Tuesday, May 15, 2018 Polls Open 11 a.m.—8 p.m.
Johnstown High School Auditorium
Greater Johnstown School District
Budget Vote
www.johnstownschools.org
What is Johnstown’s proposed School District
Budget and Tax Levy for 2018-19?
Johnstown’s proposed $35,750,076 budget for the 2018-19 school year calls for a 5.46% spending increase over this year’s operating budget, while the projected tax levy would increase by $406,561 (4.9%).
What costs are increasing for 2018-19?
Reimbursable Costs are projected to increase by $828,744. These include expenses related to the building project, student transportation, shared services through HFM BOCES, and PTECH. A portion of these costs are reimbursed to our district each year.
The cost of operating our district and employing people is projected to increase by $1,021,368. The increase in health insurance costs alone are projected to be over $1 million. This increase is being partially offset by reductions in other areas.
What is the District doing to reduce expenses?
Approximately $1 million in reductions and eliminations have been made that affect programs, staff and operational expenses. These reductions include:
Staffing reductions, including teachers, clerical workers, building support staff, business office staff, and administrators;
Consolidation of some sports teams within the district and mergers of some sports teams with other districts;
Reductions in supply purchases and overtime hours;
Elimination of transportation service for pre-k; elimination of non-essential equipment purchases; and elimination of sports programs with very low enrollment.
Does the budget meet the state’s tax levy limit?
Each district’s tax cap is calculated based upon a complex formula that is provided by New York State.
This year, the district received aid (money from the state) to start payments on the capital project. These funds arrived ahead of the capital project payments. While this funding must be used to make capital project payments, the tax cap formula does not take this into consideration. The formula simply indicates that we have increased revenue (income) and assumes it can be used to cover any expenses. This has resulted in a tax cap calculation of negative 2.5%.
The proposed 4.9% increase to our tax levy exceeds the calculated negative tax cap and will require voter approval by a 60% supermajority.
How much will taxes increase?
The final tax rate increase (used to calculate tax bills) will vary for each municipality depending on equalization rates and assessments and will be determined in August.
Estimated projections for school tax rates are as follows:
City of Johnstown, $15.32 per $1,000 of assessed value;
Town of Johnstown, $21.88 per $1,000 of assessed value;
Town of Ephratah, $20.70 per $1,000 of assessed value;
Town of Palatine, $26.41 per $1,000 of assessed value;
City of Gloversville, $15.32 per $1,000 of assessed value.
The estimated projections as set forth above do not
include adjustments for Basic or Enhanced STAR.
Accordingly, your tax bill and increase could be
LOWER than what may be calculated using the tax
rates provided above.
Board of Education Election
In addition to voting on the 2018-19 school budget, voters
will also elect three district residents to serve on our
school’s nine-member Board of Education. The successful
candidates will serve three year terms, from July 1, 2018 to
June 30, 2021. The following individuals have submitted
nominating petitions to place their names on the ballot:
Kathryn Zajicek, Ronald Beck and Susanne Fitzgerald.
Who may vote in the Greater Johnstown School
District on Tuesday, May 15, 2018?
You may vote if you are:
A U.S. citizen, and
Age 18 or older, and
A legal resident of the school district for at least 30
days prior to the vote, and
A registered voter
FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SUMMARY (2016 - 17)
INFORMATION ABOUT EXPENDITURE RATIOS (2015 - 16)(Data are lagged a year.)
Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general-education and special-education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts
and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.
The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the
Student Information Repository System (SIRS).
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$15,613,531
PUPILS
1,672
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$9,338
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$5,680,886
PUPILS
217
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$26,179
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPAVERAGE NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$8,395,886,432
PUPILS
747,643
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$11,230
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$3,487,990,842
PUPILS
110,460
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$31,577
1 of 3
ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$33,423,609,457
PUPILS
2,649,519
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$12,615
SPECIAL EDUCATION
INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES
$14,485,942,729
PUPILS
460,996
EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
$31,423
Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and
instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as
transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.
The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all
pupils, including those classi ed as having disabilities and those not classi ed, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. Pupils resident in the district but
attending a charter school are included. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education
program.
Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-
level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.
The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus
students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.
Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both
general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may bene t students not classi ed as having disabilities.
TOTAL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
$21,319
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP
$21,790
NY STATE
$23,361
Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as
expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education
and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.
2 of 3
© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: MAY 2, 2018, 9:33 AM EST
INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2016 - 17)Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classi cation rate of students with
disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below.
STUDENT PLACEMENT (PERCENT OF TIME INSIDE REGULARCLASSROOM)
THIS SCHOOLDISTRICT
80% OR MORE
127 65.5%
40% - 79%
26 13.4%
LESS THAN 40%
35 18.0%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
6 3.1%
OTHER SETTINGS
0 0.0%
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPAVERAGE NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY
80% OR MORE
56.8%
40% - 79%
19.1%
LESS THAN 40%
16.9%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
4.5%
OTHER SETTINGS
2.7%
NY STATE
80% OR MORE
58.4%
40% - 79%
11.9%
LESS THAN 40%
19.6%
SEPARATE SETTINGS
5.9%
OTHER SETTINGS
4.5%
The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and veri ed in Veri cation Report 5. The counts are numbers of
students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on BEDS Day, which is the rst Wednesday of the reporting year. The percentages
represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special-education services they receive. Rounding of
percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.
SCHOOL-AGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CLASSIFICATION RATE
THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
11.9%
SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP
13.4%
NY STATE
14.9%
This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are
parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE)
responsibility to ensure the provision of special-education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed
students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the
Basic Education Data System (BEDS).
Similar District Groups are identi ed according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information is available on our NRC capacity categories page.
3 of 3
JOHNSTOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [2016 - 17]
JOHNSTOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)K-12 ENROLLMENT 1,593
ENROLLMENT BY GENDERMALE
831 52%
FEMALE
762 48%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITYGROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
1
18
44
18
1,493
19
PERCENT
0%
1%
3%
1%
94%
1%
OTHER GROUPSENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
5 0%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
186 12%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
796 50%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADEGROUP
PRE-K (HALF DAY)
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
4TH GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
UNGRADED SECONDARY
TOTAL
81
126
91
113
109
117
135
106
5
113
121
142
132
127
146
10
PERCENT
5%
8%
5%
7%
7%
7%
8%
6%
0%
7%
7%
8%
8%
8%
9%
1%
1 of 31
AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (2016 - 17)
ATTENDANCE (2015 - 16)
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2015 - 16)
TEACHER TURNOVER RATE (2015-16 TO 2016-17)
TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS (2016 - 17)
GROUP
COMMON BRANCH
GRADE 8 ENGLISH
GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS
GRADE 8 SCIENCE
GRADE 8 SOCIAL STUDIES
GRADE 10 ENGLISH
GRADE 10 MATHEMATICS
GRADE 10 SCIENCE
GRADE 10 SOCIAL STUDIES
CLASS SIZE
20
24
24
24
24
22
23
17
20
FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2016 - 17)ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
610 38%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
130 8%
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE94%
63 4%
TURNOVER RATE OF TEACHERS WITH FEWER THAN FIVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
15%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
14%
STAFF COUNTS (2016 - 17)GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
5
1
12
55
TOTAL TEACHERS 138
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE 0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE 1%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 10%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE 3%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CLASSES 505
PERCENT TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATION 2%
2 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
38% 39%
22%
1%
23%28% 29%
36%
7%
43%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
133
117
16
GRADUATES (REGENTS + LOCAL DIPLOMAS)
128
117
11
REGENTS DIPLOMA
117 91%
114 97%
3 27%
GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
36 28%
36 31%
0 0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
25 20%
24 21%
1 9%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
11 9%
3 3%
8 73%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5 4%
0 0%
5 31%
HIGH SCHOOL NON-COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
DROPPED OUT
25 5%
19 4%
6 9%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION
PROGRAM
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25 5%
19 4%
6 9%
POST-GRADUATION PLANS OF COMPLETERS (2016 - 17)GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
39 29%
39 33%
0 0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
49 37%
45 38%
4 25%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1 1%
0 0%
1 6%
TO THE MILITARY
5 4%
5 4%
0 0%
GROUP
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
TO EMPLOYMENT
28 21%
21 18%
7 44%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1 1%
0 0%
1 6%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
1 1%
0 0%
1 6%
PLANS UNKNOWN
9 7%
7 6%
2 13%
GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 296
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
GROUP
95
84
11
2
1
89
3
6
43
52
TOTAL TESTED
23%
26%
0%
_%
_%
24%
_%
17%
28%
19%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
36 38%
25 30%
11 100%
_ _
_ _
32 36%
_ _
4 67%
16 37%
20 38%
LEVEL 2
37 39%
37 44%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
36 40%
_ _
1 17%
15 35%
22 42%
LEVEL 3
21 22%
21 25%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
20 22%
_ _
1 17%
12 28%
9 17%
LEVEL 4
1 1%
1 1%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
1 1%
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
1 2%
3 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
24%
57%
14%5% 19%
24%
35%
25%
16%
41%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
36%43%
15% 6%21%
33% 32%
22%
13%
35%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
95
53
42
95
23%
19%
29%
23%
36 38%
23 43%
13 31%
36 38%
37 39%
20 38%
17 40%
37 39%
21 22%
10 19%
11 26%
21 22%
1 1%
0 0%
1 2%
1 1%
GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 297
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
111
102
9
1
1
4
105
6
63
48
111
64
47
111
TOTAL TESTED
19%
21%
0%
_%
_%
_%
19%
17%
16%
23%
19%
11%
30%
19%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
27 24%
20 20%
7 78%
_ _
_ _
_ _
25 24%
2 33%
19 30%
8 17%
27 24%
22 34%
5 11%
27 24%
LEVEL 2
63 57%
61 60%
2 22%
_ _
_ _
_ _
60 57%
3 50%
34 54%
29 60%
63 57%
35 55%
28 60%
63 57%
LEVEL 3
15 14%
15 15%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
14 13%
1 17%
8 13%
7 15%
15 14%
7 11%
8 17%
15 14%
LEVEL 4
6 5%
6 6%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 6%
0 0%
2 3%
4 8%
6 5%
0 0%
6 13%
6 5%
GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 295
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
GROUP
116
97
19
3
3
9
99
2
8
48
TOTAL TESTED
21%
25%
0%
_%
_%
44%
20%
_%
0%
33%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
42 36%
27 28%
15 79%
_ _
_ _
4 44%
35 35%
_ _
3 38%
15 31%
LEVEL 2
50 43%
46 47%
4 21%
_ _
_ _
1 11%
44 44%
_ _
5 63%
17 35%
LEVEL 3
17 15%
17 18%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
3 33%
14 14%
_ _
0 0%
12 25%
LEVEL 4
7 6%
7 7%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
1 11%
6 6%
_ _
0 0%
4 8%
4 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
29%
48%
11% 12%
22%29%
39%
16% 16%
32%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
25%
43%
25%
7%
32%
22%
36%29%
13%
42%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
68
116
63
53
116
12%
21%
6%
38%
21%
27 40%
42 36%
29 46%
13 25%
42 36%
33 49%
50 43%
30 48%
20 38%
50 43%
5 7%
17 15%
4 6%
13 25%
17 15%
3 4%
7 6%
0 0%
7 13%
7 6%
GRADE 6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 297
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
85
75
10
2
1
5
76
1
9
41
44
85
48
37
85
TOTAL TESTED
22%
24%
10%
_%
_%
_%
21%
_%
33%
27%
18%
22%
15%
32%
22%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
25 29%
18 24%
7 70%
_ _
_ _
_ _
22 29%
_ _
3 33%
11 27%
14 32%
25 29%
16 33%
9 24%
25 29%
LEVEL 2
41 48%
39 52%
2 20%
_ _
_ _
_ _
38 50%
_ _
3 33%
19 46%
22 50%
41 48%
25 52%
16 43%
41 48%
LEVEL 3
9 11%
8 11%
1 10%
_ _
_ _
_ _
6 8%
_ _
3 33%
5 12%
4 9%
9 11%
3 6%
6 16%
9 11%
LEVEL 4
10 12%
10 13%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
10 13%
_ _
0 0%
6 15%
4 9%
10 12%
4 8%
6 16%
10 12%
GRADE 7 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 297
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
GROUP
102
80
22
1
1
1
98
1
TOTAL TESTED
32%
40%
5%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
25 25%
13 16%
12 55%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
LEVEL 2
44 43%
35 44%
9 41%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
LEVEL 3
26 25%
25 31%
1 5%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
LEVEL 4
7 7%
7 9%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
31%39%
25%6%
30%
21%
33% 30%
15%
45%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
24%
40%
21%15%
36%
25% 27% 25% 23%
48%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
102
49
53
100
2
49
53
102
32%
35%
30%
_%
_%
18%
45%
32%
25 25%
7 14%
18 34%
_ _
_ _
18 37%
7 13%
25 25%
44 43%
25 51%
19 36%
_ _
_ _
22 45%
22 42%
44 43%
26 25%
11 22%
15 28%
_ _
_ _
8 16%
18 34%
26 25%
7 7%
6 12%
1 2%
_ _
_ _
1 2%
6 11%
7 7%
GRADE 8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
MEAN SCORE: 294
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
109
98
11
2
1
5
99
2
5
49
60
109
54
55
109
TOTAL TESTED
30%
33%
9%
_%
_%
0%
32%
_%
20%
37%
25%
30%
22%
38%
30%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
34 31%
24 24%
10 91%
_ _
_ _
2 40%
31 31%
_ _
1 20%
11 22%
23 38%
34 31%
23 43%
11 20%
34 31%
LEVEL 2
42 39%
42 43%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
3 60%
36 36%
_ _
3 60%
20 41%
22 37%
42 39%
19 35%
23 42%
42 39%
LEVEL 3
27 25%
26 27%
1 9%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
27 27%
_ _
0 0%
13 27%
14 23%
27 25%
9 17%
18 33%
27 25%
LEVEL 4
6 6%
6 6%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
5 5%
_ _
1 20%
5 10%
1 2%
6 6%
3 6%
3 5%
6 6%
GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS
MEAN SCORE: 303
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
GROUP
95
83
12
1
1
TOTAL TESTED
36%
41%
0%
_%
_%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
23 24%
12 14%
11 92%
_ _
_ _
LEVEL 2
38 40%
37 45%
1 8%
_ _
_ _
LEVEL 3
20 21%
20 24%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
LEVEL 4
14 15%
14 17%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
6 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
39% 41%
10% 10%
20%27% 30%
22% 21%
43%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
39% 38%
21%
2%
22%
32%25% 27%
16%
43%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
90
3
5
42
53
95
52
43
95
36%
_%
40%
17%
51%
36%
29%
44%
36%
20 22%
_ _
3 60%
12 29%
11 21%
23 24%
15 29%
8 19%
23 24%
38 42%
_ _
0 0%
23 55%
15 28%
38 40%
22 42%
16 37%
38 40%
19 21%
_ _
1 20%
4 10%
16 30%
20 21%
9 17%
11 26%
20 21%
13 14%
_ _
1 20%
3 7%
11 21%
14 15%
6 12%
8 19%
14 15%
GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS
MEAN SCORE: 290
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
108
99
9
1
1
3
103
5
60
48
108
63
45
108
TOTAL TESTED
20%
22%
0%
_%
_%
_%
20%
20%
8%
35%
20%
6%
40%
20%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
42 39%
34 34%
8 89%
_ _
_ _
_ _
39 38%
3 60%
28 47%
14 29%
42 39%
32 51%
10 22%
42 39%
LEVEL 2
44 41%
43 43%
1 11%
_ _
_ _
_ _
43 42%
1 20%
27 45%
17 35%
44 41%
27 43%
17 38%
44 41%
LEVEL 3
11 10%
11 11%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
11 11%
0 0%
3 5%
8 17%
11 10%
4 6%
7 16%
11 10%
LEVEL 4
11 10%
11 11%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
10 10%
1 20%
2 3%
9 19%
11 10%
0 0%
11 24%
11 10%
GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS
MEAN SCORE: 296
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
GROUP
112
94
18
3
TOTAL TESTED
22%
27%
0%
_%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
44 39%
28 30%
16 89%
_ _
LEVEL 2
43 38%
41 44%
2 11%
_ _
LEVEL 3
23 21%
23 24%
0 0%
_ _
LEVEL 4
2 2%
2 2%
0 0%
_ _
7 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
15
30
45
60
17%
52%
18%13%
31%30% 30%
19% 21%
40%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0
10
20
30
4036%
39%
20%
5%
25%
33%29%
24%
14%
38%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
2
7
99
1
6
45
67
112
59
53
112
_%
29%
21%
_%
33%
22%
22%
22%
15%
30%
22%
_ _
4 57%
39 39%
_ _
1 17%
16 36%
28 42%
44 39%
28 47%
16 30%
44 39%
_ _
1 14%
39 39%
_ _
3 50%
19 42%
24 36%
43 38%
22 37%
21 40%
43 38%
_ _
2 29%
20 20%
_ _
1 17%
9 20%
14 21%
23 21%
9 15%
14 26%
23 21%
_ _
0 0%
1 1%
_ _
1 17%
1 2%
1 1%
2 2%
0 0%
2 4%
2 2%
GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS
MEAN SCORE: 305
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
84
74
10
2
1
4
76
1
8
40
44
84
47
37
84
TOTAL TESTED
31%
34%
10%
_%
_%
_%
32%
_%
25%
28%
34%
31%
23%
41%
31%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
14 17%
10 14%
4 40%
_ _
_ _
_ _
12 16%
_ _
2 25%
6 15%
8 18%
14 17%
8 17%
6 16%
14 17%
LEVEL 2
44 52%
39 53%
5 50%
_ _
_ _
_ _
40 53%
_ _
4 50%
23 58%
21 48%
44 52%
28 60%
16 43%
44 52%
LEVEL 3
15 18%
14 19%
1 10%
_ _
_ _
_ _
14 18%
_ _
1 13%
5 13%
10 23%
15 18%
6 13%
9 24%
15 18%
LEVEL 4
11 13%
11 15%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
10 13%
_ _
1 13%
6 15%
5 11%
11 13%
5 11%
6 16%
11 13%
GRADE 7 MATHEMATICSMean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.
For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu
of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 299
GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4
8 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0.0
12.5
25.0
37.5
50.0
38% 36%
6% 20%25%
30% 27%
16%
27%
43%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
95
76
19
1
1
1
92
95
45
50
93
2
43
52
95
25%
32%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
25%
27%
24%
_%
_%
14%
35%
25%
34 36%
21 28%
13 68%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
34 36%
18 40%
16 32%
_ _
_ _
24 56%
10 19%
34 36%
37 39%
31 41%
6 32%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
37 39%
15 33%
22 44%
_ _
_ _
13 30%
24 46%
37 39%
19 20%
19 25%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
19 20%
9 20%
10 20%
_ _
_ _
5 12%
14 27%
19 20%
5 5%
5 7%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 5%
3 7%
2 4%
_ _
_ _
1 2%
4 8%
5 5%
GRADE 8 MATHEMATICSMean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.
For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu
of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 280
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
80
69
11
1
3
75
1
5
34
46
80
44
36
80
TOTAL TESTED
5%
6%
0%
_%
_%
5%
_%
0%
0%
9%
5%
5%
6%
5%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
39 49%
29 42%
10 91%
_ _
_ _
37 49%
_ _
2 40%
16 47%
23 50%
39 49%
23 52%
16 44%
39 49%
LEVEL 2
37 46%
36 52%
1 9%
_ _
_ _
34 45%
_ _
3 60%
18 53%
19 41%
37 46%
19 43%
18 50%
37 46%
LEVEL 3
4 5%
4 6%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
4 5%
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
4 9%
4 5%
2 5%
2 6%
4 5%
LEVEL 4
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS MATH TEST
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
ALL STUDENTS
GROUP
22
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
0 0%
LEVEL 2
0 0%
LEVEL 3
2 9%
4 & ABOVE
20 91%
3 & ABOVE
22 100%
9 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
3% 6%
47% 44%
91%
4%10% 33%
53%
86%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
GRADE 4 SCIENCE
MEAN SCORE: 81
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
112
103
9
1
1
4
106
6
63
49
112
65
47
112
TOTAL TESTED
91%
94%
56%
_%
_%
_%
91%
100%
87%
96%
91%
86%
98%
91%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
3 3%
0 0%
3 33%
_ _
_ _
_ _
3 3%
0 0%
1 2%
2 4%
3 3%
3 5%
0 0%
3 3%
LEVEL 2
7 6%
6 6%
1 11%
_ _
_ _
_ _
7 7%
0 0%
7 11%
0 0%
7 6%
6 9%
1 2%
7 6%
LEVEL 3
53 47%
49 48%
4 44%
_ _
_ _
_ _
50 47%
3 50%
32 51%
21 43%
53 47%
32 49%
21 45%
53 47%
LEVEL 4
49 44%
48 47%
1 11%
_ _
_ _
_ _
46 43%
3 50%
23 37%
26 53%
49 44%
24 37%
25 53%
49 44%
10 of 31
District:2017
Statewide:2017
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
4%18%
50%
28%
78%
10%21%
39%29%
68%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
READING
MATHEMATICS
GRADE 8 SCIENCEData in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 75
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
116
106
10
2
1
4
107
2
9
54
62
116
56
60
116
TOTAL TESTED
78%
82%
30%
_%
_%
_%
79%
_%
56%
78%
77%
78%
66%
88%
78%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
5 4%
4 4%
1 10%
_ _
_ _
_ _
2 2%
_ _
3 33%
4 7%
1 2%
5 4%
3 5%
2 3%
5 4%
LEVEL 2
21 18%
15 14%
6 60%
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 19%
_ _
1 11%
8 15%
13 21%
21 18%
16 29%
5 8%
21 18%
LEVEL 3
58 50%
55 52%
3 30%
_ _
_ _
_ _
56 52%
_ _
2 22%
28 52%
30 48%
58 50%
25 45%
33 55%
58 50%
LEVEL 4
32 28%
32 30%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
29 27%
_ _
3 33%
14 26%
18 29%
32 28%
12 21%
20 33%
32 28%
STATEWIDE RESULTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS: NAEP (2016 - 17)
GRADE: 4
ALL STUDENTS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
GROUP
32%
68%
*%
18%
48%
45%
22%
*%
74%
44%
BELOW BASIC
32%
22%
*%
30%
34%
33%
31%
*%
21%
33%
BASIC
27%
9%
*%
33%
16%
18%
35%
*%
5%
19%
PROFICIENT
9%
2%
*%
19%
3%
4%
13%
*%
*%
4%
ADVANCED
98
93
88
PARTICIPATION RATE
ALL STUDENTS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
GROUP
24%
58%
BELOW BASIC
41%
31%
BASIC
30%
10%
PROFICIENT
5%
1%
ADVANCED
98
94
PARTICIPATION RATE
11 of 31
READING
MATHEMATICS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
*%
11%
36%
36%
14%
*%
68%
34%
*%
30%
42%
44%
40%
*%
29%
43%
*%
44%
21%
18%
38%
*%
3%
21%
*%
15%
2%
2%
7%
*%
*%
2%
91
GRADE: 8
ALL STUDENTS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
GROUP
27%
58%
*%
21%
39%
35%
20%
*%
81%
37%
BELOW BASIC
39%
33%
*%
31%
41%
43%
38%
*%
16%
41%
BASIC
30%
8%
*%
37%
19%
21%
36%
*%
3%
20%
PROFICIENT
5%
*%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
2%
ADVANCED
98
94
80
PARTICIPATION RATE
ALL STUDENTS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…
GROUP
32%
69%
*%
14%
53%
48%
21%
*%
80%
44%
BELOW BASIC
34%
23%
*%
24%
32%
33%
37%
*%
16%
34%
BASIC
24%
6%
*%
32%
14%
15%
29%
*%
4%
17%
PROFICIENT
10%
2%
*%
30%
2%
4%
13%
*%
1%
4%
ADVANCED
98
95
80
PARTICIPATION RATE
12 of 31
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
2%8% 27%
49%
76%
3% 3% 20%
65%
85%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
3%16%
63%
11%
74%
3% 7%
55%
30%
85%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGEARTS AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
160
137
23
5
4
2
147
2
8
88
72
160
73
87
160
TOTAL TESTED
76%
85%
22%
100%
_%
_%
74%
_%
88%
83%
67%
76%
55%
93%
76%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
3 2%
1 1%
2 9%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
3 2%
_ _
0 0%
2 2%
1 1%
3 2%
2 3%
1 1%
3 2%
LEVEL 2
12 8%
5 4%
7 30%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
11 7%
_ _
1 13%
4 5%
8 11%
12 8%
10 14%
2 2%
12 8%
LEVEL 3
43 27%
38 28%
5 22%
2 40%
_ _
_ _
37 25%
_ _
4 50%
26 30%
17 24%
43 27%
21 29%
22 25%
43 27%
LEVEL 4
78 49%
78 57%
0 0%
3 60%
_ _
_ _
72 49%
_ _
3 38%
47 53%
31 43%
78 49%
19 26%
59 68%
78 49%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS AFTERFOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
160
137
23
5
4
2
147
2
8
88
72
160
73
87
TOTAL TESTED
74%
82%
30%
100%
_%
_%
73%
_%
88%
80%
68%
74%
55%
91%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
5 3%
3 2%
2 9%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
5 3%
_ _
0 0%
1 1%
4 6%
5 3%
5 7%
0 0%
LEVEL 2
25 16%
18 13%
7 30%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
24 16%
_ _
1 13%
10 11%
15 21%
25 16%
19 26%
6 7%
LEVEL 3
101 63%
94 69%
7 30%
3 60%
_ _
_ _
92 63%
_ _
6 75%
61 69%
40 56%
101 63%
37 51%
64 74%
LEVEL 4
18 11%
18 13%
0 0%
2 40%
_ _
_ _
15 10%
_ _
1 13%
9 10%
9 13%
18 11%
3 4%
15 17%
13 of 31
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
9% 6%
47%
24%
71%
5% 6%
43%34%
78%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
2% 3% 28%
52%
80%
3% 4% 32%
48%
81%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
NOT MIGRANT 160 74% 5 3% 25 16% 101 63% 18 11%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL GLOBAL HISTORY ANDGEOGRAPHY AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
160
137
23
5
4
2
147
2
8
88
72
160
73
87
160
TOTAL TESTED
71%
81%
13%
100%
_%
_%
71%
_%
63%
73%
69%
71%
49%
90%
71%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
15 9%
5 4%
10 43%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
15 10%
_ _
0 0%
7 8%
8 11%
15 9%
10 14%
5 6%
15 9%
LEVEL 2
10 6%
7 5%
3 13%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
7 5%
_ _
3 38%
8 9%
2 3%
10 6%
7 10%
3 3%
10 6%
LEVEL 3
75 47%
72 53%
3 13%
2 40%
_ _
_ _
70 48%
_ _
3 38%
46 52%
29 40%
75 47%
33 45%
42 48%
75 47%
LEVEL 4
39 24%
39 28%
0 0%
3 60%
_ _
_ _
34 23%
_ _
2 25%
18 20%
21 29%
39 24%
3 4%
36 41%
39 24%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL U.S. HISTORY ANDGOVERNMENT AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
160
137
23
5
4
2
147
2
8
88
72
160
73
TOTAL TESTED
80%
88%
35%
100%
_%
_%
78%
_%
100%
83%
76%
80%
62%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
3 2%
0 0%
3 13%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
3 2%
_ _
0 0%
1 1%
2 3%
3 2%
3 4%
LEVEL 2
4 3%
1 1%
3 13%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
4 3%
_ _
0 0%
2 2%
2 3%
4 3%
3 4%
LEVEL 3
45 28%
37 27%
8 35%
1 20%
_ _
_ _
41 28%
_ _
3 38%
28 32%
17 24%
45 28%
21 29%
LEVEL 4
83 52%
83 61%
0 0%
4 80%
_ _
_ _
74 50%
_ _
5 63%
45 51%
38 53%
83 52%
24 33%
14 of 31
District:2013Cohort
Statewide:2013Cohort
1 2 3 4 3-40
25
50
75
100
4% 5%
47%35%
82%
3% 5%
45%38%
84%
Percentage Scoring at Levels
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
87
160
95%
80%
0 0%
3 2%
1 1%
4 3%
24 28%
45 28%
59 68%
83 52%
TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE AFTER FOURYEARS OF INSTRUCTION
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
160
137
23
5
4
2
147
2
8
88
72
160
73
87
160
TOTAL TESTED
82%
91%
26%
100%
_%
_%
81%
_%
88%
86%
76%
82%
66%
95%
82%
PROFICIENT LEVEL 1
7 4%
2 1%
5 22%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
6 4%
_ _
1 13%
2 2%
5 7%
7 4%
5 7%
2 2%
7 4%
LEVEL 2
8 5%
3 2%
5 22%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
8 5%
_ _
0 0%
4 5%
4 6%
8 5%
7 10%
1 1%
8 5%
LEVEL 3
75 47%
69 50%
6 26%
3 60%
_ _
_ _
67 46%
_ _
5 63%
50 57%
25 35%
75 47%
36 49%
39 45%
75 47%
LEVEL 4
56 35%
56 41%
0 0%
2 40%
_ _
_ _
52 35%
_ _
2 25%
26 30%
30 42%
56 35%
12 16%
44 51%
56 35%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
154
135
19
3
2
147
2
7
65
89
154
64
90
154
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
9 6%
3 2%
6 32%
_ _
_ _
9 6%
_ _
0 0%
2 3%
7 8%
9 6%
4 6%
5 6%
9 6%
LEVEL 2
14 9%
5 4%
9 47%
_ _
_ _
13 9%
_ _
1 14%
2 3%
12 13%
14 9%
9 14%
5 6%
14 9%
LEVEL 3
51 33%
47 35%
4 21%
_ _
_ _
50 34%
_ _
1 14%
18 28%
33 37%
51 33%
28 44%
23 26%
51 33%
LEVEL 4
24 16%
24 18%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
21 14%
_ _
3 43%
14 22%
10 11%
24 16%
9 14%
15 17%
24 16%
LEVEL 5
56 36%
56 41%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
54 37%
_ _
2 29%
29 45%
27 30%
56 36%
14 22%
42 47%
56 36%
15 of 31
REGENTS ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY
ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
5
5
1
4
5
3
2
5
1
4
5
TOTAL TESTED 55
1 20%
1 20%
_ _
_ _
1 20%
_ _
_ _
1 20%
_ _
_ _
1 20%
65
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
85
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
16 of 31
ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)
REGENTS COMMON CORE GEOMETRY
ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
195
170
25
3
2
6
181
3
8
80
115
194
1
89
106
195
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
27 14%
21 12%
6 24%
_ _
_ _
3 50%
24 13%
_ _
0 0%
7 9%
20 17%
_ _
_ _
20 22%
7 7%
27 14%
LEVEL 2
35 18%
24 14%
11 44%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
34 19%
_ _
1 13%
8 10%
27 23%
_ _
_ _
23 26%
12 11%
35 18%
LEVEL 3
90 46%
82 48%
8 32%
_ _
_ _
3 50%
83 46%
_ _
4 50%
41 51%
49 43%
_ _
_ _
35 39%
55 52%
90 46%
LEVEL 4
26 13%
26 15%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
25 14%
_ _
1 13%
14 18%
12 10%
_ _
_ _
8 9%
18 17%
26 13%
LEVEL 5
17 9%
17 10%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
15 8%
_ _
2 25%
10 13%
7 6%
_ _
_ _
3 3%
14 13%
17 9%
COMMON CORE GEOMETRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
108
103
5
1
1
2
102
2
6
55
53
108
37
71
108
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
21 19%
19 18%
2 40%
_ _
_ _
_ _
19 19%
_ _
2 33%
10 18%
11 21%
21 19%
11 30%
10 14%
21 19%
LEVEL 2
32 30%
30 29%
2 40%
_ _
_ _
_ _
31 30%
_ _
1 17%
14 25%
18 34%
32 30%
12 32%
20 28%
32 30%
LEVEL 3
45 42%
44 43%
1 20%
_ _
_ _
_ _
43 42%
_ _
2 33%
24 44%
21 40%
45 42%
11 30%
34 48%
45 42%
LEVEL 4
9 8%
9 9%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
8 8%
_ _
1 17%
6 11%
3 6%
9 8%
2 5%
7 10%
9 8%
LEVEL 5
1 1%
1 1%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
1 1%
_ _
0 0%
1 2%
0 0%
1 1%
1 3%
0 0%
1 1%
17 of 31
ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)
REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY
ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
49
49
1
48
49
27
22
49
7
42
49
TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1
1 2%
1 2%
_ _
_ _
1 2%
1 4%
0 0%
1 2%
0 0%
1 2%
1 2%
LEVEL 2
5 10%
5 10%
_ _
_ _
5 10%
3 11%
2 9%
5 10%
1 14%
4 10%
5 10%
LEVEL 3
33 67%
33 67%
_ _
_ _
33 67%
17 63%
16 73%
33 67%
6 86%
27 64%
33 67%
LEVEL 4
10 20%
10 20%
_ _
_ _
10 20%
6 22%
4 18%
10 20%
0 0%
10 24%
10 20%
LEVEL 5
0 0%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
178
154
24
1
5
170
2
8
78
100
178
82
96
178
TOTAL TESTED 55
154 87%
144 94%
10 42%
_ _
_ _
148 87%
_ _
6 75%
71 91%
83 83%
154 87%
64 78%
90 94%
154 87%
65
123 69%
120 78%
3 13%
_ _
_ _
117 69%
_ _
6 75%
57 73%
66 66%
123 69%
50 61%
73 76%
123 69%
85
37 21%
37 24%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
36 21%
_ _
1 13%
16 21%
21 21%
37 21%
7 9%
30 31%
37 21%
18 of 31
REGENTS U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT
REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT
U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
146
133
13
1
3
1
139
2
7
64
82
145
1
56
90
146
TOTAL TESTED 55
142 97%
131 98%
11 85%
_ _
_ _
_ _
135 97%
_ _
7 100%
62 97%
80 98%
_ _
_ _
55 98%
87 97%
142 97%
65
128 88%
121 91%
7 54%
_ _
_ _
_ _
122 88%
_ _
6 86%
57 89%
71 87%
_ _
_ _
46 82%
82 91%
128 88%
85
76 52%
75 56%
1 8%
_ _
_ _
_ _
72 52%
_ _
4 57%
34 53%
42 51%
_ _
_ _
19 34%
57 63%
76 52%
LIVING ENVIRONMENT
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
147
119
28
2
2
4
137
2
10
64
83
147
72
75
147
TOTAL TESTED 55
128 87%
112 94%
16 57%
_ _
_ _
_ _
119 87%
_ _
9 90%
58 91%
70 84%
128 87%
61 85%
67 89%
128 87%
65
122 83%
110 92%
12 43%
_ _
_ _
_ _
114 83%
_ _
8 80%
56 88%
66 80%
122 83%
57 79%
65 87%
122 83%
85
40 27%
37 31%
3 11%
_ _
_ _
_ _
36 26%
_ _
4 40%
19 30%
21 25%
40 27%
15 21%
25 33%
40 27%
19 of 31
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY
PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
93
84
9
2
2
89
93
38
55
93
39
54
93
TOTAL TESTED 55
86 92%
81 96%
5 56%
_ _
_ _
_ _
86 92%
36 95%
50 91%
86 92%
36 92%
50 93%
86 92%
65
77 83%
74 88%
3 33%
_ _
_ _
_ _
77 83%
31 82%
46 84%
77 83%
33 85%
44 81%
77 83%
85
17 18%
17 20%
0 0%
_ _
_ _
_ _
17 18%
8 21%
9 16%
17 18%
4 10%
13 24%
17 18%
PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
56
55
1
1
1
54
56
31
25
56
11
45
56
TOTAL TESTED 55
51 91%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
51 91%
29 94%
22 88%
51 91%
10 91%
41 91%
51 91%
65
37 66%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
37 66%
22 71%
15 60%
37 66%
8 73%
29 64%
37 66%
85
3 5%
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
3 5%
2 6%
1 4%
3 5%
0 0%
3 7%
3 5%
20 of 31
REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS
PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
SMALL GROUP TOTAL
FEMALE
MALE
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
26
26
1
1
24
26
14
12
26
2
24
26
TOTAL TESTED 55
26 100%
26 100%
_ _
_ _
_ _
26 100%
14 100%
12 100%
26 100%
_ _
_ _
26 100%
65
20 77%
20 77%
_ _
_ _
_ _
20 77%
12 86%
8 67%
20 77%
_ _
_ _
20 77%
85
5 19%
5 19%
_ _
_ _
_ _
5 19%
3 21%
2 17%
5 19%
_ _
_ _
5 19%
NEW YORK STATE ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (NYSAA) RESULTS (2016 - 17)
GRADE 3 ELA
GRADE 3 MATH
GRADE 4 ELA
GRADE 4 MATH
GRADE 5 ELA
GRADE 5 MATH
GRADE 6 ELA
GRADE 6 MATH
GRADE 7 ELA
GRADE 7 MATH
GRADE 8 ELA
GRADE 8 MATH
GRADE 8 SCIENCE
SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH
SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE
SECONDARY-LEVEL SOCIAL STUDIES
GROUP
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
1
1
TOTAL TESTED
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
NEW YORK STATE ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST (NYSESLAT) RESULTS (2016 - 17)
KINDERGARTEN
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
GROUP
2
2
TOTAL TESTED
_
_
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
GRADE 1
ALL STUDENTS
GROUP
3
TOTAL TESTED
_
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
21 of 31
GENERAL EDUCATION 3 _ _ _ _ _
GRADE 7
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
GROUP
2
1
1
TOTAL TESTED
_
_
_
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
GRADE 9
ALL STUDENTS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
GROUP
1
1
TOTAL TESTED
_
_
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
GRADE 11
ALL STUDENTS
GENERAL EDUCATION
GROUP
1
1
TOTAL TESTED
_
_
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
TESTED 95%
1,461*
0
10
25
9
1,352*
11
215*
2
777*
STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
84%*
―
―
―
―
83%*
―
87%*
―
86%*
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
609
0
6
21
9
564
9
93✝
2
331
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
96
―
―
―
―
97
―
45✝
―
78
PI
107
―
―
―
―
119
―
75
―
96
EAMO
107
―
―
―
―
107
―
58
―
90
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
GROUP
1,461*
1,444*
1,409*
1,441*
55
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
84%*
84%*
83%*
83%*
95%
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
609
603
588
600
45
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
96
96
96
96
80
PI
22 of 31
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
1,441*
1,246*
1,455*
684*
757*
704*
0
1,460*
84%*
83%*
84%*
81%*
84%*
84%*
―
84%*
600
519
607
278
322
287
0
609
97
105
96
117
89
103
―
96
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
TESTED 95%
1,465*
0
9
24
9
1,358*
11
216*
2
778*
STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
82%*
―
―
―
―
82%*
―
86%*
―
81%*
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
585
0
4
17
9
549
6
89✝
2
310
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
96
―
―
―
―
96
―
40✝
―
78
PI
104
―
―
―
―
116
―
75
―
94
EAMO
104
―
―
―
―
114
―
57
―
94
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
1,465*
1,449*
1,414*
1,445*
107*
1,445*
1,249*
1,459*
687*
759*
706*
0
1,464*
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
82%*
82%*
82%*
81%*
76%*
82%*
81%*
81%*
82%*
82%*
81%*
―
81%*
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
585
581
568
576
36
579
499
583
275
311
274
0
585
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
96
96
97
95
94
96
105
96
116
102
88
―
96
PI
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with
23 of 31
another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
TESTED 80%
242
0
2
8
3
227
2
24
0
132
STUDENTS
ENROLLED DURING
THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION
PERIOD
95%
―
―
―
―
95%
―
―
―
93%
PERCENT OF
ENROLLED
STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
PI >= EAMO OR
PROGRESS TARGET
221
0
1
6
3
209
2
22
0
119
TESTED STUDENTS
ENROLLED ON BEDS
DAY
181
―
―
―
―
183
―
―
―
172
PI
182
―
―
―
―
187
―
―
―
173
EAMO
182
―
―
―
―
187
―
―
―
173
PROGRESS TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
242
240
234
239
15
240
218
242
110
119
123
0
242
STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST
ADMINISTRATION PERIOD
95%
95%
95%
95%
―
95%
96%
95%
98%
95%
96%
―
95%
PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
221
220
215
218
12
219
199
221
102
109
112
0
221
TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY
181
181
182
181
―
182
186
181
191
183
179
―
181
PI
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
GROUP
NO
MADE AYP
YES
TESTED 95%
140
12TH GRADERS
99%
PERCENT OF 12TH
GRADERS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
135
2013
ACCOUNTABILITY
COHORT MEMBERS
143
PI
169
EAMO
146
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
24 of 31
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
0
5
2
5
126
2
17
0
55
―
―
―
―
98%
―
―
―
98%
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
0
3
2
5
123
2
14
0
50
―
―
―
―
143
―
―
―
108
―
―
―
―
177
―
―
―
155
―
―
―
―
147
―
―
―
117
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
140
135
138
135
14
138
123
140
85
63
77
0
140
12TH GRADERS
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
99%
97%
100%
―
99%
PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID
TEST SCORES
135
132
133
130
12
133
121
135
85
59
76
0
135
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS
143
144
143
142
―
143
157
143
164
129
154
―
143
PI
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
TESTED 95%
140
0
5
2
5
126
2
17
0
55
12TH GRADERS
99%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
―
―
98%
PERCENT OF 12TH
GRADERS WITH
VALID TEST SCORES
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
PI >= EAMO OR SAFE
HARBOR TARGET
135
0
3
2
5
123
2
14
0
50
2013
ACCOUNTABILITY
COHORT MEMBERS
110
―
―
―
―
108
―
―
―
84
PI
156
―
―
―
―
166
―
―
―
141
EAMO
126
―
―
―
―
127
―
―
―
104
SAFE HARBOR
TARGET
RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TO25 of 31
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
DETERMINE AYP.
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP
140
135
138
135
14
138
123
140
85
63
77
0
140
12TH GRADERS
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
99%
97%
100%
―
99%
PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID
TEST SCORES
135
132
133
130
12
133
121
135
85
59
76
0
135
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS
110
110
110
109
―
111
119
110
126
98
120
―
110
PI
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
96
―
―
―
―
97
―
45
―
78
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI
96
―
―
―
―
96
―
40
―
78
ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI
143
―
―
―
―
143
―
―
―
108
SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI
110
―
―
―
―
108
―
―
―
84
SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI
111
0
0
0
0
111
0
43
0
87
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
OVERALL GRADUATION RATE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
MADE AYP
26 of 31
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
―
―
NO
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
27 of 31
FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:
153
0
5
6
1
140
1
17
0
66
2012 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL
COHORT
78%
―
―
―
―
79%
―
―
―
67%
GRADUATION RATE
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
STATE STANDARD
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
72%
PROGRESS TARGET
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
28 of 31
FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
ALL STUDENTS
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
GROUP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:
137
2
1
2
2
130
0
14
0
65
2011 FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL
COHORT
85%
―
―
―
―
87%
―
―
―
75%
GRADUATION RATE
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
STATE STANDARD
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
77%
PROGRESS TARGET
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
29 of 31
GRADUATION RATES FOR NON-AYP GROUPS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…
NOT WHITE
NOT MULTIRACIAL
GENERAL EDUCATION
ENGLISH PROFICIENT
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
MALE
FEMALE
MIGRANT
NOT MIGRANT
GROUP FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT
153
148
147
152
13
152
136
153
87
77
76
0
153
2012 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT
78%
79%
78%
78%
―
78%
85%
78%
87%
75%
82%
―
78%
GRADUATION RATE
FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT
135
136
135
135
7
137
123
137
72
67
70
0
137
2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT
86%
86%
85%
86%
―
85%
91%
85%
94%
84%
87%
―
85%
GRADUATION RATE
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
30 of 31
© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: MAY 2, 2018, 9:37 AM EST
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (THIS DISTRICT) 22%
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (STATEWIDE) 31%
PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE NO
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (THIS DISTRICT) 12%
REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (STATEWIDE) 5%
PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE YES
31 of 31