12
Experimental Investigation of Self-Centering Steel Plate Shear Walls Patricia M. Clayton 1 , Daniel M. Dowden 2 , Tyler Winkley 3 , Jeffrey W. Berman 4 , Michel Bruneau 5 , Laura N. Lowes 6 1 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; Email: [email protected] 2 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260; Email: [email protected] 3 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; Email: [email protected] 4 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; PH: (206)616-3530; E-mail: [email protected] 5 Professor, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260; PH: (716) 645-3398; Email: [email protected] 6 Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; PH: (206)685-2563; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A self-centering steel plate shear wall (SC-SPSW) system has been developed to achieve enhanced performance objectives following earthquakes, including recentering. The SC-SPSW consists of thin steel infill web panels as the primary lateral load resistance and energy dissipation of the system providing a high initial stiffness, where the moment resisting connections of conventional SPSW construction are replaced with post-tensioned (PT) beam-to-column connections that allow the beam to rock about its flanges to provide system recentering. The system and component behavior of SC-SPSWs have been investigated experimentally through a series of quasi-static and shake table tests. Quasi-static subassembly tests at the University of Washington have been conducted to study the effects of various design parameters on overall cyclic response and component demands. The University at Buffalo experiments focus on third-scale 3-story SC- SPSWs subjected to quasi-static and shake table testing to investigate system behavior. These experiments consider three different PT rocking connection details: 1) connections that rock about the beam flanges, 2) connections that rock about the beam centerline, and 3) an innovative NewZ-BREAKSS connection that rocks about the top beam flange only. The latter two PT connections have been proposed as methods to essentially eliminate floor system damage due to frame expansion that occurs with typical PT connections where the beams rock about their flanges. 1586 Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

Experimental Investigation of Self-Centering Steel Plate Shear Walls

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Experimental Investigation of Self-Centering Steel Plate Shear Walls

Patricia M. Clayton1, Daniel M. Dowden2, Tyler Winkley3, Jeffrey W. Berman4, Michel Bruneau5, Laura N. Lowes6

1 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; Email: [email protected] 2 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260; Email: [email protected] 3Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; Email: [email protected] 4Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; PH: (206)616-3530; E-mail: [email protected] 5Professor, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260; PH: (716) 645-3398; Email: [email protected] 6Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; PH: (206)685-2563; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT

A self-centering steel plate shear wall (SC-SPSW) system has been developed to achieve enhanced performance objectives following earthquakes, including recentering. The SC-SPSW consists of thin steel infill web panels as the primary lateral load resistance and energy dissipation of the system providing a high initial stiffness, where the moment resisting connections of conventional SPSW construction are replaced with post-tensioned (PT) beam-to-column connections that allow the beam to rock about its flanges to provide system recentering.

The system and component behavior of SC-SPSWs have been investigated experimentally through a series of quasi-static and shake table tests. Quasi-static subassembly tests at the University of Washington have been conducted to study the effects of various design parameters on overall cyclic response and component demands. The University at Buffalo experiments focus on third-scale 3-story SC-SPSWs subjected to quasi-static and shake table testing to investigate system behavior. These experiments consider three different PT rocking connection details: 1) connections that rock about the beam flanges, 2) connections that rock about the beam centerline, and 3) an innovative NewZ-BREAKSS connection that rocks about the top beam flange only. The latter two PT connections have been proposed as methods to essentially eliminate floor system damage due to frame expansion that occurs with typical PT connections where the beams rock about their flanges.

1586Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

INTStesteesignwebyielunlcenwal

A ncombeatenconandverPT ultifoll

SCIn t

prc

nedes

TRODUCTel plate sheel infill platenificant strenb plates prolding in the oaded after

ntering technll to essentia

new self-cenmbining steeam-to-columsioning in t

nnection rotad with proprtical bounda

elongation pimately redulowing an ea

-SPSW BEHthis researchrovide the re

connection tyew system, ascribed by su

Figure 1. Sconnec

TION ar walls (SPes, referred tngth and stifovide energydirection of yielding m

nologies, sucally zero disp

ntering SPSel web plate

mn connectiothe connectiates relative er detailing

ary elementsprovides the

uces the costarthquake.

HAVIOR h, three differecentering caype is discusa simple appruperimposin

chematics oction in its (

PSWs) are lto as web plffness througy dissipationf the tension

makes the SPch that smalplacement af

SW (SC-SPSes with a stons (Dowdenions is desito the colum the beams

s (HBEs ande restoring fots of repair a

rent PT HBEapabilities ofssed below. Froximation o

ng the respon

of (a) SC-SP(b) undeform

lateral forcelates, withingh the develn and substafield. The lo

PSW systemller restoringfter a seismic

SW) systemteel boundarn et at. 2012igned to remmn during la and colum

d VBEs), resporces necessand provides

E-to-VBE cof the SC-SPSFor purposesof the cyclicnse of the tw

PSW and flamed and (c)

e resisting syn a steel bouopment of teantial ductilow stiffness

m ideal for bg forces arec event.

m (Fig. 1) hry frame wi2, Clayton emain elasticateral drift ofmns, referred

pectively, resary to recens a more rap

onnections aSW system. s of general

c behavior ofwo key comp

ange rockin) deformed

ystems that undary frameension field lity through of thin web

being pairede required to

has been deith post-tenset al. 2012)

c and elongf the buildind to as horemain undamnter the buildpid return to

are being invThe behaviounderstandi

f the SC-SPSonents of th

ng PT HBE-

configurati

utilize thin e to provide action. The distributed

plate when d with self-o return the

veloped by sioned (PT) ). The post-gates as the ng (Fig. 1c), izontal and

maged. This ding, which

o occupancy

vestigated to or of each ng of this SW can be e system—

to-VBE on.

1587Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

the pincomsecelasflag

PTThein Fwita ggaprotaconnon

As apacarediapdiapresuChr

In framTheconNotthe Sindecelassho

Fig

web plates ched, tensio

mplex than tions with rstic cyclic rg-shaped hys

HBE-to-VBe conventionFig. 1c. Durh a stiffnessap forms in

p opens andational stiffnnnection retunlinear elasti

a gap formsart, a phenomeful detailinphragm sysphragm detault in very ristopoulos 2

this researchme expansioe first of thnnection, thete that the Pnet elongat

nce the gap icompression stic and doe

own in Fig. 2

gure 2. Idea

and the PTon-only cycl

this idealizrespect to Sresponse of steresis (Fig

BE Connectnal PT connering lateral s equivalent t

the connectd the PT strness. If theurns along tic response s

s in the flangmenon referng, this framtem. Additiailing, the rlarge axial

2008).

h, two new on while stillese proposee HBE-to-VBPT strands mtion of the Pin the conneas with the

s not fully re2b.

alized cyclic

T boundary flic response zation, and SC-SPSW exthe PT fram. 2c) that is c

tions ection as sholoading, theto that of a ftion, referredrands elong PT connecthe same bishown for th

ge rocking Prred to as fra

me expansiononally, if frrestraint to

demands o

PT connecl maintaining

ed connectioBE joint roc

must be termPT needed tection is pre flange rockelax, the con

c behavior o

frame (Fig. (Fig. 2a); a

these key dxperimental

me (Fig. 2b)characteristi

own in Fig. 1e moment defully weldedd to as the date, the conction and itlinear path

he flange roc

T connectioame expansin can result frame expancolumns sp

on the HBE

ction details g the recente

ons is showncks about a

minated alongto generate sent in its in

king PT connnnection resp

of (a) web pl

2). The ideactual web differences results. Th

), discussed ic of self-cen

1b rocks aboemand in th

d moment-redecompressionnection rests componenduring unloking PT fram

n, the columion (Garlockin significa

nsion is not preading proE (Garlock

have been ering capabin schematic

pin at the g the length recentering

nitial confignection, as lponds in a li

late, (b) PT

ealized web plate behavare discuss

his is couplebelow, to p

ntering syste

out its flangehe connectioesisting connon moment, sponds withnts remain oading, resume in Fig. 2b

mns are forcek et al. 2007

ant damage taccommod

ovided by thet al. 2007

proposed tilities of the ally in Fig. centerline oof the HBEforces wou

guration and long as the inear, elastic

frame, (c) S

plate has a ior is more

sed in later ed with the produce the ems.

es as shown on increases nection until

Md. As the h a reduced

elastic, the lting in the b.

ed to spread 7). Without to the floor

dated in the he slab can 7, Kim and

o eliminate SC-SPSW. 3a. In this

of the HBE. E, otherwise uld be zero.

there is no PT remains c manner as

SC-SPSW.

1588Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

F

SimNewis srocthualonelemcon

UN

LarWabettintevaliutil

Tes

A ssetuHBpossubheig

Frarollimpits bVBleve

Figure 3. (a)

milarly, a new Zealand hschematicallks about thes mitigatingng the lengtments remainnection, this

NIVERSITY

rge-scale SCashington. Thter understaeraction of tidate numerlized the flan

st Setup

schematic ofup was used

BE in Fig. 4)st-tensioningbassembly mghts (HBE c

ame expansioler under thposing additbase. For sim

BE connectioels were sim

) Centerline

w connectiohas been proply shown ine top flangesg damage to th of the HBin elastic ans results in a

Y OF WASH

C-SPSW suhe purpose

anding of Sthe PT and rical modelinnge rocking P

f the test sed to simulate), where the g in the HBEmeasures 32centerline dim

on, discussehe left VBtional comprmilar purposons, such th

milar to the m

e rocking co

on inspired bposed, referr

n Fig. 3b (Ds of the HBEthe floor sl

BE in ordernd do not fua linear elasti

HINGTON E

ubassemblieof the SC-S

SC-SPSW cyweb plate f

ng methods.PT connecti

tup is showthe boundarweb plates

E due to pu235 mm wimensions) o

d earlier, waE, allowingressive forceses, the top ahat the gap middle HBE.

nnection, (b

by moment-red to as the Dowden andE and also slab. Again, tr to generateully relax, thic PT frame

EXPERIME

es have beSPSW subasyclic behavforces acting. All of the on detail (Fi

wn in Fig. 4ary conditionabove and b

ull-in of the ide (centerlf 1724 mm.

as accommog the framees on the miand bottom aopening, an

b) NewZ-BR

-resisting conNewZ-BRE

d Bruneau 2seeks to elimthe PT strane PT recenthen as with response as

ENTAL TE

een tested ssembly testior, to captg on an intespecimens i

ig. 1b) as de

a. The 2-stons for an intebelow the H

VBEs (PHBline VBE d

odated in thee to expandiddle HBE danchor HBE

nd thus the

REAKSS co

nnections deEAKSS conn2011). This minate framends must betering forcesh the centerl shown in Fi

ESTING at the Un

t program wture the effermediate Hin this phasscribed prev

ry configuraermediate HB

HBE induce aBE(VBE)). Thedimension),

e physical md horizontaldue to VBE Es also had Pbeam growt

onnection.

eveloped in nection, and

connection e expansion terminated

s. If the PT ine rocking ig. 2b.

niversity of was to get a fects of the

HBE, and to e of testing

viously.

ation of the BE (middle an effective

e SC-SPSW with story

model with a lly without restraint at

PT HBE-to-th, at these

f

1589Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

Shesheconagadecloca

ThedurmmTheMPrespboufishrepwelaffe(20

Spe

ThePT the confollfollAllexccon

(a) Sche

ear forces aear tab connennection rotaainst local dacompressionalized dama

e boundary fring testing sm diameter Ge web platesPa and 240 pectively. Inundary elemhplate connelaced followlded web plaects specime

011).

ecimen Desc

e test prograforce at eaceffects of

nvention for lowed by thlowed by the specimens

ception of Spnnection as in

matic of tes

Figure 4.t the PT HBections. Lonation. The Hamage due t. Also, cornge in the pla

frame elemeso that they Grade 270 se were of ASMPa for th

n all but onements via a ection allowwing each teate-to-fish pen behavior.

criptions

am (Table 1)ch HBE, To,

web plate the test spe

he initial tote web plate s utilized thpecimen 8s1ndicated by

st setup

. UW SC-SPBE-to-VBE

ng slotted boHBE flangesto the large ner cutouts ate as a gap f

nts were of Acould be reueven-wire st

STM A1008he 20 and 1e of the spe

bolted fishwed for the y

est. One spplate connect Further det

) included vaand numberand PT co

ecimens is thtal PT forcegage thicknhe bolted

10k20GaW, the “W” add

(b)

PSW subassconnections

lt holes wers at the conncompressivewere provi

forms in the

A992 steel aused for multrand with resteel with yi16 gage placimens, the hplate connyielded webecimen wastion to comptails on the t

ariations in tr of PT strannnection strhe number oe at each HBness or thicknweb plate-twhich utiliz

ded to the sp

) Specimen

sembly test s were tran

re used in thnections were forces actided in the connection.

and were desltiple tests. Teusable barrield strengthates (0.92mm

web platesnection. Theb plates to bs tested withpare how thtest setup ca

the web platnds in each crength and of PT strandBE in units

knesses (e.g. to-fishplate zed a weldedpecimen nam

before testi

setup sferred thro

he shear tab tre reinforceding on the flweb plates

signed to remThe PT stranrel anchors ahs of approxim and 1.52were conne

e bolted webe easily reh a more co

he web plate an be found

te thicknesseconnection, Nstiffness. T

ds per HBE of kips (e.“16Ga"), if connection

d web plate-me.

ng

ough slotted to allow for d to protect

flanges after to prevent

main elastic nds were 13 at each end. imately 180

2mm thick), ected to the eb plate-to-emoved and onventional connection in Winkley

es, tw, initial Ns, to study

The naming (e.g. “8s"), g. “100k"),

f applicable.n, with the -to-fishplate

1590Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

Table 1. SC-SPSW subassembly specimens

Specimen Name Ns To

(kN) tw(mm) Web plate-to-fish

plate conn. type Load

protocol 1st story 2nd story 8s100k 8 445 -- -- Bolted LP-BF 6s75k 6 334 -- -- Bolted LP-BF

8s100k20Ga 8 445 0.92 0.92 Bolted LP1 8s100k16Ga 8 445 1.52 1.52 Bolted LP1 6s75k20Ga 6 334 0.92 0.92 Bolted LP1 6s75k16Ga 6 334 1.52 1.52 Bolted LP1

8s100k20Ga-2 8 445 0.92 0.92 Bolted LP2 8s100k16Ga20Ga 8 445 1.52 0.92 Bolted LP2

8s100k20GaW 8 445 0.92 0.92 Welded LP2

Instrumentation and Displacement History Instrumentation was installed on the specimen to measure applied loads, global displacements, gap rotations, PT forces, and HBE and VBE strains. The cyclic displacement history for the tests (LP1) were a modification of ATC-24 (ATC 1992), similar to the history used in previous SPSW experiments by Vian et al. (2009). An alternate load protocol (LP2) was used for some of the later tests, as indicated in Table 1. This load protocol had fewer cycles at small drift levels. Since the specimens without web plates (8s100k and 6s75k) were expected to remain elastic during the entire test, a simplified load protocol (LP-BF) was used consisting of two cycles each at target peak drifts of 0.5%, 1%, and 2% and one cycle at 3% drift.

Experimental Results and Observations

Comparison of web plate thicknesses

As shown in Fig. 5, for specimens with the same number of PT strands and initial PT force, an increase in web plate thickness results in a proportional increase in specimen strength and energy dissipation as expected. When comparing the unloading portion of the hysteretic responses shown in Fig. 5, specimens with web plates (6s75k20Ga and 6s75k16Ga) have additional hysteresis below the unloading portion of the bare PT frame (6s75k) response. This additional hysteresis suggests that the web plate has some compressive strength that is not accounted for in the idealized tension-only behavior assumed in Fig. 2. This compressive strength increases as the web plate thickness increases, ranging from 10-20% of the web plate tension field strength (Clayton et al. 2011). Further research is being done to understand and better quantify this characteristic of web plate behavior. This additional hysteresis in the web plate during unloading also provides some resistance to recentering as suggested by the increase in residual drift at zero-load as the web plate thickness increases; however, with the exception of the negative loading direction of Specimen 6s75k16Ga, the specimen with the thickest web plates and lowest PT connection strength and stiffness, all test specimens were able to recenter with residual drifts less than 0.2% at zero-load (Clayton et al. 2011).

1591Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

Com

Figplatexpprodue(Cl

Com

Theconat tbetwbucdurwebof tthe of ta loearldemwel

Figure 5. C

mparison of

g. 6 shows ate thickness

pected, an inoportional ine to the incayton et al. 2

mparison of

e typical fannections wathe bottom ween 2.5 tockling of thering cyclic lob plate-to-fisthe VBEs inweld near th

the heat affeower strengtlier onset o

mands; howelded specime

Figu

Comparison

f PT connecti

a comparisonses but diffncrease in thncrease in thcrease in ro2011, 2012)

f web plate-to

ailure modeas tearing ofof the first o 3% drift. e web plate oading. Howshplate connn both storiehe rocking Pcted zone ofth capacity, f strength dever, due toen did have

ure 6. Comp

n of specime

ion designs

n of the resferent numbhe total croshe recenterinotational sti.

o-fishplate c

e of specimf the web pla

story (Fig. This tearin

at this locatwever, at thenection had tes (Fig. 7b). PT HBE-to-Vf the weld. Tapproximate

degradation o the slowera larger drift

parison of sp

ens with dif

sponses of tber of PT ss-sectional ng stiffness oiffness of th

connection ty

mens with ate along the7a). Tearin

ng is believtion as the te end of testtearing of thInitial tearin

VBE connecThe welded sely 85% of due to the r propagatioft ductility.

pecimens wi

fferent web

two specimestrands andarea of the of the specihe decompr

ypes

the bolted e entire leng

ng was typicved to be dutension fieldting, the spehe web plateng was first

ction and tearspecimen (8sthe bolted sinitiation of

on of tearing

ith different

plate thickn

ens with thed initial PTPT strands

imen duringressed PT c

web plate-gth of the clcally initiall

due to the od formed andecimen with e along the et observed aring propagas100k20GaWspecimen caf tearing at g along the

t PT design

nesses.

e same web T force. As

results in a g unloading, connections

-to-fishplate lamping bar ly observed out-of-plane d re-formed the welded

entire length at the toe of ated outside W) did have apacity, and

lower drift HBEs, the

ns

f

1592Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

FigHB

Com

AnaOpeandsprimatAISmatmatas moof t

Figthe mat2%tenandresemet

AlsspealteFurdurrelaexp

gure 7. WebBE at 4% d

mparison wi

alytical nonenSees (Maz

d the rockining elementsterial was m

SC Design Gterial couplterial with asuggested bdeled to havthe actual we

g. 8 shows coOpenSees (

terials. The % drift dema

sion-and-comd reloading pearch is beinthods of mod

so both Openecimen. Thisernating direrther researcring cyclic, atively simpperimental re

(a) b plate tearirift and (b)

ith analytica

nlinear finitezzoni et al. 2g PT connes as describe

modeled usinGuide 20 (Sled in paraa compressivby the expeve a backboneb plate mat

omparison o(OS) modelsOpenSees m

ands for purmpression stpath of the eng done to bdeling this p

nSees mode is believed ections of thch is also be

bi-directionple OpenSeesponse.

ing along (awelded web

al models

e element m2006). The wections wereed in Claytonng the idealizSabelli and Ballel with ave strength erimental resne curve thaerial.

f the experims using the t

models shownrposes of cotrip materialexperimentabetter quant

phenomenon

els underestimto be due to he tension-fing done to

nal yieldingees analytic

a) bolted web plate conn

models of thweb plates we modeled un et al. (201zed tension-Bruneau 200an elastic-peequivalent tosults. Both at matched t

mental respoension-only n here were

omparison. Tl appears to al hysteresistify this comn.

mate the ultstrain harde

field during account forof the plate

cal models

eb plate connections alo

he test specwere modeledusing a serie2). The cycl

-only behavi07), and alserfectly plao 25% of thestrip materi

the monoton

onse of Specand tensiononly subjec

The OpenSemore closel

. As previoumpressive co

timate strengening of the w

cyclic loadr this accumue in the str

match we

(b)nection of t

ong VBEs at

imens wered using the ses of comprlic behavior ior, as suggeso using a testic, compr

e tension yieials in Open

nic tension c

cimen 8s100kn-and-comprcted to cycleees model uly match theusly mentionontribution a

gth of the exweb plate as

ding in bothmulation of prip model. Oell with the

the bottom t 5% drift.

e created in trip method

ression-only of the strip

ested by the ension-only ression-only eld strength, nSees were

coupon tests

k16Ga with ression strip s at 1% and

utilizing the e unloading ned, further and develop

xperimental s it yields in

h directions. lastic strain

Overall, the e observed

1593Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

UNExpcurof Stestconof curspeemppre

(

TherespGAbou

NIVERSITYperimental trrently underSC-SPSWs. ting to invesnfigurations an SC-SPSW

rrent level oecimen and sploy the pviously desc

(a) Test Fra

e test specimpectively an

A (ASTM A1undary fram

Figure 8. COpe

Y AT BUFFAtesting of orway at the U The full exptigate SC-SPnoted earlieW system wof test compsetup is showproposed ccribed to elim

ame Before

men consists nd W6x25 V1008) at lev

me. Connect

Comparison enSees anal

ALO EXPEone-third scaUniversity atperimental pPSW system

er. This papwith rockingpletion at thwn in Fig. 9centerline rminate frame

WhitewashFigure 9. U

of a W8x18VBEs. Infill

el 3, 2, 1 restion to the s

of experimlytical mode

ERIMENTAale single-bt Buffalo to program con

m performancer presents pg about the he time of . Future testrocking ande expansion.

h UB Test Spe

8, W8x15, Wl plate thicknspectively wstrong floor

mental respoel response.

AL TESTINbay three-stoinvestigate t

nsists of quasce with threepreliminary HBE flangthis paper

ting will be dd NewZ-BR.

(b) Teecimen

W8x18 (Gradness consist

welded to steis provided

nse and

NG ory test spethe system psi-static and e different roquasi-static

ges; which submission

done on speREAKSS c

est Set-Up

de A572) at lt of 26 GA, eel fish plated by steel cl

ecimens are performance shake-table

ocking joint test results reflects the . The test

ecimens thatconnections

level 3, 2, 1 24 GA, 22

es along the levis & pin

1594Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

connection at the base of the VBEs to allow free rotation and a W6x20 HBE anchor beam bolted to the foundation plate. PT monostrands consisting of 13 mm (1/2 in.) diameter 1860 MPa (270 ksi) strands are provided at mid-depth of the HBE, one each side of the HBE web with an initial PT force of approximately 20% of the yield strength of the PT strands. The dimensions of the test specimen consist of HBE clear spans of 2134 mm (84 in.), level 1 HBE height of 1191 mm (46.875 in.) from centerline of foundation clevis connection and floor-to-floor HBE heights of 1289 mm (50.75 in.) at level 2 and 3. The test setup consists of (3) MTS 244.51 actuators one at each floor level and the use of a self-supporting gravity frame system (GFS) developed at UB that provides no in-plane resistance but provides out-of-plane stiffness to brace the test specimen. A displacement control loading based on a modified ATC 24 loading protocol was used up to 4% drift.

UB Experimental Preliminary Test Results Instrumentation was provided to record the response at strategic locations to monitor global and local responses. For the experimental results presented, string pots were provided at each floor level of the GFS to determine displacements. Load cells were provided at the PT anchorage locations to monitor PT forces. Actuator forces were recorded from the actuator load cells.

Figure 10. Experimental Results: (a) base shear and (b) PT force vs. displacement

From the hysteresis shown in Fig. 10a it observed that self-centering response is achieved. Separation of the infill plate from the boundary frame occurs at around 2% drift as indicated by the reduction of base shear capacity. With the exception of the negative stiffness of the experimental results and the compressive strength of the web plate at zero displacement noted earlier, the comparison to SAP2000 (using an idealized tension-only hysteretic model for the web plates) is comparable. Note that the negative stiffness observed is a consequence of the displacement shape imposed to the specimen, which has lead to undesirable actuator interaction across the stories. A forced controlled testing protocol will be used for the subsequent tests to eliminate this artifact. From observation of the PT force response (Fig. 10b), the PT strands remain elastic. Some PT force loss is observed which is attributed to anchor seating and strand relaxation. A typical test panel after testing is shown below in Fig. 11b.

Top Story Displacement (mm)

Top Story Drift (%)

Bas

e Sh

ear

(kN

)

Hysteresis

-200 -120 -40 40 120 200

-4.5 -3 -1.5 0 1.5 3 4.5

-250

-150

-50

50

150

250

-200 -120 -40 40 120 200

-4.5 -3 -1.5 0 1.5 3 4.5

-250

-150

-50

50

150

250Bare Frame TestSAP2000

Interstory Displacement (mm)

Forc

e (k

N)

PT Force Response

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 8040

60

80

100

120

140

160

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 8040

60

80

100

120

140

160

Level 3Level 2Level 1

1595Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

Thediff

COThedamstifcurthe testexpcapby conby test

AC

Finparawadonconand

RECla

e remainderferent PT co

(a) B

ONCLUSIOe SC-SPSWmage and rffness, energrrently being

University ts at the Uniperiments wpable of rece

principles onnection deta

typical PT ted experime

CKNOWLE

nancial support of the Geoard number nations fromnclusions, and do not nece

EFERENCEayton, P.M.,

InvestigatioEngineering

r of the quannection typ

Before TestFigure 1

NS W is a lateral

repair costs gy dissipatiog investigateof Washingtiversity at Bere presente

entering and of mechanicails have beconnections

entally in fut

DGEMENT

ort for this sorge E. BrowCMMI-0830

m the Americnd recommeessarily refle

ES Winkley, T

on of Self-Cg, ASCE, (ac

asi-static phpes is anticip

ting 1. Level 2 N

force resistfollowing

on, and receed experimenton and third

Buffalo. Theed. The exphas cyclic b

cs and finiteen proposeds rocking abture tests at t

TS

study was prwn Network0294. The aucan Institute endations preect the views

T.B., BermanCentering Stccepted Octo

hase and thepated to be fi

North Eleva

ting system earthquakes

entering capantally througd-scale three

e test programperimental rebehavior thae element md to eliminatbout their flthe Universi

rovided by tk for Earthquuthors wouldof Steel Co

esented in ts of the spon

n, J.W., and teel Plate Shober 2011).

e shake-tabinished by su

(b) 4ation Infill P

that has bees by providabilities. Thgh large-scae-story quas

am and preliesults show

at matches wmodels. Furtte floor slab

flanges. Theity at Buffalo

the National uake Engined also like to

onstruction. Athis paper arnsors.

Lowes, L.Nhear Walls,”

le phase foummer 2012

4% Drift Panel

en developeding adequahe SC-SPSWale subassemsi-static and iminary resu

w that the SCwell with thathermore, tw

b damage thase new detao.

Science Foeering Simulo acknowledAny opinionre those of

N. (2011)“Ex” Journal of

or the three 2.

d to reduce ate strength W system is mbly tests at

shake table ults of these C-SPSW is at suggested wo new PT at is caused ails will be

undation as lation under dge material ns, findings, the authors

xperimental f Structural

1596Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012

Clayton, P.M., Berman, J.W., and Lowes, L.N. (2012) “Performance Based Design and Seismic Evaluation of Self-Centering Steel Plate Shear Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, January 2012.

Dowden, D., Bruneau, M., (2011) “NewZ-BREAKSS: Post-tensioned Rocking Connection Detail Free of Beam Growth.” AISC Engineering Journal, 153-158, Second Quarter 2011.

Dowden, D. M., Purba, R., and Bruneau, M. (2012) “Behavior of Self-Centering Steel Plate Shear Walls and Design Considerations.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, January 2012.

Garlock, M. M., Sause, R., and Ricles, J. M. (2007) “Behavior and Design of Posttensioned Steel Frame Systems.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 133(3), 389–399, March 2007.

Kim, H.-J. and Christopoulos, C. (2008). “Seismic design procedure and seismic response of post-tensioned self-centering steel frames.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38, 355–376.

Mazzoni S., McKenna F., Scott M.H., Fenves G.L. (2006) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual – OpenSees Version 1.7.3. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.

Sabelli, R. and Bruneau, M. (2007). Design Guide 20: Steel Plate Shear Walls. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.

Winkley, T. B. (2011). “Self-centering steel plate shear walls: Large scale experimental investigation.” Master’s thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

1597Structures Congress 2012 © ASCE 2012