23
AVL List GmbH (Headquarters) Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system optimization EAWD19 - Electrification and All-wheel Drive Congress Graz / Spielberg May 9. – 10. 5. 2019 Joachim ECKER Mario OSWALD

Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

AVL List GmbH (Headquarters)

Frontloaded e-AWD development

with automated system

optimizationEAWD19 - Electrification and All-wheel Drive Congress

Graz / Spielberg May 9. – 10. 5. 2019

Joachim ECKER

Mario OSWALD

Page 2: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Market Situation & ChallengeElectric vehicles worldwide sales

Source: https://about.bnef.com/blog/cumulative-global-ev-sales-hit-4-million/https://www.best-selling-cars.com/global/2018-full-year-international-worldwide-car-sales-and-global-market-analysis/

Page 3: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Performance

Efficiency

Offroad

capability

Driveability

Vehicle Dynamics

& Stability

NVH

1. Customer demands on electric vehicleWhich are the main electrification related vehicle attributes

Customer requirements

Page 4: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

2. Electric vehicle development requirementsThe customer defines the main requirements

High acceleration level and vmax

High range, short charging time

High pulling force,

big ground clearance

Jerkless

accelerating

High cornering ability & traction

Low interior noise level

Vehicledevelopment requirements

Page 5: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

3. Electric Vehicle SpecificationThe vehicle requirements set the vehicle specifications

Low vehicle mass,

high motor power

High battery capacity

Off-road tire,

high ride height

Driveability Calibration

Performance tire,

low ride height

Insulation measures

Vehiclespecification

Customer’s demands

Vehicle requirements

Page 6: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

4. Powertrain System RequirementsThe vehicle specification set the powertrain requirements

Powertrain topology

E Machine type

Control strategy

Torque filter definition

Gear ratio

E machines power

& torque

Powertrainrequirements

Customer’s demands

Vehicle requirements

Vehicle specification

Page 7: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Syste

m level

Veh

icle

level

4. Powertrain System requirementsGoal of frontloaded development is to gain powertrain requirements

Customer Requirement Specification

Page 8: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Virtual Concept DefinitionProcess

Benchmarking:

• Competitive analysis

• Highlights & weaknesses

• Deep dive

Vehicles:

• Tesla Model X

• Jaguar I Pace

Vehicle Simulation

• Vehicle simulation and virtual calibration

• Simultaneous vehicle attribute assessment

Improvements

• Long. torque split

• Torque vectoring

• Slip control

• Regenerative braking

• Efficiency strategy

Output:E-AWD Powertrain according customer’s demands

Benchmarking Target Setting Simulation Improvements

Target Setting

Translating customers vision into technical requirements:

• Performance

• Efficiency

• Handling

• AWD / Off-road

• Driveability

Definition of E-AWD vehicle

attributes

AVL VSM

AVL-DRIVE

Page 9: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY CONTROL SYSTEMOFF-ROAD / AWD

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0-100[s]

max.Accerelation

[m/s²]

max.Speed[kph]

Range[km]

Real Worlddriving

consumption[kWh/100km]

ChargingEfficiency

[%]

Gradeability dirt[%]

Control qualityHDC[DR]

Pulling Forcegravel

[N]

Brake in a turn[DR]

Acceleration µ-split

[m/s²]

TorqueInterventionCornering

[DR]

Att

ribute

Rating

[DR] … AVL-DRIVE Rating

Benchmarking on Vehicle level

516

3.6

245

467

92

85

55

30.6

8.5

5)* no f unction available

12150

14920

4.8

2007.21

21.2

8

8.5

8

3.6

3.3

50

The I-Pace outperforms the Tesla in Offroad capability

Tesla: Very good slip control conservative in stability interventions

Jaguar: Very harmonic control systemTesla Model X outstanding performance

The Model X is the more efficient vehicle in terms of consumption and charging

5

8.8

Page 10: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY CONTROL SYSTEMOFF-ROAD / AWD

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0-100[s]

max.Accerelation

[m/s²]

max.Speed[kph]

Range[km]

Real Worlddriving

consumption[kWh/100km]

ChargingEfficiency

[%]

Gradeabilitydirt[%]

Control qualityHDC[DR]

Pulling Forcegravel

[N]

Brake in a turn[DR]

Acceleration µ-split

[m/s²]

TorqueInterventionCornering

[DR]

Att

ribute

Rating

[DR] … AVL-DRIVE Rating

BenchmarkingOffroad / AWD

8.5

5)* no f unction available

What causes the results and what are findings for the target

setting?

Let’s have a deeper look

Page 11: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Excellent performance level

Very good wheel slip control

Limited off-road capability

Inert on-road agility

Very restrictive cornering stability control

Very balanced over all attributes

Good total control system characteristic

Satisfying off-road capability (HDC, Hill hold)

Good on road handling balance

Model X

I pace

E-AWD related vehicle criteriaBenchmark Vehicles Overview

E-AWD related criteria

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Pullin

g F

orc

e g

ravel

[N]

Gra

dabilty

dirt

[%]

Low

speed

Contr

ola

bility [

DR

]

Accle

ration level µ-

split

[m/s

²]

Decele

ration µ

-split

[m/s

²]

avera

ge w

heel slip

level µ-l

ow

launch [

%]

Unders

teer

[DR

]

Bra

ke in a

Turn

Sta

bilty

[D

R]

Max.

late

ral

Accele

ration [

m/s

²]

Turn

In A

gility ]

DR]

Att

ribute

Rating

Page 12: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

What are the right system elements?

E/E components Inverter

Charger

TyreOff-road capability

Resistance / Grip

AerodynamicsDrag

Rideheight

BodyWeight

Geometry

Electric machines Induction / PSM type

Power

Powertrain Controls

E-AWD torque split

Slip control

Regenerative braking

Operation strategy

Battery Cell technology

Capacity

Size and weight

Voltage

Page 13: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Performance

High Moderate

Engaging Relaxed

Handling

High Low

Energy Efficiency

Translating customers vision into technical requirements down to a very detailed level

Competitor vehicles

High Low

Further attributes:

NVH, Driveability

Vehicle positioning

new e-AWD vehicle

Control System

Among the best Average

Offroade-AWD

Among the best Average

Objective targets upper target band

Objective targets minimum target band

Page 14: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Off-road capability:

Acceptable allover off-road capability

Good low speed controllability

Very good µ-split acceleration level

Performance

Performance level close to Model X

Very good overall traction

Handling

Low understeer

Good oversteer stability

Acceptable turning agilty

Target SettingE-AWD related vehicle criteria

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Pullin

g F

orc

e g

ravel

[N]

Gra

dabilty

dirt

[%]

Low

speed

Contr

ola

bility [

DR]

Accle

ration level µ-

split

[m/s

²]

Decele

ration µ

-split

[m/s

²]

avera

ge w

heel slip

level µ-l

ow

launch

[%]

Unders

teer

[DR]

Bra

ke in a

Turn

Sta

bilty

[D

R]

Max. la

tera

lAccele

ration [

m/s

²]

Turn

In A

gility ]

DR]

Att

ribute

Rating

Page 15: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Set Up of Virtual Calibration Toolchain

Automatized Optimization Toolchain

AVL Cameo:DOE approachcalibration parameter variation

AVL VSM:Vehicle dynamic simulation +e-AWD controller model embedded

AVL-DRIVE™:Objective evaluation of driving attributes

Page 16: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

E-AWD Functions

Function Torque split Slip ControlTorque vectoring

Mechanical equivalent

Center Differential E-LSD(electronic-limited slip differential)

TV-Differential

Description

Torque split between front and rear axle to maximize

traction and vehicle dynamics

Axle / wheel selective torque reduction in case of the spinning

wheels

Torque split between left and right side to generate

a yaw moment

E-AWD Functions Definition

Page 17: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Virtual Calibration and Optimization

AWD CONTROLS parameter

variation

SIMULATION vehicle, driver, road

SPECIFIC MANEUVERS

Traction, Gradeability, Pulling force

ATTRIBUTES ASSESSMENT

Offroad, Handling, Performance, WLTP

Optimization

Page 18: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Capability of vehicle dynamic calibration

Obj. Evaluation

DoE variation

Simulation

Benchmarking & competitor analysis Optimized AWD characteristic

DoE-based calibrationclosed- loop optimization

Target definition by KPIs Optimized AWD function parameter-set

Methodology for DOE optimization of AWD to achieve targets

Target Area

18% gradient µ-split

KPI Target value

max. long acc. > n [m/s²]

wheel slip level n-nn [%]

….

Page 19: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Optimization Result Video e-AWD

AVL VSM

Page 20: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Optimization Result Video Torque Vectoring – ISO T2 Lane Change

AVL VSM

Page 21: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Optimized results:

Target band could be met for all criteria

Very good on road handling due to torque vectoring

Good Performance due to low vehicle weight

Results of automated optimization E-AWD related vehicle criteria

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10Pullin

g F

orc

e g

ravel

[N]

Gra

dabilty

dirt

[%]

Low

speed

Contr

ola

bility [

DR]

Accle

ration level µ-

split

[m/s

²]

Decele

ration µ

-split

[m/s

²]

avera

ge w

heel slip

level µ-l

ow

launch

[%]

Unders

teer

[DR]

Bra

ke in a

Turn

Sta

bilty

[D

R]

Max. la

tera

lAccele

ration [

m/s

²]

Turn

In A

gility ]

DR]

Att

ribute

Rating

Page 22: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

Optimization Result Video Nürburgring Nordschleife

AVL VSM

Page 23: Frontloaded e-AWD development with automated system … · 2019-12-18 · 3.6 245 467 92 85 55 30.6 8.5 5)* no f unction available 12150 14920 4.8 200 7.21 21.2 8 8.5 8 3.6 3.3 50

www.avl.com

Thank You