Upload
emilia
View
46
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
g-2 and muon EDM (and maybe deuteron EDM also) at a high intensity storage ring. Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa CERN - 29 apr 2004. The Magnetic Dipole Moment - g. e. p. W. W. m. m. n. Z 0. Classically, considering spin s as a rotation around axis, g=1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
g-2 and muon EDM (and maybe deuteron EDM also)
at a high intensity storage ring
Marco Incagli - INFN PisaCERN - 29 apr 2004
The Magnetic Dipole Moment - g
sgsmceg
02 • Classically, considering spin s as a
rotation around axis, g=1• Quantum physics predicts, for a Dirac particle, g=2
aQED
ahad,lo
aEW
albl
ahad,nlo
• Quantum field theory predicts:
g = 2(1+a)a
0.0012• a experimentally measured with precision <1ppm
W W
Z0
e
SM predictions for a (units 10-10)
hadrons
+ +
B field
q
q
Cannot be evaluated in pQCD approach
aQED = 11 658 470.4 evaluated up to 5 (!)
loops a
had 700 7 Hadronic vacuum polarization a
EW = 15.2 0.4 Small contribution from Higgs a
lbl = 8 3 BUT recent publication from Melnikov: a
lbl = 14 3
aa 0.6 ppmSecond largest contribution
a and hadronic cross section
Dispersion integral relates ahad(vac-pol) to (e+e- hadrons)
Im[ ] | hadrons |2
ahad =
s-1
2232
2
|)(|3
)(
MFM
ee
Hadronic cross section is often written in terms of the pion form factor |F|2 :
Experimental input in a(had) - I
2|F |
2 E, MeV
L= 317.3 nb-1
114000 events in meson region
CMD2@VEPP2M
Standard method : beam energy scan
Contribution to a due to resonance:
CMD2 data confirmed by KLOE.
Experimental input in a(had) - II
Alternative approach used by KLOE : radiative return
)(22 s
dMd
M
H(s)
|F|2
CMD2
— KLOE
0.5 0.7 0.90
20
40
10
30
0M GeV
2 2( )
(376.5 0.8stat 5.4syst+theo) 10-10(378.6 2.7stat 2.3syst+theo) 10-10
KLOECMD2
L= 141 pb-1
1.5 M events in meson region
Experimental input in a(had) - III
• Recently a new method has been proposed which uses spectral function from (LEP, CESR data)
• Corrections have to be applied due: CVC violation, difference in isospin content, pion mass, effect of interference, possibly different mass and width of vs
• The related theoretical error is claimed to be under control
However, ath(ee – a
th() (20±10)10-10 (???)
hadrons
W hadrons
e+
e–
CVC: I =1 & V W: I =1 & V,A : I =0,1 & V
Muon-Anomaly: Theory vs. Experiment
Comparison Experimental Value with Theory - Prediction
a 11 659 000 ∙ 1010
TH
EO
RY
’20/
‘03
e+ e - Data: 2.7 - Deviation – Data: 1.4 - Deviation
Exp
erim
ent
’20/
‘04 Experiment BNL-E821
Values for +(2002) and -(2004)in agreement with each other.Precision: 0.5ppm
New cross section data have recently lowered theory error:
a) CMD-2 (Novosibirsk/VEPP-2M) channel with 0.6% precision < 1 GeVb) -Data from ALEPH /OPAL/CLEO
Theoretical values taken fromM. Davier, S. Eidelman, A. Höcker,
Z. Zhanghep-ex/0308213
Including KLOE result
Possible new physics contribution…
New physics contribution can affect a through the muon coupling to new particles
In particular SUSY predicts a value that, for neutralino masses of few hundred GeV, is right at the edge of the explored region
data can be affected differently than e+e- data by this new physics
In particular H- exchange is at the same scale as W- exchange, while m(H0)>>m()
W
H
LoI to J-PARC An experiment with sensitivity of 0.1 ppm proposed at J-PARC At the moment the project is scheduled for Phase2 (>2011) Together with the experiment there must be an improvement on: evaluation of lbl experimetal data on (had) to cover m()<s<m( and 1<s<2 GeV
How do we measure a
• At magic = 29.3, corresponding to E=3.09 GeV, K=0 and
precession is directely proportional to a
B (out of plane)
11
2
aK
EKBamce
msa
Precession of spin and momentum vectors in E, B fields (in the hyp. B=0) :Electric field
used for focusing (electrostatic quadrupoles)
E
Ba a
polarized
The three miracles
• A precision measurement of a is made possible by what Farley called “the three miracles”:
1 magic corresponds to E~3 GeV , not 300MeV or 30 GeV
2. It’s very easy to have strongly polarized muons
3. It’s very easy to measure the polarization of the by looking at decay electrons
BNL E821 beam line
The E821 muon storage ring
SciFi calorimeter
module for e detection
7.1 m
BNL results on 2000 + run
• 4109 events for t>50s and E>2GeV
tAeNtN at cos1)( /
0
Magnetic field
• Magnetic field is measured with a trolley, which drives through the beam pipe, with array of NMR probes.• 366 fixed probes maps the field vs time.
Stability of magnetic field
• Magnetic field map is known at the 0.1 ppm level• Largest systematics from calibration of trolley probes
New proposal - statistics
• The new experiment aims to a precision of 0.1-0.05 ppm, which needs a factor of 25-100 more muons
• This can be achieved by increasing the …
1. … number of primary protons on target target must be redisigned
2. … number of bunches
3. … injection efficiency which, at E821, was 7%
4. … running time (it was 7months with at BNL)
• The J-PARC proposal is mostly working on items 2 (go
from 12 90 bunches) and 3
New proposal - systematics
• Systematics for the measurement of a :– Coherent Betatron Oscillation (CBO) : 0.20 ppm– Pileup : 0.12 ppm– Background from extracted protons : 0.10 ppm– Lost muons : 0.10 ppm
• Systematics on magnetic field (really what it’s measured is the proton spin precession frequency p) :– Calibration of trolley probes : 0.20 ppm– Interpolation with fixed probes : 0.15 ppm– Others (temperature variations, higher multipoles, extra currents
from the kicker) : 0.15 ppm
• To improve all of this to <0.1 ppm is not an easy job!
Electric Dipole Moment (EDM)
• The electromagnetic interaction Hamiltonian of a particle with both magnetic and electric dipole moment (EDM) is:
0
0
22
22 wheres
mcedd
gsmcegd
EdBHE
M
P T
E E E
B B B
• Due to the E, B, properties under P and T reversal, [HE,Pand [HE,T
• This is not the case for the induced EDM, since dE,ind E
, at least at first order (implicitely used in deriving g-2 precession)
Predictions on EDMs
• We know that P and T simmetries are violated so it possible that
• However, in the frame of Standard Model, where only 1 CP violating phase exists, is strongly suppressed
• This is not the case for supersimmetry, where many CP violating phases exist
SM SUSY
Relation between LFV, g-2 and EDM
• The magnetic (g-2) and electric (EDM) dipole moments are related to each other as the real and imaginary part of a complex dipole operator
• In SUSY, g-2 and EDM probe the diagonal elements of the slepton mixing matrix, while the LFV decay e probes the off-diagonal terms
DdDem
a
FDDLDM
Im , Re2
: where
21*
21
21 55
~~~~
~~~~
VVVV
e
eee
Limits on EDM from g-2• The presence of perturbates the g-2 precession as
follows (B=E=0):
• At magic , with the condition that E<<B:
BEEaBamce
211
2
BBa
mce
2
that is the precession plane is tilted and a vertical oscillation can be observed in the emitted electrons.
d<2.810-19 e cm
EDMcontribution
Implications of g-2 limit on EDM Assume that new physics exists in the range of
aNP a
expaSM (1-10) 11 0.1-1 ppm
then we can write:
D= DSM + DNP = DSM + | DNP |eiCP
New Physics will induce a DM :
dNP a
NP tanCP 11e cm tanCP 1e cm
Current limit: d11e cm
Proposal for a new experiment with sensitivity
d1e cm which would probe |tanCP| 1
unit conversion
Limits on fCP according to limit on d
New approach to EDM• Do not use electrostatic but magnetic quadrupoles• Apply, in dipole B field, a radial Er field such that E // B
• Instead of working at magic, choose a combination of ,E,B that cancels muon spin (g-2) precession
rB
mceBE
mce
zEKBaEKBa ra
ˆ22
0ˆ
sideview
Muon ring for EDM measurement
Stability on B and E fields, in particular in an eventual vertical component of E field, must be kept at the 10-6 level. This has already been achieved (for B field) in g-2 BNL experiment.
P = 0.5GeV/cBz = 0.25 TEr = 2MV/mR = 7m<R> = 11mB+E = 2.6 mIntervals = 1.7 mn. elements = 16circunference 40m
Statistical error
dd NpBAP
md
22 : on error lStatistica
m = mass, = muon lifetime, p = momentum, B = magnetic field, A = asimmetry of vertical decays, P = muon beam polarization, Nd = dN = number of observed decay muons = number of injected muons (N) times detection efficiency (d)
To minimize statistical error:• maximize P2N, B, p• subject to constraint : Er a B < 2 MV/m ( Er directed inward )
The number of muons needed to reach d = 10-24 ecm , assuming A=0.3 and d=1 is:
NP2 = 1016
Systematics
• Basic idea to fight systematics: compare clockwise vs counter-clockwise results
• Needs 2 injection points and possibility of changing polarity of dipole magnets (not necessary for quadrupoles)
cw ccw -B -BE E
BEEaBamce
211
2
Opposite sign Same sign
0 due to choice of ,B,E
Summary on muons Both g-2 and EDM are sensitive to new physics behind
the corner Unique opportunity of studying phases of mixing matrix
for SUSY particles Historically, limits on dE have been strong tests for new
physics models EDM would be the first tight limit on dE from a second
generation particle The experiments are hard but, in particular the EDM, not
impossible A large muon polarized flux of energy 3GeV (g-2) or
0.5GeV (EDM) is required
P.S. - deuteron EDM at storage ring
Er value needed to cancel MDM : Er a B BpF
Deuteron EDM
• Deuterons can be used in the same ring of muons with 1s 106 and with the possibility of large fluxes (current flux at AGS is 1011D/s)
• Problem: need polarimeters to measure “asimmetry” due to spin precession under EDM torque
• The statistical error can be lowered by three orders of magnitude (!) and the nuclear state is easy to interpret
• Limit on nuclear EDM much stronger than in standard neutron and Hg experiments
dd NpBAP
md
22 : on error lStatistica
• Predictions of down squark mass sensitivity for the newly proposed Tl, n and Hg experiments and for the Deuteron experiment, assuming, for the D experiment, a reach of 210-27 e cm (hep-ph/0402023)
• A proposal for a DEDM experiment will probably be submitted at BNL