Upload
others
View
11
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub –
Project Overview
Presented by:
Dr. P. Kolovopoulos 15/09/2015
UTVSI
Agenda
Project Objectives
Project Implementation Strategy
Activities
Initial Period Activities & Adjusted Implementation
Utility Assessment Reports
Network Data Reporting
Commercial Data Evaluations
Operation of the AM Cloud
Conferences & Workshops
Training Material
Dissemination Activities
Project Challenges & Sustainability
Assistance in creating a GIS based Asset register of the Water Supply Network
Dissemination of a methodology and management assistance in the generation and interpretation of Management Reports at all levels based upon technical and commercial inputs, formulating appropriate decisions.
Utility performance assessment, through the involvement of industry experts to help analyse the Utility’s performance and to identify appropriate remedial and proactive activities
Support for regular System audits, identifying problem areas both with regard to usage of the system and business procedures.
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Project Objectives
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Types of Services/Reporting & Project Implementation Strategy
Utility Assessment Reporting (UAR)
Asset Register Evaluation (ARE)
Commercial Data Evaluation (CDE)
Un-Accounted for Water Analysis (UFW)
Maintenance Records Analysis (MRA)
Financial Assets Evaluation (FAE)
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Planning (MRP)
Agenda
Project Objectives
Project Implementation Strategy
Activities
Initial Period Activities & Adjusted Implementation
DATA & SYSTEMS
Item Topic Description Response
Is Cadastral Data (plots) available in CAD or GIS? YES
If yes do plots have a unique number? YES
If yes do plots have Land-use assigned to them? YES
Is Buildings/ Properties Data available in CAD or GIS?
Is Streets & house numbers available in CAD or GIS? partially
Are Administrative divisions (municipal, towns ...) available ? YES (depending on cadastral territory)
Is recent Satellite Imagery available? (orhophotos) yes
Are contour maps (or spot heights) available in CAD or GIS? partially
Is Billing data in electronic format? partially
Do you have history (in electronic format) of meter readings? exist
Do you have history (in electronic format) of customer
transaction/bill data?
YES
Is the Plot number (if Cadastral data exists) included in the
meter database?
NO
Do you have the coordinates of the connection/ meter (GPS) in
the database?
NO
How accurate and up-to-date is the customer database?
Specify a percentage you think is right?
98.00%
Not available at all
Available in plans (paper hard copies)
Availability in CAD 100.00%
Availability in GIS 100.00%
Not available at all
Available in plans (paper hard copies)
Availability in CAD 100.00%
Availability in GIS 100.00%
Have pressure/head zones been defined for the network? YES
If yes, please define number of pressure zones 4
If yes, are the zones metered (bulk meters)? NO
Number of bulk meters installed in the network 13
Do you have history of bulk meter readings? YES
Number (or %) of bulk meters linked on telemetry 10
Have DMA zones been defined for the network? NO
If yes please define number of DMA zones
Do you actively monitor DMA leakage? NO
Do you implement leak reduction activities? YES
If yes, do you keep records of leakages and repairs ? YES
1. Availability of Data
1 Background data (yes/no)
2 Billing Data (yes/no)
3 Transmission Network (bulk
supply) (specify %)
4 Distribution Network
(specify %)
5 Zoning
6 Bulk Metering
7 Leakage Control
Networks
Avail. In
GIS
Networks
Avail. In
CAD
Networks
available in
CAD or GID
Networks
Avail. In
Plans
Networks
not Avail.
At all
Billing
data
GPS
Conne-
ctions
Bulk
Meters
history
Cadastral
(Plots)GIS GIS CAD
CAD
or GISMaint.
Compl.
Mng,SCADA
Asset
Mngment
Billing
System
Distributi
on/ NRW
Network
Analysis
Water
Quality
1 Banja Luka Bosnia Hercegovina 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% Yes no Yes Yes ArcGIS 1 AutoCAD 1 GIS no Yes ProtOK Oracle no no in-house
2 Kozarska Dubica Bosnia Hercegovina 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% Yes Yes Yes Yes MapInfo 1 AutoCAD 1 no no no no In-house
(Access)
no Epanet no
3 Niksic Montenegro 60% 0% 60% 60% 40% Yes
(Partial)
Yes
(Partial)
Partial Yes Yes 1 No 1 No No Yes No Yes No No No
4 Subotica Serbia 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% Yes
(Partial)
No No Yes MapInfo 1 AutoCAD 1 no APEX -
ORACLE
LOOK OUT
/VIJEOCITECT
No Oracle No Epanet Visual
FoxPro
5 Bijeljina Bosnia Hercegovina 10% 90% 90% 20% 20% Yes no Yes Yes ArcGIS 1 AutoCAD 1 no no Yes no In-house no Aquanet no
6 Smederevo Serbia 60% 60% 60% 90% 10% Yes no no Yes GEOMEDIA 1 AutoCAD 1 No No No No Informix No No No
7 Budva Montenegro 80% 0% 80% 0% 20% Yes Yes Yes Yes ArcGIS 1 no 1 no no no no no no no no
8 Bosanska Krupa Bosnia Hercegovina 30% 0% 30% 99% 1% Yes no Yes Yes Yes 1 no 1 no no Yes no no no no no
9 Gračanica Bosnia Hercegovina 0% 90% 90% 90% 10% Yes no Yes Yes MapInfo 1 AutoCAD 1 no no Scada
Lookout
"Albatros"
Infonet,
Tuzla
SQL
Server
("Albatros"
CheckCA
LCS i
PMAC
Epanet no
10 Zenica Bosnia Hercegovina 0% 80% 80% 0% 20% Yes No Yes Yes No 0 Yes 1 No No Yes No Oracle No No No
11 Srebrenik Bosnia Hercegovina 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% No No Yes No No 0 No 0 No No Yes No Yes No No No
12 Velika Kladuša Bosnia Hercegovina 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% Yes No Yes No No 0 No 0 PIS
Infosys
PIS
Infosys
Yes No SQL
Server
(PIS
No No Yes
13 Gornji Milanovac Serbia 30% 20% 30% 30% 70% Yes no Yes Yes Arc_FMUT-
Aed Sicad,
Trimble
1 AutoCAD 1 no no Scada Multi -
MapNet+
partially
through
OMNIS
Oracle
(OMNIS
"PULLS")
no no no
14 Probistip R.Makedonija 0% 0% 0% 35% 65% Yes
(90%)
No No No No 0 No 0 No No No No Yes No No Yes
15 Vitez Bosnia Hercegovina 0% 0% 0% 30% 70% No No Yes Yes No 0 No 0 No No Yes No Oracle
(PIS)
No No No
16 Neum Bosnia Hercegovina 0% 0% 0% 30% 70% No no Partial No No 0 No 0 No No Yes
(Partial)
no Winkom
MATSYS
(SQL
no no no
17 Cazin Bosnia Hercegovina 0% 30% 30% 30% 70% Yes no Yes Yes No 0 No 0 Yes No Yes No No No No No
Data Systems
# Muncipality Country
Genera
l
Data
Syste
ms
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Initial Period Activities & Adjusted Implementation
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Initial Period Activities & Adjusted Implementation
Group I (4 Municipalities): These Municipalities have gone through extensive network data
capture exercises and it is considered that they have collected most of their data. They have
active GIS/CAD systems/units.
Group II (6 Muncipalities): These Municipalities have collected more than 60-70% of their network
data and are using some form of CAD/GIS.
Group III (7 Muncipalities): These Municipalities have more than 25% to 30% of the networks
unknown, or they have networks only in hard copy plans and they have very little knowledge/use
of GIS/CAD systems.
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Initial Period Activities
The results indicate that most of the Municipalities are involved in some form
of leakage detection activities; however, without proper mapping of the actual
network assets, the exercise has very limited effect.
Some of the questionnaire replies regarding the operations and management of
zoning indicate that the Utilities do not fully understand or appreciate the
importance of zoning and training will be needed to address this problem, i.e.
Many Utilities (9 out of 17) reported that do not know or manage their
pressure zones.
Most Utilities (11 out of 17) reported that they do not have DMA zoning.
Some of the Utilities that reported that their DMA zones are being
monitored, either they do not have telemetry or they do not have bulk
meters.
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Initial Period Activities
The initial assessment
indicates high levels of
NRW for all the
Municipalities in the
range of 40% to 60% and
high levels of leakage
and unbilled
consumption.
These results confirm
that the Utility problems
are not only technical
but also commercial and
that parallel actions will
have to be implemented
in term of commercial
rehabilitation programs.
Agenda
Project Objectives
Project Implementation Strategy
Activities
Initial Period Activities & adjusted implementation
Utility Assessment Reports
Objective assessment of Utility’s performance
Quantifies lost revenues and excessive production and
distribution costs attributable to the different components
of non-revenue water
Recommends achievable performance objectives
Identifies and prioritises the different remedies that will
result in the performance objectives being achieved
Provides guidelines for systems and projects necessary
to achieve the recommended performance objectives
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Utility Assessment Reporting
a. Properties Unit Value
Formal properties (households) Number 458,684
a. Connections/Meters Unit Value
Private connections - metered Number 50,000
Private connections - unmetered Number 388,684
b. Billed Consumption Unit Value
Private connections Ml/year 116,000
Large consumers Ml/year 43,000
c. Unbilled Consumption Unit Value
Unbilled authorised consumption Ml/year 9,400
d. Sales (Billed Water Consumption) Unit Value
Sales to private connections €/year 13,880,033
Sales to large consumers €/year 15,714,733
e. Debt Recovery Unit Value
% Debt recovery from private
connections
% 82%
% Debt recovery from large consumers % 86%
f. Rates (Tariffs & Accrual Costs) Unit Value
Fixed production & distribution cost €/year 42,080,233
Variable production & distribution cost €/m3 0.10
g. Sewer Charges (If Applicable) Unit Value
Sewer charges per fixed per property €/property 1.79
2. Commercial & Financial
1. Town Planning Statistics
3. Technical Statisticsa. Production Unit Value
Present total production Ml/year 231,200
b. Network Data Unit Value
% of time system is pressurised % 100%
Length of mains Km 2,802.0
c. Nightflow (If Available) Unit Value
Total nightflow % 22.6%
Total night consumption % 20%
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Utility Assessment Reporting
Water Audit (volumes) Ml/year %
Total Production 231,200
Revenue Water (Billed & Collected) 131,537 56.9%
Non-Revenue Water 99,663 43.1%
Revenue Water breakdown 131,537
Private Connections 94,772 72.0%
Large Consumers 36,765 28.0%
Non-Revenue Water breakdown 99,663
Bad debts (from consumption) 27,463 27.6%
Unbilled consumption 28,333 28.4%
Wastage & Internal leakage 3,314 3.3%
Leakage 40,553 40.7%
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Utility Assessment Reporting
Non-Revenue water breakdown
(current conditions)
27,463
Ml/year
3,314
Ml/year
40,553
Ml/year28,333
Ml/year
Bad debts (from consumption) Unbilled consumption
Wastage & Internal leakage Leakage
Changes from present to future status
Ml/year % Ml/year % Ml/year % overall %
Non-Revenue Water Decrease Breakdown 99,663 16,409 83,254 83.5% 100%
NRW decrease from Bad debts 27,463 4,246 23,217
Private Connections 21,228 77.3% 4,246 100.0% 16,982 80% 20.4%
Large Consumers 6,235 22.7% 0 0.0% 6,235 100% 7.5%
NRW decrease from Unbilled Consumption 28,333 2,494 25,839
Illegal Unknown Connections 6,010 21.2% 1,202 48.2% 4,808 80% 5.8%
Meter problems 6,462 22.8% 646 25.9% 5,816 90% 7.0%
Meter readings problems 6,462 22.8% 646 25.9% 5,816 90% 7.0%
Large Consumers 9,400 33.2% 0 0.0% 9,400 100% 11.3%
NRW decrease from Wastage & Internal Leakage 3,314 663 2,651
Private Connections - Wastage 1,206 36.4% 241 36.4% 965 80% 1.2%
Private Connections - Internal Leakage 1,206 36.4% 241 36.4% 965 80% 1.2%
Illegal/Unknown Connections - Wastage 601 18.1% 120 18.1% 481 80% 0.6%
Illegal/Unknown Connections - Internal Leakage 300 9.1% 60 9.1% 240 80% 0.3%
NRW decrease from Leakage 40,553 9,007 31,546
connections 9,607 23.7% 961 10.7% 8,646 90% 10.4%
badly corroded pipes 3,095 7.6% 309 3.4% 2,785 90% 3.3%
visible bursts 7,736 19.1% 774 8.6% 6,963 90% 8.4%
bad circulation/zoning 7,736 19.1% 0 0.0% 7,736 100% 9.3%
major non-visible 10,831 26.7% 5,416 60.1% 5,416 50% 6.5%
tanks 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0%
minor non-visible 1,547 3.8% 1,547 17.2% 0 0% 0.0%
Current After increase
Non-Revenue Water Decrease Breakdowm
31,546
23,21725,839
2,651
05,000
10,00015,000
20,00025,000
30,00035,000
NRW decrease
from Bad
debts
NRW decrease
from Unbilled
Consumption
NRW decrease
from Wastage
& Internal
Leakage
NRW decrease
from Leakage
Ml / year
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Utility Assessment Reporting
unit CurrentAfter
RecoveryChange
Main Indicators
Number of billed private connections 438,684 454,684 3.6%
System Input (Production) Ml/year 231,200 197,003 -14.8%
Non-Revenue Water Ml/year 99,663 16,409 -83.5%
Average Daily Real Losses Ml/year 40,553 9,007 -77.8%
Billed Revenue €/year 29,594,766 34,997,081 18.3%
Collected Revenue €/year 24,776,084 34,489,072 39.2%
Production cost €/year 65,200,233 55,556,286 -14.8%
Debt recovery % 83.7% 98.5% 17.7%
Gross profit (yearly) % -136.6% -60.2% n/a
Non-Revenue Water (% of System Input): % 43.1% 8.3% -80.7%
Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI): >=1 8.5 2.6 -69.3%
Real Losses
Average Daily Real Losses when system is pressurised Ml/day 111.10 24.68 -77.8%
Technical Indicator for Real Losses (TIRL) - (when pressurised) 30 - 200 l/day/conn 253.27 54.27 -78.6%
Density of Connections (billed private connections) conn/km 156.56 162.27 3.6%
Real Losses as % of System Input % 17.5% 4.6% -73.9%
Real Losses per length of main kl/day/km 39.65 8.81 -77.8%
Average Selling rates / Cost rates €/m3 YUM/m3 tariff
Selling rate for private connections €/m3 0.12 7.73 6 - 9
Selling rate for large consumers €/m3 0.37 23.61 23
Selling rate to Kiosks €/m3 0.00
Selling rate to users of public taps €/m3 0.00
Selling rate for sewer charges per property €/prop/mon 1.79
Present cost rate of water €/m3 0.28
Cost rate of water after recovery €/m3 0.31
Performance Indicators
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Utility Assessment Reporting
-15%
-84%
-78%
18%
39%
-15%
18%
-81%
-69%
-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40%
%
System Input (Production)
Non-Revenue Water
Average Daily Real Losses
Billed Revenue
Collected Revenue
Production cost
Debt recovery
Non-Revenue Water (% of System Input):
Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI):
Change in Key Performance Indicators
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Utility Assessment Reporting
Real Losses as a % of System Input Volume versus Consumption for
different values of Real Losses
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
Total Consumption (litres/connection/day)
Real L
osses a
s %
of
Syste
m In
pu
t
50 l/serv conn/day
100 l/serv conn/day
200 l/serv conn/day
500 l/serv conn/day
1000 l/serv conn/day
Current
After Rehabilitation
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Utility Assessment Reporting
Agenda
Project Objectives
Project Implementation Strategy & Adjusted Implementation
Activities
Initial Period Activities
Utility Assessment Reports
Network Data Reporting
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Asset Register Evaluation-Deliverables
GIS Data Evaluation Reports (Group III)
Basic AM Reports (Groups I, II, III)
Network Data Validation Reports-NDV (Group I)
Objectives
the building up of a Validated Network Asset Register,
[essential for Asset & Maintenance Management & Infrastructure Planning]
Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Building & Validating the Asset Registry
# Indicators Unit [No/%] Total
1 General AM Hub Services Indicators Overall
1.1 No of employees that attended
Workshops
no of employees 51
1.2 Access of AM Hub Services - On line no of Utilities (4) 41.3 Access of AM Hub Services - by Phone No. of phone calls per month 491.4 Access of AM Hub Services - by Email no of e-mails received/sent
per month59
2 Operation of the AM Cloud Service
2.1 Number of sessions no. of entries 1002.2 Duration (hours) no of hours 24.25
3Utility Assessment &
RecommendationsOverall
3.1 Collection of Utility Operational data % of total (18) 173.2 Validation of Utility Questionnaire data % of total (18) 133.3 Preparation of Utility Assessment
document
% of total (18) 13
3.4 Presentation and Agreement to
Recommendations by Utility
% of total (18) 12
4 Water Networks - Assets Register
Evaluation Phase
Per Municipality
4.1 Imported data to AM Cloud based GIS /
Setup in EDAMS
as % of no of Utilities to be
imported (4)4
4.2 Data Collection Progress- Field Survey Total Number of maps
completed during field survey
stage/ total no of maps OR
network length (km)
3,167
4.3 Data Collection Progress - Network
Captured
Total Number of maps
completed during data
capture stage/ total no of
maps
OR network length (km)
1,673
4.4 Data Collection Progress - Consumers
Captured
Total Number of maps
completed during data
capture stage/ total no of
maps
OR Consumers captures (No)
31,077
Data Requirements
Shapefile of current Network Asset Register, into EDAMS-GIS/ Network Data Management system
Activities
Importing data to EDAMS-NDM
Network Data Evaluation
Hydraulic Zones Definition
Zone Analysis
Publishing of data
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Network Data Validation (NDV)
Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Managing Discrepancies
ARE.1 Connectivity Problems
ARE.1.1 List of Chains not allocated to network
ARE.1.2 List of Nodes not allocated to network
ARE.1.3 List of Pipes not allocated to network
ARE.1.4 List of Valves not allocated to network
ARE.1.5 List of Closed Valves on Long chains
ARE.1.6 List of De-commissioned ChainsARE.2 Attribute Problems
ARE.2.1 List of Water Treatment Plants with missing hydraulic attributes
ARE.2.2 List of Tanks / Reservoirs with missing hydraulic attributes
ARE.2.3 List of Pump Stations with missing hydraulic attributes
ARE.2.4 List of Control Valves (PRV) with missing hydraulic attributes
ARE.2.5 Pipes not linked to LibrariesARE.3 Zoning Problems
ARE.3.1 Closed Valves within districts
ARE.3.2 Hydraulic Zones to be investigated
ARE.3.3 Mass Balancing Zones to be investigated
ARE.3.4 Head Zones to be investigated
ARE.3.5 Hydraulic zoning problems
ARE.3.6 Mass Balancing zoning problems
ARE.3.7 Head Zones zoning problems
Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Managing Discrepancies
Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Managing Discrepancies>Connectivity Problems
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Chains not allocated to zones
Nodes not allocated to Zones
Pipes not allocated to Zones
Valves not allocated to Zones
Closed Valves on Long chains
De-commissioned Chains
Connectivity Problems
ARE 1.4: List of Valves not allocated to networkElement
Id
Element Ref
218 V241
377 V564
726 Valve 25
729 Valve 28
749 Valve 49
3254 Valve 2582
3527 Valve 2859
3600 Valve 2932
18692 Valve 18692
18985 Valve 18985
20965 Valve 20965
21472 Valve 21472
Agenda
Project Objectives
Project Implementation Strategy & Adjusted Implementation
Activities
Initial Period Activities
Utility Assessment Reports
Network Data Reporting
Commercial Data Evaluations
identify the data problems in the existing billing systems and
recommend ways of rectifying them
correlate data with the field and bring up to date the billing system
collect missing data
identify actual problems in the field and recommend ways of
resolving them
review internal business procedures to safeguard data integrity
and consistency and achieve the best possible co-operation of the
different departments involved
reduce the commercial part of the un-accounted for water
Scope of Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Banja Luka CDE Report (Period: Sep 2013-Aug 2014)
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
Consumption Analysis
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Banja Luka CDE Report (Period: Sep 2013-Aug 2014)
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
Consumption Analysis
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Banja Luka CDE Report (Period: Sep 2013-Aug 2014)
5,960 5,753
13,694
1,727
32,494
12,223
0
2,068
23,889
0
4,642
19,914
591,193
10,97612,519
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
01 02 11 12 21 22 30 31 32 33 34 35 37 38 36 39
Metered vs Corrected daily consumption per Category (l/day)
Avg.Metered Consumption
Corrected Monthly Consumption
12,995
16,801
9,705
292
6,278
1,845
2
1,187
4101 136 408
13 4 6 3
25.9%
33.5%
19.4%
0.6%
12.5%
3.7%
0.0%
2.4%
0.8%0.0% 0.3%
0.8%0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
01 02 11 12 21 22 30 31 32 33 34 35 37 38 36 39
% n
o o
f c
on
ne
cti
on
s
Mete
red
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n (
Kl/d
ay)
Consumption Analysis (per Consumption Category Group)
25.9%
33.5%
19.4%
0.6%
12.5%
3.7%0.0%
2.4%0.8%0.0%0.3%0.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
% o
f co
nn
ect
ion
si
% o
f co
nsu
mp
tio
n
% no of connections vs % of actual consumption
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
High Consumers Analysis
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
JU S
TU
DE
NS
KI…
BA
NJA
LUC
KA
PIV
AR
A A
.D.
VO
DO
VO
DA
.D. C
ELI
NA
C
CE
NT
AR
ZA
RA
ZV
OJ
I…
CE
NT
AR
ZA
RA
ZV
OJ
I…
C.Z
A R
AZ
.SE
LA-…
KP
BU
DU
CN
OS
T a
.d.…
KP
BU
DU
CN
OS
T a
.d.…
KP
BU
DU
CN
OS
T a
.d.…
MIN
.OD
BR
AN
E B
IH
TO
PLA
NA
A.D
.
BA
BIC
MLA
DE
N
VO
DO
VO
DA
.D. C
ELI
NA
C
VO
DO
VO
DA
.D. C
ELI
NA
C
GR
UP
A G
RA
ĐA
NA
-VID
IC i…
J.Z
.U D
OM
ZD
RA
VLJ
A
KLI
NIC
KI C
EN
TA
R B
.LU
KA
KLI
NIC
KI C
EN
TA
R B
.LU
KA
JU S
TU
DE
NS
KI…
HO
TE
L" B
OS
NA
" a.
d..
KLI
NIC
KI C
EN
TA
R B
.LU
KA
SA
MO
ST
AN
TR
AP
IST
I
ZA
VO
D Z
A R
EH
AB
. "D
R…
ZA
VO
D Z
A R
EH
AB
. "D
R…
CE
NT
AR
ZA
RA
ZV
OJ
I…
JU D
om z
a st
arija
lica
BL
UN
IVE
RZ
ITE
T B
AN
JA L
UK
A
KLI
NIC
KI C
EN
TA
R B
.LU
KA
VIT
AM
INK
A A
.D.
R.K
." B
OS
KA
" A
.D.
HE
MO
FA
RM
D.O
.O.
VIT
AM
INK
A A
.D.
Consum
ptio
n (
Kl per
day)
30 Largest Consumers
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Banja Luka CDE Report (Period: Sep 2013-Aug 2014)
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
Stuck Meters Analysis
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Banja Luka CDE Report (Period: Sep 2013-Aug 2014)
Meter Stuck
(no. of zero
times)
Meters (no.) Meters (%)
Consumpti
on
(Kl/day)
Consumption
(%)
Recorded
Consumption
(l/day/conn)
Assumed
Lost
Consumption
Kl*
a b c d e f=b*1000/d f*d*b*a*30
1 1,582 22.0% 744 87.7% 470 22,307
2 1,233 17.1% 70 8.2% 57 4,193
3 1,853 25.8% 10 1.2% 6 941
4 123 1.7% 12 1.4% 96 1,419
5 232 3.2% 9 1.1% 39 1,366
6 69 1.0% 1 0.1% 18 227
7 61 0.8% 1 0.1% 20 262
8 93 1.3% 1 0.1% 7 163
9 111 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 7
10 392 5.4% 0 0.0% 0 0
11 1,075 14.9% 0 0.0% 0 0
12 361 5.0% 0 0.0% 0 0
13 8 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0
7,193 100% 848 100% 30,884
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Avg C
onsum
ption o
f stu
ck m
ete
rs
Nu
mb
er
of
Stu
ck M
ete
rs
Number of readings with zero consumption
Stuck Meters (Readings with zero consumption)
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
Commercial Data Analysis Summary
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Banja Luka CDE Report (Period: Sep 2013-Aug 2014)
3,635
619
1,219
5
3,775
1,856
Estimated Commercial Losses due to meter discrepancies
No Meter High Stuck Oversized Low No valid reading
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
Commercial Data Analysis Summary
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Banja Luka CDE Report (Period: Sep 2013-Aug 2014)
Assumed
Illegal / unregistered Connections 1,001 300 110 50% 54.8 70% 38.4
Calculated from Commercial data evaluation
meters w ith unknow n age* 0 1% 0.0 20% 0.0
meters older than 10 years* 0 20% 0.0 20% 0.0
high consumers >10Kl/day 2,255 9,021.4 7,425 10% 742.5 20% 148.5
Broken/ stuck meters
13 mm 1,454 16.2 9 100% 8.6 90% 7.7
20 mm 143 24.3 1 100% 1.3 90% 1.1
25 mm 55 21.1 0 100% 0.4 90% 0.4
30 mm 44 1.6 0 100% 0.0 90% 0.0
50 mm 679 13.6 3 100% 3.4 90% 3.0
80 mm 106 9.3 0 100% 0.4 90% 0.3
100 mm 22 9.1 0 100% 0.1 90% 0.1
Oversized Meters
30 mm 50 1,057 19 30% 5.8 50% 2.9
40 mm 29 1,098 12 30% 3.5 50% 1.7
50 mm 73 704 2,348 30% 704.4 50% 352.2
80 mm 41 765 3,715 30% 1,114.5 50% 557.3
100 mm 5 648 1 30% 0.4 50% 0.2
Suspect residential consumers (not part of NRW)
-> Residential > 15m3 140 24,363 1,245 10% 124.5 100% 124.5
Totals 2,640 1,114
% Ml/year
Flow lost
(Ml/year)
recovery
From CDA Analysis
Quantity
(no.of
conn)
Usage
(l/day/conn)
Quantity
(Ml/year)
% flow
lost
Benefit
Agenda
Project Objectives
Project Implementation Strategy & Adjusted Implementation
Activities
Initial Period Activities
Utility Assessment Reports
Network Data Reporting
Commercial Data Evaluations
Operation of the AM Cloud
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
Recommendations
Cloud solution alternative provides
major benefits for Utilities, i.e.:
Better utilization of resources.
Frees administrative resources by
outsourcing non-core applications
Reduces IT capital requirements
with an elastic pay-as-you-go
operating expense model
Improves data protection with
affordable backup and disaster
recovery
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Operation of the AM Cloud
Dec- Jan Feb-March April-May
Number of
sessions
Duration (hours)
Number of
sessions
Duration (hours)
Number of
sessions
Duration (hours)
Banja Luka 46 16 20 12 25 14
Kozarska Dubica 14 0.5 8 1 10 2
Niksic 22 7.5 15 5 9 6
Subotica 18 0.25 18 1 .50 2
Agenda
Project Objectives
Project Implementation Strategy & Adjusted Implementation
Activities
Initial Period Activities
Utility Assessment Reports
Network Data Reporting
Commercial Data Evaluations
Operation of the AM Cloud
Conferences & Workshops
Training Material
Dissemination Activities
Project Challenges & Sustainability
The IAWD AM hub uses the latest available AM technology capitalizing on the development efforts and knowledge built in Belgrade Water Works over the last 10 years.
BWS has already a pool of available resources trained in AM techniques and systems that can provide the services and use the existing infrastructure
The AM needs to operate through cloud technology, enabling much easier participation of Utilities.
IAWD needs to evaluate the development of a business model to maintain and support the activities on a cost recovery basis after the completion of the project.
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Sustainability of Centre /Project & Challenges
Questions & Discussion