23
David McDonald Consultant in Social Research & Evaluation Fellow, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health The Australian National University Community Coalition on Corrections’ Public Forum, Canberra, 14 March 2008 1

How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

  • Upload
    garron

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

David McDonald Consultant in Social Research & Evaluation Fellow, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health The Australian National University Community Coalition on Corrections’ Public Forum, Canberra, 14 March 2008. How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

David McDonaldConsultant in Social Research & EvaluationFellow, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population HealthThe Australian National University

Community Coalition on Corrections’ Public Forum, Canberra, 14 March 2008

1

Page 2: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Overview

Stigma and discrimination Imprisonment and prison health Blood-borne virus (BBV) transmission and

prisons Stigma, fear and discrimination: their links to

BBV transmission The public health approach Impediments and facilitators of rational policy

re BBVs and the AMC Discussion

2

Page 3: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Two worlds …

‘The vilest of deeds like poison-weedsBloom well in prison-air:It is only what is good in Man That wastes and withers there:Pale Anguish keeps the heavy gate And the Warder is Despair.’

(Oscar Wilde, ‘The Ballard of Reading Gaol’, 1896)

The Health Promoting Prison movement

(based on the 1986 Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion)

3

Page 4: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Stigma …

Erving Goffmann: Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity (1964)

Stigma is the gap between ‘virtual social identity’ and ‘actual social identity’

Three types: ‘abominations of the body’ ‘blemishes of individual character’ ‘the tribal stigma of race, nation, and

religion’4

Page 5: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Stigma

A mark made upon the skin by burning with a hot iron…as a token of infamy or subjection; a brand (OED)

Stigmatize: to set a stigma upon; to mark with a sign of disgrace or infamy; to characterize by a term implying severe censorship or condemnation (OED)

5

Page 6: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Thief being branded, engraving, ca. 1638

(Source: www.bowdoin.edu/news/archives/images/brand2.jpg)

6

Page 7: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Stigma is a social process, linked to discrimination

1. Illness is constructed as preventable or controllable

2. ‘Immoral’ behaviours causing illness are identified

3. These behaviours are associated with ‘carriers’ of the illness in other groups…

4. Certain people are thus blamed for their own infection and

5. Status loss is projected onto the ‘other’, which may (or may not) result in disadvantage to them: discrimination(Deacon 2006)

This is dependent upon unequal power relationships7

Page 8: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Who are the stigmatized?

Category or label Choices/behaviour/ situation

Drug use Sexual partner(s)

What illness one is living with

Heroin or shiraz? Gay lesbian bisexual

transgender or straight?

Hepatitis C, HIV/AIDS or high blood pressure?

8

Page 9: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Why do we imprison people?“Men are sent to prison as a

punishment, not for punishment”(Sir Alexander Patterson, UK 1930s)

Functions of sentencing & imprisonment: punish deter incapacitate rehabilitate

9

Page 10: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Blood-borne viruses and prison Prison populations and imprisonment rates are

rising Hepatitis C, hepatitis B & HIV/AIDS

transmission in prisons are key health and management concerns

Risk factors include: High prevalence of HCV and HBV among prisoners High-risk injecting High risk sexual behaviour Lack of resources for prevention Stigma and discrimination

10

Page 11: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Blood-borne viruses and prison HCV & HBV transmission occurs in

Australian prisons: ‘Individuals entering an Australian prison HCV negative have a 10% per annum chance of becoming infected with the virus’ (Batey 2007)

Leading risk factors Injecting: contaminated injecting environments and

contaminated injecting equipment (Butler et al. 2004)

Among non-injectors: contaminated tattooing environments and contaminated tattooing equipment (Butler et al. 2004)

Correctional Services’ and Governments’ policies reflecting and creating stigma and discrimination

11

Page 12: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Stigma, fear and discrimination in the communityAnti-Discrimination Board of NSW 2001: C-change: the

report of the enquiry into hepatitis C related discrimination

The evidence to this Enquiry clearly demonstrates that hepatitis C is a highly stigmatised condition and that discrimination against people with hepatitis C is rife.

Such discrimination is often driven by irrational fears about hepatitis C infection, due to an inadequate understanding of how hepatitis C is transmitted.

However, a perhaps more powerful driving force for discrimination than ignorance about hepatitis C transmission, is that infection is inextricably linked with illicit drug use, a highly stigmatised behaviour.

12

Page 13: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

…and particularly in health settings ‘Discrimination was reported by 22% of the

237 IDUs who reported being HCV-positive, with 17% reporting that the discrimination occurred in the preceding 12 months.

…half [the incidents] were perceived to be due to their drug user status, 15% of these incidents were due to HCV status and 25% due to a combination of both.

Twenty-five incidents occurred in a health-care setting, of which 13 resulted in the service being withheld.’ (Day et al. 2003)

13

Page 14: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

The Public Health Approach

14

host

environmentagent

Page 15: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

The Public Health Approach

The core of health promotion: making healthy choices easy choices Change the person Change the agent Change the environment/system

15

Page 16: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Preventing the BBV epidemic in prisons Primary prevention: prevent the onset of the

condition Eliminating the organism (BBVs and stigma) Environmental protection Interrupting the chain of transmission Reducing susceptibility in the host Health education and community participation

Secondary prevention: arrest the progression of an established condition Screening Investigation of the causes, transmission pathways

and risk factors, and develop interventions

Tertiary prevention: limiting the adverse consequences of an established condition Treatment

(O’Brien 2006) 16

Page 17: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Dealing with stigma and discrimination and BBV transmission in the AMC ACT Human Rights Commission’s Human Rights

Audit on the Operation of the ACT Correctional Facilities 2007 auditing prisoner health records and conducting

an epidemiological survey strategies for the prevention of BBV transmission ‘Consistent with the ethos of a healthy prison,

the emphasis must continue to shift from a culture that privileges control and security over detainees’ needs. Instead, meeting detainees’ needs should be acknowledged as assisting to maintain security and order in the prison’ (Recommendation 5.2.1, p. 93, my emphasis).

17

Page 18: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Impediments to & facilitators of rational policy on the AMC

The players in the policy process:policy makers, influencers, the public (affected communities), media (Nutbeam 2006)

How evidence is used: as a prop or for enlightenment? (Nutley et al. 2007)

Types of evidence: research knowledge & information ideas & interests politics economics (Bowen & Zwi 2005)

18

Page 19: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Assessing & monitoring stigma & discrimination in the AMC UNAIDS Protocol for the Identification of

Discrimination Against People Living with HIV (UNAIDS 2000)

Examples of indicators; for each assess as to required by law, required by internal protocols/regulations or simply occurring in practice: Refusal to treat on grounds of BBV status Differential treatment on grounds of BBV status Testing without knowledge Refusal to inform a person of the results of a test Health controls, e.g. segregation Compulsory notification of BBV status to sexual partners,

relatives, etc. Breaches of confidentiality

19

Page 20: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

For discussion … Is the concept of a ‘heath promoting prison’ realistic or

just pie-in-the-sky? Is it true that Correctional Services’ and Governments’

policies can reflect and create stigma and discrimination? and that this is a risk factor for blood-borne virus transmission?

Fear of drug users and their HCV positive status and discrimination against them are rife in the community, including in health care settings. Can the AMC be better?

Focus where: prisoners’ knowledge, attitudes & behaviour? Prison staff? Corrections policy generally? Elsewhere?

How can we move to a situation where ‘…meeting detainees’ needs should be acknowledged as assisting to maintain security and order in the prison’ (ACT Human Rights Commission 2007)?

Should qualitative and quantitative assessments of stigma and discrimination be part of the performance indicators for evaluating the AMC? 20

Page 21: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

References

International Conference on Health Promotion 1986, 'Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, WHO/HPR/HEP/95.1', paper presented to First International Conference on Health Promotion, Ottawa, 17-21 November, <http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa_charter_hp.pdf>.

Goffman, E 1963, Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Eng.

Link, BG & Phelan, JC 2001, 'Conceptualizing stigma', Annual Review of Sociology, p. 363.

Deacon, H 2006, 'Towards a sustainable theory of health-related stigma: lessons from the HIV/AIDS literature', Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 16, pp. 418-25.

Braithwaite, J 1996, Dorothy J. Killam Memorial Lecture: Restorative Justice and a Better Future, Dalhousie University, 17 October, 1996, viewed 20 Nov. 2000 <http://www.realjustice.org/Pages/braithwaite.html>.

Batey, RG 2007, 'Controversies in and challenges to our understanding of hepatitis C', World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 31, pp. 4168-76.

Butler, T, Kariminia, A, Levy, M & Kaldor, J 2004, 'Prisoners are at risk for hepatitis C transmission', European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1119-22.

New South Wales, Anti-Discrimination Board 2001, C change: report of the enquiry into hepatitis C related discrimination, The Board, [Sydney].

Day, C, Ross, J & Dolan, K 2003, 'Hepatitis C-related discrimination among heroin users in Sydney: drug user or hepatitis C discrimination?' Drug Alcohol Rev, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 317-21.

21

Page 22: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

References (cont.)

O'Brien, S 2006, 'Preventing epidemics of communicable disease', in D Pencheon, C Guest, D Melzer & JAM Gray (eds), Oxford handbook of public health practice, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 206-16.

ACT Human Rights Commission 2007, Human Rights Audit on the Operation of ACT Correctional Facilities under Corrections Legislation, Human Rights Commission, Canberra.

Nutbeam, D 2006, 'Developing healthy public policy', in D Pencheon, C Guest, D Melzer & JAM Gray (eds), Oxford handbook of public health practice, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 312-8.

Nutley, SM, Walter, I & Davies, HTO 2007, Using evidence: how research can inform public services, Policy Press, Bristol.

Bowen, S & Zwi, AB 2005, 'Pathways to "evidence-informed" policy and practice: a framework for action', PLoS Medicine, vol. 2, no. 7, p. e166.

UNAIDS: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 2000, Protocol for the identification of discrimination against people living with HIV, UNAIDS Best Practice Collection, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, http://data.unaids.org/Publications/IRC-pub01/JC295-Protocol_en.pdf .

22

Page 23: How fear and stigma inhibit sound public health policy

Presenter’s contacts

David McDonaldDirectorSocial Research & Evaluation Pty LtdPO Box 1355Woden ACT 2606

Phone: (02) 6238 3706Mobile: 0416 231 890Fax: (02) 9475 4274Email: [email protected]: www.socialresearch.com.au=======================================

===FellowNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population HealthThe Australian National UniversityCanberra ACT 0200Email: [email protected]