Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FISCAL YEAR 2020 SPECIAL EDUCATION STAFFING PLAN
Table of Contents
Pages
Fiscal Year 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan
1 – 14
Fiscal Year 2020 MCPS Special Education and Related Services Budget Guidelines
Attachment A
Fiscal Year 2020 Projected Special Education Enrollment, Services, and Positions
Attachment B
Fiscal Year 2018–2020 Special Education Improvement and Priorities Based on Staff and Community Member Input
Attachment C
Fiscal Year 2020 MCPS Special Education Staffing Plan and Operating Budget Timeline
Attachment D
Fiscal Year 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan Committee
Attachment E
Fiscal Year 2020 Professional Development Plan—Teacher Sessions
Attachment F
Fiscal Year 2020 Professional Development Plan—Paraeducator Sessions
Attachment G
1
FISCAL YEAR 2020 SPECIAL EDUCATION STAFFING PLAN Montgomery County Public Schools
December 2018
Overview The responsibility of the Office of Special Education (OSE) is to provide a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) to all students with disabilities in need of special education and related services— within a comprehensive, collaborative, and individualized support system that enables access
to the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) curriculum; within the general education framework or the Alternate Learning Outcomes (ALOs) aligned
with the curriculum; based on articulated curriculum targets aligned with the Maryland College and
Career-Ready Standards (MCCRS) or ALO, as determined by the Individualized Education Program (IEP) team; and
in the student’s home school or home school cluster, to the maximum extent appropriate, in accordance with national, state, and local mandates.
Local school systems are required by the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 13A.05.02.13 D to develop a yearly Special Education Staffing Plan to ensure that sufficient staff members are available to meet the programming needs of students. The plan must be completed on or before July 1, with evidence of Montgomery County Board of Education (Board) approval. In addition, the plan is required to include the following: evidence of public input; evidence of maintenance of effort within the meaning of 34 CFR §300.231, Maintenance of
Effort, and COMAR 13A.02.05, Maintenance of Effort; staffing patterns of service providers for special education and related services; consideration of time requirements beyond direct services; the number and type of service providers needed to provide FAPE to each student with a
disability in the Least-restrictive Environment (LRE); local accountability and monitoring; strategies to resolve concerns regarding staffing plans; evaluation of the local staffing plan for effectiveness; steps to secure public input in the development of the staffing plan; and information on how the public agency will use the staffing plan to monitor the assignment of
staff members to ensure that personnel and other resources are available to provide FAPE to each student with a disability in the LRE.
Introduction As required by the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE), the MCPS Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan provides evidence of public input, professional development, special education service descriptions (Attachment A), special education enrollment,
2
the number and types of direct service providers (Attachment B), and the process for reviewing and making adjustments to staffing and maintenance of effort. In addition, the plan recommends staffing priorities and recommendations for maintenance of initiatives for FY 2020 (Attachment C). OSE recognizes and appreciates the Board’s support of special education through previous budget initiatives and the funding of required improvements. Because of ongoing fiscal limitations, the FY 2020 Staffing Plan Committee focused on critical areas of special education programming. Those items that were not included in the FY 2019 MCPS Program Budget were considered by the committee, special education program staff members, the Department of Facilities Management (DFM), and Budget and Planning staff members during the FY 2020 budget process that started in June 2018. (Attachment D) As stated in the MCPS Strategic Plan, our core purpose is to prepare ALL students to thrive in their future. MCPS is committed to narrowing the achievement gap for all service groups. This commitment was reinforced by two major pieces of federal legislation that drive the delivery of special education services: the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Board Policy IOB, Education of Students with Disabilities, further affirms the commitment of the school system to ensure the provision of FAPE. MCPS collaborates and coordinates within the system and with agencies outside MCPS to ensure services are provided to special education students in accordance with the student’s IEP. This includes, but is not limited to, behavioral, mental health, and counselor support. It also includes transition goals with work-related goals being met within the community. IDEA mandates that “to the maximum extent appropriate” students with disabilities shall be “educated with children who are not disabled.” Moreover, assignment to “special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of students with disabilities from the general education environment” should occur “only when the nature or severity of the disability of a child is such that education in general classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.” In addition to this LRE mandate, IDEA regulations require school districts to ensure that a student with disabilities is “educated in the school he or she would attend if nondisabled” unless the IEP requires some other arrangement. MCPS uses Results Driven Accountability (RDA) meetings to evaluate our system’s performance in alignment with the federal and state RDA measures. The outcome of this process drives our general supervision responsibilities for internal monitoring, targeted professional learning opportunities (PLOs) for schools, and ultimately our strategic plan, which drives student success. ESSA holds schools accountable for improved educational outcomes for all students. ESSA specifically mandates testing and disaggregation of test results to show progress for students with disabilities and other identified student subgroups. Principal Advisory Committee meetings and Professional Learning Community (PLC) meetings are conducted throughout the school year as a forum for open dialogue and communication. Topics covered during these meetings include initial feedback on new initiatives, sharing of best practices,
3
concerns, and staffing considerations. Any staffing concerns raised during these meetings are explored for potential solutions. A project team may be formed with key stakeholders. The project team’s mission is to research, investigate, and develop recommendations for review by executive leadership. These recommendations are used to drive budget discussions, which allow for staffing changes and enhancements. During the school year, staff members from the Department of Special Education Services (DSES) and the Division of Business, Fiscal and Information Systems (DBFIS) reviewed information from student IEPs using the Maryland Online Individualized Education Program (MOIEP) and classroom observations. MSDE mandates, due process hearing decisions, and input from staff and community members are used to determine the effectiveness of the current MCPS Special Education Staffing Plan and to make recommendations for the next fiscal year’s staffing plan. MCPS holds all staff members accountable for student outcomes. MCPS is committed to increasing collaboration among all offices, staff members, schools, and the community to ensure coordinated services meet the needs of all students in the most effective and efficient ways. The MCPS Special Education Staffing Plan is a vehicle to ensure that appropriate personnel are available to deliver the services required to implement student IEPs and provides balance between student needs, teacher responsibilities, and the educational settings in which services will be provided. MCPS Budget Review and Adoption Process On December 18, 2018, the superintendent of schools will present his Recommended FY 2020 Operating Budget to the members of the Board and the community. The budget reflects input from a variety of public and private stakeholders, including input provided from the FY 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan Committee. Two public FY 2020 budget hearings will be held on January 9 and January 14, 2019. The Board operating budget work sessions will be held on January 17 and January 24, 2019. The Board is scheduled to approve the Superintendent’s Recommended FY 2020 Operating Budget on February 12, 2019. The Board’s recommended budget will be sent to each principal, Parent Teacher Association president, and public library after March 1, 2019, which is when the law requires that it be submitted to the Montgomery County Executive and the County Council. The Montgomery County Executive will make his recommendations for the MCPS budget on March 15, 2019, and the County Council will hold public hearings on all local government budgets in April 2019. The County Council’s Education Committee will hold work sessions on the Board’s recommended budget in April 2019, and the full County Council will review the school system budget in May 2019. The Montgomery County Charter, as amended by voters in November 1992, requires that the County Council act on all budgets by May 31 of each year. This year, the County Council will approve the county budget on May 23, 2019. After the County Council has completed its appropriation action, the Board will adopt the final approved budget for FY 2020 on June 11, 2019. A timeline of budget actions can be found in Attachment D.
4
Public Input Mrs. Julie S. Hall, director, DBFIS, invited members of the community, DSES/DBFIS staff members, the Special Education Advisory Committee, and other stakeholders to participate on the FY 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan Committee. The committee met on June 6, 2018, to review the FY 2019 Special Education Staffing Plan, receive information regarding the FY 2019 MCPS budget and public input, and to make recommendations for priorities to be considered for inclusion in the FY 2020 budget (see Attachment E for a list of committee members). During the June meeting, the committee received an overview of the elements of a staffing plan, considered how the process of developing a staffing plan aligned with the new MCPS budget process, reviewed the FY 2019 Special Education Staffing Plan Committee recommendations, and the final FY 2019 special education budget allocations. Additionally, the Special Education Staffing Plan Committee was asked to participate as a focus group. The committee was asked to consider current resources and the use of those resources to support students with disabilities by providing them with the skills needed to be successful in college and career when responding to the following questions.
1. An achievement gap exists for students with disabilities. We want students to be served effectively in the least-restrictive environment (LRE). Current State Indicators 5A, 5B, 6A, and 6B demonstrate we are moving in the wrong direction. We need to move the needle to increase the number of students being served in the LRE. What is currently in place that provides for effective allocation and use of the resources? What upgrades or changes can be developed to improve the allocation and use of these
resources? 2. We are charged as a system to ensure all students have the academic, creative problem solving,
and the social emotional competencies that they will need to be successful in the 21st century. State Indicator 4A discipline data shows there is more work to be done to reduce suspensions for students with disabilities. What is currently in place that provides for effective allocation and use of the resources? What upgrades or changes can be developed to improve the allocation and use of these
resources? 3. System priorities, staff responsibility, and student needs and expectations are aligned to the
current expectations for our 21st century graduates. Should resources be considered for realignment; if so, which resources? Should resources be adjusted to meet the priorities; if so, which resources?
The committee selected the following top priorities from the input of the group— Continue with social emotional supports and add to current supports available. Leverage
community partnerships to support students in the Social Emotional Special Education Services (SESES) with transition activities.
Transition the remaining Learning and Academic Disabilities (LAD) and Resource schools to the Home School Model (HSM).
Provide professional learning for all staff members (including front office) to help students with emotional regulation supports and techniques and de-escalation strategies.
5
During the process of budget development, the committee’s recommendations were considered as strategic program enhancements and incorporated into professional learning plans as priorities emerged based on student outcomes. How the recommendations were implemented was dependent on the types of priorities generated by the committee. Several initiatives were considered for the development of the FY 2020 budget, but due to fiscal restraints, initiatives were not able to be included. Funding to address professional learning goals is provided through MSDE grant funds. On December 18, 2018, the committee will receive an update on the FY 2020 budget process and a review of the special education budget that is included in the Superintendent’s FY 2020 Recommended Operating Budget. The FY 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan is available on the MCPS website. The special education staffing plan process is aligned closely with the MCPS operating budget process, with public input and community involvement ongoing throughout the process. Input received from the FY 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan Committee was considered during the ongoing budget planning process and the development of the FY 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan. In addition, oral and written testimonies received through the Board’s budget hearings will be considered as final changes are made to the Superintendent’s FY 2020 Recommended Operating Budget. Professional Learning The delivery of special education instruction is an integral part of the MCPS systemic school improvement planning process. Teams that make decisions about special education services are aware of their responsibility to consider each student’s needs and the supports and services necessary to provide the student with access to, and participation in, the MCPS curriculum in the LRE. A key element in the provision of FAPE for students with disabilities is the availability of skilled personnel to implement each student’s IEP. Through the collaborative efforts of DSES and the Office of Curriculum and Instructional Programs (OCIP), special education staff members who deliver the general education curriculum to students with disabilities participate in mandatory, voluntary, and school-specific professional learning activities, including webinars, that ensure the delivery of effective instructional best practices. Voluntary training modules provide PLOs for all school personnel responsible for IEP implementation including general educators, school counselors, psychologists, pupil personnel workers, administrators, and paraeducators. Professional learning activities are aligned with the other system initiatives that focus on the provision of special education services within home or consortia schools. OSE, OCIP, and the Office of School Support and Improvement (OSSI) continue to collaborate to ensure that students with disabilities gain access to the general education curriculum at all school levels. General and special education teachers participate in PLOs based on best practices associated with Universal Design for Learning (UDL), collaborative planning, differentiated instruction, and the use of technology. Furthermore, professional learning is provided to support the instruction of students with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in the LRE and understanding language acquisition for
6
students who are second language speakers of English. As technology supports have evolved for our students with vision, hearing, and communication challenges, training is provided to enhance the support for this group of students. Staff members will have multiple opportunities during the 2019–2020 school year to build their capacity with a focus on building the skills students need to access the curriculum. To support further skill development, professional learning also will be provided in the areas needed to support prekindergarten (pre-K) services and transition services. First-year teacher training is offered annually, and there are monthly secondary resource teacher in special education (RTSE) meetings with ongoing opportunities for professional support, communication, and learning. A comprehensive list of the professional development plan is available (Attachments F and G). At the elementary level, in the 2013–2014 school year, professional learning continued to focus on Curriculum 2.0, which is aligned with MCCRS and embeds UDL practices. A digital curriculum ensures that all students, including students with disabilities, can access general education instruction. The focus in the 2015–2016 school year was on addressing evidence-based practices in reading and mathematics to ensure student access and success with Curriculum 2.0. Professional learning on UDL principles was provided in a variety of formats including webinars, workshops, PLCs, and continuing professional development courses for graduate credits. A variety of UDL teacher self-reflection tools and instructional “look-fors” provided school staff members with a breakdown of practices to measure progress toward full UDL implementation in the classroom. In FY 2018, there were continued efforts to support professional learning on UDL, HSM, and the curriculum. Academic interventions, standards-based instruction and evidence-based practices, and High Incidence Accessible Technology will be just some of the PLOs that will be provided during the 2018–2019 school year. During the 2019-2020 school year, PLOs will be provided on best teaching practices, technology, differentiation, and academic interventions. Central services staff members will work collaboratively with various offices to develop and present PLOs and to provide ongoing support, technical assistance, and consultation to special education and general education service providers for students from pre-K through school age as follows: MCPS will implement this interdepartmental collaboration in an effort to provide all educators
with the knowledge and skills needed to deliver a highly effective instructional program and to provide all students with an equitable and supportive learning environment.
Central office staff members will work closely with the Division of Title I and Early Childhood Programs and Services (DTECPS) and OCIP to provide professional learning on Maryland’s Early Childhood Comprehensive Assessment System, including the Kindergarten (K) Readiness Assessment, Early Learning Assessment, MCPS pre-K curriculum, collaboration, coteaching strategies, and social emotional foundations of early learning.
Central office staff members will provide: o professional learning sessions and support for identifying the needs and the differentiation
of instruction for twice-exceptional students. o professional learning on reading and mathematics interventions, as well as ongoing, job-
embedded coaching and support of evidence-based reading and mathematics methodologies in elementary/secondary LAD, Learning Centers (LC), SESES, Learning For Independence (LFI) classrooms, and in HSM schools.
7
o professional learning on instructional practices and strategies to ensure student access to the curriculum and increase the performance of students with disabilities on assessments to narrow the achievement gap with their nondisabled peers.
o ongoing positive behavioral management training through the Crisis Prevention Institute (CPI).
Central office staff member provided professional learning on Zones of Regulation to all elementary teachers, paraeducators, social workers, psychologists, and behavior support teachers. Next steps will be to deliver this PLO to middle school Bridge Program and SESES staff members, followed by special education RTSEs.
Central office staff will focus on: o professional learning in UDL and differentiation strategies for Career and Technology
Education teachers. This will enable teachers to better serve the needs of students with disabilities as they transition to post-secondary outcomes.
o a special education skill-building workshop on progress monitoring. Special education students may be served by the general education teacher or a coteaching team (a general education teacher and a special education teacher) in the inclusive-school environment. The general education teacher, special education teacher, and related service providers are responsible for supporting all of their assigned students. The general education teacher, in collaboration with the special educator and related service providers, is responsible for implementing the IEP and ensuring that students with special needs receive designated accommodations and are provided with the supports required to access instruction. In collaboration with the special educator, the general educator reports on progress, implements and discusses strategies, supports IEP development, and is a member of the IEP team. Teachers and service providers are provided with adequate planning time and time for parent/guardian meetings and communication as specified by the teacher contact. Information also has been disseminated across the county to support administration in designing schedules that provide for common planning time for coteaching teams whenever possible. The majority of students with IEPs are served with their peers in the general education classroom. Students are served not only by general educators, but by school counselors and administrators as well. To ensure the provision of FAPE for all students in FY 2019, 11,663.739 Full-time equivalent (FTE) positions were budgeted for general education teachers, 505.500 FTE positions were budgeted for counselors, and 528.500 FTE positions were budgeted for building administrators to ensure the support of all students. The provision of staffing will be maintained in FY 2020 and adjusted in accordance with changes in the student population. Evaluation of Staffing Plan for Effectiveness MSDE established LRE targets for local school systems that require students with disabilities to receive special education and related services in a general education setting or a combined general education and special education setting. The current MSDE targets are to increase LRE A (in general education greater than 80 percent of the day) and decrease LRE C (removed from general education greater than 40 percent of the day—i.e., self-contained classrooms). It is assumed that as the number of students in LRE C decreases, students will transition into more inclusive environments. The LRE targets, which are closely monitored by MSDE, will ensure that
8
established standards are met, and hold schools and local school systems accountable for student performance. During 2017–2018, 67.16 percent of students with disabilities were served in the general education environment, LRE A, and 13.85 percent of students with disabilities were served in LRE C. MCPS did not meet the increased MSDE target of 70.40 percent of students with disabilities served in LRE A, nor the decreased MSDE target of 11.26 percent for students with disabilities served in LRE C. The MSDE monitoring priority area is to provide FAPE in the LRE. Measurable and rigorous targets are established. The MCPS LRE performance data and MSDE targets from October 2014 through October 2017 are indicated in the chart below.
Percentage of MCPS Students with Disabilities by LRE
Inclusion Indicator
School Year
2014–2015
School Year
2015–2016
School Year
2016–17
School Year
2017–18
MCPS LRE A 66.85% 66.31% 67.10% 67.16%
MSDE Target for LRE A 68.90% 69.40% 69.90% 70.40%
MCPS LRE C 12.85% 13.38% 13.78% 13.85%
MSDE Target for LRE C 12.76% 12.26% 11.76% 11.26% Changes that have occurred to increase opportunities for students with disabilities to be educated with their typical peers in the LRE have included the restructuring of the secondary resource classroom and the transition of elementary schools to the HSM program. Historically, the resource program exclusively served students with disabilities in a self-contained classroom. The resource program now serves general education students, students with disabilities, and students with 504 plans. This redefined composition of students reclassifies the environment from a self-contained special education class to a general education setting designed to provide small group instruction. The resource program serves a diverse group of students, providing opportunities for improving organizational skills, previewing content, and reviewing lessons. Special and general education teachers have the opportunity to reteach and reassess in the core content areas. With the monitoring and data collection on LRE targets and student performance, critical staffing data and staffing program changes are used to evaluate the effectiveness of our staffing plan. Critical staffing is allocated as additional staffing over the program-staffing ratio. Critical staffing paraeducators support individual students, in the inclusive setting, or individualized LRE setting and are allocated based on student need as indicated by the IEP. The role of this staffing is to provide the high level of support needed for student learning in the LRE. As more students with greater learning challenges access instruction in the LRE setting, the use of critical staffing paraeducators has increased to support the academic progress and learning
9
behaviors of identified students. From FY 2012 through FY 2018, there has been almost a 50 percent increase in the allocation of critical staffing. This ongoing increase in critical staffing responds to the need for additional adult support for some students to access learning in the general education classroom. In FY 2019, we continue to maintain a high level of accuracy in staffing projections. Greater accuracy in the projection of staffing is the result of process improvements used to develop the special education budget. This includes accurate enrollment projections and increased transparency through the active participation of the central office special education staff members in the budget development process. The data collected on staffing changes after the initial allocation has been steadily improving and were reflected in FY 2018 in an overall 2.8 percent decrease in the number of staffing changes as compared to FY 2017. In FY 2019, these successful staffing processes will continue to be implemented and monitored. OSE oversees the process of staffing allocations, changes, and budget. The staffing plan is reevaluated annually in June after receiving input from the Special Education Staffing Plan Committee and other key stakeholders; however, staffing is monitored throughout the school year. In the event that student enrollment does not justify the allocated staffing, the staff member is reassigned to an area of need. Whenever possible, reassignment of the staff member is to a similar classroom. It is not the practice of MCPS to move students to accommodate for staffing concerns. In the spring of FY 2018, MCPS hired an outside consultant to begin the process of examining the current staffing models and formulas and to conduct school visits. The consultant will provide additional data to the current staffing monitoring measures when the process concludes. During FY 2019, the consultant will be specifically focused on the special education Preschool Education Program (PEP). The outcomes of the consultant’s evaluation, when available, will be considered along with internal data monitoring, with documentation of staffing changes, feedback from staff members, and the Special Education Staffing Plan Committee members. In FY 2020, we will continue to monitor our staffing plan. We are consistently making upgrades to monitoring methods to provide for the most accurate and timely data. MCPS has moved to a single-data system platform using Performance Matters. We have flagged key identifiers as special education program codes. Supervisors and schools are able to analyze special education programs as they relate to our system’s accountability system—Evidence of Learning Outcomes. Student data is another measure that is considered in the ongoing review of our staffing models and understanding the patterns of staffing needs in supporting students. Data obtained from critical staffing patterns also provides valuable insight into the staffing needs of supporting students in the LRE. It is through these review processes that OSE ensures the staffing models are aligned with the MCPS strategic priorities and the needs of our students receiving special education services. MCPS uses multiple tools to refine and upgrade how staffing is implemented to improve student outcomes. Evaluation of staffing is an ongoing focus as there is a direct correlation between appropriate student support for access to LRE, high-level instruction, and student performance. Staffing is dispersed throughout the school year to meet changes in enrollment and to provide additional support as needed through the allocation of building staffing and critical staffing support. Staffing changes also are made after careful consideration has been given by the staffing team as a result of building administrator requests. These staffing requests and changes are usually
10
the result of changes in student enrollment or to meet specific needs of students and programs. There were 142 changes in FY 2018 and 136 changes in FY 2017 of permanent building staffing to address administrative requests. FY 2019 is currently being monitored for staffing changes. Special Education Facilities and Staffing Patterns According to the October 2017 Maryland Special Education Census Data, 19,320 MCPS students, ages 3 to 21, received special education services. This number includes students receiving the Extended Individualized Family Services Plan Option. Of those students, 370 received services in a public separate special education day school, and 567 students received services in a nonpublic special education school. Participation in the LRE requires access to general education classrooms. DSES, DBFIS, the Department of Transportation, DFM, and OSSI are engaged in long-range planning to provide increased options for students with disabilities to access the general education environment throughout the system. The distribution of cluster and countywide services is based on the assumption that all students will be educated in their home school or home school cluster, if possible. For example, programs for high incidence disabilities, such as learning disabilities, are available in all elementary schools and at all secondary levels. In contrast, highly specialized programs for students who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing (D/HOH) are provided on a countywide basis in centralized locations. However, many D/HOH students can be served in their home school. A benefit of being such a large school system is the ability to serve students with special needs in multiple environments and in diverse discrete programs designed to focus on the students’ strengths while meeting individual needs. The Hours-based Staffing (HBS) model considers each school’s total number of students with IEPs, the total number of instructional IEP hours needed within the school, the number of grade levels being taught, the number of IEP hours a special educator is responsible for in a given week, and a minimum-base teacher allocation. This staffing model is implemented in HSM and HBS but does not incorporate staffing for discrete program services such as LAD, School Community-based (SCB), LFI, Autism, and SESES. Since the implementation of the elementary HSM, the number of elementary schools providing this staffing model has increased. Prior to FY 2017, there were 68 elementary schools offering HSM services. In FY 2017, 20 additional elementary schools were identified as HSM and provided with a series of professional learning activities designed to build the capacity of staff members to instruct students with more complex disabilities. In FY 2018, 27 Resource Only schools transitioned to HSM services and were provided with professional learning to support high-level instruction for diverse learners. In FY 2019, two additional elementary schools transitioned to HSM and one new elementary school opened as HSM. In FY 2020, two more schools will transition to HSM and another new elementary school will open as a HSM. The purpose of this initiative is to provide increased access for students to special education services and inclusive opportunities within their neighborhood school. Data indicates that continuing our efforts to increase the number of elementary schools with the HBS model benefits students. The HBS model implemented in all MCPS middle schools allows for more flexible programming options, including coteaching. In addition, this staffing model ensures that students with disabilities have access to a continuum of services, including consultation, resource support,
11
cotaught classes, and self-contained classes in their home or consortia schools without having to be placed into more restrictive centralized services. Trends related to the identification, evaluation, and placement of students with disabilities have contributed significantly to decisions regarding the location of a variety of programs and services. The goal of OSE is to increase the percentage of students receiving special education services in their home school, or cluster. The following special education services are available in MCPS: Special education services are offered in all comprehensive schools, K–Grade 12. Starting in
FY 2020, 121 elementary schools will provide HSM services through the HBS model. A continuing goal is to provide equitable staffing in the schools implementing this approach. The HBS model is used in middle schools and provides sufficient staffing to support all students, including those who require resources and LAD services. LAD services are offered in each high school and in selected elementary schools using a staffing enrollment model.
Autism Resource Services are based in selected comprehensive middle and high school buildings. Students served by this model have a diagnosis of an ASD. These students are accessing the general education curriculum with modifications and accommodations; specifically, these students are approximately two-to-three years below grade level. Students have documented social and emotional needs that significantly interfere with their ability to participate in other educational environments despite a variety of special and individualized supports. Students are included for academic classes in the general education environment with accommodations and modifications.
Instruction to students with Autism at Darnestown Elementary LC continues to be provided in alignment with evidence-based practices that have proved to be highly effective for students with Autism.
Special education services are cluster-based for students in need of an elementary LC, LFI, or SCB class.
Special education services are available regionally for students with disabilities through the PEP, pre-K language classes, and classes for students with ASD, the Extensions Program, cluster-based SESES for students in K–Grade 12, Gifted and Talented/Learning Disabled Services, and the Longview and Stephen Knolls schools.
Countywide special education services models are available for students in the following areas: D/HOH Program, pre-K Vision Services, Physical Disabilities classes, the Augmentative and Alternative Communication classes, the Carl Sandburg Learning Center, the John L. Gildner Regional Institute for Children and Adolescents, and the Rock Terrace School.
At Magruder High School, a specially designed SESES cluster model continues to address the instructional and mental health needs of students with emotional disabilities. In FY 2019, all SESES services for elementary and middle schools were staffed based on a teacher station model. This upgrade resulted from the research and work of a project team charged with investigating the effectiveness of the current SESES model.
Extensions services, originally only provided at the middle and high school levels, expanded in FY 2016 to one elementary school. In FY 2018, the program expanded to an additional elementary site and in FY 2019, another class was added at the Rock Terrace School. This will increase the services provided for students with Autism and complex emotional and behavioral needs.
12
Special education classes and program locations are identified in the MCPS Superintendent’s Recommended FY 2020 Capital Budget and The Amendments to the FY 2019–2024 Capital Improvement Program published annually in October. However, as enrollment projections and program needs are refined during the year, the location of some classes and programs may change. Providing pre-K special education services in the LRE is challenging due to the limited number of general education pre-K programs and services available in MCPS. The Division of Prekindergarten, Special Programs, and Related Services (DPSPRS) and DTECPS continue to collaborate to provide services for students with disabilities in regular early childhood settings, and to colocate general and special education pre-K classes. The Division of Long-range Planning and OSSI also are involved in this process, as it has an impact on elementary facilities and requires careful coordination of long-range facilities and program planning. General and special educators use coteaching and collaborative planning strategies to provide instruction to pre-K students with and without disabilities. The collaborative teaching model is located in some MCPS elementary schools, and more work is being done to seek additional inclusive opportunities for pre-K students. The focus is on developing new models and expanding existing models of pre-K special education services while growing community partnerships to capitalize on inclusive opportunities. In FY 2019, MCPS opened the MacDonald Knolls Early Childhood Center, introducing a pre-K version of HSM which provides special education pre-K services to students with disabilities in full-day general education classes. A pre-K version of HSM also was introduced at one elementary school. An early childhood special education teacher will be the primary provider for services, coteaching in the general education classroom and providing services outside of the regular early childhood setting only as deemed necessary by an IEP team. General educators and paraeducators also may provide specialized instruction. In addition, to serve increased numbers of pre-K students with disabilities in classes with nondisabled peers, 4-year-old students without disabilities who do not meet income eligibility for Head Start or Pre-K programs are invited to attend special education classes in elementary schools and learn prekindergarten curriculum alongside students with IEPs. Additionally, 3-year-old nondisabled, income-eligible students unable to secure a space in limited 3-year-old Head Start classes are invited to attend special education classes as nondisabled peers. Increasing access to high quality, rigorous instruction in the general education curriculum with nondisabled peers leads to enhanced early childhood outcomes.
Ongoing Review and Adjustments to Staffing The process of allocating staff members for the following school year begins with reviews of student enrollment as reported in the MOIEP data system from September through December of the preceding year. These reviews identify any unanticipated special education enrollment trends in schools that may require adjustments to current or future staffing. The January enrollment report is used to generate lists of pre-K, Grade 5, and Grade 8 students who will articulate to elementary, middle, and high schools the following year. This process enables central office special education staff members to identify the school the student will most likely attend and add the student to that school’s projected enrollment. All of this information is used to develop initial staffing allocations for individual schools beginning in mid-January. Based on historical trends, the current state of staffing, and student articulation information, preliminary staffing allocations are made in conjunction with the OSSI area associate superintendents in early spring. Reports from MOIEP are used to confirm services recommended for the coming year. Central office special education staff members review the MOIEP data system, visit schools, and consult
13
with service providers, program staff members, and OSSI associate superintendents and directors to ensure that the information is accurate before any adjustments to preliminary staffing allocations are made. When a school makes a request for additional staffing, the central office special education staff members consult with school staff members and OSSI directors of learning, achievement, and administration (DLAAs) to ensure that current staff members are being utilized effectively to address students’ services on IEPs. As appropriate, requests for additional staffing are sent to central services special education leadership. When necessary, recommendations for staffing changes may be submitted and are reviewed by the DLAAs of OSSI and DSES/DBFIS with the OSE associate superintendent. Every effort is made to allocate staffing to meet anticipated needs for the upcoming school year. Invariably, some programs may be overenrolled and others may be under enrolled when the school year begins. In addition, staffing issues arise throughout the year due to many factors, including student mobility, changing needs, student change of program placement, and individual class makeup. Another factor that could affect staffing is the result of a due-process decision that requires additional support. There were no permanent building staffing changes resulting from due-process hearing decisions in FY 2018. If concerns arise, staff members or parents/guardians may make requests for additional staffing or for a staffing review. Principals submit requests for additional staffing through the defined process. The central office staff member assigned to the program or cluster completes a staffing request form in collaboration with the school administrator. In FY 2018, 55 schools requested additional permanent staffing. The special education staffing review team, composed of the DLAAs of OSSI and DSES/DBFIS directors, central office special education staff members, and the associate superintendent of OSE, reviews all requests to determine the appropriate recommendations. The Office of Human Resources and Development uses vacancy reports to monitor staffing needs and continuously works to hire qualified staff members. Despite efforts to ensure that all positions are filled, vacancies do occur due to an emergency, medical leave, child-care leave, or a lack of available qualified personnel. In most cases, staff members have enough advanced time to plan for coverage using substitute personnel, temporary part-time staff members, contract providers, or redistribution of existing staff members. Parents/guardians are notified by letter if such a vacancy causes a temporary lapse in the delivery of special education services. If missed services cannot be made up, an IEP team considers whether compensatory services are required for individual students. Maintenance of Effort Each year, to receive IDEA funding, MCPS must submit forms to demonstrate Maintenance of Effort (MOE) eligibility. MOE eligibility is achieved when budgeted expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year (column E) equal or exceed the actual expenditures of the preceding fiscal year for which actual expenditures are available (column C). The MOE compliance is achieved when the actual total expenditures for the grant year (column C) equal or exceed the actual expenditures of the preceding year (column B).
14
The following table shows the MOE for special education from FY 2017 to FY 2020, including transportation and fixed charges.
*Local excludes expenditures for Infants and Toddlers
A B C D E Funding Source
FY 2017 Actual
FY 2018 Actual
FY 2019 Approved
Budget
FY 2020 Requested
Budget
State
$54,843,667
$56,249,716
$58,955,879
$59,392,621
*Local
$216,675,771
$225,745,101
$238,042,952
$244,010,366
Transportation
$66,577,593
$69,238,740
$71,903,150
$72,134,767Fixed Charges/
Benefits
$71,800,824
$82,088,155
$85,918,048
$81,198,678
TOTAL $409,897,855
$433,321,712
$454,820,029 $456,736,432
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
The
num
ber
and
type
of
staf
f m
embe
rs i
ncor
pora
ted
into
the
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Publ
ic S
choo
ls (
MC
PS)
spec
ial
educ
atio
n bu
dget
mee
ts t
he d
iver
se n
eeds
of
stud
ents
w
ith d
isab
ilitie
s.
The
allo
catio
n of
spe
cial
edu
catio
n st
affi
ng b
egin
s w
ith a
pro
ject
ion
of t
he n
umbe
r of
stu
dent
s an
d se
rvic
es f
or t
he c
omin
g fi
scal
yea
r.
Eac
h ye
ar, s
taff
m
embe
rs f
rom
the
Dep
artm
ent
of F
acil
itie
s M
anag
emen
t, th
e D
epar
tmen
t of
Spe
cial
Edu
catio
n S
ervi
ces,
and
the
Div
isio
n of
Bus
ines
s, F
isca
l an
d In
form
atio
n S
yste
ms
prep
are
an e
stim
ate
of th
e nu
mbe
r of
stu
dent
s ne
edin
g se
rvic
es.
The
enr
ollm
ent p
roje
ctio
ns s
erve
as
a ba
se to
det
erm
ine
the
num
ber
and
type
of
staf
f m
embe
rs r
equi
red
to
prov
ide
adeq
uate
sta
ffin
g.
The
loc
atio
n an
d di
stri
butio
n of
the
var
ious
spe
cial
edu
catio
n se
rvic
es t
hrou
ghou
t th
e co
unty
aff
ect
the
num
ber
and
type
of
staf
f m
embe
rs n
eede
d to
pro
vide
a F
ree
App
ropr
iate
Pub
lic E
duca
tion.
Som
etim
es it
is n
eces
sary
to o
pen
a ne
w s
peci
al e
duca
tion
cla
ssro
om, o
r si
te, i
n a
part
icul
ar lo
catio
n to
lim
it th
e ti
me
stud
ents
spe
nd b
eing
tr
ansp
orte
d, th
ereb
y al
low
ing
them
to a
ttend
sch
ool i
n th
eir
hom
e cl
uste
r. C
onse
quen
tly, t
he lo
catio
n of
spe
cial
edu
catio
n cl
assr
oom
s an
d se
rvic
es a
nd m
odel
s m
ay r
equi
re
addi
tiona
l sta
ffin
g.
Enr
ollm
ent;
clas
s si
ze g
uide
lines
; dis
trib
utio
n of
cla
sses
; nat
ure
of t
he d
isab
ility
; sp
ecif
ic d
isab
ility
ser
vice
mod
els;
tim
e re
quir
emen
ts f
or s
taff
mem
bers
to
fulf
ill i
ndir
ect
serv
ice
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
such
as
plan
ning
, ca
se m
anag
emen
t, pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in m
eetin
gs,
com
plet
ing
asse
ssm
ents
; an
d le
gal
cons
ider
atio
ns a
re r
evie
wed
and
bal
ance
d to
de
term
ine
the
num
ber
and
type
of
staf
f m
embe
rs r
equi
red.
T
he F
Y 2
020
Spec
ial
Edu
catio
n St
affin
g P
lan
inco
rpor
ates
the
Spe
cial
Edu
cati
on S
taff
ing
Pla
n C
omm
itte
e’s
inpu
t re
gard
ing
spec
ial
educ
atio
n st
affi
ng i
mpr
ovem
ents
and
pri
oriti
es.
Bel
ow i
s in
form
atio
n ab
out
the
vari
ous
spec
ial
educ
atio
n in
stru
ctio
nal
serv
ice
mod
els
and
the
guid
elin
es u
sed
for
dete
rmin
ing
the
num
ber
and
type
of
spec
ific
sta
ffin
g re
quir
ed.
*
Tea
cher
=T
chr
Spe
ech
Pat
holo
gist
=S
P
O
ccup
atio
nal T
hera
pist
/Phy
sica
l The
rapi
st=
OT
/PT
Tea
chin
g S
tati
on=
TS
S
ervi
ce D
escr
ipti
on
Ser
vice
s
In
stru
ctio
nal
Mod
els
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
P
arae
du
cato
rs
Res
ourc
e Se
rvic
es
Res
ourc
e ro
om s
ervi
ces
are
avai
labl
e in
all
MC
PS
sch
ools
. S
econ
dary
res
ourc
e se
rvic
es p
rovi
de s
tude
nts
wit
h di
sabi
litie
s, g
ener
al e
duca
tion
stu
dent
s, a
nd s
tude
nts
wit
h 50
4 P
lans
wit
h th
e su
ppor
t th
ey n
eed
to b
e ac
adem
ical
ly s
ucce
ssfu
l in
the
ge
nera
l ed
ucat
ion
envi
ronm
ent.
Res
ourc
e te
ache
rs p
rovi
de a
n ar
ray
of s
ervi
ces
to
stud
ents
wit
h di
sabi
litie
s in
clud
ing
stra
tegy
-bas
ed i
nstr
ucti
on;
dire
ct i
nstr
uctio
n al
igne
d w
ith th
e M
aryl
and
Col
lege
and
Car
eer-
Rea
dy S
tand
ards
in r
eadi
ng/l
angu
age
arts
, wri
ting
, mat
hem
atic
s, a
nd o
rgan
izat
iona
l ski
lls
in p
repa
rati
on fo
r the
Par
tner
ship
fo
r A
sses
smen
t of
Rea
dine
ss f
or C
olle
ge a
nd C
aree
rs.
Mos
t el
emen
tary
and
all
mid
dle
scho
ols
are
staf
fed
wit
h an
hou
rs-b
ased
sta
ffin
g m
odel
and
incl
ude
the
reso
urce
teac
her
in th
e sp
ecia
l edu
cati
on s
taff
ing
allo
cati
on.
Ava
ilab
le in
all
scho
ols
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ools
B
ased
on
sc
hool
en
roll
men
t, sc
hool
s w
ith
Lea
rnin
g an
d A
cade
mic
D
isab
iliti
es
(LA
D)
clas
ses
proj
ecte
d to
ha
ve
an
enro
llm
ent
of f
ewer
tha
n 59
1 st
uden
ts
rece
ive
1.0
reso
urce
ro
om
teac
hers
.
Sch
ools
pr
ojec
ted
to h
ave
an e
nrol
lmen
t gr
eate
r th
an 5
91 s
tude
nts
but
few
er th
an 7
40 s
tude
nts
rece
ive
1.5
reso
urce
ro
om
teac
hers
. S
choo
ls
proj
ecte
d to
ha
ve
an
enro
llm
ent
grea
ter
than
74
0 st
uden
ts
rece
ive
2.0
reso
urce
ro
om te
ache
rs.
N/A
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
S
ervi
ce D
escr
ipti
on
Ser
vice
s
In
stru
ctio
nal
Mod
els
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
P
arae
du
cato
rs
Res
ourc
e Se
rvic
es (
cont
.)
Mid
dle
Sch
ools
S
choo
ls
are
staf
fed
usin
g a
form
ula
base
d on
th
e to
tal
num
ber
of
spec
ial
educ
atio
n cl
assr
oom
ser
vice
hou
rs.
Hig
h S
choo
ls
Sch
ools
pr
ojec
ted
to
have
an
en
roll
men
t of
few
er t
han
991
stud
ents
re
ceiv
e 1.
0 re
sour
ce
room
te
ache
r.
S
choo
ls
proj
ecte
d to
hav
e an
enr
ollm
ent
of 9
91 o
r m
ore
stud
ents
, bu
t fe
wer
th
an
1,19
0 st
uden
ts,
rece
ive
1.6
reso
urce
ro
om
teac
hers
. S
choo
ls p
roje
cted
to
have
an
en
roll
men
t of
1,
491
stud
ents
or
m
ore
rece
ive
2.0
reso
urce
roo
m te
ache
rs.
N/A
Lea
rnin
g an
d
Aca
dem
ic
Dis
abil
itie
s (L
AD
)
Ele
men
tary
LA
D c
lass
es p
rovi
de s
ervi
ces
to s
tude
nts
wit
h a
disa
bilit
y th
at i
mpa
cts
thei
r ac
adem
ic a
chie
vem
ent.
Stu
dent
s se
rved
by
this
mod
el r
ecei
ve c
onsi
dera
ble
amou
nts
of s
peci
al e
duca
tion
sup
port
in
the
gene
ral
educ
atio
n en
viro
nmen
t, bu
t re
quir
e ad
diti
onal
ser
vice
s to
dem
onst
rate
pro
gres
s to
war
d In
divi
dual
ized
Edu
cati
on
Pro
gram
(IE
P)
goal
s an
d ob
ject
ives
. S
elec
ted
elem
enta
ry s
choo
ls p
rovi
de th
is s
ervi
ce
wit
hin
each
clu
ster
. Sec
onda
ry L
AD
ser
vice
s, a
vail
able
in
all
seco
ndar
y sc
hool
s in
MC
PS
, pr
ovid
e se
rvic
es t
o st
uden
ts w
ith
a di
sabi
lity
that
im
pact
s th
eir
acad
emic
ach
ieve
men
t.
Stu
dent
s se
rved
by
this
mod
el r
ecei
ve a
con
side
rabl
e am
ount
of
spec
ial
educ
atio
n su
ppor
t, bu
t ne
ed a
ddit
iona
l se
rvic
es t
o de
mon
stra
te p
rogr
ess
tow
ard
thei
r IE
P go
als
and
obje
ctiv
es.
The
se s
ervi
ces
are
prov
ided
in
a co
ntin
uum
of
sett
ings
tha
t m
ay
incl
ude
com
pone
nts
of s
elf-
cont
aine
d cl
asse
s, c
otau
ght g
ener
al e
duca
tion
cla
sses
, and
ot
her
oppo
rtun
itie
s fo
r pa
rtic
ipat
ion
wit
h no
ndis
able
d pe
ers.
Ele
men
tary
—D
esig
nate
d si
tes
wit
hin
each
clu
ster
A
vail
able
in a
ll m
iddl
e an
d hi
gh
scho
ols
1 T
chr:
TS
1
Tch
r:T
S
0.87
5
0.87
5
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
S
ervi
ce D
escr
ipti
on
Ser
vice
s
In
stru
ctio
nal
Mod
els
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
P
arae
du
cato
rs
Lea
rnin
g fo
r In
depe
nde
nce
(LF
I)
LF
I se
rvic
es a
re d
esig
ned
for
stud
ents
wit
h co
mpl
ex l
earn
ing
and
cogn
itiv
e ne
eds,
in
clud
ing
mil
d to
m
oder
ate
inte
llec
tual
di
sabi
liti
es.
S
ervi
ces
supp
ort
the
impl
emen
tati
on o
f A
lter
nate
Lea
rnin
g O
utco
mes
(A
LO
) al
igne
d w
ith
the
curr
icul
um.
Stu
dent
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed w
ith
man
y op
port
unit
ies
for
inte
ract
ion
wit
h ge
nera
l edu
cati
on
peer
s, i
nclu
ding
inc
lusi
on i
n ge
nera
l ed
ucat
ion
clas
ses
as a
ppro
pria
te, p
eer
tuto
ring
, an
d ex
trac
urri
cula
r ac
tivi
ties.
T
hey
lear
n to
app
ly a
cade
mic
con
cept
s in
the
con
text
of
the
gen
eral
sch
ool
envi
ronm
ent
and
in c
omm
unit
y se
ttin
gs.
Com
mun
ity-
base
d in
stru
ctio
n an
d vo
catio
nal
trai
ning
are
em
phas
ized
at
the
seco
ndar
y le
vel
so t
hat
stud
ents
ar
e pr
epar
ed
for
the
tran
siti
on
to
post
-sec
onda
ry
oppo
rtun
itie
s up
on
grad
uati
ng w
ith
a ce
rtif
icat
e fr
om M
CP
S.
Des
igna
ted
elem
enta
ry, m
iddl
e,
and
high
sch
ools
in
clus
ters
1 T
chr:
TS
0.87
5
Gif
ted
an
d
Tal
ente
d
Lea
rnin
g D
isab
led
Se
rvic
es
(GT
/LD
)
Tw
ice-
exce
ptio
nal s
tude
nts
rece
ivin
g G
T/L
D s
ervi
ces
dem
onst
rate
sup
erio
r cog
niti
ve
abil
ity in
at l
east
one
are
a an
d ty
pica
lly h
ave
prod
ucti
on p
robl
ems,
par
ticu
larl
y in
the
area
of
wri
tten
expr
essi
on.
GT
/LD
ser
vice
s pr
ovid
e st
uden
ts w
ith
spec
iali
zed
inst
ruct
ion,
ada
ptat
ions
, an
d ac
com
mod
atio
ns t
hat
faci
litat
e ap
prop
riat
e ac
cess
to
rigo
rous
ins
truc
tion
in t
he L
east
-res
tric
tive
Env
iron
men
t (L
RE
), w
hich
may
inc
lude
pl
acem
ent
in H
onor
s or
Adv
ance
d Pl
acem
ent
clas
ses,
and
acc
ess
to t
he a
ccel
erat
ion
and
enri
chm
ent
com
pone
nts
in t
he M
CP
S i
nstr
ucti
onal
gui
deli
nes.
S
ome
stud
ents
m
ay r
ecei
ve s
ervi
ces
in s
peci
aliz
ed c
lass
room
s.
Reg
iona
l des
igna
ted
elem
enta
ry
Reg
iona
l des
igna
ted
mid
dle
and
high
sc
hool
s
1 T
chr:
TS
1
Tch
r:T
S
0.87
5
0.87
5
Ele
men
tary
S
choo
l-b
ased
L
earn
ing
Cen
ter
(LC
)
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool-
base
d L
Cs
prov
ide
com
preh
ensi
ve s
peci
al e
duca
tion
and
rel
ated
se
rvic
es f
or s
tude
nts
in G
rade
s ki
nder
gart
en (
K)–
5. T
he p
rogr
am o
ffer
s a
cont
inuu
m
of
serv
ices
in
se
lf-c
onta
ined
cl
asse
s,
wit
h op
port
unit
ies
to
be
incl
uded
w
ith
nond
isab
led
peer
s in
the
gen
eral
edu
cati
on e
nvir
onm
ent.
The
se s
ervi
ces
addr
ess
the
goal
s an
d ob
ject
ives
in
the
stud
ent’
s IE
P w
hile
ens
urin
g ac
cess
to
the
gene
ral
curr
icul
um t
hrou
gh s
trat
egie
s su
ch a
s as
sist
ive
tech
nolo
gy,
redu
ced
clas
s si
ze,
and
diff
eren
tiat
ed in
stru
ctio
n.
Des
igna
ted
elem
enta
ry
scho
ols
wit
hin
each
clu
ster
1 T
chr:
TS
0.87
5
Hom
e S
choo
l M
odel
(H
SM
) E
lem
enta
ry H
SM s
uppo
rts
stud
ents
in
Gra
des
K–5
wit
h a
disa
bili
ty t
hat
impa
cts
acad
emic
ach
ieve
men
t in
one
or
mor
e co
nten
t ar
eas,
org
aniz
atio
n, a
nd/o
r be
havi
or.
Stu
dent
s se
rved
by
this
mod
el a
re a
ssig
ned
to a
ge-a
ppro
pria
te h
eter
ogen
eous
cla
sses
in
the
ir n
eigh
borh
ood
scho
ols.
S
tude
nt a
cces
s to
the
gen
eral
edu
cati
on c
urri
culu
m
duri
ng th
e co
urse
of
the
day
is b
ased
on
indi
vidu
al s
tude
nt n
eeds
and
enc
ompa
sses
a
vari
ety
of i
nstr
ucti
onal
mod
els
that
may
inc
lude
ins
truc
tion
in
a ge
nera
l ed
ucat
ion
envi
ronm
ent a
nd/o
r a
self
-con
tain
ed s
etti
ng.
Des
igna
ted
elem
enta
ry s
choo
ls
Hou
rs-b
ased
Sta
ffin
g
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
Ser
vice
Des
crip
tion
S
ervi
ces
I
nst
ruct
ion
al M
odel
s P
rofe
ssio
nal
Sta
ff
Par
aed
uca
tors
C
arl
San
db
urg
L
earn
ing
Cen
ter
Car
l S
andb
urg
LC
is
a G
rade
s K
–5 s
peci
al e
duca
tion
sch
ool
that
ser
ves
stud
ents
wit
h m
ulti
ple
disa
bilit
ies,
inc
ludi
ng i
ntel
lect
ual
disa
bili
ties,
Aut
ism
Spe
ctru
m D
isor
ders
, la
ngua
ge d
isab
iliti
es,
emot
iona
l, an
d ot
her
lear
ning
dis
abil
ities
. S
ervi
ces
are
desi
gned
fo
r el
emen
tary
stu
dent
s w
ho n
eed
a hi
ghly
-str
uctu
red
sett
ing,
sm
all
stud
ent-
to-t
each
er
rati
o, a
nd a
cces
s to
the
MC
PS
gen
eral
edu
cati
on c
urri
culu
m o
r A
LO
s al
igne
d w
ith t
he
curr
icul
um.
Mod
ific
atio
n of
cur
ricu
lum
mat
eria
ls a
nd in
stru
ctio
nal s
trat
egie
s, b
ased
on
stud
ent n
eeds
, is
the
basi
s of
all
inst
ruct
ion.
Em
phas
is is
pla
ced
on th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
lang
uage
, ac
adem
ic,
and
soci
al s
kill
s pr
ovid
ed t
hrou
gh a
tra
ns-d
isci
plin
ary
mod
el o
f se
rvic
e de
live
ry i
n w
hich
all
staf
f m
embe
rs i
mpl
emen
t th
e re
com
men
dati
ons
of r
elat
ed
serv
ice
prov
ider
s.
Spe
cial
em
phas
is i
s pl
aced
on
mee
ting
the
sen
sory
and
mot
or n
eeds
of
stu
dent
s in
thei
r cla
ssro
om s
etti
ng.
To
addr
ess
beha
vior
al g
oals
, ser
vice
s m
ay in
clud
e a
beha
vior
al m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
, psy
chol
ogic
al c
onsu
ltat
ion,
and
cri
sis
inte
rven
tion
.
Sep
arat
e sp
ecia
l ed
ucat
ion
day
scho
ol
1 T
chr:
TS
1.75
0
Sch
ool
Com
mu
nit
y-b
ased
(S
CB
) P
rogr
am
SC
B p
rogr
am s
ervi
ces
are
desi
gned
for
stu
dent
s w
ith
seve
re o
r pr
ofou
nd i
ntel
lect
ual
disa
bilit
ies
and/
or m
ulti
ple
disa
bili
ties.
S
tude
nts
typi
cally
hav
e si
gnif
ican
t ne
eds
in t
he
area
s of
co
mm
unic
atio
n,
pers
onal
m
anag
emen
t, be
havi
oral
m
anag
emen
t, an
d so
cial
izat
ion.
T
he p
rogr
am e
mph
asiz
es i
ndiv
idua
lize
d in
stru
ctio
n, u
tiliz
ing
AL
Os
alig
ned
wit
h th
e cu
rric
ulum
in c
ompr
ehen
sive
sch
ools
and
rel
ated
com
mun
ity
and
wor
k en
viro
nmen
ts.
The
SC
B m
odel
inc
lude
s th
e fo
llow
ing
com
pone
nts:
ag
e-ap
prop
riat
e cl
asse
s,
hete
roge
neou
s gr
oupi
ngs,
pe
er
inte
ract
ions
, in
divi
dual
ized
in
stru
ctio
n,
com
mun
ity in
stru
ctio
n, a
nd tr
ansi
tion
. T
he p
rogr
am is
ava
ilabl
e in
all
clus
ters
. T
he g
oal
of t
he p
rogr
am i
s to
pre
pare
stu
dent
s to
tra
nsit
ion
to p
ost-
seco
ndar
y op
port
unit
ies
upon
gr
adua
tion
wit
h a
cert
ific
ate
from
the
scho
ol s
yste
m.
Des
igna
ted
elem
enta
ry,
mid
dle,
and
hig
h sc
hool
s in
or
clus
ters
1 T
chr:
TS
1.50
0
Roc
k T
erra
ce
Sch
ool
Roc
k T
erra
ce S
choo
l is
com
pris
ed o
f a m
iddl
e sc
hool
, a h
igh
scho
ol, a
nd a
n up
per s
choo
l w
hich
im
plem
ents
sch
ool-
to-w
ork
prog
ram
s.
The
ins
truc
tion
al f
ocus
of
the
mid
dle
scho
ol is
the
impl
emen
tati
on o
f AL
Os
alig
ned
wit
h th
e cu
rric
ulum
to p
repa
re th
e st
uden
ts
for t
rans
itio
n to
the
high
sch
ool p
rogr
am.
The
hig
h sc
hool
pro
gram
em
phas
izes
Alt
erna
te
AL
Os
alig
ned
with
the
curr
icul
um a
nd c
omm
unity
-bas
ed in
stru
ctio
n ac
tivi
ties
that
ena
ble
stud
ents
to
dem
onst
rate
ski
lls t
hat
lead
to
full
part
icip
atio
n in
the
sch
ool-
to-w
ork
plan
an
d vo
cati
onal
/com
mun
ity
expe
rien
ces.
A
uthe
ntic
job
s he
lp i
n re
info
rcin
g cl
assr
oom
le
arni
ng.
The
upp
er s
choo
l pre
pare
s st
uden
ts f
or p
ost-
seco
ndar
y ex
peri
ence
s an
d ca
reer
an
d co
mm
unity
rea
dine
ss.
Sep
arat
e sp
ecia
l ed
ucat
ion
day
scho
ol
1 T
chr:
TS
1.00
0
Ste
ph
en
Kn
olls
Sch
ool
Ste
phen
Kno
lls
Sch
ool p
rovi
des
serv
ices
for
stu
dent
s ag
es 5
–21
wit
h se
vere
to p
rofo
und
inte
llec
tual
dis
abil
ities
and
mul
tiple
dis
abil
itie
s.
AL
Os
alig
ned
wit
h th
e cu
rric
ulum
are
ut
iliz
ed to
pro
vide
stu
dent
s w
ith s
kill
s in
the
area
s of
com
mun
icat
ion,
mob
ility
, sel
f-he
lp,
mod
ifie
d ac
adem
ics,
and
tran
siti
on s
ervi
ces.
Sep
arat
e sp
ecia
l ed
ucat
ion
day
scho
ol
1 T
chr:
TS
1.75
0
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
S
ervi
ce D
escr
ipti
on
Ser
vice
s
In
stru
ctio
nal
Mod
els
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
Par
aed
uca
tors
L
ongv
iew
S
choo
l L
ongv
iew
Sch
ool p
rovi
des
serv
ices
to s
tude
nts
ages
5–2
1 w
ho h
ave
seve
re to
pro
foun
d in
tell
ectu
al d
isab
iliti
es a
nd m
ultip
le d
isab
ilitie
s. A
LO
s al
igne
d w
ith th
e cu
rric
ulum
are
ut
iliz
ed t
o pr
ovid
e st
uden
ts w
ith
skil
ls i
n th
e ar
eas
of c
omm
unic
atio
n, m
obil
ity,
self
-he
lp, m
odif
ied
acad
emic
s, a
nd tr
ansi
tion
ser
vice
s.
Sep
arat
e sp
ecia
l ed
ucat
ion
day
scho
ol
colo
cate
d w
ith
Spa
rk
M. M
atsu
naga
E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
l
1 T
chr:
TS
1.75
0
Ext
ensi
ons
Pro
gram
T
he E
xten
sion
s P
rogr
am s
erve
s st
uden
ts o
f el
emen
tary
, m
iddl
e, a
nd h
igh
scho
ol a
ge
wit
h th
e m
ost
sign
ific
ant
cogn
itive
dis
abili
ties,
mul
tipl
e di
sabi
litie
s, a
nd/o
r au
tism
. T
hese
are
stu
dent
s w
ith
a hi
stor
y of
rec
eivi
ng s
yste
mat
ic b
ehav
iora
l su
ppor
ts a
nd
serv
ices
to re
duce
sel
f-in
juri
ous
and/
or d
isru
ptiv
e be
havi
ors.
The
goa
l of t
he E
xten
sion
s P
rogr
am i
s to
pro
vide
int
ensi
ve e
duca
tion
al p
rogr
amm
ing
to e
nabl
e th
ese
stud
ents
to
acqu
ire
appr
opri
ate
soci
al
and
com
mun
icat
ive
skill
s to
fa
cilit
ate
thei
r ac
cess
to
A
lter
nate
A
LO
s al
igne
d w
ith
the
curr
icul
um,
and
post
-sec
onda
ry
oppo
rtun
ities
in
clud
ing
read
ines
s fo
r ca
reer
and
com
mun
ity.
Des
igna
ted
elem
enta
ry, m
iddl
e an
d hi
gh s
choo
ls
1 T
chr:
TS
2.62
5
Soc
ial a
nd
E
mot
ion
al
Spec
ial
Ed
uca
tion
Se
rvic
es
(SE
SE
S)
SE
SE
S a
re p
rovi
ded
to s
tude
nts
who
dem
onst
rate
sig
nifi
cant
soc
ial-
emot
iona
l lea
rnin
g an
d/or
beh
avio
ral
diff
icul
ties
tha
t ad
vers
ely
impa
cts
thei
r su
cces
s in
sch
ool.
The
se
stud
ents
acc
ess
the
MC
PS
gen
eral
edu
cati
on c
urri
culu
m, b
ut e
mot
iona
l and
beh
avio
ral
chal
leng
es o
ften
inte
rfer
e w
ith th
eir
abil
ity to
ach
ieve
aca
dem
ic s
ucce
ss a
nd p
artic
ipat
e ap
prop
riat
ely
in a
n ed
ucat
iona
l env
iron
men
t. T
hese
stu
dent
s ar
e se
rved
in a
con
tinu
um
of
sett
ings
in
clud
ing
gene
ral
educ
atio
n en
viro
nmen
ts
wit
h op
port
unit
ies
for
part
icip
atio
n w
ith
nond
isab
led
peer
s or
sep
arat
e cl
asse
s, a
s ap
prop
riat
e.
Des
igna
ted
elem
enta
ry, m
iddl
e,
and
high
sch
ools
in
each
are
a or
co
unty
wid
e
1 T
chr:
TS
1.50
0
Bri
dge
Ser
vice
s B
ridg
e S
ervi
ces
serv
e st
uden
ts w
ho d
emon
stra
te s
igni
fica
nt s
ocia
l em
otio
nal
lear
ning
, an
d/or
beh
avio
ral
chal
leng
es t
hat
mak
e it
dif
ficu
lt to
suc
ceed
in
a la
rge
scho
ol
envi
ronm
ent.
Man
y st
uden
ts r
equi
re s
ocia
l an
d em
otio
nal
supp
orts
to
acce
ss t
heir
ac
adem
ic
prog
ram
.
Com
preh
ensi
ve
beha
vior
al
man
agem
ent
stra
tegi
es
incl
ude
proa
ctiv
e te
achi
ng a
nd r
ehea
rsal
of
soci
al s
kills
, as
wel
l as
the
use
of
stru
ctur
ed a
nd
cons
iste
nt r
einf
orce
men
t sy
stem
s.
Ser
vice
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed i
n a
cont
inuu
m o
f se
ttin
gs,
whi
ch m
ay i
nclu
de s
epar
ate
clas
ses
wit
h op
port
unit
ies
for
part
icip
atio
n in
gen
eral
ed
ucat
ion
envi
ronm
ents
wit
h no
ndis
able
d pe
ers,
as
appr
opri
ate.
Des
igna
ted
mid
dle
and
high
sch
ools
se
rve
stud
ents
co
unty
wid
e
1 T
chr:
TS
1.
250
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
S
ervi
ce D
escr
ipti
on
Ser
vice
s
In
stru
ctio
nal
Mod
els
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
Par
aed
uca
tors
Jo
hn
L. G
ild
ner
R
egio
nal
In
stit
ute
for
C
hil
dre
n a
nd
A
dole
scen
ts
(RIC
A)
–R
ock
vill
e
RIC
A,
in c
olla
bora
tion
wit
h th
e M
aryl
and
Sta
te D
epar
tmen
t of
Hea
lth,
pro
vide
s ap
prop
riat
e ed
ucat
iona
l and
trea
tmen
t ser
vice
s to
all
stud
ents
and
thei
r fa
mil
ies
thro
ugh
high
ly s
truc
ture
d, in
tens
ive
spec
ial e
duca
tion
ser
vice
s w
ith
ther
apy
inte
grat
ed in
a d
ay
and
resi
dent
ial
trea
tmen
t fa
cili
ty.
An
inte
rdis
cipl
inar
y tr
eatm
ent
team
, co
nsis
ting
of
scho
ol,
clin
ical
, re
side
ntia
l, an
d re
late
d se
rvic
e pr
ovid
ers
deve
lops
the
stu
dent
’s t
otal
ed
ucat
iona
l pl
an
and
mon
itor
s pr
ogre
ss.
C
onsu
ltin
g ps
ychi
atri
sts,
a
full
-tim
e pe
diat
rici
an, a
nd a
sch
ool c
omm
unity
hea
lth n
urse
als
o ar
e on
sta
ff.
RIC
A o
ffer
s fu
lly-a
ccre
dite
d sp
ecia
l ed
ucat
ion
serv
ices
whi
ch e
mph
asiz
e ri
goro
us
acad
emic
and
voc
atio
nal/
occu
pati
onal
opp
ortu
nitie
s; d
ay a
nd r
esid
entia
l tre
atm
ent;
and
in
divi
dual
, gr
oup,
and
fam
ily
ther
apy.
T
he R
ICA
pro
gram
pro
mot
es a
cqui
siti
on o
f gr
ade-
and
age
-app
ropr
iate
soc
ial a
nd e
mot
iona
l ski
lls
and
allo
ws
stud
ents
to a
cces
s th
e ge
nera
l edu
cati
on c
urri
culu
m.
Sep
arat
e sp
ecia
l ed
ucat
ion
day
scho
ol
1 T
chr:
TS
1.25
0
Serv
ices
for
S
tud
ents
wit
h
Au
tism
Sp
ectr
um
Dis
orde
rs
The
C
ompr
ehen
sive
A
utis
m
Pre
scho
ol
Pro
gram
pr
ovid
es
high
ly
inte
nsiv
e an
d in
divi
dual
ized
ser
vice
s fo
r stu
dent
s ag
es 3
–5.
Stud
ents
rece
ive
inst
ruct
ion
in th
e ge
nera
l ed
ucat
ion
curr
icul
um t
o pr
epar
e th
em f
or K
. E
vide
nce-
base
d pr
actic
es a
re u
tiliz
ed t
o in
crea
se a
cade
mic
, lan
guag
e, s
ocia
l, an
d ad
apti
ve s
kill
s to
pro
vide
acc
ess
to a
var
iety
of
sch
ool-
age
serv
ices
and
to m
axim
ize
inde
pend
ence
in a
ll d
omai
ns.
Aut
ism
ser
vice
s fo
r st
uden
ts,
elem
enta
ry t
hrou
gh a
ge 2
1, p
rovi
de a
cces
s to
Alt
erna
te
AL
Os
alig
ned
wit
h th
e cu
rric
ulum
. T
o im
prov
e le
arni
ng a
nd c
omm
unic
atio
n, s
tude
nts
rece
ive
App
lied
Beh
avio
r A
naly
sis
inte
nsiv
e in
stru
ctio
n in
a h
ighl
y-st
ruct
ured
set
ting
, w
hich
pro
vide
s op
port
unit
ies
for p
arti
cipa
tion
wit
h no
ndis
able
d pe
ers.
At t
he s
econ
dary
le
vel,
stud
ents
als
o re
ceiv
e vo
catio
nal a
nd c
omm
unit
y su
ppor
t.
Sec
onda
ry A
utis
m R
esou
rce
Ser
vice
s, l
ocat
ed i
n th
ree
mid
dle
and
thre
e hi
gh s
choo
ls,
are
desi
gned
for
stu
dent
s w
ith
Aut
ism
Spe
ctru
m D
isor
ders
(A
SD
) w
ho a
re d
iplo
ma-
boun
d an
d ha
ve d
iffi
cult
y m
aste
ring
gra
de-l
evel
cur
ricu
lum
. T
hese
stu
dent
s re
quir
e a
mod
ifie
d pa
ce
and
indi
vidu
al
acco
mm
odat
ions
re
pres
enta
tive
of
th
e ne
eds
and
char
acte
rist
ics
of s
tude
nts
with
AS
D.
Stu
dent
s re
ceiv
e in
stru
ctio
n in
the
gen
eral
ed
ucat
ion
curr
icul
um w
ith
the
supp
orts
ind
icat
ed o
n th
eir
IEP
s.
Acc
ess
to t
he g
ener
al
educ
atio
n cu
rric
ulum
wit
h en
rich
men
t is
rein
forc
ed.
Pre
kind
erga
rten
(pr
e-K
)—D
esig
nate
d el
emen
tary
sch
ools
se
rve
pre-
K s
tude
nts
thro
ugho
ut th
e co
unty
S
choo
l-ag
ed—
Des
igna
ted
elem
enta
ry, m
iddl
e,
and
high
sch
ools
lo
cate
d re
gion
ally
th
roug
hout
the
coun
ty
Sec
onda
ry S
choo
l A
utis
m R
esou
rce
Serv
ices
—th
ree
mid
dle
and
thre
e hi
gh s
choo
ls lo
cate
d re
gion
ally
1 T
chr:
TS
1
Tch
r:T
S
1 T
chr:
TS
3.44
0
1.75
0
1.
750
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
S
ervi
ce D
escr
ipti
on
Ser
vice
s
In
stru
ctio
nal
Mod
els
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
Par
aed
uca
tors
T
ran
siti
on
Serv
ices
Tra
nsit
ion
serv
ices
are
pro
vide
d to
stu
dent
s re
ceiv
ing
spec
ial
educ
atio
n, a
ges
14 o
r ol
der,
to fa
cili
tate
a s
moo
th tr
ansi
tion
from
sch
ool t
o co
lleg
e, c
aree
r, a
nd/o
r com
mun
ity.
T
hese
act
ivit
ies
incl
ude,
but
are
not
lim
ited
to,
pos
tsec
onda
ry e
duca
tion
, w
orkf
orce
ex
peri
ence
s, c
onti
nuin
g an
d ad
ult e
duca
tion
, adu
lt s
ervi
ces,
inde
pend
ent l
ivin
g, a
nd/o
r co
mm
unity
pa
rtic
ipat
ion.
S
ervi
ces
are
base
d on
th
e in
divi
dual
st
uden
t’s
need
s,
cons
ider
ing
the
stud
ent’
s st
reng
ths,
pre
fere
nces
, and
int
eres
ts.
Tra
nsit
ion
serv
ices
are
de
live
red
thro
ugh
dire
ct a
nd/o
r in
dire
ct s
uppo
rt c
oord
inat
ed b
y a
tran
siti
on s
uppo
rt
teac
her.
Serv
ices
ava
ilab
le in
se
cond
ary
scho
ols
thro
ugho
ut th
e co
unty
1.0
Tch
r
Serv
ices
for
D
eaf/
Har
d o
f H
eari
ng
(D/H
OH
)
D/H
OH
ser
vice
s pr
ovid
e co
mpr
ehen
sive
edu
cati
onal
sup
port
s to
stu
dent
s w
ho a
re d
eaf
or h
ave
a si
gnif
ican
t hea
ring
loss
. T
hese
ser
vice
s, p
rovi
ded
by it
iner
ant t
each
ers,
ena
ble
stud
ents
to
deve
lop
effe
ctiv
e la
ngua
ge a
nd c
omm
unic
atio
n sk
ills
nece
ssar
y to
acc
ess
the
gene
ral
educ
atio
n cu
rric
ulum
. S
tude
nts
with
mor
e si
gnif
ican
t ne
eds
may
rec
eive
se
rvic
es
in
spec
ial
cent
rally
-loc
ated
cl
asse
s.
Se
rvic
es
are
prov
ided
in
th
ree
com
mun
icat
ion
opti
ons—
oral
/aur
al, t
otal
com
mun
icat
ion,
and
cue
d sp
eech
. A
ssis
tive
te
chno
logy
and
con
sult
atio
n al
so a
re p
rovi
ded
to s
tude
nts
and
scho
ol s
taff
mem
bers
.
Res
ourc
e se
rvic
es
avai
labl
e th
roug
hout
th
e co
unty
A
udit
ory
and
spee
ch
trai
ning
ava
ilabl
e th
roug
hout
the
coun
ty
Spe
cial
cla
sses
: on
e pr
e-K
, thr
ee
elem
enta
ry, o
ne
mid
dle,
and
one
hig
h sc
hool
ser
ve s
tude
nts
thro
ugho
ut th
e co
unty
1 T
chr:
17
1
Tch
r:17
1 T
chr:
TS
N/A
N/A
0.87
5
Phy
sica
l D
isab
ilit
ies
Pro
gram
Rel
ated
ser
vice
s of
OT
and
PT
are
pro
vide
d to
stu
dent
s w
ith
disa
bili
ties
thro
ugho
ut
MC
PS
in th
eir
hom
e or
ass
igne
d sc
hool
. T
he ty
pe a
nd f
requ
ency
of
serv
ices
are
bas
ed
on i
ndiv
idua
l ne
eds
and
incl
ude
dire
ct t
hera
py a
nd c
onsu
ltat
ion
to t
eam
mem
bers
. E
lem
enta
ry s
tude
nts
wit
h si
gnif
ican
t ph
ysic
al n
eeds
rec
eive
ser
vice
s in
one
of
two
coun
tyw
ide
loca
tion
s.
Res
ourc
e se
rvic
es
avai
labl
e th
roug
hout
th
e co
unty
S
peci
al c
lass
es:
two
elem
enta
ry s
choo
ls
One
pre
-K c
lass
36:1
1 T
chr:
TS
1
Tch
r: T
S
N/A
1.5
0.87
5
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
S
ervi
ce D
escr
ipti
on
Ser
vice
s
In
stru
ctio
nal
Mod
els
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
Par
aed
uca
tors
Se
rvic
es f
or t
he
Vis
ual
ly
Impa
ired
Vis
ion
serv
ices
ar
e pr
ovid
ed
to
stud
ents
w
ith
sign
ific
ant
visu
al
impa
irm
ents
or
bl
indn
ess.
S
ervi
ces
enab
le s
tude
nts
to d
evel
op e
ffec
tive
com
pens
ator
y sk
ills
and
pr
ovid
e th
em w
ith
acce
ss to
the
gene
ral e
duca
tion
env
iron
men
t.
A p
re-K
cla
ss p
repa
res
stud
ents
who
are
bli
nd o
r ha
ve lo
w v
isio
n fo
r en
try
into
K.
Itin
eran
t vi
sion
ser
vice
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed t
o sc
hool
-age
stu
dent
s in
the
ir a
ssig
ned
scho
ol.
Ski
lls
taug
ht i
nclu
de v
isua
l ut
iliza
tion,
vis
ion
effi
cien
cy,
read
ing,
and
wri
ting
usi
ng
Bra
ille
, an
d th
e us
e of
ass
isti
ve t
echn
olog
y.
Stu
dent
s m
ay r
ecei
ve o
rien
tati
on a
nd
mob
ility
inst
ruct
ion
to h
elp
them
nav
igat
e th
eir
envi
ronm
ent.
Stu
dent
s ov
er th
e ag
e of
14
rec
eive
spe
cial
ized
tran
siti
on s
uppo
rt, a
s ap
prop
riat
e.
Res
ourc
e se
rvic
es
avai
labl
e th
roug
hout
th
e co
unty
Sp
ecia
l cla
ss:
one
elem
enta
ry s
choo
l se
rves
pre
scho
oler
s th
roug
hout
the
coun
ty
Ori
enta
tion
and
Mob
ility
20
:1
Res
ourc
e 20
:1
1
Tch
r:T
S
0.
875
Spee
ch a
nd
Lan
guag
e Se
rvic
es
Spe
ech
and
lang
uage
ser
vice
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed t
o di
agno
se c
omm
unic
atio
n di
sord
ers
and
impr
ove
spok
en
lang
uage
sk
ills
; fa
cili
tate
co
mpe
nsat
ory
skil
ls;
and
enha
nce
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f la
ngua
ge, v
ocab
ular
y, a
nd e
xpre
ssiv
e co
mm
unic
atio
n sk
ills
to s
uppo
rt
stud
ent a
cces
s to
the
gene
ral e
duca
tion
cur
ricu
lum
. T
he ty
pe a
nd f
requ
ency
of
serv
ices
pr
ovid
ed a
re d
eter
min
ed b
y in
divi
dual
stu
dent
nee
ds.
For
stu
dent
s w
ith
less
int
ensi
ve
need
s, e
duca
tion
al s
trat
egie
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed t
o th
e st
uden
t’s
gene
ral
educ
atio
n te
ache
rs
and
pare
nts/
guar
dian
s fo
r im
plem
enta
tion
w
ithi
n th
e cl
assr
oom
an
d ho
me
envi
ronm
ents
. S
tude
nts
may
rec
eive
ser
vice
s in
the
ir c
lass
room
pro
gram
, in
sm
all
grou
ps, o
r ind
ivid
uall
y. P
re-K
stu
dent
s re
quir
ing
exte
nsiv
e se
rvic
es a
tten
d a
spec
iali
zed
clas
s, tw
o or
fiv
e da
ys p
er w
eek.
Res
ourc
e se
rvic
es
avai
labl
e th
roug
hout
th
e co
unty
’s
Pre
scho
ol
Sch
ool-
age
Priv
ate/
Rel
igio
us
Sch
ools
S
peci
al c
lass
es:
desi
gnat
ed
elem
enta
ry s
choo
ls
serv
e pr
e-K
stu
dent
s th
roug
hout
the
coun
ty, t
wo
or f
ive
days
per
wee
k
40:1
.0
57.6
:1.0
57
.6:1
.0
1
Tch
r:T
S
N/A
N
/A
N/A
0.87
5
Au
gmen
tati
ve
and
Alt
erna
tive
C
omm
un
icat
ion
(A
AC
) C
lass
es
AA
C c
lass
room
s pr
ovid
e in
tens
ive
supp
ort
for
stud
ents
who
are
not
ver
bal
or h
ave
lim
ited
spe
ech
wit
h se
vere
inte
llig
ibil
ity is
sues
. S
tude
nts
lear
n to
use
and
exp
and
thei
r kn
owle
dge
of
augm
enta
tive
co
mm
unic
atio
n de
vice
s an
d ot
her
form
s of
ai
ded
com
mun
icat
ion
to a
cces
s th
e ge
nera
l edu
cati
on c
urri
culu
m.
Em
phas
is is
on
the
use
of
alte
rnat
ive
com
mun
icat
ion
syst
ems
to e
nhan
ce l
angu
age
deve
lopm
ent,
voca
bula
ry
deve
lopm
ent,
and
expr
essi
ve c
omm
unic
atio
n sk
ills
. S
ervi
ces
and
supp
orts
are
pro
vide
d pr
imar
ily w
ithin
the
gene
ral e
duca
tion
env
iron
men
t.
Spe
cial
cla
sses
lo
cate
d in
two
elem
enta
ry s
choo
ls
serv
e st
uden
ts
thro
ugho
ut th
e co
unty
1 T
chr:
TS
1.75
0
FY
202
0 M
CP
S S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on a
nd
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s B
ud
get
Gu
idel
ines
Att
achm
ent A
S
ervi
ce D
escr
ipti
on
Ser
vice
s
In
stru
ctio
nal
Mod
els
Pro
fess
ion
al S
taff
Par
aed
uca
tors
In
terd
isci
plin
ary
Arg
um
enta
tive
C
omm
un
icat
ion
T
eam
(I
nte
rAC
T)
Ass
isti
ve t
echn
olog
y se
rvic
es p
rovi
de s
uppo
rt f
or s
tude
nts
from
bir
th–2
1-ye
ars-
old.
In
terA
CT
ser
vice
s su
ppor
t st
uden
ts w
ho a
re s
ever
ely
lim
ited
in
verb
al e
xpre
ssio
n or
w
ritt
en c
omm
unic
atio
n sk
ills
, oft
en d
ue t
o ph
ysic
al d
isab
ilitie
s.
Inte
rAC
T f
ocus
es o
n th
e us
e of
aug
men
tati
ve c
omm
unic
atio
n an
d as
sist
ive
tech
nolo
gy d
evic
es t
o in
crea
se
and
expa
nd s
tude
nts’
com
mun
icat
ion
skil
ls.
Inte
rAC
T a
lso
addr
esse
s th
e pr
ovis
ion
of
adap
ted
tech
nolo
gy f
or s
tude
nts
wit
h ph
ysic
al d
isab
iliti
es to
acc
ess
curr
icul
ar m
ater
ials
. S
ervi
ces
are
prov
ided
in th
e na
tura
l env
iron
men
t for
stu
dent
s bi
rth
thro
ugh
3-ye
ars-
old,
or
in
the
elem
enta
ry,
mid
dle,
or
high
sch
ool
clas
sroo
m s
etti
ng f
or s
tude
nts
pre-
K
thro
ugh
age
21.
Serv
ices
ava
ilab
le
thro
ugho
ut th
e co
unty
SL
P–1
/68
Ser
vice
s T
chr–
1/13
5 S
ervi
ces
OT
–1/3
38 S
ervi
ces
PT–1
/680
Ser
vice
s
0.87
5/47
2 S
ervi
ces
Pre
scho
ol
Ed
uca
tion
P
rogr
am (
PE
P)
PEP
prov
ides
spe
cial
edu
catio
n se
rvic
es t
o st
uden
ts w
ith
disa
bilit
ies
ages
3–K
who
se
dela
ys i
mpa
ct t
heir
abi
lity
to l
earn
. S
ervi
ces
are
prov
ided
in
both
reg
ular
ear
ly
chil
dhoo
d se
ttin
gs (
PE
P I
tine
rant
) an
d sp
ecia
l ed
ucat
ion
clas
sroo
ms.
P
EP
PIL
OT
cl
asse
s se
rve
stud
ents
in a
two-
day
per w
eek
earl
y ch
ildh
ood
sett
ing.
PE
P C
olla
bora
tion
cl
asse
s ar
e co
teac
hing
mod
els
wit
h M
CPS
gen
eral
edu
cati
on p
reki
nder
gart
en.
PE
P
Cla
ssic
and
Int
ensi
ve N
eeds
Cla
sses
ser
ve s
tude
nts
wit
h de
velo
pmen
tal d
elay
s in
a s
elf-
cont
aine
d se
ttin
g. P
EP
Fiv
e-H
our c
lass
es s
erve
stu
dent
s w
ith m
oder
ate
to s
ever
e de
lays
an
d m
ulti
ple
disa
bilit
ies.
PE
P 2
.5-H
our:
C
lass
ic, P
ILO
T, a
nd
Col
labo
rati
on c
lass
es
(hal
f-da
y)
Inte
nsiv
e N
eeds
S
peec
h/L
angu
age
OT
and
PT
P
EP
Iti
nera
nt/
Med
ical
ly F
ragi
le
PE
P 5
-Hou
r
1.0
Tch
r/T
S
0.3
SP
1.
0 T
chr/
TS
0.3
SP
0.2
OT
8.
0Tch
r 3.
2 S
P
2.4
OT
0.
8 P
T
1.
0 T
chr
0.2
SP
0.
2 O
T
0.3
PT
0.87
5/T
S
0.75
/TS
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
In
fan
ts
and
Tod
dle
rs
Pro
gram
(M
CIT
P)
MC
ITP
pro
vide
s ea
rly
inte
rven
tion
ser
vice
s to
fam
ilie
s of
stu
dent
s w
ith
deve
lopm
enta
l de
lays
fro
m b
irth
–3-y
ears
-old
, or
unt
il t
he s
tart
of
the
scho
ol y
ear
afte
r th
e st
uden
t’s
four
th b
irth
day
unde
r the
Ext
ende
d In
divi
dual
Fam
ily
Serv
ice
Plan
opt
ion.
Ser
vice
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed i
n th
e na
tura
l en
viro
nmen
t an
d m
ay i
nclu
de s
peci
aliz
ed i
nstr
ucti
on, a
udit
ory
and
visi
on in
stru
ctio
n, P
T a
nd O
T, a
nd s
peec
h-la
ngua
ge s
ervi
ces.
Ser
vice
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed
usin
g an
adu
lt/ca
regi
ver
coac
hing
mod
el.
Hom
e-ba
sed
for
indi
vidu
al s
tude
nts
MC
ITP
teac
her
Spe
ech/
Lan
guag
e
OT
PT
V
isio
n D
/HO
H
1.0
Tch
r/68
ser
vice
s
1.0
SP
/68
serv
ices
1.0
OT
/68
serv
ices
1.
0 P
T/6
8 se
rvic
es
1.
0 T
chr/
68.0
ser
vice
s 1.
0 T
chr/
68.0
ser
vice
s
N/A
Oth
erO
ther
Oth
erO
ther
Dep
artm
ent o
f Spe
cial
Edu
catio
n Se
rvic
esSt
uden
tsA
dmin
Teac
hers
Prof
PAR
As
Supp
ort
Stud
ents
Adm
inTe
ache
rsPr
ofPA
RA
sSu
ppor
tLe
arni
ng D
isab
ilitie
s:R
esou
rce
Onl
y1,
378
-
-
1,
137
-
-
Le
arni
ng C
ente
rs, E
lem
enta
ry71
178
.5
6.
5
66.5
00
759
80.5
6.5
68
.250
Le
arni
ng a
nd A
cade
mic
Dis
abili
ties
2,95
227
3.3
5.
0
161.
187
2,74
524
1.7
5.
0
148.
549
Hou
rs B
ased
Sta
ffing
3,11
825
7.8
8.
2
180.
000
3,17
525
9.0
8.
0
185.
062
Hom
e S
choo
l Mod
el3,
147
341.
0
192.
689
3,55
234
4.0
18
5.12
6
G
T/L
D18
011
.9
10
.125
15
411
.8
10
.325
S
econ
dary
Inte
nsiv
e R
eadi
ng8.
2
Inte
llect
ual D
isab
ilitie
s (ID
):S
choo
l/Com
mun
ity B
ased
Pro
gram
s36
262
.0
94
.500
36
465
.0
97
.500
E
xten
sion
s71
1.0
19
.0
4.
5
42.0
00
741.
0
19.5
5.5
42
.000
Le
arni
ng fo
r In
depe
nden
ce82
679
.0
69
.125
82
679
.0
71
.750
LD/ID
Pro
gram
Sup
port
3.0
4.
0
4.0
2.
000
3.
0
4.0
5.
0
2.00
0
Soci
al E
mot
iona
l Sup
port
Ser
vice
s:S
peci
al C
lass
es61
897
.7
16
.7
135.
375
3.00
0
638
99.1
16.7
13
9.25
0
3.
000
P
rogr
am S
uppo
rt1.
0
8.0
16
.5
1.00
0
1.0
8.
0
20.1
1.
000
Aut
ism
:S
peci
al C
lass
es75
711
5.3
23
2.29
0
81
512
6.0
25
2.03
0
P
rogr
am S
uppo
rt1.
0
4.2
8.
8
1.00
0
1.0
4.
2
8.8
1.
000
Tran
sitio
n Se
rvic
es:
Sch
ool-B
ased
Res
ourc
e S
ervi
ces
6,33
028
.0
8.
750
6,
298
28.0
8.75
0
Non
scho
ol-B
ased
Pro
gram
s48
11.5
7.50
0
6211
.5
7.
500
P
rogr
am S
uppo
rt1.
0
6.0
1.
5
2.37
5
1.00
0
1.0
6.
0
1.5
2.
375
1.
000
Spec
ial S
choo
ls:
Long
view
581.
0
9.8
1.
7
17.1
50
2.87
5
561.
0
10.9
0.3
15
.750
2.
875
S
teph
en K
nolls
551.
0
9.0
3.
1
15.7
50
2.87
5
451.
0
10.3
1.0
14
.000
2.
375
C
arl S
andb
urg
791.
0
14.0
5.2
24
.500
2.
875
90
1.0
18
.2
4.
0
26.2
50
2.87
5
Roc
k T
erra
ce91
2.0
15
.8
5.
6
15.8
00
3.50
0
932.
0
18.2
2.4
16
.875
3.
500
R
ICA
106
2.0
19
.0
7.
1
17.0
00
3.50
0
100
2.0
21
.1
5.
0
17.5
00
3.50
0
Mod
el L
earn
ing
Cen
ter
1.5
1.
5
Itine
rant
Par
aedu
cato
rs15
0.00
0
14
9.20
0
Scho
ol-B
ased
Ser
vice
s A
dmin
istr
ativ
e Su
ppor
t1.
0
16
.6
1.0
1.00
0
1.0
16.6
1.
01.
000
Con
tinue
d on
nex
t pag
e
Att
achm
ent B
FY 2
019
Bud
get
FY 2
020
Bud
get
FISC
AL
YEA
R 2
020
PRO
JEC
TED
SPE
CIA
L ED
UC
ATI
ON
EN
RO
LLM
ENT,
SER
VIC
ES a
nd P
OSI
TIO
NS
Dec
embe
r 201
8
Con
tinue
d fr
om p
revi
ous
page
Oth
erO
ther
Oth
erO
ther
Prek
inde
rgar
ten,
Pro
gram
s an
d Se
rvic
esSt
uden
tsA
dmin
Teac
hers
Prof
PAR
As
Supp
ort
Stud
ents
Adm
inTe
ache
rsPr
ofPA
RA
sSu
ppor
tD
eaf A
nd H
ard
of H
earin
g:R
esou
rce
Pro
gram
Ser
vice
s23
513
.0
0.
2
36.5
00
235
13.0
36.5
00
Spe
cial
Cla
sses
155
21.6
7.8
18
.900
15
521
.8
8.
0
19.0
76
Pro
gram
Sup
port
1.0
3.
5
1.00
0
1.0
3.
5
1.00
0
Visu
al Im
pairm
ents
:R
esou
rce
Pro
gram
Ser
vice
s32
411
.5
0.
500
2.
000
34
012
.5
0.
500
2.
000
S
peci
al C
lass
es24
3.0
0.
2
3.50
0
223.
0
0.2
3.
500
P
rogr
am S
uppo
rt1.
0
1.00
0
1.0
1.
000
Phys
ical
Dis
abili
ties:
Res
ourc
e P
rogr
am S
ervi
ces
3,28
592
.2
0.75
0
3,17
592
.2
Spe
cial
Cla
sses
355.
4
6.87
5
375.
9
7.62
5
Pro
gram
Sup
port
1.0
2.
0
2.0
2.
000
1.
0
2.0
2.
0
2.75
0
Spee
ch a
nd L
angu
age
Dis
abili
ties:
Res
ourc
e P
rogr
am S
ervi
ces
9,39
620
0.8
9,
558
190.
5
Spe
cial
Cla
sses
130
5.0
1.
6
4.37
5
144
5.5
1.
7
4.81
3
Pro
gram
Sup
port
1.0
6.
0
2.00
0
1.0
6.
0
2.00
0
Inte
rAC
T:In
terA
CT
Ser
vice
s (P
reK
-12)
535
4.0
8.
6
540
4.0
8.
6
0.87
5
Aug
men
tativ
e C
omm
unic
atio
n12
2.0
0.
4
3.50
0
122.
0
0.4
3.
500
P
rogr
am S
uppo
rt1.
0
0.87
5
1.00
0
1.0
1.
000
Chi
ld F
ind/
DES
C:
Pro
gram
Sup
port
13.2
2.
000
13
.2
2.00
0
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Sup
port
1.0
2.
000
1.
0
2.00
0
Pres
choo
l Edu
catio
n Pr
ogra
ms:
Spe
cial
Cla
sses
1,54
211
0.0
68
.6
120.
437
1,65
711
9.0
91
.6
132.
438
Pro
gram
Sup
port
1.0
0.
2
6.0
1.
000
1.
0
6.2
1.
000
Arc
of M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y1.
0
0.8
1.
500
1.
5
1.1
2.
250
Infa
nts
and
Todd
lers
Ser
vice
s:D
eaf a
nd H
ard
of H
earin
g19
03.
0
180
3.0
P
hysi
cal T
hera
py2,
300
33.8
2,
450
33.8
O
ccup
atio
nal T
hera
py1,
800
26.4
1,
998
26.4
S
peci
al In
stru
ctio
n5,
400
71.1
37.1
80
5,40
071
.1
37
.200
S
peec
h &
Lan
guag
e5,
300
72.6
5,
400
72.6
V
isio
n20
03.
0
190
3.0
Pro
gram
Sup
port
5.0
3.
0
5.00
0
5.0
3.
0
5.00
0
Pres
choo
l/Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s A
dmin
istr
ativ
e Su
ppor
t1.
0
1.0
-
1.0
3.
0
1.00
0
Spec
ial E
duca
tion
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Supp
ort
6.0
3.
0
19.6
19
.600
6.
0
3.0
15
.0
18.6
00
Sum
mar
y:T
otal
Spe
cial
Cla
ssro
om S
ervi
ces
15,0
778.
0
1,57
2.3
143.
0
1,44
0.6
18.6
15,5
758.
0
1,57
6.0
157.
4
1,47
0.9
18.1
Tot
al R
esou
rce
Ser
vice
s21
,483
-
257.
3
101.
0
9.3
39
.3
21
,283
-
248.
0
100.
8
10.1
38.5
Tot
al In
fant
s an
d T
oddl
ers
Ser
vice
s15
,190
-
77.1
132.
8
37.2
-
15,6
18-
77
.1
13
2.8
37
.2
-
T
otal
Pro
gram
Sup
port
15.0
30.4
60.5
15
3.3
20
.0
15
.0
30
.2
65
.3
151.
6
20.8
Tot
al A
dmin
istr
ativ
e S
uppo
rt9.
0
19
.6
21.6
-
22.6
9.0
19.6
19
.0-
22
.6
T
otal
by
Posi
tion
Typ e
32.0
1,
956.
7
45
8.9
1,64
0.25
810
0.47
5
32.0
1,
950.
9
47
5.3
1,66
9.81
899
.975
Gra
nd T
otal
FISC
AL
YEA
R 2
020
PRO
JEC
TED
SPE
CIA
L ED
UC
ATI
ON
EN
RO
LLM
ENT,
SER
VIC
ES a
nd P
OSI
TIO
NS
Dec
embe
r 201
8
FY 2
019
Bud
get
FY 2
020
Bud
get
4,18
8.33
34,
227.
943
Att
achm
ent C
FY
201
8 R
ecom
men
dat
ion
s fo
r M
ain
ten
ance
*F
Y 2
019
Rec
omm
end
atio
ns
for
Mai
nte
nan
ce *
FY
202
0 R
ecom
men
dat
ion
s fo
r M
ain
ten
ance
*
Des
crip
tion
in P
rior
ity
Ord
erD
escr
ipti
on in
Pri
orit
y O
rder
Des
crip
tion
in P
rior
ity
Ord
er
Re-
exam
ine
curr
ent
prek
inde
rgar
ten
(pre
-K)
staf
fing
mod
els
toin
crea
seop
port
unit
ies
for
stud
ents
wit
hdi
sabi
liti
esto
rece
ive
serv
ices
in r
egul
ar e
arly
chi
ldho
od p
rogr
am s
etti
ngs.
Incr
ease
dpr
ofes
sion
alle
arni
ngop
port
unit
ies
(PL
Os)
inpo
siti
vebe
havi
oral
and
de-e
scal
atio
nst
rate
gies
thro
ugh
scho
olw
ide
impl
emen
tati
on o
f cr
isis
pre
vent
ion
and
inte
rven
tion
(C
PI)
.
Con
tinu
ew
ith
soci
alem
otio
nal
supp
orts
and
add
tocu
rren
tsu
ppor
ts.L
ever
age
com
mun
ity
part
ners
hips
tosu
ppor
tst
uden
tsin
the
Soc
ial
and
Em
otio
nal
Spe
cial
Edu
cati
onS
ervi
ces
wit
htr
ansi
tion
act
ivit
ies.
Hig
hIn
cide
nce
Acc
essi
ble
Tec
hnol
ogy
(HIA
T)
expa
nsio
n:in
tech
nolo
gysu
ppor
tto
scho
ols
toap
ply
the
prin
cipa
lsof
Uni
vers
al D
esig
n fo
r L
earn
ing
(UD
L)
and
HIA
T s
taff
ing.
Col
labo
rati
vetr
aini
ngfo
rge
nera
lan
dsp
ecia
led
ucat
ion
staf
fm
embe
rs,
ongo
ing
teac
her
coac
hing
and
Pro
fess
iona
lL
earn
ing
Com
mun
itie
s(P
LC
s)in
prov
idin
ghi
ghqu
alit
ydi
ffer
enti
ated
inst
ruct
ion
for
all
stud
ents
wit
hdi
sabi
liti
esto
narr
owth
epe
rfor
man
ce g
ap.
Tra
nsit
ion
the
rem
aini
ng L
AD
and
Res
ourc
e sc
hool
s to
HS
M.
Mak
eal
lel
emen
tary
scho
ols
HS
M,
usin
gth
eH
ours
-bas
edS
taff
ing
(HB
S)
mod
el.
PL
Os
for
gene
ral
and
spec
ial
educ
ator
son
incl
usiv
epr
acti
ces
incl
udin
g th
e us
e of
par
aedu
cato
rs a
nd o
ther
res
ourc
es.
Pro
vide
PL
Os
for
all
staf
fm
embe
rs(i
nclu
ding
fron
tof
fice
)he
lpin
gst
uden
tsw
ith
emot
iona
lre
gula
tion
supp
orts
and
tech
niqu
es a
nd d
e-es
cala
tion
str
ateg
ies.
Cha
nge
the
Lea
rnin
gan
dA
cade
mic
Dis
abil
itie
sst
affi
ngra
tio
toth
e H
BS
mod
el.
Incr
ease
dP
LO
sfo
rde
velo
ping
Fun
ctio
nal
Beh
avio
ral
Ass
essm
ents
(F
BA
) an
d B
ehav
iora
l Int
erve
ntio
n P
lans
(B
IP).
* D
ue
to t
he
chal
len
gin
g ec
onom
ic s
itu
atio
n, t
he
dis
cuss
ion
s of
th
e st
affi
ng
pla
n c
omm
itte
e fo
cuse
d o
n c
riti
cal a
reas
of
spec
ial e
du
cati
on p
rogr
amm
ing.
Th
e co
mm
itte
e ex
pre
ssed
a d
esir
e th
at t
he
leve
l of
serv
ice
in id
enti
fied
are
as b
e m
ain
tain
ed.
Th
is b
ud
get
refl
ects
th
e p
rese
rvat
ion
an
d m
ain
ten
ance
of
thos
e it
ems.
Fis
cal Y
ear
(FY
) 20
18–2
020
Sp
ecia
l Ed
uca
tion
Im
pro
vem
ent
and
Pri
orit
ies
Bas
ed o
n S
taff
an
d C
omm
un
ity
Mem
ber
In
pu
t
Attachment D
FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2020 MCPS Special Education Staffing Plan And
Operating Budget Timeline Associate Superintendent for Special Education Requests Public Participation on FY 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan Committee
April 30, 2018
FY 2020 Special Education Staffing Plan Committee Meets to Develop Recommendations for Special Education Staffing Improvements and Priorities
June 6, 2018
FY 2020 Recommended Special Education Staffing Improvements and Priorities Considered During the Development of the FY 2020 Operating Budget
Fall 2018
Superintendent’s FY 2020 Budget Presentation December 18, 2018
Registration begins for Montgomery County Board of Education (Board) Operating Budget Hearings (Check the Board web page for information about the registration period for public hearings.)
December 19, 2018 through January 10, 2019
Board Operating Budget Hearings
January 9, 2019 and January 14, 2019
Board Operating Budget Work Sessions
January 17, 2019 and January 24, 2019
Board Operating Budget Action February 12, 2019
Board Budget Request Transmitted to County Executive and County Council
March 1, 2019
County Executive Recommendations Presented to County Council March 15, 2019
County Council Budget Hearings April 2019
County Council Budget Action May 23, 2019
Final Board Action on FY 2020 Operating Budget June 11, 2019
Att
achm
ent E
Fis
cal Y
ear
2020
Sp
ecia
l Ed
uca
tion
Sta
ffin
g P
lan
Com
mit
tee
Nam
e T
itle
Alf
onso
Win
dsor
, Mrs
. Ivo
n
Man
agem
ent/
Bud
get S
peci
alis
t, B
udge
t Uni
t
Bre
en, M
s. A
li
Boa
rd P
resi
dent
, GT
LD
Net
wor
k
Bro
wn,
Jam
ie
Pre
side
nt, T
he L
earn
ing
Dis
abil
itie
s A
ssoc
iati
on o
f M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y
B
row
n, M
s. W
anda
R
epre
sent
ativ
e, M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y M
aryl
and
Bra
nch
of N
AA
CP
Cat
ena,
Ms.
Mar
y R
ose
In
stru
ctio
nal S
peci
alis
t, D
ivis
ion
of P
reki
nder
gart
en, S
peci
al P
rogr
ams,
and
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s
Col
lins
, Mr.
Wil
liam
J.
Pri
ncip
al, D
amas
cus
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
C
ropp
, Mrs
. Am
y S
.
Dir
ecto
r, D
ivis
ion
of P
reki
nder
gart
en, S
peci
al P
rogr
ams,
and
Rel
ated
Ser
vice
s
DeF
osse
, Ms.
Pam
ela
A.
Sup
ervi
sor,
Spe
ech
and
Lan
guag
e S
ervi
ces
D
iam
ond,
Mrs
. Nic
ola
D.
Chi
ef F
inan
cial
Off
icer
, Off
ice
of th
e C
hief
Fin
anci
al O
ffic
er
D
imm
ick,
Mr.
Car
y D
. P
rinc
ipal
, Gai
ther
sbur
g H
igh
Sch
ool
D
oody
, Mrs
. Suz
anne
M.
F
isca
l Sup
ervi
sor,
Off
ice
of S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Dor
ner,
Mrs
. Mar
tha
F.
Fis
cal S
peci
alis
t, D
ivis
ion
of B
usin
ess,
Fis
cal a
nd I
nfor
mat
ion
Sys
tem
s
Gen
ess,
Ms.
Sim
one
A.
Sup
ervi
sor,
Tra
nsit
ion
Ser
vice
s U
nit
H
all,
Mrs
. Jul
ie S
.
Dir
ecto
r, D
ivis
ion
of B
usin
ess,
Fis
cal a
nd I
nfor
mat
ion
Sys
tem
s
Hea
twol
e, M
r. K
yle
J.
Pri
ncip
al, F
lora
M. S
inge
r E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
l
Hec
k, M
rs. L
isa
M.
Inst
ruct
iona
l Spe
cial
ist,
Div
isio
n of
Bus
ines
s, F
isca
l and
Inf
orm
atio
n S
yste
ms
Att
achm
ent E
Fis
cal Y
ear
2020
Sp
ecia
l Ed
uca
tion
Sta
ffin
g P
lan
Com
mit
tee
Nam
e T
itle
Hof
fman
, Ms.
Joa
nne
C.
Sup
ervi
sor,
Cen
tral
Pla
cem
ent U
nit
K
anna
n, M
r. A
mut
han
P
aren
t, W
ootto
n H
igh
Sch
ool
LaB
att,
Dr.
Arr
onza
M.
E
xecu
tive
Dir
ecto
r, D
eput
y S
uper
inte
nden
t of
Sch
ool S
uppo
rt a
nd I
mpr
ovem
ent
Lee
ty-W
eins
tein
, Ms.
Jes
sica
K.
Spe
cial
Edu
cati
on P
rogr
am S
peci
alis
t, L
ittl
e B
enne
tt E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
l
Ler
tora
, Mrs
. Kat
heri
ne W
.
Ass
ista
nt P
rinc
ipal
, Rob
erto
W. C
lem
ente
Mid
dle
Sch
ool
Lev
y, M
rs. J
anet
E.
Tea
cher
Spe
cial
Edu
cati
on, B
rook
e G
rove
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
L
ewis
, Dr.
Jud
ith
F.
P
rinc
ipal
, Bur
ning
Tre
e E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
l
Low
ndes
, Mr.
Kev
in E
. A
ssoc
iate
Sup
erin
tend
ent,
Off
ice
of S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Lyn
ch, M
r. P
hili
p A
. D
irec
tor,
Dep
artm
ent o
f S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Ser
vice
s
Mar
tine
z, M
s. M
onic
a P
resi
dent
, Par
tner
ship
for
Ext
raor
dina
ry M
inds
Mun
sey,
Mr.
Jos
hua
H.
Pri
ncip
al, R
ICA
–Joh
n L
. Gil
dner
Reg
iona
l Ins
titu
te f
or C
hild
ren
and
Ado
lesc
ents
Mur
ek, M
s. S
ally
R.
C
oord
inat
or, P
arae
duca
tor
Pro
gram
, Off
ice
of th
e C
hief
Aca
dem
ic O
ffic
er
Nar
di, M
r. C
hris
toph
er B
. P
rinc
ipal
, Tho
mas
W. P
yle
Mid
dle
Sch
ool
P
arro
tt, M
rs. M
arga
ret A
. In
stru
ctio
nal S
peci
alis
t, T
rans
itio
n S
ervi
ces
Uni
t
Pip
er, M
s. D
awn
Exe
cuti
ve D
irec
tor,
Dow
n S
yndr
ome
Net
wor
k of
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
R
edgr
ave,
Ms.
Kim
M.
Pri
ncip
al, S
teph
en K
noll
s S
choo
l
Att
achm
ent E
Fis
cal Y
ear
2020
Sp
ecia
l Ed
uca
tion
Sta
ffin
g P
lan
Com
mit
tee
Nam
e T
itle
Rei
ley,
Ms.
Jul
ie
Co-
Cha
irpe
rson
, Spe
cial
Edu
cati
on A
dvis
ory
Com
mit
tee
and
Vic
e C
hair
, Spe
cial
Edu
cati
on
Sub
com
mit
tee,
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
of
Par
ent-
Tea
cher
Ass
ocia
tion
s S
chau
felb
erge
r, M
iss
Ste
phan
ie R
. P
rinc
ipal
, Roc
k T
erra
ce S
choo
l
Sha
wve
r, M
rs. C
hris
sy
C
hief
Exe
cuti
ve O
ffic
er, T
he A
RC
of
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Sm
ith,
Ms.
Cla
udet
te R
. S
uper
viso
r, D
epar
tmen
t of
Spe
cial
Edu
cati
on S
ervi
ces
S
tato
n, M
r. C
raig
W.
Pri
ncip
al, J
uliu
s W
est M
iddl
e S
choo
l
Str
oubl
e, M
rs. J
enni
fer
R.
Inst
ruct
iona
l Spe
cial
ist,
Dep
artm
ent o
f S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Ser
vice
s
Tay
lor,
Mrs
. Jea
nne
M.
S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Par
aedu
cato
r, F
arqu
har
Mid
dle
Sch
ool
Tho
mas
, Mis
s B
eth
F.
Ass
ista
nt P
rinc
ipal
, Hal
lie
Wel
ls M
iddl
e S
choo
l
Val
era,
Mr.
Jav
ier
Pre
side
nt, D
own
Syn
drom
e N
etw
ork
of M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y
Wan
tana
be-T
ate,
Ms.
Rac
hel
Cha
ir, S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Sub
com
mit
tee,
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
of
Par
ent-
Tea
cher
A
ssoc
iati
ons
Whi
tfie
ld, M
r. D
onal
d P
aren
t, Jo
hn T
. Bak
er M
iddl
e S
choo
l
Com
mit
tee
Sup
port
: M
rs. R
uth
M. C
ampb
ell,
adm
inis
trat
ive
secr
etar
y, D
ivis
ion
of B
usin
ess,
Fis
cal a
nd I
nfor
mat
ion
Sys
tem
s T
elep
hone
: 24
0-74
0-38
50 E
-mai
l: R
uth_
M_C
ampb
ell@
mcp
smd.
org
A
ttac
hmen
t F
D
epar
tmen
t of
Sp
ecia
l Ed
uca
tion
Ser
vice
s D
ivis
ion
of
Bu
sin
ess,
Fis
cal a
nd
In
form
atio
n S
yste
ms
Pro
fess
ion
al D
evel
opm
ent
Pla
n
Fis
cal Y
ear
2020
Tea
cher
Ses
sion
s
Aca
dem
ic I
nter
vent
ions
: E
arly
Int
erve
ntio
ns in
Rea
ding
web
inar
and
face
-to-
face
A
cade
mic
Int
erve
ntio
ns:
Flu
ency
and
Aut
omat
icit
y th
roug
h Sy
stem
atic
Tea
chin
g an
d T
echn
olog
y (F
AS
TT
) M
athe
mat
ics
Ele
men
tary
web
inar
an
d fa
ce to
fac
e A
cade
mic
Int
erve
ntio
ns:
FA
ST
T M
athe
mat
ics
Mid
dle
Sch
ool w
ebin
ar
Aca
dem
ic I
nter
vent
ions
: Sys
tem
s 44
A
cade
mic
Int
erve
ntio
ns:
Rea
d N
atur
ally
Liv
e! w
ebin
ar
Aca
dem
ic I
nter
vent
ions
: N
umbe
r W
orld
s A
ugm
enta
tive
and
Alt
erna
tive
Com
mun
icat
ion:
Str
ateg
ies
to E
ncou
rage
Fun
ctio
nal C
omm
unic
atio
n A
ugm
enta
tive
and
Alt
erna
tive
Com
mun
icat
ion:
Str
ateg
ies
and
Ope
rati
on o
f S
peci
fic
Dev
ices
A
ugm
enta
tive
Com
mun
icat
ion
and
Ass
isti
ve T
echn
olog
y: S
trat
egie
s to
Sup
port
Ear
ly L
angu
age
Lea
rner
s A
ugm
enta
tive
Com
mun
icat
ion
and
Ass
isti
ve T
echn
olog
y: B
oard
mak
er S
tudi
o A
utis
m:
Ser
ving
Stu
dent
s w
ith
Aut
ism
Spe
ctru
m D
isor
ders
in th
e L
east
-res
tric
tive
Env
iron
men
t A
utis
m: S
uppo
rtin
g S
tude
nts
wit
h A
utis
m S
pect
rum
Dis
orde
rs in
Com
preh
ensi
ve E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
ls
Aut
ism
: Bes
t Pra
ctic
es f
or T
each
ing
Ele
men
tary
Stu
dent
s w
ith
Aut
ism
A
utis
m: B
est P
ract
ices
for
Tea
chin
g S
econ
dary
Stu
dent
s w
ith
Aut
ism
D
eaf
and
Har
d of
Hea
ring
(D
/HO
H):
Add
ress
ing
the
need
s of
D/H
OH
stu
dent
s w
ith
beha
vior
al o
r m
enta
l hea
lth
conc
erns
D
/HO
H:
Bui
ldin
g th
e C
apac
ity
of D
/HO
H T
each
ers
to A
ddre
ss th
e N
eeds
of
Stu
dent
s w
ith
Sig
nifi
cant
Cog
niti
ve D
isab
ilit
ies
D
/HO
H:
Ins
truc
tion
al a
nd B
ehav
iora
l S
trat
egie
s to
Add
ress
the
Nee
ds o
f S
tude
nts
who
are
D/H
OH
wit
h L
ittl
e/N
o P
rior
Sch
ooli
ng o
r F
orm
al
Lan
guag
e A
lter
nate
Lea
rnin
g C
urri
culu
m R
esou
rce—
Uni
que
Lea
rnin
g S
yste
ms
Pro
fess
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t: M
ulti
-Sta
te A
lter
nate
Ass
essm
ent (
MS
AA
)
Lea
d E
lem
enta
ry S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Tea
cher
s-S
peci
ally
Des
igne
d In
stru
ctio
n F
irst
Yea
r T
each
er T
rain
ing
Hig
h In
cide
nce
Acc
essi
ble
Tec
hnol
ogy
(HIA
T):
Ass
isti
ve T
echn
olog
y in
the
Chr
ome
Bro
wse
r H
IAT
: A
ssis
tive
Tec
hnol
ogy
Con
side
rati
on
HIA
T:
Ass
isti
ve T
echn
olog
y Im
plem
enta
tion
and
Doc
umen
tati
on
HIA
T:
Ass
isti
ve T
echn
olog
y in
Sch
ool a
nd o
n th
e In
divi
dual
ized
Edu
cati
on P
rogr
am (
IEP
) H
IAT
: In
trod
ucti
on to
Boo
ksha
re
A
ttac
hmen
t F
D
epar
tmen
t of
Sp
ecia
l Ed
uca
tion
Ser
vice
s D
ivis
ion
of
Bu
sin
ess,
Fis
cal a
nd
In
form
atio
n S
yste
ms
Pro
fess
ion
al D
evel
opm
ent
Pla
n
Fis
cal Y
ear
2020
Tea
cher
Ses
sion
s
HIA
T:
Intr
oduc
tion
to S
nap
& R
ead
H
IAT
: L
evel
ing
the
Pla
ying
Fie
ld-T
echn
olog
y T
ools
to S
uppo
rt A
cces
s to
Com
plex
Tex
t H
IAT
: O
ccup
atio
nal T
hera
pist
s/P
hysi
cal T
hera
pist
s P
rofe
ssio
nal L
earn
ing
Com
mun
ity
Ses
sion
s H
IAT
: P
ersp
ecti
ves
on P
ract
ice
for
Occ
upat
iona
l and
Phy
sica
l The
rapi
sts
HIA
T:
Per
spec
tive
s on
Pra
ctic
e W
orks
hops
and
Web
inar
s H
IAT
: S
peec
h R
ecog
niti
on–D
ecis
ion
Mak
ing
and
Ove
rvie
w
HIA
T:
Spe
ech
Rec
ogni
tion
–Usi
ng S
peec
h R
ecog
niti
on in
the
Cla
ssro
om
HIA
T:
Tec
hnol
ogy–
Sup
port
ing
Wri
ters
wit
h C
lick
er S
oftw
are
HIA
T:
Uni
vers
al D
esig
n fo
r L
earn
ing
(UD
L)–
Eve
ryda
y U
DL
Web
inar
Ser
ies
HIA
T:
UD
L–I
ntro
duct
ion
to U
DL
H
ome
Sch
ool M
odel
: C
o-te
achi
ng a
nd S
ched
ulin
g H
ours
Bas
ed S
taff
ing:
Co-
teac
hing
and
Sch
edul
ing
Med
ical
Ass
ista
nce:
Cer
tifi
cati
on T
rain
ing
Mul
ti-T
iere
d S
yste
ms
of S
uppo
rt a
nd S
peci
ally
Des
igne
d In
stru
ctio
n
New
Tea
cher
Ori
enta
tion
N
onvi
olen
t Cri
sis
Inte
rven
tion
: In
itia
l and
Ref
resh
er C
ours
es
Ort
on G
illi
ngha
m S
trat
egie
s P
reki
nder
gart
en:
Bui
ldin
g th
e C
apac
ity
of T
each
ers
to D
iffe
rent
iate
Ins
truc
tion
in I
nclu
sive
Set
ting
s
Pre
kind
erga
rten
: M
aryl
and’
s C
hild
Out
com
es S
umm
ary
Pro
cess
P
reki
nder
gart
en:
Mar
ylan
d’s
Ear
ly L
earn
ing
Ass
essm
ent
Pre
kind
erga
rten
: T
he S
ocia
l and
Em
otio
nal F
ound
atio
ns o
f Ear
ly L
earn
ing
P
reki
nder
gart
en:
Dev
elop
ing
Sta
ndar
ds-b
ased
, Hig
h-qu
alit
y IE
Ps
P
reki
nder
gart
en:
Ear
ly L
iter
acy:
Fou
ndat
iona
l Ski
lls
for
Sch
ool R
eadi
ness
P
reki
nder
gart
en:
Per
form
ance
Mat
ters
/Dat
a C
olle
ctio
n in
the
Pre
kind
erga
rten
Cla
ssro
om
Res
ourc
e T
each
er in
Spe
cial
Edu
cati
on s
econ
dary
mee
ting
s S
ecti
on 5
04 B
asic
s: D
eter
min
atio
n of
Eli
gibi
lity
and
Dev
elop
men
t of
App
ropr
iate
Acc
omm
odat
ions
S
peci
al E
duca
tion
Ski
ll B
uild
ing
Wor
ksho
p: F
rom
Pre
sent
Lev
els
to P
rogr
ess
Mon
itor
ing
S
peec
h an
d L
angu
age
Ser
vice
s: B
est P
ract
ices
in A
sses
smen
t and
Int
erve
ntio
n fo
r E
ngli
sh L
angu
age
Lea
rner
s w
ith
Dis
abil
itie
s
A
ttac
hmen
t F
D
epar
tmen
t of
Sp
ecia
l Ed
uca
tion
Ser
vice
s D
ivis
ion
of
Bu
sin
ess,
Fis
cal a
nd
In
form
atio
n S
yste
ms
Pro
fess
ion
al D
evel
opm
ent
Pla
n
Fis
cal Y
ear
2020
Tea
cher
Ses
sion
s
Spe
ech
and
Lan
guag
e S
ervi
ces:
Mea
sura
ble
IEP
Goa
ls a
nd D
ata
Col
lect
ion
Too
ls:
A R
efre
sher
S
peec
h an
d L
angu
age
Ser
vice
s: T
echn
olog
y T
ools
for
Stu
dent
s th
at S
uppo
rt O
ral C
omm
unic
atio
n S
kill
s
Em
otio
nal D
isab
ilit
ies:
Ele
men
tary
pro
gram
-wid
e tr
aini
ng
Tra
nsit
ion
Serv
ices
: P
rinc
ipal
s of
UD
L f
or S
elec
t Car
eer
and
Tec
hnol
ogy
Edu
cati
on T
each
ers
Tra
nsit
ion
Serv
ices
: T
rans
itio
n S
ervi
ces’
Aw
aren
ess
for
Mid
dle
and
Hig
h S
choo
l T
rans
itio
n Se
rvic
es:
Tra
nsit
ion
Sup
port
Tea
cher
s’ S
umm
it a
nd P
rofe
ssio
nal L
earn
ing
Com
mun
itie
s
Tw
ice
Exc
epti
onal
Stu
dent
s: R
ecog
nizi
ng a
nd S
ervi
ng E
lem
enta
ry S
tude
nts
Tw
ice
Exc
epti
onal
Stu
dent
s: D
iffe
rent
iati
ng E
lem
enta
ry I
nstr
ucti
on
Tw
ice
Exc
epti
onal
Stu
dent
s: R
ecog
nizi
ng C
hara
cter
isti
cs a
nd D
iffe
rent
iati
ng I
nstr
ucti
on f
or S
econ
dary
Stu
dent
s V
isio
n S
ervi
ces:
Bui
ldin
g th
e C
apac
ity
of V
isio
n S
taff
in A
ddre
ssin
g th
e N
eeds
of
Stu
dent
s w
ith
Cor
tica
l Vis
ual I
mpa
irm
ent
Vis
ion
Ser
vice
s: B
uild
ing
the
Cap
acit
y of
Vis
ion
Sta
ff in
Ass
essi
ng a
nd S
elec
ting
App
ropr
iate
Tec
hnol
ogy
for
Acc
essi
ng C
urri
culu
m M
ater
ials
V
isio
n S
ervi
ces:
Bui
ldin
g th
e C
apac
ity
of S
taff
Mem
bers
in th
e U
se o
f T
echn
olog
y: S
cien
tifi
c N
oteb
ook
and
Dux
bury
V
isio
n S
ervi
ces:
Bui
ldin
g a
Sys
tem
atic
App
roac
h to
Ori
enta
tion
and
Mob
ilit
y A
sses
smen
t and
Ser
vice
s
A
ttac
hmen
t G
Dep
artm
ent
of S
pec
ial E
du
cati
on S
ervi
ces
Div
isio
n o
f B
usi
nes
s, F
isca
l an
d I
nfo
rmat
ion
Sys
tem
s P
rofe
ssio
nal
Dev
elop
men
t P
lan
Fis
cal Y
ear
2020
Par
aed
uca
tor
Ses
sion
s
Ada
ptin
g an
d D
iffe
rent
iatin
g M
ater
ials
E
lem
enta
ry P
arae
duca
tors
: Fa
ding
Sup
port
s an
d B
uild
ing
Inde
pend
ence
A
utis
m:
Bes
t Pra
ctic
es f
or T
each
ing
Ele
men
tary
Stu
dent
s w
ith
Aut
ism
A
utis
m:
Bes
t Pra
ctic
es f
or T
each
ing
Sec
onda
ry S
tude
nts
wit
h A
utis
m
Aug
men
tativ
e C
omm
unic
atio
n an
d A
ssis
tive
Tec
hnol
ogy:
Boa
rdm
aker
Stu
dio
Col
labo
ratio
n w
ith C
linic
ians
for
par
aedu
cato
rs a
t the
Reg
iona
l Ins
titut
e fo
r C
hild
ren
and
Ado
lesc
ents
C
olla
bora
tion
wit
h te
ache
rs
Dat
a C
olle
ctio
n an
d A
naly
sis
R
esou
rces
and
Mat
eria
ls to
Sup
port
the
Inst
ruct
ion
of E
lem
enta
ry N
on-d
iplo
ma
Bou
nd S
tude
nts
Res
ourc
es a
nd M
ater
ials
to S
uppo
rt th
e In
stru
ctio
n of
Sec
onda
ry N
on-d
iplo
ma
Bou
nd S
tude
nts
Acc
omm
odat
ions
and
Mod
ific
atio
n: H
ands
-on
App
licat
ions
: E
lem
enta
ry P
arae
duca
tors
A
ccom
mod
atio
ns a
nd M
odif
icat
ion:
Han
ds-o
n A
pplic
atio
ns S
econ
dary
Par
aedu
cato
rs
Rea
ding
and
Wri
ting
Tec
hnol
ogy
Too
ls to
Sup
port
Str
uggl
ing
Stu
dent
s A
ctiv
insp
ire
Beg
inne
r A
ctiv
insp
ire
Inte
rmed
iate
A
ctiv
insp
ire
Adv
ance
d S
trat
egie
s fo
r P
arae
duca
tors
Wor
king
Eff
ecti
vely
wit
h S
tude
nts
with
Spe
cial
Nee
ds in
Phy
sica
l Edu
catio
n
Lan
guag
e D
evel
opm
ent S
trat
egie
s
Non
viol
ent C
risi
s In
terv
entio
n: I
nitia
l and
Ref
resh
er C
ours
es
Pre
kind
erga
rten
: Th
e So
cial
and
Em
otio
nal F
ound
atio
ns o
f Ear
ly L
earn
ing
P
reki
nder
gart
en:
Dat
a C
olle
ctio
n in
the
Pre
kind
erga
rten
Cla
ssro
om
Pre
kind
erga
rten
: M
aryl
and’
s E
arly
Lea
rnin
g A
sses
smen
t S
econ
dary
Res
earc
h T
ools
R
atio
nal D
etac
hmen
t tra
inin
g D
evel
opin
g P
ositi
ve B
ehav
iora
l Int
erve
ntio
ns f
or S
tude
nts
with
Int
elle
ctua
l Dis
abili
ties
Em
otio
nal D
isab
ilit
ies:
Ele
men
tary
pro
gram
-wid
e tr
aini
ng
Tra
nsit
ion
Ser
vice
s: T
rans
itio
n S
ervi
ces’
Aw
aren
ess
T
rans
ition
Ser
vice
s: J
ob C
oach
ing
Tra
nsit
ion
Ser
vice
s: T
rave
l Tra
inin
g
Tw
ice
Exc
eptio
nal S
tude
nts:
Sup
port
in th
e G
ener
al E
duca
tion
Cla
ssro
om
Sig
n L
angu
age
for
Par
aedu
cato
rs
Uns
tuck
and
On
Tar
get
Zon
es o
f Reg
ulat
ion