Harker v PVP NJFL Octas

8/13/2019 Harker v PVP NJFL Octas

1/40


2/40

LloydState of nature leads to state of warConflict from competition for resources

Will fear that people will invade them, sothey'll go for anticipatory self-d

Pre-emptive attack Conflict furthered by religious and moraldisagreementsHobbes, manNo common authority War of all against all

Only oppressive government can stop theatrocities of the state of nature

Solves innately evil things from the SoN

Huge impacts hereHobbesNo commodities, no geography, no time,arts, letters, society Life would suck No trade/tech advancement

Impact is violence and no development

And, econ

Amy My study has better methodology Oppressive gov't k2 econ Leeson

Incentivzed to promote econ growth sothey benefit

World Bank data. Looks at pre- and post-statelessness. Looks at anarchy from 2000-2005.

Government can lessen economicinequality, must turn to gov'tLack of econ inequality When no laws, individuals can do as theyplease bc no laws


3/40


4/40

1AR 2NR it is common knowledge that people that makelaws are governments and that people thatmake rules that people follow are in authority,this is common knowledge, people in authorityform governments

The OED is updated every year, it's online, better reviewing process than The FreeDictionary, OED is older Wiktionary can be edited by everyone

People cooperate bc they have an incentive tocooperate, but their incentive is based onthem getting a benefit. But if I'm on acommunal farm where I benefit, industrialsocialism fails because people free-ride.Benefits people more if they don't cooperate.Cooperation wouldn't happen. Incentive is hisonly warrant. People would constantly fearattack; he dropped that warrant.

people like the incentive to cooperate; it's beneficial and in people's interests to have self-enforcing contracts

Hobbes has no warrant

His impact will never outweigh extinction, veryeasy to negate


5/40

extNo government database but there was still adatabase, prefer Leeson, more credible

sample size outweighs

ext that this isn't an econ impact


6/40


7/40

2AR 1AR 2NR


8/40


9/40


10/40

Judge Comments


11/40

1NC 1AR I concede util

Anarchy better for econ

Leeson 1 Leeson in that study admitted that they are not completelySomalia is doing better

Leeson 12Leeson 2 No statistical analysis or information on Somalia. There

isn't yet data post the recent conflict. Intense civil warfollowed gov't collapse.

Somalia's economy is boomingService/hospitality/communications/multinationalcorporations/transportation/construction/restaurants/hotels

SCTIFG class proves no long-term impact, his impact wasecon. The conflict causes violence!

Increased confidence in Somalia econ High levels of armed conflict mean econ development isn'tpossible. Alternate causality to improved econ

development.Statelessness key GM is in Somalia right now

Business growth o/w econ inequality More businesses means more people making $

his impacts aren't about growth

Bloomberg and Hess 02Growth solves nuclear warStudies prove

Leeson 3Life expectancy in Somalia is improvingInfant mortality fallen by a lotSanitation increasedTB has decreasedPoverty has decreased

Rummel

Anarchy will prevent more deaths

Democide Absolute power kills absolutely

Genocide/mass murder by governmentsMillions killed

Prefer it A. Massive Sample Size of 42,000 examples,largest on the topic, Hobbes is just aphilosopher, not an actual study

Moller


12/40

Anarchy solves terrorism bin Laden and co. relocated to Afghanistan

under control of the Taliban Afghan state is haven for terror

Morgan 9ExtinctionIt could go nuclear


13/40

2NR 2AR

countries with war can still have growth, they can still grow

lack of a gov't was what led to the benefits

LeesonSomalia performed better when it was stateless

ex Leeson 1 and 2

ext

ext

extThe more power people have, the more violence there is

His definition says we need to have power in the first place, sohe triggers this argument

he concedes sample size is key; my impacts come first, biggeststudy on the topic

ext


14/40

no safe havens in anarchy

extterrorism will go nuclearmassive escalationgame over!

prefer extinction impactsa. Severity, death is the worst violation b. Reversibility, can't reverse deathc. All plant life and animal life will die which means mostpossible sufferingHe can win every card but dropped the terror scenario


15/40

2NR 2AR Judge Comments


16/40

1NC 1AR No government is the same as oppressive government My definition stands, so an oppressive govt isn't legitimate

because it has a position of authority. It's still agovernment. It's not the same thing.

Uzgalas

Neither government fit the function of a government

??

They're the same based on their definitionIn the state of nature, there's no controlHe says government is a system of control

LockePeople won't consent to an oppressive government

Oppressive gov't puts people in a SoNThus, oppressive govt is no government

Triggers presumption since we're comparing two alike things

Presume neg1. Limited correct judgments, infinite incorrect ones

2. Aff gets infinite prep time3. No reason to prefer one system over another, if neither isdesirable, I've met my burden

Prefer substantive presumption args, k2 topic eduNotes (me)CALL FOR THE OFF(also presumption is probably impossible in a util debate)


17/40

2NR


18/40

2AR 2NR 2AR


19/40

Judge Comments


20/40

1NC 1AR


21/40

2NR


22/40

2AR 2NR 2ARThe voter is to vote on cooperation

I do have a warrant, he dropped the preservation warrant

People will attempt to preserve themselves, includingcheating such as free-riding, people won't cooperate

SoN will still be a state of war War of all vs all

He drops the long term impactNo long-term impact since it fell into conflict 5 yrs afteranarchyex the long-term impact, there was only a short 5 yearimpact and then after the 5 years it fell into chaos

I win on economy! The impacts left are extinction andterror

Magnitude -- War of all vs all has same magnitude asextinction, equal chance of killing everyoneProbability -- Equal chance of killing everyone else bceveryone can, war means retaliationStill a probability that terrorists will be deterred by ournukesI outweigh on probability and have equal magnitude

I've won econ bc Leeson fallsGrowth is dependent on leeson, short-term impactI provide economic equality, which when kept stable

allows for steady growth rate


23/40

Judge Comments


24/40

1NC 1AR


25/40

2NR


26/40

2AR 2NR 2AR


27/40

Judge Comments


28/40

1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR


29/40



30/40

1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR


31/40



32/40

1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR


33/40



34/40

1NC 2AC 2NC/1NR 1AR


35/40



36/40


Aff Prep Neg Prep


37/40

1AC 1NC

when this opens, you may need to enable themacros

the only macros you need to know are:

ctrl + n = shift all cells down one

ctrl + j = make responses to an argument. Tomake additional responses, move down onecell. (demonstrated below)

AFF ARGUMENT IS MADE HERE 1 click this cell and click "ctrl + J" so that a "1"appears in the column to the left

push enter, and then push "ctrl + J" so that a "2"appearscontinuing pushing enter and then pushing "ctrl+ J" for as many responses as are made

I guarantee that anyone with basic motor skillsand reasoning skills can master this

2

3


38/40

1AR 2NR


39/40

2AR 2NR 2AR


40/40

Judge Comments

Documents

Harker v PVP NJFL Octas