36
Genetic analysis - mutants Forward genetics •From mutant phenotype to gene, from gene to protein function Reverse genetics •From gene to mutant phenotype, to function

Genetic analysis - mutants

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Genetic analysis - mutants

Genetic analysis- mutants

Forward genetics

•From mutant phenotype to gene, from geneto protein function

Reverse genetics

•From gene to mutant phenotype, to function

Page 2: Genetic analysis - mutants

Forward genetics

1. Screen for mutants that are defective in certain biological processes

2. Clone the gene responsible for the mutation using molecular genetic means (example include map-based cloning, end-rescue of insertions, etc.)

3. Study the gene/protein in detail…

Page 3: Genetic analysis - mutants

Pl. Phys. 2002

• Arabidopsis Map-Based Cloning in the Post-Genome Era

• Georg Jander*, Susan R. Norris, Steven D. Rounsley, David F. Bush, Irena M. Levin1, and Robert L. Last

• Cereon Genomics LLC, 45 Sidney Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Page 4: Genetic analysis - mutants
Page 5: Genetic analysis - mutants
Page 6: Genetic analysis - mutants

Molecular markers

Page 7: Genetic analysis - mutants

CAPS MarkersCAPS markers (CleavedAmplified Polymorphic Sequences) can be used to unambiguously map an Arabidopsis gene to one of the 10 Arabidopsis chromosome arms. For a detailed examination of the procedure see: Andrzej Konieczny and Frederick M. Ausubel, (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. The Plant Journal 4:(2), 403-410. New CAPS markers continue to be developed by members of the Arabidopsis research community. Eliana Drenkardand Fred Ausubelhave collected the current list of markers, and provided it in tabular form for each of the five chromosomes. If you have developed CAPS markers for an additional locus, please contact [email protected] visit the website.

Page 8: Genetic analysis - mutants
Page 9: Genetic analysis - mutants

vit. C defic. 2 – ozone senzitive mut.

Page 10: Genetic analysis - mutants

Jander et al. 2002

Page 11: Genetic analysis - mutants

Reverse geneticsBecause of the availability of oceans of genomic information, you can study your favorite gene (FG)

Knockout analysis:1. Find a knockout mutant in FG2. Analyze the mutant to see if there is any defect s3. Correlate the defect with biological processes

Overexpression analysis/ectopic expression1. Overexpress FG (endogenous promoter)

Ectopic expression (CaMV 35S promoter)2. Analyze the overexpresser to see if there is

any defect3. Correlate the defect with biological processes

Page 12: Genetic analysis - mutants

When to use reverse genetics:---

Why forward genetics cannot find mutants Carrying mutations in all genes?----

Page 13: Genetic analysis - mutants

Reverse genetics:

Gene Knockout Strategies

1. Homologous recombination2. RNAi based (silencing, antisense,

sense suppression, PTGS, etc.)3. T-DNA or transposon based insertional

mutagenesis4. Deleteagene5. TILLING

Page 14: Genetic analysis - mutants

Homologous recombination (not in plants)

MOSSP.p.

Page 15: Genetic analysis - mutants

RNAi

dsRNA-directed gene silencing mechanisms. Short dsRNA molecules can either be expressed by endogenous genes, invading viruses or by experimental means and are funnelled into one of two different silencing mechanisms. The miRNA-dependent pathway, which mainly controls the translation of mRNAs, involves imperfect base pairing of the miRNA to its mRNA target, while siRNAs are perfectly complementary to their cognate mRNA species and induce their endonucleolytic cleavage and degradation. Although human miRNAs have been identified, their biological function in humans is currently unknown. Amplification of the RNAi signal by RDRP-dependent mechanisms, RNA-induced epigenetic control of gene expression as well as RNAi transfer between cells have been observed in some but not all species.

Page 16: Genetic analysis - mutants

DNA constructs for RNA-mediated gene silencing. a | A DNA plasmid that can be propagated in Escherichia coli from which infectious potato virus X (PVX) RNA can be transcribed in vitro, using T7 polymerase. The PVX cassette contains sequence derived from the gene to be targeted. b | A transferred (T)-DNA plasmid that is propagated in Agrobacterium. When this plasmid-carrying Agrobacterium is inoculated onto a plant, it transfers the DNA between its left (LB) and right (RB) borders into the plant's cells. The region between the borders contains the viral sequences shown in part a, but in this vector, the T7 promoter has been replaced with the cauliflower mosaic virus promoter. This enables the transferred DNA to be transcribed by the plant's endogenous transcription machinery to generate infectious PVX (plus insert sequence) RNA. In amplicon transgene vectors, a selectable maker gene is also present between the left and right borders of this plasmid, enabling plants to be stably transformed with the transferred DNA. c | The tobacco rattle virus (TRV) virus-induced gene-silencing (VIGS) system. Two T-DNA plasmids that encode the TRV genome (one encoding TRV RNA1 and the other encoding TRV RNA2, which carries the inserted target sequence) are propagated separately in Agrobacterium and used to co-infect plant tissue. d | A typical T-DNA plasmid for the expression of hairpin RNAs (hpRNAs). This plasmid can be transiently introduced into plants by bombardment or stably introduced by agroinfiltration. A generic silencing precursor construct (pHANNIBAL) that enables hpRNA vectors to be easily constructed has different multiple cloning sites either side of the intron to enable the rapid insertion of target sequences in forward and reverse orientations. 35S, CaMV 35S promoter; CP, coat protein; M1,2,3, movement proteins 1, 2, 3; RdRP, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; T7, T7 promoter; Term, transcription termination sequence.

Viral mediated transfection

amplicon system

Page 17: Genetic analysis - mutants

Figure 3 | Tobacco plant phenotypes after infection with a satellite-virus-induced silencing system. Results show plant phenotypes four weeks after infection. Phenotypes caused by the silencing of the genes that encode a | cellulose synthase, b | transketolase and c | phytoenedesaturase are shown. Images courtesy of M. Metzlaff, Ghent, Belgium. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 48 © (2002) Blackwell Publishing. Please close this window to return to the main article.Note: some figures may render poorly in a web browser

Page 18: Genetic analysis - mutants
Page 19: Genetic analysis - mutants

Reverse genetics:

Gene Knockout Strategies

1. Homologous recombination2. RNAi based (silencing, antisense,

sense suppression, PTGS, etc.)3. T-DNA or transposon based insertional

mutagenesis4. Deleteagene (RADIATION induced)5. TILLING

Page 20: Genetic analysis - mutants

Agrobacterium Ti plasmid-based transformation

Page 21: Genetic analysis - mutants
Page 22: Genetic analysis - mutants
Page 23: Genetic analysis - mutants

Indexed T-DNA knockout lines

-Major sources: SALK Institute (SALK lines)Syngenta Inc. (SAIL lines)FLAG lines (French)GABI lines (German)

Built using high throughput end-rescue for each T-DNA linein the population.

Page 24: Genetic analysis - mutants

UnreliableHighHighPenetrance

PossibleLimitedNoneTissue Specificity

FamilyGene-

Specific

Gene-/Tandem

Gene-SpecificGene Specificity

Slow

& Expensive

Slow

& Expensive

Inexpensive

& FastCost & Time

LimitedLimitedWideApplicability in

Crop Species

RNAi

Knockout

Insertional

Knockout

Deletional

Knockout

DELETION vs. OTHERS

Page 25: Genetic analysis - mutants

TILLING: Targeting Induced Local Lesions In Genomes

Developed by:

Steve Henikoff., Fred Hutchinson Cancer Inst.

Luca Comai, University. of Washington

Detection of point mutations in target genes within mutagenized or natural populations of plants by heteroduplex analysis

.

Page 26: Genetic analysis - mutants
Page 27: Genetic analysis - mutants

Arabidopsis EMS Mutagenesis

• Mutation frequency can be as high as • 500 mutations/genome or

• 1 mutation/1000 bp/ 300 plants

• 5% truncations, 50% missense, 45% silent

Greene, et al., 2003, Genetics 164: 731-740

Page 28: Genetic analysis - mutants

PCR Amplification of Target Gene from Pooled Genomic DNA

3’5’

5’3’

5’3’

3’5’

5’ 3’3’ 5’

5’ 3’3’ 5’

5’ 3’

3’ 5’5’ 3’

3’ 5’

PCR

heat, re-nature

FLUORESCENTLYTAGGED PRIMERS

Page 29: Genetic analysis - mutants

• HETERODUPLEXES FORM IF THE POOL CONTAINS AT LEAST ONE PLANT WITH SNP IN THE TARGET

Page 30: Genetic analysis - mutants

CEL1 Cleavage

Denature

Resolve using Gel – PAAGE denat (on fy.Li-Cor).

5’ 3’

3’ 5’

5’ 3’

3’ 5’

3’

3’ 5’5’

5’ 3’

5’

3’ 5’

5’

CEL1 – mismatch specific celery nuclease

Page 31: Genetic analysis - mutants

Norm

al

Mut

ant

LI-COR Scanning Results:

Norm

al

Mut

ant

IR DYE 700 IR DYE 800

1.0kb

0.8kb

0.2 kb

Page 32: Genetic analysis - mutants

Colbert et al.2001, Plant Physiol. 126:480-84

Page 33: Genetic analysis - mutants

• ECOTILLING (Comai et al. 2004)

Mix ecotype DNA with the reference WT – Col-0

Page 34: Genetic analysis - mutants
Page 35: Genetic analysis - mutants

Advantages of TILLING as an Approach to Reverse Genetics

• Both natural and mutagenized populations in any organism can be screened. Mutagenized plants have a large number of randomly distributed mutations per plant genome.

• Plants heterozygous for a mutation can be detected (lethality not a problem).

• Both nonsense (knockout) and mis-sense mutations can be recovered.

• No transgenic manipulations required.

Page 36: Genetic analysis - mutants

• Česká biologie rostlin čeká na odvážlivce, kteří si troufnou na „forward screen“ se zajímavým biologickým zadáním.