20
FEBRUARY 2013 PRESENTATION OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON A PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE USE OF CONSULTANTS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT 1

FEBRUARY 2013

  • Upload
    leena

  • View
    40

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

PRESENTATION OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL. TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON A PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE USE OF CONSULTANTS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. FEBRUARY 2013. Reputation promise/mission. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: FEBRUARY 2013

FEBRUARY 2013

PRESENTATION OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL

TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON A PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE USE OF CONSULTANTS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT

1

Page 2: FEBRUARY 2013

The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the

Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) of South Africa, it exists to strengthen our country’s

democracy by enabling oversight, accountability and governance in the public

sector through auditing, thereby building public confidence.

Reputation promise/mission

2

Page 3: FEBRUARY 2013

Performance auditing

An independent auditing process to evaluate the measures put in place by

management to ensure that resources have been procured economically and used

efficiently and effectively.

3

Page 4: FEBRUARY 2013

Focus on performance – the three Es•Economy•Efficiency•Effectiveness

Done when problems are

identified

Focus on finances•Financial statements•Financial management•Accounts true and fair

Done annually

Significant expenditure -

R102 billion over 3 years

SA’s skills crisis – we have a

need

A relationship of national

importance

Public sector can benefit - if

consultants used correctly

Previous performance

audits – follow up on progress

Why a performance audit on the use of consultants by government

How do performance audits differ from other audits?

Performanceauditing

Regularityauditingvs

Performance audit at a glance

4

Page 5: FEBRUARY 2013

Scope of the audit

The departments we audited and why others were not audited

Focus of this report – national departments

R33,5 billion

Similar provincial audits conducted – to be

tabled in due courseR68,5 billion

5

Page 6: FEBRUARY 2013

Scope of the audit

The departments we audited and why others were not audited

20% of national departments represent 74% of the total national expenditure on consultants over the 3 years

Eight national departments were audited - total expenditure on consultants R24,6 billion over 3 years

Selection also guided by outcomes of financial audits and other assessments

6

Page 7: FEBRUARY 2013

Key focus areas of the audit

Focus areas crucial in ensuring the Economical, Efficient and Effective use of consultants by departments

7

Page 8: FEBRUARY 2013

8

Key challenges across departments

Page 9: FEBRUARY 2013

9

Department of Transport

Total expenditure on consultants (2008‑09 to 2010-11) R1,86 billion

Number of projects audited 16

Value of projects audited R1,884 billion*

Average vacancy rate (2009-10 to 2010‑11) 22,25%

* Includes three high-value long-term contracts of R640m (7 years), R594m (5 years) and R235m (5 years)

Page 10: FEBRUARY 2013

10

Audit findings

Page 11: FEBRUARY 2013

Audit findings (continued)

11

Page 12: FEBRUARY 2013

12

Variations per contract

Project / consultantOriginal amount

of contract Variation amountCompliance with

procurement policy Comments

Development of eNaTISTasima consortium

R594 000 000

Escalation cost of R936 192 804 increased

the contract value of R594 000 000 to R1 530 192 804

No

According to a legal opinion obtained by the department, the extension of contract in May 2010 should have been subjected to a competitive procurement process.

Maritime pollution prevention response and servicesSmit Marine South Africa

R235 014 687 R98 248 061 Yes The DG approved the three extensions.

Events management projectGroove Consultants

R45 731 821 R4 322 627 NoNo competitive bidding process was followed before awarding additional services to the consultant.

Formulation of National Airports Development Plan (NADP)Kaiser International (Pty) Ltd R10 165 118

Additional stakeholder consultation fees of

R1 830 000 increased the contract value of R10 165 118 to

R11 995 118

YesVariation submitted to the bidding committee for approval to fund additional stakeholder consultation.

Conference organisers for the AFRI RAN projectMbali G and Associates

R15 000 000 R3 584 888 YesThe bidding committee approved the request for the extension of scope.

Program management preparations for the 2010 FIFA World Cup™Safiri (Pty) Ltd

R5 790 556 R20 000 000 Yes The DG approved the extension.

Non-motorised infrastructure projectSektor Consulting Engineers

R2 085 253 R505 259 YesThe extension was approved by the bidding committee.

Technical assistance during the implementation of the TRPTranspay consortium

R7 732 931 R1 211 615 YesThe contract was extended via a closed bidding process.

Page 13: FEBRUARY 2013

13

Contract specific challenges

Intense scrutiny of strategic plans and accountability reports

Activities should be monitored quarterly

Follow up on corrective action against action plans

Page 14: FEBRUARY 2013

14

Contract specific challenges

Intense scrutiny of strategic plans and accountability reports

Activities should be monitored quarterly

Follow up on corrective action against action plans

Page 15: FEBRUARY 2013

Key recommendations: how government can remedy the current situation

Value for moneyfrom theuse of

consultants

Indicate maximum contract value and number of hours

Formal needs assessments should be

conducted

Create sufficient internal capacity

Extend contracts for valid reasons only

Compliance with legal frameworks, laws,

regulations and policies

Manage and monitor performance

Training and transfer of skills

Learn from the past, apply in the future

Develop a strategy governing the use of

consultants

15

Investigate possible fruitless and wasteful expenditure

Page 16: FEBRUARY 2013

Combined assurance: extensive assurance needed at all levels

Oversight assuranceSecond level of assurance

Coordinating /Monitoringinstitutions

Internalaudit

Auditcommittee

Extensive Extensive Extensive

Required assurance levels

Oversight’s assurance role•National Treasury/ DPSA – monitor compliance with laws and regulations and enforce appropriate action•Internal audit – follow up on management’s actions to address specific recommendations and conduct own performance audits on the use of consultants•Audit committee – monitor the implementation of commitments on corrective action made by management as well as significant spend on consultants

Management assuranceFirst level of assurance

Seniormanagement

Accountingofficers/authority

Executiveauthority

Required assurance levels

Extensive Extensive Extensive

Management’s assurance role•Senior management – take immediate action to address specific recommendations and adhere to financial management and control systems•Accounting officers/ authority – hold officials accountable for the use of resources and report annually on the use of consultants•Executive authority – monitor the use of consultants and enforce accountability and consequences

Independent assuranceThird level of assurance

Oversight(portfolio

committees / councils)

Publicaccounts

committee

External audit

Extensive Extensive Extensive

Required assurance levels

Role of independent assurance•Oversight (portfolio committees/ councils) – review strategic and business plans as well as the accounting officer’s reports on the use of consultants•Public accounts committee – exercise specific oversight on a regular basis•External audit – provide independent assurance on the credibility of reported information and identify instances of irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure on consultants

16

Page 17: FEBRUARY 2013

Commitment to action needed

17

Page 18: FEBRUARY 2013

Commitment given

18

Page 19: FEBRUARY 2013

It takes two to tango: the private sector also needs to come to the party

Publicsector

Privatesector

Enhancedcitizenvalue+ =

A critical part of this equation

• Must not take advantage of weaknesses in government systems

• Rather be good corporate citizens with a good corporate conscience

• Take steps to stop malpractices• Strong governance support by broader

private sector is critical

Realising the common goals of economic success requires effort by both government and business

The creation of citizen value is enhanced through a balanced partnership equation

19

Page 20: FEBRUARY 2013

Thank You

20