1
397 HLA ANTIBODIES DETECTED BY ELISA HTLV-III ANTIBODY KITS SiR.—Dr Kuhnl and colleagues (May 25, p 1222) provide evidence that HLA-DR4 antibodies may give positive results in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) used to detect antibodies to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III). 10 of 27 (37%) DR4 alloantisera were positive in the ELISA. The 10 monoclonal antisera were ELISA negative; however, this is expected since the second antibody, anti-human IgG, would not react with the mouse monoclonals even if they bound to the bead. The data suggest that HLA-DR4 antigen is present on the test beads used in the ELISA and, therefore, on H9, the cell line from which viral antigen is isolated for use in commercially available test kits. Professor Weiss and colleagues (July 20, p 156) typed H9 and confirmed the presence ofDR4 as well as HLA Al, Bw62, Bw6, Cw3, and DQw3. To examine whether the ELISA positives are caused by DR4 antibodies, we tested HLA antisera, procured locally from multiparous women, with Abbott ELISA kits. Class I antisera directed against HLA A, B, C found on H9 and DR antisera specific for non-H9 associated specificities were ELISA negative. 1 of 5 anti- DR4 and 3/4 anti-DQw3 sera were reproducibly ELISA positive. All sera tested were negative for HTLV-III antibodies by western blot. To extend the evidence that not only DR4 but also DQw3 antibodies give positive results in HTLV-111 ELISA tests we did HLA antibody analysis on sera from 20 ELISA repeatedly reactive blood donors. 6 of the donors were also HTLV-111 antibody positive by western blot. 4 of the 20 sera have DQw3 or DR4 specificity and an additional 5 reacted with some DR4 and DQw3 cells: Donors pOSlln’e for HTL h111 antibody Anll-HLA speciflcltzes detected ELISA positive/western blot negative 2 DQw3, 1 DR4, 1 DQwl, (n= = 14) 1 non-specific,* 9 negative ELISA positive/western blot positive 1 DQw3, 1 A9+,* 3 non-specific,* * (n=6) 1 negative *Reactivity not sufficient to assign specificity; however, sera preferentially reacted with DR4 and DQw3 positive B cells These data indicate that reactivity in HTLV-III ELISA assays can be due to DR4 and also DQw3 antibodies. However, we agree with Weiss et al that HLA antibody evaluation does not distinguish false positive ELISA results since one of our 6 western blot positive donors also has anti-DQw3 and 3 have non-specific class II HLA antibody. Western blot results are currently used for verification of HTLV- III antibodies detected by ELISA. The validity of this approach is supported by our finding that none of the HLA typing sera were positive by western blot and that 89% of western blot positive donors reported in the US by the Council of Community Blood Centers are males. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need to confirm this assumption by viral cultures or HTLV-III antigen specific testing. In addition, we strongly urge commercial manufacturers of ELISA kits to eliminate non-HTLV-III antigens from their test systems to decrease the proportionately large number of false positive tests results that occur currently. JAY B. HUNTER JAY E. MENITOVE Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, Inc, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA OVERINVESTIGATION SIR,-The patient Dr Jenkins describes (May 25, p 1213) saw several specialists. Damage to the spinal accessory nerve was identified by one, deltoid atrophy by another, decreased sensation by a third, a positive Adson’s manoeuvre by a fourth, and thoracic outlet syndrome was diagnosed by a fifth. Even the electromyogram was felt to be abnormal. Ultimately, the man was shown by the insurance company involved to be malingering. This is a strong comment on the limitations of our clinical method and on our need to make a diagnosis. When five of twelve doctors identify abnormalities that are not there, we have to reflect on how we might improve our skills. Every test, both in physical examination and in diagnostic investigation, has inherent limitations which depend upon the test’s sensitivity and specificity and upon the likelihood of the disease being present. Even for a very sensitive and specific test, a single positive finding, such as deltoid atrophy or a positive Adson’s manoeuvre, is more likely to represent a false positive than true disease, if the clinical picture suggests that the disease is unlikely. Clinicians should also recognise that their judgment may be affected by the priority they place on making a diagnosis. A physician who thinks that making a diagnosis is all-important may zealously pursue a diagnosis "because it is there"’ or may follow the maxim "when in doubt make a diagnosis". The attitude that it is much worse to call a sick person well, than to call a well person sick is deeply engrained in the medical profession and is supported by legal sanction (especially in the USA).3 This attitude underlies the "minimax" decision strategy or "better safe than sorry" approach, through which the doctor aims to minimise the chances of maximum possible loss or the worst outcome by directing investi- gation towards the most serious, though improbable, diagnosis.4 All these biases in decision making may result in overdiagnosis or misdiagnosis. As Jenkins implies, his patient and the community would have been better served if the physicians involved had recognised the limitations of their tests and curbed their desires to make a diagnosis. As family physicians we would have liked to know how the patient reacted to the revelation of his fitness and what the final outcome was. Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C I MARTIN J. BASS ROGER P. STRASSER 1 Editorial. Iatrogenesis Just what the doctor ordered. J Community Health 1980, 5: 149-57. 2 Wulff HR Rational diagnosis and treatment Oxford Blackwell, 1976: 114 3 Reiser SJ Medicine and the reign of technology Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1978, 192 4 Bursztajn H, Feinbloom RI, Hamm RM, Brodsky A Medical choices, medical chances New York: Merloyd Lawrence, 1981 189-90 DIFFUSE HYPEROSTOSIS ASSOCIATED WITH ETRETINATE SIR,-The retinoids are now the drugs of choice for the management of severe disorders of keratin is at ion such as ichthyosis. Isotretinoin (’Accutane’) has been used widely in the United States, and widespread hyperostosis as a complication oflong-term therapy has been reported. In contrast, in patients receiving etretinate (’Tigason’), there has hitherto been only one report of a disorder of ossification, and this was localised to the forearms. 3 A 38-year-old man with a recessive form of ichthyosis (congenital non-bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma) started taking etretinate 50 mg/daily (0 - 6 mg/kg) in March, 1980. His skin improved. The daily dose was increased to 75 mg and then, after 5 months, was reduced to a maintenance level of 50 mg. In November, 1984, the dose was reduced to 25 mg and he took this dose until April, 1985. In June, 1984, he noted vague musculoskeletal pains when lifting heavy objects. He practises the martial arts and noted increasing stiffness and discomfort, mainly in the thoracic spine and ribs. In April, 1985, there was limitation of movement of the thoracic spine and tenderness over the costal cartilages. X-rays suggested diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyerostosis (figure). There was ossification at the insertion of muscles around the pelvis and upper femora, ossification of the iliolumbar ligaments, and bridging of the anterior borders of the thoracic vertebral bodies. Isotope bone scans demonstrated focal areas of increased activity around the ossified iliolumbar ligaments, at the inferior borders of both sacroiliac joints, and along the anterior aspect of the cervicothoracic junction, confirming a predominantly axial hyperostosis. Serum calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, renal function, liver function, and fasting lipids were normal. Between October, 1957, and November, 1964, the patient had been treated with oral vitamin A (200 000-300 000 units daily). In November, 1958, signs of vitamin A toxicity developed. He had pains in the wrists and knees, bone tenderness, and hepatomegaly, but a liver biopsy showed no irreversible changes. Symptoms resolved when vitamin A was stopped temporarily and he was able to continue treatment for another six years. Topical vitamin A acid and topical retinoic acid were also used for prolonged periods.

HLA ANTIBODIES DETECTED BY ELISA HTLV-III ANTIBODY KITS

  • Upload
    jaye

  • View
    213

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: HLA ANTIBODIES DETECTED BY ELISA HTLV-III ANTIBODY KITS

397

HLA ANTIBODIES DETECTED BY ELISA HTLV-IIIANTIBODY KITS

SiR.—Dr Kuhnl and colleagues (May 25, p 1222) provideevidence that HLA-DR4 antibodies may give positive results inenzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) used to detectantibodies to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III

(HTLV-III). 10 of 27 (37%) DR4 alloantisera were positive in theELISA. The 10 monoclonal antisera were ELISA negative;however, this is expected since the second antibody, anti-humanIgG, would not react with the mouse monoclonals even if theybound to the bead. The data suggest that HLA-DR4 antigen is

present on the test beads used in the ELISA and, therefore, on H9,the cell line from which viral antigen is isolated for use in

commercially available test kits. Professor Weiss and colleagues(July 20, p 156) typed H9 and confirmed the presence ofDR4 as wellas HLA Al, Bw62, Bw6, Cw3, and DQw3.To examine whether the ELISA positives are caused by DR4

antibodies, we tested HLA antisera, procured locally from

multiparous women, with Abbott ELISA kits. Class I antiseradirected against HLA A, B, C found on H9 and DR antisera specificfor non-H9 associated specificities were ELISA negative. 1 of 5 anti-DR4 and 3/4 anti-DQw3 sera were reproducibly ELISA positive.All sera tested were negative for HTLV-III antibodies by westernblot.To extend the evidence that not only DR4 but also DQw3

antibodies give positive results in HTLV-111 ELISA tests we didHLA antibody analysis on sera from 20 ELISA repeatedly reactiveblood donors. 6 of the donors were also HTLV-111 antibody positiveby western blot. 4 of the 20 sera have DQw3 or DR4 specificity andan additional 5 reacted with some DR4 and DQw3 cells:Donors pOSlln’e for HTL h111 antibody Anll-HLA speciflcltzes detectedELISA positive/western blot negative 2 DQw3, 1 DR4, 1 DQwl,

(n= = 14) 1 non-specific,* 9 negativeELISA positive/western blot positive 1 DQw3, 1 A9+,* 3 non-specific,* *

(n=6) 1 negative*Reactivity not sufficient to assign specificity; however, sera preferentially reacted withDR4 and DQw3 positive B cells

These data indicate that reactivity in HTLV-III ELISA assays canbe due to DR4 and also DQw3 antibodies. However, we agree withWeiss et al that HLA antibody evaluation does not distinguish falsepositive ELISA results since one of our 6 western blot positivedonors also has anti-DQw3 and 3 have non-specific class II HLAantibody.Western blot results are currently used for verification of HTLV-

III antibodies detected by ELISA. The validity of this approach issupported by our finding that none of the HLA typing sera werepositive by western blot and that 89% of western blot positivedonors reported in the US by the Council of Community BloodCenters are males. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need to confirmthis assumption by viral cultures or HTLV-III antigen specifictesting. In addition, we strongly urge commercial manufacturers ofELISA kits to eliminate non-HTLV-III antigens from their testsystems to decrease the proportionately large number of falsepositive tests results that occur currently.

JAY B. HUNTERJAY E. MENITOVE

Blood Center ofSoutheastern Wisconsin, Inc,

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

OVERINVESTIGATION

SIR,-The patient Dr Jenkins describes (May 25, p 1213) sawseveral specialists. Damage to the spinal accessory nerve wasidentified by one, deltoid atrophy by another, decreased sensationby a third, a positive Adson’s manoeuvre by a fourth, and thoracicoutlet syndrome was diagnosed by a fifth. Even the electromyogramwas felt to be abnormal. Ultimately, the man was shown by theinsurance company involved to be malingering. This is a strongcomment on the limitations of our clinical method and on our needto make a diagnosis. When five of twelve doctors identifyabnormalities that are not there, we have to reflect on how we mightimprove our skills.Every test, both in physical examination and in diagnostic

investigation, has inherent limitations which depend upon the test’s

sensitivity and specificity and upon the likelihood of the diseasebeing present. Even for a very sensitive and specific test, a singlepositive finding, such as deltoid atrophy or a positive Adson’smanoeuvre, is more likely to represent a false positive than truedisease, if the clinical picture suggests that the disease is unlikely.

Clinicians should also recognise that their judgment may beaffected by the priority they place on making a diagnosis. Aphysician who thinks that making a diagnosis is all-important mayzealously pursue a diagnosis "because it is there"’ or may follow themaxim "when in doubt make a diagnosis". The attitude that it ismuch worse to call a sick person well, than to call a well person sickis deeply engrained in the medical profession and is supported bylegal sanction (especially in the USA).3 This attitude underlies the"minimax" decision strategy or "better safe than sorry" approach,through which the doctor aims to minimise the chances ofmaximum possible loss or the worst outcome by directing investi-gation towards the most serious, though improbable, diagnosis.4 Allthese biases in decision making may result in overdiagnosis ormisdiagnosis.As Jenkins implies, his patient and the community would have

been better served if the physicians involved had recognised thelimitations of their tests and curbed their desires to make a

diagnosis. As family physicians we would have liked to know howthe patient reacted to the revelation of his fitness and what the finaloutcome was.

Department of Family Medicine,University of Western Ontario,London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C I

MARTIN J. BASSROGER P. STRASSER

1 Editorial. Iatrogenesis Just what the doctor ordered. J Community Health 1980, 5:149-57.

2 Wulff HR Rational diagnosis and treatment Oxford Blackwell, 1976: 1143 Reiser SJ Medicine and the reign of technology Cambridge Cambridge University

Press, 1978, 1924 Bursztajn H, Feinbloom RI, Hamm RM, Brodsky A Medical choices, medical

chances New York: Merloyd Lawrence, 1981 189-90

DIFFUSE HYPEROSTOSIS ASSOCIATED WITHETRETINATE

SIR,-The retinoids are now the drugs of choice for the

management of severe disorders of keratin is at ion such as ichthyosis.Isotretinoin (’Accutane’) has been used widely in the United States,and widespread hyperostosis as a complication oflong-term therapyhas been reported. In contrast, in patients receiving etretinate(’Tigason’), there has hitherto been only one report of a disorder ofossification, and this was localised to the forearms. 3A 38-year-old man with a recessive form of ichthyosis (congenital

non-bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma) started taking etretinate50 mg/daily (0 - 6 mg/kg) in March, 1980. His skin improved. Thedaily dose was increased to 75 mg and then, after 5 months, wasreduced to a maintenance level of 50 mg. In November, 1984, thedose was reduced to 25 mg and he took this dose until April, 1985.

In June, 1984, he noted vague musculoskeletal pains when liftingheavy objects. He practises the martial arts and noted increasingstiffness and discomfort, mainly in the thoracic spine and ribs. InApril, 1985, there was limitation of movement of the thoracic spineand tenderness over the costal cartilages. X-rays suggested diffuseidiopathic skeletal hyerostosis (figure). There was ossification at theinsertion of muscles around the pelvis and upper femora,ossification of the iliolumbar ligaments, and bridging of the anteriorborders of the thoracic vertebral bodies. Isotope bone scans

demonstrated focal areas of increased activity around the ossifiediliolumbar ligaments, at the inferior borders of both sacroiliac

joints, and along the anterior aspect of the cervicothoracic junction,confirming a predominantly axial hyperostosis. Serum calcium,phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, renal function, liver function, andfasting lipids were normal.Between October, 1957, and November, 1964, the patient had

been treated with oral vitamin A (200 000-300 000 units daily). InNovember, 1958, signs of vitamin A toxicity developed. He hadpains in the wrists and knees, bone tenderness, and hepatomegaly,but a liver biopsy showed no irreversible changes. Symptomsresolved when vitamin A was stopped temporarily and he was ableto continue treatment for another six years. Topical vitamin A acidand topical retinoic acid were also used for prolonged periods.