80
ICH KAISER HILL COMPANY January 15, 1997 TO: Rad Health Labs Building 123 Ext. JOINT COMPANY-UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE FROM: UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA P. Giacomini / T. J. Tegeler Joint Company/Union Safety Committee Building T452B / Building T690G Ext. 7620 / Ext. 5800 SUBJECT: VERIFICATION OF IMPLEMENTATION - SAFETY CONCERN NUMBER 94-064 POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED ITEMS The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has verified implementation of the subject safety concern and has closed the concern. Attached is the verification form. Thank you for participating in the safety concern process. Attachment: As Stated cc: J. R. Cable R. S. Martinez D. L. McCoy D. D. Melton C. Trice C. M. Wise PATS

ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

ICHKAISER HILLCOMPANY

January 15, 1997

TO: Rad Health LabsBuilding 123Ext.

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

FROM:

UNITEDSTEELWORKERSOF AMERICA

P. Giacomini / T. J. TegelerJoint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T452B / Building T690GExt. 7620 / Ext. 5800

SUBJECT: VERIFICATION OF IMPLEMENTATION - SAFETY CONCERN NUMBER 94-064POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED ITEMS

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has verified implementationof the subject safety concern and has closed the concern. Attached is theverification form.

Thank you for participating in the safety concern process.

Attachment:As Stated

cc:

J. R. CableR. S. MartinezD. L. McCoyD. D. MeltonC. TriceC. M. WisePATS

Page 2: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JCUSC VERIFICATION / CLOSURE FORM

Check One: [0^erified Complete □ Reopened

ISP# JCUSC# ORIGIN OF FINDING ICIJSC _

ACTION RESPONSIBILITY ASSIGNED TO: C-STATEMENT OF FINDING:

^ S

EXPLANATION OF VERIFICATION:

Does the action plan address the intent of the resolution letter? Yes 0^ No O

EXPLANATION OF CLOSURE:

rro<z^ciluLt^<- fCOJ- 'T.or /

^i/o/y CJC,yt-y^jylyj / ^ Ae' yy*>c/' /?^ ^/o /\ At^/piCxJ

I/O ^OT /

y^AyJl' * ' ^ —— ■ ■> / "C jr^

— / A —iA ——

VERIFICATION BY: pAUnion Investigator Print Name / Signal

DATE:. 1-8,

VERIFICATION BY: S DATE: X-Company Investigator Print Name Signature

APPROVED BY: -7^<J 'Union Co-Chair Print Name

-7?'</ yd/yC r^yC DATE: /'/f-f 7Signature

APPROVED BY: DATE:Company Co-Chair Print Name Signature

Distrihution:

Commitments Tracking Group - T130GJoint Company/Union Safety Committee - T452B / T690G

Page 3: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

RADIOLOGICAL DEFICIENCY REPORT Page 1 of.RDR Rocky Flats Environmental Tectinology Site Commitment #

1. ORIGINATOR: /y . Name: Employee# Signature: Ext/Paae:Job / Classification: k Q. J- ~n~ Organization / Gompanv:7\.?yr Qify3 Building: Report Time / Date:/J?<3QEvent Time / Date^^V? / Building / Location: JC Event Code(s) (see reverse) a. -t- v •Description of radiological p6stingfs): .-of-, c-4 f^lc. r )Protective clothing worn: Su. rv-.o<L<r.'v.4v/ C/&-4 U c vEvolution(s) in progress: C oc >oc. o> /> d-s ory^ f^WP 4^ <79/- CbQ *^9Individuals Involved: (When this section is eompleted, this form becomes SENSITIVE INFORfl/IATION under the Privacy Act).Name: Employee#: Organization: , Job / Classifioation: Supen/isor:L vc^ _Mo rv-|0) v->

Description of Deficiency: (Include documentation; RWPs, radiological survey results, etc.): V/ln>' f-e c\c-.iv-,'c. r , 4 .'v^-<> e^of p* Fi i'c: tr^v <r> y-> Cotj w

-7EC *7^ dr.Q, ' ^ ' O

Imrnediate Corrective Actions .'v. So.'s. r A o>^ <5^ ^a.c^-<7 d ho-c. g-ert 70 7-Trc.v.s.po^4-^.i ,i \-^cvc^ ^

2. RO FOR^AN^REVIEW: ^ Q . , ,Name: / 74-/j^Kl€y^ Employee#: 'Z-rc'TtpSignature: ^

FACILITY MANAGER:

Name: DOE CATEGORIZATION: [] Unusual Occurrence [] Emergency [] Off ■ Normal (] Internally Reportable [) Not ApplicableOccurrence Report # Signature: ^ Date:

RESPONSIBLE MANAGER;

Name: Employee #: Signature: Date:Organization#: Director Name: Target completion date: Revised date:Completion Summary:Apparent Cause Category: (] Personnel [] Procedure (] Management System (] Equipment (] Training [] Planning () Communications [) OtherI have corrected this RDR and recommend close out. Name: Signature: Date:

5. RDR ADMINISTRATOR:

Actions have been reviewed, close out is: ,|; ] Satisfactory, [ ] Unsatisfactory, |; ] Returned to the Responsible Manager (Date: ).Name: Employee # Signature: Date:

Page 4: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

" EGaB ROCKY FLATSUSWA

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

Date:

To:

From:

SUBJECT:

January 27,1995

, Rad Health Labs. Building 123, Ext.

D. D. Melton, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee,Building T452B, Ext. 5130D. L. McCoy, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee,Building T690G Ext. 5298

RESOLUTION OF SAFETY CONCERN 94-064 POTENTIALLYCONTAMINATED ITEMS

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) tias Investigated the concernmentioned above.

Air-Heads were arriving at building 123 over the required radiological limits.Radiological Engineering and Radiological Operations have been monitoring this Issue.The resolution for this concern Is as follows: Radiological Operations department willadhere to Radiological Operations Instruction (ROI) ROI 4.1, when air-heads areshipped to building 123. If airheads arrive at building 123 above the limit specified InROI 4.1 the analytical tabs In building 123 will notify building Radloldglcdl &Tglneeringand Radiological Operations.

The JCUSC considers this concem adequately addressed. Changes to this agreementcannot be made without concurrence by the JCUSC. Thank you for your participationIn the safety program. If you have any further problems with this concem, Its answer orthe Implementation, please feel free to contact the JCUSC.

Oi 0.D. D. Melton

Company Safety RepresentativeD.X McCoyUnion Safety tentative

cc:

A. J. AstI

R. D, Cantwell

L J. LightJ. B. Powell

C. Trice

T. J. TegelerE. I. TIetenbergC. M. Wise

PATS

Page 5: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

iilKAISER-HILL USWA

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

November 01, 1995 SAFETY COM|^TEETO: FROM: E. I. Tietenberg / T. J. Tegeler

Rad Health Labs Joint Company/IInion Safety CommitteeBuilding 123 Building T452B / Building T690GExt. Ext. 7620 / Ext. 5800

SUBJECT: VERIEICATION OF IMPLEMENTATION - SAFETY CONCERN NUMBER 94-065RADON DECAY

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has verified implementationof the subject safety concern and has closed the concern. Attached is theverification form.

Thank you for participating in the safety concern process.

Attachment:As Stated

cc:

J. R. CableR. S. MartinezD. L. McCoyD. D. MeltonC. TriceC. M. WisePATS

Page 6: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JCUSCVEniFICATlON FORM

Circle One -(yerified Cormpie^ Reopen

,SP NO. SAFETY CONCERN NO. ORIGIN OF FINDING^JOl^

ACTION RESPONSIBILITY ASSIGNED TOSTATE OF FINDING; uJt/f- c^/^rnn'y^ ik/.l /^uJdrUi'J&- 'p/danO

aD yfYC.'Ft \]Qi^ Tlu^/lei K

EXPLANATION OF VERIFICATION:

1. Does the action plan address the intent o( the original [inding? V®®

2. Has the situation described in the finding been adequately improved or corrected?? yesno

VERIFICATION DETAIL - Describe the actions taken to reach a disposition on this finding.

hJO

EG&G VERIFICATION RY- M A. Martinez v^-i\Print Name

UNION SAFETY COMMITTEEVERIFICATION RY- A. C. Scarpeli

, nATR. IO-L6-76

Print Name Signay^ / / APPROVED RV- Rnn TiAtftnhero ^ Vy DATE. /o^/?//'f\

HATF /o^yr-fsAPPROVED RY- Tpd Tegeler— ' *

Print Name Signature

Distribution:

Operations Monitoring - T130GJoint Company/Union Safety Committee - T452B

Page 7: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

V'f

' 'i. t' *%*., V IJ\. -■

- /l(^.I? y '.1

,,i f „.-

KAISER-HILLr r- N! i A K V JOINT COMPANY-UNION

USWA

November 01. 1995

TO: Rad Health LabsBuilding 123Ext.

SAFETY COM^TEEFROM: E. I. Tietenberg / T. J. Tegeler

Joint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T452B / Building T690GExt. 7620 / Ext. 5800

SUBJECT: VERIFICATION OF IMPLEMENTATION - SAFETY CONCERN NUMBER 94-065RADON DECAY

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has verified implementationof the subject safety concern and has closed the concern. Attached is theverification form.

Thank you for participating in the safety concern process.

Attachment:As Stated

J^'r. CableR. S. MartinezD. L. McCoyD. D. MeltonC. TriceC. M. WisePATS

Page 8: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JCUSC VERIFICATION FORM

Circle One -(Verified Comple^ Reopen

ISP NO. SAFETY CONCERN ORIGIN OF

yes. nc

ACTION RESPONSIBILITY ASSIGNED TO __STATE OF FINDING; /, uJ^ 7/^ c<w7d-rf)H'.'0 'ikL

/ijp P Y tlLJi'tlHT!.

EXPLANATION OF VERIFICATION:

1. Does the action plan address the intent of the original finding?

2. Has the situation described in the finding been adequately improved or corrected?? yesJl_no

VERIFICATION DETAIL - Describe the actions taken to reach a disposition on this finding.

{^0^1^77 "^HkM-dTrO.

HATF- 10- ZL- 7!>EG&G VERIFICATION RY- M A. Martinez

Print Name Signature

UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE jP ^ r- -7/ /VERIFICATION RV- A C .Snarpelly^^^^/-^^--^ DATE._4rlgs^

Print Name Signatoi^ , /APPROVED RY- Pnn Tintnnhera ^ lkr~. DATE. /o^/7//'7\

approved

Print Name Signature

Distribution:

Operations Monitoring - T130GJoint Company/Union Safety Committee - T452B

Page 9: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

c < »

EErG rocky flats

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

uswaIM^#

Date: June 9, 1994

To: , Rad Health Labs, Building 123, Ext

From: D. L. McCoy, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee, Building T690GExt. 5298

D. D. Melton, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee, Building T452BExt. 5130

SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF SAFETY CONCERN 94-065, RADON DECAY

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has investigation the concernmentioned above. A meeting to determine a course of action for this concern was heldon May 26, 1994.

During the course of the investigation, the building Radiological Engineer clarified thehazards of radon gas to the initiator (see attached).

The JCUSC considers this concern adequately addressed. Changes to this agreementcannot be made without concurrence by the JCUSC. Thank you for your participation inthe safety program. If you have any further problems with this concern, its answer orthe implementation, please feel free to contact the JCUSC.

.'u}.D. D. Melton

Company Safety Representative

cc:

A. J. Asti

E. A. Christopher

L. J. Light

R. 8. Martinez

J. B. Powell

T. J. TegelerE. I. Tietenberg

C. Trice

0. M. Wise

PATS

IcCo^Union Safety/Representative

Page 10: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

rocky flats

INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

DATE:

TO:

FROM:

June 7, 1994

D. t, Bldg. T452B, X8847

Powe^, Radiological Engineering, Bldg. T690B, X3998

SUBJECT:' RADON DECAY OF AIRHEADS IN BUILDING 123 - JBP-030-94

In the Safety Concern 94-065, the concern was raised that the air samplescollected in the various areas are brought to Building 123 for radon decay. Ispoke with the person filing the concern and told her that the decay presentedno health concerns to her. This was due to the fact that radon is a gas and notcontained in the filter itself. What is read on the filter is the metal decayproducts from the radon. Due to the construction of the filter media the abilityof these decay products to present a health hazard to an operator is extremelylow.

ATTACHMENT 1

EG&G ROCKY FLATS. INC.. ROCKY FLATS PLANT, P.O. BOX 464, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80402-0464 (303) 966-7000

Page 11: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

rocky flats

INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

May 17,

Vtical Laboratories, Bldg. 123, X2490

, Radiological Engineering, Bldg. T690B, X3998

SUBJECy EVALUATION OF SAFETY CONCERNS #94-064 AND #94-065 - JBP-027-94

REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling(b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling

On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed over the storage of potentiallycontaminated airheads in Room 163 of Building 123. It was said that this roomin Building 123 did not have the proper engineered controls to handle this typeof usage. Radiological Engineering has evaluated the current usage of this room,with emphasis on potential radiological problems.

In accordance with references (a) and (b), air sample filters are collected atvarious places on plant site and transported to Building 123 for analysis. Theseair samples are placed in a metal tube at the collection site and then placed ina metal box for transport. These samples are sent to Building 123, Room 163 foranalysis. Once there the samples are left for 48 hours to allow for naturalairborne radioactivity (mostly radon and thoron progeny) to decay.

Radiological Engineering (RE) evaluated all of the possible pathways that couldcause radiation exposure to a worker in this area. Radiation exposure was deemednot to be a potential concern due to the types and energies of the radiationgiven off by the nuclides that could possibly be trapped in the filter. The onlyradiations that would be given off by any of the possible decay chains are alphaand low energy beta radiation. Alpha radiation does not pose an externalexposure problem and beta radiation would not be able to penetrate the metaltube. Therefore, external radiation exposure is not a potential problem in Room163 due to the storage and counting of airheads.

Next, RE evaluated the possible pathways for potential exposure to radioactivecontamination. The pathways evaluated are direct contact and airborneradioactive contamination. The potential of contamination by direct contact withthe filter is extremely slight. The reason for this is how the filter isdesigned. The filter paper that is used is manufactured such that as the air isdrawn through it 99.9% of the particulate matter in the air is trapped in thefilter matrix. Since the particles are trapped in the matrix, the possibilitythat contamination could be removed from the filter paper is extremely remote.Tests performed by RE at the Rock Creek Warehouse demonstrated that filters withcount rates between 250 counts per minute (cpm) and 7,500 cpm smeared usingnormal survey techniques produced no removable contamination. Both references (a)and (b) impose a maximum count rate of 2,500 cpm on a sample filter that is sent

EG&G ROCKY FLATS. INC., ROCKY FLATS PLANT. P.O. BOX 464. GOLDEN. COLORADO 80402-0464 (303) 966-7000

Page 12: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JBP-027-94

Attachment 1Page 1 of 1

DAC Calculation for Filter Burn

Room Height (H): 12 feet (4 meters)Room Length (L): 33 feet (11 meters)Room Width (W): 15 feet (5 meters)1 meter = 3 feet

Volume = H X L X WVolume = 4mXllmX5mVolume = 220 cubic meters (m^)

The maximum count rate that is allowed on a filter to be sent to Building 123 byprocedure is 2,500 cpm on a Ludlum 12-lA. Based on the calculation in Health andSafety Practice (HSP) 18.10, Table II, Note (1), this equated to an activity of8,330 disintegrations per minute (dpm).

250 cpm = 833 dpm, therefore 2,500 cpm = 8330 dpm

Assuming a 10% resuspension factor this would equal 833 dpm in the air volume ofthe room.

833 dpm =3.79 dpm/mj220 m'

The Derived Air Concentration for Plutonium-239 (Pu"®) is 4.4 dpm/m®; thereforethis accident would produce airborne concentration of less than one DAC. Thiscalculation is extremely conservative. This is based in the fact that theconversion factor for feet to meters was underestimated and the resuspensionfactor was increased by a factor of 10.

Page 13: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

C. Trice,May 17, 1994JBP-027-94

Page 2

to Building 123. Based upon the above experimental determinations there islittle or no possibility that direct contact could pose a health hazard.

The only mechanism for radioactive contamination to become airborne from thefilter papers is during a fire in Room 163. The possibility of this occurrenceis extremely remote due to the storage of the filters in metal boxes.> Theconditions of the scenario analyzed by RE is that a filter paper at the maximumcount rate allowed by references (a) and (b) is burned. Room 163 was measuredby RE and found to contain approximately 220 cubic meters (m^). This calculationis provided in Attachment 1. With a maximum count rate filter being burned anda 10% resuspension factor, the maximum airborne calculated in the room is stillless than one Derived Air Concentration (DAG). This calculation is extremelyconservative. A person could breathe air at the DAG for the specific nuclide for2,000 hours per year and never exceed any exposure limits established forradiation workers.

Radiological Engineering (RE) analyzed the effect of a person inhaling the entirecontents of this accident in one short term (acute) exposure. This analysis wasbased upon a filter burning that was at the limit imposed by references (a) and(b), and one person inhaling the entire amount of contamination. These factorswere run by Internal Dosimetry using Code for Internal Dosimetry (CINDY). Theresult of this analysis shows that the person would receive 11 millirem (mrem)over the first year and a total of 116 mrem over a fifty year period. This fifty-year exposure can be equated to a single year's exposure living in Denver, GO.

Based upon the above analysis, RE has determined that the potential for exposureduring normal operations is extremely remote. The analysis also determined thatduring an emergency the exposure is well within that established by both Federallaw and corporate policy for radiation worker exposure.

Attachment:

As Stated

CC!

G. M. Aldrich

E. A. Blush

J. M. Forbes

M. L. Littleton

D. D. MeltonR. M. Richards

R. S. Tyson

Page 14: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JLEGsiG ROCKY FLATSUSWA

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

Date: April 26, 1994

To: Distribution « a

From: D. L. McCoyBJoint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T690G, Ext: 5298

■i'.CkD. D. Melton, Joint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T452B, Ext 5130

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN SAFETY CONCERNPROCESS: 94-064, POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATEDITEMS, 94-065, RADON DECAY

has filed a safety concern with the Joint Company/UnionSafety Committee (JCUSC). The responsibility for resolving safetyconcerns lies with line management.

The JCUSC requests participation from you or your designatedrepresentative in resolving this safety concern. Please bring alldocumentation that vou have in regards to this issue to this meeting.The meeting to determine a course of action for this concern has been setfor the following:

Date: May 16,1994

Time: 0900

Location: Conference Room T690G

Page 15: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

April 26, 1994Page 2 of 2

Please contact D. L. McCoy or D. D. Melton to confirm your attendance at

this meeting.

The JCUSC appreciates your participation in the safety concern process.

DISTRIBUTION:

A. J. Astl

R. 8. Martinez

B. Powell

8. D. ThompsonC. Trice

C. M. Wise

CC:

T. J. TegelerE. i. Tietenberg

Page 16: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

« ■■■■%' ..x

EGrB rocky flats USWA

JOINT COMPANY - UNIONSAFETY COMMITTEE

ijpi.lK A4

X/J.

March 17. 1994

TO: Rad Health LabsBuilding 123Ext.

FROM: E. I. Tietenberg / T. J. TegelerJoint Compa ny/Union Safety Committee

T452B / rBui 1 din Building T690GExt. 76^0 / Ext. 5800

SUBJECT: ASSIGNMENT OF SAFETY CONCERN: 94-065RADON DECAY

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has received your safetyconcern and assigned the following investigators. They will contact you todiscuss this concern.

Company Representative: D. D. Melton Phone:

Union Representative: D. L. McCoy Phone: 5298

CC:J. R. CableW. D. EwanR. S. MartinezD. L. McCoyD. D. MeltonC. TriceC. M. WisePATS

Page 17: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JOINT COMPANY/UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE CONCERN FORMTHIS FORM IS TO BE USED BY ALL EMPLOYEES ON PLANT SITE

Mallto: JCUSC,T-690G(Please mail Blue Copy to JCUSC when the Concern is initiated)

Case No.

EMPLOYEE NAME EMPLOYEE NUMBERDEPARTMENT BLDG. PHONF SHIFT .D^WSUPERVISOR (Print) _ Tiric^ —■ SUPV. EXT. .MANAGER REPORTING TO DIRECTOR (Print):— MANAGER EXT.

I have previously discussed this Concern with Supervision: Yes No.

Concern (briefly)

IN) Ti4& f>pg^;. lo fTH Mn oeum^ir^ , ujf^/sj£: 'UJo/ZKjiM/T-.

Recommendation (Optional).

yyi- J-cZ-9^Date Steward Signature (If Applicable) Date

Supervision Response (within 5 working days) AtxHOf' h-P'&fn

J. A/^Z,

Supervision Signature Date 3

Manager Reporting to Director C/»Vir^ f ^ Hato

NOTE: TIMELINESS IN COMPLETING THIS FORM IS OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE.

I am satisfied with the results. I am not satisfied.

Brief reason if not satisfied: "TIpjl /gdrC" rW'j^rvf' Wjj^ •$>; KLttA

—i-Q df^j^ a'l/^bpro facLo'Un^ (.^/Tko^n- vw Ujp^pfpbU»^ AraS bACjO cacUreSs^gt. Q:\-grA\. r< 0^ ^

Employee Signat

JCUSC received SafeV^/ncern on: 5<'7^_ -'^4-Date

T^e^orn^ted by the JCUSC Co-Chairperson(s)Assigned to: Union: ^ Date 3 ^ ^ f

Company: , A^^g/rpfl Date ^ / ^Distribution: Safety Committee (White) (Completed Form)

Union Steward (Yellow)Employee (Green)Safety Committee (Blue) (When Concern Initiated)

RF-45500 (Rev. 10/90) Destroy Previous Issues

Page 18: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

EGelG rocky flats uswa

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

March 17, 1994

TO: FROmI'e. I. Tietenberg / T. J. TegelerKaq Health Labs Joint Company/Union Safety Committeepuildinq 123 Building T452B / Building T690GExt. Ext. 7620 / Ext. 5800

SUBJECT: ASSIGNMENT OF SAFETY CONCERN: 94-064POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED ITEMS

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has received your safetyconcern and assigned the following investigators. They will contact you todiscuss this concern.

Company Representative: D. D. Melton Phone: 5130

Union Representative: D. L. McCoy Phone: 5130

cc:

J. R. CableW. D. EwanR. S. MartinezD. L. McCoyD. D. MeltonC. TriceC. M. WisePATS

Page 19: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JOINT COMPANY/UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE CONCERN FORMTHIS FORM IS TO BE USED BY ALL EMPLOYEES ON PLANT SITE

Mall to: JCUSC,T-690G(Please mail Blue Copy to JOUSC when the Concern is initiated)

EMPLOYEE NAM

CaseNo

DEPARTMENT £a<LJJeeU4h LthrjSUPERVISOR (Print) ff Kh-?MANAGER REPORTING TO DIRECTOR (Print):

EMPLOYEE NUMBER

BLDG. _/53 PHONE SHIFT

SUPV. EXT..-^4

I have previously discussed this Concern with Supervision: X Yes

MANAGER EXT.

No.

Concern (briefly)'TM'^_L3^3 y/ f>:0 AKJDfi7tF=AfhKLLNj C!QN>TA<mK)»tTF"r> trgkVT^, lK}CJi)nU1^' -r

VMiAife-ivjmv ^ .Trt^ VlAOg' 'DE0l(«JS'5. lJz>(? IV>3.g-oM THe FteoO ex+Mo:sT<^U(>Hr coolo "TftA-p

nnmmpnrfarinn mntinnan 1^. . « i — ^ ^ r~Ji^ a ■<

imijrS,Recommendation (Optional)

"Bfitt fithJ'j, lA/j ll , 3 -c^- 9y

Steward Signature (If Applicable) Date

Supervision Response (within 5 working days) I A^ij> e

^ dd ^oJ-ia ho ! /^er>? / /> «9—All /S5o' <f^. [? a J / O / ! c^a ! A-fp'j'i A<i?'9

/S>i-h

C 1/ rr <2-..-i Al / hd

Supervision Signature

Manager Reporting to Director /k,/M -T/U: Date

NOTE: TIMELINESS IN COMPLETING THIS FORM IS OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE.

! am satisfied with the results. I am not satisfied.

Brief reason if not satisfiedi^'IVnQ. OC'X^ Ar\ ib"^ yto kjnouj d^W.yu ^^^o^vcxxgjnvJv4^ W (a.ir\Dorfv. -Ha.s 'ijssqp U/i <s APt?g.r laee*^

r^Clr\{r\{ Ml/MkP.-5l^A ioilAore .^Tw?- Ofniolox/O^^KxA \Qg<7ir\ bt^-VxM.'Hn ryvAy^r.iLSvyySL/0Sciile,yffi\

Employee Signati

JCUSC received S oncern on:

Assigned to: Union:

Company: A/^

To be completed by the JCUSC Co-Chalrperson(s)

^' (To/iJnh.

n,. -i lD'ffDate t ^ ^

Distribution: Safety Committee (White) (Completed Form)Union Steward (Yellow)Employee (Green)Safety Committee (Blue) (When Concern Initiated)

RF-45500 (Rev. 10/90) Destroy Previous Issues

•4 'I *m

Page 20: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

-4^\n^^ECSiiG ROCKY FLATS |, u.V,,

USWA 4^JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

Date: April 26, 1994

To: Distribution ^ a »

CM\From: D. L. McCoyf^bint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T690G, Ext: 5298

D. Melton, Joint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T452B, Ext 5130

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN SAFETY CONCERN

PROCESS: 94-064, POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATEDITEMS, 94-065, RADON DECAY

has filed a safety concern with the Joint Company/UnionSafety Committee (JCUSC). The responsibility for resolving safetyconcerns lies with line management.

The JCUSC requests participation from you or your designatedrepresentative in resolving this safety concern. Please bring alldocumentation that vou have in regards to this issue to this meeting.

The meeting to determine a course of action for this concern has been setfor the following:

Date: May 16,1994

Time: 0900

Location: Conference Room T690G

Page 21: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

April 26, 1994Page 2 of 2

Please contact D. L. McCoy or D. D. Melton to confirm your attendance at

this meeting.

The JCUSC appreciates your participation in the safety concern process.

DISTRIBUTION:

A. J. Astl

R. 8. Martinez

B. Powell

S. D. ThompsonC. Trice

C. M. Wise

CC:

T. J. TegelerE. I. TIetenberg

Page 22: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

^ EGr.G ROCKY FLATS USWA (((|J?^1JOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

'•»/'« ci.

Date: April 26, 1994

To: Distribution i .

From: D. L. McCoy,MDint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T690G, Ext: 5298D. D. Melton, Joint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T452B, Ext 5130

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN SAFETY CONCERN

PROCESS: 94-064, POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATEDITEMS, 94-065, RADON DECAY

has filed a safety concern with the Joint Company/UnionSafety Committee (JCUSC). The responsibility for resolving safetyconcerns lies with line management.

The JCUSC requests participation from you or your designatedrepresentative in resolving this safety concern. Please bring alldocumentation that vou have in regards to this issue to this meeting.

The meeting to determine a course of action for this concern has been setfor the following:

Date: May 26,1994

Time: 0900

Location: Conference Room T690G

Page 23: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

April 26, 1994Page 2 of 2

Please contact D. L. McCoy or D. D. Melton to confirm your attendance at

this meeting.

The JCUSC appreciates your participation in the safety concern process.

DISTRIBUTION:

A. J. Asti

R. S. Martinez

B. Powell

S. D. ThompsonC. Trice

C. M. Wise

CC:

T. J. TegelerE. I. Tietenberg

Page 24: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JOINT COMPANY/UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE CONCERN FORMTHIS FORM IS TO BE USED BY ALL EMPLOYEES ON PLANT SITE

Mail to: JCUSC, T-690G(Please mail Blue Copy to JCUSC when the Concern is initiated) / iJ

Case No. f V * C/(^ J

EMPLOYEE mU EMPLOYEE NUMBERDEPARTMENT JSaeL,-iJ0A/{ih--l^h^ BLDG. _ '^3 PHONE . SHIFT

-—TJ /'( iVVr^Ag--;^. SUPV. EXT.SUPERVISOR (Print)

MANAGER REPORTING TO DIRECTOR (Print): 0 ■ MANAGER EXT.I have previously discussed this Concern with Supervision: - Yes No.

Concern (hriefly)Tt4^ \XT\Lr\T ^^C&(^Arh[\LL\j CorJTAmiKlKTFTQ ftlg.t4sA0 5 ag/Ji-

VJTTH .iVi^ v-tAOig" fJb.^1-Tew_"t? onJ f-tecO ex^M06-T5~rU(Vir Cooljd ~r<iA-p '2ao:c>A<^\)S'

Recommendation (Optional) ,

Date Steward Signature (If Applicable) Date

Supervision Response (within 5 working days) — f 1 f ^ ^ ^

(a a d c/ hePor-Q oJi o f<o n; / fZern''^>^ n \ <r? s*V^ i\ u/7^1 a I ^

JtL dl'i /<; fl a J. ! O / 0(j ! Q^a I A] o ^^/crvC'n1^ () / I '~t~h <p i n errhu ~4' J A.,yg-r is

' Qate 3 ^ U^a/I^ ^ Date 3 ' f/

Supervision Signature _

Manager Reporting to Director

NOTE: TIMELINESS IN COMPLETING THIS FORM IS OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE.

I am satisfied with the results. I am not satisfied.

Brief reason if not satisfied: IKQ- pc^x" csyvgjg^ \A lfc)3> ]rVj<^ VTO C^:>\\iVvjt^Od:^v.CX>gjrnvj'vA^ W Aif DOfrv^ , "TIa. S 'i<.5>(je. VvlS HPlyQ^lT (ci^*before .-luv^ Qrniob\A^^lA6.<> \ogg.n brbTxyaVtr^««iVS5 'si^'

Employee Siqnati Date O / *_

:ct3:JCUSC received S^ty Uoncern on:

To be completed by the JCUSC Co-Chairperson(s)

Assigned to: Union: Cfy Da.e ?Company: 1 ffV Date 3 ^

Distribution: Safety Committee (White) (Completed Form)Union Steward (Yellow)Employee (Green)Safety Committee (Blue) (When Concern Initiated)

RF-45500 (Rev. 10/90) Destroy Previous Issues

Page 25: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

ik

EL se ROCKY FLATS<<4/ .11 Ilk

- jswAway

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

Date:

To:

From:

SUBJECT:

Jcnuor/ 27, 1995

, Rad Health Labs, Building 123, Ext.

D. D. Melton, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee,Building T452B, Ext. 5130D. L. McCoy, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee,Building T690G Ext. 5298

RESOLUTION OF SAFETY CONCERN 94-064 POTENTIALLY

CONTAMINATED ITEMS

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has investigated the concemmentioned above.

Air-Heads were arriving at building 123 over the required radiological limits.Radiological Engineering and Radiological Operations have been monitoring this issue.The resolution for this concem is as follows: Radiological Operations department willadhere to Radiological Operations Instruction (ROI) ROI 4.1, when air-heads areshipped to building 123. If airheads arrive at building 123 above the limit specified inROI 4.1 the analytical labs in building 123 will notify building Radiological Engineeringand Radiological Operations.

The JCUSC considers this concern adequately addressed. Changes to this agreementcannot be mode without concurrence by the JCUSC. Thank you for your participationin the safety program. If you hove any further problems with this concem, its answer orthe implementation, please feel free to contact the JCUSC.

'/ /./7 //?//

QI 0. Ii (c6^D. D. Melton D.' L. McCoyCompany Safety Representative Union Safety Rei^ir^entative

cc:

A. J. Asti

R. D. Cantwell

L. J. LightJ. B. Powell

C. Trice

T. J. TegelerE. I. Tietenberg

C. M. Wise

PATS

Page 26: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

SAFETY CONCERN

MEETING 94-064

06/07/94

9:00 AM to 10:00 AM

CONFERENCE ROOM T690G

Meeting called by:

Type of meeting:

Facilitator:

Attendees:

9:00-10:00 AM

Discussion:

Dennis and Denny

A meeting to keep contaminted items from ariving to building 123

Dennis McCoy

A. J. Asti, E. A. Christopher, L. J. Light, B. Powell

Agenda Topics

POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED ITEMS IN BUILDING DENNIS McCOY AND

123, CONTAMINATED AIRHEADS RECEIVED AND DENNY MELTON

OTHER ITBMS(Microwave Ovens)

Conclusions:

Action items: Person responsible: Deadline:

Special notes:

Page 27: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

Joint Company/tJnion SafetJCommittee

3i« Jw*!- nIi^ X X -C^ X X Nm? X*^^h^ >«<»' nU^ X**-

Date: June 7,1994

Safety Concern 94-064, Potentially Contaminated Items

Meeting Place: T690G, Conference Room

Facilitators: D. L. McCoyD. D. Melton

NAME ORGANIZATION BLDG PHONE PAGE

y^-ZA %^'PHr

l4/). (O/'ST

/ /r

i^mr

^'^3co( CvK.'X T{^9m 2if?l ^945d

w /70b-

/!/)-, 1 i^Xs /ij 7aJ

Page 28: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

EGtG ROCKY FLATS

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

USWA

October 22, 1990

To: J. R. MajesticDirector Health & SafetyBuilding 123Ext. 4707

From: E. I. Tietenberg / S. CordovaJCUSC

T-690-G

Ext. 7620 / Ext. 5800

RE: ELEVATION OF SAFETY CONCERN NUMBER 90-212 / CONTAMINATED SAMPLES COUNTEDIN BUILDING 123

Safety concern number 90-212 has been elevated to the director level forresolution as per Company/Union contract language, Article XIV, Section IZ,Paragraph D, Subparagraph 6.

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee Co-Chairmen will contact your secretaryfor time on your calendar in order to meet and resolve the safety concern.Included is a packet of all information dealing with the safety concern.

E. I. TietenbergCompany Safety Co-Chairman

S. Cordova

Union Safety Co-Chairman

cc:

C. D. DelforgeE. L. Samora

Enclosure: As stated

el90-212.et

Page 29: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

....

JLeBuG ROCKY FLATS ^ ' p ur-USWA IP

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

II

Date: 06/13/94

To: File

CC: D. D. Melton

From: Dennis McCoy

Subject: Meeting Minutes for Safety Concern 94-064, held onJune 7, 1994, 0900

The meeting was held to discuss air-heads arriving at BIdg 123 over the required limit.And to discuss whether the limit of 2500 c/m was reasonable in a building that has nohepa filtration exhaust, only fume hoods with no filtration.

A commitment was made by Radiological Operations to hold a tool box on the ROI 4.1for all RCT's in the protective area. That the Lab employees will notify the RCT, theBuilding Radiological Engineer, and their supervisor if an air-head is analyzed to beover 10% DAC. That sample will be placed in a plastic zip-lock bag and held for furtherstudies, by Rad. CP's, and Rad. Eng. Radiological Operations in BIdg 881 willdocument all findings. This testing will continue until on or about July 8, 1994, at which -time another meeting will be held to determine a course of actiorTrorinis concern.

2

dim

06/13/94 CONFIDENTIAL

Page 30: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JOINT COMPANY/UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE CONCERN FORMTHIS FORM IS TO BE USED BY ALL E^MPLOYEES ON PLANT SITE

Mall to: 'JCUSC, T-690G(Please mail Blue Copy to JCUSC when the Concern is initiated)

EMPLOYEE NAMDEPARTMENT

SUPERVISOR (Print)

EMPLOYEE NUMBER BLDG. J33. PHONE SHIFT

MANAGER REPORTING TO DIRECTOR (Print):.

I have previously discussed this Concern with Supervision:

g.-rfe/Vf?

X Yes

SUPV. EXT.

MANAGER EXT.

No.

Concern (hriefiy)TU^ UApg''BggNJ \jri/^i7-PiO "IP AKJOr^rZU^ fijttgArhKLLNj CloN;TAiniNj»r[p-r>

lAifeVjim .Trtg trlAtig" KJtSfT^LT02--t> ONJ HccO

Recommendation (Optional) ^ - ..a _

SfttytpiiW/y Joe fvigg'Gooti) ~TtiA-p f2AOlc>A<cr»vje'

"BfjtZ. t)ftcjr\06\^ CohJTftYYx'iAJ'^D

Date

M 3'^-9^Steward Signature (If Applicable) Date

Supervision Response (within 5 working days) — f € 1 ff ^ /(

(X del hePnr^^ (X^J< />o-f- jyj pa J/'o/a^/c^g ! ket'i yj o

Supervision Signature

Manager Reporting to Director -7/3

ha'i )(35>.

Date 3- 3—

Date 3-/-^/

NOTE: TIMELINESS IN COMPLETING THIS FORM IS OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE.

I am satisfied with the results. I am not satisfied.

Brief reason if not satisfied: 'IWl OCX' \f\ \.io% Y^O |^6tOuJ (AoWiVcj i-0i^o^^cyadt^o'v4^ W citr\Dorfv. ■ -Ha.s i:^oe Vvjls Aetj^rl^^ore Qrr>tnUv/v^/^lA<X<> \ogg.ir\ bfbTxVvHD tY^tixiAr^cJLi^r^su'P^cii^

Employee Signa

JCUSC received S loncern on:

Assigned to: Union:

To be completed by the JCUSC Co-Chairperson(s)

^' C'fCompany: —^ llui^

Distribution: Safety Committee (White) (Completed Form)Union Steward (Yellow)Employee (Green)Safety Committee (Blue) (When Concern Initiated)

RF-45500 (Rev. 10/90) Destroy Previous Issues

Date 1tD9*fDate S - / 4- "'9 5^

Page 31: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JLEBsiG ROCKY FLATS ' ' fllPUSWA Wi

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

Date: May 27, 1994

To: Distribution

From: D. L. McCoy>jjrLfoint Company/Union Safety Committee,Building T690G, Ext. 5298D. D. MeltitenjAVloint Company/Union Safety Committee,Building T^52B, Ext. 5130

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN SAFETY CONCERN PROCESS:

94-064, POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED ITEMS

has filed a safety concern with the JointCompany/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC). The responsibility forresolving safety concerns lies with line management.

The JCUSC requests participation from you or your designatedrepresentative in resolving this safety concern. Please bringall documentation that you have in regards to this issue to this

meeting. The meeting to determine a course of action for thisconcern has been set for the following:

Date: June 7, 1994

Time: 0900

Location: Conference Room T690G

Please contact D. L. McCoy or D. D. Melton to confirm yourattendance at this meeting.

The JCUSC appreciates your participation in the safety concernprocess.

DISTRIBUTION:

A. J. Asti

E. A. Christopher

L. J. LightB. Powell

CC:

E. I. Tietenberg

T. J. Tegeler

Page 32: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

E(3sB ROCKY FLATS USWA

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

March 17, 1994

TO: FROM; E. I. Tietenberg / T. J. TegelerRad Health Labs Joint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding 123 Building T452B / Building T690GExt. Ext. 7620 / Ext. 5800

SUBJECT: ASSIGNMENT OF SAFETY CONCERN: 94-064POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED ITEMS

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has received your safetyconcern and assigned the following investigators. They will contact you todiscuss this concern.

Company Representative: D. D. Melton Phone: 5130

Union Representative: D. L. McCoy Phone: 5130

cc:

J. R. CableW. D. EwanR. S. MartinezD. L. McCoyD. D. MeltonC. TriceC. M. WisePATS

Page 33: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

MGsiB ROCKY FLATS -USWA

lINT COMPANY - UNK

SAFETY COMMITTEE

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

^vvWWVy^^

Date: April 26, 1994

To: Distribution

From: D. L. McCoy Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T690G, Ext: 5298D. D. Melton, Joint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T452B, Ext 5130

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN SAFETY CONCERNPROCESS: 94-064, POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATEDITEiyiSrtfo^RADON DECAY ^

has filed a safety concern witn me joint Company/UiiiuiSafety Committee (JCUSC). The responsibility for resolving safetyconcerns lies with line management.

The JCUSC requests participation from you or your designatedrepresentative in resolving this safety concern. Please bring alldocumentation that vou have in regards to this issue to this meeting.

The meeting to determine a course of action for this concern has been setfor the following:

Date: May 26,1994

Time: 0900

Location: Conference Room T690G

Page 34: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

April 26, 1994Page 2 of 2

Please contact D. L. McCoy or D. D. Melton to confirm your attendance at

this meeting.

The JCUSC appreciates your participation in the safety concern process.

DISTRIBUTION:

A. J. Asti

R. 8. Martinez

B. Powell

8. D. ThompsonC. Trice

C. M. Wise

CC:

T. J. TegelerE. I. TIetenberg

Page 35: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

~ ujz Try rpT 7"^^w3>WI TT/ T^TWIT

Wrf^T^.lr )

aDVd aNOHd 'Daia

"WT

NOIiVZINVDHO

'1 oysaAii,vi,Nasadd3d

SSiLlLIPIHOD AiLUiiVS NOINIl ANVcSWOD JjNIOX*

~~ -9 o (, T - I aovad DNiiaaw

3^

-yQ ^ V y QrH/ 3 ^ i-^a^usj

._ .„_..^9'='--fth frjo-inl^ •*!>• r^h '■-^ —-H » -^-t/ _ j;-►■vn5-^-*r4lS4iB»k*5*i "We.iw»«* .-J"3aa,-«>--V ri *r~3r -< * v ^ v V » v...,r

^f V NoiididDsaaaaida

~daamN NdaoNoo

Haisod aoNvaNaiiv

3U-IIAIIA10D A13dVS

w ...u^.i-MA' •.... ^ ci.T : •.:^w.ci4.' 4*'.v-«*st--. -'A;

- .>!jis'%'.-"-ij ,'«^S!i^e»»'--'«^-v<K-.4a-i-<.-5.L»^':. Stt

Page 36: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

" EGrO rocky FLATS USWA' ■ ,

JOINT COMPANY - UNION ^SAFETY COMMITTEE

DATE:

TO: Distribution

pj^OM; ]/, .» vJoint Company/Union Safety Committee,Biag.^i^, ^D/D-SHSp.j}.Ai^li€v\ , Joint Company/Union Safety Committee,B i gg. , TT13 0

SUBJECT; REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN SAFETY CONCERN PROCESS: li- D!o^SAFETY CONCERN ^ 0gr\fidlI^{or\h^i'^i6JX^^^S

has filed a/several safety concern(s) with the JointC Committee (JCUSC). Jhe responsibility for resolvingsafety concerns lies with line management.

The JCUSC requests participation from you or your designated^representative inresolving this/these safety concerns, ihe meeting to deuermine a course oraction for this/these concerns has been sec tor the rollowing.

Date:

Time:

Location:

Please contact A// or hP.i^el-tm toconfirm your attendance au this meeting.

The JCUSC aooreciates your participation in the sarety concern proc=ss.

Distribution: Distribution:

r.M.i/ikfi o?

CS. t^arbr^r

C-Tr.'cp

n ijujcH T-h%s.

Page 37: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

EBsB ROCKY FLATSUSWA

JOINT COMPANY-UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

Date: April 26, 1994

To: DistributionM

From: D. L. McCoy®(^nt Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T690G, Ext: 5298

D. Melton, Joint Company/Union Safety CommitteeBuilding T452B, Ext 5130

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN SAFETY CONCERNPROCESS: 94-064, POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATEDITEMS, 94-065, RADON DECAY

has filed a safety concern with the Joint Company/UnionSafety Committee (JCUSC). The responsibility for resolving safetyconcerns lies with line management.

The JCUSC requests participation from you or your designatedrepresentative in resolving this safety concern. Please bring alldocumentation that vou have in regards to this Issue to this meeting.

The meeting to determine a course of action for this concern has been setfor the following:

Date: May 16,1994

Time: 0900

Location: Conference Room T690G

Page 38: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

April 26, 1994Page 2 of 2

Please contact D. L. McCov or D. D. Melton to confirm vour attendance at

this meeting.

The JCUSC appreciates your participation in the safety concern process.

DISTRIBUTION:

A. J. Asti

R. 8. Martinez

B. Powell

S. D. ThompsonC. Trice

C. M. Wise

CC:

T. J. TegelerE. I. Tietenberg

Page 39: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

llpi fk Jf,

EGizC ROCKY FLATS USWA

'h,.V' v;;

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

DATE: November 7, 1991

TO: M. T. Sullivan, Radiation Protection, Bldg. T130H, X6529

FROM: E. I. Tietenberg, Joint Co/Union Safety Comm. Bldg. T452B, X7620M. F. Wood, Joint Co/Union Safety Comm. Bldg. T590G, X5800

SUBJECT: ELEVATION OF SAFETY CONCERN 90-051 TO AGM/DIRECTOR LEVELCONTAMINATED AIR SAMPLES, BLDG. 123

Safety concern number 90-051 has been elevated to the AGM/Director level forresolution as per Company/Union contract language. Article XIV, Section 12,Paragraph C, subparagraph 6.

The subject safety concern was elevated to J. R. Majestic on October 8, 1991.Due to reorganization and your assuming responsibilities for RadiologicalProtection, the concern is reassigned to you for resolution and action.

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee Co-Chairman will contact your secretaryfor time on your calendar in order to meet and resolve the safety concern,

-is a packet of all information dealing with the safety concern.

E. I. Tietenberg E- WoodCompany Safety Co-Chairman Union Safety Co-Chairman

Attachments:

As Stated

cc:

G. M. Aldrich

E. A. DiCarloE. H. IdekerJ. R. MajesticD. L. McCoyJ. G. QuillinC. Trice

C. M. Wise

W. G. Zurliene

Page 40: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

EGnG ROCKY FLATS

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

USWAf^,riKA

mm'w

DATE:

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

October 09, 1991

C. M. Wise, Rad Hlth L 123, X5568

E. I. Tietenberg / M. F. Wood, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee(JCUSC), Bldg. 452TB / Bldg. 690TG, X7620 / X5800

ASSIGNMENT OF SAFETY CONCERN: 90-051AIR SAMPLES

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC) has received your safetyconcern and assigned the following investigators. They will contact you todiscuss this concern.

Company Representative: E. A. DiCarlo

Union Representative: 0. L. McCoy

cc:

J. R. CableE. A. DiCarloJ. M. LangstedD. L. McCoyJ. G. QuillinG. D. ShearerL. C. Smith

Phone: 5130

Phone: 5298

Page 41: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JOINT COMPANY/UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE CONCERN F,ORM(Use Black Ink Only)

Case No.

Fmpinypp Namft Employee Number

Department IS L BIdg. ^2-^ Phone — Shift1 have previously discussed this concern with my supervisor: Yes No

Concern (briefly) 7>/£ AlR. FILTER 6dUArr/^J& 5VSr£At /AZ/^^AI /ZS,Receives aj/i i^/wsr samples oveR. 2^0c//^ o^20p//yi. m/y

pysR RRose L^y^iEs p^se a Re/hth ra2/\md> ra/osmould

Be Rerv^i/Veo /M a coA/r/?oLLED r/isp W/th PA6rEcr/\/£ cidrH//V(^/)/yo

PROPER VEAjEju/jT/QA/ FO/Z CPU a/t'/a/G'

Employee Signature // Date

Immediate Supervisor Response (within 5 working days)

/ S A -^Uiyn-ep C<^nC■P>Q / y ^ ( W 0 /. C W \rt< I'J- . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ O V -g Q // I , LAJ^ j ^ Ui t r /\

^ 11 oJe-c.-f^cJ "i^o tZooc/f- C / «rK<,-//cr/'o>^A-.V. -j-La. ;n-J-p^d 1^0 Q>us^ 'hJ)/^ c-vc S-^^e.Ca^duJi'f>^ " Lud- ~ho cef 4-U c^ivs:< r> (- iU

Super\hsar Signature (Tegibly please) Date\]-L.

Direct Report Manager Signature Date

NOTE: Timeliness in completing this form is of the utmost importance.

- I am satisfied with the results.I am not satisfied. Referral to the JCUSC for investigation because:

Gdr>1 l^rXi JA R GortCOry\ Ll^^S Gp (fSc^ —

' To be completed by the JCUSC do-Chairpersbn(s)Assigned To: Union: Date _ \ /■?>! \9r^

Company: &XB> ^ Date—

Distribution: White - Safety Committee Green - EmployeeYellow - Supervision Goldenrod - Union Steward

RF-45500 (Rev. 11/86) Destroy Previous Issues

Page 42: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

's»^v r o uovvM

JOINT COMPANY - UNIONSAFETY tOMMITTEE

September 11, 1S90

To: S. Cordova / E. I. Tietanberg Fromr E. L. Samora / C. D. Del forgeCo-chairmen J.C.U.S.C. J.C.U.S.C.T-o90-G T-690-GExt. 5800 / Ext. 7520 Ext. 5301 / Ext. 4759

RE: SAFETY CONCERN NUMBER 90-212

Safety concern number 90-051 was worked and elevated to the co-chairmen's level.Concern number 90-212 deals with the same subject as 90-051. Elliott Lessersof Radiological Engineering told me that he would work this issue. If you haveany questions, please feel free to discuss them with me.

E. L. Samora

Union Safety Representative

el90-2I2.1s

Page 43: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

BB^a ROCKY FLATS \)SWA |®|fJOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

Date: October 08, 1991

TO: J. R. Majestic, Heal^^^/^afety, Bldg., 123, X4707FROM: I. Tietenberg />(^F^ood, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee

(JCUSC), B1dg. T452B / Bldg. T690G, X7620 / X5800

SUBJECT: ELEVATION TO AGM OF SAFETY CONCERN : 90-051 EL90-051CONTAMINATED AIR SAMPLES, BLDG. 123

Safety concern number 90-051 has been reopened, which had been elevated to theAGM/Director level for resolution as per Company/Union contract language. ArticleXIV, Section 12, Paragraph C, Subparagraph 6.

The concern is being reopened due to samples being found in excess of 250 cpm inBuilding 123 on September 23, 1991.

The Joint Company/Union Safety Committee Co-Chairman will contact your secretaryfor time on your calendar in order to meet and resolve the safety concern.Included is a packet of all information dealing with the safety concern.

E. I. Tietenberg M. F. WoodCompany Safety Co-Chairman Union Safety Co-Chairman

bjm

CC I

G. M. AldrichS. A. Buckie

E. A. DiCarloD. L. McCoyJ. A. QuillinC. TriceR. B. Wilkinson

C. Weise

Page 44: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

EElC ROCKY FLATS 'USWA

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

DATE: September 20, 1991

TO: E. L. Samora, Rad Ops PU Ops, Bldg. 371, X7050E. DiCarlo, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee (JCUSC),Bldg. 881, X5130

FROM: E. I. Tietenberg, JCUSC, Bldg. 452TB, X7620M. F. Wood, JCUSC, Bldg. 690TG, X5800

SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF ELEVATED SAFETY CONCERN: 90-051CONTAMINATED SAMPLE COUNTING IN BUILDING 123

The subject safety concern was elevated to the co-chairman level on September II,1990. A meeting was held with J.R. Majestic on October 30, 1990 where variouscorrective actions were identified. Subsequently the laboratories in building123 were designated as radiologically controlled areas with daily contaminationsurveys being performed by Radiation Protection Technologist. Further, ROI wasreviewed and actions were taken to insure that samples that exceed allowablecount are not removed from RCA's.

By the above actions the Co-Chairmen consider the concern closed

E. I. TietenbergCompany Co-Chairman

'M. F.

Union

WoodCo-Chairman

cc:

S. A. Buckie

D. C. Hunt

J. P. Jens

J. R. Majestic

J. G. QuillinV. Scott

G. Trice

C. Weise

W. G. Zurliene

Page 45: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

ROCKY FLATS

INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

DATE: April 22, 1991 JGQ-012-91

TQ E. I. Tietenberg, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee, BIdg. T452B, X76208. Cordova, Joint Company/Union Safety Committee, Bldg. T690G, X5800

FROM: J. G. Quiliin, Radiological Health, Bldg. 123, X2452

SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON SAFETY CONCERN NUMBERS 90-051 AND 90-212

The "proposed action plan" identified in J. P. Jens letter to E. L. Sumora, on March 15, 1991,(91-RF-1224) is still in process. Prospective suppliers of counting equipment have beenidentified. The Health Physics Instrumentation Committee (HPIC) has responsibility forapproving performance criteria and allocation of funds. Funds have been allocated and purchasespecifications are being drafted. The remaining items are progressing as well.

Additional measures have been implemented to aid in assuring safety. Specifically, the AirSample Counting Room (163) in Building 123, has been classified as a "Controlled Area." Assuch certain precautionary measures are in place:

No eating, drinking, smoking, or other consumables.

Personal dosimeter required when handling radioactive materials.

Wear buttoned smocks and surgeons gloves when handling radioactive materials.

Also, Radiation Protection Technologists perform daily contamination surveys of the room andon incoming air sample containers. Individuals working in the area are considered radiationworkers and are participants in the Radiation Worker Training course.

We believe that these precautionary actions in combination with compliance regarding existing-procedures, (ROI 4.1, "Routine Air Sampling" in particular), provide adequate measure ofsafety for the individual worker as well as members of the general public and the environment.

Please feel free to contact me should additional information or clarification be required.

bdm

cc:

S.A. Buckie

K. E. Gavin

D. M Hardin

D.C. Hunt

J. P. Jens

C. Trice

Safety Concerns File

EG&G ROCKY FLATS. INC., ROCKY FLATS PLANT, P.O. BOX 464. GOLDEN, COLORADO 80402-0464 (303) 966-7000

Page 46: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

J}^BGrC ROCKY FLATS

INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

or/

to

DATE:

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

April 3, 1991

Distribution

ET91-110

E. I. Tietenberg / S. Cordova," Co-Chairmen Joint Company/UnionSafety Committee (JCUSC), T-452-B / T-690-G, X7620 / X5800

WRITTEN STATUS AND PENDING ACTIONS ON ELEVATED JCUSC SAFETYCONCERNS

UJ

o

z

o

o

o

Ui

H-

<

UJ

UJ

oUJ

On March 21, 1991, J. P. Jens, AGM Health and Safety, requested thatwritten status be provided to the JCUSC Co-Chairmen on elevated concernsrequiring AGM action. To date, no written status has been received.

This letter is to remind you that this requirement still exists, and pleaseprovide a written status on elevated concerns (attachment 1) to the JCUSCCo-Chairmen by April 12, 1991.

For any additional information, please feel free to contact Enn Tietenbergat extension 7520, or Steve Cordova at extension 5800.

cmp

Attachment:

As Stated

Di stri buti on

A. BenjaminJ. C. Bretzke

E. H. Ideker

J. P. Jens

J. M. Kersh

V. M. Pizzuto

cc:

C. W. Buchholz

E. A. DiCarlo

P. W. DooleyI. K. Roberts

E. L. Samora

D. T. Sandoval

T. J. Tegeler

'4

ECaG ROCKY FLATS. INC.. ROCKY PLANTS PLANT. P.O. BOX 454. GOLDEN. COLORADO 80.02.0464 ■■03) FBo-TOGC

Page 47: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

[GCINGLTR no

L-2J<

)'i Li r "i I I

^r'ZKf^.j.C I «

'jattNGAMf:. A M I I

-OUCH8P. O.W. I I

AVIS. J.G. 1

vE^ED.l.E. 1

. BSnS ROCKY FLATS

EGSG ROCKY FLATS. INC.ROCKY FLATS PLANT. P.O. BOX 464, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80402-O464 • (303) 965-7000

March 15, 1991

1 MCRA. l).W.

t^RcnA KP.

-^PlS L R

:aikOh c J.

'A.NC:S

ZCOVJ\^ °

■ = SH J.M

f I

ISI I

= 3Y, W A. I I

-K£50. J A.

r. 8 M, •ccj]r : =

UPPENS. g.E. I

:ntrqss. P W

•PG AN

RTH P I I

.Mt.M L A I !

I i■n rrr\ \t n I I

I I-3LL. 5 P I I

ifAI

^ V ,I I

1Sv ifi.

•i.-.C.

I I

~ o A w.*»' I ! X

:.3£:ftCAT:CN:

^EN'TIAL I

•CP.IZED CLASSIFIER.

>. -3. cJ ^= /U. y

I- : -.TP NO.

91-RF-1224

E. L. Samora, Jr.Union Safety CommitteeT590G

SAFETY CONCERN NUMBERS 90-051, 90-212, AND 90-426 {jPJ-35-91)

EGiG Rocky Flats, Inc. Health and Safety recognizes the position of theUnited Steelworkers of America on the subject safety concerns. Building123, Room 163 has been designated as a Radiologically Controlled Area y(RCA) and is being currently controlled as such. The statement that thisroom "does not meet the requirements of a Radiation Control Area under anystandards" is incorrect. In addition, all the labs and other rooms inBuilding 123 that have been identified as areas where work withradioactive materials takes place have been posted as RCA's.

The statement "Administrative controls are not an adequate substitute forengineered controls",is only an appropriate statement when engineeredcontrols are necessary. The counting of air samples and the processing oflow level laboratory samples in Building 123 does not expose workers, thepublic or the environment to any unnecessary risk. Engineered controls arenot necessary to safely perform these tasks. A detailed analysis of eachRCA and associated requirements will follow under separate cover letter.

A review of the previous concerns on Selective Alpha Air Monitor (SAAM)repair indicates that the strengthened administrative controls wereadequate to protect workers, the public and the environment. Althoughthese controls are adequate, we concur that there is a better way of doingbusiness. We shall revisit Perimeter Security Zone (PSZ) locations andalternative engineering controls for disassembly.

In reference to the suggestion that locating the air sample count roominside the PSZ, please be advised that we are working to this end. _ Thenecessary counting equipment (automatic sample changing and recording) hasbeen requisitioned and is in the purchase cycle. All possible locationsinside the PSZ that might meet the necessary location criteria will beevaluated.

Moving the count room inside the PSZ will require 1) adequate facilitiesfor the equipment and personnel, 2) minimal exposure rates 7or workerprotection and instrument efficiency and 3) no Airborne Radioactivity orContamination Area potential . Upon receipt of the list of "The RCA areaslocated in the PSZ" which you feel "have the necessary engineeringcontrols to do this job safely and efficiently", a formal evaluation forrelocation of the count room will be conducted.

Page 48: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

E. L. SamoraMarch 15, 199191-RF-1224Page 2

A proposed action plan to bring this issue to a "safe resolution" andclosure of these concerns is as follows:

1. Develop criteria and necessary actions required to move theair sample count room to a "PSZ Location"R. L. Renne/K. E. Cavin

2. Prepare list of suitable locations inside the PSZ forevaluation

E. L. Samora/L. G. Ubias

3. Select final location(s) and obtain occupancyE. L. Samora/K. E. Cavin/J. P. Jens/Operations Managers

4. Move air sample count roomR. L. Renne

_ General ManageritiJ/and Safety

EG&G Rocky Flats

KEC:kas

CC I

G.'m. AldrichS. A. Buckie

K. E. Cavin

D. M. Hardin

J. R. MajesticJ. G. Quill inR. L. Renne

E. I. TitenbergL. G. Ubias

Page 49: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

co-'iRurc'iC.Nr :

GL

.: P A7_4 9

) iinjcMCrH. i

ET2KE . J.C

RLINGAME. A H 1OUCHER.O.W. 1 iVIS.J.G. f 1

ERED. J.E. 1

RRERA. O.W. 1

J' EBkG rocky flats

EGiG ROCKY FLATS, INC.

ROCKY FLATS PLANT. P.O. BOX 464. GOLDEN. COLORADO 80402-0464 • (303) 966-7000

^REP.A, K.P

PPIS L R-L-

;iKOR

ANCiS G g

>OOWIN R

I I

J p 1

RSH J M 1

I I^.3Y. W.A.

^KE90. J A

M

JESTIC. J.R t I

rjPRENS. S.E.

^NTROSS. R.W.

:rgan r V

)RTH. P.

■ LMER L a I I

pKjCi I q z

rra

7-n rrn w *4

i I

■ -rELL. 9 F

^■ANNON W M

VA'' "N. E.R.

ZL.•NE. J.

R.B. I

J I

►/ >y

I t or on ncipn

tTZ

I II 1

I I

3R R c ^ CON r -"CL I I I XA A r r IC I 1

CLASSiDCATlCN:

jC.NIJNCLASSIFJED:CNPiDENT:AL 1

ocCRc' 1 1

THCRIZEDCLASSIFIERSIGNATURE

3ATE

N REPLY TO LTR NO.

February 26, 1991 91 -RF-0749

E. L Samora, Jr.Union Safety RepresentativeUnited Steeiworkers of AmericaLocal Union 8031

SAFETY CONCERN NUMBERS 90-051, 90-212 and 90-426

Thank you for your letter of January 30, 1991 (Attachment 1) calling to my attention theofficial Steeiworkers position. The Steeiworkers position is no different of the one thatapplies to all EG&G Rocky Flats Plant employees, since providing a safe workingenvironment for all employees is essential if we are to succeed.

As you are aware, the subject concerns were elevated to Director level on September 11,1990 and a follow-up meeting was held with my staff of January 28, 1991. At that time,the Co-chairman reiterated that a written response would be required as to what actions arebeing taken and what actions are planned to resolve the issue. My staff is working diligentlyto come up with the best and safest course of action that meets the requirements of theDepartment of Energy (DOE) Order and allows us to perform air head filter countingoperations in the safest manner possible.

As soon as my staff has developed a plan with a satisfactory course of action, 1 will notify theCo-chairman in writing who will, in return, provide it to you.

hank^yetHor your concern and dedication.

J.Assisfan^eneral ManagerHealth and Safety

JPJtdjh

Attachment:As Stated

cc:

J. CastroS. Cordova

'J.CVALS.

:RJC i "NITIALS

Page 50: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

Dennis WiseVice President

Jess CastroPresident

Gary SwensonFinenciei Secretary

Ken CashRecording Secretary

Ray MalitoTreasurer

Httitiph ^twlrctorkfra nf Atti^riraAFL-CIO-CLC

Local Union 8031 4510 Indiana Street Golden, Colorado 80403

January 30, 1991

%%v

To: J. P. JensHealth and SafetyAssistant General ManagerT-130-G

From: E. L. Samora, Jr.Union Safety CommitteeT-690-G

Ext. 5298 / D-1752

RE: SAFETY CONCERN NUMBERS 90-051, 90-212, AND 90-426

This is an official position of the United Steelworkers on safety concernnumbers 90-051, 90-212, and 90-426. All three safety concerns deal with the airsample levels received in building 123, room 163. Room 163 in building 123 doesnot meet the requirements of a radiation control area by any standard. Bysending air samples to building 123 from the radiological control areas greaterhan 250 counts per minute and greater than 20 disintegrations per minute, we are

exposing our members, the environment, and the public to an unnecessary risk.

Administrative controls are not an adequate substitute for engineered features.operational measures for controlling occupational exposure must be applied toassure that any work with radioactive materials is carried out in the safestmanner that is achievable. The RCA areas located in the PSZ have the engineeringcontrols to do this job safe and efficient. This would seem the logical placeto do this work, since we have everything in place to accommodate this specificjob junction.

These concerns were brought to EG&G twelve months ago and to this date, EG&G hasnot offered 5. safe resolution.

E. L. Samora,/jr.Union Safety Representative

cc:

S. A. BuckieS. Cordova

R. J. FleischackerJ. R. Majestic, Jr,R. M. NelsonR. E. WilliamsJ. 0. Zane

J. CastroC. D. Del ForgeD. M. Hardin

E. I. TietenbergC. M. Wise

up51-212.426

Golden Office (303) 278-4557 — 278-4560 Rocky Flats Office (303) 966-2798 — 966-7042

Page 51: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

)

BSsS J^OCKY FLATS

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

USWA

SAFETY COMMITTEE

January 18, 1991

To: J. R. MajesticHealth and SafetyDeputy Assistant General ManagerBuildina 123Ext. 4707

From: E. I. Tietenberg / S. CordovaJCUSC Co-Chairmen

T-452-B / T-690-GExt. 7620 / Ext. 5800

RE: MANAGEMENT ACTION / SAFETY CONCERN NUMBER 90-051 AND 90-212 / AIR FILTERCOUNTING

On October 30, 1990, a meeting was held with you and members of your staffpertaining to the subject safety concerns.

The issue discussed was contaminated filters from the air heads being brought outof the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) into uncontrolled areas in building 123to be counted. The JCUSC requested you to respond in writing as to what actionswere being taken to alleviate the concern. The response was to be provided byNovember 6, 1990.

To date, the JCUSC has not received any information or actions being taken by youor your staff to resolve the issue.

Attached for your information are the safety concerns and related documentation.

Please provide the JCUSC the previously requested information by January 31,199]

I. TietenbergCompany Safety Co-Chairman

S. Cordova

Union Safety Co-Chairman

Attachment:

As Stated

cc:

E. Crusan

C. D. DelForgeE. L. Samora

up90-212.051

Page 52: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

II BGcG ROCKY FLATS

JOINT COMPANY - UNION

SAFETY COMMITTEE

uswA

' f^/c.

October 22, 1990

fo: J. R. MajesticDirector Health i. SaretyBuilding 123Ext. h7C7

From: E. I. Tietenberg / S. CordovaJCUSC

T-550-G

Ext. 7520 / Ext. 5300

RE: ELEVATION OF SAFETT CONCLRN NUMBER 90-212 / CONTAMINATED SAMPLES COUNTEDIN~BUILDING 123

Safety concern number 90-212 has been elevated to the director level forresolution as per Company/Union contract language. Article aIV, Sec.ion .Z,Paragraph D, Subparagraph 5.

The Joint Comoany/Union Safety Committee Co-Chairmen will contact your secretaryfor time on your calendar in order to meet and resolve the^ sarety concern.Included is a packet of al l inrormation dealing wi nh whe Sai=-y • .nc_.n.

/ / ^ '

4

£. I. TietenbergCompany Safety Co-Chairman

S. CordovaUnion Safety Co-Chairman

cc:

C. 0. Del forceE. L. Samora

As statec

ei90-a:i.=^

Page 53: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

EBsG ROCKY FLATS USWA tillJOINT company - UNIONSAFETY COMMITTEE

September 11, 1990

To: S. Cordova / E. I. TietenbergCo-Chairmen J.C.U.S.C.1-690-0Ext. 5800 / Ext. 7620

From." E. L. Samora / C. D. Del forgevl.C.U.S.C.

T-690-G

Ext. 5801 / Ext. 4769

RE: SAFETY CONCERN NUMBER 90-212

Safety concern number 90-051 was worked and elevated to the co-chairmen's level.Concern number 90-212 deals with the same subject as 90-051. Elliott Lessersof Radiological Engineering told me that he would work this issue. If you haveany questions, please feel free to discuss them with me.

E. L. Samora

Union Safety Representative

el90-212.1s

Page 54: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

GENERAL INFORMATION:

(*2) Date Received: \ (*1) Number: 0- 2i'?.(_)^ (3) Priority (H,M,L): H

(*4) Title: OJ^v-^eoll

(5) Initiated by (6) Emp. Number:(*7) Initiation/Start Date: _G / 25/ 5iP ' (8) Emp. Phone No:

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION:

(9*) Supervisor/Person Resp: _ (*10) Phone;

(11) Date Supervisor Answered: / 2.^/ 50

(12) Direct Report Manager; (13) Phone: .20'S\

(14) Bldg: i (15) Bldg. Manager ^"tKsCjfLL 1

SAFETY NOTIFICATIONS:

" : (17) Date: JO/A':^^0(15) Discipline: Bldg:

^(18) Area Safety Eng: 81dgi'"5^^Q_C.

(19) Union Steward: Bldg:

(20) Co, Co-Chairman: _ Bldg:XMS'^5

(21) Union Co-Chair: j5._ Bldg:(22) Company Member: Bldg:''Y^^50^

(23) Union Member: \— Sgl.->nr\C)<'0-->

INVESTIGATION STATUS:" ~~ ^

(25) Date Contacted Employee: / /

(*26) Investigation Comments:

(*27) Invest. Review/Due Date: __/ /__ (28) Status (1-5)

(29) Actions Indent. (Y or N): (30) Interim Letter Date: / / .

A*31) Close Date: / / (*32) Closed By:

*To be filled out when submitting action items*

Page 55: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

THIS FORM IS TO BE USED BY ALL EMPLOYEES ON PLANT SITEMail to: JCUSC, T-690G

Caiss No,

^ EMPLOYEE NAME

QptDEPARTMENT

EMPLOYEE NUMBER

BLDG. 10~7— PHONE SHIFTSUPERVISOR (Print) fA w rrm rVAu'> Ai"W>v.\ SUpv. EXT. ^MANAGER REPORTING TO DIRECTOR (Pnnt)- NA^-Hc?/Y MANAGER EXT.I have previously discussed this Concern with Supen/ision: Yes No,

Concam (briefly).

1S^

j . .

Co

4\l')d r^r>'-;n-Vrl (fC:/-r\--y'>4>...iniyA/-.-Urnn l,-:,. l9 lA t;,- fx.I ' ^ J

n'^utcVN a±> C'.-Ttni^rrt^c^-hi-riry TKy

r*fpf'T-ir-.y-AI tyrdi <?-vn h/. 7.. .-nxv- <.)\nnlri Ar>-rAx:u>L i;-^: d 4vc"v>o

V^g- in/Vrj - iO(^ (1)1^ .,-V cA -4^ Vi:iv <■ ,^d y6-2S-'=!D

Supervision Response (within 5 working days)

Date Steward Signature (If Applicable) Data

Supervision Signal

Manager Reportinglo pij^ctor

NOTE: TIMEUNESS IN COMPLETING THIS FO^ IS OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE.I am satisfied with the results. I am not satisfied.

Brief reason if not satisfiedriW^ (1\C \\OCX<\<. ai^rl ^ fHn/Ti>€,c{

bici^ A ^SlDQ^/»n /S lYluch./^Psiy ^O/Ki It^f^ -^rryrf^ Colc^ h a .

T

Employee Slgnatu

JCUSC received

Date

ncam on: .i'={o

Assigned to: Union:

To be completed by the JCUSC Co-Chalrperson(s)C. .\^. 2i3r-Nv

Distribution:

Co.p.nv: CltD.Date

Date

Safety Committee (White)Union Steward (Green)Employee (Goldenrod)

RF-45500 fP.ev. Z'90) Destroy Previous Issues

Page 56: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

1

JOIWT COMPANY - UNIONSAFETY COMMirrEE

September 11, ISSO

To: S. Cordova / E. I. Tietenberg Frorar E. L- Samara / C. D. DelforgeCo-Chairmen J.C.U.S.C. J.C.U.S.C.T-o50-C T-o50-5Ext. 5300 / Ext. 7520 Ext. 5301 / Ext. 4759

RE: SAFETY CONCE.RN NUHBD 90-212

Safety concern number 90-051 was worked and elevated to the co-chairmen's level ,Concern number 90-212 deals with the same subject as 90-051. Elliott Lessersof Radiological Engineering told me that he would work this issue. If you haveany Questions, please feel free to discuss tham with me.

E. L. Samora

Union Safety Represe.ntative

I elS0-212.1s

Page 57: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

tJATc April 25, 19SQ 0HP-a9-?0TO C, D. Waggoner/J. L. San Pietro

THOiM W. H. Sonjers, QHP, Bldg. 750, a5725

SUBJECT SAFETY CONCEPJI SO-051

C^jrranily n itars ar° initially scrasned for radioactivity in the areas and arenot ailowea to leave the area if the count raia is greatar than 2500 ctni. A

perroriaed in the count room and on the air sainDle canisters on aresults of the siuear sur/eys are all well below the limit of "0

apm/lQQ cnr. Air samolers are also located, in the room. Results of the samplesare attacr.ec and indicate air concentrations in the room are at normal ambient1 eve 1s.

ine c_n«.. _ls currently in place are adecuata to ensure the highly contaminatedsamples do not leave the area which could be a hazard.

WMS:=.mn

r

SucxieL w • n ti R u

E. D. LassesjM. a. Peters

<j. A • Ray ■

Page 58: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

Caa* No. q0-05\employee Name Employee Number'r^Y^er.t HSi L BId5.iZl Phone Shift DAYI .. .a previously discussed this csnce.Tj with my supervisor: __jk^Yes NoConcsm (briefly) ^ A/fZ flLT^^ (HdcJAtTJAJC- SVSTEAt IA//Zadyui /62, BU^S- rZz. _rl^CSJVe^ A//I ^JyjPLBS CV£J^ ZS'^c/at 0 2ji> d//>i , /WY

pyB.^ L/Ai/rs AA/ns/^^syy

Be Re-r/^/A/^D /// /? CD/^r;^ PL LED w/r;/ ci^ry /aJG- /;a/d

PROPE.^ ^/(SRPyU. A 770 A/ POP CDU yrjA/G^^ /

/7?<^Employee Signature ^

mmediata Supervisor fleaponse (within 5 worxing days) "~

^ ^ ' -J ClA . L- A -i i/''s C^.n.C-'-'^ov^-^4-.. 0/7> Uj^ /^ /J. s, ^ ^ oyer.-C^r/ -TTs C / i j. RjUy^

. >* -f-3 ro u s " 7~Jt/s cs •».,- TTa^Ow ~ Lcjrr h-s^ J g'cZ/'Vdc e.Vj><3-/_-

Supervisiir Signature (legibly please) Qate

^ /-A4-/0Direct fieccrt Manager Signature Cate

iC I o; TImellnesx in csmpletlng this torm is cf the utmost impcnanca.

— _ I am satisfied with the results.—^ I am not satlsfiec. neferrai to the JC'JSC for invesugaticn because:

'<2. P r-^^.rr I / /fr-^.K'c P r'A P "4' ^ y- I / / * /I'^r^i riz tp P PR:- \j (_ :■ a 7") n pP C UJapB Su PP ~y^

O' j1~<. V/ C . r"-' j? c' /P/ - /.'4/ — ■ ■ " jy J ! y>^JiJr-r / /\ c S8 completed by the JCLISCrCo-Chajrper30n(s) ' '

aignec Tc: Linicnf _uj;: ^ n^r:^ 1 l-^A /Q"^/2—^ " " i '

Comnsnv ^ ^ ^ Q ^^ n 1 / 3 )-<' :: ;

'V^ 3: v/hite - s^iev/ Czrr.rr.ir.ee Gre«n - ^.z'.zye^7 Yeticw - Sucer/tricn Gcicenrcc - Unicn Slewarc

—5zCC (nev. **/E61 Goaircv ^••vroua ilzu*!

Page 59: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

RADIOLOGICAL OPERATING INSTRUCTIONSRoutine Air Sampling

ROI 4.1Page 4 of 19March 04, 1991

5.8.2

6.0

Defective parts should be replaced with partsstocked in the Radiological Operations office.

CAUTION

PROBES OF THE FLOW METER ARE VERY DELICATE, DONOT SHOCK THEM. IF THE TIP IS BROKEN OR DIRTY,DO NOT USE SINCE THE READINGS WILL BE INVALID.

INSTRUCTION

6.1 Filter media of fixed airhead samplers shall be routinelychanged as follows:

6.1.1 Survey filter caps before unscrewing.

6.1.2 Unscrew and remove the air filter cap.

6.1.3 Survey the filter media with an alpha surveymeter (Ludlum Model 12-lA Count Rate Meter withan air proportional probe).

6.1.4 Record the survey meter reading of the filter incounts per minute (cpm) and the filter number inthe Air Sample Travel Log (Attachment 9.1).

6.1.5 Remove the filter media by handling the brassring. Do not touch the filter media.

6.1.6 Place filters which measure less than 2500 cpmin the top of the air sample carrier tube sampleside up.

6.1.6.1 Place filters which measure morethan 2500 cpm in glassine envelopes.These will be counted as "special"samples.

6.1.6.2 Write the filter number, the date,and sample (on/off) time on eachenvelope using a black marking pen.

Page 60: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

Radiological Operating Instructions

EG&G Rocky Flats, Inc.Page 2 of 19March 04, 1991

ROUTINE AIR SAMPLING

1.0 PURPOSE

To establish requirements for routine air sampling operations.

2.0 SCOPE

This instruction provides requirements for changing filter media1 of fixed air samplers, counting special air samples, calibrating

airflow rates of airhead samplers, issuing required air samplingreports, and performing preventive maintenance of airheadsamplers.

3.0 DEFINITIONS

3.1 Fixed air samplers consist of all airhead samplers and SAAMsused for room and effluent air monitoring.

3.2 Koval Factor (K) is a unit used in calculating air sample, radioactivity which adjusts for the decay of short-livedI radionuclides when sample counts are spaced in time. In

calculations, K is used to designate the Koval Factor.

3.3 DAG is the acronym used to designate Derived AirConcentration. DAG values are specified (DOE Order 5480.11)for each radionuclide and their retention class, and are thelimiting values for control of airborne radioactivity in thework place.

3.4 Airborne Radioactivity Area is the designated area postingrequired for areas where airborne radioactive materialconcentrations greater than 1/10 of the DAG are present.

3.5 Special air samples consist of any routine air sampleshaving a survey instrument reading of more than 2500 cpm, orthe filter from a positive SAAM alarm with 25 cpm or greateron a referee SAAM.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

4.1 Manager(s) of personnel required to perform work per thisinstruction shall ensure that affected personnel areinformed or trained to the extent necessary prior toinitiation of that work.

Page 61: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

Internal Letter Rockwell International

• October 23, 1985 No.

TO (N»n». Of8»nU*tlon.l(H«m«Addr»t«) PBnurnUM (Ntma. Ofganliaiion, Intarnil Addrau. PKona)

G. W. Campbell • l_.jpl^• Health, Safety, and Environment • Qper'Health PhysicsBuilding 111 . Building T750G

• X 4909

SUBJECT, safety concern 85-64, SAMPLE COUNT LABORATORY, BUILDING 123

Meetings were held with J. SanPietro and J. Castro to discussunresolved portions of Safety Concern 85-64, Sample CountLaboratory Building 123. It was agreed that with implementationor the following items, this concern can be considered resolved.

1. A SAAM unit will be installed in Room 163.

2. Change the daily swipe contamination survey taken byRadiation Monitoring, to include sample carriers and holders.In addition, a weekly survey will be accomplished ofequipment interiors.

3. Samples greater than 100% RCG will,be recounted in thebuilding of origin and treated as a special air sample.

4. Samples greater than 500% RCG will be returned in a timelymanner to the building of origin. The Radiation Monitoringforeman will be notified by the counting technician of thisaction.

5. Counting Laboratory personnel will v/ear paper or clothcoveralls while handling samples in Room 163. This isrequired to preclude contaminating personal clothing in theevent an elevated.sample was dropped on their clothing whileseated at the work bench. In this case only, coveralls wornover personal clothing is acceptable.

6. Rewrite the count room operating procedure HS A EL OP-23 toreflect these changes and better define actions required oflaboratory personnel.

Page 62: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

Case No. JOINT COMPANY-UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE Assigned to:

^ CONCERN FORM

Company

Employee ept. Bldg. JS23Phone Shift i)A1

Immediate Supervisor T)A1Jf SiOhidLd^El PhoneI Have Previously Discussed This Concern With My Supervisor: \ZI\ (Please Check)

Subject: (State Briefly) PmmC dCCJ^a/iAJS IvUiM ^£nnlAS!JLmP/^

PMl£Eb)Uli L/Mi-f /ig Clfv) IPiTUQfirnPn- AUALn-cf^ fAj u:io£hc/AjA AjAA,)

S-^f'S'SEmployee Date

Supervisor Answer: .

— conce^^n for inadvertant exposures is understandable. Initial action is underway toadaress your concern by convening a meeting between all organizations which have impacton the counting room. Representatives of Radiation Measurements, Radiation Monitoringand the HSE Analytical, Labs will be reviewing monitoring and screening protocols, counting

room protocols and various physical controls with a goal of upgrading documentation ofinstructions and minimizing potential for exposure.

"TEETI Have Discussed The Written Answer With My Supervisor:

I I I Am Satisfied With The Results.

I Am Not Satisfied, and Refer The Matter To The Joint CompanL Am jNoc aausiiea, ana Refer The Matter To The Joint Company-Union S^ety *Committee for Their Investigation Because: (A]^nO A OiiSo UclJzj^

Disiu-ibution: White - Safety CommitteeGreen - Employee j. . Received-Yellow - Supervision Received.

( t MMS KS.-'

Page 63: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

(i. W. CampbellPage TwoOctober 23, 1985

Each of these items has been addressed and implemented. At thistime, the concern can be considered resolved, I believe that asound and equitable solution was reached and will further enhanceour commitment of providing the best safety and health programpossible,

I wish to express my thanks to J, SanPietro and J, Castro fortheir open and conducive attitude, in resolve of this concern.

R, A, Link, ManagerOperational Health Physics

cc:

J. Castro

J, M, AldrichR, G, DelPizzo

C. R, LagerquistG. L. PotterW. F. Williams

Page 64: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

James D. KellyPresident

John A. Cash

Financial Secretary

Ted TegelerVice President

Michael T. DavidsonRecording Secretary

Patrick F. KellyTreasurer

of AmpriraAFL-CIO-CLC

Local Union 8031 Rocky Flats, Colorado41

;|i/fy

September lOy 1985

G. Campbell

HS&E

Bldg. Ill

Rocky Flats Plant

SUBJECT: Safety Concern 85-64y Unnecessary Exposure to Radioactive Material

in the Sample Counting Room (163) in Building 123

The Company and Union cannot reach an agreement for resolution to this SafetyConcern. Some improvements have been madey howevery further improvements are

necessary. A new procedure has been written for this areay but we feel it does

not go far enough; a copy of this new procedure is attached. L. J. Olinger, Opr.

Health Physicsy was contacted about further improvements which the Union feelsare necessary. Her replyy "further precautions are redundant beyond reasonablefor the level of hazard which exists"y exhibits arrogance and is certainly argu

ment ivey to say the least. This type of attitude is not conducive to a goodworking relationship between the Safety Committee and Health Physics. -

The Union does take exception to this reply and our recommendations for Room 163yBuilding 123 are as follows:

Room air samples be installed.,

At least one S.A.M. air monitor be installed.

Alpha mets with cables be installed on the counting instruments.A combo be placed at the door.

Protective clothing be required for personnel working in this room.This is meant to include coverallsy booties and surgeon's gloves whichare to be worn when handling samples. fV^rr

6. The sample containers must be monitored before leaving the PSZ area

buildings and the M.T. tag signed by a monitor.7. If a sample is suspected to be "hot" or greater than the counting instrument

will county the proper protocol is as follows:

a) Call Radiation Monitoring in Bldg. 881 for a monitor to respondto the area. The telephone number should be placed- by each telephonein a visible area.

b) Do not remove the suspected sample from the counting instrument. Whenthe radiation monitor arrivesy he/she will remove the sample.©If the sample is found to be greater than 100% of R.C.G. by the monitorythen the radiation monitoring supervisor of the affected area will be

notified immediately so the area in question will be posted for respirators

and surveys taken.

Page 65: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

James D. KellyPresfdent

John A. Cash

Financial Sacratary

Ted TegeierVice President

Michael T. DavidsonRecording Secretary

Patrick F. KellyTreasurer

^twlmorfe^ra nf AmwiraAFL-CIO-CLC

Local Union 803141

Rocky Flats, Colorado

G. Campbell

September 10, 1985

Page 2

(D9.

Have the radiation monitor perform a smear survey of the area to check

for levels of contamination that exceed the 20d/m/100 c/m.

Personnel will be monitored out by the radiation monitor,

f) Have the radiation monitor secure the sample and return it to the

area of origin for special counting procedures.

Personnel will be monitored out by a radiation monitor at the end of their shift.All counted samples must be secured at the end of the shift and when appropriate,

the samples will be taken back to a building inside the P.S.Z. for disposal.

The Union feels that the ideal area for counting samples would be inside the P.S.Z.

area. If this is not possible, it is imperative every effort be made to insure that

no Pu will be released to an area where personal clothing is worn and/or possiblytaken off site into someone's home or place of business.

Vie feel that Rockwell International owes its employees, their families and the surrounding communities assurance that every possible precaution is taken to prevent theunnecessary spread of radioactive contamination.

rJ. SanPietro

J.C.U.S.C.

Union Member

<5-1U tA)e^) ]-g ^ i<l Kclcc—.

cc:

J. Aldrich

J. Castro

R. DelPizzo

R. Link

C. A. Noble

J. Ortiz

Attachment

Page 66: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

HEALTH, SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT MANUAL

Rockwell International

Aerospace Operations

Rocky Fiats Plant

HSE 18.02

Page 1 of 18April 30, 1989Replaces: 01/16/89

PERSONNEL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTSFOR PLUTONIUM CONTROLLED AREAS

SCOPE

To define the minimum requirements for personnel protection in plutoniumprocessing areas, laboratories, storage facilities, or any other area postedas a Plutonium Controlled Area.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Administrative Work - Performing job reviews, reviewing and/or picking uppaper work, changing computer disks, incidental work on computer keyboards andall other similar activities.

2.2 Anti-Contamination (Anti-C) Clothing - More stringent Company-furnishedprotective clothing that may be required by Radiological Monitoring and/orOperational Health Physics for specific jobs and/or operations. Full Anti-Cclothing consists of paper coveralls, hoods, gloves, shoe covers and/or boots,this clothing shall be worn in addition to normal precautionary clothing forthe purpose of radiological/contamination control and shall not be wornoutside the controlled areas.

2.3 "B" Box - Rocky Flats terminology for containment structure/work boxpartially open to room atmosphere with restricted openings.

2.4 Contamination - The deposition or presence of unwanted radioactivematerial on the surfaces of structures, areas, objects or personnel.

2.5 Controlled Area - Any area to which access is controlled in order toprotect individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials.

2.6 Precautionary Clothing and Equipment - Company-issued clothing andequipment which workers may be required to wear in controlled areas. This mayinclude items such as coveralls, safety shoes, underwear, etc. Precautionaryclothing and equipment are worn as a precautionary measure to avoidcontaminating personal clothing or a worker's skin in case there is aninadvertent release of contamination. Precautionary clothing is not intendedto substitute for anti-contamination clothing and shall not be used as anti-contamination clothing.

2.7 Radiation - As used in this document, indicates alpha, beta, gamma. X-rayand neutron types of ionizing radiation.

2.8 Radiation Area - As used in this document, indicates any area within acontrolled area where an individual can receive a dose equivalent greater than

Page 67: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

PERSONNEL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS HSE 18.02FOR PLUTONIUM CONTROLLED AREAS Page 2 of 18

April 30, 1989

2 mrem, but less than 100 mrem, in 1 hour at 30 cm from the radiation sourceor from any surface through which the radiation penetrates.

3. GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES

3.1 Operational Health Physics

Operational Health Physics will establish the occupational radiationprotection program to support the long-term and short-term planning, as wellas the day-to-day activities, of the Rocky Flats Plant.

3.2 Radiological Monitoring

Radiological Monitoring will assist all operations with theimplementation of the radiation safety program in order to maintain radiationlevels and personnel radiation dose equivalents as low as reasonablyachievable (ALARA).

3.3 Building Managers

The Building Managers are responsible for the safety of buildingpersonnel facility maintenance and environmental protection of -heirrespective facilities. Operational Health Physics works wit;. • ■•nldingManagers to establish the radiation protection program of buii personneland facilities.

3.4 HS&E Area Engineer

The HS&E Area Engineer is responsible for programmatically managing amulti-disciplinary safety team, ensuring effective communications within theHS&E organization and with all other supervisory personnel, and implementingof the ALARA policy.

3.5 Criticality Engineering

Criticality Engineering has the primary responsibility for generating andrecommending nuclear criticality safety policies for Rocky Flats andestablishing procedures which implement the established nuclear criticalitysafety policies.

3.6 Supervision

3.5.1 It is the responsibility of all supervisors to be acquainted with allaspects of their operations which involve radioactive materials. Allsupervisors shall ensure that their operations are carried out according tothe requirements of this document and the ALARA policy.

3.6.2 In the discharge of their responsibilities, supervisors shall seek thetechnical support of Health, Safety and Environment. Supervisors shall submitto Operational Health Physics all available information on any changes oralterations contemplated in their area of responsibility which may affect theradiation or contamination control programs.

Page 68: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

PERSONNEL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS HSE 18.02FOR PLUTONIUM CONTROLLED AREAS Page 8 of 18

April 30, 1989

4.3.4.1 All individuals have the responsibility to properly use the selfmonitoring devices as described in HS&E 18.09 in order to prevent the spreadof radioactive contamination.

4.3.4.2 When leaving a controlled area, all personnel must be monitored byRadiological Monitoring. The Radiation Monitor shall also monitor therespirator, dosimetry badge, shoe bottoms and other items as appropriate(e.g., paperwork, notebooks, etc.) using the Ludlum Alpha Survey Meter. Allitems leaving a controlled area shall be smeared for removable contaminationin addition to being monitored with a Ludlum instrument.

4.3.4.3 Personnel must wash their hands upon exiting the controlled areas.

4.3.4.4 Personnel working in controlled areas, who make a clothing change,SHALL shower prior to leaving plantsite. In addition, these personnel shallwash their hair.

4.3.5 Control and Decontamination of a Radioactive Material Release

4.3.5.1 Radiological Monitoring personnel will determine the location andextent of any radioactive material release, recommend appropriate controlmeasures, and furnish supervision with written reports as necessary.

4.3.5.2 Decontamination of a radioactive material release must beginimmediately and be completed as rapidly as possible. Decontamination shall becontinued beyond the end of a shift or until the contamination is secured. Ifdecontamination efforts are stopped before decontamination is completed,approval must be obtained from Radiological Monitoring and appropriatesupervision.

4.3.5.3 Detectable levels of radioactivity from former plant ""'^'-'^sses, whichhave contributed to the overall background radioactivity levei- " not beallowed to remain as a part of the facility area which is being ..-minatedfor future unrestricted use.

4.3.6 Personnel Airlocks and Step-off Pads

4.3.6.1 Personnel airlocks are installed between plutonium controlled areasand non-controlled areas to assist in maintaining proper airflow andcontamination control.

4.3.6.2 When using personnel airlocks, only one door or one set of doubledoors shall be open at any time except for emergency egress.

4.3.6.3 Step-off pads (bootie lines) are used to assist in isolatingcontamination to controlled areas. Upon entering or exiting controlled areas,employees shall follow the posted procedures for proper step-off pad use.

4.3.7 Glovebox Operations

4.3.7.1 Supervisors shall ensure that all of their employees who work ingloveboxes are trained in the safe and proper methods of glovebox operation.

Page 69: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

RADIOLOGICAL OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS ROI 3 2ITEMS LEAVING RADIATION COMTROaED AREAS Page 4 of 10

September 25, 1989

8.0 MATERIALS

■ Black ink pen■ Forms: Record of Items Leaving Radiation Controlled Areas■ Leather gloves (as required)■ Smear paper

9.0 STANDARDIZATION AND CALIBRATION

The Ludlum 12-lA Count Rate Meter and the Ludlum Model 31 shall becalibrated annually in accordance with Radiation Instrumentationprocedures. The instruments shall be performance tested daily, orprior to use.

9.2 The SAC-4 Scintillation Smear Counter is calibrated annually inaccordance with Radiation Instrumentation procedures andperformance tested each shift (or prior to use) according to ROI 5.3,Operation and Performance checking of Alpha Scintillation SmearCounting Instrumentation.

9.3 Surface Contamination Limits for Release of Materials to UncontrolledAreas:

Table I

Aloha Surface fontamination Limits For Release of Materials toUncontrolled Arpas

Limit InstrumentRemovable 20 dpm/lOO cm« SAC-4

Total 250 cpm Ludlum 12-lA(Fixed i Removable)

Table IT

Beta/Gamma Surface Contamination Limits For Release ofMaterials to Uncontrolled Areas

Limit InstrumentRemovable 200 cpm* Ludlum - 31

Total 200 cpm* Ludlum - 31(Fixed i Removable)

*See Section 10.2

Page 70: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

J}^ES&E ROCKY FLATS

INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

date April 25, 1990 0HP-a9-90

TO C. D. Waggoner/J. L. San PietroI^ROH W. H. Somers, OHP, Bldg. 750, X5725

SUBJECT SAFETY CONCERN 90-051

Currently filters are initially screened for radioactivity in the areas and arenot allowed to leave the area if the count rate is greater than 2500 cpm. Asmear survey is performed in the count room and on the air sample canisters on adaily basis. The results of the smear surveys are all well below the limit of 20dpm/100 cm . Air samplers are also located, in the room. Results of the samplesare attached and indicate air concentrations in the room are at normal ambientlevels.

The controls currently in place are adequate to ensure the highly contaminatedsamples do not leave the area which could be a hazard.

WMS;emh

:c:

. A. BuckieD. C. Hunt

E. D. LessesM. A. PetersJ. A. Ray

COa/TtrO::>^^ Its'^3

Page 71: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

0

Building 123

Route: II

Sample: 31

0.8 -

0.4 -

0.3 -

0.2 -

Days Since 24-APR-90

Page 72: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

GENERAL INFORMATION

(*2) Date Received: _l_/30/f?P (*1) Number: (_)(3) Priority (H,MeL):

:*A) Title: Ai r.(5) Initiated by (5) Qjp Number;(•7) Initiation/Start Date: _L / SL^^O (8) Emp. Phone No:

HANAGEHENT INFQRMATTQN;

(9*) Supervisor/Person Reap: (no) Phone: 2^2(11) Date Supervisor Answered: _\_ /

(12) Direct Report Hanager: (13) pho„e: 22iQ^-(14) Bldg: A?.3_ (15) Bldg. Manager:

SAFETY NQTTFICATIQNS;

(17) Date: / 3^/g<;p(16) Discipline: Bldg:(18) Area Safety Eng: ^ Bldg:XtF^OC.(19) Union Steward: Bldg-(20) Co. Co-Chairman: Bldg:XM5ig(21) Union Co-Chair: Bldg:(22) Company Member: _G.D. OO<30<02>rier^ Bldg:(23) Union Member: TX.Jj . _Oji ^|^o/sc

INVESTIGATTUN STaTlls.

(25) Date Contacted Employee: / /

(*25) Investigation Comments:

(•27) Invest. Review/Due Date: (28) status (1-5)(29) Actions Indent. (Y or N): (30) Interim Letter Date: / /(*31) Close Date: (*32) Closed By:

*To be filled out when submitting action items'*

Page 73: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

JOINT COMPANY/UNION SAFETY COMMITTEE CONCERN FORM(Use Black ink Only)

CaseNo.9QrO^L.^ployee Name g„p|oyee Number

et- BIdn. >23 Phone shm PAYI have previously discussed this concern with my supervisor Yes No

Concern (briefly) '7'HE. Ai/Z FILTB^ CdUA/r/A/G- S)/Sr£Af /63^ /ZS,R£C£lVeS A//1 f=^iLTaf^ samples OVe/Z 0/^2^o/ai.oy£/i U/^iTs fiose A

Be Rer/^i/A/'sp /M A CONTROLLED /^>e£>? W/r£ a,drN/A/a-jia/dPROPER \/'eAjr)UAr/OAj fo£ CPUA/rjA/o-

AP n^<0Employee Signature ^ Date

Immolate Supervisor Response (within 5 working days)

^ ±_ A g-X, yj-UhH^rf '1-1,1. c^^c-e-n^ ^ (uQ^^ U. /4. ^

aiu.arf- 'tley^. IZT —1^0 <sev(. s^.^e.

O^c/^-f/ ^ Lull- -^0 gj/'vce -l-L P\:aeJ^

Supervts^ Signature (legibly please) Qa^g

Direct Report Manager Signature Qa^g

NOTE: TImeilness in completing this form is of the utmost importance.

— I arn satisfied with the results.— I am not satisfied. Referral to the JCUSC for Investigation because:

/ Z /ir'cK'c pr/6P iL"T^/r^r'rP ^ SaQiy CofyCQrn O-hl. <, ^ -tLTo be completed by the JCUSC do-^aknpmofi(s) / /

Assigned To: Uninn- PLg-A'jQ natP I jp^\ IQT)Company: "P n^tp l/Bffer^.

L ibution. Whito - Safety Committee Green - EmployeeYellow - Supervision Goldenrod - Union Steward

RF-45500 (Rev. 11/86) Destroy Prevtous Issues

Page 74: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

James D. KellyPresident ,

John A. Cash

Flnandal Secretary

Ted TegelerVice President

Michael T. Davidson

Recording Secretary

Patrick F. KellyTreasurer

Initeii §twluiark^ra nf AmrriraAFL-CIO-CLC

Local Union 8031 Rocky Flats, Colorado %41

September 10, 1985

G. Campbell

HS&E

Bldg. Ill

Rocky Flats Plant

SUBJECT: Safety Concern 85-64, Unnecessary Exposure to Radioactive Materialin the Sample Counting Room (163) in Building 123

The Company and Union cannot reach an agreement for resolution to this SafetyConcern. Some improvements have been made, however, further improvements arenecessary. A new procedure has been written for this area, but we feel it does

not go far enough; a copy of this new procedure is attached. L. J. Olinger, Opr.Health Physics, was contacted about further improvements which the Union feelsare necessary. Her reply, "further precautions are redundant beyond reasonablefor the level of hazard which exists", exhibits arrogance and is certainly argu-.entive, to say the least. This type of attitude is not conducive to a goodworking relationship between the Safety Committee and Health Physics.

The Union does take exception to this reply and our recommendations for Room 163,Building 123 are as follows:

1. Room air samples be installed.,

2. At least one S.A.M. air monitor be installed.

3. Alpha mets with cables be installed on the counting instruments.4. A combo be placed at the door.5. Protective clothing be required for personnel working in this room.

This is meant to include coveralls, booties and surgeon's gloves whichare to be worn when handling samples.

6. The sample containers must be monitored before leaving the PS2 areabuildings and the M.T. tag signed by a monitor.

7. If a sample is suspected to be "hot" or greater than the counting instrumentwill count, the proper protocol is as follows:

a) Call Radiation Monitoring in Bldg. 881 for a monitor to respondto the area. The telephone number should be placed by each telephonein a visible area.

b) Do not remove the suspected sample from the counting instrument. Whenthe radiation monitor arrives, he/she will remove the sample.

c) If the sample is found to be greater than 100% of R.C.G. by the monitor,then the radiation monitoring supervisor of the affected area will be

notified immediately so the area in question will be posted for respiratori

and surveys taken.

Page 75: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

James D. KellyPresident

John A. Cash

Finandal Sacretary

Ted TegelerVice President

•5SS#'

Michael T. DavidsonRecording Secretary

Patrick F. KellyTreasurer

IntoJi twluiorkera nf AmmraAFL-CIO-CLC

Local Union 8031 Rocky Fiats, Colorado41

G- Campbell

September 10, 1985Page 2

8.

9.

d) Have the radiation monitor perform a smear survey of the area to checkfor levels of contamination that exceed the 20d/m/100 c/m.

e) Personnel will be monitored out by the radiation monitor.f) Have the radiation monitor secure the sample and return it to the

area of origin for special counting procedures.Personnel will be monitored out by a radiation monitor at the end of their shift.All counted samples must be secured at the end of the shift and when appropriate,the samples will be taken back to a building inside the P.S.2. for disposal.

The Union feels that the ideal area for counting samples would be inside the P.S.Z.area. If this is not possible, it is imperative every effort be made to insure that^no Pu will be released to an area where personal clothing is worn and/or possiblytaken off site into someone's home or place of business.

We feel that Rockwell International owes its employees, their families and the surrounding communities assurance that every possible precaution is taken to prevent theunnecessary spread of radioactive contamination.

rJ. SanPietro

J.C.U.S.C.

Union Member

cc:

J. Aldrich

J. Castro

R. DelPizzo

R. Link

C. A. Noble

J. Ortiz

Attachment

Page 76: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

Dennis Wise

Vice President

Jess Castro

President«

Ken Cash

Recording Secretary

Gary SwensonFinancial Secretary

Ray MalitoTreasurer

of AtnwraAFL-CIO-CLC

Local Union 8031 4510 Indiana Street"Sc^g)

Golden, Colorado 80

41

403

January 30, 1991

To; J. P. JensHealth and SafetyAssistant General ManagerT-130-G

From: E. L. Samora, Jr.Union Safety CommitteeT-690-G

Ext. 5298 / D-1752

RE: SAFETY CONCERN NUMBERS 90-051, 90-212, AND 90-426

This letter is an official position of the United Steelworkers on safety concernnumbers 90-051, 90-212, and 90-426. All three safety concerns deal with the airsample levels received in building 123, room 163. Room 163 in building 123 doesnot meet the requirements of a radiation control area by any standard. Bysending air samples to building 123 from the radiological control areas greaterthan 250 counts per minute and greater than 20 disintegrations per minute, we areexposing our members, the environment, and the public to an unnecessary risk.

Administrative controls are not an adequate substitute for engineered features.Operational measures for controlling occupational exposure must be applied toassure that any work with radioactive materials is carried out in the safestmanner that is achievable. The RCA areas located in the PSZ have the engineeringcontrols to do this job safe and efficient. This would seem the logical placeto do this work, since we have everything in place to accommodate this specificjob junction.

These concerns were brought to EG2i.G tv/elve months ago and to this date, EG2iG hasnot offered a safe resolution.

E. L. Samora, /Jr.Union Safety Representative

cc:

S. A. Buckie J. Castro

S. Cordova C. D. DelForgeR. J. Fleischacker D. M. Hard in

J. R. Majestic, Jr.R. M. Nelson E. I. TietenbergR. E. Williams

J. 0. Zane

up51-212.426

mr.ra .'3031 ">78-^557 — 273-4560 Rocky Flats Office (303) 966-2798 — 966-7042

Page 77: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

~~ ^ " /forT gt^

1"!^. 6)p'5 <^r-StJnr-€_ -f-i^-e-d-ess ""^/xJi-on S^S^O -—

s^) - Pco(i.€.c^My-^ i,{- c-^ < -^^c£ —(72.A (»0 f-e-C-nS

Q

'OO Lnin

B fcoy L^mJJ^

Page 78: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed
Page 79: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

ifi). 9-X. 'Pi&Mr s-K(3

ntCSIAX C^lJ^

Page 80: ICH - Ambushed Grand Jury€¦ · REF: (a) ROI 4.1, Rev. 4, Routine Air Sampling (b) 4-61300-ROI-04.03, Portable Low Volume Air Sampling On March 2, 1994, a safety concern was addressed

H r

VvoofiS.-

iXOOEX IS a -

\ia. '