Upload
luke095
View
235
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
1/17
Caswell Memorial State Park Field Study & Lab
by Luke Basaca
November 3rd, 2008
IB Environmental Systems & Societies
Mr. WedelWord Count: 3037
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
2/17
Aim of the Lab:
How healthy is an ecosystem, based solely on biotic and abiotic factors?
Background
Caswell Memorial State Park, located on the banks of the Stanislaus River near Ripon,
California, was where the field study was conducted. The state park itself is unique in the sense
that it has certain characteristics that set it apart from other state parks. Caswell was founded in
1958 by local landowners who wanted to save this piece of land from development; it eventually
opened in 1958, its size initially 134 acres, but with additional donations increased to its current
size of 258 acres. Within the state park resides many qualities unique to not only the area but the
world. Caswell includes the largest collection of Valley Oak Trees within the Central Valley. It
also is the home of the elusive Riparian Brush Rabbit, a species of rabbit not found anywhere
else in the world.
Caswell State Park's main reason for being such a unique place within the Central Valley
is mainly due to the fact that it represents a very important and somewhat uncommon ecosystem,
called a riparian woodland or zone. Riparian woodlands are usually considerably smaller in size
compared to surrounding ecosystems. However, they are typically more ecologically diverse
with a larger amount of different species of both plants and animals residing within its'
boundaries. Riparian ecosystems are an important source of food, shelter, and resources for the
many animals not only residing in it, but also for animals surrounding it. The ecosystem itself
also serves as a type of filtration system for the rivers and streams crossing through it and as a
type of flood control system, controlling and slowing down the flow of water in a river.
Due to riparian ecosystems being typically small in size and relatively close in proximity
to major rivers and streams, they are usually most affected by ongoing human development and
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
3/17
alteration. Farming and construction has been a great issue in the Central Valley's riparian
ecosystems, contributing to the shrink of the number of remaining woodlands. As the field study
was conducted, great care was taken to make sure not to disturb the habitat of the native plants
and animal species. When any disturbances did occur, however, great care and effort was taken
in order to reverse any changes.
The healthiness of a riparian woodland ecosystem, like any ecosystem, relies on two
factors: abiotic and biotic. Abiotic factors are the non-living elements that affect an ecosystem.
Examples of abiotic factors measured in the field study and lab were light levels, temperature,
moisture levels, and soil content (pH; potassium, nitrate, and phosphorus levels). Biotic factors,
on the other hand, is quite the opposite; they are the living components of an ecosystem. Biotic
factors measured in the lab included the abundance, diversity, and density of biomass.
Purpose:
To observe and explain the biotic and abiotic characteristics of a Reparian Woodland in
order to determine it's healthiness.
Hypotheses:
1. If the abiotic factors are helpful to organisms in an ecosystem, then these organisms will
be healthy and numerous.
2. If the organisms in an ecosystem are numerous and equal, then the ecosystem itself is
healthy.
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
4/17
Materials:
-Group Field Equipment -Group Lab Equipment
1 data sheet tongs
1 Ruler electronic balances
4 stakes oventwine aluminum pan sheets
4 meter sticks
1 compass1 chemical test kits
1 thermometer
1 soil thermometer1 light meter
1 soil auger
3 ziploc bags1 distilled water jug
1 insect netdividing tape
measuring tape4 popsicle sticks
camera (optional)
Procedures:
1) equipment setup:
1. The ziploc bags were weighed and labeled.2. Four popsicle sticks were obtained and were formed into a square measuring 0.1 m2.
3. All Group Field Equipment, including the sampling quadrat square, was placed into large
bag.
2) data sheet:
3. A data sheet was created that recorded all the information from the field needed for the
lab. Include:light levels (in foot candles)
temperature (in 0C)
1.0 meters above ground level0.1 meters below ground level
at ground level
soil contents: pH levels
phosphate levels
nitrate levels
potassium levels
abundance (number of species)
2. Also included were measurements while in the lab:
total biomass (wet and dry)
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
5/17
moisture level (soil and organic material)
diversity levels (using the Simpson diversity Index)
3) Site Selection:
1. A 100 meter transect line that ran north/south was created using a tape measure and
compass.2. Tape was used to mark the transect line (see figure 1)
Figure 1:
3. Within three points along the transect, three stage quadrats were then established,
measuring 10 m2.4. The boundaries of the stage quadrats were marked by dividing tape.
5. Within each stage quadrat, smaller group quadrats, measuring 1 m2, were chosen at
random (ex: throw square over shoulder without looking, throw square with eyes closed,etc.).
6. Four meter sticks created into a square marked a chosen group quadrat.
7. A sampling qaudrat was chosen at random by throwing the 10 cm2 popsicle square intothe group quadrat. (see figure 2)
4) Field Measurements:
Sunlight
1. A light meter was obtained and should have been set to the sun and highintensity setting.
2. You were to wait until the time is at 11:50 am, or solar noon at a randomly
chosen spot within your group quadrat, at ground level. (see figure 3)
3. You were then to read the measurements at 11:50 am at ground level and recordthem in foot candles.
Temperature:
1.0 meters above and at ground level:
1. A regular thermometer and meter stick was obtained.
2. Sampling site was then chosen at random and the meter stick was thenplaced in the spot.(see figure 4):
3. The temperature was taken at solar noon, or 11:50 am, in degrees Celsius.
4. Temperatures were recorded onto data sheet.
0.1 meters below ground level :1. A soil thermometer was used to take the temperature.
2. The soil thermometer spike was marked at 10 centimeters, or .01 meters,with a sharpie.
3. Like the regular thermometer reading, the site was chosen at random
within the group quadrat.
4. The soil thermometer was then driven into the ground until the sharpiemark wasn't visible.(see figure 5)
5. The temperature was taken at solar noon, or 11:50 am, in degrees Celsius.
6. Temperature was recorded onto data sheet.
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
6/17
Soil Contents (pH, nitrate, phosphate, and potassium levels) :
1. A soil auger was obtained and used to take a soil sample within a random spot inthe group quadrat.
2. Four soil samples from the soil auger were obtained.
3. A chemical test set was then obtained.(see figure 6)
4. Tests were done for pH, phosphates, nitrates, and potassium levels in accordanceto the instructions provided inside the chemical test set.
5. The measurements were recorded.
6. The remaining soil sample was put into a pre-weighed ziploc bag
Abundance of individuals:
1. Within the group quadrat, five sampling quadrats were created at random.
2. A count of every individual plant species was then done in each sampling quadrat.3. The number of each individual plant species was also done.
4. Species classified into A, B, C categories (ex. Species A)
5. Recorded data onto data sheet.6. Biomass from each sampling quadrat was collected. (see figure 7)
7. Two pre-weighed ziploc bags were used to collect the biomass.5) Lab measurements (see figure 8) :
Moisture level (soil and biomass)1. The pre-weighed ziploc bags containing the soil sample and biomass was weighed
and the weights were recorded.
2. An aluminum pan was obtained and weighed; pan's weight was then marked.3. The aluminum pan was then filled with the biomass and soil samples that were
inside the ziploc bags.
4. The aluminum pan were weighed again and marked.5. An oven was pre-heated to 450 degrees Fahrenheit (232.22 degrees Celsius).
6. Aluminum pan was placed into oven for 24 hours.
7. After 24 hours, the aluminum pan with soil was reweighed and recorded.8. The moisture level of the soil was obtained by subtracting the weight of the bakedsoil(X) from the original weight(Y), then dividing it by the original weight(X):
X-Y
X x 100 = moisture level (in percent)9. Repeated steps 1-8 for biomass.
Total dry biomass:
1. An electronic balance was used to weigh the two biomass-filled ziploc bags.2. The difference between the total weight of each bag and the weight of each
individual bag provided the weight of the total wet biomass in each bag.
3. An aluminum pan was obtained and weighed; pan's weight was then marked.
4. The aluminum pan was then filled with the biomass that was inside the ziplocbags.
5. Aluminum pans were weighed again and marked.
6. An oven was pre-heated to 450 degrees Fahrenheit (232.22 degrees Celsius)7. Aluminum pan placed into oven for 24 hours.
8. Aluminum pan was reweighed and recorded after 24 hours.
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
7/17
Calculating Diversity Level
1. Diversity level was measured using the Simpson Reciprocal Index:
n = the total number of organisms of a particular speciesN = the total number of organisms of all species
2. The total number of organisms were determined from both the group quadrat and
overall number from all group quadrats.
3. The larger the answer, the lower the diversity level.
Calculating Density and Relative Density
Density (Di):1. Density was found using the data gathered for finding the number of all
species present, group quadrat and overall using the equation:
ni
A
ni = amount of an individual speciesA = area the individual of species inhabits
Relative Density (RDi)
1. Relative density found using the data gathered for finding the number of all
species present, group quadrat and overall using the equation:Di
Di
Di = density of a species
Di = total density in a given area for all species
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
8/17
Data:
1) Observations
Quadrat Coordinates
-Group Quadrat (4.5 Meters/2 Meters)
Figure 10: Stage and Group Quadrat coordinates
Site Description
3 living trees in stage quadrat
detrius material (plant leaves, twigs, grasses) all over ground
partial sunlight due to tree canopy
soil rich in detrius material
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
9/17
2) Data Tables and Graphs
Table #1: Abiotic Factors:
Light Levels:(taken at 11:50
am)
1500
foot candles
N/A N/A N/A
Temperature:
(taken at 11:50am)
1.0 meters above
ground level:
25oC
0.1 meters below
ground level:17oC
@ ground level:
25oC
N/A
Soil Composition pH:
6.0
Phosphates:
low
Nitrates:
low
Potassium:
medium to low
Table #2: Bag Weights
Bags Weights (in g)
with bag
Bag weights Weights (in g) without bag
A (biomass) 25.95 g 7.56 g 18.39 g
B (soil) 17.60 g 7.48 g 10.12 g
C (biomass) 11.79 g 7.76 g 4.03 g
Table #3: Biotic Factors (number of species present)
Species Number within Group Quadrat Overall Number (class data)
A (Johnson Grass) 85 136
B (Crab Grass) 3 12
C (Blackberry) 0 23
D (Valley Oak Tree) 9 9
Total: 97 185
Table #4: Percentage composition of species
Species Percentage (Group Quadrat) Overall Percentage (class data)
A 87.8% 73.53%
B 3% 9.18%
C 0% 12.43%
D 9.2% 4.86%
Total Percentage: 100% 100%
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
10/17
Graph #1: Percentage Composition of Species (Group Quadrat)
Graph #2: Percentage Composition of Species (Class Data)
A (JohnsonGrass)
B (Crab Grass)
C (Blackberry)
D (Valley OakTree)
A (JohnsonGrass)
B (Crab Grass)
C (Blackberry)
D (Valley OakTree)
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
11/17
3) Simpson Diversity Index:
Table #5 & Math: Diversity Index (group quadrat)
Species Number (n) n(n-1)
A (Johnson Grass) 85 7140
B (Crab Grass) 3 6
C (Blackberry) 0 0
D (Valley Oak Tree) 9 72
Total (N) 97
Total:
7218
97(96) 9,312
D = 7,218 = 7,218 = 1.29
Table #6 & Math: Diversity Index (class data)
Species Number (n) n(n-1)
A (Johnson Grass) 136 18360
B (Crab Grass) 12 132
C (Blackberry) 23 506
D (Valley Oak Tree) 9 72
Total (N) 185
Total:
19070
185(184) 34,040
D = 19,070 = 19,070 = 1.78
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
12/17
4)Density and Relative Density (Di & RDi)
Density (Di):
Table #7 & Math: Density Data
Species ni (group quadrat) ni (class data) A (group quadrat) A (class data)
A (Johnson
Grass)
85 136 0.1 m2 6 m2
B (Crab Grass) 3 17 0.1 m2 6 m2
C (Blackberry) 0 23 0.1 m2 6 m2
D (Valley OakTree)
9 9 0.1 m2 6 m2
Example:
Species A (group quadrat & overall)
Group Quadrat:
85Di = 0.1 m2 = 850 Di
Overall (Class Data)
136Di = 6 m2 = 22.66 Di
Table #8: Density (group quadrat & overall class data)
Species Di (Group Quadrat) Di (Class Data)
A (Johnson Grass) 850 Di 22.66 Di
B (Crab Grass) 30 Di 2.83 Di
C (Blackberry) 0 Di 3.83 Di
D (Valley Oak Tree) 90 Di 1.5 Di
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
13/17
Relative Density (RDi):
Table #9 & Math: Relative Density Data
Species Di (groupquadrat)
Di (class data) Di (groupquadrat)
Di (class data)
A (Johnson
Grass)
850 Di 22.66 Di 970 Di 30.82 Di
B (Crab Grass) 30 Di 2.83 Di 970 Di 30.82 Di
C (Blackberry) 0 Di 3.83 Di 970 Di 30.82 Di
D (Valley OakTree)
90 Di 1.5 Di 970 Di 30.82 Di
Example:
Species A (group quadrat & overall)
Group Quadrat850 Di
970 Di = .878 RDi
Overall (Class Data)22.66 Di
30.82 Di = .7352 RDi
Table #9: Relative Density (group quadrat & overall class data)
Species RDi (Group Quadrat) RDi (Class Data)
A (Johnson Grass) .878 RDi .7352 RDi
B (Crab Grass) 0.03 RDi 0.0918 RDiC (Blackberry) 0 RDi .1242 RDi
D (Valley Oak Tree) 0.092 RDi 0.0486 RDi
5) Moisture levels:
Table #10 & Math: Moisture Level Calculations
X (weight, in g, before baking) Y (weight, in g, after baking)
P1: biomass 4.73 g 4.14 g
P2: soil 17.56 g 14.21 g
P1: 4.73g 4.14g
4.73 g x 100 = 12.4 %
P2: 17.56g 14.24g17.56 g x 100 = 19 %
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
14/17
Conclusion and Evaluation:
The original purpose of this lab was to To observe and explain the biotic and abiotic
characteristics of a Reparian Woodland in order to determine it's healthiness.. Our original
hypotheses were that: 1. If the abiotic factors are helpful to organisms in an ecosystem, then
these organisms will be healthy and numerous; 2. If the organisms in an ecosystem are
numerous and equal, then the ecosystem itself is healthy.. This hypotheses were actually proven
while doing both the field study and the lab in a more negative way.
Solid pattens were found while calculating all the measurements. Both the class data and
the individual group quadrat data for diversity and relative density seemed to be quite similar.
Both showed that species A (Johnson Grass) took up a majority of the entire plant population
within both the group quadrat and the other 6 group quadrats of other groups. Diversity levels in
both the group data and the overall class data were very similar, both saying diversity levels in
the area are low. This may be connected to the fact that Johnson grass may be better suited to
grow in an environment with partial sunlight, due to the tree coverage, than the other species
present like blackberries, which were absent in our data and only 9 recorded as a whole. Johnson
grass was numerous in numbers, but compared to the other plant species in the area, it
dominated. Johnson grass took 87.8 % of the total count of species in the group data and 73.53
% in the overall data, showing a overwhelming dominance of that particular plant species in the
area. This led to a lower diversity index showing this site was actually very unhealthy. Soil
content also showed low nitrate, phosphate, and potassium levels, indicating soil with a low
amount of nutrients for a diverse amount of plants, possibly inhibiting different kinds of plant
species growing in the area . With both abiotic and biotic factors combined, the data showed that
the site was in fact very unhealthy.
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
15/17
The measurements and data obtained in both the field study and the lab showed there
have might been some room of errors and mistakes. For instance, while taking the measurements
for solar noon, the switch was mistakenly turned to florescent instead of the required sun and
high intensity setting. Conversion of the data was then required when we returned back to
school and did the lab measurements. Another possible mistake was when the biomass and soil
samples were collected. The soil sample, for example, was poor due to an object obstructing the
soil auger while it was in the ground. The collection of biomass may have also not have been all
that random, mainly due to us looking as we threw the sampling quadrat square onto the ground.
This factor could have affected the density, relative density, and diversity indexes of all the plant
species. It was also strange that the class data for collected plant species was just only 185, out of
6 separate groups. Our group collected 97, or roughly 52 % of all the recorded species population
count.
An obvious improvement that could be done, if we ever did a similar lab again, would be
to simply double-check the data and compare it to other groups in the same area. This way we
could see any inconsistencies with any of our data and act accordingly to fix it. Another
improvement that could be done is to repeat certain steps that may have been failures at first. For
example, if the soil sample was poor in quality, another one could have been done by simply
picking a different sampling quadrat at random. Lastly, one major improvement that needs to be
done in not just this lab but in any lab is to make sure each lab group does each step. The
inconsistency of the number of species counted could be avoided next time by assigning each
group a specific species to look for and record.
If further investigation was done in this same lab, I would suggest a few things to
challenge our current hypotheses. To diversify our data, we could go to Caswell at different
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
16/17
times of the year, comparing the data and concluding whether if abiotic and biotic factors are
consistent throughout the year. Another suggestion is to go to another test site, possibly ones
totally unrelated to riparian woodlands entirely to compare whether if all ecosystems share
similar biotic and abiotic characteristics or are different in some ways.
8/14/2019 Field Study: Caswell State Park
17/17
Work Cited Page
http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=557. Caswell Memorial State Park. Accessed 9-28-08
www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-ripon. : Caswell Memorial State Park.
Accessed 9-28-08
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riparian. Riparian zone. Accessed 9-29-08
http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=557http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=557http://www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-riponhttp://www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-riponhttp://www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-riponhttp://www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-riponhttp://www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-riponhttp://www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-riponhttp://www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-riponhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riparianhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riparianhttp://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=557http://www.yelp.com/biz/caswell-memorial-state-park-riponhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riparian