15
Presented by: Shridhar Kayan (2013277) Tapas Shivpuri (2013302) Udit Mehrotra (2013308) Utsav Dubey (2013311) Vainav Shah (2013314) Vineet Agarwal (2013323)

hudepohl brewing company

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

competitive advantage

Citation preview

  • Presented by:

    Shridhar Kayan (2013277)

    Tapas Shivpuri (2013302)

    Udit Mehrotra (2013308)

    Utsav Dubey (2013311)

    Vainav Shah (2013314)

    Vineet Agarwal (2013323)

  • INTRODUCTION

    Hudepohl Brewing Co. was founded by Louis Hudepohl in 1885.Thereafter, his descendants looked after the company through

    various generations.

    Bob Pohl was appointed as the new general Manager in 1980after the sudden death of the companys president.

    The company experienced a disappointing stint during the lateseventies as it was operating at less than 40% of its capacity and

    bore a loss of $538,000 in 1978.

    Even after the disappointing results, Pohl was optimistic aboutthe future and predicted growth in the earnings and this was

    confirmed by a 7% growth in sales during first four months of 1980.

    Pohl majorly focused on changing the organizational structure ofthe company right after he was appointed as the general

    manager.

  • Hudepohls Marketing Strategy

    Hudepohl marketed aggressively in Cincinnati using both push and pull-marketingtechniques.

    A large budget of $700,000 was allocated for promotion in Cincinnati. This wasmore than half of the total marketing budget of the company.

    Hudepohls promotions were mostly focused on sports-related advertising.

    The advertising was randomly distributed among its product range with anemphasis on competitively priced products dedicated towards urban, blue collar

    workers.

    According to a local market research firm, Hudepohl customers could beessentially described as white, lower-income, blue collar, middle-aged male cityresidents who have a union affiliation and are outdoor sportsman type.

  • Cost

    Willingnes

    s to Pay

  • Value Chain for Hudepohl Brewing

    Company

    Brewing Ingredients

    Molt Corn Rice Hops

    Packaging Material

    Bottles Cans

    Traditional Method

    Batch size Production

    Fermentation Process

    (soaking a starch source

    in the water and

    fermenting it with yeast)

    Racking and Packing

    Bottling and Canning

    Distribution Taking an order Filling it from the

    supplies that has

    been placed on the

    truck the day

    before.

    Collecting Cash For Order

    Picking Up the Empty Returnable

    Bottels

    The function of purchasing the raw materials and other inputs used in the value-

    creating activities.

    Finance, Legal support, Quality Management, ETC

    Compensation Plan, Recruitment, Training & Development ETC

    Batch

    production

    Inventory

    Keeping system

    Inbound logistics Operations Outbound Logistics Marketing and

    sales

    Firm Infrastructure

    Human Resource

    Technology Development

    Procurement

    Racking &

    Packing system

    Pricing

    Promotions

    Advertising

    Supporting

    Activities

    Primary

    Activities

  • U.S. Brewing Industry

    Growing market increasingly supplied by fewer brewers.

    Concentration of the industry - due to economies of scale in the

    production, distribution, and marketing of beer.

    By 1978, top 10 American brewers accounted for 94% of beer sales

    Winners (1969 & 1979) - Anheuser-Busch, Miller, and Heileman

  • Market share of top 10 brewing

    companies

  • Industry Economics

    Raw materials purchasing - major brewing ingredients, were

    subject to wide fluctuations in price

    Production - reluctant to change its methods of brewing,

    expensive installation

    Labor Higher wages, Labor productivity improved

  • Labor Cost as a Percentage of the Cost of Goods

    Sold

    1971 1955

    Anheuser-Busch

    Regional company

    (Falstaff)

    0.28%

    0.37

    0.42%

    0.385

  • Packaging - canning line speeds increased 123% and labor

    requirements dropped 42%

    General and administrative expenses - Increase in the average plants

    scale, 1 million barrels (1969) to 2.5 million barrels (1979) - decrease

    the unit costs

  • Brewing Industrys Cost per Barrel in Constant 1977 Dollars

    1977 (in $) 1972 (in $)

    Brewing materials

    Package materials

    Production labor

    Nonproduction

    labor

    Selling, general

    and administrative

    expense

    9.00

    16.91

    3.75

    1.71

    1.25

    $32.62

    $4.49

    18.90

    4.53

    2.70

    1.36

    $31.98

  • Distribution

    Difference between Hudepohl and industrys distribution channel

    As per case, Hudepohls share in regional deliveries out of the total beer they producedamounted to 60%.

    Because of large number of regional deliveries, there was a lot of money being spent onlabour force which in turn hiked the per unit labour cost.

    Considering Industry practices, national companies spent very less to distribute in localand regional areas as they relied on independent distributors.

    For distribution of beer in different areas, Hudepohl too relied on Independent distributorsbut their per unit cost did not change a lot.

  • Steps for future

    48% of total beer market segment constituted of consumption of

    premium beer, due to increased advertizing by the top players.

    Houdepohl should therefore leverage its German Heritage by

    extending its brand through upward stretch and introducing a

    premium beer product.

  • Cont.

    Marketing expenses need to be remodel to change the image of

    the company and promote its new premium beer through TVC andHofbrau in Cincinnati.

    The profits from these products should be invested in bringing as

    much automation as possible in the production process to achieve

    economies of scale.