for Affiliated-Constitutent... · Web viewPercentage of teachers using ICT for effective teaching. (E-learning resources OER’s, NPTEL, e-Pathshala, CEC, etc.) Number of teachers

NAAC - QIF for Affiliated/Constituent College

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL, BENGALURU

Proposed - Quality Indicator Framework: A Pilot Study (QIF for Affiliated/Constituent College)

Criterion 1: Curricular AspectsKey Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and

Implementation

Sl. No. Metrics Response

1.1.1 The institution ensures effective curriculum delivery through a well planned and documented process

Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this process in your institution 4-0 scale

4 3 2 1 0

1.1.2

Number of programs/courses (Certificate/Diploma) for which the institution has developed the curriculum during the last five years

1.1.3 Percentage of participation of (full time) teacher in various bodies of the Universities/ Autonomous Colleges/ Other Colleges such as BoS and Academic Council during the last five years

Number of teachers participating∈suchbodies during thelast 5 yearsTotalnumber of teachers

X 100

Note: Unless stated otherwise the period to be considered is the assessment period (five years)

Page 1 of 34


Key Indicator - 1.2 Academic FlexibilitySl. No. Metrics Response

1.2.1 New programmes introduced as a percentage of total number of programmes.

¿Number of new programmes

introduced during thelast 5 yearsTotalnumber of programmes taught∈¿ thelast 5Years

X 100

New courses (within a programme) introduced as a percentage of the total number of courses (across all programmes)

¿Number of newcourses

introduced during thelast 5 yearsTotalnumber of programmes taught∈¿ thelast 5Years

X 100

1.2.2 Percentage of programmes in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS) has been implemented

¿Number of programmes

¿whichCBCS implementedTotalnumber of programmes taught

X100

1.2.3 Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Diploma courses/Add-on courses as against the total number of students during the last five years

Toatlnumber of studentsenrolled∈¿Certificate /Diplomacourses /¿ Add−oncourses duringthe last 5 years

Total number of studentsduring thelast 5 yearsX 100

Key Indicator - 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment


Page 2 of 34


1.3.1 Institution integrates cross- cutting issues such as Gender, Environment and Sustainability, Human Values and Professional Ethics into the curriculum


4 3 2 1 0

1.3.2 Number of Value-added, Life Skills courses including Communication Skills/Soft Skills available for students

1.3.3 Percentage of students enrolled in the courses under 1.3.2 above

Totalnumber of studentsenrolled∈¿ these courses duringthe last5 years¿

Total number of students¿

X 100¿¿

1.3.4 Percentage of students undertaking field projects / internships

Number of studentsundertakingfield project / internship

¿Totalnumber of students

X 100¿

Key Indicator - 1.4 Feedback System


1.4.1Structured feedback on curriculum

Choose the applicable option

Page 3 of 34


obtained from 1) Students 2) Teachers 3) Employers 4) Alumni 5) Parents Semester wise / Year wiseOption:A. Any 4 of the

aboveB. Any 3 of the aboveC. Any 2 of the aboveD. Any 1 of the aboveE. None of the above

1.4.2 Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows:

A. Feedback not collected

B. Feedback collected

C. Feedback collected and analysed

D. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken

E. Feedback collected, analysed and action taken and feedback available on website

Choose the applicable option

Page 4 of 34


Criteria 2 – Teaching-Learning and EvaluationKey Indicator - 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile

Sl. No. Metrics Response2.1.1 Percentage of students from

other States and Countries Number of students¿

other ¿ States∧Countries¿ ¿Totalnumber of students

X 100

2.1.2 Demand Ratio (Average of last five years)

Or

Enrolment Ratio. (Average of last five years)

Number of seats availableTotalnumber of eligible applications

received

Or

Totalnumber of studentsadmittedTotal number of sanctioned seats X 100

2.1.3 Aggregate percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories as per applicable reservation policy

Actual number of students admitted¿ the reserved categories

Total number of seats earmarked forreserved category as per GOI∨¿ StateGovernment rule

X 100

Page 5 of 34


Key Indicator - 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity

Sl. No. Metrics Response2.2.1 The institution assesses the

learning levels of the students, after admission and organises special programmes for advanced learners and slow learners.


4 3 2 1 0

2.2.2 Student Teacher Ratio Students : Teachers

2.2.3 Percentage of differently abled students (Divyangjan) on rolls.

Number of differentlyabled students

Totalnumber of students X 100

Page 6 of 34


Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching - Learning ProcessSl. No. Metrics Response2.3.1 Student centred methods,

such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences.


4 3 2 1 0

2.3.2

Percentage of teachers using ICT for effective teaching. (E-learning resources OER’s, NPTEL, e-Pathshala, CEC, etc.)

Number of teachersusing ICT¿

Totalnumber of teachersX 100¿

2.3.3

The institution has a mentoring system in place to meet the academic and personal needs of students. Ratio of mentor to students

Mentor : Mentee

2.3.4 Innovation and creativity in teaching-learning

2.3.5 Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process of about 50 to 100 students.

Online survey to be conducted by NAAC

Page 7 of 34


Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality Sl. No. Metrics Response2.4.1 Percentage of regular

teachers against sanctioned posts

Number of regular teachers¿

Totalnumber of sanctioned postsX 100¿

2.4.2 Percentage of teachers with Ph.D. qualification

Number of teachers with Ph .D .qualification

Total number of teachersX 100

2.4.3

Average teaching experience of teachers (number of years) 1

N×∑

i=1

N

expi

Where: N = Number of teachersexpi = Number of years of experience

of ith teacher2.4.4

Percentage of teachers who received awards recognition /fellowships at State/ National/ International level from Government/ recognised bodies during the last five years

¿Number of teachers receiving awards

¿ state level+national level+¿ interna tional level duringthe last5 years¿

Total Number of teachers¿

X 100 ¿¿

2.4.5

Percentage of teachers from other states against sanctioned posts

Number of teachers¿other states ¿Totalnumber of teachers

X 100

Page 8 of 34


Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and ReformsSl. No. Metrics Response2.5.1 Reforms in Continuous

Internal Evaluation system at the institutional level


4 3 2 1 0

2.5.2 Mechanism for internal assessment is transparent and robust (in terms of frequency and variety)


4 3 2 1 0

2.5.3 Mechanism to deal with exam related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficient


4 3 2 1 0

2.5.4 The institution adheres to the academic calendar for the conduct of examinations


4 3 2 1 0

Page 9 of 34


Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

Sl. No. Metrics Response2.6.1 Programme outcomes and

course outcome are stated and displayed on website


4 3 2 1 0

2.6.2 Learning Outcomes are evaluated by the institution


4 3 2 1 0

2.6.3 Average pass percentage of students during assessment period

Totalnumber of final year studentswho passed∈¿ theuniversity examinationTotal number of final year students who appeared for

examinat ion

X 100

Page 10 of 34


Criteria 3 – Research, Extension and Innovations Key Indicator - 3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities

Sl. No. Metrics Response3.1.1

The institution has a well defined policy for promotion of research and the same is uploaded on institutional website

3.1.2

The institution facilitates its faculty to undertake research by providing seed money for research (mention the average seed money per year)

Theamount of seedmoney provided byinstitutions

¿its faculty∈the ¿ last5 years ¿ ¿

5

3.1.3 Number of workshops/ training programmes/ sensitization programmes conducted by the institution to promote research culture (during last five years)

3.1.4 Number of faculty members availing international fellowship for advanced studies/ research (during last five years)

3.1.5 The institution has following facilities

Central Instrumentation facility

Central computing facility

Database

Page 11 of 34


Key Indicator - 3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research


Grants for projects sponsored by the industry / corporate houses / international bodies/ endowment/ chairs in the institution. (during last five years)

In thousands of rupees

3.2.2 Number of research centres recognised by University and national / international bodies

3.2.3 Percentage of teachers recognised as research guides – PG at present

Or

Percentage of teachers recognised as research guides – UG at present

3.2.4 Number of externally funded major/minor research projects (calculated per teacher during the last five years)

Totalnumber of Externally fundedmajor∨minor researchprojectswiththe teachersTotalnumber of teachers

Page 12 of 34


Key Indicator - 3.3 InnovationsSl. No. Metrics Response3.3.1 Institution has brought

about innovative methods in creation and transfer of knowledge


4 3 2 1 0

3.3.2 Incubation centre is established and functional

3.3.3 Number of workshops/seminars conducted on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Innovative practices(during last five year)

3.3.4 Number of awards for innovation won by institution/teachers (during last five year)

3.3.5 Number of Start-ups incubated on campus (during last five year)

3.3.6 Commercialisation of research generated through Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) (during last five year)

Page 13 of 34


Key Indicator - 3.4 Research Publications and Awards

Sl. No. Metrics Response3.4.1 The institution has a stated Code

of Ethics to check malpractices and plagiarism in ResearchNumber of malpractices and plagiarism cases detected and action taken

3.4.2

The institution has instituted research awards and incentives to the faculty for receiving state, national and international recognition

3.4.3 No. of Patents/Gene sequences /Copyrights awarded ) (during last five year)

3.4.4 Output of Ph.D per teacher ) (during last five year)

Number of Ph. Ddegrees awarded¿

TotalnumberTeacher asarecognised guides¿

¿¿

3.4.5 Publications per teacher as per list of Journals notified in UGC website and chapters in edited volumes books (during last five year)

Number of publications¿

UGCnotified journals+Chapters∈edited volumes books

Total number of teachers3.4.6 Percentage of papers published in

top ranked high impact journals listed in UGC Website.

Number of publicationsofthe institutions∈toprank

highimpactUGCnotified journal

Totalnumber of teachersX100

3.4.7 Publication of reference books published by teachers (during last five year)

3.4.8 Number of papers with more than 10 citations in recognised databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Indian citation) – Index, PUBMED (during last five year)

Page 14 of 34


Key Indicator - 3.5 Consultancy

Sl. No. Indicator Questions Response3.5.1 Institution has a policy on

consultancy including revenue sharing between institution and individual(State the ratio)

Institution : Individual

3.5.2

Revenue generated from consultancy during the last five years (Rupees in thousands)

3.5.3 Revenue generated from corporate training by the Institution during the last five years(Rupees in thousands)

Page 15 of 34


Key Indicator - 3.6 Extension ActivitiesSl. No. Metrics Response3.6.1 Extension activities in the

neighbourhood community in terms of impact and sensitising students to social issues and holistic development (during last five year)


4 3 2 1 0

3.6.2

Number of activities conducted in partnerships with industry, community and NGOs for extension activities (during last five year)

3.6.3

Number of Awards and recognition received for extension activities from Government /Recognised Bodies (during last five years)

3.6.4 Number of extension and outreach programmes conducted through NSS/NCC/Red cross/YRC etc., per year

Number of suchactivitiesduringlast five year

5

3.6.5 Percentage of students participating in extension activities with GOs, NGOs and programmes such as Swachh Bharat, Aids awareness, Gender Issue, etc..,

Number of students participating∈¿ suchactivitiesTotal number of students

X100

Page 16 of 34


Key Indicator - 3.7 Collaborations


Number of linkages for faculty exchange, student exchange, internship, field trip, on-the-job training, research, etc. (during last five years)

3.7.2 Number of functional MoUs with institutions of national/ international importance/other universities/ industries/ corporate houses etc. (during last five years)

Page 17 of 34


Criteria 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources Key Indicator - 4.1 Physical Facilities

Sl. No Metrics Response4.1.1 The institution has adequate

facilities for teaching- learning. viz., classroom, laboratory, computer, equipment, etc.

Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this process in your institution

4-0 scale

4 3 2 1 0

4.1.2 The institution has adequate facilities for sports, games (indoor, outdoor, gymnasium, yoga centre etc.,) and cultural activities.


4-0 scale

4 3 2 1 0

4.1.3 Percentage of classrooms and seminars halls with ICT-enabled facilities Number of classrooms/ seminar hallswhere

ICT facilitiesare installed¿

Totalnumber of classrooms/ seminar halls¿ theinstitution

×100¿

4.1.4 Percentage of budget allocation of non-salary expenditure for infrastructure augmentation

Amount allocated for infrastructureaugmentation

¿non−salary expenditure ¿

Total non−salary expenditure×100

Page 18 of 34


Key Indicator - 4.2 Library as a Learning Resource Sl. No. Metrics Response4.2.1 Library is fully automated using

Integrated Library Management Software (ILMS)


4 3 2 1 0

4.2.2 Total number of Books available in the library (in thousands)

4.2.3 Does the institution subscribe to 1. INFLIBNET Data Base2. e-Shodh Sindhu3. e-Shodh Ganga4. e-resources5. N-LIST

Options:A. Any 4 of the aboveB. Any 3 of the aboveC. Any 2 of the aboveD. Any 1 of the aboveE. None of the above

Choose an option

4.2.4 Average yearly expenditure of funds for the purchase of books and journals (Rs in lakhs)(during last five years)

1N

×∑i=1

N

Expd i

Where: N = Number of years

Exd i = Expenditure in rupees for the purchase of books and

journals of ith year

4.2.5 Number of computers with internet/LAN, Wi-Fi etc., available for staff and students in the library

4.2.6 Percentage per day usage of library by staff, students and stakeholders

Number of people(staff , students ,¿ stackholders)using libraryTotal number of (staff , students ,¿stackholders)usinglibrary

X 100

Page 19 of 34


Key Indicator - 4.3 IT Infrastructure

Sl. No. Metrics Response4.3.1 Institution frequently upgrades

its IT facility and has latest computing facilities – hardware and software


4-0 scale

4 3 2 1 0

4.3.2 Student computer ratio Number of students : Number of

computers

4.3.3 Number of computers with 10MBPS and above bandwidth internet connection

4.3.4 Facilities for e-content development

Key Indicator - 4.4 Maintenance of Campus

Page 20 of 34


Page 21 of 34


4.4.1 The institution has a budget for maintenance of the facilities available on the campus – physical facilities and academic support facilities. (Percentage of non-salary expenditure annually.)

Budgeted amount¿

non– salary ¿expenditure ¿ formaintenance of campus facilities ¿¿¿ ¿Total amount of non−salary

expenditure

X100

4.4.2 There are established procedures and systems for maintaining and utilizing physical and academic support facilities – laboratory, library, sports complexes, computers, classrooms etc.


4 3 2 1 0


Criterion 5 - Student Support and Progression Key Indicator - 5.1 Student Support


Student welfare measures (scholarships and free ships) provided by the government.Percentage of student benefited by these.

Number of studentsbenefitedby scholarship∨freeship by govtTotalnumber of students

eligible for scholarships∧freeships¿

X 100 ¿

Student welfare measures (scholarships, free ships, etc.) provided by the institution besides government schemes.Percentage of student benefited by these.

Number of studentsbenefitedby scholarship∨ freeshipTotalnumber of applicants

¿¿

X 100

5.1.2 Number of capability enhancement and development schemes – coaching for competitive examinations, career counselling, soft skill development, remedial coaching, language lab, bridge courses etc.

5.1.3 Number of employers who visited the campus of the institution in the last five years through the placement cell of the institution

5.1.4 The institution offers coaching for competitive examinations and career counselling. Percentage of student benefited by these

Number of students attendingcoaching offered

by institution for suchexaminations

Total number of studentsX100

5.1.5 Percentage of students benefitted by Vocational Education and Training (VET)

Number of students attendingVET

¿Total number of students

X100

5.1.6 The institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases

Page 22 of 34


Key Indicator - 5.2 Student Progression Sl. No. Metrics Response5.2.1 Percentage placement of

outgoing students averaged over last five years

1N

×∑i=1

N

Plac i

Where: N = Number of yearsplaci = Percentage of placement

in ith year

= Number of outgoing students placedTotal number of outgoing students

X 100

5.2.2 Percentage of students progression to higher education

Number of students progressing¿higher education

Totalnumber of final year studentsX 100

5.2.3 Percentage of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examination per year (eg: NET/SLET/GATE/ GMAT/CAT, GRE/ TOFEL/ Civil Services/State government examination)

Totalnumber of students qualifyingsuchexamination per year

Totalnumber students whohave applied forthese examination

¿X 100 ¿

Page 23 of 34


Key Indicator - 5.3 Student Participation and Activities Sl. No. Metrics Response

5.3.1 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at Inter - University / State / national/international level

5.3.2 Presence of an active student council & representation of students on academic & administrative bodies of the institution

Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this process in your

institution 4-0 scale

4 3 2 1 0

5.3.3 Average number of sports and cultural activities/ competitions organised at the institution level per year.

Number of suchactivitiesorganised by theinstitutionduringthe last 5 years

5

Page 24 of 34


Key Indicator - 5.4 Alumni Engagement


5.4.1 The Alumni Association (registered and functional) contributes significantly to the development of the institution.



4 3 2 1 0

5.4.2 Alumni Contribution during last five years (in lakhs)

5.4.3 Number of alumni meets held during last five years

Page 25 of 34


Criteria 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management

Key Indicator - 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership

Sl. No. Metrics Response6.1.1 The governance of the

institution is reflective of an effective leadership



4 3 2 1 0

6.1.2 The institution practices decentralization and participative management



4 3 2 1 0

Page 26 of 34


Key Indicator - 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment Sl. No. Metrics Response6.2.1 Perspective plan document is an

important component of the institution’s strategy development and deployment process is available on the website



4 3 2 1 0

6.2.2 The institution has a well defined organizational structure including governing body, administrative setup, and functions of various bodies, service rules, procedures, recruitment, promotional policies and grievance redressal mechanism put up on the website



4 3 2 1 0

6.2.3 Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation

1. Administration2. Examination3. Finance and Accounts4. Student Admission and

support5. Planning and Development

Options:A. All 5 of the aboveB. Any 4 of the aboveC. Any 3 of the aboveD. Any 2 of the aboveE. Any 1 of the above

Choose among options

6.2.4 Percentage representation of staff (teaching/ non-teaching) in decision making bodies

Number of staff(teaching/non−teaching )¿decisionmakingbodies

Totalnumber of teaching / ¿non−teaching staffX 100

6.2.5 Regular meetings of various bodies/cells/committees and implementation of their resolutions



4 3 2 1 0

Key Indicator - 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies

Page 27 of 34



6.3.1 The institution has an effective welfare mechanism for teaching and non-teaching staff



4 3 2 1 0

6.3.2 The institution regularly conducts audit to ascertain inclusiveness



4 3 2 1 0

6.3.3 No. of national/international/ University level conferences /workshops organised per department, per year

Number of such activitiesorganised per year by

all departmentsTotalnumber of departments

6.3.4 Number of other professional development programmes organized by the institution per year

6.3.5 Percentage of staff attending the professional development programme per year (OP, RC, STC, FDP etc.)

Number of staff attendingsuch programme

per yearTotal number of staff

X 100

6.3.6 Institution has a system of Annual Performance Appraisal aimed at staff development



4 3 2 1 0

Page 28 of 34


Key Indicator - 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization

Page 29 of 34

Sl. No. Metrics Response6.4.1 Institution conducts internal

and external audits regularly.Based on your judgement, rate the

quality of this process in your institution 4-0 scale

4 3 2 1 0

6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies or individuals during the assessment period (Please specify the amount in rupees)

6.4.3 Institutional Strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources



4 3 2 1 0


Key Indicator - 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance SystemSl. No. Metrics Response

6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes



4 3 2 1 0

6.5.2 The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per normsOptions:

A. Review in 3 monthsB. Review in 6 monthsC. Review in 9 monthsD. Review in 12 monthsE. Review in >12 months

Choose among the option

6.5.3

Average number of activities per year conducted by IQAC per year for promoting quality culture

6.5.4

Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include

1. Accreditation by national body2. International accreditation3. Participation in NIRF4. Academic Administrative Audit

(AAA)

Options:A. All 4 of the aboveB. Any 3 of the aboveC. Any 2 of the aboveD. Any 1of the aboveE. None of the above

Choose among the options

Page 30 of 34


Criteria 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices

Key Indicator - 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities


7.1.1 Gender Equity

1. Percentage of women appointed in teaching positions

Number of women appointed¿ teaching position

Totalnumber of appointments¿ teaching positions

X 100

2. Percentage of women appointed in non - teaching positions

Number of women appointed¿non− teaching position

Totalnumber of appointments¿non−teaching positions

X 100

3. Number of Gender sensitization programmes organized by the institution (during last five years)

4. Institution shows gender sensitivity in providing facilities such as:

a) Social Securities b) Counselling c) Common Room


4 3 2 1 0

7.1.2 Environmental Consciousness and Sustainability

YES / NO

Alternate Energy Initiatives such as1. Replacement of existing

conventional bulbs /tube lights with power savings CFL/LED bulbs

YES / NO

2. Conventional energy power replaced by renewable energy sources (Solar, Bio, Wind Energy and any other)

Page 31 of 34


3. Energy audit of the institution and measures taken for conservation of energy

4. Waste Management Steps such as

Recycling of waste (solid and liquid) generated on the campus

YES / NO

E-waste disposal and Management

YES / NO

Solid waste conversion for source of energy and manure (vermi compost)

YES / NO

5. Rain water harvesting structures and utilization in the campus

YES / NO

6. Green Practices Students, staff using

a)Bicyclesb)Public Transportc) Pedestrian Friendly

Roads Plastic free campus Paperless office Green landscaping with

trees and plants


4 3 2 1 0

7. Institution provides Budget for green initiatives and ensures its utilisation

7.1.3 Differently abled (Divyangjan friendliness)Resources available in the institution

1) Physical facilities2) Provision for lift3) Ramp / Rails4) Wheel Chair5) Braille Software/facilities6) Rest Rooms7) Scribes for examination8) Special skill

development for

Choose among the options

Page 32 of 34


differently abled students

9) Any other similar facility (Specify)

Options:A. 8 and more of the

aboveB. At least 6 of the

aboveC. At least 4 of the

aboveD. At least 2 of the

aboveE. None of the above

7.1.4 Inclusion and Situatedness Number of specific

initiatives to address locational advantages and disadvantages?

Number of initiatives taken to engage with and contribute to local community

(Not covered elsewhere)

7.1.5 Human Values and Professional EthicsCode of conduct handbook for students, teachers and support staffDisplay of core values in the institution and on its website Number of activities conducted for promotion of national integration and communal harmony Institution makes conscious efforts to promote values professional ethics for academic integrity and transparency in its transaction


4 3 2 1 0

Page 33 of 34


Key Indicator - 7.2 Best Practices


7.2.1State one of the institutional best practices and rate on the scale provided


4-0 scale4 3 2 1 0

Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness

Sl. No.

Metrics Response

7.3.1This Key Indicator aims to provide an opportunity for the Institution to exemplify performance in an area aligned to its vision, priority and thrust.


4-0 scale4 3 2 1 0

Page 34 of 34

Documents

for Affiliated-Constitutent... · Web viewPercentage of teachers using ICT for effective teaching. (E-learning resources OER’s, NPTEL, e-Pathshala, CEC, etc.) Number of teachers