Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
53B09SW9413 2 .5417 ZEEMEL LAKE 010
GEOLOGICAL REPORT
GRAFF LAKE PROJECT
AREA OF ZEEMEL LAKE
AREA OF KARL LAKE
NTS: 53B9
J. PerryProject GeologistCanadian Nickel Company LimitedCopper Cliff, OntarioMay, 1982
53809SW9413 a.5417 ZEEMEL LAKE 010C
Table of Contents
SUMMARY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS
3.0 PROPERTY
3.1 Claims
3.2 Gridding
4.0 PREVIOUS EXPLORATION
5.0 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY RESULTS
5.1 Magnetometer Survey
5.2 Vertical Loop EM Survey
6.0 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
6.1 t'-cneral Geology
6.2 Stratigraphy
6.3 Structure
6.4 Mineralization
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
9.0 REFERENCES
l
l
l
l
l
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
5
6
7
7
8
Figures
Figure No. Scale
1 General Location Map 1:250,000
2 Claim Hap l:31.680
3 Geological Plans 1:2500
4 Jensen Cation Plot
5 Chip Sample Location Plan 1:15,840
Tables
Table l Table of Lithologic Units
SUMMARY
During July and August 1981, an exploration program consisting of magnetic and geological surveys was carried out over 54 contiguous claims near Graff Lake in the Areas of Zeemel and Karl Lakes. The magnetic survey defined a number of areas which outlined the oxide facies iron formations as linear zones of positive and negative anomalies.
The claim group is underlain predominantly by basic volcanics with lesser interflow greywacke and iron formation. Granite and granite gneiss are found only along the northern margin of the property. The volcanics fall within the basaltic komatiite range with minor flews in the ultramafic komatiite range. The rocks are commonly strongly foliated and metamorphic grade is at the almandine amphibolite facies. No major structural features were observed on the claims and no top dererminat ions were made, however, chemical data suggests that tops may be to the north.
samples were taken from exposed outcrops of iron formation and assayed for gold. The assay results commonly showed less than 25 ppb Au but a number gave values of several hundred ppb to a maximum of 905 (RX 43764). Line 26-tOOE has the widest anomalous zone. Results from the oxide facies iron formation are not sufficiently encouraging to warrant further exploration. however, a zone of unexposed sulphide facies iron, interpreted from magnetic data, occurs south of the baseline and this has not been tully explored.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
An exploration program consisting of geological and magnetometer surveyswas carried out over the claim block. The former was performed between 15 Julyand 19 August and the latter from 23 July to 10 August, 1981. A limitedamount of VLEM surveying was also carried out in February 1982.
A report (Gereghty, G. J.) covering the magnetometer survey was submitted for assessment credits earlier this year (1982).
2.O LOCATION AND ACCESS
The claims extend eastwards from Graff Lake and straddle the boundary between the Zeemel Lake (M-2 703) and the Karl Lake (M-2718) claim maps.
Graff Lake (Fig. 1) is Ircated about 140 km north of Pickle Lake, Ontario. Access to the area is by helicopter or by float plane to Graff Lake. An old winter freight haulage r^ad passes through the northern part of the property, linking Opapimiskan, Forester and Neawagank Lakes with Highway 808 and Pickle Lake.
3.0 PROPERTY
3.1 Claims (Fig. 2)
The property consists of 54 contiguous claims held by the Canadian Nickel Company Limited. The geological and magnetic surveys were carried out over the claims listed below:
Pa 588030-32 Pa 588058-63 Pa 5883&6-07 Pa 599163-87
Pa 5880J4-36Pa 588294-300Pa 583356-58
3.2 Gridding
A baseline was established at an azimuth of 115 of the property. Cross lines at 025 were cut and chained at with pickets planted every 25 m across the property.
through the centre100 m intervals
4.0 PREVIOUS EXPLORATION
An airbcrne electromagnetic response detected by Canico during a regional survey c.1960 is located within the property. This was examined in 1961 by a ground follow-up crew and an eight line (400 1 spacing) pace and compass grid was established. An EM conductor was located and magnetic and geological surveys carried out over this grid.
^i Subject Property^..
Figure l. Location of Graft Loke Area
Po
- Pa
Po
* 9964 S99I65 1599J66 pa "Vo
Pa
... J.iFo "T
l
4~|Pe
^99^71_.sjL'iii LL?*LL? Li?*iii li**!9 * it.'*i* 6i*.?9 *L5 "J5 3 ?x:" eosiPo \ |Pa "To Po" Te" P* IP* IP. "Tpa
Lakt599JTT5 V 5 9917 6, Po "T\PO 'Pa
l l l l l l (9176 l 599177 .599176 56 * 297166*296 l 6*6299 l 56*033^8*03*
Po JPo Tpa JPa l Pa i Pa |P* iPa j
! l ! l ' ! '59917* i 599JtOj 599161 599168 5 863001 5*6306* 5 8 83071 3*6035 [888036156608*Pa Po ~Tpa ~ipa ,Po "fpa
III
S99I83 l 599164
54 CuAKVS
599168 i 8 66356 5*6557 J S B8059 '566060 1/5860*1 Pa Tpa ~ Pa "|Pa "pa jPa
! 991 B 6 j 5^99167 898356I58608Z ' 588063 l 566O64Pa
63 l 566 j Pa 'pa J~
58*0*51 5 8*0** 16660^7 1 18*06 *
o O
AREA of ZEEMEL LAKE M-2708
52 0 34'N
AREA of KARL LAKE
M-2718
538*
SUBJECT PROPERTYPATRICIA MINING DIVISION
DISTRICT OF KENORAtPATRICIA PORTION)l O Ik*
i:3i*eo
- 2 -
5.0 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY RESULTS
A report covering the magnetometer survey was submitted earlier for assessment credits.
5.l Magnetometer Survey Results
Following is a brief description (G. J. Gereghty) of magnetic anomalies occurring within the property.
Sheet #1:
Several linear anomalies strike NW-SE through various clain.~ in the south part of this sheet. The longest and strongest positive magnetic zone varies from a high of 5500 gammas above background in claim Pa 599169 to a low of 1700 gammas below background in claim Pa 599170. Other small and weak magnetic high or low anomalies occur within claims Pa 599168, 599173 and 599174.
Sheet #2:
Two or more closely spaced parallel magnetic bands comprised of narrow elongated positive and negative anomalies, united form a broad strong magnetic zone striking NW-SE throughout the length of this sheet. At its widest point this erratic magnetic zone is 600 metres in width, however, the average width approximates 500 metres. The peak magnetic high reading is 80,000 gammas above background while a magnetic low of -22,000 gammas below background was observed.
Near the north shore of Graff Lake in claims Pa 599175 and 599171, is a rather interesting lenticular shaped magnetic anomaly AOO metres in length and 5000 gammas maximum intensity above background.
Sheet #3
A weak linear anomaly strikes E-W across claim Pa 599184 into 599183. Also within claim 599183 is a small isolated magnetic low anomaly.
Sheet #4
Small narrow magnetic anomalies occur in claims Pa 588030, 588032 and 588034. These positive magnetic anomalies vary in intensity from 4200 to *4,000 gammas above magnetic background.
Sheer ffi
A number ol linear and small elliptical magnetic high and low anomalies are scattered throughout this sheet. Linear anomalies vary from magnetic background by a high of 4500 gammas to a low of 3200 gammas and these occur in claims Pa 588299, 588032, 588035, 588036, 581053 and 588061. Magnetic elliptical anomalies vary from a low of 1000 g mas below background in claim Pa 588296 to a high of 1600 gammas above background in claim 588036.
- 3 -
Sheet #6:
Anomalies on this sheet are essentially a continuation of the strong parallel magnetic bands extending southeastward from Sheet 2. Here too this errat magnetic zone consists of linear positive and negative anomalies reaching as high as +100,000 gammas and a low of -37,000 gammas below magnetic background. The width of the overall magnetic belt has increased slightly to average around 700 metres. This strong anomalous zone ends abruptly in claim Pa 588064, however, the flanking strong linear anomalies do extend to the eastern claim boundary.
Sheet #7:
Several weak linear and small elliptical anomalies were outlined. One of these weak linear anomalies is the eastern extension of a similar zone mentioned in claim Pa 599184 on Sheet 3. This anomaly extends for 400 metres into claim Pa 599185 on Sheet 7. Weak elliptical anomalies can be seen in claims Pa 599186, 599187 and 588066.
The magnetometer survey successfully outlined the oxide facies iron formation and seems to have defined the boundaries of the mafic metavolcanic rocks.
5.2 Vertical Loop EM Results
A limited amount of VLEM coverage was carried out using an Inco Mark IV 1000 Hz unit. The survey was confined to a nairow cross section over the property in the vicinity of line 10+OOE. A number of parallel conductors were located but progress using the vertical loop equipment was slow and further work was postponed until a horizontal loop survey can be carried out.
6.O GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
6.l General Geology
The motavolcanics and metasediment s underlying the Graff Lake claims form part of the Weagamow Lake - North Caribou Lake greenstone belt (Thurston et al, 1979). These belts fall within the God's Lake Subprovince (Ayres, 1971) and consist predominantly of mafic to intermediate volcanics with lesser clastic and chemical sediments. Metamorphic grade in the area is reported (Thurston, 1979) to be "at the lowermost subfacies of the almandine amphibolite facies of Turner and Verhoogen".
The claim block is underlain by mafic volcanics, greywackes, and oxide facies iron formation with minor sulphide facies iron formation. The northern margin of the property is underlain by a grey gneiss locally intruded by pink pegmatitic granite. Outcrop distribution is uneven with the greatest concentration in the area between 5+CON and 5+OOS, parallel to the baseline.
6. 2 S^trat igraphy
Table l indicates the interpreted sequence of deposition. Five major units occur on the property, basalt, basaltic tuff, iron formation, sediments and granite gneiss. Dacite, dac.itic tuff, pegmatite and diabase occur less commonly. No convincing evidence for top direction was observed during the mapping program although there is some suggestion of a northward younging sequence as evidenced by the chemistry (Fig. 3) of the volcanics in their trend from ultramafic komatiites to basaltic komatiites to tholeitic andesites. This subdivision of the basic flows was not possible in the field.
Basic Volcanics
Basalts :
The basic volcanics consist of foliated basalt with minor massive basalt. These units weather from a medium to a dark green colour and the foliated unit has a distinct banded appearance due to the alignment of the amphibole and feldspar crystals. In thin section the basalts commonly appear as a strongly foliated amphibole-quartz-chlorite-epidote-muscovite rock. Narrow sulphide rich zones in the basalt appeared as rusty zones on the weathered outcrops; these zones achie 'e a maximum width of about 1.5 m.
Whole rock analyses (Dulanow, 1982) indicate that the basalts within the claim block fall almost exclusively within the komatiite field (Jensen, 1976). Minor flow units are mo."e basic, falling in the ultramafic komatiite range. (Fig. 3). A narrow zone extending from immediately south of the iron formation to about 50 m south ol the baseline (19+OOE to 27+OOE) consists of tholeiitic andesite.
Local horizons of massive basalt were observev south of the iron forma tion. These units ore fine to coarse grained and are commonly only 1-2 m in width.
Tut fs:
Tuffs were distinguished primarily on the basis of the weathered surface which exhibits a finely banded or laminated appearance. The bands consist of alternating light and dark green layers composed essentially of amphibole * plagioclase ^ quartz. The banding commo.ily has a distinctive wavey appearance but locally shows intense microfolding. Thn tuffs do not extend over signifi cant strike lengths but pass laterally into the basalts within a distance of one or two hundred metres along strike.
Iron Formation!
On weathered outcrops the iron formations 3ppear as finely interbedded bands of magnetite and recrystallized chert. The magnetite bands vary from a few mm up to about 15 mm wide. Rust stains commonly parallel the magnetite horizons indicating that at least minor amounts of sulphide occur with the oxide. The iron formation was observed to pass from fairly massive non-
TABLE l
TABLE OF LITHOLOGIC UNITS
PROTEROZOIC
Mafic Intrusives
Diabase
ARCHEAN
Felsic Intrusives and Gneisses
Grey to p: gneisses and granites
Clastic Sediments
Foliated greywacke with minor basic volcanics interbedded with the main basic volcanic unit
Chemical Sediments
Oxide facies iron formation and ferruginous cherts with minor sulphide facies horizons all interbedded with the basic volcanics
Mafic Volcanics
Foliated basalts and tuffs with minor intermediate to felsic flows and tuffs
FcO t Fc2O3 * TiO2
MgO
JENSEN CATION PLOT
FIGURE 4
- 5 -
ferruginous chert into well banded magnetite and chert. Two main iron formation zones were identified (Fig. 3) during the mapping program and a third was interpreted from the magnetic survey.
Sediments;
The thickest sedimentary unit nott-d on the claim block consists of greywacke. It extends for about 2 km from 25+OOE to 42+OOE between 4+OON and 6+50N and is locally interbedded with narrow basaltic flows. The very fine to medium grained sediments are well foliated and weather from a light grey or brown to a medium grey or brown colour with local iron staining. The rock consists of grains and quartz * plagioclase * biotite -t- andalusite * muscovite. The banding varies in width from about l mm to 3 mm. ~
Granite and Granite Gneiss;
The granite gneiss is found only in the extreme northern part of the property, It is a grey to pink, medium grained, equigranular rock with gneissosity parallel to bedding. In thin section it consists of quartz, plagioclase, biotite, and sericite with minor epidote, microcline and chlorite (Dubanow, 1982). This gneissic granite is locally intruded by a pink pegmatitic granite.
Dacite and Dacite Tuff;
A few outcrops of dacite and dacitic tuff were noted on the claims. These are all located north of the baseline and in almost all instances the dacite weathers to a medium brcwnish-green colour and has a grey, siliceous appearance on the fresh surface. These units are only locally present and occur over short strike lengths.
Diabase:
A northwesterly trending diabase dyke was observed cross cutting the volcanics and sediments at about 37+OOE between 4+OON and 7+OON. The diabase is a massive, medium grained and slightly magnetic rock which weathers to a rusty beige colour.
6.3 Structure
A foliation at 115 is well developed in all units mapped with the exception of the granite where bedding *s observed in the iron formation the foliation is parallel to the bedding. Small scale folds are evident, particularly in the basic tuffs and the iron formations. Soft sediment deformation i^ inter preted to have caused the latter. There is no evidence on the claim clock of any major structural feature, however, Thurston (1979, Fig. 3) indicates that the major synclinal axis passing through Opapimiskan Lake extends through and beyond the Graff Lake property. This agrees with the suggestion of top directions in the basalts as interpreted from their differentiation trends.
- 6 -
Boudin structures up to about l m long were observed in rocks ranging from cherts LO tuffs and basalts. The most spectacular were seen in narrow basalt horizons interbedded with the iron formation and traced for about 600 m a long strike.
6.4 Mineralization
Chip samples (Fig. 5) were collected across all exposed outcrops c f. iron formation. The chip samples were commonly l m long with an occasional sample up to 2 m long. All samples were analysed for gold. The iron formations are anomalous with respect to gold in the ppb range right across the property. Assays are mostly less than 25 ppb but a few have values of several hundred ppb gold up to a maximum of 905 ppb (RX 43764). All assay results greater than 100 ppb Au are listed below:
Line
9 + OOE 10+OOE 17+OOE 24+OOE 25+OOE 26+OOE 26+OOE 26+OOE 26+OOE 26+OOE 27+OOE 28+OOE 29+OOE 32+OOE
RX Sample No,
4396943994437414375243956439554375843761437634376443768439514394943777
195285125350325310130500130905110205290160
Width
l m l m l m m m m m
l m l m l m1 m2 m 2 m l m
Line 26+OOE has the widest anomalous gold zone.
Anomalous gold bearing grab samples collected during the mapping program are listed below. All of the higher assays (i.e. 100 ppb Au) were obtained from the iron formations.
Co-ords
15+95E/2+05N 28+10E/0+75N 25+OOE/1+57N 27+OOE/1+30N 29+OOE/1+30N 35+OOE/0+15N 11+05E/1+55N
20+85E/1+55N
RX Sample No.
43860439034384143884438884392143807
43827
Rock Type
440 250 165 125 730 3*5 515 (0.015 oz/Au/
ton 740
IFIFIFIFIFIF (rusty)IF
IF
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
As can be noted from figure 5, significant portions of the oxide facies iron formations were sampled. The results, although anomalous, are not considered to be sufficiently encouraging to warrant further work on these units. However, the sulphide facies iron formation which is interpreted to occur south of the baseline has not been adequately explored.
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that a horizontal loop EM survey be carried out ovo selected portions of the grid in order to idenM fy all conductors and that additional sampling be carried out if necessary.
- 8 -
9.0 REFERENCES
Ayres, L. D. et. al.1971: Explanatory Text, Legend, Scale for Ontario Geological Map;
Ontario Dept. Mines and Northern Affairs, Map 2201, Scale l inch to 16 miles, Compilation 1970.
Dubanow, T.1982: A Petrological and Geochemical Study of Archean Metavolcanics
and Metasediments, Graff Lake, Superior Province, Ontario. Unpublished B."c. Thesis, Brock University.
Cereghty, G.J.1982: Magnetometer Survey Report, Area of Zeemel Lake and Area of Karl
Lake, Patricia Mining Division. Assessment Report, Canadian Nickel Company.
Jensen, L. S.1976: A New Cation Plot for Classifying Volcanic Rocks; Ontario Div.
Mines, MP 66.
Sage, R. P. and Breaks, F. W.1976: Operation Pickle Lake, Districts of Kenora, Patricia Portion,
and Thunder Bay, Ontario Div. Mines, OFR5180.
Thurston, P. P. et. al.1979: Geologjr of the Winisk Lake Area, District of Kenora, Patricia
Portion; Ontario Geological Survey Report 193.
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
53B09SW9413 2.5417 ZEEMEL LAKE
;NDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT OT BE REPEATED IN REPORT NTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
300
Type of Survey(s) Geological_______________ T^vn.rim or ArM A reas of Zeemel Lake (M-2708)
Claim Holder(s) D omeP.O.
Exploration (Canada) Limited |
Box 270,
Survey Company ^Canadian Nick
Author of Report J. Perry, c/o
1 First Canadian Place,
el Company Limiten * ,. ."
Canadian Nirkpl Comnanv
Address of Author Limited, Copper Cliff, Ontario POM 1NO
Covering Dates of Surve
Total Miles of Line Cut
y June 15, 1981 - May 15, 1982
13
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line culling) for firsi survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
AIRBORNE CREDITS
M:i0nrinmrtrr.
nATF; Fe bruary 25,
Res. Grol.
Previous SurveysFile No. Type
i
(Special provii
^lcctromagr(enter c
l983 S ir.N*
flinecutting to office)
.0 kms
DAYS ,, , . , per claimGeophysical
~ Electromagnetic , -~
MagnrtMmrt. r
Riirijon^trjr
-nihrr
C,en]no\CA\
Ocf.rhr-miral. ,. . ,. M I ,.
ion credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi) .
ir t ir: L RnHinrnrtrirayi per claim)
TURF.: 'l - \ ^^^\Aulhdr of Report or Ag^nl
Qualifications
Date
" "
Claim Holder
.
MIINIINU CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
Pa 599163
(prefix) (number) Pa 599164
Pa 599167
Pa 599168
Pa 599171
fa 59917?
.........*a..............333m.........................Pa 599176
Pa 599179
Pa ' 599180
RECEIVED................MAR A.I91B3L........................
MfNlNGT LANDS 5E6
837 (5/79)
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survcy(s) Geological
Township or Area Areas of Zeemel A Karl Lakes (M2708 A
CkJm Huldcr(s) Canadian Nickel Company Limited M2718)
Hwy. 17 West. Copper Cliff. Ontario POM 1NO
Survey Company Canadian Nickel Company Limit-pH________,
Author of Report J* Perry, c/o Canadian Nickel Company
Address of Author Limited. Copper Cliff. Ontario———————-
Covering Dates of S..™fy -Iu"e 15. 1981 - Hay 15, 1982flinecuttinf to office)
80.98 kmsTotal Miles of Line Cut.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days {includes line culling) for firstsurvey.' tENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
— Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer—-
—Radiometric———Other——————
DAYSper claim
Geological.. 20
Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne lurveyt)
Magnetometer,.
HATF.-
.Electromagnetic, . Radiometric —————(enter days per claim)
? S , l QR1 S1P.N ATIJRR: \*7JAvAuthor1 of Report or Ajcnt
Res. Gcol... .Qualifications.
Previous Surveys File No. Typ; Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefi*) (number)
See Schedule I
.a
l
l
TOTAL
837 16/79)
S. Sf 7
1903 08 31 2.5417
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 669Sioux Lookout t OntarioPOV 2TO
Dear Sir:
RE: Geological Survey on Mining Clalos PA 588030 et al In the Areas of Zeemel 4 Karl Lakes.
The Geological Survey assessoent work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated August 5, 1983 have'been approved as of the above date.
Please Inform the recorded holder of these raining cia Ins and so Indicate on your records.
Yours very truly,
E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1300
R. P1chette:sc
cc: Canadian Nickel Co Limited Copper Cliff, Ontario
cc: Ooae Exploration (Canada) Ltd Toronto. Ontario
cc: Resident Geologist Sioux Lookout. Ontario
lOntario
Ministry ofNaturalResources
34, f 3
19133 08 05
Your file:
Our tile: 2 .5417
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 669Sioux Lookout, OntarioPOV 2TO
Dear Sir:
Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record
sheets.
For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.
Yours very truly,
E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450gueen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316
R. P1chette:sc
cc: Canadian Nickel Co Limited Copper Cliff, Ontario Attn: W.Y. Rodney
cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario
cc: Done Exploration (Canada) Ltd P.O. Box 270 l First Canadian Place Toronto, Ontario H5X 1H1
Ends:
Mimstryof Notice of Intent NaturalResources for Technical Reports
Ontario
1983 08 OS
2.5417
An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.
If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.
If the reduced rate of ciedits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.
If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and v ou are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, v^u may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. T!:e report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.
fejj\ M inlstfy 01 Technical Assess\2J Resources Work CreditsOntarif^
REPORT OF WORK REF. 1 83-
menl "2.5417Dile Mining Recorder'i fttport of
1983 08 05 wor^o. #8^ 34
34Recorded Holder
CANADIAN NICKEL COMPANY LIMITEDTownship or Area
ZEEMAL LAKE S KARL LAKE*
Type of survey and number of Aisessment day* crtdll per claim
Geophysical
Fl*rtrnmagn*tlc . rUyt
W*gn*tpmtt*' .., , ,... rtnyi
Rurllnmctrle . rliiyi
Induced palarliat Ion , ,,,. dayi
Other. rtnyt
Section 77 (19) So "Mining Clilmi Ait*((*d" column
R*nlngir*l 20 rt.yt
Rporhemirjil rlsyi
Man days CD Airborne D
Special provision [El Ground CD
Q Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims At**t*4d
\
PA 599163-164 599167-168 599171-172 599176 599179-180
f
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
5 days credit
PA 599175
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claim*
1 1 not sufficiently covered by the lurvey LJ Insufficient technical data filed
4
The Mining Recorder rrviy reduce the above credits If necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on - each claim (Sots not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77 (19) 60:
838 (83/6)
//^*"y ^^
Mmislryot Nnlural
Report o! Work,. . , - . . (Ocoi.t.yMCHl, Geological. #83-34
Instruction*: - Pleaif type or P'int.H number ol mining claim* .fdvf'Kfi
i pu c* on Ihii form, attach A lilt.Ontgcnj _ (jt'onn'mical end txpcnditurcs)
Pll'Hll^ WU-S Thi Mining ActType of SaVveyd)
GeologicalClaim Holder!*!-
Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited
Note: - Only days credits calculated In th* "Expenditures" section may be emend in the "Expend. Oayi Cr." columns.
- Do not use shaded areas below.Townthip or Area
Zeemel Lake (M-2708)Prospector'* Licence No.
A-21304Addreu
P.O. Box 270, 1 First Canadian Place, Toronto, Ontario M5X 1H1Survey Company bate of Survey
Canadian Nickel Company Limited rJB5 | 9o. | 'from ft to) Total Mllei of lin* Cut
M i i.9y iM8,! W 13.0 kmsName and Addret* ol Author (of Gto Technical report)
J. Perry, c/o Canadian Nickel Company Limited, Copper Cliff, Ontario POM 1NOCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right
Spcrlal Provlilon*
For fIrjt survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes lin* cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days ((or each)
Man Day*
Complete reverse s ide and en
Oeophyilcal
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Oeochemlcal
M AY 3 0198: \
MINING LANDS S
Airborne Credit*
Note: Special provisions j Electromagnetic
credits do not apply
Oeophyilcal
- Electromagnetic
- Wagnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geochemical
to Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer
Radiomttric
Da y l per Claim
20
Dayi per Claim
Day* per Claim
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performad on Clalm(i)
Calculation of Expenditure Dayi Credits
Toial Expenditure*Total
Days Credit*
Inttruction*Total Day* Credit* may be apportioned at the claim holder'* choice. Enter number of day* credit* per c *irn (elected in column* at right. V
Mining ClaimPrefix
Pa
Number
599163
599164
599167
599168
599171
599172
599175
599176
599179
599180
Expend. Days Cr.
Date
February 25.198Certification Verifying Report o*, work
Total number of mining claimi covered by thit r*poM of work.
Mining ClaimPrefix Number
Expend. Oayt Cr,
1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge 1** the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after Its completion and the anrraxed report is true. .
Name and Poital Addreti of Penon Certifying
W. V. Rodney, c/o Canadian Nickel Company Limited 1
Copper Cliff, Ontario POM 1NODal* Certified
^ebruary 25,1083 ' (^wnmiM
1J62 (81/9)
f.i*^'
Oniano
Report of Work ^(Geophysical, Gcolr.xjic.iil, ' flT' 6^ v5 "*wX *-?Geochemical arid Expenditures)
Thr Mining Act
Instructions P'r,nc l/fi* O' printi' i"jrri'i*i ol mining rimnv. 1'rw"M,r(l( tM'iH l[ioc* O'" tins form, (U;v h B list
Not* - Only days cied'ti calculated tn thr"Enpenditurei" secron may he enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr," columns.
- Do not use shaded areal below.Type o! SeVviiyls)
GeologicalClaim Holder(s)
Canadian Nickel Company LimitedAddress
Hwy. 17 West, Copper Cliff, Ontario POM 1NOPurvey Company Data of S
Canadian Nickel Company Limited ^ j jjName and Address of Author (of Geo Technical report)
J. Perry, c/o Canadian Nickel Company Limited, Copper
Townihip Qf A'MZeemel L/flKcli' o r 1 1 a ir a
(M-2708) fM-971*n
Pro*p*cior i uctnc* T/o.
A-17527
urv*y (from Si t o)
)7 81 1 19 , 08 , 81to. V r. | Dey | Mo. | Yr.
Total Vi 1*1 of lin* Cut
80.98 kms
Cliff, Ontario POM 1NOCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provilionl
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (Thij includni line cutting)
For each additional survey. using the tem* grid:
Enter 20 dayi (for each)
Mm Days
Complete reverse tide and enter total(i) here
MAY 3 01983
MINING LANDS
Airborn* Credits
Note: S pecial proviiionicredits do not apply to Airborne Sur*
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Redlometrlc
- Other
Geologic*!
Geoch*mlc*l
Geophyilc*!
- Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Other
ical
Geochemical
SECTION
Electromagnetic
Days p*r Cltlm
20
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes )
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credltt
Tout Expenditure!Total
Days Credits
Instruction*Total DtV'i Credits may be apportioned at the O i m holder's choice. Enter number o( days credilt per c 1*4m telec/ In columns at right. '
Mining ClaimPrefix
Pa.,...,...,
.***^. A -;^1 \ " ';.\ ' 1'-' -F,~T' .*l.l
, VV'flv'-.;i^:i . ;;
f- 1 - - .
*' ' ,
Number
588030
588031
588032
588034
588035
588036
588058
588059
588060
588061
588062
588063
588064
588065
588066
588067
588068
588294
588295
588296
588297
588298
588299
Expend. Days Cr,
Mining ClaimPrefix
Pa
Number
588300
588306
588307
588356
588357
588358
599165 .
599166
599169
599170
599173
599174
599177
599178
599181
599182
599183
599184
599185
599186
599187
Expend. Days Cr.
586030Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
Date
February 25, 19Certification Verifying Report of Work
1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of t^ or witnessed tame during and/or after its completion and the annexi
s fact* tet fortrrfn the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work fi report is true. ^
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
W.V. Rodney, c/o Canadian Nickel Company Limited \ (
Copper Cliff, Ontario POM 1NODate Certified
February 25,1983 ^ V^1 i
U62 (81/9)
Ministry ofNaturalResources
OntKjfc^
GeotechnicalReportApproval
File
Mining Land* Comment!
DTo: Geophysics
Comment*
Approved Q W lih to ice (gain with correction!Date Signature
To: Geology - Expenditures
Comment!
fliApproved [~| W ith to to a gain with corrtctloni*
DTo: Geochemistry /Comment!
f~| Approved [~| With to t** igaln with eorrtctloniSignature
l [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)
1693(81/10)
Canadian Nickel Company LimitedCopper Cliff * Ontario POM 1NO
February 25, 1983
WAK o-***
Mr. F. W. Matthews ^^ SECTIONSupervisor, Projects Section NUN i wOntario Ministry of Natural ResourcesWhitney Block, Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1X1
Dear Mr. Matthews:
Enclosed is a geological survey report in duplicate being submitted under the Special Provisions section as assessment work on the following claims located in the Areas of Zeemel and Karl Lakes (M-2708 and M-2718), Patricia Mining Division.
Pa 588030-032 "i.ncl. Pa 599167-168"Pa 588034-036 " Pa 599169-170'Pa 588058-068^ " Pa 599171-172""Pa 588294-300^ " Pa 599173-174^Pa 588306-307^ Pa 599175-176^Pa 588356-358 incl. Pa 599177-178*^Pa 599163-164 . . ..f ,. t . .. ,., pa 599179-180"""Pa 599165-166- "" "'' , ' . ,Pa 599181-187-lncl.
r k - * '' (
*
Two separate work reports covering these claims have been forwarded to Mr. A. Hanson in Sioux Lookout, while the maps indicating the survey in detail are enclosed.
Yours truly
W. V. Rodney
x.c. A. HansonDo- . Exploration (Canada) Limited
Enclosures:
EipkxttHxi lubwdMry ol
INCD LIMITED
1983 03 11 2.5417
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural BesourcesP.O. Box 669Sioux Lookout, OntarioPOV 2TO
Dear Sir:
We have received reports and Baps for a Geophysical Geological Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claim* "PA^588030 et al 1n the Areas of Zeenel and Karl Lakes.
This material will be examined and assessed and astatement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
We do not have a copy of the report of work which Is normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.
Yours very truly,
E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioH7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380
A. Barr:se
cc: Canadian Nickel Company LimitedKwy 17 West
Copper Cliff, OntarioPOM 1NOAttn: H.Y. Rodney.
rs * * t'-^ i \ 'j m t~i J *-.-
r CM; iit.Tu. cov. n:o
j. " .y •""-•' *
r c: b r vi ,-n-y 25,
RKCISTEKHJ MAIL
Mr. A.l-lining3'aLricia Mining Di.vir.ionMinistry of Natural Resource:P.O. Box 669SIOUX LOOKOUT, OntarioPOV 2 TO
Dear Mi. Hanson:
Unclosed is an application 'reporting a geological survey be.ng submit tod under the Special Provisions Section as 20 days assess work on cncli of t bc- following 44 cliiirr.s located in the Are,-):; of Zeemel and Karl Laker; (M-2708 and M-2718), Patricia Mining Division.
Pa 599165-16*' Pa 599169-170 Pa 599173-17/, Pa 5991/7-178 Pa 599181-187 incl.
Pa 588030-032 incl.Pa 588034- 'P,6Pa 588058-068Pa 588294-300P.n 588306-307P.- 588356-358 incl.\
The report and maps in duplicate indicating the survey in detail have been forwarded to Mr. F. W. Matthexvs, c/o Ontario Ministry of Natural Kesoiirccs, Toronto, Ontario.
Plea.se acknowledge the recording of this work to our Copper Clift of f i ce.
Your:; t rv l y
W. V. Kodney
x. r.. l'. V). Ma f t hews
IN C O LI I/ IT E D
Canadian Nickel Company LimitedCopper Clitl * Ontario POM 1NO
February 25, 1983
REGISTERED MAIL
Mr. A. HansonMining RecorderPatricia Mining DivisionMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 669SIOUX LOOKOUT, OntarioPOV 2TO
Man b 1983
MINING LANDS St
Dear Mr. Hanson:
On behalf of Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited, we have enclosed an application reporting a geological survey being submitted under the Special Provisions section as 20 days assessment work on the following claims located in the Area of Zeemel Lake (M-2718), Patricia MiningDivision.
Pa 599163-164Pa 599167-168Pa 599171-172Pa 599175-176f* 599179-180
The report and maps in duplicate indicating the survey in detail have been forwarded i n f r. F. W. Motthcws, c/o Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, Ontario.
Please acknowledge the recording of this work to Dome Exploration (Canada) Limited together with a copy to my attention.
Yours t
W. V. Rodney
WVR/nk
x.c. F. W. MatthewsDome Exploration (Canada) Limited
Enclosure
Eipkvalion tubtkfcfy ol
INCO LIMITED
SCHEDULE 7
Mining Claims Traversed
Pa 588030 Pa 588031 Pa 588032 Pa 58803A Pa 588035 Pa 588036 Pa 588058 Pa 588059 Pa 588060 Pa 588061 Pa 588062 Pa 588063 Pa 588064 Pa 588065 Pa 588066 Pa 588067 Pa 588068 Pa 588294 Pa 588295 Pa 588296 Pa 588207 Pa 588298
Pa 588299 Pa 588300 Pa 588306 Pa 588307 Pa 588356 Pa 588357 Pa 588358 Pa 599165 Pa 599166 Pa 599169 Pa 599170 Pa 599173 Pa 599174 Pa 599177 Pa 599178 Pa 599181 Pa 599182 Pa 599183 Pa 599184 Pa 599185 Pa 599186 Pa 599187
Total: 44
=; 7 , - i -w;i.5S*6*J ISiDSJ |5S*6*V-
!i. pJ ' p. ' P.S J \ l l Ir
KARL LAKE
DISTRICT OFKENORA
(PATRICIA PORTION)
PATRICIA MINING DIVISION
SCALE: l - INCH ~ 40 CHAINS
00L w/
Nf
T
*
*cohpoor
oV-CC
eHHIvu
ctao\1.13
O
CO•0
Pa
5882
96
Spr
ue*
R Ja
ck
P"1
Pa
5991
66
Pa
5991
65Pa
5
88
29
8
\599
I70
Pa
5991
69
Sp
rue
* ,
AI4
*r t
oce
ivio
i
Pa
5991
74
RX
43063
(15)
Cana
dian
Nick
el Co
mpan
y Li
mite
dTh
in
Sec
tio
n
Num
ber
Ass
ay
Num
bers
Au
Va
lues
in
pp
bO
utc
rop
Are
a
Sin
gle
outc
rop
Doc
i re
, {
So
] D
aci
te
Tuff
Gra
n 11
* G
neis
s 8
Ptg
ma
tite
GEO
LOG
ICAL
S
UR
VE
YF
ield
S
amp
le
Num
bers
AN
~ t
A
nders
on
DU
- !
Dub
anow
Con
tact
ob
serv
ed,
ass
um
ed ,
from
m
a g
ne tic
da
taG
RA
FT
LA
KE
, O
NT
AR
IO-'*-
j Z
EE
ME
L
L. (
M-2
70
8)X
KA
RL
L.
(M
-27
(8)
iro
n
Form
otion,
(J(7
; C
hert
J.
Pe
rry
D -c
d o,
T
Dub
onow
/S.A
nder
son
Fo
liatio
n
(Vert
ica
l),
(Incl
ined)
Direct
ion
S
degr
ee
of
slop
e
aa -
Ju
ly ,
A
ug.,
196
H.
Hur
fiphr
eys
Pa
5991
69Pa
58
8298
5882
97Pa
59
9163
Pa
5991
73R
XO
-+39
65 (T
O) 7
31
(9)
75
7(0
) R
X0
43
73
8U
3)
Pa
5991
68R
X04
3713
(
3)
73
4 (
3)
73
3 (
S)
7
32
(
5)
98
6 (
2O)
731
(4S)
.
AH
-17, "4
J
(44
01
7 *l
(1
25)
740
(CSi
H
XO
4J759
(23)
Pa
5991
78K
X04
.396
9 (O
977
(3)
97
8 (
f*3
• 8
0M
3
Jack
PI
**
438
35 (
< 3
) -•
2
Pa
5991
6790t
99
0
(3)
99
1
(13)
992
(3)
99
3
(10)
99
4 (
285
)9
95
(30
)
Pa
5991
72! pru
e*
4 t
en
* Ja
ck
Pin
*
Pa
5991
77
IfM-w
e*,
Jack
P
in*
Pa
5883
00(t
tO4
M3l(IO
) O
U-9
4
.O
U-9
9
'
Pa
5991
82
,Pa
59
9171
Pa
5991
76
Pa
5991
75
Cana
dian
Nick
el C
ompa
ny
Lim
ited
FOR
LE
GE
ND
S
EE
S
HE
ET
"
l "
-PJ
ZE
EM
EL
L.(
M-2
70
8)/
KA
RL
L.
Oy
T D
uban
ow/S
. A
ndcr
to
NT
S 53
B
9
FOR LEGEND
SEE
SHEET
53B09SW9413
2.5417 ZEEMEL LAKE
S2
053
B/0
9S6-
OO
I2.
KX
)
Cana
dian
Nick
el Co
mpa
ny
Lim
ited
C a p
p e'
C
'' f f
.
Q i *
a r!
o:N
Q
GE
OLO
GIC
AL
SU
RV
EY
GR
AFF
LA
KE
, O
NT
AR
IO
j.
per
ry
Dy
T D
ubon
ow/S
.
Sca
lel!
25
00
SHEE
T 3
ZE
EM
EL
L.
(M
-2T
O8J/K
AR
L
L.(
M-2
7|8
)
H.
Hum
phre
ys
Surv
ey d
ate
Juty
, A
uq.
Ap
ril/
82
NT
S
53
B9
20
0O
N
Pa
5882
96(S
OO
N
t
t
FOR
LE
GE
ND
S
EE
S
HE
ET
I
53B09SW9413
2.5417 ZEEMEL
LAKE
23
0
Cana
dian
Nick
el Co
mpan
y Li
mite
d
GEO
LOG
ICAL
SU
RVE
Y
GR
AFF
LA
KE
, O
NT
AR
IO
FIG
UR
E
ZE
EM
EL
L.
(M
-27
D8
/KA
RL
L.
(M
-27
t8J
J.
Per
ry
T D
uD
on
ow
/S-A
rxltr
ioo
S c o
i e3500
•3--
D,
H.
Hum
phre
ys
ao'e
ju
|yi
Aug
., 19
81
Dj'e
Oro
wr
Ap
ril/8
2 53
B 9
Cana
dian
Nick
el Co
mpa
ny
Lim
ited
GEO
LOG
ICAL
SU
RVE
YFO
R
LEG
EN
D
SEE
S
HE
ET
l
GR
AF
F
LA
KE
,
ON
TA
RIO
J.
Per
ry
ZE
EM
EL
L
(M
2708)
X K
AR
L
L (M
-27
18
)
53 B
Sfc
-T.
D
ubon
ow/S
. And
ftrso
n
53B
09S
W94
I3
2.5
41
7
ZE
EM
EL
LAK
E
Sp
rue
t S
***
s
S
i \
Pa
5991
85\
^
XPa
\
^18
6 \
g*
*o
1 **-~
-^^**"* **
^i^
\\
Pa
\59
9187
\
^ \
\\ \
Pa
5882
99
M-4
7,
RX
438T
9 ((
S)
C-8
2-0
042
~~I
'"'-•L
—^^
"'"
,*^
5 j
; W
14 3
8*5
997
(IS)
79
4 (*
B(
7SS
(IS
) R
X00
752
(UO
)
Pa
5883
5777
4(83
R
X43
946
77
3(3
) R
X4B
919
X3
'"
'
'7
76
(23
)
Pa
5883
06
AN
-33
MX 4
3*93
(5)
-•2
-OO
4*
i N
*32
1X43
892
(O)
••2-0
049
Pa
5883
58
*
Pa
5880
64
•w
oo
53B09SW9413
2.5417 ZEEMEL LAKE
2S
0
FOR
LE
GE
ND
SE
E S
HE
ET
!
B /O
*\ S
S" -0
01
T^
•Od
HC
TC
RS
\ '-".IN ••* ,~*
- j1
** *
'\
I?*^
- M
X439i
43932 (<
3^
DO
-IS
I/
' ~- — i
-x
f"
V -V\ \
^
"" -"^
aS
'r"'
-~-|
" x "
.
\
XI
* \
x^
— ~
\
s
(IS
)'
\7*~
—
——
—
——
^\
;--,
' Iro
n *
^
——
-^^^
^r::^-
\S
prue
* ft
1
\58
8067
* \
——
\ \\
ss
*'
x"\ i
\ s \
\ \
'^^^*^
J
K oh
^^ -
— . U
J C
r
* S
prva
* S
***p
\
' Jt
'^r^
TT
^
**- |\'*
Spm
Pa 5880
68
\ \ \;*
S
*l*
\
\/-A
^ -
/
\
i \
) \
—^-~
^
-r**
tf
Cana
dian
Nick
el Co
mpa
ny
Lim
ited
;00r4"
:^'0
SH
EE
T F
'GuR
E
GE
OLO
GIC
AL
SU
RV
EY
6
^y/
7^•o
,f-
GR
AF
FLA
KE
, O
NT
AR
IO
-'"
ZE
EM
EL
L.
(M-2
708)/
KA
RL
L (M
-27
18
)
Sus
e'v-
sor
j P
err
y .n
s-'u
^ent
1 S
^.eva
a'e
Ju
ly.A
ag
.,
1961
Com
3.i^
d Dy
T.
Dub
anow
/S-A
nder
son
j-3
-n o
f H
. H
umgn
reirs
A
orit/
82
Sca
ie
l;25O
O
F e
x''
- \
-\A
/'^
NTS
5
3 B
9
\ \ \S
ervo
* SW
OBS
\Po
59
9184
\ \
X
i \ x
Pa
5991
85
Xx
x \x l \l \
i
X
X Sp
ruce
S
wO
inp
Pa
5991
86
\ 4*
\
\
\
\\\
Pa
5991
87 \
Pa
5883
58
\ \Sp
'w
et
Swam
p
Pa
5880
66
4
\Pa 5880
67
IOO
O
\ \ V \
15O
OS
iii 8: Oi
CM
w|
O'
FO
R
LEG
EN
D
SE
E
SH
EE
T
538a9SW9413 2.5417 ZEEMEL LAKE
IOO
Cana
dian
Nick
el Co
mpan
y Li
mite
d
GE
OLO
GIC
AL
SU
RV
EY
GR
AF
F
LA
KE
, O
NT
AR
IO(U
-27Q
8J/
KA
RL
L (M
-27
18
.1
July
. A
ug.,
I9&
T. D
uban
ow/S
:'r3*
~r,
H
Hum
phre
ysD
jt(f
Of0
-r
2500
53
89
• •9
(O
)R
X04
398I
(O
)9
60
K
3)97
8 (1
99)
977
(31
RX
0439
69
(O)
995
9*4
(285
)99
5 00
)99
Z
O)
991
J'*)
990
(5)
989
15)
968
(39)
984
t* W
987
(5)
KX
O43
986
(O)
727
(K5I
72
* (3
9)
723
(90)
9
48
(33
) 4O
O(2
3)
990
(IO
) 99
8(19
) 0(
0439
97(3
3)
RX
0439
94 (
40)
733
(O)
734
(O)
733
(O)
732
K5)
9*
6 (2
O)
RX
0437
3I
(49)
73
t (3
)T
37
(O)
BX
O43
73
*
RX
0439
640O
)74
1 (I
2S)
T40
K3)
MX
0437
39
(23)
745
(<3)
744
(13
)74
3 U
5)
9S?
(O)
•X0
4S
74
2
(<5)
l H
X04
39S1
(2
3)
74T
(W
)74
* (O
)H
XO
4394
O
^3)
T91
(K
3)
• X
O43
93*
(IO
)
730
(15)
95
9 U
S)
74
t (O
) R
X04
3748
(I
O)
l R
XO
4388
3 (O
)
730
(30)
729
(O)
967
K5(
HX
O43
728
K9)
BASE
295
(
5OO
S
o R
XO
4378
I (O
) Si
ngle
Ch
anne
l So
mpM
(J
met
er l
ong)
i R
XO
43725
{IO
)99
8 ^
5)
Cha
nnel
( >
Im
lo
ng)
sam
pled
at
Im
in
terv
ols
729
U5)
Assa
y*
in pp
b Au
Chan
nel
Sea 1
1:
t mm
?
l m
53B89SW9413 2.5417 ZEEMEL LAKE
55 B
/o! S
E-i D
OKX
)
•C T
t ft
t
Cana
dian
Nick
el Co
mpan
y Li
mite
dl
DD
Of
- ' '
~.
r*"J
i . O
-'V
V
CH
IP
SAM
PLE
LOC
ATI
ON
P
LAN
GR
AF
F
LA
KE
, O
NT
AR
IO
O,
T. O
wbOM
Ov A
S.A
adi
' 25
OO
ZE
EM
EL
L
.(M
-27O
8)X
KA
flL
H.
Hum
phre
ys
ftX
0439
S6
(3Z
3)
• 3T
(18
) T
M K
9)
753
(19)
K
X04
3732
(35
0)
RX
0439
M
(<3)
RX
O43
937
(<3)
764
(BOS
) 7
85
030
) 76
2 (1
0)76
1 iso
oj76
0 (O
)73
*rs
a75
7
"l
130}
20)
75*
755
(30
)R
XD
4393
3 (3
10)
Ter
7e*
RX
0437
897*9
(3)
TM
(1
0)
95
3
(19)
43
83 95
(*S
)(5
5)R
X04
3942
(O
J
*X04
3t34
(C
3)
RX
0439
9I
(205
)HK
O 4
39 4
* (2
90)
3941
U
5)
777
(WO)
TT
* (2
5)
77S
(3
) 77
4 (6
5)
773
( 3)
H
XO
4393
7 (<
5}
7•0
^<
3)
779
(( 3
)7
78
RX
0439
39
KX
0437
8I
(30) (9
0)
* R
X04
J782
(9
)
BA
SE
L
INE
O •^j
8 •n
o
o (O
RX
O4378I
^<5)
S
ing
le
Cha
nnel
S
om
plt
(l m
*ter
lo
ng]
RX
O4J
725
(to
) ,
, J
998
(*
5)
Cha
nnel
()
im
king
} sa
mpl
ed
at
1m
inte
rva
ls72
9 (*
5J
Assa
ys
in pp
b Au
Cha
nnel
Sc
ale
i i m
m :
l RI
53B095W94I3 2.5417 ZEEMEL LAKE
280
•oo
Cana
dian
Nick
el Co
mpa
ny
Lim
ited
-NO
CH
IP
SA
MP
LE
LOC
ATI
ON
P
LAN
GR
AF
FL
AK
E,
ON
TA
RIO
J P
trry
T. D
uban
ow
B S.
And
erdo
n
25O
O
ZE
EM
EL
L
(M-Z
7O8)
XL
(M-2
718
May
/82
H.
Hu
mp
hrt
ys
t,,.
Ju
ne
/82 53
B
9