Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fig. 1 Cyclone center density differences between ENEAProtheus and ENEA, as diagnosed by the sixdifferent tracking methods during the whole period 19892008.
Fig. 2 Cyclone center density differences between WRFNEMO and WRF, as diagnosed by the sixdifferent tracking methods during the whole period 19892008.
Fig. 3 Cyclone center density differences between CNRMALADIN and CNRMRCSM4, asdiagnosed by the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008.
Fig. 4 Cyclone center density differences between EBUPOM and EBU, as diagnosed by the sixdifferent tracking methods during the whole period 19892008.
Fig. 5 Cyclone center density differences between COSMONEMO and COSMOCLM, as diagnosedby the six different tracking methods during the whole period 19892008.
