Upload
national-press-foundation
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
1/30
The Fight Over GMO Food Labeling
A Social Science Perspective
Carmen BainDepartment of Sociology, Iowa State University
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
2/30
Introduction
GMOs as ‘wicked’ problem Fight over political and economic interests and values
Science cannot arbitrate
Movement for GMO labeling Key actors, frames, responses
Social movements, consumers, food industry Framing GMOs as a social problem Mandatory vs. voluntary labeling
Conclusion Science cannot ‘solve’ GMO debate but inform ‘Management’ is social and political process
otential for voluntary labeling to settle the debate
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
3/30
Where’s the Science?!road criticism that anti"GMO proponents ignore
scientific consensus, facts on GMOs, and scienceshould ad#udicate
$Stand up for Science. %oin us in demanding &.science"
based standards for GMO food labeling' ()oalition for Safeand *ffordable Food, +-/.
$0ndependent ob#ective information on the scientific issues&need to be provided to legislators and consumers&to
help move the national discussion from contentiousclaims to a more fact"based and informed dialog' (1an2enennaam et.al, )*S3, +-4/.
$&army of 5uac6s and pseudo"environmentalists 7aging a
leftist 7ar on science' (Saletan, +-, Slate).
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
4/30
Is this fight about GMOs?
For opponents, GMOs pro8y forbroader political, economic, ethicalconcerns
$GMOs are concrete, it’s a target, it’ssimple, and it’s a place for people to
focus other broader moral concernsabout sustainable agriculture or the foodthat they’re eating.'
(2nvironmental Org, +-4/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
5/30
Is this fight about GMOs?
Fight over GMOs and labeling is aboutpolitical and economic interests andvalues on both sides
industrial agriculture, corporate control,property, patents, mar6ets, profits, theenvironment&
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
6/30
$9e are very, very, very concerned about theinade5uacy of the structure for evaluating7hether :GMOs; are safe to eat &right to6no7 issues and transparency&but :also; theeconomic impacts on agriculture, the biggerpicture food system impacts. So it’s the
patent issues, the consolidation of the seedindustry, increasing the role of chemicals'()onsumer *dvocacy Organi
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
7/30(Kreuter et al. +4> !atie +?> !atie and Sch7ei6hardt +-/
GMOs as a “Wicked roble!"
3ame problems@ problem is clear, outcome istrueAfalse, causes determined by scientifice8perts, science can guide solutions
9ic6ed roblems@ issue is comple8> sub#ect topolitical, scientific and social uncertainty Science cannot ‘solve’ but inform
Bo agreement over $real' problem and causes Bo shared values over desired goals for society Outcome neither trueAfalse but betterA7orse ‘Management’ is social and political process
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
8/30
#o!!unicating $ith the ublic
about GMOs
General Assumption
)ontroversies about science (e.g. GMOsafety/ are caused by a deficit of science6no7ledge
3he role of e8perts and scientists is toeducate the public, thereby reducing thecontroversy
Facts 7ill spea6 for themselves(Scheufele, +-4/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
9/30
#o!!unicating $ith the ublic
about GMOs
Deficit Model of cience Communication
Kno7ledge and attitudes about contentious
issues are generally not correlated2ven in the face of facts, 7e rarely
change our minds
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
10/30
#o!!unicating $ith the ublic
about GMOs
!hy"
0ndividuals ma6e #udgments 5uic6ly basedon our values and interests versus reasoning
9e tend to see6 out reasonsAfacts thatsupport our initial value #udgments andinterests
0f you as6 someone to believe somethingthat violates their moral intuitions, they 7ill7or6 very hard to find a reason to disagree
(Scheufele, +-4> Caidt, +-+/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
11/30
GMO #ro%s in the &S
)ommercially available since -DD4
DE corn, soybeans, cotton in S is GM "?E of processed foods include GM
ingredient
#ey GM traits
Cerbicide tolerance (Houndup Heady/
0nsecticide (!t corn/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
12/30
GMO #ro%s in the &S
-DD+ FI* determined@
GM foods substantially e5uivalent
GM foods pose no additional ris6s
Mandatory labeling for any functionaldifferences J label the difference
Bo labeling re5uiredFI* allo7s voluntary process"based
labeling so long as not false or misleading
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
13/30
Fra!ing GMOs as a Social
roble!2arly efforts to ban or label GM foods failed
-DDs@ E public support for biotech
Since +--, mandatory and voluntary labeling initiatives gained momentum
Key role of social movement organi Food 9ater 9atch>
2nvironmental 9or6ing Group> Organic )onsumers *ssociation> Bon"GMO ro#ect
(Loes6e, +> Schurman and Munroe, +-> !ain etal, +-4/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
14/30
Fra!ing GMOs as a Social roble!
$roblem
)onsumers have $right to 6no7'
)onsumers should have $choice'
3here should be $transparency' Hesonates 7ith 6ey *merican values, cultural
norms, and trends
0ndividual rights and freedoms Hise of political consumption, food
movements, private governance
olution@ labeling
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
15/30
$3o be honest, it’s a little surprising
that this push for labeling has come upin the last = to 4 years&0 thin6 itsreally lin6ed to a larger movement
among consumers 7anting moretransparency in the food system.3hey 7ant to 6no7 where their food
came from%how it was produced.'(*g olicy Org, +-4/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
16/30
olitical'(thical #onsu!%tion
Hise of consumption as political practice 0ndividuals empo7ered through role and identity
as consumers
Lac6 of trust in e8isting policies, regulations )oncerns about ris6
Iesire for non"economic values in mar6et arena
Social, environmental, ethical roduction processes
(!ostrom Klintman, +--> !ain et al. +-4/
&ood movement local foods organic
animal 7elfare fair trade
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
17/30
$0n the 7orld of GMO issues,
labeling seems achievable and ittaps into a uni5uely *mericanthing&everyone is do7n on thegovernment, the government can’tdo anything :but people thin6; 'if
you put labels on it( )’ll decide formyself*+(Food and 2nvironmental *dvocacy Organi
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
18/30
#onsu!er Surve)s
,-./0 123 poll D=E 7ant GM foods labeled
,-./0 4utgers $ublic urvey 4 E 6ne7 very littleAnothing of GM foods + E never heard of them 4=E not a7are GM products currently for sale
$9hat information 7ould you li6e to see on foodlabels that is not already on thereN' E said GM food labeling *s6ed directly, should GM foods be labeledN
= E agreed
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
19/30
rivate Food Governance
)reation food retailing giants7ith direct lin6s to consumers
1ulnerable to activist campaigns rotect valuable brand names, reputation
Labels, brands, certification Ievelop niche mar6ets 7ith price premium Bon"price competition based on ‘5uality’ attributes Iemonstrate $corporate social responsibility' )onvey transparency, trust, credibility, reduce ris6
(Catana6a et.al, +> Haynolds et.al, +-4> !usch, +--> !ain et.al, +-=/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
20/30
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
21/30
#a!%aigns for Mandator) Labeling
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
22/30
(Center for Food Safety, 201!
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
23/30
GMO Labeling O%%onents
!iotech )ompaniesA ‘!ig *griculture’AGovt *gencies
Mandatory labeling
Bo scientific #ustification
Safe
)ostly creates illusion of difference
7ill confuse and mislead consumers creates negative associations creates less choice
Support voluntary labeling(1an 2enennaam etal, +-4/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
24/30
*egulator) (fforts to +lock
Mandator) Labeling
afe and Accurate &ood 5abeling Act
674 .899:
;an states from introducing GMOlabel laws GMO"free labels 7ould have to submit to
certification process overseen by SI*
0ntroduced March + by Heps Mi6e ompeo (H"KS/ and GK !utterfield (I"B)/
Couse of 2nergy and )ommerce )ommittee and
Couse of *griculture )ommittee (%uly -4, +-/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
25/30
Governancetrategy
4etailer
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
26/30
#hi%otle Me/ican Grill
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
27/30
S!art +alance
$0’ve been in the food industry for = years. 0have never seen a consumer issue come onthis fast.' )2O Cughes
'!hat you put in your food matters* o does what
you leave out+
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
28/30
Whole Foods
-E labeling by +-?
$9hole Foods Mar6et commits to full GMOtransparency &'
$9e are putting a sta6e in the ground on
GMO labeling to support the consumer’sright to 6no7'
(9alter Hobb, co")2O, +-=/
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
29/30
,on-GMO #ertification
1on=GMO $ro>ect
Borth *merica’s only third party verification andlabeling for non"GMO food and products
Over +, products verified since +?
8/20/2019 GMO's and Labeling
30/30
#onclusion
Focus on scientific arguments and science education 7illnot resolve GMO labeling battle
Focus on facilitating dialogue that identifies trade"offs,better or 7orse (not right or 7rong/ outcomes and
identifies potential areas for managing problem
0nterest in GMO labeling reflects alignment of anti"GMOframing 7ith broader values, concerns, interests ofpolitical consumers and food retailers
Momentum for state"based mandatory labels 7aningN
Gro7th in voluntary labeling may act to $settle' the issue Bo consensus but addresses concerns of political
consumers> value"based food businesses> opponents of
mandatory labels