Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
{GASB Update}
Presented by David Helisek, CPA
{AGENDA}
GASB Issued by not yet effective
GASB 60 – Service Concession Agreements
GASB 61 – Reporting Entity (GASB 14) Omnibus
GASB 62 – FASB Codification (pre-11/30/89)
GASB 63 – Net position and deferred inflows/outflows
GASB 65 – Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities
GASB 66 – Technical Corrections – 2012
GASB 67/68 – Pension Standards
Other future pronouncements and exposure drafts
2
Effective dates
Pronouncement Effective Date – Years beginning
AFTER
June year end
December year end
60 - SCA 12/15/2011 2013 2012
61 – Financial reporting entity 6/15/2012 2013 2013
62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASB 12/15/2011 2013 2012
63 – Net position; Deferred inflow/outflow
12/15/2011 2013 2012
65 – Items previously recognized as assets/liabilities
12/15/2012 2014 2013
66 – Technical corrections 12/15/2012 2014 2013
67/68 – Pension standards Pension – 6/15/2013 Employer- 6/15/2014
Pension-2014 Employer-2015
Pension-2014 Employer-2015
3
4
GASB - ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE
PLANTE MORAN
{GASB 60 – Service Concession Arrangements}
Effective: Years beginning after 12/15/2011
Applicability: Arrangements in which government (transferor) uses another party (operator) to provide public services through the use and operation of a capital asset.
Must meet ALL the following 4 conditions:
Government maintains control over assets, services provided, prices and rate structure.
Government receives significant consideration
Operator collects and KEEPS the user fees
The control and operation of the asset reverts back to the government at the end of the agreement
5
{GASB 60 – Service Concession Arrangements}
SCA Examples:
Operator designs and builds municipal-owned recreation facility for the right to
collect fees from third parties for the use of the facility.
Operator provides significant consideration for the right to access a City owned
parking garage, and collect fees from third parties
Operator will design and build a new bridge, finance construction costs, collect fees,
and convey the bridge to the government at the end of the arrangement
NOT SCA
City hires management company to operate a golf course for a monthly management
fee. City is entitled to all revenue from the green fees.
Operator will provide significant consideration for use of a government parking lot.
The government has no say in what capacity the parking lot will be used.
6
{GASB 60 – Service Concession Arrangements}
Transferor (Government) Accounting:
Dr. - Cash or FV of new or improved facility
Cr. - Liability for the PV of significant contractual obligations
Related to facility (maintenance, capital improvements)
Minimum service level commitments (Police and Fire)
Cr. - Deferred inflows, which would be reduced in a systematic and rational manner over the term of the engagement.
NOTE: A transferor (the government) would keep the facility subject to an SCA as its capital asset on its books.
7
{GASB 60 – Service Concession Arrangements}
Operator Accounting (assuming it is a govt)
Report an intangible asset related to the facility at cost
for its right to access the facility and collect third-party
fees;
Amortize the intangible asset over the term of the
arrangement in a systematic and rational manner
8
{GASB 60 - Service Concession Arrangements: Illustration}
State (transferor) enters into an agreement with Tunnel
Authority (operator), in which the Authority will design,
build, and operate a tunnel for 40 years.
The cost of the tunnel is $4 million, and the fair value is $5
million (PV of expected net cash inflows).
The State has an obligation to insure the tunnel. The
present value of the insurance cost is $1 million
Assume that all 4 requirements of an SCA have been met
9
{GASB 60 - Service Concession Arrangements: Illustration}
State reports (full accrual):
Asset for $5 million
Liability for $1 million
Deferred inflow of resources for $4 million
Recognize $100k revenue at end of year 1 ($4 million ÷ 40 years)
Authority reports (full accrual):
Intangible asset for $4 million
Amortized $100k at end of year 1 (straight line, 40 years)
Revenue and expense on tunnel operations based on applicable revenue and expense recognition guidance
10
{GASB 61 – Reporting Entity (GASB 14/34) Omnibus}
Old Definition: Either-
Appoint majority AND
[financial benefit/burden
OR Imposition of will], Or
Fiscal dependency
New definition: Either-
Appoint majority AND
[financial benefit/burden
OR Imposition of will], Or
Fiscal dependency AND
financial benefit/burden
11
Effective: Years beginning after 6/15/2012
Impacts:
Which entities to include/exclude
How to include (blend, discretely present, footnote)
Most significant change modifies requirements for inclusion–
Financial Accountability Concept:
Old Method New Method
NFPs that provide their resources almost exclusively to the PG should almost always be discretely presented. All other CU’s should also be discretely presented unless they meet one of the following criteria:
1. The CU governing body is substantively the same as the PG
1. The CU governing body is substantively the same as the PG AND either there is a financial benefit/ burden, Or management of the PG has operational responsibility for CU
2. The CU provides its services almost entirely to the PG
2. The CU provides its services almost entirely to the PG
3. The CU’s debt is expected to be paid by the PG
12
{GASB 61 – Reporting Entity (GASB 14/34) Omnibus}
{GASB 61 – Reporting Entity (GASB 14/34) Omnibus}
Change in “misleading to exclude”
Closely related to (focus on financial relationships) OR
Financially integrated with
PGs now required to report equity interest in a for-profit discretely presented CU as an asset (subject to modified accrual)
Redefines “MAJOR” component unit – significance in relation to the PG (no longer significance in relation to other CU’s)
Govt engaged only in BTA that use single column presentation – may consolidate blended CU but show condensed combining information in the notes
13
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Effective: Years beginning after 12/15/2011
Intent is to include all pre-11/30/89 private sector
guidance into a GASB statement
Supersedes GASB Statement 20
This means we no longer have the ability to specifically continue to
follow FASBs written after 11/30/1989
Generally, does NOT apply to governmental funds
Some exceptions:
Lease accounting
Contingencies
14
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Some of the more impactful sections include:
Classification of assets (restricted assets – Noncurrent)
Related parties
Accounting Changes, errors, prior period adjustments
Contingencies
Inventory
Leases
Regulated activities
15
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Classification of assets
ARB 43 tells us that restricted assets, even though they may be liquid, are not to be reported as current assets.
Example – we issue a bond, and the bond ordinance dictates that the proceeds must be kept physically separate and spent only on the described project.
This is a fairly common item that is not always being reported correctly!
16
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Related parties
Related parties includes related organizations, joint
ventures, elected and appointed officials, or members of
their immediate family
F/S should disclose related party transactions other than
Compensation arrangements
Expense allowances
And other similar items in the normal course of business
17
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Accounting Changes, errors, prior period adjustments
Prior period adjustments/correction of errors
Restate opening net assets
Retroactively restate for all prior period presented
Change in accounting principle
Restate opening net assets
DO NOT change comparative balances presented
Requires disclosure of pro forma effects of retroactive application
Changes in estimates – prospective only
Changes in reporting entity –restate f/s of all prior periods presented
18
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Contingencies
Adopts FASB 5.
Contingent Liabilities:
If probable and estimable – record
If reasonably possible – disclosure only
Gain contingencies only recordable if realized
This is in fairly wide use today, so really only codifies
current practice.
19
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Inventory
Proprietary funds and BTA activities
Reinforces the “lower of cost or market” concept
Governmental funds and Governmental activities
This section of GASB 62 does not apply to governmental activities
or governmental funds
Refer to existing GASB guidance on accounting for inventory in
governmental funds and governmental activities
20
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Leases
Codifies FASB 13 – no changes.
A capital lease would be recorded in an arrangement
that includes ownership transfer, bargain purchase, 75%
of the useful life, or 90% of the value is paid.
Regardless of legal title.
21
{GASB 62 – Codification of pre-11/30/89 FASBs}
Regulated Activities
Codifies FAS 71, which allows for the use of regulatory
accounting methods when those methods have been used
in rate-making by a regulatory authority. This authority
might include the governing body.
22
{GASB 63 – Net Position and Deferred inflows/outflows}
Effective: Years beginning after 12/15/2011
Concepts Statement No 4 defined “deferred inflows” and “deferred
outflows”
This pronouncement :
Provides guidance for how to present deferred inflows and outflows
in financial statements
Provides for new reporting format:
Statement of Net Assets becomes Statement of Net Position
Changes to modified-accrual balance sheets
This pronouncement does NOT tell us which F/S line items to report as
deferred inflows or outflows (but GASB 65 does!)
23
{GASB 63 – Net Position and Deferred inflows/outflows}
Statement of Net Position
Two format choices:
Assets + Deferred outflows – Liabilities - Deferred inflows = Net
Position (Encouraged)
Assets + Deferred outflows = Liabilities + Deferred inflows + Net
Position (Balance sheet format)
For governmental funds, must use the balance sheet format above
except you retain the terminology “fund balance” vs “net position”
24
{GASB 63 – Net Position and Deferred inflows/outflows}
25
{GASB 63 – Net Position and Deferred inflows/outflows}
Disclosures:
Footnote disclosure of the components of deferred
inflows/outflows if aggregated in the statement of net position or a
governmental fund balance sheet
Significant impacts on a component of net position (invested in
capital assets, restricted or unrestricted) resulting from large
differences between deferred inflow/outflow and the related asset
or liability.
26
{GASB 65 – Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities}
Effective: Years beginning after 12/15/2012
Purpose: Identify reclassification guidance for transactions and other
events addressed in previous pronouncements that should now be
recognized as deferred inflows or outflows, following Concepts
Statement No. 4 and the Elements of F/S concepts statement
Implications:
Reclassification of balance sheet items
Limits future use of the term deferred to refer only to deferred
outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources
Major fund determination will be impacted as assets should be
combined with deferred outflows of resources and liabilities should
be combined with deferred inflows of resources
27
{GASB 65 – Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities}
Account Balance Treatment
Debt refunding – diff b/w reacquisition price and carrying value of debt (or lease)
Deferred inflow
Imposed nonexchange revenue – resources received (or receivable) before the period resources may be used (incl. prop taxes before the period levied)
Deferred inflow
Government- mandated nonexchange revenue or Voluntary nonexchange resources received before eligibility requirements are met (excluding time requirements)
Liability (Assets by payers)
Same as above, eligible except for time requirements Deferred inflow/ outflow
28
{GASB 65 – Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities}
Account Balance Treatment
Sale of future revenue (unless GASB 48 allows revenue in period of sale)
Deferred inflow
Debt issuance costs Expense
Prepaid insurance costs Asset (then amortized)
Operating leases – initial direct costs Expense
Sale-Leaseback gain or loss Deferred O/I
Insurance – acquisition costs Expense
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS – Revenue that is not yet “available”
Deferred inflow
29
{GASB 66 – Technical Corrections - 2012}
Effective: Years beginning 12/15/2012
Very minor!!
Changes to GASB 10:
Removes the provision that limits fund-based reporting
of a state and local government’s risk financing activities
to the general fund and the internal service fund type.
Governments will now base their fund type classification
of risk financing activities on the nature of the activity
30
{GASB 66 – Technical Corrections - 2012}
Changes to GASB 62:
Modifies the specific guidance on accounting for:
1. operating lease payments that vary from a straight-line basis,
2. the difference between the initial investment (purchase price) and the principal amount of a purchased loan or group of loans, and
3. servicing fees related to mortgage loans that are sold when the stated service fee rate differs significantly from a current (normal) servicing fee rate
31
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
History:
The GASB issued an Invitation to Comment on Pension & OPEB accounting
(comments were due July 2009)
The GASB issued a “Preliminary Views” document with its preliminary
conclusions in June 2010
The 2 exposure drafts were issued June 2011
Final standards were issued in June 2012
Effective:
Pensions – Years beginning after 6/15/2013
Employer – Years beginning after 6/15/2014
The new standards are restricted to pension (not OPEB). However, it is
fairly certain that ultimately the rules will be consistent.
Applies to the government wide statements, and proprietary fund
statements – not to the modified accrual fund based statements.
32
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Pension costs are part of the employment exchange, and
should be recognized as the obligation is incurred
The pension plan is the primary obligor for the funded
portion – but the employer is the primary obligor for the
unfunded portion; this does meet the definition of a
liability and should be recorded as a liability (in the full
accrual statements)
The NET PENSION LIABILITY (similar to the UAAL today) will be put
on the balance sheet!!
But the full change will not necessarily go on the income statement
– keep listening!
33
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Net pension liability =
Total pension liability (similar to the AAL today)
MINUS the amount of plan net position restricted for
pensions
Plan Net Position (Plan Assets – Plan Liabilities)
Assets are valued at FMV (not smoothed value!)
All other amounts determined on same accounting basis
used by pension plan
34
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Net pension liability measurement date – up to 12 months
plus one day before the balance sheet date
Actuarial valuations
Every two years
Encourage valuation at measurement date
If not, allow valuations up to 30 months and 1 day prior to the
employer’s most recent year end
Must update procedures to roll forward amounts to the measurement
date
35
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Everyone will now use the same actuarial methodology:
The “entry age” actuarial cost method, and
The “level % of payroll” basis for liability measurement.
This means no more choice to use projected unit credit,
aggregate, etc; and no more level dollar contribution!
36
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Discount rate (to be applied to “present-value” the
projected benefit payment)
Single blended rate
Long-term expected rate of return – funded portion
Index rate for a high-quality 20 year tax exempt
bond (AA/Aa or higher) – unfunded portion
37
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Impact on pension expense: The change in the net pension liability does NOT
all get recognized as pension expense immediately.
The following can be deferred (shown as deferred inflow or outflow related to
pensions):
Differences between actual and expected experience
Changes in assumptions about future economic or demographic factors
Amortize into pension expense over a closed period over the “expected
remaining service lives” of all employees
Expected remaining service lives – most people are saying this would
be approximately 12-15 years
Asset smoothing can be done over a closed five year period
Everything else (including benefit changes) will impact pension expense
immediately
38
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Cost-sharing employers will now have to report their proportionate
share of the collective net pension liability
Substantial (HUGE) impact on government-wide presentation
No impact on modified accrual statement amounts
GASB encourages the estimation of expected future
contributions as the basis to allocate; but it allows any method
that is determined on a basis that is consistent with the manner
in which required contributions are determined.
39
Very significant footnote disclosure changes (the illustrative
model takes 5 pages!):
Benefit terms;
# of participants;
Contribution requirements;
Assumptions;
support for the discount rate;
Details of the changes in the net pension liability
40
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Expanded Required Supplementary Information:
10 years of changes in net pension liability
10 year comparison of funding status
10 years of ARC v. actual contributions
41
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Things to consider:
ARC is no longer relevant for financial reporting
But still need to comply with state law!
ARC calculated under the new standards will most likely
be higher than under current GAAP
Coordination with actuary
Timing of roll forward procedures, if required
42
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Agent Employers
Plan net position – your piece
Verifiable information
Timing
Who calculates the deferrals?
Actuary report
Timing
Rollforward
Setting discount rate – could be different for each different
employer
43
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
{GASB 67/68 – PENSIONS!}
Impact of these changes:
Better measure of interperiod equity (the cost of providing services
will be matched better with the periods the employment services
were rendered)
Higher volatility – possibly very significant
These rules will not be required to be used for funding – just for
financial statement measurements
ARC is no longer meaningful for accounting purposes
Expect similar changes to OPEB (eventually!)
44
45
OTHER FUTURE PRONOUNCEMENTS AND
EXPOSURE DRAFTS
PLANTE MORAN
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
Recognition and Measurement Approaches
This is only a CONCEPT STATEMENT – it will only provide the
FOUNDATION for future accounting and reporting standards, rather
than implementation guidance
GASB is looking at three things:
Replacing current financial resources model with a “near-term
financial resources” model
Concepts related to deferred inflows/outflows
Redefining when each measurement approach (initial amount
versus remeasured amount) should be used
46
Near-term financial resources model
Near-term = period after the b/s date during which
financial resources at period end can be converted to
cash to satisfy obligations for spending for the reporting
period
Implications – current model may include longer
term assets that would no longer show up in near-
term model
47
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
Measurement Approach
Proposes when each of the following should be used:
Initial Amount
Assets that are used directly in providing services
Remeasured Amount
Assets that will be converted to cash (e.g. financial
assets)
Variable-payment liabilities (compensated
absences)
48
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
Economic Condition Reporting – Financial Projections
The proposal is to report five year financial projections as required
supplemental information in all basic financial statements
The projections would include five components: 1- Total cash inflows and major individual cash inflows (in dollars and
as % of total) & explanations
2- Total cash outflows and major individual cash outflows (in dollars
and as % of total) & explanations
3- Total financial obligations and major individual obligations (bonds,
pensions. OPEB, long-term contracts)
4- Annual debt service payments
5- Narrative discussion of major intergovernmental interdependencies
49
Government Combinations and Disposals of Operations
Defines and provides accounting and reporting guidance
for governmental
Mergers
Acquisitions
Transfer of operations
50
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
The proposal would differentiate between the following types
of combinations: Merger, Acquisition, or Transfer of
Operations
51
Is there significant consideration?
Yes No
Does the combination involve the entire legal entity?
Entire entity
Acquisition
Merger
A portion of its operations
Transfer of Operations
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
Mergers and Transfers of Operations
In general, assets and liabilities (and deferred inflows and
deferred outflows) would come forward at their originally
reported values
Subject to any corrections for misapplication of GAAP, or
to bring differing accounting principles into alignment
In a transfer of operations, the government would report a
special item for the amount of assets and liabilities (and
deferred inflows/ outflows) received
52
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
Acquisitions
In general, the acquiring government should recognize all assets and
liabilities, regardless of whether the acquired government had
recognized them, at acquisition value (FMV); Exceptions are:
Prior goodwill recorded by the acquired entity (or deferred outflows
resulting from previous acquisitions) should not be recognized;
Employment benefit liabilities can come forward; so can landfill closure;
pollution remediation; investments, derivatives and deferred inflows &
outflows
If Consideration paid is greater than recordable amounts the difference
(goodwill) is a deferred outflow; If less than, the difference should be
used to reduce carrying value of noncurrent assets acquired.
53
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
54
Disposals
Transferor Governments (whether in an acquisition or in a
transfer of operations) should recognize a gain or loss on
disposal of operations as a special item
Nonexchange Financial Guarantee Transactions
Exposure draft issued June 2012, comments due back
9/28/2012
Financial guarantee involving 3 parties
Holder of obligation
The issuer of the obligation
The entity extending the financial guarantee
Excludes special assessment debt
55
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}
Financial guarantees – steps:
Assess likelihood of making payment under guarantee
When “more likely than not” a payment will have to be
made, govt must recognize liability
Best estimate of the discounted PV of future
outflows
Only record under current financial resources model
if “due and payable”
56
{Preview of Upcoming Pronouncements}