21
Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary

Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D.Michelle Brown

Craig Cheeseman

The Nature ConservancyOctober 2012

Page 2: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Project Background

• Aquatic connectivity for streams and rivers is important

• Barriers can be dams, culverts, and natural fall lines

• Thousands of barriers exist in the Hudson River Estuary

How do you know which ones are the most important?

Page 3: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Project Background

• Partners: TNC, NYNHP, DEC-HREP

• Steering committee: TNC, NYNHP, HREP, DEC, DOT

Phase 1 Prioritize barriers Fall 2011

Phase 2 Field assess barriers January – Dec 2012

Phase 3 Prepare final products January – March 2013

Process and Timeline

Page 4: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Model

Components

1. Species

2. Condition

3. Connectivity

Page 5: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Model : Species Component

Partial Species List:

• Diadromous Fish• Brook Trout• Eastern Box Turtle• Comely Shiner• Northern Red

Salamander• Eastern Pond

Mussel

Page 6: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Species –Brook Trout

Page 7: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Species – Eastern Box Turtle

Page 8: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Model: Condition Component

1. Active River Area

2. Impervious Surface

3. Ecoregional Forest Matrix Blocks

4. Priority Tributaries

Page 9: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Condition – Active River Area

Page 10: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Condition – TNC Priority Tributaries

Page 11: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Model: Connectivity Component

Criteria Categories

1. Network Length

2. Absolute Gain

3. Downstream Barriers

Page 12: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Connectivity: Culverts and Dams

Page 13: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Remote Prioritization Results

Prioritization Metric Number of Possible Barriers

Total possible barriers 13,057

Total possible barriers on high condition streams 3,277

Total possible barriers with > 2000m network length 1,677

Total possible barriers with >=750m stream gain 924

Total possible barriers that intersect SGCN models 363

Possible barriers intersecting with SGCN’s that are culverts 283

Possible barriers intersecting with SGCN’s that are dams 80

Page 14: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Field Assessment

• Data Collection Methods– River and Stream Continuity Partnership

www.streamcontinuity.org

• Assessment Protocol– Lake Champlain Basin Fish Passage Initiative

2008- Final report• Juvenile Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis)

– 4 inch difference between bottom of culvert and top of water

– Least common denominator with published data

Page 15: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Field Results: Dams and Culverts

Page 16: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Field Results: Barriers and Non-Barriers

Page 17: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Field Assessment Prioritization

Degree of barrier to passage

+ Degree of habitat impact

Site Score

Prioritization:Tier 1 = 12 – 14

Tier 2 = 9 – 11

Tier 3 = 2 - 8

Barrier Ranking Criteria:

1. Inlet Drop (4 inches)2. Crossing slope matches

stream3. Depth in culvert matches

stream4. Outlet Drop5. Velocity

Impact Ranking Criteria:

1. Relative Scour Pool Size2. Crossing Alignment3. Span Description4. Wetted width (stream vs.

culvert)

Page 18: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Preliminary Results: Priority Barriers

Page 19: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Discussion

• False Negatives– There are probably more barriers out there

• Storm damage reduction aspects, not biodiversity, likely to fuel replacement

• Incorrect notion that FEMA will only replace what was there

Page 20: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Next Steps

• Differentiate between resident and diadromous fish barriers (Fall line layer)

• Develop field application

• Strategic replacement with partners

• DEC Funding Opportunities

Page 21: Identifying important barriers in the Hudson River Estuary Andrew J. Peck, Ph.D. Michelle Brown Craig Cheeseman The Nature Conservancy October 2012

Questions