20
Rotational Compressor Valve Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr.

Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

Rotational Compressor Valve

Group 18:Alejandro Castro

Sam LeutholdAndrew Borger

GE Sponsor: Todd HopwoodFaculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

Page 2: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

2

OverviewApplicationProblem StatementProject ScopeFinal Design(Initial)Problems EncounteredFinal DesignCurrent ProgressTestingPotential IssuesModified Future ScopeSummary

Page 3: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

3

Application

Page 4: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

4

Current Valves

Valve Stop

Valve Shutter

Valve Seat

Valve Springs

Plate Valves Poppet Valves

Page 5: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

5

Problem StatementReciprocating compressors move large

volumes of natural gas Current compressor valves are reliable but

inefficientInefficiencies caused from indirect flow pathProject Goal: Obtain direct flow with a

rotational type valve

Page 6: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

6

Project ScopeMust operate in a rotational manner and

obtain direct flowOperate at pressures between 30 psi and 600

psiMaterials must be able to withstand

temperatures approaching 350FModifiable to fit all current gas compressors

used by G.E.Is to be easily replaced$2000 budget

Page 7: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

7

Final Design(initial)

Gas Flow

Page 8: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

8

Problems Encountered Machining of the threads on the outer

housing would have been overly complicated A separate threaded insert needed to be

designed Thickness of back plate needed to be

minimized to be easily milledPrototype materials have been changed from

production materials due to cost

Page 9: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

9

Final Design(Modified)

Gas Flow

Page 10: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

10

Current Progress(update)Final design changes have been made for

ease of machiningValve machining in progressMaterials for test rig in process of being

ordered: $438.43Materials for flow visualization have been

ordered: $243.67

Page 11: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

11

Test Rig

≈ 50 psi

≈ 50 psi

Page 12: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

12

Test Rig

≈ 50 psi

Page 13: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

13

Wind-Tunnel Smoke Wire TestA simplified acrylic model will allow flow

visualization through entire valve

Page 14: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

14

Potential IssuesValve does not completely openTest conditions are not the same as operating

conditionsThread and/or pin binding Machining tolerances

Page 15: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

15

Future ScopeMachining in progressParts for test rig being orderedTesting will follow for the remainder of the semesterDuring testing valve performance will be optimizedCollaboration with team 19 not likely

Page 16: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

16

Summary3-D prototype already implementedDesign slightly changed for machining

purposes Machining in progressParts for test rig currently being orderedTotal Budget: $2000Total spent: $879.86 Project is running slightly behind accepted

schedule due to machining difficulties

Page 17: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

17

Questions

Page 18: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

18

Bill of Materials

Page 19: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

19

Original Test Rig Design

Page 20: Group 18: Alejandro Castro Sam Leuthold Andrew Borger GE Sponsor: Todd Hopwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Van Sciver

20

Calculations