1
COLUMN CONSUMER CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS How badly are we being ripped oon eyewear? Former industry execs tell all By DAVID LAZARUS MAR 05, 2019 | 5:00 AM ! " # Charles Dahan was one of the leading suppliers of frames to LensCrafters, before the company was purchased by optical behemoth Luxottica. Glasses that cost him $20 to make would be sold for five times that amount. (Luxottica) Charles Dahan knows from first-hand experience how badly people get ripped off when buying eyeglasses. He was once one of the leading suppliers of frames to LensCrafters, before the company was purchased by optical behemoth Luxottica. He also built machines that improved the lens-manufacturing process. In other words, Dahan, 70, knows the eyewear business from start to finish. And he doesn’t like what’s happened. “There is no competition in the industry, not any more,” he told me. “Luxottica bought everyone. They set whatever prices they please.” Dahan, who lives in Potomac, Md., was responding to a column I recently wrote about why consumer prices for frames and lenses are so astronomically high, with markups often approaching 1,000%. I noted that if you wear designer glasses, there’s a very good chance you’re wearing Luxottica frames. The company’s owned and licensed brands include Armani, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Chanel, Coach, DKNY, Dolce & Gabbana, Michael Kors, Oakley, Oliver Peoples, Persol, Polo Ralph Lauren, Ray-Ban, Tiffany, Valentino, Vogue and Versace. Along with LensCrafters, Luxottica also runs Pearle Vision, Sears Optical, Sunglass Hut and Target Optical, as well as the insurer EyeMed Vision Care. And Italy’s Luxottica now casts an even longer shadow over the eyewear industry after merging last fall with France’s Essilor, the world’s leading maker of prescription eyeglass lenses and contact lenses. The combined entity is called EssilorLuxottica. Just so you know up front, I reached out to both Luxottica and its parent company with what Dahan told me. I asked if they’d like to respond to his specific points or to speak generally about optical pricing. Neither company responded, which was the same response I received the last time I contacted them. Apparently EssilorLuxottica feels no need to defend its business practices. Or it understands that no reasonable defense is possible. Dahan, a chemical engineer by training, established a company called Custom Optical in 1977 after designing a machine capable of making prescription lenses appear thinner. In short order he also was designing plastic and metal frames, and proposed to LensCrafters in 1985 that he supply the then-independent company. “They bought my lens machines, and soon I was selling them a few models of frames,” Dahan said. “Those were successful, so they kept buying more.” Buying glasses online can save you a lot of money. Here’s how to do it » Eventually, he said, his company was supplying LensCrafters with about 20% of its frames. “They called me their crown jewel,” Dahan said. E. Dean Butler, the founder of LensCrafters, remembers Dahan as “a real go-getter.” “He was a key supplier — good product at reasonable prices,” Butler, 74, said in a phone interview from Berlin, where he was meeting with optical-industry contacts. He’s no longer affiliated with LensCrafters. These days he’s based in England, but serves as a consultant to optical businesses worldwide. Both Butler and Dahan acknowledged what most consumers have long suspected: that the prices we pay for eyewear in no way reflect the actual cost of making frames and lenses. When he was in the business, in the 1980s and ’90s, Dahan said it cost him between $10 and $16 to manufacture a pair of quality plastic or metal frames. Lenses, he said, might cost about $5 a pair to produce. With fancy coatings, that could boost the price all the way to $15. He said LensCrafters would turn around and charge $99 for completed glasses that cost $20 or $30 to make — and this was well below what many independent opticians charged. Nowadays, he said, those same glasses at LensCrafters might cost hundreds of dollars. Butler said he recently visited factories in China where many glasses for the U.S. market are manufactured. Improved technology has made prices even lower than what Dahan recalled. “You can get amazingly good frames, with a Warby Parker level of quality, for $4 to $8,” Butler said. “For $15, you can get designer- quality frames, like what you’d get from Prada.” And lenses? “You can buy absolutely first-quality lenses for $1.25 apiece,” Butler said. Yet those same frames and lenses might sell in the United States for $800. Butler laughed. “I know,” he said. “It’s ridiculous. It’s a complete rip- off.” In 1995, Luxottica purchased LensCrafters’ parent company, U.S. Shoe Corp., for $1.4 billion. The goal wasn’t to get into the shoe business. It was to take control of LensCrafters’ hundreds of stores nationwide. Dahan said things went downhill for him after that. Luxottica increasingly emphasized its own frames over those of outside suppliers, he said, and Custom Optical’s sales plunged. Dahan was forced to close his business in 2001. “It wasn’t just me,” he said. “It happened to a lot of companies. Look at Oakley.” Indeed, the California maker of premium sunglasses was embraced by skiers and other outdoorsy types after it released its first sunglasses in 1984. It raised $230 million with an initial public offering of stock in 1995. Its biggest customer by far was Sunglass Hut, which, like LensCrafters, had stores in malls across the country. Luxottica purchased Sunglass Hut in early 2001. It promptly told Oakley it wanted to pay significantly lower wholesale prices or it would reduce its orders and push its own brands instead. Within months, Oakley acknowledged to shareholders that the talks hadn’t gone well and that Luxottica was slashing its orders. “We have made every reasonable effort to establish a mutually beneficial business partnership with Luxottica, but it is clear from this week's surprising actions that our efforts have been ignored,” Oakley’s management said in a statement at the time. The company’s stock immediately lost more than a third of its value. Luxottica acquired Oakley a few years later, adding it to Ray-Ban, which Luxottica obtained in 1999. “That’s how they gained control of so many brands,” Dahan said. “If you don’t do what they want, they cut you off.” Again, no one at Luxottica responded to my request for comment. As I’ve previously observed, online glasses sales hold potential for pushing retail eyewear prices lower, but the e-glasses industry still has a ways to go before posing a threat to the likes of EssilorLuxottica. It can be a challenge buying something so central to one’s appearance without first trying it on or receiving hands-on help with fitting. In the meantime, Dahan and Butler told me, federal authorities should step up and prevent price gouging for eyewear — just as they’ve done with other healthcare products, such as EpiPens. “Federal officials fell asleep at the wheel,” Dahan said. “They should never have allowed all these companies to roll into one. It destroyed competition.” Butler said it should be clear from EssilorLuxottica’s practices that the company has too much market power. “If that’s not a monopoly,” he said, “I don’t know what is.” I couldn’t agree more. Regulators are currently wringing their hands over further consolidation in the wireless industry, with a proposed merger between Sprint and T-Mobile raising the prospect of just three major carriers. The eyewear market is in considerably worse shape. That should be clear to anyone. David Lazarus CONTACT ! " $ David Lazarus is an award-winning business columnist for the Los Angeles Times, focusing on consumer affairs. He also appears daily on KTLA-TV Channel 5 and is a part- time radio host. His work appears in newspapers across the country and has resulted in a variety of laws protecting consumers. COMMENTS (108) MOST READ CAPITOL JOURNAL Bryce Harper will save tens of millions in taxes by spurning the Dodgers and Giants 12:05 AM COLUMN How badly are we being ripped oon eyewear? Former industry execs tell all MAR 5, 2019 POLITICS California state workers hoarding vacation days, creating $3.5- billion debt for taxpayers 2h L.A. NOW Mystery girl in ‘Future Princess Hero’ shirt found dead on trail, in a duel bag. Who is she? 2h COLUMN On a night when Lakers fans should celebrate LeBron James’ feat, it feels awfully gloomy MAR 6, 2019 LATEST CONSUMER CONFIDENTIAL Lilly unveils a ‘generic’ insulin and shows how broken our healthcare system really is MAR 6, 2019 How badly are we being ripped off on eyewear? Former industry execs tell all MAR 5, 2019 Drug industry CEOs say the problem isn’t high prices, it’s how misunderstood they are FEB 28, 2019 Laugh it up, Republicans, but a soda tax is a serious response to a deadly serious problem FEB 26, 2019 As age-obsessed billionaires turn to ‘vampire’ therapies, the FDA takes a stand FEB 20, 2019 California Inc. Newsletter Weekly A look back, and ahead, at the latest California business news. ENTER YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS FROM AROUND THE WEB by Taboola Sponsored Links Progressive Drivers who switch save an average of $668 on car insurance. EverQuote Insurance Quotes Omaha, Nebraska Drivers Are Stunned By This New Rule Gundry MD Total Restore U.S. Cardiologist: It's Like a Pressure Wash for Your Insides MyFinance Two Savings Accounts That Pay 10x What Your Bank Pays United Naturals Top Gut Doctor: I Beg All Americans To Throw Out This… Marie Claire | Hanacure The Facial That Celebrities Say Takes 10 Years Off Your Face Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe for unlimited access About/Contact Archives Classifieds Terms Site map Advertising Corrections Privacy policy L.A. Times careers Find a job Shop ! " & ' ( ADVERTISEMENT > ADVERTISEMENT > ADVERTISEMENT > ADVERTISEMENT > ADVERTISEMENT > ADVERTISEMENT > ADVERTISEMENT > TRIAL OFFER SUPPORT QUALITY NEWS 4 weeks for 99¢ SAVE NOW By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy. Close Bryce Harper will save tens of millions in taxes by spurning the Dodgers and… California state workers hoarding vacation days, creating $3.5-billion debt f… Mystery girl in ‘Future Princess Hero’ shirt found dead on trail, in a duffel ba… From video gam How ‘SimCity’ i generation of ci ) TOPICS SEARCH SUBSCRIBE 4 weeks for only 99¢ * LOG IN

How badly are we being ripped o on eyewear? Former industry …web.surgivision.net/instantforum34/attachments/43538534How badl… · 05-03-2019  · ripped off when buying eyeglasses

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: How badly are we being ripped o on eyewear? Former industry …web.surgivision.net/instantforum34/attachments/43538534How badl… · 05-03-2019  · ripped off when buying eyeglasses

COLUMN CONSUMER CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS

How badly are we being ripped off on eyewear? Formerindustry execs tell all

By DAVID LAZARUS MAR 05, 2019 | 5:00 AM ! " #

Charles Dahan was one of the leading suppliers of frames to LensCrafters, before the company was

purchased by optical behemoth Luxottica. Glasses that cost him $20 to make would be sold for five

times that amount. (Luxottica)

Charles Dahan knows from first-hand experience how badly people getripped off when buying eyeglasses.

He was once one of the leading suppliers of frames to LensCrafters,before the company was purchased by optical behemoth Luxottica. Healso built machines that improved the lens-manufacturing process.

In other words, Dahan, 70, knows the eyewear business from start tofinish. And he doesn’t like what’s happened.

“There is no competition in the industry, not any more,” he told me.“Luxottica bought everyone. They set whatever prices they please.”

Dahan, who lives in Potomac, Md., was responding to a column Irecently wrote about why consumer prices for frames and lenses are soastronomically high, with markups often approaching 1,000%.

I noted that if you wear designer glasses, there’s a very good chanceyou’re wearing Luxottica frames.

The company’s owned and licensed brands include Armani, BrooksBrothers, Burberry, Chanel, Coach, DKNY, Dolce & Gabbana, MichaelKors, Oakley, Oliver Peoples, Persol, Polo Ralph Lauren, Ray-Ban,Tiffany, Valentino, Vogue and Versace.

Along with LensCrafters, Luxottica also runs Pearle Vision, SearsOptical, Sunglass Hut and Target Optical, as well as the insurerEyeMed Vision Care.

And Italy’s Luxottica now casts an even longer shadow over theeyewear industry after merging last fall with France’s Essilor, theworld’s leading maker of prescription eyeglass lenses and contactlenses. The combined entity is called EssilorLuxottica.

Just so you know up front, I reached out to both Luxottica and itsparent company with what Dahan told me. I asked if they’d like torespond to his specific points or to speak generally about opticalpricing.

Neither company responded, which was the same response I receivedthe last time I contacted them.

Apparently EssilorLuxottica feels no need to defend its businesspractices. Or it understands that no reasonable defense is possible.

Dahan, a chemical engineer by training, established a company calledCustom Optical in 1977 after designing a machine capable of makingprescription lenses appear thinner.

In short order he also was designing plastic and metal frames, andproposed to LensCrafters in 1985 that he supply the then-independentcompany.

“They bought my lens machines, and soon I was selling them a fewmodels of frames,” Dahan said. “Those were successful, so they keptbuying more.”

Buying glasses online can save you a lot of money. Here’s how to doit »

Eventually, he said, his company was supplying LensCrafters withabout 20% of its frames. “They called me their crown jewel,” Dahansaid.

E. Dean Butler, the founder of LensCrafters, remembers Dahan as “areal go-getter.”

“He was a key supplier — good product at reasonable prices,” Butler,74, said in a phone interview from Berlin, where he was meeting withoptical-industry contacts.

He’s no longer affiliated with LensCrafters. These days he’s based inEngland, but serves as a consultant to optical businesses worldwide.

Both Butler and Dahan acknowledged what most consumers have longsuspected: that the prices we pay for eyewear in no way reflect theactual cost of making frames and lenses.

When he was in the business, in the 1980s and ’90s, Dahan said it costhim between $10 and $16 to manufacture a pair of quality plastic ormetal frames.

Lenses, he said, might cost about $5 a pair to produce. With fancycoatings, that could boost the price all the way to $15.

He said LensCrafters would turn around and charge $99 for completedglasses that cost $20 or $30 to make — and this was well below whatmany independent opticians charged. Nowadays, he said, those sameglasses at LensCrafters might cost hundreds of dollars.

Butler said he recently visited factories in China where many glasses forthe U.S. market are manufactured. Improved technology has madeprices even lower than what Dahan recalled.

“You can get amazingly good frames, with a Warby Parker level ofquality, for $4 to $8,” Butler said. “For $15, you can get designer-quality frames, like what you’d get from Prada.”

And lenses? “You can buy absolutely first-quality lenses for $1.25apiece,” Butler said.

Yet those same frames and lenses might sell in the United States for$800.

Butler laughed. “I know,” he said. “It’s ridiculous. It’s a complete rip-off.”

In 1995, Luxottica purchased LensCrafters’ parent company, U.S. ShoeCorp., for $1.4 billion. The goal wasn’t to get into the shoe business. Itwas to take control of LensCrafters’ hundreds of stores nationwide.

Dahan said things went downhill for him after that. Luxotticaincreasingly emphasized its own frames over those of outside suppliers,he said, and Custom Optical’s sales plunged. Dahan was forced to closehis business in 2001.

“It wasn’t just me,” he said. “It happened to a lot of companies. Look atOakley.”

Indeed, the California maker of premium sunglasses was embraced byskiers and other outdoorsy types after it released its first sunglasses in1984.

It raised $230 million with an initial public offering of stock in 1995. Itsbiggest customer by far was Sunglass Hut, which, like LensCrafters,had stores in malls across the country.

Luxottica purchased Sunglass Hut in early 2001. It promptly toldOakley it wanted to pay significantly lower wholesale prices or it wouldreduce its orders and push its own brands instead.

Within months, Oakley acknowledged to shareholders that the talkshadn’t gone well and that Luxottica was slashing its orders.

“We have made every reasonable effort to establish a mutuallybeneficial business partnership with Luxottica, but it is clear from thisweek's surprising actions that our efforts have been ignored,” Oakley’smanagement said in a statement at the time.

The company’s stock immediately lost more than a third of its value.

Luxottica acquired Oakley a few years later, adding it to Ray-Ban,which Luxottica obtained in 1999.

“That’s how they gained control of so many brands,” Dahan said. “Ifyou don’t do what they want, they cut you off.”

Again, no one at Luxottica responded to my request for comment.

As I’ve previously observed, online glasses sales hold potential forpushing retail eyewear prices lower, but the e-glasses industry still hasa ways to go before posing a threat to the likes of EssilorLuxottica.

It can be a challenge buying something so central to one’s appearancewithout first trying it on or receiving hands-on help with fitting.

In the meantime, Dahan and Butler told me, federal authorities shouldstep up and prevent price gouging for eyewear — just as they’ve donewith other healthcare products, such as EpiPens.

“Federal officials fell asleep at the wheel,” Dahan said. “They shouldnever have allowed all these companies to roll into one. It destroyedcompetition.”

Butler said it should be clear from EssilorLuxottica’s practices that thecompany has too much market power. “If that’s not a monopoly,” hesaid, “I don’t know what is.”

I couldn’t agree more. Regulators are currently wringing their handsover further consolidation in the wireless industry, with a proposedmerger between Sprint and T-Mobile raising the prospect of just threemajor carriers.

The eyewear market is in considerably worse shape.

That should be clear to anyone.

David LazarusCONTACT ! " $

David Lazarus is an award-winning business columnist for the Los Angeles Times,focusing on consumer affairs. He also appears daily on KTLA-TV Channel 5 and is a part-time radio host. His work appears in newspapers across the country and has resulted in avariety of laws protecting consumers.

COMMENTS (108)

MOST READ

CAPITOL JOURNAL

Bryce Harper will save tens of millions in taxes by spurning theDodgers and Giants12:05 AM

COLUMN

How badly are we being ripped off on eyewear? Former industryexecs tell allMAR 5, 2019

POLITICS

California state workers hoarding vacation days, creating $3.5-billion debt for taxpayers2h

L.A. NOW

Mystery girl in ‘Future Princess Hero’ shirt found dead on trail, in aduffel bag. Who is she?2h

COLUMN

On a night when Lakers fans should celebrate LeBron James’ feat,it feels awfully gloomyMAR 6, 2019

LATEST CONSUMER CONFIDENTIAL

Lilly unveils a ‘generic’insulin and shows howbroken our healthcaresystem really is

MAR 6, 2019

How badly are we beingripped off on eyewear?Former industry execstell all

MAR 5, 2019

Drug industry CEOs saythe problem isn’t highprices, it’s howmisunderstood they are

FEB 28, 2019

Laugh it up, Republicans,but a soda tax is aserious response to adeadly serious problem

FEB 26, 2019

As age-obsessedbillionaires turn to‘vampire’ therapies, theFDA takes a stand

FEB 20, 2019

California Inc. NewsletterWeekly

A look back, and ahead, at the latest California business news.

ENTER YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS ∠

FROM AROUND THE WEB by TaboolaSponsored Links

Progressive

Drivers who switchsave an average of$668 on car insurance.

EverQuote Insurance Quotes

Omaha, NebraskaDrivers Are StunnedBy This New Rule

Gundry MD Total Restore

U.S. Cardiologist: It'sLike a Pressure Washfor Your Insides

MyFinance

Two Savings AccountsThat Pay 10x WhatYour Bank Pays

United Naturals

Top Gut Doctor: I BegAll Americans ToThrow Out This…

Marie Claire | Hanacure

The Facial ThatCelebrities Say Takes10 Years Off Your Face

Sign up for our newslettersSubscribe for unlimitedaccess

About/Contact

Archives

Classifieds

Terms

Site map

Advertising

Corrections

Privacy policy

L.A. Times careers

Find a job

Shop

! " & ' (

Copyright © 2019, Los Angeles Times

ADVERTISEMENT

>

ADVERTISEMENT

>

ADVERTISEMENT

>

ADVERTISEMENT

>

ADVERTISEMENT

>

ADVERTISEMENT

>

ADVERTISEMENT

>

TRIAL OFFERSUPPORT QUALITY NEWS

4 weeks for 99¢SAVE NOW

By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You can learn

more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy. Close

Bryce Harper will save tensof millions in taxes byspurning the Dodgers and…

California state workershoarding vacation days,creating $3.5-billion debt f…

Mystery girl in ‘FuturePrincess Hero’ shirt founddead on trail, in a duffel ba…

From video game to day job:How ‘SimCity’ inspired ageneration of city planners

) TOPICS fl SEARCHSUBSCRIBE

4 weeks for only 99¢ * LOG IN