Final Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Consultants Inc. was retained by the City of Waterloo to conduct a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ... soil . MOE 2011 Standards

ST. LOUIS SCHOOL

Final

Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment

Project Location: 75 Allen Street East

Waterloo, ON

Prepared for: City of Waterloo

100 Regina Street South Waterloo ON N2J 4A8

August 10, 2012

MTE File No.: 37002-100

M:\37002\Phase Two ESA\Report\75 Allen St\37002-100 - Final Phase Two ESA Report (75 Allen St).doc

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1

2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 7

(i) Site Description ............................................................................................................. 7 (ii) Property Ownership ...................................................................................................... 8 (iii) Current and Proposed Future Uses .............................................................................. 8 (iv) Applicable Site Condition Standard ............................................................................... 8

3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 8

(i) Physical Setting ............................................................................................................ 8 (ii) Past Investigations ........................................................................................................ 9

4. SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION ..................................................................................... 9

(i) Overview of the Site Investigation ............................................................................... 10 (ii) Media Investigated ...................................................................................................... 11 (iii) Phase One Conceptual Site Model ............................................................................. 11 (iv) Deviations from Sampling and Analysis Plan .............................................................. 12 (v) Impediments ............................................................................................................... 13

5. INVESTIGATION METHOD .............................................................................................. 13

(i) General ....................................................................................................................... 13 (ii) Drilling and Excavating ............................................................................................... 13 (iii) Field Screening Measures .......................................................................................... 14 (iv) Soil Sampling .............................................................................................................. 15 (v) Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation .................................................................... 16 (vi) Groundwater Field Measurements of Water Quality Parameters ................................. 17 (vii) Groundwater Sampling ............................................................................................... 17 (viii) Sediment Sampling ................................................................................................. 18 (ix) Analytical Testing ........................................................................................................ 18 (x) Residue Management Procedures .............................................................................. 18 (xi) Elevation Survey ......................................................................................................... 18 (xii) Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures ....................................................... 18

6. REVIEW AND EVALUATION ........................................................................................... 20

(i) Geology ...................................................................................................................... 20 (ii) Groundwater Elevations and Flow Direction................................................................ 20 (iii) Groundwater Hydraulic Gradients ............................................................................... 21 (iv) Soil Texture................................................................................................................. 22 (v) Soil Field Screening .................................................................................................... 22 (vi) Soil Quality ................................................................................................................. 22 (vii) Groundwater Quality ................................................................................................... 24 (viii) Sediment Quality ..................................................................................................... 26 (ix) Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results ........................................................... 26 (x) Phase Two Conceptual Site Model ............................................................................. 27

M:\37002\Phase Two ESA\Report\75 Allen St\37002-100 - Final Phase Two ESA Report (75 Allen St).doc

7. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 29

8. RECOMMENDATION AND NEXT STEPS ........................................................................ 30

9. LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................... 31

10. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 32

FIGURES FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2: SITE LAYOUT & MONITORING LOCATIONS FIGURE 3: GROUNDWATER FLOW MAP (JULY 27, 2012) FIGURE 4: PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL FIGURE 5: APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF IMPACT

TABLES TABLE 5(iv): SOIL SAMPLES SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS TABLE 5(v): MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION DETAILS TABLE 5(vii): GROUNDWATER SAMPLES SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS TABLE 6(ii): GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS TABLE 6(vi): ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN SOIL TABLE 6(vii): ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN GROUNDWATER

APPENDICES APPENDIX A1: SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN APPENDIX A2: FINALIZED FIELD LOGS AND PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX A3: LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS APPENDIX A4: RESIDUE MANAGEMENT APPENDIX A5: SURVEY OF PHASE TWO PROPERTY APPENDIX B: REPORT ON SITE REMEDIATION APPENDIX C: SOIL EXCAVATED AT OR BROUGHT TO THE PROPERTY APPENDIX D: MODIFIED GENERIC RISK ASSESSMENT

Phase Two ESA -1- MTE File No: 37002-100 75 Allen Street East, Waterloo, ON August 10, 2012

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MTE Consultants Inc. was retained by the City of Waterloo to conduct a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for an institutional property owned by the Region of Waterloo Catholic District School Board (WCDSB) at 75 Allen Street in Waterloo, Ontario (“the Site”). Refer to Figure 1 for the Site Location Map. Authorization to proceed with the project was received from Mr. Ron Ormson, P.Geo. of the City of Waterloo following acceptance of MTE’s proposal for services dated May 21, 2012. The assignment was completed by MTE according to Reference Number 37002-100. The Phase Two ESA was completed on behalf of the City of Waterloo for due diligence purposes in advance of a potential real estate purchase and meets the requirements of Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended). The Phase Two ESA has been supervised by a Qualified Person (QPESA), and is suitable to support a RSC filing. A Phase One ESA dated July 20, 2012 was completed by MTE according to Regulation 153/04 (as amended) on behalf of the City of Waterloo and is provided under separate cover. MTE completed a concurrent Phase Two ESA for the City of Waterloo at the adjacent property at 70 Willow Street, which is provided under separate cover. Background The Site (also referred to as the Phase Two Property) comprises approximately 0.19 hectares (0.48 acres) with a large rectangular-shaped building, sodded landscaping and asphalt areas. The Phase Two Property is located in a fully developed residential neighbourhood, southeast of downtown Waterloo. Refer to Figure 2 for the Site Layout and Features. The Phase Two Property was developed as an elementary school in 1908. Building additions to the school were constructed in approximately 1933 and 1963. The Phase Two Property is currently vacant but was recently occupied by the St. Louis Adult Learning & Continuing Education Centre. The surrounding land use is primarily residential and open space. There are no industrial uses within a 250 m boundary. Based on the historical use of the property as a school, the Site is not classified as an enhanced investigation property (EIP) according to Regulation 153/04 (as amended).

A below-ground tank located within a concrete vault at the west side of the school building was removed on July 31, 1997. The vault was capped with a reinforced concrete lid which was demolished during removal. At this time, MTE is unaware of any potential future uses of the Property. A Record of Site Condition (RSC) may be requested under Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended) for a future development.

Phase Two ESA -2- MTE File No: 37002-100 75 Allen Street, Waterloo, ON August 10, 2012

Investigations of the property have confirmed that more than 2 meters of overburden is present above bedrock, therefore it is not a shallow soil condition. There are no surface water bodies on or within 30 meters of the property, therefore it is not in proximity to a waterbody. The property is not on or within an area of natural significance and soil pH is within acceptable range, therefore it is not considered to be a “Sensitive Site” under Regulation 153/04 (as amended). The City of Waterloo obtains drinking water from groundwater sources. Accordingly, the analytical results for soil and groundwater samples have been compared to Table 2 of the MOE Soil, Groundwater and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011 for Residential/Parkland/Institutional use and medium/fine textured soil. MOE 2011 Standards are based on updated science and are protective of human health and ecosystems. Investigation All aspects of this investigation and report were supervised by a Qualified Person (QP) as defined in Regulation 153/04 (as amended). The drilling activities were completed on July 3, 2012 and included the advancement of four (4) boreholes each installed as a monitoring well and denoted as MW101-12, MW102-12, MW103-12 and MW104-12. The maximum finished drilling depth of 13.7 m.b.g.s was based on field observations of geologic conditions in order to meet the project objectives. The rationale for borehole locations was based upon investigating the three (3) Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) from the Phase One ESA and consideration of utility locations, property boundaries and access. Soil and/or groundwater samples were collected from the following locations during the drilling program:

• MW101-12 was located in the landscaped area at the northeast corner of the Site

to address APEC-2 (fill of unknown quality) and APEC-3 (Potential off-site impact from furniture manufacturing);

• MW102-12 & MW103-12 were located in the asphalt laneway along the western boundary of the site to address APEC-1 (Former fuel storage UST); and

• MW104-12 was located in the parking area at the southeast corner of the Site to address APEC-2 (fill of unknown quality) and APEC-3 (Potential off-site impact from furniture manufacturing).

No excavations were performed and no soil vapour probes were installed for measuring soil vapour.


Sand or sand and gravel fill was encountered below topsoil or asphalt in each of the boreholes to a maximum depth of 3.05 m.b.g.s. The fill contained brick fragments at MW102-12 and slag and cinders at MW104-12. Concrete was observed at MW103-12 possibly associated with the former UST vault along the west side of the school. The fill layer was dry at all locations except MW103-12 where perched groundwater was observed. Below the fill, native silty clay was encountered to a maximum depth of 7.9 m.b.g.s. The clay layer was dry to damp. Below the clay, native sandy silt was encountered to the maximum depths explored. The sandy silt layer was generally wet to saturated, representing a water bearing unit. Bedrock was not encountered to the depths explored. No evidence of buried waste, peat or decaying material was observed. Each of the boreholes were completed as permanent monitoring wells with 3.0 metre long, 50 mm diameter, No. 10 slotted PVC screen. The monitor pipe and screens were received pre-cleaned and sealed in a protective plastic wrap from the manufacturer. The riser pipe and screen sections were pre-threaded with O-ring seals. No glues or solvents were used to connect the pipe sections. Each monitoring well was completed with a flush-mounted, steel protective casing, which was cemented in place. During the Phase Two ESA, the groundwater elevations were measured on July 27, 2012. Groundwater elevations were measured on July 27, 2012. The depth to groundwater ranged from 11.57 m at the southeast limit of the property to 12.03 metres at the northwest limit of the property. This does not include the water level at MW103-12 in fill material associated with a former UST excavation which is considered perched. The groundwater flow direction beneath the Phase Two Property appears to be northwesterly towards Laurel Creek based on relative groundwater elevations, which is generally consistent with the Phase One CSM. There was no evidence of a hydrocarbon sheen or free product in any monitoring wells or groundwater samples. The results for all soil and groundwater samples submitted for analysis were used in the Phase Two ESA. Since there is no surface water or sediment on the Phase Two Property, no samples were collected. Analysis was conducted by AGAT Laboratories Ltd. of Mississauga, Ontario. AGAT is CALA (Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation) certified. Soil Results There is evidence of slag and cinder in fill material at the southeast corner of the Site that contains impact due to heavy metals and PAHs. The depth of fill extends to 1.5 metres in this area, representing a potential volume of impacted material to be on the order of 360 cubic meters.


Groundwater Results An exceedence of the MOE Table 2 Standards was reported for petroleum hydrocarbon fraction F2 in perched groundwater at MW103-12. No evidence of widespread contamination in groundwater or free product was observed. Monitoring well MW102-12 was advanced approximately 20 metres to the north (downgradient) of MW103-12 and there were no detections of PHCs F1–F4 at that location. Monitoring well MW104-12 was advanced approximately 20 metres to the east (cross-gradient) of MW103-12 and there were no detections of PHCs F1–F4 at that location. Based on this, it appears that PHC impacts in groundwater at MW103-12 are in a localized area associated with the former heating oil UST. An exceedence of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standard for Vanadium was also reported at MW103-12. This is likely a result of sediment in the sample and does not represent an environmental concern. Phase Two Conceptual Site Model MTE identified potentially contaminating activities that were or may have been performed on the Phase Two Property or in the Study Area. As a result, three (3) APECs were investigated during the Phase Two ESA. The following site specific data and information has been collected during the Phase Two ESA to supplement the Phase One CSM described in Section 4(iii):

• The school building occupies approximately 70% of the Phase Two Property and contains a basement. The building is bordered by pavement on the west and south sides.

• The depth to groundwater ranged from 11.57 to 12.03 m.b.g.s., in native silt. This does not include the water level at MW103-12 in fill material associated with a former UST excavation which is considered perched.

• The groundwater elevations at the Site indicate a northwesterly flow direction toward Laurel Creek.

• The horizontal gradient is 0.005 which is considered to be typical for a water bearing silt unit.

• Bedrock was not encountered to a depth of 13.7 meters below ground surface. • The QPESA has determined that various PAHs are present in shallow fill at levels

exceeding the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards. These impacts do not extend into the native silt layer. These impacts are associated with slag and cinders.

• The QPESA has determined that Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction F2 is present in perched groundwater in the vicinity of MW103-12 at low levels. There is no indication widespread impact in groundwater or any evidence of free product.

• The QPESA has determined that Vanadium is also present in groundwater in the vicinity of MW103-12 at levels above the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standard. It is possible that sediment in the sample may have caused a biased result in the


laboratory analysis. • Subsurface utilities are present along Allen Street and Willow Street but are

anticipated to be located well above the water table. Based on the most recent (institutional) use of the Site, the following human and ecological receptors are identified:

• Outdoor workers (teenagers and adults) who are involved in property maintenance;

• Indoor workers who will spend all of their time on Site within the building • Site-visitors (toddlers, children, teenagers and adults) to the property; • Construction/utility workers (adults) involved in subsurface construction or utility

repair at the Site; • Terrestrial plants typical of an urban property; • Soil organisms; and • Birds and small mammals typical of an urban environment.

The contaminant transport mechanisms to be considered for the Site are groundwater flow, groundwater extraction and vapour intrusion. A Phase Two Conceptual Site Model has been prepared in accordance with Schedule E, Part V, Table 1, S6(x) of Regulation 153/04 (as amended). Refer to Figure 4. The QPESA is satisfied that each APEC has been investigated and that sufficient samples have been collected and analyzed for the contaminants of potential concern identified in the Phase One ESA. It should be noted that the soil and groundwater conditions between and beyond the sampled locations may differ from those encountered during this assignment. Recommendation Impacts in soil and groundwater have been identified above the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards and therefore a RSC cannot be filed for the property at this time. However, based on the results for soil and groundwater, there is no evidence of an adverse effect to human health or the environment at this time that would prompt notification to the MOE or a need for remedial action. If an RSC were requested or required for a new use, remediation and/or Risk Assessment would be necessary. Under a redevelopment scenario, removal of slag and cinder would likely require disposal to a landfill as the material is not inert, and localized pumping and removal of perched groundwater at MW103-12 would also be required during any dewatering.


This report should be read in conjunction with the Phase One ESA dated July 20, 2012. This report does not address geotechnical or site planning related matters.


2. INTRODUCTION MTE Consultants Inc. was retained by the City of Waterloo to conduct a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for an institutional property owned by the Region of Waterloo Catholic District School Board (WCDSB) at 75 Allen Street in Waterloo, Ontario (“the Site”). Refer to Figure 1 for the Site Location Map. Authorization to proceed with the project was received from Mr. Ron Ormson, P.Geo. of the City of Waterloo following acceptance of MTE’s proposal for services dated May 21, 2012. The assignment was completed by MTE according to Reference Number 37002-100. The Phase Two ESA was completed on behalf of the City of Waterloo for due diligence purposes in advance of a potential real estate purchase. The Phase Two ESA meets the requirements of Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended). The Phase One ESA has been supervised by a Qualified Person (QPESA), and is suitable to support a RSC filing. A Phase One ESA dated July 20, 2012 was completed by MTE according to Regulation 153/04 (as amended) on behalf of the City of Waterloo and is provided under separate cover. MTE completed a concurrent Phase Two ESA for the City of Waterloo at the adjacent property at 70 Willow Street, which is provided under separate cover. Copies of the Phase Two ESA report will be provided to the City of Waterloo. (i) Site Description The Site (also referred to as the Phase Two Property) comprises approximately 0.19 hectares (0.48 acres) with a large rectangular-shaped building, sodded landscaping and asphalt parking areas. The Phase Two Property is located in a fully developed residential neighbourhood, southeast of downtown Waterloo. Refer to Figure 2 for the Site Layout and Features. The Phase Two Property was developed as an elementary school in 1908. Building additions to the school were constructed in approximately 1933 and 1963. The Phase Two Property is currently vacant but was recently occupied by the St. Louis Adult Learning & Continuing Education Centre. The surrounding land use is primarily residential and open space and there are no industrial uses within a 250 m boundary. Vehicle access to the Site is provided via asphalt driveways from Allen Street and Willow Street. There is underground hydro service to the building. Other utilities include natural gas, water and sanitary sewers.


(ii) Property Ownership The Phase Two Property has been owned by the local school board since the early 1900’s. (iii) Current and Proposed Future Uses School activities ceased in 2007, and the building and premises are currently vacant. At this time, MTE is unaware of any potential future uses of the Property. A Record of Site Condition (RSC) may be requested under Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended) for a future development. (iv) Applicable Site Condition Standard The MOE released Regulations 511/09 and 179/11 (amending Regulation 153/04) with new soil and groundwater standards which came into force on July 1, 2011. Investigations of the property have confirmed that more than 2 meters of overburden is present above bedrock, therefore it is not a shallow soil condition. There are no surface water bodies on or within 30 meters of the property, therefore it is not in proximity to a waterbody. The property is not on or within an area of natural significance and soil pH is within acceptable range, therefore it is not considered to be a “Sensitive Site” under Regulation 153/04 (as amended). The City of Waterloo obtains drinking water from groundwater sources. Accordingly, the analytical results for soil and groundwater samples have been compared to Table 2 of the MOE Soil, Groundwater and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011 for Residential/Parkland/Institutional use and medium/fine textured soil. MOE 2011 Standards are based on updated science and are protective of human health and ecosystems. 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION (i) Physical Setting Ontario Base Map No. 10 17 5350 48100 was consulted during the Phase One ESA and indicated the following:

• Elevations across the property range from approximately 326 to 328 meters above sea level (m.a.s.l.), with a moderate slope toward Laurel Creek; and

• Laurel Creek is located approximately 300 m to the north.


The Site is located within the broad physiographic region known as Waterloo Sandhills, which is comprised of sandy till ridges, kames, or kame moraines. The overburden consists of surficial deposits of coarse and medium textured sand and silt over medium textured till deposits (Chapman and Putnam, 1984). Bedrock is located more than 30 metres below surface and includes Middle and Lower Silurian formations of sandstone, shale, dolostone, and siltstone (Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 1991). The approximate UTM coordinates for the Site are 539,174 metres east and 4,812,338 metres north in UTM Zone 17. Surface drainage is directed overland to municipal catch basins located along Allen and Willow Streets. (ii) Past Investigations The following report applies to the entire property: “Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 75 Allen Street East, Waterloo, Ontario,” completed by MTE Consultants Inc. for the City of Waterloo, dated July 20, 2012. A Phase One ESA was completed in July 2012. The main findings of the Phase One ESA were as follows:

• The Site was first developed as an elementary school in 1908. The Site operated as a school until 2007. The Site is currently vacant.

• Based on the historical use of the property as a school, the Site is not classified as an enhanced investigation property (EIP) according to Regulation 153/04 (as amended).

• A below-ground tank located within a concrete vault at the west side of the school building was removed on July 31, 1997. The vault was capped with a reinforced concrete lid which was demolished during removal.

• The investigation revealed no evidence of actual contamination in connection with the Phase One Property; however several potentially contaminating activities were identified at the Phase One Property and the Phase One Study Area.

• Three areas of potential environmental concern (APEC) were identified in the Phase One ESA.

• A Phase Two ESA was recommended to investigate soil and groundwater. 4. SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION This Phase Two ESA commenced within 18 months of the completion of the Phase One ESA and the QPESA has confirmed that there have been no material changes to the Phase Two Property and no additional Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) identified. The Phase Two ESA applies to the entire property at 75 Allen Street.


(i) Overview of the Site Investigation The Phase Two ESA meets the requirements of Regulation 153/04 (as amended). The Phase Two ESA has been supervised by a Qualified Person (QPESA), and is suitable to support a RSC filing. Tasks relating to the Phase Two ESA included:

• A Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) including – safety provisions for project team members (i.e. protective gloves, hard hat, safety boots and safety glasses);

• Preparation of a Sampling and Analysis Plan based on the Phase One ESA; • Review of MTE Standard Operating Procedures for borehole and monitoring

well installation, equipment calibration, groundwater sampling, disposal of soil cuttings and development water and equipment decontamination;

• Drilling of four (4) boreholes at three (3) Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC 1 through 3) identified in the Phase One ESA completed by MTE;

• Assessment and field screening of soil samples from each borehole for the presence of environmental impacts;

• Submission of selected soil samples for laboratory analysis of contaminants of potential concern: Petroleum Hydrocarbon (PHC) Fractions F1-F4, Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Xylene (BTEX), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Metals according to chain-of-custody procedures;

• Submission of selected soil samples for grain size and pH analysis; • Installation of permanent monitoring wells in each of the boreholes identified as

“MW”; • Measurement of water levels at each of the monitoring wells for determination

of groundwater flow and gradient; • Collection of groundwater samples from each of the monitoring wells for

submission to an accredited laboratory for analysis of PHC F1-F4, BTEX, VOCs, PAHs, Metals, Inorganics and pH as specified on the chain of custody;

• Quality Assurance/Quality control (QA/QC) procedures for field activities and laboratory data;

• Photographic record of field activities; • Preparation of a Phase Two Conceptual Site Model (CSM); and • Data analysis and report preparation.

A Sampling and Analysis Plan for the project is included in Appendix A1. The Sampling and Analysis Plan describes how each APEC was to be investigated including: reference to MTE Standard Operating Procedures, the media to be tested, the number of samples to be collected, the Contaminants of Potential Concern (CoPC) to be analyzed, the required field screening and record keeping procedures.


The sampling program (including QA/QC methods) was conducted in accordance with MTE Standard Operating Procedures in conjunction with the MOE document “Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods of Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario,” dated December 1996. All chemical analyses were performed in accordance with the document “Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act,” dated March 2004 (as amended). (ii) Media Investigated The rationale for borehole locations was based upon investigating the four Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) from the Phase One ESA and consideration of utility locations, property boundaries and access. No excavations were performed. Soil and/or groundwater samples were collected from the following locations during the drilling program:

• MW101-12 was located in the landscaped area at the northeast corner of the Site

to address APEC-2 (fill of unknown quality) and APEC-3 (Potential off-site impact from furniture manufacturing);

• MW102-12 & MW103-12 were located in the asphalt laneway along the western boundary of the site to address APEC-1 (Former fuel storage UST); and

• MW104-12 was located in the parking area at the southeast corner of the Site to address APEC-2 (fill of unknown quality) and APEC-3 (Potential off-site impact from furniture manufacturing).

The results for all soil and groundwater samples submitted for analysis were used in the Phase Two ESA. Since there is no surface water or sediment on the Phase Two Property, no samples were collected. No soil vapour probes were installed for measuring soil vapour. (iii) Phase One Conceptual Site Model MTE has identified multiple potentially contaminating activities that were or may have been performed on the Phase One Property and within the Phase One Study Area. The geology and hydrogeology for the Phase One Property is provided by borehole logs in the EcoLog Eris report, which identified fill materials above native layers of compact sand and silt to a maximum depth of 12.5 m.b.g.s. Saturated soil conditions were encountered at one location at approximately 6.7 m.b.g.s. The Phase One Property comprises approximately 0.19 hectares (0.48 acres) with a large rectangular-shaped building and asphalt parking area. There is a basement. The Phase One Property is currently used for Institutional purposes.


The Phase One Property is surrounded by residential dwellings to the north and south, gravel parking lot & Mary Allen Park to the east and a church and convent to the west. Allen Street is located to the north and Willow Street is located to the east the Phase One Property. The Phase One Property is not considered a “Sensitive Site”, or shallow soil condition or proximity to a water body according to Regulation 153/04 (as amended) for environmental assessment purposes. The shallow groundwater flow direction in the general area of the Phase One Property is surmised to be northerly based on local topography, towards Laurel Creek located 300 m to the north. The Phase One Property is located within a designated Source Water Protection Sensitivity Area 4 and is located approximately 300 m east of the William Street wellfield. The presence of buried utilities (including hydro gas, Bell, water and sanitary sewers) on the Phase One Property, as well as municipal services along the adjacent roadways may influence the movement and distribution of potential contaminants of concern on the property depending on the depth to groundwater. Phase One Conceptual Site Model has been completed in accordance with Regulation 153/04 (as amended). Refer to Figure 6. A Legal Survey has not been completed for the Phase One Property. Please note that the legal description for the Phase One Property has not been confirmed by a lawyer. This represents potential uncertainty in the Phase One ESA; however the QPESA has determined that this uncertainty does not affect the validity of the Phase One ESA Conceptual Site Models or the conclusions in this report. The following components represent potential uncertainty in the Phase One ESA:

• A Legal survey was not available at the time of completing the report. An updated Legal survey would be required; and

• The legal description for the Phase One Property has not been confirmed by a lawyer.

The QPESA determined that this uncertainty does not affect the validity of the Phase One ESA Conceptual Site Model. (iv) Deviations from Sampling and Analysis Plan The Sampling and Analysis Plan provided in Appendix A1 proposed a total of four (4) boreholes constructed as permanent monitoring wells to evaluate the potential environmental concerns in soil and groundwater. Due to a condition at MW101-12, a


water level was not obtained and a groundwater sample could not be collected. A groundwater duplicate sample, a field blank and a trip blank were not collected during groundwater sampling activities. There were no other deviations from the Sampling and Analysis Plan that limit the investigation or the findings. (v) Impediments MTE did not encounter any physical impediments or denied access during the Phase Two ESA. 5. INVESTIGATION METHOD (i) General A Site Specific HASP was developed in accordance with MTE policy prior to commencement of field work. The Site Specific HASP identifies the location of the work, field activities, responsibilities of MTE and contractor personnel, potential compounds present, physical hazards, environmental conditions, personal protective equipment, training required and directions to the nearest emergency health care provider. A copy of the HASP is on file with MTE. MTE reviewed and followed the following company Standard Operating Procedures:

• 5.ENV.3(5)(a) - Borehole Drilling revised September 2010; • 5.ENV.3(5)(d) - Field Screening Measurements (Soil) and Equipment Calibration

revised October 2011; • 5.ENV.3(5)(e) – Monitoring Well Installation revised September 2010; • 5.ENV.3(5)(f) - Monitoring Well Development revised July 2011; • 5.ENV.3(5)(g) - Field Measurement of Water Quality and Equipment Calibration

revised July 2011; and • 5.ENV.3(5)(i) - Groundwater Sampling revised July 2011.

All borehole and monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 2. Borehole logs and photographs of field activity are provided in Appendix A2. (ii) Drilling and Excavating The drilling activities were completed on July 3, 2012 and included the advancement of four (4) boreholes, each installed as a monitoring well and denoted as MW101-12, MW102-12, MW103-12 and MW104-12. The maximum finished drilling depth of 13.7 m.b.g.s was based on field observations of geologic conditions in order to meet the project objectives.


The drilling contractor (Direct Environmental of Milton) used a track-mount direct push (percussion) GeoProbe and a track-mount Dietrich auger rig to complete the work. The drill equipment was cleaned between locations using soapy water and rinsed with a pressure washer, according to industry standard procedures, to avoid cross contamination. Drilling wastes were placed in sealed drums with the soil cuttings. Typically, continuous soil cores were recovered at each borehole to the depth explored. All soil cores were logged by MTE for geological characteristics, field screened and inspected for visual and olfactory evidence of environmental impacts. Sand or sand and gravel fill was encountered below topsoil or asphalt in each of the boreholes to a maximum depth of 3.05 m.b.g.s. The fill contained brick fragments at MW102-12 and slag and cinders at MW104-12. Concrete was observed at MW103-12 possibly associated with the former UST vault along the west side of the school. The fill layer was dry at all locations except MW103-12 where perched groundwater was observed. Below the fill, native silty clay was encountered to a maximum depth of 7.9 m.b.g.s. The clay layer was dry to damp. Below the clay, native sandy silt was encountered to the maximum depths explored. The sandy silt layer was generally wet to saturated, representing a water bearing unit. Bedrock was not encountered to the depths explored. No evidence of buried waste, peat or decaying material was observed. Each of the permanent monitoring wells were constructed with 3.0 metre long, 50 mm diameter, No. 10 slotted PVC screen and a flush-mounted protective steel casing. The drilling contractor has filed MOE well logs for each monitoring well in accordance with Regulation 903. No excavations were performed and no soil vapour probes were installed for measuring soil vapour. (iii) Field Screening Measures Soil cores were recovered during drilling and examined for visual and olfactory (odour) evidence of environmental impact. Fill containing slag and cinders (with a mild odour) was observed at MW104-12. There were no other concerns identified during field screening of the soil cores collected from the boreholes. Soil core samples were field screened by MTE using a pre-cleaned and calibrated MultiRAE 2000 single-gas detector to measure the total organic vapour. The MultiRAE 2000 detection limits are capable of 0-200 ppm VOCs with 0.1 ppm resolution or 200-2000 ppm VOCs with 1 ppm resolution. Equipment calibration and maintenance was performed by MTE according to manufacturers’ recommendations prior to arriving at the Site to ensure proper operation in the field.


The MultiRAE 2000 calibration process includes a fresh air/zero calibration and a single sensor calibration for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) using isobutylene. The fresh air/zero calibration is completed by using a charcoal filter or clean air. The fresh air calibration calibrates the unit to background conditions. After completing a fresh air/zero calibration and moisture test response, a calibration using isobutylene must be completed. There were no elevated organic vapours in the field screened samples. (iv) Soil Sampling Soil samples were collected during the drilling program for laboratory analysis based on the requirements in the SAP and according to field screening results where there was visual indication of potential impact. This included a sample from the surficial fill layer at MW104-12 due to the presence of slag and cinders, as well as samples from native materials at or above the water table depth at all locations. A sample for grain size analysis was collected from the native soil at MW103-12 (4.3 to 4.6 m.b.g.s). As required by the MOE Protocol of Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental protection Act – March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, special care must be used when sampling for BTEX, PHC F1, VOCs. For this project MTE obtained soil samples for analysis of BTEX, PHC F1 and VOCs using hermetic sample devices that take and seal a single soil sample from the undisturbed soil core. Soil samples were collected for analysis of PHC F2-F4, PAHs, Metals and pH by removing a portion of the soil core directly from the spilt spoon and placing it into a sealable glass jar. The MTE field technician utilized a steel trowel that was cleaned before each use to extract each sample. A new pair of nitrile gloves was worn to examine each spilt spoon and collect samples. All soil samples were placed in laboratory-sealed sample containers, sealed, labeled and stored in a cooler with ice for transportation to AGAT Laboratories Ltd. of Mississauga, Ontario. Standard QA/QC protocols were followed for bottle preparation and transport, as outlined by MOE guidance documents.


Refer to Table 5(iv) below for the Soil Samples Submitted for Analysis according to chain of custody.

Table 5(iv) – Soil Samples Submitted for Analysis Phase Two ESA – 75 Allen Street East, Waterloo

Sample Name Location Date Depth (m.b.g.s) Rationale (*) Analysis

MW101-12 (3-4') MW101-12 3-July-12

0.9-1.2 As per Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) Metals

MW191-12 (3-4’)** Duplicate Metals MW101-12 (20-21') 6.1-6.4 As per SAP PHCs, VOCs MW102-12 (2-3')

MW102-11 3-July-12 0.6-0.9 As per SAP Metals, SAR, pH MW102-12 (38-39') 11.6-11.9 As per SAP PHCs, VOCs, pH MW103-12 (1-2')

MW103-11 3-July-12 0.3-0.6 As per SAP Metals, PAHs MW103-12 (4-5') 1.2-1.5 As per SAP PHCs, VOCs

MW104-12 (4-4.5')

MW104-11 3-July-12

1.2-1.4 Visual evidence of poor quality fill Metals, PAHs

MW104-12 (12-13') 3.65-4.0 Sample below suspected soil

impacts pH

MW104-12 (35-36') 10.7-11.0 As per SAP PHCs, VOCs Notes: m.b.g.s - metres below ground surface (*) Refer to the Sampling and Analysis Plan in Appendix A1 and Field Screening Measures described below for rationale

** MW191-12 (3-4’) is a duplicate sample of MW101-12 (3-4’) (v) Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation Permanent monitoring wells were installed at each of the borehole locations by Direct Environmental Drilling Inc. of Milton, Ontario, (a licensed well driller). MTE was present during the monitoring well installation to record and document the well construction details. Nitrile gloves were worn during all work with the monitors, including water level checks. Each monitoring well was constructed with 3.0 metre long, 50 mm diameter, No. 10 slotted PVC screen. The monitor pipe and screens were received pre-cleaned and sealed in a protective plastic wrap from the manufacturer. The riser pipe and screen sections were pre-threaded with O-ring seals. No glues or solvents were used to connect the pipe sections. A coarse grained (#3) sand pack was placed around the screen to allow for groundwater collection in the well. Bentonite (holeplug) was placed immediately above the sand pack to hydraulically isolate the screened portion of the well. The holeplug was


manually hydrated with potable water at the time of placement. Each monitoring well was completed with a flush-mounted, steel protective casing, which was cemented in place. The drilling contractor has filed MOE well logs for each monitoring well in accordance with Regulation 903. Refer to Table 5(v) below for Monitoring Well Installation Details.

Table 5(v) – Monitoring Well Installation Details Phase Two ESA – 75 Allen Street East, Waterloo

Monitoring Well

Ground Surface (m)

Water Level (m.b.t.o.p)

Well Depth (m.b.g.s)

Screen Length (m)

Sand Pack (m)

Bentonite Seal (m)

MW101-12 100.232 Dry 9.1 3.0 3.3 5.8 MW102-12 100.685 12.03 13.7 3.0 3.3 10.4 MW103-12 100.747 1.095 4.6 3.0 3.0 1.6 MW104-12 100.305 11.57 12.2 3.0 3.3 8.9

Notes: m.b.g.s - metres below ground surface m.b.t.o.p. – metres below top of pipe Water levels measured on July 27, 2012

All monitoring wells are in good condition.

(vi) Groundwater Field Measurements of Water Quality Parameters Purging and well development included removing stagnant water from the monitoring well and the surrounding sand pack to allow a representative groundwater sample to be collected. Dedicated Waterra tubing and a foot valve were used to purge the wells. Field chemistry parameters such as conductivity, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation reduction potential and turbidity were monitored during well development using a Horiba U-52 Water Quality Meter until stabilized measurements were recorded. At a minimum, each monitoring well was purged dry once before sampling. (vii) Groundwater Sampling Following purging and well development, groundwater samples were collected from permanent monitoring wells as outlined in the SAP and SOP documents. Representative groundwater was examined for visual and olfactory evidence of impact and placed in laboratory-approved sample bottles, sealed, labeled and stored in a cooler for transportation to AGAT Laboratories Ltd. of Mississauga, Ontario. The groundwater sample from MW103-12 exhibited a faint hydrocarbon odour. There was no sheen or free product or other environmental impact identified in groundwater at the time of sampling. The samples were collected and submitted on July 13, 2012 under chain-of-custody for analysis of PHC F1-F4, BTEX, VOCs, PAHs, Metals, Inorganics and pH as shown on Table 5(vii). Standard QA/QC protocols were followed for bottle


preparation and transport, as outlined by MOE guidance documents. Groundwater samples analyzed for Metals were field filtered using a high capacity 0.45 micron in-line field filter placed on the dedicated tubing. No duplicate samples were collected.

Table 5(vii) – Groundwater Samples Submitted for Analysis Phase Two ESA – 75 Allen Street East, Waterloo

Sample Name

Analysis Performed

Sample Description

MW102-11 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs Slightly cloudy

MW103-11 PHCs, VOCs, Metals, Inorganics, pH Low turbidity

MW104-11 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs Low turbidity (viii) Sediment Sampling There is no sediment present on the Phase Two Property, therefore sediment samples were not collected for analysis. (ix) Analytical Testing Representative soil and groundwater samples were submitted under chain-of-custody to AGAT Laboratories Ltd. of Mississauga, Ontario. AGAT Laboratories is accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) through membership number 3200. The AGAT contact is Mr. Nick Boulton at 5835 Coopers Avenue in Mississauga. Mr. Boulton can be reached at (905) 712-5075. (x) Residue Management Procedures Soil cuttings and purge water from monitoring well development are temporarily stored on the property in steel drums with a secure lid and label, awaiting disposal off-site.

(xi) Elevation Survey An elevation survey was completed by MTE for all monitoring wells at the Phase Two Property on July 27, 2012. A fire hydrant at the intersection of Allen and Willow Streets was surveyed and given an arbitrary datum of 100.000 metres. Monitoring well and groundwater elevations are provided on Table 6(ii) and Figure 3. (xii) Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) was maintained during the field program through equipment decontamination and sampling procedures, as outlined in the MOE Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods (MOE, 1996).


The water level probe and sample trowel were decontaminated between sampling locations. This is accomplished by rinsing cleaning fluids over the equipment in the sequence listed below:

1. Phosphate-free detergent, such as Alcanox or Liquinox. 2. Potable water from a municipal water system. 3. Acid rinse or solvent rinse, as follows:

a. If sampling for trace metals (parts per billion) – 10% nitric acid rinse b. If sampling for organics – methanol c. If sampling for highly adsorptive chemicals (dioxins or PCBs), or trace

level organics (parts per trillion) – hexane 4. De-ionized water.

All samples were placed into pre-cleaned laboratory supplied bottles then clearly labeled with a unique sample identifier, project number, MTE contact, sample parameters required and date. A duplicate soil sample was collected from MW101-12 (at a depth of 0.9-1.2 m), and labeled MW191-12. The sample was submitted for analysis of Metals. Soil samples analyzed for VOCs and PHC Fraction F1 were collected in unpreserved hermetic sample devices that take and seal a single soil sample from the undisturbed soil core. Soil samples collected for PHC Fractions F2-F4, PAHs, Metals and pH were collected in 120 ml unpreserved amber glass jars supplied by the laboratory. Groundwater samples analyzed for VOCs and PHC Fraction F1 were placed in septum vials with Teflon® lined lids with zero head space. The following details the container types and preservatives for the ground water analytes sampled for:

Ground Water Analyte Group Container Type Preservative PHC Fraction F1 and VOCs 3 – 40 ml Amber Vials NaHS04

PHC Fraction F2-F4 1 – 500 ml Amber Glass Bottle HCl PAHs 2 – 1L Amber Glass Bottle None

Metals 1 – 120 ml Plastic Bottle (Field Filtered) HNO3

pH 1 – 250 ml Plastic Bottle None The samples were stored in insulated coolers with ice packs to initiate cooling for transportation to the laboratory. Field logbooks were maintained by technical staff to record data collection and sampling activities. The equipment used to collect samples was noted, along with the time of sampling, sampling description, depth from which the samples were collected and volume and number of containers. All samples were accompanied by a completed


chain of custody record which listed the sample identification, sample dates and time, sample matrix, the number of containers and analytical parameters for which the samples are to be tested. The laboratory has confirmed that all samples were received in good condition, within the required range of temperature and that holding times were met. Extensive QA/QC procedures were carried out by the analytical laboratory, including:

• Lab blanks; • Spikes; • Matrix blanks; and • Instrument tuning and performance assessment.

As a means of determining the reproducibility or variability related to analytical procedures and sample homogeneity, the percentage differences between analyzed values for original and duplicate samples were calculated by MTE. Based upon the above, the QPESA has determined that field sampling and lab protocols were satisfactory and that all sample data is acceptable for evaluation. 6. REVIEW AND EVALUATION (i) Geology A total of four (4) boreholes were advanced to a maximum depth of 13.7 m.b.g.s. Fill consisting of sand or sand and gravel was encountered in each of the boreholes to a maximum depth of 3.05 m.b.g.s. The fill layer was dry at all locations except MW103-12 where perched groundwater was observed. Below the fill, native silty clay was encountered to a maximum depth of 7.9 m.b.g.s. The clay layer was dry to damp. Below the clay, native sandy silt was encountered to the maximum depths explored. The sandy silt layer was generally wet to saturated, representing a water bearing unit (water table). Bedrock was not encountered to the depths explored. No evidence of buried waste, peat or decaying material was observed. (ii) Groundwater Elevations and Flow Direction Groundwater elevations were measured on July 27, 2012. The depth to groundwater ranged from 11.57 m at the southeast limit of the property to 12.03 metres at the northwest limit of the property. This does not include the water level at MW103-12 in fill material associated with a former UST excavation which is considered perched.


MTE completed a concurrent Phase Two ESA for the adjacent property to the east at 70 Willow Street. During the investigation, two permanent monitoring wells (MW105-12 and MW106-12) were installed at this location and have been used to determine groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradients at the Phase Two Property. The groundwater flow direction beneath the Phase Two Property appears to be northwesterly towards Laurel Creek based on relative groundwater elevations, which is generally consistent with the Phase One CSM. There was no evidence of a hydrocarbon sheen or free product in any monitoring wells or groundwater samples. Refer to Figure 3 for the Shallow Groundwater Flow Direction. Refer to Table 6(ii) below for groundwater elevations.

Table 6(ii) – Groundwater Elevations Phase Two ESA – 75 Allen Street East, Waterloo

Monitoring Well

Ground Surface (m) Water Level

(m.b.t.o.p) GW

Elevation (m)

Notes

MW101-12 100.232 Dry NA On Site MW102-12 100.685 12.03 88.655 On Site MW103-12* 100.747* 1.095* 99.652* On Site MW104-12 100.305 11.57 88.735 On Site MW105-12 98.465 9.345 89.12 Off Site MW106-12 99.08 10.13 88.95 Off Site

Notes: m.b.t.o.p. – metres below top of pipe Water levels measured on July 27, 2012 Arbitrary benchmark established as 100.000 m at top of fire hydrant at Willow and Allen Streets *Denotes perched groundwater condition (iii) Groundwater Hydraulic Gradients The groundwater elevation declines from approximately 88.95 m at MW106-12 at 70 Willow Street to 88.655 m at MW102-12 at the northwestern corner of the Phase Two Property, which are approximately 60 meters apart. This represents a horizontal gradient of 0.005 which is considered to be typical for a water bearing silt unit. Vertical gradients have not been assessed, however the potential for vertical migration of groundwater is low given the presence of silt and clay across the Site.


MTE did not complete a hydraulic conductivity test on any monitoring wells at the Site, however a typical hydraulic conductivity (K) of 10-5 m/s for silt was used to calculate the average linear velocity using the following equation:

V = Ki n

Where: K = 10-5 m/s (Table 2.2, Freeze and Cherry, 1979) i = 0.005 m/m n = 0.35 (Table 2.4, Freeze and Cherry, 1979)

V= 1.43 X 10-7 m/s V= 0.43 m/ year

The average linear velocity was estimated to be 0.5 m/year across the Site. (iv) Soil Texture A sample of the native silt (till) was collected from MW103-12 (4.3-4.6m) for grain size analysis. The following summarize the grain size findings:

• Approximately 32% of the native materials are sand, 47% of the materials are silt and 21% of the materials were clay, indicating a medium/fine soil texture.

Refer to Appendix A3. (v) Soil Field Screening Soil cores were recovered from split spoons during drilling and examined for visual and olfactory (odour) evidence of environmental impact. Poor quality fill including slag and cinders was observed at MW104-12. A portion from each soil core was placed in a sealable plastic bag for measurement of organic vapour in the headspace using a pre-cleaned and calibrated Photoionization Detector (PID). There were no elevated organic vapours in the field screened samples. (vi) Soil Quality Contaminants of Potential Concern in soil and groundwater identified by the Phase One ESA include the following:

1. Petroleum Hydrocarbon (PHC) Fractions F1-F4. 2. Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Xylene (BTEX). 3. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). 4. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). 5. Metals.


A summary of the soil samples submitted for analysis is provided in MTE Table 5(iii). The analytical results for soil are provided in MTE Table 6(vi), along with a comparison to the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for institutional use and medium/fine textured soils. Laboratory Certificates of Analysis are provided in Appendix A3. The following sections summarize the analytical findings for the soil samples. Petroleum Hydrocarbon (PHC) Fraction F1-F4 Four soil samples were submitted for analysis of PHC F1-F4: MW101-12 at a depth of 6.1-6.4 m.b.g.s; MW102-12 at a depth of 11.6-11.9 m.b.g.s; MW103-12 at a depth of 1.2-1.5 m.b.g.s; and MW104-12 at a depth of 10.7-11.0 m.b.g.s. There were no detections and accordingly no exceedences of MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for PHC Fractions F1-F4 in the soil samples submitted for analysis. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Four soil samples were submitted for analysis of VOCs: MW101-12 at a depth of 6.1-6.4 m.b.g.s; MW102-12 at a depth of 11.6-11.9 m.b.g.s; MW103-12 at a depth of 1.2-1.5 m.b.g.s; and MW104-12 at a depth of 10.7-11.0 m.b.g.s. There were no detections and accordingly no exceedences of MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for VOCs in the soil samples submitted for analysis. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Two samples were submitted for analysis of PAHs: MW103-12 at a depth of 0.3-0.6 m.b.g.s; MW104-12 at a depth of 1.2-1.4 m.b.g.s. The sample from MW104-12 reported exceedences of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for Fluorathene, Benz(a)anthracene, Benzo(b)Fluorathene, Benzo(k)Fluoranthene, Benzo(a)pyrene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene and Dibenz(a,h)anthracene. There were no other exceedences of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for PAHs in the soil samples submitted for analysis. Metals Five soil samples were submitted for analysis of Metals: MW101-12 at a depth of 0.9-1.2 m.b.g.s; MW191-12 (duplicate of MW101-12) at a depth of 0.9-1.2 m.b.g.s; MW102-12 at a depth of 0.6-0.9 m.b.g.s; MW103-12 at a depth of 0.3-0.6 m.b.g.s; and MW104-12 at a depth of 1.2-1.4 m.b.g.s. There were no exceedences of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for Metals in the soil samples submitted for analysis.


Other Parameters Soil samples were collected at the following locations for pH analysis:

• MW102-12 at a surface depth of 0.6-0.9 m.b.g.s; • MW102-12 at a subsurface depth of 11.6-11.9 m.b.g.s; and • MW104-12 at a subsurface depth of 3.65-4.0 m.b.g.s.

The pH results were similar, ranging between 7.89 and 7.92, which are within the acceptable range established by the MOE for surface (5.0 to 9.0) and subsurface (5.0 to 11.0) soils. Additional Evaluation The QPESA has determined that various PAHs are present in shallow fill at levels exceeding the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards. These impacts are attributed to slag and cinders that may be associated with former use of coal and/or demolition of adjacent buildings. Typically, PAHs are not readily soluble in water at normal pH levels. These impacts do not represent a source of contamination to groundwater and have not been detected in groundwater. PAHs are not volatile and are not associated with any chemical or biologic transformation. (vii) Groundwater Quality The contaminants of potential concern in groundwater identified by the Phase One ESA included the following:

1. Petroleum Hydrocarbon (PHC) Fractions F1-F4. 2. Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Xylene (BTEX). 3. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). 4. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). 5. Metals.

A summary of the groundwater samples submitted for analysis is provided in MTE Table 5(vii). Analytical results in groundwater are provided in MTE Table 6(vii), along with a comparison to the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards. Laboratory Certificates of Analysis are provided in Appendix A3. The following sections summarize the analytical findings for the groundwater samples. Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) Fractions F1-F4 Three groundwater samples were submitted for analysis of PHC F1-F4 including: MW102-12, MW103-12 and MW104-12.


The sample from MW103-12 (suspected to be perched groundwater) reported a marginal exceedence of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for PHC Fraction F2 that may be attributed to the location of the former heating oil UST. There were no other detections and accordingly no exceedences of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for PHC F1-F4 in the remaining groundwater samples submitted for analysis. Volatile Organic Compounds including BTEX (VOCs) Three groundwater samples were submitted for analysis of VOCs including: MW102-12, MW103-12, and MW104-12. There were no elevated levels or exceedences of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for VOCs in the groundwater samples submitted for analysis. Metals and Inorganics A groundwater sample was submitted for analysis of Metals and Inorganics from MW103-12. The groundwater sample from MW103-12 reported a marginal exceedence of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standard for Vanadium which may be naturally occurring or associated with silt in the sample. There were no other elevated levels or exceedences of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for Metals or Inorganics in the groundwater sample submitted for analysis. PAHs Two groundwater samples were submitted for analysis of Metals and Inorganics from MW102-12 and MW104-12. There were no detections and accordingly no exceedences of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for PAHs in the groundwater samples submitted for analysis. Other Parameters A groundwater sample was submitted for analysis of pH from MW103-12. The pH result was 8.46, which is considered acceptable for drinking water. Additional Evaluation The QPESA has determined that Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction F2 is present in perched groundwater in the vicinity of MW103-12 at low levels. There is no indication of widespread contamination or free product. This compound is considered to be moderately volatile but is not associated with any chemical or biologic transformation.


The QPESA has determined that Vanadium is also present in groundwater in the vicinity of MW103-12 at levels above the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standard. This compound is not volatile and is not associated with any chemical or biologic transformation. It is possible that sediment in the sample may have caused a bias result in the laboratory analysis. (viii) Sediment Quality Sediment samples were not collected as a part of this assignment. (ix) Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results Laboratory Certificates of Analysis from all soil and groundwater samples analyzed are provided in Appendix A3. AGAT Laboratory is CALA certified. The lab reports are signed by the lab manager(s). AGAT has indicated that all samples were received in good condition, within an acceptable temperature range. There were no lab qualifiers with respect to holding time, preservation method or sample container. As noted, a duplicate soil sample was collected from MW101-12 (at a depth of 0.9-1.2 m), and labeled MW191-12. The samples were submitted for analysis of Metals. The results between the primary sample and the duplicate sample were similar. The quality of data depends upon planning, sampling, analysis and reporting. As a means of determining the reproducibility or variability related to analytical procedures of the sample homogeneity, relative percentage differences (RPD) between analyzed values for original and duplicate sample results were calculated suing the following formula:

RPD Value = [ (Analyte A in Test 1 – Analyte A in Test 2) ] x 100 (Analyte A in Test 1 + Analyte A in Test 2)/2.

The maximum RPD values in soil were as follows:

Sample ID Parameter Maximum RPD Values MW101-12 and MW191-12 Metals 28.57% (Arsenic)

The site specific SAP provides an RPD criterion of 30% in 90% of the analyzed parameters for acceptance of soil and water data. The maximum RPD values in soil meet this requirement. The results indicate that field sampling and lab protocols were satisfactory and that the data is acceptable for evaluation. The QPESA is satisfied that the overall objectives of the investigation were met and that the data set has allowed appropriate decisions to be made regarding the environmental conditions of the Site.


(x) Phase Two Conceptual Site Model Investigations of the property have confirmed that more than 2 meters of overburden is present above bedrock, therefore it is not a shallow soil condition. There are no surface water bodies on or within 30 meters of the property. The property is not on or within an area of natural significance and soil pH is within acceptable range, therefore it is not considered to be a “Sensitive Site” under Regulation 153/04 (as amended). The City of Waterloo obtains drinking water from a groundwater source. Accordingly, the analytical results for soil and groundwater samples have been compared to Table 2 of the MOE Soil, Groundwater and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011 for Residential/Parkland/Institutional use and fine/medium textured soil. MTE identified potentially contaminating activities that were or may have been performed on the Phase One Property or in the Phase One Study Area As a result, three APECs were investigated during the Phase Two ESA. The following site specific data and information has been collected during the Phase Two ESA to supplement the Phase One CSM described in Section 4(iii):

• The school building occupies approximately 70% of the Phase Two Property and contains a basement. The building is bordered by pavement on the west and south sides.

• The depth to groundwater ranged from 11.57 to 12.03 m.b.g.s., in native silt. This does not include the water level at MW103-12 in fill material associated with a former UST excavation which is considered perched.

• The groundwater elevations at the Site indicate a northwesterly flow direction toward Laurel Creek.

• The horizontal gradient is 0.005 which is considered to be typical for a water bearing silt unit.

• Bedrock was not encountered to a depth of 13.7 meters below ground surface. • The QPESA has determined that various PAHs are present in shallow fill at levels

exceeding the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards. These impacts do not extend into the native silt layer. These impacts are associated with slag and cinders.

• The QPESA has determined that Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction F2 is present in perched groundwater in the vicinity of MW103-12 at low levels. There is no indication widespread impact in groundwater or any evidence of free product.

• The QPESA has determined that Vanadium is also present in groundwater in the vicinity of MW103-12 at levels above the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standard. It is possible that sediment in the sample may have caused a biased result in the laboratory analysis.

• Subsurface utilities are present along Allen Street and Willow Street but are anticipated to be located well above the water table.


Based on the most recent (institutional) use of the Site, the following human and ecological receptors are identified:

• Outdoor workers (teenagers and adults) who are involved in property maintenance;

• Indoor workers who will spend all of their time on Site within the building • Site-visitors (toddlers, children, teenagers and adults) to the property; • Construction/utility workers (adults) involved in subsurface construction or utility

repair at the Site; • Terrestrial plants typical of an urban property; • Soil organisms; and • Birds and small mammals typical of an urban environment.

The following exposure pathways are considered for current and future human receptors:

• Soil: o Direct contact, including incidental ingestion, dermal contact and

inhalation of particulate matter; and o Inhalation of indoor and/or outdoor vapours.

• Groundwater: o Possible vapour intrusion to indoor air associated with Petroleum

Hydrocarbon Fractions F2 in perched groundwater. The following exposure pathways are considered for ecological receptors:

• Soil: o Direct contact, including ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation of

particulate matter; o Ingestion of vegetation or prey; and o Inhalation or exposure to vapours.

• Groundwater:

o None. A Phase Two Conceptual Site Model has been prepared in accordance with Schedule E, Part V, Table 1, S6(x) of Regulation 153/04 (as amended). Refer to Figure 4.


7. CONCLUSIONS The QPESA is satisfied that each APEC has been investigated and that sufficient samples have been collected and analyzed for the contaminants of potential concern identified in the Phase One ESA. Refer to Tables 5(iii) and 5 (vii) for a detailed summary of the samples collected for analysis in soil and groundwater, including reference to each APEC. It should be noted that the soil and groundwater conditions between and beyond the sampled locations may differ from those encountered during this assignment. The following subsections summarize the results of Phase Two ESA: Residue Management There are several 45 gallon drums of soil cuttings and purge water located along the west side of the 75 Allen Street building. A Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) sample should be provided to an approved landfill prior to any soil disposal. Appendix A4 is intentionally blank. Plan of Survey of the Property A copy of an up to date legal site survey has not been provided at the time of report completion. Appendix A5 is intentionally blank. Remediation No remediation has been carried out at the property during the Phase Two ESA. Appendix B is intentionally blank. Soil Brought to the Property No soil has been brought to the property during the Phase Two ESA. Appendix C is intentionally blank. Risk Assessment A Risk Assessment has not been completed. Appendix D is intentionally blank.


Soil Results There is evidence of slag and cinder in fill material at the southeast corner of the Phase Two Property that contain impact due to various PAHs. The depth of fill extends to 1.5 metres in this area, representing a potential volume of impacted material to be on the order of 360 cubic meters. The approximate limits of slag and cinder containing material is shown on Figure 5. Groundwater Results An exceedence of the MOE Table 2 Standards was reported for petroleum hydrocarbon fraction F2 in perched groundwater at MW103-12. No evidence of widespread contamination in groundwater or free product was observed. Monitoring well MW102-12 was advanced approximately 20 metres to the north (downgradient) of MW103-12 and there were no detections of PHCs F1–F4 at that location. Monitoring well MW104-12 was advanced approximately 20 metres to the east (cross-gradient) of MW103-12 and there were no detections of PHCs F1–F4 at that location. Based on this, it appears that PHC impacts in groundwater at MW103-12 are in a localized area associated with the former heating oil UST. An exceedence of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standard for Vanadium was also reported at MW103-12. This is likely a result of sediment in the sample and does not represent an environmental concern. The approximate limits of impact in groundwater are shown on Figure 5. 8. RECOMMENDATION AND NEXT STEPS This Phase Two ESA has been completed in accordance with Regulation 153/04 (as amended) for the City of Waterloo, in advance of a potential real estate transaction. A RSC cannot be filed for the property at this time. However, based on the results for soil and groundwater, there is no evidence of an adverse affect to human health or the environment at this time that would prompt notification to the MOE or a need for remedial action. If an RSC were requested or required for a new use, remediation and/or Risk Assessment would be necessary. Under a redevelopment scenario, removal of slag and cinder would likely require disposal to a landfill as the material is not inert, and localized pumping and removal of perched groundwater at MW103-12 would also be required during any dewatering. This report should be read in conjunction with the Phase One ESA dated July 20, 2012. This report does not address geotechnical or site planning related matters.


10. REFERENCES “Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 75 Allen Street East, Waterloo, Ontario,” completed by MTE Consultants Inc. for the City of Waterloo, dated July 20, 2012.

FIGURES

TABLES

Table 6(vi): Analytical Results in Soil

MOE 2011 MW 101-12 (3-4') MW 191-12 (3-4') MW 101-12 (20-21') MW 102-12 (2-3') MW 102-12 (38-39') MW 103-12 (1-2') MW 103-12 (4-5') MW 104-12 (4-4.5') MW 104-12 (12-13') MW104-12 (35-36')

Table 2 Standards 3482394 3482398 3482399 3482401 3482404 3482406 3482410 3482515 3482572 3488528

(Institutional) 4-Jul-12

VOCs

Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/g 0.05 25 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Vinyl Chloride µg/g 0.02 0.022 - - <0.02 - <0.02 - <0.02 - - <0.02

Bromomethane µg/g 0.05 0.05 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Trichlorofluoromethane µg/g 0.05 5.8 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Acetone µg/g 0.50 28 - - <0.50 - <0.50 - <0.50 - - <0.50

1,1-Dichloroethylene µg/g 0.05 0.05 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Methylene Chloride µg/g 0.05 0.96 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene µg/g 0.05 0.75 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Methyl tert-butyl Ether µg/g 0.05 1.4 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

1,1-Dichloroethane µg/g 0.02 0.6 - - <0.02 - <0.02 - <0.02 - - <0.02

Methyl Ethyl Ketone µg/g 0.50 44 - - <0.50 - <0.50 - <0.50 - - <0.50

Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene µg/g 0.02 2.5 - - <0.02 - <0.02 - <0.02 - - <0.02

Chloroform µg/g 0.04 0.17 - - <0.04 - <0.04 - <0.04 - - <0.04

1,2-Dichloroethane µg/g 0.03 0.05 - - <0.03 - <0.03 - <0.03 - - <0.03

1,1,1-Trichloroethane µg/g 0.05 3.4 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Carbon Tetrachloride µg/g 0.05 0.12 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Benzene µg/g 0.02 0.17 - - <0.02 - <0.02 - <0.02 - - <0.02

1,2-Dichloropropane µg/g 0.03 0.085 - - <0.03 - <0.03 - <0.03 - - <0.03

Trichloroethylene µg/g 0.03 0.52 - - <0.03 - <0.03 - <0.03 - - <0.03

Bromodichloromethane µg/g 0.05 1.9 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone µg/g 0.50 4.3 - - <0.50 - <0.50 - <0.50 - - <0.50

1,1,2-Trichloroethane µg/g 0.04 0.05 - - <0.04 - <0.04 - <0.04 - - <0.04

Toluene µg/g 0.05 6 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Dibromochloromethane µg/g 0.05 2.9 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Ethylene Dibromide µg/g 0.04 0.05 - - <0.04 - <0.04 - <0.04 - - <0.04

Tetrachloroethylene µg/g 0.05 2.3 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane µg/g 0.04 0.05 - - <0.04 - <0.04 - <0.04 - - <0.04

Chlorobenzene µg/g 0.05 2.7 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Ethylbenzene µg/g 0.05 1.6 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

m & p-Xylene µg/g 0.05 NV - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Bromoform µg/g 0.05 0.26 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Styrene µg/g 0.05 2.2 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane µg/g 0.05 0.05 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

o-Xylene µg/g 0.05 NV - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

1,3-Dichlorobenzene µg/g 0.05 6 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

1,4-Dichlorobenzene µg/g 0.05 0.097 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

1,2-Dichlorobenzene µg/g 0.05 1.7 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

Xylene Mixture µg/g 0.05 25 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

1,3-Dichloropropene µg/g 0.04 0.081 - - <0.04 - <0.04 - <0.04 - - <0.04

n-Hexane µg/g 0.05 34 - - <0.05 - <0.05 - <0.05 - - <0.05

PHCs

F1 (C6 to C10) µg/g 5 65 - - <5 - <5 - <5 - - <5

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX µg/g 5 65 - - <5 - <5 - <5 - - <5

F2 (C10 to C16) µg/g 10 150 - - <10 - <10 - <10 - - <10

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene µg/g 10 150 - - - - - - - - - -

F3 (C16 to C34) µg/g 50 1300 - - <50 - <50 - <50 - - <50

F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs µg/g 50 1300 - - - - - - - - - -

F4 (C34 to C50) µg/g 50 5600 - - <50 - <50 - <50 - - <50

Parameters Units

3-Jul-12

RDL

Phase Two ESA

75 Allen Street East and 70 Willow Street, Waterloo, ON Page 1 of 2MTE File No.: 37002-100

August 2012

Table 6(vi): Analytical Results in Soil

MOE 2011 MW 101-12 (3-4') MW 191-12 (3-4') MW 101-12 (20-21') MW 102-12 (2-3') MW 102-12 (38-39') MW 103-12 (1-2') MW 103-12 (4-5') MW 104-12 (4-4.5') MW 104-12 (12-13') MW104-12 (35-36')

Table 2 Standards 3482394 3482398 3482399 3482401 3482404 3482406 3482410 3482515 3482572 3488528

(Institutional) 4-Jul-12

Parameters Units

3-Jul-12

RDL

PAHs

Naphthalene µg/g 0.05 0.75 - - - - - <0.05 - <0.05 - -

Acenaphthylene µg/g 0.05 0.17 - - - - - <0.05 - <0.05 - -

Acenaphthene µg/g 0.05 29 - - - - - <0.05 - <0.05 - -

Fluorene µg/g 0.05 69 - - - - - <0.05 - <0.05 - -

Phenanthrene µg/g 0.05 7.8 - - - - - <0.05 - 0.31 - -

Anthracene µg/g 0.05 0.74 - - - - - <0.05 - 0.12 - -

Fluoranthene µg/g 0.05 0.69 - - - - - <0.05 - 1.5 - -

Pyrene µg/g 0.05 78 - - - - - <0.05 - 1.5 - -

Benz(a)anthracene µg/g 0.05 0.63 - - - - - <0.05 - 2.6 - -

Chrysene µg/g 0.05 7.8 - - - - - <0.05 - 2.1 - -

Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/g 0.05 0.78 - - - - - <0.05 - 4 - -

Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/g 0.05 0.78 - - - - - <0.05 - 1.9 - -

Benzo(a)pyrene µg/g 0.05 0.3 - - - - - <0.05 - 3.1 - -

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/g 0.05 0.48 - - - - - <0.05 - 2.9 - -

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/g 0.05 0.1 - - - - - <0.05 - 0.68 - -

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/g 0.05 7.8 - - - - - <0.05 - 2.2 - -

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene µg/g 0.05 3.4 - - - - - <0.05 - 0.05 - -

Metals & Inorganics

Antimony µg/g 0.8 7.5 <0.8 <0.8 - <0.8 - <0.8 - <0.8 - -

Arsenic µg/g 1 18 2 3 - 4 - 3 - 10 - -

Boron µg/g 5 120 <5 <5 - <5 - <5 - 11 - -

Barium µg/g 2 390 25 30 - 10 - 11 - 54 - -

Beryllium µg/g 0.5 5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 - 1.2 - -

Cadmium µg/g 0.5 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 - -

Chromium µg/g 2 160 8 9 - 7 - 6 - 9 - -

Cobalt µg/g 0.5 22 2.3 2.6 - 2.3 - 2.4 - 3.9 - -

Copper µg/g 1 180 5 6 - 14 - 9 - 13 - -

Lead µg/g 1 120 6 7 - 6 - 7 - 24 - -

Molybdenum µg/g 0.5 6.9 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 - 1.2 - -

Nickel µg/g 1 130 5 6 - 5 - 5 - 9 - -

Selenium µg/g 0.4 2.4 <0.4 <0.4 - <0.4 - <0.4 - <0.4 - -

Silver µg/g 0.2 25 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 - <0.2 - <0.2 - -

Thallium µg/g 0.4 1 <0.4 <0.4 - <0.4 - <0.4 - <0.4 - -

Uranium µg/g 0.5 23 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 - 0.9 - -

Vanadium ug/g 1 86 14 17 - 12 - 12 - 21 - -

Zinc µg/g 5 340 36 39 - 35 - 40 - 46 - -

Sodium Adsorption Ratio NA NA 5 - - - 4.04 - - - - - -

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction pH Units NA 5.0-11.0 - - - 7.95 7.92 - - - 7.89 -

Comparison to MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards (Institutional) PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS

Notes:

- Analytical results have been compared to the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for institutional property use in medium/fine textured soil conditions

- Bolded and highlighted values indicate an exceedence of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards

Phase Two ESA


August 2012

Table 6(vii): Analytical Results in GroundwaterMOE 2011 MW102-12 MW103-12 MW104-12

Table 2 Standards 3515377 3515382 3515393

Metals & Inorganics

Antimony µg/L 0.5 6 - 1.2 -

Arsenic µg/L 1.0 25 - 10.2 -

Barium µg/L 2.0 1000 - 17.5 -

Beryllium µg/L 0.5 4.0 - <0.5 -

Boron µg/L 10.0 5000 - 73.7 -

Cadmium µg/L 0.2 2.7 - <0.2 -

Chromium µg/L 2.0 50 - 9.5 -

Cobalt µg/L 0.5 3.8 - <0.5 -

Copper µg/L 1.0 87 - <1.0 -

Lead µg/L 0.5 10 - 1.7 -

Molybdenum µg/L 0.5 70 - 8.6 -

Nickel µg/L 1.0 100 - 1.4 -

Selenium µg/L 1.0 10 - 1.8 -

Silver µg/L 0.2 1.5 - <0.2 -

Thallium µg/L 0.3 2 - <0.3 -

Uranium µg/L 0.5 20 - 1.4 -

Vanadium µg/L 0.4 6.2 - 19.9 -

Zinc µg/L 5.0 1100 - 43.2 -

Sodium µg/L 500 490000 - 254000 -

Chloride µg/L 100 790000 - 101000 -

Nitrate as N µg/L 50 NV - <50 -

Nitrite as N µg/L 50 NV - <50 -

Electrical Conductivity µg/L 2 NA - 1160 -pH µg/L NA NA - 8.46 -

PAHs

Naphthalene µg/L 0.20 11 <0.20 - <0.20

Acenaphthylene µg/L 0.20 1 <0.20 - <0.20

Acenaphthene µg/L 0.20 4.1 <0.20 - <0.20

Fluorene µg/L 0.20 120 <0.20 - <0.20

Phenanthrene µg/L 0.10 1 <0.10 - <0.10

Anthracene µg/L 0.10 2.4 <0.10 - <0.10

Fluoranthene µg/L 0.20 0.41 <0.20 - <0.20

Pyrene µg/L 0.20 4.1 <0.20 - <0.20

Benz(a)anthracene µg/L 0.20 1.0 <0.20 - <0.20

Chrysene µg/L 0.10 0.1 <0.10 - <0.10

Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/L 0.10 0.1 <0.10 - <0.10

Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/L 0.10 0.1 <0.10 - <0.10

Benzo(a)pyrene µg/L 0.01 0.01 <0.01 - <0.01

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/L 0.20 0.2 <0.20 - <0.20

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene µg/L 0.20 0.2 <0.20 - <0.20

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/L 0.20 0.2 <0.20 - <0.202-and 1-methyl Napthalene µg/L 0.20 3.2 <0.20 - <0.20

PHCs

C6 - C10 (F1) µg/L 25 750 <25 <25 <25

C6 - C10 (F1 minus BTEX) µg/L 25 750 <25 <25 <25

C>10 - C16 (F2) µg/L 100 150 <100 380 <100

C10 - C16 (F2 minus Naphthalene) µg/L 100 150 <100 - <100

C>16 - C34 (F3) µg/L 100 500 <100 <100 <100

C16 - C34 (F3 minus PAHs) µg/L 100 500 <100 - <100C>34 - C50 (F4) µg/L 100 500 <100 <100 <100

VOCs

Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/L 0.20 590 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Vinyl Chloride µg/L 0.17 0.5 <0.17 <0.5 <0.17

Bromomethane µg/L 0.20 0.89 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Trichlorofluoromethane µg/L 0.40 150 <0.40 <1.60 <0.40

Acetone µg/L 1.0 2700 <1.0 <4.0 <1.0

1,1-Dichloroethylene µg/L 0.30 1.6 <0.30 <1.20 <0.30

Methylene Chloride µg/L 0.30 50 <0.30 <1.20 <0.30

trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene µg/L 0.20 1.6 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Methyl tert-butyl ether µg/L 0.20 15 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

1,1-Dichloroethane µg/L 0.30 5 <0.30 <1.20 <0.30

Methyl Ethyl Ketone µg/L 1.0 1800 <1.0 <4.0 <1.0

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene µg/L 0.20 1.6 0.24 <0.80 <0.20

Chloroform µg/L 0.20 2.4 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

1,2-Dichloroethane µg/L 0.20 1.6 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane µg/L 0.30 200 <0.30 <1.20 <0.30

Carbon Tetrachloride µg/L 0.20 0.79 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Benzene µg/L 0.20 5.0 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

1,2-Dichloropropane µg/L 0.20 5 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Trichloroethylene µg/L 0.20 1.6 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Bromodichloromethane µg/L 0.20 16 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone µg/L 1.0 640 <1.0 <4.0 <1.0

1,1,2-Trichloroethane µg/L 0.20 4.7 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Toluene µg/L 0.20 24 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Dibromochloromethane µg/L 0.10 25 <0.10 <0.40 <0.10

Ethylene Dibromide µg/L 0.10 0.2 <0.10 <0.2 <0.10

Tetrachloroethylene µg/L 0.20 1.6 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.10 1.1 <0.10 <0.40 <0.10

Chlorobenzene µg/L 0.10 30 <0.10 <0.40 <0.10

Ethylbenzene µg/L 0.10 2.4 <0.10 <0.40 <0.10

m & p-Xylene µg/L 0.20 NV <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

Bromoform µg/L 0.10 25 <0.10 <0.40 <0.10

Styrene µg/L 0.10 5.4 <0.10 <0.40 <0.10

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane µg/L 0.10 1 <0.10 <0.40 <0.10

o-Xylene µg/L 0.10 NV <0.10 <0.40 <0.10

1,3-Dichlorobenzene µg/L 0.10 59 <0.10 <0.40 <0.10



1,3-Dichloropropene µg/L 0.30 0.5 <0.30 <0.5 <0.30

Xylene Mixture µg/L 0.20 300 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20n-Hexane µg/L 0.20 51 <0.20 <0.80 <0.20

PASS FAIL PASS

Notes:

- Analytical results have been compared to the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards for potable use in medium/fine textured soil conditions

- Bolded and highlighted values indicate an exceedence of the MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards

Comparison to MOE 2011 Table 2 Standards

RDLParameters Units

Phase Two ESA


August 2012

APPENDIX A

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

SAMPLING & ANALYSIS PLAN

PROJECT NAME: Phase Two ESA – St. Louis School

LOCATION: 75 Allen Street East, Waterloo, ON

DISTRIBUTION: Philip Lemieux B.E.S., C.E.T., Field Technician Robert J. Fedy, P.Eng., Qualified Person Dave Innocente, B.E.S., C.E.T., Project Manager

CLIENT CONTACT: Ron Ormson P.Geo., City of Waterloo

MTE FILE NO.: 37002-100

DATE: June 29, 2012

PREPARED BY: PML

REVIEWED BY: RJF

The purpose of the sampling and analysis plan is to identify and provide procedures for the following: the sampling method, the sampling media, number of samples, sampling frequency, sampling points, sampling locations, field measurements required and samples to be submitted for laboratory analysis. The plan shall include consideration by the Qualified Person of potentially contaminating activities, contaminants of concern and any matters relating to the environmental condition of the property. All contaminates of potential concern are to sampled and analyzed as wall as any other relevant contaminants. MTE is completing concurrent Phase Two ESAs for the City of Waterloo at 75 Allen Street and the adjacent property at 70 Willow Street, which will be provided under separate cover. MTE has completed a Phase One ESA dated July 20, 2012 that includes both properties. This Sampling and Analysis Plan describes the activities to be completed at 75 Allen Street East (St. Louis School) in Waterloo. 1. INTRODUCTION

The Phase Two ESA is required in accordance with Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended), in support of a possible Record of Site Condition (RSC) filing. The results of the Phase One ESA have confirmed that 75 Allen Street is not on or located within 30 m of a surface water body or environmentally sensitive area and it is presumed that there is more than 2 m of overburden present. Accordingly, the analytical results for soil and groundwater samples will be compared to Table 2 of the MOE Soil,


Groundwater and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, April 15, 2011 for Residential/Parkland/Institutional use. 2. SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION A total of four (4) boreholes will be drilled and installed as monitoring wells as part of the environmental investigation in three (3) Areas of Environmental Potential Concern (APEC-1 through APEC-3) as identified by the Phase One ESA.

Proposed drilling locations will be distributed as following:

• A monitoring well located in the landscaped area at the northeast corner to address APEC-2 (fill of unknown quality) and APEC-3 (off-site industrial use);

• Two monitoring wells located in the asphalt laneway along the western boundary to address APEC-1 (Former fuel storage UST); and

• A monitoring well located in the parking area at the southeast corner to address APEC-2 (fill of unknown quality) and APEC-3 (off-site industrial use).

Tasks relating to the Phase Two ESA will include:

• Drilling of 4 boreholes at three (3) Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC-1 through APEC-3) identified in the Phase One ESA completed by MTE;

• Assessment and field screening of soil samples from each borehole for the presence of environmental impacts;

• Submission of selected soil samples for laboratory analysis of contaminants of concern: Petroleum Hydrocarbon (PHC) Fractions F1-F4, Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Xylene (BTEX), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Metals according to chain-of-custody procedures;

• Submission of selected soil samples for grain size and pH analysis;

• Installation of permanent monitoring wells in each of the boreholes;

• Measurement of water levels at each of the monitoring wells for determination of groundwater flow and gradient;

• Collection of groundwater samples from each of the monitoring wells for submission to an accredited laboratory for analysis of PHC F1-F4, BTEX, VOCs, PAHs, Metals, Inorganics and pH as specified on the chain of custody;

• Quality Assurance/Quality control (QA/QC) procedures for field activities and laboratory data;

• Photographic record of field activities;

• Phase Two Conceptual Site Model (CSM); and

• Data analysis and report preparation.


Since the Phase Two Property does not contain a surface water body, no surface water or sediment will be collected. All samples shall be submitted to AGAT Laboratories in Mississauga, ON. 3. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES MTE technical staff shall review and follow the following company Standard Operating Procedures:

• 5.ENV.3(5)(a) - Borehole Drilling (revised September 2010);

• 5.ENV.3(5)(d) - Field Screening Measurements (Soil) and Equipment Calibration (revised October 2011);

• 5.ENV.3(5)(e) – Monitoring Well Installation (revised September 2010);

• 5.ENV.3(5)(f) - Monitoring Well Development (revised July 2011);

• 5.ENV.3(5)(g) - Field Measurement of Water Quality and Equipment Calibration (revised July 2011); and

• 5.ENV.3(5)(i) - Groundwater Sampling (revised July 2011). 4. HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM Contaminants of Potential Concern in soil and groundwater identified by the Phase One ESA include the following:

1. Petroleum Hydrocarbon (PHC) Fractions F1-F4 2. Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Xylene (BTEX) 3. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) 4. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) 5. Metals

The prepared Health and Safety Plan shall be reviewed and followed. MTE personal shall don safety boots, reflective vests, nitrile gloves and long pants for the duration of all sampling activities. Access to the Site is to be provided along Willow Street, located east of the Site. MTE staff shall park on-Site during the sampling and field activities. Site sign-in procedures for working alone include notification of arrival and departure and periodic check-ins as required by the project manager.


5. FIELD ACTIVITIES Equipment calibration and maintenance shall be performed by MTE according to manufacturers’ recommendations and MTE SOP prior to arriving at the Site to ensure proper operation in the field. Water levels shall be collected prior to any purging of the wells. The water level probe is to be decontaminated prior to, between and subsequent to use at each sampling location as indicated in the SOP. Field chemistry parameters that may include conductivity, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation reduction potential and turbidity should be monitored during well development until stabilized measurements are recorded. If the monitor does not provide sufficient water, each monitoring well should be purged dry at least once. The purge water is to be collected and stored in the drums located at the Phase Two Property. Dedicated tubing should be used to purge each monitoring well. Groundwater samples being analyzed for volatile parameters shall be placed in zero head-space, septum vials with Teflon® lined lids provided by the laboratory. The following details the container types and preservatives that shall be used for groundwater sample collection:

Parameter Group Container Type Preservative

PHC Fraction F1 & VOCs 6 – 40 ml Amber Vials NaHS04

PHC Fraction F2-F4 1 – 500 ml Amber Glass Bottle HCl

PAHs 1 or 2 – 1L Amber Glass Bottle None

Metals 1 – 120 ml Plastic Bottle (Field Filtered) HNO3

Inorganics Various (provided by Lab) Various

pH 1 – 250 ml Plastic Bottle None

The samples should be stored in insulated coolers with ice packs to initiate cooling for same day transportation to an accredited laboratory. Field logs are to be maintained by technical staff to record data collection and sampling activities. The equipment used to collect samples shall be noted, along with the time of sampling, sampling description, depth from which the samples were collected and volume and number of containers. All samples are to be accompanied by a completed chain of custody record which lists each sample identifier, sampling date and time,


sample matrix, the number of containers and analytical parameters for which the sample is to be tested. 6. Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results The quality of data depends upon planning, sampling, analysis and reporting. The Sampling and Analysis Plan for this project requires data validation and acceptance of greater than 90% of the sample results. Based on the anticipated volume of soil samples (approximately 20), a minimum of two duplicate soil samples shall be collected for QA/QC purposes and submitted for PHCs, VOCs and Metals. Based on the anticipated volume of groundwater samples (less than 10 samples) required, one duplicate groundwater sample shall be collected for QA/QC purposes. In addition, one field blank and one trip blank for VOCs shall be submitted for analysis for each trip to the Site when groundwater samples are collected. Laboratory Certificates of Analysis shall be obtained from AGAT for all soil and groundwater samples submitted to the laboratory. The lab reports shall meet the requirements of S.47(3) of Regulation 153/04 (as amended) and be signed by the account manager. The QPESA shall confirm with the lab that all samples were received in good condition, within an acceptable temperature range and that the holding times, preservation requirements and the proper number of containers were met. The QPESA shall review the results of analysis and address all occurrences where the data has been qualified by the lab due to sample dilution, matrix interference, RPD values >30% for duplicate samples and reporting detection limits (RDLs) greater than the applicable MOE Site Condition Standard. The results of this investigation will support a possible real estate transaction.

APPENDIX A2

FINALIZED FIELD LOGS AND PHOTOGRAPHS

M:\37002\Phase Two ESA\Report\75 Allen St\37002-100 - Phase Two ESA PhotoLog.doc

Photograph No. 1

Advancement of Borehole MW101-12 (Northern Portion of the Site)

Photograph No. 2

Installation of Monitoring Well MW102-12 (Northwestern Corner of the Site)

M:\37002\Phase Two ESA\Report\75 Allen St\37002-100 - Phase Two ESA PhotoLog.doc

Photograph No. 3

Advancement of Borehole MW103-12 (Western Portion of the Site)

Photograph No. 4

Advancement of Borehole MW104-12 (Southern Portion of the Site)

Borehole Number:Client:

Project:Job Number:

Location:

Drill Date:

Reviewed By: Logged By:

Method:

Notes: Sheet: 1 of 1

MTE Consultants Inc.520 Bingemans Centre Drive

Kitchener, OntarioN2B 3X9

(519) 743-6500

De

pth

(m)

0.0 0.0ft m

2.0

2.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

24.0

26.0

28.0

30.0

Ele

va

tio

n (

m)

Soil Description

Sy

mb

ol

Nu

mb

er

Ty

pe

Re

co

ve

ry (

%)

He

ad

sp

ac

e (

pp

m)

Groundwater Observations andWell Details

MW101-12City of Waterloo

Phase Two ESA37002-100

75 Allen Street East, Waterloo

July 3, 2012

0.00

0.46

1.68

2.74

9.14

Ground Elevation

TOPSOILLoose, dark brown, dry, trace sand

SAND FILLLoose, light brown, dry

SILTY CLAYVery compact, medium brown, damp

SANDY SILTVery compact, light brown, damp @ 20'

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

SC

SC

SC

SC

SC

SC

SC

SC

60

100

70

85

10

10

5

20

1.5

1.1

0.9

0.7

0.3

0.8

0.6

0.4

2"

Slo

t 10 S

cre

en

Sandpack

Bento

nite

Flu

shm

ount

Casin

g

Concre

te

No obvious Staining or Odours


Project:Job Number:

Location:

Drill Date:


Method:




(519) 743-6500

De

pth

(m)

0.0 0.0ft m

2.0

2.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

Ele

va

tio

n (

m)

Soil Description

Sy

mb

ol

Nu

mb

er

Ty

pe

Re

co

ve

ry (

%)

He

ad

sp

ac

e (

pp

m)





July 3, 2012

0.00

0.91

Ground Elevation

ASPHALT

SAND FILLLoose, light brown, trace silt, damp, brick fragments

SILTY CLAYVery compact, medium brown, dry to damp

1

2

3

4

5

6

SC

SC

SC

SC

SC

SC

80

100

100

40

5

10

1.5

0.8

0.6

1.1

0.4

0.3

Bento

nite

Flu

shm

ount

Casin

g

Concre

te



Project:Job Number:

Location:

Drill Date:


Method:




(519) 743-6500

De

pth

(m)

24.0

8.026.0

10.0

28.0

12.0

30.0

32.0

34.0

36.0

38.0

40.0

42.0

44.0

Ele

va

tio

n (

m)

Soil Description

Sy

mb

ol

Nu

mb

er

Ty

pe

Re

co

ve

ry (

%)

He

ad

sp

ac

e (

pp

m)





July 3, 2012

7.92

13.72

SANDY SILTVery compact, light brown, saturated @ 38'

7

8

9

10

SC

SC

SC

SC

5

95

80

90

0.6

0.8

0.4

0.3

2"

Slo

t 10 S

cre

en

Sandpack



Project:Job Number:

Location:

Drill Date:


Method:




(519) 743-6500

De

pth

(m)

0.0 0.0ft m

2.0

2.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

Ele

va

tio

n (

m)

Soil Description

Sy

mb

ol

Nu

mb

er

Ty

pe

Re

co

ve

ry (

%)

He

ad

sp

ac

e (

pp

m)





July 3, 2012

0.00

0.91

3.05

4.27

4.57

Ground Elevation

ASPHALT

CONCRETE

SAND AND GRAVEL FILLLoose, coarse, light brown, damp

SAND FILLLoose, medium brown, perched water @ 4'

SILTY CLAYVery compact, grey, damp

SANDY SILTVery compact, grey, damp

1

2

3

SC

SC

SC

80

20

100

0.9

0.8

0.4

2"

Slo

t 10 S

cre

en

Sandpack

Bento

nite

Flu

shm

ount

Casin

gConcre

te



Project:Job Number:

Location:

Drill Date:


Method:




(519) 743-6500

De

pth

(m)

0.0 0.0ft m

2.0

2.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

Ele

va

tio

n (

m)

Soil Description

Sy

mb

ol

Nu

mb

er

Ty

pe

Re

co

ve

ry (

%)

He

ad

sp

ac

e (

pp

m)





July 3, 2012

0.00

0.30

1.52

2.74

Ground Elevation

ASPHALT

SAND AND GRAVELLoose, medium brown, dry

SAND FILLLoose, dark brown/black, damp, trace slag and cinders @ 4-4.5'

SILTY CLAYVery compact, medium brown, dry to damp

SANDY SILTVery compact, medium brown to grey, saturated @ 35'

1

2

3

4

SC

SC

SC

SC

100

100

100

100

2.6

1.1

0.6

0.4

Bento

nite

Flu

shm

ount

Casin

g

Concre

te


Project:Job Number:

Location:

Drill Date:


Method:




(519) 743-6500

De

pth

(m)

22.0

8.0

24.0

10.0

26.0

12.0

28.0

30.0

32.0

34.0

36.0

38.0

40.0

Ele

va

tio

n (

m)

Soil Description

Sy

mb

ol

Nu

mb

er

Ty

pe

Re

co

ve

ry (

%)

He

ad

sp

ac

e (

pp

m)





July 3, 2012

12.19

5 SS 90 0.9 2"

Slo

t 10 S

cre

en

Sandpack

APPENDIX A3

LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS

CLIENT NAME: MTE CONSULTANTS INC.520 BINGEMANS CENTRE DRIVEKITCHENER, ON N2B3X9 (519) 743-6500

5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122

http://www.agatlabs.com

Mike Muneswar, BSc (Chem), Senior Inorganic AnalystSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

Inga Kuzmina, Organic Laboratory SupervisorTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:

PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 16

Jul 11, 2012

VERSION*: 2

Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100

12W616692AGAT WORK ORDER:

ATTENTION TO: Phil Lemieux

PROJECT NO: 37002-100

Laboratories (V2) Page 1 of 16

All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time.

AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.

Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA)Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA)Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)

Member of:

VERSION 2:Update: Client ID BH104-12 revised to MW104-12 as per clients request (July 10th 2012)These samples were split from original report on March 27th, 2013.

*NOTES

Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested

MW 191-12 (3-4')MW 101-12 (3-4') MW 102-12 (2-3') MW 103-12 (1-2')

MW 104-12

(4-4.5')SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSoilSoil Soil SoilSAMPLE TYPE:

7/3/20127/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/20127/3/2012DATE SAMPLED:

3482394 3482398 3482401 3482406 3482515G / S RDLUnitParameter

<0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Antimony 0.87.5µg/g

2 3 4 3 10Arsenic 118µg/g

<5 <5 <5 <5 11Boron 5120µg/g

25 30 10 11 54Barium 2390µg/g

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.2Beryllium 0.55µg/g

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium 0.51.2µg/g

8 9 7 6 9Chromium 2160µg/g

2.3 2.6 2.3 2.4 3.9Cobalt 0.522µg/g

5 6 14 9 13Copper 1180µg/g

6 7 6 7 24Lead 1120µg/g

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.2Molybdenum 0.56.9µg/g

5 6 5 5 9Nickel 1130µg/g

<0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium 0.42.4µg/g

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver 0.225µg/g

<0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium 0.41µg/g

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9Uranium 0.523µg/g

14 17 12 12 21Vanadium 186µg/g

36 39 35 40 46Zinc 5340µg/g

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(RPI,MFT) CurrentComments:


DATE RECEIVED: 2012-07-04

Certificate of Analysis

ATTENTION TO: Phil LemieuxCLIENT NAME: MTE CONSULTANTS INC.

AGAT WORK ORDER: 12W616692

DATE REPORTED: 2012-07-11


O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals (Comprehensive) (Soil)




CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Certified By:Page 2 of 16

MW 104-12

(12-13')

MW 102-12

(38-39')SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSoilSAMPLE TYPE:

7/3/20127/3/2012DATE SAMPLED:

3482404 3482572G / S RDLUnitParameter

7.92 7.89pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction pH Units

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(All)Comments:3482404-3482572 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio.

FOC - Samples were analysed and are reported in triplicate. FOC was calculated from the Total Organic Matter, which was determined using the Loss on Ignition procedure.








O. Reg. 153(511) - ORPs (Soil) pH






MW 102-12 (2-3')SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSAMPLE TYPE:

7/3/2012DATE SAMPLED:

3482401G / S RDLUnitParameter

7.95pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction pH Units

4.04Sodium Adsorption Ratio N/A5N/A

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(RPI,MFT) CurrentComments:3482401 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio.








O. Reg. 153(511) - ORPs (Soil) pH, SAR






MW 103-12

(14-15')SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSAMPLE TYPE:



32Particle Size Distribution (Sand) 2%

47Particle Size Distribution (Silt) 2%

21Particle Size Distribution (Clay) 2%

LoamSoil Texture

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / StandardComments:








Soil Analysis - Texture






MW 104-12

(4-4.5')MW 103-12 (1-2')SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:


7/3/20127/3/2012DATE SAMPLED:


<0.05 <0.05Naphthalene 0.050.75µg/g

<0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene 0.050.17µg/g

<0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene 0.0529µg/g

<0.05 <0.05Fluorene 0.0569µg/g

<0.05 0.31Phenanthrene 0.057.8µg/g

<0.05 0.12Anthracene 0.050.74µg/g

<0.05 1.5Fluoranthene 0.050.69µg/g

<0.05 1.5Pyrene 0.0578µg/g

<0.05 2.6Benz(a)anthracene 0.050.63µg/g

<0.05 2.1Chrysene 0.057.8µg/g

<0.05 4.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.050.78µg/g

<0.05 1.9Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.050.78µg/g

<0.05 3.1Benzo(a)pyrene 0.050.3µg/g

<0.05 2.9Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.050.48µg/g

<0.05 0.68Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.050.1µg/g

<0.05 2.2Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.057.8µg/g

<0.05 0.052-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 0.053.4µg/g

3.7 21.0Moisture Content 0.1%

Acceptable LimitsUnitSurrogate

67 90Chrysene-d12 % 50-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(RPI,MFT) CurrentComments:3482406-3482515 Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.

Note: The result for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Fluoranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.








O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)






MW 102-12

(38-39')

MW 101-12

(20-21') MW 103-12 (4-5')SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

SoilSoilSoilSAMPLE TYPE:

7/3/2012 7/3/20127/3/2012DATE SAMPLED:

3482399 3482404 3482410G / S RDLUnitParameter

<5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) 5µg/g

<5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 565µg/g

<10 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16) 10150µg/g

<50 <50 <50F3 (C16 to C34) 501300µg/g

<50 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50) 505600µg/g

NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 505600µg/g

18.0 16.4 16.8Moisture Content 0.1%


64 116 98Terphenyl % 60-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(RPI,MFT) CurrentComments:3482399-3482410 Results are based on sample dry weight.

The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.








O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil)






MW 102-12

(38-39')

MW 101-12



7/3/2012 7/3/20127/3/2012DATE SAMPLED:


<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.0525µg/g

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride 0.020.022ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromomethane 0.050.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane 0.055.8ug/g

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50Acetone 0.50ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene 0.050.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride 0.050.96ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.050.75ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether 0.051.4ug/g

<0.02 <0.02 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane 0.02ug/g

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.5044ug/g

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.022.5ug/g

<0.04 <0.04 <0.04Chloroform 0.040.17ug/g

<0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane 0.030.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.053.4ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride 0.050.12ug/g

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene 0.020.17ug/g

<0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane 0.030.085ug/g

<0.03 <0.03 <0.03Trichloroethylene 0.030.52ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane 0.051.9ug/g

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.504.3ug/g

<0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.040.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Toluene 0.056ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane 0.052.9ug/g

<0.04 <0.04 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide 0.040.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene 0.052.3ug/g

<0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.040.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene 0.052.7ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene 0.051.6ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene 0.05ug/g








O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)






MW 102-12

(38-39')

MW 101-12



7/3/2012 7/3/20127/3/2012DATE SAMPLED:


<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromoform 0.050.26ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Styrene 0.052.2ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.050.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05o-Xylene 0.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.056ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.050.097ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.051.7ug/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture 0.0525ug/g

<0.04 <0.04 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene 0.040.081µg/g

<0.05 <0.05 <0.05n-Hexane 0.0534µg/g


90 88 92Toluene-d8 % Recovery 50-140

75 74 744-Bromofluorobenzene % Recovery 50-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(RPI,MFT) CurrentComments:3482399-3482410 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample was

extracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.














3482515 T2(RPI,MFT) Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Benz(a)anthracene 0.63 2.6MW 104-12 (4-4.5')

3482515 T2(RPI,MFT) Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 3.1MW 104-12 (4-4.5')

3482515 T2(RPI,MFT) Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.78 4.0MW 104-12 (4-4.5')

3482515 T2(RPI,MFT) Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.78 1.9MW 104-12 (4-4.5')

3482515 T2(RPI,MFT) Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.1 0.68MW 104-12 (4-4.5')

3482515 T2(RPI,MFT) Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Fluoranthene 0.69 1.5MW 104-12 (4-4.5')

3482515 T2(RPI,MFT) Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.48 2.9MW 104-12 (4-4.5')


Guideline Violation




SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE




GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V2) Page 10 of 16


Antimony 1 3482599 1.0 1.1 9.5% < 0.8 97% 70% 130% 82% 80% 120% 82% 70% 130%

Arsenic 1 3482599 131 132 0.8% < 1 112% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 108% 70% 130%

Boron 1 3482599 9 9 0.0% < 5 76% 70% 130% 93% 80% 120% 83% 70% 130%

Barium 1 3482599 107 109 1.9% < 2 101% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 112% 70% 130%

Beryllium

1 3482599 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 97% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%

Cadmium 1 3482599 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 97% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%

Chromium 1 3482599 11 11 0.0% < 2 99% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%

Cobalt 1 3482599 5.7 5.7 0.0% < 0.5 97% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 87% 70% 130%

Copper 1 3482599 27 25 7.7% < 1 100% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Lead

1 3482599 127 123 3.2% < 1 103% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 1 3482599 26.7 26.3 1.5% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%

Nickel 1 3482599 12 12 0.0% < 1 105% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Selenium 1 3482599 0.5 0.9 NA < 0.4 101% 70% 130% 90% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Silver 1 3482599 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 72% 70% 130% 89% 80% 120% 80% 70% 130%

Thallium

1 3482599 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 89% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Uranium 1 3482599 8.01 7.84 2.1% < 0.5 100% 70% 130% 102% 80% 120% 102% 70% 130%

Vanadium 1 3482599 18 19 5.4% < 1 102% 70% 130% 91% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Zinc 1 3482599 223 224 0.4% < 5 102% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Comments: RPD Qualifier:Selenium - NA signifies Not Applicable - The average for the sample and duplicate is less than 5X RDL, thus, lab's RPD acceptance criteria are not applicable.

O. Reg. 153(511) - ORPs (Soil) pH, SAR

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 1 3482404 7.92 7.86 0.8% NA 99% 90% 110% NA NA

Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1 30.9 30.5 1.6% N/A NA NA NA

Comments: NA signifies Not Applicable.

Soil Analysis - Texture

Particle Size Distribution (Sand) 1867 1981 63 63 0.0% < 2 105% 80% 120%

Particle Size Distribution (Silt) 1867 1981 21 21 0.0% < 2 111% 80% 120%

Particle Size Distribution (Clay) 1867 1981 16 16 0.0% < 2 91% 80% 120%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured

ValueRecovery Recovery

Quality Assurance


CLIENT NAME: MTE CONSULTANTS INC.


Soil Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

BatchPARAMETERSample

IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 11, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL

MethodBlank




QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2) Page 11 of 16



Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 81% 50% 140% 112% 50% 140% 115% 50% 140%

Vinyl Chloride 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 77% 50% 140% 123% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 126% 50% 140% 122% 50% 140% 126% 50% 140%

Trichlorofluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 117% 50% 140% 107% 50% 140%

Acetone

1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 103% 50% 140% 112% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

Methylene Chloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 123% 50% 140% 103% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%

Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 122% 50% 140% 119% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 109% 50% 140% 105% 60% 130% 104% 50% 140%

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 109% 50% 140% 115% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140%

Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 120% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 94% 50% 140%

Chloroform 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 111% 50% 140% 117% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 88% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 124% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

Carbon Tetrachloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 119% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%

Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 105% 50% 140% 119% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloropropane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 119% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 100% 50% 140%

Trichloroethylene 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 107% 50% 140% 114% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

Bromodichloromethane

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 86% 50% 140% 105% 50% 140% 108% 50% 140%

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 82% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 120% 50% 140%

Toluene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 114% 50% 140% 110% 60% 130% 114% 50% 140%

Dibromochloromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 95% 60% 130% 119% 50% 140%

Ethylene Dibromide

1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 92% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 113% 50% 140%

Tetrachloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 118% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 119% 50% 140%

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 NA 50% 140% 127% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

Chlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 116% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 120% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 119% 50% 140% 116% 60% 130% 122% 50% 140%

Bromoform 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 84% 60% 130% 91% 50% 140%

Styrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 97% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 115% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 111% 50% 140%


Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 115% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichloropropene 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 114% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Trace Organics Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






n-Hexane

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 111% 50% 140%


F1 (C6 to C10) 1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 75% 60% 140% 85% 80% 120% 73% 60% 140%

F2 (C10 to C16) 1 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 103% 60% 140% 81% 80% 120% 77% 60% 140%

F3 (C16 to C34) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 97% 60% 140% 88% 80% 120% 95% 60% 140%

F4 (C34 to C50) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 102% 60% 140% 110% 80% 120% 74% 60% 140%


Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 75% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 82% 50% 140% 67% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 86% 50% 140% 71% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140%

Fluorene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 88% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140%

Anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140%

Pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 72% 50% 140%

Benz(a)anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 81% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140%

Chrysene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 73% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140%

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 89% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 88% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140%

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140%

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 86% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 78% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Soil Analysis

Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction INOR-93-6031 MSA part 3 & SM 4500-H+ B pH METER

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction INOR-93-6031 MSA part 3 & SM 4500-H+ B pH METER

Sodium Adsorption Ratio INOR-93-6007McKeague 4.12 & 3.26 & EPA SW-846 6010C

ICP/OES

Particle Size Distribution (Sand)SOIL 0520; SOIL 0110; SOIL 0120

JONES 2001; SHEPPARD 2007 HYDROMETER

Particle Size Distribution (Silt)SOIL 0520; SOIL 0110; SOIL 0120


Particle Size Distribution (Clay)SOIL 0520; SOIL 0110; SOIL 0120




Method Summary




AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER




METHOD SUMMARY (V2) Page 14 of 16


Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluorene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Phenanthrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Moisture Content Org 5506 EPA SW-846 3540 & 8270 BALANCE

Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P &T GC / FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P & T GC / FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID



Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS

Moisture Content VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035,8015

BALANCE

Terphenyl VOL-91-5009 GC/FID

Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Bromomethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Acetone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Chloroform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS


1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Benzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Method Summary










Toluene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Bromoform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Styrene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS


o-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

n-Hexane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Method Summary













Mike Muneswar, BSc (Chem), Senior Inorganic AnalystSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

Jacky Takeuchi, BScH (Chem Eng), BSc (Bio), C.Chem, Laboratory Manager

TRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Jul 05, 2012

VERSION*: 2









Member of:

VERSION 2:These samples were split from original report on March 27th, 2013.

*NOTES


MW104-12(35-

36)

MW196-12(30-

31)SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:


7/5/20127/5/2012DATE SAMPLED:


<5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) 5µg/g

<5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 565µg/g

<10 <10F2 (C10 to C16) 10150µg/g

<50 <50F3 (C16 to C34) 501300µg/g

<50 <50F4 (C34 to C50) 505600µg/g

NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 505600µg/g

16.4 21.8Moisture Content 0.1%


108 96Terphenyl % 60-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(RPI,MFT) CurrentComments:3488526-3488528 Results are based on sample dry weight.

The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.














MW104-12(35-

36)

MW196-12(30-



7/5/20127/5/2012DATE SAMPLED:


<0.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.0525µg/g

<0.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride 0.020.022ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Bromomethane 0.050.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane 0.055.8ug/g

<0.50 <0.50Acetone 0.50ug/g

<0.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene 0.050.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride 0.050.96ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.050.75ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether 0.051.4ug/g

<0.02 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane 0.02ug/g

<0.50 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.5044ug/g

<0.02 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.022.5ug/g

<0.04 <0.04Chloroform 0.040.17ug/g

<0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane 0.030.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.053.4ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride 0.050.12ug/g

<0.02 <0.02Benzene 0.020.17ug/g

<0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane 0.030.085ug/g

<0.03 <0.03Trichloroethylene 0.030.52ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane 0.051.9ug/g

<0.50 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.504.3ug/g

<0.04 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.040.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Toluene 0.056ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane 0.052.9ug/g

<0.04 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide 0.040.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene 0.052.3ug/g

<0.04 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.040.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene 0.052.7ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene 0.051.6ug/g

<0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene 0.05ug/g














MW104-12(35-

36)

MW196-12(30-



7/5/20127/5/2012DATE SAMPLED:


<0.05 <0.05Bromoform 0.050.26ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Styrene 0.052.2ug/g

<0.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.050.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.05o-Xylene 0.05ug/g

<0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.056ug/g

<0.05 <0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.050.097ug/g

<0.05 <0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.051.7ug/g

<0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture 0.0525ug/g

<0.04 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene 0.040.081µg/g

<0.05 <0.05n-Hexane 0.0534µg/g


102 99Toluene-d8 % Recovery 50-140

88 864-Bromofluorobenzene % Recovery 50-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(RPI,MFT) CurrentComments:3488526-3488528 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample was

extracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.















Antimony 1 3488519 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 84% 70% 130% 85% 80% 120% 79% 70% 130%

Arsenic 1 3488519 3 3 0.0% < 1 106% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 105% 70% 130%

Boron 1 3488519 7 7 0.0% < 5 70% 70% 130% 88% 80% 120% 88% 70% 130%

Barium 1 3488519 68 73 7.1% < 2 88% 70% 130% 83% 80% 120% 102% 70% 130%

Beryllium

1 3488519 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 84% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%

Cadmium 1 3488519 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 97% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Chromium 1 3488519 8 8 0.0% < 2 86% 70% 130% 89% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Cobalt 1 3488519 2.0 2.1 4.9% < 0.5 82% 70% 130% 89% 80% 120% 82% 70% 130%

Copper 1 3488519 44 49 10.8% < 1 95% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Lead

1 3488519 37 40 7.8% < 1 100% 70% 130% 91% 80% 120% 85% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 1 3488519 0.5 0.4 22.2% < 0.5 101% 70% 130% 85% 80% 120% 87% 70% 130%

Nickel 1 3488519 4 4 0.0% < 1 98% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Selenium 1 3488519 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 102% 70% 130% 87% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Silver 1 3488519 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 89% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%

Thallium

1 3488519 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 101% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%

Uranium 1 3488519 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 98% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 88% 70% 130%

Vanadium 1 3488519 12 13 8.0% < 1 87% 70% 130% 80% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Zinc 1 3488519 80 91 12.9% < 5 98% 70% 130% 102% 80% 120% 87% 70% 130%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Soil Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Soil)

Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 124% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%

Toluene 1 < 0.08 < 0.08 0.0% < 0.08 123% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 122% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 120% 50% 140% 114% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%

F1 (C6 to C10)

1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 88% 60% 140% 104% 80% 120% 100% 60% 140%


Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 90% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140% 71% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140%

Fluorene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%

Anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%

Pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%

Benz(a)anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 97% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%

Chrysene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 106% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140%

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 106% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140%

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%

O. Reg. 153(511) - PCBs (Soil)

Aroclor 1242 1 3489030 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1248 1 3489030 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1254 1 3489030 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1260 1 3489030 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

1 3489030 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 98% 60% 140% 96% 60% 140% 98% 60% 140%



Vinyl Chloride 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 106% 50% 140% 110% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140%


Acetone

1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 103% 50% 140% 107% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140%



Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






1,1-Dichloroethane

1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 107% 50% 140% 93% 60% 130% 93% 50% 140%


Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 94% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%

Chloroform 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 104% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 110% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%


Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 111% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%




1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 97% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%



Toluene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%


Ethylene Dibromide

1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 112% 50% 140% 103% 60% 130% 119% 50% 140%



Chlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 114% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 117% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%

Bromoform 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 117% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%

Styrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 114% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 97% 60% 130% 110% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 112% 50% 140%



Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 97% 60% 130% 110% 50% 140%


n-Hexane

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%


F2 (C10 to C16) 1 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 103% 60% 140% 83% 80% 120% 85% 60% 140%

F3 (C16 to C34) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 109% 60% 140% 87% 80% 120% 102% 60% 140%

F4 (C34 to C50) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 104% 60% 140% 93% 80% 120% 78% 60% 140%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Soil Analysis

Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS



Method Summary










Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluorene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Phenanthrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Aroclor 1242 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD




Polychlorinated Biphenyls ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD

Decachlorobiphenyl ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD

Moisture Content MOE E3139 BALANCE

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P &T GC / FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P & T GC / FID





Moisture Content VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035,8015

BALANCE


Benzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Toluene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS


F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID


F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID


F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID



Moisture Content VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE





Method Summary















Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

































Method Summary













Inga Kuzmina, Organic Laboratory SupervisorTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

Anthony Dapaah, PhD (Chem), Inorganic Lab ManagerWATER ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Jul 19, 2012

VERSION*: 3



ATTENTION TO: DAVID INNOCENTE






Member of:

VERSION 3:Revised Report (July 24th 2012)These samples were split from original report on March 27th, 2013.

*NOTES


MW104-12MW102-12SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

WaterWaterSAMPLE TYPE:

7/13/20127/13/2012DATE SAMPLED:


<0.20 <0.20Naphthalene 0.2011µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Acenaphthylene 0.201µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Acenaphthene 0.204.1µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Fluorene 0.20120µg/L

<0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene 0.101µg/L

<0.10 <0.10Anthracene 0.102.4µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Fluoranthene 0.200.41µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Pyrene 0.204.1µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Benz(a)anthracene 0.201µg/L

<0.10 <0.10Chrysene 0.100.1µg/L

<0.10 <0.10Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.100.1µg/L

<0.10 <0.10Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.100.1µg/L

<0.01 <0.01Benzo(a)pyrene 0.010.01µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.200.2µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.200.2µg/L

<0.20 <0.20Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.200.2µg/L

<0.20 <0.202-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 0.203.2µg/L


110 101Chrysene-d12 % 50-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(PGW) - CurrentComments:3515377-3515393 Note: The result for Benzo(b)Flouranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Flouranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.




ATTENTION TO: DAVID INNOCENTECLIENT NAME: MTE CONSULTANTS INC.




O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water)






MW103-12SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

WaterSAMPLE TYPE:



<25F1 (C6 to C10) 25µg/L

<25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 25750µg/L

380F2 (C10 to C16) 100150µg/L

<100F3 (C16 to C34) 100500µg/L

<100F4 (C34 to C50) 100500µg/L

NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500500µg/L


116Terphenyl % 60-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(PGW) - CurrentComments:3515382 The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.

The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.








O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Water)






MW104-12MW102-12SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

WaterWaterSAMPLE TYPE:

7/13/20127/13/2012DATE SAMPLED:


<25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) 25µg/L

<25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 25750µg/L

<100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) 100150µg/L

<100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene 100150µg/L

<100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) 100500µg/L

<100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 100500µg/L

<100 <100F4 (C34 to C50) 100500µg/L

NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500500µg/L


88 76Terphenyl % 60-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(PGW) - CurrentComments:3515377-3515393 The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.

The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.








O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water)






MW102-12 MW103-12 MW104-12SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

WaterWater WaterSAMPLE TYPE:

7/13/20127/13/20127/13/2012DATE SAMPLED:

3515377 RDL 3515382 RDL 3515393G / S RDLUnitParameter

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.20590µg/L

<0.17 0.50 <0.50 0.17 <0.17Vinyl Chloride 0.170.5µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Bromomethane 0.200.89µg/L

<0.40 1.60 <1.60 0.40 <0.40Trichlorofluoromethane 0.40150µg/L

<1.0 4.0 <4.0 1.0 <1.0Acetone 1.02700µg/L

<0.30 1.20 <1.20 0.30 <0.301,1-Dichloroethylene 0.301.6µg/L

<0.30 1.20 <1.20 0.30 <0.30Methylene Chloride 0.3050µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.201.6µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.2015µg/L

<0.30 1.20 <1.20 0.30 <0.301,1-Dichloroethane 0.305µg/L

<1.0 4.0 <4.0 1.0 <1.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1.01800µg/L

0.24 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.201.6µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Chloroform 0.202.4µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.201,2-Dichloroethane 0.201.6µg/L

<0.30 1.20 <1.20 0.30 <0.301,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.30200µg/L

<0.20 0.79 <0.79 0.20 <0.20Carbon Tetrachloride 0.200.79µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Benzene 0.205.0µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.201,2-Dichloropropane 0.205µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Trichloroethylene 0.201.6µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Bromodichloromethane 0.2016µg/L

<1.0 4.0 <4.0 1.0 <1.0Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1.0640µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.201,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.204.7µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Toluene 0.2024µg/L

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.10Dibromochloromethane 0.1025µg/L

<0.10 0.20 <0.20 0.10 <0.10Ethylene Dibromide 0.100.2µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Tetrachloroethylene 0.201.6µg/L

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.101.1µg/L

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.10Chlorobenzene 0.1030µg/L

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.10Ethylbenzene 0.102.4µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20m & p-Xylene 0.20µg/L

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.10Bromoform 0.1025µg/L








O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water)






MW102-12 MW103-12 MW104-12SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

WaterWater WaterSAMPLE TYPE:

7/13/20127/13/20127/13/2012DATE SAMPLED:

3515377 RDL 3515382 RDL 3515393G / S RDLUnitParameter

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.10Styrene 0.105.4µg/L

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.101,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.101µg/L

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.10o-Xylene 0.10µg/L

<0.10 0.40 <0.40 0.10 <0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.1059µg/L



<0.30 0.50 <0.50 0.30 <0.301,3-Dichloropropene 0.300.5µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20Xylene Mixture 0.20300µg/L

<0.20 0.80 <0.80 0.20 <0.20n-Hexane 0.2051µg/L


106 107 108Toluene-d8 % Recovery 50-140

95 97 954-Bromofluorobenzene % Recovery 50-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(PGW) - CurrentComments:3515382 Dilution factor=4

The sample was diluted because it was foamy. The reporting detection limit has been corrected for the dilution factor used.














MW103-12SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:

WaterSAMPLE TYPE:



1.2Antimony 0.56µg/L

10.2Arsenic 1.025µg/L

17.5Barium 2.01000µg/L

<0.5Beryllium 0.54.0µg/L

73.7Boron 10.05000µg/L

<0.2Cadmium 0.22.7µg/L

9.5Chromium 2.050µg/L

<0.5Cobalt 0.53.8µg/L

<1.0Copper 1.087µg/L

1.7Lead 0.510µg/L

8.6Molybdenum 0.570µg/L

1.4Nickel 1.0100µg/L

1.8Selenium 1.010µg/L

<0.2Silver 0.21.5µg/L

<0.3Thallium 0.32µg/L

1.4Uranium 0.520µg/L

19.9Vanadium 0.46.2µg/L

43.2Zinc 5.01100µg/L

254000Sodium 500490000µg/L

101000Chloride 100790000µg/L

<50Nitrate as N 50µg/L

<50Nitrite as N 50µg/L

1160Electrical Conductivity 2uS/cm

8.46pH NApH Units

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T2(PGW) - CurrentComments:








O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water) (excl. CrVI, CN, Hg)






3515382 T2(PGW) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water) (excl. CrVI,

CN, Hg)Vanadium 6.2 19.9MW103-12

3515382 T2(PGW) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Water) F2 (C10 to C16) 150 380MW103-12


Guideline Violation




SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE




GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V3) Page 8 of 14



Vinyl Chloride 1 < 0.17 < 0.17 0.0% < 0.17 102% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 112% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 121% 50% 140% 109% 50% 140% 105% 50% 140%


Acetone

1 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 118% 50% 140% 107% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140%



trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 106% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 104% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl ether 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 112% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 100% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

1 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 80% 50% 140% 107% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%


cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 104% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%

Chloroform 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 110% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 98% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%


1 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 115% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%


Benzene 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 108% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%




1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 106% 50% 140% 103% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%



Toluene 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 108% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 110% 50% 140%


Ethylene Dibromide

1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 110% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%



Chlorobenzene 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 113% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 106% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 114% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Bromoform 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 113% 50% 140% 103% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

Styrene 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 119% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 101% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 120% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%




Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 101% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






n-Hexane

1 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 NA 50% 140% 86% 60% 130% 91% 50% 140%

O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Water)

F2 (C10 to C16) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 99% 60% 140% 70% 60% 140% 64% 60% 140%

F3 (C16 to C34) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 99% 60% 140% 81% 60% 140% 106% 60% 140%

F4 (C34 to C50) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 94% 60% 140% 86% 60% 140% 101% 60% 140%

O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water)

F1 (C6 to C10) 1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 25 80% 60% 140% 80% 60% 140% 88% 60% 140%

O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water)

Naphthalene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 95% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 97% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 101% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%

Fluorene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 100% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

1 3515377 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 95% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 93% 50% 140%

Anthracene 1 3515377 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 103% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 104% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140%

Pyrene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 106% 50% 140% 101% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140%

Benz(a)anthracene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 99% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140%

Chrysene

1 3515377 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 105% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140%

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 3515377 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 96% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140%

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 3515377 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 96% 50% 140% 101% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140%

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 3515377 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.0% < 0.01 99% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 92% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140%


1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 96% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 72% 50% 140%

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 100% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 3515377 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 97% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water) (excl. CrVI, CN, Hg)

Antimony 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 98% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 102% 70% 130%

Arsenic 1 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 106% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 125% 70% 130%

Barium 1 26.1 25.5 2.3% < 2.0 100% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Beryllium 1 0.7 0.7 0.0% < 0.5 94% 70% 130% 108% 80% 120% 112% 70% 130%

Boron

1 178 166 7.0% < 10.0 98% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 117% 70% 130%

Cadmium 1 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 92% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 107% 70% 130%

Chromium 1 8.2 8.2 0.0% < 2.0 102% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Cobalt 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 102% 70% 130% 104% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Copper 1 203 193 5.1% < 1.0 109% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 130% 70% 130%

Lead

1 1.8 1.7 5.7% < 0.5 100% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 1 36.1 36.3 0.6% < 0.5 100% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 107% 70% 130%

Nickel 1 4.5 4.3 4.5% < 1.0 99% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 108% 70% 130%

Selenium 1 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 100% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 111% 70% 130%

Silver 1 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 100% 70% 130% 111% 80% 120% 107% 70% 130%

Thallium

1 < 0.3 < 0.3 0.0% < 0.3 104% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 105% 70% 130%

Uranium 1 8.2 8.1 1.2% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Vanadium 1 4.1 3.3 21.6% < 0.4 96% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Zinc 1 51.9 50.3 3.1% < 5.0 102% 70% 130% 104% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Sodium 1 9260 9240 0.2% < 500 97% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Chloride

1 69700 69300 0.6% < 100 99% 70% 130% 101% 70% 130% 98% 70% 130%

Nitrate as N 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 99% 70% 130% 99% 70% 130% 102% 70% 130%

Nitrite as N 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 NA 70% 130% 93% 70% 130% 116% 70% 130%

Electrical Conductivity 1 3340 3360 0.6% < 2 99% 90% 110% NA NA

pH 1 7.99 8.00 0.1% NA 100% 90% 110% NA NA

Comments: NA - Not Applicable.

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Water Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluorene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Phenanthrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC / FID



Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 BALANCE


F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F4 (C34 to C50) VOL -91- 5010 MOE PHC- E3421 GC/FID

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 BALANCE









trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl ether VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS






Method Summary






































Method Summary









Water Analysis

Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Sodium MET-93-6105 EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 ICP/OES

Chloride INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Nitrate as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Nitrite as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Electrical Conductivity INOR-93-6000 SM 2510 B PC TITRATE

pH INOR-93-6000 SM 4500-H+ B PC TITRATE



Method Summary









Documents

Final Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Consultants Inc. was retained by the City of Waterloo to conduct a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ... soil . MOE 2011 Standards