While we are waiting chat:

I believe

continuous improvement

in our school

would be easier

if ___________________

Evaluating and Updating the Continuous School Improvement PlanDr. Mary KearneyDr. Jorge Peña

Welcome and Prayer

Prayer for our Youth

Let us remember that we are gathered in the presence of God.

God, our Father, we thank You for the gift of love and the gift of life. We thank You for the gift of our children. We ask You to send Your holy angels to protect and guide them each day so that they will walk the narrow path of purity, self-control, and obedience as was taught to us by Your own Son, Jesus Christ. We ask this through Jesus Christ our Lord, in the union with the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Webinar Objectives

3:30 – 3:50 Objective 1- Evaluate the 2014-15 Continuous School Improvement Plan- Step 5

3:50 – 4:05 Objective 2- Update the School Profile Data- Step 1 and review the Improvement Goals- Step 2

4:05 – 4:35 Objective 3- Update the Planning Process- Step 3

4:35 – 4:45 Objective 4- Answer Archdiocese of Chicago Assurances and upload the Continuous School Improvement Plan

Webinar Norms

1. Take an inquiry position: ask “why” questions

2. Ground statements in evidence: “Give me an example;” Define, identify, explain; and data, observations, and evidence are used

3. Assume positive intentions: assume positive intentions from stakeholders;

4. Start and end on time: self-explanatory

5. Stick to protocol: stay on task to address the issues at hand

6. Be here now: avoid distractions (cell phone, email, internet, etc.)

Continuous ImprovementFive Elements

2. Set Goals:

90th Percentile

in Reading and

Math

3. Plan: Identify

measurable learning

objectives, instructional

strategies, student

activities, resources,

and timeline

5. Evaluate: assessed

what worked well and

adapt the Continuous

School Improvement Plan

1. Analyze Data: What

does the data show?

4. Implement: monitor

student proficiency with

Student On-track Report

Evaluate the 2014-15 Continuous School Improvement Plan

• Answer the diagnostic questions in Step 5 of the Continuous School Improvement Plan

Diagnostic Questions:

Context for Evaluating Interventions1. What are the reading and math Mean NCE (March 2015) results in grades 3, 5, and 7 and ACT Aspire core results for grade 8?

2. What percent of students scored at or above the 90th percentile in reading?

3. What is the achievement gap in reading between the actual performance and the goal?

4. What percent of students scores at or above the 90th percentile in math?

5. What is the achievement gap in math between the actual performance and the goal?

6. Did the professional development prepare the teacher(s) to fulfill the goals?

7. How did teacher evaluations for 2014-15 reflect attainment of the measurable objectives for each grade level?

8. Was the quality of the educational materials satisfactory to fulfill the goals?

9. What adjustments to the curriculum, instructional strategies, assessments, or educational materials were made when student performance on progress reports and report card grades were analyzed for on-track reporting for each academic quarter?

10. Was the Planning Process (Step 3) executed with fidelity?

11. Was the Planning Process (Step 3) used satisfactory to fulfill the goals?

12. Was the Implementation Process (Step 4) executed with fidelity?

13. Was the Implementation Process used (Step 4) satisfactory to fulfill the goals?

14. Were there any unforeseen factors that had a positive or negative impact on the progress to fulfill to goals?

15. What changes or adjustments are going to be made for next year’s continuous school improvement plan?

Evaluate the 2014-15 Continuous School Improvement Plan

Exemplar: Mother Teresa Continuous School Improvement Plan

Question #4. What percent of students score at or above the 90th

percentile in math? Answer: The percent of students that scored at or above the 90th percentile in math in grade 3 is 30%, grade 4 is 34%, grade 5 is 22%, grade 6 is 28%, and grade 7 is 32%.

Question #5. What is the achievement gap in math between the actual performance and the goal? Answer: There is an achievement gap in math in grade 3 by 6.4 mean NCE points (76-69.6), in grade 4 by 6 mean NCE points (76-70), in grade 5 by 8.9 mean NCE points (76-62.9), in grade 6 by 8.7 mean NCE points, and in grade 7 by 9.5 mean NCE points. An achievement gap that is greater than or equal to 7 mean NCE points is significant. The achievement gap between student performance and the performance goal is significant in grades 5, 6, and 7.

Evaluate the 2014-15 Continuous School Improvement Plan

Exemplar: Mother Teresa Continuous School Improvement Plan

Question #15. What changes or adjustments are going to be made for next year’s continuous school improvement plan? Answer: Next year’s Continuous School Improvement Plan will identify specific subskills tied to one or two objectives as identified on the TerraNova assessment. Even though the Aspire summative assessment will be administered next year, the identified subskills are measured by the Aspire summative assessment.

Webinar Objectives

3:30 – 3:50 Objective 1- Evaluate the 2014-15 Continuous School Improvement Plan- Step 5

3:50 – 4:05 Objective 2- Update the School Profile Data- Step 1 and identify the Measurable Improvement Goals- Step 2

4:05 – 4:35 Objective 3- Update the Planning Process- Step 3

4:35 – 4:45 Objective 4- Answer Archdiocese of Chicago Assurances and upload the Continuous School Improvement Plan

Update the School Profile Data- Step 1

• Complete the table in step 1 for all grades tested

• Use 2013, 2014, and 2015 Mean NCE for reading and math

• Identify the TN Performance Level on the table for reading and math for grades 3, 5, and 7 for 2012-2014

Identify the Improvement Goals- Step 2

• Goal # 1 Reading: All students in grades 3, 5, and 7 will perform at the 90th percentile

• Goal # 2 Math: All students in grades 3, 5, and 7 will perform at the 90th

percentile

• Goal #3 Optional Academic Goal: _________________________

Webinar Objectives

3:30 – 3:50 Objective 1- Evaluate the 2014-15 Continuous School Improvement Plan- Step 5

3:50 – 4:05 Objective 2- Update the School Profile Data- Step 1 and identify the Measurable Improvement Goals- Step 2

4:05 – 4:35 Objective 3- Update the Planning Process- Step 3

4:35 – 4:45 Objective 4- Answer Archdiocese of Chicago Assurances and upload the Continuous School Improvement Plan

Update the Planning Process- Step 3

1. Identify the reading and math objectives and subskills that are the lowest performing on the TerraNova.

2. Align the TerraNova subskills to AoC Benchmarks

3. Develop teacher strategies that will address teaching and assessing the objectives and subskills

4. Develop student activities that will address learning and assessing the objectives and subskills

5. Identify resources to support teaching and assessing the objectives and subskills

6. Identify an assessment timeline to assess the skills

Update the Planning Process- Step 3

• Identify the reading and math objectives and subskills that are the lowest performing

• Identify the lowest performing objective for the last three years

• Use CTB Online Reporting to generate the Summary Report: Objectives

Assessment Literacy: Summary Report Objectives

• NT = Number tested

• Mean OPI = Mean Objective Performance Index: approximate number of questions answered correctly out of 100 questions

• % in Mastery Category = percent of students that achieve mastery for an objective; defined as low mastery, moderate mastery, and high mastery

Update the Planning Process- Step 3• Identify the reading and

math the subskills that are the lowest performing

• Lowest performing objective: Reading and Writing Strategies

• Reading and Writing Strategies subskills: grade 3

– Summarize

– Apply genre criteria

– Vocabulary strategies

– Utilize structure

– Reading strategies

The Summary Report: Objectives

• Log into CTB Online Reporting

• Steps are found in Guide to CTB Online Reporting- Spring 2014

• Report #2- Summary Report Objectives

Align TerraNova Subskills with AoC Benchmarks

TerraNova Subskills- Reading and Writing Strategies for grade 3

1. Summarize

2. Apply genre criteria

3. Vocabulary strategies

4. Utilize structure

5. Reading strategies

AoC Benchmark: Domain and Strand

1. Domain- Reading Standards for Literature, Strand- Key Ideas and Details

2. Domain- Reading Standards for Literature, Strand- Craft and Structure

3. Domain- Reading Standards Foundational Skills, Strand- Fluency

4. Domain- Reading Standards for Literature, Strand- Craft and Structure

5. Domain- Language Standards, Strand-Conventions of Standard English

Let’s pause for Questions

Step 3: Update the Planning Process- Mother Teresa Exemplar

1. Identify the reading and math objectives and subskills that are the lowest performing on the TerraNova.

2. Align the TerraNova subskills to AoC Benchmarks

3. Develop teacher strategies that will address teaching and assessing the objectives and subskills. Professional development opportunities to support and fulfill the objectives and skills.

4. Develop student activities that will address learning and assessing the objectives and subskills

5. Identify resources to support teaching and assessing the objectives and subskills

6. Identify an assessment timeline to assess the skills

Webinar Objectives

3:30 – 3:50 Objective 1- Evaluate the 2014-15 Continuous School Improvement Plan- Step 5

3:50 – 4:05 Objective 2- Update the School Profile Data- Step 1 and identify the Measurable Improvement Goals- Step 2

4:05 – 4:35 Objective 3- Update the Planning Process- Step 3

4:35 – 4:45 Objective 4- Answer Archdiocese of Chicago Assurances and upload the Continuous School Improvement Plan

Answer Archdiocese of Chicago Assurances and upload the Continuous School Improvement Plan

1. Answer Archdiocese of Chicago Assurances in AdvancED Assist

a) Log into AdvancED ASSIST

b) Click on the “Assurances” tab

c) Click Start Assurance button

d) Select Archdiocese of Chicago Catholic Schools Assurances. In the Description box, enter “2015-16”

2. Upload the Continuous School Improvement Plan through the assurance, “An evidence-based continuous school improvement plan is developed, implemented, assessed, and reviewed annually.”

Any further questions?

What’s Next?

1. Organize for collaborative work

2. Evaluate and update the Continuous School Improvement Plan

3. Principal to answer Archdiocese of Chicago Assurances and upload CSIP 2015-16 in AdvancED ASSIST by June 12

Plus and Delta Protocol

+ Plus

What worked well about the workshop?

For example, workshop objectives were met

∆ Delta

What should change for the next workshop?

For example, not all participants acknowledged

the “be here now” norm

Thank you for all that you do on behalf of Catholic schools