19
ANALYZING THE MODERATING VARIABLE IN A MODEL Part 2

Good Moderator Demo

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Explain the process of understanding Moderator effect using AMOS

Citation preview

Page 1: Good Moderator Demo

ANALYZING THE MODERATING VARIABLE IN A MODEL 

Part 2

Page 2: Good Moderator Demo

Schematic diagram showing the independent variable, dependent variable and a moderator in a model 

1‐2

Page 3: Good Moderator Demo

Schematic diagram showing the independent variable, dependent variable and a moderator in a model 

1‐3

Page 4: Good Moderator Demo

Modeling the interaction effects of a moderator for the observed variable 

Moderation sometime implies a weakening of a causal effect or enhance the causal effect. Remember: The term interaction and moderation carries the same meaning. The interaction between independent variable and moderator in the model could decrease or increase the effects on dependent variable. 

1‐4

Page 5: Good Moderator Demo

Continued……Make model on board

The regression coefficient β3 measures the interaction effectbetween independent variable X and moderating variable M.Note that the regression coefficient β1 measures the simpleeffects of X when the value of M = 0 (no interaction effectsinvolved). Then, the test of moderation is operationalized bythe product term XM (the multiplication betweenindependent variable in order to test the moderation in amodel, one needs to test β3 (the coefficient of interactionterm XM). If β3 is significant, then one could conclude thatmoderator variable M moderates the relationship between Xand Y.

1‐5

Page 6: Good Moderator Demo

Testing moderator for observed variables  in OLS

Testing moderation for observed variables involve the OrdinaryLeast Squares (OLS) regression in which the dependent variable,Y, is regressed on the interaction term XM and the main effects Xand M. If both variables X and M are continuous significant, theresearcher needs to create the mean‐centred value for X and Mwhere Xi’ = (Xi – mean of X) and Mi’ = (Mi – mean of M). Thus,the new variable Xi and Mi has a mean of zero. Now XM = (Xi’) *(Mi’). Variable Y does not have to be cantered.Now again run the test.

1‐6

Page 7: Good Moderator Demo

SCALE OF MEASUREMENT FOR A MODERATING 

VARIABLE 

The researcher should employ the interval or ratio scale for measuring both independent and dependent variables since the analysis involves parametric methods. As for the moderator variable, it can be measured using any scale (nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio). Among the popularly used moderating variables in research are the respondent’s demographic characteristics (nominal) and the level of treatment variable applied (ordinal). Both the Ordinary Least Square regression (OLS) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) could be employed if the dependent variable (Y) is measured using the interval or ratio scale. However, if the dependent variable is measured using a dichotomous scale (outcome is either yes or no), then the logistic regression should be employed. 

1‐7

Page 8: Good Moderator Demo

illustrates how the regression equation is modeled in AMOS graphic 

1‐8

Page 9: Good Moderator Demo

Statistical rules for Moderation

1‐9

Page 10: Good Moderator Demo

Practical 

Run the test using AMOS‐‐‐pay attention on Amos graphic…..please

1‐10

Page 11: Good Moderator Demo

MODELING THE MODERATING EFFECTS FOR LATENT CONSTRUCTS 

Analyzing the moderating effects for the model with latent/hidden constructs is very complicated. The normal modeling procedure using interaction terms is not practical with latent constructs since it would cause problems with model convergence as well as distortion of standard errors. In the end, it resulted in model misfit and the procedure stops. 

1‐11

Page 12: Good Moderator Demo

Modeling the moderator variable in the path between X1 and Y 

1‐12

Page 13: Good Moderator Demo

Continued…….

Alternatively, the Multi‐Group CFA has been suggested as an alternative method for assessing the effect of moderator variable in the model. The researcher only needs to identify the path of interest where the moderator variable is to be assessed. This particular path would be constrained with parameter = 1 and the model is termed as the constrained model. The procedure will estimate two models separately. One is the constrained model while the other one is the unconstrained model. 

1‐13

Page 14: Good Moderator Demo

ANALYZING THE MODERATOR FOR LATENT CONSTRUCTS: THE MULTI‐GROUP CFA 

1‐14

Page 15: Good Moderator Demo

Continued…..

1‐15

Then the data is split and save into two separate data files. Data 1 is renamed as low education group, while data 2 is renamed as high education group.

Secondly, put a parameter constraint on the selected path to be equal to “1” This model is renamed as the constrained model. Thirdly, using the same model, remove the parameter constraint in the path. This model is renamed as the unconstrained model. Now the researcher has two models to be assessed namely the constrained and the unconstrained model.

Page 16: Good Moderator Demo

Continued……

1‐16

Next, obtain the estimate for both the constrained model and also the unconstrained model using the first dataset (low education group). The output can be presented under constrained model and unconstrained model.

Page 17: Good Moderator Demo

SEE PRACTICAL

1‐17

Page 18: Good Moderator Demo

1‐18

Page 19: Good Moderator Demo

See practical

1‐19