HYDROGEOLOGICAL SITE ASSESSMENT DUNLOP STREET, … Hall/environmental...undertaken to provide background hydrogeological conditions which will determine the level of permitting needed

HYDROGEOLOGICAL SITE ASSESSMENT DUNLOP STREET, BARRIE, ON

Project No.: BM-18-8036

Prepared for:

City of Barrie

70 Collier St

Barrie, ON

L4M 4T5

Prepared by:

McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd.

115 Walgreen Rd.

Carp, ON

K0A 1L0

January 7, 2020

Executive Summary

0BM-18-8036

This report presents the results of a hydrogeological assessment carried out for the purposes of evaluating

the dewatering needs for the widening and intersection improvements in Barrie, Ontario. The proposed

construction work involves road widening and intersection improvements along a 1.4 km stretch of Dunlop

Street between Ferndale Drive North and Anne Street North. The area of investigation is shown on Figure 1.

For the purpose of this report, McIntosh Perry has assumed that construction will proceed in 45 m long by 3

m wide trenches, to a maximum depth of approximately 3 m below ground surface (bgs). On-site testing was

undertaken to provide background hydrogeological conditions which will determine the level of permitting

needed for construction dewatering.

Single well response testing or slug tests were preformed at four on-site monitoring wells to establish an

accurate hydraulic conductivity (K) value for the underlying sand. Additionally, soil samples were collected

during monitoring well installation and borehole advancement, as well as groundwater samples collected

during the slug test analyses. Groundwater samples were analyzed for the necessary parameters listed under

the City of Barrie’s Storm and Sanitary Sewer Use Guidelines.

The proposed construction should proceed under the following conditions:

• A Category 3 PTTW or EASR is obtained (depends on actual excavation volumes);

• Monitoring wells are abandoned as construction progresses in their vicinity, following the

requirements of O.Reg. 903 (wells); and

• Discharged water meets all applicable sewer-use guidelines, or Provincial Water Quality Standards,

Objectives, and Guidelines (PWQO or other relevant legislation) if discharged to a natural receiving

body and/or storm sewer.

Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street

0BM-18-8036

ii

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................1

2.0 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................1

2.1 Site Setting .............................................................................................................................................................. 1

2.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................ 1

2.3 Background Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................. 2

3.0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................3

3.1 Field Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 3

3.1 Calculations ............................................................................................................................................................. 3

3.2 Results ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5

3.2.1 Static Conditions ............................................................................................................................................. 5

3.2.2 Single-well Response Tests (Slug-Tests) .......................................................................................................... 5

3.2.3 Dewatering Volumes (inflow to excavation) ................................................................................................... 9

3.2.4 Soil Quality .................................................................................................................................................... 10

3.2.5 Water Quality ................................................................................................................................................ 10

3.2.6 Water Well Record Review ........................................................................................................................... 10

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 12

5.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 13

6.0 LIMITATIONS AND CLOSURE ........................................................................................................................... 14


0BM-18-8036

iii

TABLES

Table 1 Groundwater Quality

Table 2 Soil Quality

Table 3-1 Water Level Data (in report)

Table 3-2 Monitoring Well Data (in report)

Table 3-3 Water Well Records (in report)

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location

Figure 2 Site Layout

Figure 3 Ontario Base Map with MECP Well Records

APPENDICES

Appendix A MECP Well Records

Appendix B Laboratory Certificates of Analysis (Water and Soil Quality Data)

Appendix C Hydraulic Conductivity Calculations

Appendix D Groundwater Dewatering Calculations

Appendix E Borehole Logs


0BM-18-8036

1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. (McIntosh Perry) was retained by the City of Barrie to conduct a

hydrogeological assessment in support of the widening and intersection improvements along Dunlop Street

from 150 m west of Ferndale River North to Cedar Point Drive and from the Highway 400 E/W-N ramp to 150

m east of Anne Street North in Barrie, Ontario (the Site, see Figure 1). An outline of the Site and proposed

construction area is presented in Figure 2.

This report provides a hydrogeological assessment of groundwater levels, hydraulic conductivity, and

groundwater infiltration as it relates to and affects dewatering during the construction stages of the road

widening and intersection improvements along the Site. The following reports were reviewed as part of the

current hydrogeological assessment:

• “Dunlop Street Municipal Class C, Environmental Assessment – Geotechnical Report”, by Mcintosh

Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd., dated: January 23, 2020; Project No.: 0BM-18-8036

• “City of Barrie, Dunlop Street West Improvements (Anne Street to Ferndale Drive), Class

Environmental Assessment: Hydrogeological and Contaminated Lands Assessment Components”,

dated 2008, by Golder Associates (Appendix M of Environmental Study Report, Burnside &

Associates).

This hydrogeological report addresses the following:

• General site setting information;

• Geological and hydrogeological background;

• Site-specific conditions;

• Estimated groundwater inflow volumes; and

• Hydraulic conductivity values.

2.0 BACKGROUND

2.1 Site Setting

On-site elevation ranges from approximately 230-236 m above sea level (asl). The Site slopes down to the

northeast, toward Lake Simcoe.

2.2 Hydrology

On-site surface water is presumed to drain into roadside ditches and catch basins located along Dunlop

Street. Lake Simcoe is the closest permanent natural water body and is located approximately 1.1 km east of

the subject property at its closest point.


0BM-18-8036

2

2.3 Background Geology and Hydrogeology

According to mapping published by the Ontario Geological Survey, the surficial geology of the Site generally

consists of sand, gravel, minor silt and clay. Bedrock geology in the area is described as limestone, dolostone,

shale, arkose, and sandstone of the Shadow Lake Formation. (OGS, 2019)

A review of the MECP Water Well Information System (WWIS), as summarized by Golder Associates (2008),

indicated fourteen wells within 150 m of the Site. These wells are reportedly completed in overburden

material (predominantly sand and gravel) with depths ranging from 7.3 m to 104.9 m below ground surface

(bgs). With the exception of three wells, all records are for installations occurring later than 1966. Two

additional wells are listed as abandoned (assumed monitoring wells) and an additional well is listed as a

municipal well (installed c. 1988). At this time, the Site has been municipally serviced for over ten years,

which adds to the reasonable assumption that there are no active water supply wells within 150 m of the

Site. MECP Well Records are included as Appendix A. (Golder Associates, 2008)

MECP WWIS data are generally consistent with observations made by McIntosh Perry’s staff during the

subsurface investigation, which characterized the Site as having overburden consisting of sand with trace to

some silt and/or clay (Mcintosh Perry, 2020). Additionally, McIntosh Perry conducted an independent MECP

WWIS search for records within a 500 m radius of the Site; listed completion material is generally similar to

that summarized by Golder Associates (MECP, 2019).

Based on the City of Barrie’s most recent Source Water Protection Threat Assessment (Golder Associates,

2010), MECP WWIS records indicate that a majority of the well records within 150 m of the Site are

completed in the region’s ‘intermediate/A2 aquifer’, which is found in the elevation range of approximately

175 – 230 m asl. This aquifer ranges in thickness from approximately 10 – 30 m and is confined to a unit of

inter-layered sand and silt/clay overburden. In most areas, the A2 aquifer is isolated from the ‘upper/A1

aquifer’ (300 – 220 m asl) by 5 – 20 m of confining clay and/or silty sediments. All monitoring wells installed

as part of this project are screened within the region’s A1 aquifer, which is generally unconfined and thus

considered connected to shallow groundwater and surface water.


0BM-18-8036

3

3.0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

3.1 Field Methodology

Prior to any hydrogeological testing, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells BH E4-2 and

BH W4-2 and submitted to an accredited laboratory (ALS Environmental (ALS) of Mississauga) to establish

whether water quality meets the City of Barrie (COB) Storm and Sanitary Sewer Use By-Law Criteria. The

groundwater samples were collected following standard well sampling procedures. All samples were

collected, unfiltered and unchlorinated, directly into clean bottles supplied by ALS. Samples were kept on ice

and shipped directly to ALS. As noted on the chains of custody and certifications of analysis (Appendix B), all

samples were received by the laboratory within 24 hours of collection. Results from field and laboratory

testing of groundwater samples are summarized in Table 1.

To assess potential dewatering needs for the proposed work, six (6) monitoring wells installed along Dunlop

Street were individually subject to single-well response tests, also known as bail or slug tests, to determine

hydraulic conductivity. Tests were completed on May 31 and June 1, 2019. All six (6) wells (BH E2-2, BH E4-2,

BH W2-1, BH W4-2, BH W5-2 and BH W8) were completed on May 7, 8 and 9, 2019 to maximum depths of

4.5 metres below ground (mbg), 4.2 mbg, 4.5 mbg, 4.5 mbg, 3.6 mbg, and 4.5 mbg, respectively. To complete

the single-well response test at each monitoring well, static water levels were recorded and a known volume

of water was rapidly pumped from the well using Waterra® tubing and a positive displacement foot valve.

Water level recovery was then monitored with an electronic water tape and a LeveLogger™.

3.2 Calculations

In calculating hydraulic conductivity for overburden at the Site, McIntosh Perry analyzed single-well response

recovery data in all wells (BH-E4-2, BH-W4-2, BH-W5-1, BH-E2, BH-W2-1, and BH-W8). Recover data for all

wells were assessed using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) mathematical solution. Hydraulic conductivity (K)

calculations were completed for all slug tests performed at all wells using the Bouwer and Rice formula for

partially penetrating wells, and test results were averaged to obtain a composite K value for each well.

The following assumptions apply to the Bouwer and Rice (1976) solution and subsequent calculations:

• Aquifer has infinite areal extent, and is homogenous, isotropic, and of uniform thickness over the

area of influence of the slug test

o Note: per the discussion in S. 2.3 – Background Geology and Hydrogeology (above)

McIntosh Perry has assumed the base elevation of the water-bearing formation (A1

aquifer) to be 220 m asl.

• The aquifer is unconfined

• That all wells partially penetrate the aquifer


0BM-18-8036

4

• All water removed as part of the single-well response test is discharged instantaneously from the

well

The Dupuit-Forcheimer Equation for unconfined flow to an open trench was used to estimate groundwater

inflow (Q) into the proposed excavation using the highest estimated hydraulic conductivity and highest

observed water level from the field investigation.

The following assumptions were made in calculating groundwater inflow:

• Each trench will be 45 m long x 3 m wide, and will remain open throughout construction

• Trenches will be about 3 m deep

• The aquifer is unconfined and in steady-state

• Groundwater inflow into the excavation is at steady-state

• Saturated thickness of the upper aquifer is based on hydrogeological information provided in the

City of Barrie Source Water Protection Threat Assessment (Golder Associates, 2010)

A review of MECP WWIS (as summarized by Golder, 2008) indicated groundwater in the immediate vicinity of

the Site has been encountered between 1.2 to 11 m bgs (Appendix A). A safety factor of 2 was applied to the

calculated Q value. It is noted that these calculations do not include dewatering requirements for stormwater

runoff.

Hydraulic Conductivity (Bouwer and Rice) calculations along with drawdown and recovery data from the

single-well response slug tests are included in Appendix C. Dewatering calculations (Dupuit-Forcheimer) are

included in Appendix D.


0BM-18-8036

5

3.3 Results

Recorded field measurements are presented in Table 1 (Groundwater Quality). Laboratory Certificates of

Analysis are presented in Appendix B. Data from the single-well response tests are included in Appendix C.

3.3.1 Static Conditions

The static groundwater level of monitoring wells (BH W5-2, BHW4-2, BHE4-2, BH-E2, BH W2-1 and BH W8)

were recorded as 234.13, 233.27, 225.63, 225.96, 230.45, and 233.91 m asl, respectively. This indicates that

groundwater within the shallow overburden generally flows to the northeast at the Site (i.e. flows toward

Highway 400). Water level elevation data are summarized in Table 3-1, below.

Table 3-1 Water Level Data

MW ID

Top of PVC Pipe

Elevation

(m asl)

(assumed ground level)

Static Water Level

(mbg)

Static Water Level

(m asl)

BH W5-2 234.75 0.62 234.13

BHW4-2 234.64 1.37 233.27

BHE4-2 229.54 3.91 225.63

BH-E2 230.16 4.2 225.96

BH W2-1 232.12 1.67 230.45

BH W8 235.03 1.12 233.91

3.3.2 Single-well Response Tests (Slug-Tests)

BH W5-2 (Test 1 – Rising Head)

As noted in Table 3-1, the static water level in BH W5-1 was 0.62 mbg. During the single-well response test, a

total of 0.7 L of water was removed for a maximum drawdown of approximately 0.96 m. Recovery to 0.63

mbg was achieved within approximately 3:00 minutes. A hydraulic conductivity of 1.13 x 10-5 m/s was

calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for partially penetrating wells.


0BM-18-8036

6


The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 0.62 mbg. During the single-well response

test, a total of 1.1 L of water was removed for a maximum drawdown of approximately 0.52 m. Recovery to

0.63 mbg was achieved within approximately 2:55 minutes. A hydraulic conductivity of 1.8 x 10-5 m/s was

calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating wells.

BH W5-2 (Test 3)

Data from test 3 at BH W5-1 is considered inconclusive and has not been included in this analysis.

BH W4-2 (Test 1 – Falling Head)

The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.37 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the

single-well response test, a total of 0.2 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at

approximately 1.28 mbg. Recovery to 1.36 mbg was achieved within approximately 1:30 minutes. A hydraulic

conductivity of 1.24 x 10-5 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating

wells.




approximately 1.29 mbg. Recovery to 1.36 mbg was achieved within approximately 1:00 minute. A hydraulic


wells.


The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.37 mbg. During the single-well response

test, a total of 0.4 L of water was removed for a maximum drawdown of approximately 0.20 m. Recovery to

1.39 mbg was achieved within approximately 1:20 minutes. A hydraulic conductivity of 2.11 x 10-5 m/s was

calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating wells.

BH E4-2 (Test 1 – Falling Head)





wells.


0BM-18-8036

7






wells.






wells.






wells.




approximately 1.34 mbg. Recovery to 1.57 mbg was achieved within approximately 36:00 minutes. A

hydraulic conductivity of 1.07 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully

penetrating wells.




approximately 1.28 mbg. Recovery to 1.55 mbg was achieved within approximately 42:00 minutes. A

hydraulic conductivity of 1.95 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for

partially penetrating wells.


0BM-18-8036

8






wells.

BH W8 (Test 2 – Falling Head)





wells.

BH W8 (Test 3 – Falling Head)





wells.


0BM-18-8036

9

Table 3-2 Monitoring Well Data

Well ID Depth (m)

(Screened Interval (m bgs)) Completion

Material

Estimated Hydraulic

Conductivity (K, m/s)1

BH W5-22 3.6

(0.6 – 3.6) “Clay” 1.37 x 10-5

BH W4-2 4.5

(1.5 – 4.5) “Sand” 1.27 x 10-5

BH E4-2 4.2

(1.2 – 4.2) N/A 3.35 x 10-6

BH E2-2 4.45

(1.5 – 4.5) “Sand” 5.43 x 10-6

BH W2-1 4.5

(1.6 – 4.6) “Sand” 1.51 x 10-6

BH W8-2 4.5

(1.5 – 4.5) “Sand” 7.74 x 10-6

1Data from slug tests performed on May 31 and June 1, 2019. These values represent averages of all K values calculated for each slug

test administered for each well.

2Data from Test 3 at BH W5-2 were deemed inconclusive.

3.3.3 Dewatering Volumes (inflow to excavation)

The well testing undertaken by McIntosh Perry staff on May 31 and June 1, 2019 provided a reasonable

indication of typical hydraulic conductivities values for the shallow overburden at the Site (Table 3-2). The

highest hydraulic conductivity value (BH W5-2) of 1.37x10-5 m/s was used to calculate estimated groundwater

influx into a standard open trench excavation for the proposed construction (45 m x 3 m).

To estimate groundwater inflow, the groundwater level was conservatively assumed to be at 234.13masl

based on the highest groundwater level measured during monitoring period at the west end of the Site.

To maintain a stable and dry excavation area, the groundwater level must be lowered to a depth of

approximately 1 m below the base of the proposed trench. To achieve the target groundwater level, the

existing static water level along the work area would need to be lowered by 3.4 m.

The total steady state groundwater dewatering rate is estimated to be 362,771 L of groundwater per day. By

applying a safety factor of 2 to account for variations in water table and non-steady state conditions, the

maximum groundwater dewatering may be as high as 725,543 L/day.

This estimate does not account for any stormwater runoff that may enter the excavation.

The calculated radius of influence as a result of construction dewatering is estimated using the Sichart and

Kryieleis Equation (1930), to be approximately 19 m from the edge of the excavation.


0BM-18-8036

10

Dewatering calculations are presented in Appendix D.

3.3.4 Soil Quality

As part of this assessment, soil samples retrieved during monitoring well installation were submitted for

laboratory analysis of various contaminants of concern including leachable anions and nutrients, cyanides,

inorganic parameters, and metals. Analytical results indicated exceedances of MECP Table 2 Site Condition

Standards (SCS) in the following soil samples:

• E4-2 SS5 o Conductivity

• W5-1 SS3 o SAR

3.3.5 Water Quality

As part of this assessment, groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of parameters listed

under the City of Barrie’s Storm and Sanitary Sewer Use Bylaws. Analytical results indicated exceedances of

the following for the relevant Storm and/or Sewer Use Guidelines:

• City of Barrie Sanitary Guidelines

o BH E4 – Chloride

o BH W4 – Chloride, Total Suspended Solids

• City of Barrie Storm Guidelines

o BH E4 – Total Suspended Solids, Copper

o BH W4 – Total Suspended Solids, Copper, and Zinc

3.3.6 Water Well Record Review

A review of the MECP Water Well Information System (WWIS), as summarized by Golder Associates (2008),

indicated fourteen wells within 150 m of the Site. These wells are reportedly completed in overburden

material (predominantly sand and gravel) with depths ranging from 7.3 m to 104.9 m below ground surface

(bgs). Where listed, the average static water level of these wells ranges from 1.2 – 11 m bgs (average of 4.81

m bgs).

A summary of MECP WWIS Records for water supply wells can be found in Appendix A, and are summarized

in Table 3-3, below.


0BM-18-8036

11

Table 3-3 MECP WWIS Records (Water Supply, 500 m buffer)

Well ID Depth

(m) Completion

Material Static Water Level (m bgs)

5704799 30.8 Gravel 5.5

5704797 31.1 Medium

Sand 2.7

5704796 16.8 Medium

Sand 2.4

5704800 7.3 Medium

Sand 1.2

5710958 90.5 Clay 5.8

5700282 29.6 Coarse

Sand 6.1

5704798 28.0 Coarse

Sand 3.4

5700242 66.4 Medium

Sand 0.6

5700279 25.6 Medium

Sand 2.1

5709125 100.6 Boulders /

Clay 11.0

5739211 27.7 Sand 8.2

5708760 47.5 Gravel 10.1

5708244 30.2 Sand 4.0

5722879 104.9 Boulders 7.3

5700249 22.9 Medium

Sand 5.2

7151274 55.2 Gravel 9.4

Although the area is municipally serviced, McIntosh Perry has still included a brief impact assessment for

water supply wells listed in the vicinity of the Site. Based on the MECP WWIS data summarized above, it is

McIntosh Perry’s opinion that the proposed construction dewatering at the Site should not have any negative

impacts to nearby water supply wells. Although these supply wells are completed in overburden, based on

their listed depths all but one well appear to be screened over the A2 aquifer. This aquifer is reportedly

isolated from the overlying A1 aquifer (Golder Associates 2008). Additionally, due to the shallow and short-

term nature of the proposed construction dewatering, any radius of groundwater influence generated from

this project is not expected to be significant in size or duration.


0BM-18-8036

12

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the information summarized in this report, the City of Barrie will require a Category 3 PTTW . An

EASR could be maintained If trenching size per day is were reduced. It is vital that the dewatering

calculations contained within this report are repeated to incorporate actual excavation dimensions and

estimated stormwater runoff. Additionally, a new radius of influence (ROI) should be calculated for the

proposed dewatering; MECP WWIS well records within this recalculated ROI, if any, should be subject to an

impact assessment.

To meet the requirements of the regulatory agencies in the area, the proponent may wish to carry out a long-

term groundwater monitoring program to assess seasonal fluctuations and further refine the groundwater

dewatering and control requirements.

For both a Category 3 PTTW and an EASR, a certain level of pre-treatment of pumped water will be required

prior to release into the storm and/or sanitary sewer. While it is likely that treatment for total suspended

solids (e.g. use of a filter bag or similar mechanical technology) will result in lower concentrations of other

contaminants (e.g. metals), the design, administration, and confirmatory sampling associated with any

treatment and discharge system should be the ultimate responsibility of the contractor. McIntosh Perry

recommends that any treatment design be reviewed and stamped by a Qualified Person under O.Reg.

153/04.

McIntosh Perry’s recommended option is to utilize and/or modify this document as necessary to fulfill

hydrogeological assessment requirements in applying for a Category 3 PTTW. Should the City of Barrie

require assistance in this manner, we would be happy to prepare this application.

Note regarding groundwater discharge: Both Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act and MECP’s

Water Taking User Guide for Environmental Activity and Sector Registry (EASR) outline that discharged water

cannot negatively impact the environment (which in this case extends to untreated, project-related discharge

to storm sewers). Registering with the EASR is not recommended for this project as it would generate undue

liability for the City of Barrie, contractor, and engineer/geoscientist responsible for the Water Taking and

Water Discharge Plans. In the event of an MECP inspection, the City of Barrie would need to demonstrate

that water downstream of any treatment point is suitable for discharge.


0BM-18-8036

13

5.0 REFERENCES

Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 2013. MOE Wellwater Database <http:

//www.ene.gov.on.ca/environment/en/resources/collection/data_downloads/index.htm#Well Records>

OGS Earth, 2019. Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry, - Ontario Geological Survey

Earth – for Google Earth.

McIntosh Perry, 2020. ‘Dunlop Street Municipal Class C Environmental Assessment – Geotechnical Report’.

Golder Associates, 2008. ‘City of Barrie Dunlop Street West Improvements (Anne Street to Ferndale Drive)

Class Environmental Assessment: Hydrogeological and Contaminated Lands Assessment Components’.

Golder Associates, 2010. ‘City of Barrie Source Water Protection Threat Assessment’.


0BM-18-8036

14

6.0 LIMITATIONS AND CLOSURE

This report has been prepared and the work referred to in this report has been undertaken by McIntosh Perry

Consulting Engineers Ltd. for the City of Barrie. It is intended for the sole and exclusive use of the City of

Barrie, their affiliated companies and partners and their respective insurers, agents, employees, advisors and

reviewers. The report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the express written

consent (in the form of a Reliance Letter) of McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions made based on it, without a

reliance letter are the responsibility of such third parties. McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. accept no

responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based

on this report.

The investigation undertaken by McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. with respect to this report and any

conclusions or recommendations made in this report reflect McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd.

judgment based on the site conditions observed at the time of the site inspection and testing on the date(s)

set out in this report and on information available at the time of the preparation of this report.

This report has been prepared for specific application to this site and it is based, in part, upon visual

observation of the site, subsurface investigation at discrete locations and depths, and specific analysis of

specific chemical parameters and materials during a specific time interval, all as described in this report.

Unless otherwise stated, the findings cannot be extended to previous or future site conditions, portions of

the site which were unavailable for direct investigation, subsurface locations which were not investigated

directly, or chemical parameters, materials or analysis which were not addressed. Substances other than

those addressed by the investigation described in this report may exist within the site, substances addressed

by the investigation may exist in areas of the site not investigated and concentrations of substances

addressed which are different than those reported may exist in areas other than the locations from which

samples were taken.

If site conditions or applicable standards change or if any additional information becomes available at a

future date, modifications to the findings, conclusions and recommendations in this report may be necessary.

Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street

0CM-18-0450

TABLES

Table 1 - Groundwater Quality 0BM-18-8036

BH E4 BH W4

Parameter DL UnitsCity of Barrie Santary Sewer

Use BylawsCity of Barrie StormSewer Use Bylaws 31-May-19 31-May-19

pH 0.10 pH units 6-9.5 6-9.5 7.51 7.53

Total Suspended Solids 4.0 mg/L 350 15 155 732

Chloride 5.0 mg/L 1500 5630 1590

Fluoride 0.20 mg/L 10 <0.40 <0.20

Total Kjedahl Nitrogen 0.15 mg/L 100 0.37 <1.5

Phosphorus, Total 0.0030 mg/L 10 0.18 0.66Sulfate 3.0 mg/L 1500 155.00 71.50Sulphide (as S) 0.018 mg/L 0.03 <0.018Sulphide (as H2S) 0.019 mg/L 1 0.03 <0.019

Cyanide, Total 0.002 mg/L 1.2 0.02 0.01

Aluminum (Al)-Total 0.050 mg/L 50 4.33 15.4Antimony (Sb)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 5 <0.0010 <0.0010Arsenic (As)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 1 0.0021 0.0028Barium (Ba)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 5 0.467 0.379Bismuth (Bi)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 5 <0.00050 <0.00050Cadmium (Cd)-Total 0.000050 mg/L 0.7 0.001 <0.000050 0.000202Chromium (Cr)-Total 0.0050 mg/L 2 0.08 0.0078 0.0237Cobalt (Co)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 5 0.0052 0.008Copper (Cu)-Total 0.010 mg/L 2 0.01 0.013 0.033Iron (Fe)-Total 0.10 mg/L 50 5.89 18.6Lead (Pb)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 0.7 0.05 0.005 0.00847Manganese (Mn)-Total 0.0050 mg/L 5 0.41 0.381Mercury (Hg)-Total 0.000010 mg/L 0.01 0.000025 <0.000010Molybdenum (Mo)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 5 0.00208 0.00413Nickel (Ni)-Total 0.0050 mg/L 2 0.05 0.0057 0.0181Selenium (Se)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 1 <0.00050 0.00113Silver (Ag)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 0.4 <0.00050 <0.00050Tin (Sn)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 5 0.0018 <0.0010Titanium (Ti)-Total 0.0030 mg/L 0.164 0.678Vanadium (V)-Total 0.0050 mg/L 5 0.0109 0.0335Zinc (Zn)-Total 0.030 mg/L 2 0.04 <0.030 0.047

BOD 2.0 mg/L 300 15 <2.0 <3.0COD 10 mg/L 600 190 129Oil and Grease, Total 5.0 mg/L <5.0 <5.0Animal/Veg Oil & Grease 5.0 mg/L 150 <5.0 <5.0Mineral Oil and Grease 2.5 mg/L 15 <2.5 <2.5Phenols (4AAP) 0.0010 mg/L 0.1 0.005 0.0075

Cyanides

Physical Tests

0BM-18-8036 - Dunlop Street HydrogeologicalAssessment

Total Metals

City of Barrie Storm and Sanitary UseParameters

Anions and Nutrients

Aggregate Organics

Page 1 of 3


BH E4 BH W4





Acetone 20 ug/L <20 <20Benzene 0.50 ug/L 10 <0.50 <0.50Bromodichloromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Bromoform 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Bromomethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Carbon Disulfide 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Carbon tetrachloride 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Chlorobenzene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Dibromochloromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Chloroethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Chloroform 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Chloromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.01,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 ug/L <0.20 <0.201,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 ug/L 50 <0.50 <0.501,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 ug/L 80 <0.50 <0.50Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.01,1-Dichloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,2-Dichloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1-Dichloroethylene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Dichloromethane 2.0 ug/L 90 <2.0 <2.01,2-Dichloropropane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Ethylbenzene 0.50 ug/L 60 <0.50 <0.50n-Hexane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.502-Hexanone 20 ug/L <20 <20Methyl Ethyl Ketone 20 ug/L <20 <20Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 20 ug/L <20 <20MTBE 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Styrene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 ug/L 60 <0.50 <0.50Tetrachloroethylene 0.50 ug/L 60 <0.50 <0.50Toluene 0.50 ug/L 20 <0.50 <0.501,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Trichloroethylene 0.50 ug/L 50 <0.50 <0.50Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0

Volatile Organic Compounds

Page 2 of 3


BH E4 BH W4





Vinyl chloride 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50o-Xylene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50m+p-Xylenes 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Xylenes (Total) 1.1 ug/L 300 <1.1 <1.14-Bromofluorobenzene % 108 107.11,4-Difluorobenzene % 105.4 105.6

Acenaphthene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Acenaphthylene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Anthracene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Benzo(a)anthracene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Benzo(a)pyrene 0.010 ug/L <0.010 <0.010Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Chrysene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Fluoranthene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Fluorene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.0201-Methylnaphthalene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.0202-Methylnaphthalene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Naphthalene 0.050 ug/L <0.050 <0.050Phenanthrene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Pyrene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020d10-Acenaphthene % 98.2 97.4d12-Chrysene % 91.3 91.2d8-Naphthalene % 99.3 95.7d10-Phenanthrene % 96.7 99.6Total PAHs 0.095 ug/L 5 <0.095 <0.095

Hexachlorobenzene 0.040 ug/L 0.1 <0.040 <0.0402-Fluorobiphenyl % 91.9 85.3p-Terphenyl d14 % 86.3 85

Exceeds City of Barrie Sanitary Sewer Use Guidelines183 Exceeds City of Barrie Storm Sewer Use Guidelines

Legend

Semi-Volatile Organics

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Page 3 of 3

Table 2 - Soil Quality 0BM-18-8036

O. Reg 153/04 SCS Limits E4-1 SS2 E4-1 SS5 W5-1 SS3 W5-1 SS6

Parameter LDL UnitsO.Reg 153/04 (2011) Table 2 -

Residential, Coarse * 07-May-19 07-May-19 09-May-19 09-May-19

Conductivity 0.004 mS/cm 0.7 0.337 1.4 0.688 0.423

% Moisture 0.1 % 3.84 12 18.6 18.2

pH 0.1 pH units 7.99 7.87 7.85 7.73

Redox Potential -1000 mV 187 139

Resistivity 1 ohm*cm 716 2360

Chloride 5 ug/g 627 140

Sulphate 20 mg/kg 36 <20

Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss 0.05 ug/g 0.051 <0.050 <0.050

Acid Volatile Sulphides 0.2 mg/kg <0.20 <0.20

SAR 0.1 SAR 5 4.95 13.3

Calcium 0.5 mg/L 7.97 6.65

Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.59 <0.50

Sodium 0.5 mg/L 53.8 125

Antimony (Sb) 1 ug/g 7.5 <1.0 <1.0Arsenic (As) 1 ug/g 18 1.2 <1.0Barium (Ba) 1 ug/g 390 19.9 16.5Beryllium (Be) 0.5 ug/g 4 <0.50 <0.50Boron (B), Hot Water Ext. 0.1 ug/g 1.5 0.13 <0.10Boron (B) 5 ug/g 120 <5.0 <5.0Cadmium (Cd) 0.5 ug/g 1.2 <0.50 <0.50Chromium (Cr) 1 ug/g 160 7.8 8.1Cobalt (Co) 1 ug/g 22 2.1 2.1Copper (Cu) 1 ug/g 140 4.4 4Lead (Pb) 1 ug/g 120 12.8 3.3Mercury (Hg) 0.005 ug/g 0.27 0.0117 <0.0050Molybdenum (Mo) 1 ug/g 6.9 <1.0 <1.0Nickel (Ni) 1 ug/g 100 4.1 3.8Selenium (Se) 1 ug/g 2.4 <1.0 <1.0Silver (Ag) 0.2 ug/g 20 <0.20 <0.20Thallium (Tl) 0.5 ug/g 1 <0.50 <0.50Uranium (U) 1 ug/g 23 <1.0 <1.0Vanadium (V) 1 ug/g 86 19.9 21.7Zinc (Zn) 5 ug/g 340 18.3 10.3

Chromium, Hexavalent 0.2 ug/g 8 <0.20 <0.20

Legend* O.Reg 153/04 Table 2 - Generic Site Condition Standards for Shallow Soils in a Potable Groundwater Condition

Exceeds Table 2 SCS

Speciated Metals (Soil)

Physical Characteristics


Metals

Leachable Anions & Nutrients

Anions and Nutrients (Soils)

Cyanides

Inorganic Parameters (Soil)

Saturated Paste Extractables (Soil)

Page 1 of 1


0CM-18-0450

FIGURES

ESSA

ROA

D

DUNLOP STREET EAST

DUNLOP STREET WEST

BAYVIEW DRIVE

WELLINGTON STREET EAST

BURTON AVENUE

BAYFIELD STREETROSS STREET

FERNDALEDR IVE

SOUTH

LIVIN GSTON

E STREET WEST

CUNDLES ROAD WEST

TIFFIN STREET

LEACOCK DRIVE

GROVE STREET EAS

T

LITTLE AVENUE

BRAD

FORD

STRE

ET

SPROULE DRIVE

ARDAGH ROAD

ANNE STREET NORTH

ROSE STREET

COUNTY ROAD 27

EDGEHILL DRIVE

ANNE STREET SOUTH

SUNNIDALE ROADPATTERSON ROAD

LAKES HOREDRIVE

FERNDALE DRIVE

FAIRVIEWROAD

WILSON DRIVE

LEGEND

HYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDYDUNLOP STREETSITE LOCATION

1FIGURE:

CITY OF BARRIE

Jul., 09, 2019LCJB

TITLE:

CLIENT:

PROJECT:

H:\01

Proj

ect -

Prop

osals

\2018

Jobs

\BM\0B

M-18

-8036

City

of B

arrie

EA D

unlop

\GIS\

mxd\H

ydroG

\BM-18

-8036

_01_

SiteL

ocati

on.m

xd

REFERENCE

Approximate Site ExtentLocal RoadMajor RoadWatercourse

Wooded AreaWaterbody

GIS data provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2019.

PROJECT NO: DateGISChecked By

BM-18-8036

115 Walgreen Road, RR3, Carp, ON K0A1L0Tel: 613-836-2184 Fax: 613-836-3742

www.mcintoshperry.com

Metres

950 0 950475

Scale 1:30,000

BH- W1

MW- W2

BH- W3BH- W4

MW- W5BH- W6

BH- W7

MW- W8

MW- W4BH- W5

BH- W8

BH- E1

MW- E2BH- E2

BH- E3

MW- E4

BH- E4

BH- E5

HENRY STREET

DUNLOP STREET WEST

CEDA

RPO

INTE

DRIVE

FERNDALE DRIVE NORTH

JOHN STREET

ANNE STREET NORTH

EDGEHILL DRIVE

LEACOCK DRIVE

DYMENT ROAD

SARJEANT DRIVELENNOX DRIVE

VICTORIA STREET

VESPRA STREET

EDEN DRIVE

GEORGE STREET

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

LEGEND

SITE LAYOUT

2FIGURE:

Jul., 09, 2019LCJB

TITLE:

CLIENT:

PROJECT:

H:\01

Proj

ect -

Prop

osals

\2018

Jobs

\BM\0B

M-18

-8036

City

of B

arrie

EA D

unlop

\GIS\

mxd\H

ydroG

\BM-18

-8036

_02_

SiteL

ayou

t.mxd

REFERENCE

Borehole/Monitoring WellApproximate Site Extent

GIS data provided by ESRI, Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN and the GIS User Community, 2019

PROJECT NO: DateGISChecked By



Metres

250 0 250125

Scale 1:8,000

HYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDYDUNLOP STREET

CITY OF BARRIE

BM-18-8036

7209195

71095667151232

5728346

7199900

7250165 7151274

7287024 7199898

7200966

5700249

7197566

5722879

7280992

5708244

7156669

7281652

7199899

7198925

7105341

5700277

7200964

7138488

7281654

7250164

7281720

7043230

7281721

71839747250413

5738436

7280223

7198923

5708760

5723010

7147418

5700253

7287025

5739211

7273892

5704795

5738297

7105342

7200909

7041131

7280221

7261004

7250412

5709125

57002795700242

7261002

5710720

7164608

7197565

7261003

7285840

7209088

7227248

7035405

72701027150523

5700282

7112477

5710958

7153430

5741297

5704794

7198926

5704800

7183973

7044685

7209099

7198641

72662767200910

5704796

7281722

5704797 7220281

5700240

5701702

7110083

7287023

5704798

7287026

7198924

7287022

7280222

7281651

72809907109566

7180075

5700248

5704799

7228719

7281650

7200967

72802247263068

7281649

7261001

7281653

72501937200965

CEDA

RPO

INTE

DRIVE

EDEN DRIVE

GEORGE STREET

LENNOX DRIVE

LORENA STREET

ELLIOTT AVENUE

BROADFOOT ROAD

SARJEANT DRIVE

ROBERT STREET

BOYS STREET NORTH

ANNE STREET SOUTH


DUNLOP STREET WEST

JOHN STREET

HENRY STREET

DYMENT ROAD


EDGEHILL DRIVEEDGEHILL DRIVE

BROCK STREET

DUNLOP STREET WEST

FOX RUN

REFERENCEGIS data provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resourcesand Forestry. MECP well data provided by Ontario Ministry of theEnvironment, Conservation and Parks 2019

LEGENDJ:\

GISD

ata\Te

mplat

es\Bi

ngBa

seMa

p11x

17mx

d

200 0 200100

MECP Well Record500m BufferApproximate Site ExtentLocal RoadMajor RoadWatercourseWetlandWaterbodyWooded Area

3FIGURE:

Jul., 09, 2019LCJB

BM-18-8036PROJECT NO: DateGISChecked By

TITLE:

CLIENT:

PROJECT:



CITY OF BARRIEHYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDY

DUNLOP STREETMECP WWIS SUMMARY

MetresScale 1:6,000


0CM-18-0450

APPENDICES


0CM-18-0450

APPENDIX AMECP Well Records

MECP WWIS Water Supply Records - 2019, 500 m buffer

Well Identifier Completion Year Depth(m bgs)

Depth to Bedrock(m bgs)

Static Water Level(m bgs) MECP Tag No. Use

5704799 1965 30.8 - 5.5 - Water Supply5704797 1953 31.1 - 2.7 - Water Supply5704796 1953 16.8 - 2.4 - Water Supply5704800 1952 7.3 - 1.2 - Water Supply5710958 1974 90.5 - 5.8 - Water Supply5700282 1966 29.6 - 6.1 - Water Supply5704798 1954 28.0 - 3.4 - Water Supply5700242 1955 66.4 - 0.6 - Water Supply5700279 1965 25.6 - 2.1 - Water Supply5709125 1972 100.6 - 11.0 - Water Supply5739211 2004 27.7 - 8.2 A000289 Water Supply5708760 1972 47.5 - 10.1 - Water Supply5708244 1971 30.2 - 4.0 - Water Supply5722879 1988 104.9 - 7.3 - Water Supply5700249 1960 22.9 - 5.2 - Water Supply7151274 2010 55.2 - 9.4 A011255 Water Supply

MECP WWIS Records - 2008, 150 m buffer (Golder Associates, 2008)

Well Identifier Completion Year Depth(m bgs)

Depth to Bedrock(m bgs)

Static Water Level(m bgs) MECP Tag No. Use

248 1959 73.8 - 3 - -249 1905 22.9 - 5.2 - Water Supply279 1905 25.6 - 2.1 - Water Supply282 1905 29.6 - 6.1 - Water Supply4794 1905 96.9 - - - -4797 1905 31.1 - 2.7 - Water Supply4798 1905 28.0 - 3.4 - Water Supply4799 1905 30.8 - 5.5 - Water Supply4800 1905 7.3 - 1.2 - Water Supply8760 1905 47.5 - 10.1 - Water Supply23010 1905 93.3 - 8.6 - -7105341 1905 - - - - -7105342 1905 - - - - -L0195 1905 56.1 - - - Water Supply


0CM-18-0450

APPENDIX BLaboratory Certificates of Analysis (Water and Soil Quality Data)

[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]

03-JUN-19

Lab Work Order #: L2283839

Date Received:Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)

2010 Winston Park DrSuite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7

ATTN: Nan DuFINAL 18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Report Date:

Version:

Certificate of Analysis

ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

____________________________________________

Melanie MoshiAccount Manager

ADDRESS: 5730 Coopers Avenue, Unit #26 , Mississauga, ON L4Z 2E9 Canada | Phone: +1 905 507 6910 | Fax: +1 905 507 6927

Client Phone: 905-856-5200

0T1-919169-ENJob Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:

17-623977C of C Numbers:Legal Site Desc:

Result

18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed

Ontario Sewer Use Bylaws = [Suite] - ON-SAN+STORM-BARRIE (2012-172)

L2283839 CONTD....2Page of

0T1-919169-ENANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:

Guideline Limits

#1: Barrie Sanitary Sewer (2012-172) #2: Barrie Storm Sewer (2012-172)

* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

10

L2283839-1 BH-E4ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 09:10Sampled By:WATERMatrix: #1 #2

Physical Tests


Cyanides

Total Metals

Aggregate Organics


pHTotal Suspended Solids

Chloride (Cl)Fluoride (F)Total Kjeldahl NitrogenPhosphorus, TotalSulfate (SO4)Sulphide (as S)Sulphide (as H2S)

Cyanide, Total

Aluminum (Al)-TotalAntimony (Sb)-TotalArsenic (As)-TotalBarium (Ba)-TotalBismuth (Bi)-TotalCadmium (Cd)-TotalChromium (Cr)-TotalCobalt (Co)-TotalCopper (Cu)-TotalIron (Fe)-TotalLead (Pb)-TotalManganese (Mn)-TotalMercury (Hg)-TotalMolybdenum (Mo)-TotalNickel (Ni)-TotalSelenium (Se)-TotalSilver (Ag)-TotalTin (Sn)-TotalTitanium (Ti)-TotalVanadium (V)-TotalZinc (Zn)-Total

BODCODOil and Grease, TotalAnimal/Veg Oil & GreaseMineral Oil and GreasePhenols (4AAP)

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethane

7.51155

5630<0.400.370.181155

0.0300.032

0.0203

4.33<0.00100.00210.467

<0.00050<0.000050

0.00780.00520.0135.89

0.005000.410

0.0000250.002080.0057

<0.00050<0.000500.00180.1640.0109<0.030

<2.0190<5.0<5.0<2.5

0.0050

<20<0.50<1.0

DLHC

DLDSDLDS

DLDS

DLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHC

DLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHC

0.104.0

100.400.15

0.00306.0

0.0180.019

0.0020

0.0500.00100.00100.00100.000500.0000500.00500.00100.0100.10

0.000500.0050

0.0000100.000500.00500.000500.000500.00100.00300.00500.030

2.0105.05.02.5

0.0010

200.501.0

pH unitsmg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

mg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

ug/Lug/Lug/L

04-JUN-1908-JUN-19

11-JUN-1911-JUN-1917-JUN-1917-JUN-1911-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

05-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1905-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19

09-JUN-1917-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1911-JUN-19

12-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-19

6.0-9.5 6.0-9.5350 *15

*15001010010

1500

1

1.2

505155

0.7 0.0012 0.08

5.02.0 *0.01500.7 0.055

0.0152 0.05

1.00.45

5.02.0 0.04

300 15600

150150.1

10

Result






Guideline Limits



10

L2283839-1 BH-E4ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 09:10Sampled By:WATERMatrix: #1 #2



BromoformBromomethaneCarbon DisulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneDibromochloromethaneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylenecis-1,2-Dichloroethylenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneDichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzenen-Hexane2-HexanoneMethyl Ethyl KetoneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneMTBEStyrene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethyleneTrichlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlorideo-Xylenem+p-XylenesXylenes (Total)Surrogate: 4-BromofluorobenzeneSurrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene

AcenaphtheneAcenaphthylene

<1.0<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<0.20<0.50<0.50<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<2.0<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<20<20<20

<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<1.0<1.1108.0105.4

<0.020<0.020

1.00.501.00.500.501.01.01.01.00.200.500.500.501.00.500.500.500.500.502.00.500.500.500.500.50202020

0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.501.00.500.501.01.1

70-13070-130

0.0200.020

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L%%

ug/Lug/L

12-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-19

07-JUN-1907-JUN-19

50

80

90

60

606020

50

300

Result






Guideline Limits



10

L2283839-1

L2283839-2

BH-E4

BH-W4

ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 09:10

ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 11:10

Sampled By:

Sampled By:

WATER

WATER

Matrix:

Matrix:

#1

#1

#2

#2



Physical Tests


Cyanides

Total Metals

AnthraceneBenzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fluorantheneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneBenzo(k)fluorantheneChryseneDibenzo(ah)anthraceneFluorantheneFluoreneIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene1-Methylnaphthalene2-MethylnaphthaleneNaphthalenePhenanthrenePyreneSurrogate: d10-AcenaphtheneSurrogate: d12-ChryseneSurrogate: d8-NaphthaleneSurrogate: d10-PhenanthreneTotal PAHs

HexachlorobenzeneSurrogate: 2-FluorobiphenylSurrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

pHTotal Suspended Solids

Chloride (Cl)Fluoride (F)Total Kjeldahl NitrogenPhosphorus, TotalSulfate (SO4)Sulphide (as S)Sulphide (as H2S)

Cyanide, Total

Aluminum (Al)-TotalAntimony (Sb)-TotalArsenic (As)-Total

<0.020<0.020<0.010<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.050<0.020<0.02098.291.399.396.7

<0.095

<0.04091.986.3

7.53732

1590<0.20<1.50.66471.5

<0.018<0.019

0.0053

15.4<0.00100.0028

DLHC

DLDSDLDSDLMDLMDLDS

DLHCDLHCDLHC

0.0200.0200.0100.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0500.0200.020

60-14060-14060-14060-1400.095

0.04040-13040-130

0.1020

5.00.201.5

0.0303.0

0.0180.019

0.0020

0.0500.00100.0010

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L%%%%

ug/L

ug/L%%

pH unitsmg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

mg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/L

07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1903-JUN-19

07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-19

05-JUN-1908-JUN-19

11-JUN-1911-JUN-1917-JUN-1917-JUN-1911-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

05-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19

5

0.1

6.0-9.5 6.0-9.5*350 *15

*15001010010

1500

1

1.2

5051

Result






Guideline Limits



10

L2283839-2 BH-W4ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 11:10Sampled By:WATERMatrix: #1 #2

Total Metals

Aggregate Organics


Barium (Ba)-TotalBismuth (Bi)-TotalCadmium (Cd)-TotalChromium (Cr)-TotalCobalt (Co)-TotalCopper (Cu)-TotalIron (Fe)-TotalLead (Pb)-TotalManganese (Mn)-TotalMercury (Hg)-TotalMolybdenum (Mo)-TotalNickel (Ni)-TotalSelenium (Se)-TotalSilver (Ag)-TotalTin (Sn)-TotalTitanium (Ti)-TotalVanadium (V)-TotalZinc (Zn)-Total

BODCODOil and Grease, TotalAnimal/Veg Oil & GreaseMineral Oil and GreasePhenols (4AAP)

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethaneCarbon DisulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneDibromochloromethaneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene

0.379<0.000500.0002020.02370.00800.03318.6

0.008470.381

<0.0000100.004130.01810.00113

<0.00050<0.00100.6780.03350.047

<3.0129<5.0<5.0<2.5

0.0075

<20<0.50<1.0<1.0<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<0.20<0.50<0.50<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<0.50

DLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHC

DLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHC

BODL

0.00100.000500.0000500.00500.00100.0100.10

0.000500.0050

0.0000100.000500.00500.000500.000500.00100.00300.00500.030

3.0105.05.02.5

0.0010

200.501.01.00.501.00.500.501.01.01.01.00.200.500.500.501.00.500.500.50

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

04-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1905-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19

09-JUN-1917-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1910-JUN-19

12-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-19

55

0.7 0.0012 0.08

5.02.0 *0.01500.7 0.055

0.0152 0.05

1.00.45

5.02.0 *0.04

300 15600

150150.1

10

50

80

Result






Guideline Limits



10




cis-1,2-Dichloroethylenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneDichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzenen-Hexane2-HexanoneMethyl Ethyl KetoneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneMTBEStyrene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethyleneTrichlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlorideo-Xylenem+p-XylenesXylenes (Total)Surrogate: 4-BromofluorobenzeneSurrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene

AcenaphtheneAcenaphthyleneAnthraceneBenzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fluorantheneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneBenzo(k)fluorantheneChryseneDibenzo(ah)anthraceneFluorantheneFluoreneIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene1-Methylnaphthalene2-MethylnaphthaleneNaphthalenePhenanthrenePyreneSurrogate: d10-Acenaphthene

<0.50<0.50<2.0<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<20<20<20

<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<1.0<1.1107.1105.6

<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.010<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.050<0.020<0.02097.4

0.500.502.00.500.500.500.500.50202020

0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.501.00.500.501.01.1

70-13070-130

0.0200.0200.0200.0200.0100.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0500.0200.020

60-140

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L%%

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L%

12-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-19

07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-19

90

60

606020

50

300

Result






Guideline Limits



10




Surrogate: d12-ChryseneSurrogate: d8-NaphthaleneSurrogate: d10-PhenanthreneTotal PAHs

HexachlorobenzeneSurrogate: 2-FluorobiphenylSurrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

91.295.799.6

<0.095

<0.04085.385.0

60-14060-14060-1400.095

0.04040-13040-130

%%%

ug/L

ug/L%%

07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1903-JUN-19

07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-19

5

0.1

Reference Information

0T1-919169-EN L2283839 CONTD....8Page of

18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)

BOD-WT

CL-IC-N-WT

CN-TOT-WT

COD-T-WT

EC-SCREEN-WT

F-IC-N-WT

HEXACHLOROBENZENE-WTHG-T-CVAA-WT

MET-T-CCMS-WT

OGG-SPEC-CALC-WT

OGG-SPEC-WT

P-T-COL-WT

BOD

Chloride by IC

Cyanide, Total

Chemical Oxygen Demand

Conductivity Screen (Internal Use Only)

Fluoride in Water by IC

Hexachlorobenzene in water

Total Mercury in Water by CVAAS

Total Metals in Water by CRC ICPMS

Speciated Oil and Grease A/V Calc

Speciated Oil and Grease-Gravimetric

Total P in Water by Colour

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 5210B - "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)". All forms of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) are determined by diluting and incubating a sample for a specified time period, and measuring the oxygen depletion using a dissolved oxygen meter. Dissolved BOD (SOLUBLE) is determined by filtering the sample through a glass fibre filter prior to dilution. Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) is determined by adding a nitrification inhibitor to the diluted sample prior to incubation.

Inorganic anions are analyzed by Ion Chromatography with conductivity and/or UV detection.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).

Total cyanide is determined by the combination of UV digestion and distillation. Cyanide is converted to cyanogen chloride by reacting with chloramine-T, the cyanogen chloride then reacts with a combination of barbituric acid and isonicotinic acid to form a highly colored complex.

When using this method, high levels of thiocyanate in samples can cause false positives at ~1-2% of the thiocyanate concentration. For samples with detectable cyanide analyzed by this method, ALS recommends analysis for thiocyanate to check for this potential interference

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 5220 "Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)". Chemical oxygen demand is determined using the closed reflux colourimetric method.

Qualitative analysis of conductivity where required during preparation of other tests - e.g. TDS, metals, etc.


Water samples undergo a cold-oxidation using bromine monochloride prior to reduction with stannous chloride, and analyzed by CVAAS.

Water samples are digested with nitric and hydrochloric acids, and analyzed by CRC ICPMS.

Method Limitation (re: Sulfur): Sulfide and volatile sulfur species may not be recovered by this method.


Sample is extracted with hexane, sample speciation into mineral and animal/vegetable fractions is achieved via silica gel separation and is then determined gravimetrically.

The procedure involves an extraction of the entire water sample with hexane. Sample speciation into mineral and animal/vegetable fractions is achieved via silica gel separation and is then determined gravimetrically.

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-P "Phosphorus". Total Phosphorus is deteremined colourimetrically after persulphate digestion of the sample.

Methods Listed (if applicable):

ALS Test Code Test Description

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

DLDS

BODL

DLM

DLHC

Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high Dissolved Solids / Electrical Conductivity.

Limit of Reporting for BOD was increased to account for the largest volume of sample tested.

Detection Limit Adjusted due to sample matrix effects (e.g. chemical interference, colour, turbidity).

Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high concentration of test analyte(s).

Sample Parameter Qualifier key listed:

APHA 5210 B

EPA 300.1 (mod)

ISO 14403-2

APHA 5220 D

APHA 2510

EPA 300.1 (mod)

SW846 8270

EPA 1631E (mod)

EPA 200.2/6020A (mod)

CALCULATION

APHA 5520 B

APHA 4500-P PHOSPHORUS

Method Reference***

Description Qualifier

Matrix

10



18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)

PAH-511-WT

PAH-SUM-CALC-WT

PH-WT

PHENOLS-4AAP-WT

S2-T>H2S-CALC-WT

SO4-IC-N-WT

SOLIDS-TSS-WT

SULPHIDE-WT

TKN-WT

VOC-ROU-HS-WT

XYLENES-SUM-CALC-WT

PAH-O. Reg 153/04 (July 2011)

TOTAL PAH’s

pH

Phenol (4AAP)

Total Sulphide Calculated as H2S

Sulfate in Water by IC

Suspended solids

Sulphide (as S)

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen


Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations

Aqueous samples, fortified with surrogates, are extracted using liquid/liquid extraction technique. The sample extracts are concentrated and then analyzed using GC/MS. Results for benzo(b) fluoranthene may include contributions from benzo(j)fluoranthene, if also present in the sample.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).

Total PAH represents the sum of all PAH analytes reported for a given sample. Note that regulatory agencies and criteria differ in their definitions of Total PAH in terms of the individual PAH analytes to be included.

Water samples are analyzed directly by a calibrated pH meter.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011). Holdtime for samples under this regulation is 28 days

An automated method is used to distill the sample. The distillate is then buffered to pH 9.4 which reacts with 4AAP and potassium ferricyanide to form ared complex which is measured colorimetrically.

This calculation converts Total Sulphide as (S2-) and reports it as Total Sulphide as (H2S). Total Sulphide as (S2-) is determined using procedures adapted from APHA 4500-S2 "Sulphide".


A well-mixed sample is filtered through a weighed standard glass fibre filter and the residue retained is dried in an oven at 104–1°C for a minimum of four hours or until a constant weight is achieved.

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-S2-D "Methylene Blue Method". Sulphide is determined colourmetrically.

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-Norg "Nitrogen (Organic)". Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen is determined by sample digestion at 380 Celsius with analysis using an automated colorimetric method.

Aqueous samples are analyzed by headspace-GC/MS.

Total xylenes represents the sum of o-xylene and m&p-xylene.

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

SW846 3510/8270

CALCULATION

APHA 4500 H-Electrode

EPA 9066

Calculation

EPA 300.1 (mod)

APHA 2540 D-Gravimetric

APHA 4500S2D

APHA 4500-Norg D

SW846 8260

CALCULATION

*** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.

The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:

Chain of Custody numbers:

17-623977

Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location

WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA

10



18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)

GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS

Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of samplemg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of samplemg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/L - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million.< - Less than.D.L. - The reporting limit.N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.

Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.

Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information. Guideline limits are not adjusted for the hardness, pH or temperature of the sample (the most conservative values are used). Measurement uncertainty is not applied to test results prior to comparison with specified criteria values.

10

Quality Control ReportPage 1 of

Client:

Contact:

Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du

Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

BOD-WT

CL-IC-N-WT

CN-TOT-WT

COD-T-WT

Water

Water

Water

Water

R4662884

R4664225

R4658916

R4658926

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

WG3067192-2

WG3067192-3

WG3067192-1

WG3073775-4

WG3073775-2

WG3073775-1

WG3073775-5

WG3066648-7

WG3066648-6

WG3066648-5

WG3066648-8

WG3067957-7

WG3067957-6

WG3067957-5

WG3067957-8

L2283223-1

WG3073775-3

WG3073775-3

L2283202-4

L2283202-4

L2283851-4

L2283851-4

BOD

BOD

BOD

Chloride (Cl)

Chloride (Cl)

Chloride (Cl)

Chloride (Cl)

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

32.0

89.4

<2.0

8.23

101.1

<0.50

101.6

<0.0020

94.2

<0.0020

87.9

<0.0020

87.4

<0.0020

87.4

09-JUN-19

09-JUN-19

09-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

1.1

0.1

N/A

N/A

20

20

20

20

85-115

90-110

75-125

80-120

70-130

80-120

70-130

mg/L

%

mg/L

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

32.4

8.22

<0.0020

<0.0020

2

0.5

0.002

0.002

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

17


Client:

Contact:




COD-T-WT

F-IC-N-WT

HEXACHLOROBENZENE-W

HG-T-CVAA-WT

MET-T-CCMS-WT

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

R4671745

R4664225

R4660781

R4659059

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

WG3078937-3

WG3078937-2

WG3078937-1

WG3078937-4

WG3073775-4

WG3073775-2

WG3073775-1

WG3073775-5

WG3065912-2

WG3065912-1

WG3066995-3

WG3066995-2

WG3066995-1

WG3066995-4

L2283839-1

L2283839-1

WG3073775-3

WG3073775-3

L2283556-1

L2283557-1

COD

COD

COD

COD

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Hexachlorobenzene

Hexachlorobenzene

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

Mercury (Hg)-Total

Mercury (Hg)-Total

Mercury (Hg)-Total

Mercury (Hg)-Total

196

97.1

<10

N/A

0.083

101.2

<0.020

100.2

86.8

<0.040

97.6

89.3

<0.000010

96.9

<0.000010

94.1

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

3.2

1.3

N/A

20

20

20

85-115

-

90-110

75-125

40-130

80-120

70-130

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

%

ug/L

%

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

MS-B

190

0.084

<0.000010

10

0.02

0.04

40-130

40-130

0.00001

RPD-NA

17


Client:

Contact:




MET-T-CCMS-WT Water

R4658448BatchDUP

LCS

WG3066401-4

WG3066401-2

WG3066401-3Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Barium (Ba)-Total

Bismuth (Bi)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Iron (Fe)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Molybdenum (Mo)-Total

Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Vanadium (V)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Barium (Ba)-Total

Bismuth (Bi)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Iron (Fe)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total


0.0100

<0.00010

0.00417

0.0316

<0.000050

0.0000071

0.00124

0.00020

0.206

3.33

0.000787

0.0574

0.00100

0.00122

<0.000050

<0.000050

0.00175

<0.00030

<0.00050

0.0182

102.9

103.9

103.1

101.3

103.5

95.2

102.6

100.2

100.6

98.2

102.0

102.9

05-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

1.5

N/A

0.2

0.2

N/A

10

2.2

4.4

1.0

0.0

2.1

2.8

4.3

3.1

N/A

N/A

3.1

N/A

N/A

0.1

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

0.0098

<0.00010

0.00416

0.0315

<0.000050

0.0000064

0.00121

0.00019

0.208

3.33

0.000770

0.0590

0.00105

0.00126

<0.000050

<0.000050

0.00181

<0.00030

<0.00050

0.0182

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

17


Client:

Contact:




MET-T-CCMS-WT Water

R4658448BatchLCS

MB

MS

WG3066401-2

WG3066401-1

WG3066401-5 WG3066401-3


Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Vanadium (V)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Barium (Ba)-Total

Bismuth (Bi)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Iron (Fe)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total



Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Vanadium (V)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Barium (Ba)-Total

101.1

101.1

99.3

98.7

95.5

98.3

102.0

100.8

<0.0050

<0.00010

<0.00010

<0.00010

<0.000050

<0.0000050

<0.00050

<0.00010

<0.0010

<0.010

<0.000050

<0.00050

<0.000050

<0.00050

<0.000050

<0.000050

<0.00010

<0.00030

<0.00050

<0.0030

98.8

99.0

101.4

N/A

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

70-130

70-130

70-130

-

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%MS-B

0.005

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

0.00005

0.000005

0.0005

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.00005

0.0005

0.00005

0.0005

0.00005

0.00005

0.0001

0.0003

0.0005

0.003

17


Client:

Contact:




MET-T-CCMS-WT

OGG-SPEC-WT

P-T-COL-WT

PAH-511-WT

Water

Water

Water

Water

R4658448

R4656146

R4671825

Batch

Batch

Batch

MS

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

WG3066401-5

WG3066491-2

WG3066491-1

WG3077555-3

WG3077555-2

WG3077555-1

WG3077555-4

WG3066401-3

L2287506-1

L2287506-1

Bismuth (Bi)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Iron (Fe)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total



Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Vanadium (V)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

Oil and Grease, Total

Mineral Oil and Grease

Oil and Grease, Total

Mineral Oil and Grease

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

89.2

90.0

99.4

96.3

N/A

N/A

88.8

N/A

100.6

90.6

100.8

88.8

96.4

99.9

103.0

87.7

93.7

85.3

<5.0

<2.5

0.468

94.9

<0.0030

N/A

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

0.5 20

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

-

-

70-130

-

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

80-120

-

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

MS-B

MS-B

MS-B

MS-B

0.466

5

2.5

0.003

17


Client:

Contact:




PAH-511-WT Water

R4661256BatchLCS

MB

WG3067842-2

WG3067842-1

1-Methylnaphthalene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Chrysene

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

1-Methylnaphthalene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Chrysene

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

93.1

92.6

102.9

100.6

100.2

118.7

102.0

91.0

101.0

93.8

105.8

102.6

106.2

102.4

116.1

96.3

107.8

107.2

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.010

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

17


Client:

Contact:




PAH-511-WT

PH-WT

PHENOLS-4AAP-WT

Water

Water

Water

R4661256

R4655946

R4663489

Batch

Batch

Batch

MB

DUP

DUP

LCS

LCS

DUP

DUP

LCS

LCS

MB

MB

MS

MS

WG3067842-1

WG3066716-12

WG3066716-8

WG3066716-10

WG3066716-6

WG3072867-19

WG3072867-23

WG3072867-18

WG3072867-22

WG3072867-17

WG3072867-21

WG3072867-20

WG3072867-24

WG3066716-11

WG3066716-7

L2286218-16

L2287207-3

L2286218-16

L2287207-3

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Surrogate: d8-Naphthalene

Surrogate: d10-Phenanthrene

Surrogate: d12-Chrysene

Surrogate: d10-Acenaphthene

pH

pH

pH

pH

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

<0.050

<0.020

<0.020

105.4

109.0

105.0

105.9

6.93

6.50

7.02

7.04

0.0073

<0.0010

103.1

106.0

<0.0010

<0.0010

103.1

105.7

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

07-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

05-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

10-JUN-19

10-JUN-19

10-JUN-19

10-JUN-19

10-JUN-19

10-JUN-19

10-JUN-19

10-JUN-19

0.01

0.01

0.0033

N/A

0.2

0.2

0.04

20

6.9-7.1

6.9-7.1

85-115

85-115

75-125

75-125

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

%

pH units

pH units

pH units

pH units

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

6.94

6.49

<0.020

<0.0010

0.05

0.02

0.02

60-140

60-140

60-140

60-140

0.001

0.001

J

J

J

RPD-NA

17


Client:

Contact:




PHENOLS-4AAP-WT

SO4-IC-N-WT

SOLIDS-TSS-WT

SULPHIDE-WT

Water

Water

Water

Water

R4663705

R4664225

R4661819

R4661897

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

WG3073539-10

WG3073539-8

WG3073539-7

WG3073539-9

WG3073775-4

WG3073775-2

WG3073775-1

WG3073775-5

WG3070400-3

WG3070400-2

WG3070400-1

WG3070375-3

WG3070375-2

WG3070375-1

L2286549-1

L2286549-1

WG3073775-3

WG3073775-3

L2285922-1

L2284884-2

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Sulfate (SO4)

Sulfate (SO4)

Sulfate (SO4)

Sulfate (SO4)

Total Suspended Solids






<0.0010

103.9

<0.0010

102.7

15.6

101.4

<0.30

102.6

285

98.8

<2.0

3160

97.5

<2.0

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

11-JUN-19

08-JUN-19

08-JUN-19

08-JUN-19

08-JUN-19

08-JUN-19

08-JUN-19

N/A

0.2

1.4

1.4

20

20

20

20

85-115

75-125

90-110

75-125

85-115

85-115

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

mg/L

%

mg/L

<0.0010

15.6

281

3210

0.001

0.3

2

2

RPD-NA

17


Client:

Contact:




SULPHIDE-WT

TKN-WT

VOC-ROU-HS-WT

Water

Water

Water

R4655671

R4671821

R4671926

R4664117

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

WG3066874-3

WG3066874-2

WG3066874-1

WG3066874-4

WG3077077-3

WG3077077-2

WG3077077-1

WG3077077-4

WG3077714-3

WG3077714-2

WG3077714-1

WG3077714-4

WG3073309-4

L2283173-1

L2283173-1

L2287338-3

L2287338-3

L2287842-3

L2287842-3

WG3073309-3

Sulphide (as S)

Sulphide (as S)

Sulphide (as S)

Sulphide (as S)









1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane


1,1,1-Trichloroethane


1,2-Dibromoethane

1,1-Dichloroethane

1,1-Dichloroethylene

2.80

86.7

<0.018

N/A

<0.15

99.6

<0.15

100.1

0.25

102.3

<0.15

97.0

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.20

<0.50

<0.50

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

04-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

17-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

6.6

N/A

0.11

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

20

20

0.3

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

75-125

-

75-125

70-130

75-125

70-130

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

MS-B

2.62

<0.15

0.36

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.20

<0.50

<0.50

0.018

0.15

0.15

RPD-NA

J

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

17


Client:

Contact:




VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4664117BatchDUPWG3073309-4 WG3073309-3

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

2-Hexanone

Acetone

Benzene

Bromodichloromethane

Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Disulfide

Carbon tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

Dibromochloromethane

Dichlorodifluoromethane

Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

n-Hexane

MTBE

o-Xylene

Styrene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<20

<20

<0.50

<1.0

<1.0

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<1.0

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<1.0

<2.0

<0.50

<1.0

<20

<20

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<20

<20

<0.50

<1.0

<1.0

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<1.0

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<1.0

<2.0

<0.50

<1.0

<20

<20

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

17


Client:

Contact:




VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4664117BatchDUP

LCS

WG3073309-4

WG3073309-1

WG3073309-3trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

Trichloroethylene

Trichlorofluoromethane

Vinyl chloride





1,2-Dibromoethane

1,1-Dichloroethane


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

2-Hexanone

Acetone

Benzene


Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Disulfide


Chlorobenzene

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane




<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

102.5

91.7

102.7

103.2

97.2

101.3

98.7

106.1

100.0

100.3

109.6

108.7

90.0

106.4

103.3

100.7

101.2

104.5

111.6

103.3

102.7

93.4

101.9

86.7

100.8

98.1

102.2

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

30

30

30

30

30

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

60-140

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

70-130

70-130

70-130

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

17


Client:

Contact:




VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4664117BatchLCS

MB

WG3073309-1

WG3073309-2


Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

Methyl Ethyl Ketone


n-Hexane

MTBE

o-Xylene

Styrene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene



Trichloroethylene


Vinyl chloride





1,2-Dibromoethane

1,1-Dichloroethane


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

2-Hexanone

Acetone

Benzene


62.6

99.2

102.4

102.5

97.2

92.8

96.2

99.6

100.5

104.4

110.5

101.7

102.5

96.3

107.2

103.9

74.7

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.20

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<20

<20

<0.50

<1.0

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

50-140

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

50-150

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

60-140

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.2

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

20

20

0.5

1

17


Client:

Contact:




VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4664117BatchMB

MS

WG3073309-2

WG3073309-5 WG3073309-3

Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Disulfide


Chlorobenzene

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane





Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

Methyl Ethyl Ketone


n-Hexane

MTBE

o-Xylene

Styrene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene



Trichloroethylene


Vinyl chloride

Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene

Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene




<1.0

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<1.0

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<1.0

<2.0

<0.50

<1.0

<20

<20

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

104.5

105.1

103.2

90.6

102.4

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

50-150

50-150

50-150

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

%

%

1

0.5

1

0.5

0.5

1

1

1

0.5

0.5

1

1

2

0.5

1

20

20

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

1

0.5

70-130

70-130

17


Client:

Contact:




VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4664117BatchMSWG3073309-5 WG3073309-3


1,2-Dibromoethane

1,1-Dichloroethane


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

2-Hexanone

Acetone

Benzene


Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Disulfide


Chlorobenzene

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane





Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

Methyl Ethyl Ketone


n-Hexane

MTBE

o-Xylene

101.8

95.9

100.7

89.9

107.0

100.8

101.8

108.9

107.6

86.9

116.8

103.5

102.2

98.5

89.5

96.2

101.7

101.6

82.8

103.7

69.2

101.6

95.0

101.2

43.9

99.2

100.4

100.1

109.4

94.3

83.6

99.4

99.3

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

MES

17


Client:

Contact:




VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4664117BatchMSWG3073309-5 WG3073309-3

Styrene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene



Trichloroethylene


Vinyl chloride

98.1

106.4

99.9

97.3

88.7

106.7

91.2

59.3

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

12-JUN-19

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

17

Quality Control Report

Page 16 of


Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:


J

MES

MS-B

RPD-NA

Duplicate results and limits are expressed in terms of absolute difference.

Data Quality Objective was marginally exceeded (by < 10% absolute) for < 10% of analytes in a Multi-Element Scan / Multi-Parameter Scan (considered acceptable as per OMOE & CCME).Matrix Spike recovery could not be accurately calculated due to high analyte background in sample.

Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.

Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

Legend:

Client:

Contact:


17


Page 17 of


ALS Product Description Sample

ID Sampling Date Date Processed Rec. HT Actual HT

Physical Tests

2 31-MAY-19 11:10 05-JUN-19 11:00 4 5pH

EHTL

Qualifier

Legend & Qualifier Definitions:

The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.

Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.

Hold Time Exceedances:

Units

days

EHTR-FM: EHTR: EHTL: EHT: Rec. HT:

Exceeded ALS recommended hold time prior to sample receipt. Field Measurement recommended.Exceeded ALS recommended hold time prior to sample receipt.Exceeded ALS recommended hold time prior to analysis. Sample was received less than 24 hours prior to expiry.Exceeded ALS recommended hold time prior to analysis.ALS recommended hold time (see units).

Notes*:Where actual sampling date is not provided to ALS, the date (& time) of receipt is used for calculation purposes.Where actual sampling time is not provided to ALS, the earlier of 12 noon on the sampling date or the time (& date) of receipt isused for calculation purposes. Samples for L2283839 were received on 03-JUN-19 12:49.

ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal governmentrequirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by theUS EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.

Client:

Contact:


17

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Mary-Lynn PikeALS Laboratory Group-Waterloo60 Northland Rd. Unit 1Waterloo, ON N2V 2B8CANADA

Phone:

E-mail:

(519) 886-6910

[email protected]

Report Date: June 17, 2019

34-1916354Workorder:

L2283839L2283839Purchase Order:

Project ID:

Project Manager Jessica Helland

Sampling SiteReceive DateCollect DateLab IDClient Sample ID

1916354001 05/31/19BH-E4 06/07/19

1916354002 05/31/19BH-W4 06/07/19

Page 1 of 3 Mon, 06/17/19 1:25 PM ENVREP-V4.8

ADDRESS 960 West LeVoy Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84123 USA PHONE FAX+1 801 266 7700 +1 801 268 9992

ALS GROUP USA, CORP. An ALS Limited Company

||

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Project Manager: Jessica Helland

Client: ALS Environmental(Mississauga)

Workorder: 34-1916354

Analytical Results

Sample ID: 05/31/201906/07/20191916354001Lab ID:

Collected:Received:

BH-E4 NA

Sampling Parameter: NAMatrix:

Media:

Water

125 mL NalgeneSampling Site:

Analysis: SW 6020A, Water

Analyzed: 06/14/2019 12:42Batch:

Instrument ID:EMS/5487 (HBN: 241502) Percent Solid: NA

ICPM02

Report Basis: Wet

Preparation: EPA 3010, SW 6020 Water Prep

Prepared: 06/10/2019Batch:

Weight/Volume EMS/5485 (HBN: 241048) Initial:

Final:50 mL50 mL

Result (ug/L)Analyte MDL (ug/L) RL (ug/L) Dilution Qual

Analysis Method - SW 6020

510ND 25Gold U

53.0ND 10Platinum U

53.0ND 10Rhodium U

Sample ID: 05/31/201906/07/20191916354002Lab ID:

Collected:Received:

BH-W4 NA

Sampling Parameter: NAMatrix:

Media:

Water

125 mL NalgeneSampling Site:

Analysis: SW 6020A, Water

Analyzed: 06/14/2019 12:45Batch:

Instrument ID:EMS/5487 (HBN: 241502) Percent Solid: NA

ICPM02

Report Basis: Wet

Preparation: EPA 3010, SW 6020 Water Prep

Prepared: 06/10/2019Batch:

Weight/Volume EMS/5485 (HBN: 241048) Initial:

Final:50 mL50 mL

Result (ug/L)Analyte MDL (ug/L) RL (ug/L) Dilution Qual

Analysis Method - SW 6020

510ND 25Gold U

53.0ND 10Platinum U

53.0ND 10Rhodium U

Comments

Workorder: 1916354

EPA 6020: Samples were received with nitric acid used as the preservative according the sample containers. Concentratedhydrochloric acid was added and samples were allowed to react overnight in a walk-in cooler before sample preparation. Thesamples were prepared using aqua regia so they were diluted 5x prior to analysis to reduce the acid concentration and preserveinstrument integrity.

Report Authorization

Analyst Peer ReviewMethod

(/S/ is an electronic signature that complies with 21 CFR Part 11)

SW 6020 /S/ Kristie F. Bitner06/14/2019 15:42 06/17/2019 13:17

/S/ Rex Bagley

Laboratory Contact Information(801) [email protected]

ALS Environmental960 W Levoy DriveSalt Lake City, Utah 84123

Phone:Email:Web:


ANALYTICAL REPORT

Project Manager: Jessica Helland

Client: ALS Environmental(Mississauga)

Workorder: 34-1916354

General Lab CommentsThe results provided in this report relate only to the items tested.Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.Samples have not been blank corrected unless otherwise noted.This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of ALS.

ALS provides professional analytical services for all samples submitted. ALS is not in a position to interpret the data andassumes no responsibility for the quality of the samples submitted.

All quality control samples processed with the samples in this report yielded acceptable results unless otherwise noted.

ALS is accredited for specific fields of testing (scopes) in the following testing sectors. The quality system implemented at ALSconforms to accreditation requirements and is applied to all analytical testing performed by ALS. The following table lists testingsector, accreditation body, accreditation number and website. Please contact these accrediting bodies or your ALS projectmanager for the current scope of accreditation that applies to your analytical testing.

Testing SectorAccreditation Body(Standard)

Certificate Number Website

Environmental PJLA (DoD ELAP) L17-506 http://www.pjlabs.comPJLA (ISO 17025) L17-507-R1 http://www.pjlabs.comUtah (TNI) UT00953 http://lams.nelac-institute.org/searchNevada (TNI) UT00953201-1 https://ndep.nv.gov/water/lab-certificationIowa (TNI) IA# 376 http://www.shl.uiowa.edu/labcert/idnr/Kansas E-10416 http://www.kdheks.gov/envlab/disclaimer.htmlOklahoma (TNI) IJ# 9980 http://www.deq.state.ok.us/CSDnew/labcert.htmTexas (TNI) T104704456-18-9 https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/compliance/compliance_sup

port/qa/txnelap_lab_list.pdf

Industrial Hygiene AIHA (ISO 17025 &AIHA IHLAP)

101574 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org

DOECAP-AP L18-606 http://www.pjlabs.comWashington C596 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/Permits-certifications/Lab

oratory-Accreditation

Dietary Supplements PJLA (ISO 17025) L17-507-R1 http://www.pjlabs.com

MDL = Method Detection Limit, a statistical estimate of method/media/instrument sensitivity.RL = Reporting Limit, a verified value of method/media/instrument sensitivity.CRDL = Contract Required Detection LimitReg. Limit = Regulatory Limit.ND = Not Detected, testing result not detected above the MDL or RL.< Means this testing result is less than the numerical value.** No result could be reported, see sample comments for details.

U = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was not detected above the MDL.J = Qualifier Indicates that the analyte value is between the MDL and the RL. It is also used to indicate an estimated value for

B = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was detected in the blank.E = Qualifier indicates that the analyte result exceeds calibration range.P = Qualifier indicates that the RPD between the two columns is greater than 40%.

Result Symbol Definitions

Qualifier Symbol Definitions

tentatively identified compounds in mass spectrometry where a 1:1 response is assumed.


[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]

14-MAY-19

Lab Work Order #: L2272905

Date Received:Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)

2010 WINSTON PARK DROAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7

ATTN: Bradley TrinhFINAL 22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)Report Date:

Version:

Certificate of Analysis

ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

____________________________________________

Melanie MoshiAccount Manager

ADDRESS: 95 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 1, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1H2 Canada | Phone: +1 905 881 9887 | Fax: +1 905 881 8062

Client Phone: 905-856-5200

0T1-0919169-ENJob Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:

17-725700C of C Numbers:DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIELegal Site Desc:

Result

22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed

Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - ON-511-T2-RPI-ICC-C/F-SOIL


0T1-0919169-EN - DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIEANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT


Guideline Limits

#1: T2-Soil-Ind/Com/Commu Property Use (Coarse) #2: T2-Soil-Ind/Com/Commu Property Use (Fine)

#3: T2-Soil-Res/Park/Inst. Property Use (Coarse) #4: T2-Soil-Res/Park/Inst. Property Use (Fine)


7

L2272905-1

L2272905-2

E4-1 SS2

E4-1 SS5

BRADLEY TRINH on 07-MAY-19

BRADLEY TRINH on 07-MAY-19 @

Sampled By:

Sampled By:

SOIL

SOIL

Matrix:

Matrix:

#1

#1

#2

#2

#3

#3

#4

#4

Physical Tests

Cyanides

Saturated Paste Extractables

Metals

Speciated Metals

Physical Tests


Conductivity% MoisturepH

Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss

SARCalcium (Ca)Magnesium (Mg)Sodium (Na)

Antimony (Sb)Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Beryllium (Be)Boron (B)Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.Cadmium (Cd)Chromium (Cr)Cobalt (Co)Copper (Cu)Lead (Pb)Mercury (Hg)Molybdenum (Mo)Nickel (Ni)Selenium (Se)Silver (Ag)Thallium (Tl)Uranium (U)Vanadium (V)Zinc (Zn)

Chromium, Hexavalent

Conductivity% MoisturepHRedox PotentialResistivity

Chloride

0.3373.847.99

<0.050

4.957.970.5953.8

<1.01.219.9

<0.50<5.00.13

<0.507.82.14.412.8

0.0117<1.04.1

<1.0<0.20<0.50<1.019.918.3

<0.20

1.4012.07.87187716

627

0.00400.100.10

0.050

0.100.500.500.50

1.01.01.00.505.00.100.501.01.01.01.0

0.00501.01.01.00.200.501.01.05.0

0.20

0.00400.100.10

-10001.0

5.0

mS/cm%

pH units

ug/g

SARmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

ug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/g

ug/g

mS/cm%

pH unitsmV

ohm*cm

ug/g

21-MAY-1915-MAY-1921-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

21-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-19

21-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

21-MAY-1915-MAY-1921-MAY-1916-MAY-1921-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

1.4 1.4 0.7 0.7

0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051

12 12 5 5

40 50 7.5 7.518 18 18 18670 670 390 3908 10 4 5

120 120 120 1202 2 1.5 1.5

1.9 1.9 1.2 1.2160 160 160 16080 100 22 22230 300 140 180120 120 120 1203.9 20 0.27 1.840 40 6.9 6.9270 340 100 1305.5 5.5 2.4 2.440 50 20 253.3 3.3 1 133 33 23 2386 86 86 86340 340 340 340

8 10 8 10

1.4 1.4 *0.7 *0.7

Result






Guideline Limits




7

L2272905-2

L2272905-3

L2272905-4

E4-1 SS5

WS-1 SS3

WS-1 SS6




Sampled By:

Sampled By:

Sampled By:

SOIL

SOIL

SOIL

Matrix:

Matrix:

Matrix:

#1

#1

#1

#2

#2

#2

#3

#3

#3

#4

#4

#4


Inorganic Parameters

Physical Tests

Cyanides

Saturated Paste Extractables

Metals

Speciated Metals

Sulphate

Acid Volatile Sulphides

Conductivity% MoisturepH


SARCalcium (Ca)Magnesium (Mg)Sodium (Na)

Antimony (Sb)Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Beryllium (Be)Boron (B)Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.Cadmium (Cd)Chromium (Cr)Cobalt (Co)Copper (Cu)Lead (Pb)Mercury (Hg)Molybdenum (Mo)Nickel (Ni)Selenium (Se)Silver (Ag)Thallium (Tl)Uranium (U)Vanadium (V)Zinc (Zn)


36

<0.20

0.68818.67.85

<0.050

13.36.65

<0.50125

<1.0<1.016.5

<0.50<5.0<0.10<0.508.12.14.03.3

<0.0050<1.03.8

<1.0<0.20<0.50<1.021.710.3

<0.20

SAR:M

20

0.20

0.00400.100.10

0.050

0.100.500.500.50

1.01.01.00.505.00.100.501.01.01.01.0

0.00501.01.01.00.200.501.01.05.0

0.20

mg/kg

mg/kg

mS/cm%

pH units

ug/g

SARmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

ug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/g

ug/g

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

21-MAY-1915-MAY-1921-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

21-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-19

21-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

1.4 1.4 0.7 0.7

0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051

*12 *12 *5 *5

40 50 7.5 7.518 18 18 18670 670 390 3908 10 4 5

120 120 120 1202 2 1.5 1.5

1.9 1.9 1.2 1.2160 160 160 16080 100 22 22230 300 140 180120 120 120 1203.9 20 0.27 1.840 40 6.9 6.9270 340 100 1305.5 5.5 2.4 2.440 50 20 253.3 3.3 1 133 33 23 2386 86 86 86340 340 340 340

8 10 8 10

Result






Guideline Limits




7

L2272905-4 WS-1 SS6BRADLEY TRINH on 09-MAY-19 @Sampled By:SOILMatrix: #1 #2 #3 #4

Physical Tests



Inorganic Parameters

Conductivity% MoisturepHRedox PotentialResistivity

Chloride

Sulphate


0.42318.27.731392360

140

<20

<0.20

0.00400.100.10

-10001.0

5.0

20

0.20

mS/cm%

pH unitsmV

ohm*cm

ug/g

mg/kg

mg/kg

22-MAY-1915-MAY-1921-MAY-1916-MAY-1922-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

1.4 1.4 0.7 0.7


0T1-0919169-EN - DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIE L2272905 CONTD....5Page of

22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)

B-HWS-R511-WT

CL-R511-WT

CN-WAD-R511-WT

CR-CR6-IC-WT

EC-WT

HG-200.2-CVAA-WT

MET-200.2-CCMS-WT

MOISTURE-WT

Boron-HWE-O.Reg 153/04 (July2011)

Chloride-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)

Cyanide (WAD)-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)

Hexavalent Chromium in Soil

Conductivity (EC)

Mercury in Soil by CVAAS

Metals in Soil by CRC ICPMS

% Moisture

A dried solid sample is extracted with calcium chloride, the sample undergoes a heating process. After cooling the sample is filtered and analyzed by ICP/OES.


5 grams of dried soil is mixed with 10 grams of distilled water for a minimum of 30 minutes. The extract is filtered and analyzed by ion chromatography.


The sample is extracted with a strong base for 16 hours, and then filtered. The filtrate is then distilled where the cyanide is converted to cyanogen chloride by reacting with chloramine-T, the cyanogen chloride then reacts with a combination of barbituric acid and isonicotinic acid to form a highly colored complex.


This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" SW-846, Method 7199, published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The procedure involves analysis for chromium (VI) by ion chromatography using diphenylcarbazide in asulphuric acid solution.


A representative subsample is tumbled with de-ionized (DI) water. The ratio of water to soil is 2:1 v/w. After tumbling the sample is then analyzed by a conductivity meter.


Soil samples are digested with nitric and hydrochloric acids, followed by analysis by CVAAS.


Soil/sediment is dried, disaggregated, and sieved (2 mm). For tests intended to support Ontario regulations, the <2mm fraction is ground to pass through a 0.355 mm sieve. Strong Acid Leachable Metals in the <2mm fraction are solubilized by heated digestion with nitric and hydrochloric acids. Instrumental analysis is by Collision / Reaction Cell ICPMS.

Limitations: This method is intended to liberate environmentally available metals. Silicate minerals are not solubilized. Some metals may be only partially recovered (matrix dependent), including Al, Ba, Be, Cr, S, Sr, Ti, Tl, V, W, and Zr. Elemental Sulfur may be poorly recovered by this method. Volatile forms of sulfur (e.g. sulfide, H2S) may be excluded if lost during sampling, storage, or digestion.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).

Methods Listed (if applicable):

ALS Test Code Test Description

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

SAR:M Reported SAR represents a maximum value. Actual SAR may be lower if both Ca and Mg were detectable.

Sample Parameter Qualifier key listed:

HW EXTR, EPA 6010B

EPA 300.0

MOE 3015/APHA 4500CN I-WAD

SW846 3060A/7199

MOEE E3138

EPA 200.2/1631E (mod)

EPA 200.2/6020A (mod)

CCME PHC in Soil - Tier 1 (mod)

Method Reference***


Matrix

7



22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)

PH-WT

REDOX-POTENTIAL-WT

RESISTIVITY-CALC-WT

RESISTIVITY-CALC-WT

SAR-R511-WT

SO4-WT

SULPHIDE-WT

pH

Redox Potential

Resistivity Calculation

Resistivity Calculation

SAR-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)

Sulphate

Sulphide, Acid Volatile

A minimum 10g portion of the sample is extracted with 20mL of 0.01M calcium chloride solution by shaking for at least 30 minutes. The aqueous layer isseparated from the soil and then analyzed using a pH meter and electrode.


This analysis is carried out in accordance with the procedure described in the "APHA" method 2580 "Oxidation-Reduction Potential" 2012. Samples are extracted at a fixed ratio with DI water. Results are reported as observed oxidation-reduction potential of the platinum metal-reference electrode employed, in mV.

Resistivity are calculated based on the conductivity using APHA 2510B where Conductivity is the inverse of Resistivity.

Resistivity are calculated based on the conductivity using APHA 2510B where Conductivity is the inverse of Resistivity.

A dried, disaggregated solid sample is extracted with deionized water, the aqueous extract is separated from the solid, acidified and then analyzed usinga ICP/OES. The concentrations of Na, Ca and Mg are reported as per CALA requirements for calculated parameters. These individual parameters are not for comparison to any guideline.


5 grams of soil is mixed with 50 mL of distilled water for a minimum of 30 minutes. The extract is filtered and analyzed by ion chromatography.

This analysis is carried out in accordance with the method described in APHA 4500 S2-J. Hydrochloric acid is added to sediment samples within a purge and trap system. The evolved hydrogen sulphide (H2S) is carried into a basic solution by inert gas. The acid volatile sulfide is then determined colourimetrically.

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

MOEE E3137A

APHA 2580

APHA 2510 B

MOECC E3138

SW846 6010C

EPA 300.0

APHA 4500S2J

*** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.

The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:

Chain of Custody numbers:

17-725700

Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location

WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA

7



22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)

GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS

Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of samplemg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of samplemg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/L - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million.< - Less than.D.L. - The reporting limit.N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.

Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.

Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information. Guideline limits are not adjusted for the hardness, pH or temperature of the sample (the most conservative values are used). Measurement uncertainty is not applied to test results prior to comparison with specified criteria values.

7


Client:

Contact:

Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 WINSTON PARK DR OAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7Bradley Trinh

Report Date: 22-MAY-19Workorder: L2272905


B-HWS-R511-WT

CL-R511-WT

CN-WAD-R511-WT

CR-CR6-IC-WT

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

R4639394

R4639715

R4639401

R4637221

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

DUP

IRM

LCS

MB

CRM

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

CRM

DUP

LCS

MB

WG3052961-4

WG3052961-2

WG3052961-3

WG3052961-1

WG3054003-3

WG3054003-4

WG3054003-2

WG3054003-1

WG3050953-3

WG3050953-2

WG3050953-1

WG3050953-4

WG3050923-4

WG3050923-3

WG3050923-2

WG3050923-1

L2272874-12

WT SAR3

AN-CRM-WT

L2271554-2

L2272905-3

L2272905-3

WT-SQC012

L2272905-3

Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.




Chloride

Chloride

Chloride

Chloride








0.14

87.0

95.6

<0.10

96.1

<5.0

102.7

<5.0

<0.050

98.9

<0.050

104.8

93.5

<0.20

99.0

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

17-MAY-19

2.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

30

30

35

35

70-130

70-130

70-130

80-120

80-120

70-130

70-130

80-120

ug/g

%

%

ug/g

%

ug/g

%

ug/g

ug/g

%

ug/g

%

%

ug/g

%

0.14

<5.0

<0.050

<0.20

0.1

5

0.05

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

7


Client:

Contact:




CR-CR6-IC-WT

EC-WT

HG-200.2-CVAA-WT

MET-200.2-CCMS-WT

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

R4637221

R4639436

R4640458

R4639502

R4639551

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

MB

DUP

IRM

LCS

MB

DUP

IRM

LCS

MB

CRM

DUP

LCS

MB

CRM

WG3050923-1

WG3053040-4

WG3053040-2

WG3054292-1

WG3053040-1

WG3054697-4

WG3054697-2

WG3055369-1

WG3054697-1

WG3053978-2

WG3053978-6

WG3053978-3

WG3053978-1

WG3053978-2

WG3053040-3

WT SAR3

WG3054697-3

WT SAR3

WT-CANMET-TILL1

WG3053978-5

WT-CANMET-TILL1


Conductivity

Conductivity

Conductivity

Conductivity

Conductivity

Conductivity

Conductivity

Conductivity

Mercury (Hg)

Mercury (Hg)

Mercury (Hg)

Mercury (Hg)

Antimony (Sb)

Arsenic (As)

<0.20

0.953

97.1

101.3

<0.0040

1.50

97.1

100.2

<0.0040

98.0

0.0198

113.0

<0.0050

100.8

101.8

17-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

22-MAY-19

22-MAY-19

22-MAY-19

22-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

2.1

2.1

0.7

20

20

40

70-130

90-110

70-130

90-110

70-130

80-120

70-130

70-130

ug/g

mS/cm

%

%

mS/cm

mS/cm

%

%

mS/cm

%

ug/g

%

mg/kg

%

%

0.973

1.53

0.0197

0.2

0.004

0.004

0.005

7


Client:

Contact:




MET-200.2-CCMS-WT Soil

R4639551BatchCRM

DUP

WG3053978-2

WG3053978-6

WT-CANMET-TILL1

WG3053978-5

Barium (Ba)

Beryllium (Be)

Boron (B)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Cobalt (Co)

Copper (Cu)

Lead (Pb)

Molybdenum (Mo)

Nickel (Ni)

Selenium (Se)

Silver (Ag)

Thallium (Tl)

Uranium (U)

Vanadium (V)

Zinc (Zn)

Antimony (Sb)

Arsenic (As)

Barium (Ba)

Beryllium (Be)

Boron (B)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Cobalt (Co)

Copper (Cu)

Lead (Pb)

Molybdenum (Mo)

Nickel (Ni)

Selenium (Se)

Silver (Ag)

Thallium (Tl)

Uranium (U)

101.8

101.9

3.1

101.0

106.3

101.9

101.9

97.7

101.6

102.5

0.27

0.23

0.124

97.1

105.2

102.8

<0.10

3.08

73.0

0.52

6.3

0.088

22.2

7.80

16.0

8.86

0.37

17.9

<0.20

<0.10

0.140

0.519

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

N/A

6.6

6.9

8.1

9.4

9.5

9.3

6.6

5.5

4.5

16

5.7

N/A

N/A

3.0

4.7

30

30

40

30

30

30

30

30

30

40

40

30

30

40

30

30

70-130

70-130

0-8.2

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

0.11-0.51

0.13-0.33

0.077-0.18

70-130

70-130

70-130

%

%

mg/kg

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

%

%

%

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

ug/g

0.11

3.29

78.2

0.56

6.9

0.097

24.4

8.33

16.9

9.27

0.43

18.9

<0.20

<0.10

0.144

0.544

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

7


Client:

Contact:




MET-200.2-CCMS-WT Soil

R4639551BatchDUP

LCS

MB

WG3053978-6

WG3053978-4

WG3053978-1

WG3053978-5Vanadium (V)

Zinc (Zn)

Antimony (Sb)

Arsenic (As)

Barium (Ba)

Beryllium (Be)

Boron (B)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Cobalt (Co)

Copper (Cu)

Lead (Pb)

Molybdenum (Mo)

Nickel (Ni)

Selenium (Se)

Silver (Ag)

Thallium (Tl)

Uranium (U)

Vanadium (V)

Zinc (Zn)

Antimony (Sb)

Arsenic (As)

Barium (Ba)

Beryllium (Be)

Boron (B)

Cadmium (Cd)

Chromium (Cr)

Cobalt (Co)

Copper (Cu)

Lead (Pb)

Molybdenum (Mo)

Nickel (Ni)

32.6

39.8

105.3

100.5

102.7

97.6

93.1

98.3

100.1

98.7

96.4

98.8

99.0

98.7

99.2

99.7

98.4

98.4

102.6

97.8

<0.10

<0.10

<0.50

<0.10

<5.0

<0.020

<0.50

<0.10

<0.50

<0.50

<0.10

<0.50

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

6.7

5.3

30

30

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

ug/g

ug/g

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

34.8

42.0

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.1

5

0.02

0.5

0.1

0.5

0.5

0.1

0.5

7


Client:

Contact:




MET-200.2-CCMS-WT

MOISTURE-WT

PH-WT

REDOX-POTENTIAL-WT

SAR-R511-WT

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

Soil

R4639551

R4635530

R4639804

R4636754

R4639389

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

CRM

DUP

DUP

IRM

WG3053978-1

WG3050045-3

WG3050045-2

WG3050045-1

WG3050972-1

WG3054425-1

WG3051308-1

WG3050699-1

WG3053040-4

WG3053040-2

L2272905-1

L2272905-2

WT-REDOX

L2272905-2

WG3053040-3

WT SAR3

Selenium (Se)

Silver (Ag)

Thallium (Tl)

Uranium (U)

Vanadium (V)

Zinc (Zn)

% Moisture

% Moisture

% Moisture

pH

pH

Redox Potential

Redox Potential

Calcium (Ca)

Sodium (Na)

Magnesium (Mg)

Calcium (Ca)

Sodium (Na)

<0.20

<0.10

<0.050

<0.050

<0.20

<2.0

3.75

94.3

<0.10

7.92

7.03

99.6

175

4.60

197

1.26

100.4

100.1

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

15-MAY-19

15-MAY-19

15-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

2.2

0.05

6.6

8.4

0.5

27

20

0.3

25

30

30

30

90-110

6.9-7.1

80-120

70-130

70-130

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

%

%

%

pH units

pH units

%

mV

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

3.84

7.87

187

4.23

196

0.96

0.2

0.1

0.05

0.05

0.2

2

0.1

J

7


Client:

Contact:




SAR-R511-WT

SO4-WT

SULPHIDE-WT

Soil

Soil

Soil

R4639389

R4637087

R4636594

Batch

Batch

Batch

IRM

LCS

MB

CRM

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

WG3053040-2

WG3053040-5

WG3053040-1

WG3050546-4

WG3050546-3

WG3050546-2

WG3050546-1

WG3051330-3

WG3051330-2

WG3051330-1

WT SAR3

AN-CRM-WT

L2272905-2

L2271619-5

Magnesium (Mg)

Calcium (Ca)

Sodium (Na)

Magnesium (Mg)

Calcium (Ca)

Sodium (Na)

Magnesium (Mg)

Sulphate

Sulphate

Sulphate

Sulphate




102.7

101.7

101.4

100.6

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

115.4

35

102.4

<20

<0.20

74.8

<0.20

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

21-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

16-MAY-19

1.6

N/A

30

30

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

60-140

80-120

70-130

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

mg/kg

%

mg/kg

mg/kg

%

mg/kg

36

<0.20

0.5

0.5

0.5

20

0.2

RPD-NA

7


Page 7 of


Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:


J

RPD-NA

Duplicate results and limits are expressed in terms of absolute difference.

Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.

Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

Legend:

The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.

Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.

Hold Time Exceedances:

All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times.

ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.

Client:

Contact:


7


0CM-18-0450

APPENDIX CHydraulic Conductivity Calculations

BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests

Project Name:Project Number:Well: BH-E4-2Date: 31-May-19 Test 1

Well Parameters:L 0.29 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 0.29 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 1.72 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 11.4173228 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 1.05756428 (calculated)

Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 1.756009(if well extends to the base of the formation)

Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): -0.66391(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)

Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter -23.5945Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.307596Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 1.344415

(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw

Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.718

Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:

FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 6.47E-04 m/min K: -2.45E-04 m/min

1.08E-05 m/second -4.08E-06 m/second

Transmissivity (T): 1.6 m2/day Transmissivity (T): -0.6 m2/day

COMMENTS:

Water level assumed at 3.91 m below ground (MW 4.2 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 5.63 m below ground

1

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

é

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

wwBRw

e

rLC

rHr

R

1)(ln

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

éþýü

îíì -+

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

w

w

wBRw

e

rL

rHDBA

rHr

R

÷÷ø

öççè

æDD

þýü

îíì

-=0

2 *lnln*1

2 HH

rR

tLr

Kw

ew


Project Name:Project Number:Well: W4-2Date: Test



Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.32999(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)

Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter 3.685161Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.858838Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 4.841362




FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 8.34E-04 m/min K: 7.46E-04 m/min

1.39E-05 m/second 1.24E-05 m/second

Transmissivity (T): 14.3 m2/day Transmissivity (T): 12.8 m2/day

COMMENTS:

Water level assumed at 1.37 m below ground (MW 4.5 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 13.27 m below ground (new aquifer information)

1

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

é

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

wwBRw

e

rLC

rHr

R

1)(ln

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

éþýü

îíì -+

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

w

w

wBRw

e

rL

rHDBA

rHr

R

÷÷ø

öççè

æDD

þýü

îíì

-=0

2 *lnln*1

2 HH

rR

tLr

Kw

ew


Project Name:Project Number:Well: BH-W4 Test 2Date: 31-May-19 Test 2











COMMENTS:


1

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

é

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

wwBRw

e

rLC

rHr

R

1)(ln

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

éþýü

îíì -+

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

w

w

wBRw

e

rL

rHDBA

rHr

R

÷÷ø

öççè

æDD

þýü

îíì

-=0

2 *lnln*1

2 HH

rR

tLr

Kw

ew


Project Name:Project Number:Well: BH-W4-2Date: 31-May-19 Test 3











COMMENTS:

Water level assumed at 1.37 m below ground (MW 4.5 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 13.27 m below ground (bottom of aquifer)

1

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

é

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

wwBRw

e

rLC

rHr

R

1)(ln

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

éþýü

îíì -+

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

w

w

wBRw

e

rL

rHDBA

rHr

R

÷÷ø

öççè

æDD

þýü

îíì

-=0

2 *lnln*

12 H

HrR

tLrK

w

ew


Project Name:Project Number:Well: W5-2 (NOTE: SLUG TEST DATA FOR W5-1)Date: Test











COMMENTS:

Drawdown data for BH W5-1 usedWater level assumed at 0.62 m below ground (MW 3.6 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 14.17 m below ground (where bottom of aquifer recorded)

1

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

é

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

wwBRw

e

rLC

rHr

R

1)(ln

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

éþýü

îíì -+

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

w

w

wBRw

e

rL

rHDBA

rHr

R

÷÷ø

öççè

æDD

þýü

îíì

-=0

2 *lnln*1

2 HH

rR

tLr

Kw

ew













COMMENTS:


1

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

é

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

wwBRw

e

rLC

rHr

R

1)(ln

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

éþýü

îíì -+

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

w

w

wBRw

e

rL

rHDBA

rHr

R

÷÷ø

öççè

æDD

þýü

îíì

-=0

2 *lnln*1

2 HH

rR

tLr

Kw

ew













COMMENTS:


1

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

é

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

wwBRw

e

rLC

rHr

R

1)(ln

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

éþýü

îíì -+

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

w

w

wBRw

e

rL

rHDBA

rHr

R

÷÷ø

öççè

æDD

þýü

îíì

-=0

2 *lnln*1

2 HH

rR

tLr

Kw

ew


Project Name:Project Number:Well: W5-2 (NOTE: SLUG TEST DATA FROM FIELD NOTES INITIALLY WRITTEN AS W5-1)Date: Test











COMMENTS:

Drawdown data for BH W5-1 usedWater level assumed at 0.62 m below ground (MW 3.6 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 14.17 m below ground (where bottom of aquifer recorded)

1

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

é

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

wwBRw

e

rLC

rHr

R

1)(ln

ln

1.1ln

-

úúúú

û

ù

êêêê

ë

éþýü

îíì -+

+÷øöç

èæ

=þýü

îíì

w

w

wBRw

e

rL

rHDBA

rHr

R

÷÷ø

öççè

æDD

þýü

îíì

-=0

2 *lnln*1

2 HH

rR

tLr

Kw

ew


0CM-18-0450

APPENDIX DGroundwater Dewatering Calculations

Project Number: 0BM-18-8036

Project Name

Work Area Dimensions Hydraulic Conductivity

Length of trench 45.00 metres (m)

Width of main Trench: 3.00 m K = 1.37E-05 m/s*

Equations Radius of Influence

Radius of Influence line source R0 = 1500*(H-h)*(K)^1/2 Ro = 18.8 m

Equivalent radius of excavation r = trench width/2 re = 1.5 m

x = trench length

Dupuit Equation unconfined for

open trench

where: Q = discharge flow rate Aquifer Information

K = hydraulic conductivity K = 1.4E-05 m/s

H = Initial saturated thickness H= 14.1 m

h = Final saturated thickness h= 10.8 m

Steady state seepage

Q = 4.2E-03 cubic metres/second (m3/s)

Q = 4.2E+00 litres/second (L/s)

Q = 362,771 litres/day (L/day)

Safety Factor of 2 = 725,543 litres/day (L/day)

Dunlop St., Barrie ON

Groundwater and Stormwater Dewatering Calculation

Source 1:

Q = pK[(H2-h2)/Ln(R/r) + 2 ( xK ((H2-h2)/2R)


0CM-18-0450

APPENDIX EBorehole Logs

Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment

Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario


BH E1

Date(s) Drilled May 7, 2019

Drilling Method

Drill Rig Type Hand Dig

Water Level -

Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix

Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type Solid stem

Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group

Sampling Method(s) Grab

Location Anne Street North; northbound lane

Checked By J.B.

Total Depth of Borehole (m) 0.30 mbgs

Elevation (m) 229.78 m

Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG

raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Asphalt

Fill - Granular A (brown sand, gravel with some cobbles)

Terminated borehole. Note: Locates recommended hand-digging only due to underground utilities.

Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

229.78

228.78

227.78

226.78

225.78

224.78

223.78

.




BH E2-1


Drilling Method Conventional

Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT

Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type


Sampling Method(s) SPT

Location Dunlop Street West; eastbound lane

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

55

55

70

70

100

90

100


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.127 metres Granular A (grey gravel and sand) - Approximately 0.46 metres Granular B (brown sand matrix)

SAND - Light brown - Brownish beige below approximately 3.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) - Moist to damp between approximately 3.81 mbgs to 4.42 mbgs - Wet below 4.57 mbgs - Some silty clay and trace gravel below 5.08 mbgs

Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.

Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

SS4

SS5

SS6

SS7

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

230.14

229.14

228.14

227.14

226.14

225.14

224.14

.




BH E2-2




Water Level 3.90 mbgs

Borehole Backfill Well pipe, sand and bentonite

Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type


Sampling Method(s) -

Location Dunlop Street West; eastbound sidewalk

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltSAND - Brown sand, some silty clay - Fine brown sand, slight odour of petroleum detected; however no staining observed at approximately 4.5 metres below ground surface (mbgs)

Terminated borehole and installed monitoring well.

Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

230.16

229.16

228.16

227.16

226.16

225.16

224.16

.




BH E3


Drilling Method Direct Push


Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type


Sampling Method(s) Tube

Location Anne Street South; southbound lane

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

100

100

100


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.86 metres Granular A (brown sand, some cobbles) - Granular B (fine, light brown sand matrix) below


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

228.48

227.48

226.48

225.48

224.48

223.48

222.48

.




BH E4-1




Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type

Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Gourp



Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

60

50

20

10

60

80

20

REMARKS AND OTHER TESTS

Sampled for M&I

Sampled for corrosivity

Gra

phic

Log

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.23 metres Granular A (grey gravel) - Granular B (brown sand, some gravel) below

SAND - Brown - Dark brown below approximately 3.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) - Greyish brown and saturated below approximately 3.81 mbgs - Trace silty clay below approximatley 4.57 mbgs


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

SS4

SS5

SS6

SS7

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

229.29

228.29

227.29

226.29

225.29

224.29

223.29

.




BH E4-2






Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Dunlop Street West; boulevard in eastbound direction

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


Grass - Topsoil

Fill - Approximately 0.23 metres Granular A (grey gravel) - Granular B (brown sand, some gravel) below

SAND - Brown - Dark brown below approximately 3.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) - Greyish brown and saturated below approximately 3.81 mbgs - Trace silty clay below approximatley 4.57 mbgs

Terminated borehole and installed monitoring well. Note: Observations of soil stratigraphy are from BH E4-1.

Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

229.54

228.54

227.54

226.54

225.54

224.54

223.54

.




BH E5




Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Hart Drive; westbound lane

Checked By J.B.


Elevation (m) 229.65

Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

100

100

100


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.05 metres Granular A (grey gravel and brown sand) - Granular B (brown sand matrix) below

SAND - Light brown


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS2

SS2

SS3

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

229.65

228.65

227.65

226.65

225.65

224.65

223.65

.




BH W1




Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Cedar Pointe Drive; northbound lane

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

50

90


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.6 metres Granular A (brown gravelly sand)

CLAY - Grey saturated clay - Moist to wet on surface


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

231.59

230.59

229.59

228.59

227.59

226.59

225.59

.




BH W2-1






Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Dunlop Street West; westbound lane

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

50

80

100

100

100

20


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


Asphalt

SAND - Brown sand, some gravel

Cave-in

SAND - Dark brown, some gravel, trace to some silt - Wet - Trace cobbles from approximately 2.3 metres below ground surface (mbgs) to 2.6 mbgs

SILT - Grey, damp

SAND - Grey, saturated

SILT - Grey

SILTY SAND - Grey, saturated

SAND - Grey, saturated

Terminated borehole, backfilled to 4.6 mbgs and installed monitoring well.

Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

SS4

SS5

SS6

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

232.12

231.12

230.12

229.12

228.12

227.12

226.12

.




BH W3




Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Sarjeant Drive; northbound lane

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

70

70

60


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown gravelly sand, some cobbles) - Granular B (brown sand, trace cobbles and gravel) below approximately 0.76 metres below ground surface (mbgs)

SAND - Dark brown and wet - Some silt and trace roots/organics below approximately 1.98 mbgs


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

233.5

232.5

231.5

230.5

229.5

228.5

227.5

.




BH W4-1



Drill Rig Type D-50

Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type




Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

60

60

60

50

55

75

100


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown sand, some cobbles and gravel) - Granular B (dark brown sand, trace gravel) below approximately 0.76 metres below ground surface (mbgs)

SAND - Brown/grey - Wet - Some gravel below approximately 2.74 mbgs

CLAY - Grey, soft - Wet


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

SS4

SS5

SS6

SS7

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

234.52

233.52

232.52

231.52

230.52

229.52

228.52

.




BH W4-2






Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Dunlop Street West - Grass area in eastbound direction

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


Grass - Topsoil

SAND - Dark brown, some gravel, some organics - Light brown, damp sand below 0.38 metres below ground surface (mbgs)


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

234.64

233.64

232.64

231.64

230.64

229.64

228.64

.




BH W5-1



Drill Rig Type D-50

Water Level -

Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt

Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Dunlop Street West, westbound lane

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

50

50

60

10

10

50

50

REMARKS AND OTHER TESTS

Sampled for M&I

Sampled for corrosivity

Gra

phic

Log

Wel

l Log


Asphalt

Fill - Granular A (brown sand, some gravel) - Granular B (brown sand matrix) below approximately 1.1 metres below ground surface (mbgs)

SAND - Brown/grey, trace gravel - Wet

CLAY - Grey - Firm


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

SS4

SS5

SS6

SS7

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

235.19

234.19

233.19

232.19

231.19

230.19

229.19

.




BH W5-2



Drill Rig Type Georprobe 7822DT



Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Dunlop Street West - Grass area in westbound direction

Checked By



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


Grass - Topsoil

SAND - Dark brown, some gravel - Grey, some silt, wet below 0.7 metres below ground surface (mbgs)

CLAY - Grey, wet


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

234.75

233.75

232.75

231.75

230.75

229.75

228.75

.




BH W6




Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Ferndale Drive North (north of Dunlop Street West); northbound lane

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

75

75

55


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown sand, gravel, some cobble) - Granular B (brown sand matrix) below approximately 0.83 metres below ground surface (mbgs)

SAND - Grey - Some gravel and cobbles below approximately 1.67 mbgs - Wet below approximately 1.83 mbgs


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

235.1

234.1

233.1

232.1

231.1

230.1

229.1

.




BH W7




Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Ferndale Drive North (south of Dunlop Street West); southbound lane

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

60

60

100


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown sand, some gravel and cobbles) - Granular B (brown sand matrix) below approximately 0.66 metres below ground surface (mbgs)

SAND - Greyish brown - Wet

SILTY SAND/SANDY SILT - Wet


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

234.27

233.27

232.27

231.27

230.27

229.27

228.27

.




BH W8-1




Water Level -


Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type




Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data -

Rec

over

y, %

100

100

50

0

30

70

100


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown sand, some gravel) - Granular B (brown greyish sand matrix, wet) below approximately 1.52 metres below ground surface (mbgs)

SAND - Brown/grey, trace gravel and silt

CLAY - Grey clay, medium dense - Wet

SAND - Grey brown - Wet

CLAY - Grey, medium dense


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

SS1

SS2

SS3

SS4

SS5

SS6

SS7

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

234.94

233.94

232.94

231.94

230.94

229.94

228.94

.




BH W8-2





Borehole Backfill -

Logged By B.T.

Drill Bit Size/Type



Location Dunlop Street West; grass area in eastbound direction

Checked By J.B.



Hammer Data

Rec

over

y, %


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log


Grass - Topsoil

SAND - Dark brown, some gravel and cobbles - Wet - Wet grey sand at approximately 4.5 metres below ground surface (mbgs)


Com

bust

ible

/Org

anic

H

eads

pace

Rea

ding

s, p

pm

Dep

th (

met

res)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Ele

vatio

n (m

etre

s)

235.03

234.03

233.03

232.03

231.03

230.03

229.03

.

Project:

Project Location:

Project Number:

Key to Log of Boring

Rec

over

y, %


raph

ic L

og

Wel

l Log

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONDep

th (

met

ers)

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Sam

ple

Typ

e

Sam

plin

g R

esis

tanc

e,

Ele

vatio

n (m

eter

s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

COLUMN DESCRIPTIONS

1 Depth (meters): Depth in meters below the ground surface.2 Graphic Log: Graphic depiction of the subsurface material

encountered.3 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Description of material encountered.

May include consistency, moisture, color, and other descriptivetext.

4 Well Log: Graphical representation of well installed uponcompletion of drilling and sampling.

5 Elevation (meters): Elevation (MSL, meters).

6 Recovery, %: Sample Recovery % in terms of length7 Sample Type: Type of soil sample collected at the depth interval

shown.8 Sampling Resistance, blows/0.3 m: Number of blows to advance

driven sampler 0.3 meter (or distance shown) beyond seatinginterval using the hammer identified on the boring log.

9 Sample Number: Sample identification number.10 REMARKS ANDOTHER TESTS: Comments and observations

regarding drilling or sampling made by driller or field personnel.

FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST ABBREVIATIONS

mbgs: Metres below ground surfacemAD: Metres above datumCHEM: Chemical tests to assess corrosivityCOMP: Compaction testCONS: One-dimensional consolidation test

LL: Liquid Limit, percentPI: Plasticity Index, percentSA: Sieve analysis (percent passing No. 200 Sieve)UC: Unconfined compressive strength test, Qu, in ksfWA: Wash sieve (percent passing No. 200 Sieve)

MATERIAL GRAPHIC SYMBOLS

Asphaltic Concrete (AC)

Bentonite

Lean CLAY, CLAY w/SAND, SANDY CLAY (CL)

AF

Grass and/or topsoil

Silt

Silty SAND to Sandy SILT (SM-MH)

Poorly graded SAND (SP)

TYPICAL SAMPLER GRAPHIC SYMBOLS

Auger sampler

Bulk Sample

3-inch-OD California w/brass rings

CME Sampler

Grab Sample

2.5-inch-OD ModifiedCalifornia w/ brass liners

Pitcher Sample

2-inch-OD unlined splitspoon (SPT)

Shelby Tube (Thin-walled,fixed head)

OTHER GRAPHIC SYMBOLS

Water level (at time of drilling, ATD)

Water level (after waiting)

Minor change in material properties within astratum

Inferred/gradational contact between strata

? Queried contact between strata

GENERAL NOTES

1: Soil classifications are based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive, and actual lithologic changes may begradual. Field descriptions may have been modified to reflect results of lab tests.2: Descriptions on these logs apply only at the specific boring locations and at the time the borings were advanced. They are not warranted to be representativeof subsurface conditions at other locations or times.

.

Documents

HYDROGEOLOGICAL SITE ASSESSMENT DUNLOP STREET, … Hall/environmental...undertaken to provide background hydrogeological conditions which will determine the level of permitting needed