31
IFDC Making Fertilizer Markets Work for Smallholders Presented by Sarah Gavian International Fertilizer Development Center At the AIARD 48th Annual Conference and 2012 Future Leaders Forum on Priorities for Inclusive Agriculture and Rural Development June 3, 2012

IFDC Making Fertilizer Markets Work for Smallholders Presented by Sarah Gavian International Fertilizer Development Center At the AIARD 48th Annual Conference

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

IFDC

Making Fertilizer Markets Work for Smallholders

Presented by Sarah Gavian

International Fertilizer Development Center

At the AIARD 48th Annual Conference and 2012 Future Leaders Forum on Priorities for Inclusive Agriculture and Rural Development

June 3, 2012

Overview

Overview of the fertilizer situation (in Africa)

Segmenting the “smallholder” concept.Approaches to improving fertilizer

markets for all.

Big Picture African economies are growing, in fact above world

averages African agricultural sector growth is accelerating, but

due to labor and area increases, not intensifying. Although the agricultural sector is decreasing in

overall importance, structural transformation - which wages equalize between sectors - is not occurring: agricultural productivity remains very low. (Binswanger-Mkhize 2012)

Food insecurity and poverty are falling, but not enough. Missed MDG targets means millions remain in poverty.

Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize in Patterns of Growth and Structural Transformation in Africa Trends and Lessons for Future Development Strategies, IFPRI 2012, http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/wcaotn02.pdf

Source: IMF analyses at http://www.odi.org.uk/events/presentations/1269.pdf

But structural transformation appears stalled

What’s thwarting the virtual cycle between economic growth and poverty reduction? Nature of growth: the fastest growing African

economies are the resource rich economies (minerals, petro chemicals).

With the agricultural sector, there is a failure to increase productivity for most smallholders.

Amongst other issues, fertilizer use in Africa is low and overall stagnant

Overview: Cereal Production Cereal Production in SSA keeps pace with the rest of the world.

Source: FAO Data

Overview: Cereal Yields

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

1961 1964 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009

mt / h

a

Developed Countries

Asia Developing

Latin America

Sub-Saharan Africa

Cereal yields increases in SSA have stalled

Source: FAO Data

Overview: Cereal Area Area cultivated in S Asia and the World has increased somewhat since the 1960s,

relative to Africa where area has more than doubled. (Note that World data is plotted on right hand axis.)

Sou

rce:

FA

O D

ata

Most SSA countries remain at very low levels of fertilizer use

Abuja Declaration = political target of 50 kg/ha

Recommendations often in the 200 kg/ha (accompanied by organic matter).

71% of reporting countries < 20 kg/ha

Avg. 6-8 kg/ha, mostly cash crops

Source: Seventh Progress Report January-December 2010 Implementation of the Abuja Declaration on Fertilizer for an African Green Revolution

< 20 kg/ha71%

20-40 kg/ha14%

40-100 kg/ha9%

>100 kg/ha6%

Share of SSA countries by level of fertilizer use (kg/ha

Overview: Share of Fertilizer Use While SSA has 12% of the world’s population and

23% the world’s agricultural lands, it uses 3% of the world’s fertilizers

Aspects of smallholder diversity

that influence the virtual cycle between economic growth and

poverty reduction:

farm size & gender

Farm Size

Population growth is taking its predicted toll on farm size (Jayne, Chamberlin & Muyanga, 2011)

Growing rural densities: 25% of the rural population resides in areas exceeding 500 persons per square kilometer

Large & growing numbers of farmers on < 1 ha In four country study of nationally representative household data:

Bottom 20% of farm population is approaching landlessness (w/ less than .5 ha).

Bottom 40% have less than 1 ha of land. These farmers are primarily subsistence farmers, with little marketable

surplus or use of improved inputs. Only 20% of smallholders have more than 4-5 ha. This 20% that is

creating the marketed surplus

Much of the growth comes from large and small commercial farmers, who can take advantage of input and output price signals and subsidies.

http://agrilinks.kdid.org/sites/agrilinks/files/resource/files/Stanford_Paper_April%202012.pdf

Farmers with land can commercialize, reaping higher farm incomes

(Jayne, Chamberlin & Muyanga, 2011)

Farmers with land can commercialize, reaping higher farm incomes

(Jayne, Chamberlin & Muyanga, 2011)

Farmers with land benefit disproportionately from support programs

(Jayne, Chamberlin & Muyanga, 2011)

Women also have trouble getting fertilizers

Female farmers are as efficient as males farmers

They produce less because they control less land, use fewer inputs and have less access to important services such as extension advice.

Closing the gender gap could

increase agricultural output in the developing world by 2.5–4 percent

Reduce the number of undernourished people by 12–17 percent

Source: FAO’s The State of Food and Agriculture 2010-11: Women in Agriculture - Closing the gender gap for development.

Implications

We need to rethink inputs interventions to ensure that a far greater share of smallholders can engage in growth processes.

Approach: address constraints along the two interlinked value chains that influence farmer access, availability and utilization of fertilizers

Approaches to improving fertilizer markets for all

The Double Value Chain for Inputs

Farmers’ decisions to invest in soil fertility and productivity is influenced by Output markets Input supply chain Which are themselves highly interlinked

Unprecedented high prices for food, fuel & fertilizer

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12

Per

cen

tInt'l Fertilizer, Grain, Oil Prices Indexes, Monthly Averages, Jan. 2005 - Apr. 2012

January 2005 = 100

Average of Urea 1, DAP 2, MOP 1

Crude Oil 4

Average 3 of Maize,Wheat, Rice

1. Derived from FMB Weekly Report: Urea, Arab Gulf, prilled; MOP, Vancouver. 2. Derived from Green Markets , DAP, U.S. Gulf.

3. Derived from International Monetary Fund Commodity Prices. 4. Derived from U.S. Energy Information Administration Spot Prices.

Graph by IFDC

Fertilizer Retail Prices in Africa

Fertilizer Price Formation, an example

Lack of profitability at farm level

Benefit Cost Ratios for a 2011 study of 8 African countries indicates:Fertilizer adoption at market prices not profitable

(using 0 > BCR < 2.0)Even at subsidized rates, fertilizers are often only

marginally profitableEspecially when if subsidy is stand-alone rather than

part of a larger agricultural support package with improved seed, farmer credit and technical assistance)

Source: forthcoming AGRA/NEPAD/AU/IFDC study of Best Practices and Policy Options for Implementing Fertilizer Subsidy Programs Successfully in Sub-Saharan Africa

Fertilizer requirements to meet agricultural policy objectives

IFDC studies quantities of fertilizer needed to meet production targets laid out in country implementation plans under CAADP (forthcoming)

From zero to doubling, depending on targeting strategy

Making Fertilizer Markets Work for All Supply side interventions to decrease costs along the

supply chain Make fertilizer itself more efficient: new technologies Decrease supply chain costs

Improve port capacity, transportation networks, warehouses

Extend and deepen retail into rural areasTransport, warehousesAgro-dealer training, certifying, financing & networking

Financing different levels of supply chain (e.g. African Fertilizer & Agribusiness Partnership initiative of AGRA)

Policies that promote private sector (get govt out of distribution) & develop local fertilizer resources (blending, phosphates)

Making Fertilizer Markets Work for All

Demand side interventions to improve farmer awareness on the benefits of fertilizer, its availability and affordability. Related to fertilizer itself

Increase use efficiency (and thus profitability) through farmer training (extension), promotion of complementary packages (integration of Inorganic & organic soil fertility management, improved seed, irrigation, equipment, etc)

Policy: smart subsidies, fertilizer market information Financing: smart subsidies (vouchers) Information

Related to output markets Invest in R&D to enhance productivity for viable subsistence smallholders (e.g.

land saving technologies for those < 1 ha). (Jayne, 2012). Market information systems: “smarter”, SMS based input price info (e.g.,

AMISTA www.esoko.com/amitsa) Finance: mobile-phone based money transfer service e.g., M-Pesa in Kenya Risk Management: crop insurance & other risk sharing investments Link inputs and outputs markets

Fertilizer Subsidies, smart & otherwise

Controversial but increasing in use (Dec 2010) 76% of reporting countries had fertilizer subsidies. 35% used input vouchers to administrate their subsidies 18% had fertilizer-for-work programs.

Methods to import & distribute subsidized fertilizers vary: 18% relied on gov’t importation and distribution 24% relied on private sector importation w/gov’t distribution 35% relied of gov’t importation and mix of govt & private distribution Tanzania alone has importation and distribution of fertilizers for the subsidy

program by the private sector only Abuja Declaration Resolution 5 calls for improving farmers’ access to

fertilizer by granting targeted fertilizer subsidies, with special attention to poor farmers.

Source: Seventh Progress Report January-December 2010 Implementation of the Abuja Declaration on Fertilizer for an African Green Revolution

Fertilizer Subsidies, smart & otherwise

Many lessons learned, including Effectiveness increases when twinned with complementary

inputs: soil nutrient testing, credit, quality seed, extension services, market information, market linkages

Need to accompany vouchers with other measures to target to resource-poor farmers, accompanied by:A government-backed credit programs (credit guarantee, crop

insurance scheme, etc.) “subsidy for public works” that allows poor farmers to exchange labor

to “top-up” the voucher

Accompanying need for data, monitoring, impacts assessment, policy analyses, learning

Successes at linking inputs & outputs The Ghana Grains Partnership: comprehensive input supply program including credit and

technical assistance as well as marketing of the final crop for farmers, creating a fully linked value chain. 

Syngenta Foundation financed initial inputs credit revolving fund. Wienco (a jointly owned Dutch/Ghanaian company) provides seeds, fertilizers and

chemicals on credit to well organized farmers groups following specific criteria. The Municipal Agricultural Development Unit (MADU) provides technical support in the form

of training and demonstration. Farmer commits land and labor. The maize growers’ association

Stabilizes prices and provides market linkages by purchasing the farmers’ total maize crop (recovering the inputs credit received), and storing maize in rented warehouses.

Manages a revolving credit fund (originally funded by Syngenta Foundation), which serves as a catalyst for wider private sector participation in rural agricultural finance

One Acre Fund in East Africa Warehouse receipt systems (ex. IFDC’s Non-Cotton Inputs Programme in Benin, funded by

DGIS)

Conclusions We now have the knowledge and tools for improving the

performance of the fertilizer sector through private-sector focused value chain interventions.

For agricultural growth to trigger virtuous cycles of poverty reduction, interventions reach not only commercial farmers but also subsistent smallholders Fertilizers must become more profitable for all

(decrease costs, increase efficiency) Measures to generate farmer demand for fertilizers are

critical and require tighter Linkages to output marketsMuch more attention to targeting the vast number of

smallholders at risk of missing the boom.