Upload
brian-leonard
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
F2009
TRADE SECRET SEGMENT
PROF. JANICKEJUNE 2008
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 2
SOURCES OF LAW
• 45 STATES: UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT
• TEXAS: COURT-BUILT DOCTRINES AROUND REST. OF TORTS (1ST – 1939)
• FEDERAL: GOVERNMENT CIVIL ACTIONS AND CRIM. PROCEEDINGS – ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE ACT (1997)
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 3
WHAT IS A “TRADE SECRET”
• (1) ANY COMPETITIVELY VALUABLE INFORMATION
• (2) THAT’S NOT WIDELY KNOWN OR EASILY FOUND OUT
• (3) THAT THE POSSESSOR HAS TAKEN REASONABLE STEPS TO KEEP FROM DISCLOSURE
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 4
EXAMPLES
• MFG. METHODS
• MFG. MATERIALS
• BUSINESS PLANS
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 5
• USE, OR EVEN PLANNED USE, IN POSSESSOR’S BUSINESS IS NOT NEEDED
• SECRECY OF INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS OR STEPS IS NOT NEEDED
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 6
THE PROBLEM OF CUSTOMER LISTS
• HAS CAUSED A CASE LAW QUAGMIRE
• OFTEN ARE EASILY LEARNED BY RIGHTFUL MEANS; HENCE NOT A “TRADE SECRET”
• CAN BECOME A SECRET BY ADDING PURCHASE DATA, PLANS, ETC.
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 7
HARD-TO-GET REQUIREMENT
• LIBERALLY CONSTRUED TO HELP TRADE SECRET OWNER
• EXAMPLE: OBSCURE PUBLICATION OR SUPPLIER
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 8
REASONABLE-MEASURES-FOR-SECRECY
REQUIREMENTTYPICAL:
• EMPLOYEE AGREEMENTS
• MARKING DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS “CONFIDENTIAL”
• CIRCULATING WRITTEN POLICY
• POSTING WRITTEN POLICY
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 9
TYPICAL (CONT’D):
• LIMIT TYPES OF EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE ACCESS
• LIMIT ACCESS TO PROJECT MEMBERS
• EXIT INTERVIEWS
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 10
• PROTECTIVE MEASURES CAN BE BY IMPLICATION RATHER THAN EXPRESS, BUT RISKY TO LITIGATE
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 11
OWNERSHIP OF ON-THE-JOB DEVELOPMENTS
• CONTRACT PROVISION CONTROLS, IF THERE IS ONE
• IF THERE IS NO CONTRACT PROVISION, RESULT GOES BY THE EQUITIES
• GENERAL SKILLS OF A CALLING ARE ALWAYS OK FOR EMPLOYEE TO TAKE WITH HIM
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 12
WHAT IS “MISAPPROPRIATION”
• USING UNDER WRONGFUL CONDITIONS:– OBTAIN BY FRAUD OR BREACH OF
CONFIDENCE– OBTAIN RIGHTFULLY, BUT USE IN
BREACH OF CONFIDENCE
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 13
WHAT IS NOT
• COPYING AN OPENLY AVAILABLE PRODUCT
• REVERSE ENGINEERING OF AN OPENLY AVAILABLE PRODUCT
• INDEPENDENT DESIGN
• ADOPTING THE DESIGN, AFTER DISCLOSURE UNDER CONTRACT OF NON-CONFIDENCE
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 14
MOST CASES INVOLVE RIGHTFUL LEARNING, AND THEN
MISAPPROPRIATING
TYPICAL PATTERNS:
• EMPLOYEES LEARN, THEN JUMP
• JOINT VENTURE PARTNER LEARNS, THEN VENTURE TERMINATES
• POTENTIAL BUYER OF BUSINESS LEARNS, AND SALE FALLS THRO
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 15
TYPICAL PATTERNS (CONT’D):
• HARDER: EXECUTIVE DRIVES THE DEVELOPMENT, THEN JUMPS
• VENDOR, AGENT, ADVISOR LEARNS – THEN USES FOR OTHER CLIENTS
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 16
HARD CASES:
• FLY-OVERS
• TRAILING
• TRASH COLLECTING
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 17
REMEDIES
• INJUNCTION
• BETTER VIEW IS IT SHOULD BE LIMITED TO LEAD-TIME
• TIME IT TOOK P minus TIME IT TOOK D IS A ROUGH RULE OF THUMB
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 18
DAMAGES
• ARE AVAILABLE– COMPENS. AND PUNITIVE [UTSA: TREBLING]
• CAN BE UNJUST ENRICHMENT OR P’S LOSS OF BUSINESS
• HIGH SETTLEMENT RATE• TR. SEC. CASES SOMETIMES INVOLVE
PRELIM. INJUNC. HEARING – SELDOM GO TO TRIAL
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 19
INJUNCTION AGAINST WORKING FOR A PARTICULAR COMPETITOR
• CAN BE HANDLED PER CONTRACT
• WHERE NO CONTRACT, THIS TYPE OF INJUNCTION IS COMMONLY SOUGHT TO PROTECT THE SECRET
– ARGUMENT: WORKING FOR “THEM” WILL INHERENTLY DIVULGE
• PROBLEM: EARNING A LIVING
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 20
NON-COMPETE INJUNCTION
• POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS:– INJUNCTION REQUIRES KEEPING
PERSON ON PAYROLL AND WORK– INJUNCTION REQUIRES PROVIDING
MINIMUM CONSULTING FEES AND WORK– INJUNCTION IS TAILORED TO DIVISION
MOST LIKELY TO CAUSE BREACH
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 21
SPECIAL PROBLEM: CONTINUING TO ENJOIN WRONGDOER WHEN
OWNER HAS PUBLISHED• COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD NON-
WRONGDOERS ARE RELIEVED OF COVENANTS WHEN OWNER PUBLISHES
• MOVES TO DISSOLVE: SHOULD PREVIOUS WRONGDOER NOW BE THE ONLY ONE PRECLUDED FROM USE?
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 22
SPECIAL PROBLEM: STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
• ONE VIEW: MISAPPROPRIATION IS AN ONGOING TORT, NEW VIOLATION EVERY DAY
• HENCE, ONLY OLD MISUSES ARE CUT OFF; DAMAGES AND INJUNCTION ARE AVAILABLE FOR RECENT/FUTURE VIOLATIONS
F2009 Trade Secret Segment 23
SPECIAL PROBLEM: STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
• ANOTHER VIEW: ORIGINAL MISAPPROPRIATION STARTS THE ONLY CLOCK; WHEN IT RUNS, ALL ACTION IS BARRED
• TEXAS SOLUTION: SINGLE WRONG, SINGLE RUNNING – BUT FROM DISCOVERY DATE