(Final Report) (Volume II) - The World Bankdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/pt/... · (Final Report) (Volume II) Client: Addis Ababa Water and Sewerage Authority (AAWSA) Water, Sanitation

RESETTELEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)FOR KALITI WESTEWATER TREATMENT

PLANT AND SEWER LINES EXPANSION AND REHABILITATION PROJECT

(Final Report) (Volume II)

Client:

Addis Ababa Water and Sewerage Authority (AAWSA)

Water, Sanitation Rehabilitation and Development Project Office

Consultant:

Beles Engineering PLC (Experts in Water, Land & Environment)

October, 2014

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

wb371432

Typewritten Text

RP520 V2

RAP of the Kaliti Wastewater Treatment Plant and Sewer Lines Expansion and Rehabilitation Project 2014

i Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................ v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... vi 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Project Background and Rationale ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Objectives of the RAP ............................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Scope of Work ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 5

2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PAPs .............................................................. 8 2. 1 General ................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Demographic Characteristic ................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Education ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.4 Housing Units ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Economic Characteristics ...................................................................................................... 13

3. Findings of Physical Property Inventory and the PAPs Attitude towards the Project ........................ 14 3.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 14 3.2 Findings of the Physical Property Inventory ............................................................................ 14 3.3 PAPs Attitude towards the Project ......................................................................................... 16

4. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................... 16 4.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Constitution of the FDRE ...................................................................................................... 16 4.3 The Civil Code of Ethiopia ................................................................................................... 17 4.4 Expropriation of Landholdings for Public Purpose and Payment of Compensation ..................... 18 4.5 World Bank Policies and Procedure for Involuntary Resettlement ............................................. 19 4.6 Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Project Resettlement Policy Framework ............................. 20

5. THE POSSIBLE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...................................................................................................................... 20

5.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 Positive Impacts ................................................................................................................... 21 5.3. Negative Impacts ................................................................................................................ 23

6. ELIGIBILITY OF AFFECTED PERSONS AND ENTITLEMENT MATRIX ................................ 31 6.1 Eligibility Criteria ................................................................................................................ 31 6.2 Eligibility for Compensation ................................................................................................. 31 6.3 Entitlement Matrix ............................................................................................................... 32 6.4 Cut–off Date ........................................................................................................................ 34

7. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION, PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION ........... 35 7.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 35 7.2 Community Participation ...................................................................................................... 36 7.3 Public and PAPs Consultation ............................................................................................... 36 7.4 Woreda Administration and Other Officials Consultation ......................................................... 37

8. VALUATION AND COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 38 8.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 38 8.2 Bases for Valuation of Losses ............................................................................................... 39 8.3 Method of Valuation ............................................................................................................ 39 8.4 Compensation ...................................................................................................................... 40

8.4.1 General ................................................................................................................ 40

8.4.2 Compensation for Housing Unit Structure ............................................................... 41


ii Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

8.4.3 Compensation for Fence and Other Structures .......................................................... 42

8.4.4 Compensation for Eucalyptus Trees ........................................................................ 43

8.4.5 Compensation for Loss of Businesses or Employment .............................................. 43

8.4.6 Compensation for Public Services ........................................................................... 43

8.4.7. Compensation for Social and Psychological Disturbance .......................................... 43

9. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ............................................................................................ 44 9.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 44 9.2 Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................... 44 9.3 Woreda Administration ......................................................................................................... 45 9.4 Addis Ababa city micro-small scale enterprise agency ............................................................. 45 9.5 Property Valuation Committee .............................................................................................. 46 9.6 Resettlement Implementation Committee ............................................................................... 46 9.7 PAP and RAP Committee ..................................................................................................... 47 9.8 World Bank ......................................................................................................................... 47

10. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .......................................................................................... 48 10.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 48 10.2 Grievances Redress Procedure ............................................................................................. 48 10.3 Process of Registering and Addressing Grievances ................................................................ 49 10.4 Mechanism for Appeal ........................................................................................................ 49

11. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ................................................................................................... 50 12. COST ESTIMATE FOR RAP IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................... 52

12.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 52 12.2 Rating ............................................................................................................................... 52 12.3 RAP Implementation Budget ............................................................................................... 53

13. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................ 56 14. MONITORING AND EVALUATION .............................................................................................. 59

14.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 59 14.2 Internal Monitoring ............................................................................................................ 59 14.3 External Monitoring and Evaluation ..................................................................................... 60 14.4 Monitoring and Evaluation Reports ...................................................................................... 61

15. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. 62 15.1 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 62 15.2 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 63

List of Selected References ......................................................................................................................... 66 ANNEXES .................................................................................................................................................. 67 Annex 1=Impact caused by displacement .................................................................................................. 68 Annex 2 Goods and assets affected (with household owner names) .......................................................... 70 Annex 3Businessesor Institutions Affected ................................................................................................ 82 Annex 4. Socio-economic characteristics of PAPS (fully affected) ........................................................... 84 Annex 6. Short summary list of enumerated property for compensation ................................................... 86 Annex 7 = Socio-economic survey questionnaire ....................................................................................... 89 Annex 8 Socioeconomic survey data base of the downstream households (selected) ................................ 92 Annex 9 Compensation Amount for PAPs Against lost property (in Birr) ................................................ 96 Annex 10Minutes of selected community members ................................................................................. 107 (In Amharic and translated in English) ..................................................................................................... 107


iii Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

List of Tables Table 1 Affected individual households, and organizations .............................................................................. 9 Table 2 Affected housing units total area in m2 ............................................................................................... 12 Table 3 Type of property that would be affected ............................................................................................. 15 Table 4 Measurement of infrastructures to be affected ................................................................................... 15 Table 5 Entitlement matrix .............................................................................................................................. 33 Table 6 Rate or unit costs of property that would be affected ......................................................................... 53 Table 7 Estimated cost for compensation by category ..................................................................................... 54 Table 8 Estimated Administration cost of RAP implementation for the 7 Woredas ....................................... 55 Table 9 Institutions responsible for implementing the proposed mitigation measures by time frame ............. 58 List of Figures Figure 1 Location Map of the Project Area ...................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2 PAPS by sex composition ................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3 PAPs by age category ........................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 4 PAPs Number by Education level ...................................................................................................... 11 Figure 5 PAPs by occupational status ............................................................................................................. 14


iv Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The consultant is highly indebted to the Addis Ababa Water and Sewerage Authority (AAWSA), Water, Sanitation Rehabilitation and Development Project Office for providing valuable documents for the project and facilitating the field visits. Many experts in the AAWSA project office cooperated and provided available information for the working team. In general, the client’s cooperation is extremely appreciable. We are also indebted to all respective Sub Cities and Woreda administration officials in the project area for organizing meetings and discussions and the experts of the various sectoral offices in the Addis Ababa city administration for providing valuable information. The Addis Ababa Roads Authority, Engineering Design Division provided valuable information on current costs for the assets that will be affected by the project. We are also thankful to the community, which also participated in meetings and provided valuable verbal information indicated in the RAP and socioeconomic report. All who provided verbal and written information for this report are highly appreciated. The consultants work has been presented in a one day workshop. Valuable comments have been provided by all stakeholders. All comments have been incorporated as appropriate in this final document. Furthermore, World Bank Experts provided also valuable comments. All who contributed to the quality of this final report are highly acknowledged.


v Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

ACRONYMS

AAWSA = Addis Ababa Water Supply and Sewerage Authority Act = Article CIS = Corrugated iron sheet FDRE = Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia GRC = Grievance Redress Committee IR = Involuntary Resettlement Km = Kilometer M = Meter OD = Operational Directive OP = Operational Policy PAP = Project Affected Persons PAH = Project Affected Household RAP = Resettlement Action Plan RP = Resettlement Plan RPF = Resettlement Policy Framework R& R = Resettlement & Rehabilitation WB = World Bank


vi Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

Project Background and Rational The population of Addis Ababa city is growing rapidly and provision of water supply and other associated socioeconomic development is increasing from time to time that in turn increases wastewater generation from domestic and other facilities. Sewerage system and a wastewater treatment plant currently serving some parts of Kaliti catchment specifically Bole, Ledeta, Old Airport, Central part of the City, Mekanisa and Kera areas. The existing sewerage service system does not satisfy the demand. A lot has to be done to meet the wastewater management system of the city. The proposed project is expected to play important role towards reducing the grave wastewater management problem in the city of Addis Ababa. Project Description

The Kaliti wastewater line and treatment plant expansion and rehabilitation project, which is designed to solve the existing wastewater management problem of mainly the southern and southwestern part of the city. The project has three trunk lines i.e. eastern, western and southern that joins the existing wastewater treatment plant at Akaki - Kaliti sub-city. Much of the proposed trunk lines follow the existing functioning sewer lines, which is in a bad shape. The existing system is working with very high hydraulic load because of some technical problems. Some of the pipes are broken and wastewater is being released in to open grounds and nearby streams. The proposed new sewer line will accommodate new settlement areas and reduce the high hydraulic load of the existing system significantly.

The project is designed to upgrade the capacity of the existing sewer line and treatment plant of Addis Ababa city so as to benefit the communities who are residing within the Kaliti wastewater catchment area as well as different industries and government organizations. It is expected that the project will enhance the environmental quality of the Akaki river basin, which drains in to the Awash River that is being used for different purpose in downstream where there are many cities and rural villages, that extends up to Lake Abhe locate at the border of Djibouti. Therefore, this project has far-reaching positive impact in the rift valley by reducing the pollution of the rivers that are being used for various purposes.

Objectives of the RAP

The objectives of this Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Kaliti wastewater lines and treatment plant expansion and rehabilitation project is to identify and assess the impact of the project and to define all appropriate measures and strategies that are necessary to mitigate the adverse effects of the project restore and improve the income and livelihoods of the PAPs.


vii Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

Scope of Work The major scope of work undertaken during the ESIA and RAP preparation included:

Project description: to concisely describe the proposed project, its geographic location, ecological, general layout of facilities including maps at appropriate scale;

Identification of potential impact: analysis of potential project impacts through identification of the PAPs, estimating their number and evaluating the impacts of the project on them;

Household Survey: conducting social-economic studies including household survey and assessment of the attitude of the PAPs towards the proposed project;

Legislative and Regulatory Framework: Analysis of the legal framework pertinent to the project;

Institutional Framework: analysis of institutional framework and identification of the responsible institutional body responsible for the resettlement activities;

Indicate grievances redress mechanisms: this involves evaluating availability of clear and transparent procedures for third party settlement of disputes arising from resettlement;

Propose RAP implementation schedule: Development of an implementation schedule covering all resettlement activities from preparation through implementation including target dates for the achievement of expected benefits of PAPs. The schedule indicates how the resettlement activities are linked to the overall project implementation process;

Estimation of cost of the RAP: the report shows itemized cost for all activities, including compensation for PAPs and running cost for implementation committees, running cost for training and awareness creation activities;

Propose monitoring and evaluation mechanisms: arrangements for monitoring of resettlement activities by the implementing agency, supplemented by independent monitors as considered appropriate by the World Bank to ensure complete and objective information performance monitoring indicators to measure inputs, outputs and outcome for resettlement activities; and

Prepare and submit the ESIA and Resettlement Action Plan report after incorporating the comments provided by .all stakeholders.

Methodology

To collect relevant primary and secondary data and information required to prepare this Resettlement Action Plan various methods, tools and techniques have been employed. Sources of data and information used in this document can be grouped into two broad categories namely, primary and secondary sources. These include literature review, conducting household survey, public consultation, undertaking physical property inventory using high-resolution GPS and meter tapes and visual observation of the study area.

Socio-economic Condition of PAPs

The proposed project will affect about 269 households who are residing along the designed trunk lines. Out of the total households, 31 households will lose their residential housing units resulting in relocation. Whereas a total of 238 households will lose part of their housing units, fences or plantation mainly eucalypts tree.


viii Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

Nearly all project-affected households have their own family. The average family size for affected households is calculated to be 6 persons indicating the burden of the bread winners. The would be affected households and project area communities have an easy access to all basic infrastructures and public services unlike rural communities. By economic status, most of project-affected households depend on labor sales, self-employment and government employment. There are also aged persons who are depending on social security (pension) earning. In general, nearly all affected households leave under poor economic condition. Policy and Legal Frameworks

Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Proclamation 1/1995 contains several relevant policy legal and institutional frameworks that have direct relevant with the expropriation procedures for those people who might be affected by the proposed project. Pertain articles in the constitutions are:-

Act. 40.3 states that “Land is the common property of the Ethiopian people and cannot be subject to sale or to other means of exchange.

Act. 40.7 states “Every Ethiopian shall have the full right to the immoveable property he builds and to the permanent improvements he brings about on the land by his labor or capital”

Act. 40.8 states that “Without prejudice to the right to private property, the government may expropriate private property for public purposes subject to payment in advance of compensation commensurate to the value of property.”

Act. 44.2 states that “All persons who have been displaced or whose livelihoods have been adversely affected as a result of state programs have the right to a commensurate monetary or alternative means of compensation, including relocation with adequate state assistance.”

Regulation No 135/2007 payment of compensation for property situated on land holdings expropriated for public purpose is issued for the proper implementation of the proclamation No. 455/2005. World Bank issued an operational policy on involuntary resettlement policy OP 4.12 which is applied to all World Bank financed projects. The World Bank’s OP 4.12 underlines the need to identify, understand and mitigate various “impoverishment risk social, cultural, economic and environment that may arise because of a development project that entails displacement of people.


ix Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

The PAPs Attitude towards the Project

As revealed from the survey and public consultations nearly all PAPs and major stakeholders support the project. The project has overwhelming support. However, the PAPs demanded appropriate compensations in a timely and just manner. The public concerns are annexed with minutes. The estimated compensation cost for the PAPs is also annexed. Anticipated Possible Positive and Negative Impact of the project The project has very positive impact for Addis Ababa city population particularly in terms of improving public health in general and for the population who reside in the wastewater catchment areas. It has also a considerable benefit for the downstream residents who are living along the Little Akaki and Big Akaki Rivers that drain far to the south and extends up to Lake Abhe. Specific positive impact of the project includes improvement of community health, employment opportunity at various levels, economic benefit, business opportunities and irrigation opportunities for a few households who reside at downstream of the existing treatment plant. Regarding the negative impact, it is identified that the project will affect communities who are residing along the trunk line and some public infrastructures at various pints. To this end, itis assessed and realized properties of individuals and few organizations will be affected. Due to this, households who are residing along the trunk line will lose low cost housing units, part of their fence and eucalypts tree plantation. In general, the impact will result in displacing 31 households fully. Few fences and houses can also be partially affected. All PAPs are informed about the project and the possible impacts during the surveying. Compensation and Resettlement

According to the legal and policy requirement of the Ethiopian Government and the World Bank, the principles of compensation and entitlements for the project activities impact shall include:-

The extent and amount of compensation offered by the project to project affected persons will depend on the amount and type of property that will be impacted.

PAPs are adequately informed on eligibility, compensation rates and standards. Compensation will be at full replacement cost. Land acquisition and housing unit or fence demolishing will not take place prior

to compensation. Compensation shall be paid prior to acquisition or displacement, and Stakeholders shall be consulted including communities.

One of the most outstanding issues in the study is the resettlement of the fully affected households. In connection with this relevant offices in the Addis Ababa City Administration have been consulted as to how these families are being resettled. The most important office in this regard is Land Development and Urban Renewal Agency. According to the Agency based on the proclamation of 455/2005, Guidline135/1999 and Guideline 3/2002 these families (households) will be resettled in their respective sub-cities where all basic public facilities will be


x Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

made available. In the course of resettlement, they will be consulted by resettlement committees of their sub-cities to know their needs and choices. The Agency is committed to relocate the PAPs where there are adequate basic public services in their respective sub-cities.

Grievance Redress The PAPs have the opportunity to forward any resentment with regard to compensation implementation with grievance redress procedure that is supported by the policy. The objective of the grievance procedure related to this RAP includes:

To provide PAPs with avenues for making compliant or resolve any dispute that may arise in the course of land, structure and any assets acquisition, including the process of moving;

To ensure that appropriate and mutually acceptable corrective actions are identified and implemented to address complaints;

To verify that complainants are satisfied with outcomes of corrective actions; and To avoid the need to resort to judicial proceedings.

Public and PAP Consultation The study team has organized various meetings in all project affected Woreda to gather the public opinion about it the project and create awareness about the positive impacts of the project on public health. On the consultation process, the participants were briefed about the objectives of the project, the possible anticipated impacts of the project at different phases of the project activities in their respective locality. This has given the opportunity for PAPs and the major stakeholders to internalize the ultimate objectives of the project. In the same development on the consultation process, the PAPs have got a chance to reflect their needs and feeling that valuable for the preparation of this resettlement action plan. RAP Implementation Budget

The budget that will be required to implement the RAP is worked out based on the inventory made by the consultant in the project area that is along the trunk line. The required cost for compensation is calculated considering the current market price to replace the affected property. In general the total cost of this RAP is estimated to be Birr18,764,865.75. Out of this the direct composition cost accounts 99.54 percent whereas the indirect one constitutes 0.46 percent. With regard to the finance resources to carry out compensation payment, income restoration, rehabilitation and administration costs for PAPs it is assumed that it will be settled by the AAWSA (client) as implementing agency.


xi Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

Conclusions and Recommendations The proposed project will have both positive and negative impacts. Most of the positive impacts area designed entail at the planning stage of the project. The rest positive impacts of the project realized through various opportunities that might be created at different level. Maximizing and maintaining the benefit of the project will be the responsibility of concerned bodies those who plan the benefit and attracted by the opportunity of benefit that will be obtained. Concerning the negative impact of the project, it is obvious that the impact is a challenge that would have various effects on the socioeconomic life of those who are going to bear the effect. Because of this reason, it is natural and inevitable to assess the degree of the impact and to come up with possible solution. On this premise this resettlement action plan has dealt with issues that safeguards the would be affected households at large and paves the way for the successful implementation of the project. Recommendations

Continuous sensitization of affected communities in the pre‐construction phase of the project should be encouraged as a preparatory measure before project implementation. AAWSA should be at the forefront in ensuring while this RAP is carried out and appropriate compensation should be in place for all the affected persons in a timely manner using the prevailing market price rates. For the successful implementation of this resettlement action plan and smoothly undertake the construction and operation activities of the project the consultant would recommend the following while implementing the RAP. During tender document preparation, it is necessary to ensure serious attention to instruct

the contractor to avoid or to minimize impact that may be created on socio economic life and the biophysical environment of the project beyond the anticipated impacts.

Adequate representatives should be present from the, AAWSA and project affected persons in the valuation and compensation committee.

Prior to the payment of compensations to the individual PAPs they should be notified about compensations and inform them where to collect the compensation. They have to be also notified the commencement of date of civil works.

Public awareness is believed to be a key to have community involvement on the project activity for the successful implementation of the project. To this effect AAWSA should undertake promotional activities particularly on the objectives of the project and planed impact consideration among the would be affected persons and major stakeholders.

AAWSA and the Woreda administration should undertake awareness creation program among the PAP how to manage money that will be provided for compensation before it is provided.

Training: vulnerable groups should be given the option to select training they wish, which would help them to maintain and/or improve their income generation potential. The skills


xii Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

training program will be designed during project implementation, Trainees will be entitled to a subsistence allowance during the training period.

Extraordinary attention: implementation committee should give extraordinary attention for vulnerable groups while resettlement and rehabilitation activity is carried out.

In same development strategies for promoting economic recovery of PAPs also include assisting them to improve their living standard through facilitating training opportunity and credit provision.

AAWSA should committed to implement all possible mitigation measures before construction and during construction period of the project to avoid or minimize the PAPs complaint.

AAWSA should instruct the contractor to undertake all its activities under circumstance where there will not be socio-economic and biophysical environmental adverse impact on the local communities by construction crew and machinery or material used for construction.


1 Consultants: Beles Engineering PLC

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Background and Rationale

The population of Addis Ababa City in one hand and provision of water supply and other associated socio economic development is increasing from time to time that in turn increases waste water generation from domestic and other facilities. Sewerage system and a wastewater treatment plant currently serving some parts of Kaliti catchment specifically Bole, Ledeta, Old Airport, Central part of the City, Mekanisa and Kera areas. The existing system does not go along the demand and horizontal expansion of the city. This has made the some of the population and the business centers to practice open wastewater release, especially illegal connection of sewerage to storm drainage system and rivers and streams that results in pollution of surface and groundwater sources greatly affecting the health of the population. Owing to the prevailing and expected increase of the city population and associated increase and potential problems of wastewater, the Addis Ababa Water and Sewerage Authority (AAWSA) is striving to reduce and solve the problem by developing wastewater treatment projects that include expanding the previous and constructing the new ones. The Kaliti treatment plant and sewer lines expansion and rehabilitation project is one of the projects designed to be implemented soon. 1.2 Project Description The Kaliti waste water line and treatment plant expansion and rehabilitation project is designed to solve the existing wastewater management problem of the southern part of Addis Ababa at large. The project has three trunk lines i.e. eastern, western and southern that joins the existing wastewater treatment plant. Much of the proposed trunk lines follow the existing functioning sewer lines. The existing system is working with very high hydraulic load because of some technical problem. As a matter of facts in many places the existing system is broken. The proposed new line will accommodate new settlement areas and reduce the high hydraulic load of the existing system. The proposed eastern trunk line starts from Bole Bridge from Kirkos Sub city of Woreda 3 and passes through Bulbulla River bridge goes down through Nifas Selek Lafto of Woreda 8and 9 crosses the ring road opposite to the Agricultural Marketing Enterprise. The proposed new trunk line will extend down to Comet Transport Enterprise compound and then cross the Ring road again and pass through the Agricultural Mechanization Service compound. After this it will follow the old railway line in the Akaki Kaliti Sub City of Woreda 6 and finally join the western trunk line close to the compound of the Ethiopian Water Technology Training Center. Figure 1 shows the location map.



The western trunk line will start from Nifas Selek Sub City of Woreda 12 forest area crossing the bridge at the Akaki River pass through Bihere Tsege park and Woreda 10to Akaki Kaliti Sub City of Woreda 6 and 5, touching Awash Tanning, spice factor and join the Eastern line. The project is designed to upgrade the capacity of the existing sewer line and treatment plant of Addis Ababa city so as to benefit the communities who are residing within the catchment area as well as different industries and government organizations. Along this, it is anticipated that the project will enhance the environmental quality of the Akaki River basin which draining to the Awash River that is being used for different purpose at downstream cities and rural communities, that extends up to Lake Abhe locate at the border of Djibouti. This project has far reaching positive impact in the rift valley by reducing the pollution of the rivers. The project will enable AAWSA partially to meet its established objectives that is provision of sewerage service in a better manner to fulfill the growing demands of customer, which is growing from time to time in the city of Addis Ababa. This specific project together with other wastewater treatment facilities will put the capital city Addis Ababa in a better position of managing water. All in all the design of this project covers about 18kmup to the existing treatment plant having 6 meters of right of way for trunk line, access road and working space crossing seven Woredas affecting various properties of individuals and some public infrastructures at different points. The existing treatment plant, that is designed for expansion is located at a one km distance from residences bordering Akaki River in west direction, where treated effluent can be discharged. It is located in Nifas silke Lafto sub city covering about 7865 hectare of land. The Kaliti WWTP was constructed in 1981. The design capacity of the works for the first phase was about 7,600 m3/day of hydraulic load and with a biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) load of 3,500 kg/day. The proposed plant expansion activities will undertake place in the compound of the existing treatment plant site without any land claim since the expansion area is owned by AAWSA. Due to this fact there is no economic or social impact that will be created



Figure 1 Location Map of the Project Area



1.3 Objectives of the RAP The objectives of this Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the Kaliti wastewater lines and treatment plant expansion and rehabilitation project is to identify and assess the impact of the project and to define all appropriate measures and strategies that are necessary to mitigate the negative effects of the project, restore and improve the income and livelihoods of the PAPs. The specific objectives of the RAP include;-

To present the negative impacts associated with land acquisition and loss of other assets due to the implementation of the project

To present an action plan for the delivery of compensation and assistance in accordance with the policy adopted for the project,

To generate baseline data for monitoring and evaluation of how well the mitigation will be implemented during the project implementation,

To recommend cost effective measures to be implemented to mitigate against the expected impacts of the project,

To identify and quantify different categories of project affected persons (PAPs) who would require some form of assistance, compensation, rehabilitation or relocation

To verify the adherence and compliance of the World Bank Safeguard policies for PAPs in the course of project implementation.

To design mechanisms and procedures for the resolution of conflict and redress of grievances arising from the implementation of the RAP and the project

To provide estimates of required resources for implementation of the RAP, and To come up with a framework for supervision, monitoring and evaluation of

resettlement implementation 1.4 Scope of Work The major scope of work undertaken during the ESIA and RAP preparation included:

Project description: to concisely describe the proposed project, its geographic location, ecological, general layout of facilities including maps at appropriate scale;

Identification of potential impact: analysis of potential project impacts through identification of the PAPs, estimating their number and evaluating the impacts of the project on them;

Household Survey: conducting social-economic studies including household survey and assessment of the attitude of the PAPs towards the proposed project;

Legislative and Regulatory Framework: analysis of the legal framework pertinent to the project;

Institutional Framework: analysis of institutional framework and identification of the responsible institutional body responsible for the resettlement activities;

Indicate grievances redress mechanisms: this involves evaluating availability of clear and transparent procedures for third party settlement of disputes arising from resettlement;

Propose RAP implementation schedule: Development of an implementation schedule covering all resettlement activities from preparation through implementation including target dates for the achievement of expected benefits of PAPs. The schedule



indicates how the resettlement activities are linked to the overall project implementation process;

Estimation of cost of the RAP: the report shows itemized cost for all activities, including compensation for PAPs and running cost for implementation committees, running cost for training and awareness creation activities;

Propose monitoring and evaluation mechanisms: arrangements for monitoring of resettlement activities by the implementing agency, supplemented by independent monitors as considered appropriate by the World Bank to ensure complete and objective information performance monitoring indicators to measure inputs, outputs and outcome for resettlement activities; and

Prepare and submit a Resettlement Action Plan Report.

1.5. Methodology To collect relevant and significant data and information required to prepare this Resettlement Action Plan the consultant has adopted various methods, tools and techniques. The sources of data and information used in this document can be grouped into two broad categories namely, primary and secondary sources. Details of data collection methods, tools and techniques are briefly outlined below. a) Document Review To have a good understanding of the proposed project and prepare the resettlement action plan all pertinent documents were collected from the client’s office and different organizations. Published regulations, guidelines and National Policies and the World Bank policy that deals with involuntary resettlement has been reviewed. Particular emphasis is given to the agreed Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF). b) Field Observations

To understand and obtain clear picture of the study areas and the socio-economic situation of the would be affected households observation have been made in the field. The eastern, western and southern trunk lines, the treatment plant and the downstream areas in Akaki-Kaliti sub-city (Woreda 7) have been visited.

c) Household Survey To get primary data on the demographic aspects and socio-economic situation of the would be affected households and their attitude towards the proposed project the consultant has first developed structural questionnaire. Having the developed structural questionnaire nearly all the would affected households were contacted and their response was recorded(see the annex 2). The household survey has also included those households who are residing at the downstream of the existing waste treatment plant.



To conduct the enumeration 3 enumerators were selected and oriented on the approach how the survey should be conducted out in a systematic and ethical approach. Along with the enumerators, the consultant surveyor was assigned to locate households and properties that are going to be affected as per the design of the sewer line.

Plate 1Surveying and enumeration along the wastewater trunk lines

d) GPS High resolution GPS and meter tapes were used to undertake physical inventory that would be affected by the project in the right off-way demarcation. This has helped to register eligible household for the compensation and quantify the size and dimension of the would be affected property. As instructed by the client a six meter buffer zone was taken as boundary along the trunk lines. e) Consultation of Major Stakeholders During the preparation of this Resettlement Action Plan, the consultant has carried out meaningful consultation with major stakeholders including the Woreda administration and project affected households to fully share the information about the project activity and to



mention the degree of anticipated impact. Furthermore, all affected public institutions, governmental and non-governmental organizations and private firms were consulted and briefed about the nature of the project and the scale of the effect of the project on their structure. In general, the consultation methodology that was used bythe consultant was designed to be participatory where the stakeholders share their feelings about their concern related to the project activity. All the stakeholders have been informed about the project and exhaustive discussions have been made with the communities, Woreda’ and Sub-Cities’ authorities.

Plate 2 Discussion with Woreda Administration and stakeholders

f) Valuation of Affected Property After survey of affected property, the rules and regulations of the Addis Ababa city administration for valuation have been studied in detail. Based on this the cost of the total resettlement action plan was established. In valuation current market prices are considered. In addition to this detailed property inventory has been undertaken based on the rules set by the Addis Ababa City administration and by emphasizing on the Resettlement Policy Framework.



2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PAPs

2. 1 General To obtain the socio economic condition of the PAPs and properties the consultant has conducted total numeration survey. Total numeration and house-to-house survey has been carried out and the required data have been collected. To undertake the socioeconomic surveying structural data recording instrument (sheet) and questionnaire has been developed in order to use it as data collection tool.

Plate 3Buffer zone delineation and inventory of property to be affected.

The enumeration covered 269households along the trunk lines who are anticipated to be affected by the project activities. In the downstream areas, 17householdshave been surveyed and the summarized result is annexed. The core findings are summarized in Table 1. In downstream areas there are no households to be affected by the project directly. Because, the treatment plant will be established within the existing Kaliti wastewater treatment plant compound. However, household survey was conducted to check the opinion of the community residing in the immediate vicinity about the project. Downstream dwellers are benefited from the treatment plant by using dried sludge as fertilizer for small-scale vegetable growing.



Table 1 Affected individual households, and organizations

S.N

Degree of Effect Number Household Number of household members

Male Female Total Male Female Total Remark

1 Economically displaced PAPs

238 164 74 238 598 727 1325Mainly fences

2 Physically displaced PAPS 31 21 10 31 93 96 189

3 Economically displaced Organizations

29 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Mainly fence

Total 298 185 84 269 691 823 1514

2.2. Demographic Characteristic a) The Sex Composition of PAPs Figure 2 shows the proportion of PAPs that would be affected by the project. The survey result indicates that the great majority to be affected are male household heads, which accounts 69.84%, whereas the female household heads account 30.16.



Figure 2 PAPS by sex composition

b) Age Distribution of the PAPs The age distribution of the PAPs is shown in 3. The great majority of the surveyed households that constitutes about 17.1% is found in the age category of 50 – 54. This is followed by the age group 35-39 constituting 11% of the interviewed household heads. There are household heads who have reached the age of 70 and above constituting 7.9 percent.

Figure 3 PAPs by age category

69.84%

30.16 %

Male

Female

4

24 24

2826 25

43

21

27

1013

4 3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

18‐24 25‐29 30‐34 35‐39 40‐44 45‐49 50‐54 55‐59 60‐64 65‐69 70‐74 75‐79 80>



c) Family size According to the household surveys, the average family size of the PAPs is 5.6, which is greater than the City Administration average family size that is 4.1 persons as per the 2007 population census. The area surveyed seems to be highly populated. 2.3 Education Regarding the educational background of the PAPs the household survey indicates that all PAPs have been educated. The level of education ranges from elementary to college level. As it is shown in Figure 4 out of the total PAPs 29.8 percent completed the elementary level education. In the same development, it is reported that about 27.4 percent have attended the college level education. The great majority lies in the category of 1-4 grade.

Figure 4 PAPs Number by Education level

75

55 54

69

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1‐4. 5‐8. 9‐12. 12+ and abovegrade

Number



2.4 Housing Units

The housing units in the project affected areas are typical of the low-cost type. Hence, most of the housing units are constructed of mud wall constituting 55.116 m2by area coverage. This is followed by housing units constructed of corrugated iron sheet for the wall constituting 28.40 percent by area coverage.

In general the enumeration result shows that the total area coverage of the housing units that would be affected is 9386.6 m2.

Table 2 Affected housing units total area in m2

Type of Houses Area Percent

Hollow Blacks 1510.1 16.02

Stone wall 40 0.42

Mud wall 5199.7 55.16

Corrugated Iron Sheet 2676.8 28.40

Total 9427.6 100



Plate 4Typical houses downstream of the treatment plan

2.5 Economic Characteristics The PAPs practice urban economic activities for their livelihood. To this effect most of the PAPs involve in different occupation including; daily labor, civil servant, vender, business etc. The PAPs economic status generally is observed to be in the category of lower income group. With regard to PAPs occupational engagement the survey result shows that about 49 percent of the surveyed households reported for private employment. This is followed by daily laborer and civil servant constituting 27% and 27 % respectively. Apart from this, the survey result shows that some of the surveyed persons are unemployed constituting 14 percent. See figure 5 for the detail.



Figure 5 PAPs by occupational status

Along this the survey result also shows that PAPs who would be physically displaced by the project activities are not economically dependent of their residential area involving in different activities outside home and residential area.

3. Findings of Physical Property Inventory and the PAPs Attitude towards the Project

3.1 General To obtain measurable and reliable data of the property that would be affected within 6 meter right-off- way for the trunk lines in respective Sub-cities and Woreda the consultant has undertaken physical inventory throughout the 18 km trunk line. During the inventory high resolution GPS is used to demark the location and identify the property that would be while identifying the property owner. 3.2 Findings of the Physical Property Inventory According to the physical inventory about 269 households will lose their property because of the project activity in seven Woreda that are located in three Sub-cities. These households will lose houses, fences and some plantations. Out of the 269 households, 31 are going to lose their houses

5249

27 27 27

18 17

52 2

14

24

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

percetnt



and related properties entirely. The type of properties to be affected and quantities are annexed. The table below shows the summary of properties of the PAPs and public utilities that would be affected.

Table 3 Type of property that would be affected

Sub-city

Woreda

Property that would be affected

No. of Housing unit affected Fence in M

Plantation (tree) in number

Fully Partially Total

Kirkos 3 - 16 16 305 3

Nifas Selek Lafeto 8 - 59 59 354 -

9 - 40 40 655 14

10 8 14 22 120 -

12 1 7 8 - 305

Kaliti Akaki 6 21 31 52 235 -

5 1 15 16 400 75

Total 31 200 231 2069 397

With regard to the ownership title, the survey result shows all affected housing units are owned by the PAPs. Table 4 Measurement of infrastructures to be affected

S.N Types structures Unit of measure Quantity

1 Electric poll Number 89

2 Telephone polls Number 26

3 Asphalt roads Meter square 1719

4 Coble stone roads Meter square 616

5 Gravel roads Meter square 2349



3.3 PAPs Attitude towards the Project In the course of the surveying all the PAPs are informed about the nature of the project and the likely impacts and appropriate actions to be taken including issues of resettlement. During the surveying period, it has been tried to collect information from PAPs about their feeling related to the proposed project. This is considered helpful for the preparation of the acceptable resettlement action plan. On this premises the PAPs were asked to mention their feeling about the proposed project. Out of the 269 PAPs only one person shows dissatisfaction on the implementation of the project. This indicates that the project has overwhelming public support. This does not mean that public awareness creation is not necessary. The public has to be well informed about the implementation process including the mechanism of companion and resettlement action plan.

4. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK 4.1 General The Resettlement Action Plan for the proposed project needs to be prepared within the legal and policy framework of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) and it should meet the World Bank’s resettlement policy framework. To this effect, the country constitution, civil code, the proclamation on expropriation of land and compensation, World Bank Operational Policy OP 4.12 for involuntary resettlement and Resettlement policy Framework have been seen in relation to the implementation of the resettlement action plan. 4.2 Constitution of the FDRE As a supreme law of the country, the Constitution of the FDRE is the pillar of all policies, laws and regulations both at national and regional levels. The Constitution contains several provisions that are directly related to land ownership, acquisition, compensation and planning and implementation of development-induced resettlement schemes. The Constitution provides for the public the ownership of both urban and rural land as well as all natural resources. The Constitution further stipulates that while ownership of land is vested on the State and the people of Ethiopia, dwellers have usufruct rights over land. The Constitution provides usufruct right for the holders with the right not to be evicted from their landholdings and the right for compensation in cases of expropriation of their landholdings for public purposes. The Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Proclamation 1/1995 contains several relevant policy legal and institutional frame works that have direct relevance with the expropriation procedures for those people who might be affected by the proposed project. Pertain articles in the constitutions are:-



Act. 40.3 states that “Land is the common property of the Ethiopian people and cannot be subject to sale or to other means of exchange.

Act. 40.7 states “Every Ethiopian shall have the full right to the immoveable property he builds and to the permanent improvements he brings about on the land by his labor or capital”

Act. 40.8 states that “Without prejudice to the right to private property, the government may expropriate private property for public purposes subject to payment in advance of compensation commensurate to the value of property.”

Act. 44.2 states that “All persons who have been displaced or whose livelihoods have been adversely affected as a result of state programs have the right to a commensurate monetary or alternative means of compensation, including relocation with adequate state assistance.”

In general, according to the constitution of Ethiopia, rural or urban land could not be sold or mortgaged hence citizens have only usufruct right over land. A usufruct right gives the user of the land, the right to use the land and the right to benefit from the fruits of her/his labor, whichmay be crops, trees, etc. found on the land or any permanent works such as buildings, etc. Persons who have lost their land as a result of acquisition for the purpose of public projects are entitled to be compensated to a similar land plus the related costs arising from relocation; assets such as buildings, crops or fruit trees that are part of the land, etc. 4.3 The Civil Code of Ethiopia

The 1960 Civil Code of Ethiopia has several important provisions and procedures that are pertinent to expropriation of land and compensation for private property for public purposes. Pertain to this Act. 1460 states “…competent authority has the right to compel the owner to surrender the ownership of an immoveable property for public purposes.” Under the Ethiopian Civil Code, the owner may be compelled to surrender the ownership of land for public purpose. Furthermore, it is also stipulated in the Civil Code that a project or a program that necessitated the expropriation of private property needs to be declared that it is in the public interest. This is supported by Article 1463 that states “…the project which makes expropriation necessary shall be declared by notice to be in the public interest.” and Act 1465 that states “… where public inquiry is necessary, the declaration of public utility will not be made until the public interest has been consulted.” The Civil Code also provides for valuation of and compensation for loss of property. For example, it is stated in the Civil Code that compensation for lost property should follow the replacement cost principles. Pertain to this Act 1474 states “The amount of compensation or the value of the land that may be given to replace the expropriated land shall be equal to the amount of actual damage caused by expropriation.”



4.4 Expropriation of Landholdings for Public Purpose and Payment of Compensation The proclamation on expropriation of land and compensation No 455/2005 implies repealed the outdated provisions of the Ethiopian civil code of 1960 regulations land acquisitions and compensation for the purpose of public project. It is a new legislation established detail procedures setting the time limits within which land could be acquired after a request is received from a proponent, principles for assessment of compensation for properties on the land as well as for displacement compensation. It also empowered the Woreda (district) administration to established valuation committees to value private properties in the case of public owned infrastructures to be removed the barriers for planned land acquisition, substantially raised the amount of compensation payable to expropriated owners of properties and displaced people. Regulation No 135/2007 payment of compensation for property situated on land holdings expropriated for public purpose is issued for the proper implementation of the proclamation No. 455/2005. These regulations issued for the purpose of not only paying compensation but also to assist displaced persons to restore their livelihood. This regulation set forth details to determine the amount of compensation for different assets found on land holdings expropriated for public purpose and stipulated the formula to calculate the amount of compensation payable for different assets. Regarding the determination of compensation, in part three article 7 of the proclamation No.455/2005, the basis and amount of compensation is clearly explained in article 7(1) and 7(2). Act 7(1)a states that land holder whose holding has been expropriated shall be entitled to payment of compensation for his property situated on the land and for permanent improvements he made on the land. Act. 7(2) states that the amount of compensation for property situated on the expropriated land shall be determined on the basis of replacement cost of the property. Under article 8(1) of this proclamation a survival land holder whose land holding has been permanently expropriated in addition to the compensation payable under article of this proclamation will be paid displacement compensation, which shall be equivalent to ten times the average annual income he secured to bring the five years preceding the expropriations of the land. All PAPs and organization (whether public or private) that loss houses, crops or sources of income will be compensated or rehabilitated according to the type and amount of their losses. The cut –off date for compensation eligibility will set once all detailed measurements have been completed; compensation will also not be paid for any structure erected or crops and trees planted purely to gain additional compensation. Cultivating land, constructing settlement in the project affected areas after the cut -off date will not be eligible for compensation or subsidies.



4.5 World Bank Policies and Procedure for Involuntary Resettlement World Bank issued an operational policy on involuntary resettlement policy OP 4.12 which is applied to all World Bank financed projects. The World Bank’s OP 4.12 underlines the need to identify, understand and mitigate various “impoverishment risk social cultural economic, and environment that may arise as a result of a development project that entails displacement of people. The objective of the Bank’s resettlement policy is to ensure that population displaced by a project should receive benefits from it. The policy has the following key objectives:

To avoid involuntary resettlement where feasible, or minimize resettlement impacts where population displacement is unavoidable, exploring all viable project designs. Particular attention must be given to socio-cultural considerations, such as cultural or religious significance of land, the vulnerability of the affected population, or the availability of in-kind replacement for assets, especially when they have important intangible implications. When a large number of people or a significant portion of the affected population would be subject to relocation or would suffer from impacts that are difficult to quantify and to compensate, the alternative of not going ahead with the project should be given a serious consideration: To ensure that displaced people receive resettlement assistance, preferably under

the project, so that their standards of living, income earning capacity and production levels are improved;

To provide explicit guidance to Bank staff and to the borrowers on the conditions that need to be met regarding involuntary resettlement issues in Bank operations in order to mitigate the negative impacts of displacement and resettlement and establish sustainable economy and society and

To set up a mechanism for monitoring the performance of involuntary resettlement programs in Bank operations and remedying problems as they arise so as to safeguard against ill-prepared and poorly implemented resettlement plans.

According to World Bank’s involuntary resettlement program the resettlement plan should include measures to ensure that displaced persons should be:-

Informed about their options and rights pertaining to resettlement. Consulted on, offered choices among, and provided with technically and

economically feasible resettlement alternatives. Provided prompt and effective compensation at full replacement cost for losses. Provided assistance (such as moving allowances) during relocation. Provided with residential housing, or housing sites, or as required agricultural

sites for which a combination of productive potential, location advantages and other factors is at least equivalent to the advantages of old sites.

Provided with development assistance in addition to compensation measures, such as land preparation, credit facilities, training, or job opportunities and



Offered support after displacement, for a transition period, based on a reasonable estimate of the time likely to be needed to restore their livelihood and standard of living.

4.6 Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Project Resettlement Policy Framework The agreed Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) related to the Urban Water Supply and Sanitation project mainly adheres to the constitution of Ethiopia 1995, civil code of the Empire of Ethiopia, 1960, land tenure regime in Ethiopia, rural land administration, 1997 and World Bank safeguard policy on involuntary resettlement. The Resettlement Policy Framework is prepared to be Operational Manual and reference for the water supply and sanitation project that are funded by the World Bank so as to minimize and mitigate the adverse impact of the project. Along this the policy has also the purpose to clarify resettlement principles, organizational arrangements, and design criteria to be applied to sub-projects to be prepared during project implementation. With this consideration, the framework specifies that:- Any impact of the UWSS Project on land and/or people (land acquisition, resettlement

and livelihood restoration of affected people) will be addressed in compliance with the Constitution of Ethiopia, with other Ethiopian regulations, and with the World Bank safeguard policy in involuntary resettlement (OP 4.12).

Involuntary resettlement and land acquisition will be avoided where feasible, or minimized, by exploring all viable alternatives.

Where involuntary resettlement and land acquisition is unavoidable, resettlement and compensation activities will be conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to give the displaced persons the opportunity to share project benefits. Displaced and compensated persons will be meaningfully consulted and will have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement and compensation programs.

Displaced and compensated persons will be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or levels prevailing prior to the beginning of the project implementation, whichever is higher.

5. THE POSSIBLE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT AND MITIGATION MEASURES

5.1 General Any development project has its positive and negative impacts on communities living in the project area and its environs. Accordingly, the Kaliti wastewater sewer line and treatment plant



expansion and rehabilitation project has its impacts on the communities residing in the area. The project has primarily positive impacts in one way or another for Addis Ababa city population particularly in terms of improving public health in general and for the population who reside in the wastewater catchment areas. It has also a considerable benefit for the downstream residents who are living along the Little Akaki and Big Akaki rivers that drain far to the south and extends up to Lake Abhe. On the contrary, the project has different types of negative impacts on communities particularly on those who reside along the trunk line right off way requiring mitigation measures. 5.2 Positive Impacts a) Improvement of Community Health

The main objective of the extension and rehabilitation of the sewer line and treatment plant is to bring improved health condition of the community residing the sewer catchment in particular and downstream residents and communities living along major river courses connected with the Akaki river basin. Especially for communities residing near the Little and Big Akaki Rivers and persons in the immediate downstream of the treatment plant will benefit a lot. After the project implemented individual households, industries institutions will have facilities to dispose their liquid waste which is currently major public health concern. Persons in the downstream who uses the water for domestic uses (at times for drinking)will be safer. It is obvious that this project is vital for improving the public health. In fact a lot has to be done to improve the liquid waste disposal facility of the city of Addis Ababa. b) Employment Opportunity

The proposed project is anticipated to create employment opportunities, during construction and operation period temporarily and permanently. The construction phase creates job opportunities for local contractors and they would also employ skilled and unskilled workers. During the operation period, the project would need workers to run the operation activity in the treatment plant. It creates employment opportunities for unemployed persons in Addis Ababa city administration. c) Economic Benefits

The most important economic benefit is the indirect advantage of persons living at the downstream improving their health conditions. The improvement of the health condition reduces the medication expense and improves the potential to do work. It improves their productivity, improve their nutrition status. As revealed from studies by the Addis Ababa Environmental Protection Agency many people suffer by water borne diseases due to the use of polluted rivers. The release of treated water will certainly improves the pristine quality of the rivers and protects the biological environment downstream. Many vegetable farms use the polluted river for local



irrigation. In fact the treatment plant alone may not solve the problem entirely unless the entire city gets better liquid and solid waste disposal facilities d) Business Opportunity

The project may create business opportunity to manufacturers and sellers of building materials. Local communities may sell different items such as food and drink during the construction phase for workers. Such activities are very common in Addis Ababa. Many local communities live by selling food and drink whenever and wherever there is construction activity by moving together with the construction workers. e) Irrigation Opportunity

The Kaliti treatment plant is assumed to purify the wastewater and make it safe for irrigation purpose. Farmers at the downstream may use the water and be able to grow farm products two times in a year or more. This will help farmers to grow different varieties of crops and vegetables to improve their income and improve their economic status. This will certainly in turn assists the food security program of the country and reduce the impact of climate change. If the treated water is used for irrigation (as indicated in the study document of AAWSA) many residents downstream may benefit to grow different vegetables and crops during the non-rainy periods. This is apparently the case for Oromia regional state as most of the plot of land at downstream is occupied by new settlers. Currently few residents grow vegetables around the treatment plant. They are using the solid waste from the drying beds as fertilizers. Plate 6 shows partial view of such activities. Most of them grow cabbage. How safe these vegetables are from pathogenic organisms is questionable. Hence as the benefit of the project the famers will enable to grow vegetables using well treated water that has health risk. The use of the treated water for irrigation in the Akaki well field has to be seen cautiously. Rhe aquifers in this area are unconfined and semi-confined. Trace elements may m pollute the well field. This demands further study, This is indicate in Volume I in detail.



Plate6Local vegetable farms close to the drying bed of the Kaliti treatment plant.

5.3. Negative Impacts a) Loss of Housing Units As per the physical inventory along the trunk lines about 231 housing units that were constructed for different purpose using different construction materials would be affected. In this case,31households would lose their residential housing units fully while 200 households would lose part of their residential housing units. Those households who lose their residential housing units at full demolishing condition will need to be relocated in other area because of the reason that they don’t have area of land to construct residential housing unit at back or front yard. Apart from this, those households partially affected have only a very small portion of the kitchen garden house in a few cases or eucalyptus trees or fences affected because the digging of the sewer line requires space for the equipment. Once the digging is completed the space would continue to be owned by the owner. In such cases, the partially affected households are being compensated for the structures, trees and fences that are affected so that they can reconstruct/replant as required. In all cases it is realized that housings units that found in the project area are owned privately that are constructed of mud walls and corrugated iron sheet walls.



Mitigation Measure The mitigation measure for the possible loss of fully demolished housing units is to resettle the households. In connection with the resettlement, concerned offices have been consulted as to how these families are being resettled. The Land Development and Urban Renewal Agency under the city administration is explained the modality of the resettlement. According to the Agency, physically displaced households will be resettled in their respective sub-cities where all basic public facilities will be made available. In the course of resettlement, they will be consulted by resettlement committees of their sub-cities to know their needs and choices. If the estimation of the house is less than Birr 51,000 they will be given compensation option that include cash or small size housing unit that is constructed for the lower income group households. On other hand if the estimation is over the 51,000 Birr the actual estimated cost will be compensated under the following condition.

For those who need to build their own houses with the compensated money, land will be provided in the designated areas within the respective sub-cities.

Those who need condominium can buy with the compensated money they get. These persons are going to be resettled in places where there are developed

infrastructures, social services which is likely to be better than the existing situation. With regard to Economically displaced households and organizations will be compensated according to the rules and regulations set by the city government, which is common to all sub-cities.

Plate 7 Typical Mud wall housing unit Plate 8 Typical Mud wall and CIS housing unit



b) Loss of fences A number organizations and households will lose partially fences constructed of different materials. The majority of the fences are constructed out of corrugated iron hollow blocks. The total surface area of the fences to be demolished is about 7,749.8 m2. The impact of fence demolishing activity is economical since it requires construction material and labor to replace as it was before. Mitigation Measure Since the impact of fence is reflected in terms of economy mitigation measure should be cash compensation. In this connection, all households and other organizations impacted by the project need to be compensated in cash as per measurement and type of fence that would be demolished considering the current market of the labor and the material cost.

Plate 9.Typical corrugated iron sheet fence that would be affected by the project. c) Loss of Plantation Along the trunk lines it has been identified that some households would lose their eucalypts trees. These are used for different purposes. The number of trees and their owners were recorded during the inventory.



Loss of eucalyptus tree for affected households would have significant economic implication since they plant it mainly to generate income for their livelihood. They households also use it construction and fuel wood. Mitigation Measure The mitigation measure for the possible loss of eucalyptus tree is proposed to be cash compensation on the basis of appropriate valuation as per current market price. On this base, the proper mitigation measure for the loss of eucalyptus tree will be provision of compensation for in terms of cash for the number counted tree root with specified size and year of plantation.

Plate 10Typical trees in par affected by the project.

d) Loss of Septic Tanks and Fuel Tanks At few places, the project has an impact on septic tank and fuel tank. The capacity of the would be affected septic tank and fuel tank is measured to be 348m3 and 208m3 respectively. The impact has economic implication for replacement. Apparently, both types of tanks need construction for replacement that incurs labor and construction material. Mitigation Measure The possible mitigation measure for the impact is cash compensation for the owners. With that the affected bodies would be able to replace their thanks.



e) Loss of livelihood income

In the project area as the effect of the project activities there are no households who will lose their livelihood directly. But indirectly most of the households face the problem since they depend on various activities for their livelihood.

Mitigation measure

For the purpose of the project sustainability and smooth construction activities the indirect impact on the livelihood of the PAPs needs to be mitigated. Accordingly, to improve the income status of those affected household it is necessary to organize the households under micro and small-scale enterprise in accordance to the city Administration policy.

For the implementation purpose AAWSA will have a great responsibility and commitment to cooperate with all concerned stakeholders particularly Micro-Finance institutions and Addis Ababa City Micro and Small scale Enterprise Agency.

f) Infrastructural Disturbance

i. Roads Along the trunk line crossings it is identified roads of different types including asphalt road, cobblestone road and gravel roads will be affected. The effect will be at different points and the overall effect measured to cover 1719 m2, 616m2 and 2349m2for asphalt, coble stone and gravel roads respectively. Such disturbance needs to be reconstructed incurring construction cost and demands replacement on time. The impact has social dimension.



Plate 11 Ring road to be crossed by and disturbed by the project.

Plate 12 Gravel road that would disturbed by the project.

Plate 13 Coble Stone road that would be affected by the project.

ii. Electric Power Poles



Related to impact on electric power system during the field assessment it is counted89 wooden poles needs to be relocated. The relocation has economic implication that needs replacement cost.

Plate 14 Electric Pole that would be relocated

iii. Telecommunication Poles With regard to telecommunication line disruption, it is assessed that there are 26 wooden poles to be relocated. This also needs costs for relocation purpose to continue the service in the area. Mitigation Measure For all infrastructures that require replacement and relocation, urgent measures have to be taken so that the usual services can be provided. Hence, the mitigation measure for the public infrastructure should be cash compensation for the respective service providers.

g) Traffic Accident and Jam For construction activity, it is inevitable that a number of different types of vehicle will be deployed to transport construction materials in the project areas. In connection with this it is anticipated that traffic accidents may occur during the different phases of the project.



The trunk lines cross main ring roads and local asphalted and gravel roads. This may create traffic jam that may various problems in the activities area that could be perceived by road utilizes at large. Mitigation Measure The accident that is anticipated to be created in the project areas during the different phases of the project is believed to be reduced through undertaking timely mitigation measures. To this end in order to avoid or minimize the accident and the jam the mitigation measure should be: Awareness creation for all the drivers is significant by the contractor who manages the

car drivers’ activity. Awareness creation for local communities to respect the rules of traffic during their

movement in construction areas. In large road such as the ring road construction can be done during night when there is

lower traffic movement.

h) Health Impact

The risk related to migrant workers is not expected because during construction workers are expected to come from the local area. The health impact may result to residents close to the construction sites due to increased dust level. Impacts related to health and safety matters are mainly related to accidents on workers, public health impairment, and accidents to the general public. Accidents to both the general public and workers are likely due to excavation, open trenches, trench collapses, obstructions to properties, flooding of trenches during heavy rains. Mitigation Measure As a preventive measure the contractor should be oriented to consider all safety measures in and around the area where construction activities are undertaken to safeguard the workers and the local communities.

i) Social and Psychological Disturbance During the construction period along the trunk lines it is anticipated that different impacts would be created because of the project activities which could have various implications including social and psychological disturbance. The social disturbance on the local communities is anticipated to be created because of the displacement from areas where they lived for long time having good social interaction.



In addition to this it is also anticipated that social and psychological impact would be created on households those who loss property and develop suspicion about appropriate implementation of compensation for the lost property. Mitigation Measure Practically it is difficult to quantify and measure the social and psychological impact that would be created on individuals or local community. Hence, because of its nature mitigation measure for such impact is anticipated to be in terms of promotion and awareness creation and facilitation income restoration activities particularly for vulnerable groups.

6. ELIGIBILITY OF AFFECTED PERSONS AND ENTITLEMENT MATRIX

6.1 Eligibility Criteria Setting out eligibility criteria to compensate PAPs in relation to the impact of project activities is essential for effective implementation of compensation and undertake the project activities with success. Clearly defined criteria is also helpful to reduce conflicts that may be raised between the PAPs and implementing agency during the RAP implementation period. The core base for eligibility criteria for RAP implantation purpose is the National Policy of the country that is supported by regulation and the World Bank OP 4.12. To this effect, the main eligibility criteria that should be adopted for compensation include: Formal legal right to land (including customary and traditional rights recognized by the

law of the country); Formal legal rights to land at the time the physical inventory begins but have a claim to

such lands or assets and recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan Recognizable legal right or claim to the land they are occupying PAPs that will lose

houses, fences, etc. affected by the construction works of the project. Legal documents such as certificates that proof the legal ownership of the land or

properties that are obtained from concerned body. Census of PAPs and physical inventory of property before cut of date that excludes

encroachment. It should be noted that the cut of date or completion of the physical surveying is September 10, 2013. For each household surveying date is indicated in the soft copy document provided to the client.

6.2 Eligibility for Compensation

Eligible PAPs for compensation needs to be determined and defined prior to the implementation of RAP. This RAP has defined the Eligible PAPs for compensation based on the criteria in accordance with National and World Bank policies.



Hence, according to the World Bank OP 4.12 procedures, PAPs who are found under the following condition are defined to be eligible for compensation:

a) Those who have formal rights to land (including customary and statutory rights of occupancy recognized under the Laws of Ethiopia),

b) Those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a claim to such land or assets provided that such claims are recognized under Ethiopian laws, or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement and compensation plan,

c) Those PAPs whose structures and plantation and other properties would be affected by the project activity.

d) Those who have no claim to land or housing unit they are occupying or using but standards of living are adversely affected as a consequence of project and related activities.

During the implementation of this RAP each of affected Household heads or individual person or party that claim entitlement have to prove their legal rights over the immovable property that would be affected in order to qualify as a legitimate owner to receive compensation. To determine the eligible person for compensation AAWSA should take in to account the national proclamation and regulations and World Bank involuntary resettlement policy. On this base, the inventory data has established records of the PAPs in a project area who can receive compensation for lost assets and /or resettlement and rehabilitation assistance. 6.3 Entitlement Matrix Based on analysis of the impact of the project and the eligibility policies, an entitlement matrix is developed based on categories of PAPs according to losses and their entitlement benefits. The matrix proposes eligibility and payments for all kinds of losses (e.g., housing unit, fence and other income sources). Entitlement matrix outlined in the table below defines the eligibility for compensation and rehabilitation assistance for impacts /losses for different types of assets for different category of project affected persons.



Table 5 Entitlement matrix

S/N Type of loss Entitled body Resettlement entitlement Legal Entitlement

1 Housing unit (residential, business center etc.)

Any person who owns hosing unit whether he/she have or does not have legal proof of land ownership

Physically displaced PAPs

Compensation as agreed upon by valuation committee and the proponent the entire structure at replacement cost based on the prevailing market rate Free transportation to relocation site for moveable structures affected

2 Structures like fence and septic tank etc.

Respective properties owners Compensation as agreed upon by valuation committee and the proponent the entire structure at replacement cost based on the prevailing market rate

3 Eucalypts tree plantation Respective properties owners Compensation as agreed upon by valuation committee and the proponent the entire structure at replacement cost based onthe prevailing market rate

4 Public infrastructure affected by the project e.g. Power lines, Telephone lines, water supply line, etc.

Organizations that are responsible to provide the service.

5 Income from business activity

Household who loss the business opportunity

Livelihood restoration Appropriate support to restore livelihood at list to maintain the previous ones.



6.4 Cut–off Date The project cut-off date is based on the last enumeration date for the various affected project areas. The last date of enumeration is September 10, 2013. This is considered as the cut-off date. The cut-off date determines the eligibility of the PAPs for compensation and new inhabitants coming to the project affected areas will not be considered for compensation. The consultant has advised the PAPs not to develop in areas earmarked for development as the new development will not be considered for compensation. All the Woreda have also been advised to consider the Cut- off day while providing work permission any construction activities along the line to prevent encroachment and any misleading approach in assuming compensation. As a special a case in Kirkos Sub-city Woreda 3, Small Scale Enterprises are observed while constructing buildings after a cut of date. This has been informed to the Project Office and the Woreda to take appraise actions. The following plate shows this specific site.

Plate 5 Site clearance for construction on the trunk line in Kirkos Sub-city Woreda 3. After Cut- off date



7. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION, PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION

7.1 General Community participation, public and stakeholders consultation is an essential component in the preparation of RAP so as to ensure that the interests of the affected persons are addressed in the RAP process. This is mainly essential and helpful to protect the interest of affected persons/communities, especially the poor and vulnerable groups. Public consultation also gives opportunity for the affected people to influence the project to reduce adverse impacts, maximize additional benefits, and ensure that they receive appropriate compensation. This has been reflected in all public meetings as indicated in the minutes attached to this document. The public consultation and participation will enable the PAPs to get the opportunity to positively contribute to the smooth implementation of the project activities and reduce conflicts that might be arising; having the right and timely information about the project. The public is in favor of the project. But, they require timely resettlement and appropriate compensations. In general community participation, public and stakeholder consultation at various levels for this RAP is required. To clarify the local communities about their role and responsibility while the project

undertakes. To share the information with affected persons about the proposed project, its

components and its activities. To obtain cooperation and participation of the community in all the phases of the project

implementation. To explain the public about potential impacts of the project and seek their participation

and positive contribution towards successful implementation. To obtain information about the needs of affected people and the reaction to proposed

project To ensure transparency in all activities related to compensation and the implementation

process. To establish grievance-handling procedure that is open, easily accessible and effective

ones. and To identify the role and responsibilities of concerned bodies that should be practiced

during the implementation of the RAP. In connection with this consultations were carried out with PAPs, and concerned major stakeholders at Woreda and Sub city level by the consultant. The finding of the consultations for respective project affected Woreda is presented briefly below. In general, there is a very positive response from the PAPs and all major stakeholders.



7.2 Community Participation Active participation of communities and PAPs during the implementation of RAP and project construction period is very important for the smooth implementation of the project. In the presence of community participation and involvement it is believed that every activity will be carried out smoothly and effectively as well as efficiently. During the course of the preparation of this RAP, the PAPs have participated in: Provision of necessary information about the locality for the study team, Allowing the study team to undertake physical inventory of property that would be

affected Recommending responsibilities and roles that should be played in the course of project

implementation, and Participating in public meetings with the Woreda and the study team in connection with

the project The communities indicated that they are willing to participate in the project throughout the project implementation process. They are well aware of the positive impacts of the project on community health. However, they forwarded their concerns with regard to the negative impacts during the construction phase. Some of the PAPs have mentioned that if they are not displaced from the area they take care of the sewerage line from external damage that may be caused by human activities and erosion and other constructions. 7.3 Public and PAPs Consultation The study team has organized various meetings in all project affected Woreda to gather the public opinion about the project and create awareness about the positive impacts of the project on public health. During consultation primarily the participants were briefed about the objectives of the project, the possible anticipated impacts of the project during the different phases of the project. All PAPs are informed about the nature of the project. In the course of public consultation, they were informed about the impact of property loss, expectation of compensation and how it should be managed. The response of the community is minuted. In general, the outcome or response of the public and PAPs consultation in all project affected Woreda is found to be more or less similar character. Hence, on this premises the opinion and suggestions that are obtained as the findings of public and PAPs consultation are summarized briefly below. Opinion and recommendations given by the Public and PAPs



No objection of the project since it is part of the development activity of the Government or the Addis Ababa City Administration.

The economic status of the would be affected households is subsistence livelihood which depend on daily labor income, petty trading, pension income, etc. In general the PAPs are low income community members.

The impact of the project could be tolerable if there is appropriate compensation. Compensation should be both in terms of land and money for displaced persons to

construct new houses or resettled in constructed houses with similar or better facilities and size.

Property loss valuation activity should be done in the presence of PAPs representatives. Notification should be given for the PAPs for physical and psychological readiness. Appropriate measures should be taken in a timely manner to avoid the negative impacts,

especially for community members who will be resettled. Relocation should be undertaken within the Woreda so as to maintain the existing social

life. Compensation should consider the loss of income that is generated as the opportunity of

area location. Assistance should include a cash allowance that compensates affected people for the

inconveniences associated with resettlement and defray the expenses of relocation to a new locality such as moving expenses and lost working days.

Immediate maintenance and rehabilitation for basic infrastructure such as roads, telephone, electric and water supply services should be made immediately during the construction.

The construction period of the project should be short so as to reduce negative impacts on infrastructures and local residences.

Skilled and experienced persons should be selected to establish compensation and/or be involved in the valuation committee.

There is willingness to support the project activities by clearing properties that needs to be cleared or demolished on time.

Some have requested for the provision of a plot of land for housing construction within the Woreda or nearby.

The compensation should account the current market price and potential inflations in the near future.

Construction period should be in the winter season rather than summer for smooth mobilization and demobilization.

During construction period while excavation is carried out closed to unaffected property particularly housing unit an appropriate care should be taken by the construction team to avoid risk and to minimize the impact that may be created.

7.4 Woreda Administration and Other Officials Consultation Consultation with the seven project affected Woreda administration offices and respective sector offices has been undertaken to brief about the objective of the project, the purpose of the RAP and anticipated impact of the project on the local communities.



Along this the role that should be played at Woreda level during the expropriation of land and other property and the implementation of compensation in accordance with the government policy is also discussed. All Woreda have appropriate sector office to address compensation issue. They stated that they are not new to the established procedures of compensation and grievance handling. They positively accepted the project. All Woreda’ authorities said that the project will certainly improve the public health and improved sanitation conditions of the areas and the city of Addis Ababa at large. It has been stated that at Woreda level there is a good ground of facilitating such development project by mobilizing the communities for successful implementation. To this effect all the Woreda Administration offices have agreed:- To facilitate the smooth implementation of the construction works and to provide other

routine administrative supports if the need arises. To promote community participation after awareness creation. To facilitate the establishment of compensation committee as per the Federal

Government laws and regulations. To facilitate the establishment of valuation committee, Resettlement/compensation

committee as per the Federal Government laws and regulations. Provide special support to vulnerable groups particularly for female headed households,

elders and physically disabled persons. To maintain peace and security and provide support for the contractor during

construction works. To provide the required data about the Woreda socio-economic background and about

land owning position of the would be affected persons. Monitor and protect any new construction activities along the designed sewerage line

after consultation. In fact at one places (Kirkos Sub-City) small scale enterprises are constructing houses along the propped sewer line still as indicated above. This has been informed to AAWSA and the Woreda by the consultant.

8. VALUATION AND COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK 8.1 General As per the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopians Constitution and regulation and the Word Bank involuntary resettlement policy it is indispensable to compensate project affected persons by the given project activity to mitigate the negative impact. To undertake the required appropriate compensation for eligible PAPs it is essential to valuate the property and any other thing that is subject to the project activities impact whether it is permanent or temporary. Valuation before compensation enables to build budget and ensure transparency on the common requirement of the PAPs. In the course of RAP cost estimation all established rules and regulations and valuation procedures are studied. The valuation is the same in all Woreda. All Woreda have offices established for this purpose.



8.2 Bases for Valuation of Losses The bases for valuation are FDRE’s Proclamation 455/2005 and WB policy on involuntary resettlement. To undertake the appropriate valuation for affected property there is a need to establish valuation committee that comprises of skilled and experienced persons at Woreda level. The valuation group will valuate the loss on the basis of the formula that is adopted at national level that is indicated on the proclamation. The valuation committee, in close consultation with PAPs and in collaboration with Woreda administration will prepare the unit rates for the affected assets to be determined on the basis of current market value. In short the Ethiopian legislation has well developed laws and regulations defining the bases to be used for valuation of the type of losses. The principles of the legislations are;

Provide equivalent replacement of the property for long term losses Compensating for any losses in net income, and Focus on restoring annual income

8.3 Method of Valuation There are three commonly known methods of valuing assets and properties namely; income based approach, replacement cost and market data or comparable sales approach. However, in this RAP, the methodology for valuing assets is referred at Full Replacement Cost. Full Replacement Cost is one method of valuation of property and that determines the amount of replacement through compensation. The concept of Full Replacement Cost is based on the premise that the costs of replacing productive assets that might be affected by the project activities will be considered. The replacement cost approach involves; direct replacement of expropriated assets and covers an amount that is sufficient for asset and property replacement. Valuation of lost assets will be made at their Replacement Cost. This is in line with the provisions of the Operational Policy (OP) 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement that safeguards PAPs and assists them to improve their standards of living or at least to be restored to their pre-displacement levels. a) Valuation of Housing Unit Housing unit is one of the basic needs of human being for family establishment and for coherent social relationship at local area whether it is owned by constructing or renting. For those who own housing by construction it is the land that makes to have a strong value depending on the privilege of basic infrastructures and area location. In the project Woreda totally about 231 housing units will be fully demolished and partially affected. The housing units that will be affected by the project in each Woreda are constructed of different construction material that makes the variation in its value. The details of fully and



partially affected persons and characteristics of the property is given in soft copy with a CD including their GPS locations. Hence, housing unit that will be affected by the project activity needs to be valuated in terms of replacement cost based on current market price and consideration of psychological impacts that could not be directly measured. b) Valuation for eucalyptus tree and other plantation In the project area some of the would be affected persons will loss different types of plantations in most cases eucalypts trees of different sizes. Eucalypts tree and others in the project areas are planted for various purposes particularly to generate income for and for the purpose of construction and fuel wood. In all aspects it is has economic benefit in one way or other. With this consideration the loss of eucalyptus trees would be valuated by considering the size of the tree and duration of cut down if it has been cut down and the actual market price for each tree as it is counted. c) Valuation of fences and other structure In the project affected Woreda it is realized that different types of structures aside from housing units such as fences that are constructed using different types of construction material (sheet metal, wood, hollow blocks, masonry), septic tank and the like will be affected. Hence, the impact on such structures could be replaced by unit rate valuation system in terms of material, labor and other inputs required for standard area or volume and area coverage. d) Valuation of public infrastructures Along the proposed sewerage line it is inevitable that some of the public infrastructures including roads, electric poles and telephone poles will be affected at different points. Depending on the character of the infrastructure some need relocation and others need rehabilitation after project activity is completed. The relocation and the replacement activities require cost that has standards set by the organization that responsibility to manage the structure for public benefit. Hence valuation of affected infrastructures is determined by respective organizations in each Woreda. 8.4 Compensation 8.4.1 General The would be affected persons have the right to be compensated for the impact that would be created by the project under the existing legal framework in the replacement of the loss of property.



Compensation needs to be undertaken following the appropriate procedure that includes property inventory, identification of the legal holder of the property and property valuation by committee that should be established to undertake such assignment. Policies to compensate loss of land or other property by the proposed project are based on the FDRE law and regulation and the World Bank involuntary resettlement policy. The primary objective of the RAP is to restore the income and living standard of the affected persons through appropriate compensation approach. According to the legal and policy requirement of the Ethiopian Government and World Bank, the principles of compensation and entitlements for the project activities impact shall include:-

The extent and amount of compensation offered by the project to project affected persons will depend on the amount and type of property that will be impacted.

PAPs are adequately informed on eligibility, compensation rates and standards. Compensation will be at full replacement cost. Land acquisition and housing unit or fence demolishing will not take place prior

to compensation. Compensation shall be paid prior to acquisition or displacement, and Stakeholders shall be consulted including communities.

In this relation the compensation procedures and approach for the implementation of this RAP shall be:

i. Establishment of property valuation committees: Property valuation committees will be established and will be composed of professionals working at Woreda level. The property valuation committees will provide PAPs with adequate compensation for the assets they will be losing; proper valuation will be undertaken by the valuation committee and reviewed by implementation body.

ii. Assessment of properties and assets: All properties and assets affected by the project will be reassessed at a full replacement cost, which is based on the present value of the property.

iii. Establishing unit rates: The unit rates will be established for each of the affected properties and assets that are expropriated due to the project activities along the designed trunk line.

On this premises compensation that should be made for the project affected persons needs to be undertaken in transparent manner where the major stakeholders involved and participated in the implementation activities having defined approach about the major impacts that needs compensation. 8.4.2 Compensation for Housing Unit Structure Compensation for the housing unit is an indispensable mitigation measure that should be undertaken in accordance with the FDRE constitution and regulation No.137/2007 and the World Bank involuntary resettlement policy.



Compensation for housing unit structure shall be paid to the amount of replacing the affected house cost of permanent improvement made on land, cost of materials and labor required for reconstructing of similar housing unit that has similar surface and standing. In other words, the affected persons must be able to have their structure rebuilt in a different location using the compensation payment or resettled in already constructed housing unit with similar and better standings. The replacement values of housing unit will be based on: Estimates of construction of new buildings including labor required for construction. Compensation to rebuild the affected parts in a similar structure and appearance or a

better one. For resident tenants to rebuilt the affected part in a similar structure and appearance or

better. Land replacement for new house and Full compensation to rebuild a similar new house or better.

In cases of housing unit of business service center additional compensation needs to be considered for the loss of income that could be generated assuming the opportunity obtained from the location. With this regards in the project Woreda it was identified about many housing units having different structures and constructed of different construction materials, owned by different owners need to be compensated. The type of compensation could be conditional that means in the case of full displacement from the area compensation will be replacement of land and cash for construction of similar housing unit and structures. Despite this where there is no displacement compensation will be computed in terms of cash so as to replace similar structure in place. 8.4.3 Compensation for Fence and Other Structures Along the sewerage line, the project activities will affect fences of a number of households that were constructed of different construction materials. During the survey, it has been identified that fences that measure about 1764 meters with an average 2 meters height having different type of construction material mainly hollow block and corrugated iron sheet will be demolished. In same development, other structures such as septic tank and fuel tank will be also demolished at different areas. In connection with this the amount of compensation for a fence shall be determined by calculating the current cost per square meter or the unit cost required for constructing a similar fence so as to replace the demolished structure. Similarly, compensation for septic tank and fuel tank shall be determined by calculating the current cost per cubic meter to replace similar structure for affected household or organization.



8.4.4 Compensation for Eucalyptus Trees During physical property inventory period it has been identified that about 327 eucalypts trees owned by different persons will be affected by the project activities. The eucalypts trees are planted particularly in compound or on owned land considering its economic value. Hence, for the case clearance of eucalypts tree along the sewerage line compensation needs to be calculated considering its market value that is determined by age and size. Moreover unlike other indigenous trees the frequency of cut down and the yield obtained needs to be considered in calculating the value of the tree. In connection with this compensation for affected eucalypts tree is calculated per root taking the average size and frequent yield obtained after cut based on current market price in the city. Along this according to the country policy may, in lieu compensation, cut and collect before the commencement of construction activities. 8.4.5 Compensation for Loss of Businesses or Employment Housing units at local level that serves as a business service center in most cases small kiosks need to be demolished. These are about 36. They are being used asa means of generating income for economically low earning households. Households those who will loss such business service center need compensation for daily lost income for at least one year calculating the daily net profit that is obtained from them. 8.4.6 Compensation for Public Services At different points the project activity will affect the basic public service that includes Electric poles, telephone poles and roads of different types. During the survey period it was identified about 89 electric pole, 26 telephone poles, 1.7 km asphalt 2.3 km gravel road and 2.3 km of coble stone roads will be affected. Such public services need immediate relocation or maintenance by respective bodies up on compensation. The amount of compensation for such public service is calculated by respective service provider organizations so as to continue the service as it was before project implementation. 8.4.7. Compensation for Social and Psychological Disturbance It is perceived communities who reside in the catchment areas as the effect of negative impact of the project would face social and psychological disturbance. During construction period such disturbances are assumed to be created mainly following the residential displacement, demolishing of housing units and demolishing of fence. Among the anticipated social impact that is perceived to be the major one includes losing neighborhoods, losing acquainted community based organization such as Idire, Mahiber and the like.



In general such impact is perceived to be sensitive among affected communities and it is also anticipated more sensitive among women and children whose attachment is strong with neighbors. In this connection those who would be displaced and resettle in new locality will lose what they had contributed for Idire and expected to be registered as being a new comer paying that is requested by the establisher Idire community. Hence compensation for social and psychological disturbance should need to be calculated by considering the actual situation on the ground so as to reduce the impact through provision of cash.

9. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 9.1 General Implementation of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) involves various activities that should be undertaken by different concerned bodies requiring institutional arrangement. Appropriate institutional arrangement would clearly define the responsibility and duty of each party that involves in the implementation activity. Hence organizing the inputs of concerned major stakeholders is believed to be very significant for this project in order to ensure successful implementation of the Resettlement Action Plan. With that effort it is possible to undertake appropriate mitigation measures for the adverse impact of the project respecting the rights and dignity of the PAPs. For effective and efficient implementation of the RAP it is necessary to establish the resettlement organ. The organ has a responsibility of managing the plan, coordinate, and monitor the resettlement activities. The major responsible bodies and their role as well as their responsibilities in implementing the proposed RAP is indicated below briefly. 9.2 Project Implementing Agency The project implementing agency AAWSA has great responsibility to allocate the required resources at large to implement the proposed RAP in a successful manner. The project implementing agency needs to work with concerned bodies having the representation of experts of different appropriate professional backgrounds/discipline. Specifically the project implementing agency will have the following main responsibility in the resettlement process:

Oversee the implementation of the RAP. Oversee the formation of PAP and RAP Committee.



Ensure maximum participation of the affected people in the planning of their own resettlement and post resettlement circumstances.

Accept financial responsibility for payment or compensation and other designated resettlement related costs.

Pay the affected people compensation to the amounts agreed. Facilitates PAPs whose livelihood is affected to be organized and involve in

micro and small scale activities in collaboration with Addis Ababa city Micro and small scale enterprise agency.

Ensure monitoring and evaluation of the PAPs and the undertaking of appropriate remedial action to deal with grievances and to ensure that income restoration are satisfactorily implemented.

Ensure initial baseline data is collected for the purposes of monitoring and evaluation report as per the indicators provided by the RAP.

Provide support for vulnerable groups and Monitor the restoration of services/utilities affected by the construction works.

Finally the implementing agency should submit report to the donor agency that is the World Bank, which will ensure that all the PAPs are fully compensated and resettled before the construction work begin. 9.3 Woreda Administration The Woreda administration has the responsibility to facilitate and coordinate the overall RAP implementation at community level. Specifically the Woreda administration has the following responsibility:

Engage and encourage carrying out comprehensive and practical awareness creation campaign for the proposed project, amongst the various relevant grass roots interest groups.

Appointing a suitable Desk Officer. Participating in sensitization of all communities. Participating in resolving grievances. Monitor implementation of sub-projects and activities of Operational Officers. Establishing property valuation committee.

9.4 Addis Ababa city micro-small scale enterprise agency

Organize households whose livelihood is affected by the project activity under micro small-scale enterprise to enable them to restore their lost livelihood.

Facilitate money management training courses for PAPs up on receipt of cash compensation.

Consult and support the PAPs to re-establish business.



9.5 Property Valuation Committee At Woreda level it is imperative to establish property valuation committee that should undertake specific and detail property inventory for the final compensation purpose and determine eligible persons as well as define vulnerable group among PAPs. In connection with this the Property Valuation committees will be established at the seven project affected Woreda where the sewerage line crosses. The members of the committee at each Woreda level will consist of Woreda administrator as chair person, experts from construction and housing development office, land administration and utilization offices and PAPs representatives. The involvement of the different experts will assist and speed up in the day-to-day task in the valuation of the affected assets. The valuation committee will have the following major duties and responsibilities.

Review the list and register the PAPs and affected assets. Verify the entitlement right of PAPs with concerned body. Establish standards for unit rates of affected assets and properties. Revalidate inventories of PAPs and affected assets. Establish valuation ahead of time effect the compensation payment resettlement/

relocation activities. Determine the compensation rates taking in to account the country’s legislation based

on the date payment of compensation.

9.6 Resettlement Implementation Committee Woreda level resettlement/implementation Committee will be established with the responsibility of planning, coordinating and monitoring of compensation payments and relocation activities. The Woreda level resettlement/implementation committee will have the mandate, authority to ensure the proper implementation of this RAP, assess the timely payment of compensation to the PAPs and other support mechanisms. The committee will report directly to the Woreda Administration Offices. Specifically the main duties and responsibilities of the committee include: Coordinate and supervise valuation committee, compensation payment, relocation

activities Prepare guidelines for valuation committees, Ensure that appropriate compensation procedures are adopted and followed Oversee Project’s requirements related to the social environment Clarifying policies and operational guidelines about compensation Reallocate land to permanently affected households Monitor the disbursement of funds Guide and monitor the implementation of relocation Coordinate activities between the various organizations involved in relocation Facilitate conflict resolution and addressing grievances



Provide support and assistance to vulnerable groups 9.7 PAP and RAP Committee The committee shall have a Chairperson and Secretary appointed by the PAPs. The Chairperson ought to be from the local area. The Committee will be concerned with the following activities:- Public Awareness: it includes extensive consultation with the affected people so that

they can air their concerns, interests and grievances. Compensation: this involves ratifying compensation rates and serves as dispute

resolution body to negotiate and solve any problem that may arise relating to resettlement process. If it is unable to resolve any such problems, will channel them through the appropriate grievance procedures laid out in this RAP.

Monitoring and Evaluation: this involves developing the monitoring and evaluation

protocol.

Logistics: this involves exploring all mechanisms by which RAP can be implemented.

Employment and Training: this involves facilitating employment opportunity provision protocol in the project (if any) for the local community labor force.

9.8 World Bank The World Bank which is the financer of the project may undertake the following activities.

Maintain an oversight role to ensure compliance with the safeguards policies, review and provide clearance and approval for the RPs of the project.

Maintain an oversight role of the supervision of the RAP implementation, and may conduct spot checks as necessary.

Conduct regular supervision missions throughout the project implementation, and monitor the progress of the project construction.

Recommend additional measures for strengthening the management framework and implementation performance.



10. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

10.1 General Dissatisfactions may arise through the process of compensation for a variety of reasons, including disagreement on the compensation value during valuation for assets, controversial issue on property ownership etc. To address the problem of PAPs during implementation of compensation a grievance redress committee will be established in project affected Woreda. The main function of the committee would be arbitration and negotiation based on transparent and fair hearing of the cases of the parties in dispute, PAPs, the implementing agencies and local government. The committee gives solution to Grievances related to compensation amount, delays in compensation payment or provision of different type of resettlement assistance. 10.2 Grievances Redress Procedure All PAPs will be informed in case of any grievance regarding compensation can approach to chairman of the grievance committee or the project implementer. Any PAPs who have grievance would present his /her all case to the grievance redress committee. The committee examines the case and responds within a period of 15 days. If the PAPs are not satisfied with the decision of the GRC, they can approach the regular court. The objective of the grievance procedure includes:

To provide PAPs with avenues for making compliant or resolve any dispute that may arise in the course of land, structure and any assets acquisition, including the process of moving;

To ensure that appropriate and mutually acceptable corrective actions are identified and implemented to address complaints;

To verify that complainants are satisfied with outcomes of corrective actions; and To avoid the need to resort to judicial proceedings.

The procedures to be followed by the arbitrational tribunal members to address grievances redresses include; Be transparent and simple to understand Provide PAPs with free access to the procedures The procedure should be able to activate rapidly Representatives of PAPs should be part of the committee during deciding how to respond

the grievances The response time between activating the procedure and reaching a resolution should be

as short as possible



10.3 Process of Registering and Addressing Grievances Dissatisfactions may arise through the process of compensation for a variety of reasons, including disagreement on the compensation value during valuation for assets, controversial issue on property ownership etc. To address the problem of PAPs during implementation of compensation, a Grievance Redress Committee will be established in project affected Woreda. The composition of the Grievance Redress Committee is depicted below:

1. Representative of Woreda Administration (Chairperson) 2. Representative of Woreda Construction and Housing Development Office

(Secretary) 3. Representative of project implementing agency 4. Representative of affected persons. and 5. Representatives of local Elders (Members) in the respective affected area.

The main function of the committee would be arbitration and negotiation based on transparent and fair hearing of the cases of the parties in dispute between PAPs and the implementing agency. The committee gives solution to grievances related to compensation amounts, delays in payment of compensation or provision of different type of resettlement assistance. 10.4 Mechanism for Appeal Disputes will be referred to the Grievances committee that will be established at Woreda level. The Committee may decide that the case may be re‐investigated depending on the nature of the grievance; it may be referred to the court. The project implementing agency and the Resettlement / Implementation committees will establish grievance redress procedures and mechanism for PAPs to ensure that they will be provided with the appropriate compensation payment and that all administrative measures are in line with the law. The grievance redress procedures to be setup will provide opportunity for PAPs to settle their complaints and grievances amicably. The procedure to be adopted will allow PAPs not to lose time and resources from going through lengthy administrative and legal procedures. Grievances are first preferred to be settled amicably whenever possible through arbitrational tribunal. According to the FDRE law, if a PAP is dissatisfied with the amount of compensation payment or other related measures he/she will be advised to take the case to arbitrational tribunal. For PAPs taking their cases or grievances to arbitrational committee will give them the opportunity to have positive discussions with the compensation committee in the presence of elders, local administration representative or any influential person in the locality. In case a dispute is not resolved by arbitrational tribunal, then if any of the Party disagrees, the aggrieved party has the right to appeal to the ordinary courts of law according to the FDRE Proclamation N0.455/2005. The preferred option of dispute settlement ought to be the option of settling the dispute amicably because recourse to courts may take a very long time even years



before a final decision is made and therefore, should not be the preferred option for both parties concerned. A party dissatisfied by the decision of the administrative organ and the court may appeal to the regular appellate court within 30 days from the date of decision. The decision of the court will be final.

11. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The implementation schedule discusses the major activities to be carried out in the implementation of the RAP and identifies organizations responsible for its implementation. The implementation of the RAP will be carried out and expected to be completed before the new sanitary zone is fenced. It is anticipated that the sanitary zone will be fenced following the project construction activity. During the implementation period of this RAP, AAWSA through implementation committee will provide adequate governance and management and financial support for timely operation. Assuming that there will not be any budget constraints, the tentative time schedule within which the compensation payment will take place is proposed to be 4-6 weeks. All the compensation payments, relocation of PAPs could be completed ahead of the civil works if it is implemented as per the plan shown in the RAP. The proposed time schedule is presented in the chart below.





12. COST ESTIMATE FOR RAP IMPLEMENTATION

12.1 General Cost estimate for the implementation of this RAP is categorized in to basic cost and other costs. The basic cost consist compensation costs of affected housing units, fences, septic tank, fuel tank, basic public infrastructures such as electric pole, telephone pole, roads of different types and social and psychological costs. On the other hand costs that are categorized in other costs include costs of training and promotion, costs of RAP implantation, costs of RAP monitoring and implementation, costs of administration and contingency. 12.2 Rating To estimate the cost that shall be required for appropriate compensation particularly the loss of property as the effect of the proposed project, setting the rate is found an essential activity. With this due consideration it has tried to found out the rate of possibly affected properties and psychological impacts based on the Proclamation No. 455/2005. The rate is tried to be adopted from others experience. The proposed rating for the anticipated impact is not final one but it needs reviewing by concerned bodies since there is price inflation from to time to time.



Table 6 Rate or unit costs of property that would be affected

S/N Type of property Unit of measurement

Birr Source

1 Housing unit with block wall and CIS roof

M2

3500.00 Engineering estimate

2 Housing unit with mud wall and CIS roof

M2

600.00 Engineering estimate

3 Housing unit with stone wall and CIS roof

M2 3000.00 Engineering estimate

4 Housing unit with CIS wall and roof

M2 300.00 Engineering estimate

5 Foundation for housing unit M2 1500.00 Engineering estimate 6 Septic tank M3 2000.00 Engineering estimate 7 Fuel tank M3 5500.00 Engineering estimate 8 Fence with stone M2 400.00 Engineering estimate 9 Fence with CIS M2 200.00 Engineering estimate 10 Fence with block M2 450.00 Engineering estimate 11 Stone retaining wall M2 400.00 Engineering estimate12 Eucalypts tree Number 350.00 Market assessment 13 Telephone pole Number 1000.00 ETCo 14 Electric pole Number 2500.00 EEPCo 15 Asphalt road M2 874.00 AA Road Authority 16 Coble stone road M2 397.48 AA Road Authority 17 Gravel road M2 300.00 AA Road Authority

12.3 RAP Implementation Budget The budget that will be required to implement the RAP is worked out based the inventory made by the consultant in the project area that is along the trunk line. On this base the required cost for compensation is calculated by considering the rate that has been mentioned above against anticipated property that would be affected by the project activity. The cost and budget to be prepared will include compensation for loss of crops and eucalyptus trees for rehabilitation/resettlement measures (income restoration, skill training, transportation costs, etc.); project management and administration (monitoring and evaluation, capacity building, etc.) and also for contingencies. The cost categories and items which are likely to be required in a resettlement plan are indicated below.



Table 7 Estimated cost for compensation by category

Description Unit Quantity Unit rate Total comp. Amount

Housing unit with block wall& CIS roof M2 1510 3500.00 5,285,000.00 Housing unit with mud wall & CIS roof M2 5200 600.00 3,120,000.00 Housing unit with stone wall & CIS roof M2 40 3000.00 120,000.00 Housing unit with CIS wall and roof M2 3914 300.00 1,174,200.00 Foundation for housing unit M2 181 1500.00 271,500.00 Septic tank M3 348 2000.00 696,000.00 Fuel tank M3 208 5500.00 1,144,000.00 Fence with stone M2 610 400.00 244,000.00 Fence with CIS M2 2000 200.00 400,000.00

Fence with block M2 1428 450.00 642,600.00 Stone retaining wall M2 90 400.00 36,000.00 Eucalypts tree Number 397 350.00 138,950.00 Telephone pole Number 26 1000.00 26,000.00 Electric pole Number 89 2500.00 222,500.00 Asphalt road M2 1719 874.00 1,502,406.00 Coble stone road M2 616 397.48 244,847.68 Gravel road M2 2349 300.00 704,700.00 Livelihood restoration cost psc 200,000.00 Total 16,172,703.68 Social and Psychological cost @5% 808,635.18 Contingency @ 10% 1,698,133.88 Sub- total 18,679,472.75 With regard to the cost required for the committee that shall be established to implement the proposed and accepted compensation effectively it is worked out by calculating days that will be required against per-diem and fuel and oil required for car that would be deployed for project affected Woreda. This is shown in the table below.



Table 8 Estimated Administration cost of RAP implementation for the 7 Woredas

S/N Members Position Day Unit rate /Birr

No. of Woreda

Total

1 Woreda Administration Chair Person

7 150.00 7 7350.00

2 Member 7 150.00 7 7350.00 3 W. Finance & economic

office Member 7 150.00 7 7350.00

4 W. Land administration Member 7 150.00 7 7350.00 5 Community representative Member 7 150.00 7 7350.00 6 AAWSA Member 7 150.00 7 7350.00 Total 44100.00 Driver 7 100.00 7 4900.00 Surveyor 4 130.00 7 3640.00 Daily laborer 4 80.00 7 2240.00 Fuel (150 km will be

covered) 19.00 7 19950.00

Oil ( 5 kilo per car) 80.00 7 2800.00 Total 33530.00 Sub- Total 7 77630.00 Contingency @ 10% 7 7763.00 Grand total

85,393.00 In general the total cost of this RAP is estimated to be Birr18,764,865.75. Out of this by proportion the direct composition cost constitutes about 99.54% whereas the indirect one constitutes about0.46 percent. With regard to the finance resources to carry out compensation payment, income restoration, rehabilitation and administration costs for PAPs it is expected that it will be settled by the AAWSA as implementing agency. The overall cost for compensation and resettlement for permanent and temporary structures and trees under this RAP is Birr 18,679,472.75 which excludes cost for, administration, and monitoring and evaluation.



13. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN The environmental management plan gives mitigating measures and monitoring requirements, and identifies the organizations assigned to implement them. Mitigating measures for the impacts that are likely to arise from implementing the project are given in the previous chapter. For technical and economic reasons it is not necessary to establish any new organization for implementing the mitigating measures and monitoring plans. It is believed that the project proponent in this particular case, AAWSA, the construction contractor, construction supervisor and the Woreda administration office and the representative of the would be affected households could manage it in accordance to the national policy.

a) Institutions responsible for the Implementation of ESMP The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) gives mitigating measures and monitoring requirements, and identifies the organizations assigned to implement them. Mitigating measures for the impacts that are likely to arise from implementing the project are given in the previous chapter. For technical and economic reasons it is not necessary to establish any new organization for implementing the mitigating measures and monitoring plans .It is believed that the project proponent in this particular case, AAWSA, the construction contractor and the, construction supervisor and the regional officer responsible for environment will take the major responsibility in supervising the implementation of the environmental mitigation and monitoring plans.

b) Responsibility for the implementation of ESMP in the design phase During the design phase, the consultant assigned to design the water supply project will be responsible for incorporating the recommended mitigation measures into the design and into the technical specifications of the bidding document.

c) Responsibility for the implementation of ESMP in the construction phase During construction, the contractor will be responsible for implementing environmental mitigation measures. The construction supervisor will monitor the proper implementation of mitigating measures at the right time, particularly for the impacts of the biophysical environment. The Contractor will be fully responsible for ensuring that all the work will be carried out as per the environmental requirements indicated in the design and technical specification. It is also envisaged that environmentalist ,with a broad range of experience and knowledge in environmental management of water supply project will be intermittently assigned by regional office responsible for the environment to supervise proper implementation of the mitigating measures. The environmentalist will be responsible for the overall coordination of the environmental management activities. He will advise the contractors, construction supervisors and the local authorities regarding the implementation of the environmental mitigating measures



and monitoring of impacts. The contractor will advise to strictly flow the environmental guidelines and the regional office responsible for environment will supervise the contractor check its proper use.

d) Responsibility for the implementation of ESMP in the operation phase During the operation period, the environmental issues will be monitored jointly by the regional office responsible for environment and AAWSA.

e) Implementation and Accountability

The process of compensation payments and rehabilitation procedures incorporates formation of compensation committee; detail inventory of the assets and land acquisition surveys; valuation of properties and delivery of entitlements. The Woreda compensation committee is mainly responsible to undertake the detail inventory of the assets as part of the land acquisition by the project. Proclamation N0. 455/2005 of expropriation of land holdings for public purposes and payment of compensation has articulated the responsible body for the implementation of such activities. According to this proclamation sub Act 13 the Woreda or urban administrations have the responsibility within their respective administration boundary. On this base these administration bodies have the responsibility to establish committee that is comprised of different sectors and PAP representative in close collaboration with project implementing agency AAWSA. Hence the would be established committee in accordance to Federal proclamation and regulation and Regional or Administration policies should have the responsibility to:

- Identify and quantify land that would be expropriated by type of utilization by legal holder,

- Identify and quantify housing units that would be demolished by type and legal householder ,

- Identify property that would be affected by their legal holder, - Valuate the land and all other properties that would be affected as per the policy

issued by the Region considering the current market price situation, - Present report of the finding and implement according to the final decision made by

concerned body. In general in the committee members are expected comprises of:

1) Woreda Administration office 2) Woreda construction 3) Representative of Woreda construction and housing development office (Secretary) 4) Representative of project implementing agency 5) Community representatives 6) AAWSA



Table 9 Institutions responsible for implementing the proposed mitigation measures by time frame

Socio-economic impacts

Proposed mitigation measures

Responsible for implementing the mitigation measures

Responsible for monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures

Time Horizon

Mitigation Monitoring

Demolishing of housing unit Compensation of cash for replacement and mobilization

AAWSA Woreda Administration Before construction phase

During construction phase

The increase in vehicle flow during construction is expected to increase car accident

Take precautionary measures by mounting road/ traffic signs Availing first aid kit

Contractor Construction supervisor During construction phase

During construction phase

Dust and noise will cause nuisance during construction impacting residents.

Sprinkle water occasionally to prevent dust pollution.

Contractor Construction Supervisor During Construction During Construction

Biophysical Impacts

Proposed mitigation measures

Responsible for implementing the mitigation measures

Responsible for monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures

Time Horizon

Mitigation Monitoring

Impact on land use due excavation of construction materials

-Pay cash compensation -establish plantation and plant equal or more trees than what is lost

AAWSA Woreda Administration Prior to construction During Construction

Impact on soils -Implement soil and water conservation programme on the catchments -minimize disturbance due to construction

Woreda Administration + AAWSA

AAWSA During construction and operation

During construction and operation

chemical spillage and vehicle exhaust

-provide emergency spill containment -use human labour whenever appropriate

contractor AAWSA consultant During construction During construction

Impact on flora and fauna -plant trees in replacement Woreda Administration + AAWSA

Woreda Administration

During construction During operation



14. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

14.1 General Monitoring and Evaluation is an integral part of this RAP and will oversee re-establishing process of the Project Affected Person (PAP). It will be a compliance monitoring and this will assist to follow the type of measures incorporated in RAP documents, and the extent to which on these matters, as set out in the RAP, are practically implemented. The monitoring and evaluation process will assess the implementation of the RAP and ensure that it is carried out as per the plan and as per the requirements of FDRE laws, policies and guidelines. Along this the monitoring and evaluation process shall check and ascertain the consideration of World Bank safe guard policies during the implementation of the Resettlement Action Plan. The main monitoring center would be compensation allocation schedule, payment and uses of compensation fee, implementation of the policies and regulation specified in the resettlement plan and the whole course of implementation of the compensation. The main purpose of RAP monitoring will be to verify that:

Actions and commitments described in the RPs are implemented on schedule; Eligible people and communities receive their full compensation prior to the start

of the construction activities in the area; Complaints and grievances lodged by project affected people are followed up and,

where necessary, appropriate corrective actions should be taken. In implementation, the monitoring and evaluation system will perform the following key tasks:

a. Administrative monitoring to ensure that implementation is on schedule and that problems are dealt with on a timely basis;

b. Socio-economic monitoring during and after the relocation process utilizing the baseline established by the PAP socio-economic survey undertaken during project preparation to ensure that people are settled and recovering; and

c. Impact evaluation to determine that recovery has indeed taken place and, in time, succeeded.

In general monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether activities are going according to the plan. Monitoring will cover physical and financial components. It provides the necessary feedback for project management to keep the programs on schedule. By contrast, evaluation is essentially a summing up, the end of the project assessment of whether those activities actually achieved the intended aims. 14.2 Internal Monitoring The target of internal monitoring is to ensure that there is overall fairness and transparency while compensation process takes place and Resettlement Action Plan is performed based on legal rights.



Internal monitoring is a monitoring activity that should be undertaken by resettlement implementation unit. The activity needs to be carried out during the implementation period of the resettlement. The monitoring should be a systematic evaluation of the activities of the operation in relation to the specified criteria of the condition of approval. The objective of internal monitoring and supervision will be:

To verify that the valuation of assets lost or damaged, and the provision of compensation, resettlement and other rehabilitation entitlements, has been carried out in accordance with the resettlement policies provided by the World Bank.

To oversee that the RAP is implemented as designed and approved. To verify that funds for implementation of the RAP are provided by the Project

implementing body in a timely manner and in amounts sufficient for their purposes, and that such funds are used in accordance with the provisions of the RAP.

For internal monitoring the main indicator that needs to be addressed regularly will include: Monitoring the status of entitlement that is in accordance with the approved policy

and that the assessment of compensation is carried out in accordance with agreed procedures,

Payment of compensation to the PAPs in the various categories is made in accordance with the level of compensation described in the RAP,

Public information and public consultation and grievance procedures are followed as described in the RAP,

Relocation and payment of subsistence and shifting allowances are made in a timely manner and

Restoration of affected public facilities and infrastructure are completed prior to construction.

In general through internal monitoring all corrective measures will be undertaken so as to mitigate the impact of the project and ensure the benefit of project affected persons mainly the venerable groups at large on time. It is the responsibility of the implementing agency to conduct regular internal monitoring of the resettlement performance against the indicators and to correct where necessary. 14.3 External Monitoring and Evaluation The external monitoring and evaluation will be done in a predictable manner and period. During the survey, Woreda level administration will be consulted to provide their assessments of the impacts of the mitigation measures applied. After completion of the resettlement operations, it is expected that livelihood of PAPs should be better than prior to the resettlement. Therefore, resettlement operations need to be monitored as regard performance and compliance with the set goals. The major evaluation areas include:

The overall fairness and transparency of the compensation process. The amount of compensation



Appropriateness of grievance redress mechanisms and Problem and difficult encountered.

More specifically, the project implementing agency will carry out the following: Review the results of the internal monitoring and review overall compliance with the

RAP, Assess whether relocation objectives have been met especially with regard to

housing, living standards, compensation levels, etc. Assess general efficiency of relocation and compensation and formulate lessons for

future guidance and Determine overall adequacy of entitlements to meet the objectives.

14.4 Monitoring and Evaluation Reports The monitoring and evaluation reports are believed to be the one that indicate the outputs of monitoring and evaluation activities. Hence, the reports that should be documented and submitted for concerned bodies are very significant for decision and lesson to be learnt. On this premise monitoring report for RAP implementation is essential every month following the implementation of the RAP. The output of the evaluation study will be in the form of a brief report. The draft report will be submitted to the funding agency that needs to check the effectiveness and efficiency as well as the transparency of the implementation with recorded data and evidence.



15. CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS 15.1 Conclusions This RAP has been prepared consistent with the applicable policy provisions of the Government of Ethiopia and the provisions of the World Bank Policy on Involuntary Resettlement Policy. The policy requires that full RAP be prepared for the project that involve a significant number of people (200 or more persons ) who would need to be displaced with a loss of assets, or access or reduction in their livelihood. Basically this RAP presents an inventory (register) of people likely to be affected because of the expansion and rehabilitation of the Kaliti wastewater treatment system and sewer lines in the Kaliti sewer catchment. Baseline data for proposed resettlement action plan preparation was generated through desktop studies; site visits and conducting household survey among potentially affected people. Major stakeholder consultations were also undertaken so as to disseminate information about the proposed project and ensure their participation in the implementation of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP). The project will affect a total of278 households. A total of 231 housing units will be demolished. Along this fences that are constructed using different construction material will be affected. partially and fully affected households are identified. An Asset register detailing with the features of all properties likely to be affected and the likely damage has been prepared as part of this RAP. The PAPs are all informed about the nature of the project and the property to be affected. The details (owner, dimensions and type of asset) of the property surveyed is provided o the client with a CD. In his report, summarized tables are included. A total of Birr 18,368,609.23.00 will be required to compensate for the loss of housing units, trees and other properties which will be the responsibility of AAWSA. An entitlement matrix sets out compensation packages for adverse impacts have been prepared. Payment of compensation should be made according to the proclamation No.455/2005 to provide for the expropriation of land holdings for public purpose and payment of compensation. The proposed project is important for the economic development of the area but it is likely to

lead to loss of land, property and displacement of a number of PAPs. The overall objective of the project is good and its positive impacts can be enhanced by

ensuring that the identified PAPs are adequately compensated with the aim of improving their livelihoods or restoring their livelihoods to the pre-impact standards.

The project will have also positive impact on the project area communities in terms of improving the livelihood during construction and implementation period creating employment opportunity on permanent and temporary bases.



As a major impact the project is assessed to create an adverse impact on some households particularly along sewerage lines. In 7 Woreda totally about 276 households would be affected by the project that include demolishing of housing unit, demolishing of fences, losing eucalypts tree plantation. With respect to the attitude of major stakeholders at all levels including National, City Administration, Sub-city Administration, Woreda and community level it is realized to be positive that goes with ensuring to involve and participate in the project activities. The project has overwhelming support. In general looking at the benefits against the negative impacts and the cost this project will be environmentally and socioeconomically feasible. Therefore, the implementation of the project is vital for the city of Addis Ababa, 15.2Recommendations Continuous sensitization of affected communities in the pre‐construction phase of the project should be encouraged as a preparatory measure before project implementation. AAWSA should be at the forefront in ensuring while this RAP is carried out and appropriate compensation should be in place for all the affected persons in a timely manner using the prevailing market price rates. All PAPs who will permanently loss their housing units and other property could be able to maintain their living standard as before or improves following an appropriate compensation implementation. PAPs will be compensated as per the Ethiopian law and WB involuntary resettlement policy and guidelines. All PAPs should be provided with full resettlement package even if the impact on their assets and properties is partial. Accordingly for the successful implementation of the project and ensure sustainable development as per designed manner the consultant would recommend the following while implementing the RAP.

1. During tender document preparation it is necessary to ensure serious attention to instruct the contractor to avoid or to minimize impact that may be created on socioeconomic life and the biophysical environment of the project beyond the anticipated impacts.

2. Adequate representatives should be present from the, AAWSAand project affected persons in the valuation and compensation committee.

3. Prior to the payment of compensations to the individual PAPs they should be notified about compensations and inform the where to collect the compensation. They have to be also notified the commencement date of civil works.

4. Public awareness is believed to be a key to have community involvement on the project activity for the successful implementation of the project. To this effect AAWSA should undertake promotional activities particularly on the objectives of the project and planed impact consideration among the would be affected persons and major stakeholders.

5. AAWSA and the Woreda administration should undertake awareness creation program among the PAP how to manage money that will be provided for compensation before it is provided.



6. Training: vulnerable groups should be given the option to select training they wish, which would help them to maintain and/or improve their income generation potential. The skills training program will be designed during project implementation, Trainees will be entitled to a subsistence allowance during the training period. In same development strategies for promoting economic recovery of PAPs also include assisting them to improve their living standard through facilitating training opportunity and credit provision.

7. Along this it is recommended AAWSA should consider all possible mitigation measures before construction and during construction period of the project so as to avoid or minimize the PAPs complaint.

8. AAWSA should instruct the contractor to undertake all its activities under circumstance where there will not be socio-economic and biophysical environmental adverse impact on the local communities by construction crew and machinery or material used for construction.

In general, it is also recommended that the following Resettlement Guiding Principles should be considered by implementing agency.

Consultation with PAPs: Make sure that the rights and interest of the PAPs were heard and effected to their interest so that they don’t feel cheated. Minimization of Resettlement as an Action: In order to adhere to this AAWSA has to try as much as possible to ensure that the expansion of sanitary zone has minimal displacement.

Availability in relocation of the affected persons: AAWSA will ensure and guarantee the provision of any necessary compensation for people whose land and property would be expropriated. This will be done in line with the Word Bank policies and guidelines. Negotiated compensation options: a consensus must be reached with those who will be affected so that a fair and equitable compensation be made for land and trees that are disturbed and paid according to the prevailing market price rates of the local areas.

Resettlement must take place to ensure PAPs benefit: those who are affected should be employed and sub contracted opportunities that arise from the project.

Vulnerable social groups: These are groups that include those with physically disable households, minimal assets, the illiterate, and the aged (those PAPs of more than 65 years) and widowed household heads. These are often usually need special help in the relocation/disturbance phase. Resettlement upfront project cost: Unless resettlement is built in as an Upfront project cost, it tends to be under budgeted, whereby money gets diverted away from the resettlement budget to ‘more pressing’ project needs. AAWSA will therefore ensure that compensation costs that fall within their scope of commitment are considered in the overall project budget as up‐front costs.



An independent monitoring and grievance procedure: In addition to setting up of monitoring mechanism within AAWSA, an independent team comprising local administration and Woreda and Sub-city relevant office will undertake monitoring of the resettlement as an aspect of the project. World Bank’s operational procedure on forced resettlement: The World Bank’s operational policy 4.12 on involuntary resettlement will be adhered to. It requires that involuntary resettlement be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable alternative project designs. Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits



List of Selected References

1. City Government of Addis Ababa, Addis Ababa Water & Sewerage Authority, Addis Ababa Water Supply and sanitation Development and Rehabilitation Project Office, Final Socio -Economic Report July,2010.

2. Federal Negarit Gazeta, Proclamation No.455/2005, Expropriation of land holdings for public purpose and payment of compensation, Addis Ababa, July 2005

3. Federal Negarit Gazeta, Council of Ministers Regulations No. 135/2007, payment of compensation for property situated on landholding expropriated for public purpose, Addis Ababa, May 2007

4. Waste Water Master Plan, Volume 2, existing situation, NEDECO in association with DHV and AUE, June 2002

5. Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Project Resettlement Policy Framework, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa Water and Sewerage Authority, The World Bank RP 520, F. Giovannetti, 6 Rue F. Mauriac, 84000 Avignon France, January 2007.



ANNEXES



Annex1=Impact caused by displacement

S/N Names of Household Owners

loss of land IN m2

Loss or decrease of income

loss or difficulty of access to educational services

Loss of access to health

Loss of access to public services

Loss of access network Comments

1 Fekadu Berta 22 NO NO NO NO NO Loss of dwelling mud houses

2 Senayt Kifle 17 NO NO NO NO NO “

3 Aself Haile 19 NO NO NO NO NO “

4 Sheawalem Hasen 23 NO NO NO NO NO “

5 Yeshewaget Teferra 31 NO NO NO NO NO “

6 Zulfa Abdu 17 NO NO NO NO NO “

7 Nasir Kedir 24 NO NO NO NO NO “

8 KamilS ani 34 NO NO NO NO NO “

9 Birhanu Zrgaw 39 NO NO NO NO NO “

10 Triku W/yohans 21 NO NO NO NO NO “

11 Tesema Awgchew 48 NO NO NO NO NO “

12 Girma Worku 30 NO NO NO NO NO “

13 Taddese Zirkwa 21 NO NO NO NO NO “

14 Niri Shifa 43.5 NO NO NO NO NO Loss of mud and CIS houses and fences

15 Bambeta Wegeta 17 NO NO NO NO NO “

16 Abera Haile 32 NO NO NO NO NO “

17 Fetiha Mubark 23 NO NO NO NO NO “

18 Tekle Sifer 41 NO NO NO NO NO “

19 Mohamed Sifer 44 NO NO NO NO NO “

20 Mohamed Kedir 40 NO NO NO NO NO “

21 Kifle Nemaga 40 NO NO NO NO NO “

22 Tesfaye 25 NO NO NO NO NO “



23 Taddese Ajma 144 NO NO NO NO NO “

24 Bayse Bekele 26 NO NO NO NO NO “

25 Tamrat Kebede 38 NO NO NO NO NO “

26 Belaynesh Kebede 38 NO NO NO NO NO “

27 AyanaGebre 63 NO NO NO NO NO “

28 Shamil Yasin 33 NO NO NO NO NO “

29 Mubare koumer 28 NO NO NO NO NO “

30 Birhanu Asrat 17 NO NO NO NO NO “

31 Tsega G/mariam 16 NO NO NO NO NO Loss of CIS house



Annex2Goodsandassetsaffected(withhouseholdownernames)

S/N Name of household/business owners

Plot area (m2)

Description of houses and construction

Use of the property

level of effect (total, partial, minimum)

Tenure status

Employment status of all adults Comments

1 YohansDgafee 6.5 Fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Business man

2 SamiaMelena 39.4 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Civil servant

3 Kabanshferede 51.6 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Civil servant

4 WoubshetW/gbrail 21.5 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Business man

5 TilahunDgafee 30 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

6 Sefa Umer 60 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

7 AynalemHaddis 15.8 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Business man

8 MulugetaMersha 14.5 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

9 BayushDgafee 18 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner

10 BezuFikre 20.9 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner small trade

11 Hailushibeshi 13 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Business man

12 DanilAlemayhu 116 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner no job

13 TaytuBeyene 49 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Housewife

14 Weynshet 88 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner Housewife

15 NimaniFinet 140 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Farmer

16 FantuNemani 57.2 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner House wife

17 HasenNesru 14 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Vender

18 DanilTalore 16 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner guard private emp.

19 TedlaSige 20 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner guard private emp.

20 EjiguMinda 30 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner guard private emp.

21 AlemneshGhana 77 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner House wife

22 MokeKebede 12 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

23 GonfaHude 35 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Pension




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


24 MewledAbdella 21 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

25 LubabaAdem 52 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

26 Haru 7 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Business man

27 MudinKemal 72 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Business man

28 FikreMoges 31 House &fence Dwelling Partial Owner Private

29 MubarekMuzemil 32 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner Business man

30 DegituDaba 33 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

31 DinoKedir 83 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Vender

32 LemessaKoricho 55 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private emp.

33 ShikurZeleke 28 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

34 TofikAli 27 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Vender

35 MustefaMudesir 19 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

36 MiftahShamil 25 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

37 Shiferawkebede 46 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner private emp

38 DejeneGashaw 18 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

39 AsraraNesro 10 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

40 FekieHasen 38 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner Vender

41 AkmelHasen 62 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner

42 WorkneshAli 34.5 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

43 AbdellaHasen 39.5 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner Vender

44 AyelchMegerssa 6.5 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

45 MuzeynAhmed 13 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

46 Hunde 32 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

47 NureMusa 27 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

48 MareguwaBirhanu 17 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


49 MebratuDebo 34 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

50 AsmareAyele 20 Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

51 WudmaDebo 19 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner private guard

52 FantayeLmane 21 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Vender

53 NegashMuzeyn 20 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner small scal ent

54 Gadissie Muleta 21 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner

55 HailuBekele 17 CIS house Dwelling Partial Owner Pension

56 FanayeWordofa 24 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

57 GenanawWondimu 18 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

58 EndalkachewDote 17 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner business man

59 NgashBekele 10 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

60 TesfayeAsule 21 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

61 MuluGetahun 19 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

62 MerkebuKassa 26 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

63 AskaleBereda 68 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Business

64 AselefechMengiste 36 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

65 AwgichewTilaye 6 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

66 Megerssalelissa 161.8 mud house &fence Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

67 BizuneshDemissie 66 mud house & fence Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

68 SolomonBekele 25 Hollow Block house Dwelling Partial Owner private com. Employed

69 MekuriaTesema 120 CIS house Dwelling Partial Owner Business

70 Simurayenew 10.2 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

71 AbrehamZeberga 7 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner

72 AynalemHabte 12.6 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

73 Leta 6 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


74 NuriaOmer 9 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

75 TarikuTesfaye 7.7 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

76 AshenafiKebede 50 CIS house Dwelling Partial Owner Business

77 AliyeDeremo 12.2 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

78 HadoshBaraki 12.5 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Business

79 AlemuTaddese 14 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

80 G/egziabherT/hymamot 117 CIS house Dwelling Partial Owner Business

81 SolomonG/hiwot 131 CIS house Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

82 TakeleBeyene 28 CIS house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

83 G/meskelTeklu 14 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Farmer

84 YinegrutalAbate 9.3 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner private com. Employed

85 NetanetDegu 17 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

86 TshomeBelay 55.2 mud house & fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner NGO

87 GugsaMahetem 31 mud house & fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

88 Nekhewot 15 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

89 ResomG/Silasse 17 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

90 TekalgnWerkae 40 mud house & fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner NGO

91 MamiteDesta 53 mud house &fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

92 ErkiyhunFerede 34 Stone retaining fence Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

93 HanaGetahun 12.2 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner business w

94 SolomonHirpa 23.3 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Business

95 SebsibeH/Mariam 8 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

96 TewodrosAbate 10 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Private




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


97 YaredG/medhin 31 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Student

98 BegashawKebede 3.3 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

99 T/hymanotBerehe 10.3 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

100 TeshomeZewdu 11.2 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Private .com employed

101 Kdijamohamed 4 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

102 ZelalemKassa 4 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

103 FikreAdera 8.5 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

104 EnkutatashG/Egizeabher 8 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

105 TekleabGirma 9 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Private

106 ShewayeArgaw 7 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

107 EmebetTamirat 12 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

108 H/MariamTerfa 5.4 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

109 Known by GPS 17.8 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

110 BilelegnTamre 34 Stone wall house Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

111 BrahanuEndegena 10 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

112 Zerehanetaddese 8 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

113 AlemzewdAbebe 10.2 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

114 YaradLsanu 9 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

115 SolomonKebede 10.7 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Private

116 LuelEleas 4 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Private

117 Yeshetelahaile 8.7 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

118 ZenasheGezahgn 8.5 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

119 ZerfabelenDesta 6.7 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

120 GetachewDiriba 4.7 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

121 TeshomeAbebe 6.7 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


122 known by GPS 11.5 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

123 GirmaMulugeta 4.4 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

124 MuluGeleta 8 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

125 BrtukanGeleta 5 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

126 LasabBelayneh 8.4 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

127 BancheDesta 13 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

128 BachaBerhe 34.2 mud house&hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

129 BekeleWerga 8.1 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

130 KebedeW/mariam 3.8 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

131 DemekeBatabe 5 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

132 TadeleSheferaw 7.6 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

133 AgzeBrhanu 11 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

134 TegaTolosa 8 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

135 WedageAmare 7 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

136 MeseretKebede 22.6 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

137 YrgalemTemesgen 13.3 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

138 known by GPS 13 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

139 KebedeSenbeta 8 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

140 Genetfeleke 19 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

141 AbebeMekonnen 3 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Private

142 YeshiAyele 17 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

143 DebebeBekele 10.5 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

144 DerejeMengesha 3 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

145 TsegayeW/mariam 6.6 Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


146 Segedwoldabe 17.2 Stone retaining fence Dwelling Partial Owner No

147 TizitaTilahun 5 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner No

148 MengistuBegashaw 8.1 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner No

149 TilahunMelaku 19 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

150 LakewDerbew 63 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

151 AbebaAbreha 32 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

152 KassahunAsfaw 39 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

153 YeshigetaTamre 25 Hollow Block house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

154 TsegaAlebel 75 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Priest

155 TilayeWakejira 35 Mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

156 ErbkaT/silasse 11 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

157 WaleluZewde 34 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

158 AberaKefa 13.7 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

159 AlemDejene 40 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

160 WorkeAddise 14 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

161 KyeshaGnbure 15.8 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer

162 ErmiyasWondmagn 39 fence CIS & HOLLOW BLOCK Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

163 MaleduTegabu 9 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

164 EndalkachewAdnew 20.5 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Business

165 DegfeeAgonafer 33.3 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner comp.emp

166 KassaBerehe 16 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner daily laborer




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


167 EnanaMehret 6 FenceCIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

168 MetasebiaTesfaye 16 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

169 The BiniamsShemels 31 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Student

170 DesalgnGebessa 43 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private comp. employed

171 KitabaGudeta 74 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner No

172 DinkneshBegashaw 27 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private comp. employed

173 KonjetGetachew 52 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner

174 KebebushiH/mariam 52 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

175 AmareEngdawork 106 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

176 TenaMengistu 28 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner No

177 ZewduTilahun 3 FENCE CIS Dwelling Partial Owner No

178 ZenbechAyele 56 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

179 AyeluBedane 42 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

180 NegusuMezemer 6 FENCE CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Priest

181 EyneshWeldeyes 29 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

182 MeleseHasen 70 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

183 GirmaEndeshaw 17 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Priest

184 YatneshWelde 75 mud house & Hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

185 FikreHusen 85 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

186 TegeredaDebalk 31 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

187 EstifanosG/tadik 50 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


188 EteneshEshete 26 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

189 TaddeseNega 45 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

190 Demitu Sory 6 Fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner No

191 ZelalemMengistu 6 Fence hollow b. Dwelling Partial Owner No

192 TayeAbebe 7.75 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner civil servant

193 TesmaWeldeyes 74 Block wall Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

194 BushraMussa 4.3 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Priest

195 MuktarAhmed 5.7 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

196 TsegayeTeka 78 hollow block house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

197 YonasTaye 45 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Priest

198 GetyeMikre 13 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

199 W/gebrailNrayo 12 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

200 TekabechAlemu 31 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

201 NgatuAsfaw 18 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner No

202 Ene-MesfinAlemu 17 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Pastor

203 TamratChernt 10 Fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

204 Ene-LuletGirma 21 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

205 YesheBekele 19 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

206 ZemerkinDembue 18 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

207 YesharegG/sillassie 6 Stone wall Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

208 MengistuHaile 37.5 mud house & hollow block fence Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

209 YirgaDesta 6 Fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

210 EphremTeklu 12 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner No

211 AlemayehuW/Gebriel 41 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

212 AlemeTefera 10 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


213 NebyatTefera 28 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

214 BayushTeggn 93 mud house &fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

215 MengistuZewde 71 Fence, block and mud wall Dwelling Partial Owner No

216 BerekaEshete 8.3 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

217 ErstuFantaye 26 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

218 TiruyeEngdasew 6 Fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

219 MollaGetahun 11.6 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner


221 MesfinArega 5.3 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

222 AbdrahmanYakobe 8 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Private

223 FantaneshAlemu 38 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

224 Rede 6 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Contractor

225 TesfayeH/michiel 77 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Pensioner

226 Bogale(org)Taddese 57 fence CIS& Hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner metal workshop rented

227 Abebe 13.3 Fence CIS& hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner

228 KelemwaKabthymer 66 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner house wife

229 OntaMote 83 mud house Dwelling Partial Owner Private

230 known by GPS 27 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner

231 Hasi DonomamMuzeyim 19 fence CIS Dwelling Partial Owner Business

232 MesfinAlemu 47 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Private

233 EphremGezahgn 12 fence hollow b. Dwelling Partial Owner No

234 TensaeBirhanu 10.4 fence hollow block Dwelling Partial Owner Civil

235 Abu Dabi 6 meter hollow bloc Dwelling Partial Owner




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


fence

236 known by GPS 12 " " Dwelling Partial Owner


238 known by GPS 10 " " Dwelling Partial Owner

239 Fekadu Berta 22 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

240 SenaytKifle 17 mud house Dwelling Total Owner house wife Fully affected

241 AselfHaile 19 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

242 SheawalemHasen 23 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

243 YeshewagetTeferra 31 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Private Fully affected

244 ZulfaAbdu 17 mud house Dwelling Total Owner House wife Fully affected

245 NasirKedir 24 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

246 KamilSani 34 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

247 BirhanuZrgaw 39 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

248 TrikuW/yohans 21 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

249 TesemaAwgchew 48 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

250 GirmaWorku 30 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Private emp. Fully affected

251 TaddeseZirkwa 21 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

252 NiriShifa 22 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

253 BambetaWegeta 17 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

254 AberaHaile 32 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

255 FetihaMubark 23 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

256 Tekle Sifer 41 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

257 MohamedSifer 44 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

258 Mohamed Kedir 40 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

259 KifleNemaga 40 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Private emp. Fully affected




Plot area (m2)


Use of the property


Tenure status


260 Tesfaye 25 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

261 Taddese Ajma 144 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

262 Bayse Bekele 26 mud house Dwelling Total Owner civil servant Fully affected

263 Tamrat Kebede 38 mud house Dwelling Total Owner private artist Fully affected

264 Belaynesh Kebede 38 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

265 Ayana Gebre 63 mud house Dwelling Total Owner civil servant Fully affected

266 Shamil Yasin 33 mud house Dwelling Total Owner daily laborer Fully affected

267 Mubarek Umer 28 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Vender Fully affected

268 Birhanu Asrat 17 mud house Dwelling Total Owner Private Fully affected

269 Tsega G/mariam 16 CIS house Dwelling Total Owner Private Fully affected



Annex3BusinessesorInstitutionsAffected

No. Name or type of business Plot area (m2)

Description of houses and construction material

Use of the property

level of effect (total, partial, minimum) Tenure status Remark

1 Garage 25 CIS fence Business Partial Owner

2 Muez garage 30 CIS fence Business Partial Owner

3 PLC 22.8 CIS house Business Partial Owner

4 JICA Training center 25 Fence stone wall Business Partial Owner

5 Agriculture imputes supp. 12 Fence stone wall Business Partial Owner

6 Spiece factory 757 CIS fence Business Partial Owner

7 Abdi Garage 405 CIS fence Business Partial Owner

8 Awash Tannery 125 Stone wall fence Business Partial Owner

9 Anjela store 12 CIS fence Business Partial Owner

10 Nfas Silk lafto forest 240 Eucalypts trees Business Partial Owner

11 Bihere Tegy Parck 56 Eucalypts trees Business Partial Owner

12 Joint Enterprise coop. 9 Eucalypts trees Business Partial Owner

13 comet transport 450 CIS houses & 12 meters stone wall fence Business Partial Owner

14 Mekelaeya 6 CIS fence Business Partial Owner

15 Agricltura Marketing enterprise 12 Stone wall fence Business Partial Owner

16 Mekan yesus workshop 1110 .CIS sire and 208 m3

fuel tanker Business Partial Owner 25 m3 septic tank

17 Washed coffee enterprise 12 Stone wall fence Business Partial Owner

18 Agrisco 12 Stone wall fence Business Partial Owner

19 Lika plc 19.3 Hollow block fence Business Partial Owner

20 Nefas Silk lafto dis9 mosque 12 CIS fence Business Partial Owner



Annex3BusinessesorInstitutionsAffected

21 Mekelakeya con.Entr. 12 Stone wall fence Business Partial Owner

208 m3 fuel tank and 25 m3 septic tank

22 Saudi Arebia Embay 37 Stone wall fence Business Partial Owner

23 MICro enterprise 78 Stone foundation Business Partial Owner

24 MICro enterprise 65 Stone foundation Business Partial Owner

25 ETHIO Marble Industry 206 CIS Sore Business Partial Owner

26 MICro enterprise 37 Stone foundation and CIS store Business Partial Owner

27 G.A.D construction p.l.c 23 CIS fence Business Partial Owner

28 Fetno derash ider 16.3 CIS fence Business Partial Owner

29 known by GPS 38 Stone foundation Business Partial Owner



Annex4.Socio‐economiccharacteristicsofPAPS(fullyaffected)

S.N Name of household heads

Number of persons in household

Children 13yearsofage

number of +60years of age

Number of students

source of income

Place of work or distance

Transport to place of work /study Comments

1 Fekadu Berta 5 1 1 vender In the city Bus &taxi

2 Senayt Kifle 4 1 1 house wife 0 distance

3 Aself Haile 5 0 0 vender In the city Bus and taxi

4 Sheawalem Hasen 3 1 1 1 vender In the city Bus and taxi

5 Yeshewaget Teferra 9 2 1 3 Private 5 kilometers Taxi

6 Zulfa Abdu 6 0 0 House wife 0 kilometer

7 Nasir Kedir 7 0 0 daily laborer 6 kilometer

8 Kamil Sani 9 0 1 1 vender In the city Bus and taxi

9 Birhanu Zrgaw 8 1 2 daily laborer 7 kilometer

10 Triku W/yohans 4 1 1 daily laborer 4 kilometer

11 Tesema Awgchew 6 2 2 daily laborer 7 kilometer

12 Girma Worku 8 2 2 Private emp. 4 kilometer Taxi

13 Taddese Zirkwa 10 3 1 3 daily laborer 3 kilometer

14 Niri Shifa 2 0 0 vender In the city Bus and taxi

15 Bambeta Wegeta 6 2 2 vender In the city Bus and taxi

16 Abera Haile 7 3 3 vender In the city Bus and taxi

17 Fetiha Mubark 6 2 3 daily laborer 2 kilometer

18 Tekle Sifer 10 2 1 3 daily laborer 5 kilometers

19 Mohamed Sifer 8 2 2 vender In the city Bus and taxi

20 Mohamed kedir 3 0 0 vender In the city Bus and taxi

21 Kifle Nemaga 4 1 1 Private emp. 6 kilometer Bus and taxi



22 Tesfaye 2 0 0 daily laborer 3 kilometer

23 Taddese Ajma 9 3 1 3 daily laborer 4 kilometer

24 Bayse Bekele 6 0 1 civil servant 10 kilometer Bus and taxi

25 Tamrat Kebede 8 2 4 private artist 0 kilometer

26 Belaynesh Kebede 7 0 0 daily laborer 2 kilometer

27 Ayana Gebre 3 0 0 civil servant 8 kilometer Bus and taxi

28 Shamil Yasin 5 1 1 daily laborer 2 kilometer

29 Mubarek Umer 7 2 1 2 vender In the city Bus and taxi

30 Birhanu Asrat 6 2 2 private 10 kilometer

31 Tsega G/mariam 6 0 0 vender In the city



Annex6.Short summary list of enumerated property for compensation(Coordinate datum and projection (Adandan, UTM)

A. ASPHALTROAD, OWNER OF ADDIS ABABA ROADS AUTHORITY

Date of Enumeration

Coordinate

Sub-city District Length (m) Width (m) Area (m2) X Y Z

3/9/2013 472327 989876 2212 Akaki-Kaliti 5 58 6 348

6/9/2013 472327 989876 2212 Nifas Silk-Lafto 12 61 3 183

6/9/2013 472287 989998 2203 Nifas Silk-Lafto 12 55 6 330

6/9/2013 473996 987529 2193 Akaki-Kaliti 5 8 6 30

7/9/2013 473959 988298 2206 Akaki-Kaliti 6 70 6 420

7/9/2013 474426 988561 2214 Akaki-Kaliti 6 18 6 108

7/9/2013 474426 988561 2214 Akaki-Kaliti 6 48 6 264

B. COBBLE STONE ROAD COBBLE STONE ROAD, OWNER OF ADDIS ABABA ROADS AUTHORITY

Date of Enumeration

Coordinate


3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473751 986539 2169 Akaki-Kaliti 5 50 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473693 986513 2168 Akaki-Kaliti 5 61 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473596 986449 2168 Akaki-Kaliti 5 117 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473559 986406 2169 Akaki-Kaliti 5 54 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473559 986406 2169 Akaki-Kaliti 5 54 3

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473559 986406 2169 Akaki-Kaliti 5 59 3

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473438 986279 2167 Akaki-Kaliti 5 60.5 4

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473424 986229 2167 Akaki-Kaliti 5 29.9 4

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473305 985742 2166 Akaki-Kaliti 7 10 6

7/9/2013 7/9/2013 474377 988708 2211 Akaki-Kaliti 6 109.5 6

7/9/2013 7/9/2013 474417 988996 2208 Akaki-Kaliti 6 32.4 6

7/9/2013 7/9/2013 474462 986229 2167 Akaki-Kaliti 6 44 6

7/9/2013 7/9/2013 474595 989643 2230 Nifas Silk-Lafto 9 6 6

7/9/2013 7/9/2013 474565 989673 2223 Nifas Silk-Lafto 9 6.4 6

8/9/2013 8/9/2013 475129 989717 2232 Nifas Silk-Lafto 9 421 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473751 986539 2169 Akaki-Kaliti 5 50 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473693 986513 2168 Akaki-Kaliti 5 61 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473596 986449 2168 Akaki-Kaliti 5 117 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473559 986406 2169 Akaki-Kaliti 5 54 6

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473559 986406 2169 Akaki-Kaliti 5 54 3

3/9/2013 3/9/2013 473559 986406 2169 Akaki-Kaliti 5 59 3



C. GRAVEL ROAD GRAVEL ROAD, OWNER OF ADDIS ABABA ROADS AUTHORITY

Date of Enumeration

Coordinate


3/9/2013 473866 987152 2190 Akaki-Kaliti 5 30 6 180

3/9/2013 473923 987043 2183 Akaki-Kaliti 5 56 6 336

3/9/2013 473950 96971 2180 Akaki-Kaliti 5 40 6 240

3/9/2013 473968 986900 2179 Akaki-Kaliti 5 40 6 240

3/9/2013 473993 986803 2177 Akaki-Kaliti 5 60 6 360

3/9/2013 473991 986688 2179 Akaki-Kaliti 5 50 6 300

3/9/2013 473892 986637 2176 Akaki-Kaliti 5 55 6 330

3/9/2013 473808 986565 2170 Akaki-Kaliti 5 79 3 237

4/9/2013 473479 987661 2176 Akaki-Kaliti 5 21 6 126

D. ELECTRIC POLES

Date of Enumeration

Coordinate Sub-city District Number X Y Z

3/9/2013 473895 986640 2178 Akaki-Kaliti 5 13/9/2013 473892 986637 2178 Akaki-Kaliti 5 13/9/2013 473808 986565 2170 Akaki-Kaliti 5 33/9/2013 473968 986900 2179 Akaki-Kaliti 5 13/9/2013 473557 986404 2183 Akaki-Kaliti 5 33/9/2013 473526 986373 2189 Akaki-Kaliti 5 43/9/2013 473438 986279 2167 Akaki-Kaliti 5 13/9/2013 473376 985917 2160 Akaki-Kaliti 5 44/9/2013 473470 987809 2189 Akaki-Kaliti 5 26/9/2013 473964 987533 2194 Akaki-Kaliti 5 46/9/2013 473898 987724 2196 Akaki-Kaliti 5 64/9/2013 473498 988005 2181 Akaki-Kaliti 6 14/9/2013 473509 988029 2186 Akaki-Kaliti 6 14/9/2013 473561 988173 2190 Akaki-Kaliti 6 14/9/2013 473594 988594 2196 Akaki-Kaliti 6 64/9/2013 473539 988888 2200 Akaki-Kaliti 6 15/9/2013 473587 988928 2197 Akaki-Kaliti 6 45/9/2013 473561 988926 2201 Akaki-Kaliti 6 5

5/9/2013 473224 989168 2213Nfas silk Lafto 10 1

6/9/2013 472327 989876 2212Nfas silk Lafto 12 1

7/9/2013 474408 988617 2210Nfas silk Lafto 12 5



Date of Enumeration


3/9/2013 473895 986640 2178 Akaki-Kaliti 5 1

7/9/2013 474431 989523 2229Nfas silk Lafto 6 3

7/9/2013 474431 989523 2229 Akaki Kaliti 6 17/9/2013 474419 989885 2225 Akaki Kaliti 6 1

7/9/2013 474595 989643 2230Nfas silk Lafto 9 3

7/9/2013 474565 989679 2227Nfas silk Lafto 9 9

8/9/2013 475112 989698 2235Nfas silk Lafto 9 2

8/9/2013 475179 990032 2256Nfas silk Lafto 9 4

8/9/2013 475036 990244 2256Nfas silk Lafto 9 4

8/9/2013 474874 990376 2266Nfas silk Lafto 9 6

E. TELEPHONE POLES

Date of Enumeration


3/9/2013 473860 987152 2190 Akaki-Kaliti 5 13/9/2013 473406 986130 2167 Akaki-Kaliti 5 23/9/2013 473394 986020 2179 Akaki-Kaliti 5 66/9/2013 473754 987851 2198 Akaki-Kaliti 5 94/9/2013 473561 988173 2190 Akaki-Kaliti 6 17/9/2013 474408 988617 2210 Akaki-Kaliti 6 5

7/9/2013 474595 989643 2230Nifas Silk Lafto 9 2



Annex7=Socio‐economicsurveyquestionnaire

KALITI WASTE WATER TREATMENT REAHABILITATION PROJECT AFFECTED INDIVIDUALS, LAND RESOURCES, STRUCTURES AND

ORGANIZATIONS SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY DATA SHEET

GPS Position: X________________Y_______________ Z__________ Date____________

1. General 1.1Household head name_________________2.Father's name: ___________3.Mother'sname ____

1.2 Age ________________ 1.3 Sex: 1. Male 2. Female 1.4 Occupation ____________________ 1.5 Religion _________________________ 1.6Address: Sub-city_____________ Woreda_______ House no. _________ 1.7Family size: 1. Males _________ 2. Females ______________3. Total ______________ 1.8 Education: Pre-school 1st cycle primary 2nd cycle primary

Secondary College preparatory College 1.9Is the family head or is there a family member with disability? 1) Yes 2) No

2. Type of property affected: 2.1 Type of housing: Type Size (m2) Height (m) 2.2Hollow blocks with corrugated iron sheet __________ ________ 2.3Mud with corrugated iron sheet _________ ________ 2.4Stonewall with corrugated iron sheet __________ ________ 2.5Mud house with grass roof ___________ _________ 2.6 All with corrugated iron sheet ___________ _________ 2.6Septic tank Meter cube ___________ _________ 2.7 Ownership: 2.7.1 Rented from Kebele 2.7.2 Rented from individual Owner’s Name: ______________________________ 2.7.3 My Own Ownership title number ________________ 2.7.4 No ownership title



2.8 Use: 2.8.1 Dwelling 2.8.2 Business Type of business____________; monthly income from business (birr) _________ Additional observations/Remarks_________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 2.9 Fence 2.9.1 Stonewall meter length ____________ meter thickness____________ 2.9.2 Corrugated iron sheet meter_____________ 2.9.3 Wood meter__________________ 2.9.4 Hollow block 2.9.4 Other ______________________________________________ Additional observations/Remarks_________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2.10 Number and type of affected crops and trees 2.10.1 Type of crop____________, land in hectare (harvested/covered)________Yield (Qt/ha)________ Production in Qt___________________ 2.10.2 Type of tree_____________, Number of tree: Big ________, Medium ______, Small __________ 2.10.3 Type of fruit tree_____________, Age of tree__________, Productivity in Kg._____________, Cost for land improvement (Birr)____________, Cost to grow_______________ 2.11 Affected pubic infrastructure 2.11.1Telecommunications: 1.number of poles____________1.Number of p.b.x_________ 2.11.2Electric: 1. Number of high tension power poles ______2. Number of normal poles ________ 2.11.3Asphalt road: __________meter by ___________meter= ____________square meters 2.11.4 Coble stone road: ____________meter by _________meter = ___________square meters 2.11.5 Gravel road : ____________ meter by __________meter= __________square meters



3. Opinion about the project

Do you support the project? Yes No Why? ______________________________________________________

Additional observations/Remarks________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Annex8Socioeconomicsurveydatabaseofthedownstreamhouseholds(selected)

SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEY FOR AKAKI KALITI DISTRICT 7 DATA SHEET

No.

Questions

Household owner characteristics

Code No. and Name of Contact Person SUME

SES01

SES02

SES03

SES04 SES05 SES06

SESS07 SES08 SES09

SES010

SES011 SES012

SES013

SES014

SES015

Bru Dino

Etsegenet Alemu

Sara Sakota

Tsehay Bikila

Endalech Amare

Tegenaw Mogessie

Teshome Gemeda

Mola Mekonnen

Netsanet Tesifaye

Habtamu Tolossa

Werkinesh Yimam

Muluhabt Alamir

Alem Hussien

Asinakech Dabi

Lema Gdissa

1 Age 30 24 35 52 42 33 23 35 15 20 25 22 33 40 48

2 Marital status

Married _ _ _ _ _

10

Single _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

5

Divorced _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Widowed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

3 Number of family members

Total 4 3 6 8 7 _ _

4 _ _

5 _

5 7 7 _

Male 3 1 3 4 4 _ _

2 _ _

3 _

2 3 3 _

Female 1 2 3 4 3 _ _

2 _ _

2 _

3 4 4 _

4 Educational status

Illiterate _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1

Grade 1-4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

5

Grade 5-8 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2

Grade 9-12 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

3

12+ Certificate _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2

12+ Diploma _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1

First Degree _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1

5 Occupation

Farmer _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1 Local Drink Seller

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Trader _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1

House Wife _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2 Government Employee

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2



Private Company Employee

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1

Daily Laborer _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2

Water Vendor _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Others Specify _

Nurse _ _ _

Forman Student _

Student Student _ KG

Teacher _ _ _ _

6 Monthly income

500-1000 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

5

1001-2000 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

5

Non Employee _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4

Not Known _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1

7

Being near to the Akaki wastewater treatment plant, what problem do you face ?

Bad Smell _ _

13 Attacked by Diseases

_ _ _ _ 11

Loss Land _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Loss House Units _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1

No Problem

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2

8

What did you gain from the treatment plant ?

Natural Fertilizer _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Water for Irrigation

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1

Employment Opportunity

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Non _

14

9

From where do you get your water for domestic use?

Tape Water

15

River Akaki _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Dug Well

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

10

Was there a family mummer who was sick from waterborne diseases in the last

Yes

_

_

_ _

_ _

9

No

_

_ _ _

_

_ _ _ _

6



two months?

11

If your answer for question No. 10 is yes, what type ?

Dheariya _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2

Skin Disease _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4

Parasite _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Caf _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

7

sinus _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4

Typhoid _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _

1

Typhus _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _

1

Others _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

12

Did you use water from the treatment plant for irrigation?

Yes _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _

1

No

_

14

13

If your answer for question No. 12 is yes, what did you produce?

Vegetables _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1

Cereal Crops _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Fruits _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Others

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

14

What positive gain do you expect from the extension and rehabilitation of the existing treatment plant ?

Water for Irrigation

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3

Job Opportunity _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4 Reduce Health Problem

_ _ _ _ 11

Reduce Bad Smell

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2

15

Do you anticipate any problem from the Yes

_ _ _ _

_

_

_ _ _

5



extension and rehabilitation of the existing treatment plant? No

_

_

_ _ _ _

9

16

If your answer for question No. 15 is yes, what kind of problem do you expect ?

Resettlement problem

_ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1

Health Problem(if any waste water comes from the rehabilitation center)

_ _ _ _

_

_

_ _ _ _ _

4

17

What is your opinion about the extension and rehabilitation of the exiting wastewater treatment plant ? Do agree or disagree?

Agree

_

14

Disagree

_

1



Annex9CompensationAmountforPAPsAgainstlostproperty(inBirr)

A. Compensation for fully affected PAPs

S/N Name Type of property that would be affected

Proposed compensation amount (Birr)

1 Fekadu Berta mud house 13200.00

2 Senayt Kifle mud house 10200.00

3 Aself Haile mud house 11400.00

4 Sheawalem Hasen mud house 13800.00

5 Yeshewaget Teferra mud house 18600.00

6 Zulfa Abdu mud house 10200.00

7 Nasir Kedir mud house 14400.00

8 Kamil Sani mud house 20400.00

9 Birhanu Zrgaw mud house 23400.00

10 Triku W/yohans mud house 12600.00

11 Tesema Awgchew mud house 28800.00

12 Girma Worku mud house 18000.00

13 Taddese Zirkwa mud house 12600.00

14 Niri Shifa mud house 13200.00

15 Bambeta Wegeta mud house 10200.00

16 Abera Haile mud house 19200.00

17 Fetiha Mubark mud house 13800.00

18 Tekle Sifer mud house 24600.00

19 Mohamed Sifer mud house 26400.00

20 Mohamed kedir mud house 24000.00

21 Kifle Nemaga mud house 24000.00

22 Tesfaye mud house 15000.00

23 Taddese Ajma mud house 86400.00

24 Bayse Bekele mud house 15600.00

25 Tamrat Kebede mud house 22800.00

26 Belaynesh Kebede mud house 22800.00

27 Ayana Gebre mud house 37800.00

28 Shamil Yasin mud house 19800.00

29 Mubarek Oumer mud house 16800.00

30 Birhanu Asrat mud house 10200.00

31 Tsega G/mariam CIS house 3200.00



B. Compensation Amount for PAPs

S/N

Name of PAPs

Type of Housing unit to be affected in m2

Affected fence in m2 by Construction material

Septic Tank in m3

Eucalypts tree In No.

Total compensation amount (Birr) H .Block

Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall

CIS Wall Stone Hollow block

CIS Stone retaining

1 Yohans Dgafee 13 2600

2 Samia Melena 78.8 2 16460

3 Kabansh Ferede 103.2 29 30790

4 Woubshet W/gbrail 43 1 8950

5 Tilahun Dgafee 50 10 1 32350

6 Sefa Oumer 60 21 2 43000

7 Aynalem Haddis 31.6 6320

8 Mulugeta Mersha 9 9 4500

9 Bayush Dgafee 18 28.8 20 23560

10 Bezu Fikre 13 2 8500

11 Hailu Shibeshi 15.8 3160

12 Daniel Alemayhu 105.5 60 26 86500

13 Taytu Beyene 49 21 33600

14 Woineshet 80 48000

15 Nimani Finet 140 66.5 16 15 112400

16 Fantu Nemani 57.2 34320

17 Moke Kebede 12 7200

18 Daniel Talore 16 9600

19 Tedla Sige 20 12000

20 Ejigu Minda 30 27 72000

21 Alemnesh Ghana 77 46200

22 Yeshewaget Tefera 31 18600

23 Gonfa Hude 35 21000

24 Mewled Abdella 21 12600

25 Lubaba Adem 52 31200

26 Haru 14 2800



S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

27 Mudin Kemal 72 43200

28 Fikre Moges 23 13800

29 Mubarek Muzemil 24 16 17600

30 Degitu Daba 33 19800

31 Dino Kedir 83 49800

32 Fekadu Berta 22 13200

33 Senayet Kifle 17 10200

34 Aself Haile 19 11400

35 Sheawalem Hasen 23 13800

36 Hasen Nesru 14 8400

37 Zulfa Abdu 17 10200

38 Nasir Kedir 24 14400

39 Kamil Sani 34 20400

40 Birhanu Zergaw 39 23400

41 Triku W/yohans 21 12600

42 Tesema Awgchew 48 28800

43 Asemare Ayele 61 36600

44 Girma Worku 30 18000

45 Taddese Zirkaw 21 12600

46 Nuri Shifa 22 13 17 20500

47 Bambeta Wegeta 17 10200

48 Abera Haile 32 19200

49 Fetiha Mubark 23 13800

50 Tekle Sifer 41 24600

51 Mohamed Sifer 44 26400

52 Mohamed kedir 40 24000

53 Kifle Nemaga 40 24000

54 Tesfaye 25 15000

55 Taddese Ajma 144 86400



S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

56 Lemessa Koricho 55 33000

57 Bayse Bekele 26 15600

58 Tamrat Kebede 38 22800

59 Belaynesh Kebede 38 22800

60 Ayana Gebre 63 37800

61 Shikur Zeleke 28 16800

62 Shamil Yasin 33 19800

63 Mubarek Oumer 28 16800

64 Tofik Ali 27 16200

65 Mustefa Mudeser 19 11400

66 Miftah Shamil 25 15000

67 Shiferaw kebede 46 27600

68 Dejene Gashaw 18 10800

69 Asrara Nesro 10 6000

70 Fekie Hasen 26 24 20400

71 Akmel Hasen 50 24 34800

72 Worknesh Ali 28 13 19400

73 Abdella Hasen 33 13 22400

74 Ayelch Megerssa 13.4 2680

75 Muzeyn Ahmed 13 7800

76 Hunde 32 19200

77 Nure Musa 27 16200

78 Mareguwa Birhanu 17 10200

79 Mebratu Debo 34 20400

80 Wudma Debo 19 11400

81 Birhanu Asrat 17 32 74200

82 Fantaye Lmane 21 12600

83 Negash Muzeyn 20 12000

84 Tsega G/mariam 16 4800



S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

85 Gadissie Muleta 21 12600

86 Hailu Bekele 17 5100

87 Fanaye Wordofa 24 14400

88 Genanaw Wondimu 18 10800

89 Endalkachew Dote 30 6000

90 Ngash Bekele 10 6000

91 Tesfaye Asule 21 12600

92 Mulu Getahun 19 11400

93 Merkebu Kassa 26 15600

94 Askale Bereda 68 40800

95 Aselefech Mengiste 36 21600

96 Awgichew Tilaye 22 8.2 9880

97 Megerssa lelissa 146 27.6 93120

98 Bizunesh Demissie 51 30 36600

99 Solomon Bekele 25 87500

100 Mekuria Tesema 120 36000

101 Simur Ayenew 20.4 4080

102 Abreham Zeberga 14 2800

103 Aynalem Habte 25.2 5040

104 Leta 19 12 8100

105 Nuria Omer 18 18 66600

106 Tariku Tesfaye 15.4 3080

107 Ashenafi Kebede 50 15000

108 Aliye Deremo 24.4 4880

109 Hadosh Baraki 25 5000

110 Alemu Taddese 28 5600

111 G/egziabher T/hymamot 117

35100

112 Solomon G/hiwot 131 39300



S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

113 Takele Beyene 28 8400

114 G/meskel Teklu 28 5600

115 Yinegrutal Abate 18.6 3720

116 Netsanet Degu 17 10200

117 Tshome Belay 46 22.4 32080

118 Gugsa Mahetem 20 43 22 34800

119 Nekhewot 30 13500

120 Resom G/Silasse 34 15300

121 Tekalgn Werkae 24 32 28800

122 Mamite Desta 37 32 36600

123 Erkiyhun Ferede 34 13600

124 Hana Getahun 23 24.4 5 93230

125 Solomon Hirpa 48.4 7 24230

126 Sebsibe H/Mariam 16 7200

127 Tewodros Abate 21.4 4280

128 Yared G/medhin 31 66 150600

129 Begashaw Kebede 10 6.6 36320

130 T/hymanot Berehe 20.6 9270

131 Teshome Zewdu 22.4 10080

132 Kedija Mohamed 13 8 47100

133 Zelalem Kassa 14 8 52600

134 Fikre Adera 17 7650

135 Enkutatash G/Egizeabher 16

7200

136 Tekleab Girma 18 8100

137 Shewaye Argaw 14 6300

138 Emebet Tamirat 24 10800

139 H/Mariam Terfa 26 10.8 95860

140 known by GPS 35.6 16020



S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

141 Bilelgn Tamre 34 102000

142 Brahanu Endegena 20 9000

143 Zerehane Taddese 16 7200

144 Alemzewd Abebe 20.4 9180

145 Yarad Lsanu 18 8100

146 Solomon Kebede 21.4 9630

147 Luel Eleas 18 8 66600

148 Yeshetela haile 17.4 7830

149 Zenashe Gezahgn 17 7650

150 Zerfabelen Desta 8 13.4 34030

151 Getachew Diriba 9 4.7 33615

152 Teshome Abebe 13.4 6030

153 known by GPS 23 10350

154 Girma Mulugeta 15 8.8 56460

155 Mulu Geleta 9 16 9900

156 Brtukan Geleta 9 10 36000

157 Lasab Belayneh 7 16.8 9660

158 Banche Desta 12 26 15300

159 Bacha Berhe 23 54 22.4 34480

160 Bekele Werga 16.2 7290

161 Kebede W/mariam 17 7.6 62920

162 Demeke Batabe 12 10 46500

163 Tadele Sheferaw 15.2 3040

164 Agze Berhanu 8 2 2300

165 Tsega Tolosa 16 3200

166 Wedage Amare 14 6300

167 Meseret Kebede 91 45.2 338840

168 Yergalem Temesgen 38.5 26.6 146720




S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

170 Kebede Senbeta 20 16 9200

171 Genet Feleke 54 38 206100

172 Abebe Mekonnen 21 8 77100

173 Yeshi Ayele 15 34 67800

174 Debebe Bekele 21 9450

175 Dereje Mengesha 40 5 6 142700

176 Tsegaye W/mariam 13.2 5940

177 Seged woldabe 17.2 6880

178 Tizita Tilahun 10 4500

179 Mengistu Begashaw 16.2 7290

180 Tilahun Melaku 38.6 17370

181 Lakew Derbew 60 6 37200

182 Abeba Abreha 32 19200

183 Kassahun Asfaw 39 36 95400

184 Yeshigeta Tamre 25 87500

185 Tsega Alebel 75 45000

186 Tilaye Wakejira 35 21000

187 Erbka T/silasse 11 10 26600

188 Walelu Zewde 24 20.4 18480

189 Abera Kefa 6.5 14.4 6780

190 Alem Dejene 29 22 21800

191 Worke Addise 14 8400

192 Kyesha Gnbure 12 7.6 8720

193 Ermiyas Wondmagn 28 24 54 24 129200

194 Maledu Tegabu 9 5400

195 Endalkachew Adnew 10.5 20 10300

196 Degfe Agonafer 20 2 22.6 17120

197 Kassa Berehe 16 9600

198 Enana Mehret 33 18 120900



S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

199 Metasebia Tesfaye 10 12 8400

200 Biniams Shemels 31 18600

201 Desalgn Gebessa 31 24 23400

202 Kitaba Gudeta 74 44400

203 Dinknesh Begashaw 27 37 90200

204 Konjet Getachew 52 31200

205 Kebebushi H/mariam 52 31200

206 Amare Engdawork 106 63600

207 Tena Mengistu 25 6 16200

208 Zewdu Tilahun 6 1200

209 Zenbech Ayele 53 6 33000

210 Ayelu Bedane 39 6 24600

211 Negusu Mezemer 66 12 233400

212 Eynesh Weldeyes 29 17400

213 Melese Hasen 70 42000

214 Girma Endeshaw 17 10200

215 Yatnesh Welde 69 12 46800

216 Fikre Husen 85 51000

217 Tsegereda Debalk 31 24 23400

218 Estifanos G/tadik 50 30000

219 Etenesh Eshete 26 15600

220 Tadese Nega 45 27000

221 Demitu Sory 6 1200

222 Zelalem Mengistu 65 3 233500

223 Taye Abebe 49 15.5 178475

224 Tesma Weldeyes 74 9.4 262760

225 Bushra Mussa 8.6 1720

226 Muktar Ahmed 90 11.4 29280

227 Tsegaye Teka 78 273000



S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

228 Yonas Taye 45 27000

229 Getye Mikre 13 7800

230 W/gebrail Nrayo 24 61 126800

231 Tekabech Alemu 31 18600

232 Ngatu Asfaw 18 10800

233 Ene‐Mesfin Alemu 34 6800

234 Tamrat Chernt 10 2000

235 Ene‐Lulet Girma 42 8400

236 Yeshe Bekele 38 7600

237 Zemerkin Dembue 36 16200

238 Yeshareg G/sillassie 6 18000

239 Mengistu Haile 30 34 7 128550

240 Yirga Desta 111 14 6 395100

241 Ephrem Tekelu 12 10 10200

242 Alemayehu W/Gebriel 41

24600

243 Aleme Tefera 10 9 51 110700

244 Nebyat Tefera 28 16800

245 Bayush Tegegn 87 19 12 60300

246 Mengistu Zewde 17 5100

247 Bereka Eshete 11 16.6 6620

248 Erstu Fantaye 80 48 289600

249 Tiruye Engdasew 6 1200

250 Molla Getahun 23.2 10440


252 Mesfin Arega 16 10.6 6920

253 Abdrahman Yakobe 16 3200

254 Fantanesh Alemu 38 38 34200

255 Rede 199 696500



S/N

Name of PAPs



Septic Tank in m3



Wall Mu d Wall

Stone Wall


CIS Stone retaining

256 Tesfaye H/michiel 77 7 48300

257 Bogale Taddese 65 24 60 42300

258 Abebe 20.6 6 10470

259 Kelemwa Kabthymer 8 66 67600

260 Onta Mote 83 49800


262 Hasi Donomam Muzeyim

38 7600

263 Mesfin Alemu 94 42300

264 Ephrem Gezahgn 20.6 8240

265 Tensae Birhanu 20.8 9360

266 Abu Dabi 58.6 23440

267 known by GPS 9 25.6 41740

268 known by GPS 28 44 117800

269 known by GPS 108 21600

Total 10071680.00



Annex10Minutesofselectedcommunitymembers

(In Amharic and translated in English)



Documents

(Final Report) (Volume II) - The World Bankdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/pt/... · (Final Report) (Volume II) Client: Addis Ababa Water and Sewerage Authority (AAWSA) Water, Sanitation