110
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......2017/10/24  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

    To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

    1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

    2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

    In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

    Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

  • rSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 9 2017IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONi NYCALi I.A.S. Part 46i (Hon. Lucy Billings)

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates To:JOHN F. CLIFFORD and JOANCLIFFORD,

    Index No.: 121913/97; 105235/98111061/98

    Plaintiffs NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

    - against -

    A.C. and S. INC, et al.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY herebytftcfiVv

    requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

    § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS

    COMPANY with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDEREQ< thatjUponAnotice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed

    \\&>with prejudice and without costs. FDated: White Plains, New York % 4Q . I I 2017

    CloOdes H • -FirQAttorney for Plaintiffs)Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York NY. 10003(212) 585-5500

    Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Lucy Billings

    LUCY BILLINGSj.s.c.{V0442212.1}

  • *lI

    '

    I

    I

    !:*

    RECEIVEDSEP t * 2017

    ECKERT SEAMANSCHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Hon. Lucy Billings)This Document Relates To:

    JOHN F. CLIFFORD and JOANCLIFFORD,

    Index No.: 121913/97; 105235/98111061/98

    Plaintiffs AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE- against-

    A.C. and S. INC, et al.,

    Defendants.STATE OF NEW YORK

    ss:COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER

    Erica Jackson, being duly sworn, deposes and says: deponent is not a party to this action, is over18 years of age and resides in Bronx County, NY.

    On September 15, 2017, deponent served a true copy of the annexed EXECUTED NOOPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER ON BEHALF OF A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS COMPANY upon:

    Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway

    New York NY 10003

    By depositing a true copy thereof in a post-paid wrapper, in an official depository under the careXXand custody of the United States Postal Service within the State of New York

    And the deponent also served a true copy of the annexed EXECUTED NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER ON BEHALF OF A.O. SMITH WATERPRODUCTS COMPANY upon all parties as appearingElectronic filing website at the e-mail addresses designate^XX

    Court, State of New York7 the Sunpdisaid parties.

    'JL rica/ficksonSworn to before me this

    itatoranoNotary Public, State of New Ybik

    No.02MA6303438Commission Expires S/19/2018

  • FIFO June 2013 John Clifford Service Rideras of 2/27/2013

    USA M PASCAFELLA ESQ.PEHLIVANIAN, 8RAATEN & PASCARELLA. LLC2430 ROUTE 34MANASQUAN NJ 06736PHONE # (732) 528-3888FAX # (732) [email protected] FOR INGERSOLL-RAND,TRANE U.S.INC.,ftk/a AMERICAN STANDARD,INC.JOHN J. FANNING,ESQ.CULLEN & DYKMAN177 MONTAGUE STREETBROOKLYN, NY 11201PHONE#(718) 855-9000FAX # (718) 935-1509COUNSEL FOR BURNHAM, LLC as successor lo BURNHAM CORP. MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., ANDGOULDS PUMPS,INC.SUZANNE HALBAF01ER, ESO.BARRY. MCTIERNAN & MOORE2 RECTOR STREET, 14 FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10006PHONE #(212) 313-3606FAX # (212) [email protected] FOR CLEAVER-BROOKS.INC.MICHAEL A.TANENBAUM,ESQ.SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN * ARNOLO. UPTHREE GATEWAY CENTER 12TH FLOORNEWARK, NJ 07102PHONE# (973) 242-0002FAX# (973) 242-8099COUNSEL FOR GENERAL ELECTRIC.FOSTER WHEELER L.L.C., AND CBS CORPORATION,a Delaware Corp., f/k/a/VIACOM INC.,successor fay merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corp., /k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPFRANK A CECERE, ESQ.AHMUTY. DEMERS & MCMANUS200I.U. WILIETS ROADALBERTSON, NY 11507PHONE #(516) 294-5433FAX # (516) [email protected] FOR T1SHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO.,INC.Heidi C. BakerMcMahon.Martine & Gaflagher, LLP55 Washington StreetBrooklyn,New York 11201Tel. (212) 747-1230 (voicemail ext. 111)Fax (212) [email protected] FOR TISHMAN REALTY A CONSTRUCTION CO„INC.KERRYANN COOK. ESQ.MCGIVNEY& KLUGER,P.C.80BROAD ST.. 23RD FLOORNEW YORK. NY 10004PHONE 212 509-3456r A V Kf\COUNSEL FOR TREADWELL CORP.

  • KIRSTEN KNEIS, ESQK&L GATES LLP5Q9 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022PHONE # (212) 536-3900FAX #(212) 536-3901KIRSTEN.KNEIS@KLGATES COMCOUNSEL FOR CRANE CO.Marc Gaffrey, ESQ.HOAGLANO, LONGO, MORAN, DUNST. 4 DOUKAS40 Paterson StreetNew Brunswick. NJ 06901Tel: (732) 545-4717Fax:(732) [email protected] for Kohler Co.

    PHILIP J.O'ROURKE.ESQ.LEWIS 8RISBOIS VISGAARD SMITH LLP77 WATER STREET, 21* FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10005PHONE # (212) 232-1300FAX # (212) 232-1399COUNSEL FOR PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.

    STEVE ROSENBLATT, ESQ.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY830 THIRD AVENUE. SUITE 400NEW YORK, NY 10022PHONE # (212) 651-7600FAX # (212) 651-7499SROSENBLATTflESMSM.COMCOUNSEL FOR WEIL-MCLAIN,a division of THE MARLEY CO. AURORA PUMPSSCOTT R. EMERY ESG.LYNCH DASKALEMERY LLP264 WEST 40TH STREETNEW YORK.NEW YORK 10018PHONE # (212) 302 2400FAX # (212) 302-2210COUNSEL FOR GEORGIA PACIFIC CO.

  • \Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC10 Bank StreetSuite 700White Plains, NY 10606

    TEL 914-949-2909FAX 914-949-5424www.eckertseamans.com

    ATTORNEYS AT LAW

    Laura B. Hollman, Esq(914) [email protected]

    September 15, 2017

    Via First Class Mail and FacsimileALL KNOWN DEFENSE COUNSEL

    Re: June 2013 FIFO CLUSTERJohn Clifford v. A.O. Smith Water Products, Co., et al.,121913/1997308016-00279

    Index No.:Our File No.:

    Dear Counsel:

    We represent Defendant A.O. Smith Water Products Company in the above-referencedmatter. We are in receipt of an executed No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion.

    If you object to A.O. Smith Water Products Company's dismissal from this matter, pleaseprovide the basis for this objection and any documents or evidence in support of this objection.

    Thank you for your attention regarding this matter.

    Very truly yours,ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLCAttorneys for Defendant, A.O. Smith Water Products Company

    Laura B. Hollman, Esq.

    LBH/ejEnclosures

    All Known Defense Counsel ( via Facsimile)cc:

    {V0446755.1}

  • *#v

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Billings)Index No: 190420-2010

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:

    CAROL BRADY-ROSE AND VINCENTROSE,

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYT MOTION AND ORDER

    FPlaintiffs,vs.

    CT 2 4 20173M COMPANY, ET AU.C0UN' Y CLERK'S OFFICEV NEW YORK

    WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS LLC, named in the complaint as“ GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,” hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled fiase;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against

    Defendants.

    defendant GOULDS PUMPS LLC, and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

    ORDEREE), thatjupon” notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstrrdefendant GOULDS PUMPS LLC, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    srt Gitelman Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000

    RobeNapoli Shkolnik, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiff400 Broadhollow Road, Suite 305Melville, NY 11747Phone: (631) 224-1133

    PhSO ORDERED, IOHON. LUCY BILLINGSSEP 1 3 2017

    LUCY BILLINGSJS.C. PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • RiSlifiBlSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKSEP 1 3 2017X

    IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONMVS SUPREMTCOURTX - CIVILThis Document Relates To:

    VERNON R. LEARN and MITZIE C. LEARN,NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Hon. Lucy Billings)

    Plaintiff,

    -against- IndexNo.: 107883-00NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERA.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG

    CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al„

    Defendants.x

    WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled £ase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiff's complaintagainst Defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    f t t o f A I O F F O S\'h h S I,ORDERED,that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against DefendantCRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated:

    New York, New York

    Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

    ozin, Esq.K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030 » C O(212) 536-3900 ^ \ W ^14 tWil

    t o j z j nSO ORDERED,Hon. Lucy Billings

    LUCY BfLLlMGSJ.s.c.

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A S. Part-£fT46IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BUI 1HG3

    J.S.C.jNiouitoicirnThis Document Relates to: Index No: 105986/2002

    JEAN VITALE Individually and as Administratrix ofthe Estate of ALFONCE VITALE

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation^ hereby requests summary judgment in theft.cho*''above-entitled e«SB, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintifl,s''complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDEREI), thatyjpon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantAvy 'burtj

    Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    F \ L £°Dated: New York, New Yorkotf * 4Sjj5 , 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. YaviizfEsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide'Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    Hon..gptoc11. MotrltonLUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C.

    SO ORDERED, l

    SEP 1 3 2017PART 4bMV’S SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALIAS Pait>fl46LuCY BiLLINGS(MoultearP^” J.S.C.Index No: 105986/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:

    JEAN VITALE Individually and as Administratrix ofthe Estate of ALFONCE VITALE

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintins ĉomplaint

    against defendant Amchem Products, Inc7with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDEREI^, that, uporAiotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantAmchem Products, Inc7be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    e t \-Dated: New York, New YorkSM , 2017

    °P\C

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPIT!Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVIAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    & BLAU LLPR P.A.

    lottjnSO ORDERED,Hon. Pfvter H Moulton

    LUCY BILLINGSr *•

    S E P 1 3 2 0 1 7N_YS_SUPREMECOURT ' CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Parted46(MfluitenrPT LUCY BfLLlNGS

    J .S .C .

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to: Index No: 102692/2003

    JOYCE VERDEROSA as the Administratrix of theEstate of VINCENT VERDEROSA

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation,, hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled̂ paSeTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'"*complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    jo*'" AW- AUuvJfiAtyOpposihS*^ORDEREE^ thatjUpon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    5Jli , 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavitz; Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, ^ FlodrNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    i t / z/n'UJSTWHNGSJ.S.C.SO ORDERED,

    Hon.

    S E P 1 3 2017Mvr. PART 46NYS SUPRe^ COURT “ CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part^fe(MonLtoftr~P~) yjCY BtLIndexNo: 102692/2003

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    J.S.C.This Document Relates to:

    JOYCE VERDEROSA as the Administratrix of theEstate of VINCENT VERDEROSA

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled^aee; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc7with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    Pn>r rffoJib'd*)ORDERED̂ thatyipon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Amchem Products, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    F I L E DDated: New York, New York

    OCT 2 4 2017

    COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK/ I

    , 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITAttorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavg^Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVIAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    & BLAU LLPR P.A.

    L-J^SO ORDERED, Hon. P[tn IT Mmilfrm— •LUCY BILLINGS

    J.S .C . SEP 1 3 2017PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part(Mouite«rÊ ~ :Index No: 121970/2003

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    K7?4:JU

    This Document Relates to: . ..

    PAUL NADEAU and THERESA NADEAU, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation^ hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled satStT, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    F I L E DDated: New York, New YorkSjM OCT 2 4 2017

    COUNTY CLERK'S OFF1NEW YORK j

    , 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. IDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    ( t/̂ j ry pjnSO ORDERED, / 0Hon. Petet-HrMoulldn *LUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C .SEP 1 3 2017

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part(MaultonrPT'lIndex No: 121970/2003

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION f

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part

    LUCY BiLLENGSJ.S.C.

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to: Index No: 105986/2002

    LISA LUNDY as Administratrix of the Estate ofTHOMAS MARION

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation,hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED,that,upoiTnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    f \Dated: New York, New YorkOtf ^ 4

    C°UNTVN^OB°F, 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    ipplLUCY BILUNGS

    J.S.C.

    SO ORDERED,Hon. EetetHrMoulton

    SEP I 3 20I7PART 46_ COURT - rn/r.NYS SUPREME

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part^f 6(Mojiltoar T̂'LUCY BILLINGIndex No: 105986/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:

    LISA LUNDY as Administratrix of the Estate ofTHOMAS MARION

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled gase;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

    against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.^ with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED,thatjupon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantAW. OfYoiffVdHj

    Amchem Products, Inc.;be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    c°n °̂« °F/2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. YavitzpEsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVIAttorneys for Amchem Products) Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    & BLAU LLP

    tQ(j/nSO ORDERED, "MoultonLUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C.SEP 1 3 2017

    PART 46— fflURT - CIVILN Y S SUPREME

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part >0 4̂ ^(Motrittfi; P.YIndexNo: 110985/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BlU'- CS

    •V* .This Document Relates to:

    RONALD FOWLER and SARAH FOWLER, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation^, hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled spae; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED^ thatjupon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    OCT 14W1, 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavitz “Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITE & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Eeter+r ivioulton

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C. SEP 1 3 2017

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Partyf 4b

    UJGY B L̂w.Index No: 110985/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    s; t.

    This Document Relates to:

    RONALD FOWLER and SARAH FOWLER, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled casCTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

    against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.jWith prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED, thatjiipon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Amchem Products, Inc? be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    41W1S /2% , 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq. 'WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. YavitzyEsq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, me.116 East 27th Street, 12* FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    i— a sSO ORDERED,Hon.JIctw IL MEutluii'

    LUCY BILLINGS B>SEP 1 3 20,7

    - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part

    f̂iulteirPrl_UCY BULLIMGSIndex No: 120704/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    J .S.C .This Document Relates to:

    GEORGE DOLL and CANDIDA DOLL, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporatioiy hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled faseTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,pn'or AW

    ORDERED,thatjupon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    i0 , 2017yCS OFF'C.

    N'

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavitz, Escfr /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor INew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Pe on

    LUCY BILLINGSJ .S.C. S E P 1 3 2017

    PART 46.NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part#f 4*( Moaiio»r̂ t~ LUCY BJLLluobIndex No: 120704/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:

    GEORGE DOLL and CANDIDA DOLL, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    ox.h'°*above-entitled aecSSlpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

    against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,pr ».̂

    ORDERED,thatj upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantA

    Amchem Products, Inc^ be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    SjlS , 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavitz^Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVFTZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300 F \ L £°

    U IO'1odOFFICE

    SO ORDERED,Hon. .Peter II. MoiilLOU

    LUCY BILLINGSSEP 1 3 2017

    ' CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part^46^MsultenTPr"-Index No: 117331/2001

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BHtJLSMGS

    a Q ^

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S . Part r̂ 46(WxAttnTFT Lucr;- * " 1 'Index No: 110285/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION s

    This Document Relates to:

    ANGELA DEVITO, Individually and as ProposedAdministratrix of the Estate of JOSEPH DEVITO

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporatioiy hereby requests summary judgment in thetucArio*

    above-entitled^aseTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaintagainst defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    fn'i/' M*/ / A MORDERED̂ thatyipon’notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    s )is 0u, 2017COOH^O^

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAAttorneys for Union Carbide (torporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloodNew York, NY 10016 '(212) 452-5300

    Z & BLAU LLP

    Hon. Pgtfirjy— MinihnnSO ORDERED, LUCY BILLINGSJ.s.c. SEP 1 3 2017

    - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Partly

    Index No: 110285/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION - ( s.

    This Document Relates to:

    ANGELA DEVITO, Individually and as ProposedAdministratrix of the Estate of JOSEPH DEVITO

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled j^ŝ rpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff^complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    pnV 0/*/*Jo\ovJr AAV/ a ffoSt'tiM /ORDEREDĵ that^uponAnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Amchem Products, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    hjzs OCT i * W'tco

    , 2017

    bFF/&E

    Judith A. Yrwitz, Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FlolorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    «7 Hon. PctrrH Mi mill i l l

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C.

    SO ORDERED,

    SEP 1 3 2017PART 46

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part >^46 LUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C.

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to: Index No: 110985/2002

    JOHN CZELADYN and ELLEN CZELADYN, hiswife

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporatioiy hereby requests summary judgment in the

    *cfi'o«4above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED^that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    F \ L E°Dated: New York, New YorkOtf ^ 4, 2017

    F\CE

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. YaviK, Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    lM*lr7SO ORDERED, Hon. PrtcrTI. Moulton REQEBWEDLUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C . SEP 1 3 2017

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. PartSVr4*»(MouitenrPI—Index No: 110985/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BS.UH6S

    This Document Relates to:

    JOHN CZELADYN and ELLEN CZELADYN, hiswife

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    Ach'd”above-entitled caeerpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc.;with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    priov os+d. '/AkkORDERED^ha^ upon*notice to all co-defendants’, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Amchem Products, Incvbe and the same are hereby dismissed witl^jjej^d^e and without costs.f \ V-Dated: New York, New York% 4

    2017OFF\C£

    Judith A. Yavfô T Esq. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    SO ORDERED,Hon. Petu: IT. Muuliun

    LUCY BILLINGSj.s.c.

    SEP 1 3 201?

    CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part 4̂-6(MoultenrrrIndex No: 110285/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION Y R 5U

    J.S.C.This Document Relates to:VITO COLONNA as proposed Administrator of theEstate of FRANK COLONNA

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation,hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitlcd_£a&e:pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s'complamtagainst defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    (In'cr 0 of foHti'M,ORDERED thatyupon n̂otice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    act *, 2017co^eN^

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A S. Part KT46 s(MoiiitenTPlIndex No: 110285/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION :-cL:

    This Document Relates to:

    VITO COLONNA as proposed Administrator of theEstate of FRANK COLONNA

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled case^pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plamtiffs' complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    pri'sr

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI A S.(NlauitenrPTT-'

    Index No: 101842/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION s

    f*i,,'^VaThis Document Relates to:

    DELEZI CANTALUPO as the Executrix for the Estateof ANTHONY CANTALUPO

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporatioiy hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitied £asc7pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    fr\>r **7 i h M ,ORDERED, that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed vsed \uth prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New Yorkg|2-S , 2017

    ,\cs°

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavjtz, Esq. IDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12* FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    SO ORDERED, i Qn/**1 *̂Hon. Petef-H. MOullon *

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.SiC* SEP 1 3 2017

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part(Moulterr^) v H s /r-Y r*Index No: 101842/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to:

    DELEZI CANTALUPO as the Executrix for the Estateof ANTHONY CANTALUPO

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled^aserpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffcomplaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    prtiT *Mw*Ar(M*Z offosih*iORDERED,thatyuponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Amchem Products, Inc.;be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New YorkilW

    , 20170%

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. YavitzfEsq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ/& BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, line.116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor ^New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    Qpi^s i°li/nHon. PgtexH-MoutinnLUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C .

    SO ORDERED,

    S E P 1 3 2017

    SUPREME C.nnoT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part f̂W

    ’ LUCY BILLINGSJ .S .C .

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Relates to: Index No: 104726/2003

    JAMES CALICCHIO and LUCILLE CALICCHIO,his wife

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation^ hereby requests summary judgment in theA-offerabove-entitlcd_£a£e:pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

    against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    fIni*"ORDERED^thalj upon*notice to all co-defendant's, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    E h8 , 2017

    Judith A. Yavi -̂Esq. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor*'New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    L—^SO ORDERED, Hon. PytcrH MonltnnLUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C. SEP 1 3 2017PART 46

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A S. Part(M21iltenr1rT-IndexNo: 104726/2003

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BILLINGS

    J .S .CThis Document Relates to:

    JAMES CALICCHIO and LUCILLE CALICCHIO,his wife

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled case-, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

    against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,prtof W tdoyAfiirav^ opfou'h*̂ORDERED, thatjUpon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

    Amchem Products, Incbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    5J2S , 2017

    Kevin M. Berry, Esq. »WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091

    Judith A. Yavit£-Esq. IDARGER ERRANTE YAVITEi & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

    SO ORDERED, BECE&BBLUCY BILLINGSJ .S.C . SEP 1 3 2017

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Partj*r4+(MojjjtenTPrT LwIndex No: 107263/2002

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION \UGSJ.S.C.

    r .ir *\

    This Document Relates to:

    IRENE BUCCIERO, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of MICHAEL H. BUCCIERO

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the

    above-entitled casg, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff^complaintagainst defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED, that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    £0Dated: New York, New York

    % j l8co

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALI.A.S. Part&r̂ 49IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION ( MmkerffTPl

    s

  • SEP 1 3 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL

    xThis Document Relates To:

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ON

    BEHALF OF FORD MOTORCOMPANY

    EDWARD PAUL O’NEILL,

    Plaintiff(s),

    -against- Index No.: 03-108966FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,

    Defendant(s).x

    WHEREFORE, defendani^.JFORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request* summaryjudgment in the above-entitled caserpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffcomplaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

    f T .ORDERED, that;upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

    Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017

    By: Brian Early, Esq. —EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE, 20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017

    By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-69701

    i .,/vv/v] akinSO ORDERED: HON. Gj.s.c.

    655112v{02029524.DOC }

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 3 2017XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    XThis Document Relates To:

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ON

    BEHALF OF FORD MOTORCOMPANY

    RONALD BALA,

    PlaintifF(s),

    -against- Index No.: 03-109335FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,

    Defendants).x

    WHEREFORE, defendaij^FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-en t i t l edpursuan t to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs'̂ complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

    otJr***f off* & fob*,ORDERED^ that uponAnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant^ FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

    Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017

    By: Brian Early, Esq.EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE 20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10017

    By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10Q6^\T: 212-593-6700 \F: 212-593-6Stfp \ V

    SO ORDERED:HON. GE

    CY BILLINGSj.s r c

    655112v{02029500.DOC }

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK . PPOEUWEID)COUNTY OF NEW YORKx SEP 1 3 2017NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    This Document Relates To:NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

    JUDGMENT MOTION ONBEHALF OF FORD MOTOR

    COMPANY

    JOSEPH BUSA,

    Plaintiff(s),

    -against- IndexNo.: 03-109470FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,

    Defendant(s).x

    WHEREFORE, defendant.^ORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request*summaryjudgment in the above-entitled cas&7 pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs'̂ complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED, that,upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant^ FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

    Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017

    By: Brian Early, Esq.EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE, 20 FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017

    By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEEN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700 ^ r\F: 212-593-697^^^ Wu-̂ ry >sLrhSO ORDERED:

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C.

    655112v{02029462.DOC }

  • t r SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    NYCALPart 46(Billings)

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    This Document Applies to:Index No. 105714/2002

    ANGELO C. ABRUZZINO and BARBARAABRUZZINO,

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES. INC.

    Plaintiffs,-against-

    A.C. and S„Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY)., et al„

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

    judgment in the above entitled jaass; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

    plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

    action, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED̂ that, upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    -HAD - xanoa awatwns SAN9P1WMand without costs.

    m s T d3S tDated: New York, New York

    JaooivSiebel, EsqAttorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003 *(212) 558-5500 ^ \ V

    Steven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 1863.5144

    ishlnSO ORDERED,Hon. Lucy Billings

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.S .C.

    4848-9410-2347.1

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 46(Billings)

    This Document Relates to:Index No. 109247/00

    RALPH A. MINERVINO and ANN P. ROBINSON asCo-Executors for the Estate of JOSEPH L.MINERVINO, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

    JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.

    Plaintiff(s),-against-

    A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above entitled pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

    plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in thisaction, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED that yipon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    cô ^ei'1 s°yLyMAL.Suzann^/Ratcliffe, Esq.RebeAttorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 1863.18645

    ee, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 Broadway 1New York, NY 10003212.558.5500

    E I J 3S

    L-Ĵ J ryiln̂ 55 ( olsjnSO ORDEREDHon. Lucy Billings

    LUCY B1LL1MGSj.s.c.

    4817-9774-0108.1

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    Index No.: 110268/02In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    FALYN E. STEWART, as Executrix for the Estateof DONALD E. STEWART, and FALYN E.STEWART, Individually

    NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

    Plaintiff(s),

    - against -A.C. and S, INC., et ai.

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled jzase; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto, ^ORDERED^ that, upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant^ Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without coststo either party.

    New York, New YorkDated: , 2017

    atcliffe, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

    zannlSEGSINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C.

    *l*faSO ORDERED,

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 46NYSSUPREMECOURT- iIndex No.: 119390/00 *yiLIn Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR, NO OPPOSITION

    SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONPlaintiff(s),

    - against -A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled cascr pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,

    ORDERED thatj upon1notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant^ Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without coststo either party.

    rr

    . Spfihnbh £New'York, New

    Dated: 2017York

    J^ison Yjmipolsky, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

    SEGATTMC( AMBRIITGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500 F I L E D

    LUCY BILUftGSOCT 2 4 2017SO ORDERED,

    COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

  • /

    •'•<(4

    i

    t

    I

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: NYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 7(HON.RONALD N. RUBIN and RONNI RUBIN,

    r •*, * tLUCY IPlaintiff(s), INDEX NO.: 190451/11 J.S.C.vs.

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.

    et aL,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, Defendant, Turner Construction Company, requests summary

    judgment in the above-entitled caeerpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing Plaintiffs* Complaint against Defendant, Turner Construction Company, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    t̂ -4. *1* dff

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: NYCAL

    I.A.S. Part 50(HON. PFTFRH MOMITON A I S E-frRICHARD ROKOSZAK, as Special

    Administrator for the Estate ofHENRY J. ROKOSZAK,

    r • \

    LUCY uINDEX NO.: 190508/1f

    Plaintiff(s),

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    vs.

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.et al.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, Defendant, Riley Power Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

    pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against

    Defendant, Riley Power Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,YiV'' offtrti' hWj

    ORDERED^ tha^ upon n̂otice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, Riley Power Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.

    Dated: NewYocK, New York~7pO

    C — rMidi11 PiykiflgL Esq, 'jtfry) C.Ex/1r*~ jWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

    , 2017

    Giovanni Regina) Esq.WATERS, MbPH233 BroadwayNew York, New York 10279(212) 227-7878Attorneys for Defendant Riley

    ERSON, McNEILL, P.C.

    lac.D

    OCT 2 4 2017

    °UNZCLE^S OFFNEW YORK FSO ORDERED:

    Hon. Rotor H. Moulton; A.J.S?LUCY BILL1MGS

    JSC.ICE

  • : :r• , ' ~' nwp’n=s,.VS

    !) lIiCLBS6821/legal/nosjm/May 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORKSEP 1 4 20)7

    X - CIVILRICHARD J. VARI, SR., NO OPPOSTSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

    -against- IndexNo.: 111250/04,113281/97, 111028/98 &104522/97

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part

    Defendant(s),X

    WHEREFORE, defendant/ CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC^hereby request%ummary*cft ô \judgment in the above-entitledaets l pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiff*/*complaint against defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDEREDthat,uponAnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant/ CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

    Shawn&tteFluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

    Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

    to/417SO ORDERED1}$Hon. LUCY BILLINGS

    J .S .C .,-wcov^Vs°

  • Oi(SE(!VtS0X:RWA/53392JDISM1SSALS/NOSJM SEP 1 4 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK L N Y S SUPREME COURT

    NO OPPOSITION SUMTOJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

    X - CIVILIRWIN MORRIS and SANDRA MORRIS,Plaintiff(s),

    - against - Index No.: 190082/09

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part

    Defendants.X

    WHEREFORE, defendant R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION hereby requestJsummaryjudgment in the above-entitled case;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    «»v\.y effofih'&jORDERED,that,upon'notice to all co-defendant^ all claims and cross claims against

    pn*v

    defendant^ R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.

    Div^kslcr, Esq. iAttorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

    William A. Cooney, Esq. fAttorneys for R.W. Beckett CorporationBarry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

    nnr

    F I L E 0ro/4/17SO ORDERED,Hon. Lucy Billings

    OCT l *P-SLUCY BltUNJ.S.C.

  • SEP J 4 2017FBW49173/!egal/nosjm/May 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    PART 46— COURT - CIVILNYS SUPREMEX

    RICHARD J. VARI, SR NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERP1aintiff(s),

    -against- IndexNo.: 111250/04,113281/97, 111028/98 &104522/97

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„ NYCAEI.A.S. Part

    Defendant(s),X

    WHEREFORE, defendant^FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request*summaryC\Ch'o”judgment in the above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs'̂:omplaint against defendant^ FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

    prfiv'' fash's*)ORDEREEĵ thal^uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

    defendant^ FULTON BOILER WORKS be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

    ^8^Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York. New York 10003

    Charles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKSBarry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

    \ t£°,»Mn FSO ORDERED,41̂LUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C.Off'o£i

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

    Index No. 190524/2011FRANK AYALA and MARGARITA AYALA,

    Plaintiffs,STIPULATION

    DISCONTINUING ACTIONWITH PREJUDICE

    - against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

    Defendants.

    IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, theattorneys of record for the plaintifljand defendant(s) named below in the above entitled action, thatwhereas no party hereto is an infant, incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointedor conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the action, theabove entitled action be, and the same hereby is discontinued, in accordance with the terms of theaccompanying release, with prejudice as to GOULD ELECTRONICS INC. and ABB INC. withoutcosts to any party as against the other. This stipulation may be filed without further notice withthe Clerk of the Court.

    Dated:, New York, New YorkS&jewbeR. 7.2017

    JameŝWEITAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

    f\(' fa Aof/'dc Jo Co'AA&Afi&to/h£.4" if

  • [RMIWEB)SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 3 2017

    xGALSUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

    This Document Relates To:NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

    JUDGMENT MOTION ONBEHALF OF FORD MOTOR

    COMPANY

    WILLIAM MCDONAGH,

    Plaintiffs),

    Index No.: 03-109079-against-FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,

    Defendant(s).x

    WHEREFORE, defendiujMFORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request* summaryjudgment in the above-entitled^Serpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs'*complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED, thatyUpon^notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant,FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

    ..A

    Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017

    By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970

    By: Brian EEARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE 20 FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017

    Lbsq.

    \,fcOL tiw

    OO ŜN***>*/ ilnSO ORDERED:

    HON. GERALD LEBOVITSLUCY BILLINGS

    655112V{02029490.DOC }

  • .«*v#u V / 1SEP 1 3 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORKPART 46

    NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAC

    xThis Document Relates To:

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ON

    BEHALF OF FORD MOTORCOMPANY

    GEORGE J. MCMAHON,

    Plaintiff(s),

    -against- Index No.: 03-109083FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,

    Defendants).x

    WHEREFORE, defendaj^t^FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case7 pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs*complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED that^ upon n°tice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

    Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017

    /

    By: Brian Early, Esq.EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE 20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017

    By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 1001(5T: 212-593-6700 . V VF: 212-593-6970^ \ V ^

    % KSO ORDERED:

    HON.JjERALErEEBOVFFS-»LUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C . O'

    655112v{02029506.DOC }

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Partitf 46(Silvgfc-GeorgrTTLUCY BtLLlNGS

    J.S.C.Index No.: 115633/01; 111218/01

    This Document Relates to:

    JOSEPH P. SWIADOWSKY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    ^chattythe above-entitled fi&SS, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED, thatj upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

    against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    ep/ otih'lMj

    and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New YorkQELAA , 2017

    r—Charles Ferguson, Esq. ]LAJLJLA,Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th Floor ONew York, New York 10005 % **

    Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    lojiofnSO ORDERED,Hon. Ororge J. Silver-

    &TllK;LUUY BiLLiMGS

    J.S.C.3369634

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part^ilyeirGcorgeJ'; JiCY BiUWGS

    Index No.: 101812/08This Document Relates to:

    ROY F. SCHNETTLER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled jsasgp pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED, that, upon'* notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    New York, New Yorkn^ . qa , 2017Dated:

    Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005 .

    Charles Ferguson, EsqWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    i Yin' lajiojnSO ORDERED, ^\ceHon. George J. Silverx JIGY m j r T.. nm3369634

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. PartTCr ^6^Siiyefr t̂eorge j.)

    Index No.: 111047/98; 113287/98;190391/11

    This Document Relates to:

    JOSEPH T. SANDERNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment infac-f-iaHthe above-entitled ca$C pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.yisS djf fa( ihWf

    ORDERED^ that^ upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

    against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    New York, New YorkQS- - ga , 2017

    Dated:

    ~1Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    T%\1SO ORDERED,

    Hon. Geuige J. SllVei*L oC- fedl7

    \ •< ,sI : •!3369634

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Partied(Silvi ge J.)

    This Document Relates to:Index No.: 124356/94; 124374/94;115998/95; 111041/98; 100917/08

    WALTER A. REILLYNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED, thatj uponAnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    New York, New York0 8 3.2 , 2017

    Dated:

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    7ANicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC .88 Pine Street, 24th Floor ^ yNew York, New York 10005* \ y»»

    *SO ORDERED,Hon. Goorgo J. Silver—L

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. PartXT4b

    BILLINGSJ S C

    Index No.: 106709/02; 115527/02This Document Relates to:

    JOHN P. PATTERSON SR. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled jcasS , pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED^ thatj upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

    against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    New York, New York, 2017

    Dated:

    vs

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    lojidjnLSO ORDERED, off'06Hon. George-J-i Silveri v/c

    j.s.a3369634

  • REQ,SEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORK

    CI\/iLIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part >0̂ 4(Silvej^JGeergerTjThis Document Relates to:

    ' /V

    Index No.: 107208/00; 125766/99;107208/00

    RALPH A. MENENDEZNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled £ase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED, that^upon'Yotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    fJw*A4*17

    and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York0 Sr . g 2 , 2017

    ! 2^2Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    c T*'/SO ORDERED,

    Hon. Goorge J. Silver o^ceLUCY BILLINGS

    j.s.c3369634

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 0 2017

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURTIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part>^4̂(SiiXBCrOeoigeTJLUQY BILLINGS

    J.S.C.

    CIVIL

    This Document Relates to:Index No.: 111191/96;

    117843/02;113280/97; 111069/98;109675/99;190172/09WILLIAM E. JOYCE

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment inOjcJ'intA

    the above-entitled cage”, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED thatj upon"notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York(3S~ -A9- , 2017

    X 7NNicholas P. Eliades, Esq.Charles Ferguson, Esq.

    Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005 .\ '

    SO ORDERED,Hon. George -fr Silver

    BILLINGS3369634

  • WfiCSEP 2SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORK0 201?

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURTIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part/Kf^b

    - CIVILXP - -GS

    J&G..7t

    This Document Relates to:Index No.: 106973/08

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    AUSTIN C. JOERGER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled £asC pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.peps' offoi( bl>v(

    ORDERHIVthatj upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

    against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    New York, New YorkDated:

    0 %_ &cL , 2017

    -n—Charles Ferguson, Esq. x*)Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th Floor ^ ANew York, New York 10005 \ **

    i

    Lj^ry.iĥ ts hh„jnHon. Goorgi 5/ SilverL SiHi

    SO ORDERED,

    c

    3369634

  • RGOSDVEDSEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORKPART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 4b

    ^ 2 V '"’V'A -7llV|This Document Relates to:

    Index No.: 103506/02; 103418/96;111068/98

    RONALD D. HANDZLIKNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in0.CfiV\

    the above-entitled c^sef pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.Qnor »vJL abi(MA O^ofih**,ORDERED^ that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

    against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    , 2017

    :^folas P. Eliades, Esq.Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    NicMcElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th Floor ^ XNew York, New York 10M5^^ V*l — *os

    Hon. George J. Silver. ibjiojl')SO ORDERED,L vc7

    3369634 V-'iT &c. J -- J > y*

  • RECEIVEDSEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part>0^__^Silyeiy^teGfgeT)"Index No.: 190137/09

    This Document Relates to: . •M -

    FRANKIE FUGATE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in4LCH'OH

    the above-entitled jxtpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDEREQ, that, upoif notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    08" - , 2017

    V

    Charles Ferguson, Esq. NJ Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    loj /o jnSO ORDERED,Hon. George J. Silvci

    7

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C.3369634

  • SEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART «*NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

    NYCALI.A.S. PartM*1'(Silvsr

  • SEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. Part JJTU

    ; c r-This Document Relates to: -T fIndex No.: 111089/02

    JAMES WILLIAM CARR NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled caser pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED that,upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.New York, New YorkDated:

    Qg £2 , 2017

    \_

    Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    ^ \ UL 0>'JK-3S *M/nSO ORDERED, Hon. George J. Silver' ISr i, f » :ol

    3369634 vC

    _V- O'

  • SEP 2 0 1017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PAR) 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 4*(Silver^JjeergeT)

    Index No.: 111050/98; 111440/98;123718/99; 190007/09

    • •rThis Document Relates to:

    DOUG CHAPPLENO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled a«Se7 pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto. „ORDERED^ that, upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

    against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    New York, New YorkDated:

    2 , 2017

    u£L̂ P, ZJLQ̂Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,

    Charles Ferguson, Esq. N^JWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    I Q-df*— 15s tojio/ nSO ORDERED,Hon. Georgo J. Silver

    USGVE:? :3369634 J

  • Ri(SE!¥SDSEP 2 0 2017

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S.?ait^4b

    This Document Relates to:Index No.: 115075/98; 108709/01

    RALPH N. BORELLI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled ^ea§e, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.pr / a*'' f i f t y Of [dSi f iO »\

    ORDERED^ thatjUpon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

    against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    New York, New YorkDated:

    Os as , 2017

    7Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    t— nmn-ns io/iojn C \ V-Hon. George J. Silver *SO ORDERED,OCT 2

    COUNTYCLERK'S0

    NEWYORK^\ceLUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C3369634

  • j^ECOEIWEDSEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    ' NVS SUPREMÊ COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part Yf

    ILLINGSJ.S.C.

    ;e J .IThis Document Relates to:

    Index No.: 106480/93; 132167/93;100387/08

    CHARLES BAGGIANONO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled gaser pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED^ thaj upon'Votice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.

    New York, New YorkDated:

    , 2017

    X naNicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    f U-l io)/*/nSO ORDERED,Hon. Goorgo J. Silver

    L S J L JLUCY BILLINGS3369634

    J.S.C*

  • 0SEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORKCIVIL

    IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    NYCALI.A.S. ParLKf^TSjlysfrCteorge JQ :•->

    - i----- 1.This Document Relates to: . >• -Index No.: 190107/09

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    RAPHAEL ARONE

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and

    there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED,that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    O.'O U A A A D i t i*/

    and without costs.

    New York, New York, 2017

    Dated:

    Ns^ Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925

    McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

    [— *'**7 icjinjnHon. George J. Silver—SO ORDERED, i^-UMi3369634

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    SEP 2 0 2017NyS SUPREMECOMPTIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part«5# 4̂4>

    * CIVIL

    (MfinltettrFT •i - £*JMC.This Document Relates to:

    INDEX NO.: 100862-03;110194-04JEANNE LOWE, as Executrix for the Estate of

    ROBERT A. LOWE and JEANNE LOWE,Individually NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

    JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary

    judgment in the above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being

    no opposition thereto.pn

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 0 2017

    ws SUPREM^ennoTIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALI.A.S. Part>0

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 0 2017IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. PartiT46

    PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

    (MfluRoflTFTLUCY BILUNGS

    J.S.C.This Document Relates to: Index No.: 108721/2000CHARLES R. THURLO

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

    ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary&.

  • ^ECEflVEOSEP 8 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF NEW YORKPART 46

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

    NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONIN REx

    Index No.CONO AMILO MASCARELLA, 109071-00

    April 2016 In ExtremisWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Plaintiffs,

    v.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

    JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAC and S, INC, et al., including GENERALELECTRIC COMPANY,

    Defendants.x

    WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY sued herein hereby request^summary judgment in the above-entitled ^aserpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs^complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    pr\V Offdsih'SH)ORDERED,that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

    and without costs.Dated: New York,New York

    OR-.q£ - !7

    Charles M. Ferguson, Esq>Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

    Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.v-JTanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for General Electric Company1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloNewark, NJ 07102

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.s.c.

    SO ORDERED,

  • SEP 7 2017X‘R1 yA/53392JDISMISSALS/ XOSJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    PART 46NYi lUPRBMg COURT - CIVIL

    XIRWIN MORRIS and SANDRA MORRIS, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

    JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERPlaintiff(s),

    - against - Index No.: 190082/09

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part f̂^Defendants.

    X

    WHEREFORE, defendant R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION hereby request*summaryjudgment in the above-entitled naseTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,.

    ORDERED,that^upori'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant^ R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION,be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.

    - -— AdaurDicksItr, Esq*. ,Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

    William A. Cooney, Escfr'"^Attorneys for R.W. Beckett CorporationBarry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 141'1 FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

    F I L E DSO ORDERED, L— ^Hon. Lucy BillingsOCT 2 4 2017

    COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEC NEW YORK

    EH

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    XIn Re: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI. A. S. Part^T4*»(Moulton,-Jr)fo i imqj , L.Index No.: 190406/10

    XThis document relates to:

    MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor ofThe Estate of PATRICK T. SLEVIN

    NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

    X

    WHEREAS, Defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AS

    SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. (“ Buffalo Pumps” ), requests#.ch‘o*o

    summary judgment in the above-entitled caa< pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint against Buffalo Pumps, without prejudice, and there being

    no opposition thereto, it is hereby

    ORDERED,that^upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstBuffalo Pumps^be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    bes 5^“Z,o

    Keith Binder, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

    ' HoILB; , LAWLER & BUBA

    140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Counsel for Air and Liquid SystemsCorp., as successor by merger toBuffalo Pumps

    I— rlr1 iojtnjnSO ORDERED, MgeEWEPHon. Potor Moulton;JrSSEP 2 0 2017

    {00398438.DOCX}LUCY BILLINGS

    j.s.cPART 46„_

    nvc SUPREME COURT - cwtt

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    XIn Re: NEW YORK CITY

    ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI. A. S. Part(Moitkon. J . )

    Bilim L.Index No.: 104081/08

    XThis document relates to:

    JANE KEENAN, as ADMINISTRATRIX ofThe Estate of JOHN RESKER

    NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

    X

    WHEREAS, Defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AS

    SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. (“ Buffalo Pumps” ), requestsathb*summary judgment in the above-entitled case;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

    3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Buffalo Pumps, without prejudice, and there being

    no opposition thereto, it is herebyfn'iy /^7ORDERED^thatj upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

    Buffalo Pump^ be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

    TU.

    Niehdas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff

    John S. Hogarth, Esq.WILBRA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Counsel for Air and Liquid SystemsCorp., as successor by merger toBuffalo Pumps

    , LAWLER & BUBA

    Hon. Feter-Moultoii, J. V

    UMJ BillingLUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C

    SO ORDERED,

    SEP * » ml{00398439.DOCX}

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    Index No.: 190323/10In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONMANUEL A. CHINEA and JANET M. CHINEA,

    Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITION

    SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

    - against -

    AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summarytf-Cpl'O*Judgment in the above-entitled .case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, andthere being no oppos.t.on thereto^ ^ o,ORDERED that^upoif notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefSndany Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed 'With prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerkof the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separatecounterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all

    "-V:

    purposes of this motion.Dated: A*, 2017

    New York, New York

    °Cr2Brian Early, EsqrTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 20lh FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233

    Sarah R. Haag-Fisk, Bsq.SEGAL McCAMBRHHSINGER & MAHONEY, LTDAttorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

    ^®/o

    V

    s0/?/f 0/>/c

    RFIDIPWEDSEP 2 o 2017

    i Tlr>ĥ 3SO ORDERED, lLUCY BILLINGS

    J.S.C.PART A6

    NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL

  • ggg©Eq 1 5..

    Uh SEP 15 2017i

    SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY

  • . :.Jfc ..I*-J •a-

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    Index No.: 190066/08In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONTHOMAS DOUGHERTY,

    Plaintiff,NO OPPOSITION

    SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

    - against -

    A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY hereby requests Summary

    Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant H.B. Fuller Company with prejudice, andthere being no oppos.t.on thereto^ORDEREDthat,upon'Yiotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant^ H.B. Fuller Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk

    of the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate

    counterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all

    purposes of this motion.Dated: 2016

    ew York, N$w York

    Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

    Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

    lSO ORDERED,Hon. utton

    LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.c

    SEP 2 0 2017PART 4$NVS SUPREME COURT. CIVIL

  • I•c:

    .j^r - JD.

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 108873/02

    118526/98JANICE E. FARRELL as Personal Representativefor the Estate of ROBERT C. FARRELL andJANICE E. FARRELL, Individually,

    NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

    MOTIONPlaintiffs,

    - against -

    A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.,

    Defendants.

    WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY hereby requests Summary*dri upon/'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, H.B. Fuller Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk

    of the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate

    counterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all

    purposes of this motion.

    Dated: F' t e o10 -25 , 2016New York, New York-UFstjN- Busehy-L&lT

    WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

    t/lSOU Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE

    SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

    ijfio/ n

    COu/\/TyY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK

    [RiESEflWE®iHon. Retgiji-Muul ( onBILLINGS

    J.S.C.

    SO ORDERED,

    SEP 2 0 2017PART 46

    NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

  • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

    xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

    x Index No.: 119472/2001THOMAS J. MURRAY and PATRICIA MURRAY,

    Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSU