological weapon [editorial] Southern Medical Journal 2001 November; 94(11): 10481051


http://www.sma.org/smj/ (link may be outdated)

Document 522 Chaffee, Mary; ConwayWelch, Colleen; Stephens, Veronica Bioterrorism in the United States: Take it seriously AJN: American Journal of Nursing 2001 November; 101(11): 59


Document 523 Cohen, Hillel W.; Eolis, Sharon L.; Gould, Robert M.; Sidel, Victor W. Hyping bioterrorism obscures real concerns AJN: American Journal of Nursing 2001 November; 101(11): 58


Document 524 Campbell, John Anthrax, Ethics, and Access Health Decisions 2001 November; 8(3): 1


Document 525 Ready, Tinker Bioterrorism threat becomes reality [news] Nature Medicine 2001 November; 7(11): 1167


Document 526 A battle cry for biomedicine [editorial] Nature Medicine 2001 November; 7(11): 1163


http://genetics.nature.com/



http://www.sma.org/smj/











Document 527 Spake, Amanda Confusion in spades: The anthrax scares reveal a publichealth system in disarray U.S. News & World Report 2001 October 29; 131(18): 4244, 46 48

Document 528 Greenberg, Daniel S. US [United States] anthrax scares prompt action on bioterrorism [news] Lancet 2001 October 27; 358(9291): 1435



Document 529 Ala'Aldeen, Dlawer Risk of deliberately induced anthrax outbreak [commentary] Lancet 2001 October 27; 358(9291): 13861388



Document 530 Leslie, Mitch, ed. The bioterrorism file [news brief] Science 2001 October 26; 294(5543): 751



Document 531 Bioterrorism: safeguarding the public's health [editorial] Lancet 2001 October 20; 358(9290): 1283



Document 532 World Medical Association calls for verification system to prevent development of biological weapons [newsbrief] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2001 October 13; 323(7317): 824

















Document 533 United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Oversight andInvestigations A REVIEW OF FEDERAL BIOTERRORISM PREPAREDNESS PROGRAMS FROM A PUBLIC HEALTHPERSPECTIVE Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office [GPO], 2001. 221 p. Call number: KF27 .E5546 2001d

http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house (link may be outdated)

Document 534 Greenberg, Daniel S. US [United States] reacts to anxiety about biological attacks [news] Lancet 2001 October 6; 358(9288): 1165



Document 535 Kmietowicz, Zosia Doctors asked to condemn development of biological weapons [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2001 October 6; 323(7316): 768



Document 536 McCarthy, Michael Attacks heighten US [United States] concern about threat of bioterrorism [news] Lancet 2001 September 29; 358(9287): 1071



Document 537 Sharma, Rohit India wakes up to threat of bioterrorism [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2001 September 29; 323(7315): 714



http://www.bmj.com/

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=KF27%20.E5546%202001d&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house






http://www.bmj.com/






Document 538 United States. General Accounting Office [GAO] Bioterrorism: federal research and preparedness activities Washington, DC: General Accounting Office [GAO01 915], 2001 September 28; [95] p.


Document 539 Connolly, Ceci Bioterrorism Vulnerability Cited: GAO Warns that Health Departments Are IllEquipped Washington Post 2001 September 28; p. A16


Document 540 Chyba, Christopher F. Biological security in a changed world [editorial] Science 2001 September 28; 293(5539): 2349


Document 541 The specter of biological terror [editorial] New York Times 2001 September 26; p. A18


Document 542 Ashraf, Haroon US [United States] biological defence research under the spotlight [news] Lancet 2001 September 15; 358(9285): 895



Document 543 Fidler, David P. The malevolent use of microbes and the rule of law: legal challenges presented by bioterrorism Clinical Infectious Diseases 2001 September; 33(5): 686689















Document 544 Marty, Aileen M. History of the development and use of biological weapons Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 2001 September; 21(3): 421434


Document 545 Dorey, Emma US rejects stronger bioweapons treaty [news] Nature Biotechnology 2001 September; 19(9): 793


Document 546 Enserink, Martin; Holden, Constance; Lawler, Andrew; Stone, Richard Going nowhere Science 2001 August 24; 293(5534): 1415


Document 547 Chyba, Christopher F. Microbe warfare hides the enemy New York Times 2001 August 10; p. A19


Document 548 McCarthy, Michael U.S. [United States] rejection sets biological weapons treaty adrift Lancet 2001 August 4; 358(9279): 389



Document 549 MacKenzie, Debora Bushwacked New Scientist 2001 August 4; 171(2302): 17















Document 550 Hick, John L.; Danila, Richard Health care planning for chemical and biological terrorism Minnesota Medicine 2001 August; 84(8): 3440


Document 551 Olson, Elizabeth U.S. Rejects New Accord Covering Germ Warfare New York Times 2001 July 26; p. A7


Document 552 Khan, Ali S.; Ashford, David A. Ready or NotPreparedness for Bioterrorism [editorial] New England Journal of Medicine 2001 July 26; 345(4): 287289



Document 553 Gordon, Michael R. Germ Warfare Talks Open in London; U.S. Is the Pariah New York Times 2001 July 24; p. A11


Document 554 Rath, Johannes; Burgel, Jochen L. Socioeconomic Biological Weapons [letter] Science 2001 July 20; 293(5529): 425426


Document 555 Stone, Richard Down to the Wire on Bioweapons Talks Science 2001 July 20; 293(5529): 414416















Document 556 Prepare for the Worst [opinion interview with Ken Alibek] New Scientist 2001 July 14; 171(2299): 4245


Document 557 Gorka, Sebestyen; Sullivan, Richard Attention to Bioweapons Obscures the Real Threats [letter] Nature 2001 July 5; 412(6842): 15


Document 558 Raghunath, D. Biological warfare: bioterrorism [editorial] National Medical Journal of India 2001 JulyAugust; 14(4): 194196


Document 559 Dhawan, Benu; DesikanTrivedi, Prabha; Chaudhry, Rama; Narang, Pratibha Bioterrorism: a threat for which we are ill prepared National Medical Journal of India 2001 JulyAugust; 14(4): 225230


* Document 560 Dennis, Carina The Bugs of War Nature 2001 May 17; 411(6835): 232235


Document 561 A Call to Arms [editorial] Nature 2001 May 17; 411(6835): 223


Document 562 Keppel, David Plum island: biowarfare laboratory? GeneWatch 2001 May; 14(3): 34














Document 563 Fee, Elizabeth; Brown, Theodore M. Preemptive biopreparedness: can we learn anything from history? American Journal of Public Health 2001 May; 91(5): 721726


Document 564 Wetter, Donald Clark; Daniell, William Edward; Treser, Charles David Hospital preparedness for victims of chemical or biological terrorism American Journal of Public Health 2001 May; 91(5): 710716


Document 565 Henretig, Fred Biological and chemical terrorism defense: a view from the "front lines" of public health American Journal of Public Health 2001 May; 91(5): 718720


Document 566 Sidel, Victor W.; Cohen, Hillel W.; Gould, Robert M. Good intentions and the road to bioterrorism preparedness American Journal of Public Health 2001 May; 91(5): 716718


Document 567 Geiger, H. Jack Terrorism, biological weapons, and bonanzas: assessing the real threat to public health American Journal of Public Health 2001 May; 91(5): 708709


Document 568 Marshall, Eliot Uncertainty on Bioweapons Treaty [news] Science 2001 March 23; 291(5512): 2288
















Document 569 Stone, Richard Russia, NIH Float Big Plan for Former Soviet Bioweapons Lab [news] Science 2001 March 23; 291(5512): 22882289


Document 570 Holdstock, Douglas; O'Toole, Tara; Inglesby, Thomas V. Facing the biological weapons threat [letter and reply] Lancet 2001 February 10; 357(9254): 481482


Document 571 Hadfield, Peter Lethal Legacy [news] New Scientist 2001 February 3; 269(2276): 5


Document 572 Terriff, Colleen M.; Tee, Amy M. Citywide Pharmaceutical Preparation for Bioterrorism American Journal of HealthSystem Pharmacy 2001 February 1; 58(3): 233237


Document 573 Finkel, Elizabeth Engineered Mouse Virus Spurs Bioweapon Fears [news] Science 2001 January 26; 291(5504): 585


Document 574 Dove, Alan Is Investment in Bioterrorism Research Warranted [news] Nature Medicine 2001 January; 7(1): 9


Document 575 Reminick, Gerald













NIGHTMARE IN BARI: THE WORLD WAR II LIBERTY SHIP POISON GAS DISASTER AND COVERUP Palo Alto, CA: Glencannon Press, 2001. 266 p. Call number: D763 .I82 B377 2001

* Document 576 Evans, Rob GASSED London: House of Stratus, c2000, 2001. 491 p. Call number: UG447 .E83 2001

Document 577 Dando, Malcolm THE NEW BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS: THREAT, PROLIFERATION, AND CONTROL Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001. 181 p. Call number: JZ5830 .D36 2001

Document 578 Balmer, Brian BRITAIN AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE: EXPERT ADVICE AND SCIENCE POLICY, 193065 New York: Palgrave, 2001. 246 p. Call number: UG447.8 .B324 2001

Document 579 Miller, Judith; Engelberg, Stephen; and Broad, William GERMS: BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS AND AMERICA'S SECRET WAR New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001. 382 p. Call number: UG447.8 .M54 2001

Document 580 Tucker, Jonathan B. SCOURGE: THE ONCE AND FUTURE THREAT OF SMALLPOX New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2001. 291 p. Call number: RC183.1 .T83 2001

Document 581 Stein, C. E.; Bennett, S.; Crook, S.; Maddison, F. The cluster that never was: Germ warfare experiments and health authority reality in Dorset [United Kingdom]Journal Of the Royal Statistical Society 2001; 164(1): 2327


Document 582 Bellamy, R.J.; Freedman, A.R. Bioterrorism [commentary] QJM: Quarterly Journal of Medicine 2001; 94: 227234

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=D763%20.I82%20B377%202001&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447%20.E83%202001&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=JZ5830%20.D36%202001&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4




http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.M54%202001&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4

http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=RC183.1%20.T83%202001&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4





Document 583 Franzblau, Michael J. Japanese War Atrocities [letter] New York Times 2000 December 28; p. A22


Document 584 Butler, Colin Reducing the Biological Weapons Threat [letter] Lancet 2000 December 16; 356(9427): 2104


Document 585 French, Howard W. Japanese Veteran Testifies in War Atrocity Lawsuit New York Times 2000 December 12; p. A3


Document 586 Hagstad, David Bioterrorism AJN: American Journal of Nursing 2000 December; 100(12): 3335


Document 587 Dove, Alan New Database Could Lead to Antibiotic Overuse [news] Nature Medicine 2000 December; 6(12): 1304


Document 588 Khan, Ali S.; Morse, Stephen; Lillibridge, Scott PublicHealth Preparedness for Biological Terrorism in the USA Lancet 2000 September 30; 356(9236): 11791182
















Document 589 O'Toole, Tara; Inglesby, Thomas V. Facing the Biological Weapons Threat [commentary] Lancet 2000 September 30; 356(9236): 11281129


Document 590 Wadman, Meredith US Panel Draws Blank on Gulf War Symptoms [news] Nature 2000 September 14; 406(6801): 121


Document 591 Connell, Nancy Biological Weapons: Limiting the Threat, by Joshua S. Lederberg, ed. [book review] Politics and the Life Sciences 2000 September; 19(2): 269270


http://www.politicsandthelifesciences.org (link may be outdated)

Document 592 Cole, Thomas B. When a Bioweapon Strikes, Who Will Be In Charge? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2000 August 2330; 284(8): 944, 947948


Document 593 Greenberg, Daniel S. Short of Vaccine, the Pentagon Slows Anthrax Inoculations [news] Lancet 2000 August 5; 356(9228): 491


Document 594 Endicott, Stephen; Hagerman, Edward; Furmanski, Martin; Wilde, Henry Biological Warfare in the 1940s and 1950s [letters and reply] JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2000 August 2; 284(5): 561562















Document 595 MacKenzie, Debora Sent naked into battle [news] New Scientist 2000 July 29; 167(2249): 7


Document 596 Marshall, Eliot DOD Retreats on Plan for Anthrax Vaccine [news] Science 2000 July 21; 289(5478): 382383


Document 597 A Health Warning on Bioterrorism [editorial] Nature 2000 July 13; 406(6792): 109


Document 598 Toying with smallpox New Scientist 2000 July 1; 167(2245): 17


Document 599 Gilchrist, Mary J.R. A National Laboratory Network for Bioterrorism: Evolution from a Prototype Network of LaboratoriesPerforming Routine Surveillance Military Medicine 2000 July; 165(7, Supplement 2): 2831


Document 600 Pavlin, Julie A. Bioterrorism and the Importance of the Public Health Laboratory Military Medicine 2000 July; 165(7, Supplement 2): 2527


Document 601 Bioweapon Worries [web news] Science 2000 June 23; 288(5474): 2091














Document 602 Police Extend Scope of NerveGas Test Inquiry [Porton Down] [news brief] Nature 2000 June 22; 405(6789): 877


Document 603 Baleta, Adele South Africa's Doctors Council Starts Inquiry into Apartheid Regime Doctor [news] Lancet 2000 June 10; 355(9220): 2059


Document 604 Linkie, M. The Defense Threat Reduction Agency: A note on the United States' approach to the threat of chemical andbiological warfare Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 2000 Summer; 16(2): 531563


Document 605 Niiler, Eric Researcher Stockpiled Salmonella and Explosives [news] Nature Medicine 2000 June; 6(6): 614


Document 606 MacKenzie, Debora Agents of death: Chemical leftovers are still littering China New Scientist 2000 May 27; 166(2240): 5


Document 607 Charatan, Fred US Plans Drugs Stockpile to Counter Bioterrorism Threat [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2000 May 6; 320(7244): 1225

















http://www.bmj.com/

Document 608 Inglesby, Thomas V.; Dennis, David T.; Henderson, Donald A.; Bartlett, John G.; Ascher, Michael S.; Eitzen,Edward; Fine, Anne D.; Friedlander, Arthur M.; Hauer, Jerome; Koerner, John F.; Layton, Marcelle; McDade, Joseph;Osterholm, Michael T.; O'Toole, Tara; Parker, Gerald; Perl, Trish M.; Russell, Philip K.; SchochSpana, Monica;Tonat, Kevin Working Group on Civilian Biodefense Plague as a Biological Weapon: Medical and Public Health Management JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2000 May 3; 283(17): 22812290


Document 609 Cohen, Hillel W.; Sidel, Victor W.; Gould, Robert M. Prescriptions on Bioterrorism Have It Backwards [news] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2000 April 29; 320(7243): 1211



Document 610 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Surveillance for Adverse Events Associated with Anthrax Vaccination U. S. Department of Defense, 19982000 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2000 April 28; 49(16): 341345


Document 611 Pullinger, Stephen Fighting Biological Warfare: The Convention Against Biological Weapons Badly Needs a VerificationProtocol [editorial] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2000 April 22; 320(7242): 10891090



Document 612 Centers for Disease Control (United States). Strategic Planning Workgroup Biological and Chemical Terrorism: Strategic Plan for Preparedness and Response Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2000 April 21; 49(RR4): 114






http://www.bmj.com/





http://www.bmj.com/



Document 613 Chandrasekaran, Rajiv War's toxic legacy lingers in Vietnam: cancers, birth defects attributed to U.S. use of Agent Orange Washington Post 2000 April 18; p. A1, A23

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ (link may be outdated)

Document 614 Germs for peace [editorial] New Scientist 2000 April 8; 166(2233): 3


Document 615 Dalyell, Tom Westminster diary: Comment from Tom Dalyell New Scientist 2000 April 1; 166(2232): 51


Document 616 United States. General Accounting Office [GAO] Biological Weapons: Effort to Reduce Former Soviet Threat Offers Benefits, Poses New Risks. Report toCongressional Requesters Washington, DC: GPO [GAONSIAD00138], 2000 April; 41 p.


Document 617 Holdstock, Douglas Nuclear Weapons for Ever? The NPT [NonProliferation Treaty] Review Conference and After [editorial] Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2000 AprilJune; 16(2): 159 161


Document 618 United States. General Accounting Office [GAO] Gulf War Illnesses: Understanding of Health Effects from Depeleted Uranium Evolving but Safety TrainingNeeded. Report to Congressional Requesters Washington, DC: GAO [GAO/NSIAD0070], 2000 March 29; 36 p.

http://www.gao.gov/ (link may be outdated)












http://www.gao.gov/

Document 619 Brown, David Defoliant Connected to Diabetes: Agent Orange List May Be Expanded Washington Post 2000 March 29; p. A14


Document 620 United States. General Accounting Office [GAO] Chemical and Biological Defense: Observations on Nonmedical Chemical and Biological R & D Programs.Statement of KwaiCheung Chan, Director, Special Studies and Evaluations, National Security andInternational Affairs Division. Testimony before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans' Affairs,and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives Washington, DC: GAO [GAO/TNSIAD00130], 2000 March 22; 13 p.


Document 621 United States. General Accounting Office [GAO] Agent Orange: Persisting Problems with Communication of Ranch Hand Study Data and Results. Statementof KwaiCheung Chan, Director, Special Studies and Evaluations, national Security and International AffairsDivision. Testimony before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and InternationalRelations, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives Washington, DC: GAO [GAOTNSIAD00117], 2000 March 15; 7 p.


Document 622 Kleiner, Kurt Coca killer: A bioweapon may be unlashed in Colombia's fields [news] New Scientist 2000 March 11; 165(2229): 5


Document 623 United States. General Accounting Office [GAO] Combating Terrorism: Chemical and Biological Medical Supplies Are Poorly Managed. Statement of CynthiaA. Bascetta, Associate Director Veterans' Affairs and Military Health Care Issues, Health, Education, andHuman Services Division. Testimony before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, andInternational Relations, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives Washington, DC: GAO [THEHSAIMD0059], 2000 March 8; 3 p.





http://www.gao.gov/


http://www.gao.gov/




http://www.gao.gov/

Document 624 Vogel, Kathleen M. Pathogen proliferation: Threats from the former Soviet bioweapons complex Politics and the Life Sciences 2000 March; 19(1): 316


Document 625 Henderson, Donald A. ANTHRAX: THE INVESTIGATION OF A DEADLY OUTBREAK, by Jeanne Guillemin [book review] Nature Medicine 2000 March; 6(3): 245


Document 626 Zilinskas, Raymond A. Disdained by Generals [review of THE BIOLOGY OF DOOM: A HISTORY OF AMERICA'S SECRET GERMWARFARE PROJECT, by Ed Regis] Science 2000 February 11; 287(5455): 981


Document 627 Henderson, D. A. Weapons for the Future Lancet 1999 December; 354(supplement 4): SIV64


Document 628 Tucker, Jonathan B. Solving the Sverdlovsk Mystery [review of ANTHRAX: THE INVESTIGATION OF A DEADLY OUTBREAK, byJeanne Guillemin] Science 2000 February 4; 287(5454): 812


Document 629 Biological Terrorism: Understanding the Threat, Preparation, and Medical Response DM/DISEASEAMONTH 2000 February; 46(2): 129190 Call number: Special Issue shelf

Document 630 Guidotti, Tee L.











http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=Special%20Issue%20shelf&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


Bioterrorism and the public health response [editorial] American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2000 February; 18(2): 178180


Document 631 Franz, David R.; Zajtchuk, Russ Biological terrorism: understanding the threat, preparation, and medical response DM/DiseaseAMonth 2000 February; 46(2): 129190


Document 632 Naftali, Timothy Death Factories: A History of Germ Warfare and America's Involvement in It [review of THE BIOLOGY OFDOOM: THE HISTORY OF AMERICA'S SECRET GERM WARFARE PROJECT, by Ed Regis] New York Times Book Review 2000 January 23; p. 23


Document 633 Rosen, Peter Coping with Bioterrorism: Is Difficult, But May Help Us Respond to New Epidemics [editorial] BMJ: British Medical Journal 2000 January 8; 320(7227): 7172



Document 634 United States. General Accounting Office [GAO] Gulf War Illnesses: Management Actions Needed to Address Basic Research Questions Washington, DC: GAO, [GAO/NSIAD/0032], 2000 January 6; 59 p.

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/ns00032.pdf (link may be outdated)

Document 635 Leggiadro, Robert J. The Threat of Biological Terrorism: A Public Health and Infection Control Reality Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2000 January; 21(1): 5356


Document 636









http://www.bmj.com/


http://www.gao.gov/new.items/ns00032.pdf



Pearson, Graham S. Preventing Deliberate Disease Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2000 JanuaryMarch; 16(1): 4259


Document 637 Hay, Alastair Old Dogs or New Tricks: Chemical Warfare at the Millennium Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2000 JanuaryMarch; 16(1): 3741


Document 638 Tucker, Jonathan B. Biological Warfare [review of THE BIOLOGY OF DOOM: THE HISTORY OF AMERICA'S SECRET GERMWARFARE PROJECT, by Ed Regis] Issues in Science and Technology 1999 2000 Winter; 16(2): 87 89


Document 639 Zilinskas, Raymond A., ed. BIOLOGICAL WARFARE: MODERN OFFENSE AND DEFENSE Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000. 309 p. Call number: UG447.8 .B565 2000

Document 640 Regis, Ed THE BIOLOGY OF DOOM: THE HISTORY OF AMERICA'S SECRET GERM WARFARE PROJECT New York: Henry Holt, c1999, 2000. 259 p. Call number: UG447.8 .R44 2000

Document 641 Lavoy, Peter r.; Sagan, Scott D.; and Wirtz, James J., eds. PLANNING THE UNTHINKABLE: HOW NEW POWERS WILL USE NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL, AND CHEMICALWEAPONS Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000. 270 p. Call number: U793 .P53 2000

Document 642 Tucker, Jonathan B., ed. TOXIC TERROR: ASSESSING TERRORIST USE OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. 303 p. Call number: HV6431 .T68 2000









http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=UG447.8%20.R44%202000&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=U793%20.P53%202000&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


http://catalog.library.georgetown.edu/search/c?SEARCH=HV6431%20.T68%202000&sortdropdown=-&searchscope=4


Document 643 United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Government Reform Defense vaccines: Force protection or false security? Hearing before the Committee on Government Reform.U.S. House of Representatives, 106th Congress, 1st Session. October 12, 1999. 231 p. Biolaw Microfiche Supplement 2000; Chapter 3: Fiche 99101


Document 644 United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on NationalSecurity, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations The impact of the anthrax vaccine program on Reserve and National Guard units. Hearing before theSubcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations of the Committee onGovernment Reform. U.S. House of Representatives, 106th Congress, 1st Session. September 29, 1999. 128p. Biolaw Microfiche Supplement 2000; Chapter 3: Fiche 9798


Document 645 United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on NationalSecurity, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations Anthrax vaccine adverse reactions. Hearing before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs,and International Relations of the Committee on Government Reform. U.S. House of Representatives, 106thCongress, 1st Session. July 21, 1999. 161 p. Biolaw Microfiche Supplement 2000; Chapter 3: Fiche 9596


Document 646 United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on NationalSecurity, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations Department of Defense's solesource anthrax vaccine procurement. Hearing before the Subcommittee onNational Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations of the Committee on Government Reform.U.S. House of Representatives, 106th Congress, 1st Session. June 30, 1999. 76 p. Biolaw Microfiche Supplement 2000; Chapter 3: Fiche 94


Document 647 United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on NationalSecurity, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations DOD's mandatory anthrax vaccine immunization program for military personnel. Hearing before theSubcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations of the Committee onGovernment Reform. U.S. House of Representatives, 106th Congress, 1st Session. April 29, 1999. 203 p. Biolaw Microfiche Supplement 2000; Chapter 3: Fiche 9193












Save All Print All


