24
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Krakow Oct. 6, 2008

Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

  • Upload
    jerome

  • View
    32

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar. Krakow Oct. 6, 2008. Gamma-Ray Bursts. Flash of g -rays that last several seconds – the prompt emission. NASA. NASA web site. long lasting decaying radio-optical-X-ray emission – the afterglow. Fox et. al., 05. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocksEhud Nakar

KrakowOct. 6, 2008

Page 2: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

NASA web site

Gamma-Ray Bursts

Flash of -rays that last several seconds – the prompt emission

Fox et. al., 05

long lasting decaying radio-optical-X-ray emission – the afterglow

NASA

Page 3: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Longs & shorts

Kouveliotou et al. 1993

Long GRBscollapse of a massive star

Short GRBsUnknown – possibly NS-NS or BH-NS coalescence

?

Page 4: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Prompt emission - observations (long GRBs)

Duration 1-1000s 1052-1054 erg (isotropic equivalent) 1050-1052 erg/s (isotropic equivalent) ~0.01-2 MeV photons Non-thermal spectrum; very high energy tail (at least up to GeV) Rapid variability (less than 10ms)

Page 5: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Relativistic Wind

(p-e- or p-e+-e-

or EM)

Prompt emission in the fireball model

Internaldissipation

-rays

1013-1016cm

InnerEngine

106cm

>100

Page 6: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Prompt emission - theory (long GRBs)

The emission source is internal dissipation within a relativistic outflow, >100!

Radiation process – UnknownLeading candidates are synchrotron and IC

Outflow composition and magnetization – UnknownUnmagentized pair plasma is unlikely

Collisionless shocks ? – only if the outflow is baryonic mildly relativistic internal shocks

Page 7: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Afterglow - Observations

Peaks in X-ray first (minutes-hour) , then in optical (hours-days) and finally in radio (days-years)

Temporal & spectral structure: Broken power law

Stanek et al. 99

F

t (days)Galama et al. 99

B, V

, R, I

Page 8: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Relativistic Wind

(p-e- or p-e+-e-

or EM)

The internal-external fireball model

Internaldissipation

-rays

1013-1016cm

InnerEngine

106cm

ExternalShock

Afterglow

1016-1018cm

Page 9: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

External shock afterglow model

Hydrodynamics: A relativistic blast-wave that propagates into a perfect fluid (shocked fluid energy concentrated in – R ~ R/2)

•Blast wave decelerates while shoveling mass - R-3/2 (for a constant external density).•The burst emission ionize and destruct dust in the circum-burst medium upstream is ionized, unmagnetized, p-e plasma.

ShockedShockedplasma pressureplasma pressure

upstreamupstream pressurepressure

RR

Page 10: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Radiation modeling:

•Shock crossing electron acceleration N() -p for >m • e - fraction of electrons energy out of the internal energy at the shock crossing• B - fraction magnetic field energy out of the internal energy at any time

synchrotron + Synchrotron Self-Compton radiation

The model fit for five free parameters:

Ek, n, p, e and B

Page 11: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

The basic (slow cooling) Synchrotron Afterglow Spectrum and its time evolution:

Low energy F-1/3

Synch self Absorption

t-1/2t-3/2t0

Sari et al 1998

High Energy F -p/2

F

Galama et al. 99

Model Observations

Page 12: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

The typical parameters that fit the data

e ~ 0.1

B ~ 0.01-0.001

p = 2-2.7

Ek,iso = 1052-1054 erg (Comparable to Eiso

n ~ 0.01-10 cm-3 (expected in ISM)

Page 13: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Typical scales

shock Lorentz factor - ~100 @ t=100s ~10 @ t=1 day ~2 @ t=1 month

(t – observer time since the burst)

B Downstream Bd~ mG-GB Upstream Bu~ G (B,up~10-9)

Width of shocked plasma ~1012cm @ t=100s ~1016cm @ t=1week

Skin depth ~107 cm

Page 14: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Main microphysical assumptions in the basic model:

• The shock is thin compared to the emitting region.• Electrons are coupled to the protons just through the shock.• All Electrons are accelerated – relaxing this assumption can change the best fit parameters by a factor f<mp/me (Eichler & Waxman 05)

• e and B are constant in time and space – B cannot drop significantly far in the downstream (Rossi & Rees 02)

Page 15: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Afterglow observations strongly suggest that weakly magnetized relativistic collisionless shocks:

•Generate magnetic field with ~10-4-10-2 of equipartition.

•This magnetic field survives long after crossing the shock (>107 skin depths).

•Polarization indicate that the magnetic field is anisotropic on large scales with ratio ~2:1

•Efficiently accelerate electrons (in equipartitoin with protons energy) at least up to TeV

Note: External shock is the most popular and successful afterglow model. But, it is not the only model and it cannot explain all afterglow observations in all bursts.

Page 16: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Short GRBs• Prompt emission is similar to long GRBs• About dozen observed afterglows (mostly in X-ray) suggest a similar mechanism and physical properties as in long GRB afterglows• The progenitor is an old stellar system and therefore the expected circum burst medium is the interstellar medium – unaffected by massive stellar wind.

The ability of collisionless shocks to generate field an accelerate particles is not unique to upstream which is shaped by stellar wind (e.g., with high density clumps)

Nakar 07

Page 17: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Magnetic field generation in GRB external shocks

Equipartion field on a skin depth scale is thought to be generated in unmagnetized shocks by the Weibel instability (Moiseev & Sagdeev 63; Kazimura et al 98; Medvedev & Loeb 99, …)

But … without sustaining process it is expected to decay over a similar scale (Gruzinov 01; Chang et al., 08)

How can the shock generate strong magnetic fieldthat survives over ~109 skin depths?

Page 18: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Suggested processes:

• Interaction of the thermal plasma (upstream and/or downstream) with accelerated particles via kinetic instabilities (e.g., recent numerical results by Keshet et al. 08and Spitkovsky 08)

• Amplification of the downstream field via downstream vorticity generated by

• Density inhomogeneity in the upstream (e.g., Sironi & Goodman 07)

• Angular energy anisotropy of decelerating blast wave (Milosavljevic, Nakar & Zhang 07)

• Interaction between streaming protons and the upstream plasma via nonresonant streaming instability (e.g., Bell 2004, Milosavljevic & Nakar 06, Reville et al 06, …)

Page 19: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Generation of upstream density inhomogeneies by streaming protons (Couch, Milosavljevic & Nakar 2008)

assumption: protons are accelerated in the shock by Fermi process`

shock frame

~R/

e p

upstream

IC cooling grantee that if protons are accelerated to p>103 then protons stream farther upstream then electrons

Upstream frame

~R/

ep

upstream

p

Page 20: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

• Nonresonant streaming instability amplifies the magnetic field and produces density inhomogeneities (e.g., Bell 04)

• Even if the field is not amplified by orders of magnitude (e.g., Pelletier et al 08), density contrast of order unity is generated. Such contrast is enough in order to amplify the downstream field to the observed levels by generating downstream vorticity.

• In GRB external shocks there is enough time to generate order unity density contrast even if the seed field is the pre-existing G field

Page 21: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Summary

• GRB prompt emission may be a result of mildly relativistic collisionless shocks (if GRB jets are baryonic).

• GRB external shocks are unmagnetized ultra-relativistic collisionless shocks and are the prime candidates to be the source of the observed afterglows, in which case these shocks:

• Generate long lasting magnetic field to sub-equipartition level• Efficiently accelerate electrons at least to Tev energies

• Several processes were suggested as the source of the generated magnetic field in these shocks. None of which is confirmed yet.

Page 22: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Thank!

Page 23: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Are all the electrons need to be accelerated?

e fe

B fB

E/fn n/f

If only a fraction me/mp<f<1 is accelerated the above mapping results in similar fit to f=1 (Eichler & Waxman 05).

dn

/d

Page 24: Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar

Can the magnetic field decay after the shock?

A decay of the magnetic field after the plasma crosses much less than 1% of the shocked shell is hard to explain by the observations (Rossi & Rees 02)

No decay No decay

Decay aftercrossing 1%

Decay aftercrossing 1%