Upload
emerald-douglas
View
220
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fluidity of the 16S rRNA Gene Sequencewithin Aeromonas Strains
Alessia Morandi
Institute for Infectious DiseasesUniversity of Berne
Introduction
Sequence analysis of Classification ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of organisms
Three domains
Eubacteria Archaea Eukarya
Introduction
Sequence analysis of Classification ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of organisms
Species identification of pathogenic bacteria for diagnostic purposes
16S rRNA
Universally distributed
Conserved regions PCR-amplification
Variable regions
Vertical
Ancestor : AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUCDescendent 1: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUCDescendent 2: AUCUCACCGUGACGUUCAUUCDescendent 3: AUCUCAACGUGACGUUCAUUCDescendent 4: AUCUCAACGUGACGGUCAUUC
16S rRNA
Universally distributed
Conserved regions PCR-amplification
Variable regions Fundamental assumption for using 16S rRNA to identify bacteria: the degree of sequence similarity correlates with phylogeny
16S rRNA
Universally distributed
Conserved regions PCR-amplification
Variable regions Fundamental assumption for using 16S rRNA to identify bacteria: the degree of sequence similarity correlates with phylogeny
Multiple copies per genome
Concerted Evolution
Copy 1: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 2: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCACopy 3: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 4: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 5: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCA
# 1: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 2: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 3: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 4: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 5: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC
# 1: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 2: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 3: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 4: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 5: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC
16S rRNA
Universally distributed
Conserved regions PCR-amplification
Variable regions Fundamental assumption for using 16S rRNA to identify bacteria: the degree of sequence similarity correlates with phylogeny
Multiple copies per genome 2 divergent 16S rRNA gene sequences present on the same chromosome found in T. chromogena and T. bispora
16S rRNA
Universally distributed
Conserved regions PCR-amplification
Variable regions Fundamental assumption for using 16S rRNA to identify bacteria: the degree of sequence similarity correlates with phylogeny
Multiple copies per genome 2 divergent 16S rRNA gene sequences present on the same chromosome found in T. chromogena and T. bispora
House-keeping gene
Horizontal
Ancestor 1: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC
Ancestor 2: AUCUCAACGUGACGUUCAUUC X
Descendent 1: AUCUCAACGUGACGGUCAUUC
16S rRNA
Universally distributed
Conserved regions PCR-amplification
Variable regions Fundamental assumption for using 16S rRNA to identify bacteria: the degree of sequence similarity correlates with phylogeny
Multiple copies per genome 2 divergent 16S rRNA gene sequences present on the same chromosome found in T. chromogena and T. bispora
House-keeping genes Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of 16S rRNA is very rare and does not cause a significant problem for the species identification
Identification of Aeromonas species
Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria human pathogenAeromonas media environmental species
Biochemical species identification: difficult
molecular methods using 16S rRNA gene sequence
RFLP-PCR Analysis
Aeromonas strain to be identified
Grow up a single colony
Isolate genomic DNA
PCR amplify the 16S rRNA gene
Digest amplified 16S rRNA gene with restriction enzymes
Agarose gel electrophoresis
RFLP-PCR analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplified from genomic DNA of A. media strain
622-
404-
307-
240-
190-
160-
110-
5u 5u
Faint bands ??
Incomplete digestion of DNA
RFLP-PCR analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplified from genomic DNA of A. media strain
622-
404-
307-
240-
190-
160-
110-
5u 5u 10u 20u = excess amount of enzyme
Faint bands ??
Incomplete digestion of DNA
Contamination with other DNA
Faint bands ??
Incomplete digestion of DNA
Contamination with other DNA
We suspected that these strains harbored multiple different copies of the 16S rRNA gene on their chromosome.
Faint bands ??
Incomplete digestion of DNA
Contamination with other DNA
We suspected that these strains harbored multiple different copies of the 16S rRNA gene on their chromosome.
We tested this hypothesis by cloning and sequencing multiple copies of the 16S rRNA gene for each strain.
Our study
Aeromonas strain
Grow up a single colony
Isolate genomic DNA
PCR amplify the 16S rRNA gene
Clone 16S rRNA gene
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR-amplification of 16S rRNA gene copies
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
+Ligation with Plasmid
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR-amplification of 16S rRNA gene copies
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
+Ligation with Plasmid
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR-amplification of 16S rRNA gene copies
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
+Ligation with Plasmid
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR-amplification of 16S rRNA gene copies
Transformation ofultracompetent cells
Amp Rbeta-gal= blue
Amp R no beta-gal= white
Amp S
Amp R no beta-gal= white
Amp R no beta-gal= white
Amp R no beta-gal= white
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
+Ligation with Plasmid
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR-amplification of 16S rRNA gene copies
Transformation ofultracompetent cells
Amp S Amp Rno beta-gal= blue
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Plasmid isolation from individual clones
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
+Ligation with Plasmid
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR-amplification of 16S rRNA gene copies
Transformation ofultracompetent cells
Amp S Amp Rno beta-gal= blue
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Plasmid isolation from individual clones
4.5 kb 4.5 kb 4.5 kb 6 kb
Restriction digest andgel electrophoresis single insert
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
+Ligation with Plasmid
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR-amplification of 16S rRNA gene copies
Transformation ofultracompetent cells
Amp S Amp Rno beta-gal= blue
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Plasmid isolation from individual clones
PCR-amplification of individual copies of
16S rRNA gene
4.5 kb 4.5 kb 4.5 kb 6 kb
Restriction digest andgel electrophoresis single insert
CloningSingle bacterium with multiple copies of 16S rRNA gene
+Ligation with Plasmid
Isolation of genomic DNA and PCR-amplification of 16S rRNA gene copies
Transformation ofultracompetent cells
Amp S Amp Rno beta-gal= blue
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Amp Rbeta-gal= white
Plasmid isolation from individual clones
PCR-amplification of individual copies of
16S rRNA gene
Sequence analysisof a single copy
4.5 kb 4.5 kb 4.5 kb 6 kb
Restriction digest andgel electrophoresis single insert
Our study
Aeromonas strain
Grow up a single colony
Isolate genomic DNA
PCR amplify the 16S rRNA gene
Clone 16S rRNA gene
Sequence analysis of individual clones
Sequence Comparison within Strains
Sequence Comparison within Strains
As much variation occurs among the alleles present on the same chromosome as between the 16S rRNA gene from distantly related species
These dramatic differences were surprising,and we wanted to verify that the cloned alleles corresponded to the sequence present on the genome.
RFLP-PCR analysis: comparison of the restriction patterns
16S rRNA alleles 16S rRNA genesamplified from vs amplified fromplasmid DNA genomic DNA
RFLP-PCR analysis: comparison of the restriction patternsof the A. veronii biovar sobria strain
5u 5u 10u 20u 1 2 3 4 5
Genomic DNA Cloned Allele
RFLP-PCR analysis: comparison of the restriction patternsof the A. media strain
5u 5u 10u 20u
622-
404-
307-
240-
190-
160-
110-
1 2 3 4 5 6Genomic DNA Cloned Allele
RFLP-PCR analysis: comparison
All of the bands detected by digestion of the PCR-16S rRNA alleles amplified from plasmid DNA are also present on the same chromosome and are not due to cloning artifacts.
!!!!! RFLP-PCR analysis: PCR-dependent approach.
Southern analysis: PCR-independent approach
Southern analysis: PCR-independent approach
Primer 27F 5‘-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3‘
All alleles
Southern analysis: PCR-independent approach
Primer 27F 5‘-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3‘
16S 230-232 A 5‘-GGG TCC ATC CAA TCG CG-3‘
All alleles
Allele 1
A. media strain
Southern analysis: PCR-independent approach
Primer 27F 5‘-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3‘
16S 230-232 A 5‘-GGG TCC ATC CAA TCG CG-3‘
16S 230-232 B 5‘-GGG CAT ATC CAA TCG CG-3‘
All alleles
Allele 1
Allele 2-6
A. media strain
Southern analysis of the A. media strain
3000
1600
1000
2000
4000
12000
5000
27F all alleles
1 2 3Restriction enzymes:
Southern analysis of the A. media strain
3000
1600
1000
2000
4000
12000
5000
230-232 Aallele 1
27F all alleles
1 2 3Restrition enzymes: 1 2 3
Southern analysis of the A. media strain
3000
1600
1000
2000
4000
12000
5000
230-232 Aallele 1
27F all alleles
1 2 3Restrition enzymes: 1 2 3
230-232 Ballele 2-6
1 2 3
Southern analysis
The results are consistent with our predictions based on the DNA sequence analysis.
This suggests that the differences in the sequence of the cloned alleles are not due to cloning artifacts, PCR-errors or contamination but are present on the same chromosome.
Phylogenetic analysis
Fundamental assumption for using 16S rRNA to identify bacteria: the degree of sequence similarity correlates with phylogeny.
We wanted to assess the significance of the presence of multiple divergent 16S rRNA gene sequences on the same chromosome by constructing phylogenetic trees.
Construction of phylogenetic trees
Sequence 1 : AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUCSequence 2 : AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUCSequence 3 : AUCUCACCGUAACGUUCAUUC
Sequence alignementand pairwise camparison
Construction of phylogenetic trees
Sequence 1 : AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUCSequence 2 : AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUCSequence 3 : AUCUCACCGUAACGUUCAUUC
Sequence alignementand pairwise camparison
Sequence 1 2 31 0 1 32 1 0 23 3 2 0
Distance matrix
Construction of phylogenetic trees
Sequence 1 : AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUCSequence 2 : AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUCSequence 3 : AUCUCACCGUAACGUUCAUUC
Sequence alignementand pairwise camparison
Sequence 1 2 31 0 1 32 1 0 23 3 2 0
Distance matrix
Phylogenetic tree
Construction of phylogenetic trees
Sequence 1 : AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUCSequence 2 : AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUCSequence 3 : AUCUCACCGUAACGUUCAUUC
Sequence alignementand pairwise camparison
Sequence 1 2 31 0 1 32 1 0 23 3 2 0
Distance matrix
% % = Bootstrap value
Phylogenetic tree%
Phylogenetic tree
Phylogenetic analysis
Each strain harbors multiple divergent 16S rRNA gene sequences on its chromosome, that are related to different Aeromonas species.
This result supports our cautious approach in using 16S rRNA gene sequences for the identification of Aeromonas species, because of the possible misidentification of pathogenic species for environmental species.
Sneath, 1992
Sneath, 1992
The similarity of 16S rRNA gene sequencesdoes not correlate with
the similarity of the entire genome
Sneath, 1992
The similarity of 16S rRNA gene sequencesdoes not correlate with
the similarity of the entire genome
Sneath‘s hypothesis: horizontal transfer of 16S rRNA genes between Aeromonas species and subsequent homologous recombination between the different gene copies.
Sneath, 1992
The similarity of 16S rRNA gene sequencesdoes not correlate with
the similarity of the entire genome
Sneath‘s hypothesis: horizontal transfer of 16S rRNA genes between Aeromonas species and subsequent homologous recombination between the different gene copies.
!!! Sneath missed the strains that harbored different alleles that supported his hypothesis.
Sequence Comparison within Strains
Phylogenetic analysis
We therefore provide the missing strains that support Sneath‘s hypothesis of horizontal gene transfer between Aeromonas species.
Maintenance of multiple alleles on the same chromosome=
intermediate stage during homologous recombination
Conclusions
Conclusions
We described the presence of multiple divergent 16S rRNA alleles in 2 Aeromonas strains.
Conclusions
We described the presence of multiple divergent 16S rRNA alleles in 2 Aeromonas strains.
The variation that occurred in the 16S rRNA genes within one organism was as great as the variation between distantly related species.
Conclusions
We described the presence of multiple divergent 16S rRNA alleles in 2 Aeromonas strains.
The variation that occurred in the 16S rRNA genes within one organism was as great as the variation between distantly related species.
We provide the missing strains that support Sneath‘s hypothesis of horizontal transfer of 16S rRNA genes between Aeromonas species.
Conclusions
We described the presence of multiple divergent 16S rRNA alleles in 2 Aeromonas strains.
The variation that occurred in the 16S rRNA genes within one organism was as great as the variation between distantly related species.
We provide the missing strains that support Sneath‘s hypothesis of horizontal transfer of 16S rRNA genes between Aeromonas species.
Our data suggest that horizontal gene transfer of the 16S rRNA gene occurred and that the degree of similarity of 16S rRNA gene sequences does not reflect phylogeny, which is based on the traditional view of evolution as a vertical process of inheritance.
Conclusions
We described the presence of multiple divergent 16S rRNA alleles in 2 Aeromonas strains.
The variation that occurred in the 16S rRNA genes within one organism was as great as the variation between distantly related species.
We provide the missing strains that support Sneath‘s hypothesis of horizontal transfer of 16S rRNA genes between Aeromonas species.
Our data suggest that horizontal gene transfer of the 16S rRNA gene occurred and that the degree of similarity of 16S rRNA gene sequences does not reflect phylogeny, which is based on the traditional view of evolution as a vertical process of inheritance.
If this is the case, our results violate the fundamental assumption for using 16S rRNA gene to identify bacteria.
Our study 6
We tested Sneath‘s hypothesis by constructing distance matrices and phylogenetic trees only from the left or right region of the 16S rRNA gene sequence
Distance matrix: left and right region
Left region Right region
A. media alleles 1 2 3 4 5 6 A. media alleles 1 2 3 4 5 61 0 10 8 10 10 10 1 0 9 11 2 7 52 10 0 2 0 0 0 2 9 0 2 7 8 63 8 2 0 2 2 2 3 11 2 0 9 6 84 10 0 2 0 0 0 4 2 7 9 0 7 55 10 0 2 0 0 0 5 7 8 6 7 0 26 10 0 2 0 0 0 6 5 6 8 5 2 0
A. veronii alleles 1 2 3 4 5 A. veronii alleles 1 2 3 4 51 0 14 13 7 13 1 0 6 8 5 32 14 0 1 7 2 2 6 0 2 9 73 13 1 0 6 1 3 8 2 0 7 54 7 7 6 0 6 4 5 9 7 0 25 13 2 1 6 0 5 3 7 5 2 0
Phylogenetic trees: left and right region
Phylogenetic analysis: left and right region
The differences between the left and right region suggest that for both strains the left region of allele 1 was transfered from a distantly related Aeromonas species by horizontal gene transfer.
Phylogenetic analysis: left and right region
We therefore provide the missing strains that support Sneath‘s hypothesis of horizontal gene transfer between Aeromonas species.
Maintenance of multiple alleles on the same chromosome=
intermediate stage during homologous recombination
Prevalence of multiple 16S rRNA alleles within Aeromonas
RFLP-PCR analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplified from genomic DNA
additional faint bands in the restriction = multiple 16S rRNA allelespatterns
Of 82 strains analyzed 21% contained multiple alleles
This result indicates that the presence of multiple 16S rRNA alleles in Aeromonas is not an exception but rather common.
Cloned Alleles
Strain Allel Plasmid Strain Allel Plasmid Strain Allel Plasmid Strain Plasmid Strain Allel Plasmid Strain Allel Plasmid Strain Plasmid Strain Plasmid409 6 410 417 1 501 628 1 341 646 603 662 1 802 664 1 307 666 208 705 1008
1 426 1 503 1 702 601 1 804 1 302 207 10011 401 1 506 2 338 604 1 805 2 303 209 10021 408 1 502 2 346 605 1 806 2 308 210 10044 409 1 505 3 101 606 2 309 211 10034 406 1 511 3 337 2 306 213 10074 427 1 509 3 331 2122 420 1 510 3 350 2062 402 1 507 3 3393 415 2 512 3 3423 423 2 508 3 3435 414 3 1105 413 3 1065 405 3 3355 412 3 7045 411 3 3345 418 7035 4245 4035 4075 4225 4195 404
Sequence Comparison within Strains
Species/Acc# Allele # 76 129
131
132
154
155
156
165
166
167
199
218
230
231
232
250
258
264
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
647
649
650
A. veronii 1 2 LM13695 2 4
3 64 35 2
A. media 1 5AmCDC0862 2 2
3 24 45 96 5
A. media/X74679-1A. hydrophila/X74677A. trota/X60415A. caviae/X60408A. caviae/X60409A. salmonicida/X74681A. bestiarum/AB034759A. encheleia/AJ224309A. popoffii/AJ223180A. popoffii/AJ223181A. eucrenophila/X74675A. sobria/X74683A. allosacchrophila/S39232A. veronii/X74684A. jandaei/X74678A. schubertii/X60416
A A A U A G U A C U C G A U G U A U U G G C G C C U C G U G U C A A C A GG G U C U A C G U A G U G A A A G C C A A U A G U G U C C A C U G G U G A
G U A G
Concerted Evolution
Copy 1: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 2: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCACopy 3: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 4: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 5: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCA
# 1: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 2: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 3: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 4: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 5: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCAUUC
# 1: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 2: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 3: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 4: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC# 5: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCAUUC
If NO Concerted Evolution
Copy 1: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 2: AUCUCACCGUGACGGUCACopy 3: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 4: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCACopy 5: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCA
# 1: AUCUGACGGUGACGGUCA# 2: AUCUCACCGUGAAGGUCA# 3: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCA# 4: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCA# 5: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCA
# 1: AUCUGACGGUGACGGUCA# 2: AUCUCACCGUGAAGGUCA# 3: AUCUGACCGUGACGGUCA# 4: AUCUGAAGUGACGGUCA# 5: UUCUGACCGUGACGGUCA
Sequencing
Primers, Both strands sequenced, only sequences shown that occurred at least twice.