3
EVALUATION OF MY FRONT COVER AND CONTENTS P A GE (PEER ASSESSMENT)

Evaluation of My Front Cover and Contents Page

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluation of My Front Cover and Contents Page

7/17/2019 Evaluation of My Front Cover and Contents Page

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-my-front-cover-and-contents-page 1/3

EVALUATION OF MY

FRONT COVER AND

CONTENTS PAGE

(PEER ASSESSMENT)

Page 2: Evaluation of My Front Cover and Contents Page

7/17/2019 Evaluation of My Front Cover and Contents Page

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-my-front-cover-and-contents-page 2/3

PEER ASSESSED:

Positives:

They liked the photograph as it leads the

audience’s eye around the page. The

masthead was effective as it looks

professional and captures my audience’s

attention.

Improvements:

Some have suggested fewer cover lines as

people may not take very long to read all of

it and might just flick over it. Also they havesuggest to have a more consistent font

which therefore enales my maga!ine to

have an identity.

Front Cover:

Page 3: Evaluation of My Front Cover and Contents Page

7/17/2019 Evaluation of My Front Cover and Contents Page

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/evaluation-of-my-front-cover-and-contents-page 3/3

PEER ASSESSED

Positives:

The "ritten code: drop caps was effectiveas it makes the categories right# clear and

eye catching to my target audience. Also it

helps to distinguish the different areas of

the page. Another point is that it includes a

lot of information and therefore makes it

worthwhile paying for it.

Improvements:

$y target audience have suggest having a

ackground to make it more striking to mytarget audience. A technical code which

they have suggested is that I hide the

outlines of the o%es which will therefore

make it more professional and at a higher

&uality.

Contents Page: