1
Growth Kinetics of Parent and Green Fluorescent Protein-Producing Strains of Salmonella Thomas P. Oscar, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 1124 Trigg Hall, UMES, Princess Anne, MD 21853 410-651-6062; 410-651-6568 (fax); [email protected] Introduction The green fluorescent protein (GFP) is a small polypeptide (27 kDa) from the jellyfish Aequora victoria that has been cloned and expressed in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Colonies of bacterial cells expressing GFP can be easily detected and counted by illuminating viable cell count plates with ultraviolet light. This is a desirable characteristic for predictive model development because it allows the automated counting of large numbers of plates without the need for addition of exogenous substrates. A number of studies with GFP-producing strains of bacteria indicate that GFP expression does not alter the biochemical, morphological or growth characteristics of the bacterium. However, only anecdotal or limited (i.e., at one temperature) data regarding the effects of GFP expression on microbial growth are provided in these studies. Objective To conduct a systematic comparison of the growth kinetics of parent and GFP-producing strains of Salmonella over a broad range of temperature. Hypothesis The hypothesis tested was that the GFP strains have growth kinetics that are not different from the parent strains and thus, would be suitable marker strains for constructing predictive models with naturally contaminated food. Experimental Approach Parent strains of Salmonella Typhimurium, Enteritidis and Dublin were transformed with a high copy plasmid encoding wild type GFP under the control of the lacZ promoter. Growth curves were obtained using cooked chicken burgers incubated at temperatures from 8 to 48C. Kinetic data were fit to a three phase linear model to determine lag time (LT), specific growth rate (SGR) and maximum population density (MPD) at each temperature. Secondary models for the growth parameters as a function of temperature were generated and compared among the parent and GFP strain pairs. Results Not all of the growth curves exhibited three-phases of growth. In some instances, sampling was not extended for enough time to detect the stationary phase. Consequently, MPD data were not obtained for all incubation temperatures. Nonetheless, GFP decreased MPD on the chicken burgers (Figure G to I). Likewise, GFP reduced MPD by 1 to 1.5 log cycles in the starter cultures used to inoculate the burgers (results not shown). Discussion The failure of the three GFP strains tested to display similar growth kinetics as the parent strains may have resulted from over-expression of GFP. The plasmid encoding GFP in the current study was a high copy plasmid in which gfp was under the control of the lacZ promoter for which most Salmonella do not have a lacI gene encoding for the lac repressor protein. It has been reported that GFP accounts for up to 75% of total cellular protein in bacteria that constitutively express GFP. Such a high level of marker protein expression could slow growth and decrease maximum population density by creating a competition for and eventual deficiency of essential nutrients. Although the results of this study indicated that the GFP strains tested displayed different growth kinetics than the parent strains and thus, would not be good strains for developing predictive models in naturally contaminated food, it should be possible to construct marker strains of Salmonella that do not over-express GFP and grow in a manner similar to the parent strains. For example, by placing gfp under the control of a different promoter that requires an inducer not found in food, the expression of GFP could be repressed during the growth 10 20 30 40 50 0.1 1 10 100 Parent Parent G FP G FP A)S almonella Enteritidis Tem perature ( C) Lag Tim e (h) 10 20 30 40 50 0.1 1 10 100 Parent Parent G FP G FP B)S almonella Typhimurium Tem perature ( C) Lag Tim e (h) 10 20 30 40 50 0.1 1 10 100 Parent Parent G FP G FP C)S almonella Dublin Tem perature ( C) Lag Tim e (h) 10 20 30 40 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 G FP Parent Parent G FP G)S almonella E nteritidis Tem perature ( C) M axim um Population D ensity (log C FU /cm 2 ) 10 20 30 40 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 G FP Parent Parent G FP H)S almonella Typhimurium Tem perature ( C) M axim um Population D ensity (log C FU /cm 2 ) 10 20 30 40 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 G FP Parent Parent G FP I)S almonella Dublin Tem perature ( C) M axim um Population D ensity (log C FU /cm 2 ) 10 20 30 40 50 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 Parent Parent G FP G FP D)S almonella Enteritidis Tem perature ( C) Specific G row th R ate (log CFU /h) 10 20 30 40 50 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 Parent Parent G FP G FP E)S almonella Typhimurium Tem perature ( C) Specific G row th R ate (log C FU/h) 10 20 30 40 50 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 Parent Parent G FP G FP F)S almonella Dublin Tem perature ( C) Specific G row th R ate (log C FU/h)

Growth Kinetics of Parent and Green Fluorescent Protein-Producing Strains of Salmonella

  • Upload
    jiro

  • View
    30

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Growth Kinetics of Parent and Green Fluorescent Protein-Producing Strains of Salmonella Thomas P. Oscar , Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 1124 Trigg Hall, UMES, Princess Anne, MD 21853 410-651-6062; 410-651-6568 (fax); [email protected]. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Growth Kinetics of Parent and Green Fluorescent Protein-Producing Strains of  Salmonella

Growth Kinetics of Parent and Green Fluorescent Protein-Producing Strains of Salmonella

Thomas P. Oscar, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 1124 Trigg Hall, UMES, Princess Anne, MD 21853

410-651-6062; 410-651-6568 (fax); [email protected]

The green fluorescent protein (GFP) is a small polypeptide (27 kDa) from the

jellyfish Aequora victoria that has been cloned and expressed in both prokaryotic

and eukaryotic cells. Colonies of bacterial cells expressing GFP can be easily

detected and counted by illuminating viable cell count plates with ultraviolet light.

This is a desirable characteristic for predictive model development because it

allows the automated counting of large numbers of plates without the need for

addition of exogenous substrates. A number of studies with GFP-producing strains

of bacteria indicate that GFP expression does not alter the biochemical,

morphological or growth characteristics of the bacterium. However, only anecdotal

or limited (i.e., at one temperature) data regarding the effects of GFP expression on

microbial growth are provided in these studies.

Objective

To conduct a systematic comparison of the growth kinetics of parent and GFP-

producing strains of Salmonella over a broad range of temperature.

Hypothesis

The hypothesis tested was that the GFP strains have growth kinetics that are not

different from the parent strains and thus, would be suitable marker strains for

constructing predictive models with naturally contaminated food.

Experimental Approach

Parent strains of Salmonella Typhimurium, Enteritidis and Dublin were

transformed with a high copy plasmid encoding wild type GFP under the control of

the lacZ promoter. Growth curves were obtained using cooked chicken burgers

incubated at temperatures from 8 to 48C. Kinetic data were fit to a three phase

linear model to determine lag time (LT), specific growth rate (SGR) and maximum

population density (MPD) at each temperature. Secondary models for the growth

parameters as a function of temperature were generated and compared among the

parent and GFP strain pairs.

Results

The effects of GFP on LT were significant and slightly different among the

serotypes of Salmonella. Whether GFP increased, decreased or did not alter LT

depended on the incubation temperature and serotype (Figure A to C). GFP reduced

SGR in the three serotypes tested. The magnitude of the reduction in SGR was

dependent on the incubation temperature and serotype (Figure D to F). The most

consistent effect was that GFP reduced the optimum SGR by 0.17 to 0.2 log CFU

per h.

Not all of the growth curves exhibited three-phases of growth. In some instances, sampling was

not extended for enough time to detect the stationary phase. Consequently, MPD data were not

obtained for all incubation temperatures. Nonetheless, GFP decreased MPD on the chicken

burgers (Figure G to I). Likewise, GFP reduced MPD by 1 to 1.5 log cycles in the starter

cultures used to inoculate the burgers (results not shown).

Discussion

The failure of the three GFP strains tested to display similar growth kinetics as the parent strains

may have resulted from over-expression of GFP. The plasmid encoding GFP in the current

study was a high copy plasmid in which gfp was under the control of the lacZ promoter for

which most Salmonella do not have a lacI gene encoding for the lac repressor protein. It has

been reported that GFP accounts for up to 75% of total cellular protein in bacteria that

constitutively express GFP. Such a high level of marker protein expression

could slow growth and decrease maximum population density by creating a

competition for and eventual deficiency of essential nutrients.

Although the results of this study indicated that the GFP strains tested displayed

different growth kinetics than the parent strains and thus, would not be good

strains for developing predictive models in naturally contaminated food, it

should be possible to construct marker strains of Salmonella that do not over-

express GFP and grow in a manner similar to the parent strains. For example,

by placing gfp under the control of a different promoter that requires an inducer

not found in food, the expression of GFP could be repressed during the growth

of the pathogen on the food but then induced during growth of the pathogen on

the viable cell count plate by including the inducer in the agar medium.

10 20 30 40 500.1

1

10

100ParentParentGFPGFP

A) Salmonella Enteritidis

Temperature (C)

Lag

Tim

e (h

)

10 20 30 40 500.1

1

10

100ParentParentGFPGFP

B) Salmonella Typhimurium

Temperature (C)La

g T

ime

(h)

10 20 30 40 500.1

1

10

100ParentParentGFPGFP

C) Salmonella Dublin

Temperature (C)

Lag

Tim

e (h

)

10 20 30 40 500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

GFP

ParentParent

GFP

G) Salmonella Enteritidis

Temperature (C)

Max

imum

Pop

ulat

ion

Den

sity

(log

CF

U/c

m2 )

10 20 30 40 500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

GFPParentParent

GFP

H) Salmonella Typhimurium

Temperature (C)

Max

imum

Pop

ulat

ion

Den

sity

(log

CF

U/c

m2 )

10 20 30 40 500

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

GFPParentParent

GFP

I) Salmonella Dublin

Temperature (C)

Max

imum

Pop

ulat

ion

Den

sity

(log

CF

U/c

m2 )

10 20 30 40 500.0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

ParentParent

GFPGFP

D) Salmonella Enteritidis

Temperature (C)

Spe

cific

Gro

wth

Rat

e (lo

g C

FU

/h)

10 20 30 40 500.0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

ParentParentGFPGFP

E) Salmonella Typhimurium

Temperature (C)

Spe

cific

Gro

wth

Rat

e (lo

g C

FU

/h)

10 20 30 40 500.0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

ParentParentGFPGFP

F) Salmonella Dublin

Temperature (C)

Spe

cific

Gro

wth

Rat

e (lo

g C

FU

/h)