Upload
nira
View
43
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Fixed Site/Donor Center Recruitment A Strategic Approach ‘ It’s About More Than Parties’. ADRP Presentation, May 2010 – Carol Mitchell. What’s the plan?. Who I am and why should you listen? Who are you and why are you here? About Canadian Blood Services Our Goal Our Process Outcomes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ADRP Presentation, May 2010 – Carol Mitchell
Fixed Site/Donor Center Recruitment
A Strategic Approach
‘It’s About More Than Parties’
2
What’s the plan?
1. Who I am and why should you listen? 2. Who are you and why are you here?3. About Canadian Blood Services4. Our Goal 5. Our Process 6. Outcomes7. Review of overall results year to year8. Key Learnings9. Discussion/Questions/Feedback/Ideas
3
Carol Mitchell, National Sales Manager, Canadian Blood Services•16 years in donor recruitment: Recruiter>Area Manager>National Manager
Audience:•Recruiters?•Fixed Site Recruiters?•Management?•Other?
4
Canadian Blood Services is a national, not-for-profit, charitable organization that manages the blood supply in all provinces and territories outside Quebec, and oversees the country’s OneMatch Stem Cell and Marrow Network
•Whole Blood, Apheresis Plasma, Apheresis Platelets, •41 permanent (FS) nationally•More than 20,000 donor clinics annually•One bloodmobile with others pending•All clinics are appointment based •Almost 100 Community Development Coordinators (recruiter role) nationally•Donor Service Representatives manage the appointment system and flow of donors into our clinics
5
2010-11 TargetsWhole Blood • 1,089,444 donors attending to reach 927,000 WB target• 77,000 new donors required• 85,000 reinstated donors • 426,000 active donors• Almost 1.5 million appointment bookings required
• 57,200 apheresis plasma• 40,650 apheresis platelets (22,050 singles; 9,300
doubles)
6
7
Fixed Site Locations
• 41 fixed sites across the country• Varied hours, beds, targets, days of week,
locations• Both FS and mobile sites have been below
collection targets for the past 4 fiscal years• FS events account for about 45% of whole blood
collections• Almost 100 Recruiters (CDCs) some solely
manage FS; others have combined territories
8
The Need – in 2007 • Fixed Sites provided us with the most cost
efficient opportunities to collect blood• Capacity existed in every fixed site across
Canadian Blood Services• Inconsistency in strategic recruitment planning
and implementation• Best practices had been identified in some
locations• FS recruiters were looking for some assistance
to the additional challenges they faced
9
Our GoalTo increase the efficiency of fixed site whole blood
clinics to better meet demand
Objectives:• Identify the specific and shared challenges of
fixed site recruitment• Identify the key elements of successful fixed site
recruitment• Identify best practice across the country for
inclusion in the national CDC suite of tools to better address the shared challenges
10
Our Process
• Working group was established of 7 regional recruiters with fixed site responsibilities/ expertise
• Regional reps facilitated surveying of their colleagues with FS responsibility
• August 2007 – 2-day face to face session to identify key elements of fixed site recruitment; challenges; successes and identify best practice/recommendations to nationalize
• Monthly working group teleconferences from August 2007 to date – evolved from a working group to an advisory group – membership has evolved but group continues to meet monthly!
11
Process (cont’d)
• Ultimately the organization has looked to this group to develop broader initiatives and to advise of higher level discussions
• The group was focused on specific goals and objectives at the outset but has continued to fill the role as an advisory group to new program development
12
Fixed Site Recruitment Challenges• All of the challenges of recruitment! Plus………• ‘Open all the time’ casual donor attitude to booking appointments or
attending – lots of options• Stat closures – when need is high but donor availability is reduced• Holes left 56 days after a stat or other closure – no prebooked
appointments in place• Staffing shortages – staff pulled to mobiles• Some competition with high profile mobiles in close enough
proximity• Location issues – not always best, convenient location, parking
issues, public transit issues• Wait times when groups attend – can impact other donors• Lack of sales tools, online donor booking, group tracking capabilities
limited• Autologous clinics impact on WB donor flow – donors take longer
13
Key Elements to Successful Fixed Site Recruitment – it is all about strategic planning
plan for the inevitable – control what you can
1. Group Recruitment Focus – needs to be a major element of FS recruitment plan
2. Youth/Student Recruitment focus at all FS – build the donor base
3. ‘Peer Recruitment’ programs – ‘donor get donor’ programs are essential to success – you cannot be everywhere
4. Formalized Annual Recruitment Plan for each FS that feeds into overall recruitment plan
5. Formalized, regular analysis of FS clinic schedule – days of week, hours of day, beds, targets – recommendations for change should come from the recruiter based on this analysis
14
Key Elements (cont’d)
6. Individual Donor Recruitment and Retention Initiatives through in clinic rebooking of appointments, no show calling, key messages, community presentations and outreach
7. Community and Media Relationship development – clinic sponsorship as part of the overall recruitment strategy
8. IMPACT DAYS/STATUTORY Holiday Planning – strategic annual recruitment plan must address the impact of STAT holidays and the impact of stat holiday closures on prebooked clinics
15
What We Look At• % of WB donations from Fixed Sites
• New donor rates
• Retention Rates
• Donor Frequency
• Deferral Rates
• Capacity in all fixed sites
16
WB Collections to Target
• Both perm and mobile sites have been below collection targets for the past 4 fiscal years• Perms account for about 45% of whole blood collections
% Collections to Target - Perm vs Mobile
88%
93%
87%
92%
89%
94%
90%
89%
Perm Mobile
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
Fiscal Year Clinic_Type CollectionsEXPECTED
COLLECTIONSCollections
to Target
FY0607 Perm 392,153 445,879 88%FY0607 Mobile 482,986 520,204 93%FY0607 Total 875,139 970,228 90%
FY0708 Perm 385,170 444,357 87%FY0708 Mobile 487,334 526,961 92%FY0708 Total 872,504 972,256 90%
FY0809 Perm 408,531 461,054 89%FY0809 Mobile 507,327 538,565 94%FY0809 Total 915,858 1,001,951 91%
FY0910 Perm 433,803 481,338 90%FY0910 Mobile 488,823 549,825 89%FY0910 Total 922,626 1,031,163 89%
17
What we now know…
• WB donors at fixed sites have increased to 44% of all WB donors and 47% of all WB donations
• WB Donation frequency at perms was at 2.32 in 2009-10 which was 11% higher than at mobiles in 2009-10; WB mobile frequency was at 2.07
• The number of new donors at perm sites is up 16% FY0910 over FY0607 while new donors at mobiles has dropped 10%.
• 42% of all new WB donors come from perms• New donor retention remains fairly stable at 54% in perm
clinics and 47% in mobiles• Our new donor results at fixed sites has increased while
new donor results at mobiles has decreased
18
More learning…• Teen retention is 14% higher at perms than
mobiles• Youth (age 20 – 24) is 7% higher at perms• Age 17-19, % donations at perm clinics are 2-
3% higher than at mobile clinics• % deferrals for 17-19 year olds are 2% lower
than at mobiles and 8 – 10% higher than all ages at perms
• Perm sites collect half of what mobiles collect per hour
• Collections per perm clinic event are 2/3 of mobiles
19
WB Donors, Donations & Frequency
• Perm clinic donors have increased from 41% to 44% of all WB donors and from 45% to 47% of donations from FY0607 to FY0910
• Donation frequency in perm clinics was 17% more than mobiles in FY0607 and 11% more in FY0910
Donors and Donations
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Perm Donors Perm Donations Mobile Donors Mobile Donations
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
Donation Frequency
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
Perm Frequency Mobile Frequency
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
20
WB Donors, Donations & Frequency
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
Perm Donors 165,870 163,642 177,682 186,835Donations 393,304 386,583 409,853 433,803Frequency 2.37 2.36 2.31 2.32
Mobile Donors 239,177 236,951 247,277 236,012Donations 481,835 485,921 506,005 488,823Frequency 2.01 2.05 2.05 2.07
All Whole Blood Donors 405,047 400,593 424,959 422,847Donations 875,139 872,504 915,858 922,626Frequency 2.16 2.18 2.16 2.18
21
WB New Donors
• The number of new donors at perms sites is up 16% FY0910 over FY0607 while new donors at mobiles has dropped 10%. % new donors at perms to total new donors went from 36% to 42%.
New Donors - Perm vs Mobile
31,683
55,671
31,007
51,757
38,138
56,120
36,727
50,329
Perm New Mobile New
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
% New Perm / Mobile to Total New
36%
64%
37%
63%
40%
60%
42%
58%
Perm New Mobile New
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
22
WB New Donors
• The % of new donors to total donors at perm clinics has increased from 19% to 20% since FY0607 while mobiles has decreased from 23% to 21%.
New Perm Donors
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
18%
18%
19%
19%
20%
20%
21%
21%
22%
22%
Donors New Donors % New Donors
New Mobile Donors
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
20%
20%
21%
21%
22%
22%
23%
23%
24%
Donors New Donors % New Donors
23
WB New Donor Retention
• New donor retention remains fairly stable at 54% in perm clinics and 47% in mobiles.
New Donors Retained - Perm vs Mobile
16,767
25,528
17,017
24,468
20,533
26,315
Perm Mobile
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809
% New Donors Retained - Perm vs Mobile
53%
46%
55%
47%
54%
47%
Perm Mobile
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809
24
WB New Donor Retention
Donors New % NewNew
Retained% New
RetainedDonors New % New
New Retained
% New Retained
Perm 164,159 31,683 19% 16,767 53% 161,922 31,007 19% 17,017 55%Mobile 240,895 55,671 23% 25,528 46% 238,685 51,757 22% 24,468 47%Total 405,054 87,354 22% 42,295 48% 400,607 82,764 21% 41,485 50%
Donors New % NewNew
Retained% New
RetainedDonors New % New
New Retained
% New Retained
Perm 177,561 38,138 21% 20,533 54% 182,848 36,727 20%Mobile 247,396 56,120 23% 26,315 47% 240,005 50,329 21%Total 424,957 94,258 22% 46,848 50% 422,853 87,056 21%
FY0607 FY0708
FY0809 FY0910
25
WB New Donor Retention by Age Range
New Donor Retention by Age Group
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
age 17 - 19 age 20 - 24 age 25+ All Ages
Perm FY0607 Perm FY0708 Perm FY0809 Mobile FY0607 Mobile FY0708 Mobile FY0809
age 17 - 19 age 20 - 24 age 25+ All AgesPerm FY0607 53% 47% 55% 53%Perm FY0708 53% 47% 58% 55%Perm FY0809 53% 48% 56% 54%Mobile FY0607 39% 40% 53% 46%Mobile FY0708 40% 41% 54% 47%Mobile FY0809 39% 41% 54% 47%
• Donor retention is stable for all age ranges in each fiscal • Teen retention is 14% higher at perms than mobiles• Youth (age 20 – 24) is 7% higher at perms
26
% Donated to Attended
All Clinics Age 17-19 - % Donated
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09
75%
75%
76%
76%
77%
77%
78%
78%
79%
79%
80%
Donors Attending Donors Donating % Donated
All Clinics All Ages - % Donated
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09
85%
86%
86%
86%
86%
86%
87%
87%
87%
87%
87%
88%
Donors Attending Donors Donating % Donated
Perm Clinics All Ages - % Donated
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09
All Ages
87%
87%
87%
87%
88%
88%
88%
88%
88%
89%
89%
89%
Donors Attending Donors Donating % Donated
Perm Clinics Age 17 - 19 - % Donated
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09
76%
77%
77%
78%
78%
79%
79%
80%
80%
81%
81%
Donors Attending Donors Donating % Donated
27
% Donated to Attended
• Age 17-19 % donations at perm clinics are 2-3% higher than at mobile clinics
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09Perm Donors Attending 26,093 26,803 30,496 32,303 Perm Donors Attending 536,479 532,085 564,126 571,759
Donors Donating 21,014 21,053 23,712 25,290 Donors Donating 476,417 468,078 493,812 500,948% Donated 81% 79% 78% 78% % Donated 89% 88% 88% 88%
Mobile Donors Attending 55,137 52,551 54,573 51,511 Mobile Donors Attending 574,713 591,013 619,280 608,681Donors Donating 43,228 40,239 41,189 38,938 Donors Donating 494,027 501,197 525,059 518,000
% Donated 78% 77% 75% 76% % Donated 86% 85% 85% 85%
All Clinics Donors Attending 81,230 79,354 85,069 83,814 All Clinics Donors Attending 1,111,192 1,123,098 1,183,406 1,180,440Donors Donating 64,242 61,292 64,901 64,228 Donors Donating 970,444 969,275 1,018,871 1,018,948
% Donated 79% 77% 76% 77% % Donated 87% 86% 86% 86%
Age 17 - 19 All Ages
28
% Deferred to Attended
Perm Clinics Age 17 - 19 - % Deferred
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09
19%
20%
20%
21%
21%
22%
22%
23%
23%
24%
24%
Donors Attending Deferrals % Deferral
Perm Clinics All Ages - % Deferred
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09
12%
12%
12%
12%
12%
13%
13%
13%
13%
13%
14%
Donors Attending Deferrals % Deferral
All Clinics All Ages - % Deferred
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09
13%
13%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
15%
15%
Donors Attending Deferrals % Deferral
All Clinics Age 17-19 - % Deferred
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09
21%
21%
22%
22%
23%
23%
24%
24%
25%
25%
Donors Attending Deferrals % Deferral
29
% Deferred to Attended
• % deferrals for 17-19 year olds are 2% lower than at mobiles and 8 – 10% higher than all ages at perms
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2008/09Perm Donors Attending 26,093 26,803 30,496 32,303 Perm Donors Attending 536,479 532,085 564,126 571,759
Deferrals 5,423 6,090 7,179 7,136 Deferrals 66,104 69,328 75,510 74,059% Deferral 21% 23% 24% 22% % Deferral 12% 13% 13% 13%
Mobile Donors Attending 55,137 52,551 54,573 51,511 Mobile Donors Attending 574,713 591,013 619,280 608,681Deferrals 12,359 12,599 13,515 12,528 Deferrals 87,358 95,321 98,762 94,100
% Deferral 22% 24% 25% 24% % Deferral 15% 16% 16% 15%
All Clinics Donors Attending 81230 79354 85069 83814 All Clinics Donors Attending 1111192 1123098 1183406 1180440Deferrals 17,782 18,689 20,694 19,664 Deferrals 153,462 164,649 174,272 168,159
% Deferral 22% 24% 24% 23% % Deferral 14% 15% 15% 14%
Age 17 - 19 All Ages
30
WB Collections per Hour & Event
• Perm sites collect half of what mobiles collect per hour• Collections per perm clinic event are 2/3 of mobiles
Fiscal Year Clinic_TypeClinic Events
TOTAL TIME HRS
CollectionsCollections /
HourCollections /
Event
FY0607 Perm 8,201 46,327 392,153 8 48FY0607 Mobile 6,428 29,693 482,986 16 75FY0607 Total 14,629 76,021 875,139 12 60
FY0708 Perm 8,277 47,067 385,170 8 47FY0708 Mobile 6,533 30,235 487,334 16 75FY0708 Total 14,810 77,302 872,504 11 59
FY0809 Perm 8,784 49,937 408,531 8 47FY0809 Mobile 6,572 30,778 507,327 16 77FY0809 Total 15,356 80,715 915,858 11 60
FY0910 Perm 9,191 58,742 433,803 7 47FY0910 Mobile 6,643 31,591 488,823 15 74FY0910 Total 15,834 90,333 922,626 10 58
31
Average weekly collection targets FY2010/11
• Mobile capacity is significantly higher than at perms• This is largely due to smaller beds / bed hours available at perms• Capacity does exist in the perms
Perm MobileClinic Events
Open Hours
# Beds Bed HoursCollection
TargetCollections / Bed Hour
Total Annual Collection
Target
Open Hours / Clinic Event
# Beds / Clinic Event
Bed Hours / Clinic Event
Collections / Clinic Event
Perm 188 1,205 826 5,185 9,859 1.9 503,378 6.4 4.4 27.6 52.4Mobile 120 595 973 4,976 9,992 2.0 500,016 5.0 8.1 41.5 83.4All Whole Blood 308 1,800 1,799 10,162 19,850 2.0 1,003,394 5.8 5.8 33.0 64.5
% Perm 61% 67% 46% 51% 50% 97% 50% 110% 75% 84% 81%% Mobile 39% 33% 54% 49% 50% 103% 50% 85% 139% 126% 129%
32
WB Collections to Target
• Both perm and mobile sites have been below collection targets for the past 4 fiscal years
• Perms account for about 45% of whole blood collections
% Collections to Target - Perm vs Mobile
88%
93%
87%
92%
89%
94%
90%
89%
Perm Mobile
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
Fiscal Year Clinic_Type CollectionsEXPECTED
COLLECTIONSCollections
to Target
FY0607 Perm 392,153 445,879 88%FY0607 Mobile 482,986 520,204 93%FY0607 Total 875,139 970,228 90%
FY0708 Perm 385,170 444,357 87%FY0708 Mobile 487,334 526,961 92%FY0708 Total 872,504 972,256 90%
FY0809 Perm 408,531 461,054 89%FY0809 Mobile 507,327 538,565 94%FY0809 Total 915,858 1,001,951 91%
FY0910 Perm 433,803 481,338 90%FY0910 Mobile 488,823 549,825 89%FY0910 Total 922,626 1,031,163 89%
33
WB Collections - International Benchmarking
• Canadian Blood Services collects 45% of whole blood at fixed sites. One blood service collects 2/3, one about 20% and one about 8%.
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809Canadian Blood Services 45.3 44.7 44.8Blood Service 2 22.2 21.6 20.5Blood Service 3 66.7 67.5 68.3Blood Service 5 8.0 8.0 8.0
% of Fixed Site Collections
% Fixed Site Collections
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Canadian Blood Services Blood Service 2 Blood Service 3 Blood Service 5
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809
34
WB Avg Donation Time & Donor Satisfaction
• Average donation times in perm clinics are 12% lower than in mobiles
• In 2009 overall donor satisfaction and satisfaction with waiting times were both higher at perms
Average Donation Time (Minutes) - Perms vs Mobiles
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
Perm Mobile
FY0607 FY0708 FY0809 FY0910
Donor Satisfaction Perms vs Mobiles
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Wait Times - Perms Wait Times - Mobiles Overall Satisfaction - Perms Overall Satisfaction - Mobiles
March ‘09 June ‘09 Oct ‘09
35
The outcomes – our recommendations –what happened
1. All Regional Management to build the Key elements to FS Recruitment into recruiter performance plans and socialize with their teams for FY 2008-09
2. Group Recruitment Focus• Leveraging of our Partner for Life program• Adopt a Clinic Sponsorship package delivered• Milestone Donor Program nationalized from regional practice• Standardized Group Booking Strategy implemented
3. Youth/Student Focused Recruitment• Young Blood for Life – youth peer recruiter leader and National
YBFL High School Challenge
4. Peer Recruitment ‘donor get donor’• Milestone Donor Program• In Honour of and other ‘donor days’
36
Outcomes (cont’d)
5. Formalized Annual Recruitment Plan• Fixed Site Territory Market Profiles – use Market Research –
Statistics Canada, Canada Post, Chamber of Commerce studies• Research – what does your donor base look like: donor frequency,
donor retention/reinstatement, donation activity by age, community penetration rates
6. Formalized Regular Analysis • Attendance traffic by day, by hour• Appointment booking rates by day, by hour• When do you have too many donors, when can you not fill your
beds – identification of trends – target recruitment accordingly or suggest changes
7. Individual Donor Recruitment and Retention• Need to focus efforts on peer recruitment programs like YBFL and
on programs like What’s Your Type? Blood typing events
37
Outcomes (cont’d)
8. Community and Media Relationship Development• Media sponsored days• Partner sponsored days
9. IMPACT/STAT Day Planning• IMPACT Day calendars for use throughout the
organization• IMPACT Day Alerts – out to field two weeks prior to a
stat closure and two weeks prior to the IMPACT Day from that closure
38
Impact Days Alerts – calendar shared organization wide aligned with alert messages to book, reschedule and rebook into the Impact
Days and going into and out of Stat closures
39
Milestone Donor Program– milestone donors are contacted prior to their next eligibility, encouraged to recruit friends and
family to donate with them at their milestone donation – program takes time to build but also a good media event
40
Young Blood for Life – National High School
Challenge and Student
Leadership Training
41
Young Blood for LifeAs part of the peer recruitment component of YBFL 457 students attended Youth Development Champion workshops representing 180 schools holding either mobile or FS clinic events - trained as peer recruiters on campus
As part of the National Challenge component which was entirely focused on FS attendance only: 29 of our 41 fixed sites registered 171 schools in the challenge• With two weeks remaining (as of April 16) – total FS challenge attendance (October 23 – April 16 was 6,262 with new donor attendance at 2,732• Our final results will report on actual donors and new donors as well as attendance
42
Adopt A Clinic• Provided a package on how to leverage existing
programs (Partners for Life, Milestone Donor, In Honour of) to garner individual or partner sponsorship of a specific clinic day, series of clinic days, hours of the day or a specific bed or beds (example: community sponsor supporting the day leading into every summer long weekend)
• Not a nationally required program – captured regional best practice for recruiter consideration as part of their plan
43
Market Research Fixed Site
Package
• Worked with our Market Knowledge colleagues to build a Market Research and Donor Data package template for FS recruiters
• Template includes current donor data for the site, census data, mapping, penetration data, PRIZM cluster research (Environics)
• Provides a Fixed Site Market Profile
44
We didn’t just focus on recruitment activity
• That FS clinic staff should be a dedicated team – to facilitate team ownership of goals and donor relationships
• Equip CDCs with mobile connectivity • Standardized clinic schedules/collections around
long weekends to ensure hospital demand is met – do not close on small ‘s’ statutory holidays like Easter Monday, Remembrance Day and minimize occasions when clinics are closed more than two consecutive days
45
Key LearningsSome of this wasn’t news but reinforcement
• Execute with excellence ????? – likely your biggest challenge – certainly one of ours
• When you are developing tools/programs for
broader use -regional or national - always, always always go to your experts at the front line
• Test corporate assumptions against actual experience
46
Key Learnings…
• Acknowledge the best practice already in existence – give credit where it is due
• Ensure that your experts speak for their colleagues – not just their perspective
• Expert representative responsibility is to two-way communication – regional input to project and project update to regional management/peers
47
Key Learnings…
• Be prepared for resistance – people do not like to give up the familiar
• There will be a sense that you and the group do not know the local challenges/business
• Evaluate and test your original assumptions
• Be prepared to make changes – there must be some flexibility in your model
48
Key Learnings…
• Some people will adapt knowingly (and even try to hide it) some will adapt due to misunderstanding
• Communicate, communicate, communicate
• Learn from the experience and include your working group during the evaluation
49
Bottom Line…
Know your donor base – use whatever tools you have to mine and understand your current donors: mix of repeat versus new donors, donation frequency, age representation
Know your potential market – look at populations, neighbourhoods, businesses within a radius of your location – find out as much as you can about them
50
Build internal relationships – listen to your collections’ team and volunteers who have direct donor relationships and can identify issues and opportunities for you; ensure that your collections’ team is understands your recruitment strategy
Develop a partnership strategy – recruit media partners to promote your clinic days; recruit partner sponsors to commit to sending groups on specific ‘needy’ days and a long term commitment
51
Analyse, analyse, analyse: set aside a time monthly/quarterly/annually to analyse your collection results, your donor base, attendance patterns, clinic issues that impact your results
Identify strategic recruitment priorities through analysis – do you need to build the donor base (new donor recruitment) or should your focus be increased frequency of existing donors
52
You cannot do it all by yourself – be strategic, build a network, know your priority focus, plan for the predictable and so, control what you can
53
Discussion/Questions/Feedback/Ideas
• Your fixed site/donor center recruitment challenges?
• Your resolutions?