Icam Family

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    1/15

    Immunologic Research 1998; 17/3:313-32 7

    The Intercellular Adhesion Molecule(ICAM) Fam ily of ProteinsNew Membersand Novel Functions ICOS Corporation, Bothell, WA.

    AbstractMacro molecu lar adhesive associations between cel ls are

    important for transmitting spatial and temporal informationthat is critical for imm une sy stem function. One such group ofproteins, the intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs), hasgrow n as newly identified mem bers are revealed. In addition,the functions of the ICAM s, in general, have begun to be betterunderstood, including intracel lular signal ing events. Thisinformation has led to the design of novel therapeutic agentsthat may prove ef fective in a variety of disease states.

    Key WordsIntercellular adhesion mol-eculesSignalingTherapeutics

    IntroductionIntercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs),

    are a family of related cell surface glycopro-teins as defined by the criteria of polypeptidesequence homology, conserved [~2 integrinligands, and, in most cases, genetic linkage.Each IC AM protein has extracel lular C-typeimmunog lobu l in - l i ke domains rang ing innumb er from two to nine making them mem -bers of the immun oglobulin superfamily (1) .Desp ite their structural similarity and integrin-binding capability, these proteins are expre ssedon a wide range of cell types, with very dis-tinct patterns of gene regulation and down-stream effector behaviors. Rece nt data reveal

    that ICAM engage men t triggers outside-in sig-nals that effect cellular responses. This articlesumm arizes the current level of understandingregarding ICA M-triggered outside-in signalingevents and recent developments in the area ofnewly characterized ICAM proteins.

    With the discovery of new mem bers of thisprotein family, we propose that a commonnaming system be adopted for the currentlyknown ICA M fam ily mem bers. These and anyadditional members should be given numeri-cal designations based on the chronology oftheir discovery. Given the numerical assign-ments to ICAM- 1, ICAM-2, and ICAM-3, webel ieve i t i s appropria te to des ignate the

    Dr. Joel S. Hayt]ick 9 1998[COS Corp. Huma na Press Inc.22021 20th Ave. SE 0257-277X/98/Bothell, WA 98021 17/3:313-32 7/$11.75E-mail: [email protected]

    313

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    2/15

    L a n d s t e i n e r - W e i n e r ( L W ) b l o o d g r o u p an ti -g e n a s IC A M - 4 a n d t e l e n c e p h a li n a s IC A M - 5 .ICAM- ! (CD54)

    I C A M - I i s a 7 6 - 1 1 4 - k D a s u r f a c e g l y c o -p r o t e i n th a t h a s fi v e e x tr a c e l l u la r i m m u n o g l o -b u l i n - l i k e d o m a i n s ( 2 , 3 ) . A m o t i f w i th i nd o m a i n s 1 a n d 3 o f I C A M - 1 h a s b e e n s h o w nto be c r i t i ca l fo r b ind ing to the ~ 2 i n t egr insl y m p h o c y t e f u n c t i o n - a s s o c i a t e d a n t i g e n(LF A)- 1 (CD 1 I a /CD 18) and M ac- 1, r e spec -t iv e l y (C D 1 l b / C D I 8 ) (4,5). I n t e g r i n b i n d i n gt o I C A M - 1 i s r e g u l a t e d b y a f f i n i t y a n d a v i d i t yc h a n g e s . T h r o u g h t h e s e i n te r a c t i o n s w i thL FA - 1 a n d M a c - 1 , I C A M - 1 p l a y s a n i m p o r -t an t r o l e i n l e u k o c y t e - l e u k o c y t e , e p i t h e l i a l -l e u k o c y t e , a n d e n d o t h e l i a l - le u k o c y t e c o n ta c t.As p a r t o f b o t h t h e c e l l u l a r a n d h u m o r a l i m -m u n e r e s p o n e d u r i n g l e u k o c y t e - l e u k o c y t ec o n t a c t , IC A M- 1 se r v e s as an a c c e s so r y p r o -t e in f o r a n t i g e n r e c e p t o r a c t i v a t io n o n B a n d Tcel l s (6) (see R e c e n t D e v e l o p m e n t s i n O u t -s i d e -I n S i g n a l i n g a n d C y t o p l a s m i c F u n c t i o n so f I C A M P r o t e i n s ) . E x p r e s s e d b a s a ll y o nm a n y c e ll l i n e ag e s o f m e s y n c h y m a l o r ig i n , th el ev e ls o f s u r f a c e I C A M - 1 p r o t e i n a r e m a r k -e d l y u p r e g u l a t e d a t t h e t r a n sc r i p t i o n a l l e v e lb y i n f l a m m a t o r y s t im u l i l ik e t u m o r n e c r o s isf a c t o r ( T NF ) , i n t e r fe r o n y a n d l i p o p o l y sa c c h a -r i d e (L PS) . T h e p r o t e i n a l so p l a y s a m a j o r r o l ed u r i n g l e u k o c y t e tr a n sm i g r a t i o n f ro m t h e v a s -c u l ar c o m p a r t m e n t d u r in g i m m u n e s u rv e il -l a n c e . I n th i s c o n t e x t , l e u k o c y t e s a r e t e t h e r e dv i a sp e c i f ic c a r b o h y d r a t e m o i t i e s to s e l e c t i n s ,a s we l l a s ve ry l a t e an t igen-4 (VLA-4) b ind-i n g to V C A M - 1, b o t h o f w h i c h m e d i a t e le u k o -c y t e r o l l in g o n c y t o k i n e - a c t i v a t e d e n d o t h e l i a lc e ll s . L e u k o c y t e s b e a r i n g h i g h - a f f i n it y L FA - 1o r M a c - I t h e n a d h e r e f i r m l y t o t h e e n d o t h e -l i u m b y b i n d i n g t o I C A M - I t o i n it ia te t h ep r o c e s s o f tr a n s m i g r a t o r y e g r e s s f r o m t h ev a s c u l a t u r e (7). G i v e n t h e a f o r e m e n t i o n e dr o l e s o f I C AM - 1, m i c e d e f i c i e n t in i ts e x p r e s -s i o n t h r o u g h t a r g e t e d d i s r u p t i o n o f t h e g e n e

    h a v e n u m e r o u s in f l a m m a t o r y r e s p o n s e a b n o r -m a l i t ie s , i n c l u d i n g i m p a i r e d n e u t r o p h i l e m i -g r a t i o n , a n i n a b i l i t y t o s t i m u l a t e T c e l lp r o l if e r at io n i n m i x e d a l lo g e n e i c l y m p h o c y t ec u l t u r e s , r e s i s t a n c e t o s e p t i c sh o c k , a n d ar e d u c e d su sc e p t i b i l i t y t o c e r e b r a l i s c h e m i a -r e p e r f u s i o n i n j u r y ( 8 - 1 0 ) .I n t e r e s t i n g l y , I C AM- I i s u t i l i z e d b y s e v -e r al p a t h o g e n s t o i n f e c t h o s t c e l ls a n d e v a d ei m m u n e d e t e c t i o n . I t w a s i d e n t i f i e d a s t h em a j o r c e l l- su r f a c e r e c e p t o r f o r r h i n o v i r u s a n dP l a sm o d i u m f a l c i p a ru m ( 4 ,1 1 ). HI V p a r t ic l e sh a v e b e e n f o u n d t o i n c o r p o r a t e IC A M - 1 i n t ot h e v ir a l e n v e l o p e d u r i n g t h e b u d d i n g p r o c e s s ,r e su l t ing in inc rease d in fec t iv i ty tha t is ICA M -1 / L F A - I d e p e n d e n t (12) .ICAM -2 (CD1021

    T h e e x i s t en c e o f I C A M - 2 , a s e c o n d [3 2i n t egr in l i gand , was in fe r red by the inab i l i t yo f I C A M - 1 sp e c i f ic a n t i b o d i e s t o c o m p l e t e l yb l o c k t h e a d h e s i o n o f l e u k o c y t e s to e n d o t h e -l i a l m o n o l a y e r s (13) . I C A M - 2 i s e x p r e s s e dc o n s t i t u t i v e l y at l o w l e v e l s o n r e s t i n g l y m p h o -c y t e s a n d m o n o c y t e s a n d a t h i g h e r l e v e l s o nvascu la r endo the li a l ce ll s , bu t i s no t up regu la t edi n r e s p o n s e t o i n f l a m m a t o r y s t i m u l i a s i sI C A M - 1 (14) . I t s t wo e x t r a c e l l u l a r i m m u n o -g l o b u l i n - l i k e d o m a i n s a r e m o s t c l o se l y r e la t e dt o th e a m i n o t e r m i n a l d o m a i n s o f I C A M - l (15)(see T a b l e I f o r c o m p a r i so n s ) a n d v i a b i n d i n go f L F A - l , I C A M - 2 p l a y s an i m p o r t a n t r o le i ne n d o t h e l i a l - l e u k o c y t e i n te r a c ti o n s a s s o c ia t e dw i t h i n f la m m a t i o n (14) . E v i d e n c e a l so e x i s tst o su g g e s t th a t Ma c -1 is a li g a n d f o r I C AM - 2in a m a n n e r s i m i l a r t o t h a t p r e v i o u s l y d e m o n -s t ra t e d f o r I C AM - 1 (16) .

    An o u t s t a n d i n g i s su e y e t t o b e r e so l v e d i swh y e n d o t h e l i a l c e l l s e x p r e s s t wo d i f f e r e n tI C AM p r o t e i n s t h a t h a v e t h e s a m e i n t e g r i nl ig a n d , L F A - I . C o u l d t h e i r r e l a ti v e s i z es b e ac l u e t o t h e i r ro l e s i n a m u l t i - s t e p p r o c e s s t h a tr e su l t s i n f i r m l e u k o c y t e a t t a c h m e n t t o a c t i -v a te d e n d o t h e l i u m ? T h e s h a p e o f t h e I C A M - 1

    314 Hayf l i ck , Ki lgannon , and Gal la t in

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    3/15

    Table ! , Hum an ICAM fami ly Domains I and 2 (% amino ac id i den ti t y )"

    ICAM-1 34 77 26 64I C A M - 2 3 4 38 27 42ICAM -3 38 36 27 64ICAM -4 30 30 30 28ICA M-5 25 33 31 36

    aDomain 1, boldface; do ma in 2, italic.

    e x t r a c e l l u l a r r e g i o n w a s f o u n d t o b e a nextended rod of approx 16.6 nm (4). Eachimm uno glob ul in dom ain therefore forms sub-regions of 3-3.5 nm. ICAM -2 sho uld measure6.5 nm putt ing i ts LFA-1 binding si te muchcloser to the nega t ive ly charged plasma m em-brane. In a hypothetical stepwise model, LFA - 1wou ld engage ICAM-1 in it s fi rs t domain a tabout 16 nm fro m the l ipid surface. This bind-ing could displace negatively charg ed surfacemolecules on the oppo sing cells and el ici t bend-ing of the ICAM bringing dom ain 3, at approx9 nm from the surface, w ithin proximity of Mac- 1for binding to occur. As the cells are drawntogether and i f repuls ion by the nega t ive lycharged glycocalyx on each cel l ' s surface isreduced in this manner , then LFA-1 binding toICAM -2 at about 6 nm from the surface couldthen occur resulting in firm attachment.ICAM- (CDSO, CAM-R)

    ICAM-3 was soug ht by us and others basedon da ta tha t ICAM-l-spec i f ic and ICAM-2-specif ic antibody treatment par t ia l ly blockedLFA- l -dep ende nt homoty pic T ce l l aggrega-tion (14). U t il iz in g p r i m e r d e g e n e r a c y a n dt h e a m i n o a c i d s e q u e n c e c o n s e r v a t i o nb e t w e e n I C A M - 1 , - 2 a n d o t h e r C 2 - t y p eimmu noglo bul in domains , a polymerase cha inreac t ion product was genera ted and used top r o b e a c D N A l i b r a r y f r o m t h e h u m a nmyelo mon ocyt ic ce ll l ine , HL60. The deduce damino ac id sequence revea led tha t ICAM-3,

    l ike ICAM-1, was com pos ed of five ext ra -c e l l u la r i m m u n o g l o b u l i n - l i k e d o m ai ns(17-19). Dom ain- spec i f i c sequence hom ol -ogy wi th ICAM-1 ranged from 36-77% , wi thdomain 2 be ing most h ighly conserved (seeTable 1 fo r com par i son o f the f ir s t twodomains) and the region of leas t homologybe ing the cy top la sm ic t a i l , which m ay beref lected by differences in outside - in signalst r iggered by engagement of ICAM-3 versusICAM-1 (see Recent Developments in Out-s ide-In Signa l ing and Cy toplasmic Funct ionsof ICAM Proteins) .

    The integr in-binding propert ies and expres-sion pattern of ICAM -3 p ar t ial ly over lap withthose o f ICAM -1 and -2 . ICAM -3 b indsLFA - l , but apparently not Mac- 1 (20,21). TheICAM -3 binding s i te wi thin LFA-1 has beenlocalized to regions within the evolution ar i lyconserved I d omain of the ~-cha in (CDI l a )that over laps with, but is dist inct f rom, the si tefor ICAM - 1 binding . This obse rvation is use-ful for those laborator ies t rying to developI C A M - s p e c i f i c f u n c t i o n a l i n h i b i t o r s (seeN o v e l A r e a s o f T h e ra p e u t i c D e v e l o p m e n tInvo lv ing ICAM Bio logy) (22,23). In addi-t ion to LFA- 1 binding, ICAM-3 has been iden-t if ied as the prefered l igand for O~d~2, a recentlyd i scove red m em ber o f t he [~2 integr in family(24). In humans , th is in tegr in i s expressedhighly on cer tain t issue leukocytes, par t icu-la r ly macrophages , and on subse ts of b loodleukocytes (24). Given tha t the no rmal expres-

    The ICAM Protein Family 315

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    4/15

    s i o n p a t t e r n o f I C A M - 3 is h i g h o n a l l le u k o -c y t e s , b u t l a c k i n g o n e n d o t h e l i u m , it is l i k e lytha t i t p l ays an im por t an t ro l e in ea r ly even t sd u r in g l e u k o c y t e - l e u k o c y t e c o n t a c t , f o re x a m p l e B c e l l a c ti v a t i o n m e d i a t e d b y T c e l lh e l p o r T c e ll a c t i v a t i o n b y a n t i g e n - p r e se n t i n gc e ll s ( A P C s ) . M o n o c l o n a l a n t i b o d ie s ( M A b s )t o I C AM - 3 h a v e b e e n sh o w n to i n h i b i t p e r i p h -e ra l b lood lym ph ocy te p ro l i f e ra tion in re spon set o p h y t o h e m a g g l u t i n i n , a ll o g e n e ic s t im u l a t o rce l l s , and sp ec i f i c an t igen (25,26). I C A M - 3 ish i g h l y e x p r e s s e d o n e p i d e r m a l L a n g e r h a n sc e l ls w h e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f a l l o a n t i g e n o r p e p -t ide an t igen by thes e ce l l s t o CD4 + T ce l l s m ayr e q u i r e a n i n t e r a c t i o n b e t we e n I C AM- 3 a n dL F A - 1 ( 2 7 - 30 ) . T h u s , I C A M - 3 h a s an i m p o r -t a n t r o l e i n T c e l l s t i m u l a t i o n d r i v e n b yL a n g e r h a n s c e l l s . H o w e v e r , w h e n a c h r o n i ci n f l a m m a t o r y r e a c t i o n i n t h e s k i n o c c u r s ,T c e l l s t i m u l a t i o n l e a d s t o p a t h o l o g i c a l c o n -d i t i o n s s u c h a s p s o r i a s is , s o b l o c k a d e o fI C A M - 3 / L F A - 1 b i n d i n g m a y b e a n a t t r a c -t i v e t h e r a p e u t i c t a r g e t ( see N o v e l A r e a s o fT h e r a p e u t i c D e v e l o p m e n t I n v o l v i n g I C A MB i o l o g y ) ( 31 ) . U n l i k e i t s c l o s e r e l a t i v e s ,I C A M - 3 is n o t e x p r e s s e d o n n o r m a l o ra c t iv a t e d e n d o t h e l i u m p r e c l u d i n g i ts i n v o l v e -m e n t i n l e u k o c y t e - e n d o t h e l i a l a d h e s i o nu n d e r n o r m a l c i r c u m s t a n c e s . I n t e r e s t i n g l y ,d u r i n g n e o v a s c u l a r i z a t i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i t ht u m o r g r o w t h , I C A M - 3 e x p r e s s i o n is i n d u c e do n t h e v a s c u l a r e n d o t h e l i u m w h e r e i ts r o l e isy e t to b e d e f i n e d (32 ,33) .

    M e sse n g e r R NA b l o t a n a ly s i s d e m o n s t r a t e dt h e p r e se n c e o f t r a n sc ri p t s f o r I C AM - 3 i n le u -k o c y t e s i s o l at e d f ro m n u m e r o u s p r im a t e s s p e -c i e s , dogs , an d rabb i t s , bu t no t i n roden t ce l l s( P K i lg a n n o n , u n p u b l i s h e d d a ta ). C o n s i s t e n tw i t h t h e se r e su l t s, a t t e m p t s to c l o n e t h e r o d e n tI C A M - 3 h o m o l o g h a v e b ee n u n s u c c e s s fu l an di t is l ike ly tha t roden t s do no t hav e the ge ne t i ch o m o l o g o f I C A M - 3 . A l t h o u g h th i s s it u a ti o ni s unusua l , i t i s no t wi thou t p receden t . In t e r -l e u k i n 8 ( I L 8 ) i s a n o t h e r c a s e w h e r e i n a n

    i m p o r t a n t i m m u n e c e ll m e d i a to r f o u n d inh u m a n s i s a b se n t fr o m t h e r o d e n t g e n o m e (34) .S i n c e t h e m a j o r i n t e g r i n r e c e p t o r s f o rI C A M - 3 a re c o n s e r v e d i n r o d e n t s p e ci e s, w eh y p o t h e s i z e t h a t a n o t h e r p r o t e i n p e r f o r m st h e f u n c t i o n s o f IC A M - 3 , t h u s c o m p e n s a t i n gf o r t h e a b se n c e o f t h e g e n e .IC A M - 4 (IC A M - L W , L W B lo o d G r o u pGlycoprote in)

    T h e f o u r t h m e m b e r o f t h e I C A M f a m i ly , a sd e t e r m i n e d b y t h e c h r o n o l o g y o f i ts d i s c o v e r ya s su c h , is a b l o o d g r o u p a n t i g e n k n o w n a s t h eL a n d s t e i n e r W e i n e r ( L W ) g l y c o p r o t e i n (35).I t wa s d i s c o v e r e d a t t h e s a m e t i m e a s , a n d f o rm a n y y e a rs c o n f u s e d w i th , t h e R h b l o o d g r o u psy s t e m , s i n c e b o t h R h a n d L W d e f i c i e n c i e sa r e p h e n o t y p i c a l l y l i n k e d (36) . Ge n e t i c a l l y ,h o w e v e r , t h e se l o c i a re d i s t i n c t (37,38) . T h i s4 2 - k D a g l y c o p r o t e i n h a s b e e n f o u n d o n l y o ne r y t h r o c y t e s w h e r e i t i s l i n k e d t o t h es u b m e m b r a n o u s c y t o s k e l e t o n . R e c e n t l y , t h ed e d u c e d p o l y p e p t i d e s e q u e n c e s h o w e d t h a tI C A M - 4 c o n t a i n s t w o e x t r ac e l lu l a r i m m u n o -g l o b u l i n - l i k e d o m a i n s w i t h s i g n i f i c a n t h o m o l -o g y t o t h e f i r s t t w o d o m a i n s o f t h e o t h e rm e m b e r s o f t h e fa m i l y (see Table 1 ) . Cons i s -t e n t w i t h t h i s h o m o l o g y , I C A M - 4 h a s b e e nsh o w n t o b i n d t o L FA - 1 a n d t o M a c - 1 i n s t at ica d h e s i o n a s sa y s (39) . T h i s i n t e r a c t i o n m i g h tb e i n v o l v e d in e r y t h r o c y t e t u r n o v e r w i t h i n t h esp l e e n , g i v e n t h e s e l e c ti v e e x p r e s s i o n o f ~ d ~ 2o n m a c r o p h a g e s i n sp l e n i c r e d p u l p c o rd s a n dI C AM - 4 o n e r y t h ro c y t e s (24).ICAM -$ (Te lencepha lin )

    R e l a t e d t o th e o t h e r I C AM p r o t e i n s p r e v i -o u s l y d e s c r i b e d b y p o l y p e p t i d e s e q u e n c ec o n s e r v a t io n , I C A M - 5 is th e m o s t r e c e n t l yi d e n ti f ie d a n d p e r h a p s t h e m o s t u n i q u e m e m -b e r o f t h e I C A M f a m i ly . T h e d e d u c e d p r o t e ins e q u e n c e h a s n i n e i m m u n o g l o b u l i n - l i k ed o m a i n s a n d is e x p r e s se d i n r a ts a n d h u m a n s

    316 Hay flick, Kilgannon. and Gallatin

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    5/15

    o n l y o n t e l e n c e p h a l i c n e u r o n s w h e r e i t i sl o c a l iz e d to so m a t i c a n d d e n d r i ti c m e m b r a n e s ,h e n c e i ts i n it i a l n a m e t e l e n c e p h a l i n (40,41) (PK i l g a n n o n , u n p u b l i s h e d da ta ). T h e f i ve a m i n ot e rm i n a l i m m u n o g l o b u l i n d o m a i n s o f I C A M - 5a re h o m o l o g o u s t o th e f iv e d o m a i n s o fI C A M - 1 a n d - 3 w h e r e a s d o m a i n s 6 - 8 a p p e a rt o h a v e a r is e n f r o m e x o n d u p l i c a t io n o f d o m a i n5 . T h e n i n t h d o m a i n i s le a s t l ik e t h o se o f t h eo t h e r I C A M s , r e s e m b l i n g m o r e c l o s e l y t h eC - t y p e i m m u n o g l o b u l i n d o m a i n s o f o t h e ra d h e s i o n m o l e c u l e s e x p r e s s e d i n th e c e n t r a ln e r v o u s s y s t e m s u c h a s c h i c k a x o n i n - 1 a n dn e u r o f a s c in . D o m a i n 1 o f I C A M - 5 p r e s e r v e st h e b i n d i n g m o t i f s h o w n t o b e r e q u i r e d f o ro t h e r I C A M / i n t e g r i n i n te r a c ti o n s a n d r e c e n tr e s u l t s f o u n d t h a t I C A M - 5 b o u n d t o L F A - 1a n d M a c - 1 (41,42) ( P K i l g a n n o n , u n p u b l i s h e dd a t a ) . F r o m t h e s e d a t a , i t i s p r o p o s e d t h a tI C A M - 5 i s i n v o l v e d i n n e u r o n a l - g l i a l c el li n t e r a c t i o n s u n d e r n o r m a l c o n d i t i o n s o r n e u -r o n a l - l e u k o c y t i c i n t e r a c t i o n s i n p a t h o l o g i cs e t t i n g s w h e r e l y m p h o c y t e i n f l u x i n t o t h i s" i m m u n o l o g i c a l l y p r i v i l e d g e d " s i te d o e s n o tn o r m a l l y o c c u r.Sim ilarities and Differences Withinthe ICAM Family

    St ruc tu ra l , gene t i c , and func t iona l s imi l a r i -t ie s a m o n g t h e I C A M p r o t e in s s e r v e to g r o u pt h e se p r o t e i n s t o g e t h e r . I t i s li k e l y t h a t o n e o ft h e I C A M g e n e s is t h e p r im o r d i a l g e n e f r o mw h i c h a l l o t h e r s we r e d e r i v e d . T h e g e n e s f o rI C A M - 1, - 3, - 4 , a n d - 5 h a v e a l l b e e n m a p p e dt o h u m a n c h r o m o so m e 1 9 p l 3 .2 - p 1 3 .3 , wh e r e a sI C A M - 2 r e si d es o n h u m a n c h r o m o s o m e1 7 q 2 3 - 2 5 (37 ,43-46) ( P K i l g a n n o n , W MGa l l a ti n , u n p u b l i sh e d d a ta ) . S i n c e f o u r o f th ef iv e k n o w n I C A M g e n e s in h u m a n s a re c lu s -t e re d , t h i s su g g e s t s t h a t l o c a l i z e d g e n e d u p l i -c a t i o n e v e n t s a r e r e sp o n s i b l e f o r g e n e r a t i n gd ive rs ity , a s i t ua tion tha t is qu i t e co m m on fo rre l a ted gen es w i th in a g iven fam i ly , fo r i ns t ance ,c h e m o k i n e s a n d t h e ir r e c e p to r s (47-49).

    A s t h e b a s i s f o r I C A M g e n e d u p l i c a t i o n ,t h e i n d iv i d u a l i m m u n o g l o b u l i n - l i k e d o m a i n sa r e e a c h f o u n d w i t h i n d i f f e r e n t e x o n s r e f l e c t -i n g w h a t i s t h e sm a l l e s t f u n c t i o n a l u n i t t h a t h a sb e e n m a i n t a i n e d b y e v o l u t io n a r y c o n s e r v a t i o n(1,50). A s d i s c u s s e d p r e v i o u s l y , t h e I C A Mp r o t e in s d i f fe r i n th e n u m b e r o f i m m u n o g l o -b u l i n - l i k e d o m a i n s t h a t a re l i n k e d t o g e t h e r a n dw h e t h e r t h e s e d o m a i n s c o n t a i n a n i n t e g r i nb i n d i n g s it e. T h e i m p o r t a n c e o f m u l t i p l ei m m u n o g l o b u l i n d o m a i n s l in k e d t o g e t h ermeans tha t seve ra l spa t i a l ly d i s t inc t i n t egr in -b i n d i n g s i te s ( I B Ss ) m a y e x i s t w i t h i n a s in g l ep o l y p e p t i d e , a s i s t h e c a se f o r I C AM- 1 . Ass u c h , I C A M - 1 / i n t e g r i n - b i n d i n g i n t e r a c t i o n sm a y b e o c c u r r i n g s i m u l t a n e o u s l y t o b r i n go p p o s i n g c e l ls m o r e t i g h t ly t o g e t h e r , a s m i g h tb e r e q u i r e d f o r f i r m a d h e s i o n u n d e r s h e a rs t re s s o r t h e y c o u l d b e t i m e d t o o c c u r i n a r e g u -l a te d m a n n e r a s d i s c u s s e d p r e v i o u s ly . I n s u c hc a se s , t h e r e su l t i n g o u t s i d e - i n s i g n a l s d e l i v -e r e d b y t h e I C A M m a y d i f f e r. Ye t t h e fa c t th a tt h e b a s i c u n i t i s r e p l i c a t e d m u l t i p l e t i m e swi t h i n a s i n g l e p o l y p e p t i d e , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h ep r e se n c e o r a b se n c e o f a n I B S , i n d i c a t e s t h a ti ts s t ruc tu re i s c r i t ica l t o i t s func t ion . The re -f o re , th e f o r m o f t h e d o m a i n w h i c h m a k e s u pa s t a l k m a y p r o j e c t t h e I B Ss a wa y f r o m t h ep l a s m a m e m b r a n e .

    Ov e r a l l p r o t e i n s e q u e n c e i d e n t i ti e s b e t w e e nf a m i l y m e m b e r s i n th e a m i n o t e r m i n a l d o m a i nr a n g e s f r o m 2 1 - 3 8 % (see T a b l e 1 ). H o w e v e r ,a c o n s e r v e d p e n t a p e p t i d e s e q u e n c e k n o w n t obe c r i t ica l fo r IC A M bin d in g to ]32 in t egr ins ,d e n o t e d a s t h e I B S , I ( L ) - D ( E ) - S ( T ) - P ( X ) -L ( X ) , o r i g i n a l l y id e n t i f i e d in I C A M - 1 b yS t a u n t o n a n d c o l l e a g u e s (4,20), i s foun d in a lli m m u n o g l o b u l i n - l ik e d o m a i n s o f I C A M p r o-t e in s t h a t b i n d t o i n t e g r i n s . A l t h o u g h t h e p r e -d i c t e d s e c o n d a r y s t r u c tu r e s c a f f o l d o f t h ed o m a i n s r e m a i n s s i m i l a r , t h e r e l a t i v e l y l o wl e v e l o f s e q u e n c e c o n s e r v a t i o n m a y a f f e c tb i n d i n g a f f in i ty b e t w e e n d i f f er e n t I C A M p r o -t e ins and [~2 i n t e g r i n s . F o r e x a m p l e , L F A - 1

    The ICA M Pro te in Fami ly 317

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    6/15

    b i n d s t o I C AM - 1 w i t h g r e a t e r a v i d i t y th a n i td o e s t o 1 C AM - 3 a n d c o n v e r se l y , (~d[~2 b i n d s t oI C A M - 3 p r e f e r e n t i a l l y o v e r I C A M - I ( 2 4 ) .No w t h a t a c r y s t a l s t r u c t u r e f o r i m m u n o g l o -b u l in d o m a i n s o f I C A M - 2 h a s b e e n s o l v e d ,t h e s t r u c t u r e s c a n b e m o r e r e a d i l y c o m p a r e da n d c o m p a r i s o n s w i th o t h e r IC A M s m a y b eins igh t fu l wi th re spec t t o the i r r e l a t ive in t e -g r i n - b in d i n g p r e f e r e n c e s (51) .

    Dr a m a t i c d i ff e r e n c e s ex i s t in I C A M e x p r e s -s i o n p a t t e r n s a n d t h e r e g u l a t i o n o f t h e i r g e n e sb y i n f l a m m a t o r y c y t o k i n e s . I C A M - 1 , - 2, - 3,a n d - 4 e x p r e s s i o n i s f o u n d o n c e ll s o f h e m a t o -p o i e t i c li n e a g e s , h o w e v e r , n o n e a r e e x p r e s se do n a l l l i n e a g e s . Fo r i n s ta n c e , I C A M - 4 i s f o u n do n l y o n e r y t h r o c y t e s w h e r e a s n o n e o f th e o t h -e r s a r e. D i sp a r a t e t i s su e e x p r e s s i o n p a t t e rn s o fthese p ro te ins i s a f ea tu re tha t i s the re su l t o fd i f f e r e n t ia l t r a n sc r i p t i o n f a c t o r e x p r e s s i o n o rr e c e p t o r / e f f e c t o r p a t h w a y r e g u l a t i o n . K e y d i f -f e r e n c e s a l so e x i s t i n wh e t h e r t h e l e v e l o fI C A M e x p r e s s i o n o n l e u k o c y t e s ar e r e g u la t e do r n o t . Fo r e x a m p l e , I C AM- 1 i s i n d u c e d t oh i g h l e v e l s o n l e u k o c y t e a c t i v a t i o n b y c y t o -k i n e s s u c h as T N F , w h e r e a s I C A M - 3 is c o n -s t i t u t i v e l y e x p r e s s e d a t h i g h l e v e l s . T h e s ed i f f e r e n c e s r e g u l a t e t h e t i m i n g w i t h w h i c hI C A M / in t e g r in e n g a g e m e n t ca n o c c u r a n dm a n i f e s t t h e m se l v e s i n t h e m a n n e r i n wh i c hi n te g r in e n g a g e m e n t t r ig g e r s o u t s i d e - in s i g n a lsand ce l lu l a r behav io rs tha t a re ICA M spec i f ic .Recent Dev elopm ents in O utside- InSignal ing an d Cytoplasm ic Funct ionsof ICA M Pro te ins

    A c r o s s - s p e c ie s c o m p a r i s o n o f th e a m i n oa c id s e q u e n c e s c o m p r i s i n g th e p r e d i c t e d c y t o -p l a s m i c r e g io n s o f th e f iv e k n o w n I C A M f a m -i l y m e m b e r s c a n b e s u m m a r i z e d i n t h ef o l l o wi n g wa y . T h e r e i s g r e a t e r a m i n o a c i dc o n s e r v a t i o n a m o n g s t s e q u e n c e s o f a p a r ti c u -l ar I C A M p r o t e i n f r o m d i f f e r e n t sp e c i e s t h a nt h e r e i s b e t w e e n d i f f e r e n t I C A M p r o t e i n swi t h i n a s in g l e sp e c i es . Fo r e x a m p l e , 7 1 - 9 3 %

    o f r e s i d u e s a r e c o n se r v e d i n t h e c y t o p l a sm i cd o m a i n s o f I C A M - I f r o m m o u s e , d og , a n dh u m a n s . F o r I C A M - 3 f r o m d o g , c o w , a n dh u m a n s , 6 8 - 9 0 % o f c y t o p la s m i c d o m a i n r es i-d u e s a r e c o n s e r v e d . H o w e v e r , o n l y 1 3 % o fr e s id u e s a re c o n s e r v e d b e t w e e n I C A M - 1 a n dI C A M - 3 f ro m h u m a n s . I C A M - s p e c i f i cs e q u e n c e c o n s e r v a t i o n o f t h e c y t o p l a s m i cr e g i o n s i m p l i e s t h a t e v o l u t i o n h a s m a i n t a i n e dthem for spec i f i c func t ions invo lv ing spec i f iccy top la sm ic p ro te in -p ro te in in t e rac t ions , w hicha re p robab ly e ssen ti a l fo r ICA M func t ion .

    M e c h a n i s ti c a ll y , s t u d ie s o f t h e I C A M p r o -t e i n s a r e n o t a s f a r a l o n g a s t h o se o f o t h e rp l a s m a m e m b r a n e r e c e p to r s s u c h a s t h e e p i-de rma l g row th fac to r o r p l a te l e t -de r ived g rowthf a c t o r r e c e p t o r s , h o w e v e r s o m e t h e m e s a r eb e g i n n i n g t o e m e r g e . G r o w t h f a c to r r e c e p t o rd i m e r i z a t i o n f o l l o w i n g l i g a n d b i n d i n g i s am e c h a n i s m k n o w n f o r r e c e p t o r a c t i v a t i o n .R e c e n t o b s e r v a t i o n s s u g g e s t t h a t I C A M - If o r m s a n o n c o v a l e n t d i m e r a t t h e c e ll su r f a c ea n d t h a t t h is f o r m e x h i b i t s h i g h e r a v i d i t y f o rL F A - 1 b i n d i n g th a n d o e s th e m o n o m e r f o r m( 5 2 , 5 3 ) . U n d e r t h e c o n d i t i o n s t h a t y i e l d e dI C A M - l d i m e r s , I C A M - 2 w a s f o u n d to r em a i nm o n o m e r i c a lt h o u g h l o c a ll y e n r ic h e d p l a s m am e m b r a n e r e g i o n s o f I C A M - 2 ( s e e b e l o w )wo u l d p o t e n t i a l l y e x h i b i t g r e a t e r a v i d i t y f o rL F A - 1 b i n d i n g d e s p i t e i t s a p p a r e n t m o n o -m e r i c f o r m . T h e r e q u i r e m e n t f o r c h e m i c a lc r o s s l i n k e r s d u r i n g t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l i so l a t io na n d c h a r a c t e r iz a t io n o f t h e I C A M - 1 d i m e r su g -ges t s t ha t t h i s is a l ab i l e fo rm of the p ro te in andtha t un ide n t i f i ed cofac to r s o r po s t t r ans l a t iona lm o d i f i c a ti o n s su ch a s p h o sp h o r y l a t i o n m a y b erequ i red to s t ab i l i ze the in t e rac t ion in s i tu .I n t e re s t in g l y , IC A M - 5 h a s b e e n i so la t e d f ro mce l l ex t rac t s a s a t e t r amer i c complex o f h ighm o l e c u l a r w e i g h t an d I C A M - 3 h a s b ee n f o u n dt o f o r m a h i g h m o l e c u l a r we i g h t c o m p l e x t h atp r o b a b l y re p r ese n ts a h o m o d i m e r (54) (J Hay-f li c k , u n p u b l i sh e d d a ta ). I f m u l t i m e r i c I C A Mm o l e c u l e s a r e i m p o r t a n t f o r f u n c t i o n , t h e n

    3 1 8 H a y f l i c k , K i l g a n n o n , a n d G a l l a t i n

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    7/15

    he te romer ic complexes m ay form on those ce l lstha t express more than a s ing le ICA M polypep-t ide . This type of comb ina tor ia l d ive rs i ty mayregula te in tegr in / ICAM binding in te rac t ionsand the resul t ing intrace l lular events .

    Jus t a s the d imer ic form o f ICAM - 1 inc reasesb ind ing a f f in i ty for LFA- 1 , th i s com plex m aybe the bas ic func t iona l un i t for t r ansmi t t ingICA M -tr iggered s igna ls in to ce ll s . Ear ly s ig-n a li n g w o r k u s i n g c o - i m m o b i l iz e d I C A M - IMA b a nd a subop t ima l a moun t o f a n t i - C D 3MAb to l iga te sur face pro te ins demonst ra tedtha t I C A M- l i s a c o - s t imu la to r y mo le c u le .M ore recent ly , l iga t ion of ICA M - 1 was obse rvedto t r i gge r a n a c c um ula t ion o f t y r os ine phos -phopr o te in s , i nc lud ing c dc 2 in b lood - de r ive dle ukoc y te s a nd the huma n T l e uk e mic c e l l li ne ,Mol t - 3 (55), a nd c o r t a c t in i n immor ta l i z e dr a t b r a in e ndo the l i a l c e l ls (56). A d d i t i o n a l l y ,l i ga tion o f I C A M - 1 by a n t ibody t r e a tme n t o fSV-40 la rge T an t igen (Ag) t r ansform ed syn-ovia l ce l l s indu ced ac t iva t ion of the A P- 1 t r an-s c r i p t i o n f a c t o r a s m e a s u r e d b y n u c l e a rt rans loca t ion and DN A binding (57). Upregula -t i on o f IL -113 m e ssa ge a nd c h lo r a m phe n ic o lace ty l t r ansfe rase (CAT) ac t iv i ty f rom pro-m ote r dr iven cons t ruc ts tha t conta in the IL- 1 [ 3AP-1 b inding s i te was a l so obse rved . Fur the re v ide nc e o f t he c a pa c i ty f o r s igna l ing m e d i -a t e d by I C A M - 1 l i ga tion on b loo d l e ukoc y te sw a s f ound us ing M A b t r e a tme n t o f pe r iphe ra lb lood m ono nuc le a r c el l s (P B M C ) in t he p re s -e n c e o f a s u b o p t i m a l d o s e o f N - f o r m y l -meth ionyl - leucyl -phenyla lan ine FML P) whichtoge the r i nduc e d a n ox ida t ive bu r s t r e sponse(58 ) . T h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s t a k e n t o g e t h e r ,sugge s t a mo de l fo r IC A M - I f unc t ion in thed e v e l o p m e n t o f c e l l u l a r i m m u n e r e s p o n s e sw h e r e b y e a r l y a c t i v a t i o n e v e n t s s u c h a scytok ine b inding to receptors or T ce l l an t igenr e ce p t or b i n d i n g to a n t i g e n / m a j o r h i s t o c o m -p a t i b i l i t y c o m p l e x ( M H C ) c o m p l e x e s t r i g -ge rs ICAM-1 sur face express ion a long wi tho t h e r c o m p o n e n t s o f a s i g n a l t r a n s d u c i n g

    c o m p l e x . T h e s e c o m p l e x e s m i g h t i n c l u d ekinase/ph osph atase act ivi t ies s ince no intrinsicenzymat ic ac t iv i t ie s have been demonst ra tedf o r a n y I C A M c y t o p l a s m i c r e g i o n . S u c ha s s e m b l a g e s m a y f o r m s t a b i l i z e d I C A M - 1d ime r s a nd c ou ld b ind to a c t ivat e d LF A -1 onoppo s ing ce l l s wi th h igher av id i ty . This t igh tc e l l - c e l l c on ta c t c ou ld p r e se n t o the r r e c e p -tor / l igand pa i r s wi th an op por tuni ty for in te r -a c t ion , pe r ha ps l i ga t ing I C A M- 1 in to e ve nlar ge r m ol ec ul ar assemblages, eventual ly t rig-ge r ing ICA M -1-spec i f ic ac t iva t ion events .

    The o the r me m be r o f t he IC A M f a mi ly mos tf requently associa ted with s ignal t ransductionand ac t iva t ion events i s ICAM -3. Th e fac t tha tICA M -3 was con s t i tu t ive ly expressed a t h ighleve ls on a ll ce l l s o f the hem atopoie t ic l ineagesinvo lve d in c e l lu la r imm une r e sponse s im p l i e dthat i t has a role dur ing the ini t ia l phase ofa c t iva t ion by ma in t a in ing c e l l - c e l l c on ta c t .R e c e n t o b s e r v a t i o n s w i t h p e r i p h e r a l b l o o dT ce l ls and T leukem ic ce ll l ines s t imula ted byc o - imm obi l i z e d I C A M - 3 M A b a nd subop tima la moun t s o f C D 3 M A b p r ov ide d support f o r a near ly ac t iva t ion ro le of ICAM-3 (26,59,60).Som e have obse rved tha t on pe r iphera l b loodleukocy tes and T ce l l lines , ICAM -3 an t ibodyt rea tment t r iggered tyros ine phosphory la t ion o fspecif ic prote ins and f luxed intracel lular ca l-c ium concent ra t ions (55,61,62). Others how-ever , ourse lves inc luded , have fa i led to seethese responses. Th e reasons for these dispar i-t ie s m ay be caused by an t ibody ep i tope spec i-f ic i ty or to the inhe rent dif ferences in ce l l l inesor ac t iva t ion s ta tes r e su l t ing f rom iso la t ionp r oc e dure s . I C A M - 3- de pe nde n t a c t iva t ion o fother surface prote ins has a lso been rep or ted. Inparticular, upregulation of [31 and [32 integrinfunc t ion on PBMC blas ts has been obse rved .H o w e v e r t he b ioc he mic a l s igna ling pa thw a ysl e a d ing to t he se e f f e c t s a r e a s ye t unc l e a r(63,64). ~ in tegr in upregula t ion by a l igandfor ]32 integ rins su gge sts that an intere sting cir-cular ac t ivat ion pathw ay co uld exist.

    T h e I C A M P r o te i n F a m i l y 3 1 9

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    8/15

    T o u n d e r t a k e a d e sc r i p t io n o f h o w i n tr a c e l-l u l a r e v e n t s a r e t r ig g e r e d b y I C A M - 3 , a f u n c -t io n a l m a p o f t h e c y t o p l a s m i c r e g io n o f t h ep r o t e in w a s d e v e l o p e d u s in g a n IC A M - 3 -d e f i c i e n t Ju r k a t c e l l l i n e a n d g e n e t r a n s f e rt e c h n iq u e s . H u m a n I C A M - 3 c y t o p l a s m i c ta ilt r u n c a t i o n s a n d s i n g l e a m i n o a c i d m u t a n t sw e r e t e s t e d w i t h r e s p e c t t o C D 3 / I C A M - 3 -d e p e n d e n t c y t o k i n e s ec r e ti o n , h o m o t y p i ca g g r e g a t i o n , a n d c e l l u l a r sp r e a d i n g ( 65 ) . T h em a j o r i t y o f a m i n o a c i d s i n t h e c y t o p l a s m i cr e g i o n we r e r e q u i r e d f o r C D 3 c o - s t i m u l a t i o n .D e l e t io n o f t h e m e m b r a n e d i s ta l o r p r o x i m a lt h i rd s o f t h e c y t o p l a sm i c r e g i o n s i g n i f i c a n t lya f f e c t e d a g g r e g a t i o n a n d sp r e a d i n g r e sp o n se s .Po i n t m u t a t i o n o f s e r in e 4 8 9 o r s e r i n e 5 1 5 t oa l an i n e ( l o c a te d i n t h e m e m b r a n e p r o x i m a l o rd i s t a l r e g i o n s , r e s p e c t i v e l y ) a l s o b l o c k e dI C A M - 3 f u n c t io n . P h o s p h o r y l a t io n o f s e ri n e4 8 9 i n J u r k a t c e l l s w a s e n h a n c e d b y C D 3c r o s s l i n k i n g o r b y d i r e c t ly s t i m u l a t i n g p r o t e i nk i n a se C ( PKC ) i so f o r m s w i t h p h o r b o l e s t e r .F u r t h e r m o r e , s e r i n e 4 8 9 w a s p h o s p h o r y l a t e ds p e c i fi c a ll y b y p u r i f ie d i s o f o r m s o f P K C s u g -g e s t i n g t h a t th i s e n z y m e m a y b e a s i g n i f i c a n tc o n t r i b u t o r to I C A M - 3 - m e d i a t e d s i g n a l tr a ns -d u c t i o n e v e n t s .

    E f f i c i e n t a c t i v a t i o n o f T c e l l s i s t h o u g h t t or e q u i r e s i g n a l i n g a t o r g r e a te r t h a n a t h r e sh o l dl ev e l f r o m b o t h a n t i g e n r e c e p t o r c o m p l e x e sa n d n u m e r o u s o t h e r s u r f ac e p r o t e in s f o r w h i c hl i g a n d s e x i s t o n t h e AP C su r f a c e w i t h i n a sp e -c i a l iz e d c o n t a c t z o n e b e t w e e n t h e se c e l ls . A tt h is a d h e s i v e i n t e r fa c e , I C AM - 3 p r o b a b l y p e r -f o r m s i m p o r t a n t f u n c t i o n s in s u p p o r t o f a n d t oa m p l i f y s i g n a l i n g e v e n t s . Fo r n a i v e T c e l l s( C D4 5 R A + ) , t h e s i g n a l i n g t h r e sh o l d r e q u i r e df o r a c t i v a ti o n h a s b e e n o b se r v e d t o b e g r e a t e rt h a n i t i s f o r m e m o r y T c e l l s ( C D 4 5 R O +) ( 66 ) .T h i s m a y b e t h e r e su l t o f in c r e a se d l e v e ls i ns u r f a c e e x p r e s s i o n o f a c t i v a t i o n - p r o m o t i n gp r o t e i n s o n m e m o r y v s n a i v e T c e l l s o rd e c r e a s e d l e v e ls o f m o r e n e g a t i v e ly c h a r g e dp r o t e i n s , su c h a s t h e l a r g e r i so f o r m s o f C D4 5 ,

    p r o v i d i n g l e s s r e p u l s i o n b e t we e n c e l l s . On em e a n s f o r n a i v e T c e ll s to a c h i e v e p r o d u c t i v ea c t i v a t io n i s f o r t h e m t o f o r m g r e a t e r c e l l - c e l lc o n t a c t z o n e s w i t h a n APC a l l o wi n g f o r su r -v e i l la n c e o f c o g n a t e a n t i g e n i c p e p t i d e s o r t oi n c r e a se t h e d u r a t i o n o f t h e c o n t a c t . I n t e r e s t -i n g l y , I C A M - 3 , b u t n o t IC A M - 1 , t r i g g e r e d t h ei n d u c t i o n o f T c e l l sp r e a d in g . T h i s l e n d s su p -p o r t t o t h e n o t i o n t h a t o n e o f t h e f u n c t i o n sI C A M - 3 i s t o i n c r e a s e t h e c o n t a c t a r e ab e t we e n c e l l s , f o r e x a m p l e , d u r i n g t h e e a r l ye v e n t s a t t e n d a n t T c e l l / A P C e n g a g e m e n t .T h u s , h i g h c o n s t i t u t i v e e x p r e s s i o n l e v e l s o f Tc el l I C A M - 3 c o m p l e x e d w i th L F A - 1 m a ya l l o w p r o d u c t i v e a c t i v a t i o n t o o c c u r b yi n c r e a s i n g t h e p r o b a b i l i t y o f T C R / A g i n t e r ac -t i o n s o r m a i n t a i n i n g t h a t i n t e r a c t io n i n c a se o fn a i v e T c e l l c o n t a c t o r l o w a n t i g e n a f f i n it y .

    I n l i g h t o f t h e p r e v i o u s d i s c u s s i o n s , a m o d e lo f t h e r e l a ti o n sh i p b e t we e n I C AM - 3 f u n c t i o nand ac t iva t ion can be p rop osed . At in i ti a l con-t ac t be tw een an AP C and a T ce ll , su r face adhe -s i v e p r o t ei n s su c h a s I C AM - 3 / L FA - 1 i n te r ac t.Un d e r c o n d i t i o n s o f h i g h - a f fi n i ty i n t e g r in b i n d -i n g , wh i c h wo u l d b e t h e c a se i f t h e APC i sa c t i v a t e d , t h e se c e l l - c e l l c o n t a c t s wo u l d b es t ab li li zed . T ce l l r ecep to r (TCR ) eng age m en twi t h c o g n a t e a n t i g e n / MH C c o m p l e x e s l e ad s t ok i n a se a c t iv a t io n a n d p h o sp h o r y l a t i o n o f f u n c -t i o n a l l y e s s e n t i a l c y t o p l a s m i c r e s i d u e s o fI C AM - 3 ( i .e ., s e r in e 4 89 ) . D i m e r s o f I C A M - 3form or a re s t ab i l i zed , poss ib ly a s a r e su l t o fp h o sp h o r y l a t i o n a n d r e c r u i t m e n t o f c y t o so l icfac to r s , add ing s t ab il it y to the ce l lu l a r con tac tzone an d the p rogram for T ce l l ac t iva t ion andc lona l p ro l i f e ra t ion ensues . Seve ra l ob jec t ivesa re a c h i e v e d b y e n g a g e m e n t o f I C AM - 3 i n t h isc o n t e x t. T h e n u m b e r o f a n t i g e n - r e c e p t o r i n te r -ac t ions a re inc reased in the en la rged con tac tzone . Th e con tac t is s t ab i l i zed a l low ing the s ig -na l ing th re sho ld to be m e t in the case o f a na iveT ce l l . Al so , i t b r ings the con tac t a rea be twe ent h e t wo c e ll s i n t o t ig h t j u x t a p o s i t i o n a l l o wi n go t h e r r e c e p t o r p a i rs ( i.e ., C D 4 0 - C D 4 0 L ) w i t h

    32 0 Hayflick, Kilgannon, and Gallatin

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    9/15

    an opportunity to interact a lso contr ibuting toa t ta inment of the ac t iva t ion threshold . Withc lona l pro l i f e ra t ion comes the need for d is -soc ia tion of the T ce l l f rom the APC, and th isc ou ld be a c he ive d by de - phosphor y la t ion o fI C A M - 3 , w h ic h w ou ld l e a d to lo s s o f su r fa c ed i m e r s , l o w e r L F A - 1 b i n d i n g a v i d i t y , a n ddestabil ized adhesive interact ions.

    R e - o r ga n iz a t ion o f t he a c t in c y to ske le tonin T c e l l s is ne c e s sa r y f o r t he de ve lo pm e n t o fa n t ige n - induc e d a c t iva t ion , w h ic h inc lude sr e c r u i tme n t o f im por t a n t c y to ske le ton - a s soc i-a ted pro te ins to the cor t ica l ac t in ne tw ork andm o r p h o l o g i c a l c h a n g e s a c c o m p a n y i n g c e l l -ce l l contac t (67) . M e c ha n i s t i ca l ly , the po ly -me r i z a t ion o f a c tin ha s be e n hy po the s i z e d a sthe d r iv ing f o r c e f o r p r o tr u s ion o f t he p l a sm ame mb r a ne l e a d ing e dge du r ing c e l l sp re a d ingas occurs w hen a T ce l l engul f s an AP C or itmig r a t e s du r ing imm une su r ve i l l a nc e w i th inT c e l l z one s o f s e c onda r y lympho id o r ga ns(68) . S i n c e I C A M - 3 l i g a t i o n t r i g g e r s c e l lspreading , change s in ce l lu la r f -ac tin conten tw o u l d b e e x p e c t e d t o o c c u r . J u r k a t c e l l st re a te d w i t h IC A M - 3 M A b r e s p o n d ed w i t h as low and p ro long ed inc rease in ce l lu la r f -ac t inand a dec rease in g-ac t in . Also , ICA M -3- t r ig-ge red sp read ce l l s exhib i ted f luorescen t s ta in-ing for f -ac tin a t the edges an d in a punc ta ted i s tr ibu tion , w h ic h c o loc a l i z e d w i th I C A M - 3(J Hayf l ick , unpubl ished da ta ) . In cont ras t ,an t i -CD3 MAb e l ic i ted a rap id , bu t t r ans ien tinc rease in to ta l ce l lu la r f -ac t in wh ich w as notc o l o c a l i z e d i n s p r e a d c e l l s ( 6 9 - 7 1 ) (JHay f l ick , unpubl ish ed da ta ). In te res t ing ly , inhuma n lymphoc y te s , P K C a c t iv i ty t r i gge r e db y T C R e n g a g e m e n t h a s b e e n i m p l i c at e d inr e gu la t ing c e l l sha pe a nd mo t i l i t y by mod-u la t ing the c e l lu l a r c on te n t o f f - a c t in a nda c t in - b ind ing p r o te in f unc t ion ( 72 - 74 ) . A na d d i t io n a l c o n s e q u e n c e o f r e - o rg a n i z a t io n o fthe c y tosk e le ton i s it s e f f e c t on ge ne e xp r e s -s ion by a c t iva t ion o f t r a nsc r ip t ion f a c to r s o ft h e N F - k B f a m i l y (75) . I C A M - 3 - t r i g g e r e d

    c y toske le t a l r e o r ga n iz a t ion a nd g e ne a c t iva-t ion is no t l imi t e d to T c e l l s , s inc e im m ob i -l i z e d M A b e n g a g e m e n t o f I C A M - 3 o n P B M Cand the mon ocy t ic ce l l l ine , THP -1 t r iggeredc e l l u l a r s p r e a d i n g a n d a d o s e - d e p e n d e n ti n cr ea s e i n c h e m o k i n e g e n e e x p r e s s i o n a n ds e c r e t i o n (75a) .The consequences of ICAM-1 and -3 t r ig -ge r ing on c e l lu l a r be ha v io r a r e mos t l i ke lymedia ted by d i rec t in te rac t ions wi th p lasmamembrane-assoc ia tedcytoskele ta l comp onents .ICA M - 1 has been o bse rved in assoc ia tion wi thmicrof i lament-r ich, detergent-extracted f ibro-blasts (76) . Chan ges in ICA M -3 sur face loca l -i z a ti o n b y a n t i b o d y - i n d u c e d c a p p i n g a n dcoinc iden t inc rease in res is tance to de te rgente x t r a c t i o n h a v e b e e n f o u n d ( S R o s e n m a n ,M Gal la tin , unpub l ished data ). Ant i - ICAM -3M A b t r e a t m e n t l e d t o c a p f o r m a t i o n a n di n c r e a s e d d e t e r g e n t r e s i s ta n c e i n a n e p i t o p e -de p e nd e n t ma n ne r ind ic a ting tha t l inka ge o fICAM -3 to the cy toske le ton is a r egula ted eventp e r h a p s m e d i a t e d b y i n t e g r i n b i n d i n g o rI C A M - 3 d i m e r i z a ti o n . D i r e c t cy t o s o l i c p r o-t e in - p r o te in in t e r a c t ions a r e p r e sum a b ly theu n d e r l y i n g m e c h a n i s m f o r t h e s e f i n d i n g s ,a nd se ve r a l suc h b ind ing in t e r a c t ions w i tht h e I C A M s h a v e a l r e a d y b e e n r e p o r t e d .A m o n g t h e c y t o s k e l e t o n - a s s o c i a te d p r o te i n st h a t h a v e b e e n o b s e r v e d b y i n v i t ro b i n d i n gt o I C A M - 1 c y t o p l a s m i c d o m a i n a r e a c t i n ,(x-ac t in in , ~- tubul in , and g lyce ra ldehyde-3-p h o s p h a t e d e h y d r o g e n a s e , a p r o t e i n w i t hm i c r o t u b u l e - b u n d l i n g a c t i v i t y ( 7 6 - 7 8 ) .T h e s e i n t e r a c ti o n s c o u l d l i n k IC A M - 1 w i t hthe c y toske le ton a nd pe r ha ps pa r t i c ipa t e i nregula t ing cy toske le ta l o rganiza tion . ICA M -2h a s a l s o b e e n o b s e r v e d t o b i n d d i r e c t l y t o~- a c t in in in v i t r o (79) . In fac t , the b indingsi tes on both ICAM-1 and -2 for oc-act ininshare fea tures in co m m on w i th o the r o~-ac tininb ind ing p r o te in s tha t spa n the p l a sma me m-b r a n e , n a m e l y a p r e p o n d e r a n c e o f b a si c a n dh y d r o p h o b i c a m i n o a c i d s .

    The ICAM Protein Family 321

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    10/15

    Ch a nge s i n c e l l - su r f a c e p r o t e i n l oc a l iz a t i ona r e c o m m o n l y o b s e r v e d d u r i n g o r r e s u l t i n gf r o m c e l l u l a r a c t i v a t i o n o r d i f f e r e n t i a t i o ns t at e , w h i c h a r e l i ke l y to be m e d i a t e d by d i r e c ti n t er a c t io n s b e t w e e n t h e t ra n s m e m b r a n e p r o -t e i n s t h e m s e l v e s a n d t h e p e r i p h e r a l a c t i nc y t o s k e l e t o n . A s n o t e d p r e v i o u s l y , e v i d e n c ef o r d i r e c t c y t o p l a s m i c d o m a i n i n t e r a c t i o n sw i t h i n t r a c e l lu l a r p r o t e i n s ha s be e n f ou nd f o rt h e c y t o p l a s m i c d o m a i n s o f I C A M - 1 a n d - 2.I n a dd i t i on , h i gh - l e ve l e xp r e s s i on o f c e r t a i nc y t o s k e l e t o n - a s s o c i a t e d p r o t e i n s h a s b e e nf o u n d t o p r o f o u n d l y a f f e c t s u r f a c e I C A Ml o c a l i z a t i o n . F o r e x a m p l e , w h e n e z r i n w a sove r e xp r e s se d i n a na t u r a l k i ll e r ( N K ) t a r ge tce l l va r i an t tha t was res i s t an t to ce l l k i l l ing , i tl o c a li z e d p r e d o m i n a n t l y t o u r o p o d i a l p r o t r u -s i o n s ( 8 0 ) . C o i n c i d e n t r e - d i s t r i b u t i o n o fI CA M - 2 i n t o t he s a m e s t r uc tu r e s w a s a lso se e na nd t h i s c on t r i bu t e d t o t he c e ll s a c qu i r i ng se n -s i t iv i ty to k i l l ing by NK ce l l s . Thi s cy to tox ic -i ty w as a l so inh ib i t e d by ~32 in teg r in M A bt r e a t m e n t . T h e s e d a t a s u g g e s t t h a t N Kc y t o l y t i c a c t i v i t y i s de pe nde n t on r e - l oc a l -i z a ti o n o f I C A M - 2 a n d P 2 i n t e g r i n f unc t i on .E z r in , a m e m b e r o f th e e z r i n - ra d i x i n - m o e s i n( E R M ) f a m i l y o f c y t o s k e l e t a l - m e m b r a n ep r o t e i n l in k e r s , i s t h o u g h t t o c o n t a i n c r y p t i cf - a c t i n b i nd i ng s i t e s t ha t a r e e xpose d du r i ngm i c r o v i l l u s o r u r o p o d f o r m a t i o n ( 81 ) . E z r i nb i nd i ng t o m i c r o f i l a m e n t s m i gh t t he n l a t e ra l lyr e d i s t r i bu t e m i c r o f i l a m e n t bound c ~ - a c t i n i n /I C A M - 2 c o m p l e x e s . C o r t i c a l f l o w o f a c t i nf i l a m e n t s a n d t he i r a s soc i a t e d p r o t e i n s ( e . g .,ez r in an d c~-act in in) has bee n p os tu la ted as theb a s i s f o r g e n e r a t i n g h i g h l y e n r i c h e d m e m -b r a n e s u b d o m a i n s li k e th o s e f o u n d i n u r o p o ds t ruc tures ( 82 ) . S u c h e n r i c h e d d o m a i n s c o u l da l so l e a d t o I C A M m u l t i m e r s th a t w o u l d f o s t e rh i g h a v i d i t y i n t e g r i n - b i n d i n g i n t e r a c t i o n sw h i c h ha s be e n r e po r te d f o r d i m e r s o f I CA M - 1 .

    L o c a l i z a t i o n t o u r o p o d s i s a f e a t u r e o fI C A M - 2 t h a t i s s h a r e d b y o t h e r I C A M s .I CA M - 1 ha s a l so be e n f ound t o l oc a l i z e t o

    u r opod s t r uc t u r e s i n JY B c e l l s w he n se e de don t o pu r i f i e d L F A - 1 b i l a ye r s ( 83 ) . U r o p o dpr o t r u s i ons on a c t i va t e d pe r i phe r a l b l ood Tl y m p h o b l a s t s a n d J u r k a t T c e l l s h a v e b e e nf o u n d t o c o n t a i n I C A M - 3 ( 6 3 , 8 4 , 8 5 ) . In te r -e s t ing l y , I CA M - 3 r e d i s t ri bu t i on on T c e l ls w a sf o u n d t o o c c u r w h e n t h e s e c e ll s w e r e s e e d e do n t o m o n o l a y e r s o f T N F - a c t i v a t e d e n d o t h e -l ia l ce l l s , a s we l l as on to pur i f i ed ICA M -1 orva sc u l a r c el l a dhe s i on m o l e c u l e - 1 ( V CA M - 1 ,i n th e p r e s e n c e o f t h e c h e m o k i n e s R A N T E Sa nd m o noc y t e c he m ot a c t i c p r o t e in - 1 (M C P - 1 ),sugge s t i ng t ha t m u l t i p l e s i gna l i ng pa t hw a ysa r e i n v o l v e d i n t h e m e m b r a n e d i s t r i b u t i o nc h a n g e s . A s p r o p o s e d f o r I C A M - 2 , a h i g h l yc o n c e n tr a te d m e m b r a n e d o m a i n o f I C A M - 1or - 3, p r oba b l y a s a d i m e r , w ou l d be e xpe c t e dt o e x h i b i t g r e a t e r b i n d i n g a v i d i t y f o r P 2i n t e g ri n s . T h e o c c u r a n c e o f s i m u l t a n e o u sl o c al iz a t io n o f d i f fe r e n t I C A M s t o t h e u r o p o do r w h e t h e r a te m p o r a l s e q u e n c e o f o n e I C A Mf o l l ow e d by a no t he r i n to suc h s t r uc t u r e s w i l lr e qu i r e f u r t he r s t ud i e s .N o v e l A r e a s o f T h e r a p e u tic D e v e l o p m e n tI n v o lv i n g IC A M B i o lo g y

    T h e n o t i o n t h a t t h e r a p e u t i c i n t e r v e n t i o nd u r i n g c h r o n i c a n d a c u te i m m u n e re s p o n s e s a tt he l e ve l o f I CA M / i n t e g r i n i n t e r a c t i ons ha sg a i n e d m u c h f a v o r a n d i s b e i n g p u r s u e d v i g o r -o u s l y b y t h e p h a r m a c e u t i c a l i n d u s t r y . T h ef o l l ow i ng s t r at e g i es a r e be i ng e xp l o r e d :

    1. Physical blockag e of extracellular bind ingdomain interactions;2. Phys ical block age of intracellular interac-

    tions; and3. Interruption of protein expression.

    T h e i d e a t h a t p h y s i c a ll y b l o c k in g a n I C A M /i n t e g r i n i n t e r a c t i on by c om pe t i t i ve a n t i bodyb i n d i n g h a s l e d to t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f n u m e r -ous t he r a pe u t i c c a nd i da t e s t ha t ha ve e n t e r e dc l in ica l t ri a l s fo r a va r i e ty of ind ica t ions . Ana l te r n at iv e a p p r o a c h s t e m m e d f r o m t h e o b s e r-

    322 Hayflick, Kilgannon, and Gallatin

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    11/15

    va t ions of na tura l ly occur in g so luble forms ofse ve ra l I C A M pr o te in s (86-88). In te res t ing ly ,s e r um l e ve l s o f bo th so lub le I C A M - 1 a nd - 3f luc tua te , appear ing to cor re la te wi th d is t inc tpa tho log ie s suc h a s ne u t rope n ic pne um on ia ,m ul t ip le sc le ros is , and as thma , leav ing ava i l -ab le the poss ib i l ity tha t the i r de tec t ion ma y beo f d i a gnos t i c va lue (89-91). P r e c l in i c a l ly ,a dmin i s t r a t ion o f so lub le I C A M- 1 ha s be e nf ound to be e f f e c t ive in p r e ve n t ion o f r h ino -v i ra l i n f e c t ion in c h impa n z e e s (92). The r o l eof so luble ICAM prote ins in v ivo i s unc lea r ,bu t t he y m a y se r ve to dow nr e gu la t e i n te g r inbinding and the re fo re ce l l - ce l l contac ts a f te ra n imm une r e sponse by spe c i f i c a lly she dd ingthe in t e g r in -b ind ing dom a in o r t o r e l e a se a na n t a g o n i s t i c f o r m t h a t c o u l d c o m p e t e f o ri n t e g r i n b i n d i n g . L o w e r i n t e g r i n - b i n d i n ga f fin ity o f mo nom e r ic I C A M - 1 c om pa r e d tothe d im er form sugges ts tha t the so luble pro-t e in w ou ld ha ve to be in a d im e r to e f f e c t ive lyc omp e te . The se obse r va tions ha ve g ive n r i seto the ide a tha t a n t ibody F c / I C A M f us ion p r o -te ins which possess two respec t ive in tegr in-b i n d i n g s i t e s m i g h t p r o v e t o b e a m o r ee f fec t ive so luble an tagonis t . An ex tens ion o fth is i s the proposa l tha t pept ides or s imi la rspace f i l l ing , low molecula r we ight en t i t ie s ,m i g h t c o m p e t i v e l y i n h i b i t b i n d i n g t h e r e b yproving to be e f f icac ious .

    F rom obse rva t ions rev iew ed in the sec t ione n t it l ed R e c e n t D e v e lopme n t s i n O u t s ide - I nS igna l ing and Cytoplasmic Func t ions of ICAMProte ins regard ing the ro les of the ICA M s inintracel lular events such as d irect prote in inter-a c t ions o r ge ne r a t ion o f s e c ond me sse nge reffector pathw ays, i t is plausible tha t inhibi t inge i the r of these may prove to be b enef ic ia l . S imi-lar to the ex tracel lular binding interact ions, tar-geted drug screens against ICAM -1/o~-actinininteract ion, for example , could serve the pur-pose of deve loping drug leads tha t in te r ruptcytoskele ta l associa t ion. Interruption of suchassoc ia t ions in end othe l ia l ce l l s , fo r ins tance ,

    m a y b e e f f e c t i v e i n r e d u c i n g l y m p h o c y t einf i l t ra t ion in disease se t tings such as rheu m a-toid ar thr i t is or Crohns disease . An intr iguinga l te rna t ive approach w here the d rug ta rge ts a rek inase /phospha tase e f fec tor molecu les tha t a ret r igge r e d on c e l lu l a r a c t iva t ion l e a d ing topos t tr a nsl a tiona l m od i f i c a t ion o f I C A M pr o -te ins o r that are act ivated as a result of ICA Ml iga t ion . C a ta ly t i c s i t e i nh ib i to r s o f t he seac t iv i tie s ma y b e re la t ive ly nonspec i f ic how -ever , unless their targets are suff ic iently l im-i ted in their dis tr ibution. Accessabil i ty to theinternal mil ieu is a fur ther hurdle to be over-com e, s ince these ta rge ts r e s ide w i th in the ce l l,the re fore sm al l mo lecule inh ib itor s wi th favor -able l ipid transpor t quali t ies m ust be soug ht .Final ly, a s tra tegy based on reducing synthe-sis of specif ic ICA M prote ins or important cyto-p lasmic components , such as second messengereffector proteins, utilizing main ly antisense tech-nology have been repor ted (93-96). Impor tan tfactors impinging on the effect ivness of thisapproach includ e the turnover ra te of the targetprotein itself , lysos om al degrad ation ofantisensenucle ic ac ids, and target ing to the messengerRN A. Th is s tra tegy has a lso yie lded drug candi-dates that are presen tly in clinic al tr ials.

    I n t h e f u t u r e , t h e m e c h a n i s m s o f h o wI C A M - t r igge r e d in t r a c e llu l a r eve n t s a r e r e gu -l a te d by in t e g rin e nga ge m e n t shou ld be c o m eclar if ied. Fur therm ore , the re la tionship be tw eenI C A M/c y toske le ton in t e r a c t ions a nd I C A M/in tegr in av id i ty change s may lead to the e luc i -da t ion o f nove l the rapeu t ic ta rge ts .Acknowledgments

    T h e a u t h o r s t h a n k t h e i r c o l l e a g u e s f o ra l low ing the m to inc lude unpub l i she d da t a a nda p o l o g i z e t o t h o s e w h o s e w o r k w e d i d n o tinc lude be c a use o f spa c e l imi t a tions . W e a l sot h a n k L o u i s e B a n d a n d A l i c e D e r s h a m f o rc r i t i c a l r e a d i n g a n d h e l p i n p r e p a r i n g t h emanuscr ip t , r e spec t ive ly .

    T h e I C A M P r o t e in F a m i l y 3 2 3

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    12/15

    References1 W i l l ia ms A F : The i mm uno-globulin superfamily takes shape(news). Nature (Lond) 1984;308(5954):12-13.Staunton DE, M arlin SD, StratowaC, Dustin ML, Springer TA: Pri-

    mary structure o f ICAM -I demon-strates interaction between mem-bers of the immunoglobulin andintegrin supergene families. Cell1988;52(6):925-933.3 Simmons D, Makgoba MW , SeedB: ICAM, an adhesion l igand ofLF A- 1, is homologou s to the neu-ral cell adhesion molecule NCA M .Nature (Lond) 1988;331(6157):624-627.4 Staunton DE, Dustin ML, Erick-son HP, Springer TA: The arran-gement of the immunoglobulin-l ike domains of ICAM-I and thebinding sites for LFA - 1 and rhino-virus (published errata appear inCell Jun 15 190;61(2):1157 andSep201991 ;66(6):following1311).Cell 1990;61 (2):243-254.5 V onde r he i de RH , Te dde r TF ,Springer TA, Staunton DE: Resi-dues wi thin a conserved aminoacid motif of domains 1 and 4 ofVCA M-1 are required for bindingto VL A-4. J Cell Bio11994;125(1):215-222.6 Altmann DM , Hogg N, TrowsdaleJ, Wilkinson D: Cotransfection o fI C A M - I a n d H L A - D R r e c o n -stitutes hu man antigen-presentingcell function in mouse L cells .Nature (Lond) 1989;338(6215):512-514.7 Springer TA: Adhesion receptorsof the immune sys tem. Nature(Lond) 1990;346(6283):425-434.

    8 Sligh JE, Jr., Ballantyne CM, RichSS, Hawkins HK, Smi th CW,Bradley A, Beaudet AL: Inflam-matory and imm une responses areimpai red in mice def ic ient inintercellular adhesion m olecule 1.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90(I 8):8529-853 3.9 Xu H, Gonzalo JA, St Pierre Y,Williams IR, Kupper TS, CotranR S , S p r i n g e r T A , G u t i e r r e z -Ra m os JC : Le ukoc y t os i s a ndresistance to septic shock in inter-c e l l u l a r a dhe s i on m ol e c u l e l -deficient mice. J Exp Meal 1994;1 8 0 ( I ) : 9 5 - 1 0 9 .

    10 Soriano SG, Lipton SA, W ang YF,Xiao M, Springer TA, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Hickey PR: Inte r -c e l l u l a r a dhe s i on mol e c u l e - l -deficient m ice are less susceptibleto cerebral ischemia-reperfusioninjury. Ann Neurol 1996;39(5):618-624.11 Berendt AR, Simm ons DL, Tan-sey J, Newbold C I, Marsh K : Inter-cellu lar adhesion molecule- 1 is anendothelial cell adhesion receptorfor Plasmodium falciparum. Na-ture (Lond ) 1989;341 (6237 ):57-59.12 Fortin JF, Cantin R, Lam ontagneG , Tr e mbl a y M: H os t - de r i ve dICAM-1 glycoproteins incorpor-ated on human immunodeficiencyvirus type 1 are biologically activeand enhance viral infectivi ty. JVirol 1997;71(5):3588-3596.13 Dustin ML, Springer TA : Lym -phocyte function-associated anti-gen- I (LFA-I ) in te rac t ion wi thintercellular adhesion m olecule- 1(ICAM-1) is one of at least threemechanisms for lymphocyte ad-hes ion to cul tured endothe l ia lcel ls . J Cell Biol 1988;107(1):321-331.14 de Fougerolles AR, Stacker SA,Schw arting R, Springer TA: Char-acterization of ICAM-2 and evi-dence for a third counter-receptorfor LF A- l.J Exp Med 1991;174(1):253-267.15 Staunton DE, Dustin ML, Sprin-ge r TA : F unc t i ona l c l on i ng o fICAM -2, a cell adhesion ligand forLFA-I homologous to ICAM-1.Nature (Lond) 1989;339(6219):61-64.16 Xie J, Li R, Kotovuo ri P, Vermo t-Desroches C, Wijdenes J , ArnaoutMA, Nortamo P, Gahmberg CG:Intercellular adhesion molecule-2(CDI02) binds to the leukocyteintegrin CD I Ib/CD1 8 through theA domain. J Immunol 1995;155(7):3619-3628.17 Vazeux R, Hoffman PA, Tom itaJK, Dickinson ES, Jasman RL , St.John T, G allat in W M: Cloning andcharacterization of a new inter-cellular adhesion m olecule ICAM -R. Nature (Lond) 1992;360:485-488.18 Fawcett J, Holness CLL, Need-ham LA, Tur ley H, Gat te r KC,

    Mason DY, Simmons DL: Mol-ecular cloning of ICAM -3, a thirdligand for LFA-I, constitutivelyexpressed on resting leukocytes.Nature (Lond) 1992;360:481-484.19 de Fougerolles AR, Klickstein LB,Springer TA: Cloning and expres-s i on o f i n t e r c e l l u l a r a dhe s i onmolecule 3 reveals strong homo-l ogy t o o t he r i mmunog l obu l i nfamily counter-receptors for lym -phocyte function-associated anti-gen 1. J Exp Med 1993;177(4):1187-1192.20 Sadhu C, Lipsky B, Erickson HP,Hay f l ick J , Dick KO, Gal la t inWM, Staunton DE: LFA-I b in-ding si te in ICAM-3 contains ac onse r ve d mot i f a nd non- c on-tiguous amino acids. Cell AdhesComrnun 1994;2:429440.21 de Fougerolles AR, Diamond MS,Springer TA: Heterogenous gly-cosylat ion of ICAM -3 and lack ofinteractionwith Mac-I and p 150,95.EurJ Imm unol 1995 25 4):1008-1012.22 van Kooyk Y, Binner t s ME,Edwards CP, Champe M, BermanPW , Figdor CG, Bodary SC: Cri-tical amino acids in the lympho-cyte function-associated antigen-1I doma i n me d i a t e i n t e r c e l l u l a radhesion molecule 3 binding andimmune func t ion. J Exp Med1996;183(3):1247-1252.23 Kl icks te in LB, York MR, Fou-gerolles AR, Springer TA: Local-iza t ion of the binding s i te onintercellular adhesion mo lecule-3(ICAM -3) or lympho cyte unction-associated antigen 1 (LF A- I) . JBiol Chem 1996;271(39):23,920-23,927.

    24 Van der Vieren M, Le Trong H,Wood CL , Moore PF, St . John T,Staunton DE, Gal la t in WM: Anovel leukointegrin, alpha-d beta-2, binds preferentially to IC AM -3.Immunity 1995;3:683-690.25 Vilella R, Mila J, Lozano F, A1-bero la-I la ,I, Places L, V ires J:Involvement of the CDw 50 m ole-cule in a l lorecogni t ion. TissueAntigens 1990;36(5):203-210.26 de Fougerolles AR , Qin X, Sprin-ger TA: Characterization of thefunction o f intercellular adhesionmolecule ( ICAM )-3 and compar-ison with ICAM -I and ICAM -2 in

    32 4 Hayflick, Kilgannon, and Gallatin

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    13/15

    immune responses . J Exp Med1994;179(2):619-629.27 Acevedo A, de! Pozo MA, ArroyoA G , S a nc he z - Ma t e os P , G on-zalez-Amaro R, Sanchez-MadridF: Distribution of ICAM-3-bear-ing cells in normal hum an tissues.Express ion of a nove l counte r -receptor for LFA-1 in epidermalLangerhans ce l l s . Am J Pa thol1993;143(3):774-783.28 Staquet MJ, Peguet J, Jacquet C,Dezutter-Dambuyant C, SchmittD : E xpr e s s i on o f I CA M- 3 onhuman epidermal dendritic cells.Imm unobiology 1995;192(3-4):249-261.29 Teunissen MB, Koomen CW , BosJD: Intercellular adhesion mole-cule -3 (CD50) on human epi -dermalLangerhans cells participatesin T ce ll activation. J Invest D er-matol 1995;104(6):995-998.30 Griffiths CE, Railan D, GallatinWM, Cooper KD: The ICAM-3/LFA-I interaction is cr i t ical forepidermal Langerhans cel l a l lo-antigen presentation to CD4+ Tcells. Br J Dermatol 1995;133(6):823-829.31 Chr is toph ers E : The immu no-pathology of psoriasis. Int ArchAl le rgy Imm unol 1996;110(3) :199-206.32 D ouss i s - A na gno s t opou l ou I ,Kaklam anis L, Cordell J, Jones M,Turley H, Pulford K , Simmons D,Mason D, Gar te r K: ICAM-3e xpr e s s i on on e ndo t he l i um i nl ympho i d ma l i gna nc y . A m JPathol 1993;143(4):1040-1043.33 Patey N, Vazeux R, Canioni D,Potter T, Gallatin WM , Brousse N:Intercellular adhesion molecule-3on endothelial cells. Expression intumors but not in inflammatoryresponses. Am J Pathol 1996;148(2):465-472.34 YoshimuraT, JohnsonDG: cDNAcloning and expression of guineapig neutrophil attractant protein-1( N a p- l ) . N a p- I i s h i gh l y c on-served in guinea pig. J Immunol1993;151(11):6225-6236.35 Ba illy P, Herman d P, Callebaut I,S onne bor n H H , K ha ml i c h i S ,Mornon JP, Cartron JP: The LWblood group glycoprotein is homo-logous to intercellu lar adhesionmolecules . Proc Nat l Acad Sc iUSA 1994;91(12):5306-5310.

    36 Levine P, Stetson RE: An unusualcase of intragroup agglutination.JAMA 1939;113:126,127.37 Sistonen P: Linkage of the LWblood group locus with the com-plement C3 and Lutheran bloodgr oup l oc i . A nn H um G e ne t1984;48(Pt 3):239-242.38 Marsh WL, Chaganti RS, GardnerFH, M ayer K, Nowell PC, GermanJ : Ma pp i ng huma n a u t osome s :evidence supporting assignm ent ofrhesus to the short arm of chro-mosome no. 1. Science (Wash DC)1974;183(128):966-968.39 Ba il ly P, Ton tt i E, Hermand P,Cartron JP, Gahmberg CG: Thered cell LW blood group p rotein isan intercellular adhesion m oleculewhich binds to CD11/CD18 leuk-ocyte integr ins. Eur J Immunol1995;25(12):3316-3320.40 Yoshihara Y, Oka S, Nemoto Y,Watanabe Y, Nagata S, Kagami-yama H, M ori K: An ICAM -rela-ted neuronal glycoprotein, telen-cepha l in , wi th bra in segment -specific expression. Neuron 1994;12(3):541-553.41 Mizuno T, Yoshihara Y, InazawaJ, Kagamiyama H, M ori K: cDNAcloning and chromosomal local-ization o f the human telencephalin

    and its distinctive interaction withlymphocyte func t ion-assoc ia tedantigen-1. J B iol Chem 1997;272(2):1156-1 t63.42 Tian L, Yoshihara Y, M izuno T,Mori K, Gahmberg CG : The neu-ronal glycoprotein telencephalin isa cel lular l igand for the CD1 la/CD18 leukocyte in tegr in . JImmunol 1997;158(2):928-936.43 Lewis M, Kai ta H, Coghlan G,Philipps S, Belcher E, McAlpineP J, Coopland GR, W oods RA: Thec hr omosome 19 l i nka ge g r oupLDLR, C3, LW, APOC 2, LU, SEin man. Ann Hum Genet 1988;52(Pt 2):137-144.44 Sansom D, Borrow J, Solomon E,Trowsdale J: The hu man ICAM2gene maps to 17q23-25. Genomics1991;11 (2):462-464.45 Trask B, Fertitta A, Christensen M,Youngblom J, Bergmann A, Cope-land A, de Jong P, M ohrenweiserH, Olsen A , Carrano A, et al.: Fluo-rescence in s i tu hybr idiza t ionmapping of human chromosome19: cytogenetic band location of

    540 cosmids and 70 genes or DNAmarkers. Genomics 1993;15(1):133-145.46 Bossy D, Mattei MG , SimmonsDL: The human intercellular ad-hesion m olecule 3 ( ICAM3) geneis located in the 19p13.2-p13.3region, c lose to the ICAM 1 gene.Genomics 1994;23(3):712,713.47 Naruse K, Ueno M, Staoh T, No-miyama H, Tel H, Takeda M , Led-better DH, C oillie EV, OpdenakkerG, Gunge N, Sakaki Y: A YACcontig of the human CC chemo-kine genes clustered on chromo-some 1 7ql 1.2. Genom ics 1996;34:236-240.48 Alva rez V, Coto E , Se t ien F ,Lopez-Larrea C: A physical mapof two c lus te r s conta ining thege ne s f o r s i x p r o i n f l a mma t o r yreceptors. Immunogenetics 1994;40(2):100-103.49 Rapor t CJ , Schweickar t VL,Chantry D, Eddy RL, Jr., ShowsTB, Go diska R, Gray PW: Newmem bers of the chemokine recep-tor gene family. J Leukoc Biol1996;59(1):18-23.50 Jensenius JC, W ill iams AF: The Tl ymphoc y t e a n t i ge n r e c e p t o r - -paradigm los t . Na ture (Lond)1982;300(5893):583-588.

    51 Casasnovas JM, Springer TA, LiuJH, Harrison SC, W ang JH: Crys-tal structure of ICAM -2 reveals adis t inc t ive in tegr in recogni t ionsurface. Nature (Lond) 1997;387(6630):312-315.52 Reil ly PL, W oska JR, Jr. , Jean-favre DD, McN ally E, Rothlein R,Borm ann BJ: The native structureof in te rce l lu la r adhes ion mole-cule-1 (ICAM -1) is a dimer. Cor-relation with binding to LFA-1. Jlmmunol 1995;155(2):529-532.53 M i l le r J , Knor r R, Fer rone M,Houdei R, Carton CP, Dustin ML:Intercellular adhesion m olecule- 1dimerization and its consequencesfor adhes ion media ted by lym-phocyte function a ssoc iated - l . JExp M ed 1995 ;182(5):1231-1241.54 O ka S , Mor i K , Wa t a na be Y :Mam malian telencephalic neuronsexpressa segmen t-specificmembraneglycoprotein, telencephalin. N euro-scienc e 1990;35(1):93-103.55 Chi ra thaworn C, T ibbe t t s SA,Chan MA, Benedict SH: Cross-l i nk i ng o f I CA M- 1 on T c e l l s

    The ICAM Protein Family 325

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    14/15

    induces transient tyrosine phos-phoryla t ion and inac t iva t ion ofcdc2 kinase . J Immunol 1995;155(12):5479-5482.56 Durieu-Trautmann O, Chaverot N,Cazaubon S, Strosberg A D, Cou-raud PO: Interc ellular adhesionmol e c u l e 1 ac t i va t ion i nduc e styros ine phospho ryla t ion of thecytoske le ton-assoc ia ted prote incor tac t in in bra in microvesse lendothe l ia l ce l l s . J Biol Chem1994;269(17): 12,536-12,540.57 Koyama Y, Tanaka Y, Saito K,Abe M , Nakatsuka K, Morimoto 1,Auron PE, Eto S: Cross-linking ofintercellular adhesion molecule 1(CD54) induces AP-I activationa nd I L - l - be t a t r a nsc r i p t i on . JImmunol 1996;157:5097-5103.58 Rothlein R, Kishimo to TK, Main-olf i E: Cross- l inking of ICAM-Iinduces co-s igna l ing of an oxi -da t ive burs t f rom mononuc learleukocytes. J Immunol 1994;152(5):2488-2495.59 Hernandez-Caselles T, Rubio G,Campanero MR, del Pozo MA,Mu ro M, Sanchez-MadfidF, Apari-cio P: ICAM-3, the third LFA-1counte r receptor , i s a co-s t im-ulatory molecule for both restinga n d a c t i v a t e d T l y m p h o c y t e s .Eur J Immunol 1993;23(11) :2799-2806.60 de l Pozo M A, Campanero MR,Sanchez-Mateos P, Arroy o AG ,Pulido R, Munoz C, Hernandez-Caselles T, Aparicio P, Sanchez-Ma dr i d F : Ro l e o f I CA M- 3 i nintercellular adh esion and activa-t ion o fT lymphocytes. Cell AdhesCommun 1994;2(3) :211-218.61 Arroy o AG, Campanero MR, San-chez-Mateos P, Zapata JM, UrsaMA , de l P oz o MA , S a nc he z -Madrid F: Induction of tyrosinephosphorylation during ICAM-3and LFA-l-mediated ntercellularadhesion, an d its regulation by theCD45 tyrosine ph osphatase. J CellBiol 1994;126(5):1277-1286.62 Jua n M, Vinas O, Pino-Otin MR,P l a c e s L , Ma r t i ne z - Ca c e r e s E ,Barcelo JJ, M iralles A, Vilella R,de la Fuente MA, V ires J , e t a l .:CD50 ( in te rce l lu la r adhes ionmolecule 3) stimulation inducescalcium m obilization and tyrosinephosphorylation through p59fyn

    and p561 ck in Jurkat T cell line. JE xp Me d 1994 ; 179( 6 ) : 1747-1756.63 Campanero MR, Sanchez-MateosP, del Pozo MA, Sanchez-MadridF: ICAM-3 regulates lymphocytemor pho l ogy a nd i n t e g r i n - me d-iated T cell interaction with en-dothe l ia l ce l l and ext race l lu la rmatrix ligands. J Cell Biol 1994;127(3):867-878.64 Cid MC , Esparza J, Juan M, Mir-alles A, Ordi J, Vilella R, Urbano-Marquez A, Gaya A, Vives J ,Yague J: Signaling through CD5 0(ICAM-3) stimulates Y lympho-cyte binding to human umbilicalvein endothelial cells and extra-ce l lu la r mat r ix prote ins v ia anincrease in be ta 1 and be ta 2integrin function. Eur J Immunol1994;24(6):1377-1382.65 Hay f l ick JS , S t ine J , Fox R,Hoekstra D, Gallatin WM: Func-tional mapping o f the cytoplasmicregion of intercellular adhesionmolecule 3 reveals imp ortant rolesfor serine residues. J Biol Chem1997;272(35):22,207-22,214.66 Croft M, Bradley LM , Swain SL:Naive versus m emory CD4 Y cellresponse to antigen. M emory cellsare less dependent on accessorycell costimulation an d can respondto man y antigen-presenting celltypes including resting B cells. Jlmmuno11994;152(6):2675-2685.67 Valitutti S, Dessing M, AktoriesK, Gal la t i H , Lanzavecchia A:Sustained signaling leading to Tcell activation results from pro-longed Y cell receptor occup ancy.Role ofT cell actin cytoskeleton. JExp Med 1995;181(2):577-584.68 Theriot JA, M itchison TJ: Actinmicrofilament dynamics in loco-mot i ng c e l l s ( s e e c omme nt s ) .Nature (Lond) 1991;352(6331):126-131.69 DeBell KE, Conti A, Alava MA,Hoffman T, Bo nvini E: Microfila-ment assembly modulates phos-pho l i pa se C- me d i a t e d s i gna ltransduction by the TCR/CD3 inmurine T helper lymphocytes. JImm unol 1992; 149(7):2271-2280.70 Parsey MV, Lewis GK: Act inpo l yme r i z a t i on a nd pse udopodreorga nization accompany anti-CD3- induced growth a r res t in

    Jurkat T cells. J Immunol 1993;151(4):1881-1893.71 Phatak PD, Packm an CH: Engage-ment o f the T cell antigen receptorby anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodycauses a rapid increase in lymph-ocyte F-actin. J Cell Physio11994 ;159(2):365-370.72 Phatak PD, Packman CH, Licht-man MA: Protein kinase C mod-ula tes ac t in conformat ion inhuman T lymphocytes. J Immunol1988;141(9):2929-2934.73 Brock MA, Chrest F: Differentialregulation of actin polym erizationfollowing activation of resting Tlymphocytes f rom young and agedmice. J Cell Physiol 1993;157(2):36%378.74 Trachsel S, Keller HU: Selectiveresponses (actin polymerization,shape changes, locomotion, pino-cytosis) to the PKC inhibitor Ro31-8220 sugges t tha t PKC dis-criminately regulates functions o fhuma n b l ood l ymphoc y t e s . JLeukoc Bio11995 57(4) :587-591.75 Rosette C, Karin M: Cytoskeletalcontrol of gene expression: depoly-merization of microtubules a cti-va tes NF -kapp a B. J Ce l l Biol1995;128(6):1111-1119.75a Kessel JM, Hayfl ick J, W eyrich

    AS, Hof fman PA, Gal la t in M,Mc l n t y r e T M, P r e sc o t t S M,Zimmerman GA: Engagement ofintercellular adhesion molecule-3( I CA M- 3) i nduc e s c he moki nesecre t ion and spreading bymyeloid leukocytes . J Immunol1998; in press.76 Vogetseder W, Dierich MP: Inter-c e l l u l a r a dhe s i on mol e c u l e - i( ICAM-I , CD 54) i s assoc ia tedw i t h a c t i n - f i l a me n t s . I mmuno-biology 1991 ;182(2): 143-151.77 Carpen O, Pallai P, Staunton DE,Springer TA: A ssociation of inter-ce l lu la r adhes ion molecule -1(ICAM-1) with actin-containingcytoskeleton and alpha-actinin. JCell Bio11 992;118(5): 1223,1234.78 Federici C, Cam oin L, Hattab M,Strosberg AD, Couraud PO : Asso-ciation o f the cytoplasmic dom ainof intercellular-adhesionmolecule-l w i t h g l yc e r a l de hyde - 3 - phos -phate dehydrogen ase and beta-tub-ulin. Euro J Biochem 1996;238(1):173-180.

    32 6 Hayflick, Kilgannon, and Gallatin

  • 8/2/2019 Icam Family

    15/15

    79 Heiska L, Kantor C, Parr T, Crit-chley DR, Vil ja P, Gahmberg CG ,Carpen O: Binding of the cyto-plasmic domain of in te rce l lu la radhesion molecule-2 (ICAM -2) toalpha-actinin. J Biol Chem 1996;271 (42):26,214-26,219.80 Helander TS, Carpen O, TurunenO, Kovanen PE, Vaheri A, Tim-onen T: ICAM-2 redistributed byezrin as a target for killer cells.Nature (Lond) 1996;382(6588):265-268.81 Jockusch BM, Rudiger M: Cross-talk between cell adhesion mol-ecules: viniculin as a paradigm forreguation by conformation. CellBiology 1996;6:311-315.82 Bray D, W hite JG: Cortical flowin animal cel ls . Science (WashDC) 1988;239(4842):883-888.83 Dustin ML, Carpen O, SpringerTA: R egulation o f locomotion andcell-cell contact area by the LFA - Iand IC AM -I adhesion receptors. JImm unol 1992;148(9):2654-2663.84 Campanero MR , de l Pozo MA,Arroy o AG , Sanchez-Mateos P,Hernandez-Caselles T, Craig A,P u l i do R , S a nc he z - Ma dr i d F :ICAM-3 interacts with LFA - 1 andregulates the LFA - I /ICAM - 1 celladhes ion pa thway. J Ce l l Biol1993;123(4):1007-1016.85 del Pozo MA, Sanchez-Mateos P,N i e t o M, S a nc he z - Ma dr i d F :Che moki ne s r e gu l a t e c e l l u l a rpolarization and adhesion receptorredistribution during lymphocyteinteraction with endothelium andextracellular matrix. Involvem entof cAMP signaling pathway. J CellBiol 1995;131(2):495-508.86 del Pozo MA, Pulido R, Munoz C,A I va r e z V , H umbr i a A , Ca m-panero MR, Sanchez-Madrid F:

    Regula t ion of ICAM-3 (CD50)membrane expression on humanneutrophils through a proteolyticshedding mechanism. Eur J Im-munol 1994;24(11):2586-2594.87 Pino-Otin MR , Vinas O, de la Fu-ente MA, Juan M, Font J, Torra-def lot M, Pallares L, Lozano F,Alb erola-I la , Martorel l J , YagueJ, Vives J, Gaya A: Existence of aso l ub l e f o r m o f CD 50 ( i n t e r -c e l l u l a r a dhe s i on mol e c u l e - 3 )p r oduc e d upon huma n l ymph-oc y t e a c t i va t i on . J I mmunol1995; 154:3015-30 24.88 Martin S, Rieckman n P, M elchersI, W agner R, Bertrams J, VoskuylAE, Roep BO , Zielasek J, Hei-denthal E, Weichselbraun I, et a:C i r c u l a t i ng f o r ms o f I CA M- 3( c I CA M- 3) . E l e va t e d l e ve l s i nautoimm une diseases and lack ofassociation with cICAM-1. J Im-munol 1995;154(4): 1951-1955.89 Sudhoff T, Wehm eier A, ArningM, Bauser U, S chlomer P, Aul C,Schneider W: Increases o f sICAM -I during neutropenic pneum onia inleukemic patients. Leukem ia 1997;11(3):346-351.90 Rieckm ann P, Altenhofen B, Rie-gel A, Baudewig J, Felgenhauer K:S o l ub l e a dhe s i on mol e c u l e s( sVCAM -1 and s ICAM -1) incerebrospina l f lu id and se rumcor re la te wi th MRI ac t iv i ty inmul t ip le sc le ros is . Ann Neurol1997;41 (3):326-333.91 Gonokami Y, Konno S, KurokawaM, Kawazu K, Ueno K, Tomita K,I ke M, N yu i M, A da c h i M:Circulating intracellular adh esionmol e c u l e - I c onc e n t r a t i ons f o l -lowing bronchial provocation inatopic asthma, lnt Arch AllergyImmunol 1997;112(4):386-391.

    92 Huguenel ED, Coh n D, DockumDP, Greve JM, Fournel MA, Ham -mond L , I r w i n R , Ma hone y J ,McClelland A, M uchmore E, OhlinAC, Scuderi P: Prevention ofrhinovirus infection in chimpanzeesby soluble intercellular adhesionmolecule-1. Am J Respir Crit CareM ed 1997;155(4): 1206-1210.93 Stepkowski SM, Yu Y, CondonTP , Be nne t t CF : B l oc k i ng o fhe a r t a l l og r a f t r e j e c t i on byintercellular adhesion molecule-Iantisense oligonucleotides aloneor in combina t ion wi th otheri mmunosuppr e s s i ve moda l i t i e s(published erratum appears in JI mm unol 1995 F e b 1 :154( 3) :1521). J Immunol 1994;153(11):5336-5346.94 Stepkowski SM, Tu Y, CondonTP, Benne t t CF: Induc t ion oftransplantation tolerance by treat-me n t w i t h I CA M- I a n t i s e nseoligonucleotides and anti-LFA-1monoc l ona l a n t i bod i e s . Tr a ns -plant Proc 1995;27(1):113.95 Katz SM, Browne B, Phan T,Wa ng ME, Be nne t t CF , S t e p -kowski SM , Kahan BD: Eff icacyofICAM -1 antisense oligonucleo-tide in pancreatic islet transplan-tation. Transplant Proc 1995;27(6):3214.96 Kumasaka T, Quinlan WM , DoyleNA, Condon TP, Sligh J, Takei F,Beaude t A, Benne t t CF, Doer -schuk CM: Role of the in te r -c e l l u l a r a dhe s i on mol e c u l e - I(ICAM-1) in endotoxin-inducedpne umoni a e va l ua t e d us i ngICAM-1 ant i sense ol igonuc leo-t ides, anti- ICAM-1 monoclonalantibodies, and ICAM-I mutantmice. J Clin Invest 1996;97(10):2362-2369.

    The ICAM Protein Family 327