Evaluation of Gravel Deposits...• effect of gravel mining on the future development of the lands. Each of these factors, which in part determine the value of a gravel deposit, is

Evaluation of Gravel Deposits on

MOUNTAIN VIEW CRUSHING LTD.

Lands Within

Ptn NW% Sec 9 Twp 31 Rge 3 WSM

Effective February 2010

Prepared by

Doug Badke D.A. Badke Enterprises Ltd.

Prepared on the instructions of

Brian Summers Fraser Milner Casgrain

February 2010

1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

1.1 Scope of Work

The scope of work for this report is outlined as follows:

1. Review available aerial photographs, resource and geological mapping for the subject area as well as previous testing conducted on the subject lands.

2. Excavate test pits and/or drill test holes on the subject lands, record the materials encountered and obtain representative samples of granular materials encountered.

3. Estimate the volumes of economically recoverable, commercial quality gravel located on the subject lands. This estimate is to be undertaken using the same criteria that a typical gravel operator would use in detennining the economics of a potential gravel source. Considerations in this regard are to include planning, pennitting, access, topsoil and overburden stripping, quality of gravel, land reclamation and ultimate land use.

4. Estimate the contributory value, if any, of the gravel reserves to the market value of the subject land. That is, provide an estimation of the present value of the gravel reserves located on the subject lands.

1.2 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions

The following assumptions were made in the preparation of this report:

1. The land survey is correct; no legal survey was made of the subject lands and no responsibility is assumed in this connection.

2. Infonnation furnished by others and contained in this report has been checked and is believed to be accurate, but its validity and accuracy cannot be guaranteed.

3. The titles have been searched and it has been assumed that the encumbrances on title will have no affect on the market value of the gravel on the subject lands except that the mining will be precluded in areas covered by utility right of ways.

1.3 Effective Date

The effective date of this valuation was taken to be the current date, February 2010.

2

1.4 Legal Description

The subject lands are legally described on the attached certificate of title and the following description:

NW'i'4 Sec 9, Twp 31, Rge 3 W5M, excepting thereout: • The 15 acre (+/-) gravel pit located in the northeast comer of the quarter section,

which is owned by Mountain View County; • Road widening along the north boundary of the quarter containing 0.57 acres (+/-) • The country residential subdivision in the center of the quarter described as Lot 1

Plan 971 2022 containing a net 6.33 acres (+/-);

The subject lands currently stand in the name of Mountain View Crushing Ltd. and contain a net 138.1 acres (+/-);

1.5 Location

The subject lands are located in the west central portion of Mountain View County, some 9 miles (14.5 km) west of the Town of Didsbury and 8 miles (13 km) north east of the Village of Cremona as shown on the Location Map. The Municipal Map also shows the location of the subject lands.

1.6 Zoning

The subject lands are currently zoned Agricultural (A) District; attached is a copy of these zoning regulations. Rezoning is not required in order to allow gravel mining, however, under this zoning district, a Development Permit is required for "Natural resource extraction and related facilities".

1.7 Area Description

The subject lands are located in an area where land uses are mostly agricultural on full quarter section parcels. Country residential developments in the area of the subject lands are mostly limited to one parcel per quarter section.

Highway #582 is the main east/west transportation route through the subject area and is located one mile (1.6 km) north of the subject lands. Highway #22 is the main north/south route and is located 5 miles (8 km) west of the subject lands. The subject area contains a good network of gravelled municipal roads connecting to these highways.

Mountain View County operates a gravel pit on the quarter section immediately east of the subject lands. Dogpound Creek is located one km east of the subject lands.

3

1.8 Description of Subject Lands

An unnamed tributary to Dogpound Creek, is located in the southern portion of the subject lands, flowing from west to east as shown on the attached aerial photo. The lands south of the creek are north sloping hay lands, which apparently contain no granular reserves. The lands north of the creek are gently south sloping hay and pasture lands, which contain varying depths of granular reserves. Gravel mining is currently being conducted in the east central portion of the subject lands as shown outlined on the attached aerial photo. A topographic survey was conducted on a portion of the subject lands in February 2010 and quarter metre interval contours have been prepared based on this survey. This survey was undertaken to show the current gravel mining limits on the subject lands and to quantify the processed granular materials on site. In the Appendix, we have included a photo of the north mining face of the pit, viewing to the west.

4

2.0 EVALUATION OF GRAVEL DEPOSIT

The value attributable to any sand and gravel reserve, over and above the value of the land on which it is situated, is dependent on a number of factors. These factors include:

• size and quality of the deposit; • proximity and access to available markets; • demand for the gravel in the market area; • availability of mining permits; • complexity of exploiting the deposit; • existence of competing sources of gravel operating in the same market area; • effect of gravel mining on the future development of the lands.

Each of these factors, which in part determine the value of a gravel deposit, is discussed separately in the following sections of this report.

2.1 Recoverable Gravel Reserves

In order to determine the quantity of recoverable gravel on the subject lands, we first reviewed existing resource mapping, viewed current aerial photographs and conducted a site reconnaissance. We obtained a copy of a gravel investigation report conducted on the subject lands by AMEC Infrastructure Limited for Mountain View County in 2004, which the County released to us. In preparation of this report, AMEC excavated 27 test pits throughout the gravel deposit, most of which penetrated through the gravel deposit. In order to confirm the findings in the AMEC report, we drilled an additional 9 test holes through the granular deposit on the subject lands and found good correlation with the gravel depths contained in the AMEC report. Each of the 9 test holes extended well into the clay materials underlying the granular deposit.

The current test holes were drilled using a Becker hammer drilling rig which advances a drill pipe using a modified diesel hammer pile driver. Air is forced under pressure down the annular space between the double walled drill pipe, to the drill bit. Here the compressed air enters the hollow central portion of the drill pipe and is returned to surface along with a continuous sample of the materials being encountered. Soil samples and air enter a cyclone at the surface which collects the soil sample and dissipates the air. Attached in the appendix, is a photo of the Becker drilling rig used to drill the test holes.

In the Appendix, we have also included our test hole logs, which summarize the materials we encountered. Representative samples were taken from the granular materials encountered in each of these test holes.

Based on both the AMEC test pit data and our test hole data, we have estimated the quantities of recoverable gravel on the subject lands. To be conservative, we have allowed for some 20% waste for gravel lost in the stripping process or lost on the pit floor, or material wasted due to sand elimination to meet certain product specifications.

5

These calculations presume that the gravel in all cases is continuous between test pits and test holes, which mayor may not be the case. The calculated gravel volumes are summarized as follows:

• Area A (south of existing pit, 7.1 acres): 125,000 m3 less 20% 100,000 m3

• Area B (west of existing pit, 7.5 acres): 105,000 m3 less 20% = 84,000 m3

• Area C (west of driveway, 5.3 acres): 55,000 m3 less 20% 44,000 m3

• Area 0 (NW comer of subject, 6.7 acres): 40,000 m3 less 20% = 32,000 m3

• Area E (pit bottom, 5.0 acres): 10,000 m3 less 20% 8,000 m3

In summary, the subject lands would contain an estimated 268,000 m3 or 536,000, say 540,000 tonnes of recoverable granular reserves which have yet to be unmined.

We have also quantified the granular products in stockpile on the floor of the subject pit. These products include crushed gravel and drainage rock of various sizes. The quantity of processed aggregates in stockpile is estimated at 60,000 tonnes. This does not include the stockpiles of sand screenings which were considered to be reject material that would mostly be unsalable.

In summary then, the total quantity of recoverable granular materials within the subject lands, is estimated at 600,000 metric tonnes.

2.2 Quality of Gravel

Representative samples were taken from the granular materials encountered in each of our test holes. All samples were combined and one sieve analysis was conducted by Almor Testing. The graph of this grain size analysis is included in the appendix.

The AMEC report contains the test results from 8 representative samples obtained from their test pit program which represents the majority of the granular materials to be mined. The results of the all 8 samples combined, are shown on the same graph as the combined sample from our 7 test holes. Our grain size curve is slightly finer than the AMEC curve as the drill action crushed some of the gravel rendering it finer.

AMEC conducted Los Angeles abrasion testing on 2 of the samples from their test pits and concluded that "the gravel deposit is very sound with only 28.6% loss. The abrasion loss specifications for chips is 35% maximum, for asphalt aggregate 40% maximum, a maximum of 50% is allowed for base course gravel and there is no limit specified for surfacing gravel." The AMEC report indicated that "the gravel portion of the material (78% by weight) consists of sound durable particles of quartzite, limestone (dolomite), and granite as well as a minor amount of softer mudstone and sandstone particles".

A petrographic analysis of the above samples was not conducted on the samples we collected. However, based on a visual analysis of the materials sampled from our drilling program, plus viewing of the granular materials in the current mining face, which have been subjected to some weathering, we conclude that the granular materials would not be

6

suitable for use as concrete aggregates given the considerable amount of soft porous rock. Given the AMEC testing and our visual analysis, the granular materials should be useable for most other uses including base gravel, road surfacing gravel, drainage rock and possibly asphalt aggregates. As discussed above, there is an excess of fine sand and silt in the subject granular deposit that would necessitate the elimination of 15 to 20% of the sand portion in order to produce acceptable crushed gravel products.

2.3 Access, Competing Sources and Market Area

The Location and Municipal Maps show the location of the subject lands in relation to the surrounding towns and villages.

Access to the subject gravel deposit is by way of a common approach which also provides access to the Mountain View County Luft Pit in the NE~ Section 9. The approach onto Twp Rd 31.2 provides good sight distance east and west. The haul route from the pit is then 0.8 km east of the pit on Twp Rd 31.2, then 1.6 km north on Rge Rd 3.3 to access Highway 582. Twp Rd 31.2 and Rge Rd 3.3 are both gravelled municipal roads in fairly good condition. Access to markets is then either east or west on Highway #582.

The main actively competing sources of gravel in the area are located 15 to 20 km from the subject pit, giving a fairly large market area for the subject pit. The main markets for gravel in the subject area include developments in the Town of Didsbury, the agricultural community and the oil and gas industry plus roads in the area.

2.4 Market Demand and Extraction Rate

The gravel deposit on the subject lands is a smaller sized deposit that would interest smaller gravel suppliers or contractors. It is expected that gravel sales from the subject pit would be constant at about 40,000 tonnes per year until the deposit is exhausted.

2.5 Complexity of Mining

The subject gravel deposit is similar in compOSItIon and overburden cover, when compared to other area pits in the area. As such, the complexity and cost of mining the subject gravel deposit would be similar to the competing area gravel pits.

2.6 Permits and Mining Regulations

Permits and approvals are required from the municipal and provincial authorities in order to mine, process and remove gravel from the subject lands, as well as reclaiming these lands. The required permits and approvals are outlined as follows:

7

2.6.1 Municipal Approvals

Mountain View County is the municipal authority governing the subject lands. The attached Land Use Map shows that the subject lands are zoned Agricultural (A) District Also attached is a copy of the Agricultural (A) District zoning regulations. Rezoning is not required in order to allow gravel mining, however, under this zoning, a Development Permit is required for "Natural resource extraction and related facilities ". A Development Permit application would nced to be submitted to Mountain View County along with detailed mining, reclamation and access plans. The Mountain View County Municipal Planning Commission (MPC) would meet to grant conditional approval, or deny the application. The MPC decision would be advertised to surrounding neighbours and if any appeals were received from neighbours or the applicant, the Development Appeal Board would hold a Public Hearing and would grant a decision to either uphold or deny the appeal.

The Mountain View County planning staff has advised that a Development Permit is not in place for mining gravel on the subject lands at this time.

2.6.2 Provincial Approvals:

• The main body of legislation regulating gravel mining in the Province of Alberta is the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA), which is administered by Alberta Environment. Detailed development and reclamation plans are required for registration of the mining operations pursuant to the "Code of Practise for Pits". Pit operators are required to post a bond in an amount equal to the reclamation outstanding in the mining area at anyone time. Public participation is encouraged in these applications. We understand that the necessary approvals from Alberta Environment, to mine gravel from the subject lands, are not in place at this time.

• If groundwater is encountered in the gravel mining operation, approval is required from Alberta Environment, pursuant to the Water Act, to mine beneath the water table or to dewater the granular materials to facilitate mining. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the test pits or test holes, however, a small water pond is located near the northeast pit boundary. Approval pursuant to the Water Act is not required for handling minor amounts of groundwater encountered along the pit bottom. That is, the Water (Ministerial) Regulation, provides that water diverted for the purpose of dewatering a gravel site, is exempt from requiring a Water Act approval, provided that the water is not used and provided that it is retained within an on-site pit.

APPENDIX

LAND TITLE CERTIFICATE

S LINC 0027 221 563

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

SHORT LEGAL 5;3; 31 i9;NW

MERIDIAN 5 RANGE 3 TOWNSHIP 31 SECTION 9 QUARTER NORTH WEST CONTAINING 64.7 HECTARES (160 ACRES) MORE OR LESS EXCEPTING THEREOUT: PLAN GRAVEL PIT ROAD SUBDIVISION

NUMBER 1141JK 4039JK 9712022

HECTARES 6.07 0.231 2.56

(ACRES) 15 00 0.57 6.33

EXCEPTING THEREOUT ALL MINES AND MINERALS AND THE RIGHT TO WORK THE SAME

ESTATE: FEE SIMPLE

MUNICIPALITY: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY

REFERENCE NUMBER: 971 099 934

REGISTERED OWNER(S) REGISTRATION DATE (DMY) DOCUMENT TYPE VALUE

971 311 779 21/10/1997 SUBDIVISION PLAN

OWNERS

MOUNTAIN VIEW CRUSHING LTD .. OF #1, 5401 49 AVE OLDS ALBERTA T4H 1G3

(DATA UPDATED BY: CHANGE OF ADDRESS 071229669)

( CONTINUED )

MORE OR LESS

TITLE NUMBER 971 311 779 +1

CONSIDERATION

REGISTRATION NUMBER

971 311 777

971 311 778

971 311 780

981 268 942

051 136 453

071 229 670

ENCUMBRANCES, LIENS & INTERESTS PAGE 2 #: 971 311 779 +1

DATE (DIMly) PARTICULARS

21/10/1997 CAVEAT RE : ROADWAY CAVEATOR THE COUNTY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW NO. 17. BAG 100, DIDSBURY ALBERTA TOMOWO AGENT - H D EPP

21/10/1997 CAVEAT RE : DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT CAVEATOR THE COUNTY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW NO. 17. BAG 100, DIDSBURY ALBERTA TOMOWO AGENT H D EPP

21/10/1997 EASEMENT OVER THE NORTH WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9 IN TOWNSHIP 31 RANGE 3 WEST OF THE FIFTH MERIDIAN FOR BENEFIT OF LOT 1 ON PLAN 9712022 PORTION AS DESCRIBED

02/09/1998 UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY GRANTEE - FOOTHILLS NATURAL GAS CO-OP LTD ..

25/04/2005 CAVEAT RE : SURFACE LEASE UNDER 20 ACRES CAVEATOR - ANGLE ENERGY INC .. 960,333 7 AVE SW CALGARY ALBERTA T2P2Z1 AGENT - REGENT LAND SERVICES LTD.

10/05/2007 MORTGAGE MORTGAGEE - ROYAL BANK OF CANADA. BOX 6059 INNIS FAIL ALBERTA T4G1S7 ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $1,500,000

( CONTINUED )

TOTAL INSTRUMENTS: 006

THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES CERTIFIES THIS TO BE AN ACCURATE REPRODUCTION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF TITLE REPRESENTED HEREIN THIS 25 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010 AT 04:30 P.M.

ORDER NUMBER: 15935992

CUSTOMER FILE NUMBER: 1162

*END OF CERTIFICATE*

PAGE 3 # 971 311 779 +1

THIS ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED LAND TITLES PRODUCT IS INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER, AND NONE OTHER, SUBJECT TO WHAT IS SET OUT IN THE PARAGRAPH BELOW.

THE ABOVE PROVISIONS DO NOT PROHIBIT THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER FROM INCLUDING THIS UNMODIFIED PRODUCT IN ANY REPORT, OPINION, APPRAISAL OR OTHER ADVICE PREPARED BY THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER AS PART OF THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER APPLYING PROFESSIONAL, CONSULTING OR TECHNICAL EXPERTISE FOR THE BENEFIT OF CLIENT(S) .

Mountainview Crushing Ltd. - Test Hole Logs

Test holes drilled using a Becker hammer drill rig February 9th, 2010; supplied and operated by Beck Drilling. Test holes backfilled immediately after drilling. Test pits logged and sampled by Doug Badke.

TH-1 (west of driveway) 0.0 ft to 0.5 ft 0.0 m to 0.2 m Loam 0.5 ft to 2.5 ft 0.2 m to 0.8 m Silty overburden 2.5 ft to 12.0 ft 0.8 m to 3.7 m Gravel, course, excessive fine sand and silt, dry, sampled 12.0 ft to 18.0 ft 3.7 m to 5.5 m Clay, silty, dense, till

TH·2 (west of driveway) 0.0 ft to 0.5 ft 0.0 m to 0.2 m Loam 0.5 ft to 3.0 ft 0.2 m to 0.9 m Silty overburden 3.0 ft to 13.0 ft 0.9 m to 4.0 m Gravel, course, excessive fine sand and silt, dry, sampled 13.0 ft to 19.0 ft 4.0 m to 5.8 m Clay, silty, dense, till

TH-3 (east of driveway, NW of pit) 0.0 ft to 0.5 ft 0.0 m to 0.2 m Loam 0.5 ft to 5.0 ft 0.2 m to 1.5 m Silty overburden 5.0 ft to 11.0 ft 1.5 m to 3.4 m Gravel, course, excessive fine sand and silt, dry, sampled 11.0 ft to 19.0 ft 3.4 m to 5.8 m Clay, silty, dense, till

TH-4 (West of pit) 0.0 ft to 0.5 ft 0.0 m to 0.2 m Loam 0.5 ft to 3.0 ft 0.2 m to 0.9 m Silty overburden 3.0 ft to 14.0 ft 0.9 m to 4.3 m Gravel, course, excessive fine sand and silt, dry, sampled 14.0 ft to 19.0 ft 4.3 m to 5.8 m Clay, silty, dense, till

TH-5 (SW of pit) 0.0 ft to 0.5 ft 0.0 m to 0.2 m Loam 0.5 ft to 2.5 ft 0.2 m to 0.8 m Silty overburden 2.5 ft to 16.0 ft 0.8 m to 4.9 m Gravel, course, excessive fine sand and silt, dry, sampled 16.0 ft to 19.0 ft 4.9 m to 5.8 m Clay, silty, dense, till

TH·6 (SE of pit) 0.0 ft to 0.5 ft 0.0 m to 0.2 m Loam 0.5 ft to 4.0 ft 0.2 m to 1.2 m Silty overburden 4.0 ft to 14.0 ft 1.2 m to 4.3 m Gravel, course, excessive fine sand and silt, dry, sampled 14.0 ft to 19.0 ft 4.3 m to 5.8 m Clay, silty, dense, till

TH-7 (SE of pit) 0.0 ft to 0.5 ft 0.0 m to 0.2 m Loam 0.5 ft to 2.0 ft 0.2 m to 0.6 m Silty overburden 2.0 ft to 22.0 ft 0.6 m to 6.7 m Gravel, course, excessive fine sand and silt, dry, sampled 22.0 ft to 28.0 ft 6.7 m to 8.5 m Clay, silty, dense, till

TH-8 (SW pit bottom) 0.0 ft to 6.0 ft 0.0 m to 1.8 m Gravel, course,well graded, some fine sand and silt, moist 6.0 ft to 9.0 ft 1.8 m to 2.7 m Clay, silty, dense, till

TH-9 (NW pit bottom) 0.0 ft to 8.0 ft 0.0 m to 2.4 m Gravel, course,well graded, some fine sand and silt, moist 8.0 ft to 9.0 ft 2.4 m to 2.7 m Clay, silty, dense, till

till .51 "" ~

l:l.c

?ft

7505 • 40 Streel SE Calga.ry, Alberta T2C 21-15 Telephone: (403) 236·8880

cnent DA Badke Enterprises Ltd. Attention Mr. Coug 8adke C.E. T. Address 160 Park Estates Place S.E.

Calgary. Alberta T2J 3W5 Project Mountain View Crushing

Sieve Size Percent Passing by Weight (mm) Min. Max. 200 150 100 100.0 SO 98.9 50 93.8 40 90.2 25 77.1 20 69.3 16

12.5 58.4 10 53.0 5 39.3

2.5 31.4 1.25 26.3 0.63 22.7 0.315 19.4 0.16 17.1 0.08 14.2

100

90

80

.• '~~I~ ~J ! . II

" ~\ 'l~ l\1

I I ! I

II I

Aggregate Analysis Report ASTMC.136

Almor Job # 019-01-10 Date Sampled Date Received Feb.1S/10

Date Tested Feb.22/10

Aggregate Type Pitrun Gravel

By Client By BM ByM,JO

Aggregate Source Combined SamplesTH-7 2-22, TH1 2.5-12, TH-2 3-13. TH-3 5-11. TH-5 2.5-16, TH-6 4-14, TH-4 3-14

Classification GM or GC Cc= 3.1 Cu"= 162.5

Specification

comments Sampled by Client Total Weight = 69.2kg.

Ii I , I; ! I I I

I i I

I III I I I T . 11 I I AVERAGE GRADATION OF 70

1 ! I', [\ I---" V MATERIAL FROM 7 BADKE TEST HOLES

I I ! I I II' I II I' I: I !'. I 60

SO

40

30

20

10

0

!\ ~, ,,~

I \ ~ I I III II

" I , "

,,~ ~I , I

I I I'~~~ ' ... , I! I .... I f -""'1'"-0 ~l.J ·1 I . ~ I i ,,-

II I II I I IL II, V i

AVERAGE GRADATION OF MATERIAL FROM 8 AMEC TEST PITS I II I I II I I I II'" I I I; I

00 ooco ....

- 1- _ r--: -

, I I, v, ... <"l

Sieve Size (mm)

I 111 ,

, , , I r-~ __ i-- ,,11

.~ .

I - .., , c;;l 0 0

;

I I I 1

I

I i I -q o

A • AGRICULTURAL

A. DEEMED APPROVED (Subject to F11)

1) Agriculture - Extensive 2) Ancillary Buildings and Uses 3) Cottage or Cabin. and/or Chalet (One Per Parcel) (Subject to F3) 4) Domestic Animals (Subject to F4) 5) Dugouts (Subject to E6 & E4) 6) Farm Auction Sales (Private) 7) Fences & Enclosures 8) Haystacks & Bale Stacks 9) Holiday Trailer & Recreational Vehicle (Subject to F5) 10) Landscaping & Screening (Subject to F6) 11) Signs & Advertising (One Per Parcel) (Subject to F10) 12) Temporary Construction Camp

B. PERMITTED USES OF LAND AND/OR BUILDINGS

The following uses shall be permitted with or without conditions, within this district providing the proposed development complies with this Land Use Bylaw:

LOCATION PERMIT (Subject to F11)

1) Dwelling Unit (One per parcel) 2) Dwelling Unit (2nd on 80 acres or more) 3) Dwelling Unit - Mobile (One per parcel) 4) Dwelling Unit - Mobile (2nd on 80 acre or more) 5) Private Swimming Pool 6) Public Buildings and Facilities (amended Bylaw LU 15/07)

C. DISCRETIONARY USES OF LAND AND/OR BUILDINGS

The following uses may be permitted with or without conditions, within this district providing the application complies with this Land Use Bylaw:

LOCATION PERMITS

1) Cottage or Cabin and/or Chalet (2nd Per Parcel) (Subject to F3) 2) Dugouts (Setback relaxation) 3) Farm Subsidiary Occupation 4) Holiday Trailers & Recreational Vehicles (Subject to F5) 5) Oil & Gas Equipment Storage (Subject to Fa)

33

6) Saw Mills (Less than 750 cubic meters production per year) (Subject to F9)

7) Sumps

DEVELOPMENT PERMITS

1) Agriculture - Intensive 2) Agriculture - Manufacturing 3) Agriculture - Processing 4) Agriculture - Supply and Service 5) Agriculture - Specialty 6) Assemblies, concerts, and or festivals (Subject to F1) 7) Auto Body Wrecker (Subject to F2) 8) Bed & Breakfast 9) Boarding Stable and Riding Academy 10) Cattery & Facilities (Subject to F4) 11) Cemetery & Crematorium 12) Contractors Business 13) Cottages, Cabins & Chalets (Subject to F3) 14) Developments Referred to in Section 618 of the Municipal Government Act 1S) Domestic Animals (Subject to F4) 16) Drainage Projects 17) Dwelling Unit 18) Dwelling Unit - Mobile 19) Dwelling Unit - Move - In 20) Dwelling Unit - Multi-Plex 21) Exotic Animals & Birds 22) Fences & Endosures 23) Holiday Trailers & Recreation Vehicles (Subject to FS) 24) Home Occupation 25) Irrigation Systems 26) Kennel & Facilities (Subject to F4) 27) Model Airplane Facilities 28) Natural Resource Extraction and Related Facilities [Amended Bylaw No. 30/08] 29) Oil & Gas Industry & Related Facilities 30) Parks and Playground 31) Quasi Public Buildings and Facilities (amended Bylaw LU 15/07) 32) Public Swimming Pool 33) Public Utilities and Communication Facilities 34) Sawmills (Over 750 cubic meters production per year) (Subject to F9) 3S) Signs & Advertising (Subject to F10) 36) Temporary Development (amended Bylaw LU 15/07) 37) Top Soil Removal

34

D. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

1. The mandatory regulations of the Municipal Govemment Act shall apply.

2. The provisions of the County's Municipal Development Plan shall apply. The Council may require any parcel that is the subject of a proposed subdivision be redesignated to the appropriate district. (Including the first parcel from an unsubdivided quarter that doesn't have an existing residence and related improvements.)

3. MINIMUM LOT AREA

That area of land contained in the existing certificate of title for the lot as registered in the South Alberta Land TItles Office.

E. REGULATIONS· SETBACK & SIZE

1. MINIMUM TOTAL FLOOR AREA

(a) Dwelling units - 800 sq. ft.

(b) Other buildings and structures shall contain such areas as are suitable and appropriate for their intended use.

2. MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK (Subject to Sections 5 and 6 below)

(a) 250 feet from the center line of any County road allowance. (for all Developments, Exemptions b, c, & d)

(b) 200 feet may be approved by a Location Permit.

(c) 100 feet from the center line of any County road allowance for the following developments: (i) Ancillary Buildings (Portable) (ii) Haystacks and Bale Stacks (iii) Holiday Trailers and/or Recreational Vehicles (iv) Landscaping (v) Natural Resource Extraction [Amended Bylaw No. 30/08] (vi) Solid Board Fencing (vii) Temporary Construction Camp

(d) Property Line for: (i) Fences, Gates and other means of enclosure (ii) Signs and Advertising

35

3. MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK (Subject to Section 5 & 6 Below)

(a) 50 feet from the property line.

(b) Property line for: (i) Signs and Advertising (ii) Fences, Gates and other means of enclosure

4. MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK (Subject to Section 5 Below)

(a) 50 feet from the Property Line

(b) Property line for: (i) Signs and Advertising (ii) Fences, Gates and other means of enclosure

5. MINIMUM CORNER SITE SETBACK

(a) 250 feet for all Developments, including trees, shrubs and those listed in 2c above.

(b) No Development shall be allowed to interfere with sight distances so as to be hazardous to vehicular traffic.

6. SETBACK REGULATIONS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED PRIMARY HIGHWAYS, ACCESS ROADS, SERVICE ROADS AND SECONDARY ROADS

(a) 250 feet from the center line of such roads or the pertinent regulations of Alberta Transportation and Utilities, whichever is greater.

7. OTHER SETBACK REGULATIONS FOR BUILDINGS HOUSING HUMANS

(a) (b)

(c)

(d)

Agriculture - Intensive Oil & Gas Industry

Sewage Lagoons & Treatment Plant Landfill Site & Waste Transfer Station

As determined by the Code of Practice 100 metres or as determined by the A.E.U.B. (which ever is greater) 300 metres

300 or 450 metres

8. SETBACK REGULATIONS FOR MULTI· PLEX DEVELOPMENT

(a) Common party walls and zero lot lines may be approved by the Municipal Planning Commission.

36

Legend

zoning

ZONING

A

A(2)

AI

AP

APC

APZ

BP

C

CR

CR(1)

DC

ER

ER·1

H

HC

HV

MR

PU

PUL

RF

Township

MOUNTAIN VIEW CRUSHING LTD. GRAVEL PIT

IN NW 1/4 SEC 9-31-3-5 LOCATION MAP

DRAWN:JDB SCALE:NTS O.A.8AOKE ENTERPRISES L TO, I DESIGN: DAB I DATE: FEBRUARY 2010 I

< 4(3)271-8708 DWG, No.1

Project Manager:

A.I.L. Job No.:

Gravel Investigation Report

GRAVEL INVESTIGATION REPORT

FOR

lUFT GRAVEL PIT

NW/49-31-3-W5M

FOR

MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY

PREPARED BY:

amecG AMEC Infrastructure Limited

200,6025 - 11th Street SE Calgary, Alberta

T2H 2Z2

Colin Stroeder

CAT040406

July, 2004

AMEC Infrastructure limited luft Gravel Pit (NWY. 9-31-3-W5M) . '

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARy ...................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 2 PROJECT LOCATION .......................................................................................................................... 3 PROJECT PERSONNEL ............................ .......................................................................................... 3 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATION ..................................................................................... 3 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 4 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AND GRAVEL QUALITY EVALUATION .. ......................................... .4 QUANTITIES .............. .......................................................................................................................... 5 CRUSHING OPERATIONS .................................................................................................................. 5 CONCLUSiON ...................................................................................................................................... 5

APPENDICES

Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Appendix VI Appendix VII Appendix VIII

Location Plan Site Plan Test Pit Data Soil Logs Sieve Analysis and L. A. Abrasion Reports Summary Test Results Volume Reports Cross Sections

Gravel Investigation Report Luft Gravel Pit (NWY. 9-31-3-W5M)

AMEC Infrastructure Limited

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Gravel Investigation Report documents the results of a geotechnical investigation that was carried out in the Luff Gravel Pit located 1.0 miles south of Hwy 582 and 3.0 miles west of Hwy 766. The legal location of the gravel pit is the NWY4 section 9-31-3-W5M as shown on the drawing included in Appendix I. .

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the quality and estimated quantity of the gravel that is available on this site. The study was also conducted to determine the quantity of topsoil and overburden materials that would have to be removed, stockpiled, possibly processed, and replaced in order to mine the gravel.

The following report includes the information gathered in the field including test pit logs, site survey information and the laboratory test results which were performed by AMEC Earth & Environmental. The report also includes a summary of the volumes of all of the materials involved.

Gravel Investigation Report AMEC Infrastructure Limited Luft Gravel Pit (NWV .. 9-31-3-W5M)

INTRODUCTION

The investigation commenced on June 23, 2004 using a backhoe to excavate test pits, which are shown on the site plan (included in Appendix II) and tabulated on the Test Pit data sheet (included in Appendix III). The test pits were excavated to provide representative gravel samples that were not contaminated and, therefore, suitable for grain size analysis and to help delineate the size and horizontal dimensions of the gravel deposit. Due to the depth of excavation limitations of the backhoe (approximately 5.4 metres), the thickness of the gravel deposit could not be properly defined except in the base of the existing mined area where the thickness of the remaining gravel deposit is less than 5.4 metres. In total, 27 test pits were excavated on this site (TP 1 to TP 27) at the locations shown on the enclosed site plan.

Gravel samples taken from three of the test pit excavations that were selected to represent the gravel deposit were tested by AMEC Earth & Environmental Limited to determine if the gradation of the gravel is suitable for crushing to produce surfacing gravel for the County's local gravel roads, base course gravel, chips for seal coating or asphalt aggregate. The results of the tests are included in Appendix V and are tabulated on the Summary of Aggregate Analysis Test Result Sheet located in Appendix VI.

Through this investigation we have determined the horizontal size and shape of the gravel deposit as well as the quality of the gravel. However, due to the limitations of the excavation equipment, we were not able to determine the thickness of the gravel deposit. In order to penetrate this thick and very dense gravel deposit, a Becker Hammer rig would have to be used. This type of drill rig works like a pile driver and actually drives a double walled casing into the ground with a diesel hammer which sits on the top end of the casing string. Compressed air is used to blow cuttings of the soils encountered up the center casing to the surface for examination and identification. This type of drill rig is able to penetrate hard gravel deposits in which conventional auger type drill rigs would hit refusal or drill very slowly with the continual risk of down hole breakage and possible loss of auger and drill bits down the hole. With the hammer type of drill rig, the quality of the samples that are recovered is very poor and only allows for basic soil type identification (such as gravel, sand, clay, sandstone bedrock and clayshale bedrock). The daily cost for this type of drill rig and a technologist to log and record the test hole information would be in the order of $3,600.00, which would allow for approximately 10 holes.

The measured gravel quantity was calculated using the actual elevations that were logged at each test hole. This measured volume is very conservative and, in order to provide a more reasonable volume without the expense of drilling the site, a few assumptions were made to estimate the bottom elevation of the gravel deposit. The measured volume as well as the estimated total volume available is discussed in the "Quantities" section of this document.

Gravel Investigation Report 2 AMEC Infrastructure Limited Luft Gravel Pit (NWY. 9-31-3-W5M)

PROJECT LOCATION

The study site is located 1.0 miles south of Hwy 582 and 3.0 miles west of Hwy 766 in the NW% Section 9-Township 31-Range 03-West of the 5th Meridian (location drawing included in Appendix I).

PROJECT PERSONNEL

Engineering Team

Mr. Gordon Couldwell, C.E.T. Mr. Colin Stroeder Mr. David Churchill Mr. Greg Bulych Mr. Ken Nagloren Mr. Sidney Yuen

Southern Alberta Regional Manager Area Manager Technical Support Field Technician Computer Design Technologist Draftsman

Material Testing -- AMEC Earth & Environmental Limited

Mr. Grant Pidwerbesky, C.E.T. Mr. Rick Davidson

Materials Technologist Materials Technologist

Owner's Representatives -- Mountain View County

Mr. Ritch Sudeyko Public Works Field Superintendent Mr. Glen Smith Division Public Works Foreman

FIELD AND LASORA TORY INVESTIGATION

A total of 27 test pits were excavated at locations as shown on the site plan included in Appendix II.

The test pits were excavated with a backhoe provided by Mountain View County. The depth of the test pits were limited to 5.4 metres due to the limited reach of the track-mounted backhoe. The sieve analysis samples were taken from the spill piles from selected test pits, which provided uncontaminated samples.

The laboratory testing involved grain size analysis, a Los Angeles Abrasion test and a petrographic analysis on the field samples that were taken from the various test pits throughout the site. The results of the gradation tests and the Los Angeles Abrasion test are included in Appendix V and the summary of the test results are tabulated and are included in Appendix VI. The petrographic test for detrimental matter was not completed at the time of reporting, however, the report will be forwarded upon receipt.

Gravel Investigation Report 3 AMEC Infrastructure Limited Luft Gravel Pit (NWY4 9-31-3-W5M)

SITE DESCRIPTION

The site is located on the crest of a hill that is in a glaciated area of hummocky moraine. From the crest of the hill, the existing ground level slopes to the south and west giving the site excellent natural drainage.

The site is adjacent to a local road with good access to Hwy 582 and Hwy 766.

It should be noted that the gas pipeline running south ties into private land enclosed by a fenceline. The gas pipeline is located at the west side of the driveway as shown on the site drawing included in Appendix II.

The County's shop is located at the northeast corner of the pit. The test pit locations, elevations and contour lines were established using information gathered from a site survey that was conducted on June 24,2004. The data from the site survey was also used to generate the volumes of the topsoil, overburden and the gravel. The survey datum used for the site elevation was an ASCM (SE 16-31-3-W5M) #51114.235 with an elevation of 1040.940 metres as control point #5. The legal pin located just east of the driveway has an elevation of 1059.525 metres.

SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AND GRAVEL QUALITY EVALUATION

In general, the soil stratigraphy at this site is quite uniform throughout the area that was investigated. The test pit and test hole logs are included in Appendix IV.

The topsoil encountered was black to dark brown in color, silty in texture, and contained gravel particles to a maximum size of 50 mm in diameter. The thickness of the topsoil overburden varied from 0.1 to 0.45 metres with an average thickness of 0.30 metres.

The mineral soil overburden encountered. in addition to the topsoil overburden, was a glacial clay (till) which includes silt and sand as well as gravel sizes to 200 mm in diameter. The clay was classified as a medium plastic clay which was found to be in a moist to damp state. There should not be any problems removing this material and it will be an excellent material for reclaiming the excavation after the gravel has been removed. The thickness of the clay overburden varied from 0.1 to 1.65 metres with an average thickness of 0.5 metres.

The gravel encountered was a course to medium grained gravel with some fine sand and a trace of silt and clay. The gravel portion of the material (78% by weight) consists of sound durable particles of quartzite, limestone (dolomite), and granite as well as a minor amount of softer mudstone and sandstone particles. The Los Angeles Abrasion test that was performed on the sample from test pit #5 indicates that the gravel deposit is very sound with only 28.6% loss. The abrasion loss specifications for chips is 35% maximum. for asphalt aggregate 40% maximum, a maximum of 50% is allowed for base course gravel and there is no limit specified for surfacing gravel. The sand portion of the material (15% by weight) also consists of sound particles that seemed to have a gritty texture. The silt and clay portion of the material (7.0% by weigO_t) was predominantly silt and should not pose any performance problems for use as surfacing gravel, base course gravel, chips or asphalt aggregate. The test results indicate that this gravel is gap graded with little or no material retained on the coarse sand sieves (2.5 mm to the 0.63 mm) with most of the sand being very fine. Due to the fact that this gravel is gap graded, it is very likely that 15 to 25% of the sand will have to be eliminated before crushing so that the crushed gravel will meet the required specification for gradation.


Ground water was encountered in test pit #1B and 1 C which were located in the floor of the existing gravel pit The water is most likely from runoff from within the existing excavation and, therefore, should not pose any problems with future mining operations.

QUANTITIES

The volumes of the materials that will have to be handled on this site are based on a minimum gravel face of 2.0 metres. The volumes were determined utilizing the survey information and the information from the test pit logs. The volume report for the three materials is included in Appendix VII.

For the first part (station 1 +000 to 1 +380 from east to west), the estimated volume of the topsoil overburden is 33000 cubic metres (43230 cubic yards). The estimated volume of the clay (till) overburden is 58500 cubic metres (76635 cubic yards).

The measured quantity of gravel in this deposit is 460700 cubic metres (603517 cubic yards). The estimated total volume of gravel available on the site (based on an assumed deposit that varies in thickness from 1 to 3 metres) is 559700 cubic metres (733130 cubic yards).

For the second part (station 1+380 to 1+820) from the driveway to the west of road allowance, the estimated volume of the topsoil overburden is 16400 cubic metres (21500 cubic yards). The estimated volume of the clay (till) overburden is 18250 cubic metres (23900 cubic yards).

The measured quantity of gravel in the second part of the deposit is 140000 cubic metres (183400 cubic metres).

CRUSHING OPERATIONS

The gravel deposit located on this site, when properly processed, ~l produce gravel suitable for use as surfacing aggregate on the County's local roads. Due to the fact that the pit run gravel is gap graded and contains a high fine sand content, screening and removal of approximately half of the sand portion (10 to 25% of the total weight) may be required. The sand that is eliminated may be adequate for use as blend sand for producing asphalt aggregate.

It is also possible that, with some minor adjustments, this gravel source could produce base course gravel, chips for seal coating as well as asphalt aggregate.

CONCLUSION

This report summarizes the gravel investigation conducted in the Luft Gravel Pit for the purpose of obtaining quality and quantity data.

Based on the 27 test pits, the approximate total volume of the gravel measured in this deposit is 601000 cubic metres with an additional 99000 cubic metres available below the depth that the backhoe was able to reach (refer to Appendix VII).

Based on the sieve analysis tests, the gravel will have to be screened to remove approximately half of the sand portion of the gravel as part of the crushing process. This could effectively reduce the total volume of the gravel by 10%.

Gravel Investigation Report 5 AMEC Infrastructure Limited Luft Gravel Pit (NW'h 9-31-3-W5M)

With the loss of approximately 10% of the measured gravel volume due to the elimination of half of the fine sand, this would reduce the estimated total available gravel volume to 630000 cubic metres (825300 cubic yards).

By dividing this gravel investigation into two sections, the total estimated amount of gravel in each section is as follows:

• Section one (station 1+000 to 1+380) = 504000 cubic metres (660300 cubic yards) • Section two (station 1+380 to 1+820) = 126000 cubic metres (165000 cubic yards). Note

that in this section the gas line has to be lowered before any mining may commence.


APPENDIX I

LOCATION PLAN

Gravel Investigation Report AMEC Infrastructure Limited Luft Gravel Pit (NW% 9-31-3-W5M)

I, 4

I, T

DATE amec!' MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY JULY 29, 2004 LUFT PIT

SCALE AMEC Infrastructure Limited N.W. 9 - 31 - 3 - 5

N.T.S. SITE PLAN

DRAWN BY

LOCATION MAP S. YUEN

CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. REV

STROEDER CAT040406 1 OF 1 6

APPENDIX II

SITE PLAN


DATE

JULY 29. 2004

SCALE

N.T.S.

DRAWN BY

S. YUEN

CHECKED BY

C. STROEDER

N.W. 9 - 31 - 3 - 5


I I I I

MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY LUFT PIT

N.W. 9 - 31 - 3 - 5 SITE PLAN

SITE PLAN PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. REV

CAT040406 1 OF 1 6

APPENDIX III

TEST PIT DATA

Gravel Investigation Report Luft Gravel Pit (NWY. 9-31·3-W5M)


Test Pit Pile Data Sheet arne&

Gravel Investigation for: Mountain View County Location: Luft Pit NW 9-31-3-W5M June-04

Hole# Coordinates Ground Topsoil/Overburden Topsoil Overburden/Gravel Overburden Gravel/Clayshale Gravel

Northing Easting Elevation Interface Elevation Thicknes Interface Elevation Thickness Interface Elevation Thickness

TP1 9672.115 10324.169 1050.772 1050.522 0.25 1050.122 0.40 4.10+ TP2 9559.738 10351.154 1050.785 1050.335 0.45 1049.535 0.80 3.75+ TP3 9450.143 10345.470 1047.281 1047.081 0.20 1046.081 1.00 1045.881 0.20 I

TP4 9472.592 10350.847 1049.498 1049.248 0.25 1049.048 0.20 1043.998 5.05 TP5 9478.099 10298.200 1049.223 1048.973 0.25 1048.823 0.15 1045.373 3.45 TP6 9534.532 10262.182 1051.628 1051.378 0.25 1051.228 0.15 5.10+ TP7 9594.800 10253.682 1051.066 1050.516 0.55 1050.016 0.50 5.15+ TP8 9597.822 10117.569 1050.719 1050.569 0.15 1050.469 0.10 1049.169 1.30 I

TP9 9629.952 10081.499 1051.420 1051.170 0.25 1050.720 0.45 1047.970 2.75 TP10 9701.913 10039.636 1051.972 1051.722 0.25 1051.422 0.30 1048.572 2.85 TP11 9791.380 10086.880 1051.316 1050.966 0.35 1050.616 0.35 1045.516 5.10 TP12 9743.876 10186.552 1051.364 1051.014 0.35 1050.714 0.30 5.55+ TP13 9868.543 10172.107 1052.167 1051.717 0.45 1050.067 1.65 3.40+ TP14 9881.007 10098.982 1051.915 1051.465 0.45 1050.165 1.30 3.45+ TP15 9940.496 9952.460 1056.876 1056.626 0.25 1056.226 OAO 1054.326 1.90 i

TP16 10041.172 9946.482 1059.532 1059.332 0.20 1059.132 0.20 1055.932 3.20 TP17 10046.555 9809.119 1060.288 1060.088 0.20 1059.988 0.10 1058.938 1.05 TP18 9923.466 9799.147 1056.942 1056.592 0.35 1056.242 0.35 none TP19 9916.070 9654.251 1058.636 1058.436 0.20 1058.286 0.15 1057.036 1.25 TP20 10043.294 9647.415 1061.320 1061.120 0.20 1061.020 0.10 1059.520 1.50 TP21 9970.790 9568.319 1060.302 1060.052 0.25 1059.802 0.25 1087.952 1.85 TP22 9880.372 9578.693 1057.866 1057.666 0.20 1057.466 0.20 1056.266 1.20 TP23 9796.926 9612.858 1051.829 1051.329 0.50 1049.729 1.60 1047.629 2.10 TP24 9775.791 9752.718 1049.867 1049.467 0.40 1049.067 0.40 1047.467 1.60 TP1A 9927.461 10266.642 1045.107 0.00 0.00 1044.207 0.90 TP18 9845.798 10276.836 1044.269 0.00 0.00 1043.369 0.90 TP1C 9797.708 10299.336 1045.109 0.00 0.00 1043.609 1.50

APPENDIX IV

SOIL LOGS


PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TP IA

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406

! PROJECT ENGINEER DRILL TYPE: ELEVATION: 1045.107 ,

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE GjCORE SAMPLE l2JSPT SAMPLE ~GRA8 SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

, BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE OPE A GRAVEL !1IIJSLOUGH [JGROUT E2]DRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND ...J w ... VANE SHEAR ...

1) 0 0.. 0 100 200 300 400 , :> CD >- Z <l) ~ SOIL

l- • SLOW COUNT • ...J >- w BLOWS 20 40 60 80 OTHER .s::: (f)

w ...J ~ 1 - .... SCRIPTION ...J 0.. 1150 mm ~UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPol. DATA . a. <l)

<l)-...J

0.. ~ PLASTIC M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 400 0° ~ <!

: ~ (5 <! (f) I • I Ieo.s x POCKETPEN. IkPol. (f) (f) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

0 E'~ ~~ FLOOR OF EXISTING PIT 1

~$~ FINE GR A VEL ~l~~ ,4,","" ~.~~

~~{ ~r ~

'1-1

~ CLAY

i I ,

1

-2

1-3

1-4

1-5

6 nGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL RLT. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

I~ PROJECT: LUFT PIT \BOREHOLE NO: TP IB

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: U~r~~l: ~O: CAT040406 1

PROJECT ENGINEER DRILL TYPE: 11 : 1044269

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE L;jjjCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE []]NO RECOVERY

1 BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE OPE. GRAVEL fill]SLOUGH [JGROUT E2}DRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

1 ..J W ... VANE SHEAR ...

<I) 0 !l. 0 100 200 300 400 -> CO r z E<I)

~ SOIL r- ~~~ C~~NT 00--..J

>- W BLOWS OTHER - 1 £ "'- (j)

W ..J DATA I---

0.<1) S RI ION ..J !l. 1150 mm ~UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPal.

I <1)- !l. ~ I PLASTIC 100 200 300 400 0° ..J ~ <.t ':';';

3: (5 <.t jIIo.5 x POCKETPE*al.

~ (j) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300

0 FLOOR OF EXISTING PIT ,

1 COARSE GR A VEL

~ r~ fj ~~

I ~~~~ I ~;ts -.~~~ WATER TABLE

H

~ CLAY

1 ~ 1

I' 1 -2

1 ill I f-3

1 1

'-4

1 .

1 1

f-5

tt+-

1 1 6

OGGED BY; GREG SUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHill R.E.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

j PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TP - IC

1 CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406

PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE: ELEVATION: 1045.109

J SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE CjCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

I BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL [lIl]SLOUGH QGROUT t;2lDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

..J w ... VANE SHEAR ... Q) 0 0.. 0 100 200 300 400

-> 0) >- Z E <I) ~ SOIL

f- • BLOW COUNT • -..J >- W BLOWS 20 40 60 eo OTHER

.s::. (j) W ..J c----

~ -0.4> DESCRI ION ..J 0.. 1150 mm .UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPaj. DATA <1)- 0.. ~ PLASTIC M.C. LlOUID 100 200 300 400 0° ..J ~ <r ~ ~ <r (j) I • f .a.S x POCKETPEN. IkPo'.

(f) 20 40 60 90 roo 200 300 400

0 ~r.r.~ FLOOR OF EXISTING PIT 1

~tt~ FINE GRAVEL

~~~ b"''''''-r. ~~f~

J ~lr ~r~~ s'$ ~<l~~

'-I ~<l<l

~"" ~~~ ~t· ~?~~ <~~< WATER TABLE ~<l <l <l

~~~ :;~ ... \. .. ~ ~~ c<i'.<i

~ CLAY

-2 I

~ \

-3

I I

-4

1-5

L I

~ J I , I

6 LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

I REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

1 PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH - I

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CA T040406 ,

PROJECT ENGINEER DRILL TYPE:

1 ELEVATION: 1050.772

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE [;jjjICORE SAMPLE t8,JSPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL []JlJSLOUGH QGROUT E2jDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

1 ..J W .. VANE SHEAR ..

Q) 0 0.. 0 100 200 300 400 -::> ro >- z Eo> ~ SOIL

l- • BLOW COUNT • -..J

>- W BLOWS 20 40 60 eo OTHER .c (f)

W ..J DATA I-----, _ ....

S RIP I N ..J 0.. 1150 mm !-rUNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPa'+ . a. 0>

1 0>- ..J

0.. ~ PLASTIC M.C. UQUIO 100 200 300 400 OC ~ <{

5: (5 <{ (fI I e I ~5 x POCKETpEN. IkPa,e (f) (fI1 20 40 60 SO 100 200 300 400

0 'llT I TOPSOIL

I I I I

1 OVERBURDEN

.. GRAVEL, max size 200mm ~, \ well graded,

1 ~ ~ brown, moist,

~~~~ fairly loose

~}'~ . H . ~~

1 ~~.~ .. t. ~~~t ~~:"L

~~

1 ~~~.3 ~~).~~~ 'j.l·~"

\ :~

I 1-2 ~~~~ ~$~~ ~~{~

I ~~~~ ,- ~~ ~?~~

~3 ~.~~~ I

1.-3 ~~~~ I ~}~} n~~ ,"~"'t."'~

t ~~~i I ~f~~

I I'{~~~ b."h"~""

~ BOTTOM OF TEST PIT

I GRAVEL NOT PENETRATED EXTENT OF BACK HOE'S REACH

~~-5

I ~ 6 LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY:DAVE CHURCHilL RET. COMPLETION DA TE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I "'1;13

II

. PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH - 2

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION:

DRILL TYPE:

OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406 )r-------------------~----------~~-------------------------------+----------------------~ ELEVATION: 1050.785 PROJECT ENGINEER:

. SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE GiCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

,BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE [JPEA GRAVEL [ffiSLOUGH G]GROUT E2]DRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

f-2

1--4

r -5

6

..J o OJ ::2 >(J)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

I I I I TOPSOIL (block I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I: i i i il I : : : SUBSOIL (brownl I I I I clay, till, silty I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

~~ GR AVEL, coarse, ~'S;i~ poorly graded, light brown, :1.'1.'1.2 damp. loose ~~~~ max size = 300mm 0

1.11-~~~.< ~~i ~~i~ r-~'f.~~~ ~{1~

~ ~ ,!;

~ff~ ~~~~ ~1l~ ~r~~ ~J,~ ~~~~ ~~~·b·

~J:~~ ~~~~ ~h}h~.T. ~~':.:~

~~~~ ~b'~'l :«~~~

h...,.~q~4

r-hi· ~ BOTTOM OF TEST PIT

GRAVEL NOT PENETRATED EXTENT OF BACK HOE'S REACH

w CL 0 >- Z f-

W BLOWS w ..J ...J CL 1150 mm CL ::2 ::2 <.( <.( (J) (J)

... VANE SHEAR ... 100 200 300 400

• BLOW COUNT • 20 40 60 BO OTHER f--

r.UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPal • DATA PLASTIC M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 400

I • I ~.5 x POCKETPEN. IkPa). 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

LOGGED BY: GREG BULYCH p, ENG, COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL RE,T, COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

I PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH • 3

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CA T040406 . ,

I PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE: ELEVATION: 1047.281

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE [.;jCORE SAMPLE ['i?JSPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE anNO RECOVERY

, BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE [ ]PEA GRAVEL rnDSLOUGH QGROUT f:3DR/LL CUTTINGS ~SAND

I ..J W ... VANE SHE

-Q) 0 CL 0 100 200 300 E :> CO >- Z -<I> ::::E SOIL

l- • BLOW COUNT • ..J >- w BLOWS 20 40 60 80 OTHER

.t::. (j) W ..J

~UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPol. DATA r--., - .... SCRI TION ..J CL 1150 mm 0-<1> CL ::::E

I <1>- PLASTIC LIQUID 100 200 300 400 0° ..J ::E <l

M.C .

3: 0 <l (j) I e i fee.5 1 POCKETPEN. {kPo,e (j) (j) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

0 TOPSOIL (dark brown} , I I I I

I ~IT rt~ SUBSOIL Hight brown) I I I I cloy. till. silty I I I ,

, I I I I I I I I

~~ I I I I I I , I I , I I I , I I I , I I I I , f-t I I I I

I I I I I I , I , , ~ .. fJJJGRAVEL (fine}

,

~ I ~ . ,

I 1-2

~ CLAY, silty material (dry)

..

I ~ I

..... -SANDSTONE

1-3

I •

I 1-4

I I

I I

-5

I I 6

LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH 4

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406 ,


SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE t:;ijICORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE [DNO RECOVERY

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE OPE A GRAVEL [J]]SLOUGH QGROUT EaDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

..J w .. VANE SHEAR .. a:; 0 0.. 0 100 200 300 400

-> en >- z E\U ~ SOIL

l- • BLOW COUNT • -..J >- W BLOWS 20 40 60 80 OTHER

J::. (f) W ..J DATA

I--_ L.

SCRIPTION ..J 0.. 1150 mm ~UNCONt. SHEAR STR. IkPa'. 0..\U \U- 0.. ~ PLASTIC M.C . LIQUID 100 200 300 400 0° ..J ~ <l: ~ (5 <l: (f) I • -I ~.5 x POCKETPEN. IkPo' •

(f) (f) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

0 I I I I TOPSOIL (black)

ill ill I I I i SUBSOIL (dark brown) I ~lJ. ,.r.f,.

GR AVEL (coarse) ~;.;.~ ,.r.f,. max size = 300mm 0

~~1~ poorly graded. damp. dry I

H ~~{~ ~ ~~~

~.A.~ .. if-I--

~~~i W . SI lJ.~ ~?~~ 1---[IT tb1~ h~~:l

1-2 ~f~~~ --

S{~ )h~~~ :<t~ ~:~

~{{~ ~~~~~ -r~ ~~,~:;

-3 ~ ~~ ~ .... ~ 1.t: ~.t<:! ~3~ ~~~. ~A~~~ ~!1"

......

1-4 ~~~ i

~~~~ ~ .... ~ ... h-....

~{{~ ~;~~ ~~~;r. :<tb b/'~ ~b""" 1.1~ ~ .. ~!

1-5 l~~ I'i~~~

~f:t: b~~4

~ CLAY

6 LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

I PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE: NO: TH 5

1 CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406

.,PROJECT ENGINEER, DR"-L TYPL ELEVATION: 1049.223

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE r:;(iICORE SAMPLE [8JSPT SAMPLE ~GRA8 SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

i BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE OPE A GRAVEL UlllSLOUGH QGROUT E;2lDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

I -I W .. VANE SHEAR ..

Q; 0 n.. 0 100 200 300 400 -> CO >- Z EQ) ~ SOIL

l- • BL ow COUNT • --I

>- W BLOWS 20 40 60 BO OTHER 1;:~ (f)

W -I '---

Cl..Ql SCRIPTION ..J n.. 1150 mm ~UNCONF. SHEAR sm. IkPoI. DATA

I Q)- n.. ~ PLASTIC M.C. LIOUIO 100 200 300 400 0 0 ..J ::'IE <:r

3: (5 <:r (f) I • I eo.S x POCKETPEN. IkPoJ.

(f) (f) 20 40 60 eo 100 200 300 400

0 II: : I TOPSOIL (block)

I I I I I

m I SUBSOIL (silty cloy)

«~ GRAVEL

I poorly graded.

;.~ max size :: 300mm I£'

~~ coarse. well graded at depth

" J :t.

I ~{{] H~~

: .. ~~ I I t-2

~~~~ I

~~t:.t.f.~~ ~{{; ~ .'i

I ~~~

-3 ~~~ ~~~~

I {f~~ ?l~~

t ~ CLAY

I ~ I I

-5

I ~ 6 LOGGED BY: GREG BULYCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL RET. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

I

PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH 6

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET:

PROJECT ENGINEER: SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE

Q) -> E Q) -..J .c.

1 c.. Q)

..J o CD ::i: >r..fl

SOIL DESCRIP

..J o

Q)-

O~ r..fl

o

1

-3

1-4

I

~

1-5

6

DRill TYPE: ELEV A TION: 1051.628

GjCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

OPE A GRAVEL nInSlOUGH G]GROUT ~DRILl CUTTINGS ~SAND

ION

i~ 0 >- Z t-lJ1 ~ BLOWS

... VANE SHEAR ... 100 200 300 400

• BLOW COUNT • 20 40 60 eo OTHER

DATA 0: ~ 1150 mm ::i: <l: PLASTIC M.C.

I e LIOUIO

I

!+UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPa'+ 100 200 300 400

fee.5 x P.?~!<ETPEN. IkPo,e IC 0 ;<ou 300 400

~ (f) V) 20 40 60 eo

H-I--t-t--+-I--t-H-l-+-1H-l-+--L '-1--

LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m


Page I of I

I" PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH 7

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION, OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406 ,

PROJECT ENGINEER DRILL TYPE,

I ELEVATION: 1051.066

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE [;jCORE SAMPLE rgJSPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE UDNo RECOVERY

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL [j]]JSLOUGH QGROUT f:2jDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND ,

I ..J W ~ VANE SHEAR ..

-1! 0 CL 0 o 200 300 400 en r z

E<1> :2 SOIL l- • BLOW COUNT •

-..J r w BLOWS 20 40 60 eo OTHER .c (J)

W ..J DATA I---

1 - .... SCRI TION ..J CL 1150 mm !*UNCOIllf. SHEAR STR. IkP.,. a. <1> CL :2

I <1>- PLASTlC M.C . LIQUID 100 200 300 400 0° ..J :2 <! :: 0 <! (J) I • I Ieo.S x POCKETPEN. IkPa) •

(J) (J) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

0 illl 1\ , TOPSOIL Iblock) .

I ' I

, , I I I I , , I I I , I I I I I I

~~ ~ ~

I I I , : SUBSOIL Idark brown) I I I I I I 'clay, silt I , I I

~~ ,

"H

I ~~1"" GRAVEL ~ .. t moist/dry,

r' max size " 200mm 0 1 ~~~ finer than other holes

I ~~ ~ ..

I 1-2 ;t~ ~

~3~~ 1 ~~~#.

I ~~~~~ l{~

if':' I

~~~ f-3 ~~~~ ~Ii"~

~l~~ I ~~l~

;t~~~

I ~Eh: ... ,~;

1-4 ~~~~

I ~~~~~i ~{{: ~~s-J;'

I ~~~~ ~h l~~ ~"h"'b

~~~~ I

1-5 jl~ ~~~; ~:~:h ... 't h,

I ~?}~ ~ .... h. ... ~.

~tf~

I ~~~#.

!-6 :..:~ b~~

h,...,t" .. t....,

~{{~ BOTTOM OF TEST PIT LOGGED BY, GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH, m

GRAVEL NOT PENETRATED REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DA TE: JUNE 23/04 EXTENT OF BACK HOE'S REACH Page I of I

I

, PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH - 8

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406 ,~ __ ~ ____________________________ ~ ______________________________ ~ ______________________ 4

DRILL TYPE: ELEVATION: 1050.719 PROJECT ENGINEER: SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE ~CORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE [ONO RECOVERY

1 BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL !JIDSLOUGH QGROUT r2]DRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

Qi -> E a.> -..J

1 £: ..... 0.. a.>

,

~C ~

o

-2

f-3

--4

1-5

6

..J o en :2 >(f)

..J (5 (f)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

(dark brown/blackJ

material :: 150mm 0

20mm 0

w n.. >-l-

w ..J n.. :2 <l (f)

0 Z

W BLOWS ..J n.. /150 :2

mm

<l (f)

... VANE SHEAR ... 100 200 300 400

• BLOW COUNT • 20 40 60 60 OTHER DATA

I----~UNCONF. SHEAR STR. Ikf>.l •

PLASTIC M.C . LiQUIO 100 200 300 400 I e I ItO.S x POCKETPEN. IkPale 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

-

----

I

I

LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m REVIEWED BY:OAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

I· PROJECT: LUFf PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH 9

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY I :sTATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CA T040406 "

,: PROJECT ENGINEER, DRILL TYPE, ELEVATION: 1051.420

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE c.1ICORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

i BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE [JPEA GRAVEL [III]SLOUGH QGROUT f2l0R1LL CUTTINGS ~SANO

I, ..J W .. VANE SHEAR .. Q; 0 a.. 0 100 200 300 400

-> OJ >- :z Ell> ~ SOIL

l- • BLOW COUNT • -..J >- W BLOWS 20 40 60 80 OTHER .c (J)

W ..J DATA I----

1 _ ...

SCRI ION ..J a.. 1150 mm ~UNCONF. SHEAR sm. IkPa'+ 0.11> a.. ~

1 11>- PLASTIC M.C . LIQUID 100 200 300 400 0° ..J ~ <! ;: 0 <! (J) I e I jeo.s x POCKETPEN. IkPa}e

(J) (J) 20 40 60 60 ill 300400 0 I I I TOPSOIL (block) ,

I I I

1 I , SUBSOIL Idark brown) I I I I I I

1 I I I I

IGRAVEl III ;t~ max size 600mm

f-t ~~~t.: dry, poorl graded I I

I· .. ~.l coarse wi~h lots of fines I I

~~~t ~li" , )'<-;}

I' ' ~:

1 -2

~

1 ~§. ~ .... JI

It I I i-3 W-~

~f I ~~~ ..

~ClAY 1 ~

-4

1 1 I

1-5

1 1 6


REVIEWED BY:DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

~~ Page I of I

II

J PROJECT: LUFT PIT

, CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY I STATION:

PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE:

i SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE [;jCORE SAMPLE L2:iSPT SAMPLE

,BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL [J]]SLOUGH ~--r-~~~~--~~----------~~----

a:; 0 ; - > tD

E <I.> :::;!

:;~ ~

1

0..<1.> 0)-

O~

o

'1-1

-2

, '-4

f-5

6

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0 z BLOWS w

W ~ ~ CL 1150 mm CL ~ PLASTIC ~ « I « (f) (f) 20

BOREHOLE NO: TH - 10

OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406

ELEVATION: 1051.972

~GRAB SAMPLE ITilNO RECOVERY

QGROUT E2]DRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

'" VANE SHEAR '" 100 200 300 400

• BLOW COUNT • OTHER 20 40 60 80

DATA f---

j.UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPoj.

M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 400 e I 1eo.5 x POCKETPEN. (kPole

40 60 80 100 200 300 400



Page I of I

I PROJECT: CUFT PIT IBOREHOLE NO: TH II

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY I STATION: OFFSET: ~ECT NO: CA T040406 , PROJECT ENGINEER: IDRILL TYPE,

I A TION: 1051.316

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE CjCORE SAMPLE [8JSPT SAMPLE 9 GRAi SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE E]PEA GRAVEL [lI!]SLOUGH [JGROUT E2]OOILL CUTTINGS ~SAND ,

I -1 W • VANE SHEAR •

Q) 0 0.. 0 100 200 300 400 -> en >- z Elil ::'! SOIL


>- W BLOWS 20 40 60 80 OTHER .c (f)

W ..J DATA r----

'1 - "- DEseRI TION ..J 0.. 1150 mm ~UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPal.

I Q.1Il 0.. ~ 1Il- PLASTIC M.C. LlOUID 100 200 300 400 0° -1 ~ « s: 0 « (f) I • I ~.5 x POCKETlPEN. (kPa).

(f) (f) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

0 I I I I TOPSOIL Iblackl

~+L 1 I f I I

I I I I I

~+ + I I I I I SUBSOIL (brown) I I I I , I I I I

I I I I I

~ GRAVEL H+ ,~ moist, poorly ~aded

~ max size :: 15 mm 0 f--~

I " medium grained

~'"~.a.''' , I tli~ TI

• 1 ~';f~~ I

I 11~ ~!t~~ ~~~

I -2

~r ~{; I

n~~ ~11J I

'§~ ~I ;;J, tt f--~

I ,3 ~~~~ ~:t.: ...

I i~l 11~ ~$~~

~d1j I " h

~{~~ 1-4 rf~~ I ~~~~ ~~~ ~

t{~l I r.: ~

fl1~ ~ .. ~:

11-

5 j" ~~'''~ h~,,~~

~ t1.t:r ~?~~ ~llj

I 6 ~CLAY

~ LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL R.E-T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

, PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH 12


1 PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE: ELEVATION: 1051.364

; SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE [,,;ijjCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE aGRA8 SAMPLE DJ]NO RECOVERY

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL [ffiJSLOUGH QGROUT E2lDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND ;~~r-~~~----~~--------~~----~~-'~--~'-----~~----'---~~-------'-==------'~ w .. VANE SHEAR .. a.. 0 _ Q.i 0 , E > ~ - .5 .c:

>(J)

1 £: .... Q.Gl Gl-0°

, ~

o

H

-3

I I L

'-5 r

-l (5 (J)

SOIL SCRIPTION

>-f-

w -l a.. :::E <! (J)

Z

W BLOWS ~

1150 a.. mm :::E <! (J)

100 200 300 400

• BLOW COUNT • 20 40 60 80 OTHER -r.UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPal. DATA

PLASTIC M.C. LlOUID 100 200 300 400 I - I ito.5 x POCKETPEN. IkPo,_ 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400


I PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH - 13

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STA TION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CA T040406

1 PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE: ELEVATION: 1052.167 I SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE I:jjCORE SAMPLE [8JSPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE anNO RECOVERY

_ 1 BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE [JPEA GRAVEL []]]SLOUGH QGROUT ~DRllL CUTTINGS ~SAND

I ..J w A VANE SHEAR A

_(U 0 a... 0 100 200 300 400 E> !ll >- Z -II> Z SOIL

l- • BLOW COUNT • ...J >- w BLOWS 20 40 60 eo OTHER

.c (f) W ...J

1150 !-UNCONF. SHEAR STR46~ol. DATA !----

] - .... SCRIPTION ...J a... mm 0.11>

I 11>- a... Z PLASTIC M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 0° ...J Z <l: ~ <5 <l: (f) I • I 1eo.5 x POCKETPEN. (kPa) •

(f) (f) 20 40 60 eo 100 200 300 400

0 I TOPSOIL (black) 1 I I I

I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I : SUBSOIL (dark brownl 1 I I I

I I I I I silty clay till I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

'r-! I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I 1-2 I I I I I I I I

~""Ii GRAVEL ~~~. max size = 150mm 0

I ~~Ii~~~ wet, well graded L 11 f-I- f-

f,<tit; f34

I ~;ti~ 1-3 H~~ ro,,"' .. ""t.

~~~~ I

I ~. Ii~~ "'3, ~~i~ ~~,~~~

I f.<~11:'

t~~~ 1-4 ~~~~

I ~i ~~h"~

I ;t~~3. t I

~~t.~~~ ~~:

~ f-5 ~}1i~3

~~i'..~~~ ~11.;

I ~Jt~j m BOTTOM OF TEST PIT


I !,- LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

!£pre;; Page I af I

II

•

LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH 14 , PROJECT: -CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406

1 PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE: ELEVATION: 1051.915

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE [.;jiCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

1 BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL []]]SLOUGH QGROUT f2lDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

..J W ... VANE SHEAR ... Q) 0 a... 0 100 200 300 400

j -> III >- Z E <I.> :::::; SOIL

r- • BLOW COUNT • -..J >- W BLOWS 20 40 60 80 OTHER

£ .... (J) W ..J

DATA I-----

1 0..<1.> DESCRIPTION ..J a... 1150 mm !+UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPal. <1.>- a... :::::; PLASTIC M.C. UQUID 100 200 300 400 0° ..J ~ « ~ (5 « (J) I e I ~.5 x POCKETPEN. IkPa)e

(J) (J) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

0 I I I I TOPSOIL Iblock) , I I I I I I I I I I I I

~~ ~ W I I I : SUBSOIL [dark brown) I I I I I I I silty clay till I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

'1-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I

till I I I I I I I I I I I I

, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I d '

, ~~~#. GRAVEL

~F"~~~ max size = 300mm ~ t-2 moist

~~{~ , tif;

~~~~ ~~1: ~~~!

t-3 ~S; ",~~ ~t~~

~~~:tl.

~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~t.~~~ I

~{{~ 1-4 ~ J;..

~~~~ ~~~t.~~~ ~ll: ~$1.~

" ~.;j ~~~~

'-5 ~1~~ ~~.:<,. .. f-~ l:t ''1 BOTTOM OF TEST PIT


I

r-6 LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m


Page I af I

PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH - 15

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: OJECT NO: CAT040406 1


) SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE CiiiCORE SAMPLE [8JSPT SAMPLE ~GRA8 SAMPLE [[lJNO RECOVERY

1 BA~KF~L TYPE .BENTONITE OPEA GRAVEL IIlIlSLOUGH QGROUT E2jDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

0 • VANE SHEAR • -> (l) Z

100 200 300 400 E Q) :::!E SOIL

I-- • BLOW COUNT • -...J >- W BLOWS 20 40 60 eo OTHER

.c (j') w ...J DATA

!---, 0.03 SCRIP ION ...J Q.. 1150 mm ~UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPol+ (1)-

...J Q.. :::!E PLASTIC M.C . L1QUIO 100 200 300 400

0° ::::E <! 5: 0 <! (j')

I e I teo.S x POCKETPEN. IkPo!e (j') (j') 20 40 60 eo 100 200 300 400

0 I I I I TOPSOIL (blackl )

~~ ~ I

I I I I SUBSOIL (dark brown) I I I I I I I I I I I I

)

I LL I I

~~1'¥';' GRAVEL ~(~~ dry, well graded

'H ~114 max size :: 300mm 0

~?~~ ·s~~

1 ~~~~ ~~.~~~

, ~{{~ ~~.~~

)

~~ t~ f-2

~!I ~.

~ ~CLAY

-3

f-4

f-5

f-6 LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DA TE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

1

PROJECT: LUFT PIT



SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE ~CORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE [JPEA GRAVEL [illSLOUGH

Q; -> E G> -...1

£ ... e.G> Q)-0° ~

0

..J o III ~ >(/)

..J o (/)

SOIL DESCRI TION

I: I: I: I: TOPSOIL (black)

~~iilj ) Illf I SUBSOIL (dark brown i

w n.. 0 >- :z l-

W BLOWS w ...1 ..J n.. /150 mm n.. ::!' PLASTIC ::!' <i <i (/) I (/) 20

I I I I

BOREHOLE NO: TH 16


ELEV A TION: 1059.532

~GRAB SAMPLE [ONO RECOVERY

QGROUT E2JOOILL CUTTINGS ~SAND ... VANE SHEAR ... 100 200 300 400


i---

~UNCONF. SHEAR STR, IkPal. M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 400

• I Ieo.s x POCKETPEN. IkPol. 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

'1-1

-2

1-4

r

l

r -5


l REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T, COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

I PROJECT: CUFT PIT I BOREHOLE NO: TH - 17 I CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CA T0404061

1 PROJECT ENGINEER ~L TYPE: I ELEV A TION: 1060.288 I SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY MPLE k8JSPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE [ONO RECOVERY

,BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE EJPEA GRAVEL UIllSLOUGH QGROUT EaDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND ,..; w ... VANE SHEAR ...

I Q) 0 0.. 0 100 200 300 400

-> CO >- Z EQ) :2 SOIL

I-- • BLOW COUNT • -,..;

>- w BLOWS 20 40 60 eo OTHER .c Ul

W ,..; DATA

f---1 - .... SCRIPTION ,..; 0.. 1150 mm I*UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPol.

CtQ) 0.. :2

I Q,)- ,..; PLASTIC M.C. UQUID lOa 200 300 400 0° :2 <!

3: 5 <! Ul I e I ~.5 x POCKETPEN. IkPale

Ul Ul 20 40 60 SO 100 200 300 400

0 I TOPSOIL (black) 1

I

I SUBSOIL (thin) I

... GRAVEL i I

~~ max size :: 350mm 0

I l' dry, gap graded

},~ I

.. .. 'H

~~ I ~?~-: ~~

r:a CLAY

I ~

I 1-2

I I 1-:

I I

1-4

I I I

r-5

I i F LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m


Page I of I

I

J PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH - 18

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: !PROJECT NO: CAT040406 1

PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE, ELEVATION: 1056.942

; SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE [;jCORE SAMPLE k8JSPT SAMPLE ~GRA8 SAMPLE DTINO RECOVERY

1 BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE OPE A GRAVEL []IDSLOUGH QGROUT E2jDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

...J w ... VANE SHEAR ... Cii 0 0.. 0 100 200 300 400

-> CD >- Z E Q) ~ SOIL

l- • BLOW COUNT • -...J >- W BLOWS 20 40 60 80 OTHER £ .... (f)

W ...J 1150 DATA

t----1 0..Q) DESCRI ION ...J 0.. mm !t-UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPol.

Q)- 0.. ~ PLASTIC M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 400 0° ...J :::E <!

I 5: (5 <! (J) I • I jeo.5 x POCKETPEN. (kPo). (J) (J) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

0 I I I I TOPSOIL , I I I I I I I : SUBSOIL I I I

I I I I I I I I

~ I I I I I I I I

~~ CLA Y with small amount of gravel Ipoor)

'f-! ~ ~ ~ no gravel

= Uti -2

1-3

-4

1-5

_6 LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m


Page I of I

PROJECT: LUFT PIT iBOREHOLE NO: TH - 19


1 PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE: ELEV A TION: 1058.636

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE /:.IiCORE SAMPLE [2JSPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE [ll]NO RECOVERY

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL [ill]SLOUGH G]GROUT E2]DRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND 1~--~-~--~--~~----------~~--~~W~-T~~--~-----==-------~-A~V~A~--S-H-EA-R--A--~~------~~

_ ~ g g: ~ 100 200 300 400

E. .5 ~ SOl L...... • BLOW COUNT • .c >- W ~ BLOWS 20 40 60 eo

] 0.. ii (f) S C R I ION 0: ~ /150 mm ~UNCONF. SHEAR STII. IkP.!. ~ "0 ::::! ~ <! PLASTIC M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 400

s: 0 <! (f) I e I eO.5 x PjO~.!<ETPEN. IkPa)e (f) ..,..rt.,==-~~--:,:,...,..-~ ______ -j.!:(f):.!.j----1r--__ -+-...,....=2r-0~40~ ,-;6""0:...,-.8",,0:...,-.-+-,.-',,,,00,,- lU 300 400

o I' TOPSOIL Iblack) ; I I

-2

!-3

1-4

1-5

I 1 SUBSOIL (dark brown). N~

~~.~ .. ~ GR A VEL

~1~(~ dry. gop graded 1?-: max size ::: 250mm 0 <l~~

~"II."'~~" ~~~ ~~:~: .... t..<,~< :,.~ ..... ~~~! ~~: ~~~ ... Jll ~CLAY ~

some rock l

I

I

OTHER DATA

LOGGED BY: GREG SUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY: DAVE CHURCHilL RE.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I

, PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH 20

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406 1


] SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE ~CORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE OTINO RECOVERY

I BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE OPE A GRAVEL UIIlSLOUGH G!GROUT EaDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

..J w • VANE SHEAR • . Q; 0 t:L 0 100 200 300 400 !E~ ro >- z

~ SOIL l- • BLOW COUNT • -..J

>- W BLOWS 20 40 60 80 OTHER

1 .c. (f)

W ..J DATA f.--.

a.Q; SCRIP ION ..J t:L 1150 mm !<tUNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPal. Q)- ..J

t:L ~ PLASTIC M.C • LlOUID 100 200 300 400 0° ~ «

3:: g « (f) I e I ~.5 x POCKETPEN. IkPa)e (f) 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

) 0

I TOPSOIL

I I SUBSOIL, some rock

~~ GRAVEL

~"" ... " dry, gop graded , ~~~g max size 400mm 0

t1!: ~.".~~ ~~~

'1-1 ":":~~ ~f< tt··

\

)11'1 ~~~

)1~3 ,

~ CLAY 1-2

-3

f-4

f-5



Page I of I

PROJECT: LUFT PIT [BOREHOLE NO: TH 21

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY SION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: CAT040406 . ,

PROJECT ENGINEER: L TYPE: ELEVATION: 1060.302

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE CiijCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GR, SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE [JPEA GRAVEL IlJ]SLOUGH G]GROUT EZlDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND , ..J W I ... \lANE SHEAR ...

Qi 0 0.. 0 100 200 300 400

E~ III >- z ::E SOIL


>-W BLOWS 40 60 BO OTHER

.c (f) W ..J DATA

i---

I .... "- DESCRIPTION ..J 0.. 1150 mm SHEAR STR. IkPol+ Q.<U <U- 0.. ::E PLASTIC IA.C. LlOUID 200 300 400 0° ..J ::::E <l: ~ (5 <l: (f) I • I F'OCKETPEN. IkPal.

(f) (f) 20 40 60 80 200 300 400

0 I I I I TOPSOIL

I I i i I

I I I I SUBSOIL I I I I

I w-Ll'

I ~~1 GRAVEL I I I

~':f1 dry, fairly well graded

~~ro' .,,, , 400mm 0 -l

:;~ ..

I ~

~t~;J

I' ~ t~ ~';t1 ~~~

~'l$~

· r1 , ~11

I -2 ~~

~f$~ ,.,. t .. l .. t ..

I ~ CLAY

I 1-3

I .

I L -4

Ii

I 1~5

I If 1_6

LOGGED BY: GREG SUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY:DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.I. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

f- Page I of I

PROJECT: LUFT PIT



SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE CiCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE [JPEA GRAVEL [ffiSLOUGH

Q;

E~ -...J .c:. - '-0.11> 0.>-

o~

o

H

1-2

-3

1-4

1-5

...J o OJ ::2 r CJ)

...J (5 CJ)

SOIL SCRIPTION

W 0... >-l-

w ...J 0... ::2 <:{ (J)

0 Z

W ...J 0... ::2 <:{ (J)

BLOWS 1150 mm

PLASTIC I

20

BOREHOLE NO: TH - 22


ELEV A TION: 1057.866

~GRAB SAMPLE ITDNO RECOVERY

QGROUT E2jDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND A VANE SHEAR A

100 200 300 400


I---!+UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPo).

M.C. L10UID 100 200 300 400

• I 1eo.5 x POCKETPEN. fkPol • 40 60 80 100 200 300 400



Page I of I

I PROJECT: LUFT PIT ~REHOLE NO: TH - 23

CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: NO: CA T040406 I IELEVATION:

I PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE: 1051.829

SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE c;;jCORE SAMPLE [8JSPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE [DNO RECOVERY

BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL IlIDSLOUGH QGROUT E2jDRILL CUTTINGS BjSAND , -l W ~ VANE SHEAR ~

I a; 0 a.. 0 300 400

-> tIl >- Z EQ> ~ SOIL

f- • BLOW COUNT • --l

>- W BLOWS 20 40 60 eo OTHER J:: (J')

W -l DATA f-----, _ ....

DESCRIP ION -l a.. 1150 mm ~UNCONF. SHEAR STR. IkPal. Q.~ a.. ~ PLASTIC M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 400

0 -l ::::! <{

3: P <{ (J') I e I 1-0.5 x POCKETPEN. IkPo)e (J') 20 40 60 80 100 200 300 400

I \1\ TOPSOIL ill ,

I , I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I

. , SUBSOIL

I SAND-SIL T

1,H

I 1 -

I ,

I I

,

I -2 SAND-CLAY

GRAVEL i "\"\"\ moist I ,

~"~ij I ~~~ fairly well graded ! Ii!""" fine material t~~ max size = 150mm 0 ~itt" I I

I ~tli~ I

~ ~~ ~3 1>'11

"\"\

~l!~ I "\"\~

-

" .. " ...... ~~~~ h:~:~ .. :;.~~

t :;'i~j

I I )'11

~ CLAY

I 1:-5

I 1-' LOGGED BY: GREG BUL YCH P. ENG. COMPLETION DEPTH: m

REVIEWED BY:DAVE CHURCHILL R.E.T. COMPLETION DATE: JUNE 23/04

Page I of I if:7M!

I)

; PROJECT: LUFT PIT BOREHOLE NO: TH - 24 I CLIENT: MOUNTAIN VIEW COUNTY STATION: OFFSET: PROJECT NO: ~ , PROJECT ENGINEER: DRILL TYPE: ELEVATION: 1049.867

l SAMPLE TYPE .SHELBY TUBE [;jjCORE SAMPLE ~SPT SAMPLE ~GRAB SAMPLE [DNO RECOVERY

, BACKFILL TYPE .BENTONITE DPEA GRAVEL IT!IlSLOUGH [JGROUT E;aDRILL CUTTINGS ~SAND

...J w SHEAR ... , E~ 0 a.. 0 300 400

CD >- z -.5 ~ SOIL

l- • BLOW COUNT • >- w BLOWS 20 40 60 eo OTHER

1 .c. (J)

W ...J DATA ,.............

0..4> DESCRIPTION ...J a.. 1150 mm ftcUNCONf. SHEAR sm. lkPol+ v- a.. ~ PLASTIC M.C. LIQUID 100 200 300 400 0° ...J ::E <l: ~ (5 <l: (j) I • I ~.5 x POCKETPEN. IkPale

(J) (j) 20 40 '" IT:o ~o 200 300 "'" 0 I , I I TOPSOIL ,

I , I I I I I I

t~ l I

I I I I SUBSOIL I I I I I I I I

H+ I I I I , L 11 ~ 51 GRAVEL with cloy ~ dry, dirty. lot of fines it .~ poor material

I--

~ ~ I I i

I

-f- '-f-

~ I

-2 ~ ,

~ CLAY

-3

1-4

I 1-5 I



Page I of I

· 1

APPENDIX V

SIEVE ANALYSIS & L.A. ABRASION REPORTS

Gravel Investigation Report AMEC Infrastructure Limited Luft Gravel Pit (NWV. 9-31-3-W5M)

}

AMEC Earth & Environmental Sieve Analysis Report arne~

To: AMEC Infrastructure Umit ~ [ffi[g©[g~W[g[Q) 206, 610 - 70 Avenue SE Office:

Calgary, AS Project No. : CA 16472 T2H 2J6 Client: AMEC Infrastructure

JUl 06 2004 Copies to: Attn: Mr. Colin Stroeder

Source I Location : Mountain View County AMEC Infrastructure Luft Pit Sample Id T2

Sieve Size % Passing Min Max Sample Type User Defined 150.0 Specification From 0 125.0 Sampled by Client 100.0 Date Sampled 25-Jun-04 80.0 98 Date Received 25-Jun-04 50.0 97 Date Tested 29-Jun-04 40.0 90 28.0 Fine Aggregate % Moisture 7.1 25.0 78 Percent Finer 80 urn 8.4 20.0 70 Fine Sand (2.2 - 2.5) 16.0 62 F.M. Range Medium Sand (2.5 - 2.8) 14.0 Coarse Sand (2.8 - 3.1) 12.5 53 Organic Impurities NO; I As is 10.0 46 (Colour Range 1 - 5) Low Densities Pieces Removed 5.0 25 % Low Densities Pieces 2.5 16

1.250 12 Coarse Aggregate 0.630 11 Shape: 0.315 10 Percent Crush (+ 5 mm) : 0.160 9 Soundness (Visual Inspection) : 0.080 8.4 % Low Densities Pieces :

150100 40 25 1612.5 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080 100

I I ~ II III I I I I I I II III I I I I I

90 : : 1\ I" III : : : II III I I 80 I I ~I III I I I I

I I

l~ III I I I I I

I I III I I I I I 70

CI I I II Nil I I I I I r: I I II /I I I I I I iii 1/1 60 «I I I II :'X I I I I I c.. - 50

I I II 1/ I I I I I r: I I II /11\ I I I I I IP () I I II III I I I I I ...

I I III III I I I IP 40 c.. I I II 1/1 I I I I I I I II 1/1 I I I I I

30 I I II III \ I I I I , I I II III '" I I I I I

20 ....... I I /I III i' --J. I I I

10 I I II III I I I I II III I I I I I II 1/1 I I I I I

0 I I II III I I

125 80 50 28 20 14 10 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

Sieve Size

Comments:

AMEC Earth & Environmental

Per: /~

Reporting ollhese results consilutes a testing service only Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results provided only on wdlten request

AMEC Earth & Environmental Sieve Analysis Report

To: AMEC Infrastructure Urnited 200,610·70 Avenue SE Calgary. AB T2H 2J6

Attn: Mr. Colin Stroeder

Source I Location : Mountain View County Luff Pit

Sieve Size % Passing Min Max 150.0 125.0 100.0 80.0 96

~ 67 81

28.0 25.0 67 20.0 60 16.0 54 14.0 12.5 48 10.0 43 5.0 29 2.5 24

1.250 20 0.630 17 0.315 15 0.160 13 0.080 11.4

150 100 40 100

I I I I 1\ 90

I I I 1'1 I I i\

80 I I I I \ I I

70 Ol I I c:

I I 'iii 01 60 c I I 0.. ....

50 I I c: I I GI

() I I ... I I GI 40 0..

I I I I I

30 I I I I

20 n I

I I I I

10 I I

0 : :

25

/I II I" 1/ III II II

~ II II II II II /I II

II /I

II 1/ 1/ /I II

Fine Aggregate

F.M. Range

arne& Office:

Project No, : CA 16472 Client: AMEC Infrastructure

Caples to:

Sample Id T4 Sample Type User Defined

Specification From 0 Sampled by Client

Date Sampled 25·Jun-04 Date Received 25-Jun-04

Date Tested 29-Jun..()4

% Moisture 7.6 Percent Finer 80 urn 11.4 Fine Sand (2.2 - 2.5)

Medium Sand (2.5 - 2.8) Coarse Sand (2.8 - 3.1 \

As is Organic Impurities NO; I (Colour Range 1 - 5) Low Densities Pieces Removed

% Low Densities Pieces

Coarse Aggregate Shape:

Percent Crush (+ 5 mm) : Soundness (Visual Inspection) :

% Low Densities Pieces:

1612.5 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I : III I I I I III I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I

III I I I I I III I I I I I

1J: i I I I I I I I I I

:~ I I I I I I I I

III I I I II/ I I I I I III I I I I I

...... r-III h.- I I I I III r- I I I I

I

III I I t--.. - -+--III I I I I III I I I I I II/ I I I I I III I I

125 80 50 28 20 14 10 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

Sieve Size

Comments:


Reporting of these results consitutes a testing service only Engineering interpretation or evaluation the test results is provided only on written request


To: AMEC Infrastructure Umited 206, 610 - 70 Avenue SE Calgary, AS T2H 2J6


Source I Location: Mountain View County Luft Pit

Sieve Size % Passing Min Max 150.0 125.0 100.0 80.0 100 50.0 93 40.0 86 28.0 25.0 67 20.0 60 16.0 53 14.0 12.5 46 10.0 41 5.0 30 2.5 25

1.250 21 0.630 19 0.315 18 0.160 16 0.080 13.6

150 100 40 25 100

I I " II I I II

90 I I I" I I

~ II

80 I I III I I \11 I I II

70

l\ til I I c I I u; fII 60 III I I II 0-... I I II c 50 I I II G) () I I II ..

I I III G) 40 0- I I II

I I II 30

I I II I I II

20

I I II I I II

10 I I II I I II

0 J J

Fine Aggregate

F.M. Range

arne& Office:

Project No. : CA 16472 Client: AMEC Infrastructure

Copies to:

Sample Id T5 - Top Sample Type User Defined


Date Sampled 25-Jun-04 Date Received 25-Jun-04

Date Tested 01-Jul-04

% Moisture 6.2 Percent Finer 80 um 13.6 Fine Sand (2.2 - 2.5)

Medium Sand (2.5 - 2.8) Coarse Sand (2.8 - 3.1)




Percent Crush (+ 5 mm): Soundness (Visual Inspection) :

% Low Densities Pieces :

1612.5 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I


I

li" I I I I I II I I I I I

I~ : I I I : II I I I III I I I III I I I I I III

'" I I I I I

III i"--f-t. I I I I III -..........,J.. I I I

:: : I I I I h-III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I I

125 80 50 28 20 14 10 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

Sieve Size

Comments:


Reporting 01 these test results consitutes a testing service only Engineering interpretation or evaluation al the test results is provided only on written request


To: AMEC Infrastructure Limited 206,610·70 Avenue SE Calgary, AS T2H 2J6


Source I Location: Mountain View County Luft Pit


1.250 32 0.630 27 0.315 20

~ 150100 40

100 . I I .....1\ I I

90 I I '\ I I

80 I I I I I I

70 01 I I s:: I I iii Ul 60

I; II a. - I I s:: 50 I I CD () I I ...

I I CD a. 40 I I I I ! II 30 I I I I

20 ; I I I

10 I I I I

0 I

25

" " :: N :f\ " " II

" I" II III II

" " II

;; II II II

Fine Aggregate

F.M. Range

arne& Office:

Project No. : CA16472 Client: AMEC Infrastructure

Copies to:

Sample Idl-_.,..T:...:5:.... • ....:S;;,.:o:..:,tt:..:,om~_--I Sample Type User Defined


Date Sampled 25-Jun..Q4 Date Received 25-Jun-04

Date Tested 01·Jul-04



As is Organic Impurities NO; I . (Colour Range 1 - 5) Low Densities Pieces Removed





1612.5 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

mil III I I I III I I I III I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I I I III I I I I I

~ I I I I I I I I I I I I

,,;\ I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I

''\ III I I I I I III I I !jij I III r-- 1-- I I III ~ I I

III I I I I III I I I ',I I I

I'" ~ III I I I III I I I I III I I I I III I I I I III I I

125 80 50 28 20 14 10 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

Sieve Size

Comments:


P"~

Reporting of these test results consitutes a testing service only Engineering interpretation or evaluation 01 the test results is provided only on written request


To: AMEC Infrastructure Umited 206,610 -70 Avenue SE Calgary, AS T2H 2J6


Source I Location : Mountain View County Luft Pit

Sieve Size % Passing Min Max 150.0 125.0 100.0 80.0 100:=j 50.0 93 40.0 86 28.0 25.0 73 20.0 65 16.0 58 14.0 12.5 52 10.0 47 5.0 35 2.5 28

1.250 21 0.630 17 0.315 15 0.160 14 0.080 12.2

150100 40 25 100

II ..... II

90 \ : :

I I I 1\ 80 -ri I I II I I I I I

70 11\ OJ I I c: I I I II Ui

fIl 60

Ii ,

III II a.. ! 'E 50

I I II CII I I II (.) I I II ..

I I II CII 40 a.. I I II I I II

30 I I /I I I II

20

I I II

10 I I II I I II I I II

0 I I III

Fine Aggregate

F.M. Range

arne& Office:


Copies to:




Date Tested 29-Jun-04


Medium Sand (2.5 - 2.8) Coarse Sand (2.8 - 3.1\






1612.5 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

III I I I I I I I III I I I I I

: :: : : I I I I

III I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I

III I I I I 1\1 II I I I I

fu I I I I II I I I I III : I I III I I I III I I I III

I'.r--. I I I I I

III I I I I I

It---III N I I I III I I I I

III I I ri r---j r- -t--III I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I

125 80 50 28 20 14 10 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

Sieve Size

Comments:


per~~

Reporting of these test results consitutes a testing seNice only Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request


To: AMEC Infrastructure Limited 206, 610 70 Avenue SE

AS T2H 2J6

Attn: ML Colin Stroeder



1.250 26 0.630 25 0.315 23 0.160 21 0.080 18.5

150100 40 25 100

H- I I II I I II

90 I I I" I I 1\ II

80

LIT I I II I I II I I \ " 70

OJ I I :\ II r::: I I II Ui (II 60

i~ 1\1 I I c.. ... I I r::: 50 I I :: IIJ () I I ..

I I IIJ 40 c.. I I II I I II

30 I I II I I II

20

I I II I I II

10 I I II I I II

0 I I II

Fine Aggregate

F.M. Range

arne~

Office: Project No. : CA16472

Client: AMEC Infrastructure Copies to:










Percent Crush (+ 5 mm): Soundness (Visual Inspection) :

% Low Densities Pieces:

1612.5 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I III I I I I I III I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I

III I I I I I III I I I I I . III I I I I I III I I I I I

ffiL I I I I I I I I I I I

III I I I I I III

l"-I I I I I

III ;-r--+- I I I III I I t-H ---~ III I. I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I III 1 I I

125 80 50 28 20 14 10 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

Sieve Size

Comments:


per:~~

Reporting of these lest results consitutes a testing service only Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request

- , ,


To: AMEC Infrastructure limited 206, 610 - 70 Avenue SE Calgary, AB T2H 2J6



Sieve Size % PassinQ Min Max 150.0 125.0 100.0 80.0 100 50.0 90 40.0 85 28.0 25.0 71 20.0 61 16.0 53 14.0 12.5 45 10.0 39 5.0 27 2.5 21

1.250 15 0.630 11 0.315 10 0.160 9 0.080 8.0

150100 40 25 100

I I 1\ " I I r\ " 90 I I i\ III I I II

80 I I ~ 1\ I" I I " I I ~ 70

Cl I I I ~\ t: I I II 'iii III 60 III I I II Q. ....

50 I I II

t: : : II GI 0 " ...

I I II GI 40 Q. I I "

ftH-I I II

30 I I II I I II

20 ,: II

10 I I II I I II I I " 0

'II

Fine Aggregate

F.M. Range

arnecG Office:


Copies to :



Date Sampled 25-Jun-Q4 Date Received 25-Jun-Q4



Medium Sand (2.5 - 2.8) Coarse Sand (2.8 - 3.1 \




Percent Crush (+ 5 mm) . Soundness (Visual Inspection) :


1612.5 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

II DID[ I I I I III I I I I

: :: : : I I I

III I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I

i


\" I I I I I

" I I I I I

'~ I I I

II I I I I I III I I I I III I I I I I III I I I I I

'" III I I I I I III i'- .....L I I I I

I'i-III I I I I III I I I III I I I III I I I I I III I I

125 80 50 28 20 14 10 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

Sieve Size

Comments:


per:...:o~:::::·:;...&-;:=...-t.....:;..~~=.;;.li' ~::.;-=-__

Reporting 01 these test results consitutes a testing service only Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request

80

1420

00

'1540

60

80

1640

ALTER. MATERIAL STATION CLASS

1380 STRIP SUBSOIL GRAVEL
















0.0 0.0 0.0

51.9 86.6

586.7 64.3 85.8

570.8 28.9 82.0

508.2 20.6 85.8

558.5 46.5 84.6

566.9 59.5 85.9

553.3 26.3 17.4

169.3 35.4 17.7

171.1 43.3 14.1

228.5 26.6 17.5

170.4 43.4 17 .1

170.9 25.9 17.4

169.3 33.1 16.6

163.7 25.2 16.6

157.1 42.8 28.0

314.7

UNADJUSTED MULT

INCR ACCUM FCTR

o o o

519 866

5867 1162 1724

11574 932

1678 10790

495 1678

10667 671

1704 11254

1060 1705

11203 858

1033 7226

617 351

3404 788 318

3996 699 316

3989 700 346

3414 693 345

3402 590 341

3329 583 333

3208 680 446

4718

o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00

519 0.00 866 0.00

5867 0.00 1682 0.00 2589 0.00

17441 0.00 2614 0.00 4267 0.00

28231 0.00 3109 5946

38897 3780 7650

50151 4840 9355

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

61354 0.00 5698 0.00

10388 0.00 68580 0.00

6315 10739 71983

7103 11056 75980

7802 11372 79969

8502 11718

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

83383 0.00 9195 0.00

12063 0.00 86785 0.00

9785 0.00 12403 0.00 90114 0.00 10368 0.00 12736 0.00 93322 0.00 11048 0.00 13182 0.00 98039 0.00

PAGE: 1

ADJUSTED MASS INCR ACCUM ORDINATE

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o


o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

- , ,40406_A070904_V070904 07_09_04_ PAGE: 2

clASE ALTER. MATERIAL END UNADJUSTED MULT ADJUSTED MASS ~"lTATION STATION CLASS AREA INCR ACCUM FCTR INCR ACCUM ORDINATE

1240 1240 STRIP 69.4 1425 22044 0.00 0 0 0 SUBSOIL 137.5 3112 34268 0.00 0 0 GRAVEL 1200.7 25939 331437 0.00 0 0 ESTGRAVEL 76.9 1843 90245 0.00 0 0








1020

1040

1060

1080

1100

1120

1140

1160

1180

1200

1220

ALTER. MATERIAL STATION CLASS

1000 STRIP SUBSOIL GRAVEL ESTGRAVEL












0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

115.1 183.3

1418.3 536.8 115.3 137.5

1186.9 685.3

73 .1

38.7 1058.2

926.4 92.2

100.4 1613.2

273.6 39.3 35.4

1498.9 503.7 126.2 164.8

1575.7 390.0 103.1 217.9

1691. 0 460.1 116.4 226.1

1573.8 342.8 150.9 229.6

1613.8 142.6

UNADJUSTED MaLT INCR ACCUM FCTR

o o o o

1151 1833

14183 5368 2304 3208

26053 12220

1884 1762

22451 16117

1653 1391

26714 11999

1315 1358

31121 7773 1655 2001

30746 8937 2293

o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00

1151 0.00 1833 0.00

14183 0.00 5368 0.00 3455 0.00 5041 0.00

40236 0.00 17588 0.00

5339 0.00 6803 0.00

62687 0.00 33704 0.00

6992 8194

89401 45704

8307 9553

120521 53476

9962 11554

151267 62413 12256

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3826 15380 0.00 32667 183934 0.00

8501 2196 4440

70915 0.00 14451 0.00 19820 0.00

32648 216582 0.00 8029 78943 0.00 2673 4558

17124 0.00 24378 0.00

31876 248458 0.00 4854 83797 0.00

62.8 2136 19261 0.00 137.3 3669 28046 0.00

1348.5 29623 278080 0.00 105.2 2478 86275 0.00 73.1 1358 20619 0.00

173.7 1393.3 107.4

3109 31156 0.00 27418 305498 0.00

2127 88402 0.00

PAGE: 1

ADJUSTED MASS INCR ACCUM ORDINATE



o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

}40406J070904_V070904

!fROM TO MATERIAL :TATION STATION CLASS

< 1 1000 1380

STRIP SUBSOIL GRAVEL ESTGRAVEL

Volume Summary

UNADJUSTED MULT TOTAL CUBIC METERS FCTR

32944.4 0.00 58497.6 0.00

460730.8 0.00 98908.3 0.00

PAGE: 3

ADJUSTED MASS TOTAL CUBIC METERS ORDINATE

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

o

APPENDIX VII

VOLUME REPORTS

Gravel Investigation Report AMEC Infrastructure limited luft Gravel Pit (NWY4 9-31-3-W5M)

Client: Mountain View County

Location: Luft Pit NW 9-31-3-W5M

Material: Pit Run Gravel

Date: June 2004

Job No: CA T040406

arne&

Average of 8 tests

APPENDIX VI

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS


LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST REPORT

TO: Colin Stroeder AMEC Infrastructure

PROJECT: Mountain View County

SOURCE: LUFT PIT SAMPLED ID:

OFFICE: Calgary PROJECT NO: CA16451 CC:

ame&

T9 & T11 COMBINED SAMPLED BY: CLIENT DATE SAMPLED: JUNE 25, 2004 DATE RECEIVED: JUNE 25, 2004 DATE TESTED: JULY 1, 2004

MATERIAL GRADING: A

ACTUAL SIEVE SIZES AMOUNT

- 1 W' (400 mm) + 1" (25.0 mm) 1261.9g

- 1" (25.0 mm) + %" (20.0 mm) 1251.0 g

- %" (20.0 mm) + Y2" (12.5 mm) 1249.6 g

- Y2" (12.5 mm) + 3/8" (10.0 mm) 1246.4 g

NO. OF REVOLUTIONS 500 TOTAL SAMPLE 5008.9 g

NO. OF SPHERES 12 + #12 MATERIAL AFTER 3473.5 g

WT. OF SPHERES 4977.5 - #12 MATERIAL AFTER 1535.4 g

LOSS AT 100 REVOLUTIONS -% LOSS AT 500 REVOLUTIONS 30.7%

LOSS AT 200 REVOLUTIONS -% LOSS AT 1000 REVOLUTIONS _ 0/0

TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 0 CSA A23.2 16A (ASTM C131) o CSA S23.2 - 17 A (ASTM C535)

COMMENTS:


~ .... I per:~~~

Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.

lOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST REPORT

TO: Colin Stroeder AMEC Infrastructure

PROJECT: Mountain View County

SOURCE:

DATE SAMPLED:

LUFTPIT

JUNE 25, 2004

OFFICE: Calgary PROJECT NO: CA16451 CC:

ame&

SAMPLED 10: TP 5 - TOP & BOnOM SAMPLED BY: CLIENT

DATE RECEIVED: JUNE 25, 2004 DATE TESTED: JULY 1, 2004

MATERIAL GRADING: A

ACTUAL SIEVE SIZES AMOUNT

- 1 W' (400 mm) + 1" (25.0 mm) 1258.6 g

- 1" (25.0 mm) + %" (20.0 mm) 1260.3 g

- %" (20.0 mm) + W' (12.5 mm) 1242.3 9

- W' (12.5 mm) + 3/8" (10.0 mm) 1240.1 9

NO. OF REVOLUTIONS 500 TOTAL SAMPLE 5001.3 9

NO. OF SPHERES 12 + #12 MATERIAL AFTER 3568.8 9

WT. OF SPHERES 4977.7 - #12 MATERIAL AFTER 1432.5 9

LOSS AT 100 REVOLUTIONS -% LOSS AT 500 REVOLUTIONS 28.6%

LOSS AT 200 REVOLUTIONS -% LOSS AT 1000 REVOLUTIONS -%

TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 0 CSA A23.2 16A (ASTM C131) o GSA S23.2 - 17 A (ASTM C535)

COMMENTS:


per:cZ~~ Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only_ Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.


To: AMEC Infrastructure Umited 200,610 - 70 Avenue SE Calgary, AS T2H 2J6

Attn: Mr. Colin Strooder



1.250 19 0.630 16 0.315 15 0.160 14 0.080 12.5

150100 40 25 100

00 ' , ..... " , , " 90 I I I:: , ,

~ 80 "

1/ , , I , , 70

CI , , /I c: I I /I Ui 1/1 60 III I I /I a.. - , I /I c: 50 I I 1/ III (J , , /I ...

I I 1/ III 40 a.. , , 1/ , , " 30 , , II

I I /I 20 ,: I I

" 1/

10 , , 1/ I I /I

0 I ,II

Fine Aggregate

F.M. Range

arne& Office:

Project No. : CA 16472 Client: AMEC Infrastructure

Copies to :




Date Tested 01-Jul"()4

% Moisture 5.0 Percent Finer 80 urn 12.5 Fine Sand (2.2 - 2.5)






% Low Densities Pieces .

1612.5 5 2.5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0,080

"' , , , , ,

,/I , , , , , III I I I

"' , , , , ,

III I I , , "'

, , , , , III , , I I I

I

"' , , , I ,

\!" , , I I I

hl I , I I I II , I , , I 111\ I I I I II/ , I I I , III I I I II/ \

, , I I , 1/1 " I I , , I

r--.-III rl--- I I , I 1/1 t--...

, I I I

1/1 , ~ I III I , I I 1

"' , , I , , III I 1< , I , III I I I

125 80 50 28 20 14 10 5 2,5 1.250 0.630 0.315 0.160 0.080

Sieve Size

Comments :


per:~

Reporting of these test results consi/utes a testing seNice only Engineering interpretation or evaluation 01 the test results is provided only on written request

1504 07_15_04 PAGE: 2

END UNADJUSTED MOLT ADJUSTED MASS AREA INCR ACCUM FCTR INCR ACCUM ORDINATE

1700 1700 STRIP 18.1 610 11658 0.00 0 0 0 SUBSOIL 28.0 560 13741 0.00 0 0 GRAVEL 270.0 5847 103887 0.00 0 0



1760 1760 STRIP 53.2 1000 13895 0.00 0 0 a SUBSOIL 56.3 843 15443 0.00 a a GRAVEL 375.3 6391 121263 0.00 0 0

1780 1780 STRIP 63.8 1170 15064 0.00 a a a SUBSOIL 56.0 1123 16565 0.00 0 a GRAVEL 377.9 7532 128795 0.00 0 0

1800 1800 STRIP 36.1 999 16063 0.00 0 a a SUBSOIL 55.8 1117 17683 0.00 a a GRAVEL 379.5 7574 136369 0.00 0 0

,1820 1820 STRIP 0.0 361 16425 0.00 0 0 a SUBSOIL 0.0 558 18240 0.00 0 0 GRAVEL 0.0 3795 140164 0.00 0 a

Volume SUIl1II:lary

10406....A041504_V071504 07_15_04 PAGE: 3

(OM TO MATERIAL UNADJUSTED MULT ADJUSTED MASS

:ATION STATION CLASS TOTAL CUBIC METERS FCTR TOTAL CUBIC METERS ORDINATE

1380 1820 0

STRIP 16424.8 0.00 0.0

SUBSOIL 18240.4 0.00 0.0

GRAVEL 140164.1 0.00 0.0

APPENDIX VIII

CROSS-SECTIONS

Gravel Investigation Report AMEC Infrastructure Limited Luft Gravel Pit (NWY4 9-31-3-W5M)

00 0 0

o a (\j-

On + > <ri

Zo 00 H O

ru I-«I-n U1I

- - t t • • t • • t t + t • • • • • • • t + t • + • • • b~.

- - + • • • • t • • t + t • t • • • • • t • • • • • • • b2.

- - · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·0· - - • • • • • • • • • t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • + b2L

• • • • • • • • • t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t b~L

- - • • t • • • • • • t • t • t • t • • t • • t t • t + bgL

- - • + •••••••••••• ~ .• - - + + + + + + + t + t + t + t ~ l~

• • + • + t t t + + beL

• t •••• t t • .0b~L

- - + t' + + + + + + +, + + tl+H t t ••••• t • .0e~L

- - + + + + + + t + + + + + , + 1+ I+i

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : I: [i - - + + + t + t + + + + t + + + 1+ Itj

• • • t t • • t •

• • t • t ••• t .O~~L

t • t • • • t • •

t • t t t • t t t

to~~L

- - + t t + + + t t + + + + t + r ri t t t • t t t t t

• • • • • • • • • • • • • •• ~ "[./1

•••••••••••••

• t • t t t • t •

• t • • + • t • •

- - + + t t t + + + + + t + + + , fi t t • t t t t • •

- - t t + , t + , t + + + t + + + Ii t t • • • • t t •

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : \J • t • • t • • • t

• t t t • • • t •

- - t t t • • + t t + t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t tO~EL

- - . . . t t • t • t t • t • • t t t • t t t t t t

- - t • t • t t t • • t t t t • t t t t • • t t t • t

- - • t • t t •• t t t t t • t t t t •• t • t • t t toe~L

- - t t • • • t t t •• t t • t t • t • t t • • t t t to~~L

- -o~o~o~o~o~o~o~a~o~o~o~o~o .n~~ ru--oommmm~~~~m~~~MMruru--oom~~ -----oooooooooooooooooooommm -------------------------mmm

I I I I I iii I I I I .L I f

0 0 0 0

0 ..-1

0 CD ..-1

"'t"'"i II + > "'t"'"i

Z 0 0 0 H 0

I-C\J

« ..-1

l- II (f) :r:

- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. f f f .. f f .. .. f f f f .. .. .. .. .. f

- f .. .. .. t t f t f t t .. t t t f f f f t .. t .. .. t t tosH f

- t t t t t t f f f t t t t t t t t t t t t t .. t t tov~ t

-""""""'" '/ - f t t t t t f f f f .. t t t t (. ",t

- , , , , , , , , , + + , , , + r 1\,

~ - t .. t tttff .... tftt t

-""""""", ,t - t t t t t t t f f .. t t f t f tr

- t .. t t t t t f t t t t t t .... ~

_""""", t""~ """"""""1

- .. f t t .. t f t f t .. t t t t

- .. t .. .. .. t f f .. f t t t t t

- t t t fttttttt .. t t

-tttttttttttttt

I f t

- t t t t t t t t t f t t t t t t[

_tt .. tttftttttttttt

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,~

t t t t t t t t t tot~ +

+ + + + t t + t t +00~ +

+ + t + + t t t t + ost

t t t t t t t t t t Og t

t t t t t t t t t + Oil t

+ t + t t t t + t + Oe; t

+ t t t t t t t t t +0 +

+ + t t t t t t t t Oe;.!

t t + t t t t t t tOil.!

t t t t t t t t t tOg.!

t t t t t t t t t + OS.!

+ t t t t t t t t

t t + t t t + + + +ot~ .!

t t + t + t + t + tov~.!

+ t t + + t t + t +osH.!

+ t t t t + t + t tOg~.!

_ttttttttttttt t t + t + t t t + + t +

_ttttttttttttttttt t t t + t + t t +0 te; .!

_ttttttttttttttttt + + + + + + + + +0 Ve; .!

_ttttttttttttttttt + t + + + + t

- t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + + + t t +

_ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + + t + t +

-~d~d~d~d~d~d~d~d~ ~d~d~d~d ~~~.f C\JC\J.._1_oornrnrnrn~~~~~~~~~~C\JC\J--oo~~m ______ oooooooooooooooooooornrnrn ________ .._1.._1 _____ ~ _________ rnrnrn

00 0 0

o

o enrun + > ..,..-t

20 00 H O I-C\J

«I-II (J)I

- - t t t t t t t t t t

ttttttt+t+

tttt\ttt

t + t t + t + t

t t t t t t t t Ov~ t

t t t + t t + t 02~ ;

_ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t OO~ +

--tttttttttttttt+ t t t t t + t t t t oat t

- - t + t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t t t t t ogt f

t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t + t t t t t t Ovt f

t + t t t t t t t t t t t t + I,~ t t t t t + t t t t 02t +

__ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t ~\t t t t t t t t t toot •

- - t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t \t t t t t t t t t t tOil •

t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t , t t t t t t t t t t to~ t

_ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t [ t t t t t t t t t tOI7 +

_ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t ~ t t t t t t t t t to~ t

__ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t f f t t t t t t t t t to t

_ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t tit) t t t t t t t t t t o~ _ t

t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + J t t t t t t t t t t tOI7-+

t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t to~-

__ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t ~ t t t t t t t t t t to~-' _ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t ~I t t t t t t t t t toot _ t

_ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + J t t t t t + t t t t 02 t _ i

_ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t Ovt-+

tttttttttttttt+ t t t t t + t t t t Og t _ +

_ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t f t ~l t t t t t t t t t t ost _.

t t t t t [

~

t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t + t t t t

tttttttttttttttt t t t t t + t t t 02~_f

- - t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t \ t t t + t t

_ _ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t (~ t t t t t t t t Arg-i> + momomomomomomomom~momomomovG-C\J C\J ............ 0 0 m m CD CD f'.. f'..tO to mLIl «;J" ~ (T) (T) C\J C\J - - 0 0 mom __ ............ __ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <I> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m CD __ ............ _____________ ~I-< ___ - - - - - m m m

! ! ! ! I I I I I I Ir i I I I I I I I

0 0 0 0

0 ..-1

0 lD ..-1

(T) 1/ + > .....-i

Z 0 0 0 H 0

I-C\J

<t ..-1

I-" (f) I

-..................... ir,.~··· .. · .. ··· I 'I' · · t t • • • • t

I ., · · · · · • .. .. .. .. +I + • • .. • .. • .. .. •

t + t • + • + + + + + t t •

- . t + + + + + + t + + + t +

- + • + + + + + + + + + + + +

- + • + + + + + + + + + + + + 11·'········ - • + .. + .. + + + + • • • • + \'\,." ..... . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~\ : : : : : : : : : - • .. .. • .. .. + • • • + .. • • .. i\ ~ • • .. .. .. • • • .. _ . . . . . . . , , , , , , , , . \ ,\. , , , . , , . , - ........ + ........... rr - • .. • • + • • • • • • • • • • .. 't J •

+++·+++++ds+

+ + • + + + + t + d9.

_ .................................... • d~·

- • • • • + .. • • • • • .. • • • .. .. • • .. • .. • .. .. • • de •

_ • .. • • • .. • • • • .. .. • • • .. • • • • .. • .. .. • • • ·0"

_ • .. • • • • • • • • .. t • • • t + + + • t .. t t + t + de -t

_ t t t t • + • + + + t • t t • t ~ + t • • t • + • t t d~-t

-++.++.+++++ •• +.+ + + + + + + + + + + d9~

_ • • t t t t t t • + .. + • t • • + + + • + t • • • t • ds~

- • • • t • • t t • • • • • • • • + + • • • • • • • • ·0 d~ ~ _ + + + + + t t + t t + t + + + + + + + + + t • + t + to~~ ~

- + + t + + • + + + t t t t + t + + + t + + + + + + + +0!7~ ~

_ + + + t + + + + t t + + + + t + + t + + + t t + + t +Og~ ~

- + + + t + t t + + t + t + + + + + + + t + + + + + + +m:t~ ~

- + + + + + + + + + + + + + • • + + + + + + + + + • + +0 de ~

I I I I I I J I I I I I I ! I I Iii I I I

- t t t t • • t t t .. • • t t t t • • t t t • • t t tOEt2 t

l - t • • t • .. t t • • • • • • • • • • • • t • t +Og2 ..

- t • f • t • t t • • • • t .. /t • • • t + • t t t + +Otf2 t

- t f • • t f • • .. • t t .. t t • t • t • • t t • t tOc!2 f

- t f t f • f .. • • .. • f f + -f • .. • • • • • • • • tOd2 •

- • • t • • • f • .. • • • • + • • • • • • • • • • • toEtt •

- • t + • • t • • • • • • • t \. t • • • • • t • t t tOgt •

- • f • • t • • • t • • • • + · ,~ t • • • • • t f • t .Otft t

- t • f t t • t • t t • • • • • \: • • • • • t • • • tOc!t ..

- t • • t • • • • • • • • • t • • • • • • • • • • ·odt ..

0 0 0 0

0

- • f • • • • • .. t .. • t • • • t \. t • • t • t • • t • dB·

..-t

0 0 ..-t

"'T 1/ + > -.;-f

- t • t t t • .. t t t • t • t • t ~ .. • • t • t • t t .. d9"

- f t t t t t ft. t • • t + t • t t f t t • • t t t t dl7 f

z 0 0 0

1-1 0 C\J

I-

• t t. t • t .... d2t -f •• ttttttt.tt t ••

-ttttt ... tttt •• +t. t t • • • • • t • t to t

« ..-t

l- II U1 I

- t • + • • • + .. t • • • t t • t • • • • • t • • f • .. d21'

- • • + • t t t • t t t • t + • t • • • t • • • • • • .. dl71'

- •• ttt •••• t • t • + t t • • t t • • • • t t t d9 l'

-t ••• t •• ttt.tt+.t. • t • • • • • • t dB l'

-t ••• ttttt t •• t + ••• • t t • • • • t tOdt l'

- ••••••••• t ••• + ••• • .. • t • • • • to~t l'

- f • • • • • • t • • • • • + • • • t • t • • • t • • .Otft l'

- t • • • • • • t t t t • • + • • t + • • • • • • • • .o~tt l'

- t • • • • • • .. • t • • t + • t • • • • • • t • • • .oEtt l'

- t • • t • • • t • t • • • + • • • • • • • • • • • t tod21'

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0 0 0 0

0 -0 0 -to II + > "I"-i

Z 0 0 0

1-1 0 C\J

I-« -l- II (J) :r:

- - .. + + .. .. + .. + + .. .. .. + + • t • • • f • • f + • 02e:

- - + • • • • • • • • • + • • • • • + • f + .. • • + .. 00e:

- - + • • .. • • • + + • + • • • .. • • • f • f • • + + oa~

- - • • • • • • • + + • • + • + \ + • • f f • • .. • + .. 09~

- - • • • • • • • + + + t • • + • + f t t t t • .. + .. 017~

- - + • + • • • • + • • • • • ..

--.+ ••••• ++.++ ...

- - + + • + • • • t + • + • .. •

\

• • t + t t t t + + + 02~

+ + t + • • f + + + + OO~

\ + • • + • • + + + + .. oat

--+ ....... ++++f+. I · + • + f • • .. .. + + 09t

- - + + + • .. • + • t + + t • • + t + t • + • + + + t Ovt

- - + + + + + + .. .. + + + .. + + f f .. .. + + t • • • + • 02 t

- - • • + • + .. • .. .. + + .. .. .. .. .. • .. .. • • • .. .. .. + oot

- - + f .. • + • • • + + + • + • • + + + + f • + t ..

--+f •• + ••••• ++"·" .. + t t f • t • + t

- - • + + .. • • • + + • + • .. + f f .. • + .. .. + + + + .. +0'

_ - + + + • • • + • t • • • .. + • • • • • • • • .. • + + .o~

_ - • + • .. .. .. • + • • + • .. .. .. • .+.+ •• + .. ++0

_ _ • + • .. .. • + + + • • f .. .. + + + + • t t • • + + • o~-

--f++.+.+.++ •• "+ ••

- - • f + + .. .. + • • + • f .. .. .. .. t f • • • • • • + t OSl-

_ _ + + + • .. .. • • • • • • • .. • .. • • f • • • • •

- - . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. .. · · f.. · · · + 00 t-

- - • • t t + + • + t t • • t + + t • + • • • • • t t + 02 t-

- - t ••••••••••• t ••••• f •••• • • + 017t-

- - • • • • • t • • • • • • • .. • • • t • • • t • • • • 09 t -o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o

- -~NN99QQmmmmNN~~~~ _______ oooooooooo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

O~O~O~OLDO "lt~~NN99QQrll'l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ciiltm U1

....... ------ ........ -0101

0 a 0 a

a ....-1

0 0 ....-1

,...... II

+ > "!:""i

Z a 0 a H a I-

ru

« .......

l- II U1 I

- - + + + + + t t + t + + + + t + + + + t t + t + + + + dvt:'

--+++tttttt+++++

+ + t + t t t t + + t + + +

- - t + + + + + + + + + + + + +

_ - + + + + + + + + + + + + t t

- - t t t t t + t t t + + + + +

- - + t + t + + t + + + + + t +

- - t + + + + + t t + + t + + +

+ + + + + + + t + + + det:'

t + t + t + + t t t t dot:'

I t + + t + + + + t t + o'8c!

. t t t t t t t + + + + (jgC!

t t t t t t t t + + t

t t + t t t t + + t t dec!

\ t t t + t t + + + t t doc!

+ + + + t + + t + + + o'8v

I + + + + + + + + + + + 0'91'

I + + t t t t t + + + + dv~t tl+ + t + t t t t + t t DBV

_ _ + + + + + + + + + t + + + + t -+ t t + + + + + + + + dov

- - + + + t + + + + + + + + + +

- - + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

- - + + + + + + t + t + + + + +

- - + + + t + + t + + t t t t +

_ _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t t + t + + + + + + + t uEt

t + + + + + + + + + + + t + + t t t t t t t + t + Ug

_ _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + t + + + + + + + t utf

_ _ + + + + + t + + + + + + + + t + t + + + + + + + + t uc!

- - + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + ct

- - + t t + t t t t t t + t t t + t t t t t t t t t t uc!-

- - t + t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t t t t t utf-

- - + + t + t + t t t t + + + t + t t t t t t t t t t Ug-

- - t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t t t t t uEt-

- - t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t + t t t t t t t t doV-

t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t o~ ~+_

- - t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t + + + + + + + + + oir V-

- - a l.f} a l.f} a l.f} a l.f} a l.f} a l.f} a l.f} a l.f} a a l.f} a l.f} a l.f} a l.f} rAh r+_ ~ruru .............. oommww~~~~mm~~~~ruru .............. o~ ................................................. oooooooooooooooooooom ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m

0 0 0 0

0 ...... 0 0 ...... CO II + > -.:-t

Z 0 0 0

H 0 C\J

I-« .......

l- n U1 I

_ _ • • • • • • • • • •••• t t t t • t t t t t t t tO~E.

_ _ t t t t t + t t + t + t • + t t t t + t t t t t .. to.E t

__ t t t + t t t + + .. + t .. t t t .. + t t + .. t t t tO~Et

- - + t t t t t • • t • t t t t t t • t • • + t t t ·OOE·

- - + t .. .. t t t + t .. + t t t j t + • + • • + + • + +Oe2·

- - t + + t t t t t + + + t + + I • t t t t + t t t t +0~2t

__ + + t t t t t t t t • t t t ." t + + + •• t t t t +0.2+

- - • t t t + t + t • • t • t + • t • • + • • + + + tO~2t

--tttt •• t+.ttttt 1 t t • • t • t t t t tOO2·

--tttttt.ttt+ttt

\ + + + + + + + t + + toet+

- - + t t t t t + + + + + t t t

--t+t+t+++++++++ r

+ + + + + + + + + t +o~tt

t t + + + + + t t + +o.t+

- - + t t + + + + + + + + + + + \ + t + + • + • + + t + o~ t·

- - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t I t t + • • + + + t + tOOtt

- - + + + + + + + + + + + + t t

--t+tttt+++tt+t+

+

I: t + • + + + • + • + os·

+ t • t + + + • • t + Og+

- - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + • • + + t + + +

- - + t t + • • • t • • • • • • t t + t t t + + t + t 02t

- - + + + + + + + + + + + t + t + t + + + + + + t + + + +0+

- - + + + + + + + t t t t + + + + + + + t + + + t + + + 02t.

- - + + + + + + + + + + + t + + t t + + + + + + t + t + ovt.

_ _ + + + t t t t + t + + + t t .. t • t • • • • + t • Ogt.

- - + • • + • + • + + + + + • • .. • + • • + t t t • • ost.

• • t t t t + + + t t t t t t + + •• t • t • t +oo~t.

_ _ + • t • • • • + + • + • • • t • • • • • + • t • t • o~ t t.

__ + • t • t + • + ••• t ..... t •• + + t t t t tn5.tt. o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~~ ~ruru .............. oommroro~~~~~~~~~~ruru .............. oo~ ................................................. oooooooooooooooooooom .................................................................................................. ~ ...................................................................... - ....... m

Documents

Evaluation of Gravel Deposits...• effect of gravel mining on the future development of the lands. Each of these factors, which in part determine the value of a gravel deposit, is