HYDROGEOLOGICAL SITE ASSESSMENT DUNLOP STREET, BARRIE, ON
Project No.: BM-18-8036
Prepared for:
City of Barrie
70 Collier St
Barrie, ON
L4M 4T5
Prepared by:
McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd.
115 Walgreen Rd.
Carp, ON
K0A 1L0
January 7, 2020
Executive Summary
0BM-18-8036
This report presents the results of a hydrogeological assessment carried out for the purposes of evaluating
the dewatering needs for the widening and intersection improvements in Barrie, Ontario. The proposed
construction work involves road widening and intersection improvements along a 1.4 km stretch of Dunlop
Street between Ferndale Drive North and Anne Street North. The area of investigation is shown on Figure 1.
For the purpose of this report, McIntosh Perry has assumed that construction will proceed in 45 m long by 3
m wide trenches, to a maximum depth of approximately 3 m below ground surface (bgs). On-site testing was
undertaken to provide background hydrogeological conditions which will determine the level of permitting
needed for construction dewatering.
Single well response testing or slug tests were preformed at four on-site monitoring wells to establish an
accurate hydraulic conductivity (K) value for the underlying sand. Additionally, soil samples were collected
during monitoring well installation and borehole advancement, as well as groundwater samples collected
during the slug test analyses. Groundwater samples were analyzed for the necessary parameters listed under
the City of Barrie’s Storm and Sanitary Sewer Use Guidelines.
The proposed construction should proceed under the following conditions:
• A Category 3 PTTW or EASR is obtained (depends on actual excavation volumes);
• Monitoring wells are abandoned as construction progresses in their vicinity, following the
requirements of O.Reg. 903 (wells); and
• Discharged water meets all applicable sewer-use guidelines, or Provincial Water Quality Standards,
Objectives, and Guidelines (PWQO or other relevant legislation) if discharged to a natural receiving
body and/or storm sewer.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
ii
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................1
2.0 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................1
2.1 Site Setting .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
2.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................ 1
2.3 Background Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................3
3.1 Field Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Calculations ............................................................................................................................................................. 3
3.2 Results ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1 Static Conditions ............................................................................................................................................. 5
3.2.2 Single-well Response Tests (Slug-Tests) .......................................................................................................... 5
3.2.3 Dewatering Volumes (inflow to excavation) ................................................................................................... 9
3.2.4 Soil Quality .................................................................................................................................................... 10
3.2.5 Water Quality ................................................................................................................................................ 10
3.2.6 Water Well Record Review ........................................................................................................................... 10
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 12
5.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 13
6.0 LIMITATIONS AND CLOSURE ........................................................................................................................... 14
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
iii
TABLES
Table 1 Groundwater Quality
Table 2 Soil Quality
Table 3-1 Water Level Data (in report)
Table 3-2 Monitoring Well Data (in report)
Table 3-3 Water Well Records (in report)
FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location
Figure 2 Site Layout
Figure 3 Ontario Base Map with MECP Well Records
APPENDICES
Appendix A MECP Well Records
Appendix B Laboratory Certificates of Analysis (Water and Soil Quality Data)
Appendix C Hydraulic Conductivity Calculations
Appendix D Groundwater Dewatering Calculations
Appendix E Borehole Logs
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. (McIntosh Perry) was retained by the City of Barrie to conduct a
hydrogeological assessment in support of the widening and intersection improvements along Dunlop Street
from 150 m west of Ferndale River North to Cedar Point Drive and from the Highway 400 E/W-N ramp to 150
m east of Anne Street North in Barrie, Ontario (the Site, see Figure 1). An outline of the Site and proposed
construction area is presented in Figure 2.
This report provides a hydrogeological assessment of groundwater levels, hydraulic conductivity, and
groundwater infiltration as it relates to and affects dewatering during the construction stages of the road
widening and intersection improvements along the Site. The following reports were reviewed as part of the
current hydrogeological assessment:
• “Dunlop Street Municipal Class C, Environmental Assessment – Geotechnical Report”, by Mcintosh
Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd., dated: January 23, 2020; Project No.: 0BM-18-8036
• “City of Barrie, Dunlop Street West Improvements (Anne Street to Ferndale Drive), Class
Environmental Assessment: Hydrogeological and Contaminated Lands Assessment Components”,
dated 2008, by Golder Associates (Appendix M of Environmental Study Report, Burnside &
Associates).
This hydrogeological report addresses the following:
• General site setting information;
• Geological and hydrogeological background;
• Site-specific conditions;
• Estimated groundwater inflow volumes; and
• Hydraulic conductivity values.
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Site Setting
On-site elevation ranges from approximately 230-236 m above sea level (asl). The Site slopes down to the
northeast, toward Lake Simcoe.
2.2 Hydrology
On-site surface water is presumed to drain into roadside ditches and catch basins located along Dunlop
Street. Lake Simcoe is the closest permanent natural water body and is located approximately 1.1 km east of
the subject property at its closest point.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
2
2.3 Background Geology and Hydrogeology
According to mapping published by the Ontario Geological Survey, the surficial geology of the Site generally
consists of sand, gravel, minor silt and clay. Bedrock geology in the area is described as limestone, dolostone,
shale, arkose, and sandstone of the Shadow Lake Formation. (OGS, 2019)
A review of the MECP Water Well Information System (WWIS), as summarized by Golder Associates (2008),
indicated fourteen wells within 150 m of the Site. These wells are reportedly completed in overburden
material (predominantly sand and gravel) with depths ranging from 7.3 m to 104.9 m below ground surface
(bgs). With the exception of three wells, all records are for installations occurring later than 1966. Two
additional wells are listed as abandoned (assumed monitoring wells) and an additional well is listed as a
municipal well (installed c. 1988). At this time, the Site has been municipally serviced for over ten years,
which adds to the reasonable assumption that there are no active water supply wells within 150 m of the
Site. MECP Well Records are included as Appendix A. (Golder Associates, 2008)
MECP WWIS data are generally consistent with observations made by McIntosh Perry’s staff during the
subsurface investigation, which characterized the Site as having overburden consisting of sand with trace to
some silt and/or clay (Mcintosh Perry, 2020). Additionally, McIntosh Perry conducted an independent MECP
WWIS search for records within a 500 m radius of the Site; listed completion material is generally similar to
that summarized by Golder Associates (MECP, 2019).
Based on the City of Barrie’s most recent Source Water Protection Threat Assessment (Golder Associates,
2010), MECP WWIS records indicate that a majority of the well records within 150 m of the Site are
completed in the region’s ‘intermediate/A2 aquifer’, which is found in the elevation range of approximately
175 – 230 m asl. This aquifer ranges in thickness from approximately 10 – 30 m and is confined to a unit of
inter-layered sand and silt/clay overburden. In most areas, the A2 aquifer is isolated from the ‘upper/A1
aquifer’ (300 – 220 m asl) by 5 – 20 m of confining clay and/or silty sediments. All monitoring wells installed
as part of this project are screened within the region’s A1 aquifer, which is generally unconfined and thus
considered connected to shallow groundwater and surface water.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
3
3.0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
3.1 Field Methodology
Prior to any hydrogeological testing, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells BH E4-2 and
BH W4-2 and submitted to an accredited laboratory (ALS Environmental (ALS) of Mississauga) to establish
whether water quality meets the City of Barrie (COB) Storm and Sanitary Sewer Use By-Law Criteria. The
groundwater samples were collected following standard well sampling procedures. All samples were
collected, unfiltered and unchlorinated, directly into clean bottles supplied by ALS. Samples were kept on ice
and shipped directly to ALS. As noted on the chains of custody and certifications of analysis (Appendix B), all
samples were received by the laboratory within 24 hours of collection. Results from field and laboratory
testing of groundwater samples are summarized in Table 1.
To assess potential dewatering needs for the proposed work, six (6) monitoring wells installed along Dunlop
Street were individually subject to single-well response tests, also known as bail or slug tests, to determine
hydraulic conductivity. Tests were completed on May 31 and June 1, 2019. All six (6) wells (BH E2-2, BH E4-2,
BH W2-1, BH W4-2, BH W5-2 and BH W8) were completed on May 7, 8 and 9, 2019 to maximum depths of
4.5 metres below ground (mbg), 4.2 mbg, 4.5 mbg, 4.5 mbg, 3.6 mbg, and 4.5 mbg, respectively. To complete
the single-well response test at each monitoring well, static water levels were recorded and a known volume
of water was rapidly pumped from the well using Waterra® tubing and a positive displacement foot valve.
Water level recovery was then monitored with an electronic water tape and a LeveLogger™.
3.2 Calculations
In calculating hydraulic conductivity for overburden at the Site, McIntosh Perry analyzed single-well response
recovery data in all wells (BH-E4-2, BH-W4-2, BH-W5-1, BH-E2, BH-W2-1, and BH-W8). Recover data for all
wells were assessed using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) mathematical solution. Hydraulic conductivity (K)
calculations were completed for all slug tests performed at all wells using the Bouwer and Rice formula for
partially penetrating wells, and test results were averaged to obtain a composite K value for each well.
The following assumptions apply to the Bouwer and Rice (1976) solution and subsequent calculations:
• Aquifer has infinite areal extent, and is homogenous, isotropic, and of uniform thickness over the
area of influence of the slug test
o Note: per the discussion in S. 2.3 – Background Geology and Hydrogeology (above)
McIntosh Perry has assumed the base elevation of the water-bearing formation (A1
aquifer) to be 220 m asl.
• The aquifer is unconfined
• That all wells partially penetrate the aquifer
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
4
• All water removed as part of the single-well response test is discharged instantaneously from the
well
The Dupuit-Forcheimer Equation for unconfined flow to an open trench was used to estimate groundwater
inflow (Q) into the proposed excavation using the highest estimated hydraulic conductivity and highest
observed water level from the field investigation.
The following assumptions were made in calculating groundwater inflow:
• Each trench will be 45 m long x 3 m wide, and will remain open throughout construction
• Trenches will be about 3 m deep
• The aquifer is unconfined and in steady-state
• Groundwater inflow into the excavation is at steady-state
• Saturated thickness of the upper aquifer is based on hydrogeological information provided in the
City of Barrie Source Water Protection Threat Assessment (Golder Associates, 2010)
A review of MECP WWIS (as summarized by Golder, 2008) indicated groundwater in the immediate vicinity of
the Site has been encountered between 1.2 to 11 m bgs (Appendix A). A safety factor of 2 was applied to the
calculated Q value. It is noted that these calculations do not include dewatering requirements for stormwater
runoff.
Hydraulic Conductivity (Bouwer and Rice) calculations along with drawdown and recovery data from the
single-well response slug tests are included in Appendix C. Dewatering calculations (Dupuit-Forcheimer) are
included in Appendix D.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
5
3.3 Results
Recorded field measurements are presented in Table 1 (Groundwater Quality). Laboratory Certificates of
Analysis are presented in Appendix B. Data from the single-well response tests are included in Appendix C.
3.3.1 Static Conditions
The static groundwater level of monitoring wells (BH W5-2, BHW4-2, BHE4-2, BH-E2, BH W2-1 and BH W8)
were recorded as 234.13, 233.27, 225.63, 225.96, 230.45, and 233.91 m asl, respectively. This indicates that
groundwater within the shallow overburden generally flows to the northeast at the Site (i.e. flows toward
Highway 400). Water level elevation data are summarized in Table 3-1, below.
Table 3-1 Water Level Data
MW ID
Top of PVC Pipe
Elevation
(m asl)
(assumed ground level)
Static Water Level
(mbg)
Static Water Level
(m asl)
BH W5-2 234.75 0.62 234.13
BHW4-2 234.64 1.37 233.27
BHE4-2 229.54 3.91 225.63
BH-E2 230.16 4.2 225.96
BH W2-1 232.12 1.67 230.45
BH W8 235.03 1.12 233.91
3.3.2 Single-well Response Tests (Slug-Tests)
BH W5-2 (Test 1 – Rising Head)
As noted in Table 3-1, the static water level in BH W5-1 was 0.62 mbg. During the single-well response test, a
total of 0.7 L of water was removed for a maximum drawdown of approximately 0.96 m. Recovery to 0.63
mbg was achieved within approximately 3:00 minutes. A hydraulic conductivity of 1.13 x 10-5 m/s was
calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for partially penetrating wells.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
6
BH W5-2 (Test 2 – Rising Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 0.62 mbg. During the single-well response
test, a total of 1.1 L of water was removed for a maximum drawdown of approximately 0.52 m. Recovery to
0.63 mbg was achieved within approximately 2:55 minutes. A hydraulic conductivity of 1.8 x 10-5 m/s was
calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating wells.
BH W5-2 (Test 3)
Data from test 3 at BH W5-1 is considered inconclusive and has not been included in this analysis.
BH W4-2 (Test 1 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.37 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.2 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 1.28 mbg. Recovery to 1.36 mbg was achieved within approximately 1:30 minutes. A hydraulic
conductivity of 1.24 x 10-5 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
BH W4-2 (Test 2 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.37 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.3 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 1.29 mbg. Recovery to 1.36 mbg was achieved within approximately 1:00 minute. A hydraulic
conductivity of 4.47 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
BH W4-2 (Test 3 – Rising Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.37 mbg. During the single-well response
test, a total of 0.4 L of water was removed for a maximum drawdown of approximately 0.20 m. Recovery to
1.39 mbg was achieved within approximately 1:20 minutes. A hydraulic conductivity of 2.11 x 10-5 m/s was
calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating wells.
BH E4-2 (Test 1 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 3.91 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.4 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 3.72 mbg. Recovery to 3.89 mbg was achieved within approximately 4:50 minutes. A hydraulic
conductivity of 4.08 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
7
BH E4-2 (Test 2 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 3.91 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.7 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 3.55 mbg. Recovery to 3.89 mbg was achieved within approximately 5:00 minutes. A hydraulic
conductivity of 2.61 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
BH E2-2 (Test 1 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 4.20 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.7 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 3.83 mbg. Recovery to 4.17 mbg was achieved within approximately 3:30 minutes. A hydraulic
conductivity of 6.73 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
BH E2-2 (Test 2 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 4.20 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.2 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 3.20 mbg. Recovery to 4.17 mbg was achieved within approximately 5:10 minutes. A hydraulic
conductivity of 4.12 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
BH W2-1 (Test 2 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.67 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.6 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 1.34 mbg. Recovery to 1.57 mbg was achieved within approximately 36:00 minutes. A
hydraulic conductivity of 1.07 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully
penetrating wells.
BH W2-1 (Test 3 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.57 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.6 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 1.28 mbg. Recovery to 1.55 mbg was achieved within approximately 42:00 minutes. A
hydraulic conductivity of 1.95 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for
partially penetrating wells.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
8
BH W8-2 (Test 1 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.12 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.4 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 0.90 mbg. Recovery to 1.10 mbg was achieved within approximately 2:40 minutes. A hydraulic
conductivity of 8.19 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
BH W8 (Test 2 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.12 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.5 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 0.86 mbg. Recovery to 1.10 mbg was achieved within approximately 2:50 minutes. A hydraulic
conductivity of 6.54 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
BH W8 (Test 3 – Falling Head)
The static water level recorded for this slug test was recorded at 1.12 mbg prior to slug insertion. During the
single-well response test, a total of 0.5 L of water was displaced to a maximum water level recorded at
approximately 0.84 mbg. Recovery to 1.10 mbg was achieved within approximately 3:40 minutes. A hydraulic
conductivity of 8.49 x 10-6 m/s was calculated using the Bouwer and Rice (1976) equation for fully penetrating
wells.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
9
Table 3-2 Monitoring Well Data
Well ID Depth (m)
(Screened Interval (m bgs)) Completion
Material
Estimated Hydraulic
Conductivity (K, m/s)1
BH W5-22 3.6
(0.6 – 3.6) “Clay” 1.37 x 10-5
BH W4-2 4.5
(1.5 – 4.5) “Sand” 1.27 x 10-5
BH E4-2 4.2
(1.2 – 4.2) N/A 3.35 x 10-6
BH E2-2 4.45
(1.5 – 4.5) “Sand” 5.43 x 10-6
BH W2-1 4.5
(1.6 – 4.6) “Sand” 1.51 x 10-6
BH W8-2 4.5
(1.5 – 4.5) “Sand” 7.74 x 10-6
1Data from slug tests performed on May 31 and June 1, 2019. These values represent averages of all K values calculated for each slug
test administered for each well.
2Data from Test 3 at BH W5-2 were deemed inconclusive.
3.3.3 Dewatering Volumes (inflow to excavation)
The well testing undertaken by McIntosh Perry staff on May 31 and June 1, 2019 provided a reasonable
indication of typical hydraulic conductivities values for the shallow overburden at the Site (Table 3-2). The
highest hydraulic conductivity value (BH W5-2) of 1.37x10-5 m/s was used to calculate estimated groundwater
influx into a standard open trench excavation for the proposed construction (45 m x 3 m).
To estimate groundwater inflow, the groundwater level was conservatively assumed to be at 234.13masl
based on the highest groundwater level measured during monitoring period at the west end of the Site.
To maintain a stable and dry excavation area, the groundwater level must be lowered to a depth of
approximately 1 m below the base of the proposed trench. To achieve the target groundwater level, the
existing static water level along the work area would need to be lowered by 3.4 m.
The total steady state groundwater dewatering rate is estimated to be 362,771 L of groundwater per day. By
applying a safety factor of 2 to account for variations in water table and non-steady state conditions, the
maximum groundwater dewatering may be as high as 725,543 L/day.
This estimate does not account for any stormwater runoff that may enter the excavation.
The calculated radius of influence as a result of construction dewatering is estimated using the Sichart and
Kryieleis Equation (1930), to be approximately 19 m from the edge of the excavation.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
10
Dewatering calculations are presented in Appendix D.
3.3.4 Soil Quality
As part of this assessment, soil samples retrieved during monitoring well installation were submitted for
laboratory analysis of various contaminants of concern including leachable anions and nutrients, cyanides,
inorganic parameters, and metals. Analytical results indicated exceedances of MECP Table 2 Site Condition
Standards (SCS) in the following soil samples:
• E4-2 SS5 o Conductivity
• W5-1 SS3 o SAR
3.3.5 Water Quality
As part of this assessment, groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of parameters listed
under the City of Barrie’s Storm and Sanitary Sewer Use Bylaws. Analytical results indicated exceedances of
the following for the relevant Storm and/or Sewer Use Guidelines:
• City of Barrie Sanitary Guidelines
o BH E4 – Chloride
o BH W4 – Chloride, Total Suspended Solids
• City of Barrie Storm Guidelines
o BH E4 – Total Suspended Solids, Copper
o BH W4 – Total Suspended Solids, Copper, and Zinc
3.3.6 Water Well Record Review
A review of the MECP Water Well Information System (WWIS), as summarized by Golder Associates (2008),
indicated fourteen wells within 150 m of the Site. These wells are reportedly completed in overburden
material (predominantly sand and gravel) with depths ranging from 7.3 m to 104.9 m below ground surface
(bgs). Where listed, the average static water level of these wells ranges from 1.2 – 11 m bgs (average of 4.81
m bgs).
A summary of MECP WWIS Records for water supply wells can be found in Appendix A, and are summarized
in Table 3-3, below.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
11
Table 3-3 MECP WWIS Records (Water Supply, 500 m buffer)
Well ID Depth
(m) Completion
Material Static Water Level (m bgs)
5704799 30.8 Gravel 5.5
5704797 31.1 Medium
Sand 2.7
5704796 16.8 Medium
Sand 2.4
5704800 7.3 Medium
Sand 1.2
5710958 90.5 Clay 5.8
5700282 29.6 Coarse
Sand 6.1
5704798 28.0 Coarse
Sand 3.4
5700242 66.4 Medium
Sand 0.6
5700279 25.6 Medium
Sand 2.1
5709125 100.6 Boulders /
Clay 11.0
5739211 27.7 Sand 8.2
5708760 47.5 Gravel 10.1
5708244 30.2 Sand 4.0
5722879 104.9 Boulders 7.3
5700249 22.9 Medium
Sand 5.2
7151274 55.2 Gravel 9.4
Although the area is municipally serviced, McIntosh Perry has still included a brief impact assessment for
water supply wells listed in the vicinity of the Site. Based on the MECP WWIS data summarized above, it is
McIntosh Perry’s opinion that the proposed construction dewatering at the Site should not have any negative
impacts to nearby water supply wells. Although these supply wells are completed in overburden, based on
their listed depths all but one well appear to be screened over the A2 aquifer. This aquifer is reportedly
isolated from the overlying A1 aquifer (Golder Associates 2008). Additionally, due to the shallow and short-
term nature of the proposed construction dewatering, any radius of groundwater influence generated from
this project is not expected to be significant in size or duration.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
12
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the information summarized in this report, the City of Barrie will require a Category 3 PTTW . An
EASR could be maintained If trenching size per day is were reduced. It is vital that the dewatering
calculations contained within this report are repeated to incorporate actual excavation dimensions and
estimated stormwater runoff. Additionally, a new radius of influence (ROI) should be calculated for the
proposed dewatering; MECP WWIS well records within this recalculated ROI, if any, should be subject to an
impact assessment.
To meet the requirements of the regulatory agencies in the area, the proponent may wish to carry out a long-
term groundwater monitoring program to assess seasonal fluctuations and further refine the groundwater
dewatering and control requirements.
For both a Category 3 PTTW and an EASR, a certain level of pre-treatment of pumped water will be required
prior to release into the storm and/or sanitary sewer. While it is likely that treatment for total suspended
solids (e.g. use of a filter bag or similar mechanical technology) will result in lower concentrations of other
contaminants (e.g. metals), the design, administration, and confirmatory sampling associated with any
treatment and discharge system should be the ultimate responsibility of the contractor. McIntosh Perry
recommends that any treatment design be reviewed and stamped by a Qualified Person under O.Reg.
153/04.
McIntosh Perry’s recommended option is to utilize and/or modify this document as necessary to fulfill
hydrogeological assessment requirements in applying for a Category 3 PTTW. Should the City of Barrie
require assistance in this manner, we would be happy to prepare this application.
Note regarding groundwater discharge: Both Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act and MECP’s
Water Taking User Guide for Environmental Activity and Sector Registry (EASR) outline that discharged water
cannot negatively impact the environment (which in this case extends to untreated, project-related discharge
to storm sewers). Registering with the EASR is not recommended for this project as it would generate undue
liability for the City of Barrie, contractor, and engineer/geoscientist responsible for the Water Taking and
Water Discharge Plans. In the event of an MECP inspection, the City of Barrie would need to demonstrate
that water downstream of any treatment point is suitable for discharge.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
13
5.0 REFERENCES
Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 2013. MOE Wellwater Database <http:
//www.ene.gov.on.ca/environment/en/resources/collection/data_downloads/index.htm#Well Records>
OGS Earth, 2019. Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry, - Ontario Geological Survey
Earth – for Google Earth.
McIntosh Perry, 2020. ‘Dunlop Street Municipal Class C Environmental Assessment – Geotechnical Report’.
Golder Associates, 2008. ‘City of Barrie Dunlop Street West Improvements (Anne Street to Ferndale Drive)
Class Environmental Assessment: Hydrogeological and Contaminated Lands Assessment Components’.
Golder Associates, 2010. ‘City of Barrie Source Water Protection Threat Assessment’.
Hydrogeological Assessment Road Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street , Cameron Street
0BM-18-8036
14
6.0 LIMITATIONS AND CLOSURE
This report has been prepared and the work referred to in this report has been undertaken by McIntosh Perry
Consulting Engineers Ltd. for the City of Barrie. It is intended for the sole and exclusive use of the City of
Barrie, their affiliated companies and partners and their respective insurers, agents, employees, advisors and
reviewers. The report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the express written
consent (in the form of a Reliance Letter) of McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd.
Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions made based on it, without a
reliance letter are the responsibility of such third parties. McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. accept no
responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based
on this report.
The investigation undertaken by McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. with respect to this report and any
conclusions or recommendations made in this report reflect McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd.
judgment based on the site conditions observed at the time of the site inspection and testing on the date(s)
set out in this report and on information available at the time of the preparation of this report.
This report has been prepared for specific application to this site and it is based, in part, upon visual
observation of the site, subsurface investigation at discrete locations and depths, and specific analysis of
specific chemical parameters and materials during a specific time interval, all as described in this report.
Unless otherwise stated, the findings cannot be extended to previous or future site conditions, portions of
the site which were unavailable for direct investigation, subsurface locations which were not investigated
directly, or chemical parameters, materials or analysis which were not addressed. Substances other than
those addressed by the investigation described in this report may exist within the site, substances addressed
by the investigation may exist in areas of the site not investigated and concentrations of substances
addressed which are different than those reported may exist in areas other than the locations from which
samples were taken.
If site conditions or applicable standards change or if any additional information becomes available at a
future date, modifications to the findings, conclusions and recommendations in this report may be necessary.
Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street
0CM-18-0450
TABLES
Table 1 - Groundwater Quality 0BM-18-8036
BH E4 BH W4
Parameter DL UnitsCity of Barrie Santary Sewer
Use BylawsCity of Barrie StormSewer Use Bylaws 31-May-19 31-May-19
pH 0.10 pH units 6-9.5 6-9.5 7.51 7.53
Total Suspended Solids 4.0 mg/L 350 15 155 732
Chloride 5.0 mg/L 1500 5630 1590
Fluoride 0.20 mg/L 10 <0.40 <0.20
Total Kjedahl Nitrogen 0.15 mg/L 100 0.37 <1.5
Phosphorus, Total 0.0030 mg/L 10 0.18 0.66Sulfate 3.0 mg/L 1500 155.00 71.50Sulphide (as S) 0.018 mg/L 0.03 <0.018Sulphide (as H2S) 0.019 mg/L 1 0.03 <0.019
Cyanide, Total 0.002 mg/L 1.2 0.02 0.01
Aluminum (Al)-Total 0.050 mg/L 50 4.33 15.4Antimony (Sb)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 5 <0.0010 <0.0010Arsenic (As)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 1 0.0021 0.0028Barium (Ba)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 5 0.467 0.379Bismuth (Bi)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 5 <0.00050 <0.00050Cadmium (Cd)-Total 0.000050 mg/L 0.7 0.001 <0.000050 0.000202Chromium (Cr)-Total 0.0050 mg/L 2 0.08 0.0078 0.0237Cobalt (Co)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 5 0.0052 0.008Copper (Cu)-Total 0.010 mg/L 2 0.01 0.013 0.033Iron (Fe)-Total 0.10 mg/L 50 5.89 18.6Lead (Pb)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 0.7 0.05 0.005 0.00847Manganese (Mn)-Total 0.0050 mg/L 5 0.41 0.381Mercury (Hg)-Total 0.000010 mg/L 0.01 0.000025 <0.000010Molybdenum (Mo)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 5 0.00208 0.00413Nickel (Ni)-Total 0.0050 mg/L 2 0.05 0.0057 0.0181Selenium (Se)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 1 <0.00050 0.00113Silver (Ag)-Total 0.00050 mg/L 0.4 <0.00050 <0.00050Tin (Sn)-Total 0.0010 mg/L 5 0.0018 <0.0010Titanium (Ti)-Total 0.0030 mg/L 0.164 0.678Vanadium (V)-Total 0.0050 mg/L 5 0.0109 0.0335Zinc (Zn)-Total 0.030 mg/L 2 0.04 <0.030 0.047
BOD 2.0 mg/L 300 15 <2.0 <3.0COD 10 mg/L 600 190 129Oil and Grease, Total 5.0 mg/L <5.0 <5.0Animal/Veg Oil & Grease 5.0 mg/L 150 <5.0 <5.0Mineral Oil and Grease 2.5 mg/L 15 <2.5 <2.5Phenols (4AAP) 0.0010 mg/L 0.1 0.005 0.0075
Cyanides
Physical Tests
0BM-18-8036 - Dunlop Street HydrogeologicalAssessment
Total Metals
City of Barrie Storm and Sanitary UseParameters
Anions and Nutrients
Aggregate Organics
Page 1 of 3
Table 1 - Groundwater Quality 0BM-18-8036
BH E4 BH W4
Parameter DL UnitsCity of Barrie Santary Sewer
Use BylawsCity of Barrie StormSewer Use Bylaws 31-May-19 31-May-19
0BM-18-8036 - Dunlop Street HydrogeologicalAssessment
City of Barrie Storm and Sanitary UseParameters
Acetone 20 ug/L <20 <20Benzene 0.50 ug/L 10 <0.50 <0.50Bromodichloromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Bromoform 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Bromomethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Carbon Disulfide 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Carbon tetrachloride 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Chlorobenzene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Dibromochloromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Chloroethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Chloroform 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Chloromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.01,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 ug/L <0.20 <0.201,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 ug/L 50 <0.50 <0.501,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 ug/L 80 <0.50 <0.50Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.01,1-Dichloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,2-Dichloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1-Dichloroethylene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Dichloromethane 2.0 ug/L 90 <2.0 <2.01,2-Dichloropropane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Ethylbenzene 0.50 ug/L 60 <0.50 <0.50n-Hexane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.502-Hexanone 20 ug/L <20 <20Methyl Ethyl Ketone 20 ug/L <20 <20Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 20 ug/L <20 <20MTBE 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Styrene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 ug/L 60 <0.50 <0.50Tetrachloroethylene 0.50 ug/L 60 <0.50 <0.50Toluene 0.50 ug/L 20 <0.50 <0.501,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Trichloroethylene 0.50 ug/L 50 <0.50 <0.50Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0
Volatile Organic Compounds
Page 2 of 3
Table 1 - Groundwater Quality 0BM-18-8036
BH E4 BH W4
Parameter DL UnitsCity of Barrie Santary Sewer
Use BylawsCity of Barrie StormSewer Use Bylaws 31-May-19 31-May-19
0BM-18-8036 - Dunlop Street HydrogeologicalAssessment
City of Barrie Storm and Sanitary UseParameters
Vinyl chloride 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50o-Xylene 0.50 ug/L <0.50 <0.50m+p-Xylenes 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Xylenes (Total) 1.1 ug/L 300 <1.1 <1.14-Bromofluorobenzene % 108 107.11,4-Difluorobenzene % 105.4 105.6
Acenaphthene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Acenaphthylene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Anthracene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Benzo(a)anthracene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Benzo(a)pyrene 0.010 ug/L <0.010 <0.010Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Chrysene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Fluoranthene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Fluorene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.0201-Methylnaphthalene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.0202-Methylnaphthalene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Naphthalene 0.050 ug/L <0.050 <0.050Phenanthrene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020Pyrene 0.020 ug/L <0.020 <0.020d10-Acenaphthene % 98.2 97.4d12-Chrysene % 91.3 91.2d8-Naphthalene % 99.3 95.7d10-Phenanthrene % 96.7 99.6Total PAHs 0.095 ug/L 5 <0.095 <0.095
Hexachlorobenzene 0.040 ug/L 0.1 <0.040 <0.0402-Fluorobiphenyl % 91.9 85.3p-Terphenyl d14 % 86.3 85
Exceeds City of Barrie Sanitary Sewer Use Guidelines183 Exceeds City of Barrie Storm Sewer Use Guidelines
Legend
Semi-Volatile Organics
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Page 3 of 3
Table 2 - Soil Quality 0BM-18-8036
O. Reg 153/04 SCS Limits E4-1 SS2 E4-1 SS5 W5-1 SS3 W5-1 SS6
Parameter LDL UnitsO.Reg 153/04 (2011) Table 2 -
Residential, Coarse * 07-May-19 07-May-19 09-May-19 09-May-19
Conductivity 0.004 mS/cm 0.7 0.337 1.4 0.688 0.423
% Moisture 0.1 % 3.84 12 18.6 18.2
pH 0.1 pH units 7.99 7.87 7.85 7.73
Redox Potential -1000 mV 187 139
Resistivity 1 ohm*cm 716 2360
Chloride 5 ug/g 627 140
Sulphate 20 mg/kg 36 <20
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss 0.05 ug/g 0.051 <0.050 <0.050
Acid Volatile Sulphides 0.2 mg/kg <0.20 <0.20
SAR 0.1 SAR 5 4.95 13.3
Calcium 0.5 mg/L 7.97 6.65
Magnesium 0.5 mg/L 0.59 <0.50
Sodium 0.5 mg/L 53.8 125
Antimony (Sb) 1 ug/g 7.5 <1.0 <1.0Arsenic (As) 1 ug/g 18 1.2 <1.0Barium (Ba) 1 ug/g 390 19.9 16.5Beryllium (Be) 0.5 ug/g 4 <0.50 <0.50Boron (B), Hot Water Ext. 0.1 ug/g 1.5 0.13 <0.10Boron (B) 5 ug/g 120 <5.0 <5.0Cadmium (Cd) 0.5 ug/g 1.2 <0.50 <0.50Chromium (Cr) 1 ug/g 160 7.8 8.1Cobalt (Co) 1 ug/g 22 2.1 2.1Copper (Cu) 1 ug/g 140 4.4 4Lead (Pb) 1 ug/g 120 12.8 3.3Mercury (Hg) 0.005 ug/g 0.27 0.0117 <0.0050Molybdenum (Mo) 1 ug/g 6.9 <1.0 <1.0Nickel (Ni) 1 ug/g 100 4.1 3.8Selenium (Se) 1 ug/g 2.4 <1.0 <1.0Silver (Ag) 0.2 ug/g 20 <0.20 <0.20Thallium (Tl) 0.5 ug/g 1 <0.50 <0.50Uranium (U) 1 ug/g 23 <1.0 <1.0Vanadium (V) 1 ug/g 86 19.9 21.7Zinc (Zn) 5 ug/g 340 18.3 10.3
Chromium, Hexavalent 0.2 ug/g 8 <0.20 <0.20
Legend* O.Reg 153/04 Table 2 - Generic Site Condition Standards for Shallow Soils in a Potable Groundwater Condition
Exceeds Table 2 SCS
Speciated Metals (Soil)
Physical Characteristics
0BM-18-8036 - Dunlop Street HydrogeologicalAssessment
Metals
Leachable Anions & Nutrients
Anions and Nutrients (Soils)
Cyanides
Inorganic Parameters (Soil)
Saturated Paste Extractables (Soil)
Page 1 of 1
Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street
0CM-18-0450
FIGURES
ESSA
ROA
D
DUNLOP STREET EAST
DUNLOP STREET WEST
BAYVIEW DRIVE
WELLINGTON STREET EAST
BURTON AVENUE
BAYFIELD STREETROSS STREET
FERNDALEDR IVE
SOUTH
LIVIN GSTON
E STREET WEST
CUNDLES ROAD WEST
TIFFIN STREET
LEACOCK DRIVE
GROVE STREET EAS
T
LITTLE AVENUE
BRAD
FORD
STRE
ET
SPROULE DRIVE
ARDAGH ROAD
ANNE STREET NORTH
ROSE STREET
COUNTY ROAD 27
EDGEHILL DRIVE
ANNE STREET SOUTH
SUNNIDALE ROADPATTERSON ROAD
LAKES HOREDRIVE
FERNDALE DRIVE
FAIRVIEWROAD
WILSON DRIVE
LEGEND
HYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDYDUNLOP STREETSITE LOCATION
1FIGURE:
CITY OF BARRIE
Jul., 09, 2019LCJB
TITLE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
H:\01
Proj
ect -
Prop
osals
\2018
Jobs
\BM\0B
M-18
-8036
City
of B
arrie
EA D
unlop
\GIS\
mxd\H
ydroG
\BM-18
-8036
_01_
SiteL
ocati
on.m
xd
REFERENCE
Approximate Site ExtentLocal RoadMajor RoadWatercourse
Wooded AreaWaterbody
GIS data provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2019.
PROJECT NO: DateGISChecked By
BM-18-8036
115 Walgreen Road, RR3, Carp, ON K0A1L0Tel: 613-836-2184 Fax: 613-836-3742
www.mcintoshperry.com
Metres
950 0 950475
Scale 1:30,000
BH- W1
MW- W2
BH- W3BH- W4
MW- W5BH- W6
BH- W7
MW- W8
MW- W4BH- W5
BH- W8
BH- E1
MW- E2BH- E2
BH- E3
MW- E4
BH- E4
BH- E5
HENRY STREET
DUNLOP STREET WEST
CEDA
RPO
INTE
DRIVE
FERNDALE DRIVE NORTH
JOHN STREET
ANNE STREET NORTH
EDGEHILL DRIVE
LEACOCK DRIVE
DYMENT ROAD
SARJEANT DRIVELENNOX DRIVE
VICTORIA STREET
VESPRA STREET
EDEN DRIVE
GEORGE STREET
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
LEGEND
SITE LAYOUT
2FIGURE:
Jul., 09, 2019LCJB
TITLE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
H:\01
Proj
ect -
Prop
osals
\2018
Jobs
\BM\0B
M-18
-8036
City
of B
arrie
EA D
unlop
\GIS\
mxd\H
ydroG
\BM-18
-8036
_02_
SiteL
ayou
t.mxd
REFERENCE
Borehole/Monitoring WellApproximate Site Extent
GIS data provided by ESRI, Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN and the GIS User Community, 2019
PROJECT NO: DateGISChecked By
115 Walgreen Road, RR3, Carp, ON K0A1L0Tel: 613-836-2184 Fax: 613-836-3742
www.mcintoshperry.com
Metres
250 0 250125
Scale 1:8,000
HYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDYDUNLOP STREET
CITY OF BARRIE
BM-18-8036
7209195
71095667151232
5728346
7199900
7250165 7151274
7287024 7199898
7200966
5700249
7197566
5722879
7280992
5708244
7156669
7281652
7199899
7198925
7105341
5700277
7200964
7138488
7281654
7250164
7281720
7043230
7281721
71839747250413
5738436
7280223
7198923
5708760
5723010
7147418
5700253
7287025
5739211
7273892
5704795
5738297
7105342
7200909
7041131
7280221
7261004
7250412
5709125
57002795700242
7261002
5710720
7164608
7197565
7261003
7285840
7209088
7227248
7035405
72701027150523
5700282
7112477
5710958
7153430
5741297
5704794
7198926
5704800
7183973
7044685
7209099
7198641
72662767200910
5704796
7281722
5704797 7220281
5700240
5701702
7110083
7287023
5704798
7287026
7198924
7287022
7280222
7281651
72809907109566
7180075
5700248
5704799
7228719
7281650
7200967
72802247263068
7281649
7261001
7281653
72501937200965
CEDA
RPO
INTE
DRIVE
EDEN DRIVE
GEORGE STREET
LENNOX DRIVE
LORENA STREET
ELLIOTT AVENUE
BROADFOOT ROAD
SARJEANT DRIVE
ROBERT STREET
BOYS STREET NORTH
ANNE STREET SOUTH
FERNDALE DRIVE NORTH
DUNLOP STREET WEST
JOHN STREET
HENRY STREET
DYMENT ROAD
FERNDALE DRIVE NORTH
EDGEHILL DRIVEEDGEHILL DRIVE
BROCK STREET
DUNLOP STREET WEST
FOX RUN
REFERENCEGIS data provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resourcesand Forestry. MECP well data provided by Ontario Ministry of theEnvironment, Conservation and Parks 2019
LEGENDJ:\
GISD
ata\Te
mplat
es\Bi
ngBa
seMa
p11x
17mx
d
200 0 200100
MECP Well Record500m BufferApproximate Site ExtentLocal RoadMajor RoadWatercourseWetlandWaterbodyWooded Area
3FIGURE:
Jul., 09, 2019LCJB
BM-18-8036PROJECT NO: DateGISChecked By
TITLE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
115 Walgreen Road, RR3, Carp, ON K0A1L0Tel: 613-836-2184 Fax: 613-836-3742
www.mcintoshperry.com
CITY OF BARRIEHYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDY
DUNLOP STREETMECP WWIS SUMMARY
MetresScale 1:6,000
Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street
0CM-18-0450
APPENDICES
Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street
0CM-18-0450
APPENDIX AMECP Well Records
MECP WWIS Water Supply Records - 2019, 500 m buffer
Well Identifier Completion Year Depth(m bgs)
Depth to Bedrock(m bgs)
Static Water Level(m bgs) MECP Tag No. Use
5704799 1965 30.8 - 5.5 - Water Supply5704797 1953 31.1 - 2.7 - Water Supply5704796 1953 16.8 - 2.4 - Water Supply5704800 1952 7.3 - 1.2 - Water Supply5710958 1974 90.5 - 5.8 - Water Supply5700282 1966 29.6 - 6.1 - Water Supply5704798 1954 28.0 - 3.4 - Water Supply5700242 1955 66.4 - 0.6 - Water Supply5700279 1965 25.6 - 2.1 - Water Supply5709125 1972 100.6 - 11.0 - Water Supply5739211 2004 27.7 - 8.2 A000289 Water Supply5708760 1972 47.5 - 10.1 - Water Supply5708244 1971 30.2 - 4.0 - Water Supply5722879 1988 104.9 - 7.3 - Water Supply5700249 1960 22.9 - 5.2 - Water Supply7151274 2010 55.2 - 9.4 A011255 Water Supply
MECP WWIS Records - 2008, 150 m buffer (Golder Associates, 2008)
Well Identifier Completion Year Depth(m bgs)
Depth to Bedrock(m bgs)
Static Water Level(m bgs) MECP Tag No. Use
248 1959 73.8 - 3 - -249 1905 22.9 - 5.2 - Water Supply279 1905 25.6 - 2.1 - Water Supply282 1905 29.6 - 6.1 - Water Supply4794 1905 96.9 - - - -4797 1905 31.1 - 2.7 - Water Supply4798 1905 28.0 - 3.4 - Water Supply4799 1905 30.8 - 5.5 - Water Supply4800 1905 7.3 - 1.2 - Water Supply8760 1905 47.5 - 10.1 - Water Supply23010 1905 93.3 - 8.6 - -7105341 1905 - - - - -7105342 1905 - - - - -L0195 1905 56.1 - - - Water Supply
Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street
0CM-18-0450
APPENDIX BLaboratory Certificates of Analysis (Water and Soil Quality Data)
[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]
03-JUN-19
Lab Work Order #: L2283839
Date Received:Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)
2010 Winston Park DrSuite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7
ATTN: Nan DuFINAL 18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Report Date:
Version:
Certificate of Analysis
ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
____________________________________________
Melanie MoshiAccount Manager
ADDRESS: 5730 Coopers Avenue, Unit #26 , Mississauga, ON L4Z 2E9 Canada | Phone: +1 905 507 6910 | Fax: +1 905 507 6927
Client Phone: 905-856-5200
0T1-919169-ENJob Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:
17-623977C of C Numbers:Legal Site Desc:
Result
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Sewer Use Bylaws = [Suite] - ON-SAN+STORM-BARRIE (2012-172)
L2283839 CONTD....2Page of
0T1-919169-ENANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: Barrie Sanitary Sewer (2012-172) #2: Barrie Storm Sewer (2012-172)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
10
L2283839-1 BH-E4ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 09:10Sampled By:WATERMatrix: #1 #2
Physical Tests
Anions and Nutrients
Cyanides
Total Metals
Aggregate Organics
Volatile Organic Compounds
pHTotal Suspended Solids
Chloride (Cl)Fluoride (F)Total Kjeldahl NitrogenPhosphorus, TotalSulfate (SO4)Sulphide (as S)Sulphide (as H2S)
Cyanide, Total
Aluminum (Al)-TotalAntimony (Sb)-TotalArsenic (As)-TotalBarium (Ba)-TotalBismuth (Bi)-TotalCadmium (Cd)-TotalChromium (Cr)-TotalCobalt (Co)-TotalCopper (Cu)-TotalIron (Fe)-TotalLead (Pb)-TotalManganese (Mn)-TotalMercury (Hg)-TotalMolybdenum (Mo)-TotalNickel (Ni)-TotalSelenium (Se)-TotalSilver (Ag)-TotalTin (Sn)-TotalTitanium (Ti)-TotalVanadium (V)-TotalZinc (Zn)-Total
BODCODOil and Grease, TotalAnimal/Veg Oil & GreaseMineral Oil and GreasePhenols (4AAP)
AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethane
7.51155
5630<0.400.370.181155
0.0300.032
0.0203
4.33<0.00100.00210.467
<0.00050<0.000050
0.00780.00520.0135.89
0.005000.410
0.0000250.002080.0057
<0.00050<0.000500.00180.1640.0109<0.030
<2.0190<5.0<5.0<2.5
0.0050
<20<0.50<1.0
DLHC
DLDSDLDS
DLDS
DLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHC
DLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHC
0.104.0
100.400.15
0.00306.0
0.0180.019
0.0020
0.0500.00100.00100.00100.000500.0000500.00500.00100.0100.10
0.000500.0050
0.0000100.000500.00500.000500.000500.00100.00300.00500.030
2.0105.05.02.5
0.0010
200.501.0
pH unitsmg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
mg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
ug/Lug/Lug/L
04-JUN-1908-JUN-19
11-JUN-1911-JUN-1917-JUN-1917-JUN-1911-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
05-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1905-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19
09-JUN-1917-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1911-JUN-19
12-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-19
6.0-9.5 6.0-9.5350 *15
*15001010010
1500
1
1.2
505155
0.7 0.0012 0.08
5.02.0 *0.01500.7 0.055
0.0152 0.05
1.00.45
5.02.0 0.04
300 15600
150150.1
10
Result
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Sewer Use Bylaws = [Suite] - ON-SAN+STORM-BARRIE (2012-172)
L2283839 CONTD....3Page of
0T1-919169-ENANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: Barrie Sanitary Sewer (2012-172) #2: Barrie Storm Sewer (2012-172)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
10
L2283839-1 BH-E4ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 09:10Sampled By:WATERMatrix: #1 #2
Volatile Organic Compounds
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
BromoformBromomethaneCarbon DisulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneDibromochloromethaneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylenecis-1,2-Dichloroethylenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneDichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzenen-Hexane2-HexanoneMethyl Ethyl KetoneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneMTBEStyrene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethyleneTrichlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlorideo-Xylenem+p-XylenesXylenes (Total)Surrogate: 4-BromofluorobenzeneSurrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
AcenaphtheneAcenaphthylene
<1.0<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<0.20<0.50<0.50<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<2.0<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<20<20<20
<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<1.0<1.1108.0105.4
<0.020<0.020
1.00.501.00.500.501.01.01.01.00.200.500.500.501.00.500.500.500.500.502.00.500.500.500.500.50202020
0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.501.00.500.501.01.1
70-13070-130
0.0200.020
ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L%%
ug/Lug/L
12-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-19
07-JUN-1907-JUN-19
50
80
90
60
606020
50
300
Result
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Sewer Use Bylaws = [Suite] - ON-SAN+STORM-BARRIE (2012-172)
L2283839 CONTD....4Page of
0T1-919169-ENANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: Barrie Sanitary Sewer (2012-172) #2: Barrie Storm Sewer (2012-172)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
10
L2283839-1
L2283839-2
BH-E4
BH-W4
ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 09:10
ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 11:10
Sampled By:
Sampled By:
WATER
WATER
Matrix:
Matrix:
#1
#1
#2
#2
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Semi-Volatile Organics
Physical Tests
Anions and Nutrients
Cyanides
Total Metals
AnthraceneBenzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fluorantheneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneBenzo(k)fluorantheneChryseneDibenzo(ah)anthraceneFluorantheneFluoreneIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene1-Methylnaphthalene2-MethylnaphthaleneNaphthalenePhenanthrenePyreneSurrogate: d10-AcenaphtheneSurrogate: d12-ChryseneSurrogate: d8-NaphthaleneSurrogate: d10-PhenanthreneTotal PAHs
HexachlorobenzeneSurrogate: 2-FluorobiphenylSurrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
pHTotal Suspended Solids
Chloride (Cl)Fluoride (F)Total Kjeldahl NitrogenPhosphorus, TotalSulfate (SO4)Sulphide (as S)Sulphide (as H2S)
Cyanide, Total
Aluminum (Al)-TotalAntimony (Sb)-TotalArsenic (As)-Total
<0.020<0.020<0.010<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.050<0.020<0.02098.291.399.396.7
<0.095
<0.04091.986.3
7.53732
1590<0.20<1.50.66471.5
<0.018<0.019
0.0053
15.4<0.00100.0028
DLHC
DLDSDLDSDLMDLMDLDS
DLHCDLHCDLHC
0.0200.0200.0100.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0500.0200.020
60-14060-14060-14060-1400.095
0.04040-13040-130
0.1020
5.00.201.5
0.0303.0
0.0180.019
0.0020
0.0500.00100.0010
ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L%%%%
ug/L
ug/L%%
pH unitsmg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
mg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/L
07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1903-JUN-19
07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-19
05-JUN-1908-JUN-19
11-JUN-1911-JUN-1917-JUN-1917-JUN-1911-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
05-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19
5
0.1
6.0-9.5 6.0-9.5*350 *15
*15001010010
1500
1
1.2
5051
Result
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Sewer Use Bylaws = [Suite] - ON-SAN+STORM-BARRIE (2012-172)
L2283839 CONTD....5Page of
0T1-919169-ENANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: Barrie Sanitary Sewer (2012-172) #2: Barrie Storm Sewer (2012-172)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
10
L2283839-2 BH-W4ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 11:10Sampled By:WATERMatrix: #1 #2
Total Metals
Aggregate Organics
Volatile Organic Compounds
Barium (Ba)-TotalBismuth (Bi)-TotalCadmium (Cd)-TotalChromium (Cr)-TotalCobalt (Co)-TotalCopper (Cu)-TotalIron (Fe)-TotalLead (Pb)-TotalManganese (Mn)-TotalMercury (Hg)-TotalMolybdenum (Mo)-TotalNickel (Ni)-TotalSelenium (Se)-TotalSilver (Ag)-TotalTin (Sn)-TotalTitanium (Ti)-TotalVanadium (V)-TotalZinc (Zn)-Total
BODCODOil and Grease, TotalAnimal/Veg Oil & GreaseMineral Oil and GreasePhenols (4AAP)
AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethaneCarbon DisulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChlorobenzeneDibromochloromethaneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.379<0.000500.0002020.02370.00800.03318.6
0.008470.381
<0.0000100.004130.01810.00113
<0.00050<0.00100.6780.03350.047
<3.0129<5.0<5.0<2.5
0.0075
<20<0.50<1.0<1.0<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<0.20<0.50<0.50<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<0.50
DLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHC
DLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHCDLHC
BODL
0.00100.000500.0000500.00500.00100.0100.10
0.000500.0050
0.0000100.000500.00500.000500.000500.00100.00300.00500.030
3.0105.05.02.5
0.0010
200.501.01.00.501.00.500.501.01.01.01.00.200.500.500.501.00.500.500.50
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L
04-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1905-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-19
09-JUN-1917-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1904-JUN-1910-JUN-19
12-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-19
55
0.7 0.0012 0.08
5.02.0 *0.01500.7 0.055
0.0152 0.05
1.00.45
5.02.0 *0.04
300 15600
150150.1
10
50
80
Result
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Sewer Use Bylaws = [Suite] - ON-SAN+STORM-BARRIE (2012-172)
L2283839 CONTD....6Page of
0T1-919169-ENANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: Barrie Sanitary Sewer (2012-172) #2: Barrie Storm Sewer (2012-172)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
10
L2283839-2 BH-W4ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 11:10Sampled By:WATERMatrix: #1 #2
Volatile Organic Compounds
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneDichloromethane1,2-Dichloropropanecis-1,3-Dichloropropenetrans-1,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzenen-Hexane2-HexanoneMethyl Ethyl KetoneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneMTBEStyrene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethyleneTrichlorofluoromethaneVinyl chlorideo-Xylenem+p-XylenesXylenes (Total)Surrogate: 4-BromofluorobenzeneSurrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
AcenaphtheneAcenaphthyleneAnthraceneBenzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fluorantheneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneBenzo(k)fluorantheneChryseneDibenzo(ah)anthraceneFluorantheneFluoreneIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene1-Methylnaphthalene2-MethylnaphthaleneNaphthalenePhenanthrenePyreneSurrogate: d10-Acenaphthene
<0.50<0.50<2.0<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<20<20<20
<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<1.0<0.50<0.50<1.0<1.1107.1105.6
<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.010<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.020<0.050<0.020<0.02097.4
0.500.502.00.500.500.500.500.50202020
0.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500.501.00.500.501.01.1
70-13070-130
0.0200.0200.0200.0200.0100.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0200.0500.0200.020
60-140
ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L%%
ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L%
12-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-1912-JUN-19
07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-19
90
60
606020
50
300
Result
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Sewer Use Bylaws = [Suite] - ON-SAN+STORM-BARRIE (2012-172)
L2283839 CONTD....7Page of
0T1-919169-ENANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: Barrie Sanitary Sewer (2012-172) #2: Barrie Storm Sewer (2012-172)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
10
L2283839-2 BH-W4ND on 31-MAY-19 @ 11:10Sampled By:WATERMatrix: #1 #2
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Semi-Volatile Organics
Surrogate: d12-ChryseneSurrogate: d8-NaphthaleneSurrogate: d10-PhenanthreneTotal PAHs
HexachlorobenzeneSurrogate: 2-FluorobiphenylSurrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
91.295.799.6
<0.095
<0.04085.385.0
60-14060-14060-1400.095
0.04040-13040-130
%%%
ug/L
ug/L%%
07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-1903-JUN-19
07-JUN-1907-JUN-1907-JUN-19
5
0.1
Reference Information
0T1-919169-EN L2283839 CONTD....8Page of
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)
BOD-WT
CL-IC-N-WT
CN-TOT-WT
COD-T-WT
EC-SCREEN-WT
F-IC-N-WT
HEXACHLOROBENZENE-WTHG-T-CVAA-WT
MET-T-CCMS-WT
OGG-SPEC-CALC-WT
OGG-SPEC-WT
P-T-COL-WT
BOD
Chloride by IC
Cyanide, Total
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Conductivity Screen (Internal Use Only)
Fluoride in Water by IC
Hexachlorobenzene in water
Total Mercury in Water by CVAAS
Total Metals in Water by CRC ICPMS
Speciated Oil and Grease A/V Calc
Speciated Oil and Grease-Gravimetric
Total P in Water by Colour
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 5210B - "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)". All forms of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) are determined by diluting and incubating a sample for a specified time period, and measuring the oxygen depletion using a dissolved oxygen meter. Dissolved BOD (SOLUBLE) is determined by filtering the sample through a glass fibre filter prior to dilution. Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) is determined by adding a nitrification inhibitor to the diluted sample prior to incubation.
Inorganic anions are analyzed by Ion Chromatography with conductivity and/or UV detection.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
Total cyanide is determined by the combination of UV digestion and distillation. Cyanide is converted to cyanogen chloride by reacting with chloramine-T, the cyanogen chloride then reacts with a combination of barbituric acid and isonicotinic acid to form a highly colored complex.
When using this method, high levels of thiocyanate in samples can cause false positives at ~1-2% of the thiocyanate concentration. For samples with detectable cyanide analyzed by this method, ALS recommends analysis for thiocyanate to check for this potential interference
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 5220 "Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)". Chemical oxygen demand is determined using the closed reflux colourimetric method.
Qualitative analysis of conductivity where required during preparation of other tests - e.g. TDS, metals, etc.
Inorganic anions are analyzed by Ion Chromatography with conductivity and/or UV detection.
Water samples undergo a cold-oxidation using bromine monochloride prior to reduction with stannous chloride, and analyzed by CVAAS.
Water samples are digested with nitric and hydrochloric acids, and analyzed by CRC ICPMS.
Method Limitation (re: Sulfur): Sulfide and volatile sulfur species may not be recovered by this method.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
Sample is extracted with hexane, sample speciation into mineral and animal/vegetable fractions is achieved via silica gel separation and is then determined gravimetrically.
The procedure involves an extraction of the entire water sample with hexane. Sample speciation into mineral and animal/vegetable fractions is achieved via silica gel separation and is then determined gravimetrically.
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-P "Phosphorus". Total Phosphorus is deteremined colourimetrically after persulphate digestion of the sample.
Methods Listed (if applicable):
ALS Test Code Test Description
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
DLDS
BODL
DLM
DLHC
Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high Dissolved Solids / Electrical Conductivity.
Limit of Reporting for BOD was increased to account for the largest volume of sample tested.
Detection Limit Adjusted due to sample matrix effects (e.g. chemical interference, colour, turbidity).
Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high concentration of test analyte(s).
Sample Parameter Qualifier key listed:
APHA 5210 B
EPA 300.1 (mod)
ISO 14403-2
APHA 5220 D
APHA 2510
EPA 300.1 (mod)
SW846 8270
EPA 1631E (mod)
EPA 200.2/6020A (mod)
CALCULATION
APHA 5520 B
APHA 4500-P PHOSPHORUS
Method Reference***
Description Qualifier
Matrix
10
Reference Information
0T1-919169-EN L2283839 CONTD....9Page of
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)
PAH-511-WT
PAH-SUM-CALC-WT
PH-WT
PHENOLS-4AAP-WT
S2-T>H2S-CALC-WT
SO4-IC-N-WT
SOLIDS-TSS-WT
SULPHIDE-WT
TKN-WT
VOC-ROU-HS-WT
XYLENES-SUM-CALC-WT
PAH-O. Reg 153/04 (July 2011)
TOTAL PAH’s
pH
Phenol (4AAP)
Total Sulphide Calculated as H2S
Sulfate in Water by IC
Suspended solids
Sulphide (as S)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Volatile Organic Compounds
Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations
Aqueous samples, fortified with surrogates, are extracted using liquid/liquid extraction technique. The sample extracts are concentrated and then analyzed using GC/MS. Results for benzo(b) fluoranthene may include contributions from benzo(j)fluoranthene, if also present in the sample.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).
Total PAH represents the sum of all PAH analytes reported for a given sample. Note that regulatory agencies and criteria differ in their definitions of Total PAH in terms of the individual PAH analytes to be included.
Water samples are analyzed directly by a calibrated pH meter.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011). Holdtime for samples under this regulation is 28 days
An automated method is used to distill the sample. The distillate is then buffered to pH 9.4 which reacts with 4AAP and potassium ferricyanide to form ared complex which is measured colorimetrically.
This calculation converts Total Sulphide as (S2-) and reports it as Total Sulphide as (H2S). Total Sulphide as (S2-) is determined using procedures adapted from APHA 4500-S2 "Sulphide".
Inorganic anions are analyzed by Ion Chromatography with conductivity and/or UV detection.
A well-mixed sample is filtered through a weighed standard glass fibre filter and the residue retained is dried in an oven at 104–1°C for a minimum of four hours or until a constant weight is achieved.
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-S2-D "Methylene Blue Method". Sulphide is determined colourmetrically.
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-Norg "Nitrogen (Organic)". Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen is determined by sample digestion at 380 Celsius with analysis using an automated colorimetric method.
Aqueous samples are analyzed by headspace-GC/MS.
Total xylenes represents the sum of o-xylene and m&p-xylene.
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
SW846 3510/8270
CALCULATION
APHA 4500 H-Electrode
EPA 9066
Calculation
EPA 300.1 (mod)
APHA 2540 D-Gravimetric
APHA 4500S2D
APHA 4500-Norg D
SW846 8260
CALCULATION
*** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.
The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:
Chain of Custody numbers:
17-623977
Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location
WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA
10
Reference Information
0T1-919169-EN L2283839 CONTD....10Page of
18-JUN-19 06:40 (MT)
GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS
Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of samplemg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of samplemg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/L - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million.< - Less than.D.L. - The reporting limit.N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.
Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.
Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information. Guideline limits are not adjusted for the hardness, pH or temperature of the sample (the most conservative values are used). Measurement uncertainty is not applied to test results prior to comparison with specified criteria values.
10
Quality Control ReportPage 1 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
BOD-WT
CL-IC-N-WT
CN-TOT-WT
COD-T-WT
Water
Water
Water
Water
R4662884
R4664225
R4658916
R4658926
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
WG3067192-2
WG3067192-3
WG3067192-1
WG3073775-4
WG3073775-2
WG3073775-1
WG3073775-5
WG3066648-7
WG3066648-6
WG3066648-5
WG3066648-8
WG3067957-7
WG3067957-6
WG3067957-5
WG3067957-8
L2283223-1
WG3073775-3
WG3073775-3
L2283202-4
L2283202-4
L2283851-4
L2283851-4
BOD
BOD
BOD
Chloride (Cl)
Chloride (Cl)
Chloride (Cl)
Chloride (Cl)
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
32.0
89.4
<2.0
8.23
101.1
<0.50
101.6
<0.0020
94.2
<0.0020
87.9
<0.0020
87.4
<0.0020
87.4
09-JUN-19
09-JUN-19
09-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
1.1
0.1
N/A
N/A
20
20
20
20
85-115
90-110
75-125
80-120
70-130
80-120
70-130
mg/L
%
mg/L
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
32.4
8.22
<0.0020
<0.0020
2
0.5
0.002
0.002
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
17
Quality Control ReportPage 2 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
COD-T-WT
F-IC-N-WT
HEXACHLOROBENZENE-W
HG-T-CVAA-WT
MET-T-CCMS-WT
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
R4671745
R4664225
R4660781
R4659059
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
WG3078937-3
WG3078937-2
WG3078937-1
WG3078937-4
WG3073775-4
WG3073775-2
WG3073775-1
WG3073775-5
WG3065912-2
WG3065912-1
WG3066995-3
WG3066995-2
WG3066995-1
WG3066995-4
L2283839-1
L2283839-1
WG3073775-3
WG3073775-3
L2283556-1
L2283557-1
COD
COD
COD
COD
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
Mercury (Hg)-Total
Mercury (Hg)-Total
Mercury (Hg)-Total
Mercury (Hg)-Total
196
97.1
<10
N/A
0.083
101.2
<0.020
100.2
86.8
<0.040
97.6
89.3
<0.000010
96.9
<0.000010
94.1
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
3.2
1.3
N/A
20
20
20
85-115
-
90-110
75-125
40-130
80-120
70-130
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
%
ug/L
%
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
MS-B
190
0.084
<0.000010
10
0.02
0.04
40-130
40-130
0.00001
RPD-NA
17
Quality Control ReportPage 3 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-T-CCMS-WT Water
R4658448BatchDUP
LCS
WG3066401-4
WG3066401-2
WG3066401-3Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Barium (Ba)-Total
Bismuth (Bi)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Iron (Fe)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Vanadium (V)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Barium (Ba)-Total
Bismuth (Bi)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Iron (Fe)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
0.0100
<0.00010
0.00417
0.0316
<0.000050
0.0000071
0.00124
0.00020
0.206
3.33
0.000787
0.0574
0.00100
0.00122
<0.000050
<0.000050
0.00175
<0.00030
<0.00050
0.0182
102.9
103.9
103.1
101.3
103.5
95.2
102.6
100.2
100.6
98.2
102.0
102.9
05-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
1.5
N/A
0.2
0.2
N/A
10
2.2
4.4
1.0
0.0
2.1
2.8
4.3
3.1
N/A
N/A
3.1
N/A
N/A
0.1
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
0.0098
<0.00010
0.00416
0.0315
<0.000050
0.0000064
0.00121
0.00019
0.208
3.33
0.000770
0.0590
0.00105
0.00126
<0.000050
<0.000050
0.00181
<0.00030
<0.00050
0.0182
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
17
Quality Control ReportPage 4 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-T-CCMS-WT Water
R4658448BatchLCS
MB
MS
WG3066401-2
WG3066401-1
WG3066401-5 WG3066401-3
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Vanadium (V)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Barium (Ba)-Total
Bismuth (Bi)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Iron (Fe)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Vanadium (V)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Barium (Ba)-Total
101.1
101.1
99.3
98.7
95.5
98.3
102.0
100.8
<0.0050
<0.00010
<0.00010
<0.00010
<0.000050
<0.0000050
<0.00050
<0.00010
<0.0010
<0.010
<0.000050
<0.00050
<0.000050
<0.00050
<0.000050
<0.000050
<0.00010
<0.00030
<0.00050
<0.0030
98.8
99.0
101.4
N/A
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
70-130
70-130
70-130
-
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%MS-B
0.005
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.00005
0.000005
0.0005
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.00005
0.0005
0.00005
0.0005
0.00005
0.00005
0.0001
0.0003
0.0005
0.003
17
Quality Control ReportPage 5 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-T-CCMS-WT
OGG-SPEC-WT
P-T-COL-WT
PAH-511-WT
Water
Water
Water
Water
R4658448
R4656146
R4671825
Batch
Batch
Batch
MS
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
WG3066401-5
WG3066491-2
WG3066491-1
WG3077555-3
WG3077555-2
WG3077555-1
WG3077555-4
WG3066401-3
L2287506-1
L2287506-1
Bismuth (Bi)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Iron (Fe)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Vanadium (V)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
Oil and Grease, Total
Mineral Oil and Grease
Oil and Grease, Total
Mineral Oil and Grease
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
89.2
90.0
99.4
96.3
N/A
N/A
88.8
N/A
100.6
90.6
100.8
88.8
96.4
99.9
103.0
87.7
93.7
85.3
<5.0
<2.5
0.468
94.9
<0.0030
N/A
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
0.5 20
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
-
-
70-130
-
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
80-120
-
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
MS-B
MS-B
MS-B
MS-B
0.466
5
2.5
0.003
17
Quality Control ReportPage 6 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PAH-511-WT Water
R4661256BatchLCS
MB
WG3067842-2
WG3067842-1
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
93.1
92.6
102.9
100.6
100.2
118.7
102.0
91.0
101.0
93.8
105.8
102.6
106.2
102.4
116.1
96.3
107.8
107.2
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.010
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
17
Quality Control ReportPage 7 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PAH-511-WT
PH-WT
PHENOLS-4AAP-WT
Water
Water
Water
R4661256
R4655946
R4663489
Batch
Batch
Batch
MB
DUP
DUP
LCS
LCS
DUP
DUP
LCS
LCS
MB
MB
MS
MS
WG3067842-1
WG3066716-12
WG3066716-8
WG3066716-10
WG3066716-6
WG3072867-19
WG3072867-23
WG3072867-18
WG3072867-22
WG3072867-17
WG3072867-21
WG3072867-20
WG3072867-24
WG3066716-11
WG3066716-7
L2286218-16
L2287207-3
L2286218-16
L2287207-3
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Surrogate: d8-Naphthalene
Surrogate: d10-Phenanthrene
Surrogate: d12-Chrysene
Surrogate: d10-Acenaphthene
pH
pH
pH
pH
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
<0.050
<0.020
<0.020
105.4
109.0
105.0
105.9
6.93
6.50
7.02
7.04
0.0073
<0.0010
103.1
106.0
<0.0010
<0.0010
103.1
105.7
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
07-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
05-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
10-JUN-19
10-JUN-19
10-JUN-19
10-JUN-19
10-JUN-19
10-JUN-19
10-JUN-19
10-JUN-19
0.01
0.01
0.0033
N/A
0.2
0.2
0.04
20
6.9-7.1
6.9-7.1
85-115
85-115
75-125
75-125
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
%
pH units
pH units
pH units
pH units
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
6.94
6.49
<0.020
<0.0010
0.05
0.02
0.02
60-140
60-140
60-140
60-140
0.001
0.001
J
J
J
RPD-NA
17
Quality Control ReportPage 8 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PHENOLS-4AAP-WT
SO4-IC-N-WT
SOLIDS-TSS-WT
SULPHIDE-WT
Water
Water
Water
Water
R4663705
R4664225
R4661819
R4661897
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
WG3073539-10
WG3073539-8
WG3073539-7
WG3073539-9
WG3073775-4
WG3073775-2
WG3073775-1
WG3073775-5
WG3070400-3
WG3070400-2
WG3070400-1
WG3070375-3
WG3070375-2
WG3070375-1
L2286549-1
L2286549-1
WG3073775-3
WG3073775-3
L2285922-1
L2284884-2
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Sulfate (SO4)
Sulfate (SO4)
Sulfate (SO4)
Sulfate (SO4)
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
<0.0010
103.9
<0.0010
102.7
15.6
101.4
<0.30
102.6
285
98.8
<2.0
3160
97.5
<2.0
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
11-JUN-19
08-JUN-19
08-JUN-19
08-JUN-19
08-JUN-19
08-JUN-19
08-JUN-19
N/A
0.2
1.4
1.4
20
20
20
20
85-115
75-125
90-110
75-125
85-115
85-115
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
mg/L
%
mg/L
<0.0010
15.6
281
3210
0.001
0.3
2
2
RPD-NA
17
Quality Control ReportPage 9 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
SULPHIDE-WT
TKN-WT
VOC-ROU-HS-WT
Water
Water
Water
R4655671
R4671821
R4671926
R4664117
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
WG3066874-3
WG3066874-2
WG3066874-1
WG3066874-4
WG3077077-3
WG3077077-2
WG3077077-1
WG3077077-4
WG3077714-3
WG3077714-2
WG3077714-1
WG3077714-4
WG3073309-4
L2283173-1
L2283173-1
L2287338-3
L2287338-3
L2287842-3
L2287842-3
WG3073309-3
Sulphide (as S)
Sulphide (as S)
Sulphide (as S)
Sulphide (as S)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
2.80
86.7
<0.018
N/A
<0.15
99.6
<0.15
100.1
0.25
102.3
<0.15
97.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.20
<0.50
<0.50
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
04-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
17-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
6.6
N/A
0.11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20
20
0.3
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
75-125
-
75-125
70-130
75-125
70-130
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
MS-B
2.62
<0.15
0.36
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.20
<0.50
<0.50
0.018
0.15
0.15
RPD-NA
J
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
17
Quality Control ReportPage 10 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4664117BatchDUPWG3073309-4 WG3073309-3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Hexanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
n-Hexane
MTBE
o-Xylene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<20
<20
<0.50
<1.0
<1.0
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
<0.50
<1.0
<20
<20
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<20
<20
<0.50
<1.0
<1.0
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
<0.50
<1.0
<20
<20
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
17
Quality Control ReportPage 11 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4664117BatchDUP
LCS
WG3073309-4
WG3073309-1
WG3073309-3trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Hexanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
102.5
91.7
102.7
103.2
97.2
101.3
98.7
106.1
100.0
100.3
109.6
108.7
90.0
106.4
103.3
100.7
101.2
104.5
111.6
103.3
102.7
93.4
101.9
86.7
100.8
98.1
102.2
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30
30
30
30
30
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
60-140
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
70-130
70-130
70-130
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
17
Quality Control ReportPage 12 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4664117BatchLCS
MB
WG3073309-1
WG3073309-2
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
n-Hexane
MTBE
o-Xylene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Hexanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
62.6
99.2
102.4
102.5
97.2
92.8
96.2
99.6
100.5
104.4
110.5
101.7
102.5
96.3
107.2
103.9
74.7
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.20
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<20
<20
<0.50
<1.0
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
50-140
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
50-150
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
60-140
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20
20
0.5
1
17
Quality Control ReportPage 13 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4664117BatchMB
MS
WG3073309-2
WG3073309-5 WG3073309-3
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
n-Hexane
MTBE
o-Xylene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
<1.0
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
<0.50
<1.0
<20
<20
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
104.5
105.1
103.2
90.6
102.4
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
50-150
50-150
50-150
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
%
%
1
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
2
0.5
1
20
20
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
70-130
70-130
17
Quality Control ReportPage 14 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4664117BatchMSWG3073309-5 WG3073309-3
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Hexanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
n-Hexane
MTBE
o-Xylene
101.8
95.9
100.7
89.9
107.0
100.8
101.8
108.9
107.6
86.9
116.8
103.5
102.2
98.5
89.5
96.2
101.7
101.6
82.8
103.7
69.2
101.6
95.0
101.2
43.9
99.2
100.4
100.1
109.4
94.3
83.6
99.4
99.3
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
MES
17
Quality Control ReportPage 15 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4664117BatchMSWG3073309-5 WG3073309-3
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
98.1
106.4
99.9
97.3
88.7
106.7
91.2
59.3
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
12-JUN-19
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
17
Quality Control Report
Page 16 of
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:
Description Qualifier
J
MES
MS-B
RPD-NA
Duplicate results and limits are expressed in terms of absolute difference.
Data Quality Objective was marginally exceeded (by < 10% absolute) for < 10% of analytes in a Multi-Element Scan / Multi-Parameter Scan (considered acceptable as per OMOE & CCME).Matrix Spike recovery could not be accurately calculated due to high analyte background in sample.
Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.
Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
Legend:
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
17
Quality Control Report
Page 17 of
Report Date: 18-JUN-19Workorder: L2283839
ALS Product Description Sample
ID Sampling Date Date Processed Rec. HT Actual HT
Physical Tests
2 31-MAY-19 11:10 05-JUN-19 11:00 4 5pH
EHTL
Qualifier
Legend & Qualifier Definitions:
The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.
Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.
Hold Time Exceedances:
Units
days
EHTR-FM: EHTR: EHTL: EHT: Rec. HT:
Exceeded ALS recommended hold time prior to sample receipt. Field Measurement recommended.Exceeded ALS recommended hold time prior to sample receipt.Exceeded ALS recommended hold time prior to analysis. Sample was received less than 24 hours prior to expiry.Exceeded ALS recommended hold time prior to analysis.ALS recommended hold time (see units).
Notes*:Where actual sampling date is not provided to ALS, the date (& time) of receipt is used for calculation purposes.Where actual sampling time is not provided to ALS, the earlier of 12 noon on the sampling date or the time (& date) of receipt isused for calculation purposes. Samples for L2283839 were received on 03-JUN-19 12:49.
ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal governmentrequirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by theUS EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 Winston Park Dr Suite 400Oakville ON L6H 5R7Nan Du
17
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Mary-Lynn PikeALS Laboratory Group-Waterloo60 Northland Rd. Unit 1Waterloo, ON N2V 2B8CANADA
Phone:
E-mail:
(519) 886-6910
Report Date: June 17, 2019
34-1916354Workorder:
L2283839L2283839Purchase Order:
Project ID:
Project Manager Jessica Helland
Sampling SiteReceive DateCollect DateLab IDClient Sample ID
1916354001 05/31/19BH-E4 06/07/19
1916354002 05/31/19BH-W4 06/07/19
Page 1 of 3 Mon, 06/17/19 1:25 PM ENVREP-V4.8
ADDRESS 960 West LeVoy Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84123 USA PHONE FAX+1 801 266 7700 +1 801 268 9992
ALS GROUP USA, CORP. An ALS Limited Company
||
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Project Manager: Jessica Helland
Client: ALS Environmental(Mississauga)
Workorder: 34-1916354
Analytical Results
Sample ID: 05/31/201906/07/20191916354001Lab ID:
Collected:Received:
BH-E4 NA
Sampling Parameter: NAMatrix:
Media:
Water
125 mL NalgeneSampling Site:
Analysis: SW 6020A, Water
Analyzed: 06/14/2019 12:42Batch:
Instrument ID:EMS/5487 (HBN: 241502) Percent Solid: NA
ICPM02
Report Basis: Wet
Preparation: EPA 3010, SW 6020 Water Prep
Prepared: 06/10/2019Batch:
Weight/Volume EMS/5485 (HBN: 241048) Initial:
Final:50 mL50 mL
Result (ug/L)Analyte MDL (ug/L) RL (ug/L) Dilution Qual
Analysis Method - SW 6020
510ND 25Gold U
53.0ND 10Platinum U
53.0ND 10Rhodium U
Sample ID: 05/31/201906/07/20191916354002Lab ID:
Collected:Received:
BH-W4 NA
Sampling Parameter: NAMatrix:
Media:
Water
125 mL NalgeneSampling Site:
Analysis: SW 6020A, Water
Analyzed: 06/14/2019 12:45Batch:
Instrument ID:EMS/5487 (HBN: 241502) Percent Solid: NA
ICPM02
Report Basis: Wet
Preparation: EPA 3010, SW 6020 Water Prep
Prepared: 06/10/2019Batch:
Weight/Volume EMS/5485 (HBN: 241048) Initial:
Final:50 mL50 mL
Result (ug/L)Analyte MDL (ug/L) RL (ug/L) Dilution Qual
Analysis Method - SW 6020
510ND 25Gold U
53.0ND 10Platinum U
53.0ND 10Rhodium U
Comments
Workorder: 1916354
EPA 6020: Samples were received with nitric acid used as the preservative according the sample containers. Concentratedhydrochloric acid was added and samples were allowed to react overnight in a walk-in cooler before sample preparation. Thesamples were prepared using aqua regia so they were diluted 5x prior to analysis to reduce the acid concentration and preserveinstrument integrity.
Report Authorization
Analyst Peer ReviewMethod
(/S/ is an electronic signature that complies with 21 CFR Part 11)
SW 6020 /S/ Kristie F. Bitner06/14/2019 15:42 06/17/2019 13:17
/S/ Rex Bagley
Laboratory Contact Information(801) [email protected]
ALS Environmental960 W Levoy DriveSalt Lake City, Utah 84123
Phone:Email:Web:
Page 2 of 3 Mon, 06/17/19 1:25 PM ENVREP-V4.8
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Project Manager: Jessica Helland
Client: ALS Environmental(Mississauga)
Workorder: 34-1916354
General Lab CommentsThe results provided in this report relate only to the items tested.Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.Samples have not been blank corrected unless otherwise noted.This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of ALS.
ALS provides professional analytical services for all samples submitted. ALS is not in a position to interpret the data andassumes no responsibility for the quality of the samples submitted.
All quality control samples processed with the samples in this report yielded acceptable results unless otherwise noted.
ALS is accredited for specific fields of testing (scopes) in the following testing sectors. The quality system implemented at ALSconforms to accreditation requirements and is applied to all analytical testing performed by ALS. The following table lists testingsector, accreditation body, accreditation number and website. Please contact these accrediting bodies or your ALS projectmanager for the current scope of accreditation that applies to your analytical testing.
Testing SectorAccreditation Body(Standard)
Certificate Number Website
Environmental PJLA (DoD ELAP) L17-506 http://www.pjlabs.comPJLA (ISO 17025) L17-507-R1 http://www.pjlabs.comUtah (TNI) UT00953 http://lams.nelac-institute.org/searchNevada (TNI) UT00953201-1 https://ndep.nv.gov/water/lab-certificationIowa (TNI) IA# 376 http://www.shl.uiowa.edu/labcert/idnr/Kansas E-10416 http://www.kdheks.gov/envlab/disclaimer.htmlOklahoma (TNI) IJ# 9980 http://www.deq.state.ok.us/CSDnew/labcert.htmTexas (TNI) T104704456-18-9 https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/compliance/compliance_sup
port/qa/txnelap_lab_list.pdf
Industrial Hygiene AIHA (ISO 17025 &AIHA IHLAP)
101574 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org
DOECAP-AP L18-606 http://www.pjlabs.comWashington C596 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/Permits-certifications/Lab
oratory-Accreditation
Dietary Supplements PJLA (ISO 17025) L17-507-R1 http://www.pjlabs.com
MDL = Method Detection Limit, a statistical estimate of method/media/instrument sensitivity.RL = Reporting Limit, a verified value of method/media/instrument sensitivity.CRDL = Contract Required Detection LimitReg. Limit = Regulatory Limit.ND = Not Detected, testing result not detected above the MDL or RL.< Means this testing result is less than the numerical value.** No result could be reported, see sample comments for details.
U = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was not detected above the MDL.J = Qualifier Indicates that the analyte value is between the MDL and the RL. It is also used to indicate an estimated value for
B = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was detected in the blank.E = Qualifier indicates that the analyte result exceeds calibration range.P = Qualifier indicates that the RPD between the two columns is greater than 40%.
Result Symbol Definitions
Qualifier Symbol Definitions
tentatively identified compounds in mass spectrometry where a 1:1 response is assumed.
Page 3 of 3 Mon, 06/17/19 1:25 PM ENVREP-V4.8
[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]
14-MAY-19
Lab Work Order #: L2272905
Date Received:Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)
2010 WINSTON PARK DROAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7
ATTN: Bradley TrinhFINAL 22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)Report Date:
Version:
Certificate of Analysis
ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
____________________________________________
Melanie MoshiAccount Manager
ADDRESS: 95 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 1, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1H2 Canada | Phone: +1 905 881 9887 | Fax: +1 905 881 8062
Client Phone: 905-856-5200
0T1-0919169-ENJob Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:
17-725700C of C Numbers:DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIELegal Site Desc:
Result
22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - ON-511-T2-RPI-ICC-C/F-SOIL
L2272905 CONTD....2Page of
0T1-0919169-EN - DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIEANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: T2-Soil-Ind/Com/Commu Property Use (Coarse) #2: T2-Soil-Ind/Com/Commu Property Use (Fine)
#3: T2-Soil-Res/Park/Inst. Property Use (Coarse) #4: T2-Soil-Res/Park/Inst. Property Use (Fine)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
7
L2272905-1
L2272905-2
E4-1 SS2
E4-1 SS5
BRADLEY TRINH on 07-MAY-19
BRADLEY TRINH on 07-MAY-19 @
Sampled By:
Sampled By:
SOIL
SOIL
Matrix:
Matrix:
#1
#1
#2
#2
#3
#3
#4
#4
Physical Tests
Cyanides
Saturated Paste Extractables
Metals
Speciated Metals
Physical Tests
Leachable Anions & Nutrients
Conductivity% MoisturepH
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
SARCalcium (Ca)Magnesium (Mg)Sodium (Na)
Antimony (Sb)Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Beryllium (Be)Boron (B)Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.Cadmium (Cd)Chromium (Cr)Cobalt (Co)Copper (Cu)Lead (Pb)Mercury (Hg)Molybdenum (Mo)Nickel (Ni)Selenium (Se)Silver (Ag)Thallium (Tl)Uranium (U)Vanadium (V)Zinc (Zn)
Chromium, Hexavalent
Conductivity% MoisturepHRedox PotentialResistivity
Chloride
0.3373.847.99
<0.050
4.957.970.5953.8
<1.01.219.9
<0.50<5.00.13
<0.507.82.14.412.8
0.0117<1.04.1
<1.0<0.20<0.50<1.019.918.3
<0.20
1.4012.07.87187716
627
0.00400.100.10
0.050
0.100.500.500.50
1.01.01.00.505.00.100.501.01.01.01.0
0.00501.01.01.00.200.501.01.05.0
0.20
0.00400.100.10
-10001.0
5.0
mS/cm%
pH units
ug/g
SARmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
ug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/g
ug/g
mS/cm%
pH unitsmV
ohm*cm
ug/g
21-MAY-1915-MAY-1921-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
21-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-19
21-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
21-MAY-1915-MAY-1921-MAY-1916-MAY-1921-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
1.4 1.4 0.7 0.7
0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051
12 12 5 5
40 50 7.5 7.518 18 18 18670 670 390 3908 10 4 5
120 120 120 1202 2 1.5 1.5
1.9 1.9 1.2 1.2160 160 160 16080 100 22 22230 300 140 180120 120 120 1203.9 20 0.27 1.840 40 6.9 6.9270 340 100 1305.5 5.5 2.4 2.440 50 20 253.3 3.3 1 133 33 23 2386 86 86 86340 340 340 340
8 10 8 10
1.4 1.4 *0.7 *0.7
Result
22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - ON-511-T2-RPI-ICC-C/F-SOIL
L2272905 CONTD....3Page of
0T1-0919169-EN - DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIEANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: T2-Soil-Ind/Com/Commu Property Use (Coarse) #2: T2-Soil-Ind/Com/Commu Property Use (Fine)
#3: T2-Soil-Res/Park/Inst. Property Use (Coarse) #4: T2-Soil-Res/Park/Inst. Property Use (Fine)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
7
L2272905-2
L2272905-3
L2272905-4
E4-1 SS5
WS-1 SS3
WS-1 SS6
BRADLEY TRINH on 07-MAY-19 @
BRADLEY TRINH on 09-MAY-19 @
BRADLEY TRINH on 09-MAY-19 @
Sampled By:
Sampled By:
Sampled By:
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
Matrix:
Matrix:
Matrix:
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
#3
#3
#3
#4
#4
#4
Anions and Nutrients
Inorganic Parameters
Physical Tests
Cyanides
Saturated Paste Extractables
Metals
Speciated Metals
Sulphate
Acid Volatile Sulphides
Conductivity% MoisturepH
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
SARCalcium (Ca)Magnesium (Mg)Sodium (Na)
Antimony (Sb)Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)Beryllium (Be)Boron (B)Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.Cadmium (Cd)Chromium (Cr)Cobalt (Co)Copper (Cu)Lead (Pb)Mercury (Hg)Molybdenum (Mo)Nickel (Ni)Selenium (Se)Silver (Ag)Thallium (Tl)Uranium (U)Vanadium (V)Zinc (Zn)
Chromium, Hexavalent
36
<0.20
0.68818.67.85
<0.050
13.36.65
<0.50125
<1.0<1.016.5
<0.50<5.0<0.10<0.508.12.14.03.3
<0.0050<1.03.8
<1.0<0.20<0.50<1.021.710.3
<0.20
SAR:M
20
0.20
0.00400.100.10
0.050
0.100.500.500.50
1.01.01.00.505.00.100.501.01.01.01.0
0.00501.01.01.00.200.501.01.05.0
0.20
mg/kg
mg/kg
mS/cm%
pH units
ug/g
SARmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
ug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/g
ug/g
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
21-MAY-1915-MAY-1921-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
21-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-19
21-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-1921-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
1.4 1.4 0.7 0.7
0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051
*12 *12 *5 *5
40 50 7.5 7.518 18 18 18670 670 390 3908 10 4 5
120 120 120 1202 2 1.5 1.5
1.9 1.9 1.2 1.2160 160 160 16080 100 22 22230 300 140 180120 120 120 1203.9 20 0.27 1.840 40 6.9 6.9270 340 100 1305.5 5.5 2.4 2.440 50 20 253.3 3.3 1 133 33 23 2386 86 86 86340 340 340 340
8 10 8 10
Result
22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)Sample DetailsGrouping Analyte D.L. UnitsQualifier Analyzed
Ontario Regulation 153/04 - April 15, 2011 Standards = [Suite] - ON-511-T2-RPI-ICC-C/F-SOIL
L2272905 CONTD....4Page of
0T1-0919169-EN - DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIEANALYTICAL GUIDELINE REPORT
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guideline Limit listed on this report. Guideline Limits applied:
Guideline Limits
#1: T2-Soil-Ind/Com/Commu Property Use (Coarse) #2: T2-Soil-Ind/Com/Commu Property Use (Fine)
#3: T2-Soil-Res/Park/Inst. Property Use (Coarse) #4: T2-Soil-Res/Park/Inst. Property Use (Fine)
* ** Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
7
L2272905-4 WS-1 SS6BRADLEY TRINH on 09-MAY-19 @Sampled By:SOILMatrix: #1 #2 #3 #4
Physical Tests
Leachable Anions & Nutrients
Anions and Nutrients
Inorganic Parameters
Conductivity% MoisturepHRedox PotentialResistivity
Chloride
Sulphate
Acid Volatile Sulphides
0.42318.27.731392360
140
<20
<0.20
0.00400.100.10
-10001.0
5.0
20
0.20
mS/cm%
pH unitsmV
ohm*cm
ug/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
22-MAY-1915-MAY-1921-MAY-1916-MAY-1922-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
1.4 1.4 0.7 0.7
Reference Information
0T1-0919169-EN - DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIE L2272905 CONTD....5Page of
22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)
B-HWS-R511-WT
CL-R511-WT
CN-WAD-R511-WT
CR-CR6-IC-WT
EC-WT
HG-200.2-CVAA-WT
MET-200.2-CCMS-WT
MOISTURE-WT
Boron-HWE-O.Reg 153/04 (July2011)
Chloride-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)
Cyanide (WAD)-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)
Hexavalent Chromium in Soil
Conductivity (EC)
Mercury in Soil by CVAAS
Metals in Soil by CRC ICPMS
% Moisture
A dried solid sample is extracted with calcium chloride, the sample undergoes a heating process. After cooling the sample is filtered and analyzed by ICP/OES.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
5 grams of dried soil is mixed with 10 grams of distilled water for a minimum of 30 minutes. The extract is filtered and analyzed by ion chromatography.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
The sample is extracted with a strong base for 16 hours, and then filtered. The filtrate is then distilled where the cyanide is converted to cyanogen chloride by reacting with chloramine-T, the cyanogen chloride then reacts with a combination of barbituric acid and isonicotinic acid to form a highly colored complex.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" SW-846, Method 7199, published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The procedure involves analysis for chromium (VI) by ion chromatography using diphenylcarbazide in asulphuric acid solution.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
A representative subsample is tumbled with de-ionized (DI) water. The ratio of water to soil is 2:1 v/w. After tumbling the sample is then analyzed by a conductivity meter.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
Soil samples are digested with nitric and hydrochloric acids, followed by analysis by CVAAS.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
Soil/sediment is dried, disaggregated, and sieved (2 mm). For tests intended to support Ontario regulations, the <2mm fraction is ground to pass through a 0.355 mm sieve. Strong Acid Leachable Metals in the <2mm fraction are solubilized by heated digestion with nitric and hydrochloric acids. Instrumental analysis is by Collision / Reaction Cell ICPMS.
Limitations: This method is intended to liberate environmentally available metals. Silicate minerals are not solubilized. Some metals may be only partially recovered (matrix dependent), including Al, Ba, Be, Cr, S, Sr, Ti, Tl, V, W, and Zr. Elemental Sulfur may be poorly recovered by this method. Volatile forms of sulfur (e.g. sulfide, H2S) may be excluded if lost during sampling, storage, or digestion.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011), unless a subset of the Analytical Test Group (ATG) has been requested (the Protocol states that all analytes in an ATG must be reported).
Methods Listed (if applicable):
ALS Test Code Test Description
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
SAR:M Reported SAR represents a maximum value. Actual SAR may be lower if both Ca and Mg were detectable.
Sample Parameter Qualifier key listed:
HW EXTR, EPA 6010B
EPA 300.0
MOE 3015/APHA 4500CN I-WAD
SW846 3060A/7199
MOEE E3138
EPA 200.2/1631E (mod)
EPA 200.2/6020A (mod)
CCME PHC in Soil - Tier 1 (mod)
Method Reference***
Description Qualifier
Matrix
7
Reference Information
0T1-0919169-EN - DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIE L2272905 CONTD....6Page of
22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)
PH-WT
REDOX-POTENTIAL-WT
RESISTIVITY-CALC-WT
RESISTIVITY-CALC-WT
SAR-R511-WT
SO4-WT
SULPHIDE-WT
pH
Redox Potential
Resistivity Calculation
Resistivity Calculation
SAR-O.Reg 153/04 (July 2011)
Sulphate
Sulphide, Acid Volatile
A minimum 10g portion of the sample is extracted with 20mL of 0.01M calcium chloride solution by shaking for at least 30 minutes. The aqueous layer isseparated from the soil and then analyzed using a pH meter and electrode.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
This analysis is carried out in accordance with the procedure described in the "APHA" method 2580 "Oxidation-Reduction Potential" 2012. Samples are extracted at a fixed ratio with DI water. Results are reported as observed oxidation-reduction potential of the platinum metal-reference electrode employed, in mV.
Resistivity are calculated based on the conductivity using APHA 2510B where Conductivity is the inverse of Resistivity.
Resistivity are calculated based on the conductivity using APHA 2510B where Conductivity is the inverse of Resistivity.
A dried, disaggregated solid sample is extracted with deionized water, the aqueous extract is separated from the solid, acidified and then analyzed usinga ICP/OES. The concentrations of Na, Ca and Mg are reported as per CALA requirements for calculated parameters. These individual parameters are not for comparison to any guideline.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
5 grams of soil is mixed with 50 mL of distilled water for a minimum of 30 minutes. The extract is filtered and analyzed by ion chromatography.
This analysis is carried out in accordance with the method described in APHA 4500 S2-J. Hydrochloric acid is added to sediment samples within a purge and trap system. The evolved hydrogen sulphide (H2S) is carried into a basic solution by inert gas. The acid volatile sulfide is then determined colourimetrically.
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
MOEE E3137A
APHA 2580
APHA 2510 B
MOECC E3138
SW846 6010C
EPA 300.0
APHA 4500S2J
*** ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.
The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:
Chain of Custody numbers:
17-725700
Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location
WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA
7
Reference Information
0T1-0919169-EN - DUNLOP STRET WEST BARRIE L2272905 CONTD....7Page of
22-MAY-19 13:55 (MT)
GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS
Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of samplemg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of samplemg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/L - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million.< - Less than.D.L. - The reporting limit.N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.
Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.
Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information. Guideline limits are not adjusted for the hardness, pH or temperature of the sample (the most conservative values are used). Measurement uncertainty is not applied to test results prior to comparison with specified criteria values.
7
Quality Control ReportPage 1 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 WINSTON PARK DR OAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7Bradley Trinh
Report Date: 22-MAY-19Workorder: L2272905
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
B-HWS-R511-WT
CL-R511-WT
CN-WAD-R511-WT
CR-CR6-IC-WT
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
R4639394
R4639715
R4639401
R4637221
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
DUP
IRM
LCS
MB
CRM
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
CRM
DUP
LCS
MB
WG3052961-4
WG3052961-2
WG3052961-3
WG3052961-1
WG3054003-3
WG3054003-4
WG3054003-2
WG3054003-1
WG3050953-3
WG3050953-2
WG3050953-1
WG3050953-4
WG3050923-4
WG3050923-3
WG3050923-2
WG3050923-1
L2272874-12
WT SAR3
AN-CRM-WT
L2271554-2
L2272905-3
L2272905-3
WT-SQC012
L2272905-3
Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.
Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.
Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.
Boron (B), Hot Water Ext.
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
Cyanide, Weak Acid Diss
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chromium, Hexavalent
0.14
87.0
95.6
<0.10
96.1
<5.0
102.7
<5.0
<0.050
98.9
<0.050
104.8
93.5
<0.20
99.0
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
17-MAY-19
2.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
30
30
35
35
70-130
70-130
70-130
80-120
80-120
70-130
70-130
80-120
ug/g
%
%
ug/g
%
ug/g
%
ug/g
ug/g
%
ug/g
%
%
ug/g
%
0.14
<5.0
<0.050
<0.20
0.1
5
0.05
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
7
Quality Control ReportPage 2 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 WINSTON PARK DR OAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7Bradley Trinh
Report Date: 22-MAY-19Workorder: L2272905
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
CR-CR6-IC-WT
EC-WT
HG-200.2-CVAA-WT
MET-200.2-CCMS-WT
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
R4637221
R4639436
R4640458
R4639502
R4639551
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
MB
DUP
IRM
LCS
MB
DUP
IRM
LCS
MB
CRM
DUP
LCS
MB
CRM
WG3050923-1
WG3053040-4
WG3053040-2
WG3054292-1
WG3053040-1
WG3054697-4
WG3054697-2
WG3055369-1
WG3054697-1
WG3053978-2
WG3053978-6
WG3053978-3
WG3053978-1
WG3053978-2
WG3053040-3
WT SAR3
WG3054697-3
WT SAR3
WT-CANMET-TILL1
WG3053978-5
WT-CANMET-TILL1
Chromium, Hexavalent
Conductivity
Conductivity
Conductivity
Conductivity
Conductivity
Conductivity
Conductivity
Conductivity
Mercury (Hg)
Mercury (Hg)
Mercury (Hg)
Mercury (Hg)
Antimony (Sb)
Arsenic (As)
<0.20
0.953
97.1
101.3
<0.0040
1.50
97.1
100.2
<0.0040
98.0
0.0198
113.0
<0.0050
100.8
101.8
17-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
22-MAY-19
22-MAY-19
22-MAY-19
22-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
2.1
2.1
0.7
20
20
40
70-130
90-110
70-130
90-110
70-130
80-120
70-130
70-130
ug/g
mS/cm
%
%
mS/cm
mS/cm
%
%
mS/cm
%
ug/g
%
mg/kg
%
%
0.973
1.53
0.0197
0.2
0.004
0.004
0.005
7
Quality Control ReportPage 3 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 WINSTON PARK DR OAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7Bradley Trinh
Report Date: 22-MAY-19Workorder: L2272905
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-200.2-CCMS-WT Soil
R4639551BatchCRM
DUP
WG3053978-2
WG3053978-6
WT-CANMET-TILL1
WG3053978-5
Barium (Ba)
Beryllium (Be)
Boron (B)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Cobalt (Co)
Copper (Cu)
Lead (Pb)
Molybdenum (Mo)
Nickel (Ni)
Selenium (Se)
Silver (Ag)
Thallium (Tl)
Uranium (U)
Vanadium (V)
Zinc (Zn)
Antimony (Sb)
Arsenic (As)
Barium (Ba)
Beryllium (Be)
Boron (B)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Cobalt (Co)
Copper (Cu)
Lead (Pb)
Molybdenum (Mo)
Nickel (Ni)
Selenium (Se)
Silver (Ag)
Thallium (Tl)
Uranium (U)
101.8
101.9
3.1
101.0
106.3
101.9
101.9
97.7
101.6
102.5
0.27
0.23
0.124
97.1
105.2
102.8
<0.10
3.08
73.0
0.52
6.3
0.088
22.2
7.80
16.0
8.86
0.37
17.9
<0.20
<0.10
0.140
0.519
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
N/A
6.6
6.9
8.1
9.4
9.5
9.3
6.6
5.5
4.5
16
5.7
N/A
N/A
3.0
4.7
30
30
40
30
30
30
30
30
30
40
40
30
30
40
30
30
70-130
70-130
0-8.2
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
0.11-0.51
0.13-0.33
0.077-0.18
70-130
70-130
70-130
%
%
mg/kg
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
%
%
%
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
ug/g
0.11
3.29
78.2
0.56
6.9
0.097
24.4
8.33
16.9
9.27
0.43
18.9
<0.20
<0.10
0.144
0.544
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
7
Quality Control ReportPage 4 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 WINSTON PARK DR OAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7Bradley Trinh
Report Date: 22-MAY-19Workorder: L2272905
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-200.2-CCMS-WT Soil
R4639551BatchDUP
LCS
MB
WG3053978-6
WG3053978-4
WG3053978-1
WG3053978-5Vanadium (V)
Zinc (Zn)
Antimony (Sb)
Arsenic (As)
Barium (Ba)
Beryllium (Be)
Boron (B)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Cobalt (Co)
Copper (Cu)
Lead (Pb)
Molybdenum (Mo)
Nickel (Ni)
Selenium (Se)
Silver (Ag)
Thallium (Tl)
Uranium (U)
Vanadium (V)
Zinc (Zn)
Antimony (Sb)
Arsenic (As)
Barium (Ba)
Beryllium (Be)
Boron (B)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Cobalt (Co)
Copper (Cu)
Lead (Pb)
Molybdenum (Mo)
Nickel (Ni)
32.6
39.8
105.3
100.5
102.7
97.6
93.1
98.3
100.1
98.7
96.4
98.8
99.0
98.7
99.2
99.7
98.4
98.4
102.6
97.8
<0.10
<0.10
<0.50
<0.10
<5.0
<0.020
<0.50
<0.10
<0.50
<0.50
<0.10
<0.50
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
6.7
5.3
30
30
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
ug/g
ug/g
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
34.8
42.0
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.1
5
0.02
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.5
7
Quality Control ReportPage 5 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 WINSTON PARK DR OAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7Bradley Trinh
Report Date: 22-MAY-19Workorder: L2272905
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-200.2-CCMS-WT
MOISTURE-WT
PH-WT
REDOX-POTENTIAL-WT
SAR-R511-WT
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
R4639551
R4635530
R4639804
R4636754
R4639389
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
CRM
DUP
DUP
IRM
WG3053978-1
WG3050045-3
WG3050045-2
WG3050045-1
WG3050972-1
WG3054425-1
WG3051308-1
WG3050699-1
WG3053040-4
WG3053040-2
L2272905-1
L2272905-2
WT-REDOX
L2272905-2
WG3053040-3
WT SAR3
Selenium (Se)
Silver (Ag)
Thallium (Tl)
Uranium (U)
Vanadium (V)
Zinc (Zn)
% Moisture
% Moisture
% Moisture
pH
pH
Redox Potential
Redox Potential
Calcium (Ca)
Sodium (Na)
Magnesium (Mg)
Calcium (Ca)
Sodium (Na)
<0.20
<0.10
<0.050
<0.050
<0.20
<2.0
3.75
94.3
<0.10
7.92
7.03
99.6
175
4.60
197
1.26
100.4
100.1
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
15-MAY-19
15-MAY-19
15-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
2.2
0.05
6.6
8.4
0.5
27
20
0.3
25
30
30
30
90-110
6.9-7.1
80-120
70-130
70-130
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
%
%
%
pH units
pH units
%
mV
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
3.84
7.87
187
4.23
196
0.96
0.2
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.2
2
0.1
J
7
Quality Control ReportPage 6 of
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 WINSTON PARK DR OAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7Bradley Trinh
Report Date: 22-MAY-19Workorder: L2272905
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
SAR-R511-WT
SO4-WT
SULPHIDE-WT
Soil
Soil
Soil
R4639389
R4637087
R4636594
Batch
Batch
Batch
IRM
LCS
MB
CRM
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
WG3053040-2
WG3053040-5
WG3053040-1
WG3050546-4
WG3050546-3
WG3050546-2
WG3050546-1
WG3051330-3
WG3051330-2
WG3051330-1
WT SAR3
AN-CRM-WT
L2272905-2
L2271619-5
Magnesium (Mg)
Calcium (Ca)
Sodium (Na)
Magnesium (Mg)
Calcium (Ca)
Sodium (Na)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sulphate
Sulphate
Sulphate
Sulphate
Acid Volatile Sulphides
Acid Volatile Sulphides
Acid Volatile Sulphides
102.7
101.7
101.4
100.6
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
115.4
35
102.4
<20
<0.20
74.8
<0.20
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
21-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
16-MAY-19
1.6
N/A
30
30
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
60-140
80-120
70-130
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
mg/kg
%
mg/kg
mg/kg
%
mg/kg
36
<0.20
0.5
0.5
0.5
20
0.2
RPD-NA
7
Quality Control Report
Page 7 of
Report Date: 22-MAY-19Workorder: L2272905
Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:
Description Qualifier
J
RPD-NA
Duplicate results and limits are expressed in terms of absolute difference.
Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.
Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
Legend:
The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.
Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.
Hold Time Exceedances:
All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times.
ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.
Client:
Contact:
Mcintosh Perry Limited (Vaughan)2010 WINSTON PARK DR OAKVILLE ON 46H 5R7Bradley Trinh
7
Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street
0CM-18-0450
APPENDIX CHydraulic Conductivity Calculations
BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests
Project Name:Project Number:Well: BH-E4-2Date: 31-May-19 Test 1
Well Parameters:L 0.29 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 0.29 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 1.72 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 11.4173228 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 1.05756428 (calculated)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 1.756009(if well extends to the base of the formation)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): -0.66391(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)
Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter -23.5945Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.307596Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 1.344415
(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw
Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.718
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:
FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 6.47E-04 m/min K: -2.45E-04 m/min
1.08E-05 m/second -4.08E-06 m/second
Transmissivity (T): 1.6 m2/day Transmissivity (T): -0.6 m2/day
COMMENTS:
Water level assumed at 3.91 m below ground (MW 4.2 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 5.63 m below ground
1
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
é
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
wwBRw
e
rLC
rHr
R
1)(ln
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
éþýü
îíì -+
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
w
w
wBRw
e
rL
rHDBA
rHr
R
÷÷ø
öççè
æDD
þýü
îíì
-=0
2 *lnln*1
2 HH
rR
tLr
Kw
ew
BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests
Project Name:Project Number:Well: W4-2Date: Test
Well Parameters:L 3.1 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 3.1 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 11.9 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 122.047244 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 2.08652798 (calculated)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.722671(if well extends to the base of the formation)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.32999(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)
Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter 3.685161Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.858838Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 4.841362
(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw
Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.116
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:
FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 8.34E-04 m/min K: 7.46E-04 m/min
1.39E-05 m/second 1.24E-05 m/second
Transmissivity (T): 14.3 m2/day Transmissivity (T): 12.8 m2/day
COMMENTS:
Water level assumed at 1.37 m below ground (MW 4.5 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 13.27 m below ground (new aquifer information)
1
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
é
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
wwBRw
e
rLC
rHr
R
1)(ln
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
éþýü
îíì -+
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
w
w
wBRw
e
rL
rHDBA
rHr
R
÷÷ø
öççè
æDD
þýü
îíì
-=0
2 *lnln*1
2 HH
rR
tLr
Kw
ew
BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests
Project Name:Project Number:Well: BH-W4 Test 2Date: 31-May-19 Test 2
Well Parameters:L 3.1 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 3.1 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 11.9 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 122.047244 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 2.08652798 (calculated)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.722671(if well extends to the base of the formation)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.32999(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)
Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter 3.685161Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.858838Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 4.841362
(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw
Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.461
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:
FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 3.00E-04 m/min K: 2.68E-04 m/min
5.00E-06 m/second 4.47E-06 m/second
Transmissivity (T): 5.1 m2/day Transmissivity (T): 4.6 m2/day
COMMENTS:
Water level assumed at 1.37 m below ground (MW 4.5 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 13.27 m below ground
1
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
é
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
wwBRw
e
rLC
rHr
R
1)(ln
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
éþýü
îíì -+
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
w
w
wBRw
e
rL
rHDBA
rHr
R
÷÷ø
öççè
æDD
þýü
îíì
-=0
2 *lnln*1
2 HH
rR
tLr
Kw
ew
BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests
Project Name:Project Number:Well: BH-W4-2Date: 31-May-19 Test 3
Well Parameters:L 3.1 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 3.1 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 11.9 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 122.047244 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 2.08652798 (calculated)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.722671(if well extends to the base of the formation)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.32999(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)
Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter 3.685161Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.858838Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 4.841362
(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw
Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.026
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:
FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 1.41E-03 m/min K: 1.26E-03 m/min
2.36E-05 m/second 2.11E-05 m/second
Transmissivity (T): 24.2 m2/day Transmissivity (T): 21.7 m2/day
COMMENTS:
Water level assumed at 1.37 m below ground (MW 4.5 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 13.27 m below ground (bottom of aquifer)
1
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
é
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
wwBRw
e
rLC
rHr
R
1)(ln
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
éþýü
îíì -+
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
w
w
wBRw
e
rL
rHDBA
rHr
R
÷÷ø
öççè
æDD
þýü
îíì
-=0
2 *lnln*
12 H
HrR
tLrK
w
ew
BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests
Project Name:Project Number:Well: W5-2 (NOTE: SLUG TEST DATA FOR W5-1)Date: Test
Well Parameters:L 2.98 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 2.98 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 13.55 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 117.322835 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 2.06938255 (calculated)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.691183(if well extends to the base of the formation)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.292226(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)
Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter 3.493254Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.83878Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 4.700242
(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw
Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.149
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:
FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 7.61E-04 m/min K: 6.78E-04 m/min
1.27E-05 m/second 1.13E-05 m/second
Transmissivity (T): 14.8 m2/day Transmissivity (T): 13.2 m2/day
COMMENTS:
Drawdown data for BH W5-1 usedWater level assumed at 0.62 m below ground (MW 3.6 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 14.17 m below ground (where bottom of aquifer recorded)
1
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
é
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
wwBRw
e
rLC
rHr
R
1)(ln
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
éþýü
îíì -+
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
w
w
wBRw
e
rL
rHDBA
rHr
R
÷÷ø
öççè
æDD
þýü
îíì
-=0
2 *lnln*1
2 HH
rR
tLr
Kw
ew
BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests
Project Name:Project Number:Well: W5-2 (NOTE: SLUG TEST DATA FOR W5-1)Date: Test
Well Parameters:L 2.98 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 2.98 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 13.55 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 117.322835 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 2.06938255 (calculated)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.691183(if well extends to the base of the formation)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.292226(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)
Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter 3.493254Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.83878Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 4.700242
(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw
Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.048
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:
FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 1.21E-03 m/min K: 1.08E-03 m/min
2.02E-05 m/second 1.80E-05 m/second
Transmissivity (T): 23.7 m2/day Transmissivity (T): 21.1 m2/day
COMMENTS:
Water level assumed at 0.62 m below ground (MW 3.6 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 14.17 m below ground
1
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
é
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
wwBRw
e
rLC
rHr
R
1)(ln
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
éþýü
îíì -+
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
w
w
wBRw
e
rL
rHDBA
rHr
R
÷÷ø
öççè
æDD
þýü
îíì
-=0
2 *lnln*1
2 HH
rR
tLr
Kw
ew
BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests
Project Name:Project Number:Well: W5-2 (NOTE: SLUG TEST DATA FOR W5-1)Date: Test
Well Parameters:L 2.98 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 2.98 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 13.55 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 117.322835 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 2.06938255 (calculated)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.691183(if well extends to the base of the formation)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.292226(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)
Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter 3.493254Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.83878Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 4.700242
(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw
Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.132
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:
FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 8.09E-04 m/min K: 7.22E-04 m/min
1.35E-05 m/second 1.20E-05 m/second
Transmissivity (T): 15.8 m2/day Transmissivity (T): 14.1 m2/day
COMMENTS:
Water level assumed at 0.62 m below ground (MW 3.6 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 14.17 m below ground
1
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
é
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
wwBRw
e
rLC
rHr
R
1)(ln
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
éþýü
îíì -+
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
w
w
wBRw
e
rL
rHDBA
rHr
R
÷÷ø
öççè
æDD
þýü
îíì
-=0
2 *lnln*1
2 HH
rR
tLr
Kw
ew
BOUWER & RICE ANALYSIS for Overdamped Slug Tests
Project Name:Project Number:Well: W5-2 (NOTE: SLUG TEST DATA FROM FIELD NOTES INITIALLY WRITTEN AS W5-1)Date: Test
Well Parameters:L 2.98 m Saturated length of screen or open holeH 2.98 m Distance from bottom of screen to top of water column (may be same as L)D 13.55 m Distance from bottom of formation to top of water column (for non-fully-penetrating well)rw 0.0254 m Radius of wellL/rw 117.322835 (calculated)log10(L/rw) 2.06938255 (calculated)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.691183(if well extends to the base of the formation)
Bouwer & Rice Effective Radius ln(Re/rw): 3.292226(if well does not extend to the base of the formation) (will display #NUM! for fully penetrating well, i.e. D ≤ H)
Bouwer & Rice "A" Parameter 3.493254Bouwer & Rice "B" Parameter 0.83878Bouwer & Rice "C" Parameter 4.700242
(A, B, and C parameter equations are provided by Karl DeBisschop in his paper "Spreadsheet Evaluation of Slug Tests")Equations are based on the logarithm (base 10) of L/rw
Data Points (from plot):t*: 1 minutes ΔH*/ΔH0: 0.149
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity is given by the following equation:
FULLY PENETRATING: PARTIALLY PENETRATING:K: 7.61E-04 m/min K: 6.78E-04 m/min
1.27E-05 m/second 1.13E-05 m/second
Transmissivity (T): 14.8 m2/day Transmissivity (T): 13.2 m2/day
COMMENTS:
Drawdown data for BH W5-1 usedWater level assumed at 0.62 m below ground (MW 3.6 m deep)Assumed bottom of formation at 14.17 m below ground (where bottom of aquifer recorded)
1
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
é
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
wwBRw
e
rLC
rHr
R
1)(ln
ln
1.1ln
-
úúúú
û
ù
êêêê
ë
éþýü
îíì -+
+÷øöç
èæ
=þýü
îíì
w
w
wBRw
e
rL
rHDBA
rHr
R
÷÷ø
öççè
æDD
þýü
îíì
-=0
2 *lnln*1
2 HH
rR
tLr
Kw
ew
Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street
0CM-18-0450
APPENDIX DGroundwater Dewatering Calculations
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
Project Name
Work Area Dimensions Hydraulic Conductivity
Length of trench 45.00 metres (m)
Width of main Trench: 3.00 m K = 1.37E-05 m/s*
Equations Radius of Influence
Radius of Influence line source R0 = 1500*(H-h)*(K)^1/2 Ro = 18.8 m
Equivalent radius of excavation r = trench width/2 re = 1.5 m
x = trench length
Dupuit Equation unconfined for
open trench
where: Q = discharge flow rate Aquifer Information
K = hydraulic conductivity K = 1.4E-05 m/s
H = Initial saturated thickness H= 14.1 m
h = Final saturated thickness h= 10.8 m
Steady state seepage
Q = 4.2E-03 cubic metres/second (m3/s)
Q = 4.2E+00 litres/second (L/s)
Q = 362,771 litres/day (L/day)
Safety Factor of 2 = 725,543 litres/day (L/day)
Dunlop St., Barrie ON
Groundwater and Stormwater Dewatering Calculation
Source 1:
Q = pK[(H2-h2)/Ln(R/r) + 2 ( xK ((H2-h2)/2R)
Hydrogeological AssessmentRoad Widening and Intersection Improvements, Dunlop Street, Cameron Street
0CM-18-0450
APPENDIX EBorehole Logs
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH E1
Date(s) Drilled May 7, 2019
Drilling Method
Drill Rig Type Hand Dig
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type Solid stem
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) Grab
Location Anne Street North; northbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 0.30 mbgs
Elevation (m) 229.78 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Asphalt
Fill - Granular A (brown sand, gravel with some cobbles)
Terminated borehole. Note: Locates recommended hand-digging only due to underground utilities.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
229.78
228.78
227.78
226.78
225.78
224.78
223.78
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH E2-1
Date(s) Drilled May 7, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) SPT
Location Dunlop Street West; eastbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 5.18 mbgs
Elevation (m) 230.14 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
55
55
70
70
100
90
100
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.127 metres Granular A (grey gravel and sand) - Approximately 0.46 metres Granular B (brown sand matrix)
SAND - Light brown - Brownish beige below approximately 3.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) - Moist to damp between approximately 3.81 mbgs to 4.42 mbgs - Wet below 4.57 mbgs - Some silty clay and trace gravel below 5.08 mbgs
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
230.14
229.14
228.14
227.14
226.14
225.14
224.14
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH E2-2
Date(s) Drilled May 7, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level 3.90 mbgs
Borehole Backfill Well pipe, sand and bentonite
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) -
Location Dunlop Street West; eastbound sidewalk
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 4.45 mbgs
Elevation (m) 230.16 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltSAND - Brown sand, some silty clay - Fine brown sand, slight odour of petroleum detected; however no staining observed at approximately 4.5 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
Terminated borehole and installed monitoring well.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
230.16
229.16
228.16
227.16
226.16
225.16
224.16
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH E3
Date(s) Drilled May 6, 2019
Drilling Method Direct Push
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) Tube
Location Anne Street South; southbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 2.13 mbgs
Elevation (m) 228.48 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
100
100
100
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.86 metres Granular A (brown sand, some cobbles) - Granular B (fine, light brown sand matrix) below
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
228.48
227.48
226.48
225.48
224.48
223.48
222.48
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH E4-1
Date(s) Drilled May 7, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Gourp
Sampling Method(s) SPT
Location Dunlop Street West; eastbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 5.18 mbgs
Elevation (m) 229.29 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
60
50
20
10
60
80
20
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTS
Sampled for M&I
Sampled for corrosivity
Gra
phic
Log
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.23 metres Granular A (grey gravel) - Granular B (brown sand, some gravel) below
SAND - Brown - Dark brown below approximately 3.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) - Greyish brown and saturated below approximately 3.81 mbgs - Trace silty clay below approximatley 4.57 mbgs
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
229.29
228.29
227.29
226.29
225.29
224.29
223.29
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH E4-2
Date(s) Drilled May 7, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level 3.72 mbgs
Borehole Backfill Well pipe, sand and bentonite
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) -
Location Dunlop Street West; boulevard in eastbound direction
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 4.2 mbgs
Elevation (m) 229.54 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Grass - Topsoil
Fill - Approximately 0.23 metres Granular A (grey gravel) - Granular B (brown sand, some gravel) below
SAND - Brown - Dark brown below approximately 3.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) - Greyish brown and saturated below approximately 3.81 mbgs - Trace silty clay below approximatley 4.57 mbgs
Terminated borehole and installed monitoring well. Note: Observations of soil stratigraphy are from BH E4-1.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
229.54
228.54
227.54
226.54
225.54
224.54
223.54
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH E5
Date(s) Drilled May 6, 2019
Drilling Method Direct Push
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) Tube
Location Hart Drive; westbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 2.13 mbgs
Elevation (m) 229.65
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
100
100
100
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.05 metres Granular A (grey gravel and brown sand) - Granular B (brown sand matrix) below
SAND - Light brown
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS2
SS2
SS3
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
229.65
228.65
227.65
226.65
225.65
224.65
223.65
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W1
Date(s) Drilled May 7, 2019
Drilling Method Direct Push
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) Tube
Location Cedar Pointe Drive; northbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 1.83 mbgs
Elevation (m) 231.59 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
50
90
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Approximately 0.6 metres Granular A (brown gravelly sand)
CLAY - Grey saturated clay - Moist to wet on surface
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
231.59
230.59
229.59
228.59
227.59
226.59
225.59
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W2-1
Date(s) Drilled May 8, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level 1.39 mbgs
Borehole Backfill Well pipe, sand and bentonite
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) SPT
Location Dunlop Street West; westbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 4.57 mbgs
Elevation (m) 232.12 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
50
80
100
100
100
20
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Asphalt
SAND - Brown sand, some gravel
Cave-in
SAND - Dark brown, some gravel, trace to some silt - Wet - Trace cobbles from approximately 2.3 metres below ground surface (mbgs) to 2.6 mbgs
SILT - Grey, damp
SAND - Grey, saturated
SILT - Grey
SILTY SAND - Grey, saturated
SAND - Grey, saturated
Terminated borehole, backfilled to 4.6 mbgs and installed monitoring well.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
232.12
231.12
230.12
229.12
228.12
227.12
226.12
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W3
Date(s) Drilled May 8, 2019
Drilling Method Direct Push
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) Tube
Location Sarjeant Drive; northbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 2.13 mbgs
Elevation (m) 233.50 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
70
70
60
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown gravelly sand, some cobbles) - Granular B (brown sand, trace cobbles and gravel) below approximately 0.76 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
SAND - Dark brown and wet - Some silt and trace roots/organics below approximately 1.98 mbgs
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
233.5
232.5
231.5
230.5
229.5
228.5
227.5
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W4-1
Date(s) Drilled May 9, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type D-50
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) SPT
Location Dunlop Street West; eastbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 5.18 mbgs
Elevation (m) 234.52
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
60
60
60
50
55
75
100
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown sand, some cobbles and gravel) - Granular B (dark brown sand, trace gravel) below approximately 0.76 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
SAND - Brown/grey - Wet - Some gravel below approximately 2.74 mbgs
CLAY - Grey, soft - Wet
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
234.52
233.52
232.52
231.52
230.52
229.52
228.52
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W4-2
Date(s) Drilled May 8, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level 1.28 mbgs
Borehole Backfill Well pipe, sand and bentonite
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) -
Location Dunlop Street West - Grass area in eastbound direction
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 4.5 mbgs
Elevation (m) 234.64 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Grass - Topsoil
SAND - Dark brown, some gravel, some organics - Light brown, damp sand below 0.38 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
Terminated borehole and installed monitoring well.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
234.64
233.64
232.64
231.64
230.64
229.64
228.64
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W5-1
Date(s) Drilled May 9, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type D-50
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) SPT
Location Dunlop Street West, westbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 5.18 mbgs
Elevation (m) 235.19 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
50
50
60
10
10
50
50
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTS
Sampled for M&I
Sampled for corrosivity
Gra
phic
Log
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Asphalt
Fill - Granular A (brown sand, some gravel) - Granular B (brown sand matrix) below approximately 1.1 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
SAND - Brown/grey, trace gravel - Wet
CLAY - Grey - Firm
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
235.19
234.19
233.19
232.19
231.19
230.19
229.19
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W5-2
Date(s) Drilled May 8, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Georprobe 7822DT
Water Level 0.62 mbgs
Borehole Backfill Well pipe, sand and bentonite
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) -
Location Dunlop Street West - Grass area in westbound direction
Checked By
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 3.66 mbgs
Elevation (m) 234.75 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Grass - Topsoil
SAND - Dark brown, some gravel - Grey, some silt, wet below 0.7 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
CLAY - Grey, wet
Terminated borehole and installed monitoring well.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
234.75
233.75
232.75
231.75
230.75
229.75
228.75
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W6
Date(s) Drilled May 9, 2019
Drilling Method Direct Push
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) Tube
Location Ferndale Drive North (north of Dunlop Street West); northbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 2.13 mbgs
Elevation (m) 235.10 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
75
75
55
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown sand, gravel, some cobble) - Granular B (brown sand matrix) below approximately 0.83 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
SAND - Grey - Some gravel and cobbles below approximately 1.67 mbgs - Wet below approximately 1.83 mbgs
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
235.1
234.1
233.1
232.1
231.1
230.1
229.1
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W7
Date(s) Drilled May 9, 2019
Drilling Method Direct Push
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) Tube
Location Ferndale Drive North (south of Dunlop Street West); southbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 2.13 mbgs
Elevation (m) 234.27
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
60
60
100
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown sand, some gravel and cobbles) - Granular B (brown sand matrix) below approximately 0.66 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
SAND - Greyish brown - Wet
SILTY SAND/SANDY SILT - Wet
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
234.27
233.27
232.27
231.27
230.27
229.27
228.27
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W8-1
Date(s) Drilled May 10, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level -
Borehole Backfill Soil cuttings and asphalt mix
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) SPT
Location Dunlop Street West; eastbound lane
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 5.18 mbgs
Elevation (m) 234.94 m
Hammer Data -
Rec
over
y, %
100
100
50
0
30
70
100
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
AsphaltFill - Granular A (brown sand, some gravel) - Granular B (brown greyish sand matrix, wet) below approximately 1.52 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
SAND - Brown/grey, trace gravel and silt
CLAY - Grey clay, medium dense - Wet
SAND - Grey brown - Wet
CLAY - Grey, medium dense
Reached desired depth and terminated borehole.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
SS1
SS2
SS3
SS4
SS5
SS6
SS7
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
234.94
233.94
232.94
231.94
230.94
229.94
228.94
.
Project:Hydrogeology Site Assessment
Project Location: Dunlop Street West, Barrie, Ontario
Project Number: 0BM-18-8036
BH W8-2
Date(s) Drilled May 9, 2019
Drilling Method Conventional
Drill Rig Type Geoprobe 7822DT
Water Level 0.92 mbgs
Borehole Backfill -
Logged By B.T.
Drill Bit Size/Type
Drilling Contractor Tri-Phase Group
Sampling Method(s) -
Location Dunlop Street West; grass area in eastbound direction
Checked By J.B.
Total Depth of Borehole (m) 4.5 mbgs
Elevation (m) 235.03 m
Hammer Data
Rec
over
y, %
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Grass - Topsoil
SAND - Dark brown, some gravel and cobbles - Wet - Wet grey sand at approximately 4.5 metres below ground surface (mbgs)
Terminated borehole and installed monitoring well.
Com
bust
ible
/Org
anic
H
eads
pace
Rea
ding
s, p
pm
Dep
th (
met
res)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sam
ple
Num
ber
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Ele
vatio
n (m
etre
s)
235.03
234.03
233.03
232.03
231.03
230.03
229.03
.
Project:
Project Location:
Project Number:
Key to Log of Boring
Rec
over
y, %
REMARKS AND OTHER TESTSG
raph
ic L
og
Wel
l Log
MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONDep
th (
met
ers)
Sam
ple
Num
ber
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Sam
plin
g R
esis
tanc
e,
Ele
vatio
n (m
eter
s)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
COLUMN DESCRIPTIONS
1 Depth (meters): Depth in meters below the ground surface.2 Graphic Log: Graphic depiction of the subsurface material
encountered.3 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Description of material encountered.
May include consistency, moisture, color, and other descriptivetext.
4 Well Log: Graphical representation of well installed uponcompletion of drilling and sampling.
5 Elevation (meters): Elevation (MSL, meters).
6 Recovery, %: Sample Recovery % in terms of length7 Sample Type: Type of soil sample collected at the depth interval
shown.8 Sampling Resistance, blows/0.3 m: Number of blows to advance
driven sampler 0.3 meter (or distance shown) beyond seatinginterval using the hammer identified on the boring log.
9 Sample Number: Sample identification number.10 REMARKS ANDOTHER TESTS: Comments and observations
regarding drilling or sampling made by driller or field personnel.
FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST ABBREVIATIONS
mbgs: Metres below ground surfacemAD: Metres above datumCHEM: Chemical tests to assess corrosivityCOMP: Compaction testCONS: One-dimensional consolidation test
LL: Liquid Limit, percentPI: Plasticity Index, percentSA: Sieve analysis (percent passing No. 200 Sieve)UC: Unconfined compressive strength test, Qu, in ksfWA: Wash sieve (percent passing No. 200 Sieve)
MATERIAL GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
Asphaltic Concrete (AC)
Bentonite
Lean CLAY, CLAY w/SAND, SANDY CLAY (CL)
AF
Grass and/or topsoil
Silt
Silty SAND to Sandy SILT (SM-MH)
Poorly graded SAND (SP)
TYPICAL SAMPLER GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
Auger sampler
Bulk Sample
3-inch-OD California w/brass rings
CME Sampler
Grab Sample
2.5-inch-OD ModifiedCalifornia w/ brass liners
Pitcher Sample
2-inch-OD unlined splitspoon (SPT)
Shelby Tube (Thin-walled,fixed head)
OTHER GRAPHIC SYMBOLS
Water level (at time of drilling, ATD)
Water level (after waiting)
Minor change in material properties within astratum
Inferred/gradational contact between strata
? Queried contact between strata
GENERAL NOTES
1: Soil classifications are based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Descriptions and stratum lines are interpretive, and actual lithologic changes may begradual. Field descriptions may have been modified to reflect results of lab tests.2: Descriptions on these logs apply only at the specific boring locations and at the time the borings were advanced. They are not warranted to be representativeof subsurface conditions at other locations or times.
.