goal book

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

goal review

Citation preview

  • A BOOK REVIEW

  • INDEX CONTENT

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    KEY CONCEPTS

    PROBLEM AREAS

    CONTROL SYSTEMS

    MANAGEMENT AUDIT

    THE TRANSFORMATION

    THE IMPLEMENTATION

    KEY LEARNINGS

    BRIEF INTRODUCTION

  • NEXT

    Brief Introduction

  • Alex Rogo (Plant

    Manager)

    Julie Rogo (Alexs wife)

    Bill Peach (Division

    Head)

    Bob Donovan

    (Production Manager)

    Stacey(Head

    Inventory Control)

    Jonah(Physicist / Consultant)

    Ralph Nakamura (Planning)

    Lou (Accountant)

    BRIEF INTRODUCTION

  • BRIEF INTRODUCTION

    Alexs Bearington plant is losing money.

    He is given 3 months ultimatum to either make plant make money or plant will be closed.

    He implements a few concepts suggested by Jonah.

    He, with his team consisting of Stacey, Lou, Bob and Ralph improve the processes and culture at the plant.

    As a result, Alex gets promoted as Divisional Manager.

  • NEXT

    Key Concepts

  • KEY CONCEPTS

    THROUGHPUT INVENTORY

    OPERATIONAL EXPENSES

    BOTTLENECK

    Rate at which system generates money

    through sales

    All the money system spends to convert

    inventory to throughput

    All the money system has invested in purchasing things it intends to sell

    Any resource whose capacity is equal to or less than the demand

    placed upon it

  • TOC CONCEPT

    Identify the Constraint

    Exploit the Constraint

    Subordinate and Synchronize to the

    Constraint

    Elevate performance of the Constraint

    Repeat the process

    The throughput of any system is determined by the Bottleneck Constraint. Hence to increase the throughput one must focus on identifying and improving this constraint.

  • NEXT

    Problem Areas

  • ROBOTS

    BOTTLENECKS CAPACITY

    THE INVENTORY

    ORDERS

    theproblemareas

    PROBLEM AREAS

  • THE INVENTORY

    Every machine was used with 100% capacity which in turn increased Inventories due to capacity mismatch between adjacent machines/resources

    Inventory was high.

    Inventory turnover period increase.

    Cash conversion cycle increase.

    Low Cash Inflow.

  • BOTTLENECKS CAPACITY

    Capacity is less than or equal to the demand.

    Bottlenecks decided throughput of the system as a whole.

    Bottleneck capacity could not be increased due to Capital Expenditure Constraint.

  • THE ROBOTS

    Robots were used, but production didnt increase.

    Labour wasnt laid off.

    Cost of materials didnt go down.

    So, there was no tangible effect of using Robots.

  • THE ORDERS

    Most of the orders were getting late.

    Expediting was a norm in the plants.

  • NEXT

    Control Systems

  • Y X

    X Y

    Y ASSEMBLY & X ASSEMBLY

    Y PART-A but X PART-B

    BASIC MODELS OF MANUFACTURING

    The four basic models of manufacturing, shown as follows: Where X represents a Bottleneck and Y represents a Non-Bottleneck

  • To make money by increasing net profit, while simultaneously increasing ROI and Cash Flow. SET GOALS

    Plant was making losses (Bill Peachs revelation)MEASURE

    ACHIEVEMENT

    Division was also making losses.CALCULATE VARIANCE

    Losses were not quantified thoughREPORT VARIANCE

    Less throughput due to bottleneck constraintsDERIVE CAUSE OF THE

    VARIANCE

    CONTROL SYSTEMS

  • CONTROL SYSTEMS

    TAKE NECESSARY ACTIONS TO MINIMIZE

    THE VARIANCES

    Prioritized material coming to bottlenecks over other material.

    Bottlenecks utilized to 100 % of time

    Quality Check shifted before the bottleneck to let bottleneck process non-defective WIP

    Consume the inventory to decrease levels of inventory and free money locked up in inventory

    Production Planning and Material Sourcing Planning to avoid Interactive Bottleneck Situation.

    Use of alternate resources to increase capacity of Bottleneck

    Process Re-engineering

    REPEAT THE STEPS UNTIL GOALS ARE MET

  • NEXT

    Management Audit

  • APPRAISAL OF

    CONTROL

    Process re-engineering

    Information gathered from shop floor and list of backlog orders

    Ralph created system to efficiently predict time to engineer a sale.

    Materials were sourced as per the demand and capacity constraint Resources to efficiently use bottlenecks

    APPRAISAL OF CONTROL

  • PRODUCTION

    Production Planning and Control

    Inventory Planning

    Capacity Utilization of Bottlenecks

    Production Inspection (QC moved to before bottleneck)

    APPRAISAL OF ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE

  • APPRAISAL OF ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE

    MARKETING

    Differentiation Strategy

    New Marketing Campaign for 4 week delivery

    Heightened brand image

    Long term / Yearly contracts with French Customer.

  • BALANCED SCORECARD

    INTERNAL BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE

    Production planning control

    Material sourcing 4 week delivery

    FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE

    Cash Flow Net Profit ROI Increase Sales backlog

    CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE

    Increase in Orders: New customer Burnside Contract made with

    French customer for 1 year INNOVATION &

    LEARNING PERSPECTIVE

    Revenue per employee Culture change from cost

    world to throughput world

  • NEXT

    The Transformation

  • REACTIVE

    PROACTIVE

    PREDICTIVE

    THE TRANSFORMATION

  • REACTIVE

    In Bearington plant, expediting was a norm.

    Efficiency of the plant was down.

    Plant was making losses.

    PROACTIVE

    Alex and team identified system constraints i.e. the bottlenecks.

    Gave high priority to parts that were to be fed to Bottlenecks over parts that were not going to be processed by bottlenecks.

    Bottlenecks time was not lost and it increased throughput.

    PREDICTIVE

    Red tag and green tag priority system caused starvation of resources for green tagged parts.

    Increased QUEUE TIME for green tagged parts & increased WAIT TIME for Red Tagged parts.

    By analyzing the capacity of bottlenecks, the amount of production of green tagged parts could be calculated.

    This helped in material sourcing planning and predicting the Out Time of the order.

    THE TRANSFORMATION

  • HOW DO THE MEASURES RELATE TO DECISIONS?

    NP ROI CF

    TP I OE

    OPERATIONAL FINANCIAL

    THROUGHPUT (TP) NP ROI CF

    INVENTORY (I) NP ROI CF

    OPERATIONAL EXPENSE (OE)

    NP ROI CF

    An effective decision simultaneously increases TP, decreases I, and decreases OE.

  • NEXT

    The Implementations

  • What?

    Increase in bottleneck

    capacity

    Efficiently use the

    bottleneck capacity

    THE IMPLEMENTATIONS

    WHAT TO IMPLEMENT?

  • THE IMPLEMENTATIONS

    HOW TO IMPLEMENT?

    Realigning Quality Control

    Prioritization (Tagging)

    Recall some of the Old Machines

    Dedicated Personnel

    Material Release System

    Reduce the Batch Size

  • NEXT

    Key Learnings

  • KEY LEARNINGS

    Balance the flow with demand, not capacity.

    The level of activity of the system is determined by constraints in the system.

    Activating a resource and utilizing it are not the same.

    An hour lost at a bottleneck is an hour lost by the entire system.

    An hour saved at a non-bottleneck is worthless.

    Performance of an operation should be evaluated by its bottom line.

  • How to cause the

    change

    What to change to

    Knowing what to change

    KEY LEARNINGS

    Alex and Lou identify three fundamental decision issues as critical to the success of any manager

  • THANK YOU