Greater Johnstown School District Budget Vote · used to cover. any. expenses. This has resulted in a tax . ... MAY2,2018,9:33AMEST INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2016

Tuesday, May 15, 2018 Polls Open 11 a.m.—8 p.m.

Johnstown High School Auditorium

Greater Johnstown School District

Budget Vote

www.johnstownschools.org

What is Johnstown’s proposed School District

Budget and Tax Levy for 2018-19?

Johnstown’s proposed $35,750,076 budget for the 2018-19 school year calls for a 5.46% spending increase over this year’s operating budget, while the projected tax levy would increase by $406,561 (4.9%).

What costs are increasing for 2018-19?

Reimbursable Costs are projected to increase by $828,744. These include expenses related to the building project, student transportation, shared services through HFM BOCES, and PTECH. A portion of these costs are reimbursed to our district each year.

The cost of operating our district and employing people is projected to increase by $1,021,368. The increase in health insurance costs alone are projected to be over $1 million. This increase is being partially offset by reductions in other areas.

What is the District doing to reduce expenses?

Approximately $1 million in reductions and eliminations have been made that affect programs, staff and operational expenses. These reductions include:

Staffing reductions, including teachers, clerical workers, building support staff, business office staff, and administrators;

Consolidation of some sports teams within the district and mergers of some sports teams with other districts;

Reductions in supply purchases and overtime hours;

Elimination of transportation service for pre-k; elimination of non-essential equipment purchases; and elimination of sports programs with very low enrollment.

Does the budget meet the state’s tax levy limit?

Each district’s tax cap is calculated based upon a complex formula that is provided by New York State.

This year, the district received aid (money from the state) to start payments on the capital project. These funds arrived ahead of the capital project payments. While this funding must be used to make capital project payments, the tax cap formula does not take this into consideration. The formula simply indicates that we have increased revenue (income) and assumes it can be used to cover any expenses. This has resulted in a tax cap calculation of negative 2.5%.

The proposed 4.9% increase to our tax levy exceeds the calculated negative tax cap and will require voter approval by a 60% supermajority.

How much will taxes increase?

The final tax rate increase (used to calculate tax bills) will vary for each municipality depending on equalization rates and assessments and will be determined in August.

Estimated projections for school tax rates are as follows:

City of Johnstown, $15.32 per $1,000 of assessed value;

Town of Johnstown, $21.88 per $1,000 of assessed value;

Town of Ephratah, $20.70 per $1,000 of assessed value;

Town of Palatine, $26.41 per $1,000 of assessed value;

City of Gloversville, $15.32 per $1,000 of assessed value.

The estimated projections as set forth above do not

include adjustments for Basic or Enhanced STAR.

Accordingly, your tax bill and increase could be

LOWER than what may be calculated using the tax

rates provided above.

Board of Education Election

In addition to voting on the 2018-19 school budget, voters

will also elect three district residents to serve on our

school’s nine-member Board of Education. The successful

candidates will serve three year terms, from July 1, 2018 to

June 30, 2021. The following individuals have submitted

nominating petitions to place their names on the ballot:

Kathryn Zajicek, Ronald Beck and Susanne Fitzgerald.

Who may vote in the Greater Johnstown School

District on Tuesday, May 15, 2018?

You may vote if you are:

A U.S. citizen, and

Age 18 or older, and

A legal resident of the school district for at least 30

days prior to the vote, and

A registered voter

FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SUMMARY (2016 - 17)

INFORMATION ABOUT EXPENDITURE RATIOS (2015 - 16)(Data are lagged a year.)

Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general-education and special-education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts

and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.

The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the

Student Information Repository System (SIRS).

THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT

GENERAL EDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES

$15,613,531

PUPILS

1,672

EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL

$9,338

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$5,680,886

PUPILS

217


$26,179

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPAVERAGE NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY

GENERAL EDUCATION


$8,395,886,432

PUPILS

747,643


$11,230

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$3,487,990,842

PUPILS

110,460


$31,577

1 of 3

ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


$33,423,609,457

PUPILS

2,649,519


$12,615

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$14,485,942,729

PUPILS

460,996


$31,423

Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and

instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as

transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all

pupils, including those classi ed as having disabilities and those not classi ed, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. Pupils resident in the district but

attending a charter school are included. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education

program.

Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-

level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus

students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.

Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both

general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may bene t students not classi ed as having disabilities.

TOTAL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL


$21,319

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP

$21,790

NY STATE

$23,361

Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as

expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education

and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.

2 of 3

© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: MAY 2, 2018, 9:33 AM EST

INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2016 - 17)Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classi cation rate of students with

disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below.

STUDENT PLACEMENT (PERCENT OF TIME INSIDE REGULARCLASSROOM)

THIS SCHOOLDISTRICT

80% OR MORE

127 65.5%

40% - 79%

26 13.4%

LESS THAN 40%

35 18.0%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

6 3.1%

OTHER SETTINGS

0 0.0%

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPAVERAGE NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY

80% OR MORE

56.8%

40% - 79%

19.1%

LESS THAN 40%

16.9%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

4.5%

OTHER SETTINGS

2.7%

NY STATE

80% OR MORE

58.4%

40% - 79%

11.9%

LESS THAN 40%

19.6%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

5.9%

OTHER SETTINGS

4.5%

The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and veri ed in Veri cation Report 5. The counts are numbers of

students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on BEDS Day, which is the rst Wednesday of the reporting year. The percentages

represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special-education services they receive. Rounding of

percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.

SCHOOL-AGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CLASSIFICATION RATE


11.9%

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP

13.4%

NY STATE

14.9%

This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are

parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE)

responsibility to ensure the provision of special-education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed

students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the

Basic Education Data System (BEDS).

Similar District Groups are identi ed according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information is available on our NRC capacity categories page.

3 of 3

http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/2011-12/NeedResourceCapacityIndex.pdf

JOHNSTOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [2016 - 17]

JOHNSTOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)K-12 ENROLLMENT 1,593

ENROLLMENT BY GENDERMALE

831 52%

FEMALE

762 48%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITYGROUP

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

HISPANIC OR LATINO

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

TOTAL

1

18

44

18

1,493

19

PERCENT

0%

1%

3%

1%

94%

1%

OTHER GROUPSENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

5 0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

186 12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

796 50%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADEGROUP

PRE-K (HALF DAY)

K (FULL DAY)

1ST GRADE

2ND GRADE

3RD GRADE

4TH GRADE

5TH GRADE

6TH GRADE

UNGRADED ELEMENTARY

7TH GRADE

8TH GRADE

9TH GRADE

10TH GRADE

11TH GRADE

12TH GRADE

UNGRADED SECONDARY

TOTAL

81

126

91

113

109

117

135

106

5

113

121

142

132

127

146

10

PERCENT

5%

8%

5%

7%

7%

7%

8%

6%

0%

7%

7%

8%

8%

8%

9%

1%

1 of 31

AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (2016 - 17)

ATTENDANCE (2015 - 16)

STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2015 - 16)

TEACHER TURNOVER RATE (2015-16 TO 2016-17)

TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS (2016 - 17)

GROUP

COMMON BRANCH

GRADE 8 ENGLISH

GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS

GRADE 8 SCIENCE

GRADE 8 SOCIAL STUDIES

GRADE 10 ENGLISH

GRADE 10 MATHEMATICS

GRADE 10 SCIENCE

GRADE 10 SOCIAL STUDIES

CLASS SIZE

20

24

24

24

24

22

23

17

20

FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2016 - 17)ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH

610 38%

ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH

130 8%

ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE94%

63 4%

TURNOVER RATE OF TEACHERS WITH FEWER THAN FIVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

15%

TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS

14%

STAFF COUNTS (2016 - 17)GROUP

PRINCIPALS

ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS

OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF

PARAPROFESSIONALS

STAFF

5

1

12

55

TOTAL TEACHERS 138

PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE 0%

PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE 1%

PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 10%

PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE 3%

TOTAL NUMBER OF CLASSES 505

PERCENT TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATION 2%

2 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

38% 39%

22%

1%

23%28% 29%

36%

7%

43%

Percentage Scoring at Levels

HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

133

117

16

GRADUATES (REGENTS + LOCAL DIPLOMAS)

128

117

11

REGENTS DIPLOMA

117 91%

114 97%

3 27%

GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION

36 28%

36 31%

0 0%

REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT

25 20%

24 21%

1 9%

LOCAL DIPLOMAS

11 9%

3 3%

8 73%

COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS

5 4%

0 0%

5 31%

HIGH SCHOOL NON-COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


DROPPED OUT

25 5%

19 4%

6 9%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION

PROGRAM

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

25 5%

19 4%

6 9%

POST-GRADUATION PLANS OF COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE

39 29%

39 33%

0 0%

TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE

49 37%

45 38%

4 25%

TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY

1 1%

0 0%

1 6%

TO THE MILITARY

5 4%

5 4%

0 0%

GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


TO EMPLOYMENT

28 21%

21 18%

7 44%

TO ADULT SERVICES

1 1%

0 0%

1 6%

TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS

1 1%

0 0%

1 6%

PLANS UNKNOWN

9 7%

7 6%

2 13%

GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

MEAN SCORE: 296

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE

GROUP

95

84

11

2

1

89

3

6

43

52

TOTAL TESTED

23%

26%

0%

_%

_%

24%

_%

17%

28%

19%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

36 38%

25 30%

11 100%

_ _

_ _

32 36%

_ _

4 67%

16 37%

20 38%

LEVEL 2

37 39%

37 44%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

36 40%

_ _

1 17%

15 35%

22 42%

LEVEL 3

21 22%

21 25%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

20 22%

_ _

1 17%

12 28%

9 17%

LEVEL 4

1 1%

1 1%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

1 2%

3 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

24%

57%

14%5% 19%

24%

35%

25%

16%

41%


District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

36%43%

15% 6%21%

33% 32%

22%

13%

35%


NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS


NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

NOT MIGRANT

95

53

42

95

23%

19%

29%

23%

36 38%

23 43%

13 31%

36 38%

37 39%

20 38%

17 40%

37 39%

21 22%

10 19%

11 26%

21 22%

1 1%

0 0%

1 2%

1 1%


MEAN SCORE: 297

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

111

102

9

1

1

4

105

6

63

48

111

64

47

111

TOTAL TESTED

19%

21%

0%

_%

_%

_%

19%

17%

16%

23%

19%

11%

30%

19%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

27 24%

20 20%

7 78%

_ _

_ _

_ _

25 24%

2 33%

19 30%

8 17%

27 24%

22 34%

5 11%

27 24%

LEVEL 2

63 57%

61 60%

2 22%

_ _

_ _

_ _

60 57%

3 50%

34 54%

29 60%

63 57%

35 55%

28 60%

63 57%

LEVEL 3

15 14%

15 15%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

14 13%

1 17%

8 13%

7 15%

15 14%

7 11%

8 17%

15 14%

LEVEL 4

6 5%

6 6%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

6 6%

0 0%

2 3%

4 8%

6 5%

0 0%

6 13%

6 5%


MEAN SCORE: 295

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

GROUP

116

97

19

3

3

9

99

2

8

48

TOTAL TESTED

21%

25%

0%

_%

_%

44%

20%

_%

0%

33%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

42 36%

27 28%

15 79%

_ _

_ _

4 44%

35 35%

_ _

3 38%

15 31%

LEVEL 2

50 43%

46 47%

4 21%

_ _

_ _

1 11%

44 44%

_ _

5 63%

17 35%

LEVEL 3

17 15%

17 18%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

3 33%

14 14%

_ _

0 0%

12 25%

LEVEL 4

7 6%

7 7%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

1 11%

6 6%

_ _

0 0%

4 8%

4 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

29%

48%

11% 12%

22%29%

39%

16% 16%

32%


District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

25%

43%

25%

7%

32%

22%

36%29%

13%

42%


MALE




NOT MIGRANT

68

116

63

53

116

12%

21%

6%

38%

21%

27 40%

42 36%

29 46%

13 25%

42 36%

33 49%

50 43%

30 48%

20 38%

50 43%

5 7%

17 15%

4 6%

13 25%

17 15%

3 4%

7 6%

0 0%

7 13%

7 6%


MEAN SCORE: 297

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

85

75

10

2

1

5

76

1

9

41

44

85

48

37

85

TOTAL TESTED

22%

24%

10%

_%

_%

_%

21%

_%

33%

27%

18%

22%

15%

32%

22%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

25 29%

18 24%

7 70%

_ _

_ _

_ _

22 29%

_ _

3 33%

11 27%

14 32%

25 29%

16 33%

9 24%

25 29%

LEVEL 2

41 48%

39 52%

2 20%

_ _

_ _

_ _

38 50%

_ _

3 33%

19 46%

22 50%

41 48%

25 52%

16 43%

41 48%

LEVEL 3

9 11%

8 11%

1 10%

_ _

_ _

_ _

6 8%

_ _

3 33%

5 12%

4 9%

9 11%

3 6%

6 16%

9 11%

LEVEL 4

10 12%

10 13%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

10 13%

_ _

0 0%

6 15%

4 9%

10 12%

4 8%

6 16%

10 12%


MEAN SCORE: 297

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

GROUP

102

80

22

1

1

1

98

1

TOTAL TESTED

32%

40%

5%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

25 25%

13 16%

12 55%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

LEVEL 2

44 43%

35 44%

9 41%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

LEVEL 3

26 25%

25 31%

1 5%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

LEVEL 4

7 7%

7 9%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

31%39%

25%6%

30%

21%

33% 30%

15%

45%


District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

24%

40%

21%15%

36%

25% 27% 25% 23%

48%


SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE


ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS



NOT MIGRANT

102

49

53

100

2

49

53

102

32%

35%

30%

_%

_%

18%

45%

32%

25 25%

7 14%

18 34%

_ _

_ _

18 37%

7 13%

25 25%

44 43%

25 51%

19 36%

_ _

_ _

22 45%

22 42%

44 43%

26 25%

11 22%

15 28%

_ _

_ _

8 16%

18 34%

26 25%

7 7%

6 12%

1 2%

_ _

_ _

1 2%

6 11%

7 7%


MEAN SCORE: 294

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

109

98

11

2

1

5

99

2

5

49

60

109

54

55

109

TOTAL TESTED

30%

33%

9%

_%

_%

0%

32%

_%

20%

37%

25%

30%

22%

38%

30%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

34 31%

24 24%

10 91%

_ _

_ _

2 40%

31 31%

_ _

1 20%

11 22%

23 38%

34 31%

23 43%

11 20%

34 31%

LEVEL 2

42 39%

42 43%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

3 60%

36 36%

_ _

3 60%

20 41%

22 37%

42 39%

19 35%

23 42%

42 39%

LEVEL 3

27 25%

26 27%

1 9%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

27 27%

_ _

0 0%

13 27%

14 23%

27 25%

9 17%

18 33%

27 25%

LEVEL 4

6 6%

6 6%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

5 5%

_ _

1 20%

5 10%

1 2%

6 6%

3 6%

3 5%

6 6%

GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS

MEAN SCORE: 303

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

GROUP

95

83

12

1

1

TOTAL TESTED

36%

41%

0%

_%

_%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

23 24%

12 14%

11 92%

_ _

_ _

LEVEL 2

38 40%

37 45%

1 8%

_ _

_ _

LEVEL 3

20 21%

20 24%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

LEVEL 4

14 15%

14 17%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

6 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

39% 41%

10% 10%

20%27% 30%

22% 21%

43%


District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

39% 38%

21%

2%

22%

32%25% 27%

16%

43%


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

90

3

5

42

53

95

52

43

95

36%

_%

40%

17%

51%

36%

29%

44%

36%

20 22%

_ _

3 60%

12 29%

11 21%

23 24%

15 29%

8 19%

23 24%

38 42%

_ _

0 0%

23 55%

15 28%

38 40%

22 42%

16 37%

38 40%

19 21%

_ _

1 20%

4 10%

16 30%

20 21%

9 17%

11 26%

20 21%

13 14%

_ _

1 20%

3 7%

11 21%

14 15%

6 12%

8 19%

14 15%

GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS

MEAN SCORE: 290

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

108

99

9

1

1

3

103

5

60

48

108

63

45

108

TOTAL TESTED

20%

22%

0%

_%

_%

_%

20%

20%

8%

35%

20%

6%

40%

20%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

42 39%

34 34%

8 89%

_ _

_ _

_ _

39 38%

3 60%

28 47%

14 29%

42 39%

32 51%

10 22%

42 39%

LEVEL 2

44 41%

43 43%

1 11%

_ _

_ _

_ _

43 42%

1 20%

27 45%

17 35%

44 41%

27 43%

17 38%

44 41%

LEVEL 3

11 10%

11 11%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

11 11%

0 0%

3 5%

8 17%

11 10%

4 6%

7 16%

11 10%

LEVEL 4

11 10%

11 11%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

10 10%

1 20%

2 3%

9 19%

11 10%

0 0%

11 24%

11 10%

GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS

MEAN SCORE: 296

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



GROUP

112

94

18

3

TOTAL TESTED

22%

27%

0%

_%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

44 39%

28 30%

16 89%

_ _

LEVEL 2

43 38%

41 44%

2 11%

_ _

LEVEL 3

23 21%

23 24%

0 0%

_ _

LEVEL 4

2 2%

2 2%

0 0%

_ _

7 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

17%

52%

18%13%

31%30% 30%

19% 21%

40%


District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0

10

20

30

4036%

39%

20%

5%

25%

33%29%

24%

14%

38%



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

2

7

99

1

6

45

67

112

59

53

112

_%

29%

21%

_%

33%

22%

22%

22%

15%

30%

22%

_ _

4 57%

39 39%

_ _

1 17%

16 36%

28 42%

44 39%

28 47%

16 30%

44 39%

_ _

1 14%

39 39%

_ _

3 50%

19 42%

24 36%

43 38%

22 37%

21 40%

43 38%

_ _

2 29%

20 20%

_ _

1 17%

9 20%

14 21%

23 21%

9 15%

14 26%

23 21%

_ _

0 0%

1 1%

_ _

1 17%

1 2%

1 1%

2 2%

0 0%

2 4%

2 2%

GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS

MEAN SCORE: 305

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

84

74

10

2

1

4

76

1

8

40

44

84

47

37

84

TOTAL TESTED

31%

34%

10%

_%

_%

_%

32%

_%

25%

28%

34%

31%

23%

41%

31%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

14 17%

10 14%

4 40%

_ _

_ _

_ _

12 16%

_ _

2 25%

6 15%

8 18%

14 17%

8 17%

6 16%

14 17%

LEVEL 2

44 52%

39 53%

5 50%

_ _

_ _

_ _

40 53%

_ _

4 50%

23 58%

21 48%

44 52%

28 60%

16 43%

44 52%

LEVEL 3

15 18%

14 19%

1 10%

_ _

_ _

_ _

14 18%

_ _

1 13%

5 13%

10 23%

15 18%

6 13%

9 24%

15 18%

LEVEL 4

11 13%

11 15%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

10 13%

_ _

1 13%

6 15%

5 11%

11 13%

5 11%

6 16%

11 13%

GRADE 7 MATHEMATICSMean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.

For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu

of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 299

GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4

8 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

38% 36%

6% 20%25%

30% 27%

16%

27%

43%


ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

95

76

19

1

1

1

92

95

45

50

93

2

43

52

95

25%

32%

0%

_%

_%

_%

_%

25%

27%

24%

_%

_%

14%

35%

25%

34 36%

21 28%

13 68%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

34 36%

18 40%

16 32%

_ _

_ _

24 56%

10 19%

34 36%

37 39%

31 41%

6 32%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

37 39%

15 33%

22 44%

_ _

_ _

13 30%

24 46%

37 39%

19 20%

19 25%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

19 20%

9 20%

10 20%

_ _

_ _

5 12%

14 27%

19 20%

5 5%

5 7%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 5%

3 7%

2 4%

_ _

_ _

1 2%

4 8%

5 5%

GRADE 8 MATHEMATICSMean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.

For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu

of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 280

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

80

69

11

1

3

75

1

5

34

46

80

44

36

80

TOTAL TESTED

5%

6%

0%

_%

_%

5%

_%

0%

0%

9%

5%

5%

6%

5%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

39 49%

29 42%

10 91%

_ _

_ _

37 49%

_ _

2 40%

16 47%

23 50%

39 49%

23 52%

16 44%

39 49%

LEVEL 2

37 46%

36 52%

1 9%

_ _

_ _

34 45%

_ _

3 60%

18 53%

19 41%

37 46%

19 43%

18 50%

37 46%

LEVEL 3

4 5%

4 6%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

4 5%

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

4 9%

4 5%

2 5%

2 6%

4 5%

LEVEL 4

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS MATH TEST

Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.

ALL STUDENTS

GROUP

22

TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1

0 0%

LEVEL 2

0 0%

LEVEL 3

2 9%

4 & ABOVE

20 91%

3 & ABOVE

22 100%

9 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

3% 6%

47% 44%

91%

4%10% 33%

53%

86%


GRADE 4 SCIENCE

MEAN SCORE: 81

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

112

103

9

1

1

4

106

6

63

49

112

65

47

112

TOTAL TESTED

91%

94%

56%

_%

_%

_%

91%

100%

87%

96%

91%

86%

98%

91%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

3 3%

0 0%

3 33%

_ _

_ _

_ _

3 3%

0 0%

1 2%

2 4%

3 3%

3 5%

0 0%

3 3%

LEVEL 2

7 6%

6 6%

1 11%

_ _

_ _

_ _

7 7%

0 0%

7 11%

0 0%

7 6%

6 9%

1 2%

7 6%

LEVEL 3

53 47%

49 48%

4 44%

_ _

_ _

_ _

50 47%

3 50%

32 51%

21 43%

53 47%

32 49%

21 45%

53 47%

LEVEL 4

49 44%

48 47%

1 11%

_ _

_ _

_ _

46 43%

3 50%

23 37%

26 53%

49 44%

24 37%

25 53%

49 44%

10 of 31

District:2017

Statewide:2017

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4%18%

50%

28%

78%

10%21%

39%29%

68%


READING

MATHEMATICS

GRADE 8 SCIENCEData in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test.

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

MEAN SCORE: 75

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

116

106

10

2

1

4

107

2

9

54

62

116

56

60

116

TOTAL TESTED

78%

82%

30%

_%

_%

_%

79%

_%

56%

78%

77%

78%

66%

88%

78%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

5 4%

4 4%

1 10%

_ _

_ _

_ _

2 2%

_ _

3 33%

4 7%

1 2%

5 4%

3 5%

2 3%

5 4%

LEVEL 2

21 18%

15 14%

6 60%

_ _

_ _

_ _

20 19%

_ _

1 11%

8 15%

13 21%

21 18%

16 29%

5 8%

21 18%

LEVEL 3

58 50%

55 52%

3 30%

_ _

_ _

_ _

56 52%

_ _

2 22%

28 52%

30 48%

58 50%

25 45%

33 55%

58 50%

LEVEL 4

32 28%

32 30%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

29 27%

_ _

3 33%

14 26%

18 29%

32 28%

12 21%

20 33%

32 28%

STATEWIDE RESULTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS: NAEP (2016 - 17)

GRADE: 4

ALL STUDENTS


AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…

HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…

GROUP

32%

68%

*%

18%

48%

45%

22%

*%

74%

44%

BELOW BASIC

32%

22%

*%

30%

34%

33%

31%

*%

21%

33%

BASIC

27%

9%

*%

33%

16%

18%

35%

*%

5%

19%

PROFICIENT

9%

2%

*%

19%

3%

4%

13%

*%

*%

4%

ADVANCED

98

93

88

PARTICIPATION RATE

ALL STUDENTS


GROUP

24%

58%

BELOW BASIC

41%

31%

BASIC

30%

10%

PROFICIENT

5%

1%

ADVANCED

98

94

PARTICIPATION RATE

11 of 31

READING

MATHEMATICS




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL



*%

11%

36%

36%

14%

*%

68%

34%

*%

30%

42%

44%

40%

*%

29%

43%

*%

44%

21%

18%

38%

*%

3%

21%

*%

15%

2%

2%

7%

*%

*%

2%

91

GRADE: 8

ALL STUDENTS





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL



GROUP

27%

58%

*%

21%

39%

35%

20%

*%

81%

37%

BELOW BASIC

39%

33%

*%

31%

41%

43%

38%

*%

16%

41%

BASIC

30%

8%

*%

37%

19%

21%

36%

*%

3%

20%

PROFICIENT

5%

*%

*%

12%

1%

1%

6%

*%

*%

2%

ADVANCED

98

94

80

PARTICIPATION RATE

ALL STUDENTS





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL



GROUP

32%

69%

*%

14%

53%

48%

21%

*%

80%

44%

BELOW BASIC

34%

23%

*%

24%

32%

33%

37%

*%

16%

34%

BASIC

24%

6%

*%

32%

14%

15%

29%

*%

4%

17%

PROFICIENT

10%

2%

*%

30%

2%

4%

13%

*%

1%

4%

ADVANCED

98

95

80

PARTICIPATION RATE

12 of 31

District:2013Cohort

Statewide:2013Cohort

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

2%8% 27%

49%

76%

3% 3% 20%

65%

85%


District:2013Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

3%16%

63%

11%

74%

3% 7%

55%

30%

85%


TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGEARTS AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

160

137

23

5

4

2

147

2

8

88

72

160

73

87

160

TOTAL TESTED

76%

85%

22%

100%

_%

_%

74%

_%

88%

83%

67%

76%

55%

93%

76%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

3 2%

1 1%

2 9%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

3 2%

_ _

0 0%

2 2%

1 1%

3 2%

2 3%

1 1%

3 2%

LEVEL 2

12 8%

5 4%

7 30%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

11 7%

_ _

1 13%

4 5%

8 11%

12 8%

10 14%

2 2%

12 8%

LEVEL 3

43 27%

38 28%

5 22%

2 40%

_ _

_ _

37 25%

_ _

4 50%

26 30%

17 24%

43 27%

21 29%

22 25%

43 27%

LEVEL 4

78 49%

78 57%

0 0%

3 60%

_ _

_ _

72 49%

_ _

3 38%

47 53%

31 43%

78 49%

19 26%

59 68%

78 49%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS AFTERFOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




GROUP

160

137

23

5

4

2

147

2

8

88

72

160

73

87

TOTAL TESTED

74%

82%

30%

100%

_%

_%

73%

_%

88%

80%

68%

74%

55%

91%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

5 3%

3 2%

2 9%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

5 3%

_ _

0 0%

1 1%

4 6%

5 3%

5 7%

0 0%

LEVEL 2

25 16%

18 13%

7 30%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

24 16%

_ _

1 13%

10 11%

15 21%

25 16%

19 26%

6 7%

LEVEL 3

101 63%

94 69%

7 30%

3 60%

_ _

_ _

92 63%

_ _

6 75%

61 69%

40 56%

101 63%

37 51%

64 74%

LEVEL 4

18 11%

18 13%

0 0%

2 40%

_ _

_ _

15 10%

_ _

1 13%

9 10%

9 13%

18 11%

3 4%

15 17%

13 of 31

District:2013Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

9% 6%

47%

24%

71%

5% 6%

43%34%

78%


District:2013Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

2% 3% 28%

52%

80%

3% 4% 32%

48%

81%


NOT MIGRANT 160 74% 5 3% 25 16% 101 63% 18 11%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL GLOBAL HISTORY ANDGEOGRAPHY AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

160

137

23

5

4

2

147

2

8

88

72

160

73

87

160

TOTAL TESTED

71%

81%

13%

100%

_%

_%

71%

_%

63%

73%

69%

71%

49%

90%

71%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

15 9%

5 4%

10 43%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

15 10%

_ _

0 0%

7 8%

8 11%

15 9%

10 14%

5 6%

15 9%

LEVEL 2

10 6%

7 5%

3 13%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

7 5%

_ _

3 38%

8 9%

2 3%

10 6%

7 10%

3 3%

10 6%

LEVEL 3

75 47%

72 53%

3 13%

2 40%

_ _

_ _

70 48%

_ _

3 38%

46 52%

29 40%

75 47%

33 45%

42 48%

75 47%

LEVEL 4

39 24%

39 28%

0 0%

3 60%

_ _

_ _

34 23%

_ _

2 25%

18 20%

21 29%

39 24%

3 4%

36 41%

39 24%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL U.S. HISTORY ANDGOVERNMENT AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE



GROUP

160

137

23

5

4

2

147

2

8

88

72

160

73

TOTAL TESTED

80%

88%

35%

100%

_%

_%

78%

_%

100%

83%

76%

80%

62%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

3 2%

0 0%

3 13%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

3 2%

_ _

0 0%

1 1%

2 3%

3 2%

3 4%

LEVEL 2

4 3%

1 1%

3 13%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

4 3%

_ _

0 0%

2 2%

2 3%

4 3%

3 4%

LEVEL 3

45 28%

37 27%

8 35%

1 20%

_ _

_ _

41 28%

_ _

3 38%

28 32%

17 24%

45 28%

21 29%

LEVEL 4

83 52%

83 61%

0 0%

4 80%

_ _

_ _

74 50%

_ _

5 63%

45 51%

38 53%

83 52%

24 33%

14 of 31

District:2013Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4% 5%

47%35%

82%

3% 5%

45%38%

84%


ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)


NOT MIGRANT

87

160

95%

80%

0 0%

3 2%

1 1%

4 3%

24 28%

45 28%

59 68%

83 52%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE AFTER FOURYEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

160

137

23

5

4

2

147

2

8

88

72

160

73

87

160

TOTAL TESTED

82%

91%

26%

100%

_%

_%

81%

_%

88%

86%

76%

82%

66%

95%

82%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

7 4%

2 1%

5 22%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

6 4%

_ _

1 13%

2 2%

5 7%

7 4%

5 7%

2 2%

7 4%

LEVEL 2

8 5%

3 2%

5 22%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

8 5%

_ _

0 0%

4 5%

4 6%

8 5%

7 10%

1 1%

8 5%

LEVEL 3

75 47%

69 50%

6 26%

3 60%

_ _

_ _

67 46%

_ _

5 63%

50 57%

25 35%

75 47%

36 49%

39 45%

75 47%

LEVEL 4

56 35%

56 41%

0 0%

2 40%

_ _

_ _

52 35%

_ _

2 25%

26 30%

30 42%

56 35%

12 16%

44 51%

56 35%

Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

154

135

19

3

2

147

2

7

65

89

154

64

90

154


9 6%

3 2%

6 32%

_ _

_ _

9 6%

_ _

0 0%

2 3%

7 8%

9 6%

4 6%

5 6%

9 6%

LEVEL 2

14 9%

5 4%

9 47%

_ _

_ _

13 9%

_ _

1 14%

2 3%

12 13%

14 9%

9 14%

5 6%

14 9%

LEVEL 3

51 33%

47 35%

4 21%

_ _

_ _

50 34%

_ _

1 14%

18 28%

33 37%

51 33%

28 44%

23 26%

51 33%

LEVEL 4

24 16%

24 18%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

21 14%

_ _

3 43%

14 22%

10 11%

24 16%

9 14%

15 17%

24 16%

LEVEL 5

56 36%

56 41%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

54 37%

_ _

2 29%

29 45%

27 30%

56 36%

14 22%

42 47%

56 36%

15 of 31

REGENTS ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY

ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

5

5

1

4

5

3

2

5

1

4

5

TOTAL TESTED 55

1 20%

1 20%

_ _

_ _

1 20%

_ _

_ _

1 20%

_ _

_ _

1 20%

65

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

85

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

16 of 31

ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)

REGENTS COMMON CORE GEOMETRY

ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

195

170

25

3

2

6

181

3

8

80

115

194

1

89

106

195


27 14%

21 12%

6 24%

_ _

_ _

3 50%

24 13%

_ _

0 0%

7 9%

20 17%

_ _

_ _

20 22%

7 7%

27 14%

LEVEL 2

35 18%

24 14%

11 44%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

34 19%

_ _

1 13%

8 10%

27 23%

_ _

_ _

23 26%

12 11%

35 18%

LEVEL 3

90 46%

82 48%

8 32%

_ _

_ _

3 50%

83 46%

_ _

4 50%

41 51%

49 43%

_ _

_ _

35 39%

55 52%

90 46%

LEVEL 4

26 13%

26 15%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

25 14%

_ _

1 13%

14 18%

12 10%

_ _

_ _

8 9%

18 17%

26 13%

LEVEL 5

17 9%

17 10%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

15 8%

_ _

2 25%

10 13%

7 6%

_ _

_ _

3 3%

14 13%

17 9%

COMMON CORE GEOMETRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

108

103

5

1

1

2

102

2

6

55

53

108

37

71

108


21 19%

19 18%

2 40%

_ _

_ _

_ _

19 19%

_ _

2 33%

10 18%

11 21%

21 19%

11 30%

10 14%

21 19%

LEVEL 2

32 30%

30 29%

2 40%

_ _

_ _

_ _

31 30%

_ _

1 17%

14 25%

18 34%

32 30%

12 32%

20 28%

32 30%

LEVEL 3

45 42%

44 43%

1 20%

_ _

_ _

_ _

43 42%

_ _

2 33%

24 44%

21 40%

45 42%

11 30%

34 48%

45 42%

LEVEL 4

9 8%

9 9%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

8 8%

_ _

1 17%

6 11%

3 6%

9 8%

2 5%

7 10%

9 8%

LEVEL 5

1 1%

1 1%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

1 1%

_ _

0 0%

1 2%

0 0%

1 1%

1 3%

0 0%

1 1%

17 of 31

ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)

REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

49

49

1

48

49

27

22

49

7

42

49


1 2%

1 2%

_ _

_ _

1 2%

1 4%

0 0%

1 2%

0 0%

1 2%

1 2%

LEVEL 2

5 10%

5 10%

_ _

_ _

5 10%

3 11%

2 9%

5 10%

1 14%

4 10%

5 10%

LEVEL 3

33 67%

33 67%

_ _

_ _

33 67%

17 63%

16 73%

33 67%

6 86%

27 64%

33 67%

LEVEL 4

10 20%

10 20%

_ _

_ _

10 20%

6 22%

4 18%

10 20%

0 0%

10 24%

10 20%

LEVEL 5

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

178

154

24

1

5

170

2

8

78

100

178

82

96

178

TOTAL TESTED 55

154 87%

144 94%

10 42%

_ _

_ _

148 87%

_ _

6 75%

71 91%

83 83%

154 87%

64 78%

90 94%

154 87%

65

123 69%

120 78%

3 13%

_ _

_ _

117 69%

_ _

6 75%

57 73%

66 66%

123 69%

50 61%

73 76%

123 69%

85

37 21%

37 24%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

36 21%

_ _

1 13%

16 21%

21 21%

37 21%

7 9%

30 31%

37 21%

18 of 31

REGENTS U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT

REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT

U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

146

133

13

1

3

1

139

2

7

64

82

145

1

56

90

146

TOTAL TESTED 55

142 97%

131 98%

11 85%

_ _

_ _

_ _

135 97%

_ _

7 100%

62 97%

80 98%

_ _

_ _

55 98%

87 97%

142 97%

65

128 88%

121 91%

7 54%

_ _

_ _

_ _

122 88%

_ _

6 86%

57 89%

71 87%

_ _

_ _

46 82%

82 91%

128 88%

85

76 52%

75 56%

1 8%

_ _

_ _

_ _

72 52%

_ _

4 57%

34 53%

42 51%

_ _

_ _

19 34%

57 63%

76 52%

LIVING ENVIRONMENT

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

147

119

28

2

2

4

137

2

10

64

83

147

72

75

147

TOTAL TESTED 55

128 87%

112 94%

16 57%

_ _

_ _

_ _

119 87%

_ _

9 90%

58 91%

70 84%

128 87%

61 85%

67 89%

128 87%

65

122 83%

110 92%

12 43%

_ _

_ _

_ _

114 83%

_ _

8 80%

56 88%

66 80%

122 83%

57 79%

65 87%

122 83%

85

40 27%

37 31%

3 11%

_ _

_ _

_ _

36 26%

_ _

4 40%

19 30%

21 25%

40 27%

15 21%

25 33%

40 27%

19 of 31

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY

PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

93

84

9

2

2

89

93

38

55

93

39

54

93

TOTAL TESTED 55

86 92%

81 96%

5 56%

_ _

_ _

_ _

86 92%

36 95%

50 91%

86 92%

36 92%

50 93%

86 92%

65

77 83%

74 88%

3 33%

_ _

_ _

_ _

77 83%

31 82%

46 84%

77 83%

33 85%

44 81%

77 83%

85

17 18%

17 20%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

17 18%

8 21%

9 16%

17 18%

4 10%

13 24%

17 18%

PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

56

55

1

1

1

54

56

31

25

56

11

45

56

TOTAL TESTED 55

51 91%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

51 91%

29 94%

22 88%

51 91%

10 91%

41 91%

51 91%

65

37 66%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

37 66%

22 71%

15 60%

37 66%

8 73%

29 64%

37 66%

85

3 5%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

3 5%

2 6%

1 4%

3 5%

0 0%

3 7%

3 5%

20 of 31

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

26

26

1

1

24

26

14

12

26

2

24

26

TOTAL TESTED 55

26 100%

26 100%

_ _

_ _

_ _

26 100%

14 100%

12 100%

26 100%

_ _

_ _

26 100%

65

20 77%

20 77%

_ _

_ _

_ _

20 77%

12 86%

8 67%

20 77%

_ _

_ _

20 77%

85

5 19%

5 19%

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 19%

3 21%

2 17%

5 19%

_ _

_ _

5 19%

NEW YORK STATE ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (NYSAA) RESULTS (2016 - 17)

GRADE 3 ELA

GRADE 3 MATH

GRADE 4 ELA

GRADE 4 MATH

GRADE 5 ELA

GRADE 5 MATH

GRADE 6 ELA

GRADE 6 MATH

GRADE 7 ELA

GRADE 7 MATH

GRADE 8 ELA

GRADE 8 MATH

GRADE 8 SCIENCE

SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA

SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH

SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE

SECONDARY-LEVEL SOCIAL STUDIES

GROUP

1

1

1

1

3

3

2

2

1

1

2

2

3

2

2

1

1

TOTAL TESTED

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

PROFICIENT

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

LEVEL 1

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

LEVEL 4

NEW YORK STATE ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST (NYSESLAT) RESULTS (2016 - 17)

KINDERGARTEN

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

GROUP

2

2

TOTAL TESTED

_

_

ENTERING

_

_

EMERGING

_

_

TRANSITIONING

_

_

EXPANDING

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 1

ALL STUDENTS

GROUP

3

TOTAL TESTED

_

ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

21 of 31

GENERAL EDUCATION 3 _ _ _ _ _

GRADE 7

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

2

1

1

TOTAL TESTED

_

_

_

ENTERING

_

_

_

EMERGING

_

_

_

TRANSITIONING

_

_

_

EXPANDING

_

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 9

ALL STUDENTS


GROUP

1

1

TOTAL TESTED

_

_

ENTERING

_

_

EMERGING

_

_

TRANSITIONING

_

_

EXPANDING

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 11

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

GROUP

1

1

TOTAL TESTED

_

_

ENTERING

_

_

EMERGING

_

_

TRANSITIONING

_

_

EXPANDING

_

_

COMMANDING

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

MADE AYP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

TESTED 95%

1,461*

0

10

25

9

1,352*

11

215*

2

777*

STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

84%*

―

―

―

―

83%*

―

87%*

―

86%*

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

609

0

6

21

9

564

9

93✝

2

331

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

96

―

―

―

―

97

―

45✝

―

78

PI

107

―

―

―

―

119

―

75

―

96

EAMO

107

―

―

―

―

107

―

58

―

90

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.

NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO

NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…

NOT WHITE

GROUP

1,461*

1,444*

1,409*

1,441*

55

STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION PERIOD

84%*

84%*

83%*

83%*

95%

PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

609

603

588

600

45

TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY

96

96

96

96

80

PI

22 of 31

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

1,441*

1,246*

1,455*

684*

757*

704*

0

1,460*

84%*

83%*

84%*

81%*

84%*

84%*

―

84%*

600

519

607

278

322

287

0

609

97

105

96

117

89

103

―

96

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

MADE AYP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

TESTED 95%

1,465*

0

9

24

9

1,358*

11

216*

2

778*

STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

82%*

―

―

―

―

82%*

―

86%*

―

81%*

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

585

0

4

17

9

549

6

89✝

2

310

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

96

―

―

―

―

96

―

40✝

―

78

PI

104

―

―

―

―

116

―

75

―

94

EAMO

104

―

―

―

―

114

―

57

―

94

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

1,465*

1,449*

1,414*

1,445*

107*

1,445*

1,249*

1,459*

687*

759*

706*

0

1,464*



82%*

82%*

82%*

81%*

76%*

82%*

81%*

81%*

82%*

82%*

81%*

―

81%*


VALID TEST SCORES

585

581

568

576

36

579

499

583

275

311

274

0

585


96

96

97

95

94

96

105

96

116

102

88

―

96

PI

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with

23 of 31

another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

TESTED 80%

242

0

2

8

3

227

2

24

0

132

STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

95%

―

―

―

―

95%

―

―

―

93%

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

PI >= EAMO OR

PROGRESS TARGET

221

0

1

6

3

209

2

22

0

119

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

181

―

―

―

―

183

―

―

―

172

PI

182

―

―

―

―

187

―

―

―

173

EAMO

182

―

―

―

―

187

―

―

―

173

PROGRESS TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

242

240

234

239

15

240

218

242

110

119

123

0

242



95%

95%

95%

95%

―

95%

96%

95%

98%

95%

96%

―

95%


VALID TEST SCORES

221

220

215

218

12

219

199

221

102

109

112

0

221


181

181

182

181

―

182

186

181

191

183

179

―

181

PI

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.

SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS

GROUP

NO

MADE AYP

YES

TESTED 95%

140

12TH GRADERS

99%

PERCENT OF 12TH

GRADERS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

NO

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

135

2013

ACCOUNTABILITY

COHORT MEMBERS

143

PI

169

EAMO

146

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

24 of 31



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

0

5

2

5

126

2

17

0

55

―

―

―

―

98%

―

―

―

98%

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

0

3

2

5

123

2

14

0

50

―

―

―

―

143

―

―

―

108

―

―

―

―

177

―

―

―

155

―

―

―

―

147

―

―

―

117






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

140

135

138

135

14

138

123

140

85

63

77

0

140

12TH GRADERS

99%

99%

99%

99%

―

99%

100%

99%

99%

97%

100%

―

99%

PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID

TEST SCORES

135

132

133

130

12

133

121

135

85

59

76

0

135

2013 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS

143

144

143

142

―

143

157

143

164

129

154

―

143

PI

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.

SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

TESTED 95%

140

0

5

2

5

126

2

17

0

55

12TH GRADERS

99%

―

―

―

―

98%

―

―

―

98%

PERCENT OF 12TH

GRADERS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

135

0

3

2

5

123

2

14

0

50

2013

ACCOUNTABILITY

COHORT MEMBERS

110

―

―

―

―

108

―

―

―

84

PI

156

―

―

―

―

166

―

―

―

141

EAMO

126

―

―

―

―

127

―

―

―

104

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO25 of 31

― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

DETERMINE AYP.





NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

140

135

138

135

14

138

123

140

85

63

77

0

140

12TH GRADERS

99%

99%

99%

99%

―

99%

100%

99%

99%

97%

100%

―

99%

PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID

TEST SCORES

135

132

133

130

12

133

121

135

85

59

76

0

135

2013 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS

110

110

110

109

―

111

119

110

126

98

120

―

110

PI

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.

UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

96

―

―

―

―

97

―

45

―

78

ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI

96

―

―

―

―

96

―

40

―

78

ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI

143

―

―

―

―

143

―

―

―

108

SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI

110

―

―

―

―

108

―

―

―

84

SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI

111

0

0

0

0

111

0

43

0

87

UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI

OVERALL GRADUATION RATE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

GROUP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

MADE AYP

26 of 31




―

―

NO

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

27 of 31

FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:

153

0

5

6

1

140

1

17

0

66

2012 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL

COHORT

78%

―

―

―

―

79%

―

―

―

67%

GRADUATION RATE

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

80%

STATE STANDARD

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

72%

PROGRESS TARGET

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

28 of 31

FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

NO

MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:

137

2

1

2

2

130

0

14

0

65

2011 FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL

COHORT

85%

―

―

―

―

87%

―

―

―

75%

GRADUATION RATE

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

80%

STATE STANDARD

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

77%

PROGRESS TARGET

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

29 of 31

GRADUATION RATES FOR NON-AYP GROUPS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY





NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT

153

148

147

152

13

152

136

153

87

77

76

0

153

2012 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT

78%

79%

78%

78%

―

78%

85%

78%

87%

75%

82%

―

78%

GRADUATION RATE

FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT

135

136

135

135

7

137

123

137

72

67

70

0

137

2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT

86%

86%

85%

86%

―

85%

91%

85%

94%

84%

87%

―

85%

GRADUATION RATE

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

30 of 31

© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: MAY 2, 2018, 9:37 AM EST

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (THIS DISTRICT) 22%

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (STATEWIDE) 31%

PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE NO

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (THIS DISTRICT) 12%

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (STATEWIDE) 5%

PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE YES

31 of 31

Documents

Greater Johnstown School District Budget Vote · used to cover. any. expenses. This has resulted in a tax . ... MAY2,2018,9:33AMEST INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2016