Upload
erin-walters
View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Grand Junction Grand Junction NetworksNetworks
Jason MattathilJason MattathilLarry ShiLarry Shi
Tim HobanTim HobanYongan WuYongan Wu
FNCE 451FNCE 451March 3, 2005March 3, 2005
Outline of PresentationOutline of Presentation
Grand JunctionGrand Junction IPO vs. AcquisitionIPO vs. Acquisition ValuationValuation PerspectivesPerspectives ConclusionConclusion
Grand Junction NetworksGrand Junction Networks Leader in the Ethernet Desktop Switching MarketLeader in the Ethernet Desktop Switching Market
Founded in 1992 by Howard Charney Founded in 1992 by Howard Charney Experienced rapid growth in revenues – over $65 Experienced rapid growth in revenues – over $65
million expected in 1996million expected in 1996 Overall market projected to grow to $650 M by Overall market projected to grow to $650 M by
19971997 Funded through 3 rounds of venture financingFunded through 3 rounds of venture financing
Critical decision: go for IPO or be acquired by CiscoCritical decision: go for IPO or be acquired by Cisco Switching technology would complement Cisco’s Switching technology would complement Cisco’s
router dominancerouter dominance Grand Junction files S-1 form for IPOGrand Junction files S-1 form for IPO Cisco raises the offer to $346 millionCisco raises the offer to $346 million
IPO vs. AcquisitionIPO vs. Acquisition
IPO’sIPO’s PrestigePrestige Trading regulationsTrading regulations Lack of immediate liquidityLack of immediate liquidity Litigation exposureLitigation exposure Reporting requirementsReporting requirements Recruiting difficultiesRecruiting difficulties
AcquisitionsAcquisitions Positive change of pacePositive change of pace Loss of autonomy/authorityLoss of autonomy/authority Financial rewardFinancial reward
IPO: S-1 Based Valuation IPO: S-1 Based Valuation MethodMethod
PRICEPRICE
PER PER SHARSHAR
EE
NONO
BOUNCBOUNCEE
5%5% 10%10% 15%15% 20%20% 25%25% 30%30%
$12$12 256.19256.19 269269 281.281.8181
294.6294.622
307.4307.433
320.2320.244
333.0333.055
$13$13 277.54277.54 291.291.4242
305.305.2929
319.1319.177
333.0333.055
346.9346.933
360.8360.8
$14$14 298.88298.88 313.313.8282
328.328.7777
343.343.7171
358.6358.666
373.6373.6 388.5388.544
$15$15 320.23320.23 336.336.2424
352.352.2525
368.2368.266
384.2384.288
400.2400.299
416.3416.3
$16$16 341.58341.58 358.358.6666
375.375.7474
392.8392.822
409.9409.9 426.9426.988
444.0444.055
Valuation ApproachesValuation ApproachesFCF MethodFCF Method ComparablesComparables Real OptionsReal Options
Common Common industry industry approachapproach
Common Common industry industry approachapproach
Not common in Not common in the industrythe industry
Extremely Extremely sensitive to sensitive to terminal value, terminal value, WACCWACC
Use for private Use for private company company valuations can valuations can be difficultbe difficult
Improves on Improves on NPV through NPV through valuing valuing contingencies contingencies built into built into investmentinvestment
Cash flow Cash flow assumptions assumptions may be difficultmay be difficult
Generally Generally adjusted based adjusted based on capital on capital structure, structure, illiquidity, risksilliquidity, risks
Modeling real-Modeling real-life investment life investment options can be options can be difficultdifficult
Net Present Value Net Present Value MethodMethod
FCF MethodFCF Method Assume: 3% Terminal Growth, 17% Assume: 3% Terminal Growth, 17%
WACCWACC Revenue growth rate based on $650 M Revenue growth rate based on $650 M
Ethernet Switching market in 1997Ethernet Switching market in 1997 Sensitivity analysis for WACC and Sensitivity analysis for WACC and
Terminal Growth RateTerminal Growth Rate MC Simulation for NPVMC Simulation for NPV
Valuation = $433 Valuation = $433 millionmillion
8
FCF CalculationFCF CalculationP r o j e c t e d Q u a r t e r ly R e v e n u e f o r G r a n d J u n c t io n
0
5 0
1 0 0
1 5 0
2 0 0
Q 1 ' 9 5 Q 2 ' 9 5 Q 3 ' 9 5 Q 4 ' 9 5 Q 1 ' 9 6 Q 2 ' 9 6 Q 3 ' 9 6 Q 4 ' 9 6 Q 1 ' 9 7 Q 2 ' 9 7 Q 3 ' 9 7 Q 4 ' 9 7
Qtr Revenue ProjectedQ1'95 5.10Q2'95 6.30Q3'95 8.00Q4'95 10.60Q1'96 12.40Q2'96 14.70Q3'96 17.50Q4'96 20.90Q1'97 33.98Q2'97 55.24Q3'97 89.80Q4'97 145.99
Historical Ratio Q1'97 Q2'97 Q3'97 Q4'97Cost of Sales/Revenues 36.00% 36.00% 36.00% 36.00%R & D/Revenues 14.50% 14.00% 14.00% 14.00%Marketing/Revenues 19.00% 19.00% 19.00% 19.00%General & Admin/Revenues 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%Revenue Growth Rate 58.29% 58.29% 58.29% 58.29%
Projected
NPV= $ 451 M
9
N P V a s a f u n c t i o n o f G r o w t h R a t e
0
2 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
8 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 9 . 4 3 % 3 8 . 8 6 % 5 8 . 2 9 % 7 7 . 7 1 % 9 7 . 1 4 %
G r o w t h R a t e
NP
V (
$M
)
N P V
Sensitivity AnalysisSensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity Analysis 451.16 14% 15% 16% 17% 18%
2% 531 482 441 405 3743% 577 520 472 432 3964% 631 564 509 462 4235% 697 618 552 498 453
Terminal Growth Rate
WACC
10
MC SimulationMC Simulation
Public Companies Public Companies Comparables Valuation Comparables Valuation
MethodMethod 3Com3Com
Bay Bay NetworksNetworks CabletronCabletron
CiscoCisco Digital Digital
EquipmentEquipment Fore Fore
SystemsSystems
Chosen from Grand Chosen from Grand Junction S-1Junction S-1 Equally weightedEqually weighted Fiscal Year 1995Fiscal Year 1995
FY 1995 Comparison FY 1995 Comparison ValuationsValuations
Average Average ($=Millions)($=Millions)
(Market Value (Market Value ÷÷ Sales) Sales)×× (Grand Junction 1995 (Grand Junction 1995
Sales)Sales)
173.65173.65
(Market Value (Market Value ÷÷ Book Value) Book Value)
×× (Grand Junction 1995 Book (Grand Junction 1995 Book Value)Value)
77.5277.52
(Market Value (Market Value ÷÷ Earnings) Earnings)
×× (Grand Junction 1995 (Grand Junction 1995 Earnings)Earnings)
260.57260.57
Averaged ValuationAveraged Valuation(No Adjustment Applied)(No Adjustment Applied)
170.58170.58
Public Companies Public Companies Comparables Final Comparables Final
ValuationValuation
Private Companies Private Companies Comparables MethodComparables Method
All companies acquired by CiscoAll companies acquired by Cisco Equally weightedEqually weighted (Acquisition Value) ÷ (Last 12 mo. Revenue) (Acquisition Value) ÷ (Last 12 mo. Revenue)
=Revenue Multiple=Revenue Multiple (Revenue Multiple) × (Grand Junction Revenue)(Revenue Multiple) × (Grand Junction Revenue) Average of valuations based onAverage of valuations based on
multiples – $310.80 millionmultiples – $310.80 million
CrescendoCrescendo
CommunicatioCommunicationsns
9/21/939/21/93
Newport Newport
SystemsSystems
SolutionsSolutions
07/12/9407/12/94
KalpanaKalpana
09/20/9409/20/94
Revenue Multiple Revenue Multiple
CompanieCompaniess
AcquisitioAcquisitionn
ValueValue
Last 12Last 12
MonthsMonths
RevenueRevenue
RevenueRevenue
MultipleMultiple
CrescendCrescendoo
81.9081.90 9.009.00 9.109.10
KalpanaKalpana 198.90198.90 30.0030.00 6.636.63
Newport Newport
SystemsSystems82.9082.90 5.405.40 15.3515.35
Revenue Based Valuation Revenue Based Valuation
CompanieCompaniess
RevenueRevenue
MultipleMultipleGJ 1995GJ 1995
RevenueRevenue
Revenue Revenue Based Based
ValuationValuation
CrescendCrescendoo
9.109.10 30.0030.00 273.00273.00
KalpanaKalpana 6.636.63 30.0030.00 198.90198.90
Newport Newport
SystemsSystems15.3515.35 30.0030.00 460.50460.50
AverageAverage 310.80310.80
(1996) Revenue Forecast (1996) Revenue Forecast ValuationValuation
CompanieCompaniess
RevenueRevenue
MultipleMultiple
GJ 1996GJ 1996
Sales Sales ForecastForecast
Revenue Revenue Forecast Forecast ValuationValuation
CrescendCrescendoo
9.109.10 65.565.5 596.05596.05
KalpanaKalpana 6.636.63 65.565.5 1005.431005.43
Newport Newport
SystemsSystems15.3515.35 65.565.5 434.27434.27
AverageAverage 678.58678.58
(1997) Revenue Forecast (1997) Revenue Forecast ValuationValuation
CompanieCompaniess
RevenueRevenue
MultipleMultiple
GJ 1997GJ 1997
Sales Sales ForecastForecast
GR GR Multiple=3Multiple=3
Revenue Revenue Forecast Forecast ValuationValuation
CrescendoCrescendo 9.109.10 325.00325.00 2957.502957.50
KalpanaKalpana 6.636.63 325.00325.00 4988.754988.75Newport Newport
SystemsSystems15.3515.35 325.00325.00 2154.752154.75
AverageAverage 3367.003367.00
18
Grand Junction’s OptionsGrand Junction’s Options
Sell to CiscoSell to Cisco IPO at $12-14, or $16 per IPO at $12-14, or $16 per
shareshare Remain PrivateRemain Private Issue Junk BondIssue Junk Bond Shut downShut down
19
IPO Option ValuationIPO Option Valuation
maturity (years) (t) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25strike price (X) 451.16 451.16 451.16 451.16risk free rate (r RF) 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00%IPO Price ($/share) 13Price bounce after IPO 15.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00%current stock price (P) $305.60 $359.77 $376.13 $392.48standard deviation (Sigma^2) 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00%d1 -1.37316 -0.72041 -0.5426 -0.37236d2 -1.62316 -0.97041 -0.7926 -0.62236N(d1) 0.084852 0.235637 0.293703 0.354812N(d2) 0.052278 0.165922 0.214006 0.266852
call price 2.70 11.03 15.36 20.66
New Price=Strike(X)+Call 453.86 462.19 466.52 471.82
16
Base Assumptions for Black-Scholes Model:Base Assumptions for Black-Scholes Model:S=$451.16 million, from FCF methodS=$451.16 million, from FCF methodT= 3 months, ~ time to go IPOT= 3 months, ~ time to go IPOStd Dev of Returns= 50%Std Dev of Returns= 50%Risk Free Rate= 6%Risk Free Rate= 6%
20
Sell to Others Option Sell to Others Option ValuationValuation
Bay Network and others' offer premium 10% 20% 30%
Others' offer Price in 3 months $357.50 $390.00 $422.50
Other offers' current value $342.93 $374.10 $405.28
maturity (years) (t) 0.25 0.25 0.25
strike price (X) 466.52 466.52 466.52
risk free rate (r RF) 6.00% 6.00% 6.00%
current stock price (P) $342.93 $374.10 $405.28
standard deviation (Sigma^2) 50.00% 50.00% 50.00%
d1 -1.0461 -0.6981 -0.3779
d2 -1.2961 -0.9481 -0.6279
N(d1) 0.1477 0.2426 0.3527
N(d2) 0.0975 0.1715 0.265
call price 5.87 11.91 21.16
New Price=Strike( X) +Call 472.39 478.43 487.68
21
Real Options MethodReal Options Method
Black Scholes Model is used to value Black Scholes Model is used to value optionoption
Valuation Options Valuation Options IPO OptionIPO Option
w/ $16 & 15% Bounce w/ $16 & 15% Bounce $ 466 millions $ 466 millions Sell OptionSell Option
w/ 20% premium w/ 20% premium $ 478 millions $ 478 millions
Final Option ValuationFinal Option ValuationValuation = $478 Valuation = $478 millionmillion
Valuation SummaryValuation Summary Weighting of valuation approaches Weighting of valuation approaches
Valuation Approach
Valuation
Weighting Solutions Weighted Averages
A B C A B C
Comparables $241 X 33.30% 40% 50% = 80 96 121
Net Present Value $451 X 33.30% 30% 20% = 150 135 90
Real Options $478 X 33.30% 30% 30% = 159 143 143
Weighted Total per
Solution 390 375 354
Average 373
Perspectives of various Perspectives of various stakeholdersstakeholders
Employees of Grand Junction: were Employees of Grand Junction: were not in favor of an acquisition strategy.not in favor of an acquisition strategy.
VCs are favorable in the acquisition VCs are favorable in the acquisition since they will receive a fair value for since they will receive a fair value for their interests as well as immediate their interests as well as immediate liquidity.liquidity.
Management is favorable of an Management is favorable of an acquisition because they want the acquisition because they want the technology to succeed.technology to succeed.
ConclusionsConclusions
Final Valuation = $373 millionFinal Valuation = $373 million(Range : $354 million and $390 (Range : $354 million and $390 million)million)
Grand Junction should accept the Grand Junction should accept the final Cisco offer of $346 Mfinal Cisco offer of $346 M