32
IFS410 End User Support Chapter 8 Product Evaluation Strategies and Support Standards

IFS410 End User Support Chapter 8 Product Evaluation Strategies and Support Standards

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

IFS410 End User Support

Chapter 8

Product Evaluation Strategies and Support Standards

Product Evaluation Strategies

Who within an organization should be tasked with evaluating new products?

Should hardware and software be valuated by the same group(s)?

Beware of emotional attachments Clarify “Wants” versus “Needs” Ultimate purpose of tools? Gain and sustain competitive advantage via

efficient and effective use

User Support Rolein Product Standards Support workers often have expertise to

evaluate competing products many employees do not have Eliminates duplication of effort if many

employees individually evaluate products Support employees can act as liaison between

users and IT staff to represent viewpoints of each group

Who ultimately makes / approves the recommendation?

Product standards are lists of hardware, operating systems, network and applications software products selected to meet the needs of end users

History of Product Standards Significant incompatibility among

computer products Incompatible platforms were viewed as

a marketing advantage Framework Example

How Product Standards Emerged

Limited ability to transfer data between systems and between users – Still exists today to a point. Tools?

Excessive inventory of parts required to support multiple vendors’ systems

Difficulty to train and equip hardware service technicians

User skills not transferable to other systems Increased cost to support incompatible systems

Support staff couldn’t be experts on all systems Training had to be targeted to specific platforms

Problems Caused byProduct Incompatibility

During 1980s, to reduce acquisition and support costs, companies began to

standardize on a few selected hardware platforms designed to meet users’ needs TI, Compaq, TRS,

adopt standard operating systems, and in the 1990s, standard network operating systems Banyan, Novell, AppleTalk

limit the choice of application software to a few standard application packages in each software category WordPerfect, Lotus 123

Early Development ofProduct Standards

Product Evaluation Strategies

Microsoft Microsoft

Microsoft Microsoft

Microsoft

WHY ? Is that acceptable? Should it be

acceptable?

Product evaluation is a process of researching and analyzing computer product features, capabilities, and suitability to solve specific user needs

Product evaluation process1. Collect product information2. Test, compare, and evaluate advantages and

disadvantages of competing products3. Make decisions or recommendations

1. Potentially a career make or break

Methods for Evaluating and Selecting Computer Products

Vendor literature, marketing information, Web sites, and user manuals

Demonstrations and evaluation software (Shareware) Product reviews and comparison articles in computer

periodicals and in e-zines on the Web An e-zine is an electronic magazine organized

like a print publication, but distributed via the Internet

Opinions from industry experts in trade publications and Internet news groups

Opinions of employees who have experience with various products

Opinions of colleagues Personally my Favorite

Resources Available to Help Evaluate Computer Products

Computing Review InfoWorld MacWorld MaximumPC Network Computing PC Magazine

PCWorld Smart Computing Tom’s Hardware

Guide ZDNet Business

Publications (Wall Street Journal)

Industry (Trade) Periodicals that Publish Product Comparisons

Software Evaluations

A software evaluation copy permits support staff to try out a product’s features assess a product’s ability to meet user needs

Software evaluation copies Distributed via

CD-ROM Internet download

May have limited features May operate for a limited trial period

ASP’s (Application Service Providers)

Industry standard or best-selling products Products used by competitors Me To? Benchmarks Weighted point evaluation method Request for proposal (RFP) Acknowledged subjective criteria

Product Decision-making Tools

Industry standard products are computer products that are market leaders in sales (defacto standards)

Not really a “standard” defined by an independent organization, such as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) or International Standards Organization (ISO)

Advantages Can reduce support costs Likely to be targeted by trade book publishers, training

materials developers, and support service vendors Disadvantages

May not meet needs of specialized users Standards based on market share change over time

Industry StandardBest-selling Products

Examples of “Defacto” Standards

Networking Protocol = Ethernet and TCP/IP Networking Equipment = Cisco Publishing = Apple Printers = HP Office software = Microsoft Office Database = Oracle Mainframe = IBM Payroll = ADP

Get user input before making software selection decision

Find out which products end users have experience with

Identify advantages and disadvantages of competing products for specialized tasks

Learn whether users have preferences among products

Adopting Industry Standard orBest-selling Products

Competitors may have thoroughly researched the market and identified strategic reasons for adopting products, especially in niche markets A niche or vertical market is a software

market that is highly specialized to a specific industry

Example: software for title companies Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of

products that competitors use Competitive standpoint careful of ‘Me To’

Products Competitors Use

Benchmark is an objective test used to compare the capabilities of competing products Benchmarks are unbiased because they use objective

evaluation criteria that are not influenced by personal opinion

Benchmarks try to eliminate extraneous variables that could bias the results of a product comparison

Benchmarks are confusing / complicated Every vendors product does well on a benchmark

Benchmarks

Benchmarks (continued)

Benchmarks can be used to evaluate Hardware

Speed Capacity

Software User productivity

Vendors that provide hardware and software benchmarks Business Applications Performance (BAPCO) PassMark Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation VeriTest

Weighted Point Evaluation Method uses several evaluation criteria of predefined importance to arrive at a numerical score for each product

also called Kepner-Tregoe method

Goal: to make the evaluation and selection process as objective as possible

Treat competing products equally Eliminate favoritism or bias among

evaluators Force evaluators to specify in advance the

important factors in evaluation

Weighted Point Evaluation Method

Steps in Weighted Point Evaluation Method1. Decide on evaluation criteria

2. Determine importance of each criterion

3. Rate each product against all evaluation criteria

4. Compute average rating for each product for each criterion

5. Weight the product rating by the importance of the criterion

6. Compute the total rating for each product

7. Compare product ratings

Purpose: Make evaluation as objective (emotionless) as possible

continued

Examples of Criteria Used in Weighted Point Evaluation Method

Example of Weighted Point Evaluation Results

Research Colleagues, trade publicationsResearch Colleagues, trade publicationsResearch Colleagues, trade publicationsResearch Colleagues, trade publications

24x7, Quality, Locale24x7, Quality, Locale 24x7, Quality, Locale24x7, Quality, Locale

Request for Proposal (RFP) is a product selection or competitive bidding procedure that uses objective criteria to select among products proposed by vendors Often used as the basis for awarding a

contract to provide computer products May be a legal requirement for computer

selection in public agencies An objective product and vendor selection tool

The Request for Proposal (RFP)

1. Conduct a needs analysis2. Develop a purchase specification 3. Define

decision criteria importance of each criterion

4. Write the RFP document5. Send the RFP to prospective vendors6. Receive vendor proposals

describes how vendor’s products address user requirements bid price

7. Analyze vendor responses to the RFP often uses weighted point evaluation tools

8. Select a vendor and award the contract

continued

Primary Steps in the RFP Process

Subjective evaluation criteria are factors that are not directly related to the fit between product features and user needs

Based on: personal relationships convenience personal preferences traditional practices

Are neither measurable nor repeatable from one evaluator to another

Be careful when using

Subjective Evaluation Criteria

Help control user support costs by limiting the number of hardware and software options users can choose

May offer options to balance two extremes One-size fits all Buy whatever you want

Often adopted by larger organizations with a substantial investment in computer technology because the potential for waste is so large

Product Support Standards

Company computer culture Historic computer traditions Product standards committee is a group

which defines computer product standards and coordinates their use

Composed of support specialists end users technical support staff management

How Organizations Develop Computer Product and Support Standards

Changes in Computer Product Standards

Changes in computer product standards may be met with user resistance Users are comfortable with existing standard If it ain’t broke, why fix it?

Changes in standards should be discussed with users involve users in decisions

Computer Use Standards

Acceptable use guidelines are policies adopted by an organization about how users are permitted and not permitted to use computer systems Activities that are prohibited by organizational

policy Activities that are illegal

Adoption and implementation of product and service standards is influenced by:

– Investment in existing hardware and software

– Continual arrival of new products, services, and product upgrades

Conversion to new standards can result in loss of employee productivity

during transition period can be phased in over time

How Organizations Implement Computer Product Standards

Criteria Used to Update Product Standards

New products offer technical improvements New product features may improve user

productivity Employee preferences change over time New products offer cost savings New products may be compatible with or set

new industry standards New products become best-sellers

Requires analysis and evaluation of products and services

Triggers potential support cost increases for installation, upgrades, training, documentation, trouble-shooting, and help desk services

Adopting or Modifying Technology Standards