Hanford Energy Park Peaker

DOCKETED Docket Number: 01-EP-07C

Project Title: Hanford Energy Park Peaker Project Compliance

TN #: 231026

Document Title: Hanford Energy Park Peaker 2018 Report

Description: N/A

Filer: Joe Douglas

Organization: California Energy Commission

Submitter Role: Energy Commission

Submission Date: 12/10/2019 7:54:23 AM

Docketed Date: 12/10/2019

MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC

April 25, 2019

Mr. Joseph Douglas, Compliance Project Manager California Energy Commission 1516 9th Street Sacramento, CA 95814-5512

RE: Hanford Energy Park Peaker (0J-EP-7) 2018 Report

Dear Mr. Douglas:

In accordance with the Commission's Conditions of Certification for Hanford Energy Park Peaker (01-EP-7), San Joaquin Energy Inc. submits for your review and files the annual compliance report for 2018.

If you have any questions regarding the information provided in this report, please feel free to contact Mr. Neftali Nevarez at (925) 597-2905. E-mail: nefatli [email protected] Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this matter.

Respectfully,

£it~ Plant Manager MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC

Enclosures: Hanford Energy Park Peaker 2018 Annual Report of Compliance

14950 W SCIIULTI- RD, TRACY, CALIFORNIA 95377 - 11:L (209) 248-6841

HANFORD ENERGY PARK PEAKER (01-EP-7) FACILITY INFORMATION AND DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION

Owner: MRP San Joaquin Energy LLC. Address: 14950 W. Schulte Road, Tracy, CA 95377 Primary Contact: Neftali Nevarez, Compliance Manager Phone: 925.597.2905

Facility Address: I 0550 Idaho Avenue, Hanford, CA. 93230 Primary Contact: John Archibald, Plant Manager Phone: 209.248.6838 (Office)

STATEMENT OF FACT

I certify under penalty of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in the Annual Report of Compliance; and based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fine and imprisonment.

~ John Archibald Plant Manager MRP San Joaquin Energy LLC.

Date

MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC

14950 W. SCHULTE RD; TRACY, CALIFORNIA 95377 – TEL. (209) 248-6841

Hanford Energy Park Peaker

(01-EP-7)

2018 Annual Report of Compliance

California Energy Commission

Prepared by

MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC. Tracy, California

April 25, 2019

Report of Operations Introduction In accordance with the California Energy Commission requirements, AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc., has prepared the 2018 Annual Report of Compliance that includes a summary of the Operations and Maintenance Activities for the Hanford Energy Park Peaker Plant located at 10550 Idaho Avenue, Hanford, California.

Project Description Hanford Energy Park Peaker is a nominal 95 MW peaking power plant that consist of two General Electric LM-6000 combustion gas turbine generator sets and associated equipment necessary for simple-cycle operation. The peaking plant is located at 10550 Idaho Avenue in Hanford, California. Unit A declared commercial operation on September 2, 2001 and Unit B similarly declared commercial on September 6, 2001. The units currently operate under a ten year power purchase agreement that commenced on January 1, 2013 and terminates on December 31, 2022 with Pacific Gas and Electric Company as our counterparty. Hanford Energy Park Peaker was licensed by the California Energy Commission (CEC) on May 10, 2001 under Adoption Order No. 01-0510-01, Docket No. 01-EP-7. The Peaker was authorized for construction by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District under an Authority to Construct No. C-603-1 and C-603-2. The Title V permits were renewed by the SJVAPCD on April 7, 2017. The “federally enforceable” Permit(s) To Operate C-4140-1-5 (Unit A) and C-4140-2-5 (Unit B) are valid until April 30, 2021.

Project Operating History Hanford Energy Park Peaker plant was placed into service in September 2001; the following summarizes the operating history of both units since the commercial operation dates.

Unit A Unit B Year Fired Hours MWh(net) Fired Hours MWh(net) 2001 341 12,032 288 9,862 2002 435 20,297 420 19,130 2003 244 9,346 226 8,691 2004 118 5,052 106 4,603 2005 428 16,013 424 15,862 2006 274 10,197 270 10,887 2007 546 17,964 542 17,750 2008 540 22,789 547 22,749 2009 881 30,675 863 30,020 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

291 22 1202 1979 2295

9,706 549 39,534 63,500 77,392

287 22 1129 1915 2410

9,591 524 37,150 60,725 84834

Year 2015 2016 2017 2018

Unit A Fired Hours 1396 449 380 363

MWh(net) 44,140 12,563 9,389 8,263

Unit B Fired Hours 1660 459 419 311

MWh(net) 54,210 13,061 10,188 7,342

Power Plant Owner Report In accordance with CCR Title 20, Division 2, Chapter 3, Section 1304(a) the 2017 Power Plant Owner Report was submitted to the CEC on February 14, 2019

Complaints, Notices and Citations AltaGas San Joaquin Energy did not receive any complaints, notices or citations in conjunction with the operations of the Hanford Energy Park Peaker in 2018.

Facility Closure Plan Three months prior to the scheduled closure of the HEPP facility AltaGas San Joaquin Energy will submit a closure plan to the CEC for review and approval. HEPP is not scheduled for closure, therefore the closure plan is not required at this time.

Environmental Concerns • AQ-2 Violation Notification – See Appendix A

No Notices of Violation were received by this facility during 2018. • Bio-11 Biological Resources Mitigation Implementation and Monitoring Plan – See

Appendix B Ms. Molly Sandomire, Alternate designated Biologist, conducted a visual biological resources assessment of HEPP on November 15, 2018. Copies of the status reports are included in Appendix B.

• Hydrology & Water 3 – Storm Water – See Appendix C

No storm water is discharged “offsite” from the HEPP facility. All storm water was contained in the storm water retention basin. Samples were collected during two storm events in 2018. The analytical reports are included in Appendix C.

• Hydrology & Water 5 – Ground Water Usage – See Appendix D The Ground Water Usage Annual Summary report from 2013 through 2018 is provided in Appendix D.

• Hydrology & Water 6 – Industrial Wastewater – See Appendix E

It is important to note that industrial wastewater transferred from HEPP to the adjacent Hanford LP facility is used to supplement Hanford LP’s make-up water to the cooling tower until August 2011. In August 2011, Hanford LP was shut down and future

operations were canceled. Beginning in September 2011, HEPP had periodic wastewater discharge. The discharge is the result of plant process drains and water purification waste. Wastewater was discharged via the City of Hanford Industrial Wastewater Discharge permit to the sanitation department’s facility.

A new Industrial Wastewater Discharge permit was issued by the City of Hanford on September 2, 2016. The new permit number is 2016-03-065 The expiration date is September 1, 2021. No discharge from HEPP exceeded the permit limits in 2018.

• Noise 5 – Project Noise Complaints – See Appendix F

There were no complaints of excessive noise received by AltaGas San Joaquin Energy for the HEPP facility in 2018.

• Compliance Matrix. See Appendix G A compliance matrix is included with this report.

Appendix A

AQ-2 Violation Notification Reports

No Notices of Violation were received by the AltaGas Hanford Energy Park Peaker during 2018

Appendix B

Bio-11 Biological Resources Mitigation

Implementation and Monitoring Plan Report

November 27, 2018 Submitted electronically Neftali Nevarez MRP San Joaquin Energy LLC. 14950 W. Schulte Road Tracy, CA 95377 Subject: Hanford Energy Park Peaker Plant Condition Bio-2, 2018 Annual

Biological Report, PO # HAN-18-111031 Dear Neftali: On November 15, 2018, I visited the Hanford Energy Park Peaker Plant to conduct the annual biological resources inspection as required by Condition Number Bio-2 of the Final Commission Decision for 01-EP-7. In addition to my visual inspection of the plant, I interviewed you regarding on-site activities over the last year. Below is a summary of my findings. Activities/Tasks Accomplished

Typical operational and maintenance activities took place within the plant. No construction or demolition has occurred since the last inspection. Perimeter landscaping has been maintained although drought conditions continue to require a reduction in watering and some mortality. Dead landscaping was removed from the west side of the Stormwater pond. Plans are being discussed to replace the landscaping. Pre-Activity Surveys

Due to the lack of construction activities performed by MRP San Joaquin Energy LLC (SJE), no biological surveys were warranted. Mitigation/Minimization Measures Implemented

Construction-related minimization measures for the protection of special-status species were not required. As part of plant operations, all workers employed general housekeeping measures and were observant of any wildlife within the plant. The site appeared clean with no trash or evidence of spills. Worker Training

SJE provided a refresher course of the Worker Environmental Awareness Training to the work force in September 2018. In addition, all visitors to the plant view a safety video which includes a brief discussion of sensitive wildlife species and instructs visitors to alert plant staff of any

sensitive wildlife sightings. Sensitive Wildlife Observed within the Plant

No sensitive wildlife species were observed. In September, workers observed the remains of a medium-sized mammal under a tree on the north side of the SPCC pond, which they allowed to decompose in place. I inspected the remains and determined that they were those of a grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus). Wildlife observations were otherwise limited to common bird species, such as house sparrow (Passer domesticus) and rock dove (Columba livia), and California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi). The ground squirrels have established a warren in the southeast corner of the plant, and there are additional burrows along the east fence line. I inspected the burrow entrances but did not observe signs of burrowing owl occupancy (whitewash, pellets). Fissures are located in eroded areas along the western edge of the Stormwater pond. Although the fissures showed signs of burrowing activity, their openings were covered with dusty cobwebs, indicating that they were not currently occupied by wildlife. Agency Visits

There were no visits from the agencies. Incidents and Reported Takes/Harassments of Sensitive Wildlife

There were no incidents or takes associated with sensitive wildlife species. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Molly Sandomire CEC-Designated Biologist

Appendix C

Hydrology and Water 3 – Storm Water

January 19, 2018 AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. Lab ID : VI 1840071 10596 Idaho Avenue Hanford, CA 93230

Customer : 4-14718

Laboratory Report This Page is to be Stamped

Introduction: This report package contains total of 4 pages divided into 3 sections: Case Narrative (2 pages) : An overview of the work performed at FGL. Sample Results (1 page) : Results for each sample submitted. Quality Control (1 page) : Supporting Quality Control (QC) results.

Case Narrative

This Case Narrative pertains to the following samples:

Sample Description Date

Sampled Date

Received FGL Lab ID # Matrix

Hanford PeakerPlant Stormwater 01/08/2018 01/08/2018 VI 1840071-001 STM Sampling and Receipt Information: The sample was received, prepared and analyzed within the method specified holding except those as listed in the table below.

Lab ID Analyte/Method Required Holding

Time Actual Holding

Time VI 1840071-001 pH 15 2851.2 Minutes All samples arrived on ice. All samples were checked for pH if acid or base preservation is required (except for VOAs). For details of sample receipt information, please see the attached Chain of Custody and Condition Upon Receipt Form. Quality Control: All samples were prepared and analyzed according to the following tables:

Inorganic - Metals QC

200.7 01/10/2018:200459 All analysis quality controls are within established criteria

3010 01/10/2018:200338 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria

Corporate Offices & Laboratory853 Corporation StreetSanta Paula, CA 93060TEL: (805)392-2000Env FAX: (805)525-4172 / Ag FAX: (805)392-2063CA ELAP Certification No. 1573

Office & Laboratory2500 Stagecoach RoadStockton, CA 95215TEL: (209)942-0182FAX: (209)942-0423CA ELAP Certification No. 1563

Office & Laboratory563 E. Lindo AvenueChico, CA 95926TEL: (530)343-5818FAX: (530)343-3807CA ELAP Certification No. 2670

Office & Laboratory9415 W. Goshen AvenueVisalia, CA 93291TEL: (559)734-9473FAX: (559)734-8435CA ELAP Certification No. 2810

Office & Laboratory3442 Empresa Drive, Suite DSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401TEL: (805)783-2940FAX: (805)783-2912CA ELAP Certification No. 2775

ENVIRONMENTAL AGRICULTURALAnalytical Chemists

Page 1 of 4

January 19, 2018 Lab ID : VI 1840071 AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. Customer : 4-14718

Inorganic - Wet Chemistry QC

1664A 01/18/2018:200667 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria

2510B 01/10/2018:200410 All analysis quality controls are within established criteria

01/10/2018:200343 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria

2540D 01/12/2018:200449 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria

4500-H B 01/10/2018:200355 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria

4500HB 01/10/2018:200435 All analysis quality controls are within established criteria

Certification:: I certify that this data package is in compliance with ELAP standards, both technically and for completeness, except for any conditions listed above. Release of the data contained in this data package is authorized by the Laboratory Director or his designee, as verified by the following electronic signature. KD:DMBDigitial Signature Stamp Y = 05.5

Approved By Kelly A. Dunnahoo, B.S. Digitally signed by Kelly A. Dunnahoo, B.S.Title: Laboratory DirectorDate: 2018-01-22

Page 2 of 4

January 19, 2018 Lab ID : VI 1840071-001 Customer ID : 4-14718 AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. This Page is to be Stamped

Sampled On : January 8, 2018-13:00 Sampled By : Ron Mann Received On : January 8, 2018-13:45

10596 Idaho Avenue Hanford, CA 93230 Matrix : Stormwater Description : Hanford PeakerPlant Stormwater Project : Hanford Peaker Plant Storm -1

Sample Result - Inorganic

Sample Preparation Sample Analysis Constituent Result PQL MDL Units Dilution DQF

Method ID Time Method ID Time Metals, Total Iron 0.269 0.05 0.00097 mg/L 1 3010 200338 01/10/18 03:00 200.7 200459-IT203 01/10/18-14:25AC Wet Chemistry Specific Conductance 81.2 1 0.16 umhos/cm 1 2510B 200343 01/10/18 08:46 2510B 200410-EC205 01/10/18-11:47JMG Oil and Grease 4.23 3 1.5 mg/L 1.0989 1664A 200667 01/18/18 11:06 1664A 200827-WT215 01/18/18-16:17AMM pH 7.35 -- 0.0 units 1 T 4500-H B 200355 01/10/18 12:31 4500HB 200435-PH203 01/10/18-12:47JMG Solids, Total Suspended (TSS) 12.0 2.9 0.49 mg/L 2.8571 2540D 200449 01/12/18 12:30 2540D 200593-WT215 01/15/18-11:30jba DQF Flags Definition:

T Exceeded method-specific holding time. ND=Non-Detected. PQL=Practical Quantitation Limit.







Page 3 of 4

This Page is to be Stamped January 19, 2018 Lab ID : VI 1840071 AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. Customer : 4-14718

Quality Control - Inorganic

Constituent Method Date/ID Type Units Conc. QC Data DQO Note

Metals Iron 200.7 01/10/18:200459AC CCV ppm 5.000 103 % 90-110 CCB ppm 0.0035 0.03 CCV ppm 5.000 102 % 90-110 CCB ppm 0.0030 0.03 3010 01/10/18:200338amb Blank mg/L ND <0.05 LCS mg/L 4.000 110 % 85-115 MS mg/L 4.000 120 % 75-125 (STK1830354-002) MSD mg/L 4.000 116 % 75-125 MSRPD mg/L 4.000 2.7% ≤20.0 PDS mg/L 4.000 116 % 75-125 Wet Chem Oil and Grease 1664A 01/18/18:200667AMM Blank mg/L ND <3 LCS mg/L 44.89 99.6 % 78-114 BS mg/L 44.89 105 % 78-114 BSD mg/L 44.89 101 % 78-114 BSRPD mg/L 44.89 4.4% ≤18 Conductivity 2510B 01/10/18:200410JMG ICB umhos/cm 0.30 1 CCV umhos/cm 998.0 104 % 95-105 CCV umhos/cm 998.0 104 % 95-105 E. C. 2510B 01/10/18:200343jmg Blank umhos/cm ND <1 (SP 1800303-001) Dup umhos/cm 0.0% 5 Solids, Suspended 2540D 01/12/18:200449jba Blank mg/L ND <1 LCS mg/L 50.14 84.8 % 61-112 LCS mg/L 50.14 88.8 % 61-112 (CC 1880118-001) Dup mg/L 8.1% 20 (SP 1800260-003) Dup mg/L 15.6% 20 pH 4500-H B (STK1830295-001) Dup units 0.1% 4.80 4500HB 01/10/18:200435JMG CCV units 8.000 99.8 % 95-105 CCV units 4.000 102 % 95-105 Definition PDS : PDS failed, matrix - Post Digestion Spike (PDS) not within Acceptance Range (AR) because of matrix interferences affecting this

analyte. Data was accepted based on the LCS recovery. ICB : Initial Calibration Blank - Analyzed to verify the instrument baseline is within criteria. CCV : Continuing Calibration Verification - Analyzed to verify the instrument calibration is within criteria. CCB : Continuing Calibration Blank - Analyzed to verify the instrument baseline is within criteria. Blank : Method Blank - Prepared to verify that the preparation process is not contributing contamination to the samples. LCS : Laboratory Control Standard/Sample - Prepared to verify that the preparation process is not affecting analyte recovery. MS : Matrix Spikes - A random sample is spiked with a known amount of analyte. The recoveries are an indication of how that sample

matrix affects analyte recovery. MSD : Matrix Spike Duplicate of MS/MSD pair - A random sample duplicate is spiked with a known amount of analyted. The recoveries

are an indication of how that sample matrix affects analyte recovery. BS : Blank Spikes - A blank is spiked with a known amount of analyte. It is prepared to verify that the preparation process is not

affecting analyte recovery. BSD : Blank Spike Duplicate of BS/BSD pair - A blank duplicate is spiked with a known amount of analyte. It is prepared to verify that

the preparation process is not affecting analyte recovery. Dup : Duplicate Sample - A random sample with each batch is prepared and analyzed in duplicate. The relative percent difference is an

indication of precision for the preparation and analysis. MSRPD : MS/MSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) - The MS relative percent difference is an indication of precision for the preparation

and analysis. BSRPD : BS/BSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) - The BS relative percent difference is an indication of precision for the preparation

and analysis. ND : Non-detect - Result was below the DQO listed for the analyte. DQO : Data Quality Objective - This is the criteria against which the quality control data is compared.







Page 4 of 4

~7es_ H:Gl

:- ENVIRQNj\lENTAL ~:_::::-~ AGRICULTURAL :\nalytical Cllcrnisl~ --Client: AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc.

Address: 10596 Idaho A venue Hanford, CA 93230

Phone: Fax:

Contact Person: Rick Vogler 6

Project Name: Hanford Peaker Plant Storm -1 i Purchase Order Number: c:,

Quote Number: Q B

Sampler(s) "iii 0 0. e 0 u

Sampling Fee: Pickup Fee: co :[

Compositor Setup Date: __ / __ / __ Time: _/_ e «I

C8'4(:X:), \ Cl)

Lab Number: VI 4-14718 eo... 0

-0 I 0

Samp Date Time -5 Location Description II,)

Num Sampled Sampled ::s 1 Hanford PeakerPlant Stormwater /-'6-~ -- G rs:iu

40623:09/04/2017

[ :J' i:i..

B ~ Cl) u «I u St .!9

0.

* :i' 2 ~ * tJl ~ Q co u

i ti3 ~ ~ ::s tJl I 0 Cl) Cl) ~

V) 8. tJl > co u tJl < >- ~

~ i §' Ill ~ B Ill e Cl) Cl) >. 0 * -2 Cl)

~:J' * i 6 0 .§ e; i:i.. 't:' ::s-s:!: II,) o-;;

u 0 -5 =·c:; } z 0 u •• 0.

u ~Cl) «I e; fl) 0. Bo eo... >. 0 .!! E-o ~-u ,Q ·:::i "fl ~ 0. s u OS,$ ~ ~ «I

~ ~o STM

it.8 -z S::z:: o, ~~ cn--e So ~~

1

Annual CHAIN Of' CUSTODY

www.fgUnc.com Laboratory Copy (1 of 3)

TEST DESCRIPTION - See Reverse side for Container, Preservative and Sampling information I

Cl) Cl)

E-o. ::c: 0.

i ~ e~

c:, 'i;S' ago -N

Q ": ~s:t .> 0 ·- Cl) -N ~::c: -0 I

C: -88 I

t ,< b'N i: .!!l~ EM

~ u • ..c:-uE:. ~ ~

. ~ ~ C

1, 1,1 K

/}

Remarks:

~~ ;.re~fi/::~ R;r~ ~;;-&' Time: Relinquished Date: Time:

bq1 \ {qhq lOK r2.3u J Rece~are:

/7 oc::__ ~£ ,:,,, 1-8-t<&' !;~ , , /-

Cgco2mm Qffj~g& I Lib2mlQOl 853 Corporation Street Santa Paula, CA 93060

t,,nffil"a g I ~nratorv

Phone: (805) 392-2000 Env Fax: (805) 525-4172 / Ag Fax: (805) 392-2063

2500 Stagecoach Road Stockton, CA 95215 Phone: (209) 942-0182 Fax: (209) 942-0423

Time: ,ceivedB~

.~~ ~~

Qffl~ I L.ib2ml!20l 563 E. Lindo Chico, CA 95926 Phone: (530) 343-5818 Fax: (530) 343-3807

Date: Time: t~ ~-(~ £25..~ f I

Qffi~g I Lib2r1lQOl V

3442 Empresa Drive, Suite D San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 783-2940 Fax: (805) 783-2912

( ~

. Date: Time:

~ I\~ .

Qffl~g I Lib2ml20l 9415 W. Goshen Avenue Visalia, CA 93291 Phone: (559) 734-9473 Fax:(559)734-8435

Re: Alta Gas

1 ofl

Subject: Re: Alta Gas

From: Josh Huston <[email protected]>

Date: 01/09/2018 15:07 To: Inez Covarrubias <[email protected]>

Ron Mann

----- Original Message-----From: "Inez Covarrubias" <[email protected]> To: "Josh Huston" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 11:59:28 AM Subject: Re: Alta Gas

can make out sampler name on bottles?

On 01/08/2018 15:16, Josh Huston wrote: AltaGas brought the samples in to the lab, $0 pickup fee.

----- Original Message-----From: "Inez Covarrubias" <[email protected]> To: "Josh Huston" <[email protected]>, "Belen Castaneda" <[email protected]>, "Jessica Ramierz" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 3:11:33 PM Subject: Alta Gas

Are we charging a pick up fee for all three COC or just one?

1840070

1840071

1840072

01/09/2018 15:14

FGL Environmental Revision Date: 10/09/14

Doc ID: 3D0900002_SOP _12.DOC Page 1 of1

Inter-Laboratory Condition Upon Receipt (Attach to COC) Sample Receipt at: STK CC CH VI 1. Number of ice chests/packages received: f Shipping tracking # QT<}__ 2. Were samples received in a chilled condition? Temps: -fLl:.J-__ I __ / __ j __

Surface water SWTR bact samples: A sample that has a temperature upon receipt of > 10° C, whether iced or not, should be flagged unless the time since sample collection has been less than two hours.

3. Do the number of bottles received agree with the COC? f!? No N/A 4. Were samples received intact? (i.e. no broken bottles, leaks etc.) No 5. · VOAs checked for Headspace? No if 6. Were sample custody seals intact? Yes No 7. If required, was sample split for pH analysis? Yes No 8. Were all analyses within holding times at time of receipt? Yes eNo\ 9. Verify sample date, time and sampler name ~ ~ Sign and date the COC, place in a ziplock and put in the e ice chest as tliesmnples. Sample Receipt Review completed by (initjals):____,,;;~i.,___

Sample Receipt at SP: 4 1. Weresamplesreceivedinachilledcon ·on? Tem : __ / __ / __ / £1 C

Acceptable is above freezing to ~ C. If many packages are received at one time check for tests/H. T. 's/rushes/

2. Shipping 1rack:ing numbers:

3. Do the number ofbottles received agree with the COC? ~ No N/A 4. Were samples received intact? (i.e. no broken bottles, leaks etc.) ~ No 5. Were sample custody seals intact? Yes No @ Sign and date the COC, obtain LIMS sample numbers, select methods/tests and print labels.

. .

Sample Verification, Labeling and Distribution: /4':~ 1. Were all requested analyses understood and acceptable? Yes ~ 2. Did bottle labels correspond with the client's ID's? . rres)_ No 3. Were all bottles requiring sample preservation properly preserved? ~ No N/A FGL

[Exception: Oil & Grease, VOA and CrVl verified in lab}

4. VOAs checked for Head.space? Yes · No (fjjj) 5. Have rush or project due dates been checked and accepted? ~ No @ 6. Were all analyses within holding times at time of-receipt? ~ No Attach lab~ls to the containers and include a copy of the COC for lab delivery. Sample Receipt, Login and Verification completed by (initials): lfL. gQ Discrepancy Documentation: Any items above which are "No" or do not meet specifications (i.e. temps) must be resolved. 1. Person Contacted~ Qk:_ ~ .Z .g_ Phone Number: 9' .2Ss' - ZhO -4 f 02-. .

Initiated By: ~~ Ht t~- Date: / -'7 -18; · · Problem:~ Oul""'" DC- HCl.1::> ~ Resolution: J2-..u,J,. , ~ ~

I

2. ~~~.~~ _ TI~. ___ u _____ , ____ (4-14718)

Problem: €Z 1n. -s ~ , VI. "' UP-I ""->\"> _ _ _ Al taGas San Joaquin Energy Inc, Resolution:~r~~~\'-e..w\~e-,ev-~~v VI 1840071 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c.u.:tt>-t~ ~ ...

(Please use the back of this sheet for additional comments o contacts)

IV-01/08/2018-15:10:37 ··• I " J{I . :

April 11, 2018 AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. Lab ID : VI 1841305 10596 Idaho Avenue Hanford, CA 93230

Customer : 4-14718

Laboratory Report This Page is to be Stamped

Introduction: This report package contains total of 4 pages divided into 3 sections: Case Narrative (2 pages) : An overview of the work performed at FGL. Sample Results (1 page) : Results for each sample submitted. Quality Control (1 page) : Supporting Quality Control (QC) results.

Case Narrative

This Case Narrative pertains to the following samples:

Sample Description Date

Sampled Date

Received FGL Lab ID # Matrix

Hanford PeakerPlant Stormwater 03/21/2018 03/21/2018 VI 1841305-001 STM Sampling and Receipt Information: The sample was received, prepared and analyzed within the method specified holding except those as listed in the table below.

Lab ID Analyte/Method Required Holding

Time Actual Holding

Time VI 1841305-001 pH 15 3280.8 Minutes All samples arrived on ice. All samples were checked for pH if acid or base preservation is required (except for VOAs). For details of sample receipt information, please see the attached Chain of Custody and Condition Upon Receipt Form. Quality Control: All samples were prepared and analyzed according to the following tables:

Inorganic - Metals QC

200.7 03/23/2018:204132 All analysis quality controls are within established criteria.

3010 03/23/2018:203287 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria.







Page 1 of 5

April 11, 2018 Lab ID : VI 1841305 AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. Customer : 4-14718

Inorganic - Wet Chemistry QC

1664A

04/09/2018:203915 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria, except: The following note applies to Oil and Grease: 410 Relative Percent Difference (RPD) not within Maximum Allowable Value (MAV). Data was accepted based on the LCS or CCV recovery.

2510B 03/23/2018:204073 All analysis quality controls are within established criteria.

03/23/2018:203297 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria.

2540D 03/28/2018:203467 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria.

4500-H B 03/23/2018:203310 All preparation quality controls are within established criteria.

4500HB 03/23/2018:204085 All analysis quality controls are within established criteria.

Certification:: I certify that this data package is in compliance with ELAP standards, both technically and for completeness, except for any conditions listed above. Release of the data contained in this data package is authorized by the Laboratory Director or his designee, as verified by the following electronic signature. KD:DMBDigitial Signature Stamp Y = 05.9

Approved By Kelly A. Dunnahoo, B.S. Digitally signed by Kelly A. Dunnahoo, B.S.Title: Laboratory DirectorDate: 2018-04-11

Page 2 of 5

April 11, 2018 Lab ID : VI 1841305-001 Customer ID : 4-14718 AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. This Page is to be Stamped

Sampled On : March 21, 2018-05:00 Sampled By : Ron Mann Received On : March 21, 2018-09:40

10596 Idaho Avenue Hanford, CA 93230 Matrix : Stormwater Description : Hanford PeakerPlant Stormwater Project : Hanford Peaker Plant Storm -2

Sample Result - Inorganic

Sample Preparation Sample Analysis Constituent Result PQL MDL Units Dilution DQF

Method ID Time Method ID Time Metals, Total Iron 0.258 0.05 0.00097 mg/L 1 3010 203287 03/23/18 03:00 200.7 204132-IT203 03/23/18-14:40AC Wet Chemistry Specific Conductance 73.2 1 0.16 umhos/cm 1 2510B 203297 03/23/18 08:57 2510B 204073-EC205 03/23/18-10:42JMG Oil and Grease 3.53 3 1.5 mg/L 1.087 1664A 203915 04/09/18 10:27 1664A 204918-WT215 04/09/18-14:56AMM pH 7.46 -- 0.0 units 1 T 4500-H B 203310 03/23/18 11:41 4500HB 204085-PH203 03/23/18-11:45JMG Solids, Total Suspended (TSS) 5.97 1.1 0.49 mg/L 1.0753 2540D 203467 03/28/18 11:00 2540D 204401-WT215 03/29/18-20:11jba DQF Flags Definition:

T Exceeded method-specific holding time. ND=Non-Detected. PQL=Practical Quantitation Limit.







Page 3 of 5

This Page is to be Stamped April 11, 2018 Lab ID : VI 1841305 AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. Customer : 4-14718

Quality Control - Inorganic

Constituent Method Date/ID Type Units Conc. QC Data DQO Note

Metals Iron 200.7 03/23/18:204132AC CCV ppm 5.000 102 % 90-110 CCB ppm 0.0015 0.03 CCV ppm 5.000 100 % 90-110 CCB ppm 0.0017 0.03 3010 03/23/18:203287amb Blank mg/L ND <0.05 LCS mg/L 4.000 110 % 85-115 MS mg/L 4.000 111 % 75-125 (VI 1841371-001) MSD mg/L 4.000 110 % 75-125 MSRPD mg/L 0.8000 0.9% ≤20.0 PDS mg/L 4.000 107 % 75-125 Wet Chem Oil and Grease 1664A 04/09/18:203915AMM Blank mg/L ND <3 LCS mg/L 44.89 86.9 % 78-114 BS mg/L 44.89 88.3 % 78-114 BSD mg/L 44.89 111 % 78-114 BSRPD mg/L 44.89 22.0% ≤18 410 Conductivity 2510B 03/23/18:204073JMG ICB umhos/cm 0.12 1 CCV umhos/cm 998.0 102 % 95-105 CCV umhos/cm 998.0 103 % 95-105 E. C. 2510B 03/23/18:203297jmg Blank umhos/cm ND <1 (SP 1803879-029) Dup umhos/cm 0.0% 5 Solids, Suspended 2540D 03/28/18:203467jba Blank mg/L ND <1 LCS mg/L 50.00 75.0 % 61-112 LCS mg/L 50.00 79.0 % 61-112 (SP 1803834-002) Dup mg/L 0.7% 20 (SP 1803834-003) Dup mg/L 1.4% 20 pH 4500-H B (CC 1880677-001) Dup units 0.8% 4.80 4500HB 03/23/18:204085JMG CCV units 8.000 99.8 % 95-105 CCV units 8.000 101 % 95-105 Definition PDS : PDS failed, matrix - Post Digestion Spike (PDS) not within Acceptance Range (AR) because of matrix interferences affecting this

analyte. Data was accepted based on the LCS recovery. ICB : Initial Calibration Blank - Analyzed to verify the instrument baseline is within criteria. CCV : Continuing Calibration Verification - Analyzed to verify the instrument calibration is within criteria. CCB : Continuing Calibration Blank - Analyzed to verify the instrument baseline is within criteria. Blank : Method Blank - Prepared to verify that the preparation process is not contributing contamination to the samples. LCS : Laboratory Control Standard/Sample - Prepared to verify that the preparation process is not affecting analyte recovery. MS : Matrix Spikes - A random sample is spiked with a known amount of analyte. The recoveries are an indication of how that sample

matrix affects analyte recovery. MSD : Matrix Spike Duplicate of MS/MSD pair - A random sample duplicate is spiked with a known amount of analyted. The recoveries

are an indication of how that sample matrix affects analyte recovery. BS : Blank Spikes - A blank is spiked with a known amount of analyte. It is prepared to verify that the preparation process is not

affecting analyte recovery. BSD : Blank Spike Duplicate of BS/BSD pair - A blank duplicate is spiked with a known amount of analyte. It is prepared to verify that

the preparation process is not affecting analyte recovery. Dup : Duplicate Sample - A random sample with each batch is prepared and analyzed in duplicate. The relative percent difference is an

indication of precision for the preparation and analysis. MSRPD : MS/MSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) - The MS relative percent difference is an indication of precision for the preparation

and analysis. BSRPD : BS/BSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) - The BS relative percent difference is an indication of precision for the preparation

and analysis. ND : Non-detect - Result was below the DQO listed for the analyte. DQO : Data Quality Objective - This is the criteria against which the quality control data is compared. Explanation 410 : Relative Percent Difference (RPD) not within Maximum Allowable Value (MAV). Data was accepted based on the LCS or CCV

recovery.







Page 4 of 5

. to-• ~[

ENVIRONMENTAL c;:::_-·-. - · AGRICULTURAL :\11alytic,1l Chclllists

Annual CHAIN Of' CUSTODY www.fgUnc.com

Laboratory Copy ( 1 of 3)

JIIDlfillIDillf-------------1--,4~06_24~:r-09_/_04r-/_20_1.-7_-+----r-T_EST __ n .... E_SC_RI-r-PT_IO_N_-T"""S_e_e_R_e_v..,er_se_sid_e_ti_oT"r _C_on_ta_i_ne..,r~, Pr_ese_rv_aT"tiv_e_a_n_d_S.,am __ p __ I_in_g_in_fi .... orm_a_tio_n ___ ____.l....__--1 Client: AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc.

Address: 10596 Idaho A venue Hanford, CA 93230

Phone:

Contact Person: Rick Vogler

Fax:

Project Name: Hanford Peaker Plant Storm -2 Purchase Order Number:

Quote Number:

Sampling Fee: Pickup Fee:

Compositor Setup Date: __ / __ / __ Time: _/_

Lab Number: VI Ji<t13oS 4-14718

Samp Location Description Date Time Num Sampled Sampled

1 Hanford PeakerPlant Stormwater 1.2.-a-.l-i t:)~ -

Remarks:

Corporate Offices & Laboratory

<b•r. 853 Corporation Street \..../'" Santa Paula, CA 93060 Phone: (805) 392-2000 Env Fax: (805) 525-4172 / Ag Fax: (805) 392-2063

[ ::3' ll.

£ ~ .,, ~

(.)

~ C.

* § * w ~ e

fl)

0 w fl) - ffi ~

-~ ~ 0 C. I.LI 8 I.LI 0 fl) u * * ~ =a

.!! 8 ei:I C.

fl) 8 (o.., ei:I 0 en

"'0 (o..,

0 0 ,£j 8. Q,)

~ ~

Q,)

~ 2 ,::ii:: en

co ),' ~ ~ ~

::, ~ £ 0

~ en ei:I cu Gi' C.

co ~ < >-~

ii:' 8 ~ £ ::> ~ .,, >. 0 cu fl)

~~ :0 fl

~ .g~ 0 ll. =-C: cu o-;; 0 ,£j ,::ii:: ·c:; z 0 cu •• C.

ifl) Q,>

~ C. ei:s_ >, cuo

~ E-o ,::ii::_

'§ .fl -~ t (.) ,£j

if (,:I ~o IX!

G STM

Office & Laboratory 2500 Stagecoach Road Stockton, CA 95215 Phone: (209) 942-0182 Fax: (209) 942-0423

Q,)("')

IJ..O ..!.z 3~ E-: ~ .,,_ -13 flo ~~

1

fl) fl) E-o :i C.

-i ~ ~ ~ii:' o-cc!~ =~ 0. • ~~ ·:::o

·:::: fl) uM = ::c:

"'0 ' =-0 .... uO C. ,< ::, ~N ..:.::

.S::! <II 0 ·e~ Q..

~ ~ . .c ii:'

I u-u ~ ~~ (,:I fl)

1, 1, 1 X

Office & Laboratory 563 E. Lindo Chico, CA 95926 Phone: (530) 343-5818 Fax: (530) 343-3807

Date: Time: Relinquished

3-21-/ f{ \130 ~o Date: Time: Received By:

3,2.HS l130

Office & Laboratory 3442 Empresa Drive, Suite D San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 783-2940 Fax: (805) 783-2912

Date: Time: ~~,,?5 1100

3~1 > r1 ,Oc-t~' Office & Laboratory 9415 W. Goshen Avenue Visalia, CA 93291 Phone:(559)734-9473 Fax: (559) 734-8435

FGL Environmental Revision Date: 10/09/14

Doc ID: 3D0900002_SOP _12.DOC Page 1 of1

Inter-Laboratory Condition Upon Receipt (~ch to COC) Sample Receipt at: STK CC CH VI 1. Number of ice chests/packages received: \ Shipping trac g # D TC, 2. Were samples received in a chilled condition? Temps: ~ / __ / __ / __ I __

Surface water SWTR bact samples: A sample that has a temperature upon receipt of > 10° C, whether iced or not, should be flagged unless the time since sample collection has been less than two hours.

3. Do the number ofbottles received agree with the COC? ~-·; No NIA 4. Were samples received intact? (i.e. no broken bottles, leaks etc.) No 5. · VOAs checked for Headspace? No ~ 6. Were sample custody seals intact? Yes Nci / 7. If required, was sample split for pH analysis? Yes No 8. Were all analyses -within holding times at time of receipt? Yes ~ 9. Verify sample date, time and sampler name (Yes) Yo Sign and date the COC, place in a ziplock and put iA,the s~e ice chest as tlie"' samples. Sample Receipt Review completed by (initjals):~, J,..ll:N_rz_ Sample Receipt at SP: / A

1. Were samples received in a chilled condition? Temps: _~_/ '? / __ I __ I __ Acceptable is above freezing to 6~ C. If many packages are received at one time check for tests/H.T. 's/rushes/

2. Shipping 1racking numbers:

3. Do the number of bottles received agree with the COC? ~ No NIA 4. Were samples received intact? (i.e. no broken bottles, leaks etc.) @ No 5. Were sample custody seals intact? Yes No @ Sign and date the COC, obtain LIM:S sample numbers, select methods/tests and print labels.

Sample Verification, Labeling and Distribution: 1. Were all requested analyses understood and acceptable? I No 2. Did bottle labels correspond with the client's !D's? No 3. Were all bottles requiring sample preservation properly preserved? No N/A FOL

[Exception: Oil & Grease, VOA and CrVI verified in lab)

4. VOAs checked forHeadspace? Yes No ~ 5. Have rush or project due dates been checked and accep~? Y::! No @ 6. Were all analyses -within holding times at time of receipt? ~ No Attach labels to the containers and include a copy of the COC for lab delivefY. Sample Receipt, Login and Verification completed by (initials): ( flR.9 Discrepancy Documentation: Any items above which are "No" or do not meet specifications (i.e. temps) must be resolved.

1. Person Contaqed: °'°" =~ Phone Number. Ip J?el'BWI InitiatedBy:.J~)ca.K~_i. Date: 3-z,-1~ Problem: p\r~~ltl Resolution:~ n u,t+o-\ ~Le{

2. Person Contacted: ----------- (4-14718) Initiated By: __________ _ Problem:

AltaGas San Joaquin Energy Inc. Resolution: VI. 1841305

(Please use the back of this sheet. for additional comment IV-03/21/2018-13:26:16 ~ r.nnt~cl.s)

re

January X April July OctoberFebruary May August NovemberMarch June September December

Location YES NO

X Pond is dry. Weeds aregrowing in basin

X

POND X

X

X

COMPLETED BY: Ron Mann DATE: 1/5/18 6:30

HANFORD STORM WATER OBSERVATION SHEET2018

Observation Comments

Floating or Suspended Materials

Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity

January April July OctoberFebruary X May August NovemberMarch June September December

Location YES NO

X Pond is dry. Some weeds in the pond

X

POND X

X

X





Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity

January April July OctoberFebruary May August NovemberMarch X June September December

Location YES NO

X Pond has no standingwater

X

POND X

X

X





Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity

January April X July OctoberFebruary May August NovemberMarch June September December

Location YES NO


X

POND X

X

X





Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity

January April July OctoberFebruary May X August NovemberMarch June September December

Location YES NO


X

POND X

X

X


Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity




January April July OctoberFebruary May August NovemberMarch June X September December

Location YES NO

X Pond is Dry

X

POND X

X

X





Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity

January April July X OctoberFebruary May August NovemberMarch June September December

Location YES NO

X Pond is Dry

X

POND X

X

X


Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity




January April July OctoberFebruary May August X NovemberMarch June September December

Location YES NO

X Pond is Dry

X

POND X

X

X





Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity

January April July OctoberFebruary May August NovemberMarch June September X December

Location YES NO

X Pond is DrySome weeds at pond

X inlet

POND X

X

X


Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity




January April July October XFebruary May August NovemberMarch June September December

Location YES NO


X inlet

POND X

X

X

COMPLETED BY: Lopez DATE: 10/15/18 8:40

Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity




January April July OctoberFebruary May August November XMarch June September December

Location YES NO


X inlet

POND X

X

X





Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity

January April July OctoberFebruary May August NovemberMarch June September December X

Location YES NO

X Pond has 2" of waterstanding

X

POND X

X

X


Odor

Oil or Grease

Discoloration

Turbidity




Appendix D

Hydrology and Water 5 – Ground Water Use

Month 2018 Gallons 2017 Gallons 2016 Gallons 2015 Gallons 2014 Gallons 2013 Gallons

JAN 35906 0 95744 0 0 0FEB 0 31418 272272 0 0 0MAR 70317 71065 92752 0 0 0APR 236384 69569 330616 0 0 0MAY 227408 140634 277508 0 0 0JUN 252094 546078 809336 4741901 0 0JUL 345600 184769 393448 1929974 0 0AUG 167564 476509 595408 3926525 0 0SEP 319418 489974 419628 1443740 0 0OCT 99491 570016 181764 354577 0 0NOV 263314 212447 296956 274535 0 0DEC 79294 26930 35156 285756 0 0

Annual Gallons: 2,096,790 2,819,409 3,800,588 12,957,008 0 0

Acre-Feet: 6.43 8.65 11.66 39.76 0.00 0.00Monthly Avg: 174,733 234,951 316,716 1,079,751 0 0Monthly Min: 0 0 35,156 0 0 0Monthly Max: 345,600 570,016 809,336 4,741,901 0 0Annual Min: 0Annual Max: 12,957,008Annual Avg: 4,371,077

Note:

1 gallon = 3.06888E-06 acre-feet

Hydrology & Water-5

2018 Ground Water Usage Annual Summary ReportHanford Energy Park Peaker

WELL WATER

Appendix E

Hydrology and Water 6 – Industrial Wastewater Monitoring and Discharge

City of Hanford

Significant Industrial User Permit #2016-03-65

HEPP WASTE DISCHARGE TO CITY SEWER

2018

TOTAL 1,283,686

Jan 24,542

Feb 13,591

Mar 40,733

Apr 123,490

May 139,674

Jun 148,955

Jul 198,442

Aug 131,726

Sep 229,890

Oct 0

Nov 190,349

Dec 42,294

CITY OF HANFORD Utilities and Engineering Department

900 South 10th Avenue • HANFORD, CA 93230-5234 • (559) 585-2550

Permit No. 2019-01-069 Replaces Permit No. 2016-02-064

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT

In accordance with the provisions of Section 13.08 of the Hanford Municipal Code

Location Address: Hanford Energy Park Peaker, I 0596 Idaho A venue, Hanford, CA 93230 Mailing Address: Hanford Energy Park Peaker. 14950 West Schulte Road. Tracey. CA 95377

The above industry has been identified as an industry regulated under categorical pretreatment standards specified in 40 CFR 423 Subpart B and determined to be a Significant Industrial User (SIU) in accordance with City of Hanford Municipal Code l 3.08.090A and as defined in 40 CFR 403.3(v)(i-ii).

The industry is hereby authorized to discharge industrial wastewater from the above identified facility into the City of Hanford's sewer system in accordance with the conditions set forth in this permit. Compliance with this permit does not relieve the permittee of its obligation to comply with any or all applicable regulations, standards, or requirements under local, state and federal laws, including any such regulations, standards, or laws that may become effective during the term of this permit.

Non-compliance with any term or condition of this permit, and the standard conditions for this permit, shall constitute a violation of the Hanford Municipal Code. Violations of any provision of this permit may result in this permit being revoked and the permitted address being disconnected from the sanitary sewer and/or the permittee being fined.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 14. 2019 EXPIRATION DA TE: February 13. 2024

The permit becomes void upon change of owner/operator, operations, or location of an existing facility. Change of ownership shall obligate the new owner to seek prior written approval of the City for continued discharge to the sewer system.

If the SIU wishes to continue an activity regulated by the permit after the expiration date of the permit, the SIU must submit an application for a new permit at least ninety (90) days before the expiration date of the permit.


PART I -EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

A. The permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater to the City of Hanford sewer system through a single outfall line from the facility in accordance with provisions presented herein.

B. During the term of this permit, the discharge from the outfall line shall comply with the effluent limitations and boundaries set forth below.

I. Effluent limitations listed in Sections 13.08.060 and 13.08.062 of the Hanford Municipal Code with the following exception as stipulated in Section I 3.08.060 A.3. These limitations are subject to enforcement actions as outlined in the City of Hanford's Enforcement Response Plan and sewer ordinance.

PERMIT INSTANEOUS PARAMETER LIMIT LIMIT

Electrical Conductivity (EC) 2,150 uS/cm

pH >6.0 and <I 1.00

Chromium 0.2 mg/L

Zinc 1.0 mg/L

PCB Non-Detectable

2. Effluent discharge boundaries that are specific for the permittee and have been authorized by the Utilities and Engineering Director. These boundaries are subject to but not limited to monetary billing penalties.

PARAMETER

Flow

BOD

TSS

DAILY AVER.

142,000 gpd

200 mg/L

200 mg/L

MASS LOAD DAILY AVER.

237 lbs/d

237 lbs/d

DAILY MAX

177,500 gpd

300 mg/L

300 mg/L

MASS LOAD DAILY MAX

444 lbs/d

444 lbs/d

Concentrations in mg/L for BOD and TSS are listed for illustration purposes only. Violations of the limits and boundaries established in this section will be detennined based on flow (gpd) and/or mass loading (lbs/d) as listed.

2


C. In addition to the effluent limitations and boundaries specified in this permit, the discharger shall not discharge any prohibited discharges specified in the City of Hanford's Municipal Code, Section 13.08.050.

D. All discharges shall comply with all other applicable laws, regulations, standards, and requirements contained in the Hanford Municipal Code, Attachment B the Standard Conditions for this permit, and any local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and requirements that may become effective during the term of this permit.

PART 2 - MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

A. The permittee shall provide, install and maintain a monitoring/sampling station as approved by the City of Hanford to ensure continuous flow proportioned sampling, continuous flow and pH monitoring with documentation by chart recorders for all discharges addressed in this permit.

B. The permittee shall monitor the outfall for the following parameters, at the indicated frequencies indicated on Table I, at the permittee's cost and expense.

C. The permittee shall ensure that the collection, handling, preservation, and analyses of samples obtained for the Table I analyses shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 136, 40 CFR 403 .12 and any amendments thereto.

D. Samples and measurements taken as required herein shall be representative of the volume and nature of the discharge during regular daily operational conditions. All samples shall be taken at the sampling port in the discharge line to the City sewer system before the effluent joins or is diluted by any other waste stream or substance, unless otherwise specified. The location of the monitoring/sampling port is shown on the diagram in Attachment A, Diagram of Sampling Location.

E. The permittee shall ensure that all equipment used for sampling and analysis shall be calibrated at a minimum annually and must be inspected and maintained in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations to ensure their accuracy. Calibration reports shall be submitted to the City within 15 days of the date of calibration.

F. Monitoring points shall not be changed without notification to and the approval of the City and must be accessible to City staff for sample collection on a daily basis.

(This space has been left blank.)

3


TABLE I SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS - EFFECTIVE FROM ISSUANCE DATE OF PERMIT

SAMPLE PARAMETER (mg/L)

Flow (gpd) Arsenic Cadmium Chromium(total) Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel pH Selenium Silver Sulfide Temp (degrees Celsius) Electrical Conductivity (EC) uS/cm Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Zinc PCB Total Metals (Title 22 Listing) Total Toxic Organic

(I) Sample type

FREQUENCY

Continuous (3) (2) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)

Continuous (3) (2) (2) (2)

Continuous (3) (2) (2) (4) (4) (2) (2)

SAMPLE TYPE ( 1)

Meter (la) 24 hr Composite (I b) 24 hr Composite ( I b) 24 hr Composite (I b) 24 hr Composite (I b) 24 hr Composite (I b) 24 hr Composite ( I b) 24 hr Composite (lb) 24 hr Composite ( I b)

In-Line Meter (Id) 24 hr Composite (I b) 24 hr Composite ( 1 b)

Grab (le) In-Line Meter (Id)

24 hr Composite (I b) Grab (le)

24 hr Composite (1 b) 24 hr Composite (I b) 24 hr Composite (I b)

Grab (le)

a. Meter: Flow shall be recorded from the permittee's flow meter and chart recorder. b. 24-hour composite: Sample shall be a flow proportional composite sample of the discharge

collected over 24 hours by the permittee's automatic composite sampler. c. Grab samples: Four (4) grab samples shall be taken for each shift over the course of a process day. d. In-Line Meter: pH shall be recorded with the permittee's in-line pH meter and chart recorder.

(2) Semi-annual sampling and analyses with one of the sampling dates being chosen by the City and the sample split with the City for analysis, if the City so chooses.

(3) Readings are continuously taken and recorded with a chart recorder and submitted monthly.

(4) Samples must be collected and analyzed a minimum of once each month. Discharger shall submit a written report summarizing all results of analyses on these constituents to the City on a monthly basis.

4


PART 3 - REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

A. The permittee shall prepare and submit monitoring reports at the indicated frequency at the permittee's sole cost and expense.

1. Monitoring results for constituents listed in Table 1 of this permit shall be reported in an Industrial User Monitoring Report semi-annually with the exception of daily flow and pH. Flow and pH chart recordings are due by the fifth of the month following the month of monitoring. The first semi-annual report is due on or before July 1 of each year and the second semi-annual report shall be due on a date chosen by the City. Each semi-annual report shall include all the information required in 40 CFR 403.12(b) and listed below.

a. Identifying information: name and address of the facility including the name and address of the operator and owners.

b. A list of environmental control permits held by or for the facility. c. A brief description of operations including the nature, average rate of production, and Standard

Industrial Classification of the operation(s) carried out at the facility. This description should include a schematic process diagram which indicates points of Discharge to the POTW from the regulated processes. The report must also include any changes to the operations which may affect the discharge of the permitted facility that were made from the time of the last report.

d. Flow measurement showing the measured average daily and maximum daily flow in gallons per day for each regulated stream.

e. Results for all analyses of the waste stream. f. All reports must contain the certification statement, found in 13.08.091 B.2. of the

Hanford Municipal Code, signed by an authorized representative.

2. If the pennittee monitors any pollutants more frequently than required by this permit, using test procedures prescribed in 40 CFR 136 or amendments thereto, the results of such monitoring shall be reported to the City in a monthly report and shall be included in any calculations of actual daily maximum or monthly average pollutant discharge. Such increased monitoring frequency shall also be indicated in the semi-annual report.

3. The following information shall be recorded for each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit:

a. Exact place, date and time of sampling. b. Preservation method, if any. c. Person(s) who collected the sample. d. Type of sample collected (grab, timed composite, flow proportional composite, etc.) e. Dates that the analysis were performed. f. Person(s) who performed the analyses. g. Analytical techniques or methods used. h. Results of analyses performed. 1. Detection limits for all analyses performed. j. Summary of Quality Control/Quality Assurance methods used for analyses performed.

5


k. Chain of Custody (COC) and Condition Upon Receipt (CUR) report for all samples. I. Signed certification statement.

B. Knowingly making any false statements on any report or other document required by this pennit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate is a crime and may result in imposition of civil and/or criminal sanctions and/or penalties.

C. All reports required by this permit shall be submitted to the City at the following address:

City of Hanford 900 S. 10th Ave Hanford, CA 93230-5234 Attn: Wastewater Superintendent

PART 4-PENALTIES AND VIOLATIONS

A. The pennit conditions shall be authorized at the levels listed in Part I of this pennit.

B. Penalties associated with violation of flow, and/or BOD5 and/or TSS boundaries will be imposed on the permittee for the purpose of offsetting costs for construction of facilities needed to provide effective long tenn treatment of the increased discharge and to discourage violation of the permitted boundaries of discharge. Penalties paid by the discharger under tenns of this pennit will not be credited toward increasing the discharge limits contained in this permit or for future impact fees required for any modified or new discharge pennit.

C. Penalty fees for effluent monthly average boundary violations will be imposed on the pennittee as follows:

Flow: BODS: TSS:

$0.10 per gallon $31.25 per pound $31.25 per pound

D. In addition to the penalty fees listed above, violations of any limits contained in this permit, City Ordinance, state and federal regulations will result in a NOV as well as any actions described in paragraph M of Attachment B the Standard Conditions of this permit.

E. Development Impact fees and penalties are nonrefundable. Reduction of flows or waste strengths will not result in any refunds to the permittee for previous payments made to the City of Hanford that results from flow, and/or BOD5 and/or TSS effluent boundary violations.

F. The permittee shall not deliver or cause to be delivered any form of wastewater to the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant except through the City's sewer collection system and only under conditions, limitations and requirements as provided in this permit.

G. Failure to pay monthly service charges set forth in 13.08.100 of the Hanford Municipal Code and/or any penalty amounts assessed, and/or fines imposed as provided in this permit shall constitute a violation of this permit and permittee shall be subject to all remedies and fines provided in this

6


pennit and Chapter 13.08 of the Hanford Municipal Code, including disconnection from the City's sewer system.

H. Failure to comply with the discharge limits specified in 13.08.060 of the Hanford Municipal Code and the limits and effluent boundaries listed in Part I B of this pennit shall constitute a violation of this pennit and pennittee shall be subject to all remedies and fines provided in this permit and Chapter 13.08 of the Hanford Municipal Code, including but not limited to disconnection from the City's sewer system.

PART 5- UPSET AND ACCIDENTAL OR SLUG DISCHARGE

A. For the purpose of this section, upset means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with the limits and boundaries of this pennit because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the Industrial User. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, lack of preventative maintenance, or careless or improper operation.

B. For the purposes of this section, accidental or slug discharge means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional discharge of a prohibited or non-routine discharge, episodic in nature, including but not limited to an accidental spill or non-customary batch discharge, which has a reasonable potential to cause interference or pass through, or in any other way violate the City's regulations, local limits or industrial user permit conditions. The permittee is required to notify the City immediately of any changes at its facility that creates a potential for a slug discharge. If the City decides that a slug control plan shall contain all elements contained in 40 CFR 403.S(f) (2) (VI) (A)(D).

C. In the case of an accidental or slug discharge or upset, the permittee shall follow procedure outlined in Attachment A, the Standard Conditions, of this permit and in the 40 CFR 403.16.

D. Pennittee responsibility in case of upset. The pennittee shall control production or all discharges to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with boundaries and limits upon reduction, loss, or failure of its treatment facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost or fails.

(This space has been left blank.)

7


PART6-BYPASS A. For the purpose of this section, bypass means the intentional diversion of waste streams

from any portion of an industrial user's treatment facility.

B. In the case a bypass is deemed necessary the perrnittee shall follow procedure outlined in the Standard Conditions of this permit and in the 40 CFR 403.l 7(c).

C. Perrnittee responsibility in case of a bypass. The permittee shall control production or all discharges to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with boundaries and limits upon reduction, loss, or failure of its treatment facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost or fails.

By signing below the permittee agrees to abide by all of the terms of this permit outlined above.


_Jc) h"' A~,~ I J. (Print Name)

((Ct.I,\+- whl'\ c.. ~e..r (Title)

Date 2 -/,•/9

T~ per~ it has been approved and authorized by the Utilities and Engineering Director on 2.?_17 .

Date

(Utilities~doirector Signature)

8

Appendix F

Noise 5 – Project Noise Complaints Report

1

MRP San Joaquin Energy LLC.

Memo To: Neftali Nevarez, Compliance Manager

From: Rick Vogler, Operations Supervisor

CC:

Date: March 25, 2019

Re: Hanford Energy Park Peaker – 01-EP-7 – Noise Complaint Resolution

In accordance with Noise-5 of the Conditions of Certification that requires that all noise complaints related to the operations of the Hanford Energy Park Peaker be reported and resolved, it shall be hereby reported that MRP San Joaquin Energy LLC has not received any complaints of noise during the 2018 reporting year.

Appendix G

Compliance Matrix

AltaGas Hanford Energy Park PeakerCEC Compliance Tracking Report 2017

Hanford Energy park Peaker (01-EP-7) - ACR Tracking

CoC Description ScheduleSubmittal

Date Format RecipentAir AQ-2 The project owner shall comply with the terms and conditions of the

Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate issued by SJVAPCD. In the Event that the SJVAPCD finds the project to be out of compliance with the terms and conditions of the authority to construct, the project owner shall notify the CPM of the violation and the measures taken to return to compliance within 5 working days.

N/A 4/18/2018, 07/19/2018, 10/25/2018, 01/28/2019

Report SJVAPCD & J. Douglas, CEC

Bio Bio-11 Annual review biological inspection as required by the approved BRMIMP ACR 4/25/2019 Report J. Douglas, CEC - ACR

Hydrology and Water

Hydrology and Water - 3

Stormwater samples results and monitoring. ACR 4/25/2019 Paper Kings County Env. Health Services, L. Shaw, CEC

Hydrology and Water


The project owner will record on a monthly basis the amount of groundwater pumped by the project. This information will be supplied to the Energy Commission and the Kings County Water District.

ACR 4/25/2019 Report J. Douglas, CEC - ACR

Hydrology and Water


The Project owner will obtain a final Industrial Discharge Permit prepared in accordance with the City of Hanford's pretreatment program for the project's wastewater discharge to the City's POTW. The project will not operate without a valid permit in place.


Noise Noise-5 Throughout the construction and operation of the project, the project owner shall document, investigate, evaluate, and attempt to resolve all project-related noise complaints. Within 30 days of receiving a noise complaint, the project owner shall file a copy of the Noise Resolution Form with the CPM documenting resolution of the complaint.


Documents

Hanford Energy Park Peaker